narc_10q.htm

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Item 1.	Financial Statements.	Page
	Balance Sheets – June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010		3
	Statements of Operations – For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)		4
	Statements of Cash Flows – For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)		5
	Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)		6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		21
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures.		21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:

Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	188		$	7,369
Accounts Receivable		--			16,741
Total Current Assets		188			24,110

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net		--			8,749

Other Assets:
Intangible Assets-Net of Amortization		-			86,869
Due from Advanced		-			67,800
Deposits and Prepaid Expenses		16,085			16,085
Total Other Assets		16,085			170,754

TOTAL ASSETS	$	16,273		$	203,613

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Accounts Payable	$	45,110		$	95,524
Due to Related Party		243,340			14,191
Total Current Liabilities		288,450			109,715

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Common stock, $.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized 181,735,560 and 83,715,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(respectively)		181,735			83,715
Additional Paid in Capital		582,269			680,289
Accumulated Deficit		(1,036,181	)		(670,106	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		(272,177	)		93,898

TOTAL LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY	$	16,273		$	203,613

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011			Three Months Ended June 30, 2010			Six Months Ended June 30, 2011			Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenue	$	9,563		$	-		$	76,135		$	-
Cost of Sales		22,003			-			68,662			-
Gross Profit		(12,220	)		-			7,473			-

Expenses

Depreciation		3,000			-			8,334			-
Insurance		6,510			-			16,494			-
Office		2,418			-			5,108			-
Payroll and payroll taxes		8,400			-			88,462			-
Professional fees		22,427			-			117,429			-
Rent		-			-			37,904			-
Travel and entertainment		1,837			-			11,061			-
Utilities		3,989			-			13,051			-
Other expenses		2,226			39,420			10,504			180,024
Total Expenses		50,807			39,420			308,347			180,024
Loss from Operations		(63,247	)		(39,420	)		(300,874	)		(180,024	)

Other Income (Expense)

Interest Expense					(16,860	)					(32,720	)
Impairment of Asset-Acquisition		-			-			(67,800	)		-
Interest Income		1,249			-			2,599			-
Total Other Income (Expense)		1,249			(16,860	)		(65,201	)		(32,720	)
Loss Before Income Taxes		(61,998	)		(56,280	)		(366,075	)		(212,744	)

Income Tax Benefit		-			-			-			-

Net Loss		(61,998	)		(56,280	)		(366,075	)		(212,744	)

Loss Per Share-Basic and Diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted Average Common Shares

Outstanding -Basic and Diluted		181,735,300			22,640,000			181,735,300,035,360000			22,640,000

	Six Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(366,075	)	$	(212,744	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation expense		8,750			-

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (Increase) in assets:
Accounts Receivable		16,741			-
Loan Receivable		67,800			-
Intangible assets		86,869			-
Prepaid Expenses and Deposits		-			10,000

Increase (Decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(50,606	)		(10,878	)
Due to related party		-			32,720

Net Cash Used In Operating Activities		(236,521	)		(180,902	)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Fixed Assets Purchased		-			-
Net Cash( Used In) Provided by Investing Activities		-			-
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Private Placement-Net of expenses		229,340			83,000
Proceeds from notes payable-related party		229,340			83,000
Net Cash Provided by(Used In) Financing Activities
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(7,181	)		(97,902	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		7,369			99,174
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	188		$	1,272
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES:
Interest paid during the period	$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid during the period	$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial Statements

National Asset Recovery Corp. formerly known as Nasus Consulting, Inc., is a Nevada corporation incorporated in February 2009 and the successor by merger to a Massachusetts corporation incorporated on August 1, 2000. From its inception on August 1, 2000, until May 27, 2011, the Company provided professional information technology (“IT”) services, including software and hardware installation, data conversion, training, and software product modifications to businesses.

On March 5, 2009, we completed a statutory merger (solely for the purpose of redomicile) with a Nevada corporation by the same name. On March 12, 2009, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to increase our authorized common shares to 200,000,000. On May 27, 2009, (the “Transaction Date”), our principal shareholders and officers, Russell R. Desjourdy and Lynn Desjourdy, together with all of our remaining officers and directors voluntarily resigned from their respective offices and positions effective as of the Transaction Date. All of our assets held as of the Transaction Date were distributed to Mr. Desjourdy as compensation for the voluntary termination of his employment agreement.

