10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10−Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2013

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-53132

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Nevada	26-1516355
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

Jorge Canning 1410
Ñuñoa, Santiago
Republic of Chile
(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)

+(56) (02) 813 1087
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

____________________________________________________
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]    No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X]    No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [_]	Accelerated filer [_]
Non-accelerated filer [_] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [_]    No [X]

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of August 19, 2013 is as follows:

Class of Securities	Shares Outstanding
Common Stock, $0.001 par value	11,164,134

Chile Mining Technologies Inc.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

Period Ended June 30, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	24
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	30
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	30
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	30
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	31
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	31
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	31
Item 5.	Other Information.	31
Item 6.	Exhibits	31

2

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)

Index

	Page
Interim Consolidated Balance Sheets as at June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and March 31, 2013 (audited)	4
Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	5
Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash flows for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	6
Interim Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency for the three months ended June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and year ended March 31, 2013 (audited)	7
Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements	8

3

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

		June 30, 2013			March 31, 2013
		(unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS
Current
Cash	$	-		$	7,572
Sundry assets and other receivables (Note 13)		29,399			6,216
Inventory (Note 12)					55,707
		29,399			69,495
RESTRICTED CASH (Note 17)		194,660			344,850
DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS (Note 14)		485,266			518,360
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS (Note 8 (b) and 9 (a))		472,741			503,696
PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Note 3)		5,699,949			6,281,163
	$	6,882,015		$	7,717,564
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1,694,268		$	1,636,219
Loan from related parties (Note 5)		1,274,007			1,307,422
Loan from non related parties (Note 15)		285,441			188,903
Obligation under capital lease		164,749			142,706
Due to related parties (Note 5)		2,319,995			2,488,556
Convertible promissory note (Note 8 (c))		190,000			190,000
Promissory notes (Note 4)		2,232,533			2,419,398
		8,160,993			8,373,204
		2,232,533			2,419,398
OBLIGATION UNDER CAPITAL LEASE		1,598,216			1,682,622
UNSECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE (Note 9 (b))		150,000			150,000
SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES (Note 9 (a))		1,684,544			1,619,064
		11,593,753			11,824,890
Stockholders’ Deficiency
Capital stock (Note 6)		11,151			11,151
Additional paid in capital		13,292,219			13,292,219
Accumulated other comprehensive income		223,043			18,509
Deficit		(18,238,151	)		(17,429,205	)
		(4,711,738	)		(4,107,326	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency	$	6,882,015		$	7,717,564

Going Concern (Note 1)
Related Party Transactions (Note 5)
Subsequent Event (Note 18)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements.

4

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

		June 30, 2013			June 30, 2012
Sales	$	50,326		$	34,829
Cost of sales		325,779			378,361
Gross loss		(275,453	)		(343,532	)
Operating expenses:
Impairment of mining rights (Note 7)	$	2,922			3,528
Salaries and wages		58,310			22,694
General and administrative		284,026			497,657
Professional fees		91,800			198,000
		437,058			721,879
Operating loss before the undernoted		(712,511	)		(1,065,411	)
Amortization of deferred finance costs (Note 8 (b) and 9 (a))		(30,955	)		(45,108	)
Imputed interest expense (note 4 and 9 (a))		(65,480	)		(106,405	)
Net Loss for the period		(808,946	)		(1,216,924	)
Foreign exchange translation adjustment for the period		204,534			49,361
Comprehensive loss for the period	$	(604,412	)	$	(1,167,563	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding-basic and diluted		11,151,634			10,089,414
Loss per share – basic and diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.12	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements.

5

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

		2013			2012
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(808,946	)	$	(1,216,924	)
Impairment of mining rights		2,922			3,528
Depreciation		149,582			108,754
Imputed interest expense (Note 4 and 9 (a))		65,480			106,405
Amortization of deferred finance costs		30,955			45,108
Changes in non-cash working capital:
Increase in sundry assets and other receivables		(24,735	)		(32,794	)
Decrease (Increase) in inventory		54,274			(6,273	)
Decrease (Increase) in deposits and other assets		(3,232	)		20,924
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		180,408			(206,339	)
Net Cash used by Operating Activities		(353,292	)		(1,177,611	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Restricted cash		150,190			(344,850	)
Acquisition of mining rights		(2,922	)		(3,528	)
Acquisition of property plant and equipment		-			(13,545	)
Net Cash provided by (used) in Investing Activities		147,268			(361,923	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Advances from related parties		5,128			93,851
Loan from related party		57,837			175,867
Proceeds from (repayment to) non- related party		109,723			(145,596	)
Capital lease proceeds (repayment)		68,116			(105,248	)
Proceeds from secured convertible notes, net		-			2,520,606
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities		240,804			2,539,480
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate changes		(42,352	)		18,333
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash		(7,572	)		1,018,279
Cash at beginning of the period		7,572			300
Cash at end of the period	$	-		$	1,018,579
Supplemental information:
Income tax paid		Nil			Nil
Interest paid		86,212			Nil

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements.

