XML 50 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principals of Presentation, Consolidation and Reclassifications

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the operating activity of QRHC and its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, as well as the equity method accounting for its investment in Quest through July 15, 2013.

As Quest, Earth911, and YouChange are deemed to be operating as ecology based green service companies, no segment reporting was deemed necessary.

Through July 16, 2013, Quest was deemed to be a separate operating company, and as such, there were no intercompany transactions that required elimination at that time. All other intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation, including transactions between QRHC and Quest subsequent to July 16, 2013. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year balances to conform to the current year presentation that did not have an effect on our net loss or net loss per share.

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

We use significant estimates when accounting for the collectability of accounts receivable, depreciable lives of fixed assets and intangible assets, accruals, assumptions used in the valuation and recognition of share-based payments and warrant liability, the realization of goodwill and intangible assets, deferred tax assets, the equity method investment in Quest, and the application of accounting for the senior secured convertible notes, all of which are discussed in their respective notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue only when all of the following criteria have been met:

persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;

the fee for the arrangement is fixed or determinable; and

collectability is reasonably assured.

Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement – We document all terms of an arrangement in a service agreement or quote signed or confirmed by the customer prior to recognizing revenue.

Delivery Has Occurred or Services Have Been Performed – We perform all services or deliver all products prior to recognizing revenue. Services are deemed to be performed when the services are complete.

The Fee for the Arrangement is Fixed or Determinable – Prior to recognizing revenue, a customer’s fee is either fixed or determinable under the terms of the quote, service agreement, or accepted customer purchase order.

Collectability Is Reasonably Assured – We assess collectability on a customer by customer basis based on criteria outlined by management.

We provide businesses with management programs to reuse, recycle, and dispose of a wide variety of waste streams and recyclables generated by their business. We utilize third-party subcontractors to execute the collection, transport, and recycling or disposal of used motor oil, oil filters, scrap tires, cooking oil, and expired food products. We evaluate the criteria outlined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 605-45, Revenue Recognition—Principal Agent Considerations, in determining whether it is appropriate to record the gross amount of service revenue and related costs or the net amount earned as management fees. Generally, when we are primarily obligated in a transaction, have latitude in establishing prices and selecting suppliers, have credit risk, or have several but not all of these indicators, we record revenue gross and record amounts collected from customers for sales tax on a net basis. In situations in which we are not primarily obligated and determine amounts earned using a fixed percentage, a fixed-payment schedule, or a combination of the two, we record the net amounts as management fees earned. Currently, we have no contracts accounted for as management fees.

Earth911 revenue primarily represents licensing fees that are recognized ratably over the term of the license. We derive some revenue from advertising contracts, which is also recognized ratably over the term that the advertisement appears on our website.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid instruments with a remaining maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

We follow the allowance method of recognizing uncollectible accounts receivable, which recognizes bad debt expense based on a review of the individual accounts outstanding and our prior history of uncollectible accounts receivable. Credit is extended based on evaluation of each customer’s financial condition and is generally unsecured. Accounts receivable are typically due within 30 days and are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts in the consolidated balance sheet. Accounts are considered past due if outstanding longer than contractual payment terms. We record an allowance based on consideration of a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts are past due, our previous loss history, the credit-worthiness of individual customers, economic conditions affecting specific customer industries, and economic conditions in general. We charge-off accounts receivable after all reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted. We credit payments subsequently received on such receivables to bad debt expense in the period we receive the payment.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we have established an allowance of $760,917 and $319,735, respectively, for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable. We record delinquent finance charges on outstanding accounts receivables only if they are collected.

The changes in our allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

 

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

2013

 

Beginning balance

 

$

319,735

 

 

$

7,398

 

Allowance from Quest acquisition

 

 

 

 

 

263,887

 

Bad debt expense, net of recoveries

 

 

441,338

 

 

 

62,017

 

Uncollectible accounts written off

 

 

(156

)

 

 

(13,567

)

Ending balance

 

$

760,917

 

 

$

319,735

 

 

Inventories

Inventories consist of used consumer electronics and computer devices and are stated at the lower of cost (average cost method which approximates first-in, first-out) or market. We determine cost based on our estimate of the “collection” value of each item, which is what we then pay the supplier. We establish reserves for inventory to reflect situations in which the cost of the inventory is not expected to be recovered. In evaluating whether inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, we consider such factors as the amount of inventory on hand, estimated time required to sell such inventory and current and expected market conditions. We record inventories within “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” within our consolidated balance sheet.  As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, finished goods inventories were $30,759 and $3,251, respectively, consisting of a waste compactor at December 31, 2014 and composite heaters at December 31, 2013, with no reserve for inventory obsolescence at either date.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Topic 820 also specifies a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value is follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect our own estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Stock Options - We estimate the fair value of stock options on grant date in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation, using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. Significant assumptions used in the calculation are as follows:

Expected term is determined in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 using the simplified method for plain vanilla options by the average of the contractual term and vesting period of the award as appropriate statistical data required to properly estimate the expected term was not available;

Expected volatility is measured using the historical changes in the market price of our common stock and applicable comparison companies;

Risk-free interest rate is used to approximate the implied yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bonds with a remaining maturity equal to the expected term of the awards; and

Forfeitures are based on the history of cancellations of options granted by us and our analysis of potential future forfeitures.

Warrants - We estimate fair value of the warrant liability using Level 3 inputs for the initial valuation of the warrants using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model. The March 29, 2013 cashless exercise value was calculated using Level 1 and 3 inputs from the exercise of all warrants that were exercisable on that date and the quoted common stock market price. See Note 10.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets - The fair value of the reporting unit used in the goodwill and other intangible assets impairment analysis performed during 2013 was determined assuming the suspension of funding of future development activities of the reporting unit and anticipated continuing negative cash flows from operations. These were determined to be level 3 inputs.

