10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 0-53856

OCEAN SHORE HOLDING CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New Jersey	80-0282446
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1001 Asbury Avenue, Ocean City, New Jersey	08226
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(609) 399-0012

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x     No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes x     No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one)

Large Accelerated Filer ¨	Accelerated Filer ¨
Non-accelerated Filer ¨	Smaller Reporting Company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨     No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

At August 1, 2011, the registrant had 7,296,780 shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.

OCEAN SHORE HOLDING CO.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

		Page
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition  at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	1
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months  ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	2
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	3
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  and Results of Operations	22
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	34
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	34
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	34
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	34
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	35
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	35
Item 4.	[RESERVED]	35
Item 5.	Other Information	35
Item 6.	Exhibits	35
SIGNATURES		36

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

OCEAN SHORE HOLDING CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions	$	7,912,429		$	5,330,211
Interest-earning bank balances		97,133,777			105,534,943
Cash and cash equivalents		105,046,206			110,865,154
Investment securities held to maturity
(estimated fair value—$3,350,289 at June 30, 2011; $2,638,725 at December 31, 2010)		3,170,927			2,467,418
Investment securities available for sale
(amortized cost— $44,610,801 at June 30, 2011; $22,230,208 at December 31, 2010)		44,303,313			21,253,675
Loans—net of allowance for loan losses of $4,067,965 at June 30, 2011 and $3,988,076 at December 31, 2010		662,841,122			660,340,007
Accrued interest receivable:
Loans		2,370,390			2,350,978
Investment securities		313,251			151,401
Federal Home Loan Bank stock—at cost		6,250,700			6,271,600
Office properties and equipment—net		12,706,261			12,905,526
Prepaid expenses and other assets		4,676,204			4,665,491
Real estate owned		97,500			97,500
Cash surrender value of life insurance		15,149,579			14,890,746
Net deferred tax asset		3,343,798			3,597,612
TOTAL ASSETS	$	860,269,251		$	839,857,108
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Non-interest bearing deposits	$	67,535,721		$	62,070,772
Interest bearing deposits		553,653,078			541,263,654
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		110,000,000			110,000,000
Junior subordinated debenture		15,464,000			15,464,000
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		3,734,392			3,494,418
Accrued interest payable		1,135,685			1,146,224
Other liabilities		5,924,762			5,864,523
Total liabilities		757,447,638			739,303,591
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 7,308,118 shares issued; 7,296,780 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011and  December 31, 2010		73,076			73,076
Additional paid-in capital		64,214,330			64,013,608
Retained earnings - partially restricted		43,223,319			41,736,830
Treasury stock—at cost: 10,810 at June 30, 2011; 10,810 at December 31, 2010		(115,208	)		(115,208	)
Common stock acquired by employee benefits plans		(3,836,478	)		(4,007,478	)
Deferred compensation plans trust		(521,489	)		(516,142	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(215,937	)		(631,169	)
Total stockholders’ equity		102,821,613			100,553,517
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	860,269,251		$	839,857,108

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

OCEAN SHORE HOLDING CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Taxable interest and fees on loans	$	8,629,480	$	9,058,506	$	17,184,052	$	18,089,112
Taxable interest on mortgage-backed securities		151,799		220,838		316,435		454,831
Non-taxable interest on municipal securities		10,473		19,060		21,119		36,400
Taxable interest and dividends on other investment securities		375,780		195,749		683,654		418,499
Total interest and dividend income		9,167,532		9,494,153		18,205,260		18,998,842
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest on deposits		1,494,677		1,931,453		3,060,664		3,957,788
Interest on borrowings		1,510,333		1,510,334		3,007,765		3,007,753
Total interest expense		3,005,010		3,441,787		6,068,429		6,965,541
NET INTEREST INCOME		6,162,522		6,052,366		12,163,831		12,033,301
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES		128,035		539,700		202,835		691,361
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION  FOR LOAN LOSSES		6,034,487		5,512,666		11,933,996		11,341,940
OTHER INCOME:
Service charges		394,590		445,159		754,386		881,111
Cash surrender value of life insurance		130,365		138,800		258,833		273,584
Gain on call of securities		-		-		10,014		5
Other		336,786		302,396		640,596		538,923
Total other income		861,741		886,355		1,663,829		1,693,623
OTHER EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits		2,568,056		2,452,437		5,180,749		4,948,865
Occupancy and equipment		1,133,834		981,233		2,118,025		1,958,484
Federal insurance premiums		186,188		162,519		373,268		330,431
Advertising		145,457		111,800		251,487		227,775
Professional services		310,191		204,009		604,638		381,664
Real estate owned expense		1,250		1,573		2,499		2,521
Charitable contributions		36,000		34,500		72,000		69,000
Other operating expenses		429,210		426,527		863,385		908,614
Total other expenses		4,810,186		4,374,598		9,466,051		8,827,354
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		2,086,042		2,024,423		4,131,774		4,208,209
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		928,525		785,425		1,769,671		1,632,887
NET INCOME	$	1,157,517	$	1,238,998	$	2,362,103	$	2,575,322
Earnings per share, basic:	$	0.17	$	0.18	$	0.35	$	0.38
Earnings per share, diluted:	$	0.17	$	0.18	$	0.35	$	0.38

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

OCEAN SHORE HOLDING CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	2,362,103		$	2,575,322
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		341,132			489,962
Provision for loan losses		202,835			691,361
Stock based compensation expense		371,722			410,600
Gain on call of AFS securities		(10,014	)		(5	)
Cash surrender value of life insurance		(258,833	)		(273,584	)
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:
Accrued interest receivable		(181,261	)		(57,673	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(10,712	)		255,332
Accrued interest payable		(10,539	)		(5,437	)
Other liabilities		60,239			36,467
Net cash provided by operating activities		2,866,672			4,122,345
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Principal collected on:
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		1,903,443			2,422,419
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity		295,283			357,550
Loans originated, net of repayments		(2,422,060	)		(12,672,662	)
Purchases of:
Life insurance contracts		—			(1,500,000	)
Loans		(168,000	)		—
Investment securities held to maturity		(1,000,000	)		(1,474,102	)
Investment securities available for sale		(25,005,000	)		—
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		—			(123,600	)
Office properties and equipment		(247,933	)		(207,853	)
Proceeds from sale/ maturities/ calls of:
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		20,900			—
Investment securities available for sale		724,361			771,532
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(25,899,006	)		(12,426,716	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in deposits		17,854,373			25,835,452
Dividends paid		(875,614	)		(876,911	)
Fractional share payouts on exchange		—			(15,998	)
Purchase of shares by deferred compensation plans trust		(5,347	)		(15,050	)
Increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		239,974			311,612
Net cash provided by financing activities		17,213,386			25,239,105
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(5,818,948	)		16,934,734
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period		110,865,154			33,027,710
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period	$	105,046,206		$	49,962,444
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION—Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	6,078,967		$	6,970,978
Income Taxes	$	1,890,574		$	2,148,080

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation - The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.   The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim information, and, therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).  However, all normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements have been included.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010.  The results for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 or any other period.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements - The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period.  The most significant estimates and assumptions relate to the allowance for loan losses, deferred income taxes and the fair value measurement for investment securities available for sale.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New Accounting Pronouncements – In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income.  This update to comprehensive income guidance requires all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements.  In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income.  This update also requires additional changes to the face of the financial statements including eliminating the presentation of other comprehensive income as a part of stockholders’ equity, and the presentation of certain reclassification adjustments between net income and other comprehensive income.  The new accounting guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2012, and should be applied retrospectively.  The adoption of this update will impact the presentation and disclosure of the Company’s financial statements but will not impact its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.  This update to fair value measurement guidance addresses changes to concepts regarding performing fair value measurements including: (i) the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise; (ii) the valuation of an instrument classified in the reporting entity’s shareholders’ equity; (iii) the valuation of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio; and (iv) the application of premiums and discounts.  This update also enhances disclosure requirements about fair value measurements, including providing information regarding Level 3 measurements such as quantitative information about unobservable inputs, further discussion of the valuation processes used and assumption sensitivity analysis.  The new accounting guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2012, and should be applied prospectively.  The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update will have a material impact on its financial statements.

4

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.  This new guidance requires a creditor performing an evaluation of whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, to separately conclude that both (i) the restructuring constitutes a concession and (ii) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties.  This standard clarifies the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession as well as the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties.  The updated accounting guidance also requires entities to disclose additional quantitative activity regarding troubled debt restructurings of finance receivables that occurred during the period, as well as additional information regarding troubled debt restructurings that occurred within the previous twelve months and for which there was a payment default during the current period. The new accounting guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption.  The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

5

2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment securities are summarized as follows:
	June 30, 2011
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
Held to Maturity
Municipal securities	$	1,000,000	$	—	$	—		$	1,000,000
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities		2,170,927		179,362		—			2,350,289
Totals	$	3,170,927	$	179,362	$	—		$	3,350,289
Available for Sale
Debt securities:
Municipal securities	$	830,000	$	1,353	$	—		$	831,353
Federal Agencies		25,005,000		23,323		—			25,028,323
Corporate		8,199,729		18,714		(1,118,531	)		7,099,912
Equity securities		2,596		13,754		(1,668	)		14,682
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities		10,573,476		758,110		(2,543	)		11,329,043
Totals	$	44,610,801	$	815,254	$	(1,122,742	)	$	44,303,313
	December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
Held to Maturity
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities	$	2,467,418	$	171,307	$	—		$	2,638,725
Totals	$	2,467,418	$	171,307	$	—		$	2,638,725
Available for Sale
Debt securities:
Municipal	$	1,419,971	$	11,410	$	—		$	1,431,381
Corporate		8,198,927		—		(1,795,691	)		6,403,326
Equity securities		2,596		13,562		(1,777	)		14,381
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities		12,608,714		795,963		—			13,404,677
Totals	$	22,230,208	$	820,935	$	(1,797,468	)	$	21,253,675

The following table provides the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

6

	June 30, 2011
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss
Debt securities - Corporate	$	987,500	$	(42,074	)	$	3,595,542	$	(1,076,457	)	$	4,583,042	$	(1,118,531	)
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities		549,965		(2,543	)		—		—			549,965		(2,543	)
Equity securities		928		(1,668	)		—		—			928		(1,668	)
Totals	$	1,538,393	$	(46,285	)	$	3,595,542	$	(1,076,457	)	$	5,133,935	$	(1,122,742	)

	December 31, 2010
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss
Debt securities - Corporate	$	978,030	$	(52,429	)	$	5,425,006	$	(1,743,262	)	$	6,403,036	$	(1,795,691	)
Equity securities		819		(1,777	)		—		—			819		(1,777	)
Totals	$	978,849	$	(52,429	)	$	5,425,006	$	(1,743,262	)	$	6,403,855	$	(1,797,468	)

As of June 30, 2011, management has concluded that the unrealized losses on its investment securities, which totaled eight individual securities, are temporary in nature since there currently is no indication that the entire amortized cost basis of these securities will not be recovered, the Company does not intend to sell these investments, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments, before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity.

Two pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) backed by bank trust capital securities have been determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired due solely to credit related factors. During the second quarter of 2009 the Company recognized the impairment for the entire carrying amount of these investments.  Below is a roll forward of the anticipated credit losses on securities for which the Company has recorded other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges through earnings and other comprehensive income.

	2011		2010
Credit component of OTTI as of January 1	$	3,000,000	$	3,000,000
Additions for credit related OTTI charges on previously unimpaired securities		—		—
Reductions for securities sold during the period		—		—
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected and recognized over the remaining life of the security		—		—
Additional increases as a result of impairment charges recognized on investments for which an OTTI was previously recognized		—		—
Credit component of OTTI as of June 30,	$	3,000,000	$	3,000,000

These securities have Fitch credit ratings below investment grade at June 30, 2011.  Each of the securities is in the mezzanine levels of credit subordination.  The underlying collateral consists of the bank trust capital securities of over 50 institutions.  A summary of key assumptions utilized to forecast future expected cash flows on the securities determined to have OTTI were as follows as of June 30, 2011 and 2010:

7

	June 30, 2011	June 30, 2010
Future loss rate assumption per annum	.8% to 1.2%	.8% to 1.2%
Expected cumulative loss percentage	27.8%	27.8%
Cumulative loss percentage to date	37.0% to 33.2%	37.0% to 33.2%
Remaining life	30 years	31 years

Corporate Debt Securities - The Company’s investments in the preceding table in corporate debt securities consist of corporate debt securities issued by large financial institutions and single issuer and pooled trust preferred/collateralized debt obligations backed by bank trust preferred capital securities.