6

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY FOR THE

THREE MONTH PERIOD

ENDED JUNE 30, 2013 AND YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

							Accumulated
	Number of						Other
	common	Capital	Additional Paid				Comprehensive
	shares	stock	in capital		Deficit		Income (loss)		Total
Balance as at March 31, 2012	10,062,275	10,062	11,558,314		(13,043,895	)	27,452		(1,448,067	)
Issue of shares due to non- performance	1,089,359	1,089	(1,089	)
Warrants issued along with convertible debt			710,747						710,747
Beneficial conversion feature embedded in secured convertible notes			1,024,247						1,024,247
Net loss for the year					(4,385,310	)			(4,385,310	)
Foreign currency translation							(8,943	)	(8,943	)
Balance as at March 31, 2013 (audited)	11,151,634	11,151	13,292,219		(17,429,205	)	18,509		(4,107,326	)
Net loss for the period					(808,946	)			(808,946	)
Foreign currency translation							204,534		204,534
Balance as at June 30, 2013(unaudited)	11,151,634	11,151	13,292,219		(18,238,151	)	223,043		(4,711,738	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim consolidated financial statements.

7

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.

The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and Notes thereto together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state the financial position of the Company at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the results of its operations for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, and its cash flows for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012. In addition, some of the Company’s statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q may be considered forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results. The results of operations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chile Mining Technologies, Inc. (the “Company” or “Chile Mining”), and its subsidiary Minera Licancabur S.A. (“Minera”) (99.99% owned by the Company). All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Organization

On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into and closed a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with Minera, a Chilean company, and its shareholders, pursuant to which the Company acquired 99.9% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Minera in exchange for 6,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, which constituted 83.33% of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement and after giving effect to the Cancellation Agreement described below. The acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein Minera is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entity have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized.

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who is also one of the former shareholders of Minera, retained one share of Minera, constituting 0.1% of Minera’s issued and outstanding capital stock. The acquisition of Minera was structured to allow the CEO to retain one share of Minera in order to comply with Chilean legal requirements to have at least two record owners of its capital stock. Upon the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, the CEO entered into a nominee agreement with the Company pursuant to which he agreed to act as the record holder of such share, but agreed that all other rights to the share, including the right to receive distributions on the share, vote the share and be the beneficial owner of the share, rest in the Company.

As a condition precedent to the consummation of the Share Exchange Agreement, on May 12, 2010, the Company also entered into a cancellation agreement (the “Cancellation Agreement”) with Halter Financial Investments, LP (“HFI”) and Mr. Pierre Galoppi, the controlling stockholders, whereby HFI and Mr. Galoppi agreed to the cancellation of an aggregate of 3,600,500 shares of common stock owned by them.

8

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

Private Placement Transaction

On May 12, 2010, the Company also completed a private placement transaction with a group of accredited investors. Pursuant to a securities purchase agreement that was entered into with the investors and Minera (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), the Company issued to the investors an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $5,809,000, or $2.78 per share, and warrants (the “Closing Warrants”) to purchase up to 1,044,803 shares of our common stock. The Closing Warrants have a term of four years, with an exercise price of $3.61 per share (subject to customary adjustments), are exercisable on a net exercise or cashless basis and are exercisable by investors at any time after the closing date.

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company also agreed to certain “make good” provisions. Under the “make good” provisions, the Company issued additional warrants (the “Make Good Warrants”) to the investors to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of its common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which will only become exercisable if the company does not meet certain financial performance targets in 2011 and 2012. The “make good” provisions established minimum net income thresholds of $14,382,102 and $15,179,687 for the 2011 and 2012 fiscal years, respectively. If, in a given fiscal year, 90% of the applicable minimum net income threshold is not met, such aggregate number of Make Good Warrants will become exercisable equal to the amount by which the Company’s actual net income is less than the applicable financial target, divided by the financial target, and multiplied by 2,089,593. In connection with the private placement, the Company also entered into (i) a registration rights agreement, pursuant to which the Company is obligated to register the shares of common stock issued to investors, including the shares of common stock underlying the warrants, within a pre-defined period and (ii) a closing escrow agreement, with Halter Financial Securities, Inc., as placement agent, and Securities Transfer Corporation, as escrow agent, for deposit of funds by the investors. The company also entered into lock-up agreements with each of its directors and officers, pursuant to which each of them agreed not to transfer any shares of capital stock held directly or indirectly by them for a one year period following the effective date of a registration statement covering the shares issued in connection with the private placement.