Property and Equipment

We record property and equipment at cost. We provide for depreciation on the straight-line method, over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We amortize leasehold improvements over the shorter of the useful life or the remaining term of the related leases. We charge expenditures for repairs and maintenance to operations as incurred; we capitalize renewals and betterments when they extend the useful life of the asset. We record gains and losses on the disposition of property and equipment in the period incurred. We report assets to be disposed of, if any, at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $292,067, and $209,375, respectively.

The useful lives of property and equipment for purposes of computing depreciation are as follows:

 

Vehicles

 

5 to 7 years

Computer equipment

 

3 to 5 years

Office furniture and fixtures

 

5 to 7 years

Machinery and equipment

 

5 to 7 years

Leasehold improvements

 

5 to 7 years

 

We review property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability of assets to be held and used by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If we consider such assets to be impaired, we measure the impairment recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. We determine fair value based on discounted cash flows or appraised values, depending on the nature of the asset.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We analyze assets that are held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We review the amortization method and period at least at each balance sheet date.  The effects of any revision are recorded to operations when the change arises.  We recognize impairment when the estimated undiscounted cash flow generated by those assets is less than the carrying amounts of such assets. The amount of impairment is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of such assets. We carry assets held for sale, if any, at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less selling costs. We did not recognize any impairment charges for long-lived assets during 2014 and 2013.

Goodwill

The excess of (i) the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the acquisition date fair value of any previous equity interest in the acquired entity over the (ii) fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.  We do not amortize goodwill; however, annually, or whenever there is an indication that goodwill may be impaired, we evaluate qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Our test of goodwill impairment includes assessing qualitative factors and the use of judgment in evaluating economic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, and entity-specific events, as well as overall financial performance. After evaluating these qualitative factors, an impairment loss was recorded in 2013 because the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s assets exceeded the fair value determined. Any future increases in the fair value amount will not result in an adjustment to the impairment loss recorded in our consolidated financial statements.  See Note 16 regarding the impairment of goodwill recognized during 2013.  We performed our Step 1 goodwill impairment analysis in the third quarter 2014 with no impairment recorded.

Net Loss Per Share

We compute basic net loss per share by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. We have other potentially dilutive securities outstanding that are not shown in a diluted net loss per share calculation because their effect in both 2014 and 2013 would be anti-dilutive. These potentially dilutive securities include options, restricted stock units, warrants, and convertible promissory notes (see Notes 7 and 12), and total 18,130,132 shares and 15,164,789 shares at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Concentrations

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to credit risk consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, and trade accounts receivable. We deposit our cash with commercial banks. Cash deposits at commercial banks are at risk to the extent that the balances exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insured level per institution. The bank cash balances on deposit have exceeded federally insured limits, including $4,635,398 at December 31, 2014; however, we have never experienced any losses related to these balances.  

We sell our products and services primarily to consumers, advertisers, and businesses without requiring collateral; however, we routinely assess the financial condition of our customers and maintain allowances for anticipated losses. The following table discloses the number of customers that accounted for more than 10% of our annual revenue and related receivable balances:

 

 

 

Customers Exceeding 10%

of Revenue

 

Year

 

Number of

Customers

 

 

Revenue

Combined Percent

 

 

Accounts Receivable

Combined Percent

 

2014

 

 

2

 

 

 

73

%

 

 

36

%

2013

 

 

1

 

 

 

76

%

 

 

31

%

 

We believe we have no significant credit risk in excess of recorded reserves.

Investment in Quest

We account for investee companies that are not consolidated, but over which we exercise significant influence, under the equity method of accounting. Whether or not we exercise significant influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of several factors, including, among others, representation on the investee company’s board of directors and ownership level, which is generally a 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities of the investee company. Prior to July 17, 2013, we accounted for the investment in Quest under the equity method of accounting, in which the investee company’s accounts are not consolidated within our consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations.  Our share of earnings or losses of the investee company is reflected in the caption “Equity in Quest Resource Management Group, LLC income” in our consolidated statement of operations.  Our carrying value in an equity method investee company is reflected in the caption “Investment in Quest Resources Management Group, LLC” in our consolidated balance sheet.  Subsequent to our acquisition of the Quest Interests, the operational activity and the balance sheet are consolidated with QRHC.

Income Taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. We establish valuation allowances to reduce a deferred tax asset to the amount expected to be realized. We assess our ability to realize deferred tax assets based on current earnings performance and on projections of future taxable income in the relevant tax jurisdictions. These projections do not include taxable income from the reversal of deferred tax liabilities and do not reflect a general growth assumption but do consider known or pending events, such as the passage of legislation. We review our estimates of future taxable income annually. All tax positions are first analyzed to determine if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. After the initial analysis, the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Our income tax returns are subject to adjustment under audit for approximately the last three years.

If we are required to pay interest on the underpayment of income taxes, we recognize interest expense in the first period the interest becomes due according to the provisions of the relevant tax law.

If we are subject to payment of penalties, we recognize an expense for the amount of the statutory penalty in the period when the position is taken on the income tax return. If we did not recognize the penalty in the period when the position was initially taken, we recognize the expense in the period when we change our judgment about meeting minimum statutory thresholds related to the initial position taken.

Advertising

We charge our advertising costs to expense when incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, advertising expense totaled $72,241 and $29,440, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

We expense all share-based grants to employees, including grants of employee stock options, based on their estimated fair values at grant date, in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation. We record compensation expense for stock options over the vesting period using the estimated fair value on the date of grant, as calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. We classify all share-based awards to employees as equity instruments and recognize the vesting of the awards ratably over their respective terms. See Note 12 for a description of our share-based compensation plan and information related to awards granted under the plan.