At June 30, 2011, one corporate debt security and two single issuer trust preferred securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer.  Those securities had aggregate depreciation of 23% from the Company’s amortized cost basis.  The decline is primarily attributable to depressed pricing of two private placement single issuer trust preferred securities. There has been limited secondary market trading for these types of securities, as a declining domestic economy and increasing credit losses in the banking industry have led to illiquidity in the market for these types of securities.  The unrealized loss on these debt securities relates principally to the increased credit spread and a lack of liquidity currently in the financial markets for these types of investments.  These securities were performing in accordance with their contractual terms as of June 30, 2011, and had paid all contractual cash flows since the Company’s initial investment.  Management believes these unrealized losses are notother-than-temporary based upon the Company’s analysis that the securities will perform in accordance with their terms and the Company’s intent not to sell these investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for the anticipated recovery of fair value, which may be maturity.  The Company expects recovery of fair value when market conditions have stabilized and that the Company will receive all contractual principal and interest payments related to those investments.

United States Treasury, US Federal Agencies and Government Sponsored Enterprise Mortgage-backed Securities - The Company’s investments in the preceding table in United States government sponsored enterprise notes consist of debt obligations of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”). At June 30, 2011 the Company had no agency mortgage-backed securities with unrealized losses for 12 months or longer.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	June 30, 2011
	Held to Maturity				Available for Sale Securities
	Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
Due within 1 year	$	1,000,000	$	1,000,000	$	—	$	—
Due after 1 year through 5 years		—		—		6,000,000		5,989,950
Due after 5 years through 10 years		—		—		20,005,000		20,022,953
Due after 10 years		—		—		8,029,729		6,946,685
Total	$	1,000,000	$	1,000,000	$	34,034,729	$	32,959,588

Equity securities had a cost of $2,596and a fair value of $14,682 as of June 30, 2011.  Mortgage-backed securities had a cost of $10,573,476 and a fair value of $11,329,043.

8

3.  LOANS RECEIVABLE ─ NET
Loans receivable consist of the following:
	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Real estate - mortgage:
One-to-four family residential	$	520,901,062		$	514,853,007
Commercial and multi-family		53,900,207			55,237,743
Total real estate-mortgage		574,801,269			570,090,750
Real estate - construction:
Residential		7,941,147			7,785,191
Commercial		2,699,220			3,723,800
Total real estate - construction		10,640,367			11,508,991
Commercial		22,962,908			21,963,288
Consumer:
Home equity		54,766,129			57,119,018
Other consumer loans		754,057			775,569
Total consumer loans		55,520,186			57,894,587
Total  loans		663,924,730			661,457,616
Net deferred loan cost		2,984,357			2,870,467
Allowance for loan losses		(4,067,965	)		(3,988,076	)
Net total loans	$	662,841,122		$	660,340,007

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are as follows:
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,988,076	$	3,476,040
Provision for loan loss		202,835		691,361
Charge-offs		122,946		42,987
Recoveries		—		—
Balance, end of period	$	4,067,965	$	4,124,414

The Company established a provision for loan losses of $128,035 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $539,700 for the comparable period in 2010.  The allowance for loan losses is based upon past loan loss experiences, understanding of the current macroeconomic factors, and current portfolio trends. These factors are considered in establishing the reserves necessary to cover the losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. The allowance is comprised of collective reserves for portfolio loans evaluated on a pooled basis and specific reserves on loans specifically evaluated for impairment. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being identified as impaired. For this purpose, delays less than 90 days generally are considered to be insignificant. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the impairment was measured based on the fair value of the loans’ collateral, adjusted for cost to dispose. Loans collectively evaluated for impairment include residential real estate loans, consumer loans, and smaller balance commercial and commercial real estate loans.

9

Non-performing loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of non-accrual loans that amounted to $5,935,322 and $5,222,374 respectively. The reserve for delinquent interest on loans totaled $357,739 and $246,558, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Non-accrual loans segregated by class of loans are as follows:

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Real estate
One-to-four family residential	$	5,287,199	$	4,282,002
Commercial and multi-family		328,582		729,289
Real estate construction		—		—
Commercial		203,656		134,238
Consumer		115,885		76,845
Total	$	5,935,322	$	5,222,374

An age analysis of past due loans, segregated by class of loans, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:

	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable
June 30, 2011
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	1,467,846	$	—	$	5,287,199	$	6,755,045	$	514,146,017	$	520,901,062
Commercial and Multi-Family		—		—		328,582		328,582		53,571,625		53,900,207
Construction		—		—		—		—		10,640,367		10,640,367
Commercial		483,258		—		203,657		686,915		22,275,993		22,962,908
Consumer		124,988		1,820		25,828		152,636		55,367,550		55,520,186
Total	$	2,076,092	$	1,820	$	5,845,266	$	7,923,178	$	656,001,552	$	663,924,730
December 31, 2010
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	1,584,054	$	—	$	4,282,002	$	5,866,056	$	508,986,951	$	514,853,007
Commercial and Multi-Family		—		—		729,289		729,829		54,508,454		55,237,743
Construction		—		—		—		—		11,508,991		11,508,991
Commercial		—		—		134,238		134,238		21,829,050		21,963,288
Consumer		81,600		—		76,845		158,445		57,736,142		57,894,587
Total	$	1,665,654	$	—	$	5,222,374	$	6,888,028	$	654,569,588	$	661,457,616

10

Impaired loans are set forth the in the following table.  No interest income was recognized on impaired loans subsequent to their classification as impaired.

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
June 30, 2011
With no related allowance recorded
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	2,973,738	$	2,973,738	$	—	$	495,623
Commercial and Multi-Family		328,582		328,582		—		164,291
Commercial		98,885		98,885		—		98,885
Consumer		115,885		115,885		—		115,885
With an allowance recorded
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential		2,313,461		2,313,461		658,965		330,494
Commercial and Multi-Family		—		—		—		—
Commercial		104,771		104,771		90,863		26,193
Consumer		—		—		—		—
Total
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	5,287,199	$	5,287,199	$	658,965	$	826,117
Commercial and Multi-Family		328,582		328,582		—		164,291
Commercial		203,656		203,656		90,863		125,078
Consumer		115,885		115,885		—		115,885
December 31, 2010
With no related allowance recorded
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	2,997,524	$	2,997,524	$	—	$	428,218
Commercial and Multi-Family		729,289		729,289		—		243,096
Commercial		98,885		98,885		—		98,885
Consumer		27,919		27,919		—		27,919
With an allowance recorded
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential		1,284,478		1,284,478		359,301		256,895
Commercial and Multi-Family		—		—		—		—
Commercial		35,353		35,353		73,285		35,353
Consumer		48,926		48,926		49,161		48,926
Total
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	4,282,002	$	4,282,002	$	359,301	$	685,113
Commercial and Multi-Family		729,289		729,289		—		243,096
Commercial		134,238		134,238		73,285		134,238
Consumer		76,845		76,845		49,161		76,845

Federal regulations require us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis.  In addition, federal banking regulators have the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified.  There are three classifications for problem assets:  substandard, doubtful and loss.  “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.  “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss.  An asset classified as “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted.  The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described as assets which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention.  When we classify an asset as substandard or doubtful we establish a specific allowance for loan losses.  If we classify an asset as loss, we charge off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss.

11

The following table presents classified loans by class of loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

	Real Estate
	1-4 Family Residential				Commercial and Multi-Family				Construction				Commercial				Consumer
	6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/30/2010
Grade:
Special Mention	$	1,156,740	$	927,945	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	130,552	$	197,031
Substandard		8,504,487		8,291,507		1,480,885		1,310,396		—		—		281,058		476,895		389,447		302,046
Doubtful and Loss		288,977		288,977		—		—		—		—		104,771		70,686		—		48,926
Total	$	9,950,204	$	9,508,429	$	1,480,885	$	1,310,396	$	—	$	—	$	385,829	$	547,581	$	519,999	$	548,003

The following table presents the credit risk profile of loans based on payment activity as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

	Real Estate
	1-4 Family Residential				Commercial and Multi-Family				Construction				Commercial				Consumer
	6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/30/2010
Performing	$	520,901,062	$	510,571,005	$	53,900,207	$	54,508,454	$	10,640,367	$	11,508,991	$	22,962,908	$	21,829,050	$	55,520,186	$	57,817,742
Non-Performing		5,287,199		4,282,002		328,582		729,289		—		—		203,657		134,238		115,885		76,845
Total	$	526,188,261	$	514,853,007	$	54,228,789	$	55,237,743	$	10,640,367	$	11,508,991	$	23,166,565	$	21,963,288	$	55,636,071	$	57,894,587

12

The following table details activity in the allowance for possible loan losses by portfolio segment for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

	Real Estate
	1-4 Family Residential			Commercial and Multi-Family			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
June 30, 2011
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	2,731,325		$	281,762		$	32,494		$	268,411		$	674,084		$	3,988,076
Charge-offs		(74,019	)		—			—			—			(48,927	)		(122,946	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—
Provision for loan losses		300,867			42,444			(1,571	)		(18,984	)		(119,921	)		202,835
Ending balance	$	2,958,173		$	324,206		$	30,923		$	249,427		$	505,236		$	4,067,965
Ending balance:  individually evaluated for impairment	$	658,965		$	—		$	—		$	90,863		$	—		$	749,828
Ending balance:  collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,299,208		$	324,206		$	30,923		$	158,564		$	505,236		$	3,318,137
Loan Receivables:
Ending balance	$	520,901,062		$	53,900,207		$	10,640,367		$	22,962,908		$	55,520,186		$	663,924,730
Ending balance:  individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,287,199		$	328,582		$	—		$	203,656		$	115,885		$	5,935,322
Ending balance:  collectively evaluated for impairment	$	515,613,863		$	53,571,625		$	10,640,367		$	22,759,252		$	55,404,301		$	657,989,408
December 31, 2010
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	2,220,529		$	524,107		$	49,680		$	275,826		$	405,898		$	3,476,040
Charge-offs		(16,316	)		(35,347	)		—			(10,860	)		(317,232	)		(379,755	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—
Provision for loan losses		527,112			(206,998	)		(17,186	)		3,445			585,418			891,791
Ending balance	$	2,731,325		$	281,762		$	32,494		$	268,411		$	674,084		$	3,988,076
Ending balance:  individually evaluated for impairment	$	359,300		$	—		$	—		$	73,285		$	49,510		$	482,095
Ending balance:  collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,372,025		$	281,762		$	32,494		$	195,126		$	624,574		$	3,505,981
Loan Receivables:
Ending balance	$	514,583,007		$	55,237,743		$	11,508,991		$	21,963,288		$	57,894,587		$	661,457,616
Ending balance:  individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,282,002		$	729,289		$	—		$	134,238		$	76,845		$	5,222,374
Ending balance:  collectively evaluated for impairment	$	510,571,005		$	54,508,454		$	11,508,991		$	21,829,050		$	57,817,742		$	6,656,235,242

13

4.  DEPOSITS
Deposits consist of the following major classifications:
	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
			Weighted					Weighted
			Average					Average
	Amount		Interest Rate			Amount		Interest Rate
NOW and other demand deposit accounts	$	310,596,700		0.51	%	$	289,903,528		0.66	%
Passbook savings and club accounts		110,579,419		0.70	%		102,467,025		1.07	%
Subtotal		421,536,119					392,370,553
Certificates with original maturities:
Within one year		72,992,455		0.88	%		93,134,491		1.11	%
One to three years		102,341,603		2.01	%		94,347,156		2.17	%
Three years and beyond		24,318,622		3.32	%		23,482,226		3.48	%
Total certificates		199,652,680					210,963,873
Total	$	621,188,799				$	603,334,426

The aggregate amount of certificate accounts in denominations of $100,000 or more at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 amounted to $78,328,550 and $83,439,728, respectively.

Municipal demand deposit accounts in denominations of $100,000 or more at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 amounted to $112,847,491 and $108,593,238, respectively.

5.  EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, net of any treasury shares, while diluted net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, net of any treasury shares, after consideration of the potential dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, based upon the treasury stock method using an average market price for the period, and impact of unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares.

The calculated basic and dilutive EPS are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Numerator	$	1,157,517	$	1,238,998	$	2,362,103	$	2,575,322
Denominators:
Basic average shares outstanding		6,738,827		6,826,946		6,734,602		6,822,739
Effect of dilutive securities		70,250		7,579		70,614		12,613
Diluted average shares outstanding		6,809,077		6,834,525		6,805,216		6,835,352
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.17	$	0.18	$	0.35	$	0.38
Diluted	$	0.17	$	0.18	$	0.35	$	0.38

At June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were 601,104 and 366,997 outstanding anti-dilutive options, respectively, and 99,000 and 30,125 outstanding dilutive non-vested shares, respectively.

14

6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation.  The Company establishes fair value for its equity awards to determine their cost. The Company recognizes the related expense for employees over the appropriate vesting period, or when applicable, service period. However, consistent with the stock compensation topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the amount of stock-based compensation recognized at any date must at least equal the portion of the grant date value of the award that is vested at that date and as a result it may be necessary to recognize the expense using a ratable method. In accordance with FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, the compensation expense for non-employees is recognized on the grant date, or when applicable, the service period.  