Effective as of the Transaction Date, we ceased operating our IT services business, and as a result, we no longer derive any revenues from this business. Between the Transaction Date and August 27, 2010, we were a development stage company and did not record any revenues. During this period, we were involved in the development and design of a range of massively multiplayer online (“MMO”) virtual reality experiences for online internet entertainment, education, social and business interactive purposes.

On August 27, 2010, the Company changed its business model to be a forwarding company for the repossession of motor vehicles, luxury assets and heavy equipment. The Company has operated as a repossession forwarding company in Florida and other parts of the United States through business relationships it established with banks and lenders that have loaned money to consumers who purchased autos/trucks, airplanes, boats/yachts and construction equipment. Due to substantial overhead costs, regulatory requirements and low profit margins associated with its business, the Company has temporarily ceased operations of its repossession forwarding business and is currently evaluating other opportunities in an attempt to achieve profitability.

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP"). The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original term of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011, the Company had cash equivalents in the amount of approximately $7,369, and $188, respectively, all in low risk investments.

The Company accounts for the impairment of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of” (“ASC Topic 360”) requires write-downs to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amount.

If the long-lived assets are identified as being planned for disposal or sale, they would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB No. 104”). SAB 104 clarifies application of generally accepted accounting principles related to revenue transactions. The Company also follows the guidance in ASC Topic 980, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables ("ASC Topic 980"), in arrangements with multiple deliverables.

The Company receives revenue for recovering assets for secured lenders that desire to repose boats, cars, planes and heavy equipment. Milestone payments are recognized as revenue upon achievement of contract-specified events and when there are no remaining performance obligations.

In certain cases, the Company enters into agreements with customers that involve the delivery of more than one product or service. Revenue for such arrangements is allocated to the separate units of accounting using the relative fair value method in accordance with ASC Topic 980. The delivered item(s) is considered a separate unit of accounting if all of the following criteria are met: (1) the delivered item(s) has value to the customer on a standalone basis, (2) there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item(s) and (3) if the arrangement includes a general right of return, delivery or performance of the undelivered item(s) is considered probable and substantially in the control of the vendor. If all the conditions above are met and there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value for all units of accounting in an arrangement, the arrangement consideration is allocated to the separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values.

Property and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. When items are retired or otherwise disposed of, income is charged or credited for the difference between net book value and proceeds realized thereon. Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and replacements and betterments are capitalized.

Deferred income taxes are provided based on the provisions of ASC Topic 740, "Accounting for Income Taxes", to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Based on its evaluation, the Company concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was performed for the tax quarter ended June 30 2011, the tax quarter ended June 30, 2011, the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of June 30, 2011 are 2009-2010.

The Company may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to the Company’s financial results. In the event the Company has received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in the consolidated financial statements as selling, general and administrative expense.

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 740; "Accounting For Uncertainty In Income Taxes-An Interpretation Of ASC Topic 740 ("Topic 740"). Topic 740 contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating the Company's tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments. At June 30, 2010 and 2011, the Company did not record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company maintains cash balances at one financial institution, which is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The FDIC insured institution insures up to $250,000 on account balances. The amounts that are not insured by FDIC limitations are held in short-term securities. As of June 30, 2010 and 2011, there were no uninsured balances. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Earnings (loss) per share are computed in accordance with ASC Topic 260, "Earnings per Share". Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss), after deducting preferred stock dividends accumulated during the period, by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and other potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period.

The Company applies ASC Topic 718 “Share-Based Payments” (“ASC Topic 718”) to share-based compensation, which requires the measurement of the cost of services received in exchange for an award of an equity instrument based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost is recognized when the event occurs. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted.

The cost of stock-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services are recorded, in accordance with ASC Topic 505- 50 “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees,” at either the fair value of the services rendered or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable, using the measurement date guidelines.

