SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No. )

Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ Definitive Additional Materials

☐ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

GIGPEAK, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒ No fee required.

☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5) Total fee paid:

☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

☐ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1) Amount Previously Paid:

(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3) Filing Party:

(4) Date Filed:

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To be held on November 17, 2016

To the Stockholders of GigPeak, Inc.:

I am pleased to invite you to the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of GigPeak, Inc. (the “Company”), which will be held at 8:00 a.m., local time, on November 17, 2016 at our principal executive offices, located at 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California 95134, for the following purposes:

1. To elect two Class II directors to our Board of Directors to serve a three-year term expiring on the date on which our annual meeting of stockholders is held in 2019 or until their successor is duly elected and qualified;

2. To approve, on an advisory basis, the 2015 compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

3. To ratify the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;

4. To transact any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The foregoing items of business are more fully explained in the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on October 3, 2016 as the record date for the purposes of determining the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

October 3, 2016

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Dr. Avi Katz

President and Chief Executive Officer

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders: this proxy statement, the proxy card and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on

March 14, 2016 (the “Annual Report on Form 10-K”) are available at: www.proxyvote.com.

You are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you expect to attend the meeting, please complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the meeting. A return envelope (which is postage prepaid if mailed in the United States) is enclosed for your convenience. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote in person if you attend the meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction and Summary		1
Questions and Answers		2
Proposals at the Annual Meeting		7
	Proposal 1—Election of Directors	7
	Proposal 2—Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers	9
	Proposal 3—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	11
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management		12
Corporate Governance		13
	Director Independence	13
	Meetings of the Board of Directors	13
	Board Leadership Structure	13
	Board Self-Evaluation	14
	Board Committees	14
	Candidates for the Board of Directors	15
	Board’s Role in Risk Oversight	16
	Communications with the Board of Directors	16
	Information regarding our Executive Officers	16
Executive Officer and Director Compensation		17
	Summary Compensation Table	20
	Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table	22
	Director Compensation Table	27
Report of the Audit Committee		29
Other Matters		30
	Other Matters Brought Before the Meeting	30
	Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance	30
	Code of Ethics	30
	Equity Compensation Plan Information	31
	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	31
	Stockholder Proposals	32
	Annual Report on Form 10-K	32

i

GIGPEAK, INC.

130 Baytech Drive

San Jose, CA 95134

PROXY STATEMENT

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

Date, Time and Place of Annual Meeting

This Proxy Statement contains important information regarding our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at 8:00 a.m., local time, on Thursday, November 17, 2016 at our principal executive offices located at 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California 95134. Your proxy is being solicited by our Board of Directors.

Eligibility to Vote

You can vote if you held shares of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on October 3, 2016. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote. As of October 3, 2016, there were 67,737,381 shares of common stock outstanding and eligible to vote.

How to Vote

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote by using any of the following methods:

	By Internet:  Go to http://www.proxyvote.com/ to complete an electronic proxy card. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on November 16, 2016 to be counted.
	By Phone:  Dial toll-free 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on November 16, 2016 to be counted.
	By Mail:  Simply complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the pre-paid envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.
	In Person:  Attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank, or other nominee, you should follow the voting instructions in the Notice you should have received from that organization rather than from GigPeak.

Meeting Agenda and Voting Recommendations

Proposal	Matter	Board Recommendation	Page Reference
1.	Election of Two Class II Directors For Three-Year Terms	“FOR” EACH NOMINEE	7
2.	Non-binding Advisory Vote on Executive Officer Compensation	“FOR”	9
3.	Ratification of Appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Company for 2016	“FOR”	11

1

Corporate Governance Highlights

As part of GigPeak’s commitment to high ethical standards, our Board follows sound governance practices, including the following:

Corporate Governance Highlights
✓	Comprehensive Code of Business Conduct and Ethics	✓	The Board regularly assesses its performance through annual Board and committee self-evaluations
✓	All but one of the directors are independent; and all committees consist solely of independent directors	✓	All directors attended at least 75% of 2015 meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served
✓	Policy prohibiting hedging, pledging and short selling of our stock	✓	Independent compensation consultant

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to consider and vote on the following proposals:

1. The election of two Class II directors to our Board of Directors to serve a three-year term expiring on the date on which our annual meeting of stockholders is held in 2019 or until their successors are duly elected and qualified;

2. To approve, on an advisory basis, the 2015 compensation of the Company’s named executive officers;

3. The ratification of the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;

4. The transaction of any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote:

1. FOR the election of John J. Mikulsky and Neil J. Miotto as Class II directors (Proposal 1);

2. FOR, on an advisory basis, the 2015 compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 2);

3. FOR the ratification of the selection of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 (Proposal 3);

4. FOR or AGAINST other matters that come before the Annual Meeting as the proxy holders deem advisable.

Who is entitled to vote on the proposals considered at the Annual Meeting?

The record date for the Annual Meeting is October 3, 2016. All holders of our common stock at the close of business on that date are entitled to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter that comes before the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on October 3, 2016 there were 67,737,381 shares of common stock outstanding. The number of shares outstanding as of this date reflects an increase since December 31, 2015 for among other reasons, the issuance of shares as a result of our acquisition of Magnum Semiconductor, Inc., and the sale of shares in March and June 2016, all as disclosed in our various Current Reports on Form 8-K that we have filed with the SEC.

What is a quorum, and how is it determined?

A quorum is the minimum number of shares that must be present at the Annual Meeting to conduct business. The presence in person or by proxy of a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote as of the record date shall constitute a quorum. At least 33,868,691 shares of common stock must be present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum.

2

How do I vote?

Your vote is very important, and the procedures for voting are fairly simple:

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting, vote by proxy over the telephone, vote by proxy through the internet or vote by proxy using the enclosed proxy card. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure your vote is counted. You may still attend the meeting and vote in person even if you have already voted by proxy.

• To vote in person, come to the Annual Meeting, and we will give you a ballot when you arrive.

• To vote using the proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the pre-paid envelope provided. If you return your signed proxy card to us before the Annual Meeting, we will vote your shares as you direct.

• To vote over the telephone, dial toll-free 1-800-690-6903 using a touch-tone phone and follow the recorded instructions. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on November 16, 2016 to be counted.

• To vote through the internet, go to http://www.proxyvote.com/ to complete an electronic proxy card. Your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time on November 16, 2016 to be counted.

Beneficial Owner: Shares Registered in the Name of Broker or Bank

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank, or other nominee, you should have received a Notice containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from GigPeak. Simply follow the voting instructions in the Notice to ensure that your vote is counted. To vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee. Follow the instructions from your broker or bank included with these proxy materials, or contact your broker or bank to request a proxy form.

We provide internet proxy voting to allow you to vote your shares online, with procedures designed to ensure the authenticity and correctness of your proxy vote instructions. However, please be aware that you must bear any costs associated with your internet access, such as usage charges from internet access providers and telephone companies.

On or about October 7, 2016, we expect to mail to our stockholders the proxy statement, proxy card and Annual Report on Form 10-K. The proxy card also will instruct you on how to access and submit your proxy by mail, through the internet or by telephone.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and beneficial owner?

Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Stockholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered with respect to those shares to be the “beneficial holder” or “beneficial owner,” and those shares are considered to be held in “street name.” In that case, the broker, bank, or other holder is considered the “stockholder of record.”

3

How can I vote at the meeting if I am a beneficial owner?

As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the broker, bank, or other nominee with respect to voting your shares and may do so by:

(i) completing the voting instruction card (or following any instructions on such form to use internet or telephone voting, if available) provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record; or

(ii) you may attend the Annual Meeting and cast your vote. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting, unless you request, complete and deliver a proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee. You will not be able to vote your shares at the meeting without a legal proxy.

Please note that under the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) rules, the election of directors (Proposal 1) and the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 2) are both “non-routine” (also referred to as “non-discretionary”) items. Typically, “routine” matters would include the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3).  If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to the non-discretionary items, your broker may not vote with respect to this proposal and those votes will be counted as “broker non-votes.” See “What are broker non-votes?” and “What if I don’t vote for all of the items listed on my proxy card (or what happens if I abstain or my broker does not vote)?” for more information regarding broker non-votes.

What do I need to attend the Annual Meeting?

All stockholders attending the Annual Meeting must present valid government-issued photo identification at the door to be admitted. If you are not the holder of record of your shares (e.g., you hold shares through a brokerage account), you must also present a copy of an account statement reflecting your ownership of the shares as of the close of business on the record date, October 3, 2016. No cameras, recording equipment or other electronic devices will be permitted at the Annual Meeting.

How will my shares be voted if I don’t provide specific instructions?

Your shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions that you indicate on your proxy card. If you execute your proxy card but do not provide instructions, your shares will be counted “FOR” the election of John J. Mikulsky and Neil J. Miotto as Class II directors as the election of directors, “FOR”, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and “FOR” the ratification of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. For any other matters that come before the Annual Meeting, your shares will be voted at the discretion of the proxies, Dr. Avi Katz and Mr. Darren Ma.

Can I change my vote after I have submitted a proxy?

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. In order to revoke a proxy, you must do one of the following prior to the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting:

• Provide written notice of revocation to Corporate Secretary, c/o GigPeak, Inc., 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, CA 95134;

• Deliver a valid proxy bearing a later date or submit a new later dated proxy; or

• Attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person and request that your proxy be revoked (attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy).

However, please note that if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may revoke your proxy by timely submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee or by obtaining a legal proxy from the broker, trustee or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

All shares that have been properly voted by proxy without timely revocation will be voted at the Annual Meeting.

4

What are broker non-votes?

Broker non-votes occur when proxies are submitted for shares held in street name by a broker that the broker has no discretionary authority to vote. Brokers do not have authority to vote on matters considered to be non-routine unless they have received instructions from the beneficial owners of the shares. Broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of establishing a quorum but are not considered to be entitled to vote.

What is the effect if I don’t cast my vote?

Stockholders of record—If you are a stockholder of record and you do not cast your vote, no votes will be cast on your behalf on any of the items of business at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial owners—If you hold your shares in street name, it is critical that you cast your vote if you want it to count in the election of directors (Proposal 1) and in the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 2). In the past, if you held your shares in street name and you did not indicate how you wanted your shares voted in certain non-discretionary proposals, your broker, bank or other nominee was allowed to vote those shares on your behalf as they felt appropriate. Changes in the relevant regulations were made to take away the ability of your broker, bank or other nominee to vote your uninstructed shares for non-discretionary proposals. Thus, if you hold your shares in street name and you do not instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote in the election of directors, or in the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, no votes will be cast on your behalf.

What if I don’t vote for all of the items listed on my proxy card (or what happens if I abstain or my broker does not vote)?

Stockholders of record—If your proxy indicates an abstention from voting on all matters, the shares represented will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum, but they will not be voted on any matter at the Annual Meeting. Because directors are elected based on a plurality vote, if you abstain from voting on the proposal to re-elect the directors (Proposal 1), your abstention will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to this proposal. If you abstain from voting on the advisory vote for executive compensation (Proposal 2) it will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to the proposal as abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast. If you abstain from voting on the proposal to ratify the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3), your abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

Beneficial owners—Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of shares that are held in “street name” for their clients, who are the beneficial owners of the shares, brokers have discretion to vote these shares on routine matters but not on non-routine matters. Thus, if you do not otherwise instruct your broker, the broker may vote your shares “for” routine matters but expressly indicate that the broker is NOT voting on non-routine matters. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker expressly indicates on a proxy that it is not voting on a matter, whether routine or non-routine. Broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum but are not counted for determining the number of votes cast for or against a proposal.

If you are a beneficial owner and your broker holds your shares in its name, the broker is permitted to vote your shares on the ratification of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, because of NYSE rules, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the re-election of directors or the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, so it is very important that you instruct your broker how to vote on the proposals.

How many votes are required to approve the proposals?

Proposal 1—Election of Directors. Directors are elected by a plurality of votes present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. If a quorum is present, the nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected to the Board of Directors. You may vote either “for” or “withhold” your vote for the director nominee. A properly executed proxy marked “withhold” with respect to the election of the directors will not be voted with respect to the director nominee and will not affect the outcome of the election, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum.

5

Proposal 2 — To approve, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. If a quorum is present, the Proposal will be approved if the votes cast for the Proposal exceed the votes cast against it.

Proposal 3 — Ratification of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. For the ratification of the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, represented and entitled to vote on the item will be required for approval. You may vote “for,” “against,” or “abstain” from voting on this Proposal. If you abstain from voting on this matter, your shares will be counted as present and entitled to vote on the matter for purposes of establishing a quorum, and the abstention will have the same effect as a vote against this Proposal.

Who pays the cost of proxy solicitation?

We will bear the costs of the solicitation of proxies, including the costs of preparing, filing and mailing the proxy materials. The Company has engaged The Proxy Advisory Group, LLC^® (“The Proxy Advisory Group”) to assist with the solicitation of proxies and expects to pay a maximum of $10,000 to The Proxy Advisory Group for these services, plus expenses. The solicitation will be made by mail, internet, and/or telephone. We will also reimburse brokerage firms for expenses and fees related to the forwarding of these proxy materials to beneficial owners of our common stock. Our directors and executive officers may conduct further solicitations personally, but they will not receive additional compensation for such service.

What is householding?

Householding is a procedure approved by the SEC that provides for the delivery of only one copy of our proxy materials to stockholders residing at the same address, unless the stockholders have notified us of their desire to receive multiple copies. This procedure is known as “householding” and is intended to reduce our printing costs and postage fees.

Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.

We will promptly deliver, upon request, a separate copy of the proxy statement to any stockholder residing at an address at which only one copy was mailed. Requests should be addressed to Investor Relations at our principal executive offices. If you are eligible for householding, but you and other stockholders of record currently receive multiple copies of these proxy materials, or if you hold stock in more than one account, and in either case you wish to receive only a single copy of each of these documents for your household, please contact Broadridge Householding Department at 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 or by telephone at (800) 542-1061.

If you are a beneficial stockholder and own your shares through a bank or broker, please contact your broker, bank or other nominee to request additional copies.

How can I nominate director candidates?

Please refer to the section captioned “Candidates for the Board of Directors” on page 16 of this Proxy Statement.

Who do I contact with additional questions?

We have retained The Proxy Advisory Group to act as proxy solicitor. If you have additional questions or need assistance voting your shares of common stock, you should contact them at:

The Proxy Advisory Group

18 East 41st Street, 20th Floor

New York, New York 10017

Phone: (212) 616-2181

6

PROPOSALS AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

PROPOSAL 1—Election of Directors

Our certificate of incorporation, as amended, divides the Board of Directors into three classes with overlapping three year terms, each of which features a term that expires at a different annual meeting of stockholders. One class is elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders, and the classes are to be as nearly equal in number as possible.  The Class II directors are up for election at the Annual Meeting and will serve for a term expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders. There are currently six directors, two of whom serve as Class II directors.

Upon a recommendation from a majority of the then-existing independent directors, the Board of Directors has nominated John J. Mikulsky and Neil J. Miotto to serve as Class II directors. These two nominees have a history of service on the Board of Directors that has increased stockholder value with a strong mix of relevant experience, industry knowledge and prior senior leadership positions. Our Board of Directors has evaluated each of our nominees against the criteria we use to select nominees for director, including consideration of skills and attributes that the Board of Directors believe are important to have within its membership. These include financial expertise, operational and technology expertise, prior M&A decision-making experience and the ability to be independent thinkers who consciously avoid groupthink and are able to challenge management—while still contributing to a productive and collegial boardroom environment. Further intangible characteristics considered by the Board of Directors include demonstrated understanding of the Company’s strategic plan; capacity for critical thought; and maintenance of objectivity in not being unreasonably influenced by personal experience or other Board members in situation analysis. Based on its evaluation, our Board of Directors concluded that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for each of the nominees named above to serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

In the event that the nominee is unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election as a director, the proxies authorizing management to vote for such nominee will be voted for such other person as the Board of Directors determines. Stockholders are not entitled to cumulate their votes for nominees for election to the Board of Directors. The nominee receiving the greatest number of “FOR” votes shall be elected.

The Board of Directors recommends that you that you use the enclosed proxy card (or follow the directions set forth in the proxy card to vote by telephone or via the Internet) to vote “FOR” the election of John J. Mikulsky and Neil J. Miotto as Class II directors.

Background Information on Director Nominees

Set forth below is certain information, as of October 3, 2016, regarding each director nominee, including information regarding the experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of each nominee that led to the Board of Directors’ conclusion that the person should serve on the Board of Directors. In addition to the information set forth below, this proxy statement sets forth information relating to certain of our directors, officers, and employees who are considered “participants” in this proxy solicitation under the rules of the SEC by reason of their position as Company directors or because they may be soliciting proxies on our behalf.

Class II Directors — up for election at this Annual Meeting with a term expiring at the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.

John J. Mikulsky has served on the GigPeak Board of Directors since June 2011. Mr. Mikulsky served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Endwave Corporation from December 2009 until June 2011, when Endwave was acquired by GigPeak. From May 1996 until November 2009, Mr. Mikulsky served Endwave in a multitude of capacities including Vice President of Product Development, Vice President of Marketing and Business Development and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to Endwave, Mr. Mikulsky worked as a Technology Manager for Balazs Analytical Laboratory, from 1993 until 1996, a provider of analytical services to the semiconductor and disk drive industries. Prior to 1993, Mr. Mikulsky worked at Raychem Corporation, most recently as a Division Manager for its Electronic Systems Division. Mr. Mikulsky holds a B.S. in electrical engineering from Marquette University, an M.S. in electrical engineering from Stanford University and an S.M. in Management from the Sloan School at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We believe Mr. Mikulsky’s extensive industry knowledge and experience, including his years of experience at Endwave Corporation in both technical and leadership roles, qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors.

7

Neil J. Miotto joined the GigPeak Board of Directors in December 2008. Mr. Miotto is a financial consultant and a retired assurance partner of KPMG LLP where he was a partner for twenty-seven years until his retirement in September 2006. Since his retirement from KPMG Mr. Miotto has provided high level financial consulting services to companies in need of timely accounting assistance and in serving on public company boards. He is deemed to be a ‘financial expert’ under SEC and NYSE rules. While at KPMG Mr. Miotto focused on serving large public companies, primarily semiconductor companies. Among the clients he served were National Semiconductor Corporation, Fairchild Semiconductor Corp, and nVIDIA Corporation. Mr Miotto also served as an SEC reviewing partner while at KPMG. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. He holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from Baruch College, of The City University of New York. He served on the board of directors of Micrel, Inc. prior to its acquisition in 2015. Mr. Miotto brings extensive financial risk assessment and financial reporting experience to our Board of Directors. We believe that Mr. Miotto’s extensive experience with public companies and financial accounting matters makes him well qualified to be on our Board of Directors.

Members of the Board of Directors and Background Information on Those Directors Not Up For Election

The table below sets forth information regarding all of the members of our Board of Directors as of October 3, 2016. The term of each class of directors expires as follows: Class II at the 2016 annual meeting of stockholders, Class III at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, and Class I at the 2018 Annual Meeting. Each director shall hold office until his or her successor is duly qualified.

Name	Age	Position	Class	Director Since
Dr. Avi Katz	58	Chairman of the Board, Founder, Chief Executive Officer and President	III	2008
Joseph J. Lazzara	65	Director	I	2011
John J. Mikulsky	71	Director	II	2011
Neil J. Miotto	70	Director	II	2008
Frank W. Schneider	74	Director	III	2010
Kimberly D.C. Trapp	58	Director	I	2008

Set forth below is certain information, as of October 3, 2016, regarding the Class II and Class III directors whose terms are continuing after this year’s Annual Meeting and whom are therefore not up for election.

Class III Directors— continuing directors for a term expiring at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.

Dr. Avi Katz is a serial entrepreneur. Since founding GigOptix LLC., the predecessor company to GigPeak, Inc. in July 2007, he served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of the company and all its subsidiaries, including its overseas operations GigOptix-Helix AG in Switzerland, GigOptix Israel LTD, GigOptix-Terasquare-Korea (GTK) Co., Ltd. and Magnum Semiconductor Canada, Inc. He has also previously served as a member of and Chairman of the Board of Directors of BrPhotonics Produtos Optoeletronicos LTda in Brazil, prior to resigning from that Board of Directors in June 2016. He led the Company through the public listing on the OTC Exchange in December 2008, and the listing on the NYSE-Mkt in April 2012. Prior to founding the GigPeak group of companies, Dr. Katz was the Managing Partner of APU-Global, which he founded in 2005, the Chief Executive Officer, President and a board member of Intransa, Inc., from 2003 to 2005, and of Equator Technologies, Inc., from 2000 to 2003. Earlier in his career, he held various sales and marketing, business development, technology and operational corporate executive positions following his tenure as a Member of the Technical Staff with AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ, between 1988 and 1995. He holds more than 70 U.S. and international patents, has published about 300 technical papers and is the editor of a number of technical books. Dr. Katz received his Ph.D. in materials engineering and a B.S. in engineering from Technion-IIT, Israel, and is a graduate of the Israeli Naval Academy. As our co-founder, and the CEO since the inception, Dr. Katz has the benefit of understanding our Company's complete history. This background, together with his extensive executive experience and exceptional technical skills, make Dr. Katz uniquely qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

8

Frank W. Schneider joined the GigPeak Board of Directors in June 2010. Frank W. Schneider has over 40 years of experience in the electronics and semiconductor industries, serving on the boards and executive management teams of both privately held and publicly traded companies. He recently retired from MKS Instruments Inc., where he served as vice president and general manager and continues to provide consulting services. Previously, he served as president and CEO at both ION Systems Inc., a privately held manufacturer of electrostatic management systems, and GHz Technology Inc., a privately held manufacturer of RF power transistors that was merged into Advanced Power Technology Inc. (NASDAQ: APTI), where he served as COO of the RF products group. Additionally, he was a member of the technical advisory board of Neomagic Inc., a display controller chip company, and was a member of the board of directors of GMT Microelectronics, Inc. and Micrel, Inc. He began his career at Corning Electronics and subsequently moved to Philips Semiconductor, then known as Signetics Corporation, where he held many senior positions during his tenure. He also was a group vice president at Sharp Electronics. We believe Mr. Schneider is well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors due to his leadership skills and industry experience, which he has demonstrated through more than 40 years of management and experience in the semiconductor, electronic component and systems industries.

Class I Directors— continuing directors for a term expiring at the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders.

Joseph J. Lazzarahas over 30 years of public company Board of Directors experience. He joined the GigPeak Board of Directors in July 2011 with the acquisition of Endwave where he served as a director since February 2004. From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Lazzara served as the Vice Chairman and a director of Omron Scientific Technologies, Inc. (formerly Scientific Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: STIZ)), a manufacturer of factory automation products acquired by Omron Corporation in 2006. Mr. Lazzara served in various executive positions with Scientific Technologies, including as the Chief Executive Officer, President and director and other positions between 1984 and 2006. He also serves as the Vice Chairman and Director of Automation Products Group, Inc., a privately held manufacturer of automation sensors. Mr. Lazzara received a B.S. in Engineering from Purdue University and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University.  We believe that Mr. Lazzara’s extensive business expertise, both as the Chief Executive Officer and board member of a publicly traded company as well as his technical background qualify him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Kimberly D.C. Trapp has served on the GigPeak Board of Directors since December 2008, and has more than 30 years of experience in the optoelectronics industry. She served as the Industry Liaison Officer for the Center of Optical Technologies at Lehigh University until her retirement in 2010. Before joining Lehigh University, she served as the Director of Marketing Operations of Agere Systems until 2002 and was responsible for business operations, customer marketing, technical product support, product engineering, and program management of Agere’s optoelectronic business and product portfolio. From 1980 until 1995, she served in the development and research organizations of AT&T Bell Laboratories and Lucent Technologies. Ms. Trapp has a BS in Chemistry from Purdue University and an MS in Inorganic Chemistry from Fairleigh Dickinson University. She also has an MBA from an AT&T sponsored executive program.  From her industry and academic experience of more than 30 years, Ms. Trapp brings a tremendous amount of technical expertise, especially in the area of optical and electro-optic technologies, that we believe makes her uniquely qualified to sit on our Board of Directors.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE TWO CLASS II DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.

PROPOSAL 2—Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers

Pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and adopted in connection with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the 2015 compensation which we paid to our named executive officers. This advisory vote, commonly known as a “Say-on-Pay” vote, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the Company’s executive compensation policies and programs and the compensation paid to the named executive officers in 2015.

Although this advisory vote can be conducted every year, every two years, or every three years, in accordance with the views of our stockholders in 2013 who voted on an advisory basis to recommend that we conduct a Say-on-Pay vote on an annual basis, we are doing so. We have conducted a Say-on-Pay vote for each of the last three years, and have seen steadily increasing numbers of stockholders voting in support for the compensation which we have paid to our named executive officers. The following charts show, for each of these years, the votes and percentages cast “FOR” and “AGAINST” these prior non-binding proposals, excluding broker non-votes and abstentions:

9

“SAY-ON-PAY” VOTING HISTORY

2013-2015

Shares

Percentage

We have made adjustments to our compensatory program each year, taking into consideration feedback received from stockholders both in the “Say-on-Pay” vote and otherwise. We have interpreted the turn-around in the voting record of our stockholders from the first year that we conducted a “Say-on-Pay” vote with regard to our 2012 executive compensation, to the last two years to mean that our stockholders generally support the current design, purposes and direction of our executive compensation program that we have used with regard to our 2013 and 2014 executive compensation programs. Therefore, in 2015, except with regard to changes in the peer group of companies that the Compensation Committee looks at in making decisions regarding executive compensation to better reflect the growth and financial performance that GigPeak experienced in 2015 as discussed in greater detail in the Executive Officer and Director Compensation section of this proxy statement, we have continued to maintain this compensation program and make decisions with regard to its oversight using the best judgment of the Compensation Committee in its implementation consistent with what the Compensation Committee has done in 2013 and 2014.

10

We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the 2015 compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by approving the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the Company’s stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s proxy statement for the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosure.”

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the advisory resolution in this Proposal 2 because it believes that the Company’s executive compensation program effectively reflects the goals and objectives described in the Executive Officer and Director Compensation section of this proxy statement and the overall compensation philosophy of the Company.

The vote on this Proposal 2 is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company, the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. However, stockholders can be assured that the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee will review and consider the voting results in crafting their approach to future executive compensation matters. Furthermore, in 2016, the Board of Directors has clarified under the Company’s Insider Trading Policy that our directors, executive officers and other employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging or pledging transactions or short sales of Company stock.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

PROPOSAL 3—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has approved the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. If our stockholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider the appointment but will not resubmit it for approval by our stockholders. A representative of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement. We also expect that the representative will be available to answer any appropriate questions.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU  VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF BURR PILGER MAYER, INC. AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2016.

11

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of October 3, 2016 by:

• each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock;

• each of our named executive officers and directors; and

• all of our current executive officers and current directors, as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Applicable percentages are based on 67,737,381 shares of our common stock outstanding as of October 3, 2016, adjusted as required by such rules. As provided by such rules, shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to options to purchase, restricted stock units, or other rights to acquire shares of common stock that are exercisable or vest within 60 days of October 3, 2016 are deemed to be both beneficially owned by the person holding such options and outstanding for the purpose of computing ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the ownership of any other person. Except as indicated by footnote, to our knowledge, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The information contained in the following table is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose and the inclusion of any shares in the table does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares.

	Beneficial Ownership of Our Common Stock as of October 3, 2016 Common Stock (1)
5% Stockholders	Shares		Percent of Class
None	*		*
Name Executive Officers and Directors
Dr. Avi Katz (2)		3,282,625		4.6	%
Andrea Betti-Berutto (2)		1,162,183		1.7	%
Darren Ma		66,644		*
Dr. Raluca Dinu (2)		494,347		*
Neil J. Miotto (2)(3)		397,265		*
Kimberly D.C. Trapp (2)		283,375		*
Frank Schneider (2) (4)		356,445		*
John J. Mikulsky (2)		234,054		*
Joseph J. Lazzara (2) (5)		230,920		*
All current directors and executive officers; 9 persons		6,507,858	8.9		%

* Represents less than 1% of our outstanding common stock.

(1) Unless otherwise indicated, each person’s address is c/o GigPeak, Inc., 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, California 95134.

(2) The number of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules promulgated by the SEC and includes (i) outstanding shares of Common Stock,(ii) options for Common Stock that have vested or will vest within 60 days of October 3, 2016, as follows: 3,146,649 for Dr. Katz, 438,817 for Dr. Dinu, 1,111,460 for Mr. Betti‑Berutto, 177,840 for Mr. Schneider, 75,568 for Mr. Mikulsky, 75,068 for Mr. Lazzara, 226,940 for Mr. Miotto, 198,844 for Ms. Trapp and (iii) restricted stock units that will vest within 60 days of October 3, 2016 as follows: 151,420 for Dr. Katz, 18,440 for Mr. Ma, 38,607 for Dr. Dinu, 14,282 for Mr. Betti‑Berutto, 10,340 for Mr. Schneider, 10,568 for Mr. Mikulsky, 10,068 for Mr. Lazzara, 10,840 for Mr. Miotto, 10,068 for Ms. Trapp.

(3) Certain shares calculated in the beneficial ownership are held by the Neil J. and Mary Ann Miotto Trust, Neil J. Miotto as trustee.

12

(4) Certain shares calculated in the beneficial ownership are held by the Schneider Family Trust, Frank Schneider as trustee.

(5) Certain shares calculated in the beneficial ownership are held by the Joseph and Nancy Lazzara Family Trust, Joseph J. Lazzara as trustee.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Lazzara, Mr. Mikulsky, Mr. Miotto, Mr. Schneider and Ms. Trapp are “independent” directors. Mr. Mikulsky and Mr. Miotto are each a nominee for election as a Class II director at the Annual Meeting.

The Company uses the independence standards set forth by Section 803(a)(2) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide. In reviewing the independence of our directors against these standards, we consider relationships and transactions between each director and members of the director’s family with us and our affiliates. In determining that Mr. Mikulsky is independent, the Board noted that Mr. Mikulsky previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of a company that we acquired more than 5 years ago, Endwave Corporation. However, Mr. Mikulsky has never been an employee of officer of GigPeak, has never reported to any current or former officer of GigPeak, and other than in his capacity as a director of GigPeak, has never had any of the executive officers of GigPeak reporting to him, either at GigPeak or Endwave Corporation. Based upon these facts, the Board determined that Mr. Mikulsky was independent both under the independence standards referenced above and because he has never had a relationship that provides an ability to influence the Board of Directors or management of GigPeak other than in his capacity as a director of GigPeak.

Each member of our two standing committees, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee, is independent as defined by Section 803(a)(2) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide, and each member of our Audit Committee is also independent as defined by Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act.

There are no immediate family relationships between or among any of our executive officers and directors.

Meetings of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors held 13 meetings during fiscal year 2015. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and the committees of the Board of Directors on which that director served. We recommend that directors attend each annual meeting of stockholders and all six of the directors, who were directors at the time of the 2015 annual meeting, attended the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board of Directors believes that our Chief Executive Officer is best situated to serve as our Chairman of the Board, because he is the director most familiar with our business and industry, and most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities and leading the discussion and execution of strategy. Independent directors and management have different perspectives and roles in strategy development. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside the Company and industry, while the Chief Executive Officer brings Company-specific experience and expertise. Our Board of Directors believes that the combined role of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer promotes strategy development and execution, and facilitates information flow between management and our Board of Directors, which are essential to effective governance.

One of the key responsibilities of our Board of Directors is to develop strategic direction and hold management accountable for the execution of strategy once it is developed. Our Board of Directors believes the combined role of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, together with our independent directors, is in the best interest of stockholders because it provides the appropriate balance between strategy development and independent oversight of management.

13

Board Self-Evaluation

The Board of Directors is committed to the highest standard of organizational governance. It therefore engages in an annual self-evaluation to help ensure that it and its two committees, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee, maintain the high level of effectiveness necessary to oversee the Company, perform their duties and to assist the Company as it competes in the marketplace. Historically, we have used these annual self-evaluations to improve Board and committee governance and performance, to set expectations for directors and hold directors accountable, and to strengthen the relationship between the Board of Directors and management of the Company.

Board Committees

The Board of Directors has a standing Audit Committee and Compensation Committee and has adopted a written charter for each of them. The written charter for each committee can be found at our website, www.gigpeak.com.

We do not currently have a standing nominating committee. The entire Board of Directors participates in the consideration of director nominees upon a recommendation from a majority of the then-existing independent directors.

Audit Committee

We have a separately designated standing Audit Committee, which has been established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee is comprised of not less than three directors, each of whom is independent as determined by the Board of Directors and as defined by Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act and Section 803(a)(2) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide. The Board of Directors has also determined that Mr. Miotto is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in SEC rules and Section 803(b)(2)(iii) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide. This designation does not impose on Mr. Miotto any duties, obligations or liabilities that are greater than is generally imposed on him as a member of our Audit Committee or our Board of Directors. The current members of the Audit Committee are Mr. Miotto (who serves as chairman of the committee), Mr. Lazzara, Mr. Mikulsky, Mr. Schneider and Ms. Trapp.

The Audit Committee held 4 meetings during fiscal year 2015. The Audit Committee has adopted a written charter approved by the Board of Directors, which is available at our website at ir.gigpeak.com—Corporate Governance.

The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and overseeing: (i) our accounting and financial reporting processes; (ii) the preparation and integrity of our financial statements; (iii) our compliance with financial statement and regulatory requirements; (iv) the performance of our internal finance and accounting personnel and our independent registered accounting firm and (v) the qualification and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has the authority to retain legal, accounting or other experts that it deems necessary to carry out its duties. It also has the authority to determine the compensation of such advisors, as well as that of our independent registered accounting firm, and to determine appropriate funding needs for ordinary administrative expenses that are necessary or appropriate for carrying out its duties.

The Audit Committee Report is included in this Proxy Statement on page 31.

Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee approves, administers and interprets our named executive officer compensation and benefit policies and plans. Our Compensation Committee is appointed by our Board of Directors, and consists entirely of independent directors who are “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act. The Compensation Committee rotates its chairperson on an annual basis as we believe that this enhances the committee’s functions. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Mikulsky (who serves as chairperson of the committee), Ms. Trapp (who served as chairperson of the committee in 2015), Mr. Lazzara, Mr. Miotto and Mr. Schneider.

Our Compensation Committee has primary responsibility for ensuring that our executive compensation and benefit program is consistent with our compensation philosophy and is responsible for determining the executive compensation packages offered to our named executive officers. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, as stated in its charter, include the following:

14

• Review and approve goals and objectives relevant to CEO and other named executive officer compensation, evaluate the CEO’s and other named executive officers’ performance in light of these corporate goals and objectives, and set CEO and other named executive officer compensation levels consistent with its evaluation and the company philosophy;

• Approve the salaries, bonuses and other compensation for all named executive officers;

• Adopt, administer, amend or terminate compensation plans applicable to the employees of the Company and/or any subsidiary of the Company, and review and make recommendations concerning long-term incentive compensation plans, including the use of stock options and other equity-based plans; and

• Undertake all further actions and discharge all further responsibilities imposed upon the Committee from time to time by the Board, the federal securities laws or the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Our Compensation Committee plays an integral role in setting the named executive officer compensation each year. Generally, during the fourth quarter of each year and leading up to the adoption by the Board of the annual operating plan for the following year, the Compensation Committee meets to discuss recent data and current trends in executive compensation and equity ownership programs for comparable companies. During such meeting, an independent compensation consultant engaged by the committee provides a report to the Compensation Committee regarding this information. Generally, in the first quarter or the early part of the following year, our Compensation Committee holds a regular meeting in which our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer review with the Compensation Committee GigPeak’s financial and business performance for the prior year and management’s business outlook and operating plan for the current year as adopted by the Board at the end of the prior year. In reviewing the prior year’s performance, the Compensation Committee compares our performance to the financial and operational goals set for such year and any management by objectives targets set for such year. In this meeting, the Chief Executive Officer also reviews with the Compensation Committee his assessment of the individual performance of each named executive officer, including his own performance, according to a variety of qualitative and quantitative performance criteria and salary and bonus trends. Taking into account the information conveyed and discussed at these meetings and the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer and the independent compensation consultant engaged by the committee, the Compensation Committee then determines:

• The amount and type of any bonus compensation to be awarded to each named executive officer in respect of their performance;

• Whether to raise, lower or maintain the named executive officer’s base salary for the current year; and

• Option grants and restricted stock units, if any, to be awarded to each named executive officer.

Each element of our named executive compensation system is described in more detail below.

Candidates for the Board of Directors

It is the policy of the Board of Directors to consider candidates recommended by stockholders for membership on the Board of Directors. Individuals recommended by stockholders will be considered on the same basis and be subject to the same qualification criteria as those recommended by our management or other members of the Board of Directors. Stockholders should submit their recommendations to the following address and should include verification of the stockholder’s status as a stockholder and relevant information about the recommended candidate, including such candidate’s name and qualifications for membership on our Board of Directors.

GigPeak, Inc.

130 Baytech Drive

San Jose, CA 95134

Attn: Investor Relations

While we do not have a formal diversity policy for board membership, the Board of Directors seeks directors who represent a mix of backgrounds and experiences that will enhance the quality of our Board of Directors’ deliberations and decisions. The Board of Directors has not established minimum qualifications of director nominees but considers a broad range of criteria to evaluate individual candidacies. Such criteria include but are not limited to: (i) industry experience; (ii) management experience; (iii) integrity and judgment; (iv) independence; (v) conflicts of interest and (vi) the current needs and expertise of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors generally considers candidates in connection with upcoming elections and specific vacancies, but may evaluate additional candidates on an ongoing basis as such candidates are recommended by our stockholders, directors or management.

15

The directors, who have been nominated for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting, are John J. Mikulsky and Neil J. Miotto. Mr. Mikulsky has served on the Board of Directors since June 2011. Mr. Miotto has served on the Board of Directors since December 2008. John J. Mikulsky and Neil J. Miotto were both nominated for election at the Annual Meeting by the entire Board of Directors.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors, as a whole and through its committees, has responsibility for the oversight of risk management. With the oversight of our full Board of Directors, our senior management is responsible for the day-to-day management of the material risks we face. In its oversight role, our Board of Directors has the responsibility to satisfy itself that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate and functioning as designed. Our Board of Directors holds strategic planning sessions with senior management to discuss strategies, key challenges, risks and opportunities for us. This involvement of the Board of Directors in setting our business strategy is a key part of its oversight of risk management, its assessment of management’s appetite for risk, and its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk for us. Additionally, our Board of Directors regularly receives updates from senior management and outside advisors regarding certain risks we face, including various operating risks. Our senior management attends meetings of our Board of Directors and its committees on a quarterly basis, and as is otherwise needed, and are available to address any questions or concerns raised by the board on risk management and any other matters.

Each of our board committees oversees certain aspects of risk management and reports their findings to the full Board of Directors on a quarterly basis, and as is otherwise needed. Our Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing risk management of financial matters, financial reporting, the adequacy of our risk-related internal controls, internal investigations, and enterprise risks, generally. Our Compensation Committee oversees risks related to compensation policies and practices, and is responsible for establishing and maintaining compensation policies and programs designed to create incentives consistent with our business strategy that do not encourage excessive risk-taking.

Additional review or reporting on enterprise risks is conducted as needed or as requested by the Board of Directors or a committee thereof.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Any stockholder may send communications to our Board of Directors and to any individual director. Communications addressed to the Board of Directors will be forwarded to the Chairman for review and distribution to the other members of the Board of Directors. Communications addressed to an individual director will be forwarded directly to the individual director. All communications to our executive offices should be sent to the attention of the Secretary.

Information regarding our Executive Officers

The table below sets forth information regarding those individuals who were our non-director executive officers as of December 31, 2015:

Name	Age	Title
Dr. Raluca Dinu	43	Chief Operating Officer
Andrea Betti-Berutto	52	Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer
Darren Ma	37	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dr. Raluca Dinu is our Chief Operating Officer having been promoted to that position in April 2016 and has more than 15 years of experience in the telecommunication industry. A visionary executive with an established track record of driving increased revenue and profitability, building and leading cross functional teams, developing and commercializing advanced technologies, Dr. Dinu joined GigPeak as the Vice President of Product Development in 2008 through the acquisition of Lumera Inc., where she served as the Vice President of the Electro-Optic Business Unit since 2007. From 2001 to 2007, Dr. Dinu served Lumera in various capacities as technology and business leader. In her current role, she leads GigPeak’s global marketing and sales organizations, oversees the company’s roadmap and manages the production and operations planning.  She has an exceptional ability to manage and lead in rapidly changing and competitive environments while demonstrating an innate ability to achieve corporate goals within defined resources. Dr. Dinu holds more than 15 patents, obtained her B.Sc. in Optics, and Ph.D. in Physics, at the University of Bucharest in 2000 in ferroelectric thin films for random access memories, and also graduated from the Executive MBA AeA/Stanford Institute in 2007.

16

Andrea Betti-Berutto is our Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer and has served as the Chief Technology Officer of the company since its inception in 2007 through the acquisition of the iTerra LLC assets, where he was a co-founder and served as the VP of Engineering since the inception in 2001. In iTerra LLC he led the development of analog and digital high speed ICs for 10 Gb/s and 40Gb/s optical networks, wireless applications and instrumentation. Previously, Mr. Betti-Berutto worked at Fujitsu Compound Semiconductor as manager of product development for microwave and millimeter-wave IC products for point-to-point and satellite communication applications, at Space Engineering S.p.A Rome, Italy, and the European Space Agency R&D laboratory, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, as a payload system engineer and a MMIC designer. Mr. Betti-Berutto has more than 20 years of experience in the design of high speed ICs and multichip modules for microwave, millimeter-wave, and fiber optics applications. He is the author of several papers in technical journals in the area of power amplifiers, high-speed ICs, and broadband design for optical network applications and received his M.Sc. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Rome “La Sapienza.”

Darren Ma is our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and joined GigPeak in November 2014. He brings over 13 years of semiconductor experience and financial leadership to GigPeak. He began his career at Intel Corporation, where he worked in various finance positions, specializing in budgeting, cost and inventory management, strategic financial planning, and P&L management. Prior to joining GigPeak, he worked in roles of increasing responsibility at Semtech Corporation, and served as the primary financial partner to several members of the executive staff. He played a lead role in increasing the profitability of the Power Management business unit, and, most recently, as the Business Unit Controller for the Power Management and High Reliability and Systems Innovation business units. Prior to Semtech, he held a senior financial position at Fisher Investments, supporting the M&A, Institutional, and United Kingdom investment groups. Darren holds a Managerial Economics Bachelor of Science degree from the University of California, Davis and received his MBA from W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State University.

EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Our primary objectives with respect to executive compensation are to attract and retain the best possible executive talent, to link annual compensation (cash and stock-based) and long-term stock-based compensation to achievement of measurable corporate goals and individual performance, and to align executives’ incentives with stockholder value creation. To achieve these objectives, we have implemented and maintain compensation plans that tie a portion of executives’ overall compensation to our financial performance and common stock price. Overall, the total compensation opportunity is intended to create an executive compensation program that is competitive with comparably-sized companies where we are based, as it is these companies with whom we compete most vigorously for executive and technical talent.

Comparable Company Comparisons

Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews the named executive officer compensation programs and amounts at comparable companies. As GigPeak has grown during 2015 to cross $100 million of market capitalization and the makeup of the competitive market has evolved, the set of comparable companies has also gone through changes over the years. GigPeak’s total cash compensation packages are designed to be in the range between the median up to the 75^th percentile of total target cash compensation among comparable companies for performance by comparable executives. Our equity compensation program is designed to provide a percentage ownership of GigPeak that is relatively comparable to the median percentage ownership among these comparable companies. However, the individual elements of our executive program (base salary, annual incentive compensation, equity compensation and benefits) may vary from group medians as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. In addition, we may reduce cash compensation and award RSUs vesting over the course of the following year to make up for such cash compensation reduction. On occasion, the Compensation Committee may award special acheivement bonuses to the named executive officers.

17

Each year, we engage an independent outside firm which specializes in executive compensation. During 2014 and 2015, we engaged Compensia. For this purpose, for both of those years, the Compensation Committee looked at companies with less than $120 million in annual revenues as described by the Proprietary 2014 and 2015 Executive Compensation Survey published by Compensia as well as selected peer company proxy filings. We believe those two data sources were appropriate for benchmarking executive compensation because: the companies surveyed were of similar size, both in terms of revenues and market capitalization, to GigPeak; the companies are primarily located in the same geographic market as GigPeak; GigPeak competes with many of the surveyed companies for executive and technical talent; and certain of the companies in the indices are selected independently by Compensia. We do not benchmark our executive compensation solely against companies in our industry because few of our competitors are close to our size. Most of our competitors are very large, diversified companies or very small, privately-held companies. Rather, we focus on the companies with whom we compete most vigorously for executive and technical talent. Furthermore, as our financial performance in 2015 exceeded our revenue, gross margin, and earnings guidance and targets, and our market capitalization grew significantly, we worked with Compensia to revise the set of comparable companies which are used. We believe that the peer group now being used includes competitors for talent, and that it is a better reflection of the competitor market. In addition, although this peer group has a broader revenue spread than that used in the past, we believe that GigPeak compares favorably to this group on profitability and total shareholder return.

Elements of Named Executive Officer Compensation

Our named executive officer compensation consists of base salary, annual cash and equity incentives, equity plan participation and customary broad-based employee benefits. In addition, on occasion, the Compensation Committee may award special achievement bonuses to the named executive officers. Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, we believe that we can better motivate the named executive officers to enhance stockholder return if a portion of their compensation is “at risk”— that is, contingent upon the achievement of performance objectives and overall strong company performance. The mix of base salary, annual bonus opportunity based on achievement of objectives and anticipated long-term stock-based compensation incentive (in the form of appreciation in shares underlying stock options and restricted stock units) varies depending on the officer’s position and level. Long-term stock-based compensation has always been a significant component of the named executive officer compensation, as we believe that best aligns our named executive officers’ interests with that of our stockholders. An annual bonus opportunity may also form a significant component of the named executive compensation; however, as explained in more detail below, it was not a component of the named executive officer compensation paid in 2015 for 2014 financial performance. However, the named executive officers did receive special one-time bonuses as discussed below for such 2014 financial performance.

Base Salary: Base salaries for our named executive officers are established based on the scope of their responsibilities, taking into account market compensation paid by comparable companies for equivalent positions. Base salaries are reviewed on an annual basis and any increases are similar in scope to our overall corporate salary increase, if any. For comparison purposes, we have utilized compensation survey data from Compensia and the peer company proxy filings. Our philosophy is to target the named executive officer base salaries to be in the range between the median up to the 75^th percentile of salaries for executives in equivalent positions at comparable companies. We believe targeting the named executive officer salaries to be in the range between the median up to the 75^th percentile of salaries relative to comparable companies reflects our best efforts to ensure we are neither overpaying nor underpaying our named executive officers.

18

Annual Cash Incentive: Our employment contracts with our named executive officers provide them with an opportunity to receive annual cash incentive compensation consisting of the possibility of receipt of a cash bonus award, payable once per year. Any such cash bonus would be dependent, in part, upon attaining or exceeding stated corporate objectives for the prior fiscal year, including management by objectives targets regarding revenues, non-GAAP gross margins, adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP earnings per share (“EPS”) and other significant financial measures set for such year. We use these financial measures in setting performance targets because we believe that these non-GAAP financial measures are important indicators of the ongoing operations of our business, provide better comparability between reporting periods and provide a better baseline for analyzing trends in our operations both through our organic growth and strategic extention. Our goal with bonuses to our named executive officers is to reward executives in a manner that is commensurate with the level of achievement of certain financial and strategic goals that we believe, if attained, result in greater long-term stockholder value. The Board of Directors approves these financial and strategic goals and management by objective targets on an annual basis. These financial and strategic goals and management by objective targets typically have a one-year time horizon. In 2014, although we achieved the goals and targets approved by the Board and we had overall financial performance for that fiscal year which exceeded our guidance which we had given, the Board determined not to award any annual cash bonus to the named executive officers in 2015 for the performance in 2014 based upon the extent by which goals and targets were met and the value recognized by our stockholders for such financial performance. In connection with the 2015 financial performance, however, the Board of Directors determined that the objectives which we achieved far exceeded guidance and budgeted financial targets, as well as resulted in meaningful stockholder value creation with increases in the Company’s stock price that exceeded the performance of broad market indices such as the NASDAQ Stock Market Index (U.S. Companies) and the NASDAQ Telecommunications Index , and supported awards of cash incentive compensation. In recognition of our 2015 financial performance, the Board approved bonuses to be paid in 2016 in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices. The 2015 performance bonus was paid in January 2016.

Warrants, Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units: We believe that stock ownership is an important factor in aligning corporate and individual goals. Therefore, we utilize stock options (prior to 2013) and, beginning in 2012, RSUs, to encourage long-term performance, with excellent corporate performance (as manifested in our common stock price) and extended officer tenure producing potentially significant value. Upon joining GigPeak, the named executive officers have received an initial stock option and/or RSU grant. This grant has been based on relevant industry comparisons, including data from Compensia, and was intended to be commensurate with the experience level and scope of responsibilities of the incoming executive officer. In addition, on an annual basis, the Compensation Committee, reviews with the Board the percentage ownership of GigPeak held by employees, and compares that to the employee ownership of comparable companies. The Compensation Committee uses this metric because it is easy to measure and compare to comparable companies. Based on its review, the Compensation Committee approves an annual grant and all named executive officers receive RSU grants. Additionally, we may award RSUs as special bonuses to the named executive officers. No stock options were granted in 2014 and 2015. All RSU grants for named executive officers are approved by the Compensation Committee.

Special Bonuses: On occasion, the Compensation Committee may award special achievement bonuses (cash or RSUs) to the named executive officers and selected set of key-contributing employees. As disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 30, 2015, in recognition of our 2014 financial performance that achieved the goals and targets approved by the Board for such year, the Compensation Committee on March 26, 2015 approved special one-time cash bonuses for the named executive officers as identified in that Current Report. In addition, as disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 19, 2015, in connection with the completion of recent transactions, including the acquisition of GigOptix-Terasquare-Korea (GTK) Co., Ltd., in Seoul, Korea, our follow-on public offering, and our stellar financial performance over the preceding several quarters and resulting total stockholder return, the Compensation Committee on November 19, 2015 approved special one-time cash bonuses and awards of RSUs vesting in eight quarterly installments beginning on February 1, 2016 and ending on November 1, 2017 for the named executive officers as identified in that Current Report. However, as disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2016, the total number of RSUs awarded to our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Avi Katz, in 2015 were in excess of the 1,000,000 share per calendar year per person award limit set forth in the GigPeak, Inc. 2008 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”), and as a result, and in full agreement with Dr. Katz's proposal, on July 19, 2016, the Compensation Committee determined to rescind, among other things, the grant of 401,250 RSUs to Dr. Katz previously approved by the Compensation Committee on November 19, 2015 that were to vest starting August 1, 2016 and finishing on November 1, 2017 (the “November Rescinded RSUs”). On that same date of July 19, 2016, as also described in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved for Dr. Katz the issuance of 401,250 RSUs with the award vesting in six quarterly installments beginning on August 1, 2016 and ending on November 1, 2017 (the “Near Term RSUs”).

19

In addition to the rescission of the November Rescinded RSUs, and as also disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 20, 2016, the Compensation Committee (a) determined to rescind an additional 60,106 RSUs to Dr. Katz previously approved by the Compensation Committee on March 26, 2015 that were to vest starting August 1, 2016 and finishing on May 1, 2019 (collectively with the November Rescinded RSUs, the “Rescinded RSUs”) and (b) approved for Dr. Katz the issuance of 39,121 RSUs with the award vesting in twelve quarterly installments thereafter, beginning on August 1, 2016 and ending on May 1, 2019 (collectively with the Near Term RSUs, the “New RSUs”).

Other Benefits: Named executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, group life, disability, and accidental death and dismemberment insurance and our 401(k) plan. During 2014 and 2015, we made group life insurance payments as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below. We do not maintain any pension plan, retirement benefit or deferred compensation arrangements other than our 401(k) plan.

The table below sets forth the compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer and our two other most highly compensated executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 whose compensation exceeded $100,000. These individuals are collectively referred to as our named executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Bonus		Severance		RSU's(1)			Option Awards(1)		All Other Compensation		Total
											(a)
Dr. Avi Katz	2015	$	438,000	$	688,612	$	-	$	2,367,045	(2)	$	-	$	3,965	$	3,497,622
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President	2014	$	409,500	$	475,000	$	-	$	666,600		$	-	$	1,988	$	1,553,088
Andrea Betti-Berutto	2015	$	255,000	$	22,339	$	-	$	126,450		$	-	$	764	$	404,553
Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer	2014	$	254,100	$	45,000	$	-	$	162,525		$	-	$	517	$	462,142
Dr. Raluca Dinu	2015	$	280,000	$	231,471	$	-	$	539,558		$	-	$	278	$	1,051,307
Chief Operating Officer	2014	$	227,057	$	70,000	$	-	$	86,130		$	-	$	187	$	383,374

(1) The amounts in column (a) represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 6-Stockholders’ Equity, to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2) As this amount reflects the value of RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2015, this amount includes the value of the Rescinded RSUs that were rescinded on July 19, 2016, and does not include the New RSUs that were granted on the same date. For more information on the Rescinded RSUs and New RSUs, please refer to “Elements of Named Executive Compensation - Special Bonuses” discussed above.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table

The Summary Compensation Table sets forth the aggregate compensation earned by each of our named executive officers in 2015 and 2014.

The components of executive compensation consist of base salary, annual and special achievement bonus incentives, equity plan participation and customary broad-based employee benefits, as set forth in more detail above. Annual cash and/or stock-based compensation bonuses are awarded at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors after a review and evaluation of each executive officer’s performance during the year and, as discussed above, take into consideration the attainment of stated corporate and personal performance objectives. Beginning in 2013, equity grants have generally consisted of restricted stock units and are intended to serve respectively as long-term compensation and short-term awards in lieu of higher cash payouts. On occasion, the Compensation Committee may also authorize special compensation awards in the form of cash and/or equity grants to recognize extraordinary efforts or results.

20

Equity awards such as options and restricted stock units are generally granted pursuant to the GigPeak, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. Option grants to our executive officers generally vest as to 25% of the underlying award on the one-year anniversary of the grant date and monthly thereafter for a period of three years. However, certain option grants to our executive officers vest in accordance with certain performance goals being achieved, as discussed in more detail below in the vesting schedules for such option grant. In the case of stock options, the exercise price is set at 100% of the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock unit grants generally vest quarterly over the period between one and four years. Upon vesting, a restricted stock unit is converted to an actual share of stock.

We have entered into an employment agreement with each of our executive officers, which governs the terms of employment as well as provides for certain payments upon termination of employment. The employment agreements for the named executive officers are discussed in more detail below under the caption “Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers.”

21

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2015

	Option Awards
Name and Principal Position	Grant Date	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date		Number of Securities Underlying Unvested Restricted Stock Units (#) Unvested
Dr. Avi Katz	8/1/07		166,606		-	$	0.73	8/1/17
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President	12/17/08		581,338		-	$	1.10	12/17/18
	3/19/09		77,764		-	$	0.95	3/19/19
	11/9/09		130,000		-	$	3.50	11/9/19
	3/17/10		324,100		-	$	1.95	3/17/20
	10/27/10		348,345		-	$	2.40	10/27/20
	2/3/11		405,364		-	$	2.50	2/3/21
	6/17/11		424,212		-	$	2.65	6/17/21
	3/27/12		503,906		33,594	$	2.70	3/27/22
	8/1/13		-		-	$	-		N/A		48,300
	2/7/14		-		-	$	-		N/A		196,250
	3/26/15		-		-	$	-		N/A		619,231	(1)
	11/19/15		-		-	$	-		N/A		535,000	(1)
Andrea Betti-Berutto	8/1/07		112,612		-	$	0.73	8/1/17
Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer	12/17/08		238,913		-	$	1.10	12/17/18
	3/19/09		36,025		-	$	0.95	3/19/19
	11/9/09		38,011		-	$	3.50	11/9/19
	3/17/10		101,500		-	$	1.95	3/17/20
	10/27/10		139,554		-	$	2.40	10/27/20
	2/3/11		141,287		-	$	2.50	2/3/21
	6/17/11		87,713		-	$	2.65	6/17/21
	3/27/12		188,965		12,598	$	2.70	3/27/22
	8/1/13		-		-	$	-		N/A		18,113
	2/7/14		-		-	$	-		N/A		47,500
	3/26/15		-		-	$	-		N/A		50,000
	11/19/15		-		-	$	-		N/A		20,000
Dr. Raluca Dinu	4/13/06		5,000		-	$	30.56	4/13/16
Chief Operating Officer	3/1/07		7,499		-	$	34.24	3/1/17
	3/4/08		9,375		-	$	18.16	3/4/18
	12/17/08		39,733		-	$	1.10	12/17/18
	3/19/09		6,598		-	$	0.95	3/19/19
	11/9/09		6,962		-	$	3.50	11/9/19
	3/17/10		69,000		-	$	1.95	3/17/20
	10/27/10		42,020		-	$	2.40	10/27/20
	2/3/11		51,435		-	$	2.50	2/3/21
	6/17/11		27,300		-	$	2.65	6/17/21
	3/27/12		98,513		6,568	$	2.70	3/27/22
	5/1/13		25,379		13,891	$	-		N/A
	2/10/14		-		-	$	-		N/A		25,000
	3/26/15		-		-	$	-		N/A		216,346
	11/19/15		-		-	$	-		N/A		100,000

22

(1)	As this amount reflects the value of RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2015, this amount includes those Rescinded RSUs that were rescinded on July 20, 2016, and does not include the New RSUs that were granted on the same date. For more information on the Rescinded RSUs and New RSUs, please refer to “Elements of Named Executive Compensation - Special Bonuses” discussed above.
Grant Date	Vesting Schedule for Dr. Katz
11/19/15	The grant of 535,000 restricted stock units with one eighth of the total award vesting on the following dates - 2/1/16, 5/1/2016, 8/1/2016, 11/1/2016, 2/1/17, 5/1/2017, 8/1/2017 and 11/1/2017. However, as disclosed above under “Elements of Named Executive Compensation - Special Bonuses,” on July 19, 2016, the Company rescinded 401,250 restricted stock units of this grant, representing those which were to vest on the following dates: 8/1/2016, 11/1/2016, 2/1/17, 5/1/2017, 8/1/2017 and 11/1/2017. Also on July 19, 2016, the Company issued Dr. Katz 401,250 restricted stock units with such award vesting in six quarterly installments beginning on August 1, 2016 and ending on November 1, 2017.
3/26/15	The grant of 619,231 restricted stock units will vest as to 25% of the underlying award on 5/1/16, and one twelfth of the remaining award vesting on August 1, November 1, February 1 and May 1 over the next twelve quarters thereafter, with the last vesting date occurring on May 1, 2019. However, as disclosed above under “Elements of Named Executive Compensation - Special Bonuses,” on  July 19, 2016, the Company rescinded 60,106 restricted stock units of this grant, representing a portion of the awards which were to vest on the following dates: 8/1/2016, 11/1/2016, 2/1/17, 5/1/2017, 8/1/2017, 11/1/2017, 2/1/2018, 5/1/2018, 8/1/2018, 11/1/2018 2/1/2019 and 5/1/2019. Also on July 19, 2016, the Company issued Dr. Katz 39,121 restricted stock units with the award vesting in twelve quarterly installments beginning on August 1, 2016 and ending on May 1, 2019.
3/26/15	The grant of 307,125 restricted stock units with one third of the total award vesting on the following dates - 5/1/2015, 8/1/2015 and 11/1/2015.
2/7/14	The grant of 90,000 restricted stock units with one fourth of the total award vesting on the following dates - 5/1/2014, 8/1/2014, 11/1/2014 and 2/1/2015.
2/7/14	The grant of 314,000 restricted stock units will vest as to 25% of the underlying award on 2/1/15, and one twelfth of the remaining award vesting on May 1, August 1, November 1 and February 1 over the next twelve quarters thereafter, with the last vesting date occurring on Feb. 1, 2018.
8/1/13	The grant of 354,832 restricted stock units vested with one seventh of the total award on 11/1/2013, and the remaining restricted stock units will vest on the following dates 2/1/2014, 5/1/2014, 8/1/2014, 11/1/2014, 2/1/2015, and 5/1/2015.
8/1/13	The grant of 128,800 restricted stock units will vest as to 25% of the underlying award on 5/1/2014, and one twelfth of the remaining award vesting on August 1, November 1, February 1 and May 1 over the next twelve quarters thereafter, with the last vesting date occurring on May 1, 2017.
5/3/12	The grant of 62,296 restricted stock units vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the following dates 5/10/2012, 8/10/2012, 11/09/2012, and 3/1/2013.
3/27/12	The grant of 537,500 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/27/12	The grant of 158,967 restricted stock units vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the following dates 5/10/2012, 8/10/2012, 11/09/2012, and 3/1/2013.
6/17/11	In total Dr. Katz was granted 424,212 options on 6/17/11. 100,000 of the options were vested on the day of grant. An additional 100,000 options vested on the six month anniversary of the day of grant. The remaining 224,212 options will be vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
2/3/11	The grant of 405,364 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.

23

10/27/10	The vesting of 116,115 shares of the grant of 348,344 stock options was subject to our meeting certain financial goals for the first two quarters of 2011. As the Board of directors determined that the underlying goals were satisfied, 29,029 shares of the underlying award were vested on July 27, 2011, and an additional 87,086 shares are to be vested on a monthly basis thereafter over a 39 month period; in addition 58,057 shares of the underlying award vested on October 27, 2011, and the remaining 174,172 shares of the stock options will vest on a monthly basis thereafter over a 36 month period.
3/17/10	In total Dr. Katz was granted 503,000 options on 3/17/10. 203,000 stock options vests as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the remaining options every month thereafter for three years. An additional 121,100 options were vested on April 1, 2011 as the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during March 2011 was greater than $2.50; 122,100 options were cancelled on April 1, 2012 because the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during March 2012 was below $3.50; and an additional 56,800 options will vest on April 1, 2013 if the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during March 2013 is equal to or greater than $5.00; if not, then these options will be cancelled.
11/9/09	The grant of 130,000 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/19/09	The grant of 77,764 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
12/17/08	Grant of 581,338 stock options vests as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
8/1/07	The grant of 137,500 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years, and then 50% of the unvested options were fully vested upon the closing of the GigOptix LLC merger with Lumera Corporation and the other 50% will be vested on 12/31/2009. The grant of 10,313 stock options, which was to vest upon the schedule closing of a financing event, fully vested upon the closing of the GigOptix LLC merger with Lumera Corporation. The grants of 27,500 stock options and 6,875 stock options were fully vested on the grant date.
Grant Date	Vesting Schedule for Mr. Betti-Berutto
11/19/15	The grant of 20,000 restricted stock units with one eighth of the total award vesting on the following dates - 2/1/16, 5/1/2016, 8/1/2016, 11/1/2016, 2/1/17, 5/1/2017, 8/1/2017 and 11/1/2017.
3/26/15	The grant of 50,000 restricted stock units will vest as to 25% of the underlying award on 5/1/16, and one twelfth of the remaining award vesting on August 1, November 1, February 1 and May 1 over the next twelve quarters thereafter, with the last vesting date occurring on May 1, 2019.
3/26/15	The grant of 15,000 restricted stock units with one third of the total award vesting on the following dates - 5/1/2015, 8/1/2015 and 11/1/2015.
2/7/14	The grant of 22,500 restricted stock units with one fourth of the total award vesting on the following dates - 5/1/2014, 8/1/2014, 11/1/2014 and 2/1/2015.
2/7/14	The grant of 76,000 restricted stock units will vest as to 25% of the underlying award on 2/1/15, and one twelfth of the remaining award vesting on May 1, August 1, November 1 and February 1 over the next twelve quarters thereafter, with the last vesting date occurring on Feb. 1, 2018.
8/1/13	The grant of 94,424 restricted stock units vested with one seventh of the total award on 11/1/2013, and the remaining restricted stock units will vest on the following dates 2/1/2014, 5/1/2014, 8/1/2014, 11/1/2014, 2/1/2015, and 5/1/2015.
8/1/13	The grant of 48,300 restricted stock units will vest as to 25% of the underlying award on 5/1/2014, and one twelfth of the remaining award vesting on August 1, November 1, February 1 and May 1 over the next twelve quarters thereafter, with the last vesting date occurring on May 1, 2017.
5/3/12	The grant of 22,283 restricted stock units vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the following dates 5/10/2012, 8/10/2012, 11/09/2012, and 3/1/2013.
3/27/12	The grant of 201,563 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/27/12	The grant of 39,457 restricted stock units vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the following dates 5/10/2012, 8/10/2012, 11/09/2012, and 3/1/2013.

24

6/17/2011	The grant of 87,713 stock options will be vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
2/3/2011	The grant of 141,287 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
10/27/10	The vesting of 46,518 shares of the grant of 139,554 stock options was subject to our meeting certain financial goals for the first two quarters of 2011. As the Board of directors determined that the underlying goals were satisfied, 11,630 shares of the underlying award were vested on July 27, 2011, and an additional 34,888 shares will vest on a monthly basis thereafter over a 39 month period; in addition 23,259 shares of the underlying award vested on October 27, 2011, and the remaining 69,777 shares of the stock options will vest on a monthly basis thereafter over a 36 month period.
3/17/10	In total Mr. Betti-Berutto was granted 162,000 options on 3/17/10. 61,500 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the remaining options every month thereafter for three years. An additional 40,000 options were vested on April 1, 2011 as the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during March 2011 was greater than $2.50; 43,000 options were cancelled on April 1, 2012 because the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during March 2012 was below $3.50; and an additional 17,500 options will vest on April 1, 2013 if the average closing price of the Company’s common stock during March 2013 is equal to or greater than $5.00; if not, then these options will be cancelled.
11/9/09	The grant of 38,011 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/19/09	The grant of 36,025 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
12/16/08	The grant of 238,913 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
8/1/07	The grant of 68,200 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years, and then 50% of the unvested option were fully vested upon the closing of the GigOptix LLC merger with Lumera Corporation and the other 50% vested on 12/31/2009. The grant of 44,412 stock options was fully vested on the grant date.
Grant Date	Vesting Schedule for Dr. Raluca Dinu
11/19/15	The grant of 100,000 restricted stock units with one eighth of the total award vesting on the following dates - 2/1/16, 5/1/2016, 8/1/2016, 11/1/2016, 2/1/17, 5/1/2017, 8/1/2017 and 11/1/2017.
3/26/15	The grant of 216,346 restricted stock units will vest as to 25% of the underlying award on 5/1/16, and one twelfth of the remaining award vesting on August 1, November 1, February 1 and May 1 over the next twelve quarters thereafter, with the last vesting date occurring on May 1, 2019.
3/26/15	The grant of 34,500 restricted stock units with one third of the total award vesting on the following dates - 5/1/2015, 8/1/2015 and 11/1/2015.
2/10/14	The grant of 40,000 restricted stock units with one fourth of the total award vesting on the following dates - 5/1/2014, 8/1/2014, 11/1/2014 and 2/1/2015.
2/10/14	The grant of 39,270 restricted stock units will vest as to 25% of the underlying award on 2/1/15, and one twelfth of the remaining award vesting on May 1, August 1, November 1 and February 1 over the next twelve quarters thereafter, with the last vesting date occurring on Feb. 1, 2018.
5/1/13	The grant of 43,721 restricted stock units vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the following dates 5/10/2013, 8/10/2013, 11/09/2013, and 3/1/2014.
5/1/13	The grant of 39,270 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/27/12	The grant of 17,283 restricted stock units vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the following dates 5/10/2012, 8/10/2012, 11/09/2012, and 3/1/2013.
3/27/12	The grant of 105,081 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.

25

6/17/11	The grant of 27,297 stock options will be vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
2/3/11	The grant of 51,435 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
10/27/10	The grant of 42,020 stock options.
3/17/10	In total Dr. Dinu was granted 100,000 options on 3/17/10.
11/9/09	The grant of 6,962 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/19/09	The grant of 6,598 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
12/17/08	The grant of 39,733 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/4/08	The grant of 9,375 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/1/07	The grant of 7,499 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
4/13/06	The grant of 5,000 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.
3/23/05	The grant of 2,000 stock options vested as to 25% of the underlying award on the one year anniversary of the grant date and as to 1/36 of the underlying award every month thereafter for three years.

Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

We do not have deferred compensation plans, pension plans or other similar arrangements or plans for our executive officers, except a tax-qualified 401(k) Plan, which is available generally to all of our employees.

On December 17, 2014, the Compensation Committee, approved an amendment to and restatement of the Employment Agreement of Dr. Katz, our Chief Executive Officer, which otherwise would have expired on December 31, 2014 (the “Amended Employment Agreement”). Under the Amended Employment Agreement, Dr. Katz received a base salary of $438,000 per year commencing in 2015, which was an increase from Dr. Katz’s base salary of $409,500 per year which Dr. Katz was receiving since restoration of that amount in 2013. This increase represents the standard industry annual increase of 4% and in addition, an amount of $12,000 in lieu of the annual life insurance policy amount that was authorized as part of the prior Employment Agreement, and which under the terms of the Amended Employment Agreement is no longer being purchased or paid for by the Company. As described in the Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on January 7, 2016, Dr. Katz’s base salary has been increased to $468,660 in 2016. As in the prior Employment Agreement, the Amended Employment Agreement also establishes bonuses and eligibility for health benefits, among other provisions, and provides that Dr. Katz is entitled to certain compensation amounts in the event of his departure from the Company associated with a Change of Control (as such term is defined in the Amended Employment Agreement). In such situation, he would be entitled to receive a pro-rated annual bonus plus an amount equal to three years of his then existing annual base salary and three years of his average bonus for the prior two fiscal years, which includes both any annual bonus and any special achievement bonuses paid in the prior two fiscal years, the vesting of all outstanding, unvested awards and a potential tax equalization payment or gross-up payment which would place Dr. Katz in the same after-tax position as if any excise tax penalty did not apply. In addition, the Amended Employment Agreement similarly provides that Dr. Katz would be entitled to receive such compensation if his employment with the Company is terminated without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the Amended Employment Agreement) in the absence of a change of control transaction, with six months of his annual base salary being paid and then the remainder being paid in a lump sum.

26

On August 3, 2015, the Compensation Committee approved and entered into a Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Dinu Employment Agreement”) with Dr. Raluca Dinu, amending the prior Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Dr. Dinu filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC on March 17, 2015 (the “Prior Employment Agreement”). The Prior Employment Agreement established Dr. Dinu’s base salary, which is subject to annual review by the Compensation Committee, as well as her eligibility to receive an annual performance bonus under such executive incentive plan as is applicable to our executives generally, with target bonus and performance metrics to be determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee also promoted Dr. Dinu in August 2015, as reflected in the Dinu Employment Agreement, from Senior Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing, to Executive Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing. Consistent with the promotion, the Dinu Employment Agreement has been amended to provide for the severance which Dr. Dinu is entitled to receive in the event that her employment with the Company is terminated without “cause” or she resigns for “good reason” (as those terms are defined the Dinu Employment Agreement), and the amount that will be paid to her estate in the event of her death (although Dr. Dinu was also promoted by the Compensation Committee in April 2016 to the position of Chief Operating Officer, that promotion did not result in any changes to the Dinu Employment Agreement). The Dinu Employment Agreement provides that in the event of Dr. Dinu’s death during the term of her employment, Dr. Dinu’s estate will receive one-twelfth of her base salary then in effect for twelve months, rather than six months as was provided under the Prior Employment Agreement. In addition, the amendment to her employment terms provided by the Dinu Employment Agreement provides that Dr. Dinu would be entitled to receive a pro-rated annual bonus plus severance in installments over a six month period in an amount of up to six months of her respective annual base salary then in effect and a lump sum payment equal to six months of her respective annual base salary following the initial six month period, provided that the Company terminates her employment without “cause” or she resigned for “good reason” and there has been no Change of Control (as such term is defined in the Dinu Employment Agreement). In the event that such termination or resignation occurs within twelve months following a Change of Control, then Dr. Dinu will be entitled to a pro-rated annual bonus plus lump sum severance in an amount equal to twelve months of her respective annual base salary plus the average of her annual bonuses from the prior two years. These provisions were amended in order to align Dr. Dinu’s severance terms with the severance terms provided to the other commensurate-level executive officer of the Company, as described in the Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on March 28, 2012.

On March 27, 2012 and August 10, 2012 the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved an amendment to the Employment Agreement of Mr. Betti-Berutto, our Chief Technical Officer. The agreement establishes his annual salary, bonuses and eligibility for health benefits, among other provisions and clarifies the severance which he is entitled to receive in the event that his employment with the Company is terminated without “cause” or resigns for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in his Employment Agreement). Mr. Betti-Berutto would be entitled to receive a pro-rated annual bonus plus severance in installments over a six month period, in an amount of up to six months of his respective annual base salary then in effect and a lump sum payment equal to six months of his respective annual base salary following the initial six month period plus the vesting of all outstanding, unvested awards. In the event that such termination occurs within twelve months following a Change of Control (as such term is defined in his Employment Agreement), then Mr. Betti-Berutto will be entitled to a pro-rated annual bonus plus lump sum severance amount equal to one year worth of his respective annual base salary plus average annual bonuses, the vesting of all outstanding, unvested awards and a potential tax equalization payment or gross-up payment which would place him in the same after-tax position as if any excise tax penalty did not apply.

The GigPeak, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan contains certain provisions for change in control transactions. In the event of a Covered Transaction (as defined in the plan), the outstanding awards must either be assumed or substituted by the successor company or will be fully accelerated prior to the closing of the Covered Transaction.

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation earned for services performed for us as a director by each member of our Board of Directors, other than any directors who are also our named executive officers, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

27

	2015 Director Compensation Table
	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash			Restricted Stock Units			Total
Name
Frank Schneider		$	21,750		$	132,797		$	154,547
John J. Mikulsky		$	20,750		$	127,342		$	148,092
Joseph J. Lazzara		$	20,750		$	127,342		$	148,092
Kimberly D.C. Trapp		$	27,595		$	144,328		$	171,923
Neil J. Miotto		$	24,750		$	149,783		$	174,533

As of December 31, 2015, each current director, other than directors who are also our named executive officers, held the following outstanding options and restricted stock unit awards:

Name	Aggregate Number of Shares Underlying Stock Options (#)		Aggregate Number of Shares Underlying Restricted Stock Units (#)
Frank Schneider		167,500		37,244
John J. Mikulsky		65,000		35,611
Joseph J. Lazzara		65,000		35,611
Kimberly D.C. Trapp		195,776		35,611
Neil J. Miotto		216,100		37,244

28

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, that might incorporate future filings, including this Proxy Statement, in whole or in part, the Audit Committee Report which follows does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any such filings, except to the extent to which we specifically incorporate any such information in any such future filings.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has provided the following report:

The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in its monitoring and oversight of the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and the audits, preparation and integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s compliance with financial statement and regulatory requirements, the performance of the Company’s internal finance and accounting personnel and its independent registered public accounting firm, and the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; establishes procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters; and otherwise discharges Audit Committee functions imposed by regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee specifically approves all audit and non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

During 2015, the Audit Committee was composed of five members, each of whom is independent as determined by the Board of Directors and as defined by Rule 10A-3(b)(1) under the Exchange Act and the rules of the NYSE MKT. The Audit Committee also includes at least one independent director who is determined by the Board of Directors to have the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with the SEC and NYSE MKT rules. During 2015, the Board of Directors determined that Mr. Miotto was an audit committee financial expert.

The Audit Committee held 4 meetings during fiscal 2015.

Management is responsible for the preparation, integrity, objectivity and public reporting of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. It also has responsibility for maintaining accounting and financial reporting principles and internal controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc., our independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the fairness and conformity of those financial statements to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee those processes.

As required by the Audit Committee Charter, with regard to the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015, the Audit Committee has:

• Reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting with management;

• Discussed with Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. the results of its audit, including the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) in Rule 3200T;

• Received the written disclosures and the letter from Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. regarding auditor independence required by PCAOB Rule 3526; and

• Discussed with Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. the accounting firm’s independence from the Company.

Based on its review and discussions with management and Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc., the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Neil J. Miotto, Chairman

Joseph J. Lazzara

John J. Mikulsky

Frank Schneider

Kimberly D.C. Trapp

Members, Audit Committee

29

OTHER MATTERS

Other Matters Brought Before the Meeting

As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no business that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the items referred to above. If any other matter is properly brought before the meeting for action by stockholders, proxies in the enclosed form returned to the Company will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors, or in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holder.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, we believe that each of our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of greater than 10% of our common stock complied during fiscal year 2015 with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Business Ethics and Conduct that applies to our directors, executive officers and employees. We will disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct on our website http://www.gigpeak.com within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver. We will provide to any person, without charge, a copy of Code of Business Ethics and Conduct upon written request to:

GigPeak, Inc.

130 Baytech Drive

San Jose, California 95134

Attn: Investor Relations

30

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table reflects information for our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2015.

	(a)		(b)			(c)
Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and Restricted Stock Units		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options			Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities reflected in column (a)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders*		12,280,417		$	2.32		1,489,996

* The terms of our 2008 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan provide for an annual increase in the number of shares of our common stock authorized under the plan, effective as of the first day of each subsequent fiscal year, pursuant to the terms and conditions underlined in the plan. On January 1, 2015, the number of additional shares available for issuance under our 2008 Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan was automatically increased by 1,655,604 shares. On January 1, 2016, the number of additional shares available for issuance under our 2008 Equity Incentive Plan was automatically increased by 2,260,527 shares.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or to be billed by Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. for auditing and other services provided to GigPeak for the fiscal year 2015 and 2014.

	Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.
	2015		2014
Audit Fees (1)	$	412,717	$	279,646
Audit-Related Fees (2)	$	14,220	$	13,220
Tax Fees (3)	$	-	$	-

(1) Audit fees include fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q and other services normally provided by accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years.

(2) Audit-related fees include fees for professional services rendered by Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. related to the audit of our 401(k) Plan.

(3) Fees for tax services relate to tax return preparation and other compliance services.

In considering the nature of the services provided by Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc., as our independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with the independent registered public accounting firm and our management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditors’ independence promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

31

Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit services and all permitted non-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee evaluates whether our use of the independent registered public accounting firm for permitted non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee’s policies prohibit us from engaging the independent registered public accounting firm to provide any services relating to bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information systems design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports, actuarial services, or internal audit outsourcing services unless it is reasonable to conclude that the results of these services will not be subject to audit procedures. The Audit Committee’s policies prohibit us from engaging the independent registered public accounting firm to provide any services relating to any management function, expert services not related to the audit, legal services, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services or human resource consulting. The Audit Committee approved in advance all fees for services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm, Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc., for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 and has concluded that the provision of these services is compatible with the accountants’ independence.

Stockholder Proposals

Any stockholder may submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement in accordance with Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act. The deadline for inclusion of a proposal in our proxy statement for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders is August 14, 2017. If the date of the 2017 annual meeting is changed by more than 30 days prior to or delayed by more than 30 days after the one year anniversary of the Annual Meeting (November 17, 2016), then the deadline for inclusion of a proposal in the proxy statement will be a reasonable time before we begin to print and send our proxy materials.

Stockholders may also submit proposals for consideration at the annual meeting of stockholders regardless of whether they are to be included in our proxy statement. To be properly brought before the annual meeting, a stockholder must provide written notice to the Secretary not fewer than sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting; provided that if the date of the annual meeting is advanced more than thirty (30) days prior to or delayed by more than thirty (30) days after the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such annual meeting or (ii) the tenth (10th) day following the date on which the notice of the annual meeting was mailed or other such public disclosure was made. Stockholder proposals for the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders must be submitted no earlier than August 14, 2017 and no later than September 13, 2017. These requirements are separate from, and in addition to, the requirements that must be met to have a stockholder proposal included in the proxy statement.

Pursuant to our bylaws, a stockholder may nominate a candidate for election to the Board of Directors at an annual meeting of stockholders by providing written notice to the Secretary not fewer than sixty (60) days nor more than ninety (90) days prior to the anniversary date of the prior year’s annual meeting. Any such notice must set forth the information required by our bylaws, including certain information about the stockholder making the nomination and certain information about the person nominated for election. Stockholder nominations for election at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders must be submitted no earlier than August 14, 2017 and no later than September 13, 2017.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

We will provide without charge a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements and the financial statement schedules, to any stockholder upon written request to GigPeak, Inc., 130 Baytech Drive, San Jose, CA 95134, Attn: Darren Ma, Chief Financial Officer. The copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K is accompanied by a list and brief descriptions of the exhibits not provided, and we will provide the exhibits upon request for a reasonable fee.

32

* * *

It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting, regardless of the number of shares that you hold. YOU, THEREFORE, ARE URGED TO EXECUTE PROMPTLY AND RETURN THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE THAT HAS BEEN ENCLOSED FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE. Stockholders who are present at the meeting may revoke their proxies and vote in person or, if they prefer, may abstain from voting in person and allow their proxies to be voted.

	By order of the Board of Directors,
	Dr. Avi Katz
October 3, 2016
San Jose, California

33

1 1 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 12345678 NAME THE COMPANY NAME INC. - COMMON 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS A 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS B 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS C 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS D 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS E 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS F 123,456,789,012.12345 THE COMPANY NAME INC. - 401 K 123,456,789,012.12345 → x 02 0000000000 JOB # 1 OF 2 1 OF 2 PAGE SHARES CUSIP # SEQUENCE # THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date CONTROL # SHARES To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000300584_1 R1.0.1.25 For Withhold For All All All Except The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 John J. Mikulsky 02 Neil J. Miotto GIGPEAK, INC. 130 BAYTECH DR SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95134 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 John Sample 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain 2 To approve, on an advisory basis, the 2015 compensation of the Company's named executive officers. 3 Ratification of the appointment of Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. 0000300584_2 R1.0.1.25 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice & Proxy Statement, Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com GIGPEAK, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders November 17, 2016 8:00 AM Local Time This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned hereby appoints Avi Katz and Darren Ma, and each of them, each with the power to appoint his or her substitute, as proxies (collectively, the "proxies") to vote and act at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of GIGPEAK, INC. (The "Company") to be held on November 17, 2016 or any adjournment or postponement thereof with respect to the number of shares of common stock of the Company as to which the undersigned may be entitled to vote or act. Shares represented by this proxy card will be voted as directed by the undersigned. If no such directions are indicated, the proxies will have authority to vote FOR the election of the nominees listed on the reverse side, FOR Proposals 2 and 3. Continued and to be signed on reverse side