The Company’s 2005 and 2010 Equity-Based Incentive Plans (the “Equity Plans”) authorizes the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to awards that may be granted in the form of stock options to purchase common stock (“options”) and awards of shares of common stock (“stock awards”). The purpose of the Equity Plans is to attract and retain personnel for positions of substantial responsibility and to provide additional incentive to certain officers, directors, advisory directors, employees and other persons to promote the success of the Company. Under the Equity Plan, options expire ten years after the date of grant, unless terminated earlier under the option terms. A committee of non-employee directors has the authority to determine the conditions upon which the options granted will vest. Options are granted at the then fair market value of the Company’s stock.

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock options under the Equity Plans as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011				Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Number  of shares		Weighted average exercise price		Number  of shares		Weighted average exercise price
Outstanding at the beginning of the period		587,504	$	11.92		373,592	$	13.10
Granted		13,600	$	12.06		—		—
Exercised		—		—		—		—
Forfeited		—		—		6,595	$	13.19
Outstanding at the end of the period		601,104	$	11.92		366,997	$	13.10
Exercisable at the end of the period		329,144	$	13.16		275,968	$	13.17
Stock options vested or expected to vest (1)		540,993	$	11.92		330,298	$	13.17

(1) Includes vested shares and nonvested shares after a forfeiture rate, which is based upon historical data, is applied.

The following table summarizes all stock options outstanding under the Equity Plan as of June 30, 2011:

	Options Outstanding
Date Issued	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
August 10, 2005		294,127	$	13.19	4.1 years
November 21, 2006		19,784	$	14.78	5.3 years
November 20, 2007		31,983	$	11.32	6.3 years
August 18, 2010		241,610	$	10.21	9.1 years
March 15, 2011		13,600	$	12.06	9.6 years

The compensation expense recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $32,484 and $64,968 as compared to $16,638 and $33,276 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

At June 30, 2011, there was $615,968 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to options granted under the stock option plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.1 years.

15

Summary of Non-vested Stock Award Activity:

	Six months ended June 30, 2011				Six months ended June 30, 2010
	Number of shares		Weighted avg grant date fair value		Number of shares		Weighted avg grant date fair value
Beginning of period		99,000	$	10.21		30,125	$	13.19
Issued		4,950		12.06		—		—
Forfeited		4,950		10.21		—		—
Vested		—		—		—		—
Outstanding at June 30, 2011		99,000	$	10.30		30,125	$	13.19

The compensation expense recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $51,000 and $95,730 as compared to $99,356 and $198,713 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

As of June 30, 2011, there was $839,251 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock awards.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.1 years.

7. INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $1,769,671 for an effective tax rate of 42.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1,632,887 for an effective tax rate of 38.8% for the same period in 2010.

Periodic reviews of the carrying amount of deferred tax assets are made to determine if the establishment of a valuation allowance is necessary. If based on the available evidence in future periods, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets will not be realized, a deferred tax valuation allowance would be established. Consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets.

Items considered in this evaluation include historical financial performance, expectation of future earnings, the ability to carry back losses to recoup taxes previously paid, length of statutory carryforward periods, experience with operating loss and tax credit carryforwards not expiring unused, tax planning strategies and timing of reversals of temporary differences. Significant judgment is required in assessing future earning trends and the timing of reversals of temporary differences. The evaluation is based on current tax laws as well as expectations of future performance. At June 30, 2011, no valuation allowance has been recorded for any portfolio of the outstanding deferred tax asset.

The Company recognizes, when applicable, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes in the consolidated income statement. As of June 30, 2011, the tax years ended December 31, 2007 through 2010 were subject to examination by all tax jurisdictions.  As of June 30, 2011, no audits were in process by a major tax jurisdiction that, if completed during the next twelve months, would be expected to result in a material change to the Company's unrecognized tax benefits, as none exist.

8. DECLARATION OF DIVIDEND

During the second quarter of 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.06 per share, which was paid on May 27, 2011 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 6, 2011.

16

9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company accounts for fair value measurement in accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  FASB ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements. The definition of fair value retains the exchange price notion in earlier definitions of fair value. FASB ASC 820 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability. The definition focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). FASB ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.  FASB ASC 820 also clarifies the application of fair value measurement in a market that is not active.

FASB ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

In addition, the Company is to disclose the fair value measurements for financial assets on both a recurring and non-recurring basis.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements:

Those assets at June 30, 2011 which will continue to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

	Category Used for Fair Value Measurement
Assets:	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	36,357,366	$	—
State and municipal obligations		—		831,353		—
Corporate securities		—		7,099,712		200
Equity securities		14,682		—		—
Totals	$	14,682	$	44,288,431	$	200

17

Those assets at December 31, 2010 which will continue to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

	Category Used for Fair Value Measurement
Assets:	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	13,404,677	$	—
State and municipal obligations		—		1,431,381		—
Corporate securities		—		6,403,036		200
Equity securities		14,381		—		—
Totals	$	14,381	$	21,239,094	$	200

In 2008, as a result of general market conditions and the illiquidity in the market for CDOs, management deemed it necessary to shift its market value measurement of each of the securities from quoted prices for similar assets (Level 2) to an internally developed discounted cash flow model (Level 3).  In arriving at the discount rate used in the model for each issue, the Company determined a trading group of similar securities quoted on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ over the counter market, based upon its review of market data points, such as Moody’s or comparable credit ratings, maturity, price, and yield.  The Company indexed the individual CDOs within the trading group to a comparable interest rate swap (to maturity) in determining the spread.  The average spread on the trading group was matched with the individual trust preferred issues based on their comparable credit rating which was then used in arriving at the discount rate input to the model.

The following provides details of the fair value measurement activity for Level 3 for the six-months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010:

Fair Value Measurement Activity – Level 3 (only)

	Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Trust Preferred Securities		Total
Balance, January 1, 2011	$	200	$	200
Total gains (losses), realized/unrealized:		—		—
Included in earnings (1)		—		—
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		—
Purchases, maturities, prepayments and call, net		—		—
Transfers into Level 3 (2)		—		—
Balance, June 30, 2011	$	200	$	200

(1) Amount included in impairment charge on available for sale securities on Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2) Transfers into Level 3 are assumed to occur at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred.

Fair Value Measurement Activity – Level 3 (only)

	Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Trust Preferred Securities		Total
Balance, January 1, 2010	$	200	$	200
Total gains (losses), realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings (1)		—		—
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		—
Purchases, maturities, prepayments and call, net		—		—
Transfers into Level 3 (2)		—		—
Balance, June 30, 2010	$	200	$	200

(1) Amount included in impairment charge on available for sale securities on Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2) Transfers into Level 3 are assumed to occur at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred.

18

In accordance with the fair value measurement and disclosures topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification management assessed whether the volume and level of activity for certain assets have significantly decreased when compared with normal market conditions.  Fair value for these securities is obtained from third party broker quotes. The Company evaluated these values to determine that the quoted price is based on current information that reflects orderly transactions or a valuation technique that reflects market participant assumptions by benchmarking the valuation results and assumptions used against similar securities that are more actively traded in order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair values. The fair market value estimates we assign to these securities assume liquidation in an orderly fashion and not under distressed circumstances.

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements:

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The Company measures impaired loans, FHLB stock and loans or bank properties transferred into other real estate owned at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Impaired Loans

			Category Used for Fair Value						Total
			Measurement						(Losses)
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains
June 30, 2011
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	4,186,838	$	—	$	—	$	4,186,838	$	(390,679	)
Real estate owned		97,500		—		—		97,500		—
June 30, 2010
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	1,866,185	$	—	$	—	$	1,866,185	$	(483,138	)
Real estate owned		97,500		—		—		97,500		—

The Company considers a loan to be impaired when it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Under FASB ASC 310, collateral dependent impaired loans are valued based on the fair value of the collateral, which is based on appraisals.  In some cases, adjustments are made to the appraised values for various factors, including age of the appraisal, age of the comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. These adjustments are based upon unobservable inputs, and therefore, the fair value measurement has been categorized as a Level 3 measurement. 

Specific reserves were calculated for impaired loans with an aggregate carrying amount of $1,551,198 and $1,821,916 at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The collateral underlying these loans had a fair value of $1,540,000 and $3,010,000, while the claims against collateral from other third parties, shortfall in collateral to appraised amount and liquidation costs amounted to $738,631 and $1,912,172, at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  This resulted in specific reserves in the allowance for loan losses of $749,828 and $724,888 at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There were charge-offs of $122,946 and $42,987 for impaired loans with specific reserves during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No specific reserve was calculated for impaired loans with an aggregate carrying amount of $4,384,125 and $769,157 at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as the underlying collateral was not below the carrying amount.

19

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The Company holds required equity investments in the stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”).  Investment in the FHLB stock is evaluated for impairment in accordance FASB ASC 942-325. These investments may be measured based upon a discounted cash flow model reliant on observable and unobservable inputs, and therefore, the fair value measurement may be categorized as a Level 2 or 3, depending on such inputs used. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company determined that there was no impairment and, therefore, fair value disclosure under the provision of the fair value measurement and disclosures topic is not required.

Real Estate Owned

Once an asset is determined to be uncollectible, the underlying collateral is repossessed and reclassified to foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets. These assets are carried at lower of cost or fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell. In some cases, adjustments are made to the appraised values for various factors, including age of the appraisal, age of the comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. These adjustments are based upon unobservable inputs, and therefore, the fair value measurement has been categorized as a Level 3 measurement.  At June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any remeasurement to fair value to its foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets since the original recording.  At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Company had one foreclosed property.  The Company took possession of the collateral during the first quarter of 2009.  The collateral underlying the loan had a fair value of $97,500, with an aggregate carrying value of $198,000, triggering a net charge-off of approximately $101,000. There have been no changes to the fair value of this property as described above.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with FASB ASC 825-10-50-10,the Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments.  The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a distressed sale.  Fair value is best determined using observable market prices; however, for many of the Company’s financial instruments, no quoted market prices are readily available.  In instances where quoted market prices are not readily available, fair value is determined using present value or other techniques appropriate for the particular instrument.  These techniques involve some degree of judgment and, as a result, are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange.  Different assumptions or estimation techniques may have a material effect on the estimated fair value.  The following table summarizes these results:

	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	105,046,206	$	105,046,206	$	110,865,154	$	110,865,154
Investment securities:
Held to maturity		3,170,927		3,350,289		2,467,418		2,683,725
Available for sale		44,303,313		44,303,313		21,253,675		21,253,675
Loans receivable, net		662,841,122		670,210,019		660,340,007		672,130,581
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		6,250,700		6,250,700		6,271,600		6,271,600
Liabilities:
NOW and other demand deposit accounts		310,956,700		323,408,700		289,903,528		297,533,528
Passbook savings and club accounts		110,579,419		119,420,419		102,467,025		107,987,025
Certificates		199,652,680		199,949,350		210,963,873		210,964,376
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		110,000,000		122,086,120		110,000,000		121,188,927
Junior subordinated debenture		15,464,000		10,824,800		15,464,000		9,278,400

20

Cash and Cash Equivalents—For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities—For investment securities, fair values are based on a combination of quoted prices for identical assets in active markets, quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are either actively or not actively traded and pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques that may contain unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and require significant judgment.  For investment securities that do not actively trade in the marketplace, (primarily our investment in trust preferred securities of non-publicly traded companies) fair value is obtained from third party broker quotes. The Company evaluates prices from a third party pricing service, third party broker quotes, and from another independent third party valuation source to determine their estimated fair value. These quotes are benchmarked against similar securities that are more actively traded in order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair values. The fair market value estimates we assign to these securities assume liquidation in an orderly fashion and not under distressed circumstances. For securities classified as available for sale, the changes in fair value are reflected in the carrying value of the asset and are shown as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Loans Receivable - Net—The fair value of loans receivable is estimated based on the present value using discounted cash flows based on estimated market discount rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers and reflect similar credit ratings and interest rate risk for the same remaining maturities.

FHLB Stock—Although FHLB stock is an equity interest in an FHLB, it is carried at cost because it does not have a readily determinable fair value as its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. While certain conditions are noted that required management to evaluate the stock for impairment, it is currently probable that the Company will realize its cost basis. Management concluded that no impairment existed as of June 30, 2011.  The estimated fair value approximates the carrying amount.

NOW and Other Demand Deposit, Passbook Savings and Club, and Certificates Accounts—The fair value of NOW and other demand deposit accounts and passbook savings and club accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of certificates is estimated by discounting future cash flows using interest rates currently offered on certificates with similar remaining maturities.

Advances from FHLB—The fair value was estimated by determining the cost or benefit for early termination of each individual borrowing.

Junior Subordinated Debenture—The fair value was estimated by discounting approximate cash flows of the borrowings by yields estimating the fair value of similar issues.

The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these consolidated financial statements since June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

10. REAL ESTATE OWNED

Summary of Real Estate Owned (“REO”):

	Residential Property		Total
Balance, January 1, 2011	$	97,500	$	97,500
Transfers into Real Estate Owned		—		—
Sales of Real Estate Owned		—		—
Balance, June 30, 2011	$	97,500	$	97,500

21

11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS - ACQUISITION OF CBHC FINANCIALCORP, INC.

Effective August 1, 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of CBHC Financialcorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Select Bank.  As part of the transaction, Select Bank was merged with and into Ocean City Home Bank.  At June 30, 2011, Select Bank had total assets of $136.1 million.  The Company paid a total of $12.5 million to the shareholders of CBHC Financialcorp.

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

This Quarterly Report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws.  These statements are not historical facts, but rather are statements based on Ocean Shore Holding’s current expectations regarding its business strategies and their intended results and its future performance.  Forward-looking statements are preceded by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends” and similar expressions.

Management’s ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain.  These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, changes in the interest rate environment, legislative or regulatory changes that may adversely affect our business, changes in accounting policies and practices, changes in competition and demand for financial services, adverse changes in the securities markets and changes in the quality or composition of the Company’s loan or investment portfolios.  Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.  Ocean Shore Holding assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

GENERAL

Ocean Shore Holding Co. (“Ocean Shore Holding” or the “Company”) is the holding company for Ocean City Home Bank (the “Bank”). The Company’s assets consist of its investment in Ocean City Home Bank and its liquid investments. The Company is primarily engaged in the business of directing, planning, and coordinating the business activities of the Bank.

Ocean City Home Bank is a federally chartered savings bank. The Bank operates as a community-oriented financial institution offering a wide range of financial services to consumers and businesses in our market area. The Bank attracts deposits from the general public, small businesses and municipalities and uses those funds to originate a variety of consumer and commercial loans, which we hold primarily for investment.

ACQUISITION OF CBHC FINANCIALCORP, INC.

Effective August 1, 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of CBHC Financialcorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Select Bank.  As part of the transaction, Select Bank was merged with and into Ocean City Home Bank.  At June 30, 2011, Select Bank had total assets of $136.1 million.  The Company paid a total of $12.5 million to the shareholders of CBHC Financialcorp.

22

COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT JUNE 30, 2011 AND DECEMBER 31, 2010

Total assets of the Company increased by $20.4 million to $860.3 million at June 30, 2011 from $839.9 million at December 31, 2010.  Loans receivable, net, increased$2.5 million, investment and mortgage-backed securities increased $23.7 million and cash and cash equivalents decreasedby $5.8 million.  Asset growth was funded by an increase in deposits of $17.8 million while borrowings were unchanged at $125.5 million.

Investments

Investments increased $23.7 million to $47.5 million at June 30, 2011 from $23.7 million at December 31, 2010.  The increase was the result of purchases of $25.0 million of agency investments offset by normal repayments and maturities of $1.3 million.

Loans

Loans receivable, net, increased $2.5 million to $662.8 million at June 30, 2011 from $660.3 million at December 31, 2010.  Loan originations totaled $72.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $67.1 million originated in the six months ended June 30, 2010.  Real estate mortgage loan originations totaled $46.4 million, real estate construction loan originations totaled $9.1 million, consumer loan originations totaled $6.8 million and commercial loan originations totaled $10.3 million for the second quarter of 2011.  Origination activity was offset by $70.1 million of normal loan payments and payoffs.

The following table summarizes changes in the loan portfolio in the six months ended June 30, 2011.

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			$ change			% change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate – mortgage:
One-to-four-family residential	$	520,901		$	514,853		$	6,048			1.2	%
Commercial and multi-family		53,900			55,238			(1,338	)		(2.4	)
Total real estate – mortgage		574,801			570,091			4,710			0.8
Real estate – construction:
Residential		7,941			7,785			156			2.0
Commercial		2,699			3,724			(1,025	)		(27.5	)
Total real estate – construction		10,640			11,509			(869	)		(7.6	)
Commercial		22,963			21,963			1,000			4.6
Consumer
Home equity		54,766			57,119			(2,353	)		(4.1	)
Other consumer loans		754			776			(22	)		(2.8	)
Total consumer loans		55,520			57,895			(2,375	)		(4.1	)
Total  loans		663,924			661,458			2,466			0.4
Net deferred loan cost		2,985			2,870			115			4.0
Allowance for loan losses		(4,068	)		(3,988	)		(80	)		2.0
Net total loans	$	662,841		$	660,340		$	2,501			0.4	%

23

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets totaled $6.0 million, or 0.90% of total assets, at June 30, 2011 compared to $5.3 million or 0.63% of total assets at December 31, 2010 and $3.3 million, or 0.41% of total assets, at June 30, 2010.  Theincrease from December 31, 2010 was the result of a higher balance non-performing loan replacing a lower balance non-performing loan.  Non-performing assets consisted of thirteen residential mortgages totaling $5.3 million, two commercial mortgages totaling $329 thousand, five commercial loans totaling $204 thousand, two consumer equity loans totaling $116 thousand and one real estate owned property totaling $98 thousand.  Specific reserves were recorded for fourteen of the loans included above in the amount of $750 thousand at June 30, 2011 as compared to eleven loans with specific reserves of $482 thousand at December 31, 2010. Real estate owned remained unchanged at $98 thousand at June 30, 2011.  Charge-offs totaled $123 thousand in 2011 compared to $43 thousand for the same period in 2010.

The allowance for loan losses increased $100 thousand to $4.1 million, or 0.61% of total net loans, from $4.0 million at December 31, 2010, or 0.60% of total net loans.  Theincrease in the provision for loan losses was primarily to maintain a reserve level deemed appropriate by management in light of factors such as the level of non-performing loans, growth in the loan portfolio and the current economic conditions.  The loss factors used to calculate the allowance in June 2011 from December 31, 2010 were slightly higher due to increases in delinquencies.  At June 30, 2011, the specific allowance on loans individually evaluated for impairment was $750 thousand and pooled allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio was $3.3 million as compared to specific allowance on loans individually evaluated for impairment of $482 thousand and pooled allowance on the reminder of the loan portfolio of $3.5 million at December 31, 2010.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
	(In thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period	$	3,988		$	3,476
Provision for loan losses		203			691
Recoveries		—			—
Charge-offs		123			43
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(123	)		(43	)
Allowance at end of period	$	4,068		$	4,124
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans		0.61	%		0.61	%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of non-performing loans		68.6	%		128.9	%

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(Dollars in thousands)
Nonaccrual loans:
Real estate mortgage loans	$	5,287		$	4,282
Construction		328			729
Commercial		204			134
Consumer loans		116			77
Total of non-accrual and 90 days or more past due loans		5,935			5,222
Real estate owned		98			98
Other nonperforming assets		—			—
Total non-performing assets	$	6,033		$	5,320
Troubled debt restructurings		—			—
Troubled debt restructurings and total non-performing assets	$	6,033		$	5,320
Total non-performing loans to total loans		0.90	%		0.79	%
Total non-performing loans to total assets		0.69	%		0.62	%
Total non-performing assets and troubled debt restructurings to total assets		0.70	%		0.63	%

24

Deposits

Deposits increased by $17.9 million, or 3.0%, to $621.2 million at June 30, 2011 from $603.3 million at December 31, 2010.  Interest bearing demand deposits increased $15.6 million, non-interest bearing checking increased $5.5 million, savings accounts increased by $8.1 million and certificates of depositdecreased by $11.3 million.  The Company continued its focus on attracting core deposits, which increased $29.2 million and accounted for all of the increase in deposits.

The following table summarizes changes in deposits in the six months ended June 30, 2011.

	June 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010		$ change			% change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits	$	67,536	$	62,071	$	5,465			8.8	%
Interest-bearing demand deposits		243,421		227,832		15,589			6.8
Savings accounts		110,579		102,467		8,112			7.9
Time deposits		199,653		210,964		(11,311	)		(5.4	)
Total	$	621,189	$	603,334	$	17,855			3.0	%

Borrowings

Federal Home Loan Bank advances were unchanged at $110.0 million at June 30, 2011 from December 31, 2010.  Other borrowings were unchangedat $15.5 million at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity increased $2.3 million to $102.8 million at June 30, 2011, from $100.6 million at December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of net income of $2.4 million.

COMPARISON OF OPERATING RESULTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

Net income was $1.16 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $1.24 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease of $81 thousand, or 6.6%, in 2011 from 2010 was due primarily to expenses of $155 thousand (net of tax) related to the pending acquisition of CBHC Financialcorp, Inc.

Net income was $2.36 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $2.58 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The $220 thousand, or 8.3%, decrease in 2011 from 2010 was due primarily to expenses of $244 thousand (net of tax) related to the pending acquisition of CBHC Financialcorp, Inc.

	Three Months Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010				2011			2010
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)							(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income	$	1,158			$	1,239		$	2,362		$	2,575
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.17			$	0.18		$	0.35		$	0.38
Return on average assets (annualized)		0.53	%			0.62	%		0.54	%		0.65	%
Return on average equity (annualized)		4.51	%			4.97	%		4.62	%		5.20	%

25

Net Interest Income

The following table summarizes changes in interest income and interest expense for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		$ change			% change
	(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans	$	8,629	$	9,059	$	(430	)		(4.7	)%
Investment securities		538		435		103			23.7
Total interest income		9,167		9,494		(327	)		(3.4	)
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits		1,495		1,932		437			(22.6	)
Borrowings		1,510		1,510	—			—
Total interest expense		3,005		3,442		437			(12.7	)
Net interest income	$	6,162	$	6,052	$	110			1.8

Interest income decreasedby $327 thousand, or 3.4%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to June 30, 2010.  The decrease resulted from a decrease in the average balance of loans of $7.0 million and the average rate earned on earning assets of 27 basis points, offset by an increase in the average balance of investments of $18.1 million.

Interest expensedecreasedby $437 thousand, or 12.7%, over the same period last year due to a decrease in interest paid on deposits.  The decrease in interest expense resulted from a decrease in the rate paid on deposits offset by increased balances of deposits.

The interest rate spread and net interest margin of the Company were 3.47% and 3.49% respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 3.28% and 3.48% for the same period in 2010.  The increase in the interest rate spread of 19 basis points and margin of one basis points resulted from a decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of 46 basis points offset by a decrease in the rate earned on interest-earning assets of 27 basis points.  The decrease in cost of interest bearing liabilities resulted from a decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits of 48 basis points offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits of $67.6 million.  The decrease in rate on interest earnings assets resulted from a decrease in the average balance loans of $7.0 million, a decrease in the average rate on loans of 20 basis points and a decrease in the average rate on investments of 164 basis points offset by an increase in the average balance of investments of $18.1 million.

26

The following table summarizes changes in interest income and interest expense for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans	$	17,184	$	18,089	$	(905	)		(5.0	)%
Investment securities		1,021		910		111			12.2
Total interest income	$	18,205	$	18,999	$	(794	)		(4.2	)
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits	$	3,061	$	3,958	$	(897	)		(22.7	)
Borrowings		3,008		3,008		—			—
Total interest expense		6,069		6,966		(897	)		(12.9	)
Net interest income	$	12,136	$	12,033	$	103			0.9

Interest incomedecreased by $794 thousand, or 4.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared the same period ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease resulted from a decrease in the average balance of loans of $6.4 million and the average rate earned on earning assets of 25 basis points, offset by an increase in the average balance of investments of $10.2 million.

Interest expensedecreased by $897 thousand, or 12.9%, over the same period last year due to a decrease in interest paid on deposits.  The decrease in interest expense resulted from a decrease in the rate paid on deposits offset by increased balances of deposits.

The interest rate spread and net interest margin of the Company were 3.48% and 3.48% respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 3.26% and 3.47% for the same period in 2010.  The increase in the interest rate spread of 22 basis points and margin of one basis point resulted from a decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of 49 basis points offset by a decrease in the rate earned on interest-earning assets of 25 basis points.  The decrease in cost of interest bearing liabilities resulted from a decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits of 51 basis points offset by an increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits of $71.9 million.  The decrease in rate on interest earnings assets resulted from a decrease in the average balance loans of $6.4 million, a decrease in the average rate on loans of 22 basis points and a decrease in the average rate on investments of 117 basis points offset by an increase in the average balance of investments of $10.2 million.

27

The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the resulting average yields and costs.  The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented.  The yields and costs are annualized for presentation purposes.  For purposes of this table, average balances have been calculated using the average daily balances and nonaccrual loans are only included in average balances.  Loan fees are included in interest income on loans and are insignificant.  Interest income on loans and investment securities has not been calculated on a tax equivalent basis because the impact would be insignificant.

Average Balance Tables
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011								Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	661,680		$	8,629		5.22	%	$	668,691		$	9,059		5.42	%
Investment securities		45,409			538		4.74	%		27,271			435		6.38	%
Total interest-earning assets		707,089			9,167		5.19	%		695,962			9,494		5.46	%
Noninterest-earning assets		171,934								103,740
Total assets	$	879,023							$	799,702
Liabilities and equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	262,258			418		0.64	%	$	209,533			572		1.09	%
Savings accounts		110,178			192		0.70	%		83,977			220		1.05	%
Certificates of deposit		202,473			885		1.75	%		213,787			1,140		2.13	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		574,909			1,495		1.04	%		507,297			1,932		1.52	%
FHLB advances		110,000			1,175		4.27	%		110,000			1,175		4.27	%
Subordinated debt		15,464			335		8.67	%		15,464			335		8.67	%
Total borrowings		125,464			1,510		4.82	%		125,464			1,510		4.82	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		700,373			3,005		1.72	%		632,761			3,442		2.18	%
Noninterest-bearing demand accounts		66,246								58,291
Other liabilities		9,636								8,916
Total liabilities		776,255								699,968
Stockholders’ equity		102,768								99,734
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	879,023							$	799,702
Net interest income				$	6,162							$	6,052
Interest rate spread							3.47	%							3.28	%
Net interest margin							3.49	%							3.48	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		100.96	%							109.99	%

28

Average Balance Tables	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011								Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance			Interest and Dividends		Yield/ Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Interest-earning assets:
Loans	$	659,842		$	17,184		5.21	%	$	666,240		$	18,089		5.43	%
Investment securities		38,073			1,021		5.36	%		27,869			910		6.53	%
Total interest-earning assets		697,915			18,205		5.22	%		694,109			18,999		5.47	%
Noninterest-earning assets		178,143								98,455
Total assets	$	875,958							$	792,564
Liabilities and equity:
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	261,955		$	850		0.65	%	$	208,073		$	1,177		1.13	%
Savings accounts		107,364			399		0.74	%		80,402			437		1.09	%
Certificates of deposit		205,188			1,812		1.77	%		214,086			2,344		2.19	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		574,507			3,061		1.07	%		502,561			3,958		1.58	%
FHLB advances		110,000			2,338		4.25	%		110,000			2,338		4.25	%
Subordinated debt		15,464			670		8.67	%		15,464			670		8.67	%
Total borrowings		125,464			3,008		4.80	%		125,464			3,008		4.80	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		699,971			6,069		1.73	%		628,025			6,966		2.22	%
Noninterest-bearing demand accounts		64,380								56,571
Other		9,417								8,877
Total liabilities		773,768								693,473
Stockholders’ equity		102,190								99,091
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	875,958							$	792,564
Net interest income				$	12,136							$	12,033
Interest rate spread							3.48	%							3.26	%
Net interest margin							3.48	%							3.47	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		99.71	%							110.52	%

Provision for Loan Losses

We review the level of the allowance for loan losses on a monthly basis and establish the provision for loan losses based on the volume and types of lending, delinquency levels, loss experience, the amount of classified loans, economic conditions and other factors related to the collectibility of the loan portfolio.  The provision for loan losses was $128 thousand and $203 thousand in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $540 thousand and $691 thousand in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The provision was primarily to maintain a reserve level deemed appropriate by management in light of factors such as the level of non-performing loans, growth in the loan portfolio and the current economic environment.

29

Other Income

The following table summarizes other income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the changes between the periods.

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
OTHER INCOME:
Service charges	$	395	$	445		(11.2	)%
Cash surrender value of life insurance		130		139		(6.5	)
Other		337		302		11.6
Total other income	$	862	$	886		(2.7	)%

Other income decreased$24 thousand, or 2.7%, to $862 thousand for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 from the same period in 2010. The decrease in service charges income of $50 thousand resulted from lower service charges collected on deposit accounts.  The decrease in cash surrender value of life insurance income of $9 thousand resulted from a lower yield earned on existing policies.  Other income increased $35 thousand primarily from increased debit card commissions received.

The following table summarizes other income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the changes between the periods.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
OTHER INCOME:
Service charges	$	754	$	881		(14.4	) %
Cash surrender value of life insurance		259		274		(5.5	)
Other		651		539		20.8
Total other income	$	1,664	$	1,694		(1.8	)%

Other income decreased$30 thousand, or 1.8%, to $1.7 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 from the same period in 2010. The decrease in service charges income of $127 thousand resulted from lower service charges collected on deposit accounts.  The decrease in cash surrender value of life insurance income of $15 thousand resulted from a lower yield earned on existing policies.  Other income increased $112 thousand primarily from increased debit card commissions received.

Other Expense

The following table summarizes other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the changes between periods.

30

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
OTHER EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	2,568	$	2,452		4.7	%
Occupancy and equipment		1,134		981		15.6
Federal insurance premiums		186		163		14.1
Advertising		145		112		29.5
Professional services		310		204		52.0
Real estate owned expense		1		2		(50.0	)
Other operating expense		466		461		1.1
Total other expense	$	4,810	$	4,375		9.9	%

Other expenses increased $435 thousand, or 9.9%, to $4.8 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 from the same period in 2010.  Costs associated with the pending acquisition of CBCH Financialcorp increased occupancy and equipment $109 thousand, professional services $89 thousand and other operating expenses $14 thousand.  Additionally, increases in salaries and benefits, occupancy and equipment, FDIC insurance, professional services and advertising of $230 thousand were offset by decreases in other expense of $9 thousand.

The following table summarizes other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the changes between the periods.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		% Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
OTHER EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	$	5,181	$	4,949		4.7	%
Occupancy and equipment		2,118		1,958		8.2
Federal insurance premiums		373		330		13.0
Advertising		251		228		10.1
Professional services		605		382		58.4
Real estate owned expense		3		3	—
Other operating expense		935		977		(4.3	)
Total other expense	$	9,466	$	8,827		7.2	%

Other expenses increased$639 thousand, or 7.2%, to $9.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 from the same period in 2010. Costs associated with the pending acquisition of CBCH Financialcorp increased occupancy and equipment $109 thousand, professional services $179 thousand and other operating expenses $14 thousand.  Additionally, increases in salaries and benefits, occupancy and equipment, FDIC insurance, professional services and advertising of $392 thousand were offset by decreases in other expense of $56 thousand.

Income Taxes

Income taxes increased $143 thousand to $929 thousand for an effective tax rate of 44.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $785 thousand for an effective tax rate of 38.8% from the same period in 2010.  Theincrease in tax was a result of higher taxable income while the increase in the effective tax rate resulted from $214 thousand of merger expenses that are not tax deductible.

Income taxes increased $137 thousand to $1.7 million for an effective tax rate of 42.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $1.6 million for an effective tax rate of 38.8% from the same period in 2010.  Theincrease in tax was a result of higher taxable income while the increase in the effective tax rate resulted from $303 thousand of merger expenses that are not tax deductible.

31

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, maturities and sales of investment securities and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.  While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management policy.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits.  The levels of these assets depend on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period.  At June 30, 2011, cash and cash equivalents totaled $105.0 million.  Securities classified as available-for-sale whose market value exceeds our cost, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $39.3 million at June 30, 2011.  In addition, at June 30, 2011, we had the ability to borrow a total of approximately $230.6 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York.

At June 30, 2011, we had $56.2 million in loan commitments outstanding, which included $14.9 million in undisbursed loans, $24.1 million in unused home equity lines of credit and $17.2 million in commercial lines and letters of credit.  Certificates of deposit due within one year of June 30, 2011 totaled $122.6 million, or 61.4% of certificates of deposit.  We believe, however, based on past experience that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us.  We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

At June 30, 2011, the Bank exceeded all of its regulatory capital requirements with tangible capital of $87.7 million, or 10.31% of total adjusted assets, which is above the required level of $12.8 million or 1.5%; core capital of $87.7 million, or 10.31% of total adjusted assets which is above the required level of $34.0 million or 4.0%; and risk-based capital of $91.0 million, or 20.29% of risk-weighted assets, which is above the required level of $35.9 million or 8.0%.  The Bank is considered a “well-capitalized” institution under the applicable prompt corrective action regulations.

MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT

Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis

We analyze our interest rate sensitivity position to manage the risk associated with interest rate movements through the use of interest income simulation.  The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which such assets and liabilities are “interest sensitive.” An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period.

Simulation analysis is only an estimate of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time.  We continually review the potential effect changes in interest rates could have on the repayment of rate sensitive assets and funding requirements of rate sensitive liabilities.

32

The following table reflects changes in estimated net interest income only for the Company:

	At March 31, 2011 Percentage Change in Estimated Net Interest Income Over
	12 Months			24 Months
200 basis point increase in rates		10.91	%		18.33	%
100 basis point decrease in rates		N/A			N/A

The 200 and 100 basis point change in rates in the above table is assumed to occur evenly over the following 12 and and 24-month periods.  Based on the scenario above, net interest income would bepositively affected (within our internal guidelines) in the 12-month and 24-month periods if rates rose by 200 basis points. In addition, a decline in rates by 100 basis points in both the 12- and 24-month periods has been determined by management as not possible and therefore deemed not measurable.

Net Portfolio Value Analysis

In addition to a net interest income simulation analysis, we use an interest rate sensitivity analysis prepared by the Office of Thrift Supervision to review our level of interest rate risk.  This analysis measures interest rate risk by computing changes in net portfolio value of our cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates.  Net portfolio value represents the market value of portfolio equity and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with adjustments made for off-balance sheet items.  This analysis assesses the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 50 to 300 basis point increase or a sustained 50 to 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement.  We measure interest rate risk by modeling the changes in net portfolio value over a variety of interest rate scenarios.  The following table, which is based on information that we provide to the Office of Thrift Supervision, presents the change in our net portfolio value at March 31, 2011 that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates based on Office of Thrift Supervision assumptions, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counteract that change.

	Net Portfolio Value (Dollars in Thousands)								Net Portfolio Value as % of Portfolio Value of Assets
Basis Point (“bp”) Change in Rates	$ Amount		$ Change			% Change			NPV Ratio			Change
300 bp	$	82,296	$	(34,275	)		(29	)%		9.85	%		(317	)bp
200		96,571		(20,000	)		(17	)		11.27			(176	)
100		109,226		(7,346	)		(6	)		12.44			(59	)
50		113,739		(2,832	)		(2	)		12.82			(21	)
0		116,571								13.02
(50)		116,641		69			—			12.96			(7	)
(100)		116,921		349			—			12.91			(11	)

The Office of Thrift Supervision uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest rate risk of savings associations.  These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others.  As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table.  For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates.  Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates.  Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset.  Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.

33

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements.  These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk.  Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit.

For the three months and six ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, we engaged in no off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The information required by this item is included in Item 2 of this report under “Market Risk Management.”

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits against us, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to our business.  We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

34

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The Company did not repurchase any of its common stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and did not have any outstanding repurchase authorizations.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.  [RESERVED]

Item 5.  Other Information

  None.

Item 6.  Exhibits

31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

32.0 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Office.

101.0 The following materials from the Ocean Shore Holding Co. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (iv) related notes.

35

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	OCEAN SHORE HOLDING CO.
	(Registrant)
Date:  August 10, 2011	/s/ Steven E. Brady
	Steven E. Brady
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 10, 2011	/s/ Donald F. Morgenweck
	Donald F. Morgenweck
	Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

36

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Steven E. Brady, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ocean Shore Holding Co.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 10, 2011	/s/ Steven E. Brady
	Steven E. Brady
	President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Donald F. Morgenweck, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ocean Shore Holding Co.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 10, 2011	/s/ Donald F. Morgenweck
	Donald F. Morgenweck
	Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

EX-32

EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Date:  August 10, 2011	/s/ Steven E. Brady
	Steven E. Brady
	President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 10, 2011	/s/ Donald F. Morgenweck
	Donald F. Morgenweck
	Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President

XML



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION [Parenthetical] (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Investment securities held to maturity, Estimated fair value (in dollars)	$ 3,350,289	$ 2,638,725
Investment securities available for sale,amortized cost (in dollars)	44,610,801	22,230,208
Allowance for Loan Losses (in dollars)	$ 4,067,965	$ 3,988,076
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, shares Issued	0	0
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	25,000,000	25,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	7,308,118	7,308,118
Common stock, shares outstanding	7,296,780	7,296,780
Treasury stock, shares	10,810	10,810

XML



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (USD $)	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Taxable interest and fees on loans	$ 8,629,480	$ 9,058,506	$ 17,184,052	$ 18,089,112
Taxable interest on mortgage-backed securities	151,799	220,838	316,435	454,831
Non-taxable interest on municipal securities	10,473	19,060	21,119	36,400
Taxable interest and dividends on other investment securities	375,780	195,749	683,654	418,499
Total interest and dividend income	9,167,532	9,494,153	18,205,260	18,998,842
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest on deposits	1,494,677	1,931,453	3,060,664	3,957,788
Interest on borrowings	1,510,333	1,510,334	3,007,765	3,007,753
Total interest expense	3,005,010	3,441,787	6,068,429	6,965,541
NET INTEREST INCOME	6,162,522	6,052,366	12,163,831	12,033,301
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	128,035	539,700	202,835	691,361
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	6,034,487	5,512,666	11,933,996	11,341,940
OTHER INCOME:
Service charges	394,590	445,159	754,386	881,111
Cash surrender value of life insurance	130,365	138,800	258,833	273,584
Gain on call of AFS securities	0	0	10,014	5
Other	336,786	302,396	640,596	538,923
Total other income	861,741	886,355	1,663,829	1,693,623
OTHER EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits	2,568,056	2,452,437	5,180,749	4,948,865
Occupancy and equipment	1,133,834	981,233	2,118,025	1,958,484
Federal insurance premiums	186,188	162,519	373,268	330,431
Advertising	145,457	111,800	251,487	227,775
Professional services	310,191	204,009	604,638	381,664
Real estate owned expense	1,250	1,573	2,499	2,521
Charitable contributions	36,000	34,500	72,000	69,000
Other operating expenses	429,210	426,527	863,385	908,614
Total other expenses	4,810,186	4,374,598	9,466,051	8,827,354
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES	2,086,042	2,024,423	4,131,774	4,208,209
INCOME TAX EXPENSE	928,525	785,425	1,769,671	1,632,887
NET INCOME	$ 1,157,517	$ 1,238,998	$ 2,362,103	$ 2,575,322
Earnings per share, basic (in dollars per share)	$ 0.17	$ 0.18	$ 0.35	$ 0.38
Earnings per share, diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 0.17	$ 0.18	$ 0.35	$ 0.38

XML



Document And Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Aug. 01, 2011
Entity Registrant Name	Ocean Shore Holding Co.
Entity Central Index Key	0001444397
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Trading Symbol	oshc
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		7,296,780
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011

XML



INCOME TAXES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]

7. INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $1,769,671 for an effective tax rate of 42.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1,632,887 for an effective tax rate of 38.8% for the same period in 2010.

Periodic reviews of the carrying amount of deferred tax assets are made to determine if the establishment of a valuation allowance is necessary. If based on the available evidence in future periods, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets will not be realized, a deferred tax valuation allowance would be established. Consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets.

Items considered in this evaluation include historical financial performance, expectation of future earnings, the ability to carry back losses to recoup taxes previously paid, length of statutory carryforward periods, experience with operating loss and tax credit carryforwards not expiring unused, tax planning strategies and timing of reversals of temporary differences. Significant judgment is required in assessing future earning trends and the timing of reversals of temporary differences. The evaluation is based on current tax laws as well as expectations of future performance. At June 30, 2011, no valuation allowance has been recorded for any portfolio of the outstanding deferred tax asset.

The Company recognizes, when applicable, interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes in the consolidated income statement. As of June 30, 2011, the tax years ended December 31, 2007 through 2010 were subject to examination by all tax jurisdictions.  As of June 30, 2011, no audits were in process by a major tax jurisdiction that, if completed during the next twelve months, would be expected to result in a material change to the Company's unrecognized tax benefits, as none exist.

XML



LOANS RECEIVABLE NET

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Receivables [Abstract]

Loans, Notes, Trade and Other Receivables Disclosure [Text Block]

3.  LOANS RECEIVABLE ─ NET
Loans receivable consist of the following:
	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Real estate - mortgage:
One-to-four family residential	$	520,901,062		$	514,853,007
Commercial and multi-family		53,900,207			55,237,743
Total real estate-mortgage		574,801,269			570,090,750
Real estate - construction:
Residential		7,941,147			7,785,191
Commercial		2,699,220			3,723,800
Total real estate - construction		10,640,367			11,508,991
Commercial		22,962,908			21,963,288
Consumer:
Home equity		54,766,129			57,119,018
Other consumer loans		754,057			775,569
Total consumer loans		55,520,186			57,894,587
Total  loans		663,924,730			661,457,616
Net deferred loan cost		2,984,357			2,870,467
Allowance for loan losses		(4,067,965	)		(3,988,076	)
Net total loans	$	662,841,122		$	660,340,007

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are as follows:
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010
Balance, beginning of period	$	3,988,076	$	3,476,040
Provision for loan loss		202,835		691,361
Charge-offs		122,946		42,987
Recoveries		—		—
Balance, end of period	$	4,067,965	$	4,124,414

The Company established a provision for loan losses of $128,035 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $539,700 for the comparable period in 2010.  The allowance for loan losses is based upon past loan loss experiences, understanding of the current macroeconomic factors, and current portfolio trends. These factors are considered in establishing the reserves necessary to cover the losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. The allowance is comprised of collective reserves for portfolio loans evaluated on a pooled basis and specific reserves on loans specifically evaluated for impairment. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being identified as impaired. For this purpose, delays less than 90 days generally are considered to be insignificant. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the impairment was measured based on the fair value of the loans’ collateral, adjusted for cost to dispose. Loans collectively evaluated for impairment include residential real estate loans, consumer loans, and smaller balance commercial and commercial real estate loans.

Non-performing loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of non-accrual loans that amounted to $5,935,322 and $5,222,374 respectively. The reserve for delinquent interest on loans totaled $357,739 and $246,558, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Non-accrual loans segregated by class of loans are as follows:

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Real estate
One-to-four family residential	$	5,287,199	$	4,282,002
Commercial and multi-family		328,582		729,289
Real estate construction		—		—
Commercial		203,656		134,238
Consumer		115,885		76,845
Total	$	5,935,322	$	5,222,374

An age analysis of past due loans, segregated by class of loans, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:

	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable
June 30, 2011
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	1,467,846	$	—	$	5,287,199	$	6,755,045	$	514,146,017	$	520,901,062
Commercial and Multi-Family		—		—		328,582		328,582		53,571,625		53,900,207
Construction		—		—		—		—		10,640,367		10,640,367
Commercial		483,258		—		203,657		686,915		22,275,993		22,962,908
Consumer		124,988		1,820		25,828		152,636		55,367,550		55,520,186
Total	$	2,076,092	$	1,820	$	5,845,266	$	7,923,178	$	656,001,552	$	663,924,730
December 31, 2010
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	1,584,054	$	—	$	4,282,002	$	5,866,056	$	508,986,951	$	514,853,007
Commercial and Multi-Family		—		—		729,289		729,829		54,508,454		55,237,743
Construction		—		—		—		—		11,508,991		11,508,991
Commercial		—		—		134,238		134,238		21,829,050		21,963,288
Consumer		81,600		—		76,845		158,445		57,736,142		57,894,587
Total	$	1,665,654	$	—	$	5,222,374	$	6,888,028	$	654,569,588	$	661,457,616

Impaired loans are set forth the in the following table.  No interest income was recognized on impaired loans subsequent to their classification as impaired.

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
June 30, 2011
With no related allowance recorded
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	2,973,738	$	2,973,738	$	—	$	495,623
Commercial and Multi-Family		328,582		328,582		—		164,291
Commercial		98,885		98,885		—		98,885
Consumer		115,885		115,885		—		115,885
With an allowance recorded
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential		2,313,461		2,313,461		658,965		330,494
Commercial and Multi-Family		—		—		—		—
Commercial		104,771		104,771		90,863		26,193
Consumer		—		—		—		—
Total
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	5,287,199	$	5,287,199	$	658,965	$	826,117
Commercial and Multi-Family		328,582		328,582		—		164,291
Commercial		203,656		203,656		90,863		125,078
Consumer		115,885		115,885		—		115,885
December 31, 2010
With no related allowance recorded
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	2,997,524	$	2,997,524	$	—	$	428,218
Commercial and Multi-Family		729,289		729,289		—		243,096
Commercial		98,885		98,885		—		98,885
Consumer		27,919		27,919		—		27,919
With an allowance recorded
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential		1,284,478		1,284,478		359,301		256,895
Commercial and Multi-Family		—		—		—		—
Commercial		35,353		35,353		73,285		35,353
Consumer		48,926		48,926		49,161		48,926
Total
Real Estate
1-4 Family Residential	$	4,282,002	$	4,282,002	$	359,301	$	685,113
Commercial and Multi-Family		729,289		729,289		—		243,096
Commercial		134,238		134,238		73,285		134,238
Consumer		76,845		76,845		49,161		76,845

Federal regulations require us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis.  In addition, federal banking regulators have the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified.  There are three classifications for problem assets:  substandard, doubtful and loss.  “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.  “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss.  An asset classified as “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted.  The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described as assets which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention.  When we classify an asset as substandard or doubtful we establish a specific allowance for loan losses.  If we classify an asset as loss, we charge off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss.

The following table presents classified loans by class of loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

	Real Estate
	1-4 Family Residential				Commercial and Multi-Family				Construction				Commercial				Consumer
	6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/30/2010
Grade:
Special Mention	$	1,156,740	$	927,945	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	130,552	$	197,031
Substandard		8,504,487		8,291,507		1,480,885		1,310,396		—		—		281,058		476,895		389,447		302,046
Doubtful and Loss		288,977		288,977		—		—		—		—		104,771		70,686		—		48,926
Total	$	9,950,204	$	9,508,429	$	1,480,885	$	1,310,396	$	—	$	—	$	385,829	$	547,581	$	519,999	$	548,003

The following table presents the credit risk profile of loans based on payment activity as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

	Real Estate
	1-4 Family Residential				Commercial and Multi-Family				Construction				Commercial				Consumer
	6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/31/2010		6/30/2011		12/30/2010
Performing	$	520,901,062	$	510,571,005	$	53,900,207	$	54,508,454	$	10,640,367	$	11,508,991	$	22,962,908	$	21,829,050	$	55,520,186	$	57,817,742
Non-Performing		5,287,199		4,282,002		328,582		729,289		—		—		203,657		134,238		115,885		76,845
Total	$	526,188,261	$	514,853,007	$	54,228,789	$	55,237,743	$	10,640,367	$	11,508,991	$	23,166,565	$	21,963,288	$	55,636,071	$	57,894,587

The following table details activity in the allowance for possible loan losses by portfolio segment for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  Allocation of a portion of the allowance to one category does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.

	Real Estate
	1-4 Family Residential			Commercial and Multi-Family			Construction			Commercial			Consumer			Total
June 30, 2011
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	2,731,325		$	281,762		$	32,494		$	268,411		$	674,084		$	3,988,076
Charge-offs		(74,019	)		—			—			—			(48,927	)		(122,946	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—
Provision for loan losses		300,867			42,444			(1,571	)		(18,984	)		(119,921	)		202,835
Ending balance	$	2,958,173		$	324,206		$	30,923		$	249,427		$	505,236		$	4,067,965
Ending balance:  individually evaluated for impairment	$	658,965		$	—		$	—		$	90,863		$	—		$	749,828
Ending balance:  collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,299,208		$	324,206		$	30,923		$	158,564		$	505,236		$	3,318,137
Loan Receivables:
Ending balance	$	520,901,062		$	53,900,207		$	10,640,367		$	22,962,908		$	55,520,186		$	663,924,730
Ending balance:  individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,287,199		$	328,582		$	—		$	203,656		$	115,885		$	5,935,322
Ending balance:  collectively evaluated for impairment	$	515,613,863		$	53,571,625		$	10,640,367		$	22,759,252		$	55,404,301		$	657,989,408
December 31, 2010
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning Balance	$	2,220,529		$	524,107		$	49,680		$	275,826		$	405,898		$	3,476,040
Charge-offs		(16,316	)		(35,347	)		—			(10,860	)		(317,232	)		(379,755	)
Recoveries		—			—			—			—			—			—
Provision for loan losses		527,112			(206,998	)		(17,186	)		3,445			585,418			891,791
Ending balance	$	2,731,325		$	281,762		$	32,494		$	268,411		$	674,084		$	3,988,076
Ending balance:  individually evaluated for impairment	$	359,300		$	—		$	—		$	73,285		$	49,510		$	482,095
Ending balance:  collectively evaluated for impairment	$	2,372,025		$	281,762		$	32,494		$	195,126		$	624,574		$	3,505,981
Loan Receivables:
Ending balance	$	514,583,007		$	55,237,743		$	11,508,991		$	21,963,288		$	57,894,587		$	661,457,616
Ending balance:  individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,282,002		$	729,289		$	—		$	134,238		$	76,845		$	5,222,374
Ending balance:  collectively evaluated for impairment	$	510,571,005		$	54,508,454		$	11,508,991		$	21,829,050		$	57,817,742		$	6,656,235,242

XML



FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company accounts for fair value measurement in accordance with FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  FASB ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  FASB ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements. The definition of fair value retains the exchange price notion in earlier definitions of fair value. FASB ASC 820 clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell the asset or transfer the liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact for the asset or liability. The definition focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). FASB ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.  FASB ASC 820 also clarifies the application of fair value measurement in a market that is not active.

FASB ASC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

In addition, the Company is to disclose the fair value measurements for financial assets on both a recurring and non-recurring basis.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements:

Those assets at June 30, 2011 which will continue to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

	Category Used for Fair Value Measurement
Assets:	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	36,357,366	$	—
State and municipal obligations		—		831,353		—
Corporate securities		—		7,099,712		200
Equity securities		14,682		—		—
Totals	$	14,682	$	44,288,431	$	200

Those assets at December 31, 2010 which will continue to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

	Category Used for Fair Value Measurement
Assets:	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Government agencies and mortgage-backed securities	$	—	$	13,404,677	$	—
State and municipal obligations		—		1,431,381		—
Corporate securities		—		6,403,036		200
Equity securities		14,381		—		—
Totals	$	14,381	$	21,239,094	$	200

In 2008, as a result of general market conditions and the illiquidity in the market for CDOs, management deemed it necessary to shift its market value measurement of each of the securities from quoted prices for similar assets (Level 2) to an internally developed discounted cash flow model (Level 3).  In arriving at the discount rate used in the model for each issue, the Company determined a trading group of similar securities quoted on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ over the counter market, based upon its review of market data points, such as Moody’s or comparable credit ratings, maturity, price, and yield.  The Company indexed the individual CDOs within the trading group to a comparable interest rate swap (to maturity) in determining the spread.  The average spread on the trading group was matched with the individual trust preferred issues based on their comparable credit rating which was then used in arriving at the discount rate input to the model.

The following provides details of the fair value measurement activity for Level 3 for the six-months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010:

Fair Value Measurement Activity – Level 3 (only)

	Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Trust Preferred Securities		Total
Balance, January 1, 2011	$	200	$	200
Total gains (losses), realized/unrealized:		—		—
Included in earnings (1)		—		—
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		—
Purchases, maturities, prepayments and call, net		—		—
Transfers into Level 3 (2)		—		—
Balance, June 30, 2011	$	200	$	200

(1) Amount included in impairment charge on available for sale securities on Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2) Transfers into Level 3 are assumed to occur at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred.

Fair Value Measurement Activity – Level 3 (only)

	Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Trust Preferred Securities		Total
Balance, January 1, 2010	$	200	$	200
Total gains (losses), realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings (1)		—		—
Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss		—		—
Purchases, maturities, prepayments and call, net		—		—
Transfers into Level 3 (2)		—		—
Balance, June 30, 2010	$	200	$	200

(1) Amount included in impairment charge on available for sale securities on Consolidated Statement of Income.

(2) Transfers into Level 3 are assumed to occur at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred.

In accordance with the fair value measurement and disclosures topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification management assessed whether the volume and level of activity for certain assets have significantly decreased when compared with normal market conditions.  Fair value for these securities is obtained from third party broker quotes. The Company evaluated these values to determine that the quoted price is based on current information that reflects orderly transactions or a valuation technique that reflects market participant assumptions by benchmarking the valuation results and assumptions used against similar securities that are more actively traded in order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair values. The fair market value estimates we assign to these securities assume liquidation in an orderly fashion and not under distressed circumstances.

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements:

Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The Company measures impaired loans, FHLB stock and loans or bank properties transferred into other real estate owned at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Impaired Loans

			Category Used for Fair Value						Total
			Measurement						(Losses)
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains
June 30, 2011
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	4,186,838	$	—	$	—	$	4,186,838	$	(390,679	)
Real estate owned		97,500		—		—		97,500		—
June 30, 2010
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	1,866,185	$	—	$	—	$	1,866,185	$	(483,138	)
Real estate owned		97,500		—		—		97,500		—

The Company considers a loan to be impaired when it becomes probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Under FASB ASC 310, collateral dependent impaired loans are valued based on the fair value of the collateral, which is based on appraisals.  In some cases, adjustments are made to the appraised values for various factors, including age of the appraisal, age of the comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. These adjustments are based upon unobservable inputs, and therefore, the fair value measurement has been categorized as a Level 3 measurement. 

Specific reserves were calculated for impaired loans with an aggregate carrying amount of $1,551,198 and $1,821,916 at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The collateral underlying these loans had a fair value of $1,540,000 and $3,010,000, while the claims against collateral from other third parties, shortfall in collateral to appraised amount and liquidation costs amounted to $738,631 and $1,912,172, at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  This resulted in specific reserves in the allowance for loan losses of $749,828 and $724,888 at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There were charge-offs of $122,946 and $42,987 for impaired loans with specific reserves during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No specific reserve was calculated for impaired loans with an aggregate carrying amount of $4,384,125 and $769,157 at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as the underlying collateral was not below the carrying amount.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The Company holds required equity investments in the stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”).  Investment in the FHLB stock is evaluated for impairment in accordance FASB ASC 942-325. These investments may be measured based upon a discounted cash flow model reliant on observable and unobservable inputs, and therefore, the fair value measurement may be categorized as a Level 2 or 3, depending on such inputs used. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company determined that there was no impairment and, therefore, fair value disclosure under the provision of the fair value measurement and disclosures topic is not required.

Real Estate Owned

Once an asset is determined to be uncollectible, the underlying collateral is repossessed and reclassified to foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets. These assets are carried at lower of cost or fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell. In some cases, adjustments are made to the appraised values for various factors, including age of the appraisal, age of the comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. These adjustments are based upon unobservable inputs, and therefore, the fair value measurement has been categorized as a Level 3 measurement.  At June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any remeasurement to fair value to its foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets since the original recording.  At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Company had one foreclosed property.  The Company took possession of the collateral during the first quarter of 2009.  The collateral underlying the loan had a fair value of $97,500, with an aggregate carrying value of $198,000, triggering a net charge-off of approximately $101,000. There have been no changes to the fair value of this property as described above.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In accordance with FASB ASC 825-10-50-10,the Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments.  The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a distressed sale.  Fair value is best determined using observable market prices; however, for many of the Company’s financial instruments, no quoted market prices are readily available.  In instances where quoted market prices are not readily available, fair value is determined using present value or other techniques appropriate for the particular instrument.  These techniques involve some degree of judgment and, as a result, are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange.  Different assumptions or estimation techniques may have a material effect on the estimated fair value.  The following table summarizes these results:

	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	105,046,206	$	105,046,206	$	110,865,154	$	110,865,154
Investment securities:
Held to maturity		3,170,927		3,350,289		2,467,418		2,683,725
Available for sale		44,303,313		44,303,313		21,253,675		21,253,675
Loans receivable, net		662,841,122		670,210,019		660,340,007		672,130,581
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		6,250,700		6,250,700		6,271,600		6,271,600
Liabilities:
NOW and other demand deposit accounts		310,956,700		323,408,700		289,903,528		297,533,528
Passbook savings and club accounts		110,579,419		119,420,419		102,467,025		107,987,025
Certificates		199,652,680		199,949,350		210,963,873		210,964,376
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		110,000,000		122,086,120		110,000,000		121,188,927
Junior subordinated debenture		15,464,000		10,824,800		15,464,000		9,278,400

Cash and Cash Equivalents—For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities—For investment securities, fair values are based on a combination of quoted prices for identical assets in active markets, quoted prices for similar assets in markets that are either actively or not actively traded and pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques that may contain unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and require significant judgment.  For investment securities that do not actively trade in the marketplace, (primarily our investment in trust preferred securities of non-publicly traded companies) fair value is obtained from third party broker quotes. The Company evaluates prices from a third party pricing service, third party broker quotes, and from another independent third party valuation source to determine their estimated fair value. These quotes are benchmarked against similar securities that are more actively traded in order to assess the reasonableness of the estimated fair values. The fair market value estimates we assign to these securities assume liquidation in an orderly fashion and not under distressed circumstances. For securities classified as available for sale, the changes in fair value are reflected in the carrying value of the asset and are shown as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.

Loans Receivable - Net—The fair value of loans receivable is estimated based on the present value using discounted cash flows based on estimated market discount rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers and reflect similar credit ratings and interest rate risk for the same remaining maturities.

FHLB Stock—Although FHLB stock is an equity interest in an FHLB, it is carried at cost because it does not have a readily determinable fair value as its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. While certain conditions are noted that required management to evaluate the stock for impairment, it is currently probable that the Company will realize its cost basis. Management concluded that no impairment existed as of June 30, 2011.  The estimated fair value approximates the carrying amount.

NOW and Other Demand Deposit, Passbook Savings and Club, and Certificates Accounts—The fair value of NOW and other demand deposit accounts and passbook savings and club accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of certificates is estimated by discounting future cash flows using interest rates currently offered on certificates with similar remaining maturities.

Advances from FHLB—The fair value was estimated by determining the cost or benefit for early termination of each individual borrowing.

Junior Subordinated Debenture—The fair value was estimated by discounting approximate cash flows of the borrowings by yields estimating the fair value of similar issues.

The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.  Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these consolidated financial statements since June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

XML



REAL ESTATE OWNED

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Real Estate [Abstract]

Real Estate Disclosure [Text Block]

10. REAL ESTATE OWNED

Summary of Real Estate Owned (“REO”):

	Residential Property		Total
Balance, January 1, 2011	$	97,500	$	97,500
Transfers into Real Estate Owned		—		—
Sales of Real Estate Owned		—		—
Balance, June 30, 2011	$	97,500	$	97,500

XML



DECLARATION OF DIVIDEND

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Declaration Of Dividend Disclosure [Abstract]

Declaration Of Dividend Disclosure [Text Block]

8. DECLARATION OF DIVIDEND

During the second quarter of 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.06 per share, which was paid on May 27, 2011 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on May 6, 2011.

XML



SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements Disclosure and Significant Accounting Policies [Text Block]

1.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation - The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ocean Shore Holding Co. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.   The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim information, and, therefore, do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).  However, all normal recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements have been included.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010.  The results for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 or any other period.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements - The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period.  The most significant estimates and assumptions relate to the allowance for loan losses, deferred income taxes and the fair value measurement for investment securities available for sale.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New Accounting Pronouncements – In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income.  This update to comprehensive income guidance requires all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or two separate but consecutive statements.  In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income.  This update also requires additional changes to the face of the financial statements including eliminating the presentation of other comprehensive income as a part of stockholders’ equity, and the presentation of certain reclassification adjustments between net income and other comprehensive income.  The new accounting guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2012, and should be applied retrospectively.  The adoption of this update will impact the presentation and disclosure of the Company’s financial statements but will not impact its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards.  This update to fair value measurement guidance addresses changes to concepts regarding performing fair value measurements including: (i) the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise; (ii) the valuation of an instrument classified in the reporting entity’s shareholders’ equity; (iii) the valuation of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio; and (iv) the application of premiums and discounts.  This update also enhances disclosure requirements about fair value measurements, including providing information regarding Level 3 measurements such as quantitative information about unobservable inputs, further discussion of the valuation processes used and assumption sensitivity analysis.  The new accounting guidance is effective beginning January 1, 2012, and should be applied prospectively.  The Company does not anticipate the adoption of this update will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.  This new guidance requires a creditor performing an evaluation of whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, to separately conclude that both (i) the restructuring constitutes a concession and (ii) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties.  This standard clarifies the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession as well as the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties.  The updated accounting guidance also requires entities to disclose additional quantitative activity regarding troubled debt restructurings of finance receivables that occurred during the period, as well as additional information regarding troubled debt restructurings that occurred within the previous twelve months and for which there was a payment default during the current period. The new accounting guidance is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption.  The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

XML



DEPOSITS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Banking and Thrift [Abstract]

Deposit Liabilities Disclosures [Text Block]

4.  DEPOSITS
Deposits consist of the following major classifications:
	June 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
			Weighted					Weighted
			Average					Average
	Amount		Interest Rate			Amount		Interest Rate
NOW and other demand deposit accounts	$	310,596,700		0.51	%	$	289,903,528		0.66	%
Passbook savings and club accounts		110,579,419		0.70	%		102,467,025		1.07	%
Subtotal		421,536,119					392,370,553
Certificates with original maturities:
Within one year		72,992,455		0.88	%		93,134,491		1.11	%
One to three years		102,341,603		2.01	%		94,347,156		2.17	%
Three years and beyond		24,318,622		3.32	%		23,482,226		3.48	%
Total certificates		199,652,680					210,963,873
Total	$	621,188,799				$	603,334,426

The aggregate amount of certificate accounts in denominations of $100,000 or more at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 amounted to $78,328,550 and $83,439,728, respectively.

Municipal demand deposit accounts in denominations of $100,000 or more at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 amounted to $112,847,491 and $108,593,238, respectively.

XML



EARNINGS PER SHARE

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share [Text Block]

5.  EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, net of any treasury shares, while diluted net income per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, net of any treasury shares, after consideration of the potential dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, based upon the treasury stock method using an average market price for the period, and impact of unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares.

The calculated basic and dilutive EPS are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Numerator	$	1,157,517	$	1,238,998	$	2,362,103	$	2,575,322
Denominators:
Basic average shares outstanding		6,738,827		6,826,946		6,734,602		6,822,739
Effect of dilutive securities		70,250		7,579		70,614		12,613
Diluted average shares outstanding		6,809,077		6,834,525		6,805,216		6,835,352
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.17	$	0.18	$	0.35	$	0.38
Diluted	$	0.17	$	0.18	$	0.35	$	0.38

At June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were 601,104 and 366,997 outstanding anti-dilutive options, respectively, and 99,000 and 30,125 outstanding dilutive non-vested shares, respectively.

XML



STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Abstract]

Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments [Text Block]

6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation.  The Company establishes fair value for its equity awards to determine their cost. The Company recognizes the related expense for employees over the appropriate vesting period, or when applicable, service period. However, consistent with the stock compensation topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the amount of stock-based compensation recognized at any date must at least equal the portion of the grant date value of the award that is vested at that date and as a result it may be necessary to recognize the expense using a ratable method. In accordance with FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, the compensation expense for non-employees is recognized on the grant date, or when applicable, the service period.  

The Company’s 2005 and 2010 Equity-Based Incentive Plans (the “Equity Plans”) authorizes the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to awards that may be granted in the form of stock options to purchase common stock (“options”) and awards of shares of common stock (“stock awards”). The purpose of the Equity Plans is to attract and retain personnel for positions of substantial responsibility and to provide additional incentive to certain officers, directors, advisory directors, employees and other persons to promote the success of the Company. Under the Equity Plan, options expire ten years after the date of grant, unless terminated earlier under the option terms. A committee of non-employee directors has the authority to determine the conditions upon which the options granted will vest. Options are granted at the then fair market value of the Company’s stock.

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock options under the Equity Plans as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 and changes during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are presented below:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011				Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Number  of shares		Weighted average exercise price		Number  of shares		Weighted average exercise price
Outstanding at the beginning of the period		587,504	$	11.92		373,592	$	13.10
Granted		13,600	$	12.06		—		—
Exercised		—		—		—		—
Forfeited		—		—		6,595	$	13.19
Outstanding at the end of the period		601,104	$	11.92		366,997	$	13.10
Exercisable at the end of the period		329,144	$	13.16		275,968	$	13.17
Stock options vested or expected to vest (1)		540,993	$	11.92		330,298	$	13.17

(1) Includes vested shares and nonvested shares after a forfeiture rate, which is based upon historical data, is applied.

The following table summarizes all stock options outstanding under the Equity Plan as of June 30, 2011:

	Options Outstanding
Date Issued	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
August 10, 2005		294,127	$	13.19	4.1 years
November 21, 2006		19,784	$	14.78	5.3 years
November 20, 2007		31,983	$	11.32	6.3 years
August 18, 2010		241,610	$	10.21	9.1 years
March 15, 2011		13,600	$	12.06	9.6 years

The compensation expense recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $32,484 and $64,968 as compared to $16,638 and $33,276 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

At June 30, 2011, there was $615,968 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to options granted under the stock option plans.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.1 years.

Summary of Non-vested Stock Award Activity:

	Six months ended June 30, 2011				Six months ended June 30, 2010
	Number of shares		Weighted avg grant date fair value		Number of shares		Weighted avg grant date fair value
Beginning of period		99,000	$	10.21		30,125	$	13.19
Issued		4,950		12.06		—		—
Forfeited		4,950		10.21		—		—
Vested		—		—		—		—
Outstanding at June 30, 2011		99,000	$	10.30		30,125	$	13.19

The compensation expense recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $51,000 and $95,730 as compared to $99,356 and $198,713 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.

As of June 30, 2011, there was $839,251 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock awards.  That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.1 years.

XML



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$ 2,362,103	$ 2,575,322
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	341,132	489,962
Provision for loan losses	202,835	691,361
Stock based compensation expense	371,722	410,600
Gain on call of AFS securities	(10,014)	(5)
Cash surrender value of life insurance	(258,833)	(273,584)
Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:
Accrued interest receivable	(181,261)	(57,673)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(10,712)	255,332
Accrued interest payable	(10,539)	(5,437)
Other liabilities	60,239	36,467
Net cash provided by operating activities	2,866,672	4,122,345
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale	1,903,443	2,422,419
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity	295,283	357,550
Loans originated, net of repayments	(2,422,060)	(12,672,662)
Purchases of:
Life insurance contracts	0	(1,500,000)
Loans	(168,000)	0
Investment securities held to maturity	(1,000,000)	(1,474,102)
Investment securities available for sale	(25,005,000)	0
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	0	(123,600)
Office properties and equipment	(247,933)	(207,853)
Proceeds from sale/ maturities/ calls of:
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	20,900	0
Investment securities available for sale	724,361	771,532
Net cash (used in) investing activities	(25,899,006)	(12,426,716)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Increase in deposits	17,854,373	25,835,452
Dividends paid	(875,614)	(876,911)
Fractional share payouts on exchange	0	(15,998)
Purchase of shares by deferred compensation plans trust	(5,347)	(15,050)
Increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance	239,974	311,612
Net cash provided by financing activities	17,213,386	25,239,105
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(5,818,948)	16,934,734
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS-Beginning of period	110,865,154	33,027,710
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS-End of period	105,046,206	49,962,444
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION-Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	6,078,967	6,970,978
Income Taxes	$ 1,890,574	$ 2,148,080

XML



INVESTMENT SECURITIES

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Investments, Debt and Equity Securities [Abstract]

Investments in Debt and Marketable Equity Securities (and Certain Trading Assets) Disclosure [Text Block]

2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment securities are summarized as follows:
	June 30, 2011
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
Held to Maturity
Municipal securities	$	1,000,000	$	—	$	—		$	1,000,000
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities		2,170,927		179,362		—			2,350,289
Totals	$	3,170,927	$	179,362	$	—		$	3,350,289
Available for Sale
Debt securities:
Municipal securities	$	830,000	$	1,353	$	—		$	831,353
Federal Agencies		25,005,000		23,323		—			25,028,323
Corporate		8,199,729		18,714		(1,118,531	)		7,099,912
Equity securities		2,596		13,754		(1,668	)		14,682
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities		10,573,476		758,110		(2,543	)		11,329,043
Totals	$	44,610,801	$	815,254	$	(1,122,742	)	$	44,303,313
	December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross			Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gain		Loss			Value
Held to Maturity
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities	$	2,467,418	$	171,307	$	—		$	2,638,725
Totals	$	2,467,418	$	171,307	$	—		$	2,638,725
Available for Sale
Debt securities:
Municipal	$	1,419,971	$	11,410	$	—		$	1,431,381
Corporate		8,198,927		—		(1,795,691	)		6,403,326
Equity securities		2,596		13,562		(1,777	)		14,381
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities		12,608,714		795,963		—			13,404,677
Totals	$	22,230,208	$	820,935	$	(1,797,468	)	$	21,253,675

The following table provides the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	June 30, 2011
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss
Debt securities - Corporate	$	987,500	$	(42,074	)	$	3,595,542	$	(1,076,457	)	$	4,583,042	$	(1,118,531	)
US treasury and government sponsored entity mortgage-backed securities		549,965		(2,543	)		—		—			549,965		(2,543	)
Equity securities		928		(1,668	)		—		—			928		(1,668	)
Totals	$	1,538,393	$	(46,285	)	$	3,595,542	$	(1,076,457	)	$	5,133,935	$	(1,122,742	)

	December 31, 2010
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized			Estimated		Unrealized
	Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss			Fair Value		Loss
Debt securities - Corporate	$	978,030	$	(52,429	)	$	5,425,006	$	(1,743,262	)	$	6,403,036	$	(1,795,691	)
Equity securities		819		(1,777	)		—		—			819		(1,777	)
Totals	$	978,849	$	(52,429	)	$	5,425,006	$	(1,743,262	)	$	6,403,855	$	(1,797,468	)

As of June 30, 2011, management has concluded that the unrealized losses on its investment securities, which totaled eight individual securities, are temporary in nature since there currently is no indication that the entire amortized cost basis of these securities will not be recovered, the Company does not intend to sell these investments, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investments, before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity.

Two pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) backed by bank trust capital securities have been determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired due solely to credit related factors. During the second quarter of 2009 the Company recognized the impairment for the entire carrying amount of these investments.  Below is a roll forward of the anticipated credit losses on securities for which the Company has recorded other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges through earnings and other comprehensive income.

	2011		2010
Credit component of OTTI as of January 1	$	3,000,000	$	3,000,000
Additions for credit related OTTI charges on previously unimpaired securities		—		—
Reductions for securities sold during the period		—		—
Reductions for increases in cash flows expected to be collected and recognized over the remaining life of the security		—		—
Additional increases as a result of impairment charges recognized on investments for which an OTTI was previously recognized		—		—
Credit component of OTTI as of June 30,	$	3,000,000	$	3,000,000

These securities have Fitch credit ratings below investment grade at June 30, 2011.  Each of the securities is in the mezzanine levels of credit subordination.  The underlying collateral consists of the bank trust capital securities of over 50 institutions.  A summary of key assumptions utilized to forecast future expected cash flows on the securities determined to have OTTI were as follows as of June 30, 2011 and 2010:

	June 30, 2011	June 30, 2010
Future loss rate assumption per annum	.8% to 1.2%	.8% to 1.2%
Expected cumulative loss percentage	27.8%	27.8%
Cumulative loss percentage to date	37.0% to 33.2%	37.0% to 33.2%
Remaining life	30 years	31 years

Corporate Debt Securities - The Company’s investments in the preceding table in corporate debt securities consist of corporate debt securities issued by large financial institutions and single issuer and pooled trust preferred/collateralized debt obligations backed by bank trust preferred capital securities.

At June 30, 2011, one corporate debt security and two single issuer trust preferred securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer.  Those securities had aggregate depreciation of 23% from the Company’s amortized cost basis.  The decline is primarily attributable to depressed pricing of two private placement single issuer trust preferred securities. There has been limited secondary market trading for these types of securities, as a declining domestic economy and increasing credit losses in the banking industry have led to illiquidity in the market for these types of securities.  The unrealized loss on these debt securities relates principally to the increased credit spread and a lack of liquidity currently in the financial markets for these types of investments.  These securities were performing in accordance with their contractual terms as of June 30, 2011, and had paid all contractual cash flows since the Company’s initial investment.  Management believes these unrealized losses are notother-than-temporary based upon the Company’s analysis that the securities will perform in accordance with their terms and the Company’s intent not to sell these investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for the anticipated recovery of fair value, which may be maturity.  The Company expects recovery of fair value when market conditions have stabilized and that the Company will receive all contractual principal and interest payments related to those investments.

United States Treasury, US Federal Agencies and Government Sponsored Enterprise Mortgage-backed Securities - The Company’s investments in the preceding table in United States government sponsored enterprise notes consist of debt obligations of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), and Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”). At June 30, 2011 the Company had no agency mortgage-backed securities with unrealized losses for 12 months or longer.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	June 30, 2011
	Held to Maturity				Available for Sale Securities
	Amortized		Estimated		Amortized		Estimated
	Cost		Fair Value		Cost		Fair Value
Due within 1 year	$	1,000,000	$	1,000,000	$	—	$	—
Due after 1 year through 5 years		—		—		6,000,000		5,989,950
Due after 5 years through 10 years		—		—		20,005,000		20,022,953
Due after 10 years		—		—		8,029,729		6,946,685
Total	$	1,000,000	$	1,000,000	$	34,034,729	$	32,959,588

Equity securities had a cost of $2,596and a fair value of $14,682 as of June 30, 2011.  Mortgage-backed securities had a cost of $10,573,476 and a fair value of $11,329,043.

XML



SUBSEQUENT EVENTS - ACQUISITION OF CBHC FINANCIALCORP, INC.

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events [Text Block]

11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS - ACQUISITION OF CBHC FINANCIALCORP, INC.

Effective August 1, 2011, the Company completed its acquisition of CBHC Financialcorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Select Bank.  As part of the transaction, Select Bank was merged with and into Ocean City Home Bank.  At June 30, 2011, Select Bank had total assets of $136.1 million.  The Company paid a total of $12.5 million to the shareholders of CBHC Financialcorp.

XML



CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions	$ 7,912,429	$ 5,330,211
Interest-earning bank balances	97,133,777	105,534,943
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS-Beginning of period	105,046,206	110,865,154
Investment securities held to maturity (estimated fair value-$3,350,289 at June 30, 2011; $2,638,725 at December 31, 2010)	3,170,927	2,467,418
Investment securities available for sale (amortized cost- $44,610,801 at June 30, 2011; $22,230,208 at December 31, 2010)	44,303,313	21,253,675
Loans-net of allowance for loan losses of $4,067,965 at June 30, 2011 and $3,988,076 at December 31, 2010	662,841,122	660,340,007
Accrued interest receivable:
Loans	2,370,390	2,350,978
Investment securities	313,251	151,401
Federal Home Loan Bank stock-at cost	6,250,700	6,271,600
Office properties and equipment-net	12,706,261	12,905,526
Prepaid expenses and other assets	4,676,204	4,665,491
Real estate owned	97,500	97,500
Cash surrender value of life insurance	15,149,579	14,890,746
Net deferred tax asset	3,343,798	3,597,612
TOTAL ASSETS	860,269,251	839,857,108
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Non-interest bearing deposits	67,535,721	62,070,772
Interest bearing deposits	553,653,078	541,263,654
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank	110,000,000	110,000,000
Junior subordinated debenture	15,464,000	15,464,000
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance	3,734,392	3,494,418
Accrued interest payable	1,135,685	1,146,224
Other liabilities	5,924,762	5,864,523
Total liabilities	757,447,638	739,303,591
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued	0	0
Common stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 7,308,118 shares issued; 7,296,780 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011and December 31, 2010	73,076	73,076
Additional paid-in capital	64,214,330	64,013,608
Retained earnings - partially restricted	43,223,319	41,736,830
Treasury stock-at cost: 10,810 at June 30, 2011; 10,810 at December 31, 2010	(115,208)	(115,208)
Common stock acquired by employee benefits plans	(3,836,478)	(4,007,478)
Deferred compensation plans trust	(521,489)	(516,142)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(215,937)	(631,169)
Total stockholders' equity	102,821,613	100,553,517
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$ 860,269,251	$ 839,857,108