UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File number: 000-53764
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Delaware | 98-0574019 (Series A); 98-0574020 (Series B) | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Superfund Office Building P.O. Box 1479 Grand Anse St. Georges, Grenada West Indies |
Not applicable | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(473) 439-2418
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer | ¨ | Accelerated Filer | ¨ | |||
Non-Accelerated Filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting Company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
The following unaudited financial statements of Superfund Gold, L.P., Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A and Superfund Gold L.P. Series B are included in Item 1:
2
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
US Government securities, at fair value, (amortized cost of $4,048,849 and $6,400,000 as of March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively) |
$ | 4,048,849 | $ | 6,400,000 | ||||
Due from brokers (net of reserve of $194,753 as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011) (See Note 5) |
10,221,478 | 17,505,597 | ||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
146,326 | 134,988 | ||||||
Futures contracts sold |
378,509 | 378,483 | ||||||
Cash |
12,280,535 | 5,304,787 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
27,075,697 | 29,723,855 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
205,049 | 95,397 | ||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
611,085 | 2,237,362 | ||||||
Subscriptions received in advance |
488,838 | 914,000 | ||||||
Redemptions payable |
317,407 | 904,938 | ||||||
Management fee payable |
48,361 | 107,656 | ||||||
Fees payable |
46,683 | 105,056 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
1,717,423 | 4,364,409 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET ASSETS |
$ | 25,358,274 | $ | 25,359,446 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
3
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
as of March 31, 2012
Percentage of | ||||||||||||
Face Value | Net Assets | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Debt Securities United States, at fair value |
||||||||||||
United States Treasury Bills due May 24, 2012 (amortized cost $4,048,849), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards |
$ | 4,050,000 | 16.0 | % | $ | 4,048,849 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Forward contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.6 | 146,326 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
0.6 | 146,326 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Currency |
(0.8 | ) | (205,049 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
(0.8 | ) | (205,049 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total forward contracts, at fair value |
(0.2 | ) | (58,723 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.1 | 22,416 | ||||||||||
Energy |
(0.5 | ) | (126,924 | ) | ||||||||
Financial |
0.2 | 52,941 | ||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
(0.1 | ) | (28,049 | ) | ||||||||
Indices |
0.3 | 77,036 | ||||||||||
Metals |
(2.4 | ) | (608,505 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts purchased |
(2.4 | ) | (611,085 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.0 | * | 6,329 | |||||||||
Energy |
0.0 | * | 4,580 | |||||||||
Food & Fiber |
(0.4 | ) | (104,134 | ) | ||||||||
Indices |
0.2 | 50,724 | ||||||||||
Livestock |
0.8 | 204,800 | ||||||||||
Metals |
0.9 | 216,210 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts sold |
1.5 | 378,509 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts, at fair value |
(0.9 | )% | $ | (232,576 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures and forward contracts by country composition |
||||||||||||
Australia |
0.1 | 27,686 | ||||||||||
European Monetary Union |
(0.0 | )* | (5,471 | ) | ||||||||
Great Britain |
(0.1 | ) | (25,435 | ) | ||||||||
Japan |
0.1 | 24,333 | ||||||||||
United States |
(1.4 | ) | (353,142 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
0.2 | 40,730 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures and forward contracts by country |
(1.1 | )% | $ | (291,299 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
4
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
as of December 31, 2011
Percentage of | ||||||||||||
Face Value | Net Assets | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Debt Securities United States, at fair value |
||||||||||||
United States Treasury Bills due February 23, 2012 (amortized cost $6,400,000), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards |
$ | 6,400,000 | 25.2 | % | $ | 6,400,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Forward contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.5 | 134,988 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
0.5 | 134,988 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Currency |
(0.4 | ) | (95,397 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
(0.4 | ) | (95,397 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total forward contracts, at fair value |
0.2 | % | $ | 39,591 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.3 | % | $ | 68,483 | ||||||||
Energy |
(0.3 | ) | (86,639 | ) | ||||||||
Financial |
||||||||||||
2 Year U.S. Treasury Note |
0.0 | * | 1,954 | |||||||||
Other |
0.0 | * | 3,926 | |||||||||
Total Financial |
0.0 | * | 5,880 | |||||||||
Food & Fiber |
0.1 | 30,713 | ||||||||||
Indices |
0.0 | * | 8,193 | |||||||||
Metals |
||||||||||||
171 contracts of CMX Gold expiring February 2012 |
(8.8 | ) | (2,228,620 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
(0.1 | ) | (35,372 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Metals |
(8.9 | ) | (2,263,992 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts purchased |
(8.8 | ) | (2,237,362 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.3 | 85,282 | ||||||||||
Energy |
0.3 | 84,680 | ||||||||||
Financial |
(0.0 | )* | (11,937 | ) | ||||||||
Food & Fiber |
0.1 | 23,297 | ||||||||||
Indices |
0.2 | 58,871 | ||||||||||
Livestock |
0.1 | 18,950 | ||||||||||
Metals |
0.5 | 119,340 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts sold |
1.5 | 378,483 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts, at fair value |
(7.3 | )% | $ | (1,858,879 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures and forward contracts by country composition |
||||||||||||
Australian |
0.1 | % | $ | 13,630 | ||||||||
European Monetary Union |
0.3 | 69,960 | ||||||||||
Great Britain |
0.0 | * | 5,614 | |||||||||
Japan |
0.4 | 106,637 | ||||||||||
United States |
(8.1 | ) | (2,048,725 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
0.1 | 33,596 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures and forward contracts by country |
(7.2 | )% | $ | (1,819,288 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
5
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Investment income |
||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 8 | $ | 4,699 | ||||
Other income |
950 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total income |
958 | 4,699 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Brokerage commissions |
136,950 | 157,510 | ||||||
Management fees |
158,598 | 157,878 | ||||||
Selling commissions |
99,252 | 99,491 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
52,866 | 52,623 | ||||||
Incentive fee |
| 13,556 | ||||||
Other |
2,019 | 4,796 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total expenses |
449,685 | 485,854 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net investment loss |
(448,727 | ) | (481,155 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts |
(962,649 | ) | 2,829,267 | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts |
1,527,989 | (2,274,104 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net gain on investments |
565,340 | 555,163 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
$ | 116,613 | $ | 74,008 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
6
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Increase in net assets from operations |
||||||||
Net investment loss |
$ | (448,727 | ) | $ | (481,155 | ) | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts |
(962,649 | ) | 2,829,267 | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts |
1,527,989 | (2,274,104 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
116,613 | 74,008 | ||||||
Capital share transactions |
||||||||
Issuance of Units |
1,414,685 | 3,510,976 | ||||||
Redemption of Units |
(1,532,470 | ) | (3,148,679 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions |
(117,785 | ) | 362,297 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets |
(1,172 | ) | 436,305 | |||||
Net assets, beginning of period |
25,359,446 | 26,675,225 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net assets, end of period |
$ | 25,358,274 | $ | 27,111,530 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
7
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
$ | 116,613 | $ | 74,008 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Purchases of U.S. government securities |
(4,049,212 | ) | (9,647,533 | ) | ||||
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities |
6,400,000 | 9,600,000 | ||||||
Amortization of discounts and premiums |
363 | (2,880 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in due from brokers |
7,284,119 | (2,621,694 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in due from affiliate |
| 5,599 | ||||||
Decrease in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
(11,338 | ) | (83,988 | ) | ||||
Increase in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
109,652 | 235,094 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased |
(1,626,277 | ) | 2,229,493 | |||||
Decrease in futures contracts sold |
(26 | ) | (106,495 | ) | ||||
Decrease in incentive fee payable |
| (395,667 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in management fees payable |
(59,295 | ) | 4,860 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in fees payable |
(58,373 | ) | 4,930 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
8,106,226 | (704,273 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Subscriptions, net of change in advance subscriptions |
989,523 | 3,332,909 | ||||||
Redemptions, net of change in redemptions payable |
(2,120,001 | ) | (524,219 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(1,130,478 | ) | 2,808,690 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in cash |
6,975,748 | 2,104,417 | ||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
5,304,787 | 3,630,425 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | 12,280,535 | $ | 5,734,842 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
8
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES A
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
as of March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
US Government securities, at fair value (amortized cost of $2,149,389 and $3,700,000 as of March 31, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively) |
$ | 2,149,389 | $ | 3,700,000 | ||||
Due from brokers (net of reserve of $93,232 as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011) (See Note 5) |
5,588,915 | 10,182,255 | ||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
80,209 | 69,300 | ||||||
Futures contracts sold |
199,822 | 189,971 | ||||||
Cash |
9,288,142 | 4,325,976 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
17,306,477 | 18,467,502 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
112,319 | 51,238 | ||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
356,184 | 1,411,823 | ||||||
Subscriptions received in advance |
328,418 | 336,000 | ||||||
Redemptions payable |
249,237 | 711,068 | ||||||
Management fee payable |
30,985 | 67,674 | ||||||
Fees payable |
32,130 | 70,546 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
1,109,273 | 2,648,349 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET ASSETS |
$ | 16,197,204 | $ | 15,819,153 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-1 Net Assets |
$ | 12,854,354 | $ | 12,507,057 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Number of Units outstanding |
8,504.507 | 8,359.510 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-1 Net Asset Value per Unit |
$ | 1,511.48 | $ | 1,496.15 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-2 Net Assets |
$ | 3,342,850 | $ | 3,312,096 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Number of Units outstanding |
2,025.400 | 2,037.421 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A-2 Net Asset Value per Unit |
$ | 1,650.46 | $ | 1,625.63 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
9
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES A
UNAUDITED CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2012
Percentage of | ||||||||||||
Face Value | Net Assets | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Debt Securities United States, at fair value |
||||||||||||
United States Treasury Bills due May 24, 2012 (amortized cost $2,149,389), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards |
$ | 2,150,000 | 13.3 | % | $ | 2,149,389 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Forward contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.5 | 80,209 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
0.5 | 80,209 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Currency |
(0.7 | ) | (112,319 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
(0.7 | ) | (112,319 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total forward contracts, at fair value |
(0.2 | )% | $ | (32,110 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures Contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Futures Contracts Purchased |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.1 | % | $ | 10,523 | ||||||||
Energy |
(0.5 | ) | (73,852 | ) | ||||||||
Financial |
0.2 | 27,327 | ||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
(0.1 | ) | (15,447 | ) | ||||||||
Indices |
0.3 | 40,849 | ||||||||||
Metals |
(2.1 | ) | (345,584 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts purchased |
(2.1 | ) | (356,184 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures Contracts Sold |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.0 | * | 3,294 | |||||||||
Energy |
0.0 | * | 2,670 | |||||||||
Food & Fiber |
(0.3 | ) | (56,479 | ) | ||||||||
Indices |
0.2 | 26,125 | ||||||||||
Livestock |
0.7 | 109,060 | ||||||||||
Metals |
0.7 | 115,152 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts sold |
1.3 | 199,822 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts, at fair value |
(0.8 | )% | $ | (156,362 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts by country composition |
||||||||||||
Australia |
0.1 | % | $ | 15,026 | ||||||||
European Monetary Union |
(0.0 | )* | (2,542 | ) | ||||||||
Great Britain |
(0.1 | )* | (15,057 | ) | ||||||||
Japan |
0.1 | 11,572 | ||||||||||
United States |
(1.2 | ) | (219,286 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
0.1 | 21,815 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts by country |
(1.0 | )% | $ | (188,472 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
10
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES A
UNAUDITED CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2011
Face Value | Percentage of Net Assets |
Fair Value | ||||||||||
Debt Securities United States, at fair value |
||||||||||||
United States Treasury Bills due February 23, 2012 (amortized cost $3,700,000), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards |
||||||||||||
$ | 3,700,000 | 23.4 | % | $ | 3,700,000 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Forward contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.4 | 69,300 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
0.4 | 69,300 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
||||||||||||
Currency |
(0.3 | ) | (51,238 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
(0.3 | ) | (51,238 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total forward contracts, at fair value |
0.1 | % | $ | 18,062 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures Contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Futures Contracts Purchased |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.2 | % | $ | 36,900 | ||||||||
Energy |
(0.3 | ) | (45,053 | ) | ||||||||
Financial |
0.0 | * | ||||||||||
2 Year U.S. Treasury Note |
0.0 | * | 1,016 | |||||||||
Other |
0.0 | * | 1,598 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Financial |
0.0 | * | 2,614 | |||||||||
Food & Fiber |
0.1 | 16,738 | ||||||||||
Indices |
0.0 | * | 4,717 | |||||||||
Metals |
||||||||||||
108 contracts of CMX Gold expiring February 2012 |
(8.9 | ) | (1,407,280 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
(0.1 | ) | (20,459 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Metals |
(9.0 | ) | (1,427,739 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts purchased |
(9.0 | ) | (1,411,823 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures Contracts Sold |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.3 | 43,963 | ||||||||||
Energy |
0.3 | 42,480 | ||||||||||
Financial |
(0.0 | )* | (6,656 | ) | ||||||||
Food & Fiber |
0.1 | 11,607 | ||||||||||
Indices |
0.2 | 26,026 | ||||||||||
Livestock |
0.1 | 9,670 | ||||||||||
Metals |
0.4 | 62,881 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts sold |
1.4 | 189,971 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts, at fair value |
(7.6 | )% | $ | (1,221,852 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts by country composition |
||||||||||||
Australia |
0.1 | % | $ | 8,242 | ||||||||
European Monetary Union |
0.2 | 36,313 | ||||||||||
Great Britain |
0.0 | * | 2,711 | |||||||||
Japan |
0.3 | 55,550 | ||||||||||
United States |
(8.2 | ) | (1,316,556 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
0.1 | 9,950 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts by country |
(7.5 | )% | $ | (1,203,790 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
11
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES A
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Investment income |
||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 8 | $ | 2,245 | ||||
Other income |
507 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total income |
515 | 2,245 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Brokerage commissions |
72,956 | 68,990 | ||||||
Management fees |
98,982 | 83,865 | ||||||
Selling commission |
69,550 | 58,922 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
32,994 | 27,955 | ||||||
Incentive fee |
| 1,619 | ||||||
Other |
555 | 1,890 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total expenses |
275,037 | 243,241 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net investment loss |
(274,522 | ) | (240,996 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts |
(571,187 | ) | 1,304,809 | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts |
1,015,318 | (1,050,056 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net gain on investments |
444,131 | 254,753 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
$ | 169,609 | $ | 13,757 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon weighted average number of Units outstanding during period) for Series A-1* |
$ | 13.52 | $ | 1.12 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon change in net asset value per Unit during period) for Series A-1 |
$ | 15.33 | $ | (8.17 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon weighted average number of Units outstanding during period) for Series A-2** |
$ | 26.27 | $ | 2.61 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon change in net asset value per Unit during period) for Series A-2 |
$ | 24.83 | $ | (1.23 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
* | Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series A-1 for Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011: 8,529.69 and 7,765.88, respectively. |
** | Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series A-2 for Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011: 2,065.66 and 1,930.20, respectively. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
12
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES A
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Increase in net assets from operations |
||||||||
Net investment loss |
$ | (274,522 | ) | (240,996 | ) | |||
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts |
(571,187 | ) | 1,304,809 | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts |
1,015,318 | (1,050,056 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
169,609 | 13,757 | ||||||
Capital share transactions |
||||||||
Issuance of Units |
810,685 | 2,557,345 | ||||||
Redemption of Units |
(602,243 | ) | (2,225,891 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions |
208,442 | 331,454 | ||||||
Net increase in net assets |
378,051 | 345,211 | ||||||
Net assets, beginning of period |
15,819,153 | 13,716,691 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net assets, end of period |
$ | 16,197,204 | 14,061,902 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series A-1 Units, beginning of period |
8,359.510 | 6,916.044 | ||||||
Issuance of Series A-1 Units |
425.396 | 1,251.930 | ||||||
Redemption of Units |
(280.399 | ) | (1,061.343 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series A-1 Units, end of period |
8,504.507 | 7,106.631 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series A-2 Units, beginning of period |
2,037.421 | 1,724.508 | ||||||
Issuance of Series A-2 Units |
76.785 | 412.521 | ||||||
Redemption of Units |
(88.806 | ) | (348.532 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series A-2 Units, end of period |
2,025.400 | 1,788.497 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
13
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES A
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended March 31, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net increase in net assets from operations |
$ | 169,609 | $ | 13,757 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Purchases of U.S. government securities |
(2,149,584 | ) | (4,898,745 | ) | ||||
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities |
3,700,000 | 4,950,000 | ||||||
Amortization of discounts and premiums |
195 | (1,473 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in due from brokers |
4,593,340 | (1,285,956 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in due from affiliate |
| 5,599 | ||||||
Decrease in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
(10,909 | ) | (35,874 | ) | ||||
Increase in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
61,081 | 100,896 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased |
(1,055,639 | ) | 1,023,293 | |||||
Decrease in futures contracts sold |
(9,851 | ) | (38,259 | ) | ||||
Decrease in incentive fee |
| (197,367 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease ) in management fees payable |
(36,689 | ) | 4,123 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in fees payable |
(38,416 | ) | 4,103 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
5,223,137 | (355,903 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Subscriptions, net of change in advance subscriptions |
803,103 | 2,277,710 | ||||||
Redemptions, net of change in redemptions payable |
(1,064,074 | ) | (106,961 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(260,971 | ) | 2,170,749 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in cash |
4,962,166 | 1,814,846 | ||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
4,325,976 | 2,215,532 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | 9,288,142 | $ | 4,030,378 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
14
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES B
STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
March 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
US Government securities, at fair value |
$ | 1,899,460 | $ | 2,700,000 | ||||
Due from brokers |
4,632,563 | 7,323,342 | ||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
66,117 | 65,688 | ||||||
Futures contracts sold |
178,687 | 188,512 | ||||||
Cash |
2,992,393 | 978,811 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
9,769,220 | 11,256,353 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
92,730 | 44,159 | ||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
254,901 | 825,539 | ||||||
Subscriptions received in advance |
160,420 | 578,000 | ||||||
Redemptions payable |
68,170 | 193,870 | ||||||
Management fee payable |
17,376 | 39,982 | ||||||
Fees payable |
14,553 | 34,510 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
608,150 | 1,716,060 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NET ASSETS |
$ | 9,161,070 | $ | 9,540,293 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-1 Net Assets |
$ | 5,255,933 | $ | 5,617,352 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Number of Units outstanding |
4,307.371 | 4,524.265 | ||||||
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-1 Net Asset Value per Unit |
$ | 1,220.22 | $ | 1,241.61 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-2 Net Assets |
$ | 3,905,137 | $ | 3,922,941 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Number of Units outstanding |
3,039.391 | 3,015.557 | ||||||
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B-2 Net Asset Value per Unit |
$ | 1,284.84 | $ | 1,300.90 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
15
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES B
UNAUDITED CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
March 31, 2012
Percentage of | ||||||||||||
Face Value | Net Assets | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Debt Securities United States, at fair value |
||||||||||||
United States Treasury Bills due May 24, 2012 (amortized cost $1,899,460), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards |
$ | 1,900,000 | 20.7 | % | $ | 1,899,460 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Forward contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
0.7 | 66,117 | ||||||||||
Currency |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
0.7 | 66,117 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
(1.0 | ) | (92,730 | ) | ||||||||
Currency |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
(1.0 | ) | (92,730 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total forward contracts, at fair value |
(0.3 | )% | $ | (26,613 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.1 | % | $ | 11,893 | ||||||||
Energy |
(0.6 | ) | (53,072 | ) | ||||||||
Financial |
0.3 | 25,614 | ||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
(0.1 | ) | (12,602 | ) | ||||||||
Indices |
0.4 | 36,187 | ||||||||||
Metals |
(2.9 | ) | (262,921 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts purchased |
(2.8 | ) | (254,901 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.0 | * | 3,035 | |||||||||
Energy |
0.0 | * | 1,910 | |||||||||
Food & Fiber |
(0.5 | ) | (47,655 | ) | ||||||||
Indices |
0.3 | 24,599 | ||||||||||
Livestock |
1.0 | 95,740 | ||||||||||
Metals |
1.1 | 101,058 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts sold |
1.9 | 178,687 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts, at fair value |
(0.9 | )% | $ | (76,214 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures and forward contracts by country composition |
||||||||||||
Australian |
0.1 | % | $ | 12,660 | ||||||||
European Monetary Union |
(0.0 | )* | (2,929 | ) | ||||||||
Great Britain |
(0.1 | ) | (10,378 | ) | ||||||||
Japan |
0.1 | 12,761 | ||||||||||
United States |
(1.5 | ) | (133,856 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
0.2 | 18,915 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures and forward contracts by country |
(1.2 | )% | $ | (102,827 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
16
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P. SERIES B
UNAUDITED CONDENSED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2011
Percentage of | ||||||||||||
Face Value | Net Assets | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Debt Securities United States, at fair value |
||||||||||||
United States Treasury Bills due February 23, 2012 (amortized cost $2,700,000), securities are held in margin accounts as collateral for open futures and forwards |
||||||||||||
$ | 2,700,000 | 28.3 | % | $ | 2,700,000 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Forward contracts, at fair value |
||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
0.7 | 65,688 | ||||||||||
Currency |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized appreciation on forward contracts |
0.7 | 65,688 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
(0.5 | ) | (44,159 | ) | ||||||||
Currency |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrealized depreciation on forward contracts |
(0.5 | ) | (44,159 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total forward contracts, at fair value |
0.2 | % | $ | 21,529 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts, at fair value Futures contracts purchased |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.3 | % | $ | 31,583 | ||||||||
Energy |
(0.4 | ) | (41,586 | ) | ||||||||
Financial |
||||||||||||
2 Year U.S. Treasury Note |
0.0 | * | 938 | |||||||||
Other |
0.0 | * | 2,328 | |||||||||
Total Financial |
0.0 | * | 3,266 | |||||||||
Food & Fiber |
0.1 | 13,975 | ||||||||||
Indices |
0.0 | * | 3,476 | |||||||||
Metals |
||||||||||||
63 contracts of CMX Gold expiring February 2012 |
(8.6 | ) | (821,340 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
(0.2 | ) | (14,913 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Metals |
(8.8 | ) | (836,253 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts purchased |
(8.8 | ) | (825,539 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
||||||||||||
Currency |
0.4 | 41,319 | ||||||||||
Energy |
0.4 | 42,200 | ||||||||||
Financial |
(0.1 | ) | (5,281 | ) | ||||||||
Food & Fiber |
0.1 | 11,690 | ||||||||||
Indices |
0.3 | 32,845 | ||||||||||
Livestock |
0.1 | 9,280 | ||||||||||
Metals |
0.6 | 56,459 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts sold |
1.8 | 188,512 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures contracts, at fair value |
(7.0 | )% | $ | (637,027 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Futures and forward contracts by country composition |
||||||||||||
Australian |
0.1 | % | $ | 5,388 | ||||||||
European Monetary Union |
0.3 | 33,647 | ||||||||||
Great Britain |
0.0 | * | 2,903 | |||||||||
Japan |
0.4 | 51,087 | ||||||||||
United States |
(7.8 | ) | (732,169 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
0.2 | 23,646 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total futures and forward contracts by country |
(6.8 | )% | $ | (615,498 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
17
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES B
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Investment income |
||||||||
Interest income |
$ | | $ | 2,454 | ||||
Other income |
443 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total income |
443 | 2,454 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Expenses |
||||||||
Brokerage commissions |
63,994 | 88,520 | ||||||
Management fees |
59,616 | 74,013 | ||||||
Selling commissions |
29,702 | 40,569 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
19,872 | 24,668 | ||||||
Incentive fee |
| 11,937 | ||||||
Other |
1,464 | 2,906 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total expenses |
174,648 | 242,613 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net investment loss |
(174,205 | ) | (240,159 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments |
||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts |
(391,462 | ) | 1,524,458 | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts: |
512,671 | (1,224,048 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net gain on investments |
121,209 | 300,410 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
$ | (52,996 | ) | $ | 60,251 | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon weighted average number of Units outstanding during period) for Series B-1* |
$ | (14.77 | ) | $ | 4.58 | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon change in net asset value per Unit during period) for Series B-1 |
$ | (21.39 | ) | $ | (1.06 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon weighted average number of Units outstanding during period) for Series B-2** |
$ | 3.78 | $ | 8.44 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon change in net asset value per Unit during period) for Series B-2 |
$ | (16.06 | ) | $ | 4.76 | |||
|
|
|
|
* | Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series B-1 for Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011: 4,423.85 and 6,225.63, respectively. |
** | Weighted average number of Units outstanding for Series B-2 for Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011: 3,266.31 and 3,758.94, respectively. |
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
18
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES B
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
||||||||
Net investment loss |
$ | (174,205 | ) | $ | (240,159 | ) | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on futures and forward contracts |
(391,462 | ) | 1,524,458 | |||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on futures and forward contracts |
512,671 | (1,224,048 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
(52,996 | ) | 60,251 | |||||
Capital share transactions |
||||||||
Issuance of Units |
604,000 | 953,631 | ||||||
Redemption of Units |
(930,227 | ) | (922,788 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions |
(326,227 | ) | 30,843 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets |
(379,223 | ) | 91,094 | |||||
Net assets, beginning of period |
9,540,293 | 12,958,534 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net assets, end of period |
$ | 9,161,070 | $ | 13,049,628 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series B-1 Units, beginning of period |
4,524.265 | 5,784.122 | ||||||
Issuance of Series B-1 Units |
77.496 | 638.189 | ||||||
Redemption of Units |
(294.390 | ) | (359.565 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series B-1 Units, end of period |
4,307.371 | 6,062.746 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series B-2 Units, beginning of period |
3,015.557 | 3,700.480 | ||||||
Issuance of Series B-2 Units |
384.349 | 106.799 | ||||||
Redemption of Units |
(360.515 | ) | (319.424 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Series B-2 Units, end of period |
3,039.391 | 3,487.855 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
19
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.SERIES B
UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
$ | (52,996 | ) | $ | 60,251 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Purchases of U.S. government securities |
(1,899,628 | ) | (4,748,788 | ) | ||||
Sales and maturities of U.S. government securities |
2,700,000 | 4,650,000 | ||||||
Amortization of discounts and premiums |
168 | (1,407 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in due from brokers |
2,690,779 | (1,335,738 | ) | |||||
Decrease in unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
(429 | ) | (48,114 | ) | ||||
Increase in unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
48,571 | 134,198 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts purchased |
(570,638 | ) | 1,206,200 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in futures contracts sold |
9,825 | (68,236 | ) | |||||
Decrease in incentive fee |
| (198,300 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in management fees |
(22,606 | ) | 737 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in fees payable |
(19,957 | ) | 827 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
2,883,089 | (348,370 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Subscriptions, net of change in advance subscriptions |
186,420 | 1,055,199 | ||||||
Redemptions, net of change in redemptions payable |
(1,055,927 | ) | (417,258 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(869,507 | ) | 637,941 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in cash |
2,013,582 | 289,571 | ||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
978,811 | 1,414,893 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | 2,992,393 | $ | 1,704,464 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.
20
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P., SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P. SERIES A and SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P. SERIES B
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2012
SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P.
1. Nature of operations
Organization and Business
Superfund Gold, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the Fund), commenced operations on April 1, 2009. The Fund was organized to trade speculatively in the United States (U.S.) and international commodity futures and forward markets using a strategy developed by Superfund Capital Management, Inc., the general partner and trading advisor of the Fund (Superfund Capital Management). The Fund has issued two series of units of limited partnership interest (the Units), each with a subseries, Series A-1/A-2 and Series B-1/B-2 (each, a Series). Series A-1/A-2 and Series B-1/B-2 are traded and managed the same way, with the exception of the degree of leverage. Series B implements the Funds futures and forward trading program at a leverage level equal to approximately 1.5 times that implemented on behalf of Series A. Over the long term (periods of several years), the targeted average ratio of margin to equity for Series A is approximately 20% and approximately 30% for Series B. The leverage with which each of the Series is traded is the only difference between the Series. Sub-Series within a Series are not managed differently. Rather, Series A-1 Units and Series B-1 Units are subject to selling commissions. Series A-2 Units and Series B-2 Units are not subject to selling commissions but are available exclusively to: (i) investors participating in selling agent asset-based or fixed-fee investment programs or a registered investment advisers asset-based fee or fixed-fee advisory program through which an investment adviser recommends a portfolio allocation to the Fund and for which Superfund USA Inc. (Superfund USA) serves as selling agent, (ii) investors who purchased the Units through Superfund USA or an affiliated broker and who are commodity pools operated by commodity pool operators registered as such with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and (iii) investors who have paid the maximum selling commission on their Series A-1 or Series B-1 Units (by re-designation of such Units as Series A-2 Units or Series B-2 Units as described herein). The foregoing eligibility requirements and selling commissions are the only differences between the Sub-Series within a Series.
The term of the Fund commenced on the day on which the Certificate of Limited Partnership was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act and shall end upon the first of the following to occur: (i) receipt by Superfund Capital Management of an approval to dissolve the Fund at a specified time by limited partners of the Fund (the Limited Partners) owning Units representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding Units of each Series then owned by Limited Partners of each Series, notice of which is sent by certified mail return receipt requested to Superfund Capital Management not less than 90 days prior to the effective date of such dissolution; (ii) withdrawal, insolvency or dissolution of Superfund Capital Management or any other event that causes Superfund Capital Management to cease to be the general partner of the Fund, unless (a) at the time of each event there is at least one remaining general partner of the Fund who carries on the business of the Fund (and each remaining general partner of the Fund is hereby authorized to carry on the business of general partner of the Fund in such an event), or (b) within 120 days after such event Limited Partners of a Series holding a majority of Units of such Series agree in writing to continue the business of the Fund and such Series and to the appointment, effective as of the date of such event, of one or more general partners of the Fund and such Series; (iii) a decline in the aggregate net assets of each Series to less than $500,000 at any time following commencement of trading in the Series; or (iv) any other event which shall make it unlawful for the existence of the Fund to be continued or which requires termination of the Fund.
2. Basis of presentation and significant accounting policies
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (U.S. GAAP) with respect to the Form 10-Q and reflect all adjustments which in the opinion of management are normal and recurring, and which are necessary for a fair statement of the results of interim periods presented. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes included in the Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
21
Valuation of Investments in Futures Contracts, Forward Contracts, and U.S. Treasury Bills
All commodity interests (including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments) are used for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on a trade date basis and open contracts are recorded in the statements of assets and liabilities at fair value on the last business day of the period, which represents market value for those commodity interests for which market quotes are readily available.
Exchange-traded futures contracts are valued at settlement prices published by the recognized exchange. Any spot and forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund will be valued at published settlement prices or at dealers quotes. The Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing U.S. Treasury Bills due to the short-term nature of such instruments; accordingly, the cost of securities plus accreted discount or minus amortized premium approximates fair value (See Section 3 Fair Value Measurements).
22
Translation of Foreign Currency
Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at the period-end exchange rates. Purchases and sales of investments and income and expenses that are denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts on the transaction date. Adjustments arising from foreign currency transactions are reflected in the statements of operations.
The Fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in the statements of operations.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income and Expenses
Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade-date basis. Interest income and expenses are recognized on the accrual basis. The Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing U.S. Treasury Bills. Operating expenses of the Fund are allocated to each Series in proportion to the net asset value of the Series at the beginning of each month. Expenses directly attributable to a particular Series are charged directly to that Series.
Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated. Unrealized gains and losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and market price) are reported in the statements of financial condition as a net gain or loss, as there exists a right of offset of unrealized gains or losses in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 210-20, Offsetting Balance Sheet.
Income Taxes
The Fund does not record a provision for U.S. income taxes because the partners report their share of the Funds income or loss on their returns. The financial statements reflect the Funds transactions without adjustment, if any, required for income tax purposes.
Superfund Capital Management has evaluated the application of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740), to the Fund to determine whether or not there are uncertain tax positions that require financial statement recognition. Based on this evaluation, Superfund Capital Management has determined no reserves for uncertain tax positions are required to be recorded as a result of the application of ASC 740. Superfund Capital Management is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months. As a result, no income tax liability or expense has been recorded in the accompanying financial statements. The Fund files federal and various state tax returns. The 2009 through 2011 tax years generally remain subject to examination by the U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires Superfund Capital Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2011-11
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2011-11). ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. GAAP more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of assets and liabilities as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. New disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. Superfund Capital Management is evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-11 on the financial statements and disclosures.
23
ASU 2011-04
In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Fund adopted ASU 2011-04 as of January 1, 2012. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-4 has not had a material impact on the Funds financial statement disclosures.
3. Fair Value Measurements
The Fund follows ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC 820 which establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820 are described below:
Level 1: | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities; | |
Level 2: | Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; | |
Level 3: | Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In determining fair value, the Fund separates its financial instruments into two categories: U.S. government securities and derivative contracts.
U.S. Government Securities. The Funds only market exposure in instruments held other than for speculative trading is in its U.S. Treasury Bill portfolio. As the Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing its U.S. Treasury Bill portfolio, which approximates fair value, this portfolio is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative Contracts. Derivative contracts can be exchange-traded or over-the-counter (OTC). Exchange-traded derivatives typically fall within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy depending on whether they are deemed to be actively traded or not. The Fund has exposure to exchange-traded derivative contracts through the Funds trading of exchange-traded futures contracts. The Funds exchange-traded futures contract positions are valued daily at settlement prices published by the applicable exchanges. In such cases, provided they are deemed to be actively traded, exchange-traded derivatives are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Less actively traded exchange-traded derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs to models, model calibration to market-clearing transactions, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Where models are used, the selection of a particular model to value an OTC derivative depends upon the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent in, the instrument as well as the availability of pricing information in the market. For OTC derivatives that trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards and swaps, model inputs can generally be verified and model selection does not involve significant management judgment. The OTC derivatives that held by the Fund may include forwards and swaps. Spot and forward foreign currency contracts held by the Fund are valued at published daily settlement prices or at dealers quotes. The Funds forward and swap positions are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Certain OTC derivatives trade in less liquid markets with limited pricing information, and the determination of fair value for these derivatives is inherently more difficult. Such instruments are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Where the Fund does not have corroborating market evidence to support significant model inputs and cannot verify the model to market transactions, transaction price is initially used as the best estimate of fair value. Accordingly, when a pricing model is used to value such an instrument, the model is adjusted so that the model value at inception equals the transaction price. The valuations of these less liquid OTC derivatives are typically based on Level 1 and/or Level 2
24
inputs that can be observed in the market, as well as unobservable Level 3 inputs. Subsequent to initial recognition, the Fund updates the Level 1 and Level 2 inputs to reflect observable market changes, with resulting gains and losses reflected within Level 3. Level 3 inputs are changed only when corroborated by evidence such as similar market transactions, third-party pricing services and/or broker or dealer quotations, or other empirical market data. In circumstances in which the Fund cannot verify the model value to market transactions, it is possible that a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. The Fund attempts to avoid holding less liquid OTC derivatives. However, once held, the market for any particular derivative contract could become less liquid during the holding period. As of and during the quarter ended March 31, 2012, the Fund held no derivative contracts valued using Level 3 inputs.
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Funds assets and liabilities by the ASC 820 fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
Superfund Gold, L.P.
Balance March 31, 2012 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government securities |
$ | 4,048,849 | $ | | $ | 4,048,849 | $ | | ||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
146,326 | | 146,326 | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
336,164 | 336,164 | | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
593,648 | 593,648 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 5,124,987 | $ | 929,812 | $ | 4,195,175 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
$ | 205,049 | $ | | $ | 205,049 | $ | | ||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
$ | 947,249 | $ | 947,249 | $ | | | |||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
$ | 215,139 | $ | 215,139 | $ | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 1,367,437 | $ | 1,162,388 | $ | 205,049 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance December 31, 2011 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government securities |
$ | 6,400,000 | $ | | $ | 6,400,000 | $ | | ||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
134,988 | | 134,988 | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
378,483 | 378,483 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 6,913,471 | $ | 378,483 | $ | 6,534,988 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
$ | 95,397 | $ | | $ | 95,397 | $ | | ||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
2,237,362 | 2,237,362 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 2,332,759 | $ | 2,237,362 | $ | 95,397 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Superfund Gold, L.P.Series A | ||||||||||||||||
Balance March 31, 2012 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government securities |
$ | 2,149,389 | $ | | $ | 2,149,389 | $ | | ||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
80,209 | | 80,209 | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
169,576 | 169,576 | | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
312,402 | 312,402 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 2,711,576 | $ | 481,978 | $ | 2,229,598 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
$ | 112,319 | $ | | $ | 112,319 | $ | | ||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
$ | 525,760 | $ | 525,760 | $ | | | |||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
$ | 112,580 | $ | 112,580 | $ | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 750,659 | $ | 638,340 | $ | 112,319 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance December 31, 2011 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government securities |
$ | 3,700,000 | $ | | $ | 3,700,000 | $ | | ||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
69,300 | | 69,300 | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
189,971 | 189,971 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 3,959,271 | $ | 189,971 | $ | 3,769,300 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
$ | 51,238 | $ | | $ | 51,238 | $ | | ||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
1,411,823 | 1,411,823 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 1,463,061 | $ | 1,411,823 | $ | 51,238 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Superfund Gold, L.P.Series B | ||||||||||||||||
Balance March 31, 2012 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government securities |
$ | 1,899,460 | $ | | $ | 1,899,460 | $ | | ||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
66,117 | | 66,117 | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
166,588 | 166,588 | | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
281,246 | 281,246 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 2,413,411 | $ | 447,834 | $ | 1,965,577 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
$ | 92,730 | $ | | $ | 92,730 | $ | | ||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
$ | 421,489 | $ | 421,489 | $ | | | |||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
$ | 102,559 | $ | 102,559 | $ | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 616,778 | $ | 524,048 | $ | 92,730 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance December 31, 2011 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government securities |
$ | 2,700,000 | $ | | $ | 2,700,000 | $ | | ||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts |
65,688 | | 65,688 | | ||||||||||||
Futures contracts purchased |
188,512 | 188,512 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 2,954,200 | $ | 188,512 | $ | 2,765,688 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts |
$ | 44,159 | $ | | $ | 44,159 | $ | | ||||||||
Futures contracts sold |
825,539 | 825,539 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value |
$ | 869,698 | $ | 825,539 | $ | 44,159 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
4. Disclosure of derivative instruments and hedging activities
The Fund follows ASC 815, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (ASC 815). ASC 815 is intended to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments by requiring enhanced disclosure that enables investors to understand how and why an entity uses derivatives, how derivatives are accounted for, and how derivative instruments affect an entitys results of operations and financial position.
Derivative instruments held by the Fund do not qualify as derivative instruments held as hedging instruments, as defined in ASC 815. Instead, the Fund includes derivative instruments in its trading activity. Per the requirements of ASC 815, the Fund discloses the gains and losses on its trading activities for both derivative and nonderivative instruments in the Statement of Operations for each Series.
The Fund engages in the speculative trading of forward contracts in currency and futures contracts in a wide range of commodities, including equity markets, interest rates, food and fiber, energy, livestock and metals. ASC 815 requires entities to recognize all derivatives instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. Investments in forward contracts and commodity futures contracts are recorded in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on open forward contracts and futures contracts purchased and futures contracts sold. Since the derivatives held or sold by the Fund are for speculative trading purposes, the derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under the provisions of ASC 815. Accordingly, all realized gains and losses, as well as any change in net unrealized gains or losses on open positions from the preceding period, are recognized as part of the Funds realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments in the Statements of Operations.
Superfund Capital Management believes futures and forward trading activity expressed as a percentage of net assets is indicative of trading activity. Information concerning the fair value of the Funds derivatives held long or sold short, as well as information related to the annual average volume of the Funds derivative activity, is as follows:
Superfund Gold, L.P.
The fair value of the Funds derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of March 31, 2012, is as follows:
Type of Instrument |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location |
Asset Derivatives at March 31, 2012 |
Liability Derivatives at March 31, 2012 |
Net | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts | $ | 146,326 | $ | | $ | 146,326 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts | | (205,049 | ) | (205,049 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts |
Futures contracts purchased | 336,164 | (947,249 | ) | (611,085 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts |
Futures contracts sold | 593,648 | (215,139 | ) | 378,509 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Totals |
$ | 1,076,138 | $ | (1,367,437 | ) | $ | (291,299 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
The fair value of the Funds derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:
Type of Instrument |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location |
Asset Derivatives at December 31, 2011 |
Liability Derivatives at December 31, 2011 |
Net | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts | $ | 134,988 | $ | | $ | 134,988 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts | | (95,397 | ) | (95,397 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts |
Futures contracts purchased | | (2,237,362 | ) | (2,237,362 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts |
Futures contracts sold | 378,483 | | 378,483 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Totals |
$ | 513,471 | $ | (2,332,759 | ) | $ | (1,819,288 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
Location of Gain (Loss) on Income |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
|||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $ | 90,112 | $ | (98,314 | ) | ||||
Futures contracts |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (1,052,761 | ) | 1,626,303 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | (962,649 | ) | $ | 1,527,989 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Realized Gain on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Change in Unrealized Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
|||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $ | 119,014 | $ | (151,104 | ) | ||||
Futures contracts |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2,710,253 | (2,123,000 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 2,829,267 | $ | (2,274,104 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
Superfund Gold, L.P. gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of March 31, 2012:
As of March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Positions Gross Unrealized | Short Positions Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Net
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Open Positions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 26,737 | 0.1 | $ | (115,439 | ) | (0.5 | ) | $ | 119,589 | 0.5 | $ | (89,610 | ) | (0.4 | ) | $ | (58,723 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Currency |
67,951 | 0.3 | (45,535 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 11,779 | 0.0 | * | (5,450 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 28,745 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
72,728 | 0.3 | (19,787 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | | | | 52,941 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
6,500 | 0.0 | * | (34,549 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 37,438 | 0.1 | (141,572 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (132,183 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indices |
173,143 | 0.7 | (96,107 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 91,005 | 0.4 | (40,281 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 127,760 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Metals |
917 | 0.0 | * | (609,421 | ) | (2.4 | ) | 244,045 | 1.0 | (27,836 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (392,295 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Livestock |
| | | | 204,800 | 0.8 | | | 204,800 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
14,926 | 0.1 | (141,850 | ) | (0.6 | ) | 4,580 | 0.0 | * | | | (122,344 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 362,902 | 1.4 | $ | (1,062,688 | ) | (4.2 | ) | $ | 713,236 | 2.8 | $ | (304,749 | ) | (1.2 | ) | $ | (291,299 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
28
Superfund Gold, L.P. gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2011:
As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Positions Gross Unrealized | Short Positions Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Net
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Open Positions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 5,543 | 0.0 | * | $ | (44,476 | ) | (0.2 | ) | $ | 129,445 | 0.5 | $ | (50,921 | ) | (0.2 | ) | $ | 39,591 | |||||||||||||||||
Currency |
68,883 | 0.3 | (400 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 91,363 | 0.4 | (6,081 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 153,765 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
33,539 | 0.1 | (27,659 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | | (11,937 | ) | (0.0 | )* | (6,057 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
32,513 | 0.1 | (1,800 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 85,412 | 0.3 | (62,115 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 54,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Indices |
10,041 | 0.0 | * | (1,848 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 77,622 | 0.3 | (18,751 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 67,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Metals |
1,110 | 0.0 | * | (2,265,102 | ) | (8.9 | ) | 163,647 | 0.6 | (44,307 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (2,144,652 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Livestock |
| | | | 19,430 | 0.1 | (480 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 18,950 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
| | (86,639 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 84,680 | 0.3 | | | (1,959 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 151,629 | 0.5 | $ | (2,427,924 | ) | (9.5 | ) | $ | 651,599 | 2.5 | $ | (194,592 | ) | (0.7 | ) | $ | (1,819,288 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
Superfund Gold, L.P. average* contract volume by market sector for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
Average Value of Long Positions |
Average Value of Short Positions |
|||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
82 | 60 | $ | 546,093 | $ | 476,810 |
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
|||||||
Currency |
836 | 459 | ||||||
Financial |
1,513 | 315 | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
173 | 152 | ||||||
Indices |
680 | 353 | ||||||
Metals |
899 | 103 | ||||||
Livestock |
33 | 115 | ||||||
Energy |
375 | 150 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Totals |
4,591 | 1,707 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Based on quarterly holdings |
Superfund Gold, L.P. average* contract volume by market sector for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
Average Value of Long Positions |
Average Value of Short Positions |
|||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
106 | 83 | $ | 363,897 | $ | 327,589 |
29
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
|||||||
Currency |
1,410 | 71 | ||||||
Financial |
1,927 | 634 | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
92 | 6 | ||||||
Indices |
1,066 | 439 | ||||||
Metals |
630 | 186 | ||||||
Livestock |
99 | | ||||||
Energy |
415 | 350 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Totals |
5,745 | 1,769 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Based on quarterly holdings |
Superfund Gold, L.P. trading results by market sector:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Net
Realized Gain (Losses) |
Change in
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
Net
Trading Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 90,112 | $ | (98,314 | ) | $ | (8,202 | ) | ||||
Currency |
(982,670 | ) | (125,020 | ) | (1,107,690 | ) | ||||||
Financial |
(541,071 | ) | 58,998 | (482,073 | ) | |||||||
Food & Fiber |
(341,050 | ) | (186,193 | ) | (527,243 | ) | ||||||
Indices |
(201,914 | ) | 60,696 | (141,218 | ) | |||||||
Metals |
(400,291 | ) | 1,752,357 | 1,352,066 | ||||||||
Livestock |
(15,695 | ) | 185,850 | 170,155 | ||||||||
Energy |
1,429,930 | (120,385 | ) | 1,309,545 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total net trading gains (losses) |
$ | (962,649 | ) | $ | 1,527,989 | $ | 565,340 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Losses) |
Change in
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
Net
Trading Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 119,014 | $ | (151,104 | ) | $ | (32,090 | ) | ||||
Currency |
(10,739 | ) | (266,366 | ) | (277,105 | ) | ||||||
Financial |
(457,845 | ) | (175,026 | ) | (632,871 | ) | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
82,147 | (189,450 | ) | (107,303 | ) | |||||||
Indices |
(177,582 | ) | (141,833 | ) | (319,415 | ) | ||||||
Metals |
1,624,336 | (1,443,023 | ) | 181,313 | ||||||||
Livestock |
147,140 | (16,240 | ) | 130,900 | ||||||||
Energy |
1,502,796 | 108,938 | 1,611,734 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total net trading gains (losses) |
$ | 2,829,267 | $ | (2,274,104 | ) | $ | 555,163 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
Superfund Gold, L.P.Series A
The fair value of the Funds derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of March 31, 2012, is as follows:
Type of Instrument |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location |
Asset Derivatives at March 31, 2012 |
Liability Derivatives at March 31, 2012 |
Net | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts | $ | 80,209 | $ | | $ | 80,209 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts | | (112,319 | ) | (112,319 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts | Futures contracts purchased | 169,576 | (525,760 | ) | (356,184 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts | Futures contracts sold | 312,402 | (112,580) | 199,822 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Totals | $ | 562,187 | $ | (750,659 | ) | $ | (188,472 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Funds derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:
Type of Instrument |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location |
Asset Derivatives
at December 31, 2011 |
Liability Derivatives at December 31, 2011 |
Net | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts | $ | 69,300 | $ | | $ | 69,300 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts | | (51,238 | ) | (51,238 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts | Futures contracts purchased | | (1,411,823 | ) | (1,411,823 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts | Futures contracts sold | 189,971 | | 189,971 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Totals |
$ | 259,271 | $ | (1,463,061 | ) | $ | (1,203,790 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
|||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $ | 34,720 | $ | (50,172 | ) | ||||
Futures contracts | Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (605,907 | ) | 1,065,490 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | (571,187 | ) | $ | 1,015,318 | |||||
|
|
|
|
31
Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Realized Gain
on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Change
in Unrealized Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
|||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $ | 56,190 | $ | (65,021 | ) | ||||
Futures contracts | Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1,248,619 | (985,035 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 1,304,809 | $ | (1,050,056 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of March 31, 2012:
As of March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Positions Gross Unrealized | Short Positions Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Open Positions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 14,957 | 0.1 | $ | (62,231 | ) | (0.4 | ) | $ | 65,252 | 0.4 | $ | (50,088 | ) | (0.3 | ) | $ | (32,110 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Currency |
34,913 | 0.2 | (24,390 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 6,534 | 0.0 | * | (3,240 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 13,817 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
37,788 | 0.3 | (10,461 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | | | | 27,327 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
3,300 | 0.0 | * | (18,747 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 18,724 | 0.1 | (75,203 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (71,926 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indices |
91,601 | 0.6 | (50,752 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 46,129 | 0.3 | (20,004 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 66,974 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Metals |
| | (345,583 | ) | (2.1 | ) | 129,284 | 0.8 | (14,133 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (230,432 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Livestock |
| | | | 109,060 | 0.7 | | | 109,060 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
1,975 | 0.0 | * | (75,827 | ) | (0.5 | ) | 2,670 | 0.0 | * | | | (71,182 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 184,534 | 1.2 | $ | (587,991 | ) | (3.6 | ) | $ | 377,653 | 2.3 | $ | (162,668 | ) | (0.9 | ) | $ | (188,472 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series A gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2011:
As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Positions Gross Unrealized | Short Positions Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Open Positions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 2,774 | 0.0 | * | $ | (23,321 | ) | (0.1 | ) | $ | 66,526 | 0.4 | $ | (27,917 | ) | (0.2 | ) | $ | 18,062 | |||||||||||||||||
Currency |
37,100 | 0.2 | (200 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 47,744 | 0.3 | (3,781 | ) | (0.0 | ) | 80,863 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
17,166 | 0.1 | (14,552 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | | (6,656 | ) | (0.0 | ) | (4,042 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
17,413 | 0.1 | (675 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 44,589 | 0.3 | (32,982 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 28,345 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Indices |
5,624 | 0.1 | (907 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 38,232 | 0.2 | (12,206 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 30,743 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Metals |
1,110 | 0.0 | * | (1,428,849 | ) | (9.0 | ) | 88,207 | 0.6 | (25,326 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (1,364,858 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Livestock |
| | | | 9,670 | 0.1 | | | 9,670 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
| | (45,053 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 42,480 | 0.3 | | | (2,573 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 81,187 | 0.5 | $ | (1,513,557 | ) | (9.5 | ) | $ | 337,448 | 2.2 | $ | (108,868 | ) | (0.7 | ) | $ | (1,203,790 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
32
Series A average* contract volume by market sector for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
Average Value of Long Positions |
Average Value of Short Positions |
|||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
43 | 30 | $ | 286,181 | $ | 257,133 |
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
|||||||
Currency |
440 | 242 | ||||||
Financial |
799 | 165 | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
91 | 81 | ||||||
Indices |
360 | 185 | ||||||
Metals |
501 | 55 | ||||||
Livestock |
17 | 60 | ||||||
Energy |
203 | 79 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Totals |
2,454 | 897 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Based on quarterly holdings |
Series A average* contract volume by market sector for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
Average Value of Long Positions |
Average Value of Short Positions |
|||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
47 | 37 | $ | 150,228 | $ | 132,546 |
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
|||||||
Currency |
624 | 29 | ||||||
Financial |
859 | 248 | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
38 | 4 | ||||||
Indices |
455 | 207 | ||||||
Metals |
304 | 77 | ||||||
Livestock |
44 | | ||||||
Energy |
172 | 159 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Totals |
2,543 | 761 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Based on quarterly holdings |
Series A trading results by market sector:
33
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Net
Realized Gain (Losses) |
Change in
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
Net Trading Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 34,720 | $ | (50,172 | ) | $ | (15,452 | ) | ||||
Currency |
(514,870 | ) | (67,046 | ) | (581,916 | ) | ||||||
Financial |
(288,340 | ) | 31,369 | (256,971 | ) | |||||||
Food & Fiber |
(181,687 | ) | (100,271 | ) | (281,958 | ) | ||||||
Indices |
(105,274 | ) | 36,231 | (69,043 | ) | |||||||
Metals |
(275,661 | ) | 1,134,426 | 858,765 | ||||||||
Livestock |
(10,053 | ) | 99,390 | 89,337 | ||||||||
Energy |
769,978 | (68,609 | ) | 701,369 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total net trading gains (losses) |
$ | (571,187 | ) | $ | 1,015,318 | $ | 444,131 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Losses) |
Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
Net
Trading Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 56,190 | $ | (65,021 | ) | $ | (8,831 | ) | ||||
Currency |
(4,289 | ) | (113,127 | ) | (117,416 | ) | ||||||
Financial |
(162,966 | ) | (73,460 | ) | (236,426 | ) | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
32,787 | (78,745 | ) | (45,958 | ) | |||||||
Indices |
(131,299 | ) | (57,135 | ) | (188,434 | ) | ||||||
Metals |
838,805 | (704,523 | ) | 134,282 | ||||||||
Livestock |
64,250 | (5,330 | ) | 58,920 | ||||||||
Energy |
611,331 | 47,285 | 658,616 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total net trading gains (losses) |
$ | 1,304,809 | $ | (1,050,056 | ) | $ | 254,753 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Superfund Gold, L.P.Series B
The fair value of the Funds derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of March 31, 2012, is as follows:
Type of Instrument |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location |
Asset Derivatives at March 31, 2012 |
Liability Derivatives at March 31, 2012 |
Net | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts | $ | 66,117 | $ | | $ | 66,117 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts | | (92,730 | ) | (92,730 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts | Futures contracts purchased | 166,588 | (421,489 | ) | (254,901 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts | Futures contracts sold | 281,246 | (102,559 | ) | 178,687 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Totals |
$ | 513,951 | $ | (616,778 | ) | $ | (102,827 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Funds derivatives by instrument type, as well as the location of those instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, as of December 31, 2011, is as follows:
Type of Instrument |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location |
Asset Derivatives at December 31, 2011 |
Liability Derivatives at December 31, 2011 |
Net | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts | $ | 65,688 | $ | | $ | 65,688 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | Unrealized depreciation on open forward contracts | | (44,159 | ) | (44,159 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts | Futures contracts purchased | | (825,539 | ) | (825,539 | ) | ||||||||
Futures contracts | Futures contracts sold | 188,512 | | 188,512 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Totals |
$ | 254,200 | $ | (869,698 | ) | $ | (615,498 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Realized Gain
(Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Change
in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
|||||||
Foreign Exchange contracts | Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $ | 55,392 | $ | (48,142 | ) | ||||
Futures contracts | Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (446,854 | ) | 560,813 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | (391,462 | ) | $ | 512,671 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Effects of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments under ASC 815 |
Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Realized Gain on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Net Change in Unrealized Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