The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants in accordance ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”. The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives the company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the company), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” which amends the disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance requires disclosure of transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the transfers and information on purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of the assets and liabilities measured under Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted these amendments in the first quarter of 2010 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, which changes various aspects of accounting for and disclosures of interests in variable interest entities. ASU 2009-17 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted these amendments in the first quarter of 2010 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued authoritative guidance on accounting for transfers of financial assets. This guidance was issued to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor's continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance that will require additional disclosures about the credit quality of loans, lease receivables and other long-term receivables and the related allowance for credit losses. Certain additional disclosures in this new accounting guidance will be effective for the Company on June 30, 2010 with certain other additional disclosures that will be effective on June 30, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of this new accounting guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718) — Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades.” ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010 and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) — Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” ASU 2010-11 clarifies that the only form of an embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements are those that relate to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The provisions of ASU 2010-11 will be effective on July 1, 2010 and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-14, “Software (Topic 985) — Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)”. ASU 2011-14 requires tangible products that contain software and non-software elements that work together to deliver the products essential functionality to be evaluated under the accounting standard regarding multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The Company does not expect that this standard update will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2009, the FASB issued certain amendments as codified in ASC Topic 605-25, “Revenue Recognition; Multiple-Element Arrangements.” These amendments provide clarification on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. An entity is required to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables in the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price. These amendments also eliminate the use of the residual method and require an entity to allocate revenue using the relative selling price method. The amendments significantly expand the disclosure requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. These provisions are to be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after September 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted. The Company will adopt the provisions of these amendments in its fiscal year 2011 and is currently evaluating the impact of these amendments to its consolidated financial statements.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had Federal and state net operating losses of approximately $1,036,000 and $719,000, respectively, that are subject to limitations. The losses are available to offset future income. The net operating loss carry forwards will expire in various years through 2028 subject to limitations of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The Company has provided a valuation reserve against the full amount of the net operating loss benefit, because in the opinion of management based upon the earning history of the Company, it is more likely than not that the benefits will not be realized.

The Company adopted ASC 740 which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statement or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between Consolidated Financial Statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Temporary differences between taxable income reported for financial reporting purposes and income tax purposes are insignificant.

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 imposed substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating losses and tax credits in the event of an "ownership change", as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. Federal and state net operating losses are subject to limitations as a result of these restrictions. On August 27, 2010, the Company experienced a substantial change in ownership exceeding 50%. As a result, the Company's ability to utilize its net operating losses against future income has been significantly reduced.

In assessing the amount of deferred tax asset to be recognized, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some of the losses will be used in the future. Management expects that they will not have benefit in the future. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been established.

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and debt. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their respective estimated fair value due to the short-term maturities and/or approximate market interest rates of these instruments. The estimated fair value is not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company would realize in a current market exchange or from future earnings or cash flows.

The Company adopted Statement of ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements (“ASC Topic 820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard provides a consistent definition of fair value which focuses on an exit price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The standard also prioritizes, within the measurement of fair value, the use of market-based information over entity specific information and establishes a three-level hierarchy

Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable or the asset or liability other than quoted prices, either directly or indirectly including inputs in markets that are not considered to be active;

	Fair value measurement at reporting date using
	June 30,		Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical is		Significant Other Observable		Significant Unobservable Inputs
Description	2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Bank Accounts	$	188	$	188		-		-
Marketable Securities:
Common Stock		0		0		-		-
Preferred /Fixed
Rate Cap Securities

Total Assets	$	188	$	188		-		-

On August 27, 2010, the Company sold an aggregate of 3,020,367 shares of common stock to a total of 15 individuals for gross proceeds of $1,366,596. The Company sold these shares of common stock pursuant to the registration exemption afforded the Company under Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), due to the facts that all of the purchasers were non-US residents and the Company did not solicit individuals or advertise the offering of securities.

On August 27, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 20,000,000 to William G. Forhan in consideration for services rendered to the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to the registration exemption afforded the Company under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance did not involve a public offering of securities and was made to one individual.

On August 27, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 20,000,000 to DewFish and Company, Inc. in consideration for services rendered to the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to the registration exemption afforded the Company under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the shares were issued for services rendered, the issuance did not involve a public offering of securities and was made to one entity.

On August 27, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 20,000,000 to Ralph Oelbermann in consideration for consulting services rendered to the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to the registration exemption afforded the Company under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the shares were issued for services rendered, the issuance did not involve a public offering of securities and was to one individual.

As a result of the Company issuing a total of 60,000,000 shares of common stock there was in effect, a change of control of the Company. The persons who acquired such control were William G. Forhan, DewFish and Company, Inc. and Ralph Oelbermann, with each beneficially owning on August 27, 2010 approximately 23.35% of the Company's common stock and together, approximately 70.04%.

In connection with the August 27, 2010 change of control Oleksandr Shalash, John Jenkins and Thomas Kellgren each resigned from the Board of Directors of the Company. John Jenkins also resigned as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Robert Ogden resigned as the Company's Treasurer and Secretary. There were no disagreements between the Company and any of the directors or officers who resigned.

Upon the aforementioned resignations, William G. Forhan, Robert Kuechenberg, Brad Shrader and Steven York were subsequently elected as the Company's directors by majority consent of the common stockholders. Board members Mr. Kuechenberg and Mr. York each received 50,000 upon being elected to the board of directors. The Board of Directors then appointed Mr. Forhan as the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Brad Shrader as the Company's Chief Operating Officer.

On May 17, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 75,000,000 shares of common stock to Bradley Wilson for services rendered. The Company sold these shares pursuant to an exemption from registration pursuant to §4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”). Mr. Wilson has served as the Chairman to the Company’s Board of Directors since December 16, 2010, and is receiving these shares as partial compensation for entering into a five year employment agreement with the Company. The shares issued to Mr. Wilson are subject to forfeiture on a pro-rata basis if he voluntarily terminates his employment or if the Company terminates his employment agreement for cause before the end of the five year term.

On May 17, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of common stock to William A. Glynn for services rendered. The Company sold these shares pursuant to an exemption from registration pursuant to §4(2) of the Act. Mr. Glynn has served as the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since December 16, 2010, and is receiving these shares as partial compensation for entering into a five year employment agreement with the Company. The shares issued to Mr. Glynn are subject to forfeiture on a pro-rata basis if he voluntarily terminates his employment or if the Company terminates his employment agreement for cause before the end of the five year term.

As a result of the issuance of 95,000,000 shares of common stock as reported in Item 3.02 above, a change of control of the Registrant took place. The persons who acquired such control are Bradley Wilson, who beneficially owns approximately 41% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock and William A. Glynn, who beneficially owns approximately 11% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Collectively, Mr. Wilson and Mr. Glynn own approximately 52% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

On June 10, 2011, the Company relocated its executive and operations offices from Palm Beach Gardens, Florida to Lake Mary, Florida. The Company is currently being allowed to use its new space free of charge. The Company surrendered the lease for its prior office space in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, which surrender was accepted by the landlord. As a result, the Company has no liability for unpaid rent or any other costs or expenses arising from its previous lease agreement.

On August 29, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with William G. Forhan to serve as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the term of which was approximately three years ending on July 19, 2013 and subject to renewal or termination with or without cause. Mr. Forhan received an annual base salary of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000) per year during the term of his employment, payable in accordance with the Company’s semi-monthly payroll disbursement cycle. Under this agreement, Mr. Forhan was also entitled to be paid a bonus of five percent (5%) of our annual EBITDA, in cash and a $500 monthly car allowance. On December 21, 2010, Mr. Forhan voluntarily resigned from his positions as our Chief Executive and Financial Officer and his employment agreement was effectively terminated. Following this event, Mr. Forhan served as our Chief Operating Officer until January 11, 2011, at which time he also voluntarily resigned from that position. Mr. Forhan had previously been removed as a Director by a majority vote of our shareholders on December 16, 2010.

On August 29, 2010, the Company also entered into an employment agreement with Brad Shrader to serve as our Chief Operating Officer. The term of this agreement was to expire on August 23, 2013, subject to renewal or termination with or without case. Through this agreement, Mr. Shrader received an annual base salary of $135,000 plus a bonus equal to 1.5% of the Company’s EBITDA and a $500 per month car allowance. Mr. Shrader also received 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and an option to purchase up to 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for a purchase price of $.20 per share until the third anniversary from the grant date of the option.

On December 16, 2010, Mr. Shrader was terminated as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer due to disagreements he had with other members of management. In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, its termination also constituted the resignation by Mr. Shrader from our Board of Directors. Mr. Shrader’s shares and options to purchase additional shares as provided for by the employment agreement were also cancelled. Mr. Shrader accepted the termination of his employment agreement but has claimed he is owed approximately $12,500 for accrued wages, unpaid expenses and severance. The Board of Directors has evaluated these claims and disputes that Mr. Shrader is owed any additional amounts. To date, no further action has been taken by Mr. Shrader to pursue these claims.

On October 19, 2010, National Asset Recovery Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Advanced Recovery Florida, a sole proprietorship, and Michael James Blackburn, the owner of Advanced Recovery Florida (the “Owner”).