Convertible Promissory Note and Make Good Warrant

Halter Financial Group, L.P. (“HFG”) provided certain advisory services to the Company in connection with the acquisition of Minera and the private placement transaction described above. Pursuant to an advisory agreement that Minera entered into with HFG on April 16, 2009, HFG agreed to (a) advise Minera with regard to its desire to effect a combination transaction with a U.S. domiciled public shell corporation, (b) help Minera identify suitable investment bank(s) to act as placement agent for its contemplated private placement transactions and (c) counsel management on matters related to the operating a U.S. domiciled public company. Under the terms of the advisory agreement, HFG was entitled to receive a cash payment of $450,000 at the closing of the reverse acquisition of Minera. In lieu of such cash payment, HFG agreed to accept a cash payment of $260,000 and a promissory note issued by the Company in the principal amount of $190,000 that accrues simple annual interest at a rate of 3% per annum (the “HFG Note”). The HFG Note is due and payable on the sooner of the closing of our next equity financing (including the receipt of additional funds by the Company from any subsequent closing of the May 12 private placement) or the 180th day following the date of its issuance. In addition, at any time that the HFG Note remains outstanding, it may be converted at HFG’s option into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $2.78. At the closing, HFG was also issued a “Make Good” warrant, to purchase up to 985,104 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “HFG Make Good Warrant”). The terms of the HFG Make Good Warrant are identical to the terms of the Make Good Warrants issued to the investors in the private placement.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. This contemplates that assets will be realized and liabilities and commitments satisfied in the normal course of business.

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $8,131,594 and has incurred a deficit of $18,238,151 for the cumulative period to June 30, 2013. On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Investors (i) up to $3.5 million of eleven percent (11%) secured convertible notes (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. The Notes and warrants were issued in two tranches. The first tranche issued on May 8, 2012 contained (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $2,120,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 530,000 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,120,000. The second tranche issued on June 7, 2012 contained (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $1,015,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 253,750 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,015,000.

9

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

In addition, during the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company raised and issued to an accredited investor $150,000 of eleven percent (11%) unsecured convertible note to purchase the Company’s common stock. The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing and upon future profitable operations from the production of copper. Management has plans to seek additional capital through private placements and public offering of its capital stock. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Although there are no assurances that management's plans will be realized, management believes that the Company will be able to continue operations in the future. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)-Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”), to establish an optional two- step analysis for impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles other than goodwill. The standard is effective for financial statements of periods beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which requires entities to disclose additional information for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). For items reclassified out of AOCI and into net income in their entirety, entities are required to disclose the effect of the reclassification on each affected line item of net income. For AOCI reclassification items that are not reclassified in their entirety into net income, a cross reference to other required U.S. GAAP disclosures is required. This information may be provided either in the notes or parenthetically on the face of the statement that reports net income, provided that all the information is disclosed in a single location. However, an entity is prohibited from providing this information parenthetically on the face of the statement that reports net income, if it has items that are not reclassified in their entirety into net income. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

2. COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION

On May 12, 2010, Chile Mining Technologies, Inc completed an acquisition of Minera pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement. The acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein Minera is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entity have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized.

10

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

3. PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

	June 30, 2013			March 31, 2013
		Accumulated
	Cost	Depreciation	Net	Net
	$	$	$	$
Santa Filomena Plant	1,026,655	-	1,026,655	1,103,687
Land-Santa Filomena Plant	49,277	-	49,277	52,974
Land- Mina Al Abuelo Plant	256,376	-	256,376	275,613
Ana Maria Plant and equipment	5,712,701	1,507,356	4,205,345	4,674,415
Machinery under construction	162,296	-	162,296	174,474
	7,207,305	1,507,356	5,699,949	6,281,163

Property Plant and Equipment is translated into U.S. Dollars using the rate of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. The Santa Filomena Plant is not being amortized as plant is under construction. Depreciation for the period amounted to $149,582 ($108,754 in 2012). Included in property, plant and equipment are amounts relating to capital leases having a cost of $2,122,132 ($2,281,360 as at March 31, 2013) and accumulated depreciation of $285,431 ($249,253 as at March 31, 2013).