|||||||
Foreign Exchange contracts | Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | $ | 62,824 | $ | (86,083 | ) | ||||
Futures contracts | Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1,461,634 | (1,137,965 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 1,524,458 | $ | (1,224,048 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of March 31, 2012:
As of March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Positions Gross Unrealized | Short Positions Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Open Positions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 11,780 | 0.1 | $ | (53,208 | ) | (0.6 | ) | $ | 54,337 | 0.6 | $ | (39,522 | ) | (0.4 | ) | $ | (26,613 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Currency |
33,038 | 0.3 | (21,145 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 5,245 | 0.0 | * | (2,210 | ) | 0.0 | * | 14,928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
34,940 | 0.4 | (9,326 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | | | | 25,614 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
3,200 | 0.0 | * | (15,802 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 18,714 | 0.2 | (66,369 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (60,257 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indices |
81,542 | 0.9 | (45,355 | ) | (0.5 | ) | 44,876 | 0.5 | (20,277 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 60,786 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Metals |
917 | 0.0 | * | (263,838 | ) | (2.9 | ) | 114,761 | 1.2 | (13,703 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (161,863 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Livestock |
| | | | 95,740 | 1.0 | | | 95,740 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
12,951 | 0.1 | (66,023 | ) | (0.7 | ) | 1,910 | 0.0 | | | (51,162 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 178,368 | 1.8 | $ | (474,697 | ) | (5.1 | ) | $ | 335,583 | 3.5 | $ | (142,081 | ) | (1.4 | ) | $ | (102,827 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
35
Superfund Gold, L.P. Series B gross and net unrealized gains and losses by long and short positions as of December 31, 2011:
As of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Positions Gross Unrealized | Short Positions Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Gains | % of Net Assets |
Losses | % of Net Assets |
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Open Positions |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 2,769 | 0.0 | * | $ | (21,155 | ) | (0.3 | ) | $ | 62,919 | 0.7 | $ | (23,004 | ) | (0.2 | ) | $ | 21,529 | |||||||||||||||||
Currency |
31,783 | 0.3 | (200 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 43,619 | 0.4 | (2,300 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 72,902 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial |
16,373 | 0.1 | (13,107 | ) | (0.1 | ) | | | (5,281 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (2,015 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Food & Fiber |
15,100 | 0.1 | (1,125 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 40,823 | 0.4 | (29,133 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 25,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Indices |
4,417 | 0.0 | * | (941 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 39,390 | 0.4 | (6,545 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 36,321 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Metals |
| | (836,253 | ) | (8.8 | ) | 75,440 | 0.8 | (18,981 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (779,794 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Livestock |
| | | | 9,760 | 0.1 | (480 | ) | (0.0 | )* | 9,280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy |
| | (41,586 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 42,200 | 0.4 | | | 614 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 70,442 | 0.5 | $ | (914,367 | ) | (9.6 | ) | $ | 314,151 | 3.2 | $ | (85,724 | ) | (0.9 | ) | $ | 615,498 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Due to rounding |
Series B average* contract volume by market sector for the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
Average Value of Long Positions |
Average Value of Short Positions |
|||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
39 | 30 | $ | 259,912 | $ | 219,677 |
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
|||||||
Currency |
396 | 217 | ||||||
Financial |
714 | 150 | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
82 | 71 | ||||||
Indices |
320 | 168 | ||||||
Metals |
398 | 48 | ||||||
Livestock |
16 | 55 | ||||||
Energy |
172 | 71 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Totals |
2,137 | 810 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Based on quarterly holdings |
Series B average* contract volume by market sector for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
Average Value of Long Positions |
Average Value of Short Positions |
|||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
59 | 46 | $ | 213,669 | $ | 195,043 |
Average Number of Long Contracts |
Average Number of Short Contracts |
|||||||
Currency |
786 | 42 | ||||||
Financial |
1068 | 386 | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
54 | 2 | ||||||
Indices |
611 | 232 | ||||||
Metals |
326 | 109 | ||||||
Livestock |
55 | | ||||||
Energy |
243 | 191 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Totals |
3,202 | 1,008 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Based on quarterly holdings |
36
Series B trading results by market sector
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Net
Realized Gain (Losses) |
Change in
Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
Net Trading Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 55,392 | $ | (48,142 | ) | $ | 7,250 | |||||
Currency |
(467,800 | ) | (57,974 | ) | (525,774 | ) | ||||||
Financial |
(252,731 | ) | 27,629 | (225,102 | ) | |||||||
Food & Fiber |
(159,363 | ) | (85,922 | ) | (245,285 | ) | ||||||
Indices |
(96,640 | ) | 24,465 | (72,175 | ) | |||||||
Metals |
(124,630 | ) | 617,931 | 493,301 | ||||||||
Livestock |
(5,642 | ) | 86,460 | 80,818 | ||||||||
Energy |
659,952 | (51,776 | ) | 608,176 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total net trading gains (losses) |
$ | (391,462 | ) | $ | 512,671 | $ | 121,209 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Net Realized Gain (Losses) |
Change in Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) |
Net Trading Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||
Foreign Exchange |
$ | 62,824 | $ | (86,083 | ) | $ | (23,259 | ) | ||||
Currency |
(6,450 | ) | (153,239 | ) | (159,689 | ) | ||||||
Financial |
(294,879 | ) | (101,566 | ) | (396,445 | ) | ||||||
Food & Fiber |
49,360 | (110,705 | ) | (61,345 | ) | |||||||
Indices |
(46,283 | ) | (84,698 | ) | (130,981 | ) | ||||||
Metals |
785,531 | (738,500 | ) | 47,031 | ||||||||
Livestock |
82,890 | (10,910 | ) | 71,980 | ||||||||
Energy |
891,465 | 61,653 | 953,118 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total net trading gains (losses) |
$ | 1,524,458 | $ | (1,224,048 | ) | $ | 300,410 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Due from/to brokers
Due from brokers consists of proceeds from securities sold. Amounts due from brokers may be restricted to the extent that they serve as deposits for securities sold short. Amounts due to brokers, if any, represent margin borrowings that are collateralized by certain securities. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were no amounts due to brokers.
In the normal course of business, all of the Funds marketable securities transactions, money balances and marketable security positions are transacted with brokers. The Fund is subject to credit risk to the extent any broker with whom it conducts business is unable to fulfill contractual obligations on its behalf. On October 31, 2011, MF Global reported to the SEC and the CFTC possible deficiencies in customer segregated accounts held at the firm. As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a liquidation proceeding led by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) would be the safest and most prudent course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and SIPC initiated the liquidation of MF Global under the Securities Investor Protection Act. Superfund Capital Management closely monitored MF Global in the weeks prior to October 31, 2011 and began reducing the Funds exposure to MF Global. In October, total trading positions and assets of the Fund held at MF Global were reduced and steps were initiated to transfer all remaining positions and assets from MF Global to other clearing brokers prior to the bankruptcy filing. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the SIPC liquidation Trustee announced that the shortfall in the customer segregated funds account could be as much as 22% or more. After consideration of the Funds exposure, Superfund Capital Management caused the Fund to take a reserve to account for the Funds estimated exposure to such 22% shortfall. Series A-1 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $74,000, Series A-2 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $19,000, Series B-1 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $58,000 and Series B-2 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $43,000. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $255,000 of Series A-1 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 2.0% of Series A-1s net asset value of approximately $12.85 million as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $67,400 of Series A-2 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 2.0% of Series A-2s net asset value of approximately $3.34 million as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $198,000 of Series B-1 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 3.8% of Series B-1s net asset value of approximately $5.26 million as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $145,100 of Series B-2 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 3.7% of Series B-2s net asset value of approximately $3.91 million as of March 31, 2012.
37
Through March 31, 2012, there has been no change to the Series A-1 reserve, which represents approximately 0.6% of the net assets of Series A-1 as of March 31, 2012 (or approximately $8.70 per Series A-1 Unit). Through March 31, 2012, there has been no change to the Series A-2 reserve, which represents approximately 0.6% of the net assets of Series A-2 as of March 31, 2012 (or approximately $9.50 per Series A-2 Unit). Through March 31, 2012, there has been no change to the Series B-1 reserve, which represents approximately 1.1% of the net assets of Series B-1 as of March 31, 2012 (or approximately $13.52 per Series B-1 Unit). Through March 31, 2012, there has been no change to the Series B-2 reserve, which represents approximately 1.1% of the net assets of Series B-2 as of March 31, 2012 (or approximately $14.24 per Series B-2 Unit). In December 2011 and January 2012, the Fund received distributions from the SIPC liquidation trustee of a portion of the Funds assets on deposit at MF Global. In total, Series A received approximately $5,700 in distributions and Series B received approximately $14,400. The receipt of these distributions has not impacted the reserves established on October 31, 2011. In April, the Court in the MF Global liquidation proceeding authorized the additional distribution of up to approximately $600 million of segregated customer assets and $50 million in secured customer assets. To date, the Fund has not received its portion of these distributions. Superfund Capital Management has concluded that receipt of the Funds estimated portion of these distributions will not have an impact on the reserves already taken, which continue to represent reasonable estimations of the potential exposure to MF Global. Superfund Capital Management does not believe that the MF Global liquidation will have a material impact on the ongoing trading operations of the Fund. However, because MF Global is still in the liquidation process, further developments in the MF Global liquidation proceedings may have an impact on the ability of the Fund to:
| satisfy redemption requests in the normal 20-day time period; |
| adequately value redemption requests in the ordinary timeframe; |
| accept new subscriptions and properly value the net asset value for new subscribers; and |
| provide for accurate valuation in the Funds account statements provided to Limited Partners. |
There can be no assurances:
| that the Fund will have immediate access to any or all of its assets in accounts held at MF Global; and |
| as to the amount or value of those assets in the context of the bankruptcy. |
Future actions involving MF Global may impact the Funds ability to value the portion of its assets held at MF Global and/or delay the payment of a Limited Partners pro rata share of such assets upon redemption. The foregoing reserve is based upon available information. As additional information becomes available, additional reserves may be taken or prior reserves reversed, which will be accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as of the time that such information is then available (and not as of the date that the liquidation proceedings commenced with respect to MF Global). As a result, all Limited Partners will participate in any future reserves taken (resulting in decreases in the Funds net asset value) or any reversal of prior reserves (resulting in increases in the Funds net asset value) to the extent that such Limited Partner holds Units at the time that such reserve is taken or reversed.
6. Allocation of net profits and losses
In accordance with the Funds Third Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (the Limited Partnership Agreement), net profits and losses of the Fund are allocated to partners according to their respective interests in the Fund as of the beginning of each month.
Subscriptions received in advance, if any, represent cash received prior to the balance sheet date for subscriptions of the subsequent month and do not participate in the earnings of the Fund until the following month.
7. Related party transactions
Superfund Capital Management shall be paid a management fee equal to one-twelfth of 2.25% of month-end net assets (2.25% per annum) and operating and ongoing offering expenses equal to one-twelfth of 0.75% of month-end net assets (0.75% per annum), when considered together, not to exceed the amount of actual expenses incurred. Superfund Capital Management will also be paid a monthly performance/incentive fee equal to 25% of the new appreciation without respect to interest income or any changes in net asset due to changes in value of the Funds dollar for dollar gold position. Trading losses will be carried forward and no further performance/incentive fee may be paid until prior losses have been recovered. In addition, Superfund Asset Management, Inc., an affiliate of Superfund Capital Management, serves as the introducing broker for the Funds futures transactions and receives a portion of the brokerage commissions paid by the Fund in connection with its futures trading. Superfund USA, Inc., (Superfund USA) an entity related to Superfund Capital Management by common ownership, shall be paid selling commissions equal to 2% of the month-end net asset value per Series A-1 Unit and Series B-1 Unit (one-twelfth of 2% per month). These amounts are included under Selling commission in the Statements of Operations. However, the maximum cumulative selling commission per Unit is limited to 10% of the gross offering proceeds of such Unit.
38
8. Financial highlights
Financial highlights for the period January 1 through March 31, 2012 are as follows:
2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Series A-1 | Series A-2 | Series B-1 | Series B-2 | |||||||||||||
Total Return* |
||||||||||||||||
Total return before incentive fees |
1.0 | % | 1.5 | % | (1.7 | )% | (1.2 | )% | ||||||||
Incentive fees |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total return after incentive fees |
1.0 | % | 1.5 | % | (1.7 | )% | (1.2 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Ratios to average partners capital** |
||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses before incentive fees |
1.7 | % | 1.2 | % | 1.9 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
Incentive fees |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total expenses |
1.7 | % | 1.2 | % | 1.9 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net investment loss** |
(1.7 | )% | (1.2 | )% | (1.9 | )% | (1.4 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net asset value per unit, beginning of period |
$ | 1,496.15 | $ | 1,625.63 | $ | 1,241.61 | $ | 1,300.90 | ||||||||
Net investment loss |
(27.28 | ) | (20.85 | ) | (25.03 | ) | (19.59 | ) | ||||||||
Net gain on investments |
42.61 | 45.68 | 3.64 | 3.53 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net asset value per unit, end of period |
$ | 1,511.48 | $ | 1,650.46 | $ | 1,220.22 | $ | 1,284.84 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other per Unit information: |
||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon weighted average number of Units during period) upon weighted average Number of Units during period) upon weighted average number of Units during period) |
$ | 13.52 | $ | 26.27 | $ | (14,77 | ) | $ | 3.78 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon change in net asset value per Unit) upon change in net asset value per Unit) upon change in net asset value per Unit) |
$ | 15.33 | $ | 24.83 | $ | (21.39 | ) | $ | (16.06 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Total return is calculated for each Series of the Fund taken as a whole. An individual investors return may vary from these returns based on the timing of capital transactions. |
** | Annualized for periods less than a year |
Financial highlights for the period January 1 through March 31, 2011 are as follows:
2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Series A-1 | Series A-2 | Series B-1 | Series B-2 | |||||||||||||
Total Return* |
||||||||||||||||
Total return before incentive fees |
(0.5 | )% | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.5 | % | ||||||||
Incentive fees |
0.0 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total return after incentive fees |
(0.5 | )% | (0.01 | )% | (0.02 | )% | (0.1 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Ratios to average partners capital** |
||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses before incentive fees |
7.1 | % | 5.0 | % | 7.9 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
Incentive fees |
0.0 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.2 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total expenses |
7.1 | % | 5.1 | % | 8.1 | % | 6.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net investment loss** |
(7.0 | )% | (5.0 | )% | (7.8 | )% | (5.8 | )% | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net asset value per unit, beginning of period |
$ | 1,566.65 | $ | 1,671.00 | $ | 1,351.21 | $ | 1,389.80 | ||||||||
Net investment loss |
(26.26 | ) | (20.75 | ) | (25.99 | ) | (21.13 | ) | ||||||||
Net gain on investments |
18.09 | 19.52 | 24.93 | 25.89 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net asset value per unit, end of period |
$ | 1,558.48 | $ | 1,669.77 | $ | 1,350.15 | $ | 1,394.56 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other per Unit information: |
||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon weighted average Number of Units during period) upon weighted average Number of Units during period) upon weighted average number of Units during period) |
$ | 1.12 | $ | 2.61 | $ | 4.58 | $ | 8.44 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations per Unit (based upon change in net asset value per Unit) upon change in net asset value per Unit) upon change in net asset value per Unit) |
$ | (8.17 | ) | $ | (1.23 | ) | $ | (1.06 | ) | $ | 4.76 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
* | Total return is calculated for each Series of the Fund taken as a whole. An individual investors return may vary from these returns based on the timing of capital transactions. |
** | Annualized for periods less than a year |
9. Financial instrument risk
In the normal course of its business, the Fund is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. The term off-balance sheet risk refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in a future obligation or loss. These financial instruments may include forwards, futures and options whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash flows, to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specific future dates or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange or OTC. Exchange-traded instruments are standardized and include futures and certain option contracts. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and include forwards and certain options. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract.
For the Fund, gross unrealized gains and losses related to exchange-traded futures were $929,812 and $1,162,388, respectively, and gross unrealized gains and losses related to non-exchange-traded forwards were $146,326 and $205,049, respectively, at March 31, 2012.
For Series A, gross unrealized gains and losses related to exchange-traded futures were $481,978 and $638,340, respectively, and gross unrealized gains and losses related to non-exchange-traded forwards were $80,209 and $112,319, respectively, at March 31, 2012.
For Series B, gross unrealized gains and losses related to exchange-traded futures were $447,834 and $524,048, respectively, and gross unrealized gains and losses related to non-exchange-traded forwards were $66,117 and $92,730, respectively, at March 31, 2012.
Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Fund due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interest positions at the same time, and Superfund Capital Management was unable to offset such positions, the Fund could experience substantial losses.
Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transactions. The Funds risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the statements of assets and liabilities and not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. As the Funds assets are held in segregated accounts with futures commission merchants, the Fund has credit risk and concentration risk. The Funds futures commission merchants are currently ADM Investor Services, Inc., Barclays Capital Inc., and Rosenthal Collins Group, L.L.C. Prior to its insolvency, the Fund used MF Global, Inc. as one of its futures commission merchants. See Note 5 for additional discussion of MF Global.
Superfund Capital Management monitors and attempts to control the Funds risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit, and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Fund is subject. These monitoring systems allow Superfund Capital Management to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, on-line monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures and forward positions by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions, and collateral positions.
The majority of these instruments mature within one year of March 31, 2012. However, due to the nature of the Funds business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.
40
10. Subscriptions and redemptions
Investors must submit subscriptions at least five business days prior to the applicable month-end closing date and they will be accepted once payments are received and cleared. All subscription funds are required to be promptly transmitted to HSBC Bank USA, as escrow agent. Subscriptions must be accepted or rejected by Superfund Capital Management within five business days of receipt, and the settlement date for the deposit of subscription funds in escrow must be within five business days of acceptance. No fees or costs will be assessed on any subscription while held in escrow, irrespective of whether the subscription is accepted or the subscription funds are returned.
Limited Partners may request any or all of their investment in such Series be redeemed by such Series at the net asset value of a Unit within such Series as of the end of the month, subject to a minimum redemption of $1,000. A request for less than a full redemption that would reduce a Limited Partners remaining investment to less than $5,000 will be treated as a request for full redemption. Limited Partners must transmit a written request of such redemption to Superfund Capital Management not less than five business days prior to the end of the month (or such shorter period as permitted by Superfund Capital Management) as of which redemption is to be effective. Redemptions will generally be paid within 20 days after the effective date of the redemption. However, in special circumstances, including, but not limited to, inability to liquidate dealers positions as of a redemption date or default or delay in payments due to each Series from clearing brokers, banks or other persons or entities, each Series may in turn delay payment to persons requesting redemption of the proportionate part of the net assets of each Series represented by the sums that are the subject of such default or delay, and Limited Partners will be paid their pro rata portion of the redemption amount not subject to defaults or delays.
11. Indemnification
In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund, and therefore cannot be established; however, based on experience, the risk of loss from such claims is considered remote.
12. Subsequent events
Superfund Capital Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the Fund through the date the financial statements were filed and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
INTRODUCTION
The Fund commenced the offering of its Units on February 17, 2009. The initial offering terminated on March 31, 2009, and the Fund commenced operations on April 1, 2009. The continuing offering period commenced at the termination of the initial offering period and is ongoing. Subscription and redemption data is presented for both the Fund, as the SEC registrant, and for Series A and Series B, individually. For the quarter ended March 31, 2012, subscriptions totaling $1,414,685 in the Fund have been accepted and redemptions over the same period totaled $2,098,532. For the quarter ended March 31, 2012, subscriptions totaling $682,685 in Series A-1, $128,000 in Series A-2, $104,000 in Series B-1, and $500,000 in Series B-2 have been accepted and redemptions over the same period totaled $450,728 in Series A-1, $151,515 in Series A-2, $400,088 in Series B-1 and $530,139 in Series B-2. The Fund operates as a commodity investment pool, whose purpose is speculative trading in the U.S. and international futures and forward markets. Specifically, the Fund trades a portfolio of more than 120 futures and forward markets using a fully-automated, proprietary, computerized trading system. The Fund also seeks to maintain an investment in gold approximately equal to the total capital of each Series, as of the beginning of each month. The gold investment is intended to delink each Series net asset value, which is determined in U.S. dollars, from the value of the U.S. dollar relative to gold, effectively denominating the Series net asset value in terms of gold.
LIQUIDITY
Most U.S. commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as daily price fluctuation limits or daily limits. During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. This may affect the Funds ability to initiate new positions or close existing ones or may prevent it from having orders executed. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. Similar occurrences could prevent the Fund from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions and subject the Fund to substantial losses, which could exceed the margin initially committed to such trades. In addition, even if futures prices have not moved the daily limit, the Fund may not be able to execute futures trades at favorable prices if little trading in such contracts is taking place.
41
Trading in forward contracts introduces a possible further impact on liquidity. Because such contracts are executed off exchange between private parties, the time required to offset or unwind these positions may be greater than that for regulated instruments. This potential delay could be exacerbated to the extent a counterparty is not a U.S. person.
On October 31, 2011, MF Global reported to the SEC and CFTC possible deficiencies in customer segregated accounts held at the firm. As a result, the SEC and CFTC determined that a SIPC-led liquidation proceeding would be the safest and most prudent course of action to protect customer accounts and assets, and SIPC initiated the liquidation of MF Global under the Securities Investor Protection Act. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $255,000 of Series A-1 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 2.0% of Series A-1s net asset value of approximately $12.85 million as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $67,400 of Series A-2 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $198,000 of Series B-1 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $145,100 of Series B-2 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. There can be no assurance that all of the Funds assets currently held at MF Global will be returned to the Fund or the length of time it will take for such return.
Other than these limitations on liquidity, the Funds assets are expected to be highly liquid.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Fund will raise additional capital only through the sale of Units offered pursuant to the continuing offering and does not intend to raise any capital through borrowings. Due to the nature of the Funds business, it will make no capital expenditures and will have no capital assets which are not operating capital or assets.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Series A:
Net results for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, were a gain of 1.0% in net asset value for Series A-1 and a gain of 1.53% in net asset value for Series A-2. In this period, Series A experienced a net increase in net assets from operations of $169,609. This increase consisted of total income of $515, trading gains of $444,131, and total expenses of $275,037. Expenses included $98,982 in management fees, $32,994 in operating expenses, $69,550 in selling commissions, $72,956 in brokerage commissions and $555 in other expenses. At March 31, 2012, the net asset value per Unit of Series A-1 was $1,511.48, and the net asset value per Unit of Series A-2 was $1,650.46.
Series B:
Net results for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, were a loss of 1.7% in net asset value for Series B-1 and a loss of 1.24% in net asset value for Series B-2. In this period, Series B experienced a net decrease in net assets from operations of $52,996. This decrease consisted of total income of $443, trading gains of $121,209, and total expenses of $174,648. Expenses included $59,616 in management fees, $19,872 in operating expenses, $29,702 in selling commissions, $63,994 in brokerage commissions and $1,464 in other expenses. At March 31, 2012, the net asset value per Unit of Series B-1 was $1,220.22, and the net asset value per Unit of Series B-2 was $1,284.84.
Fund results for 1st Quarter 2012:
In March, the Funds trading strategies produced disappointing returns as rapidly shifting macroeconomic factors led to trendless and choppy market conditions. The United States (U.S.) economy sustained momentum, adding another 227,000 jobs for its best six-month streak since May of 2006. Retail sales climbed 1.1%, the most in five months, reflecting consumer confidence despite rising gas prices. In contrast, commodity-driven economies such as Australia felt the effects of reduced base-metal demand, while euro-zone gross domestic product unexpectedly contracted as the region struggles to contain its debt crisis. Crude oil declined as the impact of Iranian tensions receded when compared to slowing global demand and ample supplies. The Funds short-term strategies produced mixed to slightly negative results. The Funds allocation to currency markets yielded poor results in March. The U.S. dollar (+0.5%) advanced early as improvements in the U.S. economy and positive investor sentiment drove up equities and sent interest rates modestly higher. Later in the month Chairman Bernanke of the Federal Reserve (the Fed) reiterated his commitment to low interest rates, pressuring the U.S. dollar and erasing previous gains. The European Central Bank (ECB) continued to hold the line on interest rates, keeping its discount rate at 1%. The euro and British pound finished unchanged versus the U.S. dollar after declines of 2%. The Australian dollar (-4.4%) fell on weak gross domestic product (GDP), an unexpected rise in unemployment, as well as softening commodity exports. The
42
Funds bond exposure experienced losses during a turbulent March as U.S. and European bonds sold off precipitously only to rebound later in the month. Japanese Government Bonds (JGB) came under pressure as the Bank of Japan (BOJ) resisted calls to increase asset purchases beyond the 30 trillion yen committed at their February meeting. JGB yields rose to 1.056%, the highest since December 2011. The Fund experienced negative results in the global equity markets in March. European stocks fell sharply on euro-zone GDP contraction (-0.3%) before optimistic U.S. data helped lift futures to 8-month highs. Markets quickly reversed on Chinas shrinking economy and the possible need for further Greek debt restructuring. The FTSE (-2.1%), Amsterdam EOE Index (-1.2%), and Euro Stoxx (-4.5%) all finished lower. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (the Dow Jones) (+1.2%) and the Standard and Poor 500 (the S&P 500) (+2.5%) rose to four-year highs. Asian shares were mostly lower, pressured by the slowdown in China. Chinas H-Shares (-10.9%) sank on weaker-than-expected housing and auto data with stocks in Singapore (-1.1%), Taiwan (-2.5%), and India (-2.3%) also lower. The Nikkei (+1.5%) managed to gain as the BOJ continued to ease in an effort to boost growth and weaken the yen. The Funds grains positions experienced moderate losses for the month. Directionless trading led to losses in corn and wheat while trending soybeans benefited long soybean meal positions. The Funds exposure to the metals sectors generated moderate losses as precious metals declined on increasingly positive sentiment surrounding the stability of the global economy. The Funds allocation to money market futures also produced negative results. Short-rate price movement closely mirrored the volatility seen in longer-term maturities as central banks continued to hold overnight lending rates between 0 and 25 basis points. Although targeted rates are expected to remain near zero for an extended period, the strength of the equity rally precipitated a decline in global short-rate prices, negatively impacting the Funds long positions. The Funds perpetual long gold position underperformed in March as investors exited the precious metal in exchange for risk. The steady pace of upbeat economic reports in the U.S., including consumer spending and confidence, fed growing optimism over the stability of the worlds largest economy.
In February, the Funds trading strategies generated solid returns as geopolitical and economic forces pushed energies and equities decidedly higher. Intensifying tensions with Iran over their nuclear program injected risk premium into oil markets, driving crude prices to multi-month highs. Meanwhile, a wave of hopeful economic data and the long-awaited second Greek bailout lifted stocks. U.S. unemployment fell for a fifth straight month, adding 234,000 jobs while U.S. consumer confidence posted its longest streak of gains since 1997. The Nasdaq Stock Market (the Nasdaq) hit 11-year highs and the Dow Jones closed above 13,000 for the first time since 2008. The BOJ revealed plans to inject 10 trillion yen into the Japanese economy in an effort to suppress deflation while the ECB sought to stabilize euro-zone banks and stimulate the economy by issuing 529.5 billion of low interest loans. Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) corn slid sideways awaiting spring plantings, while soybeans soared on expected crop damage in Brazil. Short-term strategies enhanced overall performance with gains in currencies, stocks, metals, and energies. The Funds allocation to the energy sector produced significant returns in February as economic optimism, escalating Iranian tensions, and reduced refinery capacity led to robust returns for long energy positions. Extreme cold in Europe in the midst of heavy refinery maintenance drove IPE gas oil (+6.3%) to a nine-month high. New York heating oil (+6.0%), also used in home heating, was pulled higher on anticipated demand shift to the U.S. Brent crude gained 10.9%, its best month since May of 2009, while NY crude (+8.6%) reached a nine-month high. Despite poor U.S. gasoline demand, RBOB futures extended an impressive rally, gaining 5.4%, aided by permanent, unplanned, and seasonal refinery closures. Promising U.S. employment data and the Greek bailout approval lifted energies universally on hopes of economic growth. The Fund experienced positive results in global equity markets as stocks rose on continued economic improvement. While Europe worked its way towards the second bailout of Greece, equity markets across the continent were higher as fears of an imminent euro-zone collapse subsided. The ECB eased monetary policy significantly in an effort to support markets, stepping away from its traditional mandate of inflation stability. Markets responded with the CAC40 (+4.5%), FTSE (+3.7%) and DAX (+6.0%) all finishing the month higher. Only the Greek index finished lower with a 9.1% loss. Investor optimism drove up markets across Asia with the Nikkei (+10.2%) climbing sharply as the yen fell. Improvements in the outlook for exports also boosted shares in Hong Kong (+6.6%), Korea (+3.5%) and Taiwan (+7.6%). The U.S. markets rose as unemployment fell to 8.3%, jobless claims hit a four-year low, and modest growth was seen in manufacturing and housing. The S&P 500 (+4.3%) is off to its best start in 21 years. The Funds allocation to currencies generated moderate losses due to the sharp reversal in the Japanese yen. The U.S. dollar was weaker against most global currencies as the Fed reiterated its highly accommodative stance in spite of improving economic conditions. The BOJ, which has struggled with deflation for more than a decade, announced it would target a 1% annual inflation rate, adding 10 trillion yen to the economy in the process. Traders took the news seriously and sent the yen (-6.2%) to a seven-month low. The euro (+1.9%) strengthened against the U.S. dollar as fears over a Greek debt disaster abated and expectations rose for increased lending activity. The Swiss franc (+1.8%) and British pound (+1.1%) also gained while better-than-expected economic data in Australia drove the AUD/USD rate to a six-month high (1.0795 $/AUD). South American currencies continued to climb with the Mexican peso (+1.4%), Colombian peso (+2.4%), and the Brazilian real (+1.7%) all gaining. The Funds bond portfolio produced negative results in February. U.S. bond prices retreated slightly from January highs as positive economic data continued to foster the strongest equity rally in two decades. U.S. unemployment dropped to 8.3%, returning to a level not seen since February 2009. U.S. 10-year notes retreated on the news and ended the month down 0.8%. The ECB implemented phase two of their long term refinancing operation liquidity program on February 27th, injecting 530 billion of short-term liquidity into the region. The 1% loan offering was taken up by 800 euro-zone banks. The monetary infusion is expected to make its way into longer-term maturities as seen by the resulting rally in Bunds and 10-year Swap Notes. The Funds strategies underperformed in the metals sector after bullish trends in precious metals radically corrected as Fed chairman Bernanke quelled hopes for QE3. Immediately prior to the plunge, gold and silver each hit multi-
43
month highs as investors placed hedges against rising consumer prices and a weakening U.S. dollar. Following Mr. Bernankes testimony, gold (-1.7%) and silver (-6.9%) decreased significantly. Fears of reduced euro-zone base metal demand abated as leaders came to agreement on a second aid package for Greece. LME aluminum (+4.0%), assisted by record canceled warrants (orders to withdraw stockpiles), reversed early losses in the broad-based rally. Rising confidence levels on both sides of the Atlantic and falling inventories worked in tandem to elevate Comex (+2.1%) and LME copper (+2.2%). The Funds perpetual long gold position suffered late-month losses as testimony from Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke expressed optimism over improving macroeconomic data, reducing the likelihood of additional monetary stimulus. Gold and other safe-havens dropped on the news as the U.S. dollar rallied.
In January, the Funds strategies produced mixed results as optimism toward a European debt resolution and positive economic growth indicators led investors to add risk. The U.S. dollar declined against major currencies as the safety trade unwound, accelerated by the Feds stated willingness to purchase additional bonds. Gold benefited from the dollars decline, posting a +10% gain, climbing solidly back above its 200-day moving average while base-metals surged on production cutbacks and anticipated Chinese demand. European Union (EU) negotiations with Greece, initially promising, weighed on equity markets towards month-end as leaders debated terms of a second rescue package worth 500 billion euro. Nymex gasoline trended higher throughout the month as supply concerns intensified due to multiple refinery closures while natural gas plummeted to a 10-year low on unseasonably warm winter temperatures and overabundant supply. The Funds short-term strategies contributed positively to performance with gains in bonds, stocks, and metals, while the Funds perpetual long gold position produced significant gains for the month. The Funds allocation to money market futures yielded robust returns as central banks universally maintained accommodative monetary policies. In the United States, minutes from the Federal Open Market Committee of the Fed revealed the Feds commitment to maintain interest rates at or near zero through 2014. The European Central Bank, having cut rates twice in the last three months, maintained rates at a record low of 1%, citing signs of stabilization. In the United Kingdom, the Bank of England also maintained a record low benchmark of 0.5%. The Funds allocation to currency markets yielded negative returns as the U.S. dollar reversed its recent uptrend as global economic concerns began to subside. What had been a flight to safety in the U.S. dollar in late 2011 reversed as investors chose risk exposure and yield over conservation. The euro reached a 17-month low before recovering on perceived EU debt negotiation progress. The Australian dollar sustained its climb on relative economic outperformance, attractive interest rates, and strength in commodity prices. South American currencies, which lost significant ground in 2011, advanced considerably against the U.S. dollar. The Japanese yen rallied sharply late, closing at a three-month high, as investors flocked to the currency given the short-term U.S. interest rate outlook. The Funds grain positions experienced moderate losses for the month. Lingering concerns over South American corn and soybean yields drove grains to multi-week highs before surprisingly bearish U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) figures abruptly reversed trends. The highly anticipated January USDA report caused significant declines mid-month on unexpected increases in corn production and inventories, resulting in losses for the Funds corn positions. Wheat traded in tandem with corn, pressured by weak exports, ample supply, and favorable winter crop conditions. The Funds exposure to the energy sector generated positive returns, led by long gasoline and short natural gas positions. Gasoline ended up (+7.3%) for the month, while an unusually warm winter and continued supply glut pushed natural gas to $2.231/btu, a 10-year low. The Fund experienced losses in Nymex crude oil amid a directionless trade as prices were range-bound between $98 and $103 per barrel. The Funds perpetual long gold position produced sizable gains after the Federal Open Market Committee of the Fed announced that interest rates would remain low through 2014, sparking U.S. dollar worries. The ongoing EU debt crisis also continues to keep the euro weak. The instability associated with these currencies provided strong support for safe-haven assets.
For the first quarter of 2012, the most profitable market group overall was the energy sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the currency sector.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Series A:
Net results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, were a loss of 0.52% in net asset value for Series A-1 and a loss of 0.07% in net asset value for Series A-2. In this period, Series A experienced a net increase in net assets from operations of $13,757. This increase consisted of interest income of $2,245, trading gains of $254,753, and total expenses of $243,241. Expenses included $83,865 in management fees, $27,955 in operating expenses, $58,922 in selling commissions, $68,990 in brokerage commissions, $1,619 in incentive fees and $1,890 in other expenses. At March 31, 2011, the net asset value per Unit of Series A-1 was $1,558.48, and the net asset value per Unit of Series A-2 was $1,669.77.
Series B:
Net results for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, were a loss of 0.08% in net asset value for Series B-1 and a loss of 0.34% in net asset value for Series B-2. In this period, Series B experienced a net increase in net assets from operations of $60,251. This increase consisted of interest income of $2,454, trading gains of $300,410, and total expenses of $242,613. Expenses included $74,013 in management fees, $24,668 in operating expenses, $40,569 in selling commissions, $88,520 in brokerage commissions, $11,937 in incentive fees and $2,906 in other expenses. At March 31, 2011, the net asset value per Unit of Series B-1 was $1,350.15, and the net asset value per Unit of Series B-2 was $1,394.56.
44
Fund results for 1st Quarter 2011:
In March, the Funds allocation to global equity markets underperformed as a sharp countertrend reversal following the disaster in Japan produced losses for the Funds strategies. Equity markets opened the month moving sideways as the reemergence of sovereign debt and inflation worries in Europe offset steady expansion in global manufacturing. From there the Nikkei plunged 25.0% on panic-induced selling following the events of March 11th. Results for the Funds models experienced losses as most leading indices participated in the selloff as risk appetite abated. Equities quickly recovered as the focus shifted to the growth to be generated by rebuilding Japan. Nikkei futures finished only 7.7% lower on the month while shares in South Korea and Hong Kong finished 9.1% and 0.9% higher, respectively, on the belief that these markets are well positioned to fill the temporary void left by the decimated Japanese manufacturing sector. U.S. equity markets also experienced small gains as macroeconomic data continued on a positive trajectory. A mixture of long and short positions in equity markets led the Fund to an overall loss. The Funds positions in the bond sector experienced gains in March despite volatile market conditions as geopolitical instability in Libya and Japan and financial instability in Europe led investors to the relative safety of treasuries. Positions in Japanese government 10-year bonds experienced gains as the market opened the month near unchanged before rallying sharply in response to a nearly 20.0% washout in equities following the disaster. The Fund experienced losses in German bund futures as the market finished lower on news of improving employment, factory orders and retail sales. Meanwhile, the sovereign debt situation continued to evolve amid several debt downgrades of peripheral states, prompting investors to demand more yield to hold German debt even as EU leaders agreed to an expanded bailout package for troubled states. Results in U.S. bonds also experienced losses in turbulent trading activity as strong economic prospects offset geopolitical safe haven buying. A mixture of long and short bond positions led the Fund to an overall gain on the month. The Funds currency positions experienced gains in March as interest rate expectations and unsettling geopolitical developments dominated trading activity. June euro futures advanced 2.9% despite debt downgrades of Greece, Portugal and Spain as the ECB chairman continued to express the need for extreme vigilance with respect to the growing threat of inflation. The Swiss franc benefitted as investors sought shelter from the U.S.s quantitative easing and Europes sovereign debt troubles. The yen rose over 4.0% following the catastrophic earthquake, amid expectations for a massive repatriation of capital to rebuild the stricken nation. However, in the first coordinated G7 intervention since the 2000 support for the euro, central bankers crushed the rally on March 18th, leading to a loss of 1.6% on the month. The Mexican peso outperformed as the oil producing nation saw slowing inflation complimented by expectations for continuing strong GDP growth. A mixture of long and short currency positions led the Fund to an overall gain on the month. June gold contracts finished a choppy month with a 2.0% gain as the trend of a shift from improving macroeconomic results to inflation risks continued. Daily reminders of rising food costs fuelled the inflation story and, according to the United Nations, food costs posted record highs in February after rising 25.0% in 2010. Gold experienced a mid-month correction of 4.4% following the catastrophe in Japan as investors moved out of risk assets. However, the market closed strong as ECB rate hike expectations pressured the U.S. dollar to a loss of 1.5% on the month. These factors produced an overall gain for the Funds perpetual long gold futures position.
In February, the Funds allocation to equity markets performed well in February as major indices in the U.S. and Europe continued to press higher on improving economic conditions and strong corporate results. Late in the month, European and U.S. equities were shaken as the political unrest in Egypt spread to Libya and Bahrain, where protesters were met with force. The outbreak of violence triggered a spike in energy markets, which, when combined with uncertainty surrounding the severity of the crisis, prompted liquidation. Most major U.S. and European indices recovered late amid reassuring comments that the Saudis would cover any oil supply shortfalls. Asian shares struggled as inflation took a toll on growth prospects. Chinese H-shares lagged, finishing unchanged as inflation and consequent fiscal tightening dominated the action. Spillover pressure also affected shares in Singapore and Taiwan, which finished 5.9% and 5.6% lower, respectively. Japans Nikkei and Australias SPI finished 3.7% and 2.1% higher, respectively, in relatively quiet trading. A mixture of long and short positions in equity markets led the Fund to an overall gain in February. The Fund experienced losses in the bond sector in February as existing positions suffered amid a reversal in investors perception of the current risk environment. After breaking lower early in the month on strong corporate earnings and forward guidance, U.S. 30-year bond futures surged to January highs as growing unrest across the Middle East unnerved investors, prompting a general flight to safety. Germanys bund futures opened the month under pressure as anecdotal evidence of exceptional demand from China offset disappointing December factory orders and retail sales data. However, the deteriorating geopolitical situation and local election losses by the majority ruling party in Germany spurred a reversal that led to losses for the Fund. Trade in Australian bond futures was particularly volatile, to the Funds detriment, as weakness associated with a strong early month employment report faded as the Reserve Bank of Australia chief indicated that the central bank was not considering a rate hike at the current time. A mixture of long and short bond positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund obtained gains in currencies in February as the U.S. dollar continued to trend lower, extending Januarys losses by another 0.7%. The Swiss franc and Japanese yen finished 1.5% and 0.3% higher, respectively, amid safe haven buying as the situation deteriorated in the Middle East. The Fund experienced gains in the British pound, which finished the month 1.5% higher, after Consumer Price Index (CPI) readings showed that prices
45
were increasing at a 4.0% annualized rate, the highest level since the fall of 2008. Meanwhile, central bankers in Peru, Colombia, Indonesia and Russia raised rates as they continued to battle inflation while also attempting to fend off the negative effects that massive currency inflows are having on domestic currency appreciation. Colombia extended its dollar purchase program for another three months, hoping to cap currency gains to protect its export prospects. The Australian dollar finished 2.5% higher against the U.S. dollar as strong commodity markets supported full employment. A mixture of long and short positions in the currency sector led the Fund to an overall gain on the month. The Funds allocation to global energy markets yielded gains as growing instability in the Middle East and Northern Africa sent prices significantly higher. Short positions in West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil performed well early in the month, falling over 5.0% following the Egyptian presidents resignation and total U.S. fuel supplies moving to twenty year highs at the Cushing, Oklahoma delivery point. From there, the Fund experienced gains on long positions in April gasoline, heating oil, and brent crude, which finished 9.8%, 7.6% and 10.9% higher, respectively, at the expense of the Funds WTI crude position as civil unrest spread to Bahrain, Libya, and Oman. The markets gathered momentum as speculation surrounding the stability of the Saudi regime intensified. Short positions in April natural gas also performed well, falling 8.9% on the month as forecasts for mild weather contributed to a convincing breach of the $4 btu level. A mixture of long and short positions in the energy sector led the Fund to an overall gain on the month. The Fund experienced gains in April gold contracts, which finished the month 5.6% higher as the markets focus shifted from improving economic results to inflation risks. Gold rallied early as China responded aggressively to its inflation challenges with interest rate and reserve requirement hikes. While the unrest in Egypt subsided relatively peacefully, matters took a more violent turn in Bahrain, and Libya, as rising food costs exacerbated widespread discontent, fuelling skyrocketing energy markets which posed even greater inflation risks and support for gold. These factors produced an overall gain for the Funds perpetual long gold futures position.
In January, the Funds allocation to global equities finished mixed in January as disappointing performances in several peripheral markets offset steady trends in major indices. In Europe, several past laggards, including Greece, Italy and Spain finished the month 13.9%, 9.2% and 10.2% higher, respectively, as heavy ECB participation in secondary market debt auctions and plans for a comprehensive debt relief structure reassured investors. Small gains on positions in Germanys DAX, Frances CAC40 and the Amsterdam EOE Index, which finished 2.5%, 5.1% and 1.3% higher, respectively, offset losses in the sector as several core European economies improved. U.S. equities pressed higher as improving employment figures and solid consumer demand elevated corporate earnings. The Fund experienced early losses in Australias SPI as epic flooding cut into 2011 GDP prospects. Chinese H-Shares reversed lower late in the month to the Funds detriment as authorities continued to struggle with inflation. Overall, a mixture of long and short stock indices positions led the Fund to an overall loss. The Funds allocation to global bond markets underperformed in January as investors exited safe haven assets in response to improving global economic conditions. The Fund experienced losses in its Japanese government bond positions as large auctions and generally poor economic performance resulted in a ratings agency debt downgrade, encouraging investors to put money to work outside the country. In Europe, investors sold bund and bobl futures as Euro-zone industrial production readings easily surpassed expectations. Additionally, positive dialogue from various heads of state regarding a comprehensive crisis solution was backed up by aggressive ECB purchases of Italian, Portuguese and Spanish debt in secondary markets, ensuring successful auctions for the embattled countries. In the U.S., performance suffered in choppy countertrend action as bond and note futures moved sideways to slightly higher as the Quantitative Easing 2 program persisted in spite of rising inflation concerns in the rest of the world. A mixture of long and short bond positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Fund experienced losses in the interest rates sector as European short rates reversed sharply from Decembers strong close. While the ECB left rates unchanged in January, their policy minutes emphasized vigilance over price stability in the midst of rising commodity prices. Policy makers also noted that uncertainty remains elevated and some financial institutions still face the threat of balance sheet adjustments despite positive underlying momentum in the economy. They also stressed the need for Euro members to reduce debt-to-GDP ratios. Short rate futures in the U.S. finished near their highs as early weakness associated with a strong employment report was offset by staunchly accommodative Fed monetary policy. Their focus, in contrast to the ECB, continues to be focused on growth and full employment at the expense of inflation. Meanwhile, Australian short rate futures moved higher to the Funds benefit as epic flooding cut into 2011 GDP estimates, thereby reducing prospects for previously expected rate hikes. A mixture of long and short interest rate positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Funds allocation to currency markets underperformed in January as the euro and British pound finished 2.4% and 2.8% higher against the U.S. dollar, respectively, and euro-zone regionals reversed late 2010 losses. Early month news that Japan would buy distressed sovereign debt and strong ECB secondary market participation in Portugal, Spain, and Italian bond auctions provided support to these recently battered economies. As confidence in the euro improved, investors moved out of the Swiss franc, which finished 0.9% lower against the U.S. dollar, and back into risk plays in Hungary and Poland, which finished 5.4% and 4.1% higher, respectively, resulting in losses for the Fund. The Australian dollar finished 2.1% lower against the U.S. dollar as flood damage triggered a one-time levy, which tempered 2011 growth estimates and rate hike expectations. The Fund experienced losses in the yen following a credit rating downgrade as Japans huge debt load and limited policy options unnerved investors. Gains in the Mexican peso, which finished 1.8% higher against the U.S. dollar, offset some losses in the sector as the peso rallied on prospects for a sustained U.S. economic recovery. The Funds mixture of long and short currency positions led to an overall loss on the month. The Fund experienced losses in the metals sector in January as gold and silver futures traded sharply lower amid growing optimism that the global economic recovery is gaining momentum. April gold finished with a loss of 6.2% as strong early month U.S. employment figures and ebbing contagion fears in Europe limited
46
investors appetite for the alternative asset. March silver finished the month 8.8% lower in correlated action. The Funds allocation to industrial metals also suffered. The Funds positions in March Comex copper were stopped out after a 6.0% intra-month decline due to China raising its reserve requirement in response to elevated GDP and CPI reports. Fears that China would take more aggressive measures to limit growth led to losses in London aluminum, lead, and zinc as several Chinese banks were forced to cease lending for the remainder of the month. A mixture of long and short metals positions led the Fund to an overall loss on the month. The Funds allocation to global energy markets produced positive returns in January as economic, logistical, and geopolitical factors underpinned values. Strong U.S. employment figures and a pipeline shutdown in Alaska supported the Funds New York crude oil positions early in the month. However, elevated Chinese GDP and CPI readings precipitated another reserve requirement hike while increasing expectations for additional measures to slow their economy. This scenario, along with a bearish U.S. inventory report, contributed to losses for the Fund amid an 8.0% drop from intra-month highs. Long positions in brent crude finished 6.6% higher, surpassing $100 per barrel following a reversal in European demand expectations, an accident in the North Sea which idled 200k barrels of production, and heightening unrest in Egypt. Front-month heating oil surged as well, adding 7.4% as exceptionally cold weather gripped the northern hemisphere, providing excellent returns for the Fund. A mixture of long and short energy positions led the Fund to an overall gain on the month.
For the first quarter of 2011, the most profitable market group overall was the energy sector while the greatest losses were attributable to positions in the stock indices sector.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The term off-balance sheet risk refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in a future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures and forward contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts, there exists a market risk that such contracts may be significantly influenced by conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Fund at the same time, and if Superfund Capital Management was unable to offset such positions, the Fund could experience substantial losses. Superfund Capital Management attempts to minimize market risk through real-time monitoring of open positions, diversification of the portfolio and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio in all but extreme instances not greater than 50%.
In addition to market risk, in entering into futures and forward contracts, there is a credit risk that a counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Fund. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the U.S. and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this credit risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, like some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.
In the fourth quarter of 2011, the SIPC liquidation Trustee announced that the shortfall in the customer segregated funds account could be as much as 22% or more. After consideration of the Funds exposure, Superfund Capital Management caused the Fund to take a reserve to account for the Funds estimated exposure to such 22% shortfall. Series A-1 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $74,000, Series A-2 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $19,000, Series B-1 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $58,000 and Series B-2 recorded a reserve that reduced the net asset value by approximately $43,000. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $255,000 of Series A-1 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 2.0% of Series A-1s net asset value of approximately $12.85 million as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $67,400 of Series A-2 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 2.0% of Series A-2s net asset value of approximately $3.34 million as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $198,000 of Series B-1 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 3.8% of Series B-1s net asset value of approximately $5.26 million as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012 approximately $145,100 of Series B-2 assets were still on deposit in an account(s) at MF Global. These assets represented approximately 3.7% of Series B-2s net asset value of approximately $3.91 million as of March 31, 2012.
Through March 31, 2012, there has been no change to the Series A-1 reserve, which represents approximately 0.6% of the net assets of Series A-1 as of March 31, 2012 (or approximately $8.70 per Series A-1 Unit). Through March 31, 2012, there has been no change to the Series A-2 reserve, which represents approximately 0.6% of the net assets of Series A-2 as of March 31, 2012 (or approximately $9.50 per Series A-2 Unit). Through March 31, 2012, there has been no change to the Series B-1 reserve, which represents approximately 1.1% of the net assets of Series B-1 as of March 31, 2012 (or approximately $13.52 per Series B-1 Unit). Through March 31, 2012, there has been no change to the Series B-2 reserve, which represents approximately 1.1% of the net assets of Series B-2 as of March 31, 2012 (or approximately $14.24 per Series B-2 Unit). In December 2011 and January 2012, the Fund received distributions from the SIPC liquidation trustee of a portion of the Funds assets on deposit at MF Global. In total, Series A received approximately $5,700 in distributions and Series B received approximately $14,400. The receipt of these distributions has not impacted the reserves established on October 31, 2011. In
47
April, the Court in the MF Global liquidation proceeding authorized the additional distribution of up to approximately $600 million of segregated customer assets and $50 million in secured customer assets. To date, the Fund has not received its portion of these distributions. Superfund Capital Management has concluded that receipt of the Funds estimated portion of these distributions will not have an impact on the reserves already taken, which continue to represent reasonable estimations of the potential exposure to MF Global. Superfund Capital Management does not believe that the MF Global liquidation will have a material impact on the ongoing trading operations of the Fund. However, because MF Global is still in the liquidation process, further developments in the MF Global liquidation proceedings may have an impact on the ability of the Fund to:
| satisfy redemption requests in the normal 20-day time period; |
| adequately value redemption requests in the ordinary timeframe; |
| accept new subscriptions and properly value the net asset value for new subscribers; and |
| provide for accurate valuation in the Funds account statements provided to Limited Partners. |
There can be no assurances:
| that the Fund will have immediate access to any or all of its assets in accounts held at MF Global; and |
| as to the amount or value of those assets in the context of the bankruptcy. |
Future actions involving MF Global may impact the Funds ability to value the portion of its assets held at MF Global and/or delay the payment of a Limited Partners pro rata share of such assets upon redemption.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Fund does not engage in off-balance sheet arrangements.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The Fund does not enter into contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments of a type that would be typical for an operating company. The Funds sole business is trading futures, currency, forward and certain swap contracts, both long (contracts to buy) and short (contracts to sell). All such contracts are settled by offset, not delivery. Substantially all such contracts are for settlement within four months of the trade date and substantially all such contracts are held by the Fund for less than four months before being offset or rolled over into new contracts with similar maturities. The Financial Statements of the Fund present a Condensed Schedule of Investments setting forth net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of such Series open forward contracts as well as the fair value of the futures contracts purchased and sold by each Series at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES VALUATION OF THE FUNDS POSITIONS
Superfund Capital Management believes that the accounting policies that will be most critical to the Funds financial condition and results of operations relate to the valuation of the Funds positions. The Fund uses the amortized cost method for valuing U.S. Treasury Bills. Superfund Capital Management believes the cost of securities plus accreted discount, or minus amortized premium, approximates fair value. The majority of the Funds positions will be exchange-traded futures contracts, which will be valued daily at settlement prices published by the exchanges. Any spot and forward foreign currency or swap contracts held by the Fund will also be valued at published daily settlement prices or at dealers quotes. Thus, Superfund Capital Management expects that under normal circumstances substantially all of the Funds assets will be valued on a daily basis using objective measures.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
ASU 2011-11
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2011-11). ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. GAAP more comparable to those prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of assets and liabilities as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. New disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The General Partner is evaluating the impact of ASU 2011-11 on the financial statements and disclosures.
48
ASU 2011-04
In May 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Fund adopted ASU 2011-04 as of January 1, 2012. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2011-04 has not had a material impact on the Funds financial statement disclosures.
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Not required.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Superfund Capital Management, the Funds general partner, with the participation of Superfund Capital Managements principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures with respect to each series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, and, based on their evaluation, have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no formal changes in Superfund Capital Managements internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Superfund Capital Managements internal control over financial reporting with respect to each series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole.
The Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certifications of the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2, respectively, are certifying as to each Series individually, as well as the Fund as a whole.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
Superfund Capital Management is not aware of any pending legal proceedings to which either the Fund is a party or to which any of its assets are subject. The Fund has no subsidiaries.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Not required.
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
(a) | There were no sales of unregistered securities during the quarter ended March 31, 2012. |
(b) | Updated information required by Item 701(f) of Regulation S-K: |
(1) | The use of proceeds information is being disclosed for Registration Statement No. 333-151632 declared effective on February 17, 2009. |
(4)(iv) | As of March 31, 2012, the Fund sold $16,067,382 of Series A-1 Units, $3,738,873 of Series A-2 Units, $10,790,591 of Series B-1 Units and $4,632,221 of Series B-2 Units. |
(v) | As of March 31, 2012, the Fund incurred expenses for the account of the Fund totaling $5,581,786 of which $4,579,358 was paid to Superfund Capital Management and $1,002,428 was paid to Superfund USA. |
(vi) | Net offering proceeds to the Fund as of March 31, 2012 were $29,647,281. |
49
(vii) | As of September 30, 2011, the amount of net offering proceeds to the Fund for commodity futures and forward trading in accordance with Superfund Capital Managements trading program totaled $29,647,281. |
(c) Pursuant to the Limited Partnership Agreement, investors may redeem their Units at the end of each calendar month at the then current month-end net asset value per Unit. The redemption of Units has no impact on the value of Units that remain outstanding, and Units are not reissued once redeemed.
The following tables summarize the redemptions by investors during the three months ended March 31, 2012:
Series A-1: |
||||||||
Month |
Units Redeemed | Net Asset Value per Unit ($) |
||||||
January 31, 2011 |
96.022 | 1,671.23 | ||||||
February 28, 2011 |
74.649 | 1,667.76 | ||||||
March 31, 2011 |
109.728 | 1,511.48 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total |
280.399 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Series A-2: |
||||||||
Month |
Units Redeemed | Net Asset Value per Unit ($) |
||||||
January 31, 2011 |
21.184 | 1,818.91 | ||||||
February 28, 2011 |
7.425 | 1,818.08 | ||||||
March 31, 2011 |
60.197 | 1,650.46 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total |
88.806 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Series B-1: |
||||||||
Month |
Units Redeemed | Net Asset Value per Unit ($) |
||||||
January 31, 2011 |
149.891 | 1,392.59 | ||||||
February 28, 2011 |
84.124 | 1,399.06 | ||||||
March 31, 2011 |
60.375 | 1,220.22 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total |
294.390 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Series B-2: |
||||||||
Month |
Units Redeemed | Net Asset Value per Unit ($) |
||||||
January 31, 2011 |
20.550 | 1,461.54 | ||||||
February 28, 2011 |
339.965 | 1,470.74 | ||||||
March 31, 2011 |
0.000 | 1,284.84 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total |
360.515 | |||||||
|
|
ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE |
Not applicable.
50
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
The following exhibits are included herewith:
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labe Linkbase Document |
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* | XBRL information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is not subject to liability under those sections, is not part of any registration statement or prospectus to which it relates and is not incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference into any registration statement, prospectus or other document. |
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 15, 2012 | SUPERFUND GOLD, L.P. | |||
(Registrant) | ||||
By: Superfund Capital Management, Inc. | ||||
General Partner | ||||
By: | /s/ Nigel James | |||
Nigel James | ||||
President and Principal Executive Officer | ||||
By: | /s/ Martin Schneider | |||
Martin Schneider | ||||
Vice President and Principal Financial Officer |
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number |
Description of Document |
Page Number | ||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer | E-2 | ||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer | E-3 | ||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer | E-4 | ||
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer | E-5 |
E-1
Exhibit 31.1
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Nigel James, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012, of Superfund Gold, L.P.; |
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: May 15, 2012 | By: | /s/ Nigel James | ||
Nigel James | ||||
President and Principal Executive Officer |
E-2
Exhibit 31.2
RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Martin Schneider, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012, of Superfund Gold, L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: May 15, 2012 | By: | /s/ Martin Schneider | ||
Martin Schneider | ||||
Vice President and Principal Financial Officer |
E-3
Exhibit 32.1
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
In connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012 (the Report), I, Nigel James, President and Principal Executive Officer of Superfund Capital Management, Inc., the general partner of Superfund Gold, L.P. (the Fund), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
Date: May 15, 2012 | By: |
/s/ Nigel James | ||
Nigel James | ||||
President and Principal Executive Officer |
E-4
Exhibit 32.2
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
In connection with the report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012 (the Report), I, Martin Schneider, Vice President and Principal Financial Officer of Superfund Capital Management, Inc., the general partner of Superfund Gold, L.P. (the Fund), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
Date: May 15, 2012 | By: |
/s/ Martin Schneider | ||
Martin Schneider | ||||
Vice President and Principal Financial Officer |
E-5