XML 36 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies

5. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

In March 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for approximately 50,740 square feet of office space located in Redwood City, California for a period beginning in June 2015 through May 2022 with initial annual payments of approximately $2.0 million, increasing to $2.4 million annually during the final year of the lease term. In December 2016, the Company entered into an amendment for an additional approximately 49,980 square feet of office space adjacent to the premises under the original lease (the Expansion Premises), with initial annual payments of $1.2 million, increasing to $2.9 million in the final year of the amended lease term.  The lease for the Expansion Premises commences on the earlier of (i) the date the Company commences business operations in the Expansion Premises, or (ii) the date upon which the Landlord substantially completes certain improvements to, and permitting for, the Expansion Premises (the Commencement Date). The Commencement Date is expected to occur in the first half of 2018.  The amendment also extends the lease term for the original premises to terminate on the same date as the amended lease.  Under the amendment, if the Company is unable to move into the Expansion Premises before the Scheduled Delivery Date, as defined in the amendment, the Company may terminate the lease for the Expansion Premises. In April 2017, the Company entered into a second amendment to the lease for a temporary space of 8,171 square feet for a period beginning in May 2017 and ending on the Commencement Date of the Expansion Premises.

The Company entered into a non-cancellable operating lease effective May 1, 2010 for facilities in Menlo Park, California as amended in 2012 to extend the period of the lease until May 31, 2015. In March 2015, the Company extended the lease through September 30, 2015, at which time the lease terminated. In August 2014, the Company entered into a new facility lease for warehouse space beginning on August 21, 2014 through May 31, 2015, under which it was obligated to pay approximately $100,000 in lease payments over the term of the lease. In March 2015, the Company extended the warehouse lease through February 2017 under which it was obligated to pay approximately $0.3 million in lease payments over the remaining term of the lease.

In February 2017, the Company entered into a separate non-cancellable facility lease for warehouse space beginning March 1, 2017 through February 28, 2022, under which the Company is obligated to pay approximately $0.4 million in lease payments over the term of the lease.

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $2.5 million, $2.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

Excluding the terms under the amendment for the Expansion Premises, which is subject to certain cancellation clauses, future minimum lease payments under operating leases as of December 31, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

Leases

 

Year ending December 31,

 

 

 

 

2018

 

$

2,288

 

2019

 

 

2,356

 

2020

 

 

2,409

 

2021

 

 

2,484

 

2022

 

 

1,227

 

Total

 

$

10,764

 

 

Warranty Obligations

The Company warrants that its products will operate substantially in conformity with product specifications and provides a limited one- to five-year warranty.  Activities related to warranty obligations were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Beginning Balance

 

$

645

 

 

$

394

 

Provision for warranty

 

 

1,468

 

 

 

902

 

Utilization

 

 

(1,405

)

 

 

(651

)

Ending Balance

 

$

708

 

 

$

645

 

 

Supply Agreements

The Company has entered into supply agreements with certain of the Company’s suppliers that required certain minimum annual purchase agreements.  As of December 31, 2017, the Company had minimum annual purchase commitments $6.6 million due in 2018, $6.4 million due in 2019 and $6.2 million due in 2020.

The Company also entered into a service agreement for which it is committed to pay $3.6 million over the term of the service agreement.

License Agreements

In March 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated license agreement with the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (Mayo) and Venturi Group LLC (VGL), which provides the Company access to the certain know how and licensed patents owned by Mayo and VGL for treatment of central, autonomic and peripheral nervous system disorders, including pain, using devices to modulate nerve signaling. The licenses granted are exclusive and the Company has the right to sub-license. The agreement will terminate upon the last to expire patent application, unless terminated earlier. The agreement can be terminated any time after three years from March 2006 by Mayo or VGL.

Per terms of the license, the Company is required to pay royalties based on the greater of earned royalty or minimum royalty. The earned royalty will be based on a percentage of net sales of licensed products either by the Company or the sub-licensee. The minimum royalty payment will be based on royalty periods as defined in the agreement.

In March 2011, the Company entered into a Phase II License Agreement with Mayo which provides the Company access to the certain know how and licensed patents owned by Mayo. The licenses granted are exclusive and the Company has the right to sub-license. The agreement will terminate upon the last to expire patent application, unless terminated earlier.

Per terms of the license, the Company is required to:

 

Pay a retainer fee of $40,000 per annum starting March 2011 and ending February 2013;

 

Pay royalties based on the greater of earned royalty or minimum royalty. The earned royalty is based on a percentage of net sales of licensed products either by the Company or the sub-licensee. The minimum annual royalty payment is $200,000.

Royalties paid during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $2.5 million, $1.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

In November 2014, the Company issued Mayo 20,833 shares of common stock owed in connection with the IPO pursuant to the terms of the license, and recorded noncash research and development expense of $0.5 million for the fair value of the shares on the date of issuance.

In July 2017, the Company entered into a license agreement for which it is committed to pay $0.5 million over the remaining term of this license agreement, which ends in 2022.

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company may have certain contingent liabilities that arise in the ordinary course of business activities. The Company accrues a liability for such matters when it is probable that future expenditures will be made and such expenditures can be reasonably estimated. There have been no contingent liabilities requiring accrual at December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Indemnification

The Company enters into standard indemnification arrangements in the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these arrangements, the Company indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified parties for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including, among other circumstances, in connection with any trade secret, copyright, patent or other intellectual property infringement claim by any third-party with respect to the Company’s technology. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these agreements is not determinable because it involves claims that may be made against the Company in the future, but have not yet been made.

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and officers that may require the Company to indemnify its directors and officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct of the individual. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has director and officer insurance coverage that reduces the Company’s exposure and enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. The Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal.

The Company has not incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. No liability associated with such indemnifications has been recorded to date.

Legal Matters

On November 28, 2016, the Company filed a lawsuit for patent infringement against Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation (collectively, Boston Scientific). The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, asserts that Boston Scientific is infringing the Company’s patents covering inventions relating to the Senza system and HF10 therapy. The lawsuit seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement as well as damages and attorney’s fees.

On December 9, 2016, Boston Scientific filed a patent infringement lawsuit alleging the Company’s manufacture, use and sale of the Senza system infringes certain of Boston Scientific’s patents covering SCS technology related to stimulation leads, rechargeable batteries and telemetry. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, seeks unspecified damages and attorney’s fees, as well as preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against further infringement. As of December 31, 2017, the Company did not record a liability, as an outcome or potential loss range cannot be reasonably determined

The Company is and may from time to time continue to be involved in various legal proceedings of a character normally incident to the ordinary course of its business, including several pending European patent oppositions at the European Patent Office (EPO) initiated by the Company’s competitors Medtronic and Boston Scientific, which the Company does not deem to be material to its business and consolidated financial statements at this stage.