EX-99.1 2 tm252094d1_ex99-1.htm EXHIBIT 99.1

 

Exhibit 99.1

 

 

 

NI 43 – 101 TECHNICAL REPORT 

Operational Technical Report 

at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, 

Jujuy Province, Argentina

 

 

 

 

Prepared by: 

Ernest Burga, P.Eng. 

David Burga, P.Geo. 

Daniel Weber, P.G., RM-SME 

Anthony Sanford, Pr.Sci.Nat. 

Marek Dworzanowski, CEng, PrEng.

 

Effective Date: December 31, 2024 

Filing Date:     January 8, 2025

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

 

1.0Summary 2

1.1Introduction 2
1.2Property Description, Location, Access and History 2
1.3Geological Setting and Deposit Types 4
1.4Mineralization 5
1.5Exploration and Drilling 5
1.6Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing 6

1.6.1Continuing Work Plan for Supporting the Plant Operations 7

1.7Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves 7
1.8Mining Methods 11

1.8.1Brine Processing 11
1.8.2Lithium Carbonate Plant Production 11

1.9Site Infrastructure and Buildings 12

1.9.1Wells 12
1.9.2Evaporation Ponds 12
1.9.3Salt Harvest Equipment 12
1.9.4Site Infrastructure and Support Systems 13

1.10Market Studies and Contracts 15

1.11Permitting, Environmental Studies and Social or Community Impact 15

1.11.1Permits and Authorities 15
1.11.2Social or Community Impact 16
1.11.3Environmental Baseline Studies 16

1.12Capital and Operating Cost Estimate 17

1.12.1Capital Cost Estimate 17
1.12.2Exclusions 18
1.12.3Currency 18
1.12.4Operating Cost Estimate 18

1.13Economic Analysis 19

1.13.1Sustaining Capital Expenditures (Sustaining CAPEX) 20
1.13.2Production Revenues Schedule 20
1.13.3Other Expenses 20

1.14Conclusions and Recommendations 22

1.14.1Conclusions 22
1.14.2Recommendations 23

2.0Introduction and Terms of Reference 26

2.1Terms of Reference 26
2.2Qualified Persons Site Visits 26
2.3Sources of Information 26
2.4Units and Currency 27

3.0Reliance on Other Experts 32
4.0Property Description and Location 33

4.1Property Description 33
4.2Property Area 35
4.3SQM Joint Venture 42
4.4Ganfeng Joint Venture 42

4.4.1Los Boros Option Agreement 42
4.4.2Borax Argentina S.A. Agreement 43
4.4.3JEMSE Arrangement 43
4.4.4Creation of LAAC 44

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page i 

 

 

4.5Type of Mineral Tenure 44

4.6Property Boundaries 44

4.7Environmental Liabilities 44

4.8Permits 46

4.9Neigboring Communities 49

5.0Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure, and Physiography 50

5.1Topography 50

5.2Access 50

5.3Population 50

5.4Climate 52

5.4.1Vaisala Station 52

5.4.2Regional Meteorological Stations 53

5.5Temperature 54

5.6Precipitation 56

5.7Humidity 58

5.8Winds 59

5.9Evaporation 61

5.9.1Evaporation Measurements 61

5.9.2Calculated Evaporation Using Site-Collected Parameters 61

5.10Existing Infrastructure 64

6.0History 66

7.0Geological Setting and Mineralization 67

7.1Regional Structural Features 67

7.2Regional Geology 69

7.3Geology of the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars 69

7.3.1Salar Structural Setting 69

7.4Salar Surface Sediments and Mineralization 71

7.5Salar Lithostratigraphic Units 73

7.5.1Unit 1 – Red Silts with Minor Clay and Sand 73

7.5.2Unit 2 – Banded Halite Beds with Clay, Silt and Minor Sand 73

7.5.3Unit 3 – Fine Sands with Minor Silt and Salt Beds 73

7.5.4Unit 4 – Banded and Massive Halite Beds with Minor Sandy Beds 74

7.5.5Unit 5 – Medium and Fine Sands 74

7.5.6Sedimentation Cycles 74

7.5.7Sedimentary Facies Analysis and In-filling History 74

7.6Surface Water 83

7.7Mineralization 85

8.0Deposit Types 87

9.0Exploration 90

9.1Overview 90

9.2Surface Brine Program 90

9.3Seismic Geophysical Program 91

9.4Gravity Survey 94

9.5TEM Survey 98

9.6Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES) 106

9.72019 Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES) 113

9.82020 Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES) 117

9.92021 Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES) 120

9.102024 Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES) 122

9.11Boundary Investigation 124

9.12Surface Water Monitoring Program 127

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page ii 

 

 

9.13Brine Level Monitoring Program 137

9.14Pumping Test Program 142

9.14.1Overview 142

9.15Chemistry of Samples Collected During Pump Tests 144

10.0Drilling 145

10.1Reverse Circulation (RC) Borehole Program 2009-2010 145

10.2Diamond Drilling (DDH) Borehole Program 2009-2010 149

10.3Diamond Drilling (DDH) Borehole Program 2017-2019 150

10.4Production Well Drilling 159

10.5Exploration Diamond Drilling (DDH) Borehole and Production Well Drilling Program 2022-2024 166

10.6Conclusion 166

11.0Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security 173

11.1Sampling Method and Approach 173

11.2Rotary Drilling Sampling Methods 173

11.3Diamond Drilling Borehole Solids Sampling Methods 174

11.4Diamond Drilling Borehole Brine Sampling Methods 176

11.5Sampling Preparation, Analysis and Security 176

11.5.1Brine Samples from the Piezometers 176

11.5.2Brine Samples from the Pumping Test Program 177

11.6Brine Analysis 178

11.6.1Analytical Methods 178

11.6.2Sample Security 179

11.7Sample Preparation Analysis and Security Conclusions and Recommendations 179

11.8Geotechnical Analysis 179

11.8.1Overview 179

11.9Analytical Methods 180

11.9.1Specific Gravity 180

11.9.2Relative Brine Release Capacity (RBRC) 180

11.9.3Particle Size Analysis 181

11.9.4Exar Porosity Test Lab 181

12.0Data Verification 182

12.1Overview 182

12.2Site Visits 182

12.3February 2019 Site Visit and Due Diligence Sampling 183

12.4June 2019 Site Visit and Due Diligence Sampling 185

12.5Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program 186

12.6Performance of Blank Samples 187

12.7Certified Reference Materials 188

12.8Duplicates 193

12.9Check Assays Exar Versus Alex Stewart 194

12.10Conclusions and Recommendations 196

13.0Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing 197

13.1Pond Tests – Universidad De Antofagasta, Chile 198

13.2Tests – Exar, Cauchari Salar 200

13.2.1Salar de Cauchari Evaporation Pan and Pilot Pond Testing 200

13.2.22017 Evaporation Tests 201

13.2.3Liming Tests – Exar, Cauchari Salar 203

13.3Solvent Extraction Tests – SGS Minerals and IIT, Universidad de Concepción 204

13.4Carbonation Tests – SGS Minerals (Canada) 206

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page iii 

 

 

13.5Pilot Purification Testing – SGS Minerals 206

13.5.1Lithium Carbonate Precipitation 209

13.6Recent Testing Work Performed in the Pilot Plant 210

13.7Recent Work Performed in External Laboratories 213

13.8Continuing Work Plan for Supporting the Plant Operations 213

14.0Mineral Resource Estimates 215

14.1Overview 215

14.1.1Statement for Brine Mineral Prospects and Related Terms 217

14.2Definition of Resource-Bearing Formations 219

14.2.1Geology 219

14.2.2Drilling and Sampling 220

14.3Mineral Resource Estimate Methodology 222

14.3.1Background and History 222

14.3.2Hydrostratigraphic Framework 226

14.3.3Hydrostratigraphic Unit Model 229

14.3.4Specific Yield 235

14.3.52019 HSU Model 236

14.3.6Lithium Concentrations 238

14.3.7Exploratory Data Analysis and Domain Analysis 242

14.3.8Mineral Resource Block Model Variography, Methods, and Validation 243

14.42019 Mineral Resource Statement 248

14.5Relative Accuracy of the Mineral Resource Estimate 250

15.0Mineral Reserve Estimate 252

15.1Background 252

15.2Overview 253

15.3Conceptual Model 255

15.4Numerical Model Construction 256

15.5Numerical Model Mesh 256

15.6Numerical Model Boundary Conditions 259

15.7Hydraulic Properties 262

15.8Pre-Development Model Conditions 264

15.9Transient Model Calibration 266

15.102019 Mineral Reserve Estimate Model Results 270

15.11Statement for Lithium Mineral Reserve Estimate 275

15.12Relative Accuracy in Mineral Reserve Estimate 277

16.0Mining Methods 278

16.1Production Wellfield 278

16.2Brine Production Uncertainties, Limitations, and Risk Assessment 278

16.3Well Utilization 280

16.3.1Well Utilization 280

17.0Recovery Methods (Brine Processing) 286

17.1General 286

17.2Process Description 286

17.2.1Process Block Diagram 286

17.3Brine Concentration Process Description 287

17.3.1Pond Surface Area 287

17.3.2Pond Design 288

17.3.3Pond Layout 291

17.3.4Pond Transfer System 291

17.3.5Salt Harvesting 292

17.3.6Impurity Reduction-Liming 292

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page iv 

 

 

17.4Lithium Plant Process Description 293

17.4.1Solvent Extraction for Boron Removal 295

17.4.2Purification Process 297

17.4.3Evaporation and KCl Crystallization Stage 301

17.4.4Lithium Carbonate Crystallization and Recovery 303

17.4.5Lithium Carbonate Drying, Micronization and Packaging 305

17.5Reagents 307

17.6Plant Design Basis 308

18.0Project Infrastructure 309

18.1Main Facilities Location 309

18.2Brine Extraction 309

18.2.1Brine Extraction Wells 309

18.2.2Well Pumps 309

18.2.3Additional Equipment in the Well Field 310

18.2.4Well Field Electric Power Distribution 310

18.3Evaporation Ponds 310

18.4Salt Harvest Equipment 313

18.5Liming Stage 313

18.6Lithium Carbonate Plant 314

18.6.1Process Facilities 314

18.6.2Lithium Carbonate Production 316

18.6.3Plant Wide Instrumentation 316

18.7Supporting Services 316

18.7.1Fresh Water 316

18.7.2Sanitary Services 317

18.7.3Diesel Fuel 317

18.8Permanent Camp 317

18.8.1Other Buildings 319

18.8.2Security 319

18.9Off-Site Infrastructure and Support Systems 319

18.9.1Natural Gas Pipeline 319

18.9.2Electrical Power Supply 320

18.9.3Water Pipeline 320

18.9.4Instrumentation and Control 320

19.0Market Studies and Contracts 322

19.1Lithium Demand 322

19.2Lithium Supply 323

19.3Price Forecast 326

19.4Offtake Contracts 327

20.0Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact 328

20.1Executive Summary 328

20.2Introduction 328

20.3Environmental Studies 329

20.3.1Executive Summary 329

20.3.2Objective 330

20.3.3Baseline Studies 330

20.3.4Environmental Impacts 336

20.3.5Monitoring Programs 342

20.3.6Environmental Management Plan 343

20.4Permitting 345

20.4.1Executive Summary 345

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page v 

 

 

20.4.2Legal Framework 345

20.4.3Framework Legal Study 347

20.4.4Exploration Phase Permits for Project 348

20.4.5Exploitation Phase Permits for Project 349

20.4.6Water Permits 350

20.4.7Provincial Regulations 351

20.4.8Compliance Documentation 351

20.4.9Permit Risks 352

20.5Social or Community Impact 352

20.5.1Executive Summary 352

20.5.2Social Baseline 353

20.5.3Evaluation of Impacts 357

20.5.4Social Impact Management 359

20.6Closure and Reclamation Plans 363

20.6.1Key Closure Requirements and Commitments (Pre-2023) 363

20.6.2New Requirements (Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023) 364

20.6.3Recommendations 365

21.0Capital and Operating Cost 366

21.1Capital Costs (CAPEX) Estimate 366

21.1.1Capital Expenditures CAPEX Definition 366

21.1.2Evaporation Ponds 367

21.1.3Lithium Carbonate Plant 368

21.1.4Reagents Cost 368

21.1.5Offsite Infrastructure Cost 369

21.2Indirect Costs 370

21.2.1Final CAPEX for Exar 40,000 tpa Plant 370

21.2.2Exclusions 371

21.2.3Currency 371

21.2.4Sustaining Capital 371

21.3Operating Costs Estimate 371

21.3.1Operating Cost Summary 371

21.3.2Pond and Plant Reagents Costs Definition 372

21.3.3Salt Removal and Transportation 373

21.3.4Energy Cost 373

21.3.5Maintenance Cost 373

21.3.6Labour Cost 373

21.3.7Catering, Camp Services Cost, Security and Third-Party Services 374

21.3.8Transport of Product to Port 374

21.3.9General and Administrative Costs 374

21.4Company Operational Organization 374

22.0Economic Analysis 376

22.1Introduction 376

22.2Evaluation Criteria 376

22.3Taxes And Royalties 377

22.3.1Provincial Royalty 377

22.3.2Export Duties and Export Refunds 377

22.3.3Tax on Debits and Credits Accounts 377

22.3.4Los Boros Agreement 378
22.3.5Borax Argentina Royalty Payment 378
22.3.6Neighboring Communities Programs 378
22.3.7Corporate Taxes 378

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page vi 

 

 

22.3.8VAT 378

22.4Capital Expenditures Spend Schedule 379

22.4.1Lithium Carbonate Production Schedule 379

22.5Operating Costs Schedule 380

22.6Production Revenues 381

22.7Cash Flow Projection 382

22.8Economic Evaluation Results 384

22.9Sensitivity Analysis 385

22.10Conclusions 386

22.10.1Economic Analysis 386

22.10.2Project Strengths 387

22.10.3Project Risks 388

22.10.4Project Schedule 388

23.0Adjacent Properties 392

23.1Olaroz Project - Arcadium Lithium 392

23.2Cauchari Project - Arcadium Lithium 396

24.0Other Relevant Data and Information 398

25.0Interpretation and Conclusions 399

25.1Geology and Resources 399

25.2Brine Production 400

25.3Process Information and Design 400

25.4Economic Analysis 401

25.5Project Risks 401

26.0Recommendations 403

27.0References 406

28.0Certificates 412

Appendix 1. Summary Tables of Pumping Test Results for Exploration and Production Wells 422

Appendix 2. Summary of Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate Model Projections 425

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page vii 

 

 

List of Tables

 

Table 1.1     Summary of 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for Lithium 8
Table 1.2     Summary of 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for Lithium Represented as LCE 9
Table 1.3     Summary of Estimated Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves (Without Processing Efficiency) 10
Table 1.4     Lithium Carbonate Plant Design Criteria 12
Table 1.5     Capital Costs Summary 17
Table 1.6     Operating Costs Summary 19
Table 1.7     Sustaining CAPEX Expenditure Schedule 20
Table 1.8     Production and Revenue Schedule – Medium Lithium Price Scenario 20
Table 1.9     Project Evaluation Economic Summary 21
Table 1.10   Recommendations Budget 25
Table 2.1     Abbreviations Table 27
Table 4.1     Exar Mineral Claims 37
Table 4.2     Annual Royalties and Payments 43
Table 4.3     Exploration Permits for Cauchari-Olaroz Project Exploration Work 46
Table 4.4     Exploitation Permits for Cauchari-Olaroz Project 48
Table 5.1     Measured Parameters - Vaisala Weather Station 52
Table 5.2     Climate Records in Northwest Argentina 53
Table 5.3     Temperature Data 55
Table 6.1     Lithium Mineral Resource Summary 66
Table 8.1     Comparative Chemical Composition of Andean Salt Pans 88
Table 9.1     Test Pit Transect Results for TDS and Lithium 126
Table 9.2     Test Pit Transect Results for TDS and Lithium with Depths 127
Table 9.3     Average Surface Water Flow Rates 130
Table 9.4     Static Water Level Measurements for the Period from January 2010 to February 2019 137
Table 10.1   Borehole Drilling Summary for the RC Borehole Program Conducted in 2009 and 2010 145
Table 10.2   Summary of Brine Samples Collected and Submitted for Laboratory Analysis from the RC and DDH Borehole Programs 146
Table 10.3   Brine Concentrations (mg/L) and Ratios Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals for RC Program Boreholes 147
Table 10.4   Borehole Drilling Summary for the DDH Program Conducted in 2009 and 2010 149
Table 10.5   Brine Concentrations (mg/L) Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals for DDH Program Boreholes 150
Table 10.6   Borehole Drilling Summary for the DDH Program Conducted in 2017 and 2019 152
Table 10.7   Brine Concentrations (mg/L) Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals for DDH Program Boreholes 2017-2019 156
Table 10.8   Production Well Drilling and Construction Details 160
Table 10.9   Borehole Drilling Summary for the DDH and Production Well Drilling Program Conducted in 2022 and 2024 167
Table 11.1   Summary Pumping Test Measurement Frequency 177
Table 11.2   Summary of Geotechnical Property Analyses 180
Table 12.1   Results of Due Diligence Sampling – February 2019 184
Table 12.2   Results of Due Diligence Sampling – June 2019 185
Table 12.3   QA/QC Sampling 187
Table 12.4   Results of Due Diligence Sampling 188
Table 12.5   Check Assay Sampling 195
Table 13.1   Monthly Evaporation Ratio 203

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page viii 

 

 

Table 13.2   Composition of the Brine Used for Testing SX 205
Table 13.3   Reagent Optimization in Primary Purification 212
Table 14.1   Summary of Hydrostratigraphic Units Assigned in 2012 and 2019 Mineral Resource Estimates 228
Table 14.2   Summary of Hydrostratigraphic Units and Assigned Specific Yield Estimates for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019) 236
Table 14.3   Summary of Hydrostatigraphic Units in the 2019 HSU Model 237
Table 14.4   Experimental Variogram Parameters 244
Table 14.5   Summary of 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for Lithium 249
Table 14.6   2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for Lithium Represented as LCE 250
Table 15.1   Summary of Mountain Front Recharge 260
Table 15.2   Summary of Assigned Aquifer Parameter Estimates 263
Table 15.3   Steady-State Model Residuals 264
Table 15.4   Summary of Model Boundary Fluxes 266
Table 15.5   Initial Measured and Simulated Lithium Concentrations at Existing Production Wells 269
Table 15.6   Projected Annual Results from 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate Model 272
Table 15.7   Summary of Estimated Probable and Proven Mineral Reserves (Without Processing Efficiency) 275
Table 15.8   Summary of Estimated Probable and Proven Mineral Reserves (Assuming 53.7% Processing Efficiency) 276
Table 16.1   Borehole Drilling Summary for Infill Producing Wells Program Conducted in 2024 281
Table 16.2   Volume Pumped per Production Well per Year and Average Flow per Year - Cauchari-Olaroz 282
Table 18.1   Production Wells Estimate 309
Table 19.1   Average Pricing Scenarios Adopted for the Economic Analysis of the Project 327
Table 20.1   Summary of Key Monitoring Parameters 330
Table 20.2   Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 340
Table 20.3   Compliance with Regulations and Standards 344
Table 20.4   Summary of Key Permitting Milestones 345
Table 20.5   Key Aspects of Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023 346
Table 20.6   Exploration Permits 348
Table 20.7   Exploitation Permits 349
Table 20.8   Industrial Water Permits and Concessions for Cauchari-Olaroz Project 350
Table 20.9   Summary of Key Social Impacts 352
Table 20.10 Summary of Community Agreements 355
Table 20.11 Legislation, Conventions, and Standards 357
Table 20.12 Studies Conducted and Monitoring Processes 360
Table 20.13 Summary of Community-related Investments 361
Table 21.1   Lithium Carbonate Plant Capital Costs Summary 357
Table 21.2   Production Wells Capital Cost 357
Table 21.3   Evaporation and Concentration Ponds Capital Cost 368
Table 21.4   Lithium Carbonate Plant Capital Cost Summary 368
Table 21.5   Reagent Cost 369
Table 21.6   Offsite Infrastructure Cost 369
Table 21.7   Onsite Infrastructure and General Capital Cost Summary 370
Table 21.8   Project Indirect Costs 370
Table 21.9   Operating Costs Summary 372
Table 22.1   Sustaining CAPEX Expenditure Schedule 379
Table 22.2   Production and Revenue Schedule 379

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page ix 

 

 

Table 22.3   Production Costs 380
Table 22.4   Revenue – High, Medium and Low-Price Scenario (US$ 000) 381
Table 22.5   Project Evaluation Medium Price Scenario (US$ 000) 382
Table 22.6   Project Evaluation Economic Summary 384
Table 22.7   Project NPV Before Taxes - 8% Discount Rate Sensitivity Medium Scenario 385
Table 22.8   Project NPV After Taxes - 8% Discount Rate-Sensitivity Medium Scenario 386
Table 23.1   Production From Rio Tinto’s Olaroz Project – 2021 – 2023* 393
Table 23.2   Mineral Resource Estimate for Arcadium’s Olaroz JV Project In Tonnes of Lithium Metal (1-10) 393
Table 23.3   Mineral Resource Estimate for Arcadium’s Cauchari JV Project in Tonnes of Lithium Metal (1-7) 396
Table 23.4   Mineral Reserve Estimate for Arcadium’s Cauchari JV Project in Tonnes of Lithium Metal (1-7) 397
Table 26.1   Recommendations Budget 405

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page x 

 

 

List of Figures

 

Figure 1.1 Ownership Structure 4
Figure 1.2 Overall Process Block Diagram 11
Figure 4.1 Location of the Cauchari-Olaroz Project 34
Figure 4.2 Exar Property Claims at the Cauchari-Olaroz Project 36
Figure 5.1 Regional Topography and Population Centres Near the Cauchari-Olaroz Project 51
Figure 5.2 Solar Radiation, 2011-2015 54
Figure 5.3 Mean Monthly Temperature Recorded by Regional Meteorological Stations 55
Figure 5.4 Daily Temperature, Vaisala Station, Cauchari, 2011-2015 56
Figure 5.5 Average Monthly Rainfall Recorded by Regional Meteorological Stations Near the Cauchari- Olaroz Salars 57
Figure 5.6 Rainfall Data Collected at the Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015 58
Figure 5.7 Daily Humidity Collected at Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015 59
Figure 5.8 Prevailing Wind Directions, Vaisala Station, Cauchari, 2011-2015 60
Figure 5.9 Daily Calculated Evaporation from Vaisala Weather Station at the Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015 62
Figure 5.10 Minimum and Maximum Daily Water Evaporation at the Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015 63
Figure 5.11 Minimum and Maximum Daily Brine Evaporation at the Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015 64
Figure 7.1 Regional Geology in the Vicinity of the Exar Project 68
Figure 7.2 Structural Features in the Central Area of the Cauchari Basin 70
Figure 7.3 Surficial Geology in the Central Area of the Cauchari Basin 72
Figure 7.4 Facies Map of the Lower Salt Cycle Showing Line 1 Crossing a Thick Salt Succession 76
Figure 7.5 Isopleth Curves of Salt Percent in the Facies Triangle 77
Figure 7.6 Main Salt Sources of the Lower Cycle 78
Figure 7.7 Facies Map of the Upper Cycle 80
Figure 7.8 Salt Percent Isopleths of the Upper Cycle 81
Figure 7.9 Isopleth Map of Sand Percents of the Upper Cycle Sedimentation Stage 82
Figure 7.10 Caucharri-Olaroz Watershed 84
Figure 7.11 Janecke Classification of Brines 86
Figure 9.1 Seismic Tomography Lines – 2009 and 2010 92
Figure 9.2 Seismic Tomography Results for the 12 Survey Lines in Figure 9.1 93
Figure 9.3 Location of Gravity Survey Lines at the Cauchari Salar 95
Figure 9.4 Modeling Results for the Northeast Oriented Gravity Line (Grav 1) Over the Mineral Resource Estimate 96
Figure 9.5 Modeling Results for the North-South Gravity Line (Grav 2) Across the Southwest Portion of the Mineral Resource Estimate 97
Figure 9.6 Location of TEM Sounding Profiles Conducted at the Cauchari Salar 99
Figure 9.7 2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 1 100
Figure 9.8 2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 2 101
Figure 9.9 2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 3 102
Figure 9.10 2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 4 103
Figure 9.11 2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 5 104
Figure 9.12 2017 Survey Results for Line TEM 1 105
Figure 9.13 2017 Survey Results for Line TEM 2 105
Figure 9.14 2017 Survey Results for Line TEM 3 106
Figure 9.15 2010-2011 Map of VES Survey Area 107

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page xi 

 

 

Figure 9.16 2010-2011 VES Survey Interpretation on the Archibarca Fan, Along Line VI 109
Figure 9.17 2010-2011 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line 2 110
Figure 9.18 2010-2011 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line 8 111
Figure 9.19 2010-2011 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line 20 112
Figure 9.20 2019 VES Survey Area 113
Figure 9.21 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line A 114
Figure 9.22 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line B 114
Figure 9.23 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line C 114
Figure 9.24 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line D 115
Figure 9.25 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line E 115
Figure 9.26 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line F 115
Figure 9.27 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line G 116
Figure 9.28 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line H 116
Figure 9.29 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line I 116
Figure 9.30 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line J 117
Figure 9.31 2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line K 117
Figure 9.32 2020 VES Survey Area 118
Figure 9.33 2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line A-A’ 118
Figure 9.34 2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line B-B’ 118
Figure 9.35 2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line C-C’ 119
Figure 9.36 2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line D-D’ 119
Figure 9.37 2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line E-E’ 119
Figure 9.38 2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line F-F’ 120
Figure 9.39 2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line G-G’ 120
Figure 9.40 2021 VES Survey Area 121
Figure 9.41 2021 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line A 121
Figure 9.42 2021 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line B 122
Figure 9.43 2024 VES Survey Area 123
Figure 9.44 2024 VES Survey Interpretation 124
Figure 9.45 Boundary Investigation Map Showing Test Pit Transects and Multi-level Monitoring Well Nests 125
Figure 9.46 Surface Water Flow Monitoring Sites 129
Figure 9.47 Average Depth to Static Water Levels in Shallow Wells (50 m) 139
Figure 9.48 Average Depth to Static Water Levels in Intermediate Depth Wells (250 - 300 m) 140
Figure 9.49 Average Depth to Static Water Levels in Deep Wells (450 - 600 m) 141
Figure 9.50 Production Wells 143
Figure 9.51 Lithium Concentrations in Samples Collected During Pump Tests 144
Figure 10.1 Black Sand in DD19D-001 154
Figure 10.2 Borehole Locations and Associated Drilling Platforms 155
Figure 10.3 Pumping Well W18-05 159
Figure 10.4 Pumping Wells Location 165
Figure 10.5 DD19D-05 Lithological Profile 168
Figure 10.6 DD19D-06 Lithological Profile 168
Figure 10.7 DD19D-07 Lithological Profile 169
Figure 10.8 DD19D-08 Lithological Profile 169
Figure 10.9 DD19D-11 Lithological Profile 170
Figure 10.10 DD19D-13 Lithological Profile 170
Figure 10.11 DD19D-15 Lithological Profile 171
Figure 10.12 DD19D-26 BIS Lithological Profile 171
Figure 10.13 2022-2024 Drill Hole Locations 172

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page xii 

 

 

Figure 11.1 Rock Chip Tray with Dry and Wet Samples 174
Figure 11.2 Collecting an Undisturbed Sample 175
Figure 11.3 Collecting an Undisturbed Sample from Core 175
Figure 11.4 Measuring Sediment in an Imhoff Cone 177
Figure 12.1 Due Diligence Sample Results for Lithium: February 2019 184
Figure 12.2 Due Diligence Sample Results for Lithium: June 2019 186
Figure 12.3 Performance of Lithium Blank Samples 188
Figure 12.4 Performance of Patron A 189
Figure 12.5 Performance of Patron B 190
Figure 12.6 Performance of Patron C 190
Figure 12.7 Performance of Standard A 191
Figure 12.8 Performance of Patron AA 191
Figure 12.9 Performance of Patron BB 192
Figure 12.10 Performance of Patron CC 192
Figure 12.11 Performance of Standard AA 193
Figure 12.12 Duplicate Samples – Exar Laboratory 194
Figure 12.13 Check Assays – Exar Laboratory Versus ASA Laboratories 195
Figure 12.14 Check Assays – Exar Laboratory Versus ASA Laboratories – November 2023 196
Figure 13.1 Evaporation Pans and Lamps 198
Figure 13.2 Dry Air Evaporation Tests 199
Figure 13.3 Li Concentration Changes in the Brine During the Evaporation Process 199
Figure 13.4 Pilot Ponds 201
Figure 13.5 Brine Evaporation 202
Figure 13.6 Water Evaporation 202
Figure 13.7 Sedimentation Rate of Limed Pulps with Different Amounts of Excess Lime 204
Figure 13.8 Extraction Isotherm at 20ºC Using Mixed Extractants 205
Figure 13.9 Re-extraction Isotherm at 20ºC Using Mixed Extractants 206
Figure 13.10 Pilot Plant (SX-Purification-Carbonation-Filtration-Washing Pulp) 207
Figure 13.11 SX Process Boron Extraction Efficiency 208
Figure 13.12 Ca and Mg Precipitation Efficiency 209
Figure 13.13 Li Precipitation Efficiency 210
Figure 13.14 Sulphate-Calcium Equilibrium Curve 211
Figure 13.15 Example of Economic Optimization Curve 213
Figure 14.1 Location Map for 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate 216
Figure 14.2 Methodology for Evaluating Brine Mineral Resources and Mineral Reservesa 218
Figure 14.3 Well Location Map 221
Figure 14.4 Plan and Section Views of the 2012 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate 223
Figure 14.5 Location Map Showing Mineral Resource Evaluation Areas – 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate and 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate 225
Figure 14.6 Representative Plan and Section Views of the 2019 Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate 226
Figure 14.7 Generalized Framework for Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate 227
Figure 14.8 Generalized Framework for the Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate 229
Figure 14.9 Location Map of Representative Hydrostratigraphic Sections 231
Figure 14.10 Section A-A' of the Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate 233

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page xiii 

 

 

Figure 14.11 Section A-A’ of the Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate Processed in Leapfrog Geo 233
Figure 14.12 Section A-A’ of the 2019 Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019) 234
Figure 14.13 Section B-B’ of the Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019) 235
Figure 14.14 Location Map of Representative Fence Sections for Lithium Concentrations 239
Figure 14.15 Representative Fence Sections of Initial Lithium Concentrations in the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate Processed in Leapfrog Geo 240
Figure 14.16 Representative Fence Sections of Initial Lithium Concentrations in the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate Processed in Leapfrog Geo 241
Figure 14.17 Box Plots of Lithium Concentrations – SdC, Archibarca, and SdO Areas 243
Figure 14.18 Experimental Semi-Variograms of Lithium with Theoretical Model 245
Figure 14.19 Representative Elevation Maps of Initial Lithium Concentrations for 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate 246
Figure 14.20 Model Validation Swath Plots in the X, Y, and Z Directions 247
Figure 14.21 3D Schematic View of the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate – Measured, Indicated, and Inferred 248
Figure 15.1 Conceptual Model and Model Boundary Conditions 255
Figure 15.2 Numerical Model Domain and Sub-basins Map 257
Figure 15.3 Numerical Model Grid 258
Figure 15.4 Numerical Model Top Boundary Conditions 261
Figure 15.5 Representative Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution in Production Wellfield Area 263
Figure 15.6 Measured and Simulated Drawdown Responses for Representative Pumping Tests 267
Figure 15.7 Simulated Production Wellfield for 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate 271
Figure 15.8 Predicted Average Pumping Rate and Lithium Concentration from Simulated Wellfield 274
Figure 15.9 Predicted Annual LCE Production from Simulated Wellfield (Assuming 53.7% Process Efficiency) 274
Figure 16.1 Production Wells – Pumped Volumes per Well per Year 283
Figure 16.2 Location of Production Wells 284
Figure 16.3 Location of Production Wells Showing 2019 Mineral Resource Area 285
Figure 17.1 Process Block Diagram 287
Figure 17.2 Evaporation Ponds at Cauchari Salar 289
Figure 17.3 Testing of Berm Material 290
Figure 17.4 Evaporation Ponds – Close Up 290
Figure 17.5 Evaporation Ponds 291
Figure 17.6 Evaporation Ponds – Transfer Pump Station 292
Figure 17.7 Lithium Plant Block Diagram 294
Figure 17.8 Boron Solvent Extraction 296
Figure 17.9 Brine Purification Processing Circuit Diagram 297
Figure 17.10 Primary Purification Processing Circuit Diagram 298
Figure 17.11 Secondary Purification Processing Circuit Diagram 299
Figure 17.12 Primary IX Circuit Diagram 300
Figure 17.13 Carbonate Removal Circuit Diagram 301
Figure 17.14 Evaporation and KCl Crystallization Diagram 302
Figure 17.15 Secondary IX Polishing Diagram 303
Figure 17.16 Lithium Carbonate Crystallization Diagram 304
Figure 17.17 Lithium Carbonation Reactor Diagram 305

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page xiv 

 

 

Figure 17.18 Mother Liquor Diagram 305
Figure 17.19 Lithium Carbonate Drying, Micronization and Packaging Diagram 307
Figure 18.1 Site Main Facilities 311
Figure 18.2 Evaporation Pond Layout 312
Figure 18.4 Camp General Layout 318
Figure 19.1 Lithium Demand in Batteries (2024) 322
Figure 19.2 EV Sales Forecast per Region 323
Figure 19.3 EV Penetration Rate Forecast 323
Figure 19.4 Lithium Production (2023) by Country 324
Figure 19.5 Lithium Supply Forecast per Resource Type 325
Figure 19.6 Lithium Supply Forecast per Country 325
Figure 19.7 Projected Pricing for Battery-Quality Lithium Carbonate Used in Economic Model 326
Figure 20.1 Vicuñas (Vicugna Vicugna) on Shrub Steppe of Archibarca Cone 335
Figure 20.2 General Arrangement of the Project Facilities 337
Figure 20.3 General Arrangement of the Project Facilities 339
Figure 21.1 Project Organization 375
Figure 22.1 Yearly Income and Cumulative Income (Before and After Taxes) (US$ 000) 383
Figure 22.2 Yearly Simple Cash Flow and Discounted Cash Flow (Before and After Tax) at 8% Discount Rate (US$ 000) 383
Figure 22.3 Diagram for Project NPV Before Taxes at 8% Discount Rate-Sensitivity Medium Scenario 385
Figure 22.4 Diagram for Project NPV After Taxes at 8% Discount Rate-Sensitivity Medium Scenario 386
Figure 22.5 Project Schedule 391
Figure 23.1 Olaroz Project Production – 2016–2021 392
Figure 23.2 Olaroz Project – Evaporation Ponds and Facilities 394
Figure 23.3 Adjacent Properties Showing Boundary with the Exar Property 395

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page xv 

 

 

 

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

This Technical Report, including the economics analysis, contains statements or information that constitute forward-looking information (forward-looking statements) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward looking statements include, but are not limited to project economics, financial and operational parameters such as the timing and amount of future production from the Project, expectations with respect to the NPV and costs of the Project, anticipated mining and processing methods of the Project; proposed infrastructures, anticipated mine life of the Project, expected recoveries and grades, timing of development plans, the estimation of mineral resources and reserves; realization of mineral resource and reserve estimates; the timing, success and amount of estimated future exploration; costs of future activities; capital and operating expenditures; and success of exploration activities. Generally, forward looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “continue”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “will”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Forward looking statements are made based upon certain assumptions and other important facts that, if untrue, could cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the project to be materially different from future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions, some of which are discussed in this Technical Report. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the project to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: there being no assurance that the exploration program or programs for the project will result in expanded mineral resources; risks and uncertainties inherent to mineral resource and reserve estimates; the high degree of uncertainties inherent to economic analysis which are based to a significant extent on various assumptions; variations in gold prices and other metals; exchange rate fluctuations; variations in cost of supplies, labour rates and consumable and equipment costs; receipt of necessary approvals; availability of financing for project development; uncertainties and risks with respect to developing mining projects; general business, economic, competitive, political and social uncertainties; future lithium prices; accidents, labour disputes and shortages; environmental and other risks of the mining industry, including without limitation, risks and uncertainties discussed in the Company’s latest Annual Information Form and other continuous disclosure documents of the Company available under the Company’s profile at www.sedarplus.ca. There may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward looking statements.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 1 of 427

 

 

 

1.0Summary

 

1.1Introduction

 

This report titled “Operational Technical Report up at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina” (the “Report” or “Technical Report”), was prepared by Andeburg Consulting Services Inc. (“ACSI”) to provide Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (“LAAC” or “Lithium Argentina” or the “Company”) with a Technical Report that is compliant with National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) on the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars (the “Cauchari-Olaroz Project” or “Project” or “Property”), located in the Jujuy Province, Argentina.

 

Lithium Argentina (previously Lithium Americas Corp. or “LAC”) and Ganfeng Lithium Co. Ltd. (“GFL” or “Ganfeng Lithium”) own the Cauchari-Olaroz Project through a joint venture company (“JV”), Minera Exar S.A. (“Exar”). On August 26, 2020, GFL, LAC and Exar entered into a Share Acquisition Option Execution Agreement with Jujuy Energía y Minería S.E. (“JEMSE”) a Province of Jujuy state company, setting the guidelines of JEMSE acquisition of an 8.5% participating interest in Exar, proportionally diluting GFL and LAC participating interest accordingly.

 

Lithium Argentina is a public company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “LAAC.” GFL trades on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (“HKEX”) under the stock code 01772. ACSI understands that the Company may use this Report for internal decision-making purposes and will file it as required under applicable securities laws.

 

The current Mineral Reserve Estimate presented in this Report is taken from a report prepared by Burga, E. et al. dated October 2020, and has been prepared in compliance with the “CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves – Definitions and Guidelines” as referred to in NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects as well as Ontario Securities Commission (“OSC”) Staff Notice 43-704 regarding brine projects. This report has an effective date of December 31, 2024.

 

References to LAC in respect to events occurring prior to October 3, 2023, are to Lithium Argentina prior to its name change from Lithium Americas Corp.

 

1.2Property Description, Location, Access and History

 

The Cauchari and Olaroz Salars are located in the Department of Susques in the Province of Jujuy in northwestern Argentina, approximately 250 kilometres (“km”) northwest of San Salvador de Jujuy, the provincial capital. The salars extend in a north-south direction from S23°18’ to S24°05’ and in an east-west direction from W66°34’ to W66°51’. The average elevation of the salars is 3,940 metres. The midpoint between the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars is located along National Highway 52, 55 km west of the Town of Susques. The nearest port is Antofagasta (Chile), located 530 km west of the Project by road.

 

Through its Argentine subsidiary Exar, LAAC acquired title to the project through direct staking or entering into exploration and exploitation contracts with third party property owners. The claims are contiguous and cover most of the Caucharí Salar and the eastern portion of the Olaroz Salar. The annual aggregate payment (canon rent) required by Exar to maintain the claims is US$268,346. Under Exar’s usufruct agreement with Borax Argentina S.A., Exar acquired Borax Argentina S.A.’s usufruct rights on properties in the area in exchange for an annual royalty of US$200,000 plus annual canon rent property payments to Jujuy Province. The area that contains the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimate is covered by mining concessions which grant the holder a perpetual mining right, subject to the payment of a fee and an agreed upon investment in accordance with the principal legislation that regulates the mining industry in Argentina, the Código de Minería.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 2 of 427

 

 

 

On March 28, 2016, Exar entered into a purchase option agreement (“Option Agreement”) with Grupo Minero Los Boros (“Los Boros”) for the transfer of title to Exar for certain mining properties that comprised a portion of the Cauchari-Olaroz Project. Under the terms of the Option Agreement, Exar paid US$100,000 upon signing, and obtained a right to exercise the purchase option at any time within 30 months for the total consideration of US$12 M payable in sixty quarterly installments of US$200,000.

 

On November 12, 2018, Exar exercised the purchase option; as a result, the following royalties became payable to Los Boros:

 

·US$300,000 was paid on November 27, 2018 because the commercial plant construction started (purchase option established payment within 10 days of the commercial plant construction start date); and

 

·3% net profit interest for 40 years, to be paid annually in Argentine pesos, within 10 business days after calendar year end.

 

Exar can cancel the first 20 years of net profit interest in exchange for a one-time payment of US$7M and the second 20-year period for an additional US$7M.

 

On March 28, 2016, SQM and Exar executed a Shareholders Agreement that established the terms by which the parties planned to develop the Cauchari-Olaroz Project.

 

On October 31, 2018, the Company closed a transaction with Ganfeng Lithium and SQM. Ganfeng Lithium agreed to purchase SQM’s interest in the Cauchari-Olaroz Project. LAAC increased its interest in the Project from 50% to 62.5% with Ganfeng holding the remaining 37.5% interest and the parties entered into a shareholder agreement to govern their ownership and business operations of Exar. Ganfeng Lithium also provided the Company with a US$100 million unsecured, limited recourse subordinated loan facility as part of funding its 62.5% share of the project expenditures.

 

On August 19, 2019, LAAC and Ganfeng completed a transaction whereby Ganfeng contributed US$160 million in Exar and increased its participating interest in Exar to 50%. At such transaction closing, LAAC and GFL each owned a 50% equity interest in Exar. The parties made certain consequential amendments to the shareholders agreement governing their relationship to refer to the new equity ownership structure in Exar. LAAC and GFL authorized Exar to undertake a feasibility study on a development plan to increase the initial production capacity from 25,000 tpa to 40,000 tpa of lithium carbonate, as well as certain permitting and development work in advance of a decision to increase the project production rate.

 

On August 27, 2020, LAAC and Ganfeng closed a transaction whereby Ganfeng increased its participating interest in Exar to 51% by completion of US$16 million capital contribution in Exar. At such transaction closing, GFL owned a 51% equity interest in Exar and LAAC a 49%. The parties made certain consequential amendments to the shareholders agreement governing their relationship to refer to the new equity ownership structure in Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 3 of 427

 

 

 

On August 26, 2020, GFL, LAAC and Exar entered into a Share Acquisition Option Execution Agreement with Jujuy Energía y Minería S.E. (“JEMSE”) a Province of Jujuy state company, setting the guidelines of JEMSE acquisition of an 8,5% participating interest in Exar, proportionally diluting GFL and LAAC participating interest accordingly. JEMSE incorporation was completed in 2020. JEMSE acquired the Exar shares for a consideration of US$1 plus an amount equal to 8.5% of the capital contributions in Exar. JEMSE paid for this amount to the shareholders through the assignment of one-third of the dividends to be received by JEMSE from Exar after taxes. In accordance with the agreement, for future equity contributions GFL and LAAC are obliged to loan to JEMSE 8.5% of the contributions necessary for JEMSE to avoid dilution, which loans also would be repayable from the same one-third dividends assignment, after taxes.

 

On October 3, 2023, LAAC separated into two independent public companies, Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (“LAAC”) and a new Lithium Americas Corp. LAAC retained the Cauchari-Olaroz Project as well as the Pastos Grandes and Sal de la Puna projects in Argentina.

 

Current ownership of the Project is summarized in Figure 1.1.

 

Figure 1.1     Ownership Structure

 

 

 

1.3Geological Setting and Deposit Types

 

There are two dominant structural features in the region of the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars: north-south trending faults and northwest-southeast trending lineaments. The high-angle north-south trending faults form narrow and deep basins, which are accumulation sites for numerous salars, including Olaroz and Cauchari. Basement rock in this area is composed of Lower Ordovician turbidites (shale and sandstone) that are intruded by Late Ordovician granitoids. Bedrock is exposed to the east, west and south of the two salars, and generally along the eastern boundary of the Puna Region.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 4 of 427

 

 

 

The salars are in-filled with flat-lying sedimentary deposits, including the following five primary informal lithological units that have been identified in drill cores:

 

·Red silts with minor clay and sand;
·Banded halite beds with clay, silt and minor sand;
·Fine sands with minor silt and salt beds;
·Massive halite and banded halite beds with minor sand; and
·Medium and fine sands.

 

Alluvial deposits intrude into these salar deposits to varying degrees, depending on location. The alluvium surfaces slope into the salar from outside the basin perimeter. Raised bedrock exposures occur outside the salar basin. The most extensive intrusion of alluvium into the basin is the Archibarca Fan, which partially separates the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars. National Highway 52 is constructed across this alluvial fan. In addition to this major fan, much of the perimeter zone of both salars exhibits encroachments of alluvial material associated with fans of varying sizes.

 

1.4Mineralization

 

The brines from Cauchari are saturated in sodium chloride with total dissolved solids (TDS) on the order of 27% (324 to 335 grams per litre) and an average density of about 1.215 grams per cubic centimetre. The other primary components of these brines include potassium, lithium, magnesium, calcium, sulphate, HCO3, and boron as borates and free H3BO3. Since the brine is saturated in NaCl, halite is expected to precipitate during evaporation. In addition, the Cauchari brine is predicted to initially precipitate halite (NaCl) and ternadite (Na2SO4) as well as a wide range of secondary salts that could include: astrakanite (Na2Mg(SO4)2·4H2O), schoenite (K2Mg(SO4)2·6H2O), leonite (K2Mg(SO4)2·4H2O), kainite (MgSO4·KCl·3H2O), carnalite (MgCl2·KCl·6H2O), epsomite (MgSO4·7H2O) and bischofite (MgCl2·6H2O).

 

1.5Exploration and Drilling

 

The following exploration programs were conducted between 2009 and 2024 on behalf of LAAC to evaluate the lithium development potential of the Project area:

 

·Surface Brine Program – 55 brine samples were collected from shallow pits throughout the salars to obtain a preliminary indication of lithium occurrence and distribution.

 

·Seismic Geophysical Program – Seismic surveying was conducted to support delineation of basin geometry, mapping of basin-fill sequences, and siting borehole locations.

 

·Gravity Survey - A limited gravity test survey was completed to evaluate the utility of this method for determining depths to basement rock.

 

·Time Domain Electromagnetic (TEM) Survey – TEM surveying was conducted to attempt to define freshwater and brine interfaces within the salar.

 

·Air Lift Testing Program – Testing was conducted within individual boreholes as a preliminary step in estimating aquifer properties related to brine recovery.

 

·Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) Survey – A VES survey was conducted to attempt to identify freshwater and brine interfaces and surrounding freshwater occurrences. Surveys were conducted in 2010-2011, 2019-2021 and 2024.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 5 of 427

 

 

 

·Surface Water Sampling Program – A program was conducted to monitor the flow and chemistry of surface water entering the salars.

 

·Pumping Test Program 2011-2019 – Pumping wells were installed at eleven locations, to estimate aquifer parameters related to brine recovery. One of the locations was used to estimate the capacity of freshwater supply. Some tests were carried out using multiple wells on the same platform in order to estimate three-dimensional aquifer parameters.

 

·Boundary Investigation –A test pitting and borehole program was conducted to assess the configuration of the freshwater/brine interface at the salar surface and at depth, at selected locations on the salar perimeter.

 

·Reverse Circulation (RC) Borehole Program – Dual-tube, reverse circulation drilling was conducted to develop vertical profiles of brine chemistry at depth in the salars and to provide geological and hydrogeological data. The program included installation of 24 boreholes and collection of 1,487 field brine samples (and additional Quality Control samples).

 

·Diamond Drilling (“DD”) Borehole Program 2009-2010 – A drilling and sampling program was conducted to collect continuous cores for geotechnical testing (relative brine release capacity (“RBRC”), grain size and density) and geological characterization. The program included 29 boreholes and collection of 127 field brine samples.

 

·Diamond Drilling (DD) Borehole Program 2017-2019 – A drilling and sampling program included a total of 49 boreholes and 9,703 metres of cores recovered. In 2019, 58 additional samples were sent for RBRC testing at Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. (samples from DD19D-001 and DD19D-PE09; this program also included a total of 1,006 samples sent to the laboratory for brine characterization, including QAQC samples).

 

·Since 2011 a total of 43 production wells have been drilled on the Property.

 

1.6Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

 

Since 2019, the pilot plant has worked to provide process support and monitor efficiency improvements in the lithium carbonate production process.

 

In the liming plant, important work has been carried out monitoring the consumption of lime reagent. A 50% reduction in the consumption required by design was obtained. This improvement not only reduced the operating expenditure (“OPEX”) but also enhanced downstream performance in the purification process.

 

Other studies conducted in the pilot plant also allowed for the optimization of reagent consumption in the purification stages. In purification, lime consumption was reduced from a molar ratio of 300% relative to the incoming magnesium to 250%, representing a 16.7% decrease in consumption.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 6 of 427

 

 

 

1.6.1Continuing Work Plan for Supporting the Plant Operations

 

Homologation Tests for Inputs Used in Lithium Carbonate Production:

 

·Evaluation of synthetic sodium carbonate.

·Tests with different flocculants.

·Testing and evaluation of new inputs.

 

Evaluation of Suppliers for Various Production Inputs:

 

·Procedure for evaluating new suppliers.

·Tests required for evaluation.

 

Work Required According to Plant Needs for Process Optimization, Operational Problem Resolution, or Development of Alternatives:

 

·Solvent extraction tests at different brine pH values to reduce HCl consumption.

 

·Studying the use of process water and mother liquors in the liming process.

 

·Evaluation of salt washing processes for improving lithium recovery.

 

·Tests for reagent dosing in primary and secondary purification processes to reduce reagent OPEX.

 

·Pilot Plant IX tests to adjust production and regeneration cycles.

 

·Tests to reduce HCl and NaOH consumption in IX regeneration processes.

 

·Evaluation of the relationship between lithium concentration and sodium / potassium rejection to assist with improving the operation of the KCl process step.

 

·Implement a process support program for ensuring that product quality is achieved more consistently.

 

·Continue solid / liquid separation tests in PUR1 and PUR2 for optimising filter cloths, flocculant make up and filter cake washing.

 

1.7Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves

 

The lithium Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves described in this report occur in subsurface brine. The brine is contained within the pore space of alluvial, lacustrine, and evaporite deposits that have accumulated as a multi-layer aquifer in the structural basin of the salars.

 

The Mineral Resource Estimate, detailed in Burga et. al. (2019), effective date February 13, 2019, incorporated a Mineral Resource Evaluation Area extending north to include the Exar property areas, as well as deeper in the brine mineral deposit, with 2017 and 2018 exploration results meeting the criteria of Mineral Resource classification for Mineral Resource estimation. Overall, it incorporated information consisting of the following: 1) the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium and associated database, and 2) the expanded Project database compiled from results of 2017 through 2018 exploration drilling and sampling campaigns and additional sampling in early 2019 as part of data verification.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 7 of 427

 

 

 

Since the effective date of the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate, the results of deeper drilling and sampling has allowed for partial conversion of the Inferred Mineral Resource aquifer volume in the updated hydrostratigraphic unit (HSU) model to Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource aquifer volumes of the deeper HSUs. This conversion of aquifer volume to more confident Mineral Resource Estimate classification provides the support for simulated wells in the Mineral Reserve Estimate numerical model to be completed in the deeper and more permeable Lower Sand and Basal Sand HSUs in the southeast part of the model domain. This resulted in the latest 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for the Project with an effective date of May 7, 2019.

 

The 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate at the Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource classification (CIM, 2014) for lithium is based on the total amount of lithium in brine that is theoretically drainable from the bulk aquifer volume. The Mineral Resource Estimate is computed as the overall product of the Resource Evaluation Area and aquifer thickness resulting in an aquifer volume, lithium concentration dissolved in the brine, and specific yield of the resource aquifer volume. This framework is based on an expanded and updated hydrostratigraphic model incorporating bulk aquifer volume lithologies and specific yield estimates for block modeling of the Mineral Resource Estimate. Radial basis function was performed as the main lithium distribution methodology using variogram modeling techniques; the interpolation method was verified with ordinary kriging. The Mineral Resource block model was validated by means of visual inspection, checks of composite versus model statistics and swath plots. No areas of significant bias were noted.

 

The Mineral Resource Estimate is summarized in Table 1.1 at the Measured, Indicated, and Inferred confidence level classes. As is accepted in standard practice for lithium brine Mineral Resource Estimates, Table 1.2 provides lithium represented as Li2CO3, or Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (“LCE”), at the Measured, Indicated, and Inferred level classes.

 

Table 1.1
Summary of 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for Lithium
Classification Aquifer
Volume
(m3)

Drainable
Brine
Volume
(m3)

Average
Lithium
Concentration
(mg/L)

Lithium
(tonnes)

Measured Resource 1.07E+10 1.13E+09 591 667,800
Indicated Resource 4.66E+10 5.17E+09 592 3,061,900
Measured + Indicated 5.73E+10 6.30E+09 592 3,729,700
Inferred 1.33E+10 1.50E+09 592 887,300

 

Notes:

 

1. The Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of May 7, 2019, and is expressed relative to the Resource Evaluation Area and a lithium grade cut-off of greater than or equal to 300 mg/L. 

2. The Mineral Resource Estimate is not a Mineral Reserve Estimate and does not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted to Mineral Reserves. 

3. Calculated brine volumes only include Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource volumes above cut-off grade. 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 8 of 427

 

 

 

4. The Mineral Resource Estimate has been classified in accordance with CIM Mineral Resource definitions and best practice guidelines (2012 and 2014). 

5. Comparisons of values may not add due to rounding of numbers and the differences caused by use of averaging methods.

 

Table 1.2
Summary of 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate
for Lithium Represented as LCE
Classification

LCE

(tonnes)

Measured Resource 3,554,700
Indicated Resource 16,298,000
Measured + Indicated 19,852,700
Inferred 4,722,700

 

Notes: 

1. Lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) is calculated using mass of LCE = 5.322785 multiplied by the mass of Lithium reported in Table 1.1. The Mineral Resource Estimate represented as LCE has an effective date of May 7, 2019, and is expressed relative to the Resource Evaluation Area and a lithium grade cut-off of greater than or equal to 300 mg/L. 

2. The Mineral Resource Estimate is not a Mineral Reserve Estimate and does not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted to Mineral Reserves. 

3. Volumes only include Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource volumes above cut-off grade. 

4. The Mineral Resource Estimate has been classified in accordance with CIM Mineral Resource definitions and best practice guidelines (2012 and 2014). 

5. Comparisons of values may not add due to rounding of numbers and the differences by use of averaging methods.

 

The 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate for lithium incorporates the 2019 Resource Estimate and additional drilling and testing through an effective date of May 7, 2019. To obtain the Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate, the previous hydrostratigraphic and numerical models and the expanded database were analyzed and updated by Montgomery & Associates. Once formulated and calibrated, the updated numerical model used a simulated production wellfield to project extraction from the brine aquifer and verify the feasibility of producing sufficient brine for processing a minimum target of 40,000 tonnes per year (tpa) LCE for a 40-year operational period. After verifying the capability of the simulated wellfield to produce sufficient brine for the minimum 40,000 tpa LCE process target, the model was then used to predict a maximum production rate for assessment of a Total Mineral Reserve Estimate for a 40-year production and process period of LCE.

 

The Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate is summarized in Table 1.3 without factoring estimated LCE process efficiency (pre-processing). The Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (Table 1.1 and Table 1.2) correspond to the total amount of lithium enriched brine estimated to be available within the aquifer while the Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves represent a portion of the Mineral Resource Estimate that can be extracted under the proposed pumping schedule and wellfield configuration. Therefore, the Mineral Reserve Estimate is not “in addition” to the Mineral Resource Estimate, and instead, it simply represents a portion of the total Mineral Resource that is extracted during the life-of-mine plan. A cut-off value was not employed in the Mineral Reserve Estimate because the average calculated lithium concentration after 40 years of simulated mine life was significantly above the processing constraint.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 9 of 427

 

 

 

Table 1.3
Summary of Estimated Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves
(Without Processing Efficiency)

Mineral

Reserve

Classification

Production

Period

(Years)

Brine

Pumped

(m3)

Average

Lithium

Concentration

(mg/L)

Lithium
Metal

(tonnes)

LCE

(tonnes)

Proven 0 through 5 156,875,201 616 96,650 514,450
Probable 6 to 40 967,767,934 606 586,270 3,120,590
           
Total 40 1,124,643,135 607 682,920 3,635,040

 

Notes: 

1. The Mineral Reserve Estimate has an effective date of May 7, 2019. 

2. Lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) is calculated using mass of LCE = 5.322785 multiplied by the mass of Lithium Metal. 

3. The conversion to LCE is direct and does not account for estimated processing efficiency. 

4. The values in the columns for “Lithium Metal” and “LCE” above are expressed as total contained metals. 

5. The Production Period is inclusive of the start of the model simulation (Year 0). 

6. The average lithium concentration is weighted by per well simulated extraction rates. 

7. Tonnage is rounded to the nearest 10. 

8. Comparisons of values may not be equivalent due to rounding of numbers and the differences caused by use of averaging methods.

 

The independent qualified person and author, Daniel Weber, believes the Mineral Reserve Estimate has been conservatively modeled and represents a Proven Mineral Reserve for Year 1 through 5 of full-scale extraction wellfield pumping and a Probable Mineral Reserve for Years 6 to 40 of extraction wellfield pumping. The division between Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves is based on 1) sufficiently short duration of wellfield extraction to allow a higher degree of predictive confidence yet long enough to enable significant production, and 2) a duration long enough to enable accumulation of a strong data record to allow subsequent conversion of Probable Mineral Reserves to Proven Mineral Reserves.

 

During 2023 and 2024, the first years of ramping-up operation, 39 wells were operative to support LCE production. During 2023, 496 l/s of brine were delivered to the wellfield and in 2024 an average of 706 l/s of brine were pumped. Table 15.6 shows the total wellfield delivery rate per year for the predicted 40-year production period.

 

Considering a conservative processing efficiency of 53.7%, the predicted results for the 40-year production period are as follows.

 

·Average production rate of 47,700 tpa LCE for the 40-year pumping period.

 

·Average production rate of 48,700 tpa LCE following the completion of the 40-year pumping period.

 

·Average lithium concentration of 609 mg/L for the 40-year pumping period, considering an average lithium grade assumption is 638 mg/l during the first years of operation.

 

·Minimum lithium concentration of 598 mg/L near the end of the pumping period in year 40.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 10 of 427

 

 

 

1.8Mining Methods

 

1.8.1Brine Processing

 

In 2019, Exar implemented a Feasibility Study based on new tests work and the 2012 Feasibility Study. With additional test information, Exar developed a process for converting brine to high-purity lithium carbonate. The proposed process follows industry standards: pumping brine from the salar, concentrating the brine through evaporation ponds, and taking the brine concentrate through a hydrometallurgical facility to produce high-grade lithium carbonate. While the 2012 process model employed proprietary, state-of-the-art physiochemical estimation methods and process simulation techniques for electrolyte phase equilibrium, the 2019 model uses a process model that has been further refined using the results of lab scale and pilot scale testing from Exar, Ganfeng Lithium, and equipment suppliers, the results of which are reflected in the 2019 Feasibility Study and implemented in the detail engineering of the facilities. The basis of the process methods has been tested and supported by laboratory test work, pilot testing facilities, and equipment vendor testing and design to support equipment guarantees.

 

1.8.2Lithium Carbonate Plant Production

 

The process route simulated for the production of lithium carbonate from Cauchari brines resembles the flowsheet presented in Figure 1.2 Overall Process Block Diagram.

 

Primary process inputs include evaporated brine, water, lime, soda ash, HCl, NaOH, and natural gas. The evaporation ponds produce salt tailings composed of Na, Mg, Ca, K, and borate salts. The brine concentrate from the terminal evaporation pond is further processed, through a series of polishing and impurity removal steps. Soda ash is then added with the purified brine concentrate to produce lithium carbonate that is dried, micronized, and packaged for shipping.

 

Figure 1.2     Overall Process Block Diagram

 

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 11 of 427

 

 

 

Design criteria for the Lithium Carbonate plant is presented Table 1.4.

 

Table 1.4
Lithium Carbonate Plant Design Criteria
Description Unit Value
Li2CO3 production tonnes per year 40,000
Annual operation days days 292
Annual operation hours hours 7008
Availability % 80
Utilization (22 h/d) % 97.2
Plant Overall Efficiency % 53.7

 

1.9Site Infrastructure and Buildings

 

1.9.1Wells

 

1.9.1.1Well Production Equipment Selection

 

Screened wells target the largest lithium brine aquifers. Submersible electric pumps are used for brine pumping. These pumps send the brine to evaporation ponds through a network of pipelines and mixing pools.

 

1.9.2Evaporation Ponds

 

An average water evaporation rate of 6.26 mm per day was used as criterion to design the pond system. This rate corresponds to measured evaporation rates observed at the site where the ponds are located.

 

Assuming the above-mentioned evaporation rate, the total evaporation area required for the production of 40,000 tpa of lithium carbonate is 1,200 ha when including consideration for harvesting of salt deposited in the ponds. The ponds are lined with multi-layer liner consisting of a polymer-based material and engineered granular bedding. The ponds configuration includes provision for uninterrupted production during salt harvesting and maintenance work.

 

Brine is transferred between the successive evaporation ponds using self-priming pumps.

 

1.9.3Salt Harvest Equipment

 

In order to recover pond volume taken up by precipitated salt and recover lithium values entrapped with the brine; salt is harvested. Harvesting began after the third year of steady operation.

 

The harvesting operation consists of draining the free brine from the pond, scraping the salt to a minimum depth, and making drainage trenches before removing salt.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 12 of 427

 

 

 

1.9.4Site Infrastructure and Support Systems

 

1.9.4.1Natural Gas Pipeline

 

Natural gas is obtained from the Rosario gas compression station, which is on the Gas Atacama pipeline, 52 km north of the Project site.

 

Capital costs for this pipeline was US$7.2M. This pipeline can supply natural gas at capacities that are sufficient for a 40,000 tpa LCE facility.

 

1.9.4.2Power Supply

 

Electricity is provided by a new 33 kV transmission line that interconnects with an existing 345 kV transmission line located approximately 60 km south of the Project. The interconnection consists of a sub-station with a voltage transformer (345/33 kV) and associated switchgear.

 

A stepdown 33/13.2 kV substation at the Project site, consist of two voltage transformers (33/13,2 kV, 15-20 MVA), one (1) 33 kV electrical room and one (1) 13.2 kV electrical room with suitable switchgears and auxiliary equipment for the 13.2 kV local distribution system.

 

The 13.2 kV local electrical distribution system provides power to the plant, camp, intermediate brine accumulation and homogenizing pools/lime pumps, wells, and evaporation ponds. In general, all the distribution is based on overhead lines, unless there are major restrictions then the underground distribution is adopted.

 

The estimated average load for the Project is around 16.4 MW or 123,461 MWh/y, assuming a plant and periphery utilization factor of 0.86. The power line has sufficient capacity for this load plus the existing users.

 

The whole electrical system is designed for the maximum load condition plus a safety factor of 1.2.

 

A stand-by diesel generating station, located close to main substation, power selected equipment during outages.

 

1.9.4.3Permanent Camp

 

The permanent camp (called Operations Camp), and the Construction Camp are located 8,000 m south of National Highway 52. The Operations Camp is a complete housing and administrative complex to support all activities of the operation with a capacity of 634 people.

 

The Operations Camp includes office buildings, bedrooms, dining facilities, medical room, and recreation areas, consisting of a gym, an indoor sports center, a recreation room and an outdoor soccer field.

 

In the Construction Camp there are eight housing modules with a total capacity of 392 people, of which only three modules are currently in use. In addition, this camp includes the pilot plant facilities, water treatment plants and contractor workshops.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 13 of 427

 

 

 

1.9.4.4Other Buildings

 

Other buildings include:

 

·A warehouse for spare parts and consumables;

 

·A steel building for the storage of soda ash;

 

·A steel building for the storage of solvent extraction plant chemicals designed with appropriate ventilation, safety, and security features;

 

·Operating facilities for sheltering operators, electrical equipment, and central control rooms; and,

 

·Product storage facility designed for protecting the product against contamination and staging it for shipment.

 

1.9.4.5Security

 

At the main entrance of the plant, there is a barrier and a security booth to grant access to the facilities. There is a second access control point upon reaching the main module of the camp. There, individuals' entry is registered again using facial and fingerprint recognition.

 

Given the remote location of the facilities, it is not necessary to enclose the plant with a metallic perimeter fence. The plant is illuminated to allow night work and improve security.

 

1.9.4.6Access and Site Roads

 

Access to the plant site is via paved National Highways 9 and 52, which connect the site to San Salvador de Jujuy and Salta in Argentina. In addition, National Highway 52 connects to Paso Jama to the west, a national border crossing between Chile and Argentina, and provides connection to Chilean Route 27 and convenient access to Antofagasta.

 

Access within the site is possible through Route 70, a gravel road, which skirts the west side of the salars. This road is approximately 1 km from the plant site. Access roads to ponds, wells, and other infrastructure were part of the overall construction.

 

1.9.4.7Fuel Storage

 

The plant includes a diesel storage and dispensing station for mobile equipment and transport vehicles. Diesel fuel can also be used in stand-by generators and back up for dryers in the plant. The main fuel for equipment operation will be natural gas.

 

1.9.4.8Water Supply

 

The estimated average consumption of brackish water for mining/industrial use is 105 (+/- 20%) liters per second (“L/s”).

 

Water for industrial use is supplied by groundwater wells adjacent to the salar and a water pipeline from the north.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 14 of 427

 

 

 

1.9.4.9Pond Solid Wastes

 

The pond evaporation process leaves considerable amounts of salts on the bottom of the ponds. These salt piles may reach up to 15 m in height. It is estimated that approximately 740 ha of salt piles will be built over a 40-year period and these piles are built near the pond areas.

 

These discarded salts are classified as inert waste. The salts are generated from brines and do not introduce foreign compounds. It is estimated that sodium chloride and sulphate make up over 87% of this waste.

 

1.9.4.10Tailings Liquid Disposal

 

Several possible sites for liquid industrial waste evaporation ponds were analyzed. These ponds are similar to the evaporation ponds, complete with liner. A 50 ha parcel located close to the plant was selected for the industrial waste evaporation ponds and presents no risks to distant populated areas.

 

1.10Market Studies and Contracts

 

The outlook for lithium demand is positive, driven by the development of electromobility and the growing need for batteries in the electronics industry. Lithium consumption is expected to increase significantly in the coming years driven by a rapid increase in demand for EVs.

 

The global lithium mineral production is largely driven by spodumene operations in Australia, brine operations in Chile and Argentina and lithium chemical conversion in China.

 

A market review was performed to establish three pricing scenarios for lithium carbonate (per ton) used in the economic analysis.

 

Both Lithium Argentina and Ganfeng Lithium are entitled to a share of offtake from production at the Caucharí-Olaroz Project. The Company is entitled to 49% of offtake, which would amount to approximately 19,600 tpa of lithium carbonate assuming full capacity is achieved.

 

1.11Permitting, Environmental Studies and Social or Community Impact

 

1.11.1Permits and Authorities

 

Permitting processes for the Project are governed by Argentina’s national and provincial laws, with oversight from the Jujuy provincial government. Recent updates under Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023 have modernized permitting standards, including enhanced consultation protocols and mandatory financial assurances for closure. The Project’s permits for exploration and exploitation activities are in full compliance, with biannual updates submitted as required.

 

Exploration permits require the submission of an Environmental Impacts Report (“IIA”), which details the scope of proposed exploration activities and their potential environmental impacts. The Provincial Government of Jujuy, through the Mining and Energy Resource Directorate, reviews and approves these reports. These permits require updates every two years.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 15 of 427

 

 

 

On February 11, 2023, the Provincial Executive Government of Jujuy issued Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023 (the "Decree"), which regulates the General Environmental Law No. 5063 and comprehensively updates provincial environmental protection norms for mining activities. This Decree replaces Decree No. 5,772/2010, previously governing this domain.

 

1.11.2Social or Community Impact

 

Community engagement and consultation processes have been ongoing since 2009, fostering trust and cooperation. Social impact assessments highlight the Project’s contributions to local economic development, infrastructure improvements, and cultural preservation. Comprehensive studies have been completed to understand the Project's impacts, robust monitoring processes to track progress, and targeted investments in critical sectors such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare.

 

Project perceptions in the surveyed communities conclude a generally positive opinion of the mining industry as it has recently become an economic pillar of the region. Accordingly, the Project is viewed as a source of job opportunities.

 

The population directly impacted by the Project is mostly rural and self-identifies with the Atacama ethnic group. In general, their settlement patterns and spatial dispersion is based on the camelid’s pasturage activity. The area of direct influence for the Project includes the communities of Susques, Huáncar, Pastos Chicos, Puesto Sey, Catua and Olaroz Chico. All these communities are in the department of Susques, Province of Jujuy, with the town of Susques being the head of the Department.

 

Exar has developed a program that promotes social and economic development within a sustainability framework and aims to address the evolving needs of local communities, focused employment, training, and equitable benefit-sharing while addressing concerns related to resource management and cultural heritage.

 

1.11.3Environmental Baseline Studies

 

Environmental baseline data were compiled through extensive studies commissioned by Exar. Initial studies were conducted between 2010 and 2011, with regular updates and quarterly participatory monitoring from 2017 to 2024. Environmental Impacts Reports (EIRs) have been periodically updated and approved to account for evolving Project layouts and operational changes.

 

Quarterly follow-up campaigns since 2017 confirmed stable water quality conditions. For surface water, the natural concentrations of aluminum, boron, and iron exceed permissible limits for drinking water.

 

Air quality measurements of PM10, SO2, NO2, O3, and H2S fall within permissible limits per provincial guidelines. Recent campaigns note reductions in PM10 levels at Vega Alegría and Vega Archibarca, consistent with stricter dust control measures.

 

The Project area has a low biodiversity although there are some zones within it that are more diverse than others, such as shrub steppes and meadows, the Archibarca cone being the zone with the greatest biodiversity within the Project area.

 

Follow up fauna and flora monitoring campaigns were carried out around the pilot plant in March 2015 and in October 2016 and quarterly monitoring during 2017 up to 2024. Diversity results indicate that there is no significant change in the diversity parameters.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 16 of 427

 

 

 

1.12Capital and Operating Cost Estimate

 

1.12.1Capital Cost Estimate

 

Capital costs for the Project (CAPEX) are based on the total engineering and construction work, having a design capacity of 40,000 tonnes per year of lithium carbonate.

 

The CAPEX is expressed in current US dollars on a 100% project equity basis. LAAC contributed 49% of these costs, matching its shareholding in Exar and excluding JEMSE’s 8.5% interest.

 

Capital costs include direct and indirect costs for:

 

·Brine production wells.

 

·Evaporation and concentration ponds.

 

·Lithium carbonate plant.

 

·General site areas, such as electric, gas, and water distribution.

 

·Stand-by power plant, roads, offices, laboratory and camp, and other items.

 

·Off-site infrastructure, including gas supply pipeline and high voltage power line and water pipeline; and

 

·Salaries, construction equipment mobilization, and other expenses.

 

The capital investment for the 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate project, including equipment, materials, indirect costs and contingencies after completion of the construction period is consolidated to US$979 million. This total excludes interest expense capitalized during the same period. Disbursements of these expenditures started in 2017 as part of the 25,000 tpa lithium carbonate project. These capital expenditures are summarized in Table 1.5.

 

Table 1.5
Capital Costs Summary
Item US$ M
Direct Cost  
Salar Development 51.0
Evaporation Ponds 175.5
Lithium Carbonate Plant and Aux. 361.7
Reagents 26.2
On-Site Infrastructure 108.7
Off-site Services 13.6
Total Direct Cost 736.7

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 17 of 427

 

 

 

Table 1.5
Capital Costs Summary
Item US$ M
Indirect Cost  
Total Indirect Cost 224.5
   
Total Direct and Indirect Cost  
Total Direct and Indirect 961.2
Others 17.8
 
Total Capital 979
Expended to date 979
Estimate to complete -

 

1.12.2Exclusions

 

The following items are not included in this estimate:

 

·Legal costs.

·Special incentives and allowances.

·Mineral license costs.

·Escalation; and

·Start-up costs beyond those specifically included.

 

1.12.3Currency

 

All values are expressed in current US dollars; the exchange rate between the Argentine peso and the US dollar as at October 31, 2024 was AR$970/US$. Argentine peso denominated costs follow the exchange rate as a result of inflation, and the impact of the exchange rate fluctuation on CAPEX and OPEX has been incorporated; no provision for currency escalation has been included.

 

1.12.4Operating Cost Estimate

 

The operating cost estimate (±15% expected accuracy) for the Project is estimated at US$6,543 per tonne of lithium carbonate (Table 1.6), based on 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate production. This estimate is based upon vendor purchase orders for main costs such as reagents, fuel (diesel and natural gas), electricity, maintenance, halite harvesting, transport, and catering and camp services. Reagents consumption rates were determined by pilot plant and laboratory work, as well as detailed process mass and energy balances. Energy consumption was determined on the basis of the specific equipment considered in each sector of the facilities and their utilization rate. Labour requirements are based on Exar’s actual manpower used during the ramp up period. Labour costs have been estimated using the results of a salary survey, carried out on behalf of Exar in Argentina, on mining companies with similar conditions and actual salaries paid by Exar. Consumables costs were estimated on the basis of existing supplier contracts and forecasted changes in future prices.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 18 of 427

 

 

 

Table 1.6
Operating Costs Summary
Description

Total

(US$ 000

/Year)

Li2CO3

(US$/Tonne)

Allocation of
Total OPEX
(%)
Direct Costs      
Reagents 100,981 2,525 38.60%
Maintenance 24,701 618 9.4%
Electric Power 9,283 232 3.5%
Pond Harvesting & Tailing Management 24,348 609 9.3%
Water Treatment System 0 0 0
Natural Gas 4,455 111 1.70%
Manpower 32,059 801 12.20%
Catering, Security & Third-Party Services 32,083 802 12.30%
Consumables 6,443 161 2.50%
Diesel 3,249 81 1.20%
Bus-in/Bus-out Transportation 0 0 0
Product Transportation 9,200 230 3.5%
Direct Costs Subtotal 246,803 6,170 94.30%
       
Indirect Costs      
G&A 14,912 373 5.7%
Indirect Costs Subtotal 14,912 373 5.7%
       
Total Operating Costs 261,714 6,543 100.0%

 

1.13Economic Analysis

 

A sophisticated economic analysis of the Project was conducted to determine its financial viability. Capital and Operational Expenditures have been used in this model. The forecasted tax schedules, both payments and rebates, were researched using internal and external taxation experts. Prices for lithium carbonate were based on a market study carried out by a qualified third party. Economic analysis in the technical report considers the actual results of Exar's production in 2024 and estimated 2024 financial results. Project's revenues in 2024 and cost of production are expected to be approximately USD$200 million.

 

Results obtained include Net Present Values (NPV) for a range of discount rates. In order to determine the influence of different input parameters on projected results, a sensitivity analysis has also been carried out. Parameters considered in this analysis were sustaining CAPEX, selling prices, production levels, and OPEX.

 

The model assumes the current charges for royalties, taxes and payments obligations and a return on export value.

 

This economic analysis assumes that Capital expenditures prior to December 31, 2024, are considered sunk costs and are excluded from the capital expenses in the economic model. Only capital expenditures from December 31, 2024, onwards are included.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 19 of 427

 

 

 

Investment decisions are made on a forward-looking basis. The purpose of the economic model is to assess whether future capital expenses and operations with updated product price, production cost and other assumptions will bring a positive economic result. Positive economic results include future cash flows, generated from sales of the finished product, less related cost of sales and other expenses, excluding capital expenditures prior to December 31, 2024.

 

This economic assessment ignores sunk costs in the determination of cash flows and economic indicators. However, these costs are considered as opening balances for the purpose of determining tax assets and liabilities.

 

1.13.1Sustaining Capital Expenditures (Sustaining CAPEX)

 

The capital expenditures schedule is presented in Table 1.7, which contains consolidated Sustaining CAPEX Expenditures Schedule from 2025 for the life of the Project.

 

Table 1.7
Sustaining CAPEX Expenditure Schedule
Description

2025-2035

(US$ 000)

2036-2060

(US$ 000)

Total

(US$ 000)

Total 225,500 765,000 990,500

 

1.13.2Production Revenues Schedule

 

The production revenues schedule is presented in Table 1.8.

 

Table 1.8
Production and Revenue Schedule –
Medium Lithium Price Scenario
Year

Average Revenue

per Year

(US$ 000)

Average Production
per Year Li2CO3

(t)

2025-2030 709,000 38,667
2031-2060 780,000 40,000
Total 28,044,000 1,452,000

 

1.13.3Other Expenses

 

Other expenses and cash flow items considered in the model include Argentinian transaction tax, Jujuy and private royalties, licenses and permits, export refunds, easement rights, equipment depreciation, sustaining capital, exploration expenses amortization and remediation allowances.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 20 of 427

 

 

 

1.13.3.1Economic Evaluation Results

 

The economic evaluation results are presented in Table 1.9.

 

Table 1.9
Project Evaluation Economic Summary
Price Case Unit High Medium Low
Average Lithium Price LCE US$/tonne $21,645 $20,757 $19,641
Key Statistics        
  Project capacity tonnes 40,000 40,000 40,000
 Sustaining CAPEX US$ M $990 $990 $990
  OPEX US$/tonne $6,543 $6,543 $6,543
  Max negative cash flows US$ M $-13 $2 $-87
  Average Lithium price Li2CO3 US$/tonne $21,645 $20,757 $19,641
         
Average yearly values        
  Revenue US$ M $793 $758 $714
  OPEX US$ M $-258 $-258 $-258
  Other Expenses US$ M $-38 $-38 $-35
  EBITDA1 US$ M $497 $463 $421
         
Before taxes        
  NPV (6%) US$ M $7,430 $6,538 $5,311
  NPV (8%) US$ M $6,044 $5,230 $4,101
  NPV (10%) US$ M $5,049 $4,305 $3,263
         
After taxes        
  NPV (6%) US$ M $5,035 $4,466 $3,630
  NPV (8%) US$ M $4,122 $3,603 $2,830
  NPV (10%) US$ M $3,466 $2,992 $2,274

 

Notes: next page.

 

Table 1.9 notes:

 

1. Presented on a 100% project equity basis. As of the date of this report, LAAC currently owns 49% of the project. 

2. Measured form the end of the capital investment period.

 

 

1 EBITDA is non-GAAP financial measures and has no standardized meaning under IFRS Accounting Standards (“IFRS”) and may not be comparable to similar measures used by other issuers. The Company does not have historical non-GAAP financial measures nor historical comparable measures under IFRS, and therefore the foregoing prospective non-GAAP financial measure may not be reconciled to the nearest comparable measure under IFRS.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 21 of 427

 

 

 

1.14Conclusions and Recommendations

 

1.14.1Conclusions

 

·Brine: The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves described in this report occur in subsurface brine. The brine is contained within the pore space of salar deposits that have accumulated in a structural basin.

 

·Hydrostratigraphic Model, Mineral Resource Block Model, and Updated Mineral Resource Estimate: Comparing the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate to the Updated Mineral Resource Estimate, the percent change is a decrease of less than 1% for total average lithium concentration of Measured + Indicated; the percent change is an increase of 69% for total LCE Measured + Indicated (11,752,000 tonnes LCE vs. 19,852,700 tonnes LCE). The large increase in overall estimated mass of LCE can be attributed to the expansion and deepening of the Resource Evaluation Area based on exploration results obtained between 2017 and 2019. The small decline in total average concentration can be attributed to the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate affected by the 2017, 2018, and 2019 spatial range of samples collected in the Salar de Orocobre and Archibarca alluvial fan areas of the Project.

 

·Numerical Model and Mineral Reserve Estimate: A numerical groundwater model was updated in 2019 for an expanded area of the basin to calculate the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate. The model simulates long-term wellfield extraction from the Cauchari-Olaroz brine aquifer and is based on a rigorous assembly of groundwater flow and solute transport parameters.

 

·2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate: The total 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate for Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves is 3,635,040 tonnes of LCE for 40-year life of mine plan. Assuming a processing efficiency of 53.7 percent for forecasting an economic reserve over the 40-year life of mine plan, the total Mineral Reserve Estimate for Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves is 1,952,020 tonnes of LCE.

 

·Lithium Industry: Market studies indicate that the lithium industry has a promising future. The use of lithium ion batteries for electric vehicles and renewable energy storage applications are driving lithium demand.

 

·Project Capital Cost: The capital investment for the 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate Cauchari-Olaroz Project, including equipment, materials, indirect costs and contingencies during the construction period was defined at US$979 million. A production design capacity of 40,000 tpa of lithium carbonate, has been implemented and the facility has reached over 80% design capacity during the second year of the ramp up period.

 

·The main CAPEX drivers were the pond construction and the lithium carbonate plant, which represent 57% of total project capital expenditures.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 22 of 427

 

 

 

·Operating Costs: The operating cost estimate (+/-15% accuracy) for the 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate facility is US$6,543 per tonne. This figure includes pond and plant chemicals, energy/fuel, labour, salt waste removal, maintenance, camp services, and transportation.

 

·Sensitivity Analysis: Sensitivity analysis indicates that the Project is economically viable even under very unfavourable market conditions.

 

·Project Economics: Project cash flow analysis for the base case and alternative cases indicates the project is economically viable based on the assumptions used.

 

1.14.2Recommendations

 

·Updates to models representing Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves: conceptual and Mineral Resource and Reserve models should be updated. The domain of the Resource Evaluation Area should be evaluated so that additional areas can be included as potential new sources for Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates. Future modeling activities should include:

 

oComparison of the model hydrostratigraphy against new borehole data.
oComparison of produced brine concentrations against predicted concentrations.
oComparison of measured production and monitor well drawdown levels against predicted levels; and
oMonitoring of measured production well flow rates against predicted rates; derivation of updated K (hydraulic conductivity), Ss (specific storage), and Sy (specific yield) estimates from analysis of pumping and drawdown information, and comparison with the values used in the model; and incorporation of third-party brine pumping from adjacent properties if appropriate and if any occurs in the future.

 

·Continuing with New Well Testing: In addition to the long-term evaluation components recommended above, each new production well should undergo an initial pumping test, on the order of seven to ten days of constant-rate pumping, for assessment of long-term performance.

 

·Based on the conceptual hydrogeologic system and results of the numerical model, the authors believe it is appropriate to categorize the Proven Mineral Reserve as what we believe is feasible to be pumped to the evaporation ponds and recovered at the end of the first five years of operations as currently modeled for the Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate. During the initial five years of operation and wellfield build-out, the numerical model should be recalibrated based on demonstrated results and new projections should be done for re-examination of the Proven Mineral Reserve and potential for conversion of part of Probable to Proven classification.

 

·Improving the certainty of the Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves could be gained with scheduled water level measurements along with brine density measurements at production wells and nearby monitoring wells (representing shallow, intermediate, and deep monitoring of the brine aquifer), validation of the water balance and characterization of any changes in inflow to the salar, and additional controlled, long-term aquifer testing to more accurately represent aquifer parameters for calibrating hydraulic parameters in the numerical model. Changes to the hydrostratigraphic unit model based on additional exploration drilling and production well drilling should also be incorporated into future numerical flow and transport modeling.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 23 of 427

 

 

 

·Additional certainty in predictive simulations of wellfield extraction and capture of lithium mass could be gained by re-examination of the water balance using measured data at aquifer boundaries, model sensitivity analysis for critical aquifer parameters such as hydraulic conductivity and specific yield, and potentially including effects of off-property production of lithium by adjacent mining operations. Furthermore, variable-density flow and transport should be considered in future model updates given the domain has expanded considerably compared to prior groundwater modeling efforts and now includes larger regions of freshwater inflow. Along with these recommended refinements to improve certainty of the predictive capabilities of the groundwater model, the numerical model should be used as an operational tool to optimize pumping rates at production wells, maximize lithium concentrations, and control the overall wellfield capture.

 

·Drainable porosity or Sy estimates relied upon the prior 2012 model estimates because the 2017 and 2018 exploration results lacked Sy estimates. In order to address the uncertainty of Sy estimates for the different stratigraphic groups, ongoing exploration work should include analysis of Sy by use of laboratory methods such as RBRC or similar techniques for core samples, and field methods using calibrated nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) borehole logging in open boreholes or in wells with PVC casing installed.

 

·The 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate assumes that production from adjacent external property areas will not be impacted by brine production, both currently and in the future. However, depending on the location of production wells and the potential overlap of brine aquifer capture areas, this assumption may introduce significant uncertainty. Adjacent external brine production wells could directly affect the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate by causing dilution of brine concentrations or lowering brine levels in the aquifer. Although the details of adjacent properties' brine production are uncertain, it is recommended to conduct a sensitivity analysis to assess potential impacts.Lime supply: We recommend that efforts to firm up lime supply source be pursued. The area producer will require support for increasing production capacity as other local producers are depending on the same source. Exar intends to obtain lime from this source and discussions for providing additional support are underway.

 

·QA/QC: The QA/QC program, using regular insertions of blanks, duplicates, and standards should be continued. All exploration samples should be analyzed at Alex Stewart when exploration activities resume.

 

·The on-site laboratory should obtain ISO 17025 certification for analytical laboratories.

 

·Align Closure Plan with New Legislation: Update the conceptual closure plan to meet the requirements of Decreto No. 7,751-DEyP-2023.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 24 of 427

 

 

 

·Engage Stakeholders Early: Collaborate with indigenous communities, local governments, and relevant authorities to identify potential public or social uses for infrastructure and areas post-mining.

 

·Strengthen Financial Assurances: Establish and maintain the required financial guarantees.

 

·Quantify Financial Implications: Compare pre-2023 closure cost estimates with anticipated costs under the new legislation to provide a clearer understanding of financial impacts.

 

·Enhance Stakeholder Engagement: Ensure ongoing discussions or frameworks are in place to address environmental and social priorities and demonstrate proactive collaboration with affected parties.

 

The estimated cost for the recommendations is summarized in Table 1.10.

 

Table 1.10
Recommendations Budget
Item

Budget

(US$)

Mineral Resource and Reserve Update $200,000
ISO 17025 Accreditation $20,000
Updated Technical Report $80,000
Permitting and Social Community Work $200,000
   
Total $500,000

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 25 of 427

 

 

 

2.0Introduction and Terms of Reference

 

2.1Terms of Reference

 

Lithium Argentina retained Andeburg Consulting Services Inc. (“ACSI”) to complete an independent NI 43-101 compliant 2024 Technical Report – Operations Update for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project, located in the Province of Jujuy in Argentina. The supervising Independent Qualified Person (“QP”) for the Report is Mr. Ernie Burga, P.Eng. of ACSI.

 

The purpose of this Operational Technical Report is to update aspects of the project including project development work to date, updated estimates of capital costs, and updated financial model including current operating cost estimates. The current Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates presented in this report are taken from the ACSI report Updated Feasibility Study and Mineral Reserve Estimation to Support 40,000 tpa (Burga, et al., 2020). The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates were prepared in compliance with the “CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves – Definitions and Guidelines” as referred to in NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and in force as of the effective date of this report. This is consistent with CIM Best Practice Guidelines for Resource and Reserve Estimation for Lithium Brine (dated November 1, 2012), in which it is stated that the CIM considers brine projects to be mineral projects, as defined in NI 43-101.

 

This report was prepared by the authors, at the request of Lithium Argentina, a Vancouver registered company, trading under the symbol of “LAAC” on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange with its corporate office at:

 

300 – 900 West Hastings St 

Vancouver, BC 

V6C 1E5

 

This report is considered current as of December 31st, 2024.

 

2.2Qualified Persons Site Visits

 

Mr. Ernie Burga, P.Eng. (ACSI), conducted a site visit of the Property on January 24, 2017 and June 10 to 12, 2019. (ACSI) to observe the evaporation ponds and interview engineering personnel. Mr. David Burga, P.Geo. (ACSI), conducted a site visit of the Property on January 24, 2017, February 19 through 21, 2019, June 10 and 12, 2019 (ACSI) to review the drilling work from 2017 and 2018, the QA/QC procedures, interview geologists on site and conduct a verification sampling program. He most recently visited the site between November 20 and 21, 2024 to observe the status of the project and interview personnel. Mr. Daniel Weber, P.G. (M&A), visited the Project on September 8 and 9, 2018, to review site conditions and to verify 2017 and 2018 core logging and description methods. Mr. Anthony Sanford, Pr.Sci.Nat. visited the Project on February 14 and 15, 2017 and July 23 and 24, 2019 to observe site conditions and interview key environmental personnel.

 

2.3Sources of Information

 

This report is based, in part, on internal company technical reports maps, published government reports, company letters, memoranda, public disclosure and public information, as listed in the References at the conclusion of this report. Sections from reports authored by other consultants have been directly quoted or summarized in this report and are so indicated where appropriate.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 26 of 427

 

 

 

The 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate was developed for the Project using MODFLOW-USG, a control volume finite difference code, coupled with the Groundwater Vistas modeling interface. The groundwater modeling was supported by geological, hydrogeological, geochemical, and geophysical data collected through field programs at the site.

 

2.4Units and Currency

 

Unless otherwise stated all units used in this report are metric. Salt contents in the brine are reported in weight percentages or mass per volume.

 

All values are expressed in current US dollars; the exchange rate between the Argentine peso and the US dollar as at October 31, 2024 was AR$970/US$. Argentine peso denominated costs follow the exchange rate as a result of inflation, and the impact of the exchange rate fluctuation on CAPEX and OPEX has been incorporated; no provision for currency escalation has been included.

 

The coordinate system used by Cauchari for locating and reporting drill hole information is the UTM system. The Property is in UTM Zone 19K and the WGS84 datum is used. Maps in this Report use either the UTM coordinate system or Gauss Kruger-Posgar 94 datum coordinates that are the official registration coordinates of the local registry.

 

The following list shows the meaning of the abbreviations for technical terms used throughout the text of this report, Table 2.1.

 

Table 2.1
Abbreviations Table

 

  AbbreviationMeaning
  Inches
1DOne dimensional
3Dthree dimensional
  °CCelsius degrees
  Analtitude, in masl
ADTaverage daily traffic
AETactual evapotranspiration
αalpha, the fitting coefficient of the capillary head curve
Ahampere-hour
Amslabove mean sea level
AR$Argentine Pesos
ARAWPARA WorleyParsons
ASAAlex Stewart Argentina
ASLAlex Stewart Laboratories S.A.
ASTMAmerican Society of Testing and Materials
ATafter tax
Bboron
Bitbefore interest and tax
Blsbelow land surface
CIMCanadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
Cacalcium
  CaCl2 calcium chloride

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 27 of 427

 

 

 

CaCO3 calcium carbonate

CAGRcompound annual growth rate

CaOcalcium oxide

CAPEXcapital expenditure

CaSO4·2H2O gypsum

CCcurvature coefficient

CEOChief Executive Officer

CFRcost and freight

CHPcombined heat and power unit

CISCommonwealth of Independent States

Clchloride

CIMCanadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum

cmcentimetre(s)

Company, the Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp.

Cuuniformity coefficient

δdelta, the exponent for the relative permeability curve

DC + IC direct costs plus indirect costs

DDdiamond drilling

DDHdiamond drill hole

Degdegrees

DEMdigital elevation model

Dep, Amort & Ra Depreciation, Amortization and Remediation Allowance

DFSdefinitive feasibility study, 2017 Burga et al. report

DLlongitudinal dispersivity

Ebitdaearnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization

EIAEstudio de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Assessment)

EIREnvironmental Impacts Report

Elevbelevation of site b in masl

EMPEnvironmental Management Plan

EPEquator Principles

ETevapotranspiration

ETppotential evaporation

EVelectric vehicles

ExarMinera Exar S.A.

FOBfree on board

FSFeasibility Study

G&A General and Administration

g/cm3 grams per cubic centimetre

g/Lgrams per liter

GECGeophysical Exploration Consulting

GFLJiangxi Ganfeng Limited

GISgeographic information system

hhour

h/dhours per day

H2S hydrogen sulphide

H3BO3 boric acid

hahectares

HCO3 bicarbonate

HDPEhigh density polyethylene

HEVhybrid electric vehicles

HMSHydrologic Modeling System

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 28 of 427

 

 

 

HSUhydrostratigraphic unit

Iinflow

ICEinternal combustion engine

ICPinductively coupled plasma

IDidentification

IFCInternational Finance Corporation

IIAIndicador de Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact Indicator, an Environmental Impacts Report)

IITInstituto de Investigaciones Tecnológicas (Technology Investigations Institute)

ILOInternational Labour Organization

INTAInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (National Institute of Agricultural Technology)

IRRinternal rate of return

ITinformation technology

ITTInstituto de Investigaciones Tecnológicas (Technology Investigations Institute) of the Universidad de Concepción

IUCNInternational Union for Conservation of Nature

Kpotassium

Khydraulic conductivity

K2Mg(SO4)2·4H2O leonite

K2Mg(SO4)2·6H2O schoenite

K2SO4 potassium sulphate

K2SO4.CaSO4·H2O syngenite

K3Na(SO4)2 glaserite

KClpotash

kgkilograms

kg/cm2 kilograms per square centimetre

kmkilometres

km2 square kilometres

km/hkilometres per hour

KRrecession constant, h

ktkiloton, 1,000 tonnes

kt/yr1,000 tonnes per year

Kvvertical hydraulic conductivity

kWhkilo watt hour

kriginga Gaussian process regression method of interpolation governed by prior covariances

KxHydraulic Conductivity in the X direction

KyHydraulic Conductivity in the Y direction

KzHydraulic Conductivity in the Z direction

Llitres

L/slitres per second

L/m or L/min litres per minute

LACLithium Americas Corp.

LAACLithium Americas (Argentina) Corp.

LCleast concern

LCElithium carbonate equivalent

Lilithium

Li2CO3 lithium carbonate

LiBOBlithium bis(oxalate)borate

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 29 of 427

 

 

 

LiOHlithium hydroxide

LiOH-H20 lithium hydroxide monohydrate

Lithium Argentina Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp.

LOMlife of mine

LSGCLower Salt Generation Cycle metres

Mmillions of dollars

mthe second fitting exponent for the capillary head curve

mmetres

m/dmetres per day

m/kametres every thousand years

m/smetres per second

m-11/metre

m2 square metres

m2/s square metres per second

m3 cubic metres

m3/d cubic metres per day

m3/MWh cubic metre per mega watt hour

m3/yr cubic metres per year

Mamillions of years

maslmetres above sea level

Maxmaximum

mbgsmetres below ground surface

mbtcmetres below top of casing

Mgmanganese

mg/Lmilligrams per liter

mGal10-3 gal, also called galileo (10-3 cm/s2)

MgCl2 magnesium chloride

MgCl2·6H2O bischofite

MgCl2·KCl·6H2O carnalite

Mg(OH)2 magnesium hydroxide

MgSO4·7H2O epsomite

MgSO4·KCl·3H2O kainite

MIBCmethyl isobutyl carbinol

mmmillimeters

MMBTUmillion(s) British Thermal Units (BTU)

mm/dmillimeters per day

mm/yrmillimeters per year

mm/yymonth/year

MontgomeryMontgomery & Associates

MPMining Permit

MRmud rotary

Mslmean sea level

MTmillion tons

Mtonmillion U.S. short ton (s)

MWmega watt

nthe fitting exponent for the capillary head curve

n/anot applicable

Nasodium

Na2Mg(SO4)2·4H2O astrakanite

NaClsodium chloride

Na2CO3 sodium carbonate, soda ash

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 30 of 427

 

 

 

NaOHsodium hydroxide or caustic soda

NICanadian National Instrument

NMRnuclear magnetic resonance

NPVnet present value

φe transport properties include effective porosity

OPEXoperating costs

Peeffective porosity

PEAPreliminary Economic Assessment

PFSPreliminary Feasibility Study

PoOPlan of Operations

ppmparts per million

Projectthe Cauchari-Olaroz Lithium Brine Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina

PVCpolyvinyl chloride

RBFradial basis function

RBRCrelative brine release capacity

RCreverse circulation

Ssspecific storage

Srresidual saturation

SXsolvent extraction

Syspecific yield

TDStotal dissolved solids

TEMTime Domain Electromagnetic

tpatonnes per annum (tonnes per year)

US$ 000 thousands of US dollars

VESVertical Electrical Sounding

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 31 of 427

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.0Reliance on Other Experts

 

Although copies of the tenure documents, operating licenses, permits, and work contracts were reviewed, an independent verification of land title and tenure was not performed. ACSI has not verified the legality of any underlying agreement(s) that may exist concerning the licenses or other agreement(s) between third parties but has relied on the client’s law firm, Alfaro Abogados, to have conducted the proper legal due diligence for the claims discussed in Section 4.2. This was addressed in a Memorandum dated December 31, 2024.

 

Details on lithium market were obtained by iLiMarkets, who are global commodity experts, in a report titled iLi Markets Lithium Quarterly Market Review, dated October 2024, as well as the U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summarries from January 2024.

 

A draft copy of this Report has been reviewed for factual accuracy by LAAC, and ACSI has relied on LAAC’s historical and current knowledge of the Property in this regard.

 

Any statements and opinions expressed in this document are given in good faith and in the belief that such statements and opinions are not false and misleading at the date of this Report.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 32 of 427

 

 

 

4.0Property Description and Location

 

4.1Property Description

 

The Cauchari and Olaroz Salars are located in the Department of Susques in the Province of Jujuy in northwestern Argentina. The salars extend in a north-south direction from S 23° 18’ to S 24° 05’, and in an east-west direction from W 66° 34’ to W 66° 51’. The average elevation of both salars is approximately 3,950 m.

 

Figure 4.1 shows the locations of both salars, approximately 270 km northwest of San Salvador de Jujuy, the provincial capital. The midpoint between the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars is located directly on National Highway 52, 55 km west of the Town of Susques where the Project field offices are located. The nearest port is Antofagasta, Chile, located 530 km west of the Project by road.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 33 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 4.1     Location of the Cauchari-Olaroz Project

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2019)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 34 of 427

 

 

 

4.2Property Area

 

Exar has acquired mining and exploration permits applications through acquisition of such permits applications, direct request of permits from the applicable provinicial mining authority and/ or through brines usufruct agreements in the Province of Jujuy, Argentina, covering a total of 60,712 ha in the Department of Susques, of which 28,717 ha can support the entire project, presented on Table 4.1. Some of the claims are still in the process of being granted by the Jujuy Mining Court and in order to present a conservative figure, the smaller figure in the ‘received’ column was used to calculate the property area. Figure 4.2 shows the location of the Exar claims in the Cauchari-Olaroz Project. As shown in the figure, the claims are contiguous and cover most of the Cauchari Salar and the eastern portion of the Olaroz Salar.

 

The aggregate annual property payment required by the Argentine Mining Code to the Province of Jujuy that Exar needs to attend in order to maintain the tenements claims referenced in Figure 4.2 in good standing is approximately US$268,346 per year.

 

Under Exar’s usufruct agreement with Borax Argentina S.A. (“Borax Argentina”) signed on May 19th, 2011, Exar acquired Borax Argentina’s usufruct rights on properties in the area in exchange for an annual royalty of US$200,000 payable in May of each year plus annual canon rent property payments to Jujuy Province.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 35 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 4.2     Exar Property Claims at the Cauchari-Olaroz Project

 

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2019)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 36 of 427

 

 

 

Table 4.1
Exar Mineral Claims
Claim File Owner Claim Type Requested Received Claim Status Contract Status
LA YAVEÑA 27-R-00 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 1482/1119 1119 Active Rights acquired
LUISA 61-I-98 Grupo Minero Los Boros S.A. Mina 4706 4076/3500 Active Rights acquired
ARTURO 60-I-98 Grupo Minero Los Boros S.A. Mina 5100 5049/3500 Active Rights acquired
ANGELINA 059-I-98 Grupo Minero Los Boros S.A. Mina   2346 Active Rights acquired
CAUCHARI ESTE 1149-L-09 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 5860 5856,98//3500 Active Rights acquired
IRENE 140-N-92 Triboro S.A. Mina 200 200 Active Rights acquired
MINERVA 37-V-02 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 250 229 Active Rights acquired
CHIN CHIN CHULI II 201-C-04 Vicente Costa y otros Pedido de Mina 941 910 Active Opted/Usufruct agreement
Hekaton 150-M-92 Electroquimica El Carmen Mina 200 200 Active Rights acquired
Victoria I 65-E-02 Electroquimica El Carmen Mina 300 300  Active Rights acquired
SAENZ PEÑA (Grupo Minero Boroquímica) 354-C-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 300 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
DEMASIA SAENZ PEÑA (Grupo Minero Boroquímica) 354-C-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 59 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
LINDA (Grupo Minero Boroquímica) 160-T-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
MARIA TERESA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 378-C-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
ARCHIBALD (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 377-C-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
San Nicolas (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 191—R-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
Mina Vacante CLOTILDE 121-D-44 // 1642-M-10 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina Vacante 100 100 Active/ Under Dispute Opted
EDUARDO DANIEL 120-M-1944 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina Vacante 100 100 Active Purchased

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 37 of 427

 

 

 

Table 4.1
Exar Mineral Claims
Claim File Owner Claim Type Requested Received Claim Status Contract Status
CAUCHARI NORTE 349-R-2005 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Cateo 998 998 Active Purchased
DELIA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 42-E-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
GRAZIELLA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 438-G-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
MONTES DE OCA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 340-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 99 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
JUANCITO (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 339-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
UNION (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 336-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 300 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
JULIA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 347-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 300 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
MASCOTA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 394-B-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 300 300 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
UNO (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 345-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
TRES (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 343-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
DOS (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 344-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
CUATRO (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 352-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
CINCO (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 351-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
ZOILA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 341-C-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
SARMIENTO (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 190-R-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
PORVENIR (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 116-D-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
ALICIA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 389-B-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
CLARISA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 402-B-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
DEMASIA CLARISA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 402-B-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 19 19 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
INES (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 220-S-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
MARIA CENTRAL (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 43-E-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
MARIA ESTHER (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 259-M-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 38 of 427

 

 

 

Table 4.1
Exar Mineral Claims
Claim File Owner Claim Type Requested Received Claim Status Contract Status
SAHARA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 117-D-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 300 300 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
PAULINA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 195-S-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
SIBERIA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 306-B-1944 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 24 24 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
SAN ANTONIO 72-M-1099 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 2165 2165 Registro, pero luego libre 2400//900 Active Rights acquired
TITO 48-P-1998 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 200 100 Active Rights acquired
MIGUEL 381-M-2005 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired
VERANO I 299-M-2004 Luis Austin Cekada and Camilo Alberto Morales Mina 2448 2448/2094 (Servidumbre de Electroducto) Active Rights acquired
CHICO 3 1251-M-09 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 1400 1400 Active Interés/Derechos Adquiridos
CHICO 4 1252-M-09 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 1100 1100/62 Active Interés/Derechos Adquiridos
SULFA 6 70-R-1998 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 2000/1395 1683Peticion de Mensura Active Rights acquired
SULFA 7 71-R-1998 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 2000/1667 1824Peticion de Mensura Active Rights acquired
SULFA 8 72-R-1998 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 2000/1417 1841 Petición de Mensura Active Rights acquired
SULFA 9 67-R-1998 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 1336 1570 Petición de Mensura//1582 Ultimo Informe Reg. Grafico Active Rights acquired
BECERRO DE ORO (Grupo Minero Osiris 104-I-90) 264-M-1944 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired
OSIRIS (Grupo Minero Osiris 104-I-90) 263-M-1944 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 39 of 427

 

 

 

Table 4.1
Exar Mineral Claims
Claim File Owner Claim Type Requested Received Claim Status Contract Status
ALSINA (Grupo Minero Osiris 104- I-90) 48-H-1944 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired
JORGE 62-L-1998 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 2461 2351 Active Rights acquired
LA INUNDADA (GRUPO LA INUNDADA) 669-G-1956 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 100 100/137 Grupo Minero Active Rights acquired
Inundada Este (Grupo Minero La Inundada) 721-G-1957 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired
Jujuy (Grupo Minero La Inundada) 725-G-1957 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired
Inundada Sur (Grupo Minero La Inundada) 789-G-1957 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired
Susques (Grupo Minero La Inundada) 726-G-1957 Minera Exar S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired
ALEGRIA 7 1343-M-2009 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 1277 1036 Active/Recourse to be Resolved Interest
CAUCHARI SUR 1072-L-2008 Minera Exar S.A. Cateo 1559 1499//612 (Servidumbre de Electoducto) Active Interest
CAUCHAR OESTE 1440-M-10 Minera Exar S.A. Cateo 9751 9479 Active Interest
JULIO A. ROCA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 444-P-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
ELENA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 353-C-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 300 301 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
EMMA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 350-C-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
URUGUAY (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 89-N-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
AVELLANEDA (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 365-V-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
BUENOS AIRES (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 122-D-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired
MORENO (Grupo Minero Boroquimica) 221-S-44 Borax Argentina S.A. Mina 100 100 Active Ususfruct Rights acquired

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 40 of 427

 

 

 

Table 4.1
Exar Mineral Claims
Claim File Owner Claim Type Requested Received Claim Status Contract Status
Payo III 1517-M-2010 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 2905 2890/2388 (Servidumbre de Electroducto) Active Rights acquired
Payo IV 1518-M-2010 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 3003 2981 Active Rights acquired
Payo V 1519-M-2010 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de mina 896 896 Active Rights acquired
Payo VI 1520-M-2010 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 2800 2800 Active Rights acquired
Payo VII 1521-M-2010 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 2999 2999 Active Rights acquired
Payo VIII 1522-M-2010 Minera Exar S.A. Pedido de Mina 1343 1337 Active Rights acquired
Nelida 56-C-1995 Electroquimica El Carmen Pedido de Mina Vacante 100 100 Active Rights acquired
Eduardo 183-D-1990 Electroquimica El Carmen Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired
Maria Angela 177-Z-1903 Ceballos Oscar Pedido de Mina 100 100 Active Rights acquired

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 41 of 427

 

 

 

4.3SQM Joint Venture

 

On March 28, 2016, SQM made a US$25M capital contribution in the Company for a 50% interest in Exar, and the parties executed a Shareholders Agreement that established the terms by which the parties plan to develop the Cauchari-Olaroz Project. Following receipt of the contribution, Exar repaid loans and advances from Lithium Argentina in the amount of US$15M. The remaining US$10M was for project development costs in the Joint Venture.

 

4.4Ganfeng Joint Venture

 

On October 31, 2018, the Company announced the closing of a transaction with Ganfeng Lithium and SQM. Under the transaction Ganfeng Lithium agreed to purchase SQM’s interest in the Cauchari-Olaroz Project. LAAC increased its interest in the Project from 50% to 62.5% with Ganfeng holding the remaining 37.5% interest. Ganfeng Lithium also provided the Company with a US$100 million unsecured, limited recourse subordinated loan facility to fund its 62.5% share of the project expenditures.

 

On August 19, 2019, the Company anounced that it had closed the previously announced Project Investment in which a subsidiary of GFL subscribed for newly issued shares of Exar, the holding company for the Caucharí-Olaroz lithium brine project. The parties executed an updated Shareholders Agreement that established the terms by which the parties plan to develop the Cauchari Project.

 

In consideration for the newly issued shares, Exar received US$160 million in cash to continue to fund the Project’s construction activities. Upon closing, Ganfeng Lithium increased its interest in Caucharí-Olaroz from 37.5% to 50%, with Lithium Argentina holding the remaining 50% interest.

 

On August 27, 2020, LAAC and Ganfeng closed a transaction whereby Ganfeng increased its participating interest in Exar to 51% by completion of US$16 million capital contribution in Exar. At such transaction closing, GFL owned a 51% equity interest in Exar and LAAC a 49%. The parties made certain consequential amendments to the shareholders agreement governing their relationship to refer to the new equity ownership structure in Exar.

 

4.4.1Los Boros Option Agreement

 

On September 11, 2018, the Joint Venture exercised a purchase option agreement (“Option Agreement”) with Grupo Minero Los Boros (“Los Boros”), entered into on March 28, 2016, for the transfer of title to the Joint Venture for certain mining properties that comprised a portion of the Cauchari-Olaroz Project.

 

Under the terms of the Option Agreement, the Joint Venture paid US$100,000 upon signing and exercised the purchase option for the total consideration of US$12,000,000 to be paid in sixty quarterly instalments of US$200,000. The first installment becomes due upon occurrence of one of the following two conditions, whichever comes first: the third anniversary of the purchase option exercise date or the beginning of commercial exploitation with a minimum production of 20,000 tons of lithium carbonate equivalent. As security for the transfer of title to the mining properties, Los Boros granted to the Joint Venture a mortgage over those mining properties for US$12,000,000. In accordance with the Option Agreement, on November 27, 2018, Exar paid Los Boros a US$300,000 royalty which was due within 10 days of the commercial plant construction start date.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 42 of 427

 

 

 

According to the Option Agreement, a 3% net profit interest royalty will have to be paid to Los Boros by the Joint Venture for 40 years, payable in Argentinian pesos, annually within the 10 business days after calendar year end.

 

The Joint Venture can cancel the first 20 years of net profit interest royalties in exchange for a one-time payment of US$7,000,000 and the next 20 years for an additional payment of US$7,000,000.

 

4.4.2Borax Argentina S.A. Agreement

 

Under Exar’s usufruct agreement with Borax Argentina S.A. (“Borax Argentina”), on May 19th, 2011, Exar acquired its usufruct rights to Borax Argentina’s properties in the area. On execution, the agreement requires Exar to pay Borax Argentina an annual royalty of US$200,000 in May of each year.

 

4.4.3JEMSE Arrangement

 

On August 26, 2020, GFL, LAAC and Exar entered into a Share Acquisition Option Execution Agreement with Jujuy Energía y Minería S.E. (“JEMSE”) a Province of Jujuy state company, setting the guidelines of JEMSE acquisition of an 8,5% participating interest in Exar, proportionally diluting GFL and LAAC participating interest accordingly. JEMSE incorporation was completed in 2020. JEMSE acquired the Exar shares for a consideration of US$1 plus an amount equal to 8.5% of the capital contributions in Exar. JEMSE paid for this amount to the shareholders through the assignment of one-third of the dividends to be received by JEMSE from Exar after taxes. In accordance with the agreement, for future equity contributions GFL and LAAC are obliged to loan to JEMSE 8.5% of the contributions necessary for JEMSE to avoid dilution, which loans also would be repayable from the same one-third dividends assignment, after taxes.

 

The above-mentioned agreements with private mineral rights owners are independent of, and do not impinge upon the Provincial Government royalty of up to 2% of the value of the mineral at well head. A summary of royalties and payments is presented in Table 4.2.

 

Table 4.2
Annual Royalties and Payments
Royalties Value
Borax Argentina S.A. US$200,000
Los Boros 3% Net Profit or US$7M payment every 20 years
Provincial Government of Jujuy 2% Value of Mineral at Well Head
   
Neighboring Communities Program Payments US$
2017-2019 Total Payment 239,417
2020 – Onwards Annual Payments (estimated) 552,000

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 43 of 427

 

 

 

4.4.4Creation of LAAC

 

On October 3, 2023, LAC separated into two independent public companies, Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (“LAAC”) and a new Lithium Americas Corp. LAAC retained the Cauchari-Olaroz Project as well as the Pastos Grandes and Sal de la Puna projects in Argentina.

 

4.5Type of Mineral Tenure

 

There are two types of mineral tenure in Argentina: Mining Permits and Exploration Permits (“cateos”). Mining Permits are licenses that allow the property holder to exploit the property, provided environmental approval is obtained. Exploration Permits are licenses that allow the property holder to explore the property for a period of time that is proportional to the size of the property (approximately 3 years per 10,000 ha). Exploration activity under Exploration Permits also require Environmental Permits. An Exploration Permit can be transformed into a Mining Permit any time before the expiry date of the Exploration Permit by filing a mineral discovery claim. Mining or Exploration can start only after obtaining the environmental impact assessment permit for the activity such permit is required.

 

Exar acquired its interests in the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars through either direct staking or exploration/usufruct of brines contracts with third party property owners (mainly Borax Argentina S.A.).

 

4.6Property Boundaries

 

The Exar claims follow the north-northeast trend of the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars. Figure 4.2 shows that the boundaries of the claims are irregular in shape (a reflection of the mineral claim law of the Province of Jujuy). All coordinates are recorded in the Gauss Krueger system with the WGS 84 datum. The coordinates of the boundaries of each claim are recorded in a file in the claims department of the Jujuy Provincial Ministry of Mines and are also physically staked on the ground with metallic pegs in concrete pillars. The entire area of exploitation has been surveyed and physically staked.

 

4.7Environmental Liabilities

 

Exar has developed a plan that promotes social and economic development within a sustainable framework. Exar began work on the Communities Relations Program with the Susques Department in 2009. This plan was created to integrate local communities into the Project by implementing programs aimed at generating positive impacts on these communities.

 

The Communities Relations Program has been divided into several sub-programs: one dealing with external and internal communications to provide information and transparency; a second is a consultation program that allows Exar to acknowledge community perceptions of their mining activities; a third program deals with service and supply contracts to be signed with the communities. The intended outcome of the program is to deliver on social, cultural, and environmental initiatives.

 

Exar has signed formal contracts with neighbouring communities that own the surface rights where the Project is developed. According to these contracts, the communities agree to grant Exar traffic and other rights in exchange for cash payments to be used based on decisions made at community assemblies.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 44 of 427

 

 

 

The potential impacts to local fauna due to mine development must be managed to ensure they are minimal. Vicuñas are common in the region. The vicuña was traditionally exploited by local inhabitants for its wool. Past unrestricted hunting resulted in near extinction of the vicuña, which is now protected under a 1972 international agreement signed between Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador. It has been observed that vicuñas are present on the Archibarca Fan, part of which would be partially affected by Project development. The impact to vicuñas can be minimized by implementing the actions provided in the Project management plan in the IIA (“Estudio de Impacto Ambiental”).

 

With regard to potential development effects on other species in the area, such as ocultos, small lizards, and birds, a primary concern is the danger associated with accidental confinement in the large processing ponds. This potential should be minimized by methods such as: devices to ward animals away from the ponds, rescuing animals that may become entrapped, and relocation of animals to appropriate areas nearby.

 

Exar has prepared an inventory of known archaeological sites in the Department of Susques. An archeological survey of the Property identifies all findings that need to be managed in order to minimize any impact from the Project. This information is also filed with the authorities. Additional information is provided in Section 20.1.

 

The IIA expressly considers the closing mechanism and the post-closure monitoring of the proposed mine. The federal environmental legislation in Argentina and the provincial environmental legislation in Jujuy do not require any closure bonding or guarantees.

 

4.8Permits

 

The Provincial Government of Jujuy (Direccion Provincial de Mineria y Recursos Energéticos) approved the Exar Environmental Impacts Report (the “IIA”) for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project exploration work, by Resolution No. 25/09 on August 26, 2009. Updates are required every two years to accurately reflect the ongoing exploration program. For the Cauchari-Olaroz Project these included a 2009 update for IIA reports (“Actualización de Impacto Ambiental”) incorporating topographic and geophysical studies, opening supply wells and new exploration wells. In addition, there was an IIA for the installation of a brine enrichment pilot plant, and in 2011 the renewal of the IIA was presented for the exploration stage, specifying all activities undertaken, and planned exploration activities for the 2012-2013 period. An addendum to the IIA for Exploration was submitted in May 2014 for the installation, implementation and subsequent operation of a Posco lithium phosphate plant which was approved in July 2014 (Resolution No. 011/2014). And in June 2015 and June 2016 two separate IIA exploration permit addenda were submitted for on-going exploration work (Table 4.3). These remained in the approval process and, in agreement with the authority, were replaced in the approval process by the update of the IIA for exploration submitted in February 2017, and was approved for exploration works, by Resolution No. 008/17 on September 19, 2017. The IIA was updated again in Jun 2020 and December 2021 through Resolution No. 017/2021 to reflect ongoing exploration activities. The most recent update, submitted in March 2024, is still pending. Details are presented in Table 4.3.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 45 of 427

 

 

 

Table 4.3
Exploration Permits for Cauchari-Olaroz Project Exploration Work

Report

Submitted

Date
Presented
Approvals Observations

Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration

(IIA Exploration)

2009 Resolution No. 25/09, August 26, 2009 Original exploration permit for Project

Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration

(AIIA Exploration 2009)

2009   Included topographic and geophysical studies, opening supply wells and new exploration wells

Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration

(AIIA Exploration 2011)

September 2011 Resolution No. 29/2012, November 08, 2012 All activities undertaken to date, and planned exploration activities for the 2012-2013 period
Addendum to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration, Posco Pilot Plant May 2014 Resolution No. 011/2014, July 15, 2014 Installation, implementation and subsequent operation of the POSCO lithium phosphate plant

Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration

(AIIA Exploration 2015)

June 2015 Update cancelled and filed: DMyRE Note No. 101/2019 Operation of the pilot-scale POSCO plant and the continuation of exploration including perforation of brine well field for the trial to test the hydraulic properties of the different aquifers. A drilling plan for the drilling of 49 wells was also presented as well as the update of the 4 wells drilled up to the time of the presentation of the report.
Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration June 2016 Update cancelled and filed: DMyRE Note No. 101/2019 Presentation of the proposed work to be carried out over the following months: Phase 1: measurement of hydrogeological variables; Phase 2: pond construction and impermeability tests; Phase 3: drilling of deep wells; Phase 4: pilot plant tests and trials.
Update to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration February 2017 Resolution No.008/2017, September 19, 2017

It was agreed with the Authority that the Environmental Impacts Report for exploration (June 2016) would not be evaluated by the Authority and that this latest Environmental Impacts Report (Exploration, February 2017) would replace it.

 

Update of the proposed works to be carried out during next years. This consisted of seismic reflection, SEV, trenches, measurement of hydrogeological variables; pond construction, impermeability tests; drilling of deep wells; pilot plant tests, construction of embankments, auxiliary roads and drilling platforms, drilling of wells, construction of facilities and camp. It also described the exploration works that were to be developed, consisting of geochemical sampling and exploration wells.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 46 of 427

 

 

 

Table 4.3
Exploration Permits for Cauchari-Olaroz Project Exploration Work
Report
Submitted
Date
Presented
Approvals Observations
Update to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration 2019 -2021 June 2020 Resolution No. 017/2021, December 17, 2021 This up-dated biannual IIA for exploration has been submitted to the authority for approval to accurately reflect the ongoing exploration program and details the activities the Exar carried out during the 2019-2021 period.
Update to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration 2021 - 2023 December 2021 Resolution No. 017/2021, December 17, 2021. (the previous resolution was maintained) The authorities established that the same approving resolution be maintained in the current bi-annual renewal because the activities in this report correspond to the same ones from the previous renewal.
Update to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration 2023 - 2025 March 2024 Pending Presentation of the new activities to be carried out in the period which include the drilling of new brine wells and vertical electrical surveys focused on the southern area of the salt flat.

 

An Environmental Impacts Report (“IIA”) for the exploitation phase was presented in December 2011 and approved by Resolution No. 29/2012 on 08 November 2012 based on an initial annual production of 20,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate with a second expansion phase to 40,000 tonnes/year.

 

A report for the update of the permit was submitted in March 2015 (AIIA Exploitation March 2015) based on the same Project description as in the initial 2011 filing. A further update was submitted in February 2017 based on updated Project parameters (AIIA Exploitation February 2017) and it was agreed with the Authority that this would replace the AIIA Exploitation March 2015 submission and was approved by Resolution No. 010/2017 on 05 October 2017.

 

The permit for exploitation issued in 2012 for the Project (IIA Exploitation December 2011) was still valid during this approval process, as ratified by a letter issued by the Gobierno de Jujuy (NOTA SMeH No 043/20179, issued 16 March 2017), which stated that “construction may commence on the necessary infrastructure approved in this permit, without prejudice to future adaptations and updates that the mining operator performs with respect to the mining project, which are subject to the analysis of this authority.”

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 47 of 427

 

 

 

A further biannual update to the Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation (AIIA Exploitation 2019) for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project has been submitted for evaluation by the Authority. This new document includes the new environmental studies carried out and information collected during the last two years as well as taking account of the current Project layout.

 

Exploitation permits and reports submitted are summarized in Table 4.4.

 

The IIA expressly considers the closing mechanism and the post-closure monitoring of the proposed mine. The federal environmental legislation in Argentina and the provincial environmental legislation in Jujuy do not require any closure bonding or guarantees and as a result, there are no bond, closure or remediation requirements, however, the cash flow model includes estimated closure and remediation cost of US$32.5 million in the end of the mine life for Exar’s environmental and closure obligations in order to comply with the considerations in the IIA.

 

Exar has paid the water fee through 2018. The water concession permit (160 L/s) was approved.

 

Table 4.4
Exploitation Permits for Cauchari-Olaroz Project
Report
Submitted
Date
Presented
Approvals Observations

Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation

(IIA Exploitation December 2011)

December 2011 Resolution No. 29/2012, November 08, 2012 Production of 20,000 tonnes/year of lithium carbonate with a second expansion phase to 40,000 tonnes/year

Biannual Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation

(AIIA Exploitation March 2015)

March 2015 Update cancelled and filed: DMyRE Note No. 101/2019 Biannual update of the Environmental Impacts Report (AIIA) approved in 2012, based on exactly the same project approved in 2012

Biannual Environmental Impacts Report (Exploitation)

(AIIA Exploitation February 2017)

February 2017 Resolution No. 010/2017, October 05, 2017

It was agreed with the Authority that the Environmental Impacts Report for exploitation (AIIA March 2015) would not be evaluated by the Authority and that this document (AIIA Exploitation, February 2017) would replace it

 

Production of 25,000 tonnes/year of lithium carbonate with a second expansion phase to 50,000 tonnes/year

Biannual Environmental Impacts Report (Exploitation)

(AIIA Exploitation 2019)

September 2019 Resolution No. 080/2020, December 18,2020. The AIIA 2019, exploitation stage, was completed in June 2019.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 48 of 427

 

 

 

Table 4.4
Exploitation Permits for Cauchari-Olaroz Project
Report
Submitted
Date
Presented
Approvals Observations

Biannual Environmental Impacts Report (Exploitation)

(AIIA Exploitation 2021)

March, 2022 Pending The AIIA 2021, was presented with additionals, which included modifications for an expansion in production. Finally, at the UGAMP meeting, these modifications were dismissed by the company, leaving the activities in the same way as the previous AIIA. It is estimated that we will obtain the approving resolution soon.

Biannual Environmental Impacts Report (Exploitation)

(AIIA Exploitation 2023)

December, 2023 Pending Th AIIA 2023, was presented to respect the bi-annuity although the authority is not issued with the previous report. Some changes were added that are intended to be made with respect to ponds and harvest salts

 

4.9Neigboring Communities

 

The surface rights of the area subject to exploitation are owned by the local neighboring communities of Pastos Chicos (10-23-2011), Olaroz Chico (12-20-2011), Huancar (12-20-2011), Puesto Sey (12-14-2011), and a part of El Toro (as an easement for the water and gas pipelines), some locations are shown in Figure 5.1. Ownership of the ground that is not currently proposed for exploitation also includes Portico de los Andes and Catua (2-23-2012).

 

Exar has completed contracts with each local community to have the right to develop the mine and use local water resources and transit. The arrangements vary between communities, but they all include the following (see Section 20.5.4.1 Community Relations Program):

 

·Aggregate payments of approximately US$239,417 per year between 2017-2019;

 

·Aggregate payments of approximately US$552,000 per year in 2020 and after;

 

·Joint environmental monitoring programs;

 

·Priority rights for any job for which a person from the community is qualified;

 

·Training on site to qualify for employment;

 

·A school of business training in each community to assist in setting up businesses for the provision of services during construction; and

 

·Individual infrastructure programs in each community.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 49 of 427

 

 

 

5.0Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure, and Physiography

 

5.1Topography

 

The Cauchari and Olaroz Salars are bounded on the east and west by mountains that range in elevation from 4,600 m to 4,900 m (Figure 5.1). The Cauchari Salar forms an elongated northeast-southwest trending depression extending 55 km in a north-south direction and approximately 6 km to 10 km in an east-west direction. The Olaroz Salar extends 40 km north-south and 10 km to 15 km east-west. The elevation of the floor of the salars ranges from 3,910 m to 3,950 m. There is negligible vegetation on the surface of the salars.

 

5.2Access

 

The main access to the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars from San Salvador de Jujuy is via paved National Highways 9 and 52, as shown in Figure 4.1. The midpoint between the two salars is located along National Highway 52 (Marker KM 192). Paso Jama, a national border crossing between Chile and Argentina (also on National Highway 52) is 100 km west of the Project. These highways carry significant truck traffic, transporting borate products to market from various salars in northern Argentina. Access to the interior of the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars is possible through a gravel road, Highway 70, which skirts the west side of the salars.

 

5.3Population

 

The Town of Susques, (population of 3,980 according to a 2022 census), 45 km east of the Olaroz Salar, is the nearest population centre (Figure 5.1). Further east lies the provincial capital of San Salvador de Jujuy (population of 276,222 according to a 2022 census) and the settlement of Catua (population of 427 according to a 2010 census) to the southwest. LAAC utilizes local employees for approximately 74% of the Project workforce (from Salta and Jujuy), of which 24% are from the local communities. The company transports them to and from the site by bus.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 50 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 5.1     Regional Topography and Population Centres Near the Cauchari-Olaroz Project

 

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2019)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 51 of 427

 

 

 

5.4Climate

 

The climate in the region of the Cauchari-Olaroz Salares is severe as a result of its geographical position bordering elevations of 4,000 masl, and due to the effect of two semi-permanent high-pressure systems. The Pacific anticyclone, which operates mainly in winter, provides very dry air to the region, and the Atlantic anticyclone, which brings warm and moist air to the region, mainly in the summer.

 

The climate favors the recovery of some minerals such as lithium through processes that depend on the evaporation caused by the severe conditions and a large amount of solar radiation available all year in the region.

 

In the Project area, Exar installed two weather stations in 2010 and 2018.

 

The first was Vaisala, model MAWS301 and the second DAVIS model Vantage Pro (www.davisinstruments.com/solution/vantage-pro2/).

 

The Vaisala weather station collected reliable data from May 18, 2010, to December 2015, The Davis Weather Station began recording data on September 25, 2018, until the effective date of this report. Data from this station have not yet met one year of records, so they are not presented in this report.

 

5.4.1Vaisala Station

 

Parameters recorded by Vaisala station are in Table 5.1.

 

The parameters of temperature, dew point, Net radiation and Evaporation are estimated are by Vaisala but are not direct measurements.

 

Table 5.1
Measured Parameters - Vaisala Weather Station
Parameter Units
Air Temperature (Tamb) °C
Relatively Humidity (RH): %
Temperature dew point (DP): °C
Atmopheric pressure (Patm) hpa
Wind Speed (VV) m/s
Maximum Wind Speed (VMV) m/s
Minimum Wind Speed (VmV) m/s
Wind Direction (DV)  
Maximum Wind Direction (DMV)  
Minimum Wind Direction (DmV)  
Solar Radiation (SR) W/m2
Net Radiation (NR) W/m2
Precipitation (PR) mm
Evaporation (Evap) mm

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 52 of 427

 

 

 

5.4.2Regional Meteorological Stations

 

Several regional meteorological stations are located in surrounding communities and provide historical temperature and precipitation records that are used to validate site-collected data and assess the potential long-term variability of climate at the site. The period of record and location of the most representative of these weather conditions are shown in Table 5.2. A map illustrating the location of the stations closest to the Project site (Susques, Olacapato and San Antonio de los Cobres) is presented in Figure 7.10, the black dot with a number beside it represents the meteorological station.

 

Table 5.2
Climate Records in Northwest Argentina
Station Latitude Longitude Elevation Period
Coranzuli 23.03 S 66.40 W 4,100 m 1972/96
Castro Tolay 23.35 S 66.08 W 3,430 m 1972/90
Susques 23.43 S 66.50 W 3,675 m 1972/96
Mina Pan de Azucar 23.62 S 66.03 W 3.690 m 1982/90
Olacapato 24.12 S 66.72 W 3,820 m 1950/90
San Antonio de Los Cobres 24.22 S 66.32 W 3,775 m 1949/90
Salar de Pocitos 24.38 S 67.00 W 3,600 m 1950/90

 

5.4.2.1Solar Radiation

 

Statistical data analysis indicates that monthly hourly values through all of the years of measurements are decreasing in amplitude (day duration) and maximum value, from summer to winter. Then the values increase, from winter to summer (Figure 5.2).

 

Data dispersion is greater in the summer months. This is due to the effect of cloud cover, which appears to be greater in summer and spring (November to February).

 

Solar Radiation, being seasonal, has an average daily value in November, of 8.31 kWh/m2 (daily) and minimum in June of 4.30 kWh/m2 (daily).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 53 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 5.2     Solar Radiation, 2011-2015 

 

 

Source: Salazar (2019)

 

5.5Temperature

 

As the Olaroz-Cauchari Salars are located in a plateau at approximately 4,000 masl, the temperature varies considerably between day and night, over 20°C on many days.

 

Temperature in the Puna Region is also affected by the seasons, with winter minimum temperatures dropping to between -25°C and -30°C, while summer maximum temperatures reach between 15°C and 25°C.

 

Meteorological stations are located in many surrounding communities (Figure 7.10) providing additional historical records for assessing the potential variability of climate at the site. The period of record and location of the most representative of these weather conditions are shown in Table 5.3.

 

The mean temperatures recorded by the stations in Table 5.3, are shown in Figure 5.3. The 2012 values are taken from King, Kelley, Abbey (2012) and the 2011-2015 Vaisala Station values are taken from Salazar (2019).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 54 of 427

 

 

 

Table 5.3
Temperature Data

Temperature

(oC)

2012 Feasibility

Study

Vaisala Station

(2011-2015)

Average 6.3 6.4
Absolute Minimum -14.6 -18
Absolute Maximum 25.9 25.9

 

Figure 5.3     Mean Monthly Temperature Recorded by Regional Meteorological Stations

 

 

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Figure 5.4.shows the temperature from Vaisala Station in the Project area averaging every month of the five-year period.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 55 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 5.4     Daily Temperature, Vaisala Station, Cauchari, 2011-2015

 

 

 

Source: Salazar (2019)

 

The observed temperature fluctuations in Cauchari by the Vaisala weather station show similar trends to the regional meterological stations. The average of these oscillations during the period recorded shows Extreme temperatures during this period had an absolute maximum of 25.9°C (January 11, 2011) and an absolute minimum of -16.3°C (July 29, 2014).

 

The records for Vaisala Station 2011-2015 show that:

 

·The lowest temperature of the day is at sunrise; and
·The highest temperature of the day occurs after solar noon.

 

5.6Precipitation

 

The desert climate of Cauchari and Olaroz is also known as the Puna climate (Hoffmann, 1971). The Puna region is exposed to substantial warming due to the enormous amount of radiation received and the limited availability of moisture to use this energy in the atmosphere. These extreme conditions make the location very attractive for the use of processes that depend on evaporation at the region of the Project; rainfall is usually less than 50 mm during the year (Cabrera, 1976).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 56 of 427

 

 

 

Rainfall originates during the summer season, between December and March when the South American Continental Low approaches the region of the salt flats, bringing hot and humid air from the jungles of the Amazon, causing very active convective cloud development with abundant storm-type rainfall.

 

The rainfall in the region according to the stations are shown in Figure 5.5.

 

Figure 5.5     Average Monthly Rainfall Recorded by Regional Meteorological Stations Near the Cauchari- Olaroz Salars

 

 

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Precipitation occurs in the summer months (December, January and February), being almost nil for the rest of the year (Figure 5.6).

 

January averages 59 mm/month of precipitation, and February averages 66 mm/month of precipitation (year-on-year). The lowest precipitation values occur in April, May and November with 1 mm/month.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 57 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 5.6     Rainfall Data Collected at the Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015

 

 

 

Source: Salazar (2019)

 

5.7Humidity

 

Puna desert climate is extremely dry for most of the year. However, in summer, due to the incursion of the South American Continental Low, the air is changed by acquiring high moisture content that sometimes causes heavy precipitation as described above. The average daily records show these changes in moisture during the year 2011-2015, Figure 5.7.

 

For relative humidity, considering the monthly average, the maximum values are in summer, 69% in February. In November, during the spring, the relative humidity drops to 5%.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 58 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 5.7     Daily Humidity Collected at Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015

 

 

 

Source: Salazar (2019)

 

5.8Winds

 

The Puna desert is usually visited by a low-level jet stream current, which arises as a secondary branch of the subtropical jet stream that is generated as a result of the horizontal surface and intertropical convergence of trade winds on the cell (Hadley, Holton, 2004), which pushes the air molecules to higher levels of the atmosphere. The air transported to the upper atmosphere, due to the high potential energy gained by the elevation, acquires great speed during the descents, and converts the potential energy into kinetic energy. This allows the molecules to reach high speeds within the jet streams.

 

The intensities of these low flows reach speeds of 35.9 m/s (129 km/h) and are often observed in the salt flats of Olaroz and Cauchari.

 

The daily monthly average of wind velocity values is higher during winter and spring (July to November), reaching the highest values in September. There is no manifest seasonality.

 

Wind direction values indicate that during ten months of the year, the predominant wind direction is west-northwest. Only in January and February does the predominant wind direction change to east-southeast.

 

The Rose plot in Figure 5.8 shows the prevailing wind directions for the years 2011-2015.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 59 of 427

 

 

 

 

Figure 5.8     Prevailing Wind Directions, Vaisala Station, Cauchari, 2011-2015

 

 

 

Source: Salazar (2019)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 60 of 427

 

 

 

5.9Evaporation

 

Records of water evaporation are more complex to perform in the Puna desert because the water tanks of evaporimeters freeze most of the year during the night. Therefore, most readings, including those from remote sensors, have a large associated error (WMO, 1971) which is another added difficulty. Because of these difficulties, the Vaisala station installed on the Cauchari Salar uses an indirect method to calculate evaporation, which in practice is very effective because of the adjustments to the curve that assesses the evaporation rate works well.

 

However, extreme climate conditions favour evaporation because the air in the Puna is extremely dry, so the large input of solar radiation is the most relevant factor in the evaporation process. Additionally, wind frequently intensifies the kinetic energy that is delivered through the transfer of momentum between molecules facilitating the process of evaporation.

 

It should be noted that the information presented in this section is collected from the Vaisala station. The Evaporation Rate used for the Project is based on a 12-month evaporation test conducted by Exar are elaborated upon in Section 13.2.2.

 

5.9.1Evaporation Measurements

 

To avoid errors that could affect indirect estimates of the Vaisala weather station, two cylindrical tanks were installed, the type of Class A or PAN evaporimeters (WMO No. 168, 1994), for direct measurements of evaporation of water and brine. The persons responsible for carrying out evaporation observations were trained to make daily observations, which also allowed for the control of the evaporation measurements from the Vaisala meteorological station.

 

The correlations obtained were used to establish some climatic extrapolations, using tight correlations between the Vaisala automatic weather station and PAN evaporimeters at the Pilot Plant.

 

Annual seasonality can be seen in the average of the monthly values.

 

Based on the information in Figure 5.9, evaporation rates from the Vaisala station show:

 

·Annual, monthly average: 4.95 mm/day;

·The monthly minimum value (June): 3.32 mm/day; and

·The maximum monthly daily value (November): 6.75 mm/day.

 

5.9.2Calculated Evaporation Using Site-Collected Parameters

 

Monitoring of evaporation from pans is complex to perform in the Puna desert because the water in the pans is subject to freezing during the night, which can introduce error (WMO, 1971). Therefore, to validate the evaporation pan data, evaporation was calculated using surrogate meteorological parameters collected at the Vaisala station installed on the Cauchari Salar. The dominating processes controlling evaporation (and considered in the equation) are solar radiation, humidity, wind speed and temperature.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 61 of 427

 

 

 

The daily calculated record of evaporation for 2011 to 2015 are shown in Figure 5.9.

 

Figure 5.9     Daily Calculated Evaporation from Vaisala Weather Station at the Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015

 

 

Source: Salazar (2019)

 

Evaporation for water is summarized below and in Figure 5.10:

 

·Annual, monthly average: 8.00 mm/day;

·The monthly minimum value (July): 5.34 mm/day; and

·Maximum monthly value (November): 11.03 mm/day.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 62 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 5.10     Minimum and Maximum Daily Water Evaporation at the Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015

 

 

 

Source: Salazar (2019)

 

Evaporation for brine is summarized below and in Figure 5.11:

 

·Average annual monthly: 6.05 mm/day;

·The monthly minimum value (July): 4.25 mm/day; and

·Maximum monthly value (November): 8.20 mm/day.

 

The annual mean evaporation values are:

 

·Vaisala: 1,806 mm per year (Min: 1,605 mm per year; Max: 2,017 mm per year);

 

·Water (PAN Evaporators): 2,910 mm per year (Min: 2,520 mm per year; Max: 3,324 mm per year); and

 

·Brine (PAN Evaporators): 2,208 mm per year (Min: 1,682 mm per year; Max: 2,759 mm per year).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 63 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 5.11     Minimum and Maximum Daily Brine Evaporation at the Cauchari Salar, 2011-2015

 

 

 

Source: Salazar (2019)

 

5.10Existing Infrastructure

 

National Highway 52, a paved, well-maintained highway, passes through the Property. A high-pressure natural gas pipeline is located 52 km south of the Project.

 

Electricity is provided by a new 33 kV transmission line that interconnects with an existing 345 kV transmission line located approximately 60 km south of the Project. The interconnection consists of a sub-station with a voltage transformer (345/33 kV) and associated switchgear.

 

A 53 km long water pipeline parallel to the gas pipeline was constructed to transport water to the lithium plant. The freshwater requirements are provided by local wells within the watershed. The infrastructure for camp water handling includes wells, low-voltage transmission lines to power the wells, pipelines, storage tanks and reverse osmosis plants.

 

Facilities at the site also include a permanent camp (“Operations Camp”), and the Construction Camp. The Operations Camp is a complete housing and administrative complex to support all activities of the operation with a capacity of 634 people. The Operations Camp includes office buildings, a habitational area, dining facilities, medical room, and recreation areas, consisting of a gym, an indoor sports center, a recreation room and an outdoor soccer field. The modular offices for operation and project management activities to support the activities of hydrogeology, drilling, site management, health and safety, the pilot plant, maintenance, human resources and community relations, amongst others.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 64 of 427

 

 

 

In the Construction Camp there are 8 housing modules with a total capacity of 392 people, of which only 3 modules are currently in use. In addition, this camp includes the pilot plant facilities, water treatment plants and contractor workshops.

 

Additional buildings in Operations Camp include:

 

·Lithium carbonate plant;

·Spare parts and consumables warehouse building;

·Soda ash storage building;

·Final product – lithium carbonate – storage building;

·Chemical laboratory;

·Maintenance Shop; and

·Water treatment plants.

 

All buildings are equipped with appropriate lighting, heating, ventilation, and security provisions.

 

Additionally, a storage building (720 m2 covered area), contractors’ facilities, a pilot plant, and laboratory. The aforementioned facilities have water supply, a site generated power supply, and an effluents treatment plant.

 

Production wells are operative, and the access is through roads and platforms to move around the different areas of the Property and Project as well as internal roads and platforms.

 

The Project considers the design of a single Control and Data Building, dedicated to the control and monitoring of Plant and Peripherals, located near the electrical substation.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 65 of 427

 

 

 

6.0History

 

Historically, Rio Tinto has mined borates on the western side of the Cauchari salar, at Yacimiento de Borato El Porvenir. Grupo Minero Los Boros S.A. mines a few thousand tonnes per year of ulexite on the east side of the Olaroz Salar. No other mining activity (including lithium production) has been recorded at the properties comprising the Cauchari-Olaroz Project. Exar acquired Mining and Exploration Permits across the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars during 2009 and 2010. The Company completed a resource exploration program in 2009 and 2010 targeting both lithium and potassium.

 

In 2010, the Company filed a Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource report for both lithium and potassium (King, 2010b). An amended Inferred Mineral Resource report was filed later that year (King, 2010a). In 2012, the Company filed a NI 43-101 complaint feasibility study that presented a Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimate, proposed processing technology, environmental and permitting assessment, costing and economic analysis. In 2017, LAAC filed a NI 43-101 compliant Feasibility Study, with an updated Mineral Reserve Estimate. In April of 2019, LAAC filed a NI 43-101 compliant Updated Mineral Resource Estimate with an updated Mineral Resource Estimate which is used in Section 14.0. For reference purposes, the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate is provided in Table 6.1. All past Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates are no longer considered current and are superseded by the Mineral Resource Estimate presented in Section 14.0 and the Mineral Reserve Estimate presented in Section 15.0 of this Report.

 

Table 6.1
Lithium Mineral Resource Summary
Classification

Average
Lithium
Concentration
(mg/L)

Mass Cumulated1
(cut-off 354 mg/L)

Brine
Volume
(m³)

Li
(tonne)

Li2CO3
(tonne)
2012 Measured Mineral Resource 630 576,000 3,039,000 9.1 x 108
2012 Indicated Mineral Resource 570 1,650,000 8,713,000 2.9 x 109
         
Total 585 2,226,000 11,752,000 3.8 x 108

 

Note:

 

1.The 2012 Mineral Resources are expressed relative to a lithium grade cut-off of ≥ 354 mg/L, which was identified as a brine processing constraint by LAAC engineers, and with an effective date of July 11, 2012.
2.Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resource will be converted to Mineral Reserves.
3.Lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) is calculated based the following conversion factor: Mass of LCE = 5.323 x Mass of lithium metal.
4.The values in the columns on Lithium Metal and Lithium Carbonate Equivalent above are expressed as total contained metals within the relevant cut-off grade.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 66 of 427

 

 

 

7.0Geological Setting and Mineralization

 

7.1Regional Structural Features

 

There are two dominant structural features in the region: north-south trending, high-angle faults and northwest-southeast trending lineaments. The high-angle north-south trending faults form narrow and deep basin systems (Figure 7.1). These basins have formed primarily in the eastern and central sectors of the Puna Plateau, through compressional Miocene-age orogeny (Helvaci and Alonso, 2000), and have been accumulation sites for numerous salars, including Olaroz and Cauchari.

 

The northwest-southeast trending lineaments cause displacement of the horst-and-graben basins. The El Toro Lineament and the Archibarca Lineament occur in the vicinity of the LAAC Project. The Cauchari Basin, which contains the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars, is located north of the El Toro Lineament in the northeast of the Figure 7.1 map area. Between the El Toro and Archibarca Lineaments, the basin is displaced to the southeast and is known as the Centenario Basin. South of the Archibarca Lineament, the basin is displaced to the northwest and is known as the Antofalla Basin. Collectively, these three displaced basin segments contain a lithium brine mine (in Salar Hombre Muerto) and several lithium brine exploration projects (Figure 7.1). Two additional lithium brine mines are located in the Atacama Basin, approximately 150 km west of the Cauchari Basin, between the El Toro and Archibarca Lineaments.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 67 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.1     Regional Geology in the Vicinity of the Exar Project

 

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2019)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 68 of 427

 

 

 

7.2Regional Geology

 

The regional geology of the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars is shown in Figure 7.1. The basement rock in this area is composed of Lower Ordovician turbidites (shale and sandstone) intruded by Late Ordovician granitoids. It is exposed to the east, west, and south of the two salars, and generally along the eastern boundary of the Puna Region.

 

Throughout the Puna Region, a wide range of rock types unconformably overlies the basement rock. In some areas, including to the south and east of the Project area, the basement rock is overlain by Cretaceous-Tertiary continental and marine sedimentary rocks such as conglomerates, sandstones, and siltstones, as well as tuffs and oolitic limestones. In most of the Chilean and Argentina-Chile border area of the region, the basement rock is overlain by Tertiary-Quaternary volcanics. In the Project area, the basement rock is overlain by andesites (six to three million years) and recent basaltic flows (0.8 - 0.1 million years) ranging up to several tens of metres in thickness. In addition, Neogene dacitic to rhyolitic ignimbrites (20 – 0.1 million years) sourced from calderas to the north and south of the Cauchari and Olaroz salars overlie basement strata. In some cases, these ignimbrites flowed into the salars and are intercalated with the basinal stratigraphies. These ignimbrites and their source calderas are the presumed sources for the lithium contained in the brines of the Lithium Triangle.

 

Salars formed in the basins of the Puna region have thick layers of Pleistocene halite beds. Jordan et al. (2002) studied the Atacama Salar in Chile and found high rates of sedimentation and accumulation for halite and clastic material (around 0.6 m/ka).

 

7.3Geology of the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars

 

7.3.1Salar Structural Setting

 

Figure 7.2 shows structural features in the central area of the Cauchari Basin (northern area of the Cauchari Salar), which is the focus of this Mineral Reserve Estimate. These features are interpreted from the seismic lines and boreholes shown in the figure.

 

Several small-scale, north-south trending, faults occur within the Cauchari Salar, between the basin border main faults. Cutting across the salar basin is a series of out-of-sequence, south-southeast trending, reverse faults that have a strong right-lateral component in the Exar Project area. These reverse faults are likely related to displacement along the El Toro Lineament.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 69 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.2     Structural Features in the Central Area of the Cauchari Basin

 

 

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 70 of 427

 

 

 

7.4Salar Surface Sediments and Mineralization

 

The surface distribution of alluvium, salar sediments, and basement rock in the central zone of the Cauchari Basin is shown in Figure 7.3. This zone is shown because it is the focus of the Mineral Reserve Estimate (Section 15.0). Flat-lying salar deposits occur throughout the salars, at the lowest ground surface elevation in the basin. Alluvial deposits intrude into these salar deposits to varying degrees, depending on location. The alluvium surface slopes upward from the salar surface and extends outside the basin perimeter. Raised bedrock exposures also occur outside the salar basin.

 

The most extensive intrusion of alluvium into the basin occurs on the Archibarca Fan (Figure 7.2), which partially separates the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars. Route 52 is constructed across this alluvial fan. The Archibarca Fan developed during the late-Holocene. In addition to this major fan, much of the perimeter zone of both salars exhibits encroachments of alluvial material forming fans of varying sizes. Alluvium deposition is interpreted to range from early- to late-Holocene.

 

A range of dominant sediment types and characteristic mineral assemblages are found across the surface of the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars. In the Olaroz Salar and the southern part of the Cauchari Salar, particularly in marginally elevated areas, buff clays occur, interlayered with dirty calcite travertine sand with irregular calcite cementation produced mainly by hydrothermal activity (calcareous sinters). Ulexite concretions with or without gypsum and mirabilite are occasionally associated with the carbonate deposits.

 

Borax is common throughout both salars, occuring as small, rounded concretions in red and brown clays along a narrow and discontinuous strip on the western border of Cauchari Salar and in the eastern and central area of Olaroz Salar. In some areas of central Olaroz Salar, surficial borax alters to form evaporitic ulexite. When this mineral occurs in significant concentrations it forms large ulexite concretions or “papas” that expand the associated black or red clays, creating a hummocky surface. In the subsurface, borax commonly occurs as concretions and as an in-filling of corrosion holes in halite. In some locations, borax has been replaced by ulexite and/or tincal.

 

Gypsum is the primary sulphate mineral in the surficial muds and the crystals commonly have a small, bladed habit. In some locations, mirabilite and trona are associated with the gypsum-bearing layers. Trona is more abundant in the Cauchari Salar, although neither salar is known to contain exploitable amounts.

 

Halite occurs throughout the surface of both salars but is more dominant on the Olaroz Salar where a well-formed, polygonal-cracked, salt hardpan is present. In contrast, the surface layer across much of the Cauchari Salar consists of a thin, red silt / halite, polygonal-cracked crust over brine-saturated red plastic silt.

 

Distinctive accessory minerals occur within the red surface silt of the Cauchari Salar. Gypsum and minor glaserite are the main accessory phases in the southern area of the salar. In the central area, halite is a primary accessory mineral and gypsum is secondary. Ulexite, mirabilite, and trona are the primary accessory phases in the northern area of Cauchari.

 

In the zone where the recent alluvial fans merge with the salar sediments, the salar sediments often exhibit evidence of biological activity (bioturbation and rootlets) and are typically devoid of borate concretions and gypsum.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 71 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.3     Surficial Geology in the Central Area of the Cauchari Basin

 

 

 

  Recent sediments (mainly salted muds with a halite rough polygon crust)
  Mud flat with borates and gypsum
  Young alluvial fans
  Old bahadas and alluvial fans
  Cenozoic volcanics and pyroclastic rocks
  Ordovician thin bedded fine sands and shales

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 72 of 427

 

 

 

7.5Salar Lithostratigraphic Units

 

The following five informal lithological units are interpreted from the drill core:

 

·Unit 1. Red silts with minor clay and sand;

·Unit 2. Banded halite beds with clay, silt, and minor sand;

·Unit 3. Fine sands with minor silt and salt beds;

·Unit 4. Massive halite and banded halite beds with minor sand; and

·Unit 5. Medium and fine sands.

 

These units are described briefly in the following sections.

 

7.5.1Unit 1 – Red Silts with Minor Clay and Sand

 

This unit consists of layers of massive red to grayish-brown silt with some clay, alternating with layers of fine sand with minor clay and medium to coarse sands, and trace gravel. At the surface, this unit exhibits mud cracks, as well as bioturbation and mottled structures with organic matter. At depth, the silt layers contain phreatic carbonate concretions, mottled structures, bioturbation, and occasional gypsum crystals. These layers are relatively thin, typically ranging from less than one metre up to four metres.