4. PROMISSORY NOTES

Promissory notes payable to related parties were unsecured and consisted of the following:

Company	Interest Rate		June 30,		March 31,
			2013		2013
Ivan Vergara	Nil	$	315,124	$	341,500
Jorge Pizarro	Nil		199,144		215,813
Geominco EIRL	Nil		1,718,265		1,862,085
Total Long Term		$	2,232,533	$	2,419,398

All promissory notes are valued at fair market value at inception. These notes do not bear interest and had an original maturity date of March 31, 2013. On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into Loan Repayment Agreements (the “Repayment Agreements”) with holders of promissory notes of the Company (each, a “Lender”). Pursuant to the Repayment Agreements, each Lender agreed that the Company is entitled to defer payment, and the Lender shall not demand payment, of any amounts due under certain loans made by the Lender to the Company, and the Lender shall not commence the exercise of any remedies it may have against the Company or any of its assets arising out of the Company’s breach of its obligations under the loans until the later of: (i) twelve (12) months from the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and (ii) such time as the Company reports positive net income in quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the deferment shall be operative only so long as any Notes remain outstanding.

based on the above agreement, these notes have been classified as current as of June 30, 2013.

The Company recognized a discount on the face value of the loans at inception to adjust the carrying value to the fair value. Fair value was calculated by using the net present value of the loans, at an assumed interest rate of 18%. The amount of the discount, being $1,404,458 was recorded in “Additional paid in capital” on the opening balance sheet.

During the year ended March 31, 2011, the promissory note holders forgave $661,552 in debt. The transaction was accounted for as a capital transaction with related parties and the company credited ‘Additional paid in capital’ with $661,552.

In addition, the Company credited additional paid in capital with $13,835 (refer to Note 8 (c)).

11

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

The discounts are being amortized over the lives of the promissory notes using the effective interest method, with interest expense being recorded as an expense in the related period. The Company recognized interest expense to amortize discounts on promissory notes to related parties for the three month period ended June 30, 2013 in the amount of $nil ($76,563 in 2012).

5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

a) Transactions with related parties

i) As of June 30, 2013, the Company has loans payable to related parties for $1,274,007. Loan for $147,043 is unsecured, free of interest and was originally payable on March 31, 2012. The balance of the outstanding loans for $1,126,964 is unsecured, free of interest and payable on demand. On May 8, 2012, the Company entered Loan Repayment Agreements (the “Repayment Agreements”) with related parties of the Company (each, a “Lender”). Pursuant to the Repayment Agreements, each Lender agreed that the Company is entitled to defer payment, and the Lender shall not demand payment, of any amounts due under certain loans made by the Lender to the Company, and the Lender shall not commence the exercise of any remedies it may have against the Company or any of its assets arising out of the Company’s breach of its obligations under the loans until the later of: (i) twelve (12) months from the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and (ii) such time as the Company reports positive net income in quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the deferment shall be operative only so long as any Notes remain outstanding. See Note 4.

ii) During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company expensed fees to three directors for total of $50,000. The Company expensed fees to the CFO for $37,800. The expense for the CFO for the three month includes a commitment to issue 6,000 shares of common stock.

iii) During the quarter, the Company had equipment rental and consulting expenses of $nil to a related party, related by virtue of common control.

The transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties under common control.

b) The company owes the following amounts to related parties:

(i) Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities are amounts owing for services provided to directors and officers for a total of $150,000

ii) As of June 30, 2013, the Company owes to Geominco E.I.R.L. $2,139,243 and Geominco S.A, $180,752, entities in which a director has an interest for a total of $2,319,995. This advance is unsecured non-interest bearing and due on demand.

On May 8, 2012, the Company entered Loan Repayment Agreements (the “Repayment Agreements”) with related parties of the Company (each, a “Lender”). Pursuant to the Repayment Agreements, each Lender agreed that the Company is entitled to defer payment, and the Lender shall not demand payment, of any amounts due under certain loans made by the Lender to the Company, and the Lender shall not commence the exercise of any remedies it may have against the Company or any of its assets arising out of the Company’s breach of its obligations under the loans until the later of: (i) twelve (12) months from the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and (ii) such time as the Company reports positive net income in quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the deferment shall be operative only so long as any Notes remain outstanding. See Note 4.

12

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

6. CAPITAL STOCK

Authorized:

Preferred Stock; $0.001 par value 10,000,000 shares
Common Stock: $0.001 par value 100,000,000 shares

Issued and outstanding:

Preferred Stock: Nil
Common Stock: 11,151,634 common shares (March 31, 2013: 11,151,634 common shares)

On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into and closed the Share Exchange Agreement with Minera and its shareholders, pursuant to which the Company acquired 99.9% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Minera in exchange for 6,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, which constituted 83.33% of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement and after giving effect to the Cancellation Agreement.

As a condition precedent to the consummation of the Share Exchange Agreement, on May 12, 2010, the Company also entered into the Cancellation Agreement HFI and Mr. Pierre Galoppi, the controlling stockholders, whereby HFI and Mr. Galoppi agreed to the cancellation of an aggregate of 3,600,500 shares of common stock owned by them.

On May 6, 2010, the Company entered into a letter agreement that outlined the proposed terms of a standby facility of credit with AIBC International Corp. (SR), or AIBC. Under the letter agreement, the Company could request an advance from AIBC for up to an aggregate of $3 million, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. In connection with the execution of the letter agreement, the Company issued to AIBC 75,000 shares of common stock.

On May 12, 2010, the Company also completed a private placement transaction with a group of accredited investors. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement that was entered into with the investors and Minera, the Company issued to the investors an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $5,809,000, or $2.78 per share, and the Closing Warrants to purchase up to 1,044,803 shares of common stock. The Closing Warrants have a term of four years, bear an exercise price of $3.61 per share (subject to customary adjustments), are exercisable on a net exercise or cashless basis and are exercisable by investors at any time after the closing date (refer to Note 8 (b)).

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company also agreed to certain “make good” provisions. Under the “make good” provisions, the Company issued additional warrants (the “Make Good Warrants”) to the investors to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of its common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which will only become exercisable if the company does not meet certain financial performance targets in 2011 and 2012. The “make good” provisions established minimum net income thresholds of $14,382,102 and $15,179,687 for the 2011 and 2012 fiscal years, respectively. If, in a given fiscal year, 90% of the applicable minimum net income threshold is not met, such aggregate number of Make Good Warrants will become exercisable equal to the amount by which the Company’s actual net income is less than the applicable financial target, divided by the financial target, and multiplied by 2,089,593. Halter Financial Group, L.P. (“HFG”) provided certain advisory services to the Company in connection with the acquisition of Minera and the private placement transaction. At the closing, HFG was also issued a “Make Good” warrant, to purchase up to 985,104 shares of the Company's common stock (the “HFG Make Good Warrant”). The terms of the HFG Make Good Warrant are identical to the terms of the Make Good Warrants issued to the investors in the private placement.

The Company was unable to meet minimum income thresholds in 2011 and again in 2012. The Company is obligated to issue 3,074,698 common shares on a cashless basis to meet the “make good” provisions of the “Make Good Warrants’. The Company transferred $6,608,097 from derivative liabilities to the credit of additional paid in capital (see note 8 (c)). In addition, the Company transferred $3,128,605 from redeemable common stock to additional paid in capital (see note 8(b)).

13

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company did not issue any shares for exercise of make good warrants on a cashless basis. During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued 1,089,359 common shares for exercise of 1,094,809 make good warrants on a cashless basis.

7. IMPAIRMENT OF MINING RIGHTS

The Company has expensed the mining rights, since the Company currently has no formal plan to exploit these mining rights.

8(a) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivative financial instruments, as defined in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-10-15-83 Derivatives and Hedging, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.

The Company generally does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company has entered into certain other financial instruments and contracts, such as secured convertible debenture and warrant financing arrangements that are either (i) not afforded equity classification or (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts. As required by ASC 815, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in the financial statements.

The following table summarizes the components of the derivative liabilities as of June 30, 2013 and inception of the instruments:

May 2010 Private Placement:		June 30, 2013		Inception May 12, 2010
Investor warrants	$	-	$	1,519,144
Broker warrants		-		273,442
Credit facility warrants		-		523,440
Make Good warrants		-		131,891
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants		-		62,176
Total derivative liabilities	$	-	$	2,510,093

At inception, warrants were classified as liabilities due to the fact that they were considered not to be indexed to the company's own stock and due to the firm registration rights embodied in the agreements. At March 31, 2012 all variability and rights resulting in liability classification were removed and the instruments were re-measured and reclassified to equity.

The following table summarizes the common shares indexed to the derivative instruments as of June 30, 2013 and inception of the instruments:

May 2010 Private Placement:	June 30, 2013	Inception May 12, 2012
Investor warrants	-	1,044,803
Broker warrants	-	188,062
Credit facility warrants	-	360,000
Make Good warrants	-	47,597
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants	-	22,438
	-	1,662,900

14

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

Make Good warrants indexed to 1,537,349 shares of common stock vested when the Company did not meet the performance condition as of March 31, 2011 and additional Make Good warrants indexed to 1,537,349 shares of common stock vested when the Company did not meet the March 31, 2012 performance condition. At March 31, 2012, all variability and rights resulