EXHIBIT 5.1

April 29, 2008

China Fundamental Acquisition Corporation Room 2301, World-Wide House 19 Des Voeux Road, Central Hong Kong DIRECT LINE: E-MAIL: OUR REF: YOUR REF (852) 2842 9511 david.lamb@conyersdillandpearman.com DML/lg/259653/(M#872184)

Dear Sirs,

China Fundamental Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”)

We have acted as special Cayman legal counsel to the Company in connection with an initial public offering of (i) 3,750,000 units (the “Units”), with each Unit consisting of one ordinary share, par value US$0.001 per share (the “Shares”) and, one warrant (the “Warrants”), (ii) up to 562,500 Units (the “Over-Allotment Units”) which Chardan Capital Markets, LLC and Maxim Group LLC (collectively, the “Underwriters”) will have a right to purchase from the Company to cover over-allotments, if any, (iii) up to 225,000 Units which the Underwriters will have the right to purchase (the “Purchase Option Units”), (iv) all Shares and all Warrants issued as part of the Units, Over-Allotment Units and Purchase Option Units and (v) all Shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants included in the Units and Over-Allotment Units as described in the prospectus contained in the registration statement on Form F-1 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Registration Statement”).

For the purposes of giving this opinion, we have examined and relied upon copies of the following documents:

(i)  the Registration Statement to be filed by the Company under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about April 29, 2008 as amended;

(ii) a draft of the prospectus (the “Prospectus”) contained in the Registration Statement;

(iii) a draft of the warrant agreement, warrant purchase agreement and the warrant certificate (the “Warrant Documents”) constituting the Warrants; and

China Fundamental Acquisition Corporation

April 29, 2008

Page 2

(iv) drafts of the unit certificates (the “Unit Certificates”) constituting the Units, the Over-Allotment Units and the Purchase Option Units.

We have also reviewed and relied upon (1) the memorandum of association and the articles of association of the Company, (2) copies of the minutes of meetings and written resolutions passed by directors of the Company dated March 26, 2008 (the “Minutes”), (3) the register of members of the Company, (4) a certificate of good standing issued by the Cayman Islands Registrar of Companies on April 22, 2008 (the “Certificate Date”) and (5) such other documents and made such enquiries as to questions of law as we have deemed necessary in order to render the opinion set forth below.

We have assumed (i) the genuineness and authenticity of all signatures, stamps and seals and the conformity to the originals of all copies of documents (whether or not certified) examined by us and the authenticity and completeness of the originals from which such copies were taken; (ii) the accuracy and completeness of all factual representations made in the Prospectus and Registration Statement and other documents reviewed by us, (iii) that the resolutions contained in the Minutes are full and accurate records of resolutions passed at meetings duly convened and held by the directors and shareholders of the Company in accordance with the articles of association of the Company and that such resolutions have not been amended or rescinded and remain in full force and effect; (iv) that there is no provision of the law of any jurisdiction, other than the Cayman Islands, which would have any implication in relation to the opinions expressed herein; (v) the validity and binding effect under the laws of the United States of America of the Registration Statement and the Prospectus and that the Registration Statement will be duly filed with or declared effective by the SEC; (vi) that the Unit Certificates will be governed by the laws of the State of New York and the validity and binding effect under the laws of the State of New York of the Warrant Documents and the Unit Certificates; and (vii) that the Prospectus, when published, will be in substantially the same form as that examined by us for purposes of this opinion.

The obligations of the Company under the Warrant Documents and the Unit Certificates (a) will be subject to the laws from time to time in effect relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, possessory liens, rights of set off, reorganisation,amalgamation, moratorium or any other laws or legal procedures, whether of a similar nature or otherwise, generally affecting the rights of creditors; (b) will be subject to statutory limitation of the time within which proceedings may be brought; (c) will be subject to general principles of equity and, as such, specific performance and injunctive relief, being equitable remedies, may not be available; (d) may not be given effect to by a Cayman Islands court, whether or not it was applying the laws of the State of New York, if and to the extent they constitute the payment of an amount which is in the nature of a penalty and not in the nature of liquidated damages. Notwithstanding any contractual submission to the jurisdiction of specific courts, a Cayman Islands court has inherent discretion to stay or allow proceedings in the Cayman Islands against the Company under the Warrant Documents and the Unit Certificates if there are other proceedings in respect of those Warrant Documents and the Unit Certificates simultaneously underway against the Company in another jurisdiction.

China Fundamental Acquisition Corporation

April 29, 2008

Page 3

We express no opinion as to validity or the binding effect of obligations to make any payment at an increased rate on overdue amounts or on the happening of an event or default or to pay a specified rate or interest on the amount of a judgment after the date of judgement. In addition, any provision expressly or impliedly providing that certain statements, calculations and/or certificates are incorrect on their face or fraudulent will not necessarily prevent judicial enquiry into the merits of a claim of an aggrieved party.

We have made no investigation of and express no opinion in relation to the laws of any jurisdiction other than the Cayman Islands. This opinion is to be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Cayman Islands and is limited to and is given on the basis of the current law and practice in the Cayman Islands.

On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

1.  As at the Certificate Date, the Company is duly incorporated and existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands in good standing (meaning solely that it has not failed to make any filing with any Cayman Islands government authority or to pay any Cayman Islands government fee which would make it liable to be struck off by the Registrar of Companies and thereby cease to exist under the laws of the Cayman Islands)

2. The issue of the Shares has been duly authorised, and when the Shares have been issued, delivered and paid for in the manner described in and pursuant to the terms of the Prospectus and Registration Statement they will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable (meaning that no further sums are payable to the Company with respect to the holding of such Shares).

3. When duly executed and delivered by or on behalf of the Company, the Warrant Documents and the Unit Certificates will constitute the valid and binding obligations of the Company in accordance with the respective terms thereof.

We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the SEC as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the references to us under the headings “Taxation” and “Legal Matters” in the Prospectus contained in the Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act, or the Rules and Regulations of the SEC thereunder.

Yours faithfully,

/s/ CONYERS DILL & PEARMAN

CONYERS DILL & PEARMAN