 

Borate concretions often occur throughout this unit. Halite crystals occur at some locations (for example in DDH4 and DDH10) but are absent in others (DDH12). X-ray diffraction (“XRD”) analysis of the clays in this unit (Cravero, 2009a and 2009b) shows that they are predominantly illite with minor kaolinite, smectite, and chlorite. Glass shards and magnetite are also present, indicating that the dominant source for this unit is the Neogene volcanic rocks.

 

7.5.2Unit 2 – Banded Halite Beds with Clay, Silt and Minor Sand

 

This unit is characterized by banded halite with reddish clay or silt partitions alternating with massive fine-grained sand beds. The sand beds may contain halite crystals or may be cemented by halite. This unit may also contain occasional layers of thinly bedded clays, evaporites, silts, and sands. The individual beds of this unit vary in thickness from a few centimetres to a few metres. Unit 2 is generally more clayey than Unit 1. The evaporites in Unit 2 are comprised mainly of halite and occasionally halite with gypsum. Borehole logs show that Unit 2 is typically between 50 m and 60 m in thickness.

 

Some of the thick sand beds in this unit are friable and devoid of halite cement. These sands were likely deposited in water and may have been mobilized from the surrounding old alluvial fans. The green color of some sand beds is characteristic of material derived from volcanic sources. While this unit is relatively thin in some locations (e.g., DDH12), it is well-developed and dominated by massive and banded salt beds in boreholes located in the central area of the salar. The relatively thin occurrence of Unit 2 in DDH12 (see Figure 7.3) is due to the close proximity of the Archibarca Fan clastic source (see Figure 7.2).

 

7.5.3Unit 3 – Fine Sands with Minor Silt and Salt Beds

 

This unit is composed of massive light grey to grayish-brown, fine-grained, clean sand inter-layered with evaporite (primarily halite) beds. The layers are tens of metres thick and are typically friable. This unit also contains occasional thin red silt horizons (20 cm to two metres thick). Structures indicating biological activity are uncommon in this unit, although some of the silt layers are mottled (e.g., in DDH10).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 73 of 427

 

 

 

The sand composition in this unit is a mixture of quartz, feldspar, and mafic minerals (pyroxene, biotite, and amphibole), with abundant magnetite and volcanic glass. Other minerals commonly present in the sand include halite and gypsum, with lesser amounts of borate, ulexite, and narrow beds of tincal. The sand beds of this unit often contain a component of well-sorted aeolian sand (identifiable as rounded particles) mixed with sub-angular finer sand. The aeolian sands were likely re-worked and mixed with alluvial materials and dispersed into the basin by surface water.

 

7.5.4Unit 4 – Banded and Massive Halite Beds with Minor Sandy Beds

 

This unit is dominated by banded halite beds and dark to light grey massive halite beds alternating with sandy layers. These primary layers typically range from 1 to 3 m in thickness, although a continuous 100 m layer of halite beds was observed at the DDH3. Layers of red clay and irregular halite mixes are also common in this unit. Thin silt horizons between 0.25 m and 1 m in thickness are occasionally observed.

 

The banding in the banded halite beds is caused by layers of grey or brownish-grey silts or sands that are typically cemented by halite and contain halite and gypsum crystals. The massive halite layers of this unit occasionally occur as a sintered sponge of halite crystals, with high porosity due to crystal corrosion. Borate concretions are common in the upper section of this unit. In the southern Cauchari Salar, several carbonate horizons ranging up to six metres in thickness were observed in this unit, with karstic solution cavities in-filled with loose sand.

 

7.5.5Unit 5 – Medium and Fine Sands

 

This unit is composed of massive, thick-bedded, fine-grained, light to dark-green sand layers, alternating with massive light-red silt layers. The grain size of the sand is coarser in the lower levels of the unit. The sand mineralogy indicates volcanic source rocks.

 

Bioturbation by invertebrates is observed at some locations in this unit. Halite and gypsum crystals occur infrequently. Only boreholes DDH4, DDH10, and DDH12 penetrated deep enough to encounter this unit.

 

Refer to Section 14.2.1 and Section 15.7 for a more detailed breakdown of the stratigraphic and hydrostratigraphic units used in the Mineral Resource Estimate and Mineral Reserve Estimate, respectively. Cross sections can be viewed in Section 14.3.2.

 

7.5.6Sedimentation Cycles

 

Sedimentation cycles were evaluated for the salar sediments, as a supportive step for understanding, delineating, and grouping the important hydrostratigraphic units. The energy level and RBRC curves help to explain the vertical variations observed in the salar sediments. The RBRC curves show the distribution of measured RBRC, expressed over 10 m intervals. The collection and analysis of the RBRC samples are described in Section 11.9.2. The energy level curves represent a qualitative measure of depositional energy, expressed over five metre intervals. The lithology-based scale used to rank the energy level is summarized below:

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 74 of 427

 

 

 

  0- Massive halite beds (> 5 cm thick);
  1- Halite in thin beds (< 5 cm), including banded halite with thin sand, silt, or clay partitions;
  3- Silt with root marks or bioturbation; silty clay beds with or without halite crystals and borate concretions; silt or clay with plant remains; thin and irregular clay or halite bedding;
  4- Silt with or without halite crystals and borate concretions;
  5- Fine-grained sands;
  7- Medium-grained sands; and
  8- Coarse-grained sand with or without gravel.

 

This scale is qualitative and was developed as an aid for interpreting sedimentary cycles in the salar. The exclusion of Levels 2 and 6 is intended to represent a large energy level increase between Levels 1 and 3, and Levels 5 and 7, relative to the other levels.

 

The energy level measurements in DDH10 exhibit a repeating pattern, between the upper 130 m of the borehole and the lower part of the borehole. This pattern is considered to represent two distinct sedimentation cycles: an Upper Salt Generation Cycle (“USGC”) and a Lower Salt Generation Cycle (“LSGC”), with the division between the two occurring at approximately 130 mbgs. These cycles are used as an aid to interpret the progression of sediment deposition throughout the Project area, and to support the development of a hydrostratigraphic model.

 

7.5.7Sedimentary Facies Analysis and In-filling History

 

The figures referred to in this subsection are from a sedimentology report prepared on behalf of Exar (Bossi, 2011).

 

The distribution of dominant geologic materials within the LSGC (defined as > 130 mbgs) is shown in Figure 7.4. Materials are divided into fractions of three end members that exhibit unique porosity profiles: sand, silt, and halite. Isopleth maps of salt and sand thickness within the LSGC are shown in Figure 7.5 and Figure 7.6, respectively. These maps were used to infer the primary locations where salt deposition occurred within the basin, and where sand entered the basin.

 

A central elongated salt deposition zone dominates the LSGC, as shown in Figure 7.4. This salt body is continuous, but irregular in the fraction that it comprises of the LSGC. As shown in Figure 7.5, elongated zones of relatively more dominant salt deposits occur in the southern, central, and northern areas of the salar. The northern zone is displaced towards the east, due to the strong influence of clastic sedimentation associated with the Archibarca Fan.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 75 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.4     Facies Map of the Lower Salt Cycle Showing Line 1 Crossing a Thick Salt Succession

 

 

 

Source: Bossi, (2011)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 76 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.5     Isopleth Curves of Salt Percent in the Facies Triangle

 

 

 

Source: Bossi, (2011)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 77 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.6     Main Salt Sources of the Lower Cycle

 

 

 

Source: Bossi, (2011)

 

Clastic contributions to the LSGC originated from various locations around the salar (Figure 7.6). However, the main sand source was located in the mountains to the west of the salar and is responsible for the LSGC occurrence of the Archibarca Fan. The influence of this source is indicated by the increasing sand fraction in the vicinity of the fan (Figure 7.6). The main mud source is south of the salar, with an additional source located to the west.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 78 of 427

 

 

 

The distribution of materials in the LSGC is related to the equilibrium between subsidence and clastic supply. Brine became concentrated in the dropped zones, and extensive halite beds were formed through evaporation. Conversely, the horsts were relatively elevated and primarily received muds (silts) or sands. LSGC deposits were formed during the Late/Middle Pleistocene when the Puna region was situated at lower altitudes. At that time, cooler climatic conditions and rain-shadow effects associated with the eastern Pampean Ranges resulted in enhanced aridity. Climatic conditions cycled between relatively wet and dry periods.

 

The wet periods were characterized by the development of permanent shallow lakes with high evaporation rates and the dry periods by ephemeral lagoons. Saltpan formation was enhanced during the wet periods, and the salt deposited at these times tends to be white to grey in colour and lacking in clastic components. Conversely, banded halite and associated reddish-coloured clastic materials were likely crystallized and deposited in drier periods.

 

The distribution of materials in the USGC (defined as <130 mbgs) is shown in Figure 7.7. For these more recent deposits, the supply of clastic sediments is greater, particularly in association with the Archibarca Fan. Consequently, the saltpan is located mainly in the southern area of the salar with a minor isolated zone in the north, probably connected with the Olaroz Basin.

 

The distribution of salt in the LSGC follows a relatively regular pattern (Figure 7.8), probably due to the smoothing effect of the final subsidence stage. The two southern loci of salt deposits in the LSGC (Figure 7.5) unify into one in the USGC (Figure 7.8,) that occupies a broader zone in the central area of the basin. A remnant small salt zone persists in the northeastern area of the salar close to the eastern border and in front of the Archibarca Fan.

 

Figure 7.9 shows locations where sand entered the salar basins during the USGC deposition period. Similar to the LSGC, the primary location is at the Archibarca Fan (below the present-day fan), as indicated by the high sand fraction extending into the salar. Secondary locations occur at another fan system originating from the eastern mountains, and at two locations along the western basin border south of the Archibarca Fan. Penetration of the Archibarca Fan into the basin reaches a maximum during the period represented by the USGC. During this period, most mud still originated from the south with minor contributions from the mountains located on the western border.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 79 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.7     Facies Map of the Upper Cycle

 

 

 

Source: Bossi, (2011)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 80 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.8     Salt Percent Isopleths of the Upper Cycle

 

 

 

Source: Bossi, (2011)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 81 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.9     Isopleth Map of Sand Percents of the Upper Cycle Sedimentation Stage

 

 

 

Source: Bossi, (2011)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 82 of 427

 

 

 

7.6Surface Water

 

The Cauchari-Olaroz watershed is shown in Figure 7.10. The watershed is an elongated depression with a length of approximately 150 km in a north-south direction and a width of 30 to 40 km in an east-west direction and covering approximately 4,500 km2. The surface water network within the watershed eventually flows into the Olaroz or Cauchari Salars. There is no surface water outflow from the salars. These rivers are the main freshwater inflows into the salar and have been monitored since 2009.

 

The primary surface waterways within the watershed basin are Rios El Rosario, Ola, and Tocomar. Rio Rosario, which is locally called Rio El Toro, originates in the northern part of the watershed, at an elevation of 4,500 m. The river flows south-southeast for 55 km, past the village of El Toro, before it enters into the Olaroz Salar.

 

Rio Ola, which is locally called Rio Lama, originates just south of Cerro Bayo Archibarca, at an elevation of around 4,500 m, and flows east for 20 km. It enters the salars on top of the Archibarca Fan that separates Olaroz from Cauchari on the western flank of the basin.

 

Rio Tocomar, which is locally called Rio Olacapato, originates some 10 km west of Alto Chorillo at an elevation of around 4,360 m. The river flows west for approximately 30 km before it enters the Cauchari Salar from the southeast.

 

In addition to the surface waterways noted above which enter the salars, there is an area in the central southern part of the Cauchari Salar some 15 km north of the village of Cauchari, where surface water originates from an array of springs. Discharge from these springs is naturally channelled into a central stream that flows north for several kilometres and then gradually seeps back underground.

 

Chemistry and flow monitoring results from the Surface Water Sampling Program conducted throughout the Cauchari-Olaroz watershed are presented in Section 9.12.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 83 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.10     Caucharri-Olaroz Watershed

 

 

 

Note: black dot with a number beside it = meteorological station, red square = town.

Source: Burga et al. (2019)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 84 of 427

 

 

 

7.7Mineralization

 

The brines from Cauchari are saturated in sodium chloride with total dissolved solids (TDS) on the order of 27% (324 to 335 g/L) and an average density of about 1.215 g/cm3. The other primary components of these brines are common to brines in other salars in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile, and include potassium, lithium, magnesium, calcium, sulphate, HCO3, and boron as borates and free H3BO3.

 

A Janecke Projection comparing the chemistry of several brine deposits is shown in Figure 7.11. This type of figure can be used as a visualization tool for mineral crystallization. The diagram represents an aqueous five-component system (Na+, K+, Mg++, SO4=, and Cl–) saturated in sodium chloride. The aqueous system can be represented in this simplified manner, due to the higher content of the ions Cl–, SO4=, K+, Mg++, Na+ compared with other elements (e.g., Li, B, Ca). In Figure 7.11, each corner of the triangle represents one of three pure components (Mg, SO4 and K2), in mol%. The sides of the triangle represent sodium chloride-saturated solutions, with two reciprocal salt pairs (MgCl2 + Na2SO4), (Na2SO4+KCl) and a quaternary system with a common ion (MgCl2+KCl+NaCl).

 

The inner regions of the diagram show expected crystallization fields for minerals precipitating from the brine. Since the brines are saturated in NaCl, halite precipitates during evaporation in all the cases. In addition, the Cauchari brine is predicted to initially precipitate ternadite (Na2SO4). The brines of Guayatayoc, Silver Peak, Hombre Muerto, Olaroz, and Rincon would initially precipitate glaserite (K3Na(SO4)2). Atacama, Uyuni, and Salinas Grandes brines would initially precipitate silvite (KCl).

 

In addition to the primary minerals indicated in the diagram, a wide range of secondary salts may precipitate from these brines, depending on various factors including temperature and dissolved ions. The additional salts could include: astrakanite (Na2Mg(SO4)2·4H2O), schoenite (K2Mg(SO4)2·6H2O), leonite (K2Mg(SO4)2·4H2O), kainite (MgSO4·KCl·3H2O), carnalite (MgCl2·KCl·6H2O), epsomite (MgSO4·7H2O), and bischofite (MgCl2·6H2O).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 85 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 7.11     Janecke Classification of Brines

 

 

 

References as per Table 8.1, with the addition of information from Houston (2010b) for Salinas Grandes and Guayatayoc.

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 86 of 427

 

 

 

8.0Deposit Types

 

The Cauchari and Olaroz Salars are classified as “Silver Peak, Nevada” type terrigenous salars. Silver Peak, Nevada in the USA was the first lithium-bearing brine deposit in the world to be exploited. These deposits are characterized by restricted basins within deep structural depressions in-filled with sediments differentiated as inter-bedded units of clays, salt (halite), sands and gravels. In the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars, lithium-bearing aquifers have developed during arid climatic periods. On the surface, the salars are presently covered by carbonate, borax, sulphate, clay, and sodium chloride facies. A detailed description of the geology of the Olaroz and Cauchari Salars is provided in Section 7.0.

 

Cauchari and Olaroz have relatively high sulphate contents and therefore both salars can be further classified as “sulphate type brine deposits”. Section 10.0 provides detailed further discussion of the chemistry of Cauchari and Olaroz.

 

Table 8.1 compares mean values for hydrochemical compositions of brines from Andean salt pans. It should be noted that the Qualified Person, Mr. David Burga, has been unable to verify the information for other properties listed in Table 8.1 and that the information is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the Property that is the subject of the Technical Report but is presented for reference purposes only.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 87 of 427

 

 

 

Table 8.1
Comparative Chemical Composition of Andean Salt Pans

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 88 of 427

 

 

 

 

Notes:

(A)n = number of samples

(B)Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) is reported in g/L

(C)Remaining concentrations in mg/L

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 89 of 427

 

 

 

9.0Exploration

 

The work described in this Section, other than the 2024 VES survey, was done for Exar and reported by LAC prior to the creation of LAAC in 2023.

 

9.1Overview

 

The following exploration programs have been conducted to evaluate the lithium brine and freshwater development potential of the Project area:

 

·Surface Brine Program – Brine samples were collected from shallow pits throughout the salars to obtain a preliminary indication of lithium occurrence and distribution.

 

·Seismic Geophysical Program – Seismic surveying was conducted to support delineation of basin geometry, mapping of basin-fill sequences, and siting borehole locations.

 

·Gravity Survey – A limited gravity test survey was completed to evaluate the utility of this method for determining depths to basement.

 

·TEM Survey – TEM surveying was conducted to attempt to define freshwater / brine interfaces around the salar perimeter. This work was conducted by Quantec Geoscience.

 

·VES Survey – A VES survey was conducted to attempt to define freshwater and brine interfaces, and extensive freshwater occurrences.

 

·Surface Water Sampling Program – An ongoing program is conducted to monitor the flow and chemistry of surface water entering the salars.

 

·Pumping Test Program – Pumping and monitoring wells were installed, and pumping tests were conducted at five locations, to estimate aquifer properties related to brine recovery and freshwater supply.

 

·Reverse Circulation (RC) Borehole Program – Dual tube reverse circulation drilling was conducted to develop vertical profiles of brine chemistry at depth in the salars and to provide geological and hydrogeological data.

 

·Diamond Drilling (DD) Borehole Program – This program was conducted to collect continuous cores for geotechnical testing (RBRC, grain size and density) and geological characterization. Some of the boreholes were completed as observation wells for future brine sampling and monitoring.

 

Samples were representative and no known biases were introduced due to sampling procedures. Details of the drilling programs are discussed in Section 10.0.

 

9.2Surface Brine Program

 

In 2009, a total of 55 surface brine samples were collected from shallow hand-dug test pits excavated throughout the Project area. Results from this early program indicated favourable potential for significant lithium grades at depth. Additional exploration work was initiated on the basis of these results. A full description of the Surface Brine Program is provided in the Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate Report for the Project (King, 2010a).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 90 of 427

 

 

 

9.3Seismic Geophysical Program

 

A high-resolution seismic tomography survey was conducted primarily on the Cauchari Salar and to a lesser extent on the Olaroz Salar, during 2009 and 2010. The survey was contracted to Geophysical Exploration Consulting (GEC) of Mendoza, Argentina. Measurements were conducted along 12 survey lines, as shown in Figure 9.1. Nine lines are oriented east-west (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11, and 12), two lines (7 and 10) have a north-south orientation, and Line 8 is a northeast trending diagonal line parallel to the western property boundary and covering the Archibarca Fan. A total of 62,500 m of seismic survey data was acquired.

 

The survey configuration utilized a five-metre geophone separation, and a semi-logarithmic expanding drop-weight source array symmetrically bounding the central geophone array. The geophone array comprised 48 mobile measurement sites utilizing Geode Geoelectrics 8 Hz geophones. Symmetrically surrounding the 48 geophones were accelerated, 150 kg drop-weight sites moving away from the geophone array as follows: 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 250, 500, 750, and 900 m. Based on standard methods for depth resolution, the outer drop-weight positions would provide sufficient velocity detail to depths on the order of 500 to 600 m. The seismic survey data supported the identification of drilling sites for the RC and DD Programs in 2009 and into 2010. The seismic inversions are shown in Figure 9.2.

 

The maximum interpreted depth of the salars for each of the twelve seismic lines ranged from approximately 300 to 600 m. This variance in the apparent depth of the basin is attributed to two factors: 1) actual basin depth, and 2) property limitations which restricted the placement of the source hammer, and therefore the depth of exploration.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 91 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.1     Seismic Tomography Lines – 2009 and 2010

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 92 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.2     Seismic Tomography Results for the 12 Survey Lines in Figure 9.1

 

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 93 of 427

 

 

 

9.4Gravity Survey

 

A reconnaissance gravity survey was completed at the Cauchari Salar during July of 2010. The survey was a test to evaluate the effectiveness of the gravity method to define basement morphology and grabens that could represent favourable settling areas for dense brine. Data were collected at 200 m intervals along the two survey profiles shown in Figure 9.3. These profiles extended to outcrop locations outside the salar limits, to facilitate final gravity data processing and inversion.

 

Instrumentation used for the survey was a La Coste and Romberg #G-470 gravimeter with an accuracy of ± 0.01 mGal. The gravity survey field procedure included repetition of survey control points at intervals of less than five hours, to minimize instrument drift control errors. Initial gravity data processing was completed with Oasis software, using the Gravity and Terrain Correction module. Inversions were also produced with Oasis software, using the gravity module GM-SYS.

 

Differential GPS measurements provided the station control with an accuracy level of ± 1 cm. A GPS base station using a Trimble DGPS 5700 model was employed in two locations within five kilometres of the survey lines and operated continuously during the measurement of the survey GPS points along the gravity traverses. A Trimble model R3 was used for the gravity station placement.

 

Modelling results for the northeast oriented gravity survey line (GRAV 1) are shown in Figure 9.4. The image shows the location of boreholes, the input densities used for model generation, and the calculated Bouger results from the field data. The upper profiles indicate an excellent fit of observed and modeled data based on the coloured model shown in the lower part of the figure. The lower red portion is the modeled depth to basement, or denser lithologies, using the starting model densities and the observed field data. There is good correlation between the gravity and seismic results which indicate changes in density and velocity, respectively, at approximately 300 m depth. It is interpreted that this approximate depth represents an increase in compaction of the sand-salt mix encountered during drilling.

 

Modelling results for the north-south gravity profile (GRAV 2) across the southwest portion of the Mineral Resource Estimate zone are shown in Figure 9.5. Drilling results for DDH-4 show a change at 160 m depth to thick and dense halite with low porosity. This is marginally higher than the red area indicated by the gravity inversion modelling program. Similarly, for DDH-12, the intersection of the massive halite is slightly different from the model results but is within acceptable limits. Overall, an excellent fit is apparent between the observed and modeled data as seen in the profile on the upper section of the figure. This image demonstrates that the gravity method is effective for identifying relative density changes associated with different lithologies or increased compaction with depth in the salar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 94 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.3     Location of Gravity Survey Lines at the Cauchari Salar

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 95 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.4     Modeling Results for the Northeast Oriented Gravity Line (Grav 1) Over the Mineral Resource Estimate

 

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 96 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.5     Modeling Results for the North-South Gravity Line (Grav 2) Across the Southwest Portion of the Mineral Resource Estimate

 

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 97 of 427

 

 

 

9.5TEM Survey

 

A Time Domain Electromagnetic (TEM) survey was conducted in the Cauchari Salar during July 2010, along the five TEM lines shown in Figure 9.6. The main objective of the survey was to test the applicability of this method for determining resistivity contrasts that may relate to changes in groundwater salinity. In general, it is expected that saline brines will be more conductive (lower resistivity), whereas areas of freshwater will be less conductive (higher resistivity). The TEM survey parameters included:

 

·The use of Zonge GDP-16 Rx and GGT-20 Tx instrumentation;

 

·In-loop sounding configuration using 200 m × 200 m square transmitting loops and a base transmitting frequency of 4 Hz;

 

·Soundings completed at 100 m station intervals from 45 ms to 48 ms; and

 

·Completion of a total of 12.6 linear survey kilometres.

 

Line TEM 1 (Figure 9.7) – Borehole logs and brine sampling results for PE-07 and DDH-02 indicate that the top of the brine aquifer is at approximately 40 m depth. This is reasonably consistent with the low resistivity values seen in the inversion at this location where the resistivity drops in the presence of brine. For DDH-09, there is sand present to approximately 60 m depth, followed by variable salt, silt, and sand past the bottom of the TEM inversion depth. The resistivity section is supported by the logging results. Notably on this TEM line is the area on the west (left) side of the image, which corresponds to a portion of the alluvial Archibarca Fan, where freshwater inflow occurs. The higher resistivity values in this area are consistent with the inflow of freshwater. The profile also shows two low resistivity anomalies that may be attributable to occurrence of brines at depth, possibly related to structures that intersect the TEM profile orthogonally at these locations.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 98 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.6     Location of TEM Sounding Profiles Conducted at the Cauchari Salar

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2019)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 99 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.7     2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 1

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Line TEM 2 (Figure 9.8) – This TEM image shows a typical layered model in the vicinity of DDH-08 where sandy layers containing the brine resource are situated at 20 m depth. The deeper, low resistivity region associated with DDH-08 is associated with the sandy brine-containing layers continuing to depth. Further to the east (right) there is indication of another low resistivity, high conductivity source. The higher resistivity values in the center of the image may be associated with compacted halite, possibly related to a horst.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 100 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.8     2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 2

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Line TEM 3 (Figure 9.9) – This northwest-southeast oriented line is situated in the eastern sector of the Cauchari Salar, where no drilling has occurred. It was selected to investigate the possibility of freshwater inflow and/or the presence of brine. The resistivity data suggest that both scenarios occur. Higher resistivity values are likely attributable to freshwater inflow from one of the alluvial fans in the area. The lower resistivity values may be related to brines, with typical resistivity values of < 1.0 ohm/m, associated with interpreted structural features within the basin.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 101 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.9     2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 3

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Line TEM 4 (Figure 9.10) – This line is situated along the western margin of the Cauchari Salar. PE-15 is cased from the surface to a depth of 65 m. Sampling results indicate the presence of a brine aquifer at the bottom of the casing. The resistivity values suggest continuity of the brine to surface. Below 65 m the lithology is characterized by high halite content. The resistivity values at this point are around 1 ohm/m, which is slightly more resistive than sandy brine responses, and consistent with high halite content. Further to the west (left) of the boreholes, a low resistivity zone may indicate brine in a structural feature along the margin of the salar. The higher resistivity at the left end of the section may indicate freshwater moving into the salar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 102 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.10     2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 4

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Line TEM 5 (Figure 9.11) – This line was located to investigate groundwater composition under the Archibarca Fan. The central portion of the inversion shows an area of higher resistivity extending from the surface to a depth of approximately 75 m. Laterally, this zone could approach one kilometre in width. The resistivity values decrease under this interpreted body of freshwater, but not to the degree that would indicate brine presence. They may represent either background resistivity, or the transition to more saline water at depth. Some of the resistivity zones on this TEM line are greater than 1,000 ohm/m, clearly indicating a highly resistive environment that is in contrast with the conductive brines of Cauchari. The higher resistivity values on the right side of the section may relate to the near-surface occurrence of bedrock.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 103 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.11     2010 Survey Results for Line TEM 5

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 104 of 427

 

 

 

In December 2017, another campaign was conducted in the Cauchari south and Olaroz Salar. There were three lines completed with a total of 98 TEM surveys, shown in Figure 9.12 to Figure 9.14.

 

The TEM survey successfully mapped the resistivity to different depths in the area of salt depending on the conductivity of the area considered. In more conductive areas, such as the profile 1, the signal penetrates only up to about 300 m depth, while, in the southern area of the Project, in profiles 2 and 3, models can be defined up to about 800 m or more.

 

Figure 9.12     2017 Survey Results for Line TEM 1

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Figure 9.13     2017 Survey Results for Line TEM 2

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 105 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.14     2017 Survey Results for Line TEM 3

 

Source: Exar.

 

In conclusion, the TEM survey results indicate that the method can be used to determine resistivity contrasts within the salar. However, resolution may be limited to depths on the order of 75 m – 100 m, due to the broad presence of low resistivity materials, as indicated by ambient resistivity values of near sub-ohm/m in many areas of the salar.

 

9.6Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES)

 

A Vertical Electrical Sounding (VES) survey was conducted at perimeter locations on the Cauchari-Olaroz Salar, from November 2010 to May 2011. The extended survey period was due to recurring weather conditions that were unfavourable for surveying. The objectives of this program were to: 1) explore potential shallow freshwater sources on the Archibarca Fan, for future industrial purposes; and 2) evaluate salar boundary conditions related to the configuration of the brine/freshwater interface.

 

The survey was conducted using a 4-point light HP, which provides a simultaneous reading of intensity and potential that directly yields apparent resistivity. Data collected in the field were interpreted using RESIX 8.3 software, producing a graph of points representing the field measurements, and a solid line curve corresponding to the physical-mathematical model. Survey locations are shown on Figure 9.15.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 106 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.15     2010-2011 Map of VES Survey Area

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2019)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 107 of 427

 

 

 

The VES results enable the differentiation of the following five zones on the Archibarca Fan and the salar perimeter locations, as shown in Figure 9.16 through to Figure 9.19:

 

·An upper unsaturated layer, with relatively high resistance;
·An upper saturated aquifer containing freshwater;
·A lower conductive layer, interpreted as containing brine;
·An interface or mixed zone, grading from freshwater to brine; and
·A lower resistive zone, only detected in three VES lines and in which the degree of saturation and water salinity is unknown.

 

The first three of these were encountered on most lines and are interpreted to be relatively continuous on the Archibarca Fan and the salar perimeter. The latter two were discontinuous. On the Archibarca Fan, the VES results indicate the occurrence of freshwater to an average depth of 50 m below surface. Below the freshwater layer, a gradational interface often occurs between shallow freshwater and deeper brine, from approximately 20 to 70 m depth.

 

The upper zone, interpreted as freshwater, is present throughout the investigated area of the fan and has potentially favourable characteristics for water supply. This zone is a target for expansion of the freshwater supply at PB-I (Section 9.14). The occurrence of freshwater on the Archibarca Fan indicates with the inflow of freshwater into the shallow sandy fan sediments from upgradient areas. The VES results are consistent with existing drilling results and are useful for evaluating the potential thickness of the freshwater wedge.

 

Additional potential zones of freshwater were also identified on other smaller alluvial fans and also other non-fan perimeter locations (e.g., Figure 9.16, Figure 9.17, Figure 9.18 and Figure 9.19). The water supply potential of these additional zones appears to be lower than that of the Archibarca, due to more limited lateral and/or vertical extent of the interpreted freshwater zone. Nevertheless, these occurrences may yield useful quantities of freshwater, and would be worthwhile to evaluate further, depending on final water supply results from the Archibarca Fan.

 

The VES results are also useful for general delineation of the freshwater/brine interface on the salar boundary. They were used to identify follow-up sampling locations at perimeter drilling and test pitting locations (see Section 9.11). Subsequently, the VES results and the follow-up sampling were used to define grade boundary conditions along the salar perimeter.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 108 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.16     2010-2011 VES Survey Interpretation on the Archibarca Fan, Along Line VI

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 109 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.17     2010-2011 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line 2

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 110 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.18     2010-2011 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line 8

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 111 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.19     2010-2011 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line 20

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 112 of 427

 

 

 

9.72019 Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES)

 

In 2019, Geoelectric prospecting hydrogeological in Cauchari salar. In the study area, 42 Vertical Electrical Surveys were carried out. The objectives of this program were to: 1) explore potential shallow freshwater sources on the basin edges, for future industrial purposes; and 2) evaluate salar boundary conditions related to the configuration of the brine/freshwater interface. The survey lines and results are presented on Figure 9.20 to Figure 9.31.

 

Figure 9.20     2019 VES Survey Area

 

 

Source: Exar (2024)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 113 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.21     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line A

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.22     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line B

 

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.23     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line C

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 114 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.24     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line D

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.25     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line E

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.26     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line F

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 115 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.27     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line G

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.28     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line H

 

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.29     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line I

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 116 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.30     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line J

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.31     2019 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line K

 

 

Source: Exar

 

9.82020 Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES)

 

During 2020, Geoelectric hydrogeological prospecting was conducted in the Rosario River, alluvial fan, Salar de Olaroz. The study was carried out with the objective of identifying, based on geophysics, the different sedimentological units and especially the units that can behave as freshwater aquifers for industrial use. In the study area, 20 (twenty) Vertical Electrical Surveys were carried out. The survey lines and results are presented on Figure 9.32 to Figure 9.39.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 117 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.32     2020 VES Survey Area

 

 

Source: Exar (2024)

 

Figure 9.33     2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line A-A’

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.34     2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line B-B’

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 118 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.35     2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line C-C’

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.36     2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line D-D’

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.37     2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line E-E’

 

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 119 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.38     2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line F-F’

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Figure 9.39     2020 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line G-G’

 

 

Source: Exar

 

9.92021 Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES)

 

In 2021, a new geolectric campaign was carried out. Geoelectric hydrogeological prospecting in mina Irene, Salar de Olaroz. The objective was to identify, based on geophysics, the different sedimentological units and especially the units that can behave as aquifers with different characteristics, such as freshwater, brackish water or brine. In the study area, 6 (six) Vertical Electrical Surveys were carried out. The survey lines and results are presented on Figure 9.40 to Figure 9.42.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 120 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.40     2021 VES Survey Area

 

 

Source: Exar (2024)

 

Figure 9.41     2021 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line A

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 121 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.42     2021 VES Survey Interpretation Along Line B

 

 

Source: Exar

 

9.102024 Vertical Electrical Sounding Survey (VES)

 

Finaly in 2024, a new geophysics study was made, the objective of the study was the characterization of the sedimentological units through geophysical techniques, with a special focus on the identification of those with the potential to act as aquifers for industrial water use, in order to adjust a potential drilling target, in the Salar of Cauchari, geoelectric prospecting hydrogeological, southeast sector, Salar Cauchari

 

In the study area, 9 Vertical Electrical Surveys were carried out. The survey lines and results are presented on Figure 9.43 and Figure 9.44.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 122 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.43     2024 VES Survey Area

 

 

Source: Exar (2024)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 123 of 427

 

 

 

This study recommends carrying out exploratory drilling in the southern sector of the alluvial fan, in the vicinity of the Excauch4, Excauch5, Excauch8, Excauch9 and Excauch4 boreholes, where the greatest thicknesses of the zone saturated with freshwater were interpreted.

 

Figure 9.44     2024 VES Survey Interpretation

 

 

Source: Exar

 

9.11Boundary Investigation

 

The Boundary Investigation was conducted to further assess the configuration of the freshwater/brine interface, at the salar surface and at depth, at selected locations on the salar perimeter. Data from this program were interpreted in conjunction with the VES survey (described in the previous section). Information from these two programs supported the extension of the hydrostratigraphic model and the lithium grade interpolation to the outer boundaries of the salar, and the evaluation of numerical model boundary conditions for lithium (Section 15.0).

 

Test pits and monitoring wells advanced for the Boundary Investigation are shown in Figure 9.45, and were advanced in two successive steps. In the first step, test pits were excavated along lateral transects at salar boundary locations (T3 through T6) or on the edge of the Archibarca Fan (T1 and T2). The purpose of the test pits was to identify the shallow transition zone from brine to freshwater. Test pits were excavated until water was reached, and water samples were collected from the bottom of the pits.

 

Water samples were sent to Alex Stewart Laboratory for major ion analysis. Field parameters, including conductivity, density, and temperature, were also measured and were used for assessing if the transition zone was captured by the transect in real time. For the salar perimeter transects, the capability to fully capture the transition zone was limited by the edge of the Exar claim boundary (T3, T4, and T5) or by difficult access conditions (T6). A summary of test pit transect data for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and lithium is provided in Table 9.1.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 124 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.45     Boundary Investigation Map Showing Test Pit Transects and Multi-level Monitoring Well Nests

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 125 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.1
Test Pit Transect Results for TDS and Lithium
Transect
Test Pit
TDS
(mg/L)
Lithium
(mg/L)
Transect
Test Pit
TDS
(mg/L)
Lithium
(mg/L)
T1-1 1,120 ND T4-3 23,260 33
T1-2 1,420 ND T4-4 110,980 175
T1-3 720 ND T4-5 215,740 402
T1-4 64,860 112 T5-1 12,560 18
T1-5 114,740 194 T5-2 30,220 52
T1-6 175,340 328 T5-3 106,080 240
T1-7 256,540 631 T5-4 128,500 261
T1-8 182,680 327 T5-5 227,200 442
T2-1 1,100 ND T5-6 292,580 619
T2-2 3,640 ND T6-1 No water
T2-3 2,780 ND T6-2 4,200 ND
T2-4 2,300 ND T6-3 6,280 ND
T2-5 59,500 101 T6-4 7,580 ND
T3-1 No water T6-5 21,640 25
T3-2 33,300 45 T6-6 26,860 29
T3-3 84,260 140 T6-7 26,980 34
T3-4 207,920 301 T6-8 22,460 26
T3-5 251,160 362 T6-9 22,200 26
T3-6 237,180 472 T6-10 26,000 35
T4-1 No water T6-11 No water
T4-2 No water ND – below detection limit.

 

The goal of the second step of the investigation was to install multi-level monitoring well nests at the locations identified as central to the freshwater/brine transition zone. In execution, the nests could not be installed directly on the shallow transition zones, due to access restrictions. Well nests were installed on three of the test pit transects and, within each nest the wells were screened at different levels, to enable an evaluation of depth trends in brine strength and lithium grade. Drilling was completed by Andina Perforaciones SRL using rotary methods. A summary of well specifications and sampling results for TDS and lithium is provided in Table 9.2.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 126 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.2
Test Pit Transect Results for TDS and Lithium with Depths
Drill Hole ID Depth of Screened Interval (m)

Casing

Diameter

(in)

Lithology of Screened
Interval

TDS1

(mg/L)

Lithium1

(mg/L)

PT1 59.0–63.0 4.0 Medium to fine sand

265,380

263,120

267,920

559

541

545

PT1A 39.5–43.5 4.0 Sand and Gravel

243,520

243,140

246,260

471

464

457

PT2 39.0–49.0 4.5 Medium to fine sand

190,120

190,640

189,520

372

365

365

PT2A 21.5–29.5 4.5 fine gravel sandy clay matrix

119,280

128,040

123,400

230

250

237

PT2B 11.5–15.5 4.0 fine gravel sandy clay matrix

39,160

39,100

46,040

76

76

87

PT2C 3.5–5.5 4.0 clay

99,600

55,540

197

111

PT3 47.5–77.5 2.0 Inter-bedded sand and clay

19,940

18,920

38

36

PT3 2” 11.5–33.5 4.5 Coarse sand and gravel 18,700 35
PT3 4”       Dry well  

 

(1)Triplicate, duplicate or single samples were collected.

 

9.12Surface Water Monitoring Program

 

A Surface Water Monitoring Program was initiated in early 2010 to record the flow and chemistry of surface water in the vicinity of the Cauchari-Olaroz salars. Measurements were taken at each monitoring location for pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and temperature. A subsequent Surface Water Monitoring Program, measuring identical parameters, was initiated in 2017 with the new drilling and was ongoing as of the effective date of this report. Flow rates are being monitored monthly. Measurements were made by monitoring flow velocity across a measured channel cross-sectional area at each site. Where the flow was too small to measure, it was estimated qualitatively. Monitoring locations are shown in Figure 9.46. Table 9.3 shows the results of this program for every month and the results with different methodologies used to measure the flows. The following methods were used to estimate the flow rates:

 

·Volumetric Method - consisting in a section of a known volume and measurement of time;

 

·Float Method - recording the time it takes a float to pass along a known volumetric section of stream; and

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 127 of 427

 

 

 

·Flow meter - a mechanical spinner tool which measuring the velocity of surface water passing through a known section of stream width.

 

These parameters are somewhat elevated in surface water inflows at the north and south ends of the salars, relative to other surface water inflows.

 

The data acquired from this program supported the water balance calibration and numerical groundwater modeling.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 128 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.46     Surface Water Flow Monitoring Sites

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 129 of 427

 

 

 

 

Table 9.3
Average Surface Water Flow Rates
Year 2017 2018 2019  
Month Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Monthly
Average
(L/s)
Tocomar Norte
April        9.46 8.8   9,14     9.13
May       7.25 7.34     7,00   7.19
June 11.30 13.47 3.33 6.43 9.52         8.81
July      6.62   4.53 3.335       4.83
August 8.65 13.36   7.80 5.33         8.78
September     9.77 26.14 20.21         18.71
October 8.93 8.65 15.61 18.13 12.78         12.82
November 7.58 10.21 14.88 8.71           10.35
December 5.92 9.74   8.34 14.87         9.72
January         9.67     20.83   15.25
February       7.92 8.6   7.66 3.47   6.91
March       8.4 8.8   7,11     8.10
Tocomar Sur
April          51.40 49.40   35,09   45,29
May         24.62 29.42   30,50   28,18
June   66.83 62.66   29.27 28.53       46.82
July          45.08 44.01       44.55
August   46.00 29.02   46.89         40.64
September     46.12   40.64 40.27       42.34
October   36.14 34.37   22.28 28.49       30.32
November   30.32 23.84   23.34 21.45       24.74
December     8.03   33.55 31.97       24.51
January         38.29 45.30       41.80
February         28.08 33.60   46.22 62.66 42.64
March         64.30 48.90   29,96   47.72

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 130 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.3
Average Surface Water Flow Rates
Year 2017 2018 2019  
Month Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Monthly
Average
(L/s)
Tocomar Puente
April          102.8 96.45   103,74 116,54 104,88
May         84 63.46   102,69   83,33
June   194.15 40.64   81.45 81.22       99.36
July      234.99   161.6 135.07       177.22
August   82.28 62.17   147.34 152.9       111.17
September     113.10   44.07 49.33       68.83
October     73.11   42.90 49.86       55.29
November     64.59   43.75 43.02       50.45
December   30.68 51.68   25.75 26.61       33.68
January         55.49 82.88   41.01 40.64 55.01
February         37.36 27.8   47.62   37.59
March         90.42 60.2   25,12   58,58
Afluente Este 1
April          4.99 4.15   0,65   3,26
May         2.65     4,89   3,77
June   16.55 11.45   2.74         10.25
July      6.18             6.18
August   27.33     5.38         16.36
September 6.47 8.34 4.15   7.98         6.74
October   11.31 7.37   7.75         8.81
November   9.54 9.58   5.21         8.11
December   5.37     7.72         6.54
January         11.05     26.13   18.59
February         1.84 1.38   5.86   3.03
March         1.33     6,46   3,89

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 131 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.3
Average Surface Water Flow Rates
Year 2017 2018 2019  
Month Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Monthly
Average
(L/s)
Afluente Este 1R
April        0.75     1,68     1,21
May       0.54     1,04     0.79
June 0.60     0.52           0.56
July  0.92     0.59           0.76
August 0.67     0.56           0.62
September 1.17     1.59           1.38
October 0.81     1.33           1.07
November 0.87     0.85           0.86
December 0.68     1.53           1.10
January       0.57           0.57
February       0.53           0.53
March       0.43     0,65     0.54
Los Berros
April        2.40   1.74   26,34   10.16
May       0.60           0.60
June 10.53     8.77           9.65
July            27.22       27.22
August 11.76 11.76     23.43         15.65
September 4.65     6.15           5.40
October 1.33   1.74 3.78           2.28
November 0.16     1.08           0.62
December 0.19     0.17           0.18
January                    
February       5.97       4.68 4.83 5.16
March       7.29     12,05     9,67

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 132 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.3
Average Surface Water Flow Rates
Year 2017 2018 2019  
Month Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Monthly
Average
(L/s)
Puente Centro Sur Cauchari
April          11.36 10.98       11.17
May       1.70           1.70
June     0.33   20.45         10.39
July            16       16.00
August         11.03         11.03
September 6.96   15.29   15.91         12.72
October 0.77       18.16         9.46
November         3.35         3.35
December         2.23         2.23
January         2.73     9.66   6.19
February       10.60 2.90         6.75
March       5.29 5.85     11,67   7.60

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 133 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.3
Average Surface Water Flow Rates
Year 2017 2018 2019  
Month Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Monthly
Average
(L/s)
Quebrada Arizaro
April        0.33     0,61     0.47
May       0.52     0,27     0.39
June 0.92     0.85           0.88
July                     
August 0.83 0.83   1.35           1.00
September 0.96     1.20           1.08
October 0.60     1.35           0.97
November 0.19920319     0.25           0.22
December 0.12     0.12           0.12
January       2.94           2.94
February       1.35     2.55     1.95
March       0.53     0,31     0.42
Quebrada Guayar
April        0.38     0,53     0.45
May       0.40     0,24     0.32
June 1.28     0.33           0.80
July  1.79     0.24           1.01
August 1.15 1.15   0.22           0.84
September 0.38     0.22           0.30
October 0.39     0.21           0.30
November 0.29     0.29           0.29
December 0.31     0.24           0.27
January       0.27           0.27
February       0.46           0.46
March       0.31     0,43     0.37

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 134 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.3
Average Surface Water Flow Rates
Year 2017 2018 2019  
Month Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Monthly
Average
(L/s)
Río Antuco
April          12.00 11.19   85,21   36.13
May         4.58 7.5   16,18   9,42
June   29.46 7.6   4.00         13.69
July      15.53   8.53 9.8       11.29
August   27.91     13.89         20.90
September     10.62   12.03         11.32
October   16.36 15.28   17.05         16.23
November     12.88   12.78         12.83
December   12.60 13.45   11.15 14.11       12.83
January           9.44   10.64 7.60 9.23
February         15.4 13.27   11.15   9.42
March         9.35 5.9   9,28   8.17
Río Quebar
April          56.37 39.80       48.09
May         35.40 29.32       32.36
June   85.50 22.08   66.04 77.42       62.76
July      76.56   67.63 65.20       69.80
August   86.32 33.86   38.61 42.90       50.42
September     65.09   44.85 44.15       51.36
October   51.86 52.57             52.22
November   51.05 55.63   41.71         49.46
December   20.1 33.82   20.82 22.68       24.36
January         20.39 39.81   34.71   31.64
February         57.80 35.47       46.64
March         76.65 89.25       82.95

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 135 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.3
Average Surface Water Flow Rates
Year 2017 2018 2019  
Month Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Volumetric
(L/s)
Float
(L/s)
Flow
Meter
(L/s)
Monthly
Average
(L/s)
Río Rosario (Puente Aar)
April          334 255   277,49 309,25 293,93
May     276.67   288.95 228.811   208,38 244,32 249.42
June         427.33 338.56       382.95
July          393.19 418.76       405.98
August   331.18 224.52   577.86         377.85
September     114.36   391.75 380.72       295.61
October   33.15 42.37   229.39 235.13       135.01
November   32.27 36.61   131.01 119.09       79.75
December   704.3 459.59   96.87 73.03       333.45
January         92.40 67.90       80.15
February         439 426.17   548.11 216.15 407.36
March         973 781   903,16   885.72
Río Tocomar (Puente Esquina Azul)
April          114.75 117.55       116.15
May         159.6 159.79       159.70
June                    
July            12.67       12.67
August                    
September                    
October                    
November                    
December                    
January                    
February               14.43   14.43
March         151.2 157.6       154.40

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 136 of 427

 

 

 

9.13Brine Level Monitoring Program

 

The static level of subsurface brine was monitored every month from an array of accessible wells within the salars. Monitoring was also conducted at domestic water wells just outside the Cauchari Salar. Measurements were taken with a Solinst Model 101 Water Level Meter. Some wells with difficult access used a Solinst Levelogger, model 3001, which records brine levels once a day.

 

Table 9.4 shows the average depth to static levels observed in the monitoring wells between 2010-2019. Variations in average fluid density and electrical conductivity monitored during sampling and testing were found to be negligible.

 

The data from the Brine Level Monitoring Program was used to calibrate the numerical groundwater model to long-term static conditions. Extensive monitoring of dynamic brine levels (i.e., in response to pumping) was also conducted, for the Pumping Test Program described in Section 9.14.

 

Table 9.4
Static Water Level Measurements for the Period
from January 2010 to February 2019
Borehole
ID
Monitoring
Period

(mm/yy)
Average Water Level
(m below ground
surface)
DL-001 12/17 - 02/19 6.02
ML-001 10/17 - 02/19 7.98
SL-001 09/17 - 02/19 2.05
W-01 02/18 - 02/19 7.95
DL-002 12/17 - 02/19 14.43
ML-002 01/18 - 02/19 12.56
SL-002 10/17 - 02/19 4.73
W-02 02/18 - 02/19 13.34
ML-003 09/17 - 02/19 11.96
DL-003 09/17 - 02/19 14.51
DL-003B 01/18 - 02/19 26.39
DL-004B 03/18 - 02/19 12.47
ML-004 09/17 - 02/19 4.52
SL-004 09/17 - 02/19 2.35
SL-004B 03/18 - 02/19 2.43
DL-005 03/18 - 02/19 17.22
ML-005 12/17 - 02/19 16
W-05 02/18 - 02/19 23.81
DL-006 12/17 - 02/19 11.46
ML-006 11/17 - 02/19 3.11
SL-006 09/17 - 02/19 0.79
SL-007 09/17 - 02/19 3.11

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 137 of 427

 

 

 

Table 9.4
Static Water Level Measurements for the Period
from January 2010 to February 2019
Borehole
ID
Monitoring
Period

(mm/yy)
Average Water Level
(m below ground
surface)
ML-007 12/17 - 02/19 8.67
DL-007 12/17- 02/19 15.90
DL-008 03/18 - 02/19 14.1
ML-008 10/17 - 02/19 Artesian
DL-009 12/17 - 02/19 18.42
ML-009 12/17 - 2/19 7.68
SL-009 09/17 - 02/19 4.72
DL-010 01/18 - 02/19 8.66
ML-010 09/17 - 02/19 5.39
SL-010 12/17 - 11/18 3.3
DL-011 01/18 - 02/19 13.01
ML-011 10/17 - 02/19 5.46
DL-012 01/18 - 02/19 5.70
ML-012 04/18 - 02/19 11.96
DL-013 01/18 - 02/19 8.85
ML-013 01/18 - 02/19 7.06
SL-013 01/18 - 02/19 Artesian
SL-014 01/18 - 02/19 2.41
ML-014 01/18 - 02/19 9.53
DL-014 01/18 - 02/19 12.72
DDH-04A 01/10 - 01/19 3.22
DDH-05 01/09 - 01/19 1.92
DDH-06A 02/10 - 02/19 3.69
DDH-07 01/10 - 02/19 1.54
DDH-08 02/10 - 02/19 1.05
DDH-09A 04/10 - 02/19 2.64
DDH-11 06/10 - 02/19 9.36
DDH-12A 05/10 - 02/19 5.72
DDH-13 06/10 - 01/19 4.23
DDH-14 07/10 - 12/18 7.39
DDH-15 08/10 - 12/18 2.09
DDH-16 07/10 - 02/19 10.90
DDH-17 08/10 - 02/19 Artesian
DDH-18 08/10 - 02/19 4.21
DDH-1 08/10 - 02/29 11.40
PP-20 03/14 - 02/19 18.00

 

Figure 9.47, Figure 9.48 and Figure 9.49 show the average depth of water levels for observation wells drilled in the shallow part of the aquifer (50 m deep), intermediate parts of the aquifer (250 to 300 m deep) and in the deeper parts of the aquifer (450 and 600 m deep).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 138 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.47     Average Depth to Static Water Levels in Shallow Wells (50 m)

 

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 139 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.48     Average Depth to Static Water Levels in Intermediate Depth Wells
(250 - 300 m)

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 140 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.49      Average Depth to Static Water Levels in Deep Wells (450 - 600 m)

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 141 of 427

 

 

 

9.14Pumping Test Program

 

9.14.1Overview

 

Based on exploration results in 2017-2019, production wells drilled after the 2011 production wells penetrate deeper parts of the aquifer. Deeper production wells increase the depth of the extractable part of the aquifer. A total of ten pumping wells and associated observation wells were installed at the site from 2011 to 2019 at the locations shown in Figure 9.50.

 

The pumping tests were conducted with two main objectives. The first objective was to develop broad-scale estimates of K (from Transmissivity (T)) and Ss (from Storativity (S)), for use in the numerical groundwater model. The second objective was to assess hydraulic interconnections between hydrostratigraphic units, to assist in understanding the overall flow system and in developing the groundwater model.

 

Drilling and testing in 2011 was conducted by Andina Perforaciones of Salta, Argentina, under field supervision by Conhidro of Salta, Argentina; in 2018-2019 by Hidrotec Perforaciones and Wichi Toledo. The drilling method was direct rotary. Field supervision of the pumping tests was provided by Exar personnel. The constant rate pumping tests were preceded by step tests, to determine appropriate pumping rates for the constant rate tests.

 

The 2011 pumping test analysis was conducted independently by both Conhidro and Matrix Solutions Inc.; in 2018-2019 the pumping test analysis is being conducted by Exar with technical review by Montgomery.

 

A summary of the pumping tests carried out during 2011-2019 is provided in Appendix 1.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 142 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 9.50      Production Wells

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 143 of 427

 

 

 

9.15Chemistry of Samples Collected During Pump Tests

 

A plot of lithium results for samples collected during 2018-2019 pumping tests is provided in Figure 9.51. The record of concentration is relatively stable for each well.

 

Figure 9.51      Lithium Concentrations in Samples Collected During Pump Tests

 

 

 

* Data points show samples taken hourly at the beginning of the pumping test and daily after two days. In some cases, the pumping test stopped due to mechanical reasons and the sampling resumed when the pumping re-started.

 

Source: Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 144 of 427

 

 

 

10.0Drilling

 

10.1Reverse Circulation (RC) Borehole Program 2009-2010

 

The objectives of this program were to: 1) develop vertical profiles of brine chemistry at depth in the salars, and 2) provide geological and hydrogeological data. This program was conducted between September 2009 and August 2010 and the drilling is summarized in Table 10.1. Twenty-four RC boreholes (PE-01 through PE-22, plus two twin holes) were completed during this period, for total drilling of 4,176 m. Borehole depths range from 28 m (PE-01) to 371 m (PE-10).

 

Table 10.1
Borehole Drilling Summary for the RC Borehole Program Conducted
in 2009 and 2010
RC
Borehole
Drilling Interval Drilling
Length (m)
RC
Borehole
Drilling Interval Drilling
Length (m)
From (m) To (m) From (m) To (m)
PE-01 - 28 28 PE-13 - 209 209
PE-02 - 40 40 PE-14 - 144 144
PE-03 - 90 90 PE-14A 144 228 84
PE-04 - 187 187 PE-15 - 205 205
PE-05 - 210 210 PE-16 - 64 64
PE-06 - 165 165 PE-17 - 246 246
PE-07 78.9 249 170.1 PE-17A - 220 220
PE-08 - 194 194 PE-18 - 312 312
PE-09 - 198 198 PE-19 - 267 267
PE-10 - 371 371 PE-20 - 204 204
PE-11 - 80 80 PE-21 - 222 222
PE-12 - 36 36 PE-22 - 230 230
               
Total Boreholes: 24 / Total drilling: 4,176 m

Note: RC = reverse circulation.

 

Major Drilling, a Canadian drilling company with operations in Argentina, was contracted to carry out the RC drilling using a Schramm T685W rig and support equipment. The holes were initially drilled using ODEX and open-hole RC drilling methods at 10”, 8”, and 6” diameters. No drilling additives were used. A change was later made from ODEX and open-hole RC drilling to tri-cone bits of 17½” 16”, 9½”, 7⅞”, 6”, and 5½” diameters. Bit diameters were selected based on ambient lithological conditions at each borehole, with the objective of maximizing the drilling depth.

 

During drilling, chip and brine samples are collected from the cyclone at one-metre intervals. Occasionally, lost circulation resulted in the inability to collect samples from some intervals. Brine sample collection is summarized in Table 10.2. A total of 1,487 brine samples were collected from 15 of the RC boreholes and submitted for laboratory chemical analyses. For each brine sample, field measurements were conducted on an irregular basis, for potassium (by portable XRF analyzer), and regularly for electrical conductivity, pH and temperature. Sample collection, preparation and analytical methods are described in Section 11.0.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 145 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.2
Summary of Brine Samples Collected and Submitted for
Laboratory Analysis from the RC and DDH Borehole Programs
Description Brine Samples
Total Field Samples 1,614
Total RC Borehole Program Field Samples 1,487
Total DDH Borehole Program Field Samples 127
Total Samples (Including QC) 2,390
Total Field Duplicates 260
Total Blanks 263
Total Standards 253

Note: RC = reverse circulation, DDH = diamond drill hole.

 

Air-lift flow measurements were conducted at six-metre intervals in six RC boreholes, when circulation was adequate. Daily static water level measurements were carried out inside the drill string at the start of each drilling shift, using a water level tape. Boreholes were completed with steel surface casing, a surface sanitary cement seal, and a lockable cap.

 

Average concentrations and chemical ratios of brine samples are shown in Table 10.3, for sampled intervals in 14 of the 15 sampled RC boreholes. Results for PE-3 (a flowing artesian well) are not included in the table because it receives freshwater from the alluvial cone adjacent to its position on the eastern margin of the Olaroz Salar. The sampled brines have a relatively low Mg/Li ratio (lower than most sampling intervals), indicating that the brines would be amenable to a conventional lithium recovery process. RC borehole logs are provided by King (2010b), including available brine sampling results.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 146 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.3
Brine Concentrations (mg/L) and Ratios Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals
for RC Program Boreholes
Borehole Depth
(m)
Length
(m)
B K Li Mg SO4 Mg/Li K/Li SO4/Li
PE-04 11-32 21 795 5,987 692 2,458 20,498 4 8.652 29.621
59-79 20 1,033 7,225 759 1,993 24,114 3 9.519 31.770
83-187 89 935 6,226 623 1,844 22,568 3 9.994 36.246
PE-06 18-21 3 729 7,060 834 2,737 18,234 3 8.465 21.872
54-165 111 1,261 6,982 870 2,031 16,731 2 8.025 19.240
PE-07 78-108 20 824 3,520 380 907 14,388 2 9.263 37.867
109-113 4 1,078 5,328 768 1,924 16,961 3 6.938 22.075
117-136 19 1,019 3,887 448 1,151 13,238 3 8.676 29.530
145-205 54 1,054 4,558 579 1,461 16,420 3 7.872 28.351
207-248 38 1,030 4,205 490 1,080 15,326 2 8.582 31.247
PE-09 72-105 33 921 4,229 530 1,482 17,379 3 7.979 32.800
109-163 54 809 4,998 646 2,126 23,746 3 7.737 36.755
164-197 33 827 5,998 741 1,734 16,445 2 8.094 22.196
PE-10 60-152 92 1,041 4,051 396 174 17,495 0 10.230 44.183
152-234 82 1,398 6,072 598 1,144 20,401 2 10.154 34.106
PE-13 102-105 3 655 3,963 505 1,383 16,225 3 7.848 32.129
108-120 12 751 4,433 533 1,379 20,465 3 8.317 38.431
PE-14 147-179 32 860 6,572 733 1,918 23,359 3 8.966 31.853
179-192 13 874 6,287 681 1,821 20,763 3 9.232 30.499
192-228 36 861 6,152 712 1,842 21,222 3 8.640 29.813
PE-15 62-92 30 981 5,096 527 1,174 16,079 2 9.670 30.527
103-132 29 762 3,719 465 1,066 16,639 2 7.998 35.758
144-156 12 883 4,794 582 1,238 13,966 2 8.237 24.017
168-189 21 888 5,079 606 1,224 12,575 2 8.381 20.744

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 147 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.3
Brine Concentrations (mg/L) and Ratios Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals
for RC Program Boreholes
Borehole Depth
(m)
Length
(m)
B K Li Mg SO4 Mg/Li K/Li SO4/Li
PE-17 78-84 6 968 3,910 537 1,623 17,021 3 7.281 31.716
87-91 4 901 3,572 481 1,442 16,137 3 7.426 33.531
103-107 4 669 4,229 482 1,121 18,481 2 8.774 38.322
110-111 1 863 5,446 648 1,702 23,544 3 8.404 36.333
154-156 2 1,044 4,026 472 935 12,167 2 8.530 25.805
171-174 3 968 4,269 507 1,109 12,965 2 8.420 25.573
PE-18 140-260 120 1,396 7,216 717 1,489 27,284 2 10.064 38.064
PE-19 26-30 4 1,154 5,152 404 761 17,275 2 12.752 42.733
42-62 20 1,182 7,601 911 3,050 20,347 3 8.344 22.343
64-132 68 817 6,347 738 2,456 18,160 3 8.600 24.604
145-267 122 757 5,957 655 1,906 21,467 3 9.095 32.755
PE-20 18-30 12 717 6,712 747 2,706 21,407 4 8.985 28.644
60-127 64 821 5,759 650 1,778 22,117 3 8.860 34.013
129-150 19 794 6,389 698 2,183 21,572 3 9.153 30.887
155-204 49 795 6,193 691 2,193 21,464 3 8.962 31.040
PE-21 92-112 20 1,255 5,619 661 1,298 22,085 2 8.501 33.389
113-134 21 1,235 5,587 735 1,412 22,605 2 7.601 30.761
135-222 87 1,233 7,162 825 1,694 22,086 2 8.681 26.769
PE-22 72-89 17 1,095 6,414 656 1,456 26,397 2 9.777 40.248
90-197 107 1,136 7,216 696 1,482 26,604 2 10.368 38.232
198-230 32 1,051 7,036 733 1,913 24,928 3 9.599 34.002

Note: RC = reverse circulation.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 148 of 427

 

 

 

10.2Diamond Drilling (DDH) Borehole Program 2009-2010

 

The objectives of this program were to collect: 1) continuous cores for mapping and characterization, 2) geologic samples for geotechnical testing, including Relative Brine Release Capacity (RBRC), grain size and density, 3) brine samples using low-flow pumping methods, and 4) information for the construction of observation wells for future sampling and monitoring. The drilling reported herein was conducted between October 2009 and August 2010. DD Borehole Program drilling is summarized in Table 10.4. Twenty-nine boreholes (DDH-1 through DDH-18, plus twin holes) were completed, for a total of 5,714 m of drilling. Borehole depths range from 79 m (DDH-2) to 449.5 m (DDH-7).

 

Table 10.4
Borehole Drilling Summary for the DDH Program Conducted in 2009 and 2010
DDH
Borehole
Drilling Interval Drilling
Length
(m)
DDH
Borehole
Drilling Interval Drilling
Length
(m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
From
(m)
To
(m)
DDH-1 - 272.45 272.45 DDH-10B - 36.80 36.80
DDH-2 - 78.90 78.90 DDH-11 165.00 260.80 95.80
DDH-3 - 322.00 322.00 DDH-12 - 309.00 309.00
DDH-4 - 264.00 264.00 DDH-12A - 294.00 294.00
DDH-4A - 264.00 264.00 DDH-13 - 193.50 193.50
DDH-5 - 115.50 115.50 DDH-13A - 20.50 20.50
DDH-6A - 338.50 338.50 DDH-13B - 20.50 20.50
DDH-6 - 129.00 129.00 DDH-13C - 20.50 20.50
DDH-7 371.00 449.50 78.50 DDH-13D - 20.50 20.50
DDH-8 - 250.50 250.50 DDH-14 - 254.50 254.50
DDH-8A - 252.50 252.50 DDH-15 - 206.50 206.50
DDH-9 - 362.50 362.50 DDH-16 - 270.00 270.00
DDH9A - 352.00 352.00 DDH-17 - 79.00 79.00
DDH-10 - 350.50 350.50 DDH-18 - 203.50 203.50
DDH-10A - 258.00 258.00        
               
Total Boreholes: 29 / Total Drilling: 5,714 m

Note: DDH = diamond drill hole.

 

Major Drilling, a Canadian drilling company with operations in Argentina, was contracted to carry out the drilling using a Major-50 drill rig and support equipment. The boreholes were drilled using triple tube PQ and HQ drilling methods. During drilling, core was retrieved and stored in boxes for subsequent geological analysis. Borehole logs are provided by King (2010b). Undisturbed samples were taken from the core in PVC sleeves (two-inch diameter and five-inch length) at selected intervals, for laboratory testing of geotechnical parameters including: RBRC, grain size, and particle density. A total of 832 undisturbed samples were tested.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 149 of 427

 

 

 

On completion of exploration drilling, selected DD boreholes were converted to observation wells to enable brine sample collection as a means of supplementing the brine data collected through the RC Borehole Program. The observation wells were prepared by installing Schedule 80, 2-inch diameter, PVC casing and slotted (1 mm) screen in the boreholes. The wells were completed with steel surface casing, a surface sanitary cement seal and lockable cap. Brine sampling was conducted from March to August 2010. Samples were initially collected with a low-flow pump. However, later samples were collected with a bailer, due to technical difficulties with the low-flow setup. Analytical results are summarized in Table 10.5.

 

Table 10.5
Brine Concentrations (mg/L) Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals for DDH Program Boreholes
Borehole Depth (m) Length (m) B K Li Mg SO4 Mg/Li
DDH-01 15-55 40 610 4.847 523 1.147 9.039 2.20
70-105 40 765 5.253 596 1.399 10.901 2.35
140-170 30 832 5.518 634 1.528 11.694 2.41
205-260 55 839 5.558 636 1.463 11.572 2.30
DDH-04 15-190 175 668 4.968 544 1.039 23.038 1.91
DDH-06 100-115 15 674 3.961 515 1.100 15.934 2.14
118-136 18 667 5.860 627 1.353 18.552 2.16
140-190 51 719 6.698 732 1.579 20.853 2.16
DDH-08 20-75 50 611 3.735 408 1.409 10.537 3.46
80-205 125 822 5.232 588 1.223 16.971 2.08
DDH-12 65-70 5 696 4.120 464 927 16.834 2.00
170-185 10 800 5.050 545 1.161 17.888 2.13
225-285 25 827 5.249 565 1.223 17.819 2.16
DDH-13 50-140 90 872 5.940 650 1.921 20.955 2.96

 

10.3Diamond Drilling (DDH) Borehole Program 2017-2019

 

The objectives of this program were to collect: 1) continuous cores for mapping and characterization of the shallow, intermediate and deeper parts of the aquifer; 2) geologic samples for geotechnical testing and grain size analysis; 3) brine samples using a bailer; and 4) information for the construction of observation wells for future sampling and monitoring. The drilling reported in Table 10.6 was conducted between July 2017 and June 2019. It should be noted that the lithium resource is contained in brines and is not affected by the drill core recovery.

 

The 2017, 2018, and 2019 programs included drilling 50 m, 200 m and 450 to 600 m deep, smaller diameter wells from the same drilling platform. Shallow and intermediate depth boreholes were competed in the same borehole. The shallowest wells use 1” diameter PVC casing. The deeper borehole was drilled 15 m away from the shallow and intermediate well locations. The intermediate and deep wells were cased using Schedule 80, 2-inch or 2.5-inch diameter, PVC casing and slotted (1 mm) screen in the boreholes. The wells were completed with steel surface casing, a surface sanitary cement seal and lockable cap. Brine sampling was conducted prior to pump testing. Sample collection, preparation and analytical methods are described in Section 11.0.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 150 of 427

 

 

 

Major Drilling, a Canadian drilling company with operations in Argentina, and Ideal Drilling, a Bolivian company, were contracted to carry out the drilling program.

 

The deep boreholes were drilled using HQ-diameter size, triple-tube core recovery methods. During drilling, core was retrieved and stored in metal boxes for subsequent geological analysis. The shallow and medium depth boreholes were drilled with tricone 5 ½” diameter rotary methods. Description of continuous core from the deep borehole served as overall characterization of lithologies for the location of the platform. A photo of the black sand targeted in DDH19D-001 is shown in Figure 10.1.

 

All borehole locations and their associated platforms are presented in Figure 10.2. Brine concentrations averaged across select intervals are presented in Table 10.7 Brine sample collection is summarized in Section 11.4.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 151 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.6
Borehole Drilling Summary for the DDH Program Conducted in 2017 and 2019
DD
Borehole
ID
Piezometer
Name
Screen
Diameter
Plataform Contractor Total
Depth

(m)
Screen
Top
(mbtw)
Screen
Base
(mbtw)
X
Coordinate
Y
Coordinate
DD17S-001 ML-001 2" 1 IDEAL 200 109.40 174.80 3424377.00 7378282.00
DD17S-001 SL-001 1" 1 IDEAL 50 23.80 47.73 3424377.00 7378282.00
DD17D-001 DL-001 2.5" 1 IDEAL 450 265.50 444.00 3424392.00 7378275.00
DD17D-002B DL-002 2" 4 IDEAL 450 343.36 444.24 3427266.00 7396185.00
DD17S-002 ML-002 2" 4 IDEAL 189.1 109.20 168.70 3427273.00 7396180.00
DD17S-002 SL-002 1" 4 IDEAL 50 23.80 47.73 3427273.00 7396180.00
DD17S-003 ML-003 2" 9 IDEAL 200 151.72 193.30 3430870.00 7404487.00
DD17D-003 DL-003 2.5" 9 IDEAL 650 292.60 636.10 3430861.00 7404476.00
RC17D-003 DL-003 B 2.5" 9 Major 648 221.20 642.00 3430859.00 7404497.00
RC17S-004 ML-004 2" 2 Major 200 122.75 194.00 3422991.00 7379367.00
RC17S-004 SL-004 1" 2 Major 50 23.80 47.73 3422991.00 7379367.00
DD17D-004 DL-004 2.5" 2 IDEAL 650 427.68 617.57 3423010.00 7379367.00
RC17D-004 B DL-004 B 2.5" 2 Major 550 196.92 547.30 3423006.00 7379355.00
RC17S-004 B SL-004B 2.5 " 2 IDEAL 50 14.30 50.00 3423001.00 7379362.00
DD17D-005 DL-005 2.5" 7 IDEAL 604.55 309.25 576.77 3429086.00 7400627.00
RC17S-005 ML-005 2" 7 Major 192 115.00 186.40 3429092.00 7400696.00
RC17S-006 ML-006 2" 3 13 14 Major 200 122.70 194.00 3427230.00 7392980.00
RC17S-006 SL-006 1" 3 13 14 Major 50 23.80 47.73 3427230.00 7392980.00
DD17D-006B DL-006 2.5 3 13 14 IDEAL 450 255.90 443.95 3427245.00 7393001.00
RC17S-007 SL-007 1" 8 15 Major 50 23.80 47.73 3429894.00 7398465.00
RC17S-007 ML-007 2" 8 15 Major 200 110.10 175.50 3429894.00 7398465.00
DD17D-007 DL-007 2.5" 8 15 IDEAL 450 217.10 436.70 3429885.00 7398456.00
RC17S-008 ML-008 2.5" 6 Major 160 86.10 151.50 3431846.00 7398167.00
DD17D-008 DL-08 2" 6 Major 447 267.30 439.56 3431865.00 7398168.00
RC17S-009 SL-009 2" 11 12 Major 50 23.80 47.73 3432230.00 7407612.00
RC17S-009 ML-009 2.5" 11 12 Major 200 122.90 194.00 3432230.00 7407612.00
DD17D-009 DL-09 2.5" 11 12 Major 450 218.00 444.05 3432221.00 7407596.00
RC17S-010 B ML-010 2.5" 5 Major 200 115.97 187.1 3429367.00 7395232.00
RC17S-010 B SL-010 2" 5 Major 50 23.80 47.73 3429367.00 7395232.00

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 152 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.6
Borehole Drilling Summary for the DDH Program Conducted in 2017 and 2019
DD
Borehole
ID
Piezometer
Name
Screen
Diameter
Plataform Contractor Total
Depth

(m)
Screen
Top
(mbtw)
Screen
Base
(mbtw)
X
Coordinate
Y
Coordinate
DD17D-010 DL-10 2.5" 5 Major 450 230.10 444.40 3429348.00 7395235.00
RC17S-011 ML-011 2.5" 16 Major 200 101.00 166.00 3433260.00 7411045.00
DD17D-011 DL-011 2.5" 16 IDEAL 450 235.80 444.00 3433255.00 7411065.00
RC17S-012 ML-012 2.5" 10 Major 200 128.94 194.39 3433213.00 7405310.00
DD17D-012 DL-012 3" 10 Major 451.65 204.34 436 3433225.00 7405308.00
RC17S-13 SL-13 1" 18 IDEAL 50 23.8 47.6 3426671.00 7379792.00
RC17S-13 ML-013 2" 18 IDEAL 200 122.7 194 3426671.00 7379792.00
DD17D-013 DL-013 2.5" 18 IDEAL 450 279.18 443 3426658.00 7379792.00
DD17D-014 DL-014 2.5" 17 20 IDEAL 431.35 238 425.03 3426361.00 7387640.00
RC17S-014 ML-014 2.5" 17 20 IDEAL 200 104.75 194.9 3426381.00 7387647.00
RC17S-014 SL-014 1" 17 20 IDEAL 26.7 2.9 26.7 3426361.00 7387640.00
DD18D-001 Cemented 2.5" CN-10 IDEAL 300 Cemented Cemented 3430069.00 7403904.00
DD18D-002 Cemented 2.5" CN-14 IDEAL 300 Cemented Cemented 3431478.00 7406690.00
DD18D-003 Abandoned 2.5" CN-19 IDEAL 13 Abandoned Abandoned 3428499.00 7398500.00
DD18D-004 Cemented 2.5" CN-02 IDEAL 300 Cemented Cemented 3427303.00 7397557.00
DD18D-005 Cemented 2.5" CS-28 IDEAL 300 Cemented Cemented 3424500.00 7382499.00
DD18D-006 Cemented 2.5" CS-31 IDEAL 300 Cemented Cemented 3426650.00 7385299.00
DD18D-007 Cemented 2.5" P-17 IDEAL 300 Cemented Cemented 3424250.00 7385700.00
DD19D-001 DD19D-001 - 1 Hidrotec 632 - - 3424376.00 7378282.00
DD19D-PE09 DD19D-PE09 2” PE-09 Hidrotec 358 42 352 3419473.00 7374367.00

Note: DD = diamond drilling, DDH = diamond drill hole, mbtw = metres below top of well.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 153 of 427

 

 

 

 

Figure 10.1 Black Sand in DD19D-001

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 154 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 10.2 Borehole Locations and Associated Drilling Platforms

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 155 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.7
Brine Concentrations (mg/L) Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals for
DDH Program Boreholes 2017-2019

DD

Borehole

ID

From

– To

(m)

Lenth

(m)

Li

(mg/L)

K

(mg/L)

Mg

(mg/L)

H3BO3

(mg/L)

SO4

(mg/L)

Mg/Li
DL-001 0-100 100 574.0 5465.0 1584.0 5953.0 18996.0 2.8
DL-001 100-200 100 549.0 5368.0 1645.8 5782.8 20878.7 3.0
DL-001 200-300 100 502.3 4661.1 1674.6 6076.0 24260.6 3.3
DL-001 300-400 100 585.2 5186.1 1230.1 4477.4 22927.4 2.1
DL-001 400-450 50 579.4 4897.2 1230.1 5273.0 24900.6 2.1
DD19D-001 450-632 182 559.7 4768.0 1309.4 4604.7 18795.7 2.3
DL-002 0-100 100 528.0 3867.0 1182.0 6404.0 15717.0 2.2
DL-002 100-200 100 519.0 4129.0 1168.0 6355.0 15695.0 2.3
DL-002 200-300 100 588.0 4113.0 1172.0 6397.0 15578.0 2.0
DL-002 300-400 100 515.0 4208.0 1208.0 6781.0 15785.0 2.3
DL-002 400-450 50 511.6 4214.3 1315.4 6820.8 15955.8 2.6
DL-003B 0-250 250 805.9 6349.2 1271.1 9181.9 20757.0 1.6
DL-003B 250-300 50 770.5 5760.3 1289.0 9417.1 22503.2 1.7
DL-003B 300-400 100 807.2 5907.1 1235.2 9502.7 23114.7 1.5
DL-003B 400-500 100 767.3 4774.6 1609.0 7210.6 16808.4 2.1
DL-003B 500-600 100 730.8 4409.2 1814.8 6747.7 16686.6 2.5
DL-004B 0-200 200 652.9 4400.8 1594.7 4775.6 21278.4 2.4
DL-004B 200-300 100 679.0 5426.6 1831.9 4771.0 22094.8 2.7
DL-004B 300-400 100 733.2 5499.0 1936.9 4900.2 24440.0 2.6
DL-004B 400-500 100 757.0 5653.2 1871.8 4859.6 24786.3 2.5
DL-005 0-100 100 686.0 6100.5 1127.0 9205.9 31482.5 1.6
DL-005 100-200 100 685.4 5887.4 1101.6 8821.4 30967.2 1.6
DL-005 200-300 100 696.5 5938.9 1124.2 8645.7 31649.8 1.6
DL-005 300-375 75 766.1 6688.0 1349.8 8519.3 24563.2 1.8

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 156 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.7
Brine Concentrations (mg/L) Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals for
DDH Program Boreholes 2017-2019

DD

Borehole

ID

From

– To

(m)

Lenth

(m)

Li

(mg/L)

K

(mg/L)

Mg

(mg/L)

H3BO3

(mg/L)

SO4

(mg/L)

Mg/Li
DL-006 0-100 100 534.6 4775.0 1275.8 6196.5 17131.5 2.4
DL-006 100-200 100 552.0 4601.0 1299.0 6990.0 15762.0 2.4
DL-006 200-300 100 561.0 4627.0 1352.0 6782.0 14510.0 2.4
DL-006 300-400 100 534.0 4627.0 1357.0 7034.0 15607.0 2.5
DL-007 0-100 100 446.0 3741.8 434.9 11671.4 46958.1 1.0
DL-007 100-200 100 481.7 4223.7 705.2 9843.0 43842.5 1.5
DL-007 200-300 100 459.9 3766.3 422.6 11646.9 51584.5 0.9
DL-007 300-400 100 448.9 3865.7 425.2 11771.7 54743.3 0.9
DL-008 0-100 100 315.1 2240.6 1260.4 3517.3 11319.9 4.0
DL-008 100-200 100 315.9 2281.5 1275.3 3201.1 11115.0 4.0
DL-008 200-300 100 237.0 1968.0 1172.0 2468.0 9528.0 4.9
DL-008 300-400 100 267.0 2064.0 1236.0 3837.0 10212.0 4.6
DL-009 0-100 100 782.0 5295.0 1170.0 10505.0 19910.0 1.5
DL-009 100-200 100 769.9 5205.7 1054.6 10680.3 20040.8 1.4
DL-009 200-300 100 689.0 4034.0 685.0 11400.0 43208.0 1.0
DL-009 300-400 100 765.0 5299.0 1325.0 10586.0 21966.0 1.7
DL-010 0-19 19 411.1 3566.6 943.0 6913.1 23817.3 2.3
DL-010 19-250 231 462.1 3733.1 766.1 8028.0 25049.6 1.7
DL-010 250-300 50 463.2 3803.3 792.4 8014.9 25964.7 1.7
DL-010 300-400 100 433.3 3379.7 520.0 10683.9 44196.6 1.2
DL-011 0-100 100 549.9 3165.0 1061.9 9470.5 17963.4 1.9
DL-011 100-200 100 523.7 3191.2 1082.8 8854.9 17539.2 2.1
DL-012 0-100 100 653.9 5788.6 1421.7 4861.0 15258.6 2.2
DL-012 100-200 100 690.8 6035.8 1452.0 5708.5 15150.0 2.1

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 157 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.7
Brine Concentrations (mg/L) Averaged Across Selected Depth Intervals for
DDH Program Boreholes 2017-2019

DD

Borehole

ID

From

– To

(m)

Lenth

(m)

Li

(mg/L)

K

(mg/L)

Mg

(mg/L)

H3BO3

(mg/L)

SO4

(mg/L)

Mg/Li
DL-012 200-275 75 663.7 5825.5 1428.1 4621.0 15485.4 2.2
DL-013 0-100 100 631.0 5351.0 1547.0 8882.0 25501.0 2.5
DL-013 100-200 100 585.6 4977.6 1450.6 8479.0 21838.0 2.5
DL-013 200-260 60 476.6 4545.8 1242.8 8541.8 25662.0 2.6
DL-014 0-225 225 476.0 5224.0 1094.0 4008.0 23495.0 2.3
DL-014 225-300 75 458.0 4705.0 1092.0 7155.0 24746.0 2.4
DL-014 300-400 100 453.0 4790.0 1073.0 6424.0 25694.0 2.4
ML-001 0-50 50 715.0 6104.0 2067.0 5291.0 37239.0 2.9
ML-001 50-100 50 679.0 7422.0 1701.0 5972.0 40111.0 2.5
ML-001 100-150 50 580.0 6357.0 1232.0 5904.0 29900.0 2.1
ML-002 0-50 50 641.0 4850.0 1264.0 6255.0 17492.0 2.0
ML-002 50-100 50 623.0 5164.0 1328.0 6240.0 18615.0 2.1
ML-002 100-150 50 557.1 5074.1 1093.5 4747.1 19376.0 2.0
DD19D-PE09 286-301 15 545.05 4552.8 1385.4 5168.7 19077.0 2.5
DD19D-PE09 325-340 15 532.4 4573.8 1458.05 4917.4 20328.0 2.7

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 158 of 427

 

 

 

10.4Production Well Drilling

 

Information from the exploration drilling and pump tests was used to select the locations of the production wells that are used to pump lithium brine to the evaporation ponds. Since 2011, a total of 43 production wells have been drilled on the Property.

 

The production well field uses three wells drilled in 2011, these wells had a smaller diameter (8 inches). The wells drilled in 2018/2019 were drilled deeper and used a larger diameter according to the expected flow. The production wells were drilled with conventional rotary rigs and a surface casing at the top of the wells to ensure the stability of the well head over time. The design of the deeper wells used larger diameter casing in the upper 200/250 m, continuing with smaller diameter casing below. This telescopic design saves costs and drilling time. An example of brine being pumped from a well is shown in Figure 10.3.

 

The production wells use stainless steel screen, which guarantees a long life and avoids corrosion. The Stanley steel screen casing is inserted in each well at different intervals and is inserted facing the productive horizons of the aquifer. As a rule, the minimum length used is two metres. The solid screen casing is generally used in front of massive halite and clay layers (aquicludes and aquitards). The solid and screen casing alternate through the aquifer.

 

Details of the production wells and length of screened casing and solid casing used in each well are provided in Table 10.8. Well locations are shown in Figure 10.4.

 

Figure 10.3 Pumping Well W18-05

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 159 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.8
Production Well Drilling and Construction Details
Pumping
Well
Year Total
Depth
(m)
Coordinates Drilling
Method
Drilling
Diameter

(Inches)
Well Construction Construction Material
X Y Total Length
of Casing
Inserted

(m)
Total Length of
Screen Casing
Inserted
(m)
Solid
Casing
Screen
Casing
PB-03A 2011 204 7383015 3425965 Rotary 22" (0-39 m) 8" (122.9 m) 8" (77.89 m) Carbon Steel Galvanized Steel
13 1/4" (39-205 m)
PB-04 2011 201 7381604 3421378 Rotary 22" (0-57 m) 8" (220.7 m) 8" (80.88 m) Carbon Steel Galvanized Steel
12 1/4" (57-305 m)
PB-06A 2011 305 7377554 3419220 Rotary 18" (0-47 m) 8" (114.5 m) 8" (79.0 m) Carbon Steel Galvanized Steel
12 1/4" (47-194 m)
W18-05 2018 270 7382499 3424500 Rotary 17" (0-273.7 m) 10" (138.0 m) 10" (132.4 m) Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
13" (273.7-278 m)
W17-06 2018 455 7392988 3427261 Rotary 27"(0-12 m) 20" (12 m)   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17"(12-229.5 m) 10" (123.5 m) 10" (99.0 m)
13"(229.5-455 m) 6" (35.5 m) 6" (187.0 m)
W18-06 2019 460 7385299 3426650 Rotary 27" (0-44.5 m) 20" (44 m)   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (44.5-253 m) 10" (104.0 m) 10" (146.0 m)
12 1/4" (253-450 m) 6" (51 m) 6" (149.0 m)
W11-06 2019 434 7383792 3424279 Rotary 27" (0-41.3 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (41.3-212.7 m) 10" (127.5 m) 10" (74.0 m)
12 1/4" (212.7-434 m) 6" (59.5 m) 6" (167.0 m)
W18-23 2019 484 7381500 3423500 Rotary 27" (0-36 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
18 1/2" (36-230 m) 10" (91.5 m) 10" (134.0 m)
12 1/4" (230-486 m) 6" (73.5 m) 6" (185.0 m)
W-04A 2019 478 7379360 3423300 Rotary 27" (0-51 m) 10" (292.0 m) 10" (181.0 m) Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (51-478 m)
WR-10 2019 445 7380009 3420981 Rotary 27" (0-23 m) 10" (114.5 m) 6" (33.5 m) 10" (70 m) 6" (132 m) Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
18" (23-190 m)
13 1/2" (190-355 m)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 160 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.8
Production Well Drilling and Construction Details
Pumping
Well
Year Total
Depth
(m)
Coordinates Drilling
Method
Drilling
Diameter

(Inches)
Well Construction Construction Material
X Y Total Length
of Casing
Inserted

(m)
Total Length of
Screen Casing
Inserted
(m)
Solid
Casing
Screen
Casing
WR-28 2019 464 7391301 3427390 Rotary 27" (0-65.44 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (65.44-225 m) 10" (123.5 m) 10" (97 m)
12 1/4" (225-464 m) 6" (63.5 m) 6" (174 m)
WR-23 2019 469 7387343 3426988 Rotary 27" (0-43.5 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (43.5-214 m) 10" (100.5 m) 10" (116 m)
12 1/4" (214-469 m) 6" (79.5 m) 6" (170 m)
W-02B 2019 505 7396259 3427137 Rotary 27" (0-41 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
18 1/2" (41-223.8 m) 12" (103.5 m) 12" (115 m)
15" (223.8-505 m) 8" (70.5 m) 8" (212 m)
WR-21 2019 493 7385987 3425367 Rotary 27" (0-52.8 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (52.8-230 m) 10" (129.5 m) 10" (96 m)
14" (230-480 m) 6" (67.5 m) 6" (202 m)
W09-06 2019 355 7381651 3425959 Rotary 24" (0-47.38 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
18" (47.38-200 m) 10" (170.5 m) 10" (125 m)
12 1/4" (20-355 m) 6" (15.5 m) 6" (141 m)
W-2 2019 475 7382500 3423500 Rotary 27" (0-19 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (19-220 m) 10" (122.5 m) 10" (94 m)
12 1/4" (220-470 m) 6" (56.5 m) 6" (199 m)
W-14 2019 494 7395200 3427355 Rotary 27" (0-24 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (24-212.1 m) 10" (85.5 m) 10" (124 m)
13 1/2" (212.1-607.7 m) 6" (107.5 m) 6" (288 m)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 161 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.8
Production Well Drilling and Construction Details
Pumping
Well
Year Total
Depth
(m)
Coordinates Drilling
Method
Drilling
Diameter

(Inches)
Well Construction Construction Material
X Y Total Length
of Casing
Inserted

(m)
Total Length of
Screen Casing
Inserted
(m)
Solid
Casing
Screen
Casing
W-6 2019 514 7380503 3423495 Rotary 27" (0-26 m) 20" 27" (0-24 m) Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (26-210 m) 10" (128.5 m) 10" (80 m)
13 1/2" (210-514 m) 6" (97.5 m) 6" (201 m)
W-11 2020 435 7381499 3422495 Rotary 27" (0-29 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (29-218 m) 10" (113.5 m) 10" (101 m)
12 1/4" (218-435 m) 6" (22.5 m) 6" (193 m)
W-17 2020 680 7395459 3426522 Rotary 27" (0-26.9 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (26.9-212 m) 10" (122 m) 10" (89 m)
12 1/4" (212-680 m) 6" (74 m) 6" (392 m)
W-15 2020 607 7393711 3426282 Rotary 27" (0-25 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (25-242 m) 10" (208 m)  
12 1/4" (242-607 m) 6" (96 m) 6" (299 m)
W-1 2019 386.6 7380788 3421631 Rotary 27" (0-30.22 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
18" (30.22-204.95 m) 10" (99 m) 10" (98 m)
12 1/4" (204.95-386.6 m) 6" (41 m) 6" (144 m)
WR-07 2019 338.6 7378442 3420554 Rotary 27" (0-29 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (29-220 m) 10" (154 m) 10" (84 m)
13 1/2" (220-338.6 m) 6" (17 m) 6" (145 m)
W-9 2020 511 7378500 3422500 Rotary 27" (0-34 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
18 1/2" (34-233 m) 10" (78 m) 10" (147 m)
13 1/2" (233-511 m) 6" (44 m) 6" (229 m)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 162 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.8
Production Well Drilling and Construction Details
Pumping
Well
Year Total
Depth
(m)
Coordinates Drilling
Method
Drilling
Diameter

(Inches)
Well Construction Construction Material
X Y Total Length
of Casing
Inserted

(m)
Total Length of
Screen Casing
Inserted
(m)
Solid
Casing
Screen
Casing
W-18 2021 530 7396871 3427605 Rotary 27" (0-36 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (36-205 m) 10" (108.5 m) 10" (89 m)
13 1/2" (205-530 m) 6" (33.5 m) 6" (294 m)
W10-04 2020 434.1 7377243 3421092 Rotary 27" (0-30 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
18 1/2" (30-224.68 m) 10" (71.5 m) 10" (126 m)
13 1/2" (224.68-434.1 m) 6" (45.5 m) 6" (168 m)
W-8 2020 308 7376655 3419086 Rotary 27" (0-34 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (34-136 m) 10" (89.5 m) 10" (45 m)
13 1/2" (136-308 m) 6" (10.5 m) 6" (149 m)
W-16 2020 715 7394024 3227420 Rotary 27" (0-31.2 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (31.2-240 m) 10" (158.5 m) 10" (78 m)
13 1/2" (240-715 m) 6" (69.5 m) 6" (392 m)
WR-03 2021 366 7376056 3420007 Rotary 27" (0-40.5 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (40.5-211 m) 10" (55.5 m) 10" (134 m)
13 1/2" (211-366 m) 6" (16.5 m) 6" (140 m)
W-7 2020 565 7375500 3421500 Rotary 27" (0-28 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (28-220.7 m) 10" (68.5 m) 10" (147 m)
13 1/2" (220.7-561.81 m) 6" (48.5 m) 6" (295 m)
W-12 2020 530 7383998 3426498 Rotary 27" (0-30 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (30-214.8 m) 10" (108.5 m) 10" (102 m)
13" (214.8-499 m) 6" (39.5 m) 6" (272 m)
10 5/8” (499-530 m)    

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 163 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.8
Production Well Drilling and Construction Details
Pumping
Well
Year Total
Depth
(m)
Coordinates Drilling
Method
Drilling
Diameter

(Inches)
Well Construction Construction Material
X Y Total Length
of Casing
Inserted

(m)
Total Length of
Screen Casing
Inserted
(m)
Solid
Casing
Screen
Casing
W-5 2021 675 7394545 3426260 Rotary 27" (0-30 m) 20"     Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (30-211 m) 10" (143.5 m) 10" (54 m)
13 1/2" (211-675 m) 6" (65.5 m) 6" (398 m)
W-19 2021 571.2 7397593 3428178 Rotary 27" (0-41 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
18" (41-223.4 m) 10" (88.5 m) 10" (127 m)
13 1/2" (223.4-571.2 m) 6" (33.5 m) 6" (314 m)
W-13 2021 578 7397557 3427303 Rotary 27" (0-33 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (33-218 m) 10" (132 m) 10" (78 m)
12 1/4" (218-578 m) 6" (72 m) 6" (286 m)
W-10 2021 493 7375500 3421500 Rotary 27" (0-23 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (23-218 m) 10" (159.5 m) 10" (59 m)
12 1/4" (218-490 m) 6" (111.5 m) 6" (158 m)
W-4 2021 696 7399263 3428517 Rotary 27" (0-12 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17 1/2" (12-210 m) 10" (43.5 m) 10" (160 m)
12 1/4" (210-696 m) 6" (302.5 m) 6" (166 m)
W-42 2021 416 7382929 3422340 Rotary 27" (0-32 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
17" (12-245 m) 10" (154 m) 10" (84 m)
13 1/2" (245-416 m) 6" (17 m) 6" (145 m)
W-31 2023 650 7382440 3425495 Rotary 26" (0-26.1 m) 20"   Carbon Steel Stainless Steel
19" (26.1-237.5 m) 12" (128 m) 12" (102 m)
15" (237.5-645.4 m) 8" (63 m) 8" (342 m)
12 1/4" (645.4-650 m)    

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 164 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 10.4 Pumping Wells Location

 

 

Note: orange area = 2019 Mineral Resource area, black dot = production well, black line = mineral property.

Source: Exar (2024)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 165 of 427

 

 

 

10.5Exploration Diamond Drilling (DDH) Borehole and Production Well Drilling Program 2022-2024

 

The objective of this drilling program was to increase knowledge of the southern sector of Cauchari, outside of the previously certified resource area in the basin. In this new sector, three HQ diameter diamond drill holes were advanced, to a maximum depth of 600 m. Relevant information was obtained in terms of lithology, drilling cores, brine sampling and the continuity of deep production levels. The drilling program is summarized in Table 10.9.

 

To complement this exploration program in order to determine the hydraulic parameters of the area, 6 wells were drilled with the construction characteristics of production wells. These wells reached a depth of 700 m, are cased in 12" for the first 250 m and then in 8" at the bottom. In these wells, pumping tests are currently being carried out to determine the flow rates and chemical composition.

 

Based on these exploration campaigns, progress was made in understanding the southern sector of the Cauchari basin. Further work will be required to define a new resource in the 15,000-ha area known as "Cauchari Sur.” Well details are presented on Table 10.9 and lithological profiles are presented in Figure 10.5 through Figure 10.12. Borehole locations are presented in Figure 10.13.

 

10.6Conclusion

 

The QP, David Burga, determined that the drilling work was done to industry standards and that there were no factors that could materially impact the accuracy and reliability of the results. The drilling work was appropriate to be used in the Mineral Resource Estimate and Mineral Reserve Estimate. The recommendation is made to update the Mineral Resource Estimate and Mineral Reserve Estimate.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 166 of 427

 

 

 

Table 10.9
Borehole Drilling Summary for the DDH and Production Well Drilling Program Conducted in 2022 and 2024
Borehole ID Piezometer Name Screen Diameter Type Plataform Contractor Total Depth (m) Screen Top (mbtw) Screen Base (mbtw) Coordinates
X Y
DD19D-05   2'' DDH DD19D-05 Conosur 415 41,07 410,97 3420723 7371919
DD19D-06 DD19D-06 BIS 2'' DDH DD19D-06 Conosur 88 12 84 3422112 7368852
DD19D-07   8'', 12'' Rotary DD19D-07 Wichi Toledo 493,7 90 421 3420882 7367309
DD19D-08   8'', 12'' Rotary DD19D-08 Wichi Toledo 624 96 608 3421788 7365110
DD19D-11   8'', 12'' Rotary DD19D-11 Wichi Toledo 706,8 72,11 700,23 3422049 7360087
DD19D-13   8'', 12'' Rotary DD19D-13 Wichi Toledo 465 70 537 3420167 7358999
DD19D-15   8'', 12'' Rotary DD19D-15 Wichi Toledo 652,83 66 607 3419956 7356406
DD19D-26 BIS DD19D-26 8'', 12'' Rotary DD19D-26 Wichi Toledo 533 80 524 3419508 7363138

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 167 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 10.5 DD19D-05 Lithological ProfileFigure 10.6 DD19D-06 Lithological Profile
  
Source: ExarSource: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 168 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 10.7 DD19D-07 Lithological Profile Figure 10.8 DD19D-08 Lithological Profile
   
   
Source: Exar Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 169 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 10.9 DD19D-11 Lithological Profile Figure 10.10 DD19D-13 Lithological Profile
   
   
Source: Exar Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 170 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 10.11 DD19D-15 Lithological Profile Figure 10.12 DD19D-26 BIS Lithological Profile
   
   
Source: Exar Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 171 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 10.13 2022-2024 Drill Hole Locations

 

 

Source: Exar (2024)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 172 of 427

 

 

 

11.0Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security

 

11.1Sampling Method and Approach

 

Exar established the following procedures for sample preparation, analyses and security at the Project from 2010 to 2012. These procedures are discussed in the 2017 Feasibility Study, authored by Burga et al. Drilling, brine sampling and pumping tests for the 2017-2019 campaigns were supervised by Exar personnel.

 

Drilling was subject to daily scrutiny and coordination by Exar geologists. On the drill site, the full drill core boxes are collected daily and brought to the core storage warehouse where the core is laid out, measured, logged for geotechnical and geological data, and photographed.

 

Core boxes are placed on core racks and covered with a black PVC sheet to protect the integrity of the core and stored outside. RBRC values were not measured during the 2017 to 2018 drilling program, however, 33 drill samples were tested for RBRC during the 2019 drilling campaign and results were in line with other RBRC sampling. The core was well logged to include the lithological data required for the Mineral Resource Estimate.

 

11.2Rotary Drilling Sampling Methods

 

Rotary drilling was conducted by Hidrotec and Wichi Toledo for the purpose of installing pumping wells for testing purposes. Exar personnel recorded the time it took to advance 1 m and sampled the cuttings by placing them in a rock chip tray (Figure 11.1) and brought back to the field office for logging. Samples were not taken during rotary drilling for chemical analysis.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 173 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 11.1 Rock Chip Tray with Dry and Wet Samples

 

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

11.3Diamond Drilling Borehole Solids Sampling Methods

 

Diamond drilling was performed by Major Drilling and Ideal Drilling. During diamond drilling, PQ or HQ diameter cores were collected through a triple tube sampler. The cores were taken directly from the triple tube and placed in wooden or metal core boxes for geologic logging, sample collection, and storage. During the 2009-2011 drilling, undisturbed geologic samples were collected by driving a two-inch diameter, five inch long PVC sleeve sampler into the core at three metre intervals (Figure 11.2 and Figure 11.3). The DD boreholes were used to help select the pumping well locations.

 

During the 2009-2011 drilling campaigns, a total of 1,244 undisturbed samples were collected from the cores of DDH-1 through DDH18. Undisturbed samples were shipped to D.B. Stephens & Associates Laboratory in the USA for analysis of geotechnical parameters, including: RBRC (total of 865 samples), particle size (total of 58 samples), and dry bulk density (total of 36 samples). Geotechnical analytical methods are described in Section 11.8.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 174 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 11.2 Collecting an Undisturbed Sample

 

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey, (2012).

 

Figure 11.3 Collecting an Undisturbed Sample from Core

 

 

Source: Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 175 of 427

 

 

 

11.4Diamond Drilling Borehole Brine Sampling Methods

 

Samples were further analyzed in the field laboratory for confirmation of field parameters. After analysis of field laboratory parameters, brine samples were split into three clean 250 ml, clean, plastic sample bottles. The three bottles were tagged with pre-printed tag numbers. Two bottles were used per sample, one for density and one for geochemistry, which was shipped to ASL in Jujuy or sent to the onsite Exar laboratory. One sample was maintained in the Exar field office, as a backup.

 

11.5Sampling Preparation, Analysis and Security

 

There is an established and firm chain of custody procedure for Project sampling, storage, and shipping. Samples were taken daily from the drill sites and stored at the on-site facility. All brine samples were stored inside a locked office, and all drill cores were stored inside the core storage area on site. Brine samples were taken by Exar staff to the on-site laboratory or transported to Jujuy in a company truck. Solid samples were periodically driven in Project vehicles to Jujuy, approximately three hours from the site. In Jujuy, solid samples were delivered to a courier (DHL) for immediate shipment to the appropriate analytical laboratory.

 

Brine samples were analyzed by Alex Stewart Argentina S.A. (ASA) and the internal Exar laboratory. ASA is an ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certified laboratory with facilities in Jujuy and Mendoza, Argentina and headquarters in England. The internal Exar laboratory handles samples from the pilot processing plant and hydrogeology and is not a certified laboratory.

 

Analytical methods for all brine samples are described in Section 11.6.1. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) for brine samples collected is discussed in Section 12.0.

 

D.B. Stephens and Associates Laboratory in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA was used for the geotechnical property analyses of the undisturbed core samples from the DD Borehole Program in the 2009-2011 drilling campaigns. D.B. Stephens and Associates is certified by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and is a contract laboratory for the U.S. Geological Survey.

 

11.5.1Brine Samples from the Piezometers

 

Piezometers were installed for sampling prior to pump testing. These samples were collected at 20 m intervals using bailers. Bailers would be manually lowered to the desired depth, pulled up one metre quickly to fill the bailer then lowered slowly to obtain a sample at the desired depth. Brine from the bailer would be used to rinse out a plastic bucket and then the remainder of the brine would be emptied into the bucket. Brine from the bucket would be used to rinse out three 250 ml bottles before being filled with a sample and marked with the borehole and depth. Back at the field office, samples would be logged into a field book and assigned a unique sample code and any identifying information about the borehole would be removed from the bottle using rubbing alcohol. Data from the logbook is then entered into the sampling database.

 

Samples were not filtered after collection because the pumping wells produced brine with negligible suspended solids.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 176 of 427

 

 

 

11.5.2Brine Samples from the Pumping Test Program

 

In 2017-2019 each well had a pump test to help define the pumping rate and lithium concentration. 2018 pumping production wells helped define the lithium concentration and flow rate in each location where the production wells are being drilled. The first test is well development which lasts for 7 days to clean the well, generally starting with 20 hz, then ramping up to clear the silt and sediment. Prior to taking samples the well is developed to clean all the fine sediments in the area immediately adjacent to the screen. The development lasts from 3 to 7 days. The well is considered developed when the percentage of solids during pumping is less than 0.1 ml measured in an Imhoff cone (Figure 11.4). Measurements are taken with the frequency shown in Table 11.1. The parameters measured include dynamic water level, flow (m3/h), and turbidity. After the test is done, recovery is measured using a water level tape with readings being taken with the same frequency shown in Table 11.1 until 95% recovery is achieved. During and after the pumping tests, technicians measure the drawdown and recovery of nearby wells.

 

Table 11.1
Summary Pumping Test Measurement Frequency
Time Frequency of Sampling
0-5 minutes Every 30 seconds
5-10 minutes Every minute
10-30 minutes Every 2 minutes
30-60 minutes Every 5 minutes
1 – 2 hours Every 10 minutes
2 – 3 hours Every 20 minutes
3 – 4 hours Every 30 minutes
4 hours – end Hourly

 

Figure 11.4 Measuring Sediment in an Imhoff Cone

 

 

Source: Exar.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 177 of 427

 

 

 

Once the water level has recovered to 95%, a short sampling pump test (2-4 hours) is conducted. This test is to find the maximum pumping rate without draining the well. The well is allowed to recover afterwards.

 

An 8-12 hour, pumping rate test follows, which is broken up into 4 parts at 25% of the maximum pumping rate, 50% of the maximum pumping rate, 75% of the maximum pumping rate and 100% of the maximum pumping rate. This test is to see which rate the well stabilizes at. The well is allowed to recover afterwards.

 

The final pump test is a constant rate pump test that is conducted for a minimum of 7 days. Water measurements are taken with the same frequency listed on Table 11.1. Brine sampling is done at 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, 2 h, and then every 4 hours to the end of the test. Brine from a valve on the side of the hose coming out of the well would be used to rinse out a plastic bucket and then refilled. Brine from the bucket is used to rinse out three 250 ml bottles before being filled with a sample and marked with the borehole and date. Back at the field office, samples would be logged into a field book and assigned a unique sample code and any identifying information about the borehole is removed from the bottle using rubbing alcohol. Data from the logbook is then entered into the sampling database.

 

11.6Brine Analysis

 

11.6.1Analytical Methods

 

ASA in Jujuy and the on-site Exar laboratory were the primary laboratories for analysis of brine samples. In order to provide a quick response, ASA used Inductively Coupled Plasma (“ICP”) as the analytical technique for the primary constituents of interest, including sodium, potassium, lithium, calcium, magnesium, and boron. Samples were diluted by 100:1 before analysis. Density was measured via pycnometer and sulphates were measured using the gravimetric method. The argentometric method was used for assaying chloride and volumetric analysis (acid/base titration) was used for carbonates (alkalinity as CaCO3).

 

In the internal Exar laboratory, a 20 g sample is taken from the 250 ml bottle. The sample is entered into the laboratory database. Sulphates were measured using the gravimetric method and volumetric analysis (acid/base titration) was used for calcium, magnesium and chloride. Brine samples were diluted before being passed through the AA spectrometer which analyzes Li, Na, and K.

 

A larger laboratory was built on site to handle the increased number of samples to be tested along the production circuit. Once exploration was complete and production commenced, The Company used the internal laboratory exclusively. This resulted in quicker analysis times which allowed for better monitoring of project activities. Samples are taken at the following points:

 

·Production Wells – 1 sample per week;

 

·Evaporation Ponds – 1 sample per pond per week;

 

·Liming Plant – 2 samples per day;

 

·Post Concentration Ponds – 1 composite per week for the first pond with the remaining ponds sampled daily;

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 178 of 427

 

 

 

·Solvent Extraction – 2 samples per day taken at various points;

 

·Purification Plant – 2 samples per day;

 

·KCl Circuit – 2 samples per day; and

 

·Carbonation – 1 sample taken every 2 tons.

 

The control room in geology also constantly monitors various points along the process circuit (i.e. – vapor distribution and freshwater pressure) and can inform the appropriate group if specifications are not being met.

 

The laboratory can process 100-150 samples per day. A Laboratory Information Management System was installed in 2020.

 

11.6.2Sample Security

 

There is an established and firm chain of custody procedure for Project sampling, storage and shipping. Samples were taken daily from the drill sites and stored at the core storage facility on site. Brine samples are taken by Exar personnel to the on-site analytical laboratory or by truck to the Alex Stewart facility in Jujuy.

 

11.7Sample Preparation Analysis and Security Conclusions and Recommendations

 

The field sampling, preparation, security, and analysis of drill core and brines from the piezometers and pumping tests and production wells are adequate and are being executed to industry standards. Security procedures are adequate for the sampling program. The recommendation is made that sample books with dedicated tickets be used for future sampling. It is also recommended that a separate building be dedicated to the storage of the duplicate sample bottles and that a selection of samples of low, medium, and high-grade lithium be submitted to Alex Stewart for analysis.

 

The Company was ISO 9001 certified in 2023, but this certification expired in 2024. The recommendation is made for the Exar internal lab to seek ISO 17025 certification for analytical laboratories.

 

11.8Geotechnical Analysis

 

11.8.1Overview

 

D.B. Stephens and Associates Laboratory carried out selected geotechnical analyses on undisturbed samples from the geologic cores (DDH-1 through DDH-18), from the 2009-2011 drilling campaigns as summarized in Table 11.2. RBRC results were used in the Resource Estimate (King, 2010b) to estimate the volume of recoverable brine present in various geological materials. 33 RBRC samples were taken from DD19D_PE09 from the 2019 drilling campaigns.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 179 of 427

 

 

 

Table 11.2
Summary of Geotechnical Property Analyses
Analysis Procedure
Dry bulk density ASTM D6836
Moisture content ASTM D2216, ASTM D6836
Total porosity ASTM D6836
Specific gravity (fine grained) ASTM D854
Specific gravity (coarse grained) ASTM C127
Particle size analyses ASTM D422
Relative brine release capacity Developed by D.B. Stephens (see Section 11.9.2)

 

11.9Analytical Methods

 

Results of dry bulk density, moisture content, and total porosity are geotechnical parameters and are not used in the Mineral Resource and Reserve Estimates. The results of those tests are not discussed here.

 

11.9.1Specific Gravity

 

Specific gravity testing was conducted for four formation samples (012714, 012715, 012716, and 012743). Density results for these samples ranged from 2.47 g/cm3 to 2.75 g/cm3. It was subsequently determined that these values could be skewed due to the high salt content. Consequently, no attempt was made to apply these measured values to the remaining samples, and an assumed particle density of 2.65 g/cm3 was used for all other samples.

 

11.9.2Relative Brine Release Capacity (RBRC)

 

The RBRC method was developed by D.B. Stephens and Associates Laboratory, in response to some of the unique technical challenges in determining porosity for brine-saturated samples (Stormont, et al., 2010). The method predicts the volume of solution that can be readily extracted from an unstressed geologic sample.

 

According to the RBRC method, undisturbed samples are saturated in the laboratory using a site- specific brine solution. The bottom of the sample is then attached to a vacuum pump using tubing and permeable end caps and are subjected to a suction of 0.2 to 0.3 bars for 18 to 24 hours. The top of the sample is fitted with a perforated latex membrane that limits atmospheric air contact with the sample, to avoid evaporation and precipitation of salts. Depending on the pore structure of the material, there may be sufficient drainage so that a continuous air phase is established through the sample. The vacuum system permits testing multiple samples simultaneously in parallel. After extraction, the samples are oven dried at 110°C.

 

The volumetric moisture (brine) content of the sample is calculated based on the density of the brine, the sample mas`s at saturation, and the sample mass at “vacuum dry”. The difference between the volumetric moisture (brine) content of the saturated sample and the volumetric moisture (brine) content of the ‘vacuum dry’ sample is the specific yield or “relative brine release capacity”.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 180 of 427

 

 

 

RBRC test samples are taken in the field during drilling. Mr. Burga was not present on site at the time that RBRC sampling was being conducted and could not obtain a sample for verification purposes. Once the samples dry and the salts in the brine precipitate, the characteristics of the sample change and cannot be relied upon. D.B. Stephens and Associates Laboratory is an independent laboratory, and results were obtained directly from the laboratory for verification purposes. No errors were noted.

 

11.9.3Particle Size Analysis

 

Particle size analyses were carried out on 58 undisturbed samples after the drainable porosity testing was completed. Uniformity and curvature coefficients (Cu and Cc) were calculated for each sample and samples were classified according to the USDA soil classification system.

 

11.9.4Exar Porosity Test Lab

 

In addition to the on-site analytical laboratory, the Project site also has a porosity test lab. This lab tests total porosity (as opposed to drainable porosity) which helps to distinguish between types of halites and clays and silts. Samples dried in an oven at 70 degrees Celsius, weighed, measured, and then put through a gas pycnometer. Volume, porosity, and density are obtained. Samples are photographed and given a bar code, and the equipment is calibrated at the end of each day.

 

The lab also conducts grain size analysis on the gravel pack used by the drillers for well construction.

 

It should be noted that results from the Exar Porosity Test Lab have not been used for Mineral Reserve Estimate Purposes (porosity values are not considered in the Mineral Resource Estimate).

 

The Exar Porosity Test Lab was no longer operational in 2024.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 181 of 427

 

 

 

12.0Data Verification

 

12.1Overview

 

The Data Verification for data obtained prior to the 2017-2019 drilling campaigns is elaborated in the 2017 Feasibility study (Burga et al., 2017).

 

Since the Mineral Resource Estimate and Mineral Reserve Estimate were not being updated for this Technical Report, verification samples were not collected during the 2024 site visit.

 

12.2Site Visits

 

Mr. D. Burga visited the site and the Exar office on January 24 and 25, 2017, February 18-21, 2019, and June 10-12, 2019. Project features inspected and reviewed during these visits, which are relevant to data verification, included the following:

 

·Several drill hole locations were visited, and several active pumps were observed;

 

·27 brine samples were obtained from 13 wells

 

·5 duplicate samples were taken from the sample storage tent;

 

·4 standard samples were collected for analysis;

 

·Review of Exar sampling procedures;

 

·Inspection of the 2017-2019 Project database;

 

·Inspection of digital laboratory certificates for the Exar brine dataset, and the Project database;

 

·The sample storage facility and security systems were observed and are considered appropriate; and

 

·Tours of the Exar Analytical Lab and the Exar Grain Size Analysis were conducted.

 

Mr. D. Burga conducted interviews with Exar employees who were present during the drilling and pump testing of the new wells.

 

Digital copies of the lab certificates were obtained directly from Alex Stewart and compared to the Exar database.

 

Mr. D. Burga visited the site and the Exar office between November 19 and 25, 2024. Project features inspected and reviewed during these visits, which are relevant to data verification, included the following:

 

·One production well (P26) was observed;

 

·Tour of Production Well Control Room;

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 182 of 427

 

 

 

·Review of Exar sampling procedures;

 

·Inspection of the 2019-2024 Project database;

 

·Inspection of digital laboratory certificates for the Exar brine dataset, and the Project database;

 

·The sample storage facility and security systems were observed and are considered appropriate; and

 

·Tour of the Exar Analytical Lab was conducted.

 

Digital copies of the lab certificates were obtained directly from Exar laboratory and compared to the database.

 

12.3February 2019 Site Visit and Due Diligence Sampling

 

Mr. D. Burga collected 23 brine samples during his site visit from 10 wells during the site visit. Each sample consisted of three 250 ml plastic bottles. 4 samples were taken from pumping well sites (PB-06, W18-05, W11-06, and PB-03). For the pumping well samples, a valve was opened on the main pipe coming out of the well, a plastic pail was rinsed with brine, filled again and then the brine was used to rinse out each sample bottle before being filled with the sample. 19 samples were taken from various depths in six different observation piezometers (DL-014, ML-014, DL-005, W-05, DL-09, and ML-09). A bailer was lowered to the desired depth, pulled up a metre and lowered again to obtain a sample at that depth then pulled back to the surface. A small amount of brine was used to rinse out a plastic pail and then dumped out and the remainder of the brine from the bailer was emptied into the pail. Each bottle was marked with the well and depth and brought back to field office where each sample was given a sample code, entered into a logbook and identifying well information was removed from the sample bottles with rubbing alcohol.

 

The samples were taken by Mr. Burga directly to Alex Stewart Laboratories in Jujuy for chemical analysis. The samples were analyzed for lithium using and ICP with an OES finish.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 183 of 427

 

 

 

Results of the site visit due diligence samples are listed in Table 12.1 and presented graphically in Figure 12.1.

 

Table 12.1
Results of Due Diligence Sampling – February 2019

ACSI

Sample No.

Well

No.

Depth

(m)

Li (mg/L)

Alex Stewart

Li (mg/L)

Exar

SBH-440 PB-06A - 537 580
SBH-441 W18-05 - 760 750
SBH-442 W11-06 - 753 750
SBH-443 PB-03A - 784 772
SBH-444 DL-014 100 565 548
SBH-445 DL-014 200 689 430
SBH-446 DL-014 300 631 464
SBH-447 DL-014 370 564 440
SBH-448 ML-014 100 387 548
SBH-449 ML-014 115 721 449
SBH-450 DL-005 100 763 686
SBH-451 DL-005 200 717 685
SBH-452 DL-005 300 833 696
SBH-453 DL-005 320 979 699
SBH-454 W-05 100 973 686
SBH-455 W-05 200 639 685
SBH-456 W-05 300 375 696
SBH-457 ML-09 100 859 801
SBH-458 ML-09 200 817 559
SBH-459 DL-09 100 676 757
SBH-460 DL-09 200 685 769
SBH-461 DL-09 300 669 681
SBH-462 DL-09 400 626 780

 

Figure 12.1 Due Diligence Sample Results for Lithium: February 2019

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 184 of 427

 

 

 

The results for the due diligence sampling were similar in tenor between ASA and the internal Exar laboratories, with the samples from ASA being higher than the Exar labs in 16 of 23 samples. During the on-site interviews one of the hydrogeologists indicated that sample SBH456 was taken at the bottom of an observation well that had drillers mud in it that would have settled at the bottom, because of its density, thus diluting the sample. This is a possible explanation for the difference, the Exar sample had 696 mg/L Li and the ASA sample taken by ACSI had 375 mg/L.

 

12.4June 2019 Site Visit and Due Diligence Sampling

 

Mr. D. Burga collected 4 brine samples from 4 wells during his site visit. 5 samples were duplicate samples taken from the sample storage tent and 4 samples were taken of the standards used by the Exar laboratory. Each sample consisted of two 250 ml plastic bottles. 4 samples were taken from pumping well sites (W11-06, WR-10, W18-23, and W-04A). For the pumping well samples, a valve was opened on the main pipe coming out of the well, a plastic pail was rinsed with brine, filled again and then the brine was used to rinse out each sample bottle before being filled with brine.

 

The duplicate samples and standard samples were selected from the sample storage tent. It should be noted that the samples are stored on shelves and the area is not temperature controlled in any way. Older duplicate bottles, which have been exposed to colder temperatures for more time, showed evidence of sulphate precipitation. These samples would not be suitable for duplicate analysis.

 

The standard samples were created at the internal Exar laboratory as elaborated in Section 12.7.

 

All bottles were brought back to field office where each sample was given a sample code, entered into a logbook and identifying well information was removed from the sample bottles with rubbing alcohol. In the case of the duplicates, the old stickers were removed from the bottles and replaced with a new sample number.

 

The samples were taken by Mr. Burga directly to Alex Stewart Laboratories in Jujuy for chemical analysis. The samples were analyzed for lithium using and ICP with an OES finish.

 

Results of the site visit due diligence samples are listed in Table 12.2 and presented graphically in Figure 12.2.

 

Table 12.2
Results of Due Diligence Sampling – June 2019

ACSI

Sample No.

Well

No.

Depth

(m)

Li (mg/L)

Alex Stewart

Li (mg/L)

Exar

SBH-922 - - 119 126.84
SBH-923 - - 118 126.84
SBH-924 - - 116 116.38
SBH-926 - - 1151 1238.00
SBH-927 - - 948 1027.00
SBH-928 - - 752 815.00
SBH-929 - - 553 671.00
SBH-930 W11-06 - 770 716.61
SBH-931 WR-10 - 680 604.18
SBH-932 W18-23 - 727 682.85
SBH-933 W-04A - 647 615.06

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 185 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.2 Due Diligence Sample Results for Lithium: June 2019

 

 

12.5Quality Assurance/Quality Control Program

 

Exar implemented and monitored a thorough quality assurance and quality control program (QA/QC or QC) for the brine sampling undertaken at the Project over the 2017-2018 period. QA/QC protocol included the insertion of QC samples into every batch of samples. QC samples included one standard, one blank and one field duplicate. Check assaying is also conducted on the samples at a frequency of approximately 5%.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 186 of 427

 

 

 

A total of 4,356 samples, including QC samples, were submitted during Exar’s brine sampling program at the Project (2017 through the end of 2018), as shown in Table 12.3. A total of 164 check samples were also submitted to an external laboratory for check assaying.

 

Table 12.3
QA/QC Sampling
Samples

No. of

Samples

Percentage

(%)

Blanks 63 1.5%
Standards 618 14.2%
Duplicates 285 6.5%
Normal 3,390 77.8%
Total 4,356 100%
Check Samples 164 2.51%

 

12.6Performance of Blank Samples

 

Blank samples were inserted to monitor possible contamination during both preparation and analysis of the samples in the laboratory. The blank material used was initially distilled water and then switched to tap water which is sourced from a freshwater well that contains trace amounts of lithium.

 

Blank samples should be inserted at an average rate of approximately 1 in 120 samples, with a total of 63 blank samples submitted accounting for 1.5% of the samples submitted. Three of the samples were submitted to ASA with the remainder of the samples submitted to the internal Exar laboratory.

 

At the time of the site visit there was not a set of Standard Operating Procedures that set tolerance limits for QA/QC samples. It is recommended that the tolerance limit used for the blank samples be 2 times the minimum detection limit (mdl) for the internal Exar AA samples and 10 times the lower detection limit for ASA AA samples (the Exar lab uses AA with a mdl 10 mg/L and ASA uses AA with a mdl 1 mg/L). It should be noted that at times the Exar laboratory used 10, 1, 0 and -10 mg/l as the lower limit depending on dilution used. ASA used -1 mg/L denoting dilution at the sample preparation stage.

 

The results of the blank sampling are shown graphically in Figure 12.3. There were no failures for the blank samples.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 187 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.3         Performance of Lithium Blank Samples

 

 

12.7Certified Reference Materials

 

Certified Reference Materials ("CRM”) are used to monitor the accuracy of a laboratory. Exar did not use CRM for their QA/QC sampling program. Standards (“Patrons”) were prepared at the uncertified on-site laboratory by Exar staff and were submitted at an average frequency of 1 in 7 samples. These Patrons were prepared by taking high-grade lithium brines and diluting them to prepare high, medium, and low-grade samples. These Patrons were prepared in 50 L batches and when they were used up a subsequent batch was prepared. The first round of Patron samples were analyzed solely at the Exar laboratory. The second and third rounds of Patron samples were analyzed at both the Exar and ASA laboratories. At the time of this report, the third round of Patron samples was being used. A total of 545 standards were used during the 2017-2019 drilling campaigns. The standards/Patrons’ results are summarized in Table 12.4.

 

Table 12.4
Results of Due Diligence Sampling
Round 1 – Created March 2017
Name Target Value
(mg/L)
Lab Exar Value
(mg/L)
Avg of All Samples
(mg/L)
Patron A 1,500 1,345 1,382
Patron B 1,100 1,144 1,163
Patron C 850 876 894
Standard A 550 579 615
       

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 188 of 427

 

 

 

Table 12.4 
Results of Due Diligence Sampling
Round 2 – Created April 2018
Name Target Value
(mg/L)
Lab Exar Value
(mg/L)
ASA Value
(mg/L)
Patron AA 1,200 1,151 1,121
Patron BB 1,000 923 933
Patron CC 750 751 740
Patron DD 540 523 542
Round 3 – Created October 2018
Name Target Value
(mg/L)
Lab Exar Value
(mg/L)
ASA Value
(mg/L)
Patron 1 540 528 -
Patron 2 770 804 -
Patron 3 1,000 1,152 -
Patron 4 1,200 1,296 -

 

For the purposes of the QA/QC review, all of the Exar samples for each Patron were averaged to find a mean value and standard deviation. Patrons were submitted randomly in the sample stream and were plotted as a different series to check bias with regards to the Exar results. The results for each Patron are shown graphically in Figure 12.4 through to Figure 12.11.

 

Figure 12.4        Performance of Patron A

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 189 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.5        Performance of Patron B

 

 

Figure 12.6        Performance of Patron C

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 190 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.7        Performance of Standard A

 

 

Figure 12.8        Performance of Patron AA

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 191 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.9        Performance of Patron BB

 

 

Figure 12.10        Performance of Patron CC

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 192 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.11        Performance of Standard AA

 

 

Although there were no Standard Operating Procedures in place, a failure should be considered a result that is greater than +/- 3 standard deviations. None of the results for the standards were outside of this range indicating consistent results from the Exar laboratory. As seen in Figure 12.4, Figure 12.5, Figure 12.6, and Figure 12.8, the analytical results for lithium from Alex Stewart, for both AA and ICP, were slightly below the average.

 

12.8Duplicates

 

As part of their regular QA/QC program, Exar routinely used duplicate samples to monitor potential mixing up of samples and data precision. Duplicate samples were collected in the field by Exar personnel and preparation involved filling an additional three bottles of brine at the same depth. The original and duplicate samples were tagged with consecutive sample numbers and sent to the laboratory as separate samples. Duplicate samples were collected at a rate of approximately 1 in 20 samples.

 

A total of 285 duplicate samples were taken representing 6.5% of total samples.

 

The results of duplicate sampling are shown graphically in Figure 12.12. Data precision was strong with a correlation coefficient value of 0.99143.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 193 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.12        Duplicate Samples – Exar Laboratory

 

 

12.9Check Assays Exar Versus Alex Stewart

 

Exar routinely conducted check analyses at ASA to evaluate the accuracy of the Exar laboratory.

 

Duplicate samples were collected and sent to a second laboratory to verify the original assays and monitor any possible deviation due to sample handling and laboratory procedures. Exar uses the ASA laboratory in Jujuy, Argentina, for check analyses.

 

A total of 105 check samples were sent to a third-party laboratory for check analysis, equating to approximately 2.5% of the total samples taken during the sampling program.

 

Correlation coefficient is high (0.95471) for Lithium, showing strong overall agreement between the original Exar analysis and the ASA check analysis.

 

The results of the check sampling program are shown by way of scatter diagrams in Figure 12.13.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 194 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.13        Check Assays – Exar Laboratory Versus ASA Laboratories

 

 

The Company sent duplicates of production well samples to Alex Stewart to check the accuracy of analysis conducted at the Exar Laboratory located on site. This work was done until the end of 2023 and then production well samples were analyzed exclusively at the Exar Laboratory.

 

An example of check assays from November 2023 are presented in Table 12.5 and presented on Figure 12.14.

 

Table 12.5
Check Assay Sampling
Well Li - Exar Lab
(ppm)
Li – Alex Stewart
(ppm)
PB-4 585 595
WR-28 454 453
W09-06 911 887
W-14 632 646
CW-60 22 18

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 195 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 12.14        Check Assays – Exar Laboratory Versus ASA Laboratories – November 2023

 

 

12.10Conclusions and Recommendations

 

Mr. David Burga has personally met, and had technical discussions with, most of the technical experts working on the Project on behalf of LAAC. These individuals are competent professionals, with experience within their respective disciplines. Their interpretations demonstrate a conservative approach in assigning constraints on the estimate, which increases the technical strength of the results.

 

The field sampling of brines from the pumping tests is being done to industry standards. The quality control data based upon the insertion of standards, field blanks and field duplicates indicate that the analytical data is accurate, and the samples being analyzed are representative of the brine within the aquifer.

 

It is the QP’s opinion that the data is adequate for the purpose used in this report.

 

The following recommendations are made with regards to QA/QC procedures:

 

·Proper certified lithium standards, with values comparable to the grades found on site, should continue to be used for the exploration brine sampling.

 

·Exploration samples should continue to be sent Alex Stewart.

 

·Verification sampling should be conducted prior to updating the Mineral Resource Estimate and Mineral Reserve Estimate in 2025.

 

·The Exar internal laboratory should seek ISO 17025 certification for analytical laboratories.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 196 of 427

 

 

 

13.0Mineral Processing and Metallurgical Testing

 

In the 2012 Feasibility Study, LAAC developed a process model for converting brine to lithium carbonate based on evaporation and metallurgical testing. The proposed process followed industry standards:

 

·Pumping brine from the aquifers;

·Concentrating the brine through evaporation ponds; and

·Taking the brine concentrate through a hydrometallurgical facility to produce high-grade lithium carbonate.

 

The 2012 process model employed proprietary, state-of-the-art physiochemical estimation methods, and process simulation techniques for electrolyte phase equilibrium. From the execution of the Shareholders Agreement between LAAC and SQM in 2016 until October 2018, SQM advanced the process engineering work, employing their proprietary technology and operational experience. In 2018, SQM left the joint venture and the Project, and LAC and Ganfeng Lithium reviewed the process and design of the plant for 40,000 tpa output with an engineering consulting firm. The revised process work was implemented in the plant design, and it is reflected in this study. The basis of the process methods had been tested and supported by laboratory evaporation and metallurgical test work.

 

Multiple additional tests were conducted in different qualified laboratories and in pilot facilities located at the Project site to develop a brine processing methodology. Testing objectives included:

 

·Determine the evaporation path as the brine gets more concentrated and determine the type of salts which are formed during the process.

 

·Determine the amount of CaO required to accomplish Mg, SO4 and B reduction in the evaporation process.

 

·A trade off between yield and the maximum allowable and attainable lithium concentration throughout the evaporation train.

 

·Complete the testing and design of the Boron solvent extraction facility with a performance guarantee supplied by the equipment vendor.

 

·Determine the reactant consumption and conditions for brine purification.

 

·Investigate ion exchange equipment, resins and operating conditions for impurity removal.

 

·Specify the KCl removal system in terms of design and operating conditions.

 

·Determine the carbonation conditions for lithium carbonate to produce high purity product.

 

The following outlines the testing work completed during the previous 2012 Feasibility Study and current updated progress that is the basis for this revised Technical Report.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 197 of 427

 

 

 

13.1Pond Tests – Universidad De Antofagasta, Chile

 

In late 2010 and early 2011, Universidad de Antofagasta (Chile) conducted evaporation testing on raw, CaO-treated and CaCl2-treated brines. CaCl2 was used in addition to CaO to determine the most cost-effective removal of sulphate ions. A temperature-regulated and air flow-regulated evaporation chamber was used (Figure 13.1). The brine is contained in the tubs in the base of the chamber, while heat lamps (shown top left) are used to simulate solar radiation. Dry, cool air is circulated through the chamber using an electric fan to simulate the environment expected at the site. Digital thermometers are shown in the pan. Samples of the brine and salt were taken to determine the change in salt precipitated from the brine during natural evaporation. These samples were analyzed for composition.

 

The site is located at more than 4,000 m above sea level. To simulate the effect of lower air pressure, a series of dry air, negative pressure evaporation tests were carried out in parallel with the evaporation pans. The negative pressure test apparatus is shown in Figure 13.2. These tests were done to simulate the effect of brine evaporation at elevation under natural conditions.

 

Figure 13.1        Evaporation Pans and Lamps

 

 

Test results demonstrated that it is possible and cost effective to obtain a concentrated brine through an evaporation process by treating the brine with CaO liming process alone to control Mg levels while reducing SO4 and boron levels. The cost of CaCl2 per tonne of sulphate removed was significantly higher, and the reduction of other ions by precipitating double salts was not more cost effective than removal later in the process.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 198 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 13.2        Dry Air Evaporation Tests

 

 

Figure 13.3 shows the change of Li ion concentration in the brine as water is evaporated in an example test. The y-axis is the weight percent lithium, while the x-axis represents the percentage of the initial brine mass evaporated. In brines treated with either CaO or CaCl2, concentrations close to 4% Li were achieved with minimal lithium loss.

 

Figure 13.3        Li Concentration Changes in the Brine During the Evaporation Process

 

 

Results suggested treatment with CaO alone (i.e. liming) is ideal. CaO has a lower cost than CaCl2, and the increase in brine pH removes a portion of the Mg at the same time. Limed brine precipitated Sylvinite with KCl (potash) concentrations up to 20%. This suggests that fertilizer-grade potash could be produced by floatation at Cauchari (although potash production is not contemplated at this time). The precipitation of KCl and NaCl from solution purifies the brine naturally during evaporation and reduces the cost of operation and equipment in the processing plant after evaporation in the ponds.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 199 of 427

 

 

 

Testing of the CaO-treated brine resulted in a 60% reduction in sulphate ions. This reduction in sulphate ion is sufficient to produce concentrated lithium brines by natural solar evaporation and CaCl2 treatment is not necessary.

 

13.2Tests – Exar, Cauchari Salar

 

13.2.1Salar de Cauchari Evaporation Pan and Pilot Pond Testing

 

To validate the bench scale tests obtained at Universidad de Antofagasta, Chile, and obtain brine evaporation rate data at the site, pilot ponds and Class A evaporation pans were installed at the site. These ponds and pans are still under operation to allow correlation of the Class A pan, brine pan and pilot pond test data and determine the scale-up factor of the full-scale ponds.

 

The first seven months of evaporation pan testing at the Salar de Cauchari pilot facility:

 

·Validated the composition of Cauchari brine exposed to the Project site seasonal environmental conditions;

 

·Obtained concentrated brine for additional pilot and bench scale testing; and

 

·Obtained precipitated salts to determine the entrainment of brine in the salt during the different salt regimes precipitated during concentration.

 

A total of 6 pilot ponds, pre-concentration, liming, settling, and concentration ponds, totalling 11,180 m2 were constructed as well as the liming equipment for treating the brine. Pre-concentration, liming, settling, and concentration ponds were represented. Over 20,000 liters of 1% Li brine was generated over a 7-month period. These ponds continue to operate and provide material for pilot testing at the site and with equipment vendors. The pilot ponds can be seen in Figure 13.4.

 

These ponds were installed with liners that consist of a geotextile underlay overlain by a polyethylene waterproofing liner to minimize the leakage from the ponds. Samples of the brine and salt are taken regularly and analyzed for composition and brine entrainment in the salt. This validates the process model used for the ponding operation and allows for the estimation of the shape factor for the full-scale ponds.

 

13.2.1.1Pond Pilot Testing

 

·Validated the continuous operation of evaporation ponds;

 

·Provided data for all seasonal environmental effects (wind, temperature, rain, etc.);

 

·Provided concentrated brine for the purification pilot plant;

 

·Developed the operating philosophy of the ponds and lime system; and

 

·Trained the staff (engineers and operators) who work in the commercial operation.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 200 of 427

 

 

 

Salar testing results were consistent with prior laboratory and mathematical model results. The test data has been used to update the mathematical process model and ensure accurate design information. Exar’s Project site evaporation and analytical results were independently validated by testing at ASA (Mendoza, Argentina).

 

The pond process performance improved when liming was performed after pre-evaporation and 10% or more excess lime was used. It was verified that the use of CaCl2 was not necessary because the Ca from the CaO reduced sulphate ions sufficiently to avoid downstream LiKSO4 precipitation at a lower operating cost than CaCl2 addition.

 

Figure 13.4        Pilot Ponds

 

 

 

13.2.22017 Evaporation Tests

 

In 2017, Exar completed a 35-month evaporation test program with the intention to define the relation of brine evaporation to water evaporation. This data was obtained from the brine pan and Class A water pan data observed between June 2013 and April 2016.

 

Figure 13.5 presents the monthly evaporation rate of the brine during the year and Figure 13.6 presents the monthly evaporation rate of the water. Table 13.1 displays the monthly evaporation ratio of brine to water. The minimum brine evaporation rate occurs in June at 3.77 mm/day for the bottom quartile of observed test data. The minimum median evaporation rate for brine observed is 5.00 mm/day in June while November has the highest median evaporation rate of 9.8 mm/day. Comparing this to the original evaporation used to engineer the ponds of 2.54 mm/day annual average evaporation for brine in the full-scale ponds results in an increase in pond productivity per evaporative area. When applying a conservative pond shape factor of about 0.65 to the 8.2 mm/day median brine evaporation observed, the effective pond productivity for 1,200 Ha of ponds roughly doubles versus the originally estimated evaporation used in the 2017 Feasibility Study (Burga, et al 2017). Mass balances on the full-scale operating pond segments confirm this shape factor.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 201 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 13.5        Brine Evaporation

 

 

Figure 13.6        Water Evaporation

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 202 of 427

 

 

 

Table 13.1
Monthly Evaporation Ratio

 

 

As a result of this test evaluation, the factor for water to brine design was changed from the assumed value of 0.7 to an average of 0.84.

 

Detailed simulations were then carried out using brine chemistry observed in the test ponds and pans, and with the observed rainfall and evaporation data to determine the annual productivity of the ponds. Currently, the operations team at Exar is working on detailed operating strategy to ensure a robust and safe operation based on ongoing mass balance calculations on the ponds and responses to actual weather / brine conditions.

 

13.2.3Liming Tests – Exar, Cauchari Salar

 

Lime ratio, sedimentation, and flocculent performance testing with locally sourced CaO were performed at Exar’s Laboratory. Testing was completed in order to determine the required excess CaO (the liming operation) and residence time at an intermediate location in the ponds to reduce Mg, Ca, SO4 and boron in the brine entering the Purification and Carbonation Plant.

 

Figure 13.7 shows the sedimentation rate data from example tests. The time is shown on the x-axis, while the y-axis shows the depth of solids during natural settling. Three tests are shown here with a 10% (green triangle), 20% (green circle) and 30% (blue diamond) excess of CaO added to the brine. The excess is estimated based on the mass of magnesium in the initial brine. The solid lines plotted on the diagram is the initial settling rate which is used to design settling equipment.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 203 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 13.7        Sedimentation Rate of Limed Pulps with Different Amounts of Excess Lime

 

 

The lime ratio required to precipitate of 99.6% of Mg ions and 60% of SO4 ions was utilized for cost estimation. Testing is presently underway at vendors to design the thickener and filters for downstream processing.

 

13.3Solvent Extraction Tests – SGS Minerals and IIT, Universidad de Concepción

 

Solvent extraction (SX) bench tests were performed at SGS Minerals in Lakefield, Canada, and Instituto de Investigaciones Tecnológicas (Technology Investigations Institute) of the Universidad de Concepción (ITT).

 

This testing determined:

 

·The most effective organic reagents for the extraction of boron from the brine;

·The pH effect on the extraction of boron;

·Extraction isotherms for extraction and re- extraction required in the project;

·The extraction and re-extraction kinetics in the system;

·The phase separation rate at two temperatures previously defined; and

·The required number of extraction and re-extraction stages.

 

Typical brine feed to SX is shown in Table 13.2.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 204 of 427

 

 

 

Table 13.2
Composition of the Brine Used for Testing SX
Li (g/L) B (mg/L) Ca (mg/L) K (g/L) Na (g/L) Mg (mg/L) SO4 (g/L) pH
10.5 5,565 266 32.3 65.4 < 0.02 26.0 11

 

Several organic extract formulations were tested targeting boron removal over 97%.

 

Tests at both institutions showed that the extraction process should be performed at pH ≤ 4, and re-extraction of the extractant should occur at basic pH. The process uses HCl to adjust the brine pH for extraction, and a solution of NaOH for re-extraction of the boron from the organic mixture.

 

Figure 13.8 and Figure 13.9 show the isotherms in a McCabe-Thiele diagram. These diagrams have been used to determine the number of extraction and re-extraction steps. In Figure 13.8, the x-axis is the boron concentration in the aqueous phase, while the y-axis is the concentration of boron in the organic phase during extraction. In Figure 13.9, the x-axis is the boron concentration in the organic phase, while the y-axis is the boron concentration in the aqueous phase during re-extraction. The bold, straight line is the operating line for the proposed equipment, while the thin, stair-steps are the individual operating stages. Perfect extraction efficiency was not assumed to design the equipment to develop a realistic sizing.

 

Figure 13.8        Extraction Isotherm at 20ºC Using Mixed Extractants

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 205 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 13.9        Re-extraction Isotherm at 20ºC Using Mixed Extractants

 

 

13.4Carbonation Tests – SGS Minerals (Canada)

 

Carbonation tests were conducted by SGS Minerals on boron-contaminated brine.

 

The following tests were conducted:

 

·Removal of remaining Mg using NaOH solution;

·Removal of remaining Ca using a solution of Na2CO3; and

·Carbonation reaction of Li using Na2CO3 solution to precipitate Li2CO3.

 

Differing reagent dosage, residence time, and temperatures were investigated. NaOH was found to be effective to remove the remaining Mg, and careful control of the Na2CO3 solution was required to remove the Ca without loss of Li. The test results of these carbonation tests were used to set the temperature, residence time and dosage of reagent ranges for the pilot plant tests.

 

13.5Pilot Purification Testing – SGS Minerals

 

SGS Minerals piloted removal of contaminants and lithium carbonate production. The pilot program used 10,000 liters of concentrated brine obtained from the Salar de Cauchari pilot pond system. The results were used for plant design in this study. The pilot plant flowsheet includes solvent extraction for B removal, regeneration of solvent, removal of the Ca and Mg impurities, and lithium carbonate precipitation and washing.

 

The main objectives of the pilot plant were to:

 

·Test the continuous process developed from bench testing; and

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 206 of 427

 

 

 

·Validate and obtain parameters and design criteria for the development of the industrial plant engineering.

 

Figure 13.10 shows the equipment for the pilot plant where the first tests were performed. The solvent extraction banks are on the left of the photograph, and the other reactors and filters are shown in the center and right of the image.

 

Figure 13.10        Pilot Plant (SX-Purification-Carbonation-Filtration-Washing Pulp)

 

 

This plant was subsequently installed in the Salar de Cauchari for further testing and training of the operators at site. The pilot plant provides data for brines of varying compositions from seasonal effects and final lithium concentration. The results of the pilot plant test work have been incorporated to the engineering for the final facility to ensure a robust, reliable operation capable of producing the demanded product quality at the committed rate.

 

The SX pilot plant achieved an extraction efficiency of over 99.5% as shown in Figure 13.11. The x-axis in Figure 13.11 shows the date and time of the run, while the y-axis shows the percent of the boron mass in the feed that was removed during the test. The solvent extraction process was operated for 5 days during this test with no loss of boron removal efficiency.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 207 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 13.11        SX Process Boron Extraction Efficiency

 

 

Mg and Ca polishing testing succeeded in obtaining over 95% removal efficiency, as shown in Figure 13.12. The x-axis is the date and time, while the y-axis shows the removal efficiency as a percentage of the mass of Ca or Mg in the feed brine. The Ca and Mg precipitation maintains the 95% removal efficiency over 4 days of operation in this test.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 208 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 13.12        Ca and Mg Precipitation Efficiency

 

 

13.5.1Lithium Carbonate Precipitation

 

Figure 13.13 demonstrates that over 86% recovery of lithium carbonate at acceptable excess-soda ash ratios was obtained. In Figure 13.13, the x-axis is the date and time of the test, while the left y-axis shows the percent of lithium mass precipitated during the tests, and the right y-axis shows the excess sodium carbonate being fed to the reactor. During this testing, excess soda ash varied from -40% to 70%. The optimum excess of soda ash is between 5 and 20% based on the lithium in the feed.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 209 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 13.13        Li Precipitation Efficiency

 

 

Washing of lithium carbonate filter cake with soft water resulted in sufficient product purity for the intended markets and use.

 

Control of lithium carbonate crystal habit and particle size via precipitation reaction parameters was effective in minimizing impurities. The lithium carbonate was then dried and packaged. A sample of dried lithium carbonate was shipped to the United States for micronization testing.

 

13.6Recent Testing Work Performed in the Pilot Plant

 

The pilot plant works constantly to provide process support and monitor efficiency improvement and resource optimization in the lithium carbonate production process.

 

In the liming plant, important work has been carried out monitoring the consumption of lime reagent for optimizing reagent consumption in the liming plant.

 

The reactions that take place precipitate magnesium hydroxide, gypsum, and calcium borates. The unbalanced reactions produce the following products:

 

(Mg)+2 + Ca(OH)2,(s) → Mg(OH)2,(s) + Ca+2

 

Ca+2 + SO4-2 → CaSO4,(s)

 

2Ca+2 + 3B2O4 → Ca2B6O11·5H2O(s)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 210 of 427

 

 

 

Through tests carried out in the pilot plant by the process team to determine the equilibrium curve of magnesium hydroxide, calcium sulphate, and calcium borates, the optimal lime consumption was identified. This study enabled a 50% reduction in the consumption required by design. This improvement not only reduced OPEX but also enhanced downstream performance in the purification process.

 

·Optimization of reagent consumption in the purification stages.

 

Additionally, other studies conducted in the pilot plant also allowed for the optimization of reagent consumption in the purification stages.

 

In purification, through preliminary tests carried out in the pilot plant, the lime consumption was reduced from a molar ratio of 300% relative to the incoming magnesium to 250%, representing a 16.7% decrease in consumption.

 

An empirical equilibrium curve was also established (Figure 13.14), which serves as the basis for calculating the addition of calcium chloride to achieve the desired sulphate removal in primary purification.

 

Figure 13.14        Sulphate-Calcium Equilibrium Curve

 

 

Additionally, a simulation was developed that, by considering the prices of various reagents, determines the optimal economic route for sulphate removal during the purification process (Table 13.3 and Figure 13.15). This tool establishes a target concentration at the output of primary purification, thereby identifying the most efficient scenario in terms of the consumption of calcium chloride, barium chloride, and sodium carbonate.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 211 of 427

 

 

 

Table 13.3

Reagent Optimization in Primary Purification

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 212 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 13.15        Example of Economic Optimization Curve

 

 

With the support of the pilot plant, a new operating temperature was established in purification. Lowering it from 70°C to 55°C reduced lithium loss in the precipitated solids during secondary purification.

 

13.7Recent Work Performed in External Laboratories

 

Chromatographic analysis in external laboratories to monitor the concentration of organic solvents in the SX process streams has been carried out in:

 

·Refined brine.

·Stripping streams.

 

13.8Continuing Work Plan for Supporting the Plant Operations

 

The following work and activities are being carried out at the pilot plant to support the operation:

 

Homologation Tests for Inputs Used in Lithium Carbonate Production:

 

·Evaluation of synthetic sodium carbonate.

·Tests with different flocculants.

·Testing and evaluation of new inputs.

 

Evaluation of Suppliers for Various Production Inputs:

 

·Procedure for evaluating new suppliers.

 

·Tests required for evaluation.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 213 of 427

 

 

 

Work Required According to Plant Needs for Process Optimization, Operational Problem Resolution, or Development of Alternatives:

 

·Solvent extraction tests at different brine pH values to reduce HCl consumption.

 

·Studying of the use of process water and mother liquors in the liming process.

 

·Evaluation of salt washing processes for improved lithium recovery.

 

·Tests for reagent dosing in primary and secondary purification processes to reduce reagent OPEX.

 

·Pilot Plant IX tests to adjust production and regeneration cycles.

 

·Tests to reduce HCl and NaOH consumption in IX regeneration processes.

 

·Evaluation of the relationship between lithium concentration and sodium / potassium rejection to assist with improving the operation of the KCl process step.

 

·Implement a process support program for ensuring that product quality is achieved more consistently.

 

·Continue Solid / liquid separation tests in PUR1 and PUR2 for optimising filter cloths, flocculant make up and filter cake washing.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 214 of 427

 

 

 

14.0Mineral Resource Estimates

 

14.1Overview

 

Exar, operating as a subsidiary of a joint venture between LAAC, GFL, and JEMSE, commissioned Montgomery to update the lithium brine Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cauchari-Olaroz lithium brine project, Jujuy Province, Argentina in 2019. The following Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of May 7, 2019, and represents a Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource for lithium. The Project area consists of parts of Salar de Olaroz (“SdO”) basin in the north and Salar de Cauchari (“SdC”) basin in the south. Figure 14.1 shows the Project area highlighting properties controlled by Exar, the extents of the 2019 Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate (“Resource Evaluation Area”), the watershed boundary of the basin, and the expanded numerical model boundary domain (Section 15.0).

 

LAAC has previously filed the following NI 43-101 technical reports (as LAC) on the Project providing prior Mineral Resource Estimates for lithium.

 

·King, M., 2010a. Amended Inferred Resource Estimation of Lithium and Potassium at the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report prepared for Lithium Americas Corp. Effective Date: February 15, 2010.

 

·King, M., 2010b. Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resource Estimation of Lithium and Potassium at the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report prepared for Lithium Americas Corp. Effective Date: December 6, 2010.

 

·King, M., Kelley, R., and Abbey, D., 2012. Feasibility Study Reserve Estimation and Lithium Carbonate and Potash Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report prepared for Lithium Americas Corp. Effective Date: July 11, 2012.

 

·Burga, E., Burga, D., Rosko, M., King, M., Abbey, D., Sanford, T., Smee, B., and Leblanc, R., 2017. Updated Feasibility Study Reserve Estimation and Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report prepared for Lithium Americas Corp. Effective Date: March 29, 2017. Filing Date: January 15, 2018.

 

·Burga, D., Burga, E., Genck, W., and Weber, D., 2019. Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for Cauchari-Olaroz Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report prepared for Lithium Americas Corp. Effective Date: March 1, 2019. Filing Date: March 31, 2019.

 

·Burga, E., Burga, D., Genck, W., Weber, D., Sandford, A., Dworzanowski, M. 2020. Updated Feasibility Study and Mineral Reserve Estimation to Support 40,000 tpa at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Report, Prepared for Lithium Americas. Effective Date: September 30th, 2020. Filing Date: October 19, 2020.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 215 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 14.1        Location Map for 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate

 

 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 216 of 427

 

 

 

For purposes of this section, the prior Resource Estimate provided in King and others (2012) with an effective date of July 11, 2012 and subsequently included in Burga et al. (2017) are referred to as LAC (2012) and LAC (2017), respectively. The prior Mineral Resource Estimate was updated in Burga et. al (2019) with an effective date of February 13, 2019 and is referred to as LAC (2019); that update incorporated: 1) samples and interpretations used from the prior LAC (2012) Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium, and 2) an expanded Project database compiled from results of 2017 through 2018 exploration drilling and sampling campaigns and additional depth-specific sampling in early 2019 as part of data verification.

 

In developing the Mineral Reserve Estimate, documented in Section 15.0, and after statement of the most recent Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019), the hydrostratigraphic (HSU) model developed in Leapfrog Geo and used for the Mineral Resource Estimate in LAC (2019) was simplified according to conceptual depositional environments or stratigraphic sequence units (Section 14.3.5). This update of the HSU model allowed for a departure from the complex 24-layer lithologic scheme used in the prior HSU model, and for deepening of the bedrock basement in the model based on recent results from both deep core drilling and sampling at Platform 1 (Section 14.2.2), and published results of neighboring property areas (Advantage Lithium, 2018 and 2019).

 

The results of drilling and sampling at Platform 1 conducted after statement of the recent Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019) has allowed for partial conversion of the Inferred Mineral Resource aquifer volume in the 2019 HSU model to Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource aquifer volumes of the deeper HSUs. This conversion of aquifer volume to more confident Mineral Resource Estimate classification surrounding Platform 1 provides the support for simulated wells in the Mineral Reserve Estimate numerical model to be completed in the deeper and more permeable Lower Sand and Basal Sand HSUs in the southeast part of the model domain. This resulted in the latest Mineral Resource Estimate for the Project with an effective date of May 7, 2019 (Section 14.4).

 

14.1.1Statement for Brine Mineral Prospects and Related Terms

 

Lithium occurs as a dissolved mineral species in subsurface brine of the Project area. The brine is contained within an aquifer comprised of alluvial, lacustrine, and evaporite deposits that have accumulated in the SdC and SdO structural basin. Mineral Resource estimation for brine mineral deposits is based on knowledge of the geometry of the brine aquifer, the variation in specific yield (the yield of drainable fluid obtained under gravity flow conditions from the interconnected pore volume and referred to as drainable porosity), and concentration or grade of dissolved mineral species such as lithium in the brine aquifer.

 

Following CIM standards and guidelines for technical reporting, classification standards for a Mineral Resource are applied as indicators of confidence level classifications: Measured, Indicated, and Inferred. According to these standards, “Measured” is the most confident classification and Inferred is the least confident (CIM, 2012 and 2014). To estimate the Mineral Reserve, in addition to economic, process, and other potentially modifying aspects, further information is necessary for permeability (hydraulic conductivity), transmissivity, storativity, diffusivity and the overall groundwater flow regime to predict how the resource will change over the life of mine plan (CIM, 2012 and 2014). The evaluation framework used by Montgomery for brine Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimation, based on CIM standards and best practice guidelines, is shown in Figure 14.2.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 217 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 14.2        Methodology for Evaluating Brine Mineral Resources and Mineral Reservesa

 

 

As a liquid mineral deposit, a Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium occurring as a dissolved mineral species in a brine aquifer is determined by quantifying the brine volume and associated mass able to drain by gravity effects. The Mineral Resource Estimate is computed as the product of the estimated resource area and resource thickness or aquifer volume, lithium concentration dissolved in the brine (grade), and specific yield of the resource. The brine Mineral Resource Estimate, sometimes referred to as the static or in situ model of the brine aquifer, can be advanced to a Mineral Reserve Estimate by projecting the producing capacity of the proposed operating facilities and site-wide lithium grade to be extracted from the aquifer volume comprising the Mineral Resource Estimate. The brine Mineral Reserve Estimate, sometimes referred to as the dynamic model of the brine aquifer, involves flow, transport and density numerical modeling for simulating an extraction wellfield using production-scale wells as the mining method of the Project.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 218 of 427

 

 

 

Mineral Resource classifications used in this study conform to the 2014 CIM Definition Standards:

 

Mineral Resource: a Mineral Resource is a concentration or occurrence of solid material of economic interest in or on the Earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction. The location, quantity, grade or quality, continuity and other geological characteristics of a Mineral Resource are known, estimated or interpreted from specific geological evidence and knowledge, including sampling.

 

Measured Mineral Resource: a Measured Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape, and physical characteristics are estimated with confidence sufficient to allow the application of Modifying Factors to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to confirm geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. A Measured Mineral Resource has a higher level of confidence than that applying to either an Indicated Mineral Resource or an Inferred Mineral Resource. It may be converted to a Proven Mineral Reserve or to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

 

Indicated Mineral Resource: an Indicated Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity, grade or quality, densities, shape and physical characteristics are estimated with sufficient confidence to allow the application of Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Geological evidence is derived from adequately detailed and reliable exploration, sampling and testing and is sufficient to assume geological and grade or quality continuity between points of observation. An Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to a Measured Mineral Resource and may only be converted to a Probable Mineral Reserve.

 

Inferred Mineral Resource: an Inferred Mineral Resource is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. Geological evidence is sufficient to imply but not verify geological and grade or quality continuity. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority of Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources with continued exploration.

 

14.2Definition of Resource-Bearing Formations

 

14.2.1Geology

 

Based on reporting in LAC (2012 and 2017), there are two dominant structural features in the region of SdO and SdC: north-south trending faults and northwest-southeast trending lineaments. The high-angle north-south trending faults form narrow and deep basins, which are accumulation sites for numerous salars in the region, including Olaroz and Cauchari. Basement rock in this area is composed of Lower Ordovician turbidites (shale and sandstone) that are intruded by Late Ordovician granitic rocks. Bedrock is exposed to the east, west and south of SdO and SdC, and generally along the eastern boundary of the Puna Region of Argentina. These rocks are overlain by Neogene sedimentary and volcanic rocks, including basaltic to rhyolitic lava flows and dacitic to rhyolitic caldera-forming ignimbrites.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 219 of 427

 

 

 

The salars are in-filled with flat-lying clastic sedimentary and evaporite deposits, including the following five informal lithological units that have been identified in drill cores:

 

·Red silts with minor clay and sand;

·Banded halite beds with clay, silt and minor sand;

·Fine sands with minor silt and salt beds;

·Massive halite and banded halite beds with minor sand; and

·Medium and fine sands.

 

Alluvial deposits intrude into these salar deposits to varying degrees, depending on location. The alluvium surfaces slope into the salar from outside the basin perimeter. Raised bedrock exposures occur outside the salar basin. The most extensive intrusion of alluvium into the basin is the Archibarca alluvial fan system, which partially separates SdO and SdC on the western boundary. In addition to this significant alluvial fan deposit, much of the perimeter zone of both salars exhibits encroachments of alluvial material associated with alluvial fan systems (Figure 14.1).

 

14.2.2Drilling and Sampling

 

Exploration drilling and sampling programs conducted between 2009 and 2011 evaluated the lithium development potential of the Project area and supported the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC 2012 and 2017). A map showing exploration wells and boreholes used to evaluate the prior Mineral Resource Estimate and the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate is shown in Figure 14.3.

 

For the 2017, 2018 and 2019 exploration programs, Exar provided the following additional drilling and sampling information of the Project area for analysis of the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate:

 

·Reverse Circulation (RC) Borehole Program: Reverse circulation drilling was conducted to develop vertical profiles providing geological and hydrogeological information. The program included installation of 27 boreholes: 19 boreholes completed as shallow wells, and eight boreholes completed as deep wells. The program included description of rotary drill cuttings samples, pumping tests, and collection of 90 depth-specific brine samples collected using bailer methods at 15 well locations.

 

·Diamond Drilling (DD and DDH) Borehole Program: This program was conducted to collect continuous cores for lithologic description, geotechnical testing (total porosity, grain size and density) and brine sampling. The program included 19 boreholes often with multiple screened-interval completions and collection of 195 depth-specific brine samples using bailer methods. In 2019, 58 additional samples were sent for RBRC testing at Daniel B. Stephens & Associates, Inc. (samples from DD19D-001 AND DD19D-PE09). Drilling and analysis of samples at Platform 1 (DD19D-001) was completed on May 7, 2019 and forms the basis of the effective date for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate.

 

·Additional Depth Specific Brine Sampling Program: Samples totaling 71 depth-specific bailer samples were collected in 2017 and 2018 at 14 RC and DDH locations drilled between 2009 and 2011. With the 2017 and 2018 depth specific samples, six additional depth-specific bailer samples were collected and incorporated into the data set in February 2019 as confirmatory samples.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 220 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 14.3        Well Location Map

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 221 of 427

 

 

 

14.3Mineral Resource Estimate Methodology

 

14.3.1Background and History

 

14.3.1.1Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2012)

 

The development of the prior Mineral Resource Estimate reported in LAC (2012; effective date of July 11, 2012) used Leapfrog Hydro modeling software; volume and mass calculations for the Resource Evaluation Area were developed using GIS software. The Resource Evaluation Area was defined as Measured or Indicated based on the continuity demonstrated by exploration drilling and sampling data. The regions of the prior 2012 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate are shown on Figure 14.4 for slice depth of 150 m and include a section through SdC.

 

The methodology for defining the Measured and Indicated classification was as follows:

 

·Indicated Mineral Resource: The lateral extent of the Indicated Mineral Resource is defined by whichever of the following is less laterally extensive: (1) the Exar claim boundary, (2) the location of the lithium iso-surface for the cut-off grade, or (3) a 1.5 km buffer around the exploration data points. The base of the zone is defined by the shallowest of the following: (1) the deepest chemistry sample in an exploration well in a 5 km search radius, or (2) the interpreted surface of the basement rock underlying the salar sediments.

 

·Measured Mineral Resource: The Measured Mineral Resource is defined if there is: (1) at least one measurement of grade within 30 m vertically and 1,250 m horizontally, and (2) adequate knowledge of grade continuity, as defined by the presence of at least four independent locations of grade measurement at any depth within a 1,500 m search radius.

 

The 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate was calculated relative to a lithium concentration cut-off grade of 354 mg/L. This value was identified as a process engineering constraint for the 2012 Mineral Reserve Estimate.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 222 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 14.4        Plan and Section Views of the 2012 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate

 

Source: King, Kelley, Abbey (2012)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 223 of 427

 

 

 

14.3.1.2Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019)

 

The development of a Mineral Resource Estimate reported in LAC (2019; effective date of February 13, 2019) was conducted as a collaborative effort between Montgomery and the Exar project team starting in September 2018. Verification of 2017 and 2018 core logging and description methods were conducted on-site at the Project on September 8 and 9, 2018 by Montgomery Qualified Persons: Michael Rosko and Daniel Weber. The on-site field visit to the Project area was led by Exar representative M. Casini and associated field hydrogeologists from Exar. Results of 2017 and 2018 exploration drilling and sampling were provided to Montgomery in digital format in the software platform Strater (v.5, Golden Software) and Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. These data were subsequently compiled in a database using Microsoft Access to update the hydrostratigraphic framework.

 

The 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate incorporated: (1) samples and analytics used from the previous 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate, and (2) an expanded Project database compiled from results of 2017 and 2018 exploration drilling and sampling campaigns, and recent depth specific brine sampling in early 2019 for data verification. Sample verification and sample QA/QC was conducted by an independent Qualified Person in coordination with the Exar team. To obtain the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate, the previous models and expanded database were analyzed and processed by Montgomery using Leapfrog Geo 4.4 and Leapfrog EDGE geologic modeling and resource estimation software (Seequent, 2018).

 

A map showing the Resource Evaluation Area of Mineral Resource classes is shown in Figure 14.5 for the prior Mineral Resource Estimate and for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate. For the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate, the Resource Evaluation Area extended north to include: 1) Exar Property areas with 2017 and 2018 exploration results, and 2) areas meeting the criteria of resource classes for Mineral Resource estimation. Figure 14.6 shows a section view of the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate and a map view at a slice elevation of 3,800 masl (approximate depth of 150 m within SdC). Compared with a similar representation for the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate (Figure 14.4), the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate extends deeper in the brine mineral deposit as well as to the north property claim area.

 

Except for cut-off grade, the methodology and resource classification scheme for evaluating the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate followed the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate criteria for Measured and Indicated. The prior 2012 processing constraint of cut-off grade of 354 mg/L was not imposed as a strict control by Exar for the update in 2019. However, for comparison purposes the cut-off grade was set at 300 mg/L concentration of lithium, largely to include results from drilling platform 06.

 

Comparing the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate to the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC 2012 and LAC 2019, respectively), the percent change showed a decrease of less than 1% for total average lithium concentration of Measured + Indicated (585 mg/L vs. 581 mg/L); the percent change was an increase of 53% for total LCE Measured + Indicated (11,752,000 tonnes LCE vs. 17,977,200 tonnes LCE). The large increase in overall mass can be attributed to the expansion and deepening of the Resource Evaluation Area based on exploration results obtained in 2017 and 2018. The small decline in total average concentration can be attributed to the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate affected by the 2017 and 2018 range of samples collected in SdO and Archibarca areas of the Project. When spatially averaged with the lithium concentration of SdC samples, which essentially dominated the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate, the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate had a relatively small percentage decrease in the overall concentration of lithium.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 224 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 14.5        Location Map Showing Mineral Resource Evaluation Areas – 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate and 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 225 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 14.6        Representative Plan and Section Views of the 2019 Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

14.3.2Hydrostratigraphic Framework

 

A generalized hydrostratigraphic framework of the hydrostratigraphic model developed for the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate is presented in Figure 14.7. The framework was comprised of five primary units distributed across 24 layers representing a multi-layered, brine aquifer system. The primary units were based on the lithologic interpretation of core and rotary drill-cutting samples from boreholes, geophysical surveys, results of hydraulic testing at the site, as well as consideration of the interpreted in-filling history of the salar basin.

 

Interpretation of the 24 layers included the following descriptive comments (LAC 2012):

 

·Laterally, not all units exist at all locations, as they may pinch out laterally between sections and boreholes.

 

·Characterization was extended to the margins of the salar basin at a minimum thickness of 0.1 m to facilitate numerical modeling of groundwater flow regimes across natural flow boundaries.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 226 of 427

 

 

 

·Hydraulic properties were assigned to zones of inferred sedimentary homogeneity in each hydrostratigraphic unit, as interpreted from pumping tests.

 

·The recent coarse-grained alluvial fan deposits and finer-grained mud, salted mud, and lesser sand and salt (halite) tend to be the units that occur at the surface, and in the near surface zone.

 

·A mud complex consisting of silt and clay with sandy lenses and discontinuous sand beds is persistent in the subsurface under recent salar sediments.

 

·The mud complex is separated from an underlying salt complex by a discontinuous unit of sand with minor mud and salt content.

 

·Alternating units of salt (halite) and sand/mud characterize the salt complex.

 

·A laterally discontinuous mud body is interpreted to overlie a basal sand deposit.

 

·The basal sand is interpreted to be persistent across most of the model.

 

·Geophysical data help to define a series of faults that control the basin-filling history, and in turn control the position of the salt hardpan surfaces.

 

·The broad graben basin is interpreted to have an asymmetric shape; the eastern border fault is interpreted to have a greater component of dip-slip than the western fault. Consequently, the basin is deeper in the center and the east.

 

Figure 14.7        Generalized Framework for Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate

 

Source: LAC (2012)

 

As part of data processing for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019), Montgomery used the 24-layer model represented in the 2012 FEFLOW model to integrate and update the hydrostratigraphic nomenclature according to additional lithologic data collected during the 2017 and 2018 exploration drilling and sampling campaigns. The 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate used six hydrostratigraphic units distributed across 24 layers representing a multi-layered, brine aquifer system. Table 14.1 shows the comparison of hydrostratigraphic interpretation and nomenclature used in the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate versus the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate. Figure 14.8 shows the 2019 hydrostratigraphic nomenclature and adjusted color scheme to correlate with colors in Exar lithologic logs.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 227 of 427

 

 

Table 14.1
Summary of Hydrostratigraphic Units Assigned in 2012 and
2019 Mineral Resource Estimates
2012
Lithostratigraphic
Unita
2012
Stratigraphic
Groupa
2012
Resource Estimate
Hydrostratigraphic
Unita

2019
Resource

Estimate
Hydrostratigraphic
Unitb

Recent sediments Alluvial Fan Complex Sand

Alluvial Fan Sand and Gravel

(with minor silt and clay)

Recent Sediments

Unit 1: Red silts with minor clay and sand

Unit 2: Banded halite beds with clay, silt, and minor sand

Mud Complex

Mud

(Clay and Silt Mix)

Clay and Silt

(with minor sand and halite)

Unit 3: Fine sands with minor silt and salt beds Sand layer between mud and salt complex Sand

Sand

(with minor clay/silt and halite)

Unit 3: Fine sands with minor silt and salt beds Sand/mud layer between mud and salt complex Sand Mix

Sand and Clay/Silt

(with minor halite)

Unit 4: Massive halite and banded halite beds with minor sand Salt Complex Halite

Halite

(with minor clay/silt and sand)

Unit 5: Medium and fine sands Basal Sands Sand

Basal Sand

(with minor silt and weathered bedrock)

(a)  LAC (2012)

(b)  LAC (2017)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 228 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.8     Generalized Framework for the Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate

14.3.3Hydrostratigraphic Unit Model

The 2012 hydrostratigraphic unit (HSU) model representing the prior Resource Evaluation Area of the Project involved a complex layering scheme. In order to assess the reliance of this framework for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate method (LAC, 2019), the 2012 hydrostratigraphic model was analyzed in Leapfrog Geo using the 2012 FEFLOW layers used for modeling the 2012 Mineral Reserve Estimate. To illustrate the results, sections A-A’ and B-B’, located on Figure 14.9, are provided from the hydrostratigraphic models representing the prior and 2019 hydrostratigraphic model analysis, Figure 14.10 and Figure 14.11 respectively. Results show the reported 2012 hydrostratigraphic model Section A-A’ shown on Figure 14.10 compares well to the same section location of the 2012 model using the FEFLOW layers as processed in Leapfrog Geo and shown on Figure 14.11.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 229 of 427

 

 

After similar verification methods of the 2012 hydrostratigraphic model, its 3D extents were expanded using the 2019 database of drilling and sampling results from the 2017 and 2018 exploration campaigns provided by Exar to Montgomery. Additionally, publicly available results were used as off-property control points of the Resource Evaluation Area in SdO and SdC (Orocobre Limited, 2011 and Advantage Lithium, 2018). The 2017 and 2018 exploration campaigns included several wells in SdO to expand the model in the north and wells drilled to greater depths in both SdC and SdO to better characterize the deep salar sediments. The 2019 hydrostratigraphic model boundary is delineated in SdC using the prior model boundary and in SdO by either the mapped salar sediments or the Exar Property boundary, whichever has the greatest lateral extent. Several of the wells extended deeper than the previous 2012 basement contact resulting in the basement contact to be deepened along the eastern part of the basin. The section shown on Figure 14.12 representing the 2019 hydrostratigraphic model, also evaluated to Section A-A’ for comparison to the 2012 model (Figure 14.10), illustrates the deepened basement contact on the east side of the basin.

The complexity of the hydrostratigraphic layers and differences between SdC and SdO basins are shown on the SW-NE Section B-B’ in Figure 14.13, which bisects the basin and extends further NE beyond the prior 2012 model domain Figure 14.9). Hydrostratigraphic units in SdC to the southwest are generally more varied and coarse-grained compared to SdO in the northeast which shows more halite with minor clay/silt and sand lenses. Although the 24-layer hydrostratigraphic framework was used to expand the model further NE into SdO, the section shows the complexity of translating this layering strategy outside of the original modeled area which relied on prior exploration in SdC.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 230 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.9      Location Map of Representative Hydrostratigraphic Sections

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 231 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.10     Section A-A' of the Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate

Source: King Kelley, Abbey (2012)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 232 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.11     Section A-A’ of the Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate Processed in Leapfrog Geo

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 233 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.12     Section A-A’ of the 2019 Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019)

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 234 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.13     Section B-B’ of the Hydrostratigraphic Model Used for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019)

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

14.3.4Specific Yield

Specific yield (“Sy”) or drainable porosity is the total volume of pore space in saturated media that drains, under the influence of gravity, expressed as a percentage of sample volume. In standard terms of aquifer mechanics, Sy is defined as the volume of water released from a unit volume of unconfined aquifer per unit decline in the water table. Sy has been estimated with laboratory RBRC methods as reported in the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2012). Results were used to estimate representative Sy values for each of the six primary unit types in the hydrostratigraphic model.

In the 2012 FEFLOW model (LAC, 2012), the upper two model layers included variation in Sy to represent mapped surface geology and numerical parameter estimation results from steady-state calibration of the 2012 FEFLOW model. Deeper model layers generally had more uniform Sy based on the lithology of the primary unit. The finer-grained, primary units at depth (Halite, Clay and Silt) were modeled with a uniform Sy estimate based on the dominant lithology, while the Sy of the Sand unit varied with approximate correlation to depth and potential effects of lithostatic loading. The representative values of Sy for each layer remained unchanged from the 2012 FEFLOW model and were distributed similarly in the Leapfrog model for the Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019). Table 14.2 provides parameter values for Sy.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 235 of 427

 

 

Table 14.2
Summary of Hydrostratigraphic Units and Assigned Specific Yield
Estimates for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019)
Primary Unit Minor Units

Specific Yield Estimate
for Primary Unit

(percent)

Alluvial Fan Sand and Gravel Silt and Clay Lenses 24.9
Clay and Silt Sand and Halite Lenses 5.6
Sanda Clay/Silt, and Halite Lenses 24.9 / 16.0 / 12.1
Sand and Clay/Silt Minor Halite Lenses 16.0
Halite Clay/Silt and Sand Lenses 5.9
Basal Sand Silt and Weathered Bedrock 13.7
(a)        Sand unit modeled similarly to the LAC 2012 model where Sy generally decreases with depth: hydrostratigraphic model layers 4, 8, 11, and 16 were assigned values of specific yield of 24.9 percent; layer 13 was assigned 16.0 percent; layers 6, 19, and 21 were assigned 12.1 percent.

14.3.52019 HSU Model

During the process of updating the Mineral Reserve Estimate model in 2019 (Section 15.0), the HSU model developed in Leapfrog Geo and used for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019) described in Section 14.3.3 was modified according to conceptual depositional environments or stratigraphic sequence units. This re-evaluation of the HSU model was required to support the formulation Mineral Reserve Estimate numerical model by allowing for simplifying the complex 24-layer lithologic scheme used in the previous model, deepening of the bedrock basement in the model based on deep core drilling at Platform 1 (Figure 14.3), and incorporating published results of neighboring property areas (Advantage Lithium, 2018 and 2019). The re-evaluation of the HSU model, along with incorporation of Platform 1 drilling and sampling results, also allowed for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate as presented in Section 14.4.

The resulting HSUs are essentially equivalent to and composed of the previously declared HSUs, however the HSU naming conventions and descriptions for the numerical model of the Mineral Reserve Estimate have been modified as identified in Table 14.3 into seven HSUs with representative primary and secondary lithologic units. The regrouping of units in the 2019 HSU model conformed to review and analysis of lithologic log descriptions grouped by the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) according to sand, gravel, halite, silt, clay, and other descriptions noted in logs and core photographs to sum the percent distributions for the grouped HSU units. For each logged interval, the primary and secondary lithologic units were identified by percent distribution and the interval thickness was calculated in order to weight the lithology. This was then summed by HSU to provide an overall lithologic distribution to appropriately weight and adjust Specific Yield estimates based on laboratory results for RBRC and published literature estimates. The largest effect of the analysis was redistributing the previously defined single Halite HSU by splitting it into representative HSUs with either primary or secondary units of Halite and quantifying the lithologic distribution of other units mixed with the Halite.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 236 of 427

 

 

Table 14.3
Summary of Hydrostatigraphic Units in the 2019 HSU Model
Hydrostratigraphic Unit Primary Units Minor Units
Alluvial Fan Sand and Gravel Sand and Gravel Silt/Clay
Interbedded Sand and Clay/Silt Sand and Clay/Silt Halite
Clay/Silt with Sand Clay/Silt with Sand Halite
Halite with Sand Halite with Sand Clay/silt lenses
Interbedded Sand and Halite Sand and Halite Silt/Clay
Lower Sand Sand Silt and Halite
Basal Sand Sand Silt and Weathered Bedrock

Adjustments to Specific Yield estimates for the HSUs were constrained to be equivalent to the overall average Specific Yield estimate of the previous updated Mineral Resource Estimate (Burga, et al., 2019); initial lithium concentrations also remained unchanged as described in Section 14.3.6. The net effect of regrouping the HSUs was minor on the 2019 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate (Burga, et al., 2019): on average, modifications to the HSU model showed an approximate 1 percent increase in the total Measured plus Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium concentrations, lithium mass, brine volume, and LCE mass compared to reported values in the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate. This net effect is largely attributed to the change in bedrock surface geometry at the boundary of the Resource Evaluation Area due to updated exploration results rather than regrouping the HSU groups.

A larger change in the Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate, by an increase of approximately 25 percent, resulted from modification of the HSU model. Again, this increase is largely attributed to the deepening of the bedrock basement incorporating results derived from exploration at Platform 1, as well as incorporating recent publically available exploration reporting by Advantage Lithium (2018 and 2019). The results of drilling and sampling at Platform 1 allowed for increasing confidence and partial conversion of the Inferred Mineral Resource aquifer volume in the updated HSU model to Indicated Mineral Resource aquifer volume of the deeper HSUs and the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (Section 14.4). This conversion of aquifer volume to more confident Mineral Resource Estimate classification surrounding the Platform 1 location also provided the support for simulated wells in the Mineral Reserve Estimate numerical model to be completed in the deeper and more permeable Lower Sand and Basal Sand HSUs in the southeast part of the model domain (Section 15.0).

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 237 of 427

 

 

14.3.6Lithium Concentrations

The lithium concentrations from the depth-specific bailer samples obtained in 2017 and 2018 boreholes were spatially analyzed and compared to the distribution of lithium in the resampled resource grid from the 2012 FEFLOW model and the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2012). Measured concentrations in the 2017 and 2018 samples often differed from values predicted by the prior 2012 resource grid. Therefore, the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate required a re-interpolation of lithium concentrations to resolve the additional sampling results; incorporating the lithium concentrations in the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate model followed and expanded upon methods used in the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate model. In summary, the 2019 lithium concentrations database included the following:

·Concentration measurements from original samples used in LAC (2012) and recent sampling locations with bailer samples were assigned a discrete depth (if represented as a depth interval).

·Data analysis was conducted to evaluate the quality and representativeness of the data. Sample verification and the sample QA/QC was conducted by Exar and independent Qualified Person and provided to Montgomery.

·Publicly available results were used for off-property northern control points in SdO of the Resource Evaluation Area in the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate (Orocobre Limited, 2011); similarly for the 2019 Resource Evaluation Area, publically available results were used for off-property control points in SdC to the east and west of the Resource Evaluation Area (Advantage Lithium, 2018).

·Spatial correlation of lithium concentration data points was assessed with semi-variogram analysis to prepare iso-surfaces using two different methods in Leapfrog EDGE: Radial Basis Function (“RBF”) and Ordinary Kriging.

In total, 1,880 lithium concentrations are represented in the 3D geologic model for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate. Locations of representative fence sections of the distribution of initial lithium concentrations are shown on Figure 14.14 for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate. For comparison purposes, the fence sections for the 2012 and the 2019 initial lithium concentrations are shown on Figure 14.15 and Figure 14.16, respectively.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 238 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.14     Location Map of Representative Fence Sections for Lithium Concentrations

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 239 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.15     Representative Fence Sections of Initial Lithium Concentrations in the 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate Processed in Leapfrog Geo

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 240 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.16     Representative Fence Sections of Initial Lithium Concentrations in the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate Processed in Leapfrog Geo

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 241 of 427

 

 

14.3.7Exploratory Data Analysis and Domain Analysis

The Exploratory Data Analysis (“EDA”) of the lithium concentrations involved the univariate statistics of the samples using histograms, box plots, and probability plots, and spatial correlations based on data posting, trend analysis, hydrostratigraphic units, and relative location in the Project area. Box plots of the lithium concentrations grouped by samples located in SdC, Archibarca, or SdO are shown in Figure 14.17. Although the variance and spatial trend of the distribution of lithium concentrations differs slightly in these three areas, the Resource Evaluation Area was modeled as one domain recognizing the following: 1) the distribution of lithium concentrations are not dependent on the hydrostratigraphic units, 2) the hydrostratigraphic units are continuous through the three areas, and 3) modeling the three areas as sub-domains, even with soft boundaries, produces disconnects in the lithium concentration contours which affect gridding required for numerical modeling of the Mineral Reserve Estimate. The perimeter of the Resource Evaluation Area was modeled as a soft boundary to incorporate outside control points.

As part of the EDA for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate, the box plots showing mean and median concentrations are informative as they show the influence of 2017 and 2018 samples collected in SdO and Archibarca relative to the SdC samples, which dominated the sample database used for the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate. Additionally, the SdC sample population shows a smaller range of the upper and lower quartile, indicating less dilution effects of shallow samples collected in the SdO area and the freshwater influx of the basin margin in the Archibarca area.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 242 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.17     Box Plots of Lithium Concentrations – SdC, Archibarca, and SdO Areas

14.3.8Mineral Resource Block Model Variography, Methods, and Validation

Variogram models were developed in three orthogonal directions based on experimental variograms. No outlier restrictions were applied, as measured sample concentrations do not show anomalously high values. Analysis of the lithium distributions did not show a dependency on hydrostratigraphic units. Therefore, the model domain was distinguished by the Resource Evaluation Area with a soft boundary accounting for samples outside of the Resource Evaluation Area. Categories were applied within the model domain to subdivide the Mineral Resource classification (Measured, Indicated, and Inferred) and the hydrostratigraphic sequences in order to apply variations in Sy.

The Mineral Resource block model within the Resource Evaluation Area, composed of 6,896,092 blocks, was defined with a block size of x = 100 metres, y = 100 metres, and z = 1 metre. The block size was chosen to apply the specific yield to the units within the hydrostratigraphic model imposed by incorporating the parameterization in the 2012 FEFLOW model.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 243 of 427

 

 

The spatial correlations for the lithium concentrations were reviewed in Leapfrog EDGE using experimental variograms with the parameters shown in Table 14.4. The spatial variability was modeled using three experimental directions adjusted to a 3D ellipsoidal model using one spherical structure and three experimental variogram directions. The experimental semi-variograms of lithium and theoretical model is shown in Figure 14.18.

Table 14.4
Experimental Variogram Parameters

Axis Variogram Parameters Tolerance
Lag
(metres)
Maximum
Number of
Lags
Azimuth
(degrees)
Dip
(degrees)
Angular
(degrees)
Major 500 50 114.45 0 20
Semi-major 500 50 24.45 0 75
Minor 5 100 0 90 5

The interpolation methodology for estimating the lithium resource was Radial Basis Function (“RBF”) to produce iso-surfaces which were then evaluated to the resource block model. Figure 14.19 shows the initial lithium concentrations on plan maps for elevations of 3,900, 3,800, and 3,700 metres.

The RBF interpolation method was verified with ordinary kriging. The model was validated using a series of checks including comparison of univariate statistics, verification with ordinary kriging, evaluation of the model to the original sample points to verify values, and swath plots to detect any spatial bias. Swath Plots in the X, Y, and Z directions are shown on Figure 14.20 and provide a general perspective on the modeled concentrations compared to the samples. The model was interrogated where the swath plots showed the modeled concentrations differed from the sample concentrations. Upon examination and verification, differences were often attributed to 1) the swath fully intersecting the Resource Evaluation Area in the specified direction, 2) variability of the number and distribution of sample data available in each swath, and 3) the resource model incorporating soft boundary control points outside the Resource Evaluation Area.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 244 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.18     Experimental Semi-Variograms of Lithium with Theoretical Model

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 245 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.19     Representative Elevation Maps of Initial Lithium Concentrations for 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 246 of 427

 

 

Figure 14.20     Model Validation Swath Plots in the X, Y, and Z Directions

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 247 of 427

 

 

14.42019 Mineral Resource Statement

A map showing the Resource Evaluation Area of resource classifications is shown on Figure 14.5 for the prior (2012) Mineral Resource Estimate and for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (King, Kelley, Abbey, 2012 and Burga et al., 2019). For the Mineral Resource Estimate, the Resource Evaluation Area remains the same as Burga et al. (2019), extending north to include: 1) Exar Property areas with 2017, 2018 and 2019 exploration results, and 2) areas meeting the criteria of resource classes for Mineral Resource estimation. Figure 14.21 shows a schematic 3D view of the Resource Evaluation Area for the Mineral Resource classifications: Measured, Indicated, and Inferred.

Figure 14.21     3D Schematic View of the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate – Measured, Indicated, and Inferred

  

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

The methodology and resource classification scheme for evaluating the Mineral Resource Estimate followed the prior 2012 Mineral Resource Estimate (King, Kelley, Abbey, 2012) and the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate in Burga et al. (2019) (Section 14.3.1.2).

The Mineral Resource Estimate at the Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource classification (CIM, 2014) for lithium is based on the total amount of lithium in brine that is theoretically drainable from the bulk aquifer volume. The volumes where lithium concentration is determined to be less than the cut-off grade of 300 mg/L are not included in the resource calculations. In some areas, there are volumes of brine included in the Mineral Resource Estimate even where they extend beyond data points from wells. These zones (usually at depth below known data points or extending laterally from known data points) are included in the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate based on the substantial amount of geophysical information obtained that justifies extrapolating the resource to its logical boundary conditions (such as lateral property or geological boundaries, lithological characteristics, or hydrogeologic bedrock constraints). The 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate does not include brine aquifer volumes at depths greater than the projected bedrock contacts.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 248 of 427

 

 

With further exploration and characterization, deep aquifer volumes at the Inferred Mineral Resource classification may convert to a higher confidence classification; other aquifer volumes within property boundaries to the north and south remain open.

The 2019 Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium is summarized in Table 14.5. The 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium has an effective date of May 7, 2019, based on Platform 1 results, the most recent drilling and sampling information included for interpreting and updating the Mineral Resource Estimate. As is accepted in standard practice for lithium brine Mineral Resource Estimates, Table 14.6 provides lithium as Li2CO3 or LCE, at the Inferred, Indicated, and Measured confidence level classes.

Table 14.5
Summary of 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for Lithium
Classification Aquifer
Volume
(m3)
Drainable
Brine Volume
(m3)
Average Lithium
Concentration
(mg/L)
Lithium
(tonnes)
Measured Resource 1.07E+10 1.13E+09 591   667,800
Indicated Resource 4.66E+10 5.17E+09 592 3,061,900
Measured + Indicated 5.73E+10 6.30E+09 592 3,729,700
Inferred 1.33E+10 1.50E+09 592   887,300

Notes:

1.         The 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of May 7, 2019 and includes results of drilling and sampling at Platform 1 and the 2019 HSU model. The Resource Evaluation Area, initial lithium concentrations, and a lithium grade cut-off of greater than or equal to 300 mg/L parameters remained the same as the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate given in LAC (2019).

2.         The Mineral Resource Estimate is not a Mineral Reserve Estimate and does not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted to Mineral Reserves.

3.         Calculated brine volumes only include Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Mineral Resource volumes above cut-off grade.

4.         The Mineral Resource Estimate has been classified in accordance with CIM Mineral Resource definitions and best practice guidelines (2012 and 2014).

5.         Comparisons of values may not add due to rounding of numbers and the differences caused by use of averaging methods.

Using Platform 1 results and the 2019 HSU model, conversion of the aquifer volumes from Inferred to Measured and Indicated, while still maintaining the 3D initial lithium concentration grid (Sections 14.3.5 and 14.3.6), results in the total Measured plus Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium concentration increasing by approximately 2% in comparison to results of the previous Mineral Resource Estimate (Burga et al., 2019). Similarly, for LCE mass, this conversion of aquifer volume to more confident Mineral Resource Estimate classification surrounding the Platform 1 resulted in an increase of Measured plus Indicated of approximately 10 percent in comparison to results of the previous Mineral Resource Estimate (Burga et al., 2019).

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 249 of 427

 

 

Table 14.6
2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for Lithium Represented as LCE
Classification LCE
(tonnes)
Measured Resource   3,554,700
Indicated Resource 16,298,000
Measured + Indicated 19,852,700
Inferred   4,722,700

Notes:

1.          Lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) is calculated using mass of LCE = 5.322785 multiplied by the mass of Lithium reported in Table 14.5.

2.         The 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of May 7, 2019 and includes results of drilling and sampling at Platform 1 and the 2019 HSU model. The Resource Evaluation Area, initial lithium concentrations, and a lithium grade cut-off of greater than or equal to 300 mg/L parameters remained the same as the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate given in LAC (2019).

3.         The Mineral Resource Estimate is not a Mineral Reserve Estimate and does not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted to Mineral Reserves.

4.         The Mineral Resource Estimate has been classified in accordance with CIM Mineral Resource definitions and best practice guidelines (2012 and 2014).

5.        Comparisons of values may not add due to rounding of numbers and the differences caused by use of averaging methods.

14.5Relative Accuracy of the Mineral Resource Estimate

The relative accuracy of the Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium is largely a function of the confidence demonstrated in sampling methods, laboratory results, analytical methods, and the overall development and understanding of the conceptual hydrogeologic system. Montgomery has confidence in the Mineral Resource Estimate based on previous data collected and interpreted by LAC (2012), as well as analysis of 2017, 2018 and 2019 exploration data and methods provided by Exar, with brine concentration and lithologies of the hydrostratigraphic model domain.

With respect to conceptualization and parameterization of the hydrogeologic system for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate, the factors that could affect Mineral Resource estimation include:

·Estimates of drainable porosity or Sy values. The estimates of Sy are extrapolated from the 2012 resource grid to similar lithologies in the expanded and updated resource grid. Estimates of Sy in the expanded resource grid have some uncertainty due to the lack of representative testing results of samples.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 250 of 427

 

 

To address the uncertainties and improve the Mineral Resource Estimate, recommendations include the following:

·Drainable porosity or Sy estimates relied upon the prior 2012 model estimates because the 2017 and 2018 exploration results lacked Sy estimates. In order to address the uncertainty of Sy estimates for the different stratigraphic groups, ongoing exploration work should include analysis of Sy by use of laboratory methods such as RBRC or similar techniques for core samples, and field methods using calibrated nuclear magnetic resonance (“NMR”) borehole logging in open boreholes or in wells with PVC casing installed.

According to the authors, there are no other known factors—such as environmental, permitting, legal title, taxation, socio-economic, or political issues—that could materially impact the 2019 Mineral Resource estimate, except as disclosed in this report. For details on relevant environmental and community activities, see Section 20.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 251 of 427

 

 

15.0Mineral Reserve Estimate

15.1Background

Mineral Reserve classifications used in this section conform to the following CIM (2012 and 2014) definitions referenced in NI 43-101 and discussed in Section 14.1.1, Statement for Brine Mineral Prospects and Related Terms:

·Mineral Reserve: a Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured and/or Indicated Mineral Resource. It includes diluting materials and allowances for losses, which may occur when the material is mined or extracted and is defined by studies at Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility level as appropriate that include application of Modifying Factors. Such studies demonstrate that, at the time of reporting, extraction could reasonably be justified. Mineral Reserves are sub-divided in order of increasing confidence into Probable Mineral Reserves and Proven Mineral Reserves. A Probable Mineral Reserve has a lower level of confidence than a Proven Mineral Reserve.

·Modifying Factors: modifying factors are considerations used to convert Mineral Resources to Mineral Reserves. These include, but are not restricted to, mining, processing, metallurgical, infrastructure, economic, marketing, legal, environmental, social, and governmental factors.

·Probable Mineral Reserve: a Probable Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of an Indicated, and in some circumstances, a Measured Mineral Resource. The confidence in the Modifying Factors applying to a Probable Mineral Reserve is lower than that applying to a Proven Mineral Reserve.

·Proven Mineral Reserve: A Proven Mineral Reserve is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource. A Proven Mineral Reserve implies a high degree of confidence in the Modifying Factors.

The mining method to be employed for the Project involves an extraction wellfield using production-scale wells for pumping brine from the aquifer in the Resource Evaluation Area. As such, the Mineral Reserve for the Project is identified based on the extraction wellfield unit and the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources within the resource model (Section 14.0).

The Mineral Reserve Estimate has been conservatively modeled and stated as a Proven Mineral Reserve for Year 1 through 5 of full-scale extraction wellfield pumping and a Probable Mineral Reserve for Years 6 to 40 of full-scale extraction wellfield pumping. The division between Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves is based on: (1) sufficiently short duration of wellfield extraction to allow a higher degree of predictive confidence, yet long enough to enable significant production, and (2) a duration long enough to enable accumulation of a strong data record to allow subsequent conversion of Probable Mineral Reserves to Proven Mineral Reserves. Provided a detailed data record for monitoring wellfield operations and further updates to model calibration, the authors believe it could be possible to achieve partial conversion of Probable to Proven Mineral Reserves during the first five years of full-scale operation and assessment of build-out of the extraction wellfield.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 252 of 427

 

 

15.2Overview

The 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate was developed for the Project using MODFLOW-USG, a control volume finite difference code (Panday and others, 2013), coupled with the Groundwater Vistas modeling interface (ESI, 2015). The groundwater modeling was supported by geological, hydrogeological, geochemical, and geophysical data collected through field programs at the site (LAC, 2019). Previous Mineral Reserve Estimate groundwater modeling reported in LAC (2012, 2017, and 2019) was conducted for the Project using FEFLOW finite-element groundwater modeling software (DHI, 2010). The conversion to MODFLOW-USG allowed for distinct advantages to simulate evaporative flux of the salar surface that is more numerically stable for steady-state calibration and to more accurately simulate production well conditions and mass capture using local grid refinement and robust solution methods. The MODFLOW-USG platform is a publically available groundwater flow and transport code which is now considered as the industry standard for a wide variety of groundwater-related applications; it has been verified and validated in public forums and in professional publications by the United States Geological Survey (Panday and others, 2013).

Updating the groundwater model to the MODFLOW-USG platform in 2019 occurred as a sequential step after updating of the hydrostratigraphic model framework in Leapfrog Geo. With this update and expansion of model boundaries, the numerical model incorporates a larger-scale water balance (SQM, 2016) and conceptual model, while still maintaining consistency with methods used in the previous groundwater model (LAC, 2017). During the process of the numerical model update, calibration of the model used additional spatially representative pre-development hydraulic head data, and transient head data and associated aquifer parameters conforming to results of reported historical pumping tests as well as more recent pumping tests conducted by Exar.

Once formulated and calibrated, the numerical model used a simulated production wellfield to project extraction from the brine aquifer and verify the feasibility of producing sufficient brine for processing a minimum target of 40,000 tpa LCE. After verifying the capability of the simulated wellfield to produce sufficient brine for the minimum 40,000 tpa LCE process target, the model was then used to predict a maximum production rate for assessment of a Total Mineral Reserve Estimate for a 40-year production and process period of LCE.

Predictive groundwater model results include projected brine production rates, drawdown in production wells, and lithium concentration during simulated wellfield pumping. A previous Mineral Reserve Estimate study by LAC (2012) concluded that rigorous consideration of variable density within the aquifer did not materially improve model results, therefore variable-density flow and transport was not simulated in these current analyses. The authors believe the procedure used for the modeling is valid and appropriate for development of a Mineral Reserve Estimate, as defined by the CIM and referenced by NI 43-101. The primary steps used to develop and apply the numerical groundwater model for the purposes of Mineral Reserve Estimation were as follows:

·The hydrostratigraphic units (HSUs) and the HSU model used for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019) were re-evaluated to incorporate recommendations for simplification of hydrostratigraphy and incorporation of conceptual depositional environments or stratigraphic sequence units (Section 14.3.5). The re-evaluated HSU model formulated for the Mineral Reserve Estimate model is built upon the model developed for the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate and incorporates more recent information collected by Exar in order to consider: 1) previous parts of deep aquifer system as an Indicated Mineral Resource aquifer volume and therefore appropriate for consideration in the Mineral Reserve Estimate model, and 2) deeper basin extents basin to include the larger numerical model domain and an expanded Mineral Inferred Resource aquifer volume. After producing the modifications to the HSU model, the updated Mineral Reserve Estimate model was designed and constructed to conform to the HSU distributions as well as interpolated lithium concentrations mapped directly from Leapfrog to the cell centroids of the numerical model.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 253 of 427

 

 

·Appropriate lateral and vertical extents were identified for expansion of the numerical model domain. The objective was to define model boundaries that were sufficiently removed from the Resource Evaluation Area that they would not significantly constrain the production wellfield simulations, while maintaining the model domain at a practical size (Section 15.4). Additionally, lateral inflow estimates from contributing watersheds (SQM, 2016) coincided directly with the newly expanded model domain.

·Hydraulic and grade conditions were assigned along each boundary of the numerical groundwater model based on an evaluation of sub-watershed boundaries and interpreted surficial contacts alluvium and bedrock following the updated HSU model, as well as through the incorporation of a basin-wide water balance model of the entire basin (SQM, 2016; Sections 15.5 and 15.6).

·Hydraulic and transport properties were evaluated and assigned for each hydrostratigraphic unit in the numerical groundwater model (Section 15.7). A 3D lithium concentration field was mapped directly from the updated resource model in the numerical model domain. Input data included measured brine concentrations and values consistent with the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019). In zones with no available data outside of the Resource Evaluation Area, initial lithium concentrations were conservatively set to 50 mg/L.

·Preliminary modeling was previously conducted to determine the potential effect of density dependent flow on the Mineral Reserve Estimate in previous reporting (LAC, 2012). Due to their high computational demand, the exclusion of density effects from the site model would enable more model runs to be conducted for calibration and wellfield simulations. However, variable water density could only be excluded if it would not have a significant effect on the results. Based on the preliminary modeling evaluation, it was concluded that the exclusion of density-dependent flow from the numerical groundwater model would not have a significant effect on the Mineral Reserve Estimate. However, as additional monitoring data are collected in the expanded model domain and if interpretations lead to the reduction of model uncertainty, the current modeling platform will support density-dependent groundwater flow conditions using the density-driven flow (DDF) package.

·The numerical groundwater model was calibrated to current conditions and to representative long-term pumping tests (Section 15.8 and 15.9). A conceptual well design (with initial pumping rates) was input to the model, based on aquifer properties and engineering constraints for brine production efficiency. The wellfield was simulated over the life of mine estimate of 40 years, with well locations and production rates adjusted as required, to maximize overall wellfield extraction rate and optimize production well locations for predictive assessment of an Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate (Section 15.10).

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 254 of 427

 

 

·The long-term simulation of the wellfield by use of the Well Package of MODFLOW was used to generate the Mineral Reserve Estimate for lithium. Extracted concentrations from the wells in Groundwater Vistas represent a composite value that is weighted by the transmissivity of each model layer. The simulated wells are assumed to be 100 percent efficient, and the screen tops and bottoms are represented as exact elevations.

Exar has advised the authors that it is unaware of any environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-economic, marketing, or political factors, that may materially affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate contained in this Report.

15.3Conceptual Model

The conceptual model of recharge and discharge relationships for a closed basin, salar setting is shown on Figure 15.1. The illustration shows the relationship between groundwater recharge from bedrock mountainous areas and distributed aerial precipitation and groundwater discharge through evapotranspiration.

Groundwater inflow occurs at the margins of the basin and moves towards the center of the salar. Inflow is relatively freshwater as it enters the salar and its salinity increases with movement towards the center due to discharge by evapotranspiration. Evapotranspiration is large in the salar perimeter areas, where the water table is closest to the surface, and decreases towards the center as brine concentrations increase and salt crust thickens impeding evaporative flux. The driving force for groundwater movement in the salar is a combination of standard hydraulic gradients caused by recharge in elevated areas and discharge due to evaporation in lower areas, and convection due to density gradients.

Figure 15.1     Conceptual Model and Model Boundary Conditions

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 255 of 427

 

 

15.4Numerical Model Construction

The model domain encompasses the sedimentary and evaporite deposits comprising the Cauchari-Olaroz Project area. Extent of the model domain, which covers an area of about 1290 square kilometres, is shown on Figure 15.2.

The domain includes the Resource Evaluation Area and was designed to be large enough to minimize influence of applied boundary conditions on production well simulations. The base of the model domain was set at the top of bedrock basin in which the sediments were deposited. The model simulates equilibrium conditions for groundwater movement and lithium concentration distribution in the sedimentary basin aquifer, with fresh groundwater inflow from drainage sub-basins that surround the salars. Groundwater outflow from the basin occurs via evaporation from the moist salar surfaces. Groundwater movement is generally from the margins of the salars, where mountain front recharge enters the model domain as groundwater underflow, toward the center of the salar. Precipitation recharge, limited due to the large evaporative potential, is included in the model and was generally applied to the model surface outside evaporative zones (Figure 15.1).

15.5Numerical Model Mesh

The 3D model domain represented on Figure 15.3 is divided into a grid of node-centered, rectangular prisms or cells. Cells with small lateral dimensions (4.69 m) were assigned in areas of interest within the salar, particularly in the vicinity of production well locations and transient calibration targets, while larger elements (531 m) were assigned near the edges of the model domain, farthest from the area of interest. Vertically, the domain was divided into 25 model layers, each of which consists of a variable number of cells (between 3,149 and 54,417 cells) depending on the presence of bedrock at depth. The entire numerical model mesh totals 805,808 nodes.

Thicknesses of model layers were designed to more refined near land surface to accommodate the evaporative surface and gradually increase in thickness with depth. Model layers directly incorporate the HSU distribution from the updated Mineral Resource model and account for transitions between HSUs, as well as zonation of aquifer parameters in particular HSUs for model calibration purposes.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 256 of 427

 

 

Figure 15.2     Numerical Model Domain and Sub-basins Map

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 257 of 427

 

 

Figure 15.3     Numerical Model Grid

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 258 of 427

 

 

15.6Numerical Model Boundary Conditions

Boundary conditions that are consistent with the conceptual model were applied in the numerical model. As described in Section 15.1, the aquifer is recharged by a combination of groundwater underflow from upland, mountain front recharge and surface infiltration of precipitation. Under natural conditions, all of the influent groundwater is consumed by evaporation that occurs in the center and along the margins of the salar.

The numerical boundary conditions that were applied to simulate these groundwater flow conditions are summarized as follows:

·Top Boundary – Similar to hydrologic modeling reported by LAC (2012), recharge due to infiltration of precipitation was applied at a temporally constant rate of 10 mm/yr over the model domain that lies outside of the active zones of modeled evaporation (i.e., outside of the salar nucleus and immediate salar margins). The modeled zones of evaporation and recharge are shown on Figure 15.4. Within the active zones of modeled evaporation, in regions where depth to the water table was lower than the extinction depth, evaporation (outward flux) was applied in a linear fashion from the extinction depth to land surface using the evapotranspiration (EVT) package of MODFLOW. Potential evaporation (ETp), the rate of evaporation when the water table is coincident with the ground surface, of 2.2 mm/d, 4.3 mm/d, and 5.7 mm/d was assigned to the salar nucleus and margins respectively. Additionally, evaporative extinction depths varied as a function of interpreted water density and proximity to the salar nucleus; specifically, 0.25 m was assigned in the salar nucleus and 0.5 m to 0.7 m was specified along the salar margin. Actual evaporation was simulated as a function of depth to the water table, ranging from zero where the water table was below the extinction depth to ETp where the water table was at ground surface, and has virtually no effect on potential lithium recovery. During simulation, therefore, net recharge within the salar region of the model domain varies spatially and temporally in response to changes in depth to the water table.

·Lateral Boundary – Except as noted below for select model cells of model layer 1, all cells in model layers along the lateral boundaries of the domain are conservatively assigned no flow boundary conditions, consistent with the bedrock lithology and its comparable low permeability. Therefore, neither fresh groundwater nor brine can enter or exit the model domain in any of these regions.

·Specific locations where boundary conditions were applied along the lateral boundaries of the model are described as mountain front recharge. The quantity of mountain front recharge in sub-basin is shown in Table 15.1 and is consistent with the previous Mineral Reserve Estimate model, following the water balance analysis reported by SQM (2016). Incoming groundwater is conservatively assumed to be fresh, with a lithium concentration of zero.

·Bottom Boundary – The entire bottom slice of the model was assigned as a no flow boundary condition.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 259 of 427

 

 

Table 15.1
Summary of Mountain Front Recharge
Sub-basin Identifier

Recharge

(L/s)

Rosario – Toro 1,193
Turi Lari 144
Tuzgle 108
Tocomar 611
Nac Quevar 59
Guayaos 102
Archibarca 87
Olaroz 173
Total 2,477

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 260 of 427

 

 

Figure 15.4     Numerical Model Top Boundary Conditions

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 261 of 427

 

 

15.7Hydraulic Properties

Hydraulic and transport properties used in the updated numerical model started with those determined in the prior models reported by LAC (2012 and 2017). Hydraulic properties include hydraulic conductivity in the three cardinal directions (Kx, Ky, and Kz), specific storage (Ss), and specific yield (Sy). These parameters were adjusted for specific zones to aid in subsequent recalibration of the model for the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate. The range of assigned hydraulic properties in the model, shown in Table 15.2, conform to the range of values determined from pumping tests provided in Appendix 1, prior model calibrations, and published literature values for corresponding salar sediments and evaporites. Brief summaries of the hydraulic and transport properties are provided below.

·Hydraulic Conductivity – The hydraulic conductivity (K) distribution used in the model was determined by (i) analysis of available pumping test data in the screened HSUs and (ii) calibration of the model in steady-state and transient. Without evidence of horizontal anisotropy from testing results, Kx is considered equal to Ky; for reporting purposes horizontal hydraulic conductivity is termed radial hydraulic conductivity (Kr). Vertical anisotropy was evident from analysis of testing results, and accordingly for model calibration, was applied in the vertical direction with proportional ratios of Kz/Kr for individual HSUs where appropriate. Where anisotropy was incorporated for calibration purposes, the ratios of Kz/Kr consider results from pumping tests and estimates from literature values for similar sedimentary regimes. Sections showing representative Kr distributions as applied in the current model are provided on Figure 15.5.

·Specific Storage – The range of specific storage assigned in the model are based on results from pumping tests in addition to estimates from literature values for similar sedimentary regimes. The lower end of the range is near the compressibility of water, which indicates a rigid, low porosity material with small compressibility of the rock mass. The upper end of the range is indicative of higher porosity and larger compressibility of the rock mass.

·Specific Yield and Effective Porosity – Assigned values of Specific Yield correspond to the updated HSU model, measured values determined from laboratory analyses of core samples from previous studies, and the overall average Specific Yield is consistent with the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate. Effective Porosity is assumed to be equivalent to Specific Yield and varies spatially based on the distribution of HSUs.

·Dispersion – For modeling the transport of dissolved lithium concentrations in brine, assigned values of dispersivity correspond to 5 m for longitudinal dispersivity, 0.5 m for transverse dispersivity, and 0.05 m for vertical dispersivity. Molecular diffusion was not included in the 2019 Mineral Reserve model because it is negligible in large-scale regional models.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 262 of 427

 

 

 

Table 15.2
Summary of Assigned Aquifer Parameter Estimates
Hydrostratigraphic
Unit
Horizontal Hydraulic
Conductivity (Kr)

(m/d)
Ratio Vertical
to Horizontal
Hydraulic
Conductivity
Estimate

(Kz/Kr)
Specific
Storage
(1/m)
Specific
Yield and
Effective
Porosity
(%)
Minimum Maximum
Alluvial Fan Sand and Gravel 0.2* 65 0.33 to 1 1.0E-05 to 5.0E-04 20
Interbedded Sand and Clay/Silt 0.5 0.5 1 1.0E-07 11
Clay/Silt with Sand 0.08 0.08 1 1.0E-06 7
Halite with Sand 0.08 0.08 1 1.0E-07 8
Interbedded Sand and Halite 0.11 0.25 0.1 to 1 1.0E-07 to 5.0E-06 12
Lower Sand 2 2 1 1.0E-06 15
Basal Sand 5 5 1 1.0E-06 16

Note: * Kr decreases with depth to the minimum value presented.

 

Figure 15.5      Representative Hydraulic Conductivity Distribution in Production Wellfield Area

 

  

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 263 of 427

 

 

 

15.8Pre-Development Model Conditions

 

The current or pre-development groundwater system in the basin was assumed to be in equilibrium with groundwater inflows and approximately equivalent to groundwater outflows, without pumping or temporal changes in the hydrologic stresses. Aligned with the conceptual model, simulated groundwater inflow is comprised largely of mountain front recharge inflow from margins of the basin, underflow from neighboring watersheds, and small amounts of areal recharge from precipitation infiltration. Outflow consists of evapotranspiration (primarily evaporation from the salar surface and with minimal transpiration from scant vegetation).

 

The pre-development model was calibrated to representative groundwater levels measured at 27 groundwater level monitoring locations in the basin representing 2018 conditions (Table 15.3). The steady-state calibration relied on these spatial values as they are generally composite water levels for wells with screened intervals completed to near land surface; additionally, the potentiometric surface represented by the water levels shows groundwater flow directions consistent with the conceptual model of the basin. Groundwater levels from wells with deeper and more isolated completions were also examined for steady-state calibration purposes and corresponding potentiometric maps show similar patterns of groundwater movement. However, these water levels from deeper parts of the brine aquifer require more complicated pressure head corrections to equivalent water level elevations, and lacking supporting water density measurements, were determined insufficient for current modeling calibration purposes.

 

Aquifer parameters for pre-development model calibration were varied to achieve an acceptable calibration to the representative groundwater levels. After incorporating model zonation methods of aquifer parameters and trial and error adjustment modeling techniques, the simulated groundwater levels are judged to reasonably match the measured data representing 2018 pre-development conditions. A mean error of -2.5 m was reported for the steady-state flow solution by LAC (2017) for the previous Mineral Reserve Estimate model as compared to a mean error of - 2.2 m for the revised model used in this updated modeling analysis. The maximum residual (observed minus simulated groundwater elevation) is within 7 m. Given these statistics, and provided the magnitude of the apparent error for the updated model compared to the previous model, the larger inflows incorporated from the SQM water balance (2016), as well as the exclusion of equivalent water level elevation corrections (described in Section 16.2), it was concluded that the steady-state distribution of heads could be reasonably used as initial conditions in the updated model for predictive model simulations.

 

Table 15.3
Steady-State Model Residuals
Well Identifier Easting (m) Northing (m) Observed Groundwater Elevation (masl) Computed Groundwater Elevation (masl) Residual (m) Source
SL-001 3424377 7378282 3936.86 3938.15 -1.29 Exar
SL-002 3427273 7396180 3934.51 3937.41 -2.90 Exar
SL-004B 3423001 7379362 3936.92 3937.17 -0.25 Exar
SL-006 3427230 7392980 3938.33 3936.81 1.52 Exar
SL-007 3429894 7398465 3935.50 3936.04 -0.54 Exar

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 264 of 427

 

 

 

Table 15.3
Steady-State Model Residuals
Well Identifier Easting (m) Northing (m) Observed Groundwater Elevation (masl) Computed Groundwater Elevation (masl) Residual (m) Source
SL-009 3432230 7407612 3934.26 3937.04 -2.78 Exar
SL-010 3429367 7395232 3935.72 3936.18 -0.46 Exar
SL-13 3426671 7379792 3939.69 3940.11 -0.42 Exar
SL-014 3426361 7387640 3936.70 3940.63 -3.93 Exar
PE-11 3427395 7391301 3937.14 3938.75 -1.61 Exar
DDH-07 3426159 7388920 3936.23 3940.54 -4.31 Exar
DDH-09 3427293 7386922 3937.21 3940.92 -3.71 Exar
DDH-02 3425984 7385599 3937.95 3940.84 -2.89 Exar
PT-1A 3427326 7383616 3936.96 3940.77 -3.81 Exar
PF-3B 3425969 7382974 3937.58 3939.35 -1.77 Exar
PF-1B 3423901 7380849 3937.28 3937.91 -0.63 Exar
PT-2 3419261 7378454 3938.20 3941.14 -2.94 Exar
DDH-04A 3421093 7377243 3936.80 3939.70 -2.90 Exar
PE-15 3419086 7376655 3937.07 3940.34 -3.27 Exar
DDH-15 3419253 7375340 3937.53 3939.83 -2.30 Exar
DDH-05 3421965 7367860 3937.70 3942.22 -4.52 Exar
PE-08 3422504 7363500 3937.60 3944.20 -6.60 Exar
DDH-17 3418305 7343262 3960.71 3959.42 1.29* Exar
CAU02D 3424385 7376814 3938.65 3939.85 -1.20 Adv. Lithium, 2018
CAU03D 3421874 7373649 3936.90 3939.72 -2.82 Adv. Lithium, 2018
CAU06R 3423531 7370126 3937.98 3941.91 -3.93 Adv. Lithium, 2018
CAU12D 3421708 7374690 3938.83 3939.84 -1.01 Adv. Lithium, 2018

* Reported as flowing well; the observed value was assumed to be greater than land surface and calibrated in Groundwater Vistas using a “censoring” target, where a residual of 0 is given if the simulated value is greater than the observed.

 

The simulated pre-development water budget for the updated model is provided in Table 15.4. Predicted evaporation from the salar surfaces is 228,567 m3/d compared to 228,595 m3/d of applied mountain front recharge and direct recharge. The resulting water balance for the pre-development model shows an acceptable error of approximately 28 m3/d, or about 0.01 percent.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 265 of 427

 

 

 

Table 15.4
Summary of Model Boundary Fluxes
Water Balance Component

Modeled Flux

(L/s)

Mountain Front Recharge 2,477
Areal Recharge 168.8
Evaporation 2,645.5
Error 0.3
% Error 0.01%

 

15.9Transient Model Calibration

 

Transient model calibration in the 2019 numerical model for the Mineral Reserve Estimate incorporates calibration of aquifer parameters derived using analytical results from long-term pumping tests conducted in 2011 (LAC, 2012) and pumping tests conducted by Exar in 2018 and 2019 (Appendix 1). As a verification analysis of model calibration, the 2019 model was operated under transient conditions for simulation and comparison to four pumping tests: a 27-day pumping test at well PB-03A, a 30-day pumping test at well PB-04, an 11-day pumping test at well PB-06A, and a 7-day pumping test at well W17-06. Model calibration using these pumping tests focused on observation wells completed in similar HSUs as the pumped well.

 

Results of the modeled and observed results for representative pumping tests are presented on Figure 15.6. Model statistics for transient calibration correspond to a scaled RMS of 5.4 percent and mean residual of 0.13 m; the values of these statistical parameters indicate a sufficient transient calibration for simulated versus measured conditions.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 266 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 15.6      Measured and Simulated Drawdown Responses for Representative Pumping Tests

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 267 of 427

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 268 of 427

 

 

 

 

After transient model calibration using results of pumping tests, the 2019 model was further verified by simulating initial concentrations of lithium at six locations representing recently completed production wells for comparison to measured concentrations. The measured and simulated results are shown in Table 15.5 and are judged to be in reasonable agreement for the purposes of operating the model as a predictive tool for the Mineral Reserve Estimate.

 

Table 15.5
Initial Measured and Simulated Lithium Concentrations
at Existing Production Wells

Well

Pumping
Rate

(L/s)

Measured
Lithium
Concentrations

(mg/L)

Simulated
Lithium
Concentrations

(mg/L)

Percent
Difference
W-04 25.3 683 679 0.6%
W11-06 22.5 750 720 4.1%
W17-06 29.6 582 560 3.9%
W18-05 22.6 766 797 -4.0%
W18-06 15.8 575 567 1.4%
W18-23 26.9 720 698 3.1%

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 269 of 427

 

 

 

15.102019 Mineral Reserve Estimate Model Results

 

Once completing calibration and verification procedures, the 2019 model was used to predict production of LCE for a 40-year wellfield operational simulation. A series of trial simulations were conducted to verify results of modeling for the prior Mineral Reserve Estimate and to select locations for production pumping wells within the expanded model domain of the Resource Evaluation Area. Pumping rates and durations were applied at each simulated production well during the simulation in order to meet the operational constraints of achieving overall wellfield production rate for a minimum of processed 40,000 tpa LCE and a minimum average lithium concentration of 590 mg/L. The layout of the simulated wellfield is shown on Figure 15.7.

 

The pumping schedule for the wellfield allowed for a ramping up during the initial year of production simulation period (Year 1) using 23 simulated wells, either completed or planned by Exar. After Year 1, an additional 33 wells were added to the wellfield in order to meet or exceed the 40,000 tonnes LCE process target through Year 40. Annual projections are shown in Table 15.6 for wellfield production rate, lithium concentrations, and mass of lithium and LCE delivered from the wellfield and after applying processing efficiency. Appendix 2 provides per well simulated production rates, lithium concentrations, and drawdown for each well during the 40-year production period. Lithium concentrations and drawdown results represent composite values which are weighted by the amount of simulated extraction from each model layer, in accordance with the transmissivity of the screened HSUs. A map showing estimated drawdown in the upper layer of the model for the simulated wellfield area after 40 years of operation is included in Appendix 2.

 

Predicted brine production from the simulated wellfield, shown on Figure 15.8, ranges from 462 L/s during Year 1 of operation using Phase 1 wells, to 903 L/s during production Year 2 through 40 using the additional Phase 2 wells. Average concentration of lithium brine delivered from the simulated wellfield is included on Figure 15.8 and ranges from 615 mg/L from Year 1 to 598 mg/L through Year 40 of wellfield operations. The average concentration for the 40-year production period is 607 mg/L.

 

The numerical model utilizes an adaptive time stepping (ATS) scheme which varies the time step length depending on the rate of convergence; the predicted cumulative mass of lithium produced was extracted from the model results in half-year increments. The results were then multiplied by a conversion factor of 5.322785 to compute equivalent LCE. The overall efficiency of brine processing to produce LCE provided by Exar is projected as 53.7 percent. To account for processing efficiency, the net amount of LCE produced was computed by multiplying the LCE extracted from the wellfield by 53.7 percent. The resulting values from each production well were then summed for each production year to determine the predicted annual LCE production. Figure 15.9 shows yearly production as LCE assuming processing efficiency of 53.7 percent. During the entire 40-year simulated production period the cumulative mass of LCE, after accounting for LCE processing efficiency, is projected to average 48,800 tonnes per year.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 270 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 15.7      Simulated Production Wellfield for 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 271 of 427

 

 

 

Table 15.6
Projected Annual Results from 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate Model
Wellfield Operation
Year

Total
Wellfield
Delivery
Rate

(L/s)

Lithium LCE
Average
Wellfield
Concentration
(mg/L)

Total Wellfield
Delivery Mass

(tonnes)

Total
Unprocessed
Mass

(tonnes)

Total
Processed
Mass

(tonnes)

1 462 615 9,000 47,900 25,600
2 903 617 17,600 93,700 50,200
3 903 617 17,600 93,700 50,200
4 903 616 17,500 93,100 50,100
5 903 615 17,500 93,100 50,100
6 903 615 17,500 93,100 50,000
7 903 614 17,500 93,100 50,000
8 903 614 17,500 93,100 49,900
9 903 613 17,500 93,100 49,900
10 903 612 17,400 92,600 49,800
11 903 612 17,400 92,600 49,800
12 903 611 17,400 92,600 49,700
13 903 611 17,400 92,600 49,700
14 903 610 17,400 92,600 49,700
15 903 610 17,400 92,600 49,600
16 903 609 17,300 92,100 49,600
17 903 609 17,300 92,100 49,500
18 903 608 17,300 92,100 49,500
19 903 607 17,300 92,100 49,400
20 903 607 17,300 92,100 49,400
21 903 606 17,300 92,100 49,400
22 903 606 17,300 92,100 49,300
23 903 606 17,200 91,600 49,300
24 903 605 17,200 91,600 49,200
25 903 605 17,200 91,600 49,200
26 903 604 17,200 91,600 49,200
27 903 604 17,200 91,600 49,100
28 903 603 17,200 91,600 49,100
29 903 603 17,200 91,600 49,100
30 903 603 17,200 91,600 49,000
31 903 602 17,100 91,000 49,000
32 903 602 17,100 91,000 49,000
33 903 601 17,100 91,000 48,900
34 903 601 17,100 91,000 48,900

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 272 of 427

 

 

 

Table 15.6
Projected Annual Results from 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate Model
Wellfield Operation
Year

Total
Wellfield
Delivery
Rate

(L/s)

Lithium LCE
Average
Wellfield
Concentration
(mg/L)

Total Wellfield
Delivery Mass

(tonnes)

Total
Unprocessed
Mass

(tonnes)

Total
Processed
Mass

(tonnes)

35 903 601 17,100 91,000 48,900
36 903 600 17,100 91,000 48,800
37 903 600 17,100 91,000 48,800
38 903 599 17,100 91,000 48,800
39 903 599 17,000 90,500 48,700
40 903 598 17,000 90,500 48,700
40-Year Averages 892 607 17,100 90,900 48,800

Abbreviations: mg/L = milligrams per liter; tonnes = tonnes (metric), rounded to the nearest 100 tonnes.

 

Notes: 

1) The mass and concentration of lithium are derived using the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate model; wellfield configuration OS4 shown on Figure 15.7. 

2) The average concentrations are weighted by the extraction rate at each well. 

3) To obtain the recoverable tonnage for Lithium Carbonate Equivalent (LCE), the predicted mass of Lithium is multiplied by a factor based on the atomic weights of each element in LCE to obtain the final compound weight. The factor used is 5.322785 to obtain LCE mass from Lithium mass. 

4) The LCE process calculation assumes an efficiency of 53.7 percent. 

5) The first production year (year 0 of the model simulation) is presented as Wellfield Operation Year 1.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 273 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 15.8      Predicted Average Pumping Rate and Lithium Concentration from Simulated Wellfield

 

 

Figure 15.9      Predicted Annual LCE Production from Simulated Wellfield
(Assuming 53.7% Process Efficiency)

 

Note: The first production year (year 0 of the simulation) is shown as Year 1.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 274 of 427

 

 

 

15.11Statement for Lithium Mineral Reserve Estimate

 

The updated numerical groundwater model was used to evaluate the potential to produce LCE for 40 years from a wellfield constructed with 56 simulated production wells within the Resource Evaluation Area of the Project Figure 15.7). Based on predictive simulations using the groundwater model, the results are provided in Table 15.7 as a Mineral Reserve Estimate of the 40-year simulated production period and duration of a life of mine plan. The Mineral Reserve Estimate is inclusive of the reported Mineral Resource Estimate (Table 14.5 and Table 14.6) (Section 14.4).

 

Table 15.7
Summary of Estimated Probable and Proven Mineral Reserves
(Without Processing Efficiency)

Mineral

Reserve

Classification

Production

Period

(Years)

Brine

Pumped

(m3)

Average
Lithium

Concentration

(mg/L)

Lithium
Metal

(tonnes)

LCE

(tonnes)

Proven 0 through 5 156,875,201 616 96,650 514,450
Probable 6 to 40 967,767,934 606 586,270 3,120,590
           
Total 40 1,124,643,135 607 682,920 3,635,040

Notes: 

1) The Mineral Reserve Estimate has an effective date of May 7, 2019. 

2) Lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) is calculated using mass of LCE = 5.322785 multiplied by the mass of Lithium Metal. 

3) The conversion to LCE is direct and does not account for estimated processing efficiency.

4) The values in the columns for “Lithium Metal” and “LCE” above are expressed as total contained metals. 

5) The Production Period is inclusive of the start of the model simulation (Year 0). 

6) The average lithium concentration is weighted by per well simulated extraction rates. 

7) Tonnage is rounded to the nearest 10. 

8) Comparisons of values may not be equivalent due to rounding of numbers and the differences caused by use of averaging methods.

 

The Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate for the 40-year production period is summarized in Table 15.7 without factoring estimated processing efficiency. The Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (Section 14.4) correspond to the total amount of lithium enriched brine estimated to be available within the aquifer while the Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves represent a portion of the Mineral Resource Estimate that can be extracted under the proposed pumping schedule and wellfield configuration. Therefore, the Mineral Reserve Estimate is not “in addition” to the Mineral Resource Estimate, and instead, it simply represents a portion of the total Mineral Resource that is extracted during the life of mine plan.

 

The authors believe the Mineral Reserve Estimate has been conservatively modeled and represents a Proven Mineral Reserve for Year 1 through 5 of full-scale extraction wellfield pumping and a Probable Mineral Reserve for Years 6 to 40 of full-scale extraction wellfield pumping. The division between Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves is based on: 1) sufficiently short duration of wellfield extraction to allow a higher degree of predictive confidence, yet long enough to enable significant production, and 2) a duration long enough to enable accumulation of a strong data record to allow subsequent conversion of Probable Mineral Reserves to Proven Mineral Reserves.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 275 of 427

 

 

 

Provided a detailed data record for monitoring wellfield operations and further updates to model calibration, the authors believe it could be possible to achieve partial conversion of Probable to Proven Mineral Reserves during the initial five years of full-scale operation and assessment of build-out of the extraction wellfield. The modeling results show that during the 40-year pumping period, brine will be diluted by less dense brine with corresponding lower concentrations of lithium (Figure 15.8). To compensate for the average decline in concentration during full-scale operations, increasing pumping rates at some wells could be achieved in the Resource Evaluation Area where excessive drawdown is minimal, and lithium concentrations remain favorable.

 

During the evaporation and concentration process of the brine pumped from the wellfield, there will be anticipated losses of lithium. Therefore, the total amounts provided in Table 15.7 do not include anticipated loss of lithium due to process losses, and therefore cannot be used for determination of the economic reserve. Table 15.8 provides results of the Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves from the wellfield when the percent estimated processing efficiency is factored, assuming continuous average brine extraction rates and process efficiency.

 

Table 15.8
Summary of Estimated Probable and Proven Mineral Reserves
(Assuming 53.7% Processing Efficiency)

Mineral

Reserve

Classification

Production

Period

(Years)

Brine

Pumped

(m3)

Average

Lithium

Concentration

(mg/L)

Lithium

Metal

(tonnes)

LCE

(tonnes)

Proven 0 through 5 156,875,201 616 51,900 276,250
Probable 6 to 40 967,767,934 606 314,830 1,675,770
           
Total 40 1,124,643,135 607 366,730 1,952,020

Notes: 

1) The Mineral Reserve Estimate has an effective date of May 7, 2019. 

2) Lithium carbonate equivalent (“LCE”) is calculated using mass of LCE = 5.322785 multiplied by the mass of Lithium Metal. 

3) The conversion to LCE accounts for 53.7% estimated processing efficiency.

4) The Production Period is inclusive of the start of the model simulation (Year 0). 

5) The average lithium concentration is weighted by per well simulated extraction rates. 

6) Tonnage is rounded to the nearest 10. 

7) Comparisons of values may not be equivalent due to rounding of numbers and the differences caused by use of averaging methods.

 

After accounting for processing efficiency (53.7%), the predicted results for the 40-year production period are as follows.

 

·Average production rate of 48,800 tpa LCE for the 40-year pumping period; the minimum of 25,600 tpa LCE occurs at the start-up of operations in Year 1; the maximum rate of 50,200 tpa LCE occurs at full-build in Years 2 and 3, after initial pumping begins for both the Phase 1 and Phase 2 wells. At the end of the pumping period in Year 40, the rate averages 48,700 tpa LCE.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 276 of 427

 

 

 

·Average lithium concentration of 607 mg/L for the 40-year pumping period; the maximum concentration of 617 mg/L occurs at the start-up of full-build in Year 2 and the minimum concentration of 598 mg/L occurs near the end of the pumping period in Year 40.

 

15.12Relative Accuracy in Mineral Reserve Estimate

 

The relative accuracy and confidence in the Mineral Reserve estimation is dominantly a function of the accuracy and confidence demonstrated in sampling and analytical methods, development and understanding of the conceptual hydrogeologic system, and construction and calibration of the numerical groundwater flow model. As has been demonstrated in this report and in previous technical reporting by LAC (2012, 2017, and 2019), input data and analytical results via sample duplication, the use of multiple methods to determine brine grade, and to obtain aquifer parameters from pumping tests have been verified and used as a basis for the Mineral Reserve Estimate model.

 

Using standard methods, a conceptual geological and hydrogeologic model consistent with the geologic, hydrogeologic, and chemistry data obtained during the field exploration phases of the Project was prepared. The conceptual model was then used to prepare the numerical groundwater flow model. In addition, the calibration of the numerical model iteratively provided support for the conceptual hydrogeologic model. After review and verification of model projections, the authors have a reasonably high level of confidence in the ability of the aquifer system, assuming certain levels of uncertainties and risk described in Section 16.0, can yield the quantities and grade of brine calculated as the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate.

 

The 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate assumes that production from adjacent external property areas will not be impacted by brine production, both currently and in the future. However, depending on the location of production wells and the potential overlap of brine aquifer capture areas, this assumption may introduce significant uncertainty. Adjacent external brine production wells could directly affect the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate by causing dilution of brine concentrations or lowering brine levels in the aquifer. Although the details of adjacent properties' brine production are uncertain, it is recommended to conduct a sensitivity analysis to assess potential impacts.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 277 of 427

 

 

 

16.0Mining Methods

 

16.1Production Wellfield

 

A total of 56 wells were used to simulate brine extraction for the Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate. The wells comprising the brine extraction wellfield are spatially distributed in the Resource Evaluation Area of the Project to optimize well performance and capture of brine enriched in lithium (Figure 15.7).

 

During the first years of ramp up operation, in 2023 and 2024, 39 wells were operative to support LCE production. During 2023, average wellfield extraction was 493 L/s and in 2024, 704 L/s were pumped. Table 16.2 lists the total wellfield delivery rate per year.

 

For 2019 technical report, it was assumed that from Years 2 through 40, 33 wells are added to the pumping schedule for duration of the life of mine plan (Figure 15.8). During the Phase 2 pumping period, the average nominal pumping rate per well is 16 L/s capacity, providing approximately 903 L/s of lithium enriched brine from the aquifer to the evaporation ponds.

 

Due to uncertainties in the spatial distribution of aquifer hydraulic properties and ultimate well hydraulic efficiencies at constructed production wells, difference may exist between pumping rates applied in the simulation versus measured pumping after construction of wells. In addition, it is likely that wells will need to be rehabilitated or replaced during the 40-year production period and cost estimates should include provisions to cover such expenditures.

 

16.2Brine Production Uncertainties, Limitations, and Risk Assessment

 

An assessment of key potential sources of uncertainties and limitations in the numerical model predictions and the Mineral Reserve Estimate is provided below. These descriptions are based on an extensive series of model runs for calibration and sensitivity analysis provided in prior LAC reporting for the previous Mineral Reserve Estimate and additional modeling analysis used for the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate and subject of this report.

 

·Initial brine concentrations – These are based on relatively extensive sampling programs. The order of uncertainty in the average modeled brine concentration is expected to be ± 6% and is based on differences reported in prior resource area models of brine concentration.

 

·Effective Porosity (φe) and Specific Yield (Sy) – Effective porosity is difficult to measure in the field. Therefore, effective porosity was assumed to be equal to specific yield for modeling purposes. A high degree of variability is noted in the Sy estimates (as based on RBRC results). Since most of extracted brine is derived from elastic rather than pore storage, uncertainties in effective porosity affect the distance that lithium mass in the brine travels to reach a production well. As a result, uncertainties in estimates of specific yield will affect the amount of mass capture produced by the wellfield at boundaries with more dilute concentrations of lithium. To avoid these potential dilution effects and reduce uncertainty, the wellfield is currently configured for maximizing mass capture within the Project property aquifer volumes with largest amounts of lithium mass, and at sufficient distances from more dilute areas near aquifer boundaries.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 278 of 427

 

 

 

·Dispersivity – The value of dispersivity, which controls the spreading of dissolved lithium as it is transported with groundwater, is also difficult to determine in field settings given the scale of the model domain. Values were set in the Updated Mineral Reserve model to be generally consistent with the previous modeling effort (King, Kelley, Abbey, 2012) and professional literature estimates for controlled testing (Gelhar et al., 1992 and Hess et al., 2002), and the amount of spreading parallel to groundwater flow (horizontal dispersivity) is reasonably assumed to be greater than the transverse and vertical components. Sensitivity runs with varied dispersivity values will aid in better evaluating its effect on the simulated results.

 

·Stratigraphic assumptions – Stratigraphic variability is inherent in any depositional environment. The updated HSU model is based on the available data and interpretation of depositional processes. Additional refinements using model zonation of aquifer parameters were made based on well responses to the pumping tests, to refine the continuity of aquifer and aquitard units between wells. Stratigraphic uncertainty tends to affect either the number of wells required to recover the Mineral Reserve, or the rate at which the Mineral Reserve can be recovered, rather than the total Mineral Reserve. Consequently, it can be addressed by the addition of contingency wells. Similarly, it could be addressed by acceptance of lower production rates spread over a longer period of time. As the production wellfield is constructed there will be further opportunity to update the stratigraphy and hydraulic properties to better predict drawdown and refine the number of wells required to meet pumping targets.

 

·Hydraulic conductivity (K) – The K distribution field is directly correlated with HSU model and, given the large range in lithologic heterogeneity of the HSUs, values of K have a broad range as well as associated uncertainty. Similar to stratigraphic uncertainty, the magnitude of the uncertainty for K estimates primarily affects the number of required pumping wells, rather than the total Mineral Reserve Estimate. If K values are smaller than represented in some areas of the model, it ultimately would require closer well spacing which can be addressed by the addition of contingency wells.

 

·Water Balance – The water balance is defined as the entry of water into the salar, either laterally or vertically (recharge), and water exiting the model primarily via evaporation (discharge). Given the conceptual model of the basin, recharge at mountain fronts and basin margins essentially controls influx and thereby dictates evaporative discharge flux. The amount of recharge into the model domain has the potential to affect the required number of pumping wells and steady-state residual mean, where for example, a lower recharge estimate to the salar could improve the apparent spatial bias of negative residuals (Table 15.3). Sensitivity analyses shows if actual recharge is significantly less than represented in the model, then the amount of drawdown and dilution associated with a given pumping rate will tend to be greater over long pumping periods. Consequently, more production wells would be required to spread out the effects of brine extraction and promote less drawdown and dilution at individual pumping wells. This is addressed by the addition of contingency wells.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 279 of 427

 

 

 

·Water density – In most salar settings, variations in the density of groundwater are an important driver for flow, especially in the marginal mixing zone. Similar to the previous modeling efforts, a constant density of groundwater was assumed in this Updated Mineral Reserve model. Although the extensive numerical modeling analysis of LAC (2012) indicated that the consideration of variations in groundwater density did not significantly impact the simulated results of that model, the extended domain of this Updated Mineral Reserve model includes the marginal salar areas and freshwater zones of the basin. Therefore, in future modeling updates, and with additional measurements of groundwater density, consideration of variable-density flow and transport is recommended with modeling code and interface utilized (MODFLOW-USG with Groundwater Vistas). In addition, the steady-state calibration may be improved if the observed groundwater values were corrected for water density; in this case, the equivalent freshwater head would be higher than the respective observed field groundwater elevation (Table 15.3), resulting in an increased residual mean and possible improvement of the spatial bias of over predicted model values. This improvement would also be subject to more field measurements of water density in order to properly convert the observed groundwater elevations to equivalent freshwater heads.

 

·Brine production from adjacent properties – The Mineral Reserve Estimate assumes that production within the Project property areas will not be affected by production from adjacent third-party properties. Depending on production well locations and projected associated capture areas, this uncertainty may be large as off-property brine pumping from immediately adjacent property areas claims may have direct effect on the Mineral Reserve Estimate. Although details of proposed off-claim production are not known, a sensitivity analysis is recommended projecting the potential effects.

 

16.3Well Utilization

 

For the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate, it was assumed that the 56 wells would be needed to meet or exceed the production goal targets. From 2018 to 2024, prior to initiation of full-scale operations, a total of 39 brine extraction wells were constructed. Storage ponds and the recovery plant were also assumed to be fully operational at the start of the simulation. As a result, ramp up of pumping for the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate only occurred during the initial two years of operation and pumping rates needed to achieve production goals was initiated at the start of each yearly simulation period.

 

Variations in brine demand due to differences in brine-pond evaporation rates, either seasonal or due to long-term climatic trends, were not incorporated directly into the simulations. Incorporation of brine pumping variations can be conducted as part of model predictive scenarios for operational controls. In practice, however, pumping at selected wells could be stopped and started as necessary to meet total wellfield requirements.

 

16.3.1Well Utilization 2018 to 2024

 

From 2018 to 2024, a total of 39 producing wells have been progressively commissioned in the current exploitation area of the resource (Cauchari-Olaroz), which sustained the ramp-up operation during those years.

 

From 2018 to the present, the number of wells in production has increased, as has the volume of brine extracted and the efficiency in the concentration of lithium. In 2018, production began with the pumping of 5 wells located in the Cauchari Salar. During 2019, 8 wells were incorporated into the production, considerably increasing the volume of brine extracted compared to the previous year. By 2020, the number of wells in production doubled, with a total of 24 wells in production, distributed in the Cauchari-Olaroz Salar. During 2021, 1 well was incorporated into production, this and the improvements in the efficiency of the wells meant an increase of almost 70% in brine production compared to the previous year. From 2022 to 2024, brine pumping and production reached a total of 39 wells.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 280 of 427

 

 

 

Currently, 3 new infill producing wells are being built in the Salar de Olaroz in order to increase the versatility and productive capacity of the pumping field. Their location information is presented in Table 16.1.

 

Table 16.2 summarizes the volume of brine pumped per well, as well as the average flows per year. Figure 16.1 shows graphically the volume of exploitation per well. Figure 16.2 shows the location of the production wells and Figure 16.3 shows the location of the production wells against the area of the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate.

 

After accounting for processing efficiency (53.7%), the predicted results for the 40-year production period are as follows.

 

·During the first years of operation, a total of 122,407 t LCE have been delivered to the wellfield. For the following years, it is expected to have an average production rate of 49,354 tpa LCE.

 

·The average predicted production rate for the 40-year pumping period is 47,700 tpa LCE.

 

·At the end of the predicted pumping period in Year 40, the rate averages 48,700 tpa LCE.

 

·Average lithium concentration of 609 mg/L for the 40-year predicted pumping period. During the first years of operation, the average lithium grade is 638 mg/L, and the minimum concentration of 598 mg/L occurs near the end of the pumping period in Year 40.

 

The recommendation is made to update the Mineral Resource Estimate and Mineral Reserve Estimate in 2025.

 

Table 16.1
Borehole Drilling Summary for Infill Producing Wells Program
Conducted in 2024

Borehole

ID

Type Platform Contractor Stage Location Coordinates
X Y
Pozo 44 Rotary W-30 Wichi Toledo Under construction Olaroz 3425552 7393300
Pozo 45 Rotary W-28 Wichi Toledo Under construction Olaroz 3425189 7392374
Pozo 46 Rotary W-29 Wichi Toledo Under construction Olaroz 3424736 7391203

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 281 of 427

 

 

 

Table 16.2
Volume Pumped per Production Well per Year and Average Flow per Year - Cauchari-Olaroz

 

Note: The volumes shown here include all feed to the system as well as the volumes used for pond leak detection and pumping tests.

Source: (Exar)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 282 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 16.1      Production Wells – Pumped Volumes per Well per Year

 

Source: (Exar)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 283 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 16.2      Location of Production Wells

 

Source: (Exar, 2024)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 284 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 16.3      Location of Production Wells Showing 2019 Mineral Resource Area

 

Source: (Exar, 2024)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 285 of 427

 

 

 

17.0Recovery Methods (Brine Processing)

 

17.1General

 

The lithium recovery process consists of the following main processing stages:

 

·Brine production from wells.

 

·Sequential solar evaporation.

 

·Liming for Impurity Reduction.

 

·Lithium plant including:

 

oBoron removal;

 

oPurification process;

 

oForced Evaporation process;

 

oPolishing;

 

oCarbonation/Lithium carbonate precipitation;

 

oLithium carbonate crystal compaction and micronization; and

 

oLithium carbonate packaging.

 

The current process design, based on testing and simulation, has been enhanced with:

 

·Sulphate and boron reduction.

 

·Plant-Based potassium chloride reduction.

 

Mass and energy balance simulations were developed for estimation of operating and equipment costs. A conservative approach was used to design the ponds and plant infrastructure to ensure product purity and delivery commitments.

 

17.2Process Description

 

17.2.1Process Block Diagram

 

Figure 17.1 shows the process diagram that outlines the general process. The brine is pumped from the salar into the pond system on the left side. As it progresses through the ponds, different salts precipitate, and chemical treatments are applied. The concentrated brine leaves the pond system on the right side then enters on the top left of the Lithium Carbonate Plant Simplified Block flow diagram.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 286 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.1      Process Block Diagram

 

Source: (Exar)

 

17.3Brine Concentration Process Description

 

17.3.1Pond Surface Area

 

Exar has designed, configured and planned the operation of the pond system based on test work at the site and multiple laboratory tests.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 287 of 427

 

 

A water evaporation rate of 6.26 mm/day (average rate between summer and winter) was used as the design criteria for the pond system, which was obtained using Class A evaporation pans and the test results discussed in Section 13.2.2. In addition, 10% of the available evaporation time the pond will be available for harvesting. A seasonal model of the ponds has been used to obtain the net annual productivity including variation in rain fall, evaporation rates, and brine chemistry changes due to temperature. All these variables are estimated based on site-specific statistics.

Using the above-mentioned rate, a total pond surface area of 1,200 Ha is required to produce 40,000 tpa of lithium carbonate. The operation strategy considers daily evaporation control adjustments by adjusting surface area requirements as necessary during operations through monitoring weekly pond mass balances and long-term prediction based on historic evaporation and meteorological data.

The pond system consists of 28 evaporation ponds segregated into the following types, (with accompanying evaporation):

·16 pre-concentration ponds (Evaporation rate: 4.38 mm/d).

·6 halite ponds (Evaporation rate: 4.25 mm/d).

·2 ponds as sylvinite ponds (Evaporation rate: 3.56 mm/d).

·2 ponds for control (Evaporation rate: 3.51 mm/d.)

·2 lithium ponds (Evaporation rate: 3.45 mm/d).

The ponds configuration includes two parallel trains as presented in Figure 17.5. Associated piping allows for flexible operation and bypassing of individual ponds for maintenance activities.

17.3.2Pond Design

The pond design consists of engineered fill material and a thick impermeable pond liner (geomembrane) with geotextile only on berms. The use of both engineered fill material and a liner reduces the potential of rocks penetrating the liner and compromising pond impermeability. The engineered fill material consists of screened sands and fines which are installed on the native material in the pond area below the liner then leveled and compacted.

Testing of this design using pond liners from several different suppliers and installation details was completed to reach the final decisions on the liner and construction approaches. A total of 10 pond cells (approx. 40 m x 40 m) were constructed on site and installed with the proposed design. Production and salt harvesting were then simulated, and the liners were then tested for damage/leakage using inspection and mass balances on the test ponds.

Figure 17.2 illustrates the evaporation ponds constructed upon the engineered bedding that was overlain with a geotextile and liner.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 288 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.2      Evaporation Ponds at Cauchari Salar

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

The pond berms were constructed using compacted, impermeable clay-rich soils and overlain with the engineered materials described above. Testing of the berm construction material, sourced locally in the Olaroz salar, has confirmed the design specifications (Figure 17.3). Evaporation ponds are shown in Figure 17.4.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 289 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.3      Testing of Berm Material

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Figure 17.4      Evaporation Ponds – Close Up

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 290 of 427

 

 

 

17.3.3Pond Layout

  

Figure 17.5 presents the outline of the ponds and the salt disposal area.

Figure 17.5      Evaporation Ponds

Source: (Google Earth, 2024)

17.3.4Pond Transfer System

Each pond is equipped with a pump station and pipeline system for transferring brine between ponds (Figure 17.6). The ponds are arranged geometrically to efficiently move brine during the anticipated normal operation and maintenance of the ponds and pump systems. An analysis of the prevailing wind direction was considered in pond orientation, pump station locations, and brine inlets.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 291 of 427

 

 

Brine progresses along the long axis of the pond. Internal, temporary walls constructed of salt ensure the brine does not bypass the pond section and has a consistent residence time.

Figure 17.6      Evaporation Ponds – Transfer Pump Station

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

17.3.5Salt Harvesting

As brine concentrates, the salt precipitates in the pond thus purifying the brine. Salt that precipitates in the bottom of ponds is porous and entraps brine. In order to recover pond volume taken up by precipitated salt and recover lithium values entrapped with the brine; salt will be harvested. Harvesting began after the third year of steady operation.

The harvesting operation consists of draining the free brine from the pond, scraping the salt to a minimum depth, and making drainage trenches before removing salt. Draining the entrapped brine from the salt will recover roughly 90% of the lithium that was entrapped in the salt. Harvesting is being conducted 24/7 to satisfy overall production plans.

17.3.6Impurity Reduction-Liming

A liming stage is necessary to avoid the precipitation of lithium compounds by removing some of the sulphate. In the liming system almost all of the Mg is precipitated with a portion of the sulphates and boron compounds.

The only reagent used in this area is quick lime (CaO) which is stored in two silos of 1,000-tonne capacity each. A milk of lime preparation system includes the vertimill lime slaker to prepare the reagent for the process.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 292 of 427

 

 

Milk of lime and brine from the pre-concentration ponds are contacted in two separate trains of reactors. These reactors produce a slurry of sulphates, magnesium hydroxides and borates that can be easily separated from the brine and washed to recover the lithium.

The reactions that take place precipitate magnesium hydroxide, gypsum and calcium borates. The reactions give the following products:

(Mg)+2 + Ca(OH)2,(s) → Mg(OH)2,(s) + Ca+2

Ca+2 + SO4-2 → CaSO4,(s)

2Ca+2 + 3B2O4 → Ca2B6O11·5H2O(s)

The brine with precipitated solids is discharged from the reaction tank to a solid liquid separation system. The treated brine stream goes to the post-concentration ponds for further concentration, whereas the solids are transferred to a disposal area.

17.4Lithium Plant Process Description

Pre-treated and concentrated brine from the evaporation ponds is fed into the lithium plant.

The plant is composed of the following processing sections:

·SX circuit for boron removal.

·Purification circuit: In this circuit, impurities such as magnesium, calcium, and sulphates are removed from the brine using specific reagents.

·Forced Evaporation and KCl Crystallizer circuit.

·Carbonation circuit to precipitate high-grade Lithium carbonate.

·Drying and packing area.

The block diagram for the plant is shown in Figure 17.7 Lithium Carbonate Plant Block Diagram.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 293 of 427

 

 

  

Figure 17.7      Lithium Plant Block Diagram

  

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 294 of 427

 

 

  

17.4.1Solvent Extraction for Boron Removal

Boron removal is necessary to achieve high-quality lithium product. The solvent extraction stage allows an effective removal of this element. This step reduces boron concentration to specification values

In the 2012 Feasibility Study, a boron solvent extraction stage was considered to treat the brine and produce an essentially boron-free brine for further processing. Test work provided the basis of design for the solvent extraction plant including six solvent extraction stages and three stripping stages.

The design of the extraction unit is based on pilot testing at the pilot plant located at the Project site, and Tenova have provided a process guarantee.

The main reagents of this process are:

·The organic mix used in the extraction is a mix of Escaid 110 and 2-Ethyl-hexanol.

·32% HCl to control the acidic pH in the extraction stage, acidifying to a pH of 2.5.

·5% NaOH solution to prepare the aqueous stripping solution and reach a pH of 10 in the stripping stages.

The boron from the feed is transferred to the organic phase as the liquids mix during the extraction process. The extraction circuit consists of six stages.

Boron removal from the organic phase is carried out using an alkaline caustic solution. The stripping circuit has three stages. The extracted solution containing boron is sent to a disposal tank for the process. The regenerated organic phase is recycled back into the extraction stage.

The solvent extraction plant configuration is shown in Figure 17.8 Boron Solvent Extraction.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 295 of 427

 

 

Figure 17.8      Boron Solvent Extraction

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 296 of 427

 

 

17.4.2Purification Process

The rest of the impurities, magnesium, calcium, and sulphates are removed from the brine in the purification process.

The purification process consists of the following steps:

·Primary purification: main objective is magnesium and sulphates removal.

·Secondary purification: main objective is calcium and sulphates removal.

·Primary IX: main objective is the removal of any residual calcium, magnesium and other divalent ions.

Purification is done in two stages using Ca(OH)2, Na2CO3, CaCl2 and BaCl2 as reagents that are effective for the precipitation of calcium, magnesium, sulphate.

The circuit includes the solid/liquid separation stages, and the ion exchange sequences for the overall removal of traces of divalent ions (calcium and magnesium mainly but also strontium and barium).

The process stages included in the purification circuit area outlined in the Figure 17.9 Brine Purification Circuit Diagram.

Figure 17.9      Brine Purification Processing Circuit Diagram

17.4.2.1Primary Purification – Magnesium and Sulphate Reduction

Magnesium must be removed before the carbonation step. This is accomplished by adding lime in a set of reactors. The lime reacts with the magnesium in the brine to form insoluble magnesium hydroxide. The precipitated solids are removed by a solid-liquid separation system.

Mg2+(aq) + Ca(OH)2(lime) à Mg(OH)2(solid) + Ca2+(aq)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 297 of 427

 

 

 

Residual sulphate ions are precipitated by addition of calcium chloride in a stirred reactor. The precipitated solids are removed by a solid-liquid separation system.

CaCl2(sn) + SO42- à CaSO4(solid) + 2Cl-

The primary purification filter cakes report to final disposal.

Figure 17.10 Primary Purification Processing Circuit Diagram presents the configuration of this section of the plant.

Figure 17.10      Primary Purification Processing Circuit Diagram

17.4.2.2Secondary Purification – Calcium and Sulphates Removal

Residual calcium and sulphates in the brine will be precipitated with soda ash and barium chloride.

BaCl2.2H2O + SO42- à BaSO4(solid) + 2Cl-

Ca2+(aq) + Na2CO3(sn) à CaCO3(solid) + 2Na+(aq)

The precipitated solids will be removed by a solid-liquid separation system. The secondary purification filter cakes report to final disposal. Figure 17.11 Secondary Purification Processing Circuit Diagram presents the configuration of this section of the plant.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 298 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.11      Secondary Purification Processing Circuit Diagram

  

17.4.2.3Primary IX

An ion exchange system acts as a guard to remove any residual calcium, magnesium and other divalent ions. The main objective is to obtain Ca, Mg, Ba and Sr <1 ppm. Figure 17.12 Primary IX Circuit Diagram presents the configuration of this section of the plant.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 299 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.12      Primary IX Circuit Diagram

For IX resin regeneration, the following stages are required with the following streams:

·Displacement and backwashing uses demineralized water.

·Regeneration: uses HCl 8%.

·Conversion uses NaOH 5%.

·Washing: uses demineralized water.

17.4.2.4Carbonate Removal

The objective is to reduce the carbonate concentration in the brine by adding HCl in desorption equipment for conditioning the brine for effective carbonate removal:

CO32- + HCl à CO2 + 2Cl-

Figure 17.13 Carbonate Removal Circuit Diagram presents the configuration of this section of the plant.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 300 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.13      Carbonate Removal Circuit Diagram

  

17.4.3Evaporation and KCl Crystallization Stage

Potassium and sodium concentrations are reduced by evaporative crystallization. Centrifuges are used to separate the sylvinite crystals. There are two trains, A and B, with the same capacity. This stage also increases the lithium concentration

The evaporator has the following steps:

1.Vacuum evaporation. Triple-effect evaporator (4 bodies). Crystallization by water loss.

2.First Solid/Liquid separation in Pusher type centrifuges. Continuous operation.

3.Crystallization by cooling; crystals grow due to differential KCl saturation. There is crystal seeding in this operation.

4.Second Solid/Liquid separation in Peeler type centrifuges. Batch operation.

5.Concentration adjustment to 3% by mass lithium by dilution.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 301 of 427

 

 

Figure 17.14 Evaporation and KCl Crystallization Diagram presents the configuration of this section of the plant.

Figure 17.14      Evaporation and KCl Crystallization Diagram

17.4.3.1Secondary IX Polishing

The objective is to remove divalent ions (Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr) from the brine to allow the final lithium carbonate product to meet the required product specifications.

This operates in the same way as primary IX. The configuration of this stage is presented in Figure 17.15 Secondary IX Polishing Diagram.

IX regeneration is the same as in Primary IX.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 302 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.15      Secondary IX Polishing Diagram

  

17.4.4Lithium Carbonate Crystallization and Recovery

The main objective is to generate the lithium carbonate (solid). The feed is divided between the first two reactors to reduce supersaturation and improve the size and purity of the crystals. Then the feed is mixed in the reactors with soda ash. The centrifuges dewater the crystals and then the crystals are washed with condensate to maintain a high yield of lithium, and the wash water will be sent to the evaporator feed.

Figure 17.16 Lithium Carbonate Crystallisation Diagram presents the configuration of this section of the plant.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 303 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.16      Lithium Carbonate Crystallization Diagram

In addition to the reactors, the process consists of:

·Decanter centrifuges: 3 decanter centrifuges operating in parallel receive the slurry from Reactor Trains A and B. (119.34 t/h). Objective: to obtain a dense lithium carbonate slurry with 30% solids by mass.

·Peeler centrifuges: 6 peeler centrifuges in parallel, divided into two trains, each of a diameter of1.8 m. Objective: to obtain a lithium carbonate cake with retained moisture between 8% and 13% by mass.

·Filter presses: 2 vertical plate-type filter presses with a filtration area of 100 m², receiving the mother liquor from the decanters and peelers. Objective: to recover the fine lithium carbonate solids suspended in the mother liquor.

The carbonation reactors have a special configuration as shown on Figure 17.17 Carbonation Reactor Diagram. The reactor configuration includes a draft tube configuration to promote internal recirculation and the reaction between the soda ash and the feed brine.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 304 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.17      Lithium Carbonation Reactor Diagram

17.4.4.1Mother Liquor Handling

Mother liquor is sent to a dedicated pond for accumulation. Then it is fed to the post-liming brine system. With the possibility of concentrating in ponds and recycling to purification plants, the process considers the addition of HCl to avoid the possible precipitation of lithium as the mother liquor concentrates, as shown in Figure 17.18.

Figure 17.18      Mother Liquor Diagram

17.4.5Lithium Carbonate Drying, Micronization and Packaging

The wet cake from the centrifuges is fed to a rotary dryer with indirect steam heating. The product reaches the commercial moisture level in the dryer.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 305 of 427

 

 

The dry product is conditioned for packaging including the following process sequence:

The dry solid is transported to a distribution hopper that allows the flow to be split considering half of the flow rate to be fed into the micronization process and the other half going to the bulk packaging. An inline magnet bank is installed to remove all ferromagnetic particles.

The micronization system is employed to produce fine lithium carbonate for customers who require a fine, narrowly distributed particle size.

The final product can be packaged in two types of containers:

·20 kg bags of micronized product, 50 bags per pallet.

·500 kg big bags of either micronized or non-micronized product, with pallets holding 2 big bags each.

The overall configuration of the system is presented in Figure 17.19 Lithium Carbonate Drying, Micronization and Packaging Diagram.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 306 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 17.19      Lithium Carbonate Drying, Micronization and Packaging Diagram

 

17.5Reagents

Quick lime (CaO) is trucked to site and stored in silos. Hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2) is made on site and distributed to the various users. Two different lime qualities have been sourced. A lower-grade lime is used to supply the liming plant while a higher quality grade CaO with less magnesium is used within the lithium carbonate plant for magnesium removal.

Soda ash (Na2CO3) is transported by ship to the port of Buenos Aires and trucked to the Project site. Sodium carbonate solution will be prepared with purified water. It is used for calcium removal and to produce lithium carbonate in the processing facility.

Barium chloride is trucked and stored at site. A solution of barium chloride is prepared with purified soft water and used to remove sulphate in solution.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 307 of 427

 

 

 

Calcium chloride is trucked and stored at site. A solution of calcium chloride will be prepared with purified water and used to remove sulphate in solution.

  

Hydrochloric acid is trucked and stored at site as 32 wt.% solution. Hydrochloric acid as 32 wt.% solution is used as a pH modifier. The acid is diluted and used as awash solution in ion exchange columns.

Sodium hydroxide is trucked and stored at site. A solution of sodium hydroxide is prepared with purified water and used as a stripping agent in the boron solvent extraction circuit and as a pH modifier.

17.6Plant Design Basis

The following describes the criteria for the operation of the Lithium Carbonate Plant:

·Plant operating capacity is 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate product;

·The plant operates 292 days per year (80% runtime);

·Design factor of 1.2;

·Lithium carbonate plant yield is 85%;

·Lithium carbonate has a purity of at least 99.5%;

·50 % of the production could be micronized;

·Final product particle size distribution will be set based on customer demand; and

·Product can be packed into 500 kg maxi bags for shipping and dispatching to customers or 20 kg bags of micronized product.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 308 of 427

 

 

 

18.0Project Infrastructure

18.1Main Facilities Location

Figure 18.1 presents the location of the main facilities that are part of the Cauchari-Olaroz Project, including:

·Well field;

·Evaporation ponds;

·Lithium carbonate plant;

·Salt and process residues disposal; and

·Camp.

18.2Brine Extraction

18.2.1Brine Extraction Wells

The reserve model output states the required brine production rate is achieved with 46 brine wells. Additional 7 wells are planned for back up purposes (Table 18.1). It is estimated that an additional 1 well per year of operation will be drilled throughout the 40-year operation to maintain brine productivity.

During start-up, 40 production wells are considered for production, with average nominal capacity of 16.3 L/s, that provide up to 652 L/s of brine to the ponds. Additionally, 13 wells will be completed during the first five years to have the operation fed by 53 wells. This flow rate assumes a yield of 53.7% on the whole lithium carbonate process.

The wells will be screened across the most productive lithium and sealed against freshwater aquifers.

Table 18.1
Production Wells Estimate

(Re: Section 15.0)

Description Unit Value
Total brine from production wells m3/day 74,600
Total brine from wells (average) L/s 864
Brine requirement for number of well estimate for 40,000 tpa L/s 748
Estimated average well brine output L/s 16.3
Number of wells planned no. 40
Reserve wells no. 13
Total production wells required no. 53

18.2.2Well Pumps

Submersible well pumps are equipped with variable speed drives. Flow from each well is monitored before discharging into a common pipeline. Brine from 7 wells is combined in two main pipelines that discharge into a collecting brine pool called ‘PDA2’. A pumping station allows brine transfer into another collecting brine pool called ‘PDA1’. Brine from the remaining wells is received in this collecting pool and the mixed brine is transferred to two main pipelines discharging directly into ‘PDA1’.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 309 of 427

 

 

The collecting brine pools (‘PDA1’ and ‘PDA2’) enhance brine homogenization as well as act as intermediate pumping stations before transferring the full brine flow into the pre-concentration ponds. Transfer pumps from PDA2 to PDA1 have sufficient flow to meet the demands of the pond system.

18.2.3Additional Equipment in the Well Field

In addition, the well field equipment required include:

·10,000 L to 20,000 L capacity water trucks.

·Temporary portable diesel generators for well pump operation in early stages.

·Cable reel truck for electrical network.

·Electrical lines for proper power distribution; and

·Portable brine transfer pumps.

18.2.4Well Field Electric Power Distribution

A 60 km 13.2 kV transmission line from the main plant substation feeds the two substations in the well field located at brine collection ponds PDA2 and PDA1. The substations downgrade the voltage for distribution to the pond pumps. Low voltage aerial distribution lines feed power to well pumps, where local transformers provide 400 V power to well pumps.

18.3Evaporation Ponds

There are 28 evaporation ponds located in the southeast area of the Property, and consist of:

·16 pre-concentration ponds;

·6 halite ponds;

·2 sylvinite ponds;

·2 control ponds; and

·2 lithium ponds.

Figure 18.2 shows the location of the evaporation ponds.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 310 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 18.1      Site Main Facilities

  

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 311 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 18.2      Evaporation Pond Layout

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 312 of 427

 

 

 

18.4Salt Harvest Equipment

  

Pond design and operation require the removal of the salt deposits formed at the bottom of the ponds. Typical earthmoving machinery is used for salt removal, such as front-end loaders and dump trucks. There is a minimum salt depth in the pond to protect the liner from harvesting activities. Harvested salts, some of which are rich in potassium, will be stockpiled locally and available for future recovery pending market value.

18.5Liming Stage

Quick Lime Reception

The quicklime is received from a truck that feeds storage silos by pneumatic conveying. From the silos the lime is reacted with water in an engineered system. Lime slurry is discharged from the reaction system and is screened to remove larger contaminating material. The lime slurry is stored in a tank and distributed through a recirculating loop into two liming systems. One for higher quality lime, one for less expensive lime.

The lower quality lime is used to treat the brine at the ponds. The reaction between the lime and the brine results in a precipitated solid containing almost all of the magnesium and most of the sulphate. The solids are filtered from the brine and washed to recover the lithium. The solids are then disposed of in an on-site salt pile, while the brine is sent for further concentration.

Liming System

In the liming system, a set of processes allow for the removal of magnesium and sulphate present

in the lithium-rich brine obtained from the concentration ponds. The process is carried out in three steps: 1) preparation of the milk of lime, 2) its addition to the brine and the resulting reaction, and 3) separation of the undesired solid byproducts of the reaction.

1.Preparation of Milk of Lime: Quicklime is delivered by truck and transferred to storage silos using a pneumatic conveying system. From the silos, the quicklime is mixed with water in a specially designed system, undergoing a typical slaking reaction.

2.Lime addition reaction: Milk of lime is introduced into lithium brine, triggering a reaction that forms magnesium and sulphate precipitates. This is done in 3 continuous stirred tank reactors in series. More than half of the unwanted initial sulphate and nearly all the magnesium originally present in the brine form precipitates.

3.Separation of undesired solid byproducts: These precipitates are subsequently removed using press filters, yielding a clarified brine. As a result, the filtered brine is left at a reduced sulphate content and nearly free of magnesium. The filter cakes are then transported to a landfill for final disposal.

The clarified brine is then transferred to the post-Liming evaporation ponds for further concentration. This additional concentration is necessary before the brine can be fed into the lithium carbonate plant.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 313 of 427

 

 

 

18.6Lithium Carbonate Plant

  

The plant is located approximately 8000 m south of National Highway 52. Plant equipment is designed for an 80% On Stream Factor (7,006 hours per year).

18.6.1Process Facilities

18.6.1.1Boron Removal - Solvent Extraction

The boron concentration from the last evaporation pond is too high to make good quality lithium carbonate and most of it needs to be removed. A solvent extraction process has been engineered to reduce the boron concentration. to <10 ppm. The feed needs to be conditioned prior to feeding the solvent extraction process. The organic material being used is highly selective for boric acid species, so the feed must be acidified prior to loading the organic material.

The extraction circuit is made up of a set of conventional mixing-decanters that contact an organic mixture to selectively remove the boron without dissolving in the brine. This phase loads the brine with boron compounds. The organic phase is then regenerated by removing the boron from the organic phase, while the purified brine is further purified.

The regeneration of the organic phase is done by a caustic solution in a set of mixing-decanters. The boron species are removed as sodium borate solution. The sodium borate solution is taken to a disposal pond where it evaporates. The salt from this pond is harvested and stored in the plant waste pile. The regenerated organic phase is recycled back to the extraction pipeline.

18.6.1.2Brine Purification

The brine purification section targets the removal of Mg, Ca, B, and SO4 to allow the evaporation system to operate at a low scaling rate and achieve the uptime target for the process plant.

18.6.1.3Primary Treatment

The primary treatment uses slaked lime to precipitate magnesium and calcium borates. Additional reagents are added to remove sulphates. The primary treatment uses a higher quality of quick lime to purify the brine. These reagents precipitate the target ions as solids and are engineered to allow for efficient filtration and washing of the solids to maintain the yield of lithium. The wash water is returned to the process while the solids are sent to the final disposal pile. The purified brine is then sent to secondary treatment.

18.6.1.4Secondary Treatment

The secondary treatment polishes the brine from the primary treatment to finish removing sulphates and divalent ions from the brine. The brine is treated with calcium chloride and barium chloride to eliminate the sulphate. A small dose of soda ash is used to remove the divalent ions as precipitated carbonates.

The slurry produced in the chemical treatment is sent to a solid/liquid separation system. This system filters off the solids and washes the solids with water to recover the lithium. The moist cake is then discharged into a storage pile. The brine from this treatment then goes to ion exchange for final purification of the divalent ions.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 314 of 427

 

 

 

18.6.1.5Primary IX

  

The purified brine from secondary purification filter is subject to an ion exchange treatment to remove impurities to minimum levels.

The IX system includes a set of columns that allow for continuous operation and resin regeneration process. Conventional steps are used for elution to restore the ion exchange capacity of the resin including elution, regeneration and washing. Multiple columns are cycled through the loading, regeneration, elution, and lag processes.

18.6.1.6Brine Concentration and Na/K Reduction

After the filtration of the slurry from the brine purification plant, the brine is concentrated to increase the lithium concentration for final polishing prior to lithium carbonate production. This process removes NaCl and KCl salts from the brine to meet the target quality specifications. The resulting NaCl and KCl salts are separated from the brine with a centrifuge and washed with process condensate. The resulting wash liquid is recycled back to the feed for the evaporation/ crystallization. The solid NaCl and KCl salts are sent to final storage, and the purified brine is sent to the lithium carbonate precipitation reaction system.

18.6.1.7Feed Preheat

The feed is preheated via a series of preheaters using condensate and steam to condition the brine prior to processing in the multiple effect evaporator. The steam heaters are used to raise the temperature.

18.6.1.8Multiple-Effect Evaporation and Crystallization

A forced-circulation evaporator/crystallizer is utilized for the three-effect multiple effect design. The design of this system incorporates the third effect using two crystallizers. An additional centrifuge separates the NaCl from the second effect crystallizer. The discharge from the third effect crystallizer is sent to a flash-cooled crystallization stage.

18.6.1.9Flash-Cooled Crystallization

The flash-cooled crystallizer provides further removal of salts by the controlled crystallization of KCl and NaCl. The mixed salts are removed from the crystallizer by a centrifuge.

18.6.1.10Process Condensate Collection

Additional facilities include a process condensate handling, reverse osmosis feed water, and material handling equipment for solids handling.

18.6.1.11Mg/Ca Polishing IX

In case to produce battery grade product, the conditioned stream from the evaporation is fed to ion exchange resin (IX) for further removal of Mg and Ca to less than 1 ppm. This is a conventional commercial circuit that allows for continuous operation and resin regeneration in a batchwise operation with continuous processing and purification of brine.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 315 of 427

 

 

 

18.6.2Lithium Carbonate Production

18.6.2.1Carbonation

The lithium carbonate production system consists of reactive crystallizer that produces single-crystal product to obtain a high yield and consistent quality.

There are facilities to control temperature and pH and to dose the Na2CO3 to optimize precipitation conditions. A heat recovery system is also included in this stage. The crystallization train includes four reactors working in series.

18.6.2.2Final Product

The resulting slurry is filtered to remove the lithium carbonate product. The filter operates as a counter current wash system using the wash water from the filtered stream. The final wash solution is used for dilution and the brine from the reaction is recycled to recover the lithium. A portion of solids are recycled from the separation system to the first one reactor to promote the crystals growing and improve the number of solids in the reactors.

The moist cake from the filter is centrifuged on a basket centrifuge and then fed to a rotary dryer. The wash water is sent to the counter current wash on the lithium carbonate filter.

The dryer is an indirect steam tube rotary dryer type. A baghouse is used to collect fine particles of lithium carbonate to control loss of final product.

The product is air-cooled while transported by a pneumatic system to storage. Then it is fed to the micronizer equipment to provide a defined particle size.

The lithium carbonate product is loaded in silos based on a packaging size system. It can be packaged into polyethylene big bags or sealed plastic bags.

18.6.3Plant Wide Instrumentation

Well, pond, and plant control signals are be provided to a centralized control system. The control system utilizes redundant controllers. Communication with remote devices such as those associated with wells and ponds will utilize fiber optic communications. Distributed control system information, operation, and alarms are accessible from a centralized control room.

18.7Supporting Services

18.7.1Fresh Water

The freshwater requirements are provided by local wells within the watershed. The infrastructure for water handling includes wells, low-voltage transmission lines to power the wells, pipelines, storage tanks and reverse osmosis plants. Wates is required by the process and both camps.

First, a pumping system fills a water storage tank located in the plant. This in turn feeds the fire water system and the raw water system. Raw water feed the ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis (RO) and water treatment plant to produce pure water for the process. At the time of this report the Company has applied to increase the freshwater use to 150 L/s which meet the water demands of an operation of more than 40,000 tpa LCE.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 316 of 427

 

 

Then, the well currently supplying freshwater to both camps are called PBI and is located 3.5 km north of the Operations Camp.

The infrastructure installed at Campamento de Construcción includes a 20 m3 raw water storage tank, two reverse osmosis plants that together have a production capacity of 7.74 m3/hour, 110 m3 of treated water storage distributed in 4 tanks and a pressurization system.

The Operations Camp has a 25 m3 raw water storage tank, two reverse osmosis plants that together have a production capacity of 13 m3/hour, 160 m3 of treated water storage distributed in tanks, and two pressurization systems. In addition, the reverse osmosis plant supplies water to 4 tanks of 25 m3 each for the firefighting system.

18.7.2Sanitary Services

Each camp has an effluent treatment plant that receives and treats sanitary effluents.

These plants work under the activated sludge system and generate a treated effluent whose physical parameters make it suitable for use in road irrigation or disposal in infiltration beds.

18.7.3Diesel Fuel

The plant includes a diesel storage and dispensing station for mobile equipment and transport vehicles. The total storage capacity is 210,000 liters of diesel.

Diesel fuel is used in electric generators, cargo vehicles, vans, road equipment and special equipment used in operations (cranes, telescopic handlers, forklifts).

18.8Permanent Camp

The permanent camp (called Operations Camp), and the Construction Camp are located 8,000 m south of National Highway 52. The Operations Camp is a complete housing and administrative complex to support all activities of the operation with a capacity of 634 people.

The Operations Camp includes office buildings, habitational area, dining facilities, medical room, and recreation areas, consisting of a gym, an indoor sports center, a recreation room and an outdoor soccer field.

In the Construction Camp there are eight housing modules with a total capacity of 392 people, of which only three modules are currently in use. In addition, this camp includes the pilot plant facilities, water treatment plants and contractor workshops.

Figure 18.3 shows the camp layout and its components.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 317 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 18.3      Camp General Layout

 

 

Source: Exar (2024)

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 318 of 427

 

 

 

18.8.1Other Buildings

Additional buildings in Operations Camp include:

·Lithium carbonate plant.

·Spare parts and consumables warehouse building.

·Soda ash storage building.

·Final product – lithium carbonate – storage building.

·Chemical laboratory.

·Maintenance Shop.

·Water treatment plants.

All buildings are equipped with appropriate lighting, heating, ventilation, and security provisions.

18.8.2Security

At the main entrance of the plant, there is a barrier and a security booth to grant access to the facilities. Then, there is a second access control point upon reaching the main module of the camp. There, individuals' entry is registered again using facial and fingerprint recognition.

Given the remote location of the facilities, it is not necessary to enclose the plant with a metallic perimeter fence. The plant is illuminated to allow night work and improve security.

18.9Off-Site Infrastructure and Support Systems

18.9.1Natural Gas Pipeline

The natural gas pipeline transport fuel to the Project from the Rosario gas compression station located 52 km south of the plant. The main pipeline belongs to Gas Atacama. This natural gas pipeline has sufficient capacity to supply its current users and the needs for the Project site.

The Exar Gas Pipeline began operations on April 28, 2022, with a pressure of 25.5 bar. It has a length of 53,044 metres, a diameter of 6 inches, and a pipe wall thickness of 4.8 mm in regular terrain and 7.11 mm in special crossings (Schedule 40, API 5L GrB). The pipeline draws gas from the mainline owned by the ENEL-Gas Atacama Group, which is a 20-inch export pipeline that is supplied by REFINOR and TGN (Vaca Muerta).

The Exar gas pipeline operates according to the following specifications:

·- Maximum Operating Pressure (MAPO): 27 barg.

·- Design Pressure: 82.5 bar (NAG-100/Section 105 / Design Factor: 0.60).

It is a welded pipeline with 100% of its welds radiographed, following API 1104 standards, and it has a 1600-micron anticorrosive coating (NAG-108 (2009), Subgroup G4.2). It includes a Cathodic Protection System using Sacrificial Anode Batteries (High-Potential Magnesium Alloy, AZ-63).

Minimum burial depth is 1.00 m, with 2.50 m for road crossings and 3.50 m for water crossings. Along its route, there are two automatic line valves, as well as a Primary Regulation and Measurement Station, where it connects to Gas Atacama and measures the flow mainly consumed by two boilers that generate steam for Exar’s processes.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 319 of 427

 

 

The maximum flow rate (Qmax) is 6600 Sm³/h of natural gas, and we are currently in a ramp-up phase, consuming an average of 3300 Sm³/h.

18.9.2Electrical Power Supply

Electricity is provided by a new 33 kV transmission line that interconnect with an existing 345 kV transmission line located approximately 60 km south of the Project. The interconnection consists of a sub-station with a voltage transformer (345/33 kV) and associated switchgear.

A stepdown 33/13.2 kV substation at the Project site, consist of two voltage transformers (33/13,2 kV, 15-20 MVA), one (1) 33 kV electrical room and one (1) 13.2 kV electrical room with suitable switchgears and auxiliary equipment for the 13.2 kV local distribution system.

The 13.2 kV local electrical distribution system provides power to the plant, camp, intermediate brine accumulation and homogenizing pools/lime pumps, wells, and evaporation ponds. In general, all the distribution is based on overhead lines, unless there are major restrictions then the underground distribution is adopted.

The estimated average load for the Project is around 16.4 MW or 123,461 MWh/y, assuming a plant and periphery utilization factor of 0.86. The power line has sufficient capacity for this load plus the existing users.

The whole electrical system is designed for the maximum load condition plus a safety factor of 1.2.

A stand-by diesel generating station, located close to main substation, will power selected equipment during outages.

18.9.3Water Pipeline

A 53 km long water pipeline parallel to the gas pipeline was constructed to transport 105 L/s to the lithium plant.

18.9.4Instrumentation and Control

18.9.4.1Control and Data Building

The Project considers the design of a single Control and Data Building, dedicated to the control and monitoring of Plant and Peripherals, located near the electrical substation, which contains the following rooms:

·1 control room.

·1 communication room.

·1 server room.

·1 HVAC room.

·1 UPS room.

·3 offices.

·1 meeting room.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 320 of 427

 

 

 

18.9.4.2Telecommunications System

Necessary infrastructure for the proper functioning and integration of the systems and services that are being used in the Project, specifically, the Control Networks, Auxiliary Services, CCTV and SCADA, including:

·125 km of Optical Fiber 48 Core Single-Mode ADSS Cable; and

·50 Communications and Fiber Optic Cabinets.

This infrastructure interconnects all the Electric Rooms, Control Room, Communications Room, SSEE, Powerhouse, Laboratory, TAS Plant, Truck Weighing, and Control Checkpoint.

18.9.4.3Control System

The Control System is responsible for the control and supervision of the process in the Plant and Peripheral areas of the Exar Lithium Project. The Control System is based on a conventional Control System with integral architecture.

The Control System is made up of the following main components:

·Control Panels – Local and redundant controllers.

·Remote Inputs and Outputs Panels.

·Operation and Engineering Stations.

·Video-Wall.

·Servers and printers.

·Instrumentation:

oAnalog Signal, 4-20 mA with Hart protocol.

oDigital Signal, with control voltage in 24Vdc.

·Process Control Network: Considered in the scope of the Telecommunications System, ETHERNET network over optical fiber, with ring topology, which allows the Control Panels to interact (higher level), and star topology to communicate with operated equipment (lower level).

·Control Subnetworks: Considered in the scope of the Telecommunications System, ETHERNET network over fiber optic, which allows to communicate the Panels of Remote Inputs and Outputs with their Controllers, and the motor controls, either smart relay or frequency drivers, with the associated Controller, both with an independent ring topology.

18.9.4.4Other Systems

The following systems are outside the scope of Engineering, so the following infrastructure is defined by others:

·CCTV System.

·Fire Detection System.

·IP Telephony System; and

  

·Access Control System.

However, in the developed infrastructure (fiber optic networks), communication networks have been enabled for them to be implemented on them, without the need to make new fiber optic tracings.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 321 of 427

 

 

 

19.0Market Studies and Contracts

  

This section provides a summary of the supply and demand of lithium and price forecasts. Material presented in this chapter is primarily from the Lithium Quarterly Market Review October 2024, Benchmark Minerals, iLiMarkets and U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2024.

19.1Lithium Demand

Lithium has unique properties that enables its use in many applications. It is the lightest metal and has a high electrochemical potential. Lithium-ion batteries are the most suitable technology for energy storage and the most electrochemically mature due to their high energy capacity. The largest applications for lithium chemicals are rechargeable batteries, but lithium chemicals are also used in the glass, lubricating greases, metallurgy, pharmaceutical, and polymer industries.

Lithium average demand growth through 2030 is expected to be 250-300 kMT/y with a CAGR of 18%. Lithium demand for batteries was projected to reach 3.4 million MT LCE in 2033, electric vehicles (EVs) accounting for 64% of lithium demand and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) representing 24% (Figure 19.1).

Figure 19.1      Lithium Demand in Batteries (2024)

Source: Lithium Quarterly Market Review October 2024 from iLiMarkets.

The outlook for lithium demand is positive, driven by the development of electromobility and the growing need for batteries in the electronics industry (Figure 19.3). Lithium has been listed as one of the critical elements by the U.S. Department of Energy based largely on its importance in rechargeable batteries. Lithium-ion battery is the preferred form for high-density applications like EVs and portable electronics. A full-electric EV can require over 50 kg of LCE in the battery. By 2033, it is estimated that energy storage could represent 95% of global lithium demand.

Lithium consumption is expected to increase significantly in the coming years driven by a rapid increase in demand for EVs. According to Lithium Quarterly Market review from iLiMarkets issued on October 2024, EV sales have grown by 3.5 -4.0 million EVs per year over the last three years, which represents between 150-200 kMT-LCE incremental demand year on year. The EV sales forecast for the region is presented in Figure 19.2 and the EV penetration rate forecast is presented in Figure 19.3.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 322 of 427

 

 

Figure 19.2      EV Sales Forecast per Region

Source: Lithium Quarterly Market Review October 2024 from iLiMarkets. Horizontal axis label is in years.

Figure 19.3      EV Penetration Rate Forecast

Source: Lithium Quarterly Market Review October 2024 from iLiMarkets.

19.2Lithium Supply

Lithium occurs in the structure of pegmatitic minerals, the most important of which is spodumene (hard rock) and due to its solubility as an ion, is also commonly found in brines and clays. Pure lithium does not occur freely in nature, only in compounds. Starting in the 1980s, brine-based lithium chemicals provided most of the supply; however, in recent years’ hardrock forms have surpassed brine as the largest feedstock for lithium chemical production.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 323 of 427

 

 

The US Geological Survey estimates global lithium reserves of 147 MT of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) (USGS, January 2024).

The world's largest known lithium reserves are in Chile, which accounts for 34% of lithium reserves, followed by Australia with 22%, and Argentina in third place, accounting for 13% of global reserves. Lithium production is summarized in Figure 19.4.

China is a global leader in lithium refining and battery production, with a highly advanced and integrated supply chain. It imports raw lithium minerals, mainly from Australia and South America, and then processes it into battery-grade lithium compounds, such as lithium hydroxide and lithium carbonate.

Figure 19.4      Lithium Production (2023) by Country

Source: U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January 2024. It excludes US production.

Minerals are expected to play a key role in meeting the growing demand for critical resources in the coming years, contributing the majority of the incremental supply. The global lithium production is largely driven spodumene operations in Australia, brine operations in Chile and Argentina. Over the last 12 months, Australia’s lithium exports were approximately 400,000 metric tons of LCE, Chile’s lithium exports were about 250,000 metric tons of LCE, and Argentina’s lithium mineral exports reached approximately 60,000 metric tons of LCE. The lithium supply forecast per resource type is presented in Figure 19.5 and per country in Figure 19.6.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 324 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 19.5      Lithium Supply Forecast per Resource Type

Source: Lithium Quarterly Market Review October 2024 from iLiMarkets.

Currently, Argentina has four active lithium projects, collectively exporting approximately 60,000 metric tons of LCE. Production is projected to reach 450,000 metric tons of LCE by 2034, driven by the expansion of existing operations and the development of new projects. This growth highlights Argentina's increasing role in the global lithium market as demand for critical resources continues to rise.

Figure 19.6      Lithium Supply Forecast per Country

Source: Lithium Quarterly Market Review October 2024 from iLiMarkets.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 325 of 427

 

 

 

19.3Price Forecast

  

As the transition towards sustainable energy solutions accelerates, lithium has become a critical raw material. Over the past decade, supply constraints and oversupply at different times have contributed to significant price fluctuations. In recent years, prices saw dramatic increases between 2021 and 2023, peaking for a short period of time at around US$80 per kg, before seeing a significant decline and downward trend continue through 2024.

Investments in lithium extraction technologies, such as direct lithium extraction (DLE), and the expansion of mining capacity could impact the future supply/demand balance and pricing landscape.

Market analysts predict that lithium prices may stabilize in the coming years as supply chains adapt to growing demand and new production methods are developed.

A range of projected prices to 2040 is presented in Figure 19.7.

Figure 19.7      Projected Pricing for Battery-Quality Lithium Carbonate Used in Economic Model

Source: “Lithium Price Forecast,” Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, October 2024.

Table 19.1 reflects Benchmark Minerals market price expectations for battery quality lithium, which was presented in the Benchmark Mineral Intelligence Lithium Price Forecast report dated October 2024.

The average prices for the life of project are displayed in Table 19.1 These three scenarios have been adopted for the economic analysis presented in Section 22.0.

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 326 of 427

 

 

 

 

Table 19.1
Average Pricing Scenarios Adopted for the
Economic Analysis of the Project

Pricing Scenarios

Average price Per Tonne - Battery-Quality Lithium Carbonate

Low Medium High
US$19,641 US$20,757 US$21,645

 

Realized pricing for Exar is based on these price scenarios adjusted for deductions related to the removal of trace levels of impurities to achieve battery quality lithium carbonate.

 

19.4Offtake Contracts

 

Production from the Project is divided between the partners of Exar according to their ownership, excluding JEMSE’s 8.5% interest (Ganfeng Lithium 51% and LAAC 49%). Accordingly, LAAC is entitled to 19,600 tpa of LCE based on a full production rate of 40,000 tpa. LAAC has entered into lithium carbonate offtake agreements with two counterparties, Ganfeng Lithium and BCP Innovation Pte Ltd. (“Bangchak”). These offtake agreements are related to strategic investment agreements by the counterparties, which include both debt facilities for Project construction and equity investments. Assuming a 40,000 tpa production rate and LAAC maintaining its 49% interest in the Project, the Ganfeng offtake agreement entitles Ganfeng to acquire 9,800 tpa of LCE (80% of 49% of the first 25,000 tpa of production) at prevailing market prices, while the Bangchak offtake agreement entitles Bangchak to acquire 6,000 tpa of LCE (20% of 49% of the first 25,000 tpa plus 46.67% of production above that rate) at prevailing market prices. The remaining 3,800 tpa is unallocated, subject to certain rights of Bangchak to top-up its offtake entitlement to 6,000 tpa from this unallocated amount in certain circumstances.

 

For clarity at a production rate of 40,000 tpa, Ganfeng Lithium is entitled to its 51% share of production (20,400 tpa) and 80% of LAAC’s share of production up to 25,000 tpa (9,800 tpa) or, in aggregate, 75.5% of 40,000 tpa (30,200 tpa).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 327 of 427

 

 

 

20.0Environmental Studies, Permitting and Social or Community Impact

 

20.1Executive Summary

 

This section provides an overview of the environmental management, permitting, and social aspects of the Cauchari-Olaroz Project. The Project, operated by Exar, is currently in the exploitation phase with a planned lithium carbonate production capacity of 40,000 tonnes per year. It is governed by Argentina’s national and provincial regulations and aligns with international frameworks such as the Equator Principles. The chapter outlines baseline environmental studies, key permitting milestones, social impact assessments, and strategies for stakeholder engagement. Critical findings highlight stable environmental conditions, effective mitigation measures, and robust community relations.

 

20.2Introduction

 

This chapter focuses on the environmental, permitting, and social aspects of the Cauchari-Olaroz Mining Deposit and Industrial Plant, located in the Susques Department, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Operated by Exar, the Project is currently in the exploitation stage, with the commissioning and initial production of lithium carbonate (Li₂CO₃) at a planned capacity of 40,000 tonnes per year (tpa). The Project's environmental management is currently governed by the Declaration of Environmental Impact (Declaración de Impacto Ambiental, DIA), issued under Resolution DMyRE No. 080/2020, which approved the biennial update of the Environmental Impact Report (Informe de Impacto Ambiental, IIA).

 

A new biannual update to the IIA for the period 2023-2025 has been submitted under the new Decree 7,751-DEyP-2023 and is currently being assessed by the Authorities.

 

This chapter also aligns its assessment with the new requirements of Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023, under General Environmental Law No. 5,063. The decree, which includes Annexes I through VI as its regulatory framework, ensures the Project operates within the latest environmental guidelines, and replaces Decree No. 5,772-P-2010.

 

Exar adhered firmly to the Equator Principles2 (“EP”) even before exploration operations began. These principles are a voluntary commitment, which arose from an initiative of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), member of the World Bank Group, to stimulate sustainable private sector investment in developing countries. Financial institutions that adopt these principles are bound to evaluate and consider environmental and social risks of the projects they finance in developing countries and, therefore, to lend only to those who show the proper administration of its social and environmental impacts such as biodiversity protection, use of renewable resources and waste management, protection of human health, and population movements.

 

In this context, Exar established from the beginning that the Equator Principles will be the minimum standards for developing the Project, taking the following measures:

 

 

2 EP: Credit risk management framework for determining, assessing and managing environmental and social risk in Project Finance transactions.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 328 of 427

 

 

 

·Make the effort to understand and respect local customs, traditions, lifestyles, and needs.

  

·Commit to meet the country standards.

 

·Establish safety procedures for its own staff, consultants, and contractors.

 

·A FPIC (Free and Prior Informed Consent) shall be granted, thereby respecting the rights of nearby communities to access information. The two-way open communication will be kept permanently, and before each stage of the Project is initialized, nearby communities will receive the required information to participate.

 

·If relationships with communities are formalized through agreements that define roles and responsibilities, they may be used to reduce the risk of misunderstandings relative to the presence, activities, and intentions of Exar in the area.

 

Indigenous and Tribal Peoples' Rights: As defined in the ILO (International Labour Organization3), will be ratified and will respect the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples' Convention, 1989 (No. 169).

 

Exar commits to maintain a contract registration, records of all the meetings with communities and reports relating to negotiations with property owners.

 

The team responsible of keeping the proper community relationships will manage this process through specific programs and the CEO of Exar will be informed regularly and directly about them.

 

20.3Environmental Studies

 

20.3.1Executive Summary

  

Environmental studies for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project include detailed baseline data collection on climate, water quality, air quality, noise levels, flora and fauna, soil conditions, and cultural heritage. Monitoring programs, frequently with community participation, and mitigation measures have ensured compliance with regulatory requirements and sustained ecological stability. Key impacts have been identified and effectively mitigated, aligning with both local laws and international standards, summarized in Table 20.1.

 

 

3 ILO: International organization responsible for drawing up and overseeing international labour standards.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 329 of 427

 

 

 

Table 20.1
Summary of Key Monitoring Parameters
Parameter Key Findings Mitigation Measures Measurable
Outcomes/Success
Criteria
Climate Seasonal temperatures range from -6.6°C to 15.6°C. Strong winds exceeding 43 m/s noted. Wind-resistant infrastructure design. Infrastructure remains operational during extreme weather events.
Water Quality Stable groundwater quality; natural boron exceedances in some surface water. Advanced effluent treatment and water management plans. Compliance with Argentine water quality standards; reduced boron levels in key areas.
Air Quality PM10 and other pollutants within permissible limits. Dust suppression measures and vehicle maintenance. Sustained PM10 levels below regulatory thresholds.
Flora & Fauna Stable species richness and diversity; vicuña and Andean flamingo populations stable. Habitat restoration and seasonal operational adjustments. Monitoring shows no decline in key species populations.
Soil Quality Unsuitable for agriculture; slight improvements in organic content noted. Topsoil reuse and restricted access to sensitive areas. Enhanced soil organic matter in rehabilitated zones.
Cultural Heritage 52 archaeological sites identified, with mitigation plans implemented. Archaeological monitoring and preservation agreements. No significant disturbances to identified heritage sites.

 

20.3.2Objective

 

This section outlines the environmental baseline studies, assessments, and ongoing environmental management practices for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project. The framework adheres to Argentinean provincial and national environmental standards and aligns with international best practices, including the Equator Principles.

 

Geology and geomorphology, hydrogeology, and hydrology are covered in Sections 7.3 to 7.5, Section 7.6 and Section 7.5.4 respectively.

 

20.3.3Baseline Studies

 

20.3.3.1Sources of Baseline Data

 

Environmental and social baseline data were compiled through extensive studies commissioned by Exar. Initial studies were conducted between 2010 and 2011, with regular updates and quarterly participatory monitoring from 2017 to 2024. Environmental Impacts Reports (EIRs) have been periodically updated and approved to account for evolving Project layouts and operational changes.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 330 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.3.2Methods Used for Data Collection

 

20.3.3.2.1 Climate Monitoring

 

Climate data have been collected from several key weather stations installed at different stages of the Project:

 

·Vaisala Station (2010): Located south of the current camp, this station recorded temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind speeds, and evaporation data.

 

·Davis Weather Station (2018): Installed 300 meters northwest of the current camp, it enhanced local climate monitoring capabilities by providing real-time meteorological updates.

 

·Campbell Station (2024): Recently installed north of the Cauchari-Olaroz basin, this station expanded coverage to capture climate variations across the northern part of the Project area.

 

20.3.3.2.2 Water Sampling

 

Surface and groundwater sampling was conducted at key locations, including:

 

·Vega de Archibarca (Surface water).

·Vega de Olaroz Chico (Surface water).

·Casa de Guardaparque (Surface water).

·Industrial water well in the Archibarca Fan (Groundwater).

 

Analytical results were evaluated against:

 

·Water Quality Reference Levels (Niveles Guía de Calidad de Agua) under Argentina's National Law No. 24,585 Annex IV.

 

·Argentine Food Code (2010) for permissible levels in potable water.

 

20.3.3.2.3 Air Quality and Noise Monitoring

 

Baseline air quality campaigns (2012) and subsequent quarterly monitoring since 2017 measured pollutants such as PM10, CO, SO2, NO2, O3, and H2S. Monitoring complies with:

 

·National Law No. 24,585/95 (Mining Legal Framework).

 

·Provincial Decree No. 5,772/10 (Table 8, Air Quality Guide Levels) under Provincial Law No. 5,063/98(General Environmental Law).

 

Noise measurements align with the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline limits for Equivalent Continuous Sound Level (Leq) of 70 dB(A) for industrial areas. Comparisons over multiple campaigns indicate gradual reductions in ambient noise levels at some monitoring points.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 331 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.3.2.4 Flora Data Collection

 

Vegetation was surveyed through fieldwork and permanent monitoring plots in the project area, focusing on shrub steppes, wetlands, and barren areas. Species richness and diversity were quantified using the Shannon Index. Vegetation monitoring expanded in 2017 to assess changes in plant communities during construction and operation phases. Recent comparative studies highlight increased vegetation stability in disturbed areas due to restoration efforts.

 

20.3.3.2.5 Fauna Data Collection

 

Baseline studies identified 57 species through direct observation and monitoring. Specific attention was given to vicuñas, flamingos, and other species of conservation concern. Long-term monitoring reveals stable vicuña populations and improved Andean flamingo numbers, particularly around Vega Olaroz Chico.

 

20.3.3.2.6 Limnology Data Collection

 

Sampling in 2011 analyzed phytoplankton, zooplankton, and benthic communities in nutrient-rich, high-salinity water bodies near the Project. Ongoing quarterly monitoring tracks seasonal changes and evaluates the adaptive capacity of aquatic species in stressed environments. Comparative data from 2024 suggest a consistent dominance of diatom species and limited temporal fluctuations in species composition.

 

20.3.3.2.7 Soil Assessment

 

Soil profiles were characterized using satellite images, on-site surveys, and soil sampling. Analytical results were compared with:

 

·Annex V of Provincial Decree No. 5,772/10, which outlines guidance levels for soil quality under Provincial Law No. 5,063/98.

 

·Eight soil units were identified and classified based on their limitations for agricultural use (Classes VII and VIII) under USDA Soil Taxonomy guidelines.

 

20.3.3.2.8 Cultural and Archaeological Studies

 

Surveys identified 52 archaeological sites across five Project sectors, with sensitivity categorized based on potential impacts. These studies comply with Provincial Law No. 4,133/84 and National Law No. 25,743/03, which regulate the protection of archaeological and paleontological heritage.

 

20.3.3.3Results

 

20.3.3.3.1 Climate

 

·Average annual temperature: 5.1°C.

·Seasonal temperature range: -6.6°C to 15.6°C, with extremes from -17.9°C to 25.9°C.

·Annual average precipitation: 50 mm, concentrated between November and March.

·Average wind speeds: 5.0–10.0 m/s, with peaks exceeding 43.0 m/s during warmer months.

·Weather data confirm consistent seasonal trends and highlight extreme weather conditions such as strong westerly winds, impacting Project design and planning.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 332 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.3.3.2 Water Quality

 

·Quarterly follow-up campaigns since 2017 confirmed stable water quality conditions.

·For surface water, natural concentrations of aluminum, boron, and iron exceed permissible limits for drinking water.

·Groundwater samples showed acceptable values for most parameters, except for boron, which exceeds reference levels due to regional lithology. Trends from "Comparativas" sections show slight reductions in boron concentrations in certain surface water points.

 

20.3.3.3.3 Air Quality

 

·Measurements of PM10, SO2, NO2, O3, and H2S fall within permissible limits per provincial guidelines.

·Recent campaigns note reductions in PM10 levels at Vega Alegría and Vega Archibarca, consistent with stricter dust control measures.

 

20.3.3.3.4 Flora

 

·Vegetation in the Project area falls within the Puna and High Andes eco-regions, comprising units such as shrub steppe, Festuca and Sporobolus grasslands, barren areas, and wetlands.

·The shrub steppe exhibits the highest species richness. Monitoring from 2017 to 2024 indicates no significant changes to plant diversity or stability since 2011.

·Comparative findings in restoration zones highlight increased species richness.

 

20.3.3.3.5 Fauna

 

·Fauna surveys recorded 57 species, including mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians.

·Notable species include the vicuña, categorized as "Least Concern" by IUCN, and the Andean flamingo, which is "Vulnerable."

·Trends show slight increases in wetland bird populations and improved habitat quality.

 

20.3.3.3.6 Limnology

 

·Baseline studies identified nutrient-rich water bodies, supported by high concentrations of phytoplankton and benthic diatoms.

·Extreme salinity and hydrological stress limit biodiversity to specialized organisms adapted to these conditions.

·Seasonal phytoplankton blooms observed correlate with increased water temperatures.

 

20.3.3.3.7 Soil

 

·Soils classified as Classes VII and VIII, unsuitable for agriculture but viable for extensive livestock grazing and tourism.

·Comparative data indicate slight improvements in soil organic matter content at restoration sites.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 333 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.3.3.8 Ecosystem Characterization

 

·The Project area has a low diversity although there are some zones within it that are more diverse than others, such as shrub steppes and meadows, the Archibarca cone being the zone with the greatest biodiversity within the Project area.

 

·Follow up fauna and flora monitoring campaigns were carried out around the pilot plant in March 2015 and in October 2016 and quarterly monitoring during 2017 up to 2024. Diversity results indicate that there is no significant change in the diversity parameters.

 

20.3.3.3.9 Cultural Heritage

 

·52 archaeological sites identified; West and Centre West sectors exhibit medium-to-high sensitivity.

·Archaeological sites CV02, CV08, CV09, CV10, and CV26 possess high sensitivity (IIA, 2012).

·No significant paleontological findings, though precautionary measures are implemented for future activities.

 

20.3.3.3.10Landscape

 

In general, the fragility and visual quality of the landscape around the Project have values ranging from medium-high to medium-low, with the Cauchari-Olaroz Salt Flats landscape unit having the highest visual quality and fragility value.

 

20.3.3.4Relevant Findings Affecting the Project

 

20.3.3.4.1 Climate

 

Extreme conditions, including high winds and significant seasonal temperature variability, influence operational planning and infrastructure design. The Project's infrastructure accounts for strong westerly winds, frequently exceeding 43.0 m/s during warmer months.

 

20.3.3.4.2 Water Quality

 

Natural exceedances of aluminum, boron, and iron in surface waters necessitate robust water management strategies. Groundwater boron levels consistently exceed reference levels due to regional lithology. Trends show reductions in boron concentrations in some surface water points.

 

20.3.3.4.3 Air Quality

 

Air quality monitoring shows that PM10 and other pollutants remain within permissible limits. Dust control measures implemented since 2020 have contributed to reduced particulate matter concentrations.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 334 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.3.4.4 Flora

 

Stable vegetation diversity aligns with conservation objectives, with no significant disturbances to plant communities during the monitoring period. Trends from 2017 to 2024 highlight vegetation recovery in disturbed areas.

 

20.3.3.4.5 Fauna

 

The area supports a stable population of species such as vicuñas and Andean flamingos. Comparative data highlight improving habitat conditions for flamingos in specific wetland zones.

 

The Project area is within the Cauchari - Olaroz Flora and Fauna Reserve, created in October 1981, one of principal aims of which is the recovery of the vicuña. Because of this protection and local, national and international conservation programs, information from the 2008 National Census indicated that the population size has been restored. As a result, based on International Union for Conservation of Nature (“IUCN”) criteria, vicuñas (Figure 20.1) have been considered as a Least Concern (“LC”) species since 2008.

 

Figure 20.1      Vicuñas (Vicugna Vicugna) on Shrub Steppe of Archibarca Cone

 

Source: Ausenco (2017)

  

20.3.3.4.6 Limnology

 

Nutrient-rich, high-salinity water bodies sustain specialized communities of aquatic organisms. Seasonal monitoring confirms these ecosystems remain stable despite environmental stresses.

 

20.3.3.4.7 Soil

 

The Project's soils are classified as Classes VII and VIII, with inherent limitations for agricultural use. Improvements in organic content were noted in rehabilitated areas.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 335 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.3.4.8 Ecosystem Characterization

 

Due to the low intensity of sampling conducted at the new site where the Project will be located, it is recommended that the monitoring frequency be increased at the new sites.

 

20.3.3.4.9 Cultural Heritage

 

Medium-to-high sensitivity archaeological sites in the West and Centre West sectors require specific mitigation measures during construction and operational phases. The protection of identified cultural heritage resources aligns with national and provincial regulations.

 

20.3.3.4.10 Landscape

 

Protection, correction, or mitigation of environmental impacts on the landscape, which will decrease the impact of future extractive activities, is required to preserve the current morphology of the landscape, chromatic variation, landscape perspectives as well as the preservation of the natural ecosystem. This has been covered within the context of the Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation and is especially pertinent with respect to the height of the salt heaps and visibility of the ponds from the national and provincial roads.

 

20.3.4Environmental Impacts

 

This section builds on the environmental baseline studies outlined in the previous section, detailing the identified impacts, associated mitigation strategies, and main infrastructure elements or activities driving these impacts. The analysis aligns with provincial and national regulations and incorporates findings from ongoing Environmental Impact Assessment Updates (2023-2025) provided by Exar.

 

20.3.4.1Major Sources of Impacts

 

The general arrangement of the facilities for the 40,000 tpa Li2CO3 Project is shown in Figure 20.2. Production at this rate is scheduled to be reached in January 2025.

 

The Project generates salts and liquid wastes during the process, mainly brines, which do not represent a contamination risk. These liquid wastes are sent to evaporation ponds, but the Project does not require a tailings dam.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 336 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 20.2      General Arrangement of the Project Facilities 

Source: Exar (2024)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 337 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.4.1.1 Pond Solid Wastes

 

The evaporation process in the ponds leaves a considerable quantity of salts on the bottom of the ponds. These salts must be removed (“harvested”) and transported to proximal stockpiles. The quantity of salt to be harvested is approximately 8 million tonnes/year, necessitating the use of mining-type front end loaders and trucks for this purpose. Transportation of harvested salts will be undertaken considering load and haul optimization needs, as well as environmental considerations. It is estimated that the six piles covering an area of approximately 740 ha will be built over a 40-year period and these piles will be built at an estimated average distance of about 2.3 km east and north of the pond sector. The salt piles will average 10 m in height for the two that are to be built on the salt flat surface and averaging 15 m in height for the four that will be built on soil.

 

A further 340,000 tonnes/year of harvested salts will be generated from the plant process which will be stored in separate piles that will be equally environmentally inert.

 

The harvested salts can be considered as an environmentally inert waste. The salts are generated from brines already present in the salt flat and do not introduce foreign compounds to it. They are composed essentially of sodium chloride (common salt), potassium chloride, sodium and calcium sulphates, magnesium hydroxide and boron. It is estimated that sodium chloride and sulphate make up over 87% of these harvested salts.

 

20.3.4.1.2 Pond Liquid Wastes

 

The evaporation process in solar pools begins with a pre-concentration stage, where almost 90% of the sodium chloride (halite) crystallizes. In this pre-concentration stage, the volume of brine is reduced by between 70 and 80%, depending on its composition. 50% of the sulfate found in the brine is also extracted during pre-concentration. Pre-concentration of the brine requires 874 ha of ponds.

 

The next stage, called liming, is aimed at eliminating the magnesium (Mg) present in the pre-concentrated brine, by means of the controlled precipitation of magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2), through the addition of calcium hydroxide (lime). The liquids produced in this process are returned to the concentration ponds.

 

The concentration of the brine is done through a series of ponds: halite ponds, silvinite ponds, control ponds and lithium ponds A further 312 ha are required for these ponds (Figure 20.3).

 

These ponds are all part of the production process and are lined with HDPE geomembrane to contain the brine produced from the wellfield. The contents of these ponds do not represent any risk to the environment from the perspective of the chemistry of their contents.

 

The final liquor produced from this evaporative process is fed into the plant.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 338 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 20.3      General Arrangement of the Project Facilities 

 

Source: Burga et al. (2020)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 339 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.4.1.3 Plant Industrial Liquid Wastes

 

Several possible sites for the evaporation ponds for the plant’s industrial liquid wastes were analyzed. A location close to the new site selected for the plant on the salt flat was chosen and which presents no risks to populated areas. A total of 50 ha is required for this purpose which includes two industrial liquid residue (“RILES”) ponds and three mother liquor ponds. The main solutions that will be sent to the RILES ponds are the lower concentration filtrate from the lithium carbonation stage and the different stages of impurity removal. These solutions will be confined in the RILES ponds from where they will be used for the preparation of reagents or recirculated into other stages of the process. The higher concentration filtrate of the carbonation stage will be stored in the mother liquor ponds, which is a purified brine of low lithium content with the objective of concentrating its lithium content by solar evaporation and its recirculation into the process.

 

20.3.4.2Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures

 

Table 20.2 provides a summary of the main environmental impacts and mitigation measures for the Project.

 

Table 20.2
Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Category Main
Infrastructure /
Activities
Key Impacts
Identified
Mitigation
Measures
Effectiveness
Air Quality Construction of Process Plant, vehicular movement, and material stockpiling. Elevated PM10 levels during specific periods; localized CO exceedances at CIO in 2017. Dust suppression measures, improved vehicular maintenance. Reduced PM10 levels at key sites; overall compliance with air quality standards.
Noise Levels Heavy machinery operations, construction activities, and transportation. Noise peaks near Process Plant during construction; seasonal fluctuations in noise levels. Adjusted operational schedules, installation of noise barriers. Noise levels remain within permissible limits with few exceptions during peak activities.
Soil Quality Construction of evaporation ponds, storage areas for salts and process residues. Stable heavy metal levels; localized natural boron variations in vegas. Restricted access to sensitive areas, topsoil reuse for rehabilitation. Soil conditions consistent with baseline findings; no significant deviations noted.
Water Quality Use of industrial water wells, effluent discharge from camps and operational areas. Naturally high boron and arsenic levels; stable groundwater quality. Advanced effluent treatment, localized water management systems. Water quality impacts effectively mitigated; trends consistent with baseline data.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 340 of 427

 

 

 

Table 20.2
Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Category Main
Infrastructure /
Activities
Key Impacts
Identified
Mitigation
Measures
Effectiveness
Limnology Construction and operation of evaporation ponds; water discharge into natural basins. Seasonal changes in phytoplankton and benthic communities; dominance of diatom species in high-salinity waters. Quarterly monitoring of aquatic ecosystems; adaptive management strategies for stressed environments. Ecosystems remain stable with no significant biodiversity loss; diatoms dominate as expected in saline conditions.
Flora and Fauna Land clearance for facilities, increased human presence, and vehicular traffic. Stable species richness and diversity; no significant deviations from baseline findings. Habitat restoration projects, seasonal adjustments to operational schedules. Biodiversity preserved with stable populations of key species like vicuñas and Andean flamingos.
Waste Management Generation of industrial waste, storage and disposal of solid and liquid residues. Effective segregation and recycling; consistent effluent treatment meeting regulatory standards. Enhanced recycling programs, compliance with provincial waste management guidelines. Waste management measures have minimized contamination risks effectively.
Archaeology Land clearance for new facilities and road construction. Potential disturbance to 52 identified archaeological sites, including high-sensitivity sites (CV02, CV08). Archaeological monitoring, restricted access, and preservation plans. No significant impacts recorded; all high-sensitivity sites protected during operations.

Landscape Large-scale construction activities, including evaporation ponds and salt heaps. Visual intrusion and changes to the natural topography, especially from provincial and national roads. Visual mitigation measures, including vegetation buffers and alignment with landscape management plans. Changes minimized; ongoing restoration efforts support landscape integration.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 341 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.4.3Key Observations

 

The impacts observed align closely with baseline data and have been mitigated effectively through current strategies. Each mitigation measure demonstrates alignment with both regulatory requirements and international best practices.

 

Archaeological protection measures have been successfully implemented, ensuring no significant disturbances to sensitive sites.

 

Visual impact mitigation strategies have reduced the Project's footprint on the natural landscape, aligning with community and environmental expectations.

 

20.3.4.4Conclusions

 

Environmental impacts at the Cauchari-Olaroz Project appear to have been effectively identified and are being successfully mitigated.

 

20.3.5Monitoring Programs

 

20.3.5.1Ongoing Environmental Monitoring Data

 

The Cauchari-Olaroz Project maintains robust monitoring programs to ensure compliance with environmental standards and to detect trends in key parameters.

 

20.3.5.1.1 Groundwater Quality

 

Quarterly sampling from industrial wells and natural basins monitors parameters such as boron and arsenic, which are naturally elevated due to regional lithology.

 

20.3.5.1.2 Biodiversity

 

Seasonal surveys track populations of vicuñas, Andean flamingos, and other species to ensure habitat stability.

 

20.3.5.2Trends and Compliance with Environmental Standards

 

20.3.5.2.1 Air Quality

 

Monitoring data confirm that PM10 levels have reduced since implementing advanced dust suppression techniques in 2020. Noise levels remain within permissible limits, with exceptions addressed by adjusting operations.

 

20.3.5.2.2 Water Quality

 

Data reveal consistent groundwater quality trends, with effective mitigation measures keeping parameters within regulatory limits. Limnological studies show stable aquatic ecosystems.

 

20.3.5.2.3 Biodiversity

 

Monitoring confirms stable populations of key species, with positive trends in restored habitats.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 342 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.6Environmental Management Plan

 

20.3.6.1Purpose of the EMP

 

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) sets out in detail the measures to be implemented both in the medium and long term to prevent the negative effects or impacts generated by the Project on physical, biotic and social factors.

 

The actions that Exar will implement through the EMP are designed to ensure that activities are carried out in an environmentally responsible and sustainable manner during the construction, operation, closure, and post-closure phases. The EMP aims to prevent, control, and reduce the negative impacts of the Projects activities.

 

Preventing impacts involves the introduction of protective, corrective, or compensatory measures. These measures may include modifications to location, technology, size, design, or materials, based on project forecasts or the incorporation of new elements.

 

The Environmental Management Plan is a dynamic document that will be updated with each biannual renewal of the IIA for Exploitation, in accordance with legislation. This approach allows for the inclusion of previously unaccounted aspects or adjustments to address relevant changes throughout the life of the Project. These plans provide a structured approach to achieving sustainable operations.

 

20.3.6.2Key Components of the EMP

 

20.3.6.2.1 Air Quality Management

 

Reduction of emissions through improved vehicle maintenance.

 

Dust suppression measures, such as wetting roads and stockpiles.

 

20.3.6.2.2 Water Management

 

Protection of surface and groundwater quality through advanced treatment systems.

 

Strategies for water reuse and controlled discharge to minimize impact on aquatic ecosystems.

 

20.3.6.2.3 Waste Management

 

Handling, storage, and disposal of mine waste in compliance with provincial guidelines.

 

20.3.6.2.4 Biodiversity and Habitat Management

 

Conservation strategies include habitat restoration in disturbed areas and monitoring programs for sensitive species.

 

20.3.6.2.5 Noise and Vibration Control

 

Noise barriers and adjusted operational schedules mitigate impacts on nearby communities and wildlife.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 343 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.6.2.6 Emergency Response Plans

 

Comprehensive procedures for managing environmental incidents, including infrastructure failures and chemical spills have been implemented.

 

20.3.6.3Compliance with Regulations and Standards

 

Table 20.3 identifies the Project’s compliance framework.

 

Table 20.3
Compliance with Regulations and Standards
Framework/Standard Description Implementation Status
Equator Principles Global environmental and social risk management framework ensuring responsible project financing. Fully aligned.
United Nations SDG 2030 Goals Measures contributions to sustainable development goals through annual sustainability reporting. Fully integrated into sustainability reporting.
Argentine Global Compact Network Adheres to the principles of the United Nations Global Compact, including progress reporting. Formally joined in 2022, with progress reporting initiated.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Prepares annual sustainability reports in conformity with GRI standards for transparency and accountability. Fully compliant.

ISO 14001

(Environmental Management)

Provides tools for identifying and managing environmental risks, ensuring protection and sustainability. Implementation initiated in 2020; ongoing progress.

ISO 26000

(Social Responsibility)

Aligns with seven core subjects to address social responsibility effectively. Integrated into corporate practices and sustainability reporting.
Towards Sustainable Mining (HMS) An international standard promoting responsible and transparent mining practices. Four of eight protocols implemented as of 2022.

Source: Exar Sustainability Report, 2022

 

Exar ensures that the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) aligns with these frameworks and standards to uphold local, national, and international compliance. Regular audits and sustainability reviews further validate the companys adherence to these principles.

 

20.3.6.4Monitoring and Reporting

 

Ongoing environmental monitoring programs, frequently with community participation, track key parameters such as air and water quality, biodiversity, and waste management. These activities align with the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards, ensuring transparency and consistency in reporting. Data collected from quarterly and biannual campaigns are not only submitted to provincial authorities and stakeholders but also integrated into the companys annual sustainability reports. Exars adherence to the Argentine Global Compact Network includes submitting regular progress updates on sustainability principles, further embedding accountability within its monitoring framework.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 344 of 427

 

 

 

20.3.6.5Adaptive Management and Continuous Improvement

 

The EMP is regularly updated to incorporate new data, monitoring results, and regulatory changes. Exar employs dynamic management tools such as the "Towards Sustainable Mining (HMS)" program and ISO 26000 guidelines to refine strategies and address emerging challenges. This approach ensures the Plan remains effective while reflecting evolving Project requirements, stakeholder expectations, and environmental conditions. Continuous alignment with global frameworks like the SDG 2030 Goals and ISO certifications underscores the companys commitment to improvement and sustainable operations.

 

20.3.6.6Conclusion

 

The monitoring programs and EMP collectively align the Cauchari-Olaroz Project with the Argentine and Jujuy regulatory framework and international best-practice environmental stewardship.

 

20.4Permitting

 

20.4.1Executive Summary

 

Permitting processes for the Project are governed by Argentina’s national and provincial laws, with oversight from the Jujuy provincial government. Recent updates under Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023 have modernized permitting standards, including enhanced consultation protocols and mandatory financial assurances for closure. The Project’s permits for exploration and exploitation activities are in full compliance, with biannual updates submitted as required. Table 20.4 identifies the key permitting milestones.

 

Table 20.4
Summary of Key Permitting Milestones
Permit Type

Date

Approved

Key

Updates

Exploration August 2009 (initial) Regular biannual updates reflecting new activities.
Exploitation

November 2012

(initial)

Expanded production capacity and operational adjustments.
Water Use

December 2020

(160 L/s)

Permanent concession granted; additional permits pending.

 

20.4.2Legal Framework

 

The legislative context for exploration and exploitation environmental permits for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project is defined by Argentina's national and provincial mining and environmental laws. At the national level, Law No. 24,585, known as the Environmental Protection for Mining Activities Act, provides the framework for assessing and managing environmental impacts associated with mining. This law mandates that mining projects must submit an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before commencing activities, and it ensures the application of stringent environmental protection measures throughout the lifecycle of a project.

 

Natural resources are under the jurisdiction of the provinces as per the Argentinean National Constitution. While the Mining Code is enacted by the National Congress, permitting and jurisdictional authority resides with the provincial governments. Consequently, the Province of Jujuy holds the authority for significant permits concerning the construction and operation of the Project.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 345 of 427

 

 

 

20.4.2.1Permits for Exploration

 

Exploration permits require the submission of an Environmental Impacts Report (“IIA”), which details the scope of proposed exploration activities and their potential environmental impacts. The Provincial Government of Jujuy, through the Mining and Energy Resource Directorate, reviews and approves these reports. The Directorate coordinates with other provincial offices, such as the Provincial Directorate of Water Resources and the Environmental Ministry, to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. These permits require biannual updates.

 

20.4.2.2Permits for Exploitation

 

Exploitation permits build upon the exploration phase by requiring a more detailed Environmental Impacts Report (“DIA”), which must address long-term operational and environmental management plans. The approval process involves multiple provincial entities, including the Environmental Ministry and the Secretariat of Tourism and Culture, which oversees permits for activities in areas of archaeological or paleontological interest. These permits require biannual updates to reflect changes in project design, such as expansions in production capacity or relocation of key facilities.

 

20.4.2.3Recent Legislation Updates

 

On February 11, 2023, the Provincial Executive Government of Jujuy issued Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023 (the "Decree"), which regulates the General Environmental Law No. 5063 and comprehensively updates provincial environmental protection norms for mining activities. This Decree replaces Decree No. 5,772/2010, previously governing this domain.

 

The Decree aims to optimize and modernize the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process for mining projects to foster investment opportunities, environmental protection, and social development, particularly for lithium extraction projects.

 

Key aspects of the Decree are detailed in Table 20.5.

 

Table 20.5
Key Aspects of Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023
Key Aspect Details
Exclusions Activities related to hydrocarbon extraction, ancillary works outside concession areas, and industrial plants over 100 km from deposits are excluded.
Responsible Authorities The Ministry of Economic Development and Production of Jujuy, in coordination with the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, enforces the Decree.
UGAMP's Role The Provincial Mining Environmental Management Unit (UGAMP) advises the Provincial Directorate of Mining on Environmental Impact Reports.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 346 of 427

 

 

 

Table 20.5
Key Aspects of Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023
Key Aspect Details
Categorization Mining projects are classified into five categories: (i) social mining, (ii) initial prospecting/exploration, (iii) advanced exploration, (iv) small-scale exploitation, (v) medium- and large-scale exploitation.
Review Deadlines EIAs evaluation timeframes: 40 days for initial exploration, four months for advanced exploration and small-scale exploitation, six months for medium- and large-scale exploitation.
Validity of DIAs Declarations of Environmental Impact (DIAs) are valid for two years and require updates thereafter.
Consultation Processes EIAs must include consultations with indigenous communities and surface owners within the area of direct influence, alongside a public consultation process via the Provincial Directorate of Mining's website.
Mine Closure Standards Mandatory minimum guidelines for mine closure processes are established.
Sanctions Incremental penalties for non-compliance include warnings, fines, temporary closures, and operator disqualification.
Environmental Violations Registry A Provincial Registry of Environmental Mining Violators is created to track infractions and recurrences, issue certifications, and share information with other provincial departments.

 

20.4.3Framework Legal Study

 

The permitting process for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project has been supported by a comprehensive legal framework study carried out early in the exploration phase. This study encompassed international, national, and provincial norms and standards relevant to the environmental and operational aspects of the Project. At the national level, the Environmental Protection Act for Mining Activity No. 24,585 provides the foundational guidelines for environmental management. At the provincial level, Jujuy’s General Environmental Law, recently updated by Decree No. 7,751/2023, details the specific procedures and standards for compliance. This decree, which came into effect on February 17, 2023, replaces Decree No. 5,772/2010. It introduces revised requirements for Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) and refines the stages, requirements, and content of applications for exploration and exploitation permits. The decree also formalizes the interaction with surface rights holders, ensuring a more structured framework for prospection, exploration, and mining activities in the province.

 

The framework legal study ensures that all permitting activities for the Project align with the responsibilities of relevant state institutions, including the Provincial Department of Mines and Energy and the Directorate of Mining.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 347 of 427

 

 

 

20.4.4Exploration Phase Permits for Project

 

The Environmental Impacts Report ("IIA") for the exploration phase of the Cauchari-Olaroz Project was first approved by the Provincial Government of Jujuy (Dirección Provincial de Minería y Recursos Energéticos) under Resolution No. 25/09 on August 26, 2009. Key updates and approvals include:

 

·2011 Update: Resolution No. 29/2012 approved on November 8, 2012, covering activities for the 2012–2013 period.

 

·2014 Addendum: Resolution No. 011/2014 approved on July 15, 2014, for the installation and operation of a pilot lithium phosphate plant.

 

·2017 Update: Resolution No. 008/2017 approved on September 19, 2017, replacing prior updates and encompassing planned exploration activities, including seismic reflection, hydrogeological studies, pond construction, and geochemical sampling.

 

·2020 Update: Approved by Resolution No. 017/2021 on December 17, 2021, reflecting exploration activities conducted from 2019–2021.

 

·2024 Update: Submitted in March 2024, focusing on drilling new brine wells and conducting vertical electrical surveys in the southern Project area; approval is pending.

 

The next biannual update to the IIA for Exploration permit is programmed for 2026.

 

A complete listing of the IAA for Exploitation permits is given in Table 20.6.

 

Table 20.6
Exploration Permits
Report Submitted Date
Approved
Approvals Observations
Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration (IIA Exploration) August 2009 Resolution No. 25/09 Original exploration permit for the Project.
Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration (AIIA Exploration 2011) November 2012 Resolution No. 29/2012 Activities for the 2012–2013 period approved.
Addendum to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration, Posco Pilot Plant July 2014 Resolution No. 011/2014 Pilot lithium phosphate plant installation approved.
Update to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration September 2017 Resolution No. 008/2017 Comprehensive update for exploration activities.
Update to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration 2019 -2021 December 2021 Resolution No. 017/2021 Reflecting ongoing exploration activities, 2019–2021.
Update to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration 2021 - 2023 December 2021 Resolution No. 017/2021 The authorities established that the same approving resolution be maintained in the current bi-annual renewal because the activities in this report correspond to the same ones from the previous renewal.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 348 of 427

 

 

 

Table 20.6
Exploration Permits
Report Submitted Date
Approved
Approvals Observations
Update to Environmental Impacts Report for Exploration 2023 - 2025 March 2024 (submitted) Pending Includes drilling new brine wells and vertical electrical surveys focused on the southern area of the salt flat.

 

20.4.5Exploitation Phase Permits for Project

 

The IIA for exploitation was initially approved under Resolution No. 29/2012 on November 8, 2012, for an annual production of 20,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate. Key updates include:

 

·2017 Biannual Update: Incorporated new environmental studies and increased production in phases, first to 25,000 tpa and then to 40,000 tonnes per year; approved in October 2017.

 

·2023 Biannual Update: A biannual update submitted in March 2023 is under review, with activities detailed for ongoing operations.

 

The next biannual update to the IIA for Exploitation permit is programmed for 2025.

 

A complete listing of the IAA for Exploitation permits is given in Table 20.7.

 

Table 20.7
Exploitation Permits
Report Submitted Date
Approved
Resolution Key Updates
Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation (IIA Exploitation 2011) November 2012 Resolution No. 29/2012 20,000 tpa production capacity.
Biannual Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation (AIIA Exploitation March 2015) March 2015 Update cancelled and filed: DMyRE Note No. 101/2019 Biannual update of the Environmental Impacts Report (AIIA) approved in 2012, based on the same project approved in 2012.
Biannual Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation (AIIA Exploitation February 2017) October 2017 Resolution No. 010/17 Increased production to 25,000 tpa lithium carbonate, with a second expansion to 40,000 tpa, and layout adjustments.
Biannual Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation (AIIA Exploitation 2019) December 2020 Resolution No. 080/2020 Detailed ongoing exploitation activities.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 349 of 427

 

 

  

Table 20.7
Exploitation Permits
Report Submitted Date
Approved
Resolution Key Updates
Biannual Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation (AIIA Exploitation 2021) March 2022 (submitted) Pending Initially included modifications for an expansion of production. This expansion request was subsequently retracted by the company, leaving the AIIA Exploitation 2021 activities as per AIIA Exploitation 2019.
Biannual Environmental Impacts Report for Exploitation (AIIA Exploitation 2023) December 2023 (submitted) Pending The AIIA 2023 was presented to respect the bi-annual submission requirement, although the authority has not issued a permit for the previous (AIIA Exploitation 2021) report. Changes were added that are intended to be made with respect to ponds and the harvesting of salts.

 

20.4.6Water Permits

 

·A Water Use Permit was issued for 45 L/s for exploration purposes.

 

·A Permanent Water Concession was granted for 160 L/s from the Rosario River area for the exploitation phase was granted.

 

·A Permanent Water Concession for a further 160 L/s from the south of the basin, for the exploitation phase, is currently under evaluation.

 

·Fees for water extraction from brackish sources have been paid through 2023, with annual renewals ongoing.

 

A complete listing of the water permits and concessions is given in Table 20.8.

  

Table 20.8
Industrial Water Permits and Concessions for Cauchari-Olaroz Project
Report
Submitted
Date
Submitted
Date
Approved
Validity Term Observations
Water Use Permit (45 l/s) December 2017 06 June 2020 Exploration 25 l/s from PBI well, and 20 l/s from 3 wells near Rosario River
Permanent Water Concession (160 l/s) NORTH December 2020 28 December 2020 40 years 160 l/s from 6 to 8 wells near Rosario River
Permanent Water Concession (160 l/s) SOUTH March 2024 Pending 40 Years The provincial water resources department (DPRH) granted authorization to drill exploration wells in the south of the basin. After drilling the wells, and with the results obtained from the tests, DPRH will have to be notified again to complete the permit requirements and obtain the permit to use this industrial water.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 350 of 427

 

 

 

20.4.7Provincial Regulations

 

Jujuy’s environmental permitting processes are governed by the recently updated General Environmental Law No. 5063, as regulated by Decree No. 7,751/2023. This decree replaces the earlier Decree No. 5,772/2010 and modernizes the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) requirements for mining activities. Key updates include:

 

·Expanded Authority: The Ministry of Economic Development and Production of Jujuy, in coordination with the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change, now oversees the permitting process.

 

·Categorization of Projects: Mining projects are classified into five categories, ranging from social mining to large-scale exploitation, with differentiated EIA requirements and review timelines.

 

·Consultation Requirements: EIA procedures now mandate consultations with indigenous communities and surface rights holders in the direct area of influence, alongside public consultations via the Provincial Directorate of Mining's online platform.

 

·Mine Closure Standards: The decree establishes minimum mandatory guidelines for mine closure and reclamation processes.

 

Additionally, mining projects within the Cauchari-Olaroz Salar must adhere to its designation as a Protected Area for Multiple Use, requiring permits for activities that may affect archaeological or paleontological resources.

 

20.4.8Compliance Documentation

 

All permits align with local, regional, and national regulations:

 

·Regular environmental monitoring ensures compliance with provincial standards for air, water, and soil quality, as established under relevant laws.

 

·Quarterly participatory monitoring programs validate adherence to environmental baselines, with documented updates presented to regulatory authorities.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 351 of 427

 

 

 

20.4.9Permit Risks

 

Potential risks to operations include:

 

· Approval Delays: Pending updates for the 2024 Exploration and 2023 Exploitation IIAs could impact the initiation of planned activities.

 

·Regulatory Changes: Changes in provincial or national mining laws necessitate adjustments to compliance strategies. The recent introduction of Decree No. 7,751/2023 highlights a significant shift in regulatory requirements. The Project should assess potential impacts of the updated Environmental Impact Assessment process, including enhanced consultation protocols, and the mandatory mine closure guidelines, and the regulatory response to the latest 2023-2025 AII update, which is aligned with the new decree.

 

20.5Social or Community Impact

 

20.5.1Executive Summary

 

The social impact assessment highlights the Project’s contributions to local economic development, infrastructure improvements, and cultural preservation. Community engagement and consultation processes have been active since 2009, fostering trust and cooperation. The Project has focussed on employment, training, and equitable benefit-sharing while addressing concerns related to resource management and cultural heritage. Table 20.9 identifies the key social impacts for the Project.

 

Table 20.9
Summary of Key Social Impacts
Area Key Impacts Actions Taken Measurable Outcomes/Success Criteria
Employment Direct employment for 700 workers; 1,300 indirect jobs. Local hiring policies and technical training programs. Increased percentage of local workforce participation.
Infrastructure Roads, utilities, and healthcare facilities improved. Investments in community infrastructure. Enhanced community access to healthcare and transportation.
Cultural Heritage Agreements with indigenous groups to safeguard sites. Monitoring and awareness programs. No damage to cultural heritage sites during operations.
Community Engagement Positive perceptions of the Project. Regular consultations and grievance mechanisms. High satisfaction ratings in community feedback surveys.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 352 of 427

 

 

 

20.5.2Social Baseline

 

20.5.2.1Introduction

 

The Olaroz-Cauchari Project, located in the Susques Department of Jujuy Province, Argentina, has undergone significant social and economic changes from its exploration phase in 2011 to the early operational phase in 2024. These shifts are reflected in the 2011 and 2024 Social Baseline Studies, which document the evolving characteristics of the local communities and their interactions with the Project.

 

20.5.2.2Social Characteristics

 

The area of direct influence for the Project includes the communities of Susques (1565 residents), Huáncar (397 residents), Pastos Chicos (150 residents), Puesto Sey (148 residents), Catua (464 residents) and Olaroz Chico (199 residents) based on 2018 data. All these communities are in the department of Susques, Province of Jujuy, with the town of Susques being the head of the Department, located approximately 60 km by road from the Project.

 

The population directly impacted by the Project is mostly rural and self-identifies with the Atacama ethnic group. In general, their settlement patterns and spatial dispersion is based on the camelid’s pasturage activity.

 

Structurally all communities share similar rural characteristics, however, Susques is unique in having urban characteristics such as denser population, national and provincial public institutions, and commercial activity. Commercial activity in Susques is the highest of the Department.

 

The main economic activities in Susques are employment in public administration, trade, small-scale livestock production, craft industries, and small industries related to tourism and mining. Mining-related employment includes direct employment and indirect employment such as transportation, lodging, dining, grocery shopping, vacation homes and offices. The main activities in the rest of the department are mainly related to mining and small-scale livestock (mainly camelid) production.

 

Project Perceptions: In the surveyed communities there is generally a positive perception of the mining industry as it has recently become an economic pillar of the region. For this reason, Exar is very well considered and the Cauchari-Olaroz project is viewed as a possible source of job opportunities for the population in general.

 

The construction phase began in the first half of 2018 and continued through 2021 and generated a peak employment of 3,300 people. It currently employs 700 workers and generates more than 1,300 indirect jobs.

 

A total of 270 people will be required for the operation stage (including administrative, professional, plant, laboratory and maintenance personnel) for an approximate LoM period of 40 years.

 

Preference is given to the surrounding areas of the Project in terms of workforce. Exar has developed a training plan for local staff, in order to meet its commitments on the hiring of local labor given that in the province of Jujuy there is not much knowledge about lithium mining. Exar opened the Ckuri School to help build local technical capacity. 132 candidates from the local communities the provincial capital were enrolled in 2022. Employees are also recruited from areas outside of Jujuy, when employment requirements cannot be met locally.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 353 of 427

 

 

 

There has been an active communication, consultation, and engagement process in place since 2009. Exar has designed and implemented a Community Relations Plan engendering long-term cooperation with the population within the Area of Direct Influence of the Project. The communities have signed a Convention approving all stages of the Project.

 

Among the direct benefits expected from the Project, respondents indicated the following: direct employment on the Project; collaboration of the company in resolving water related issues; and the provision of training. There is a general expectation that the Project will facilitate improvement in infrastructure, health and education.

 

Respondents also explained that approval of the Project by the members of the communities is conditional on measures taken to protect the environment and mitigate the possible social impacts, as well as the Project´s ability to generate a positive contribution to the community.

 

Vehicular Traffic: A traffic study of the area focused on three routes: RN No. 51, RN No. 52 and RP No. 70. Three key intersections of interest for the Project were analyzed.

 

Based on the Average Daily Traffic (“ADT”) results, it was observed that for both national routes the busiest hour of the day is noon; while on Provincial Highway No. 70 there was more traffic in the mornings and evenings. These differences may be related to the purpose for which the roads are used: National Routes are for international transit, while the use of the Provincial Highway is largely related to local inter-urban transit and transit to mining projects in the area.

 

20.5.2.3Demographic Data

 

The demographic profile of the region has remained relatively stable in terms of population size but demonstrates nuanced trends:

 

·Population Size and Growth: In 2011, the Susques Department had a population of approximately 3,791 individuals, with a population density of 0.4 inhabitants per km². By 2024, the population grew to 4,098, reflecting modest growth influenced by mining-related economic opportunities.

 

·Age and Gender Distribution: Both studies highlight a balanced gender distribution. The youth population showed a minor decrease in migration trends, attributed to employment prospects in mining.

 

·Ethnic Composition: Most of the local population identifies as Atacama indigenous people, emphasizing the importance of culturally sensitive engagement practices.

 

The Atacama people maintain a strong connection to their ancestral lands and traditions, including subsistence practices such as camelid herding and small-scale agriculture. This ethnic group is characterized by their communal social structure and rich cultural heritage, which includes weaving, traditional music, and festivals that are integral to their identity.

 

The legal recognition of their communal land rights is supported by both provincial and national frameworks, including Article 75, Clause 17 of the Argentine National Constitution, which guarantees the possession and property rights of indigenous communities, and the Program for Regularization of Indigenous Community Lands in the Province of Jujuy, which has issued decrees recognizing the communal ownership of lands traditionally and publicly occupied by these communities.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 354 of 427

 

 

 

20.5.2.4Economic Conditions

 

The local economy has shifted significantly due to mining activities:

 

·Employment: In 2011, pastoral activities and public sector employment dominated. By 2024, mining emerged as a central employer, directly and indirectly impacting local livelihoods. The Project contributed to increased income levels, although concerns about dependency on mining were noted.

 

·Key Livelihoods: Livestock and small-scale agriculture, significant in 2011, have seen reduced prominence, replaced by mining-related jobs and services.

 

20.5.2.5Social Infrastructure

 

The Project’s impact on infrastructure and services is evident:

 

·Healthcare: The 2024 baseline indicates improved healthcare access, supported by the project’s investments in medical facilities and programs.

 

·Education: Educational infrastructure and access have seen improvements, particularly in technical training related to mining.

 

·Utilities and Transportation: Development of roads and utilities by the Project has enhanced connectivity and service delivery.

 

20.5.2.6Land Use and Ownership

 

·Land Use Patterns: Traditional pastoralism remains, but land use has diversified with industrial development.

 

·Agreements: The Project has entered into various agreements with indigenous communities to address land use, resource management, and cultural preservation. These agreements are summarized in Table 20.10.

 

Table 20.10
Summary of Community Agreements
Community Agreement Description Focus Area Renewal Required?
Puesto Sey Agreement for access and land use for mining infrastructure. Land Ownership Yes, reviewed annually
Pastos Chicos Agreement ensuring compensation for land use and community investment initiatives. Land Ownership No, permanent
Olaroz Chico Long-term agreement covering environmental monitoring and shared resource management. Land Ownership Yes, every 5 years

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 355 of 427

 

 

 

Table 20.10
Summary of Community Agreements
Community Agreement Description Focus Area Renewal Required?
Huancar Framework agreement for local employment and use of communal resources. Land Ownership Yes, every 3 years
Catua Agreement covering water usage and infrastructure development. Land Ownership Yes, annually
Olaroz Chico Agreement for the preservation of sacred sites and rituals, involving regular monitoring. Cultural Heritage Yes, every 5 years
Pastos Chicos Framework for cultural resource management, ensuring no disruption to traditional practices. Cultural Heritage No, permanent
Huancar Collaborative agreement to protect and document cultural landmarks and historical artifacts. Cultural Heritage Yes, every 3 years

 

20.5.2.7Community Attitudes Toward the Project

 

The Project’s relationship with local communities has evolved:

 

·Initial Concerns: In 2011, key concerns included water quality and quantity, cultural preservation, and equitable employment opportunities.

 

·Current Perceptions: By 2024, acceptance of the Project improved, driven by visible economic benefits and effective grievance mechanisms. However, water use remains a sensitive issue.

 

20.5.2.8Vulnerable Groups

 

Vulnerable groups, particularly women and elders in indigenous communities, require ongoing attention to ensure equitable benefit sharing and cultural preservation.

 

20.5.2.9Community Engagement

 

20.5.2.9.1            Stakeholder Engagement Strategies

 

The Project’s stakeholder engagement evolved significantly:

 

·Consultations: Semi-structured interviews, participatory monitoring, and community meetings have been conducted regularly since 2009.

 

·Grievance Mechanisms: A robust grievance redressal system has enhanced transparency and trust.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 356 of 427

 

 

 

20.5.2.9.2            Documentation

 

All engagement activities are well-documented, ensuring accountability and compliance with Argentine legislation, ratified conventions, and international standards as noted in Table 20.11.

 

Table 20.11
Legislation, Conventions, and Standards
Standard Type Specific Standard
National Argentine Environmental Protection Act for Mining Activities (Law No. 24,585).
National General Environmental Law of the Province of Jujuy (Decree No. 5,772-P-2010).
International Equator Principles.
International International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability.
International Indigenous and Tribal Peoples' Convention, 1989 (ILO Convention No. 169).

 

20.5.3Evaluation of Impacts

 

The identification, description and assessment of potential environmental and social impacts, both positive and negative, were performed for the construction, operation and closure stages of the Project.

 

Initially, actions that could cause impacts were identified, and a classification of the environment was made, providing Environmental Units to each of the factors that will be affected by the Project.

 

Subsequently, qualitative and quantitative impacts using the methodology proposed by Conesa Fernández-Vítora (Conesa Fernández-Vítora, 1997) 4 were performed. The evaluation was done for each stage of the Project, including construction, operation and closure.

 

During the construction and operation stages of the Project, there is the potential for moderate impacts to the environment, some of which can be reversed or mitigated in the short, medium and long term. The following are the key potential impacts that were identified:

 

·Change in air quality due to the emission of particles and combustion gases.

 

·Increased noise levels due to the use of equipment, machinery and vehicles, and plant process operations.

 

·Changes in the geomorphology and soils due to evaporation ponds and production facilities.

 

·Change in land use and diversification of land use.

 

 

4 Conesa Fernández-Vítora, V. (1997). Auditorías medioambientales, guía metodológica (2a. ed. re). Madrid: Mundi-Prensa. Retrieved from http://www.sunass.gob.pe/doc/cendoc/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=author_see&id=174

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 357 of 427

 

 

 

·Impact on the brine reservoir and aquifer system in general.

 

·Intensive use of brackish water for mining/industrial use.

 

·Removal of the vegetation for the siting of Project facilities, especially the preconcentration and concentration ponds.

 

·Alteration of wildlife habitat due to reductions of vegetation in some sectors, emission of noise and vibration, and human settlements.

 

·Impact on landscape due to harvested salt dumps.

 

In addition, potential impacts were identified, such as:

 

·Archaeological resources due to the possibility of subsurface findings.

 

·Biological corridor due to the installation of infrastructure in the salt flat.

 

The area of direct influence (ADI) is defined as the physical space where project activities are seen to affect specific social and/or environmental components. The environmental ADI for the Environmental Impact Report for exploitation for the Project is the area comprising the housing camp, evaporation ponds, sector where harvested salts are stored, drill platforms, access roads and other easements where there is a greater likelihood of interaction due to Project actions.

 

The social ADI is the inhabited sectors or those sectors that have communities, such as Puesto Sey, Pastos Chicos, Huáncar, Catua, Olaroz Chico and Susques. These communities are in watersheds different from those of the Salar de Olaroz - Cauchari, except for Olaroz Chico, which is the only community located on the eastern slope of the Olaroz mountains. It is within the territory of these communities that the salt flats and mining properties are located and where the activities related to exploitation will be carried out.

 

The area of indirect influence (AII) is defined as the physical space where an action related to the project activity could influence the social and environmental components. For the Environmental Impact Report for exploitation for the Project, the area that is outside the limits established for the environmental ADI was considered as the environmental AII. It should be clarified that for each of the environmental factors particular areas were considered based on the possibility that effects could manifest. The extent of these areas was defined based on each action that will be implemented.

 

For the social aspects, the rest of the localities of the department of Susques were considered as being the social AII: Jama, El Toro, San Juan de Quillaques and Coranzuli.

 

Should further easements be required for the Project, the areas of influence for the Project could change.

 

The hiring of local labor by the Company will generate a positive impact because a portion of the population will have increased quality of life. This in turn has a positive impact on the local economy. Access to formal employment will have direct (monthly salaries) and indirect (skilled training) benefits that will have immediate and longer-term positive impacts, particularly in terms of increasing employability post completion of contracts/mine closure. Also, local employment contributes towards stopping the phenomenon of youth migration to urban centers in search of better jobs. These effects are also pertinent to the Area of Indirect Influence (personnel coming from other provinces).

 

The procurement of goods and services during Project implementation would involve a stimulus in each of the industries supplying these resources. These effects would occur in the total area of influence of the mining Project.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 358 of 427

 

 

 

20.5.4Social Impact Management

 

The social impact management strategies for the Olaroz-Cauchari Project aim to address the evolving needs of local communities while ensuring that the benefits of the Project are equitably shared. This includes comprehensive studies to understand the Project's impacts, robust monitoring processes to track progress, and targeted investments in critical sectors such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare.

 

Exar has developed a program that promotes social and economic development within a sustainability framework. Exar began work on the Community Relations Program with the Susques Department in 2009. This program was created to integrate local communities into the Project by implementing sub-programs aimed at generating positive impacts on these communities.

 

Susques is the most important commercial center in the area. However, the Program also focused on the Catua, Olaroz Chico, Huancar, Pastos Chicos and Puesto Sey communities.

 

20.5.4.1Community Relations Plan

 

The Community Relations Program has been divided into three key sub-programs. One deals with external and internal communications to provide information and show transparency. The second is a consultation program that allows Exar to acknowledge perceptions of mining activities. A third program deals with execution of contracts with the communities for economic benefits. The most important part of the program is supporting social, cultural and environmental initiatives. The criteria for choosing initiatives are: the initiative should benefit the whole community; it should contribute to sustainable development and be participatory, and it must originate inside the community.

 

It should also be noted that Exar has signed formal contracts with neighboring communities that own the surface rights where the Project will be developed. According to these contracts, the communities grant Exar traffic and other rights, while Exar ensures them a regular cash flow, to be used as the members of the communities decide. The arrangements vary between communities, but they all include the following:

 

·Aggregate payments of approximately US$239,417 per year between 2017-2019.

 

·When construction begins aggregate payments of approximately US$260,000 per year and beyond during construction.

 

·When production begins aggregate payments of approximately US$465,000 per year and beyond during production.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 359 of 427

 

 

 

·Joint environmental monitoring programs.

 

·Priority rights for any job for which a person from the community is qualified.

 

·Training on site to qualify for the job.

 

·A school of business training in each community to assist in setting up businesses for the provision of services during construction.

 

·Individual infrastructure programs in each community.

 

20.5.4.2Studies and Monitoring

 

Table 20.12 summarizes the comprehensive social impact studies and participatory monitoring processes conducted for the Project.

 

Table 20.12
Studies Conducted and Monitoring Processes
Year Process or Study Frequency Key Focus
2011 Initial Social Baseline Study One-time Documented demographic, economic, and cultural characteristics.
2015 Participatory Social Monitoring One-time Highlighted early impacts on local employment and community perceptions.
2017 Quarterly Environmental and Social Monitoring Every 3 months (ongoing) Assessed ongoing environmental and social dynamics.
2018 Participatory Monitoring with Communities Semi-annual (ongoing) Facilitated community involvement in monitoring efforts.
2019 Community Feedback Surveys Annual (ongoing) Gathered community perceptions and satisfaction levels.
2024 Updated Social Baseline Study One-time Assessed changes in demographics, infrastructure, and economic reliance.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 360 of 427

 

 

 

20.5.4.3Social Investments

 

The Project has invested in infrastructure, education, and healthcare initiatives, directly benefiting local communities. These investments are summarized in Table 20.13.

 

Table 20.13
Summary of Community-related Investments
Sector Initiative Impact
Infrastructure Construction of roads and utility networks Improved connectivity and accessibility for local communities
Healthcare Development of medical facilities and programs Enhanced healthcare access, leading to improved community health outcomes
Education Establishment of technical training centers and support for local schools Increased educational opportunities, particularly in mining-related skills

 

20.5.4.4Employment Programs

 

Targeted employment programs, including local hiring policies and skills training, have significantly impacted the socioeconomic fabric of the area.

 

20.5.4.5Cultural Heritage

 

20.5.4.5.1            Impacts

 

While Project activities have the potential to impact cultural heritage sites, mitigation measures have minimized disruptions.

 

20.5.4.5.2            Protective Agreements

 

The Project has established protective agreements with indigenous communities to safeguard cultural heritage sites. These agreements are summarized in Table 20.10 for clarity, included under the Land Use and Ownership Section.

 

20.5.4.5.3            Mitigation Measures

 

Awareness Programs: Education on cultural heritage preservation is part of the Project’s community engagement strategy.

 

20.5.4.6Trends and Changes

 

A comparison of the 2011 and 2024 baselines highlights the following trends:

 

·Economic Transition: The region’s economy has transitioned from primarily agricultural to mining driven.

 

·Social Development: Improvements in infrastructure, education, and healthcare reflect the Project’s positive contributions.

 

·Community Perceptions: Increasing acceptance of the Project is evident, though concerns about resource management persist.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 361 of 427

 

 

 

20.5.4.7Conclusion

 

The Olaroz-Cauchari Project has profoundly influenced the social and economic landscape of its area of influence. Continuous adaptation to community feedback and proactive management of social impacts are crucial for sustaining positive relations and ensuring the long-term success of the Project.

 

20.5.4.8Recommendations

 

To enhance the sustainability and social performance of the Olaroz-Cauchari Project, the following recommendations are proposed:

 

1.Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Metrics: Introduce KPIs to monitor and measure social impact areas such as employment, healthcare, education, and community satisfaction. For example:

 

oEmployment: Percentage of jobs filled by local community members.

 

oHealthcare: Number of medical consultations per 1,000 residents annually.

 

oEducation: Enrollment in technical training programs.

 

oCommunity Perception: Annual satisfaction ratings based on feedback surveys.

 

2.Integration of KPIs: Use existing data collection mechanisms like participatory monitoring and feedback surveys to streamline KPI tracking and reporting.

 

3.Baseline and Targets: Establish baselines from 2011 and 2024 data to set realistic, community-informed targets.

 

4.Reporting and Adaptation: Regularly publish KPI results to communities and stakeholders, adapting strategies based on trends and identified gaps.

 

5.Third-Party Audits: Implement regular third-party audits of the Project's social and environmental programs to ensure accountability, transparency, and continuous improvement.

 

6.Enhanced Community Engagement: Expand participatory processes by incorporating more community members in monitoring and decision-making to increase trust and inclusion.

 

7.Focus on Vulnerable Groups: Develop targeted programs to address the needs of women, elders, and other vulnerable populations within indigenous communities.

 

8.Long-Term Cultural Preservation Plans: Strengthen protective agreements with indigenous communities and formalize long-term strategies to safeguard cultural heritage sites.

 

9.Periodic Impact Assessments: Conduct regular social impact assessments to adapt strategies in response to evolving community dynamics and Project operations.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 362 of 427

 

 

 

20.6Closure and Reclamation Plans

 

Closure and reclamation for the Project have followed legislative requirements and best practice guidance. The legislative requirements for the closure of the Project were outlined in Decree No. 5,772-P-2010 until 17 February 2023, when it was replaced by Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023. This transition introduced more comprehensive and structured guidelines, particularly emphasizing financial assurance and progressive closure measures.

 

All future IIA submissions for the Project are required to comply with the new legislation.

 

20.6.1Key Closure Requirements and Commitments (Pre-2023)

 

Before 2023, the Project developed its strategy for closure based on the following aspects:

 

20.6.1.1Closure Objectives

 

1.The Project’s closure objectives also focused on meeting all regulatory requirements outlined in agreements signed by Exar to achieve the Final Closure of the Project.

 

2.Emphasis was placed on preventing, minimizing, or mitigating negative environmental impacts throughout the closure process.

 

3.The site’s abandonment condition aimed to protect the environment and ensure public safety.

 

4.The closure process aimed to uphold the social license by fostering trust and transparency with affected communities and stakeholders. This included aligning closure activities with social expectations and addressing concerns through proactive engagement with local and indigenous groups.

 

5.Strategies for mine site reclamation and rehabilitation included the removal of roads, the evaporation to dryness of ponds, and the leveling and contouring of pond sites. The physical stability of pond slopes was also established.

 

6.Closure activities were primarily planned for the end of the 40-year Life of Mine (LoM) operation phase, with some activities potentially conducted during operations (progressive closure). This included aligning closure activities with social expectations and addressing concerns through proactive engagement with local and indigenous groups.

 

20.6.1.2Financial Assurance

 

Estimated closure and remediation costs of approximately US$52.7 million were included in the Project's cash flow model to meet environmental and closure obligations outlined in the Informe de Impacto Ambiental (IIA). This ensured compliance, despite the lack of closure bonding or guarantees required under Argentine federal or Jujuy provincial legislation prior to 2023.

 

20.6.1.3Post-Closure Monitoring

 

Post-closure monitoring was planned to continue for about five years following the end of operations, including a two-year period for executing closure activities and an additional three years for environmental monitoring. This approach ensured the Project achieved definitive closure.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 363 of 427

 

 

 

20.6.2New Requirements (Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023)

 

The legislative changes introduced by Decree No. 7,751-DEyP-2023 require the Project to align with a more structured and detailed closure framework:

 

20.6.2.1Closure Objectives

 

1.Closure must include the rehabilitation or repurposing of all areas and infrastructure affected by mining activities, except for those identified as suitable for public or social use by indigenous communities, local municipalities, or the provincial government. Transfers of such areas must comply with environmental criteria evaluated by the Dirección Provincial de Minería or the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change.

 

2.Social objectives must include collaborating with indigenous and local communities to ensure areas and assets can be utilized for social and public benefit where applicable, fostering transparency and trust throughout the closure process.

 

3.Provisions for progressive closure measures must be integrated into the conceptual closure plan to enable rehabilitation during operational phases without disrupting ongoing activities.

 

4.Plans for temporary or premature mine closures must include maintenance and monitoring protocols, with a maximum suspension period of three years unless extended by a formal resolution.

 

20.6.2.2Financial Assurance

 

1.A financial guarantee is mandatory to secure compliance with closure plans, covering direct and indirect closure costs, including contingencies, and adjusted as needed for changes in closure requirements.

 

2.The guarantee's phased implementation includes:

 

o10% of the closure cost during the first year of construction.

 

o20% during the first year of operation.

 

oFull guarantee coverage by the final third of the mine's life or five years before closure, whichever comes sooner.

 

3.Adjustments to financial assurances are required with each update to the closure plan, and partial reductions may be granted for completed closure milestones.

 

20.6.2.3Post-Closure Monitoring

 

1.A mandatory post-closure phase begins after the issuance of a "Certificate of Final Compliance" and extends for a minimum of five years for medium- and large-scale projects. This period may be extended based on environmental needs.

 

2.Annual post-closure reports must document monitoring results, environmental and social trends, and maintenance activities, guiding evaluations of closure objectives and certification issuance.

 

3.Following successful post-closure activities, the financial guarantee is released, and a "Certificate of Final Closure" is issued.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 364 of 427

 

 

 

20.6.3Recommendations

 

1.Align Closure Plan with New Legislation: Update the conceptual closure plan to meet the requirements of Decreto No. 7,751-DEyP-2023.

 

2.Engage Stakeholders Early: Collaborate with indigenous communities, local governments, and relevant authorities to identify potential public or social uses for infrastructure and areas post-mining.

 

3.Strengthen Financial Assurances: Establish and maintain the required financial guarantees.

 

4.Quantify Financial Implications: Compare pre-2023 closure cost estimates with anticipated costs under the new legislation to provide a clearer understanding of financial impacts.

 

5.Enhance Stakeholder Engagement: Ensure ongoing discussions or frameworks are in place to address environmental and social priorities and demonstrate proactive collaboration with affected parties.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 365 of 427

 

 

 

21.0Capital and Operating Cost

 

Capital costs for the Project are based on the total engineering and construction work.

 

All values are expressed in current US dollars; the exchange rate between the Argentine peso were adjusted at the time of the incurred cost. Argentine peso denominated costs followed the exchange rate because of inflation, and the impact of the exchange rate fluctuation on CAPEX and OPEX has been incorporated in the definition of the cost presented in this section; no provision for currency escalation has been included. At the completion of the Project, the CAPEX was consolidated at US$979 million.

 

21.1Capital Costs (CAPEX) Estimate

 

The main objectives for determining the capital costs for the full plant are:

 

·Present the total project CAPEX for investment consolidation purposes.
·Confirm cost of the processes and facilities that are operating during the ramp up period to obtain the best comparison between initial and actual capital costs and operating costs.
·Providing the necessary data for the economic evaluation of the project; and
·Providing guidance for the following production phase.

 

21.1.1Capital Expenditures CAPEX Definition

 

Capital costs for the Project are based on the total engineering and construction work, having a design capacity of 40,000 tonnes per year of lithium carbonate equivalent. The expenditures are expressed in current US dollars.

 

Capital costs include direct and indirect costs for:

 

·Brine production wells;
·Evaporation and concentration ponds;
·Lithium carbonate plant;
·General areas, such as electric, gas and water distribution;
·Stand-by power plant, roads, offices, laboratory and camp, and other items;
·Off-site Infrastructure, including gas pipeline and high voltage power line; and
·Contingencies, salaries, construction equipment mobilization, and other expenses.

 

The capital investment for the 40,000 tpa Lithium Carbonate Cauchari-Olaroz Project, including equipment, materials, indirect costs and others during the construction period was US$979 million. This excludes debt interest expense capitalized during the same period. Disbursements of these expenditures are summarized in Table 21.1 and the costs for the production wells are presented on Table 21.2.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 366 of 427

 

 

 

Table 21.1
Lithium Carbonate Plant Capital Costs Summary
Item

Cost

(US$ M)

Direct Cost  
Salar Development 51.0
Evaporation Ponds 175.5
Lithium Carbonate Plant and Aux. 361.7
Reagents 26.2
On-site Infrastructure 108.7
Off-site Services 13.6
Total Direct Cost 736.7
Indirect Cost  
Total Indirect Cost 224.5
Total Direct and Indirect Cost  
Total Direct and Indirect 961.2
Other (1.85%) 17.8
 
Total Capital 979
Expended to date 979
Estimate to complete 0

 

Table 21.2
Production Wells Capital Cost
Description

Total Project Budget

(US$M)

Well pumps and auxiliaries 46.2
Power Distribution 4.8
   
Total 51.0

 

21.1.2Evaporation Ponds

 

The capital cost for the evaporation and concentration pond facilities is US$175.5 million (Table 21.3).

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 367 of 427

 

 

 

Table 21.3
Evaporation and Concentration Ponds Capital Cost
Description

Total Projected Budget

(US$ M)

Ponds 172.1
Power distribution 3.3
   
Total 175.5

 

21.1.3Lithium Carbonate Plant

 

The direct cost for the construction of the Lithium Carbonate plant is US$361.7 million (Table 21.4). During engineering work, capital equipment costs were estimated using more than 100 quotes for various equipment items and construction contracts, estimates and using in-house data for minor items. As of the effective date of this report, all of the equipment purchase orders have been executed as well as construction contracts, validating the total construction of the plant. The initial material take-off (e.g. material quantity estimates) from 3D models were confirmed during the construction phase to complete the capital cost.

 

Table 21.4
Lithium Carbonate Plant Capital Cost Summary
Description

Total Projected Budget

(US$ M)

Lithium Carbonate Plant
Boron SX 68.3
Lithium Carbonate wet plant 116.2
Dry area 41.4
In-plant evaporation. circuit (KCl) 73.1
Plant wide auxiliaries 24.1
Power distribution 3.3
Utilities 31.2
Non-Process Buildings 4.0
   
Total 361.7

 

21.1.4Reagents Cost

 

Reagents cost refer to the installation for receiving, preparation and distribution of reagents for use in the process stages. Costs are shown in Table 21.5.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 368 of 427

 

 

 

Table 21.5
Reagent Cost
Item

Cost

(US$ M)

Reagents 24.5
Power supply 1.7
   
Total 26.2

 

21.1.5Offsite Infrastructure Cost

 

Offsite infrastructure refers to gas and electrical interconnection and transmission. Costs are shown in Table 21.6.

 

Table 21.6
Offsite Infrastructure Cost
Item

Cost

(US$ M)

Natural gas supply 7.2
Power supply 6.4
   
Total 13.6

 

21.1.5.1Natural Gas Supply to Plant

 

Natural gas is obtained from the Rosario gas compression station of the Gas Atacama pipeline located 52 km north of the Project site. Cost for this pipeline was obtained from a specific contractor bid.

 

Installed cost for this work is US$7.2 million (Table 21.6). This pipeline is designed to supply natural gas sufficient for production up to 50,000 tpa LCE.

 

21.1.5.2Power Supply to Plant

 

The transmission system has been designed to provide sufficient electricity for a production capacity of at least 40,000 tpa LCE. Installed cost for this work is US$6.4 million (Table 21.6).

 

21.1.5.3Onsite Infrastructure and General Cost Summary

 

Onsite infrastructure costs are summarized in Table 21.7.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 369 of 427

 

 

 

Table 21.7
Onsite Infrastructure and General Capital Cost Summary
Description

Total Projected Budget

(US$ M)

On-Site Infrastructure
General Area (including roads) 90.6
Camp 13.4
Utilities 1.7
Emergency Power Generation 3.1
   
Total 108.7

 

21.2Indirect Costs

 

The indirect costs used for this study are given in Table 21.8. The percentages listed indicates the relation between the estimated costs for the item and the direct cost.

 

Table 21.8
Project Indirect Costs
Description

Cost

(%)

Cost

(US$ M)

EP – Engineering and Procurement 3.87% 37.9
CM – Construction Management 7.82% 76.6
Commissioning 2.02% 19.8
Vendor Representative 0.39% 3.8
Third Party Services 0.71% 7.0
Temporary Facilities 0.28% 2.7
Construction Camp 1.18% 11.5
Catering and Camp Services 0.31% 3.0
Freight (by owner) 1.88% 18.4
First Fills (calculated) 0.62% 6.1
Training 1.85% 18.1
     
Total Indirect Costs 22.94% 224.5

 

21.2.1Final CAPEX for Exar 40,000 tpa Plant

 

The Final CAPEX for the 40,000 tpa LCE facilities, as defined during the engineering studies, reached a total of $979 million. This investment included the extraordinary cost incurred during the COVID-19 pandemic and the changes in cost due to inflation during construction.

 

The reported CAPEX is already committed and the ramp up period of three years is in the second year of implementation.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 370 of 427

 

 

 

21.2.2Exclusions

 

The following items are not included in this estimate:

 

·Legal costs;

 

·Special incentives and allowances;

 

·Escalation; and

 

·Start-up costs beyond those specifically included.

 

21.2.3Currency

 

All values are expressed in current $US dollars. During the construction period, Argentine peso denominated costs follow the exchange rate as a result of inflation, and there was a significant impact of the exchange rate fluctuation on CAPEX and OPEX.

 

21.2.4Sustaining Capital

 

A provision of US$990 million of the sustaining capital over the life of the Project was included in the economic model. The sustaining capital includes purchase of equipment or development of facilities which would otherwise be capitalized. The sustaining capital costs include processing equipment to be purchased in future years, replacement of equipment, drilling of replacement wells, capital repairs of ponds, equipment replacement for the processing plant, etc.

 

For the next 10 years ahead, US$20.5 million is estimated for sustaining capital, equivalent to US$512.5 per ton of lithium carbonate.

 

21.3Operating Costs Estimate

 

21.3.1Operating Cost Summary

 

The operating cost (OPEX) estimate for a 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate facility has been prepared at the completion of the Project and using data generated during the ramp up. (Table 21.9). The OPEX that defined by Exar at this stage is US $6,543 per tonne. This present cost is a substantial change from the FS OPEX definition that was US $3,579 per tonne. The inflation and devaluation of the local currency affected several items conforming the OPEX including reagent costs, maintenance, manpower, catering, security, consumables, and product transportation cost components.

 

During the ramp up, there is the opportunity to identify the requirement of an optimization program to control and if possible, to reduce OPEX cost.

 

Reagent consumption rates that were determined by pilot plant, laboratory, and computer model simulation have been actualized based on data obtained during ramp up period. Reagent cost values, which represent 39% of OPEX, has been obtained from the suppliers servicing the actual plant operation.

 

Energy consumption has been determined on an equipment-by-equipment basis and design utilization rate and confirmed with actual operational data.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 371 of 427

 

 

 

Labour levels are confirmed in accordance with Exar Management’s operating the new facility. Salary and wage are based on the actual data being used by Exar in Argentina.

 

Maintenance estimates were updated by Exar’s management based on the actual maintenance cost and projected future cost based on their experience with similar operations.

 

Results are as summarized in Table 21.9.

 

Table 21.9
Operating Costs Summary
Description

Total

(US$ 000

/Year)

Li2CO3

(US$/Tonne)

Allocation of Total OPEX (%)
Direct Costs      
Reagents 100,981 2,525 38.60
Maintenance 24,701 618 9.4
Electric Power 9,283 232 3.5
Pond Harvesting & Tailing Management 24,348 609 9.3
Water Treatment System 0 0 0
Natural Gas 4,455 111 1.70
Manpower 32,059 801 12.20
Catering, Security & Third-Party Services 32,083 802 12.30
Consumables 6,443 161 2.50
Diesel 3,249 81 1.20
Bus-in/Bus-out Transportation 0 0 0
Product Transportation 9,200 230 3.5
Direct Costs Subtotal 246,803 6,170 94.30
       
Indirect Costs      
G&A 14,912 373 5.7
Indirect Costs Subtotal 14,912 373 5.7
       
Total Operating Costs 261,714 6,543 100.0

 

21.3.2Pond and Plant Reagents Costs Definition

 

Reagents comprise 38.6% of total OPEX costs and were estimated by Exar using contractual prices for the present operation. Consumption volumes have been obtained from laboratory work and computer model simulations, performed by Exar and its consultant, and actual operational data collected by Exar.

 

Pond and plant reagents include the following:

 

·Calcium oxide;
·Lime;
·Sodium Carbonate;
·Barium Chloride;
·Hydrochloric Acid;
·Sodium Hydroxide;

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 372 of 427

 

 

 

·Sulphuric Acid;
·Extractants diluent; and
·Organic solvents.

 

As indicated in Section 17.0, sulphate brines such as the one present in Cauchari typically require treatment with lime to remove unwanted elements before proceeding to the lithium carbonate plant. The lime is bought from a local producer (150 km from the Project) producing lime of suitable quality for the application This producer will require expansion of their facilities to be considered a preferable supplier; however, the proximity of this lime facility could provide cost savings over other supply alternatives from San Juan province located at 1,200 km from the Project.

 

Na2CO3 is the dominant reagent cost in the lithium carbonate plant. Boron removal costs are dominated by solvent extraction organic make-up and HCl, for pH adjustment.

 

21.3.3Salt Removal and Transportation

 

Annual cost for harvesting and disposal of the projected precipitated salts were estimated at US$24,348,000 based on qualified service provider quote.

 

21.3.4Energy Cost

 

Overall electricity consumption is estimated to be 129.8 MWh/year. The Project cost includes the installation of a grid-tied high voltage transmission line to supply all electric power requirements for the plant facility.

 

Natural gas yearly expenditure is US $4,455,000.

 

Diesel fuel is also required by the stand-by diesel generators and mobile equipment. Annual diesel cost is estimated to be US $3,249,000.

 

Temporary diesel power generators were used to meet the energy requirements prior to the installation of the 33 kV line and are included in the capital cost estimate. As the high voltage line for power distribution to the field well is fully operational, the diesel generators are being phased out. Operating costs for these units were included in the OPEX during early years.

 

21.3.5Maintenance Cost

 

Yearly expenditures for this item, including the Lithium Carbonate plant and supporting facilities, are estimated at US $24,701,000.

 

21.3.6Labour Cost

 

Annual total costs, including base salary, contributions, bonuses, benefits and other remuneration inherent to the area and type of work performed, are approximately US $32,059,000 per year.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 373 of 427

 

 

 

21.3.7Catering, Camp Services Cost, Security and Third-Party Services

 

Catering and camp services include breakfast, lunch, dinner, housekeeping, security and other services. This item amounts to US $32,083,000 per year and is based on actual prices.

 

21.3.8Transport of Product to Port

 

Product is being shipped through Buenos Aires port in Argentina. The total cost of transportation to the port in Buenos Aires is US$230 per tonne that represents US$9,200,000 per year. Alternatively, in a future, the product can be shipped from Chile with a trade-off analysis.

 

21.3.9General and Administrative Costs

 

General and Administrative Costs are estimated to be US $14,912,000 per year.

 

21.4Company Operational Organization

 

The following diagram in Figure 21.1 Operational Organization presents an overview of the organization to operate the new lithium carbonate plant.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 374 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 21.1      Project Organization

 

  

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 375 of 427

 

 

 

22.0Economic Analysis

 

22.1Introduction

 

The section provides an economic analysis of the Project. The analysis was prepared by using an economic model and assesses both before- and after-tax cash flow scenarios. Capital and Operational Expenditures presented in previous sections have been used in this analysis. Prices for lithium carbonate are obtained from a market study carried out by a third party and summarized in Section 19.0. The model includes all taxes, rebates, government and commercial royalties/payments and community payments.

 

The results include Net Present Values (“NPV”) for different discount rates and sensitivity analysis of key inputs.

 

This economic analysis assumes that Capital expenditures prior to December 31, 2024, are considered sunk costs and are excluded from the capital expenses in the economic model. Only capital expenditures from December 31, 2024, onwards are included.

 

Investment decisions are made on a forward-looking basis. The purpose of the economic model is to assess whether future capital expenses and operations, with updated product price, production costs, and other assumptions, will bring a positive economic result. Positive economic results include future cash flows, generated from sales of the finished product, less related cost of sales and other expenses, excluding capital expenditures prior to December 31, 2024.

 

This economic assessment ignores sunk costs in the determination of cash flows and economic indicators. However, these costs are considered as opening balances for the purpose of determining tax assets and liabilities.

 

With the exclusion of the historic capital spent from the discounted cashflow, the presentation of an IRR value is not considered to be applicable.

 

22.2Evaluation Criteria

 

The following criteria have been used to develop the economic model:

 

·Project life: Engineering and construction and life of mine is estimated to be 4 and 40 years, respectively.

 

·Pricing was obtained from a market study (Section 19.0). Deductions to the price related to the removal of trace levels of impurities to achieve battery quality lithium carbonate are described as tolling costs in the economic model and deducted from revenue.

 

·Production based on design capacity of 40,000 tpa of lithium carbonate and,

 

·Valuation Date: December 31, 2024.

 

·Equity basis: For project evaluation purposes, it has been assumed that 100% of capital expenditures, including pre-production expenses and working capital are financed with owners’ equity.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 376 of 427

 

 

 

 

·Brine composition may be suitable for extraction and commercial production of other salts or other chemical compounds such as Boric Acid (H3BO3), potassium, etc. These options were not included in this report.

 

·The economic evaluation was carried out on a constant money basis so there is no provision for escalation or inflation on costs or revenue.

 

·All values are expressed in current US dollars; the exchange rate between the Argentine peso and the US dollar as at October 31, 2024 was AR$970/US$. Argentine peso denominated costs follow the exchange rate as a result of inflation, and the impact of the exchange rate fluctuation on CAPEX and OPEX has been incorporated; no provision for currency escalation has been included.

 

·The base-case assessment was carried out on a 100%-equity basis. Apart from the base case discount rate of 8.0%, two (2) variants of 6.0% and 10.0% were used to determine the Net Present Value (“NPV”) of the Project. These discount rates represent possible costs of equity capital.

 

22.3Taxes And Royalties

 

The following taxes and royalties have been applied to the economic analysis of the Project:

 

22.3.1Provincial Royalty

 

An effective royalty rate of 1.6% of sales is applied, which is consistent with the current royalty payments of other operating companies producing lithium from the same watershed. The provincial rate is 2% of the value of the mineral at the mine head when the mineral is processed in Jujuy and 3% if it is not processed in Jujuy.

 

22.3.2Export Duties and Export Refunds

 

The company has to pay an effective tax rate of 4.31% of sales as export duties on lithium carbonate sales.

 

The company is entitled to receive a 1.44% of sales as national incentive refund for selling lithium carbonate.

 

As a result, a net amount of 2.87% has to be paid as Export duties and Export refunds on lithium carbonate sales.

 

22.3.3Tax on Debits and Credits Accounts

 

In Argentina, a 0.6% tax on debits and credits of bank accounts is considered. Exar is permitted to book 34% of the tax paid on credits accounts as a credit for income tax. Thus, the net effective rate on both debit and credit accounts used in the economic model is 0.996%.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 377 of 427

 

 

 

 

22.3.4Los Boros Agreement

 

The Los Boros agreement is described in Section 4.4.1. The economic analysis assumed the following payments will have to be made to Los Boros under the following agreement:

 

·A US$12M payment for the exercise of the option, distributed quarterly, as per the agreement, for a total of 60 quarterly installments of US$200,000 each (US$800,000 annually for 15 years); and

 

·Two lump sum payments of US$7M each in year 1 and year 21 of operations (royalty buyout payments).

 

22.3.5Borax Argentina Royalty Payment

 

Pursuant to the usufruct agreement dated May 19, 2011, a fixed amount of US$200,000 per year is to be paid by Exar to Borax Argentina over a total of thirty (30) years. To date, 9 installments have been made and 21 installments remain to be paid. The model has assumed the same fixed amount of US$200,000 per year for the remaining 19 years of the Project and assumes that Exar will extend the agreement with Borax Argentina with the same terms and conditions. The agreement relates to claims that constitute less than approximately 5% of the Project property and thus is not considered material to the Project’s economics.

 

22.3.6Neighboring Communities Programs

 

The economic model has accounted for all payments pursuant to existing agreements with local neighboring communities.

 

22.3.7Corporate Taxes

 

The corporate tax rate in Argentina is 30%. In addition, dividends are subject to withholding tax which results in a cumulative effective tax rate of 35% (considered in this model).

 

22.3.8VAT

 

VAT payments involve two tax rates affecting goods and services. A reduced rate of 10.5% is applied to certain supplied equipment, and certain bulk materials, and construction subcontracts that are directly part of the Project implementation. A normal rate of 21% has been allocated to indirect project costs and other costs. The present regulation considers a return on the VAT payments once production starts, and this assumption is included in the model.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 378 of 427

 

 

 

22.4Capital Expenditures Spend Schedule

 

Capital costs for the Project are described in Section 21.0.

 

The sustaining capital schedule for capital expenditures is presented in Table 22.1 for each period.

 

Table 22.1
Sustaining CAPEX Expenditure Schedule
CAPEX Costs
by Years

2025-2035

(US$ 000)

2036-2060

(US$ 000)

Total

(US$ 000)

Total 225,500 765,000 990,500

 

The sustaining capital requirements were evaluated at US$990.5 million. Project closure costs were estimated at US$86.4 million (to be spent in three years after the closure of the operation).

 

22.4.1Lithium Carbonate Production Schedule

 

The lithium carbonate production schedule is presented in Table 22.2 in a yearly base for the period shown:

 

Table 22.2
Production and Revenue Schedule
Year

Average Revenue

per Year

(US$ 000)

Average Production

per Year Li2CO3

(t)

 
2025-2030 709,000 38,667  
2031-2060 780,000 40,000  
Total 28,044,000 1,452,000  

 

The figures in Table 22.2 utilize the medium lithium price scenario.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 379 of 427

 

 

 

22.5Operating Costs Schedule

 

The operating cost schedule is shown in Table 22.3 in a yearly base for the period shown.

 

Table 22.3
Production Costs
OPEX (US$ 000) Li2CO3 2025-2030 2031-2060 Total
Direct Costs      
Reagents 97,835 100,981 3,666,921
Maintenance 24,701 24,701 901,601
Electric Power 9,081 9,283 337,610
Pond Harvesting & Tailing Management 24,348 24,348 888,698
Water Treatment System 0 0 0
Natural Gas 4,284 4,455 161,592
Manpower 32,059 32,059 1,170,151
Catering, Security & Third-Party Services 32,083 32,083 1,171,043
Consumables 6,366 6,443 234,708
Diesel 3,249 3,249 118,598
Bus-In / Bus-Out Transportation 0 0 0
Product Transportation 8,855 9,200 333,730
Direct Cost Subtotal 242,861 246,803 8,984,652
       
Indirect Costs      
G & A 14,912 14,912 544,270
Indirect Cost Subtotal 14,912 14,912 544,270
       
Total Li2CO3 OPEX 257,773 261,714 9,528,922

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 380 of 427

 

 

 

22.6Production Revenues

 

Production revenues have been estimated based on the three price scenarios for lithium carbonate according to Section 19.0, and the production schedule shown in Table 22.2. The resulting revenue projection is shown in Table 22.4 in a yearly base for the period.

 

Table 22.4
Revenue – High, Medium and Low-Price Scenario (US$ 000)

Li2CO3 Price Scenario

(US$ 000 /tonne)

Year
2025-2030 2031-2060 Total
High Price 839,530 788,219 29,347,980
Medium Price 709,000 780,000 28,044,000
Low Price 561,800 743,032 26,404,800

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 381 of 427

 

 

 

22.7Cash Flow Projection

 

Table 22.5 and Figure 21.1 and Figure 22.1 summarize cash flows in a yearly base for the period for the medium price scenario.

 

Table 22.5
Project Evaluation Medium Price Scenario (US$ 000)

Description

(US$ 000)

Unit 2025 to 2030 2031 to 2060 Total average
(2025 to 2060)
Profit and Loss Account        
           
Gross Revenue        
  Sales        
    Li2CO3 Price US$/tonnne 19,500 21,000 20,757
    Li2CO3 sales volume Tonnes 38,667 40,000 39,243
    Tolling cost US$ 000 58,000 60,000 58,865
    Revenue US$ 000 709,000 780,000 757,946
           
Cost of Production        
    Cost per tonne US$/tonnne 6,692 6,543 6,567
    Operating Costs US$ 000 (257,777) (261,720) (257,544)
           
Taxes and Royalties        
    Provincial Royalties (1.6% of Revenues) US$ 000 (11,344) (12,480) (12,127)
    Export Duties and Export Refunds (2.87%
  Li2CO3 Revenues)
US$ 000 (20,354) (22,392) (21,759)
    Tax on Debits and Credits US$ 000 (2,488) (2,315) (2,275)
    Neighboring communities programs US$ 000 (661) (661) (661)
    Payment to Purchase Los Boros Option US$ 000 (800) (207) (300)
    Los Boros Royalty US$ 000 - (233) (189)
    Borax Royalty US$ 000 (200) (200) (200)
  Total Taxes and Royalties US$ 000 (35,603) (38,482) (37,503)
          -
  Total Expenses US$ 000 (293,381) (300,202) (295,047)
           
EBITDA US$ 000 415,619 479,798 462,899
  Depreciation US$ 000 (91,554) (39,681) (39,681)
           
PAIBT US$ 000 324,065 449,388 423,218
    Cumulative PAIBT US$ 000 1,944,393 15,659,048 15,659,048
    Corporate Income Tax US$ 000 (95,651) (143,570) (143,570)
           
PAIT   US$ 000 228,415 293,167 279,648
    Cumulative PAIBT US$ 000 1,370,489 8,976,486 10,346,975

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 382 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 22.1      Yearly Income and Cumulative Income (Before and After Taxes)
(US$ 000)

 

 

Figure 22.2      Yearly Simple Cash Flow and Discounted Cash Flow
(Before and After Tax) at 8% Discount Rate (US$ 000)

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 383 of 427

 

 

 

22.8Economic Evaluation Results

 

Project economics resulting from three price scenarios used in the economic model are presented in Table 22.6.

 

Table 22.6
Project Evaluation Economic Summary
Price Case Unit High Medium Low
Average Lithium Price Li2CO3 US$/tonne $21,645 $20,757 $19,641
Key Statistics        
  Project capacity tonnes 40,000 40,000 40,000
  Sustaining CAPEX US$ M $990 $990 $990
  OPEX US$/tonne $6,543 $6,543 $6,543
  Max negative cash flows US$ M $-13 $2 $-87
  Average Lithium price Li2CO3 US$/tonne $21,645 $20,757 $19,641
         
Average yearly values        
  Revenue US$ M $793 $758 $714
  OPEX US$ M $-258 $-258 $-258
  Other Expenses US$ M $-38 $-38 $-35
  EBITDA5 US$ M $497 $463 $421
         
Before taxes        
  NPV (6%) US$ M $7,430 $6,538 $5,311
  NPV (8%) US$ M $6,044 $5,230 $4,101
  NPV (10%) US$ M $5,049 $4,305 $3,263
         
After taxes        
  NPV (6%) US$ M $5,035 $4,466 $3,630
  NPV (8%) US$ M $4,122 $3,603 $2,830
  NPV (10%) US$ M $3,466 $2,992 $2,274

 

Notes:

 

1. Presented on a 100% project equity basis. As of the date of this report, LAAC currently owns 49% of the Project.

2. Measured form the end of the capital investment period.

 

 

5 EBITDA is non-GAAP financial measures and has no standardized meaning under IFRS Accounting Standards (“IFRS”) and may not be comparable to similar measures used by other issuers. The Company does not have historical non-GAAP financial measures nor historical comparable measures under IFRS, and therefore the foregoing prospective non-GAAP financial measure may not be reconciled to the nearest comparable measure under IFRS.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 384 of 427

 

 

 

22.9Sensitivity Analysis

 

A sensitivity analysis was conducted to illustrate the impact of changes in key variables on the Project’s NPV (Table 22.7 to Table 22.8 and Figure 22.3 to Figure 22.4).

 

Table 22.7
Project NPV Before Taxes - 8% Discount Rate Sensitivity Medium Scenario
Driver Variable Base Data Project NPV (US$M)
75% 90% 100% 110% 125%
Production tonne/year $40,000 3,771 4,647 5,230 5,814 6,689
Price US$/tonne $20,757 2,829 4,270 5,230 6,191 7,632
Sustaining CAPEX US$M $990 5,308 5,261 5,230 5,199 5,153
OPEX US$/tonne $6,543 6,058 5,561 5,230 4,899 4,402

 

Figure 22.3      Diagram for Project NPV Before Taxes at 8% Discount Rate-Sensitivity Medium Scenario

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 385 of 427

 

 

 

Table 22.8
Project NPV After Taxes - 8% Discount Rate-Sensitivity Medium Scenario
Driver Variable Base Data Project NPV (US$M)
75% 90% 100% 110% 125%
Production tonne/year $40,000 2,145 3,020 3,603 4,187 5,062
Price US$/tonne $20,757 1,203 2,643 3,603 4,564 6,005
Sustaining CAPEX US$ M $990 3,682 3,634 3,603 3,572 3,526
OPEX US$/tonne $6,543 4,433 3,934 3,603 3,272 2,775

 

Figure 22.4      Diagram for Project NPV After Taxes at 8% Discount Rate-Sensitivity Medium Scenario

 

 

Project economics are most sensitive to variability in product pricing and production. Project results are less sensitive to sustaining CAPEX and total operating costs, but some differences appear when results are measured in terms of NPV. The Project is shown to be more sensitive to capital expenditures than to total operating cost.

 

22.10Conclusions

 

22.10.1Economic Analysis

 

·CAPEX: Total capital investment for the 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate project, including equipment, materials, indirect costs and others during the construction period was US$979 million. This total also excludes interest expenses capitalized during the same period.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 386 of 427

 

 

 

·Operating costs and working capital requirements from 2025 to 2060 are estimated to be US$258 million per year.

 

·Sustaining capital expenditures total US$990 million over the 40-year evaluation period of the Project.

 

·OPEX: The operating cost for the Project is estimated at US$6,543 per tonne of lithium carbonate. This figure includes pond and plant chemicals, energy, labour, salt waste removal, maintenance, camp services, and transportation. The cost estimate was based on actual operating costs, on the basis of existing supplier contracts and forecasted changes in future prices.

 

·Cash Flow: Cash flow will be according to production ramp up that will reach 100% in 2026 of the cash flow estimate.

 

·Sensitivity Analysis: Sensitivity analysis indicates that the Project is economically viable even under very unfavourable market conditions.

 

·Other: The Project’s economic evaluation presented in this report does not consider any payment on financing taken by the owners of Exar.

 

22.10.2Project Strengths

 

·Brine: The Project uses subsurface brines to extract lithium, a proven and cost-effective method compared to hard rock mining.

 

·Lithium: The Project has over 682,920 tonnes of lithium (about 3.6 million tonnes lithium carbonate), enough to support a production rate of 40,000 tonnes per year for 40 years. There is also potential for resource expansion at depth and to the north of the Olaroz salar, and laterally beyond existing well zones.

 

·Location: Energy Access: The Project site is 50 km away from a Natural Gas (NG) trunk pipeline and the flat and featureless ground over which the feeder pipeline is to be built reduces pipeline construction cost and complexity.

 

·Location: The Project benefits from solid ground for plant and camp facilities due to an alluvial fan separating the Caucharí and Olaroz salars, reducing geotechnical risks. Ponds were also built on flat ground in the salar, and overall site conditions are well-suited for this type of operation.

 

·Energy Costs: Access to natural gas has improved in the country due to new natural gas fields being brought to production and by using the planned pipeline. The estimated long-term costs are approximately US$4.8 per MMBTU.

 

·Pricing Estimate: Sensitivity analysis indicates that the Project is economically viable even under unfavourable pricing conditions.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 387 of 427

 

 

 

22.10.3Project Risks

 

·Location: Elevation: The Project site is at a high elevation, approximately 4,000 m above sea level, which can result in difficult work conditions for those not accustomed to high altitudes. Medical oxygen tanks are readily available for staff travelling to and working at the mine site.

 

·Brine composition: High contents of sulphate and magnesium in the brine make it necessary for a chemical treatment with lime to remove these components.

 

·Weather Dependence: Unpredictable weather, including heavy rains and long winters in recent years, could affect the evaporation cycle in the ponds.

 

·Process Implementation: The Exar process is specialized to the type of brine in the salar and there is no other industrial operation running the same process configuration. Mitigation measures include dedicated steps for removing impurities and purifying the solution.

 

·Process System Design and Supplier Expertise: Equipment and facilities are custom-designed for this unique process and the high-altitude, high-wind environment. Tests at various suppliers and a pilot plant were conducted before placing equipment orders.

 

22.10.4Project Schedule

 

The Project schedule is based on activities that started in early 2017, with the early construction started in mid-2017, in alignment with the planning of the 25,000 tpa project. The main activities included:

 

·Detailed engineering of on-site infrastructure including plant, wells, ponds and camp.

 

·Definition and acquisition of construction and installation contracts for the pond area.

 

·Procurement of equipment and materials for the construction of wells, ponds and the lithium carbonate plant.

 

·Construction of a temporary camp.

 

·Initiation of production well installation.

 

In 2018, as part of the 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate plant, the main activities included:

 

·Continued well field construction.
·Initiation of pre-concentration pond construction and bring pumping.
·Completion of an updated Stage 1 definitive feasibility study, which included:
oupdated Mineral Reserve Estimate.
onameplate capacity increases from 25,000 tpa to 40,000 tpa.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 388 of 427

 

 

 

In 2019, the main activities included:

 

·Advancement of construction of well fields, pre-concentration ponds, and lining placement.

 

·Initiation of earthworks for the pre-concentration and concentration ponds, the lithium carbonate plant, and the associated facilities.

 

·Started operation of several pre-concentration ponds.

 

·Awarded and executed construction contracts for the pre-engineered buildings, SX plant, lime plant, crystallizer equipment, plant platform, structural steel erection, and concrete works.

 

In 2020, the main activities included:

 

·Drilling of brine well and water wells and continuing brine pumping to ponds.

 

·Continued construction of pre-concentration ponds, the lithium carbonate plant and liming process plants, and related civil works for pre- and post-concentration ponds.

 

·Continued liner installation.

 

·Commenced operations by the main contractor of the lithium carbonate plant.

 

·Initiation of gas pipeline construction and power lines (13,2 kW and 33 kW).

 

·Water pipeline bidding process initiated.

 

In 2021 the main activities included:

 

·Commissioning of brine wells and completion of pond construction.

 

·Continued work on the aqueduct, the lithium carbonate plant, power lines, the liming plant and the solid-liquid separation (SSL) plant.

 

·Completion of gas pipeline construction.

 

·Final authorization of accumulation pond systems.

 

In 2022 the main activities included:

 

·Completion of all building plans and installation of the main equipment, primary civil works and structural assembly.

 

·Completion of lime plant commissioning, and initiation of the liming process in the ponds.

 

·Completion of access to infrastructure.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 389 of 427

 

 

 

In 2023 the main activities included:

 

·Installation of the lithium carbonate plant and ancillary systems.

 

·Commissioning and production ramp-up of the lithium carbonate plant, including: SX, primary purification, secondary purification, carbonation, and auxiliary services.

 

·Achieved first lithium production in June 2023.

 

·Total production of 6,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate.

 

In 2024, the main activities included:

 

·Continued ramp-up of KCl plant, primary IX and dryer.
   
·Total production of approximately 25,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate.
   
·Continued progressing toward nameplate capacity.

 

In 2025 the following milestones are expected:

 

·Continue advancing production towards optimal efficiency, with processes streamlined and production levels stabilizing.

 

·Complete capacity check on all plant systems.

 

·Ongoing product quality checks.

 

·Continued focus on safety to ensure the potential issues or concerns are quickly addressed as the operation matures.

 

In 2025 and beyond, the following milestones are expected:

 

·Achieve and maintain consistent operations in alignment with production volumes and quality set by shareholders and in accordance with market demands.

 

·Operate efficiently with a strong focus on safety and an emphasis on cost-effectiveness.

 

·Ensure environmental monitoring systems are in place, allowing for continuous improvement and quick adjustments when necessary.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 390 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 22.5 presents these activities in a Gantt chart format.

 

 Figure 22.5      Project Schedule

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 391 of 427

 

 

 

23.0Adjacent Properties

 

23.1Olaroz Project - Arcadium Lithium

 

The Exar properties are adjacent to an operation owned by a joint venture between Arcadium Lithium Plc. (“Arcadium”), Toyota Tsusho, and JEMSE, where Arcadium owns 66.5% of the project, Toyota Tsusho owns 25% and JEMSE owns 8.5% of the project.

 

The 66.5% portion of the project was originally owned by Orocobre Limited (“Orocobre”). In August 2021, Orocobre and Galaxy Resources Limited merged to form Allkem. In January 2024 Allkem merged with Livent to form Arcadium Limited. In October 2024, Rio Tinto made an offer acquired 100% of Arcadium through an all-cash purchase expected to close in mid-2025.

 

The Salar de Olaroz project consists of 33 mining concessions covering 47,615 ha of claims (Figure 4.2 and Table 4.1). Exploration on the project began in 2008. In March of 2013, Orocobre began construction of a 17,500 tpa lithium carbonate production facility that was completed in November of 2014 with production subsequently commencing on November 21, 2014. Production began on the project without determining Mineral Reserves.

 

Production from the project from 2016 through part of 2021 is presented in Figure 23.1. An expansion of the plant to 42,400 tpa was completed in 2023. Production from the project from 2021 through 2023 is presented in Table 23.1 and the Mineral Resource Estimate presented Table 23.2 was taken from the Arcadium 2023 Annual Report. A photo of the Olaroz evaporation ponds and facility is presented in Figure 23.2.

 

Figure 23.1      Olaroz Project Production – 2016–2021

 

 

* In the first nine months of 2021, the Project produced approximately 9.3 thousand metric tons of lithium carbonate.

Source: (Statista.com)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 392 of 427

 

 

 

Table 23.1
Production From Rio Tinto’s Olaroz Project – 2021 – 2023*
Product Year
2021 2022 2023
Lithium Carbonate (tonnes) 12,977 13,959 17,758

 

* Information on this table was taken from the Arcadium Lithium Annual Report dated February 29, 2024. Figures reported in the Arcadium annual report were adjusted to reflect Arcadium’s 66.5% ownership. The numbers in this table are reported to reflect 100% of the production.

 

Table 23.2
Mineral Resource Estimate for Arcadium’s
Olaroz JV Project In Tonnes of Lithium Metal (1-10)
Item Mineral Resource Classification
Measured (M) Indicated (I) M+I Inferred
Li Mean Concentration (mg/L) 659 592 641 609
Resource (tonnes) 1,560,000 499,000 2,059,000 1,105,000

 

Notes:

 

1.Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated reasonable prospects for economic extraction.
2.Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of lithium metal).
3.The estimate is reported in-situ and exclusive of mineral reserves, but because no reserves were estimated, the resources has only been depleted by historical production.
4.An elevated lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was estimated based on a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the life-of-mine of 30 years. The average lithium grade of the measured and indicated mineral resources corresponds to 641 mg/l. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average mineral resources concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction.
5.The estimated economic cut-off grade estimated for resource reporting purposes is 300 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions:
6.A technical grade LCE price of $20,000/metric ton.
7.An estimated recovery factor for the salar operation over the span of life-of-mine is 62%, equivalent to the assumed process recovery factor of 62%.
8.An average annual brine pumping rate of 600 L/s is assumed.
9.Cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate and capital costs.
10.The resource has been depleted for the historical well production which is approximately 0.323 million tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE), 0.314 million tonnes of LCE were depleted from measured resource and 0.009 million tons of LCE was depleted from indicated resources (associated with the accumulative production of well E-26). The accumulated production between 30 of June of 2023 and 31 December of 2023 was 0.031 million tons of LCE.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 393 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 23.2      Olaroz Project – Evaporation Ponds and Facilities

 

 

Source: (arcadiumlithium.com)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 394 of 427

 

 

 

Figure 23.3      Adjacent Properties Showing Boundary with the Exar Property 

 

 

Source: (Exar, 2024)

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 395 of 427

 

 

 

23.2Cauchari Project - Arcadium Lithium

 

Advantage Lithium Corp. (Advantage) held their Cauchari project at the south end of the Cauchari salar. Advantage was in a JV with Orocobre and in February of 2020, Orocobre announced the acquisition of 100% of the outstanding shares of Advantage. The subsequent changes in Orocobre are described in Section 23.1 and the Cauchari project is 100% owned by Arcadium. Exar’s Cauchari-Olaroz Salars Project, the Project, is located between Arcadium’s Cauchari project and its producing Olaroz project (Figure 23.3).

 

The Cauchari property consists of 22 mining concessions covering 28,906 ha. The Mineral Resource Estimate presented in Table 23.3 and Table 23.4 were taken from the Arcadium 2023 Annual Report.

 

Table 23.3
Mineral Resource Estimate for Arcadium’s
Cauchari JV Project in Tonnes of Lithium Metal (1-7)
Item Mineral Resource Classification
Measured
(M)
Indicated
(I)
M+I Inferred
Li Mean Concentration (mg/L) 581 494 519 473
Resource (tonnes) 302,000 321,000 623,000 285,000

 

1.Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated reasonable prospects for economic extraction.
2.Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of lithium metal).
3.The estimate is reported in-situ and exclusive of mineral reserves, where the lithium mass is representative of what remains in the reservoir after the life-of-mine. To calculate mineral resources exclusive of mineral reserves, a direct correlation was assumed between proven reserves and measured resources, as well as probable reserves and indicated resources. Proven mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from measured mineral resources, and probable mineral reserves (from the point of reference of brine pumped to the evaporation ponds) were subtracted from indicated mineral resources. The average grade for measured and indicated resources exclusive of mineral reserves was estimated based on the remaining brine volume and lithium mass.
4.An elevated lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was estimated based on a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the life-of-mine of 30 years. The average lithium grade of the measured and indicated mineral resources corresponds to 519 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average measured and indicated resource concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction.
5.The estimated economic cut-off grade estimated for resource reporting purposes is 300 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions:
6.A technical grade LCE price of $20,000/metric ton.
7.An estimated recovery factor for the salar operation over the span of life-of-mine is 66%, lower than the estimated process recovery factor of 67%.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 396 of 427

 

 

 

Table 23.4
Mineral Reserve Estimate for Arcadium’s
Cauchari JV Project in Tonnes of Lithium Metal (1-7)
Item Mineral Resource Classification
Proven Probable Total
Li Mean Concentration (mg/L) 571 485 501
Reserves (tonnes) 43,000 169,000  212

 

1.Lithium metal is converted to lithium carbonate with a conversion factor of 5.323 (i.e., 5.323 metric tons of LCE per 1 metric ton of lithium metal).
2.An elevated lithium cut-off grade of 300 mg/l was estimated based on a projected price of $20,000 per metric ton LCE over the entirety of the life-of-mine of 30 years. The average lithium grade of the Proven and Probable Reserves corresponds to 501 mg/l and represents the flux-weighted composite brine collected as brine is routed to the evaporation ponds. Extracted grades at individual production wells and the average Proven and Probable Reserves concentration are well above the 300 mg/l cut-off grade, demonstrating that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction.
3.The estimated economic cut-off grade estimated for Mineral Reserve reporting purposes is 300 mg/l lithium, based on the following assumptions:
4.A technical grade LCE price of $20,000/metric ton.
5.An estimated recovery factor for the salar operation over the span of life-of-mine is 66%, lower than the estimated process recovery factor of 67%.
6.An average annual brine pumping rate of 480 L/s is assumed.
7.Cost estimates are based on a combination of fixed brine extraction, G&A and plant costs and variable costs associated with raw brine pumping rate or lithium production rate and capital costs.

 

The information in this section has not been verified by the Qualified Person and it should be noted that the information is not necessarily indicative of the mineralization on the property that is the subject of this Technical Report.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 397 of 427

 

 

 

24.0Other Relevant Data and Information

 

There is no other data and information relevant to the report.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 398 of 427

 

 

 

25.0Interpretation and Conclusions

 

25.1Geology and Resources

 

The Mineral Reserve Estimate for lithium incorporates the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium using: 1) samples used from the prior, LAC (2012) Mineral Resource Estimate for lithium, and 2) an expanded Project database compiled from results of 2017 through 2018 exploration drilling, sampling, and testing campaigns, additional depth-specific sampling in early 2019 as part of data verification, and additional drilling and testing through the effective date of May 7, 2019. To obtain the 2019 Reserve Mineral Estimate, the prior geologic and numerical models and the expanded database were analyzed and updated by Montgomery using Leapfrog® 3D geologic and resource modeling software developed by Seequent (2018) and MODFLOW-USG developed by Panday and others (2013) coupled with the Groundwater Vistas interface (ESI, 2015).

 

The 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate is based on an expanded numerical model domain incorporating the substantial amount of exploration drilling and exploration work completed through the effective date of this report. Montgomery evaluated the Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate using the following modeling criteria as specified by Exar:

 

·A 40-year wellfield extraction period. Recovery of a minimum of 17,500 tonnes per year or more of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) processed during the first year of production wellfield operation and during initial wellfield ramp-on stage (Year 1), a minimum of 36,000 tonnes of LCE processed during the second year of production wellfield operation and 40,000 tonnes of LCE processed during subsequent wellfield operations (Year 3 through Year 40).

 

·An average lithium concentration for the 40-year extraction period from the simulated wellfield at or above the current engineering estimate for processing of 590 mg/L.

 

·Brine production from simulated wells derived from Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource volumes.

 

·In consideration of current uncertainties and limitations in the numerical model, maximize overall wellfield extraction rate and optimize production well locations for predictive assessment of an Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate.

 

The simulated brine production wellfield for the basis of the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate uses a total of 56 production wells. The pumping schedule for the wellfield allowed for a ramping up during the initial year of production (Year 1) using 23 simulated wells, either completed or planned by Exar (Phase 1 Wells), required to achieve or exceed the 17,500 tonnes LCE process target. After Year 1, 33 wells are added to the wellfield (Phase 2 Wells) in order to meet or exceed the 36,000 tonnes LCE during second Year 2 and 40,000 tonnes LCE process target through Year 40.

  

The 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate model is based on initial lithium concentrations incorporated in the HSU model used in the 2019 Mineral Resource Estimate (LAC, 2019), as well as representative aquifer parameters derived from aquifer testing and calibration for steady-state and transient hydraulic conditions.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 399 of 427

 

 

 

 

Overall, the modeled wellfield shows the ability to exceed the minimum 40,000 tpa LCE process and 590 mg/L annual lithium concentration targets. The predicted results for the 40-year production period are as follows:

 

·Average production rate of 48,800 tpa LCE accounting for processing efficiency (53.7%) for the 40-year pumping period; the minimum of 25,600 tpa LCE occurs at the start-up of operations in Year 1; the maximum rate of 50,200 tpa LCE occurs at full-build in Years 2 and 3. At the end of the pumping period in Year 40 the rate averages 48,800 tpa LCE.

 

·Average lithium concentration of 607 mg/L for the 40-year pumping period; the maximum concentration of 617 mg/L occurs at the start-up of full-build in Year 2 and the minimum concentration of 598 mg/L occurs near the end of the pumping period in Year 40.

 

Without factoring processing efficiency, the Mineral Reserve Estimate for lithium is summarized as Proven and Probable for a 40-year production period as follows:

 

·Proven Mineral Reserves (without processing efficiency).

oThe Proven Mineral Reserves for lithium are 96,650 tonnes.

oThe Proven Mineral Reserves for LCE are 514,450 tonnes.

 

·Probable Mineral Reserves (without processing efficiency).

oThe Probable Mineral Reserves for lithium are 586,270 tonnes.

oThe Probable Mineral Reserves for LCE are 3,120,590 tonnes.

 

·Total Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves (without processing efficiency).

oThe Total Mineral Reserve for lithium is 682,920 tonnes.

oThe Total Mineral Reserve for LCE is 3,635,040 tonnes.

 

For comparative purposes, without factoring processing efficiency, approximately 20 percent of the 2019 Measured plus Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate reported in Burga et al. (2019) are converted to a total Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate as brine produced from wellfield and delivered to the brine evaporative ponds.

 

25.2Brine Production

 

The location, design and assumed productivity of the brine extraction wells was determined using a hydrogeologic model supported by data collected from geologic logs, drill cores, chemistry analysis and long-term pumping test data.

 

25.3Process Information and Design

 

The implemented process is based on conventional brine extraction and processing methods including pumping brine from the salar, concentrating the brine through evaporation ponds, and taking the brine concentrate through a hydrometallurgical facility to produce high-grade lithium carbonate. Exar and its consultants have successfully tested the brine chemistry of the Cauchari deposit through process simulation using estimation methods and process simulation techniques. This work has been validated by the results of evaporation and process testing at the on-site pilot plant and evaporation ponds, in addition to other testing developed with universities and suppliers.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 400 of 427

 

 

 

The facilities are operating in a ramp up period with good success. Production level has reached 70% of design capacity and it is expected to reach 100 % by in the third quarter of 2025.

 

25.4Economic Analysis

 

·Lithium Industry: Market studies indicate that the lithium industry has a promising future. The use of lithium ion batteries for electric vehicles and renewable energy storage applications are driving lithium demand rapidly to unprecedented levels.

 

·Project Capital Cost: The capital investment for the 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate Cauchari-Olaroz Project, including equipment, materials, indirect costs and contingencies during the construction period was defined at US$-980 million. Costs have been completed using consulting engineering services for facilities definition and supplier purchase order for all major items. The main cost drivers are the pond construction and process facilities, which represents 54% of total project capital expenditures.

 

·Operating Costs: The operating cost estimate (+/-15% accuracy) for the 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate facility is US$6,170 per tonne. This figure includes pond and plant chemicals, energy/fuel, labour, salt waste removal, maintenance, camp services and transportation.

 

·Sensitivity Analysis: The sensitivity analysis incorporates future product prices as projected by Benchmark organization. The Project is forecast to generate cash flow even under unfavourable conditions for key variables. Project economic sensitivity analysis shows that lithium carbonate price and production have the highest impact on Project results (NPV and IRR). Project results are somewhat less sensitive to capital expenditures and total operating costs.

 

·Viability of the Project: Project cash flow analysis for the base case and alternative cases indicates that, if assumptions that sustain the different cases materialize, the Project remains economically viable.

 

·Project Strength: Project fundamentals, such as the full completion of facilities construction, fully invested capital and a controlled operating cost, product demand and improved future price, and economics are all strong.

 

25.5Project Risks

 

·Based on the conceptual hydrogeologic system and results of the numerical model, the authors believe it is appropriate to classify the Proven Mineral Reserve as what we believe is feasible to be pumped to the evaporation ponds and recovered at the end of the process during the first five years of operations as currently model for the 2019 Mineral Reserve Estimate. During the initial five years of operation and wellfield build-out, the numerical model should be recalibrated based on demonstrated results and new projections should be done for re-examination of the Proven Mineral Reserve and potential for conversion of part of Probable Mineral Reserve to Proven.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 401 of 427

 

 

 

·Process risk: Problems may arise during detailed design, or later in scaling up to full production capacity. Reagents consumption may be higher than predicted and/or product yields may be lower than current estimates.

 

·Fluctuation in reagent costs: Soda ash supply is assumed to be imported. There is an existing soda ash manufacturer in Argentina, which currently operates at full capacity. Market pricing for other reagents may also fluctuate. However, the sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the economic performance of the Project is not highly sensitive to operating cost.

 

·Electricity and gas: Electricity for the Project is supplied via the provincial electrical network and is approximately 3.5% of the total operating costs. Cost escalation risk for grid power is relatively low and can be mitigated quickly and cost-effectively by exploiting the significant solar energy potential at site, if required. Natural gas is used mainly for camp operations and specific process applications and represents only 1.7% of the total operating costs. The current natural gas price is US$4.8/MMBTU. As Argentina has become a net gas exporter to Chile and Brazil, due to successful gas production from the Vaca Muerta Formation, the risk for price increased has diminished due to the large availability of this commodity.

 

·Taxes: The Company operates under Federal Argentinian Mining Law N° 24.196. This law grants Exar a tax freeze, or protection against tax increases for a period of 30 years from the date when Exar files the Feasibility Study with the Federal Mining Authority.

 

·Inflation, exchange rate, and devaluation: Economic policies of the New Government are projecting a positive control in these important sectors of the economy.

 

·Location – elevation: The Project site is at a high elevation, approximately 4,000 m above sea level, which can result in difficult work conditions for individuals used to lower elevations. Medical oxygen tanks are readily available for staff travelling to, and working at, the mine site. The ramp up period allowed to identify the needs of the workforce to confront the elevation creating a safe environment.

 

·Brine composition: Relatively high contents of sulphate and magnesium in the brine make it necessary for a chemical treatment with lime to remove these components. This has been successfully implemented.

 

·Weather dependence: Weather variation, including higher than normal raining periods and long winter periods have occurred in recent years that those factors could impact in the performance of the evaporation cycle in the ponds.

 

·Process implementation: The Exar process is specialized to the type of brine in the salar and there is no other industrial operation running the same process configuration. Mitigation factors include implementation of dedicated stages for elimination of impurities and purification of the solution.

 

·Process system design - supplier expertise: The design and fabrication of process equipment/facilities are unique for the process and high-altitude location, considering the performance at high elevation and high wind environment. Test at different vendors and pilot plant were performed before placing some of the equipment orders. Operation during ramp up allowed to identify the suitability of the design and correction were made as necessary.

 

·The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the project schedule and indirect costs. Project schedule included in this report reflects the best understanding of the impact based on the known information.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 402 of 427

 

 

 

26.0Recommendations

 

The Qualified Persons involved in the Report make the following recommendations:

 

·Updates to models representing Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves: conceptual and Mineral Resource and Reserve models should be updated. The domain of the Resource Evaluation Area should be evaluated so that additional areas can be included as potential new sources for Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates. Future modeling activities should include:

 

oComparison of the model hydrostratigraphy against new borehole data;

oComparison of produced brine concentrations against predicted concentrations;

oComparison of measured production and monitor well drawdown levels against predicted levels; and

oUpdate of measured production well flow rates against predicted rates; derivation of updated K (hydraulic conductivity), Ss (specific storage), and Sy (specific yield) estimates from analysis of pumping and drawdown information, and comparison with the values used in the model; and incorporation of third-party brine pumping from adjacent properties if appropriate and if any occurs in the future.

 

·New Well Testing: In addition to the long-term evaluation components recommended above, each new production well should undergo an initial pumping test, on the order of 7-10 days of constant-rate pumping, for assessment of long-term performance.

 

·Based on the conceptual hydrogeologic system and results of the numerical model, the authors believe it is appropriate to categorize the Proven Mineral Reserve as what we believe is feasible to be pumped to the evaporation ponds and recovered at the end of the first five years of operations as currently modeled for the Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate. During the initial five years of operation and wellfield build-out, the numerical model should be recalibrated based on demonstrated results and new projections should be done for re-examination of the Proven Mineral Reserve and potential for conversion of part of Probable to Proven classification.

 

·Improving the certainty of the Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves could be gained with scheduled water level measurements along with brine density measurements at production wells and nearby monitoring wells (representing shallow, intermediate, and deep monitoring of the brine aquifer), validation of the water balance and characterization of any changes in inflow to the salar, and additional controlled, long-term aquifer testing to more accurately represent aquifer parameters for calibrating hydraulic parameters in the numerical model. Changes to the hydrostratigraphic unit model based on additional exploration drilling and production well drilling should also be incorporated into future numerical flow and transport modeling.

 

·Additional certainty in predictive simulations of wellfield extraction and capture of lithium mass could be gained by re-examination of the water balance using measured data at aquifer boundaries, model sensitivity analysis for critical aquifer parameters such as hydraulic conductivity and specific yield, and potentially including effects of off-property production of lithium by adjacent mining operations. Furthermore, variable-density flow and transport should be considered in future model updates given the domain has expanded considerably compared to prior groundwater modeling efforts and now includes larger regions of freshwater inflow. Along with these recommended refinements to improve certainty of the predictive capabilities of the groundwater model, the numerical model should be used as an operational tool to optimize pumping rates at production wells, maximize lithium concentrations, and control the overall wellfield capture.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 403 of 427

 

 

 

·Drainable porosity or Sy estimates relied upon the prior 2012 model estimates because the 2017 and 2018 exploration results lacked Sy estimates. In order to address the uncertainty of Sy estimates for the different stratigraphic groups, ongoing exploration work should include analysis of Sy by use of laboratory methods such as RBRC or similar techniques for core samples.

 

·Project capacity expansion: The level of Mineral Resources estimated in previous report supported a 40,000 tpa lithium carbonate production plant, it is recommended that a capacity expansion project for lithium carbonate above 40,000 tpa, be carried out at a Feasibility Study (FS) level to confirm resources and compare alternate lithium adsorption technologies with conventional evaporation concentration.

 

·Lime supply: We recommend that efforts to firm up lime supply source be pursued. The area producer will require support for increasing production capacity as other local producers are depending on the same source. Exar intends to obtain lime from this source and discussions for providing additional support are underway.

 

·QA/QC: The QA/QC program, using regular insertions of blanks, duplicates, and standards should be continued. All exploration samples should be analyzed at Alex Stewart when exploration activities resume.

 

·The on-site laboratory should obtain ISO 1705 certification for analytical laboratories.

 

·As a result of the ramp up period experience, it is recommended to implement a lessons learned program aimed at identify an optimization program for the plant.

 

·Align Closure Plan with New Legislation: Update the conceptual closure plan to meet the requirements of Decreto No. 7,751-DEyP-2023.

 

·Engage Stakeholders Early: Collaborate with indigenous communities, local governments, and relevant authorities to identify potential public or social uses for infrastructure and areas post-mining.

 

·Strengthen Financial Assurances: Establish and maintain the required financial guarantees.

 

·Quantify Financial Implications: Compare pre-2023 closure cost estimates with anticipated costs under the new legislation to provide a clearer understanding of financial impacts.

 

·Enhance Stakeholder Engagement: Ensure ongoing discussions or frameworks are in place to address environmental and social priorities and demonstrate proactive collaboration with affected parties.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 404 of 427

 

 

 

The estimated cost for the recommendations is summarized in Table 26.1.

 

Table 26.1
Recommendations Budget
Item

Budget

(US$)

Mineral Resource and Reserve Update $200,000
ISO 17025 Accreditation $20,000
Updated Technical Report $80,000
Permitting and Social Community Work $200,000
   
Total $500,000

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 405 of 427

 

 

 

27.0References

 

Alonso, Ricardo N. 1999. “On the origin of La Puna Borates”. Acta geológica hispánica, vol.VOL 34, no. 2, pp. 141-66.

 

Aloulou, F. Zaretskaya, V., Growth in Argentina’s Vaca Muerte Shale and Tight Gas Production Leads to LNG Exports. U.S. Energy Informaiton Administration.

www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=40093, July 12, 2019.

 

Advantage Lithium, 2018. NI 43-101 Technical Report - Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Advantage Lithium Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina: effective date August 31, 2018, prepared by Worley Parsons and Flo Solutions.

 

Bear, J., 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Dover Publications, New York.

 

Beauheim R.L. and Roberts, R.M., 2002. Hydrology and Hydraulic Properties of a Bedded Evaporite Formation. Journal of Hydrology 259, no. 1-4 (March 1, 2002): 66- 88.

 

Beauheim, R.L., Saulnier, G.J. and Avis, G.J., 1991. Interpretation of Brine- Permeability Tests of the Salado Formation at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Site: First Interim Report, Report: SAND90-0083, Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories, August 1991.

 

Beauheim, R.L. and Holt, R.M., 1990. Hydrogeology of the WIPP Site: Geological and Hydrological Studies of Evaporites in the Northern Delaware Basin for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP), New Mexico (pp. 131-79). Geological Society of America Field Trip No. 14 Guidebook. Dallas: Dallas Geological Society.

 

Bossi, G.E., 2011. The Cauchari Sedimentology Final Report. Minera Exar S.A., Prepared for Lithium Americas.

 

Burga, E., Burga, D., Genck, W., Weber, D., Sandford, A., Dworzanowski, M. 2020. Updated Feasibility Study and Mineral Reserve Estimation to Support 40,000 tpa at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Report, Prepared for Lithium Americas.

 

Burga, E., Burga, D., Genck, W., Weber, D., 2019. Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate For the Cauchari-Olaroz Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Report, Prepared for Lithium Americas.

 

Burga, E., Burga, D., Rosko, M., Sanford, T., Leblanc, R., Smee, B. King, M., Abbey, D., 2017. Updated Reserve Estimation and Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina, NI 43-101 Report, Prepared for Lithium Americas.

 

CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definition, CIM Definition Standards-For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. 2014.

 

CIM Best Practice Guidelines for Resource and Reserve Estimation for Lithium Brines, 2012.

 

Conesa, V., 1997. Auditorías Medioambientales: Guía Metodológica. España.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 406 of 427

 

 

 

Conhidro, 2012. Informe Plataforma Pozo Agua Industrial Pozos: PPI1 y PBI1, Salar de Cauchari, Provincia de Jujuy, Minera Exar, Septiembre, 2011.

 

Cooper, H.H. and Jacob, C.E., 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history, Am. Geophys. Union Trans., vol. 27, pp. 526-534.

 

Cravero, F., 2009a. Informe de Actividades realizadas en el Salar Cauchari-Olaroz, Minera Exar S.A., LAC Internal Report.

 

Cravero, F., 2009b. Analisis Mineralogico de los Pozos 5 y 6, Salar de Olaroz. Comparación con los Resultados de los Pozos 3 y 4, Salar de Cauchari., Minera Exar S.A. LAC Internal Report.

 

Domenico, P. and Schwartz, F., 1990. Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

 

Dougherty, D.E and Babu, D.K., 1984. Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir, Water Resources Research, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1116-1122.

 

Environmental Simulations Incorporated (ESI), 2015. Groundwater Vistas version 7.

 

Fetter, C.W., 1994. Applied Hydrogeology. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

 

Fowler, J., and Pavlovic, P., 2004. Evaluation of the potential of Salar Del Rincon brine deposit as a source of lithium, Potash, boron and other mineral resources. Report for Argentina Diamonds Ltd.

 

Freeze, R.A., and Cherry, J.A., 1979. Groundwater. Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

 

Gelhar, L., Welty, C., and K. Rehfeldt, 1992. A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resources Research, 28: 1955-1974.

 

Hantush, M.S., 1964. Hydraulics of wells, in: Advances in Hydroscience, V.T. Chow (editor), Academic Press, New York, pp. 281-442.

 

Hantush, M.S., 1962. Flow of ground water in sands of nonuniform thickness; 3. Flow to wells, Jour. Geophys. Res., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1527-1534.

 

Hantush, M.S., 1961a. Drawdown around a partially penetrating well, Jour. of the Hyd. Div., Proc. of the Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., vol. 87, no. HY4, pp. 83-98.

 

Hantush, M.S., 1961b. Aquifer tests on partially penetrating wells, Jour. of the Hyd. Div., Proc. of the Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., vol. 87, no. HY5, pp. 171-194.

 

Hantush, M.S., 1960. Modification of the theory of leaky aquifers, Jour. of Geophys. Res., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 3713-3725.

 

Hantush, M.S. and Jacob, C.E., 1955. Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer, Am. Geophys. Union Trans., vol. 36, pp. 95-100.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 407 of 427

 

 

 

Harbaugh, A.W., 2005. MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model -- the Ground-Water Flow Process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A16.

 

Helvaci, C., and Alonso, R.N., 2000. Borate Deposits of Turkey and Argentina; a summary and geological comparison. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences Vol 9, pp1-27.

 

Hess, K., Davis, J, Kent D., and J. Coston. 2002. Multispecies reactive tracer test in an aquifer with spatially variable chemical conditions, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: dispersive transport of bromide and nickel. Water Resources Research 38: 36-1 – 36-27.

 

Houston J., 2006. Variability of Precipitation in the Atacama Desert: Its Causes and Hydrological Impact. International Journal of Climatology 26:2181-2189.

 

Houston J., 2009. A recharge model for high altitude, arid, Andean aquifers. Hydrol. Process. 23, 2383–2393, Published online 13 May 2009 in Wiley InterScience,

(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7350.

 

Houston, J., 2010a. Technical Report on the Cauchari Project, Jujuy, Argentina. NI 43-101 Report, prepared on behalf of Orocobre Limited.

 

Houston, J., 2010b. Technical Report on the Salinas Grandes – Guayotayoc Project, Jujuy-Salta Provinces, Argentina. NI 43-101 Report, prepared on behalf of Orocobre Limited.

 

Houston, J., and Gunn, M., 2011. Technical Report on the Salar de Olaroz Lithium- Potassium Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina.NI 43-101 Report, prepared on behalf of Orocobre Limited.

 

Houston, J., Ehren, P., 2010. Technical Report on the Olaroz Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report for NI 43-101, prepared on behalf of Orocobre Limited.

 

Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censos, Censo 2022 Republica Argentina, Censo Nacional de Población, Hogares y Viviendas, 2022, Resultados provisionales. 2023.

 

Jaganmohan, M. (2024, April 25). Lithium production of Orocobre in Argentina 2021. Statista.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1092121/argentina-lithium-carbonate-production-orocobre/

 

Johnson, A.I., 1967. Specific yield — compilation of specific yields for various materials. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1662-D. 74 p.

 

Jordan, T.E., Muñoz, N., Hein, M., Lowenstein, T., Godfrey, L., and Yu, J., 2002. Active faulting and folding without topographic expression in an evaporite basin, Chile. Geological Society of America Bulletin 114: 1406-1421.

 

King, M., 2010a. Amended Inferred Resource Estimation of Lithium and Potassium at the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report prepared for Lithium Americas Corp.

 

King, M., 2010b. Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resource Estimation of Lithium and Potassium at the Cauchari and Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report prepared for Lithium Americas Corp.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 408 of 427

 

 

 

King, M., Abbey, D., Kelley, R., 2012. Feasibility Study Reserve Estimation and Lithium Carbonate and Potash Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina. Report prepared for Lithium Americas Corp.

 

Liu, J., Williams, J.R., Wang, X., and Yang, H., 2009. Using MODAWEC to generate daily weather data for the EPIC model. Environmental Modelling & Software 24 (5):655-644

 

Moench, A.F., 1985. Transient flow to a large-diameter well in an aquifer with storative semiconfining layers, Water Resources Research, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1121- 1131.

 

Orocobre Limited, 2011. NI 43-101 Technical Report on the Salar de Olaroz Lithium-Potash Project: dated May 13, 2011, prepared by J. Houston and M. Gunn.

 

Panday S, Langevin ChD, Niswonger RG, Ibaraki M, Hughes JD, 2013. MODFLOW–USG version 1: an unstructured grid version of MODFLOW for simulating groundwater flow and tightly coupled processes using a control volume finite-difference formulation. Ch 45, Section A, Groundwater Book 6, Modeling Techniques. USGS, Reston, VA, USA.

 

Papadopulos, I.S. and H.H. Cooper, 1967. Drawdown in a well of large diameter, Water Resources Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 241-244.

 

Proyecto Fenix – Salar de Hombre Muerto website,

http://www1.hcdn.gov.ar/dependencias/cmineria/fenix.htm.

 

Remy, N., Boucher, A., and Wu, J., 2011. Applied Geostatistics with SGeMs: A User’s Guide. Cambridge University Press, New York.

 

Robson, S.G. and Banta, E.R., 1990. Determination of specific storage by measurement of aquifer compression near a pumping well. Ground Water. V. 28m no. 6, pp. 868-874

 

Roskill, 2009. The Economics of Lithium. 11th Edition.

 

Seggario, R.E., 2015. Hoja Geologica, 2366-III, Susques, Provincias de Jujuy y Salta. Servicio Geologico Minero Argentino, Instituto de Geologia y Recursos Mineral.

 

Salazar, G.A., 2019. Reporte, Análasis estadístico de datos meteorólogicos medidos y de tendencia de evaporación en Salar Cauchari-Olaroz (Prov. de Jujuy-Argentina) INENCO-CONICET.

 

Smee, B., 2011. Quality Control Data Review, Salares Lithium Project, Argentina. Report for Minera Exar.

 

Stormont, J. C., Hines, J. H., Pease, R. E., O’Dowd, D. N., Kelsey, and J. A., 2010. Method to Measure the Relative Brine Release Capacity of Geologic Material. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal Symposium in Print: Innovations in Characterizing the Mechanical and Hydrological Properties of Unsaturated Soils.

 

SQM, 2016. Cálculo de la recarga de caudal en la cuenca de los salares Cauchari y Olaroz, utilizando el modelo hidrológico HEC HMS.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 409 of 427

 

 

 

Suárez-Authievre, C., and Villarroel-Alcocer, F., 2012. Cutoff analysis of Lithium Carbonate process from brines the Salar de Cauchari. Report for Lithium Americas.

 

Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage, Am. Geophys. Union Trans., vol. 16, pp. 519-524.

 

USACE (United States Army Corps of Engineers), 2006. Hydrologic Modelling System HEC-HMS. User's Manual. Version 3.1.0. http://www.hec.usace.army.miL/software/hec-hms/documentation.html.

 

US SEC (United States Securities and Exchange Commission), 2009. Form 20-F for Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A. (Chemical and Mining Company of Chile Inc.).

 

Van der Leeden, F., Troise, F., and Todd, D., 1990. The Water Encyclopedia, Second Edition. Lewis Publishers, Chelsen, Michigan.

 

Background References

 

ARA WorleyParsons, 2011. Preliminary Assessment and Economic Evaluation of the Cauchari-Olaroz Lithium Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina.

 

Esteban C. L., 2005. Estudio geologic y evapofacies del salar Cauchari, departamento Susques, Jujuy. Universidad Nacional de Salta, Tesis Professional.

 

Jerez, D., 2010. Informe sobre los tributos con incidencia en el Proyecto Cauchari. August 2010.

 

Koorevaar P., Menelik G., and Dirksen C., 1983. Elements of Soil Physics, Elsevier.

 

Kunaz, I., 2009. Cauchari and Incahuasi Argentine Salars Assessment and Development. Internal report by TRU group for Lithium Americas Corp.

 

Kunaz, I., 2009. Evaluation of the Exploration Potential at the Salares de Cauchari and Olaroz, Province of Jujuy, Argentina. Internal report by TRU group for Lithium Americas Corp.

 

Latin American Minerals, 2009. Informe de impacto ambiental, etapa de exploracion proyecto Olaroz – Cauchari.

 

Lic. Echenique Mónica, Lic. Agostino Gilda, Lic Zemplin Telma, 2009. Plan de relaciones comunitarias.

 

Nicolli H. B., 1981. Geoquimica de aguas y salmueras de cuencas evaporaticas de la Puna. Anal. Acad. Nac. Cs. Ex. Fís. Nat. Buenos Aires, Tomo 33.

 

Platts, January 2016, Argentina eyes raising natural gas prices to boost output, retrieved from

http://www.platts.com/latest-news/natural-gas/buenosaires/argentina-eyes-raising-natural-gas-prices-to-21829120 on March 31, 2017.

 

Schalamuk, I., Fernandez R. y Etcheverry R., 1983. Los yacimientos de minerals no metalíferos y rocas de aplicacion de la region NOA. Ministeria de Economía, Subsecretaría de Minería, Buenos Aires.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 410 of 427

 

 

 

Autor desconocido, 2000. Estudio geologic-económico, mina La Yaveña, departamento de Susques de Jujuy.

 

Testing

 

CICITEM, Estudios Experimentales Salmuera Salar de Cauchari, Parte 1 y 2, Dr. P. Vargas, Mayo 2011.

 

Minera EXAR, Pruebas De Encalado Con Cal Viva, Documento interno, Noviembre 2011.

 

Minera EXAR, Pruebas De Sedimentacion Con Cal Viva, Documento interno, Noviembre 2011.

 

IIT-UdeC, Pruebas De Laboratorio De Extraccion Por Solvente De Boro Desde Salmuera Del Salar De Cauchari, I. Wilkomirski, Octubre 2011.

 

SGS Canada Inc. The Production Of Lithium Carbonate From A Representative Sample From Salar Cauchari, Project 13101-001 – Final Report, septiembre 2011.

 

SGS Canada Inc, Pilot Plant investigation into The Production of Lithium Carbonate from a Representative Sample from Salar Cauchari, Mayo 2012.

 

SRC, Saskatchewan Research Council Mining and Minerals Division, Cauchari- Olaroz Project Potash Recovery from Salt Lake Winter Precipitates, Diciembre 2011.

 

Bibliography

 

Conesa Fernández-Vítora, V. (1997). Auditorías medioambientales, guía metodológica (2a. ed. re). Madrid: Mundi-Prensa. Retrieved from

http://www.sunass.gob.pe/doc/cendoc/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=author_see&id=174.

 

Soil Survey Staff. (1999). Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys (2nd ed.). Washington D.C.: US Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 411 of 427

 

 

 

28.0Certificates

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

 

DAVID BURGA, P.GEO.

 

I, David Burga, P. Geo., residing at 3884 Freeman Terrace, Mississauga, Ontario, do hereby certify that:

 

1.I am an independent geological consultant contracted by Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp.

 

2.This certificate applies to the technical report titled “Operational Technical Report at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina,” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective date of December 31, 2024.

 

3.I am a graduate of the University of Toronto with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geological Sciences (1997). I have worked as a geologist for a total of 22 years since obtaining my B.Sc. degree. I am a geological consultant currently licensed by Professional Geoscientists Ontario (License No 1836). I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and certify that, by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. My relevant experience for the purpose of the Technical Report is:

 

Exploration Geologist, Cameco Gold        1997-1998 
Field Geophysicist, Quantec Geoscience        1998-1999 
Geological Consultant, Andeburg Consulting Ltd.        1999-2003 
Geologist, Aeon Egmond Ltd.        2003-2005 
Project Manager, Jacques Whitford        2005-2008 
Exploration Manager – Chile, Red Metal Resources        2008-2009 
Consulting Geologist        2009-Present 

 

4.I have visited the Property that is the subject of this Technical Report on January 24, 2017, February 19-21, 2019, June 10-12, 2019, and November 19-21, 2024.

 

5.I am responsible for Sections 2-12, 23, 24, 27, and co-author for Sections 24 to 26 of the Technical Report along with those sections of the Summary pertaining thereto.

 

6.I am independent of the Issuer applying the test in Section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

 

7.I have had prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of this Technical Report. That involvement was as an author on the technical report titled “Updated Feasibility Study and Mineral Reserve Estimation to Support 40,000 tpa Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina”, (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of September 30th, 2020, “Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of March 1st, 2019, and the technical report titled “Updated Feasibility Study and Reserve Estimation and Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina”, (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of March 29th, 2017.I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and this Technical Report has been prepared in compliance therewith.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 412 of 427

 

 

 

8.I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance therewith.

 

9.As of the effective date of this technical report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: December 31, 2024

Signing Date: January 8, 2025

 

{SIGNED AND SEALED}

[David Burga]

 

  

David Burga, P.Geo.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 413 of 427

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

ERNEST BURGA, P. ENG.

 

I, Ernest Burga, P. Eng., residing at 3385 Aubrey Rd., Mississauga, Ontario, L5L 5E3, do hereby certify that:

 

1.I am an Associate Mechanical Engineer and President of Andeburg Consulting Services Inc.

 

2.This certificate applies to the technical report titled “Operational Technical Report at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina,” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective date of December 31, 2024.

 

3.I am a graduate of the National University of Engineering located in Lima, Peru where I earned my Bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering (B.Eng. 1965). I have practiced my profession continuously since graduation and in Canada since 1975. My work with major consulting firms in Canada has exposed me to hydrometallurgical processing with specialized depth to understand chemistry as required for metal extraction and lithium brines processing. In the last 25 years, I have completed hydrometallurgical projects interfacing directly with metallurgists for application of conventional and novel hydrometallurgical processes including hydrometallurgical processing of copper refinery slimes for a precious metal refinery, the selective removal of Bismuth and antimony from copper refinery electrolyte using IBC Advanced Technologies’ Molecular Recognition Technology based on a Nobel prize recognized development. During the last ten years, I have participated in the Lithium industry in brine processing interfacing with specialized metallurgists and process modeller for interpreting test works results, brine processing mass balances and undertaken full responsibility for process implementation and engineering work for PEAs and Definite feasibility studies for brine processing projects. Main clients include Lithium 1, Galaxy Resources, Simbol Minerals, Pure Energy and Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. I am licensed by the Professional Engineers of Ontario (License No. 6067011).

 

I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association (as defined in NI 43-101) and past relevant work experience in the Lithium Carbonate extraction processing, I fulfill the requirements to be a “qualified person” for the purposes of NI 43-101. My summarized career experience is as follows:

 

Maintenance Engineer – Backus and Johnston Brewery of Peru       1966-1975
Design Mechanical Engineer – Cambrian Engineering Group       1975-1978
Design Mechanical Engineer – Reid Crowther Bendy       1979-1981
Lead Mechanical Engineer – Cambrian Engineering Group       1981-1987
Project Engineer –Hydro Metallurgical Division- HG. Engineering       1988-2003
Lead Mechanical Engineer – AMEC Americas       2003-2005
Sr. Mechanical Engineer – SNC Lavalin Ltd.       2005-2009
President – Andeburg Consulting Services Inc.-Specialized in Lithium Extraction       2004 to present
Contracted Mechanical Engineer – P&E Mining Consultants Inc.       2009 to present

 

4.I have visited Property that is the subject of this Technical Report on January 24, 2017, and June 10-12, 2019.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 414 of 427

 

 

 

5.I am responsible for authoring Sections 18, 19, 21, 22 and 25.2-25.5 of this Technical Report along with those sections of the Summary pertaining thereto.

 

6.I am independent of the issuer applying the test in Section 1.5 of NI 43-101. I am independent of the Vendor and the Property.

 

7.I have had prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of this Technical Report. That involvement was as an author on the technical report titled “Updated Feasibility Study and Mineral Reserve Estimation to Support 40,000 tpa Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina”, (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of September 30th, 2020, “Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of March 1st, 2019, and the technical report titled “Updated Feasibility Study and Reserve Estimation and Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina”, (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of March 29th, 2017.I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and this Technical Report has been prepared in compliance therewith.

 

8.I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance therewith.

 

9.As of the effective date of this technical report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: December 31, 2024

Signing Date: January 8, 2025

 

{SIGNED AND SEALED}

[Ernest Burga]

 

  

Ernest Burga, P. Eng.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 415 of 427

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

DANIEL WEBER, P.G., RM-SME

 

As the co-author of the report titled “Operational Technical Report at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina,” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective date of December 31, 2024 (the Technical Report) I, Daniel Weber, P.G., RM-SME, do hereby certify that:

 

1.I am a senior hydrogeologist with LRE Water, Denver, CO. From July 2012 through April 2020, I was a senior hydrogeologist and operations manager with Errol L. Montgomery & Associates, Inc. (Montgomery & Associates), 400 South Colorado Blvd., Suite 340, Denver, CO 80246 USA.

 

2.I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degrees in Geological Sciences and Environmental Sciences from Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois in 1980. I graduated with a Master of Science in Hydrology from the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona in 1986.

 

3.I have professional registrations in good standing with the following organizations: Registered Professional Geologist in the State of Arizona (26044); Registered Professional Geologist in the State of California (5830); Registered Member of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME) registered member (4064243). I have practiced hydrogeology for 38 years, during which I have worked extensively in salar basins in Arizona, Nevada, California, Chile and Argentina. My experience as a hydrogeologist includes groundwater resource development and management, drilling and testing of production, injection, and monitoring wells, technical oversight for feasibility investigations, design and application of groundwater models, and interpretation of aquifer test data. My relevant experience for the purpose of the Technical Report is: Qualified Person for the Centenario-Ratones Project, Salta Province, Argentina for Eramine Sudamerica, a subsidiary of Eramet; Qualified Person for the Clayton Valley Lithium Project, Esmeralda County, Nevada for Pure Energy Minerals; and evaluation of brine resources and reserves in salar settings of the altiplano of Argentina and Chile, and the arid regions of the southwestern U.S. as part of independent technical due diligence investigations.

 

I have read the definition of “qualified person” set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) and certify that and by reason of my education, experience and affiliation with professional associations I fulfill the requirements to be a “Qualified Person” for the purposes of NI 43-101.

 

4.I participated in field visits to the Project site on September 8 and 9, 2018.

 

5.I have had prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of this Technical Report. That involvement was as an author on the technical report titled “Updated Feasibility Study and Mineral Reserve Estimation to Support 40,000 tpa Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina”, (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of September 30th, 2020, and the technical report titled “Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of March 1st, 2019.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 416 of 427

 

 

 

6.As of the effective date of this technical report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

7.I am independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101.

 

8.I have read National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1, and the Technical Report has been prepared in compliance with that instrument and form.

 

9.As qualified person for this project, I have been responsible for review of the conceptual model and drilling and testing results, updating and re-calibrating the previous numerical groundwater flow model, and for calculating estimated Mineral Resource and Reserve values for lithium provided in this Technical Report. I am responsible for authoring Sections 14, 15, 16.1 and 16.2 of the Technical Report along with those sections of the Summary pertaining thereto.

 

Effective Date: December 31, 2024

Signing Date: January 8, 2025

 

{SIGNED AND SEALED}

[Daniel Weber]

 

  

Signature of Daniel Weber, P.G., RM-SME

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 417 of 427

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

MAREK DWORZANOWSKI

 

I, Marek Dworzanowski, EUR ING, CEng, BSc(Hons), FIMMM, HonFSAIMM residing at 975 Route du Plateau,Trejouls, France, do hereby certify that:

 

1.I am an independent process consultant contracted by Lithium Americas Argentina Corporation.

 

2.This certificate applies to the technical report titled “Operational Technical Report at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina,” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective date of December 31, 2024.

 

3.I graduated from the University of Leeds, United Kingdom, with a BSc (Honours) in Mineral Processing in July 1980. In March 2016, I was appointed as a Visiting Adjunct Professor in Metallurgical Engineering, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.

 

4.I became a Fellow of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM) in 2006 and my membership number is 19594. I became a Fellow of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining (IMMM) in 2020 and my membership number is 485805. I became a Chartered Engineer (CEng) with the Engineering Council of the United Kingdom in 2020 and my registration number is 357983. I became a European Engineer (EUR ING) in 2022 and my registration number is 34956.

 

5.I have read the definition of “qualified person” (QP) set out in NI 43-101 and by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be a QP for the Technical Report.

 

6.I have over 40 years of experience in the mining industry during which time I gained a considerable amount of diverse experience in various senior roles within the areas of mineral processing and hydrometallurgy, production, project execution, project studies, technical consulting and research and development. My relevant experience in lithium brine projects for the purpose of the Technical Report includes operational reviews of producing lithium plants, process consulting support and acting as QP for a number of lithium brine projects including: Minera Salar Blanco Maricunga Project PEA and DFS (Chile), Millennial Lithium Pastos Grandes Project PEA and DFS (Argentina), Advantage Lithium Cauchari Project PEA and PFS (Argentina), NeoLithium 3Q Project DFS (Argentina), Standard Lithium Lanxess Smackover Project PEA (USA) and Standard Lithium SWA Project PFS (USA).

 

7.I am independent of Lithium Americas Argentina Corporation applying the test in Section 1.5 of National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”).

 

8.I have had prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of this Technical Report. That involvement was as an author on the technical report titled “Updated Feasibility Study and Mineral Reserve Estimation to Support 40,000 tpa Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina”, (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of September 30th, 2020.

 

9.I have not visited the property that is the subject of the Technical Report.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 418 of 427

 

 

 

10.I am responsible for Section 13 and Section 17 of the Technical Report along with those sections of the Summary pertaining thereto.

 

11.I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and those portions of the Technical Report that I am responsible for have been prepared in compliance therewith.

 

12.As of the effective date of this technical report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: December 31, 2024

Signing Date: January 8, 2025

 

{SIGNED AND SEALED}

[Marek Dworzanowski]

 

  

Marek Dworzanowski, EUR ING CEng

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 419 of 427

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFIED PERSON

ANTHONY SANFORD

 

I, Anthony Sanford, BSc. (Hons.), MBA (Mineral Resources Management), Pr.Sci.Nat, residing at Calle Esquilache 371, Piso 6, San Isidro, Lima Perú do hereby certify that:

 

1.I am an independent geological consultant contracted by Lithium Americas Corporation.

 

2.This certificate applies to the technical report titled “Operational Technical Report at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina,” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective date of December 31, 2024.

 

3.I graduated with a MBA (Mineral Resources Management) from the University of Dundee, Scotland, Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, in 1998; with a B.Sc (Hons), Geology from the University of Natal, Durban, South Africa in 1985 and B.Sc. (Geology & Applied Geology) in 1984. I am a geological consultant currently licensed by the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (Registration No 400089/03). I have worked in my profession for a total of 35 years since completing my honours degree in 1984 in the fields of geology, and environmental and social science related to the exploration, construction, operation, and closure phases of mine development. My experience includes working in environmental and social issues related to both open pit and underground mining including heap leach and mine waste/tailings disposal, and on the development of regulatory permits including ESIAs and mine closure plans, the last 20 years of which have been in South America. I have read the definition of “Expert” set out for the purposes of contributions to an NI 43-101 Technical Report and certify that by reason of my education, affiliation with a professional association, and past relevant work experience, I fulfill the requirements to be an “Expert” for the purposes of the Technical Report.

 

Principal Consultant, South America, EnviroProTech-t:       2021 – present
Senior Regional Consultant, South America, Ausenco       2016-2020
Environmental Services and Water Resources Manager. Perú, Ausenco       2015 - 2016
Environmental Services Manager, Perú, Ausenco       2008 - 2015
Senior Geologist, Perú, Ausenco       2004 - 2008
Geologist, Senior Geologist, Anglovaal, South Africa, Zambia       1985 - 1996

 

4.I have visited the Property that is the subject of this Technical Report during the period 14-15 February 2017 and 23-24 July 2019.

 

5.I am responsible for authoring Section 20 and Sections 4.7 through 4.10 and co-authoring Sections 25 and 26 of the Technical Report along with those sections of the Summary pertaining thereto.

 

6.I am independent of the Issuer applying the test in Section 1.5 of NI 43-101.

 

7.I have had prior involvement with the Property that is the subject of this Technical Report. That involvement was as an author on the technical report titled “Updated Feasibility Study and Mineral Reserve Estimation to Support 40,000 tpa Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina”, (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of September 30th, 2020, “Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Cauchari-Olaroz Project, Jujuy Province, Argentina” (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of March 1st, 2019, and the technical report titled “Updated Feasibility Study and Reserve Estimation and Lithium Carbonate Production at the Cauchari-Olaroz Salars, Jujuy Province, Argentina”, (the “Technical Report”) with an effective of March 29th, 2017.I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and this Technical Report has been prepared in compliance therewith.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 420 of 427

 

 

 

8.I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and this Technical Report has been prepared in compliance therewith.

 

9.As of the effective date of this technical report, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Technical Report contains all the scientific and technical information that is required to be disclosed to make the Technical Report not misleading.

 

Effective Date: December 31, 2024

Signing Date: January 8, 2025

 

{SIGNED AND SEALED}

[Anthony Sanford]

 

  

Anthony Sanford, Pr.Sci.Nat.

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 421 of 427

 

 

 

  Appendix 1 - Summary Tables of Pumping Test Results for Exploration
and Production Wells Exploration and Production Wells

 

Appendix 1. Summary Tables of Pumping Test Results for Exploration and Production Wells

 

Table 1
Location and Construction Information for Exploration Wells and Pumping Tests
Well Identifier Coordinates

Land Surface Elevation

(m amsl)

Year Constructed

Total Depth of Well

(m)

Depth Interval of
Well Screen

(m, bls)

HSU(s)

Penetrated by Screened
Interval of Well

East

(m)

North

(m)

Top Bottom
PB-01 3423907.28 7380861.37 3939.95 2010 204 66 186 Halite with Sand
PB-03A 3425965.69 7383015.18 3940.3 2011 201 58 197 Interbedded Sand and Halite
PB-04 3421378.53 7381604.24 3946.67 2011 305 59 297 Clay/Silt with Sand Interbedded Sand and Halite
PB-06A 3419220.00 7377555.48 3942.00 2011 194 57 191 Interbedded Sand and Halite Lower Sand
PB-I 3422532.00 7385915.00 3962.30 2011 51 18 44 Alluvial Fan (Archibarca)
W17-06 3427261 7392988 3936.49 2018 455 94 437 Alluvial Fan (East)
W18-05 3424500 7382499 3943.12 2018 270 63 265 Alluvial Fan (East)
Interbedded Sand and Halite
W18-06 3426650 7385299 3945.91 2018 460 63 440 Interbedded Sand and Halite Halite with Sand
W04-A 3422492 7379474 3937.97 2019 478 73 472 Halite with Sand Interbedded Sand and Halite Halite with Sand Lower Sand Basal Sand
W11-06 3424279 7383792 3945.95 2019 434 114 422 Alluvial Fan (Archibarca) Halite with Sand Interbedded Sand and Halite Lower Sand Basal Sand
W18-23 3423500 7381500 3941.25 2019 484 70 476 Clay/Silt with Sand Interbedded Sand with Halite Halite with Sand Lower Sand Basal Sand
CW-62 3425680 7388632 NA 2019 90 47 86 Alluvial Fan (East) Clay/Silt with Sand

a) coordinates of wells constructed after 2011 based on DEM; wells constructed in 2010 and 2011 are based on reported differential GPS survey (Posgar 94)

NA = not available

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 422 of 427

 

 

 

  Appendix 1 - Summary Tables of Pumping Test Results for Exploration
and Production Wells Exploration and Production Wells

 

Table 2
Hydraulic Results of Pumping Tests at Exploration Wells
Pumped
Well
Identifier
Month-
Year of
Test
Pumping
Period
(days)
Pre-
pumping
Water
Level (m, bls)

Average
Pumping
Rate

(L/s)

Drawdown

(m)

Specific
Capacity
(L/s/m)
Data Source
 
PB-01 Mar-2011 8 4.80 4 41.27 0.097 LAC 2012
 
PB-03A Aug-2011 27 6.36 12 31.78 0.38 LAC 2012
PB-03A Oct-2016 12 7.79 13 64.57 0.20 SQM 2016
 
PB-04 May-2011 31 13.50 20 50.40 0.40 LAC 2012
PB-04 Sep-2016 15 10.94 25 55.28 0.45 SQM 2016
 
PB-06A Oct-2011 11 5.21 22 40.34 0.55 LAC 2012
PB-06A Oct-2016 10 4.19 21 35.15 0.60 SQM 2016
 
PB-I Sep-2011 4 18.99 23 3.84 6.0 LAC 2012
W17-06 Oct-2018 7 7.46 50 21.22 2.4 EXAR 2018
W18-05 Oct-2018 11 NA 31 42.47 0.73 Andina 2018
W18-06 Jan-2019 9 5.50 17 40.74 0.42 EXAR 2019
W04-A May-2019 3 11.65 25 30.00 0.83 EXAR 2019
W11-06 Jan-2019 5 13.84 30 32.82 0.91 EXAR 2019
W18-23 May-2019 4 13.43 25 25.35 0.99 EXAR 2019
CW-62 Apr-2019 4 4.62 16.5 48.71 0.34 EXAR 2019
NA = not available

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 423 of 427

 

 

 

  Appendix 1 - Summary Tables of Pumping Test Results for Exploration
and Production Wells Exploration and Production Wells

 

Table 3
Summary of Computed Aquifer Parameters for Exploration Wells
Pumped
Well
Identifier

Observation
Well

Identifier

Distance
from
Pumped
Well

(m)

Average T

(m2/d)

Estimated
Aquifer
Thicknessa (m)

Average

Kr

(m/d)

Ratio

Kz/Kr

Average S

Ss

(m-1)

Average Sy Representative HSU(s)
PB-01b PP-1B
PP-1C

71.3

29.8

10 132 0.08 0.002 3.0E-05 2.2E-07 --- Halite with Sand
PB-03A PB-03 24.0 60 131 0.46 --- 2.6E-05 2.0E-07 --- Interbedded Sand and Halite
PB-04 DDH-12A 23.8 65 238 0.27 --- 1.0E-04 4.2E-07 --- Clay/Silt with Sand Interbedded Sand and Halite
PB-06A PE-15
PE-17

909

1118

125 121 1.0 --- 3.0E-03 2.4E-05 --- Interbedded Sand and Halite Lower Sand
PB-I PP-I 15 1,730 26 67 --- 4.0E-02 1.0E-04 --- Alluvial Fan (Archibarca)
W17-06c ML-006 DL-006

40.9

25.2

650 373 1.7 0.3 2.5E-03 7.0E-06 0.18d Alluvial Fan (East)
W18-05 PE-14
DDH-11

1340

1690

90 202 0.45 --- 4.0e-04 2.0E-06 --- Alluvial Fan (East) Interbedded Sand and Halite
W18-06 --- --- 70 258 0.3 --- --- --- --- Interbedded Sand and Halite, Halite with Sand
W04-A --- --- 170 399 0.43 --- --- --- --- Halite with Sand Interbedded Sand and Halite Halite with Sand Lower Sand Basal Sand
W11-06 --- --- 200 308 0.65 --- --- --- --- Alluvial Fan (Archibarca) Halite with Sand Interbedded Sand and Halite Lower Sand Basal Sand
W18-23 --- --- 170 406 0.42 --- --- --- --- Clay/Silt with Sand Interbedded Sand with Halite Halite with Sand Lower Sand Basal Sand
CW-62 CM-62 8 220 65 3.5 0.1 3.5E-03 5.4E-05 0.2d Alluvial Fan (East) Clay/Silt with Sand

a) thickness from top of tested unit to bottom of perforated interval of pumped well

b) 28-hour response prior to boundary effect

c) 3-day response prior to boundary effect

d) estimated; longer duration of pumping is required to confirm estimate

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 424 of 427

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix 2. Summary of Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate Model Projections

 

Table 4
Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate
Well Information - OS4 (56 Wells) Predicted Composite Drawdown (m) Predicted Composite Lithium Concentration (mg/L)
Simulated Production Well Easting (m) Northing (m) Top of Model (masl)

Well Screen

Top

(masl)

Well

Screen

Bottom

(masl)

Start (year) End (year) Pumping (L/s) Year 1

Pumping (L/s)

Years 2 through 40

Year 1 Year 10 Year 20 Year 30 Year 40 Year 1 Year 10 Year 20 Year 30 Year 40
PB-3A 3425965 7383015 3939.83 3881.49 3749.95 1 40 9.5 9.5 92.30 99.14 103.56 107.41 110.72 813.95 801.33 797.26 791.61 785.15
PB4 3421378 7381604 3946.79 3902.67 3589.13 1 40 12.41 12.41 70.92 77.74 82.12 85.65 88.93 546.64 520.77 467.29 428.87 401.36
PB-6A 3419220 7377554 3941.44 3884.64 3749.28 1 40 14.97 14.97 9.40 24.82 32.24 37.54 42.85 503.85 499.85 489.26 480.97 476.83
W18-05 3424500 7382499 3943.12 3880.18 3678.18 1 40 22.61 22.61 33.32 42.05 46.68 50.54 53.85 797.30 750.32 723.85 709.05 701.94
W17-06 3427261 7392988 3936.49 3842.42 3499.42 1 40 29.58 29.58 5.35 6.07 7.39 9.26 11.31 559.90 559.57 559.19 558.51 557.84
W11-06 3424279 7383792 3945.95 3832.10 3524.10 1 40 22.5 22.5 7.38 12.39 15.95 19.02 21.94 720.04 678.38 629.89 584.57 545.64
W18-06 3426650 7385299 3945.91 3881.12 3504.12 1 40 15.81 15.81 25.56 31.74 34.91 37.78 40.54 566.78 555.28 540.23 525.07 510.50
W-02B 3427266 7396185 3937.76 3600.00 3435.00 1 40 20 17 2.59 7.32 8.86 10.40 12.03 527.09 530.72 532.38 534.32 536.84
W-04A 3422492 7379474 3937.97 3865.18 3466.18 1 40 25.3 25.3 7.83 24.28 30.92 35.38 39.18 679.11 680.91 679.86 674.44 666.50
WR-21 3425377 7386026 3945.40 3570.00 3423.80 1 40 25 17 3.61 8.30 11.33 14.09 16.74 574.17 573.41 578.36 582.96 586.57
WR-10 3420980 7380008 3943.39 3862.10 3596.10 1 40 20 15 9.86 24.55 31.72 36.59 41.05 567.89 568.62 560.73 553.11 546.94
WR-07 3420554 7378442 3941.95 3890.83 3682.23 1 40 21 21 8.09 24.83 32.38 37.63 42.72 552.62 558.64 551.48 543.47 536.84
WR-23 3426988 7387343 3941.00 3872.69 3482.69 1 40 15 10 19.62 16.97 19.52 22.06 24.58 492.26 495.39 497.56 499.26 500.43
WR-3 3420007 7376056 3940.29 3750.00 3683.09 1 40 21 21 7.72 21.22 28.50 33.47 38.14 602.60 615.09 619.23 618.49 618.01
W17-12 3433225 7405308 3938.41 3857.41 3489.04 1 40 17 17 14.43 15.59 15.91 16.07 16.18 661.45 655.44 650.46 643.99 636.71
W18-23 3423500 7381500 3941.25 3871.50 3467.47 1 40 26.9 26.9 5.28 18.22 23.39 27.24 30.60 697.68 685.51 677.29 675.55 681.13
WR-24 3425666 7388636 3944.99 3796.70 3462.72 1 40 20 10 3.56 4.57 7.00 9.43 11.84 555.58 558.42 561.74 561.39 560.15
W09-01 3428590 7398393 3935.62 3510.00 3368.58 1 40 21 21 3.16 8.01 9.57 10.91 12.31 583.03 578.09 575.97 574.30 572.56
W10-04 3421093 7377243 3940.06 3720.00 3666.45 1 40 21 21 8.77 23.51 30.79 35.76 40.30 654.73 635.52 620.24 605.18 598.65
WR-28 3427380 7391643 3938.59 3838.53 3488.53 1 40 23 23 3.13 3.84 5.29 7.20 9.21 615.35 614.99 613.55 611.53 609.25
W09-06 3425959 7381651 3939.34 3510.00 3422.20 1 40 28 28 4.84 17.36 22.39 26.14 29.44 632.84 632.18 631.63 629.99 627.63
W-1 3421632 7380788 3942.39 3810.00 3442.00 2 40 0 15 2.76 24.79 30.61 34.80 38.56 585.34 576.68 570.20 563.03 550.47
W-10 3421500 7375500 3940.37 3660.00 3340.00 2 40 0 13 0.57 11.16 17.73 22.35 26.21 569.95 578.25 587.07 579.32 510.26
W-11 3422500 7381500 3943.43 3810.00 3443.00 1 40 13 13 17.92 28.00 33.11 37.00 40.49 631.46 581.83 539.81 510.21 487.12
W-12 3426499 7383999 3938.61 3540.00 3438.00 2 40 0 15 2.57 17.44 21.43 24.71 27.74 586.20 590.95 592.41 591.88 589.14
W-13 3427303 7397557 3937.78 3600.00 3438.00 2 40 0 10 1.18 6.96 8.54 9.99 11.52 572.39 574.46 576.31 579.01 582.18
W-14 3427363 7395197 3937.57 3570.00 3337.00 2 40 0 8 1.16 6.44 7.94 9.55 11.27 544.28 540.59 540.89 540.93 540.42
W-15 3426283 7393711 3938.69 3570.00 3338.00 1 40 17 17 4.87 7.16 8.63 10.48 12.45 583.22 586.62 589.54 592.20 595.02
W-16 3427420 7394024 3937.06 3510.00 3337.00 2 40 0 15 1.01 6.18 7.63 9.36 11.22 584.34 577.18 574.40 570.88 566.93

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 425 of 427

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4
Updated Mineral Reserve Estimate
Well Information - OS4 (56 Wells) Predicted Composite Drawdown (m) Predicted Composite Lithium Concentration (mg/L)
Simulated Production Well Easting (m) Northing (m) Top of Model (masl)

Well Screen

Top

(masl)

Well

Screen

Bottom

(masl)

Start (year) End (year) Pumping (L/s) Year 1

Pumping (L/s)

Years 2 through 40

Year 1 Year 10 Year 20 Year 30 Year 40 Year 1 Year 10 Year 20 Year 30 Year 40
W-17 3426523 7395459 3938.81 3600.00 3338.00 2 40 0 15 1.03 6.92 8.44 10.08 11.83 555.57 559.07 564.09 566.84 567.57
W-18 3427606 7396872 3937.08 3600.00 3337.00 2 40 0 8 1.33 6.89 8.45 9.92 11.48 537.57 538.97 539.28 539.67 540.68
W-19 3428178 7397594 3936.35 3570.00 3336.00 2 40 0 8 1.36 6.98 8.54 9.95 11.42 554.08 549.92 546.25 543.19 540.67
W-2 3423500 7382500 3945.92 3600.00 3445.00 2 40 0 15 2.51 14.07 18.54 22.05 25.21 666.81 663.73 669.63 684.43 698.12
W-20 3425179 7383375 3943.33 3600.00 3443.00 2 40 0 17 2.63 14.26 18.51 21.91 25.00 645.84 644.77 646.94 656.74 671.81
W-21 3425885 7384559 3941.04 3570.00 3441.00 2 40 0 15 2.50 13.12 16.78 19.87 22.77 613.70 609.42 604.10 601.21 601.88
W-22 3424513 7381491 3939.63 3540.00 3439.00 2 40 0 17 2.91 16.97 22.14 25.96 29.31 676.43 671.02 669.61 669.77 667.32
W-23 3422500 7380500 3940.97 3810.00 3341.00 2 40 0 17 2.72 25.36 31.55 35.83 39.50 674.35 677.50 678.00 675.81 672.52
W-24 3424030 7381949 3942.35 3570.00 3342.00 2 40 0 17 3.03 16.34 21.23 24.94 28.22 676.36 673.45 669.70 683.52 710.52
W-25 3421551 7379038 3940.34 3840.00 3340.00 2 40 0 17 2.60 30.89 38.36 43.29 47.69 709.73 675.94 673.92 672.82 673.28
W-26 3422500 7377500 3939.09 3570.00 3338.00 2 40 0 17 0.85 16.72 23.48 28.08 31.94 657.74 646.80 637.12 629.49 624.23
W-27 3420119 7377453 3940.77 3840.00 3340.00 2 40 0 13 2.93 20.25 27.69 32.90 37.96 567.41 556.72 551.62 548.11 548.34
W-28 3426257 7386139 3941.78 3510.00 3342.00 2 40 0 18 2.61 17.30 20.30 23.06 25.71 547.51 552.93 551.98 550.51 549.40
W-29 3427532 7398121 3937.63 3600.00 3337.00 2 40 0 10 1.22 7.21 8.80 10.21 11.69 577.01 579.82 582.67 585.29 587.80
W-3 3427237 7386343 3942.28 3841.00 3441.00 2 40 0 18 2.05 39.99 42.70 45.35 47.96 524.92 515.92 505.16 495.43 486.63
W-30 3430861 7404476 3936.33 3835.00 3335.00 2 40 0 12 0.07 13.88 15.04 15.75 16.26 762.90 762.99 761.91 760.78 759.61
W-31 3425454 7382449 3940.98 3570.00 3341.00 2 40 0 17 3.05 16.14 20.86 24.47 27.70 643.38 644.40 645.71 647.98 650.77
W-32 3424814 7384921 3946.45 3600.00 3346.00 2 40 0 13 1.90 9.48 12.85 15.78 18.56 611.46 617.61 624.17 630.32 633.89
W-4 3428167 7399343 3936.52 3836.00 3336.00 2 40 0 10 1.10 6.79 8.41 9.74 11.10 621.16 623.48 625.27 625.35 621.69
W-5 3426260 7394546 3939.03 3600.00 3339.00 2 40 0 15 0.98 6.91 8.40 10.15 12.03 571.42 575.03 579.64 581.23 585.09
W-6 3423500 7380500 3937.92 3600.00 3338.00 2 40 0 15 2.59 18.21 23.99 28.08 31.60 718.36 712.66 704.74 697.86 691.54
W-7 3422182 7376598 3940.15 3600.00 3340.00 2 40 0 13 0.77 13.54 20.25 24.87 28.75 552.82 543.16 538.97 537.26 536.81
W-8 3419086 7376655 3940.72 3810.00 3340.00 2 40 0 13 1.99 18.04 25.37 30.52 35.56 544.58 540.81 533.96 535.14 529.97
W-9 3422500 7378500 3938.00 3570.00 3338.00 2 40 0 15 1.63 21.44 28.22 32.77 36.61 627.63 627.80 619.24 607.73 596.86
R64 3424476 7378150 3938.74 3390.00 3354.60 2 40 0 17 1.03 15.67 22.00 26.35 29.99 580.62 628.56 623.14 613.49 583.96
R66 3424918 7379262 3938.99 3450.00 3374.90 2 40 0 17 1.63 16.45 22.43 26.59 30.13 635.03 631.03 627.57 624.56 621.61
R67 3425499 7380396 3939.50 3480.00 3398.30 2 40 0 17 2.40 16.83 22.35 26.30 29.72 583.53 632.46 630.18 627.58 625.17

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 426 of 427

 

 

 

Figure A1      Numerical Model 40-Year Drawdown Layer 1

 

 

 

Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp., Operational Technical Report

Cauchari Salars, Argentina

Page 427 of 427