After the Agreement was entered into, a number of conditions were not satisfied or completed by the respective parties and no assets belonging to Blackburn were ever transferred to the Company. Although efforts were made by the Company and Blackburn to resolve these issues, it was ultimately agreed to that the Agreement, the Employment Agreement and the Shares issued to Blackburn would be rescinded and cancelled. As of the date of this Report, a definitive agreement to cancel the Agreement, Employment Agreement and Blackburn’s Shares has not yet been entered into. The Company, however, considers both the Agreement and the Employment Agreement as having been cancelled and has provided notice of its position to Blackburn. The Company has also made demand on Blackburn for the return of the Shares.

Commencing in December 2010, the Company experienced significant changes to management. Mr. Shrader was terminated as our COO and also removed as a Director on December 16, 2010. On December 16, 2010, a majority of the Company’s shareholders also caused Mr. Forhan to be removed from the Board of Directors and elected William A. Glynn and Bradley Wilson as new Directors. Following these events, Mr. Forhan assumed the responsibilities of our COO and Mr. Glynn became the new Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Wilson became Chairman of our Board of Directors and also was appointed to serve as our Secretary.

Due to the material changes in the composition of our executive management, both Mr. York and Mr. Kuechenberg voluntarily resigned from their positions on the Board of Directors on January 31, 2011 and February 21, 2011, respectively. As of the date, the vacancies created from these departures have not been filled and Mr. Glynn and Mr. Wilson represent all current members of our Board of Directors.

As per the above note Note 5-Common Stock, the Company did not issue the shares relating to the private offering dated August 27, 2010 until March 31, 2011 due to the oversight of the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer. The shares have been issued and are outstanding as of March 31, 2011.

In order to meet the Company’s operating capital needs for the first quarter of 2011 the Company has borrowed funds from York &Kassing Services, Ltd., a related party. The notes are due one year from the time each advance was made and have a yearly interest rate of 5%. As of June 30, 2011, the total outstanding principal balance owed to York & Kassing Services,Ltd. is $243,340. A detail of the related party notes and advances payable as of the date of this Report as follows:

Note Holder	Principal Amount		Due Date
York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	31,690	January 4, 2012
York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	40,151	February 7, 2012
York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	89,124	March 28, 2012
York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	28,169	April 22, 2012
Other Advances from York & Kassing	$	54,205	To Be Determined

The Company had losses from continuing operations of $366,075 during the quarter ended June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, the Company had negative working capital of $288,261. The Company had cash on hand of $189 at June 30, 2011, which is not sufficient to meet our current cash requirements for the next twelve months.

The Company expects to incur additional losses until sufficient sales of its services are achieved or alternative revenue streams can be created. The Company’s total sales figure for the Three and Six months ended June 30, 2011 is $76,135, however the Company is still operating at a loss and substantial sales volumes have not yet been achieved. The Company continues to need operating capital to continue operations. There can be no assurance that the Company's future revenues will ever be significant or that the Company's operations will ever be profitable.

We were incorporated in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on August 1, 2000, originally under the name Nasus Consulting, Inc. On March 5, 2009, we completed a statutory merger (solely for the purpose of redomicile) with a Nevada corporation by the same name. On March 12, 2009, we amended our Articles of Incorporation to increase our authorized common shares to 200,000,000. From inception until May 27, 2009, we provided professional information technology (“IT”) services, including software and hardware installation, data conversion, training, and software product modifications to businesses. On May 27, 2009, our principal shareholders and officers, Russell R. Desjourdy and Lynn Desjourdy, together with all of our remaining officers and directors voluntarily resigned from their respective offices and positions effective as of May 27, 2009. All of our assets held as of the May 27, 2009, were then distributed to Mr. Desjourdy as compensation for the voluntary termination of his employment agreement.

Effective as of May 27, 2009, we ceased operating our IT services business, and as a result, no longer derived any revenues from this business. From May 27, 2010 until August 27, 2010, our management was engaged in negotiating the potential purchase or an exclusive licensing arrangement of certain technology from Idea Fabrik SA (“Idea Fabrik”), a company domiciled in Luxembourg. That technology was intended to serve as the foundation platform for the development of a range of Massively Multiplayer Online ("MMO"), virtual reality experiences for online internet entertainment, educational, social and business purposes. We were also engaged in product design, market analysis, testing and evaluation of other related technologies. During 2010, we had to reduce significantly the level of activity in all these areas due to capital constraints that was compounded by the fact that we were a development stage company and did not have any recorded revenues between May 27, 2009 and August 27, 2010.

As a result of these events, our management recommended that we discontinue the development of our MMO and any other technologies and on August 27, 2010 (the “Transaction Date”), our principal shareholder and Chairman, Oleksandr Shalash (“Mr. Shalash”), as well as all of our remaining officers and directors voluntarily resigned from their respective positions effective as of the Transaction Date. On the Transaction Date, Mr. Shalash and Ivan Hrubi (“Mr. Hrubi”), our two (2) principal shareholders, granted options to approximately fifteen (15) investors to acquire all of the 16,000,000 shares they collectively owned. In addition, Messrs. Shalash and Hrubi granted proxies to William G. Forhan to vote their shares. All of our assets held as of the Transaction Date were transferred and delivered to Idea Fabrik in consideration for its agreement to cancel certain debts of the Company, which were evidenced by promissory notes held by Idea Fabrik. Idea Fabrik also agreed to assume other debts of the Company that were owed to a former director. On the Transaction Date, we received a signed general release for each debt that was either cancelled or assumed by Idea Fabrik.

Effective as of the Transaction Date, a new Board of Directors was elected by a majority of shareholders and was comprised of William G. Forhan, Robert Kuechenberg, Brad Shrader and Steven York. The newly elected Board of Directors then appointed Mr. Forhan to serve as our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and appointed Mr. Shrader as our Chief Operating Officer (“COO”). On the Transaction Date, we issued a total of 60,000,000 new shares from our treasury to Mr. Forhan (20,000,000 shares), Ralph Oelbermann (20,000,000 shares) and Dewfish and Company (20,000,000 shares) for services provided to us. The issuance of these shares resulted in a change of our control and on the Transaction Date, these three (3) shareholders collectively owned approximately 70.04% of our outstanding shares.

Effective as of the Transaction Date, we changed our business model to become a forwarding company for the repossession of motor vehicles, construction equipment, watercraft, airplanes and luxury assets. On October 1, 2010, we also changed our name from Nasus Consulting, Inc. to National Asset Recovery Corp. to more accurately associate our corporate name with the type of business we are engaged in. Our stock symbol was also changed from NSUS to REPO for this same reason.

As part of the efforts to grow our business, we acquired all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Advanced Recovery of Florida, a sole proprietorship, from Michael James Blackburn on October 19, 2010, through an Asset Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) in exchange for 625,000 shares (“Shares”) of our common stock and other consideration. Following this transaction and due to financial constraints that affected the parties, the terms and conditions of the Agreement were not satisfied and no assets of Blackburn were ever transferred to us. As a result, both parties verbally agreed to cancel and rescind the transaction including the Employment Agreement with Blackburn. Efforts by the parties to enter into a written agreement to void and nullify the original transaction have not been successful but the Company has notified Blackburn, in writing, that it no longer considers the Agreement or the Employment Agreement to be valid and has demanded that Blackburn return the Shares he received.

Commencing in December 2010, we experienced significant changes to our management. Mr. Shrader was terminated as our COO and also removed as a Director on December 16, 2010, due to disagreements he had with other members of management. On December 16, 2010, a majority of our shareholders also caused Mr. Forhan to be removed from the Board of Directors and elected William A. Glynn and Bradley Wilson as new Directors. Following these events, Mr. Forhan assumed the responsibilities of our COO and Mr. Glynn became our new Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Wilson became Chairman of our Board of Directors and was also appointed to serve as our Secretary.

Due to the material changes in the composition of our executive management, both Mr. York and Mr. Kuechenberg voluntarily resigned from their positions on the Board of Directors on January 31, 2011 and February 21, 2011, respectively. As of the date of this Annual Report, the vacancies created from these departures have not yet been filled and Mr. Glynn and Mr. Wilson represent all current members of our Board of Directors.

In addition and due to declining revenues from operations and our need to lower overhead costs and expenses, we relocated our offices from Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, to Lake Mary, Florida and reduced the number of employees we havefrom six (6) to two (2) individuals. We have also temporarily ceased operating as a repossession forwarding company and are evaluating other business opportunities within the debt collection and asset recovery industry.

Revenue: For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, our total revenues were $9,563 and $76,135 as compared to -0- for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010. The increase in total revenues was a result of the change in our business model on August 27, 2010, to a forwarding company for the repossession of motor vehicles, construction equipment, watercrafts, airplanes and other luxury assets. Between May 27, 2009 and August 27, 2010, we were a development company and generated no revenues.

Cost of Sales: For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, our costs of sales were $22,003 and $68,662, respectively, resulting in a gross profit of $(12,220) and $7,473 as compared to costs of sales of -0- for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010. The increase in cost of sales in 2011 was due to the decision to change our business model on August 27, 2010, to a repossession forwarding company as referenced above. Between May 27, 2009 and August 27, 2010, we were a development company and generated no revenues.

Operating Expenses: For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 our total operating expenses were $50,807 and $308,347, as compared to total operating expenses of $39,420 and $180,024, respectively, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010. This increase was due primarily to increases in salaries, wages and professional fees due to the employment of additional personnel, increased costs resulting from our being a public company and increases in other general and administrative expenses primarily as a result of the decision to change our business model to a repossession company on August 27, 2010.

Net losses: Net losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 were $(61,998) and $(366,075) as compared to net losses of $(56,280) and $(212,744) for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010. The increase in net losses of $(156,464) was a result of increased operating expenses incurred by the Company to implement its repossession forwarding business.

Our financial statements as presented in Item 1 of this Report have been prepared in conformity with US GAAP, which contemplate our continuation as a going concern. However, the report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our financial statements, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The “going concern” qualification results from, among other things, our working capital deficiency, stockholder’s deficiency and our significant operating losses since the Transaction Date. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if we were unable to continue as a going concern.

As of June 30, 2011, we had $188 in cash and, since August 27, 2011, have funded our operations with capital raised through a private offering of our equity securities, which after the deduction of offering related expenses netted us $732,145, and revenues we generated from operations that commenced in November 2010 of approximately $105,333. The capital required to execute our total business vision and objectives is significant and the revenues we currently produce from operations are not sufficient to satisfy our operating expenses or establish adequate working capital reserves to provide for future contingencies. Since January 1, 2011, we have depended and shall continue to depend on related party loans to satisfy our working capital needs and operating expenses. We have recently taken steps to further reduce the number of employees we have and have also relocated our offices to Lake Mary, Florida, in order to reduce rent, utilities and other operating costs. We have also temporarily ceased operations as a repossession forwarding business and are evaluating opportunities to create more economical sources of revenue within the debt collection and asset recovery industry. At this time, however, there is no assurance that we will be successful in generating sufficient revenues from operations or raising additional capital that is required to execute our business objectives.

On January 4, 2011, we executed an unsecured note payable in the principal amount of $31,690.59 with York & Kassing Services, Ltd., a related party. The note bears interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum and all principal and accrued interest are due on January 4, 2012.

On February 7, 2011, we executed an unsecured note payable in the principal amount of $40,150.66 with York & Kassing Services, Ltd., a related party. The note bears interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum and all principal and accrued interest are due on February 7, 2012.

On March 28, 2011, we executed an unsecured note payable in the principal amount of $89,124.38 with York & Kassing Services, Ltd., a related party. The note bears interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum and all principal and accrued interest are due on March 28, 2012.

On April 22, 2011, we executed an unsecured note payable in the principal amount of $28,169.37 with York & Kassing Services, Ltd., a related party. The note bears interest at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum and all principal and accrued interest are due on April 22, 2012.

Our cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2011, were $189 as compared to $7,369 at December 31, 2010. For the Six months ended June 30, 2011, net cash used in operations was $(236,329) as compared to net cash used in operations of $(180,902) for the Six months ended June 30, 2010. For the Six months ended June 30, 2011, the primary use of cash from operations was the loss from operations of $(366,075), the impairment of acquired assets $(67,800) and other income expense $(86,869). For this same period, the primary sources of cash from operations were derived from revenues generated through our repossession business in the amount of $76,135 and interest income in the amount of $2,550. For the Six months ended June 30, 2010, the primary use of cash from operations was the net loss of $(212,744). For this same period, there were no sources of cash from operations since between May 27, 2009 and August 27, 2010, we were a development stage company and had no revenues.

On September 1, 2010, we purchased 400,000 common shares at a cost of $100,000 from Casino Players, Inc. (“CPI”), a publicly traded company that William G. Forhan, our former Chief Executive and Financial Officer, was and continues to be affiliated with. The common shares currently have no value and we cannot predict whether the common shares will ever have any value. As a result, we elected to fully impair the value of the CPI shares as of December 31, 2010. We had no cash flows from investing activities for the Six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010. For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, net cash provided by financing activities was $189,135 and was comprised of cash proceeds from notes payable to a related party, York & Kassing Services, Ltd. For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, net cash provided by financing activities was $83,000 and comprised of notes payable to Idea Fabrik S.A., a Luxemburg based company. On August 27, 2010, all of the notes payable to Idea Fabrik were cancelled and forgiven in consideration for the transfer and assignment of all of the assets that we held on that date.

Note Holder	Principal Amount		Due Date
York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	31,690	January 4, 2012
York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	40,151	February 7, 2012
York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	89,124	March 28, 2012
York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	28,169	April 22, 2012
Other Advances from York & Kassing Services, Ltd.	$	54,205	To Be Determined

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with US GAAP. Our significant accounting policies and estimates are disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010. Due to the nature of our current business, the number of accounting transactions are minimal and involve primarily the recording of operating expenses we incurred and revenues we have derived.

Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), as of the last day of the fiscal period covered by this report, June 30, 2011. The term disclosure controls and procedures means our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive and Financial Officer (the "Certifying Officer") to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our Certifying Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of June 30, 2011. Based on this evaluation, our Certifying Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of this date.

On June 13, 2011, a lawsuit was filed against us by UH-SI, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Plaintiff”) seeking damages in the amount of $75,137,50 together with costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. The action arose out of an agreement that we allegedly entered into on November 29, 2010 to book and reserve rooms at the Palm Beach Marriott Singer Island beach Resort (the “Hotel”) for a series of upcoming sales seminars that had been planned between February and May 2011. The complaint further alleges that on January 5, 2011, we cancelled all of the events that were subject to the agreement. The Plaintiff contends that it was not able to resell all of the reserved rooms and has been damaged. On July 6, 2011, we served an answer and affirmative defenses denying any liability for damages to the Plaintiff. Since the litigation has been recently commenced, our counsel is not able to provide us with an estimate of the probability of an unfavorable outcome. Nevertheless, an unfavorable outcome in this litigation would, more likely than not, have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

From time to time, we may be involved in other legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business or otherwise which may include legal action against certain members of our prior management. The costs and expenses to resolve any such matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. We could be forced to incur material expenses with respect to these legal proceedings and in the event there is an outcome that is adverse to us, our financial position and prospects could be harmed.

On August 27, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 20,000,000 to DewFish and Company, Inc. in consideration for services rendered to the Company. The shares were issued pursuant to the registration exemption afforded the Company under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the shares were issued for services rendered and the issuance did not involve a public offering of securities.

3.1(ii)

Amended Articles of Incorporation to change the Company’s name from Nasus Consulting, Inc. to National Asset Recovery Corporation effective October 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Definitive Information Statement filed pursuant to Section 14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on September 13, 2010)

3.3

Agreement of Merger dated as of March 5, 2009 between the Company and Nasus Consulting, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, including the Certificate of Merger and other state filings (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed on April 8, 2009)

10.1(iv)

Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 19, 2010, between the Registrant, Advanced Recovery Florida and Michael James Blackburn, the owner of Advanced Recovery Florida (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K as filed on October 25, 2010)

Nevada		04-3526451
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Asset Category		Depreciation/Amortization Period
Furniture and Fixture		5 Years
Office equipment		5 Years
Leasehold improvements		2 Years

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Deferred tax asset due net operating losses	$	330,000		$	242,000
Less: Valuation allowance	$	(330,000	)	$	(242,000	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	0		$	0

Property and Equipment:	Estimated Life	June 30, 2010			June 30, 2011
Computer and software	5 Years	$	18,749		$	0
Total Property and Equipment			18,749			0
Accumulated Depreciation			( 18,749	)		( 0	)
Total Property and Equipment, Net		$	-0-			0

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	22
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	22
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	22
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	23
Item 5.	Other Information.	23
Item 6.	Exhibits.	23
		23
Signature		24

	NATIONAL ASSET RECOVERY CORP.

Dated: August 11, 2011	By:	/s/ William A. Glynn
		Name: William A. Glynn
		Title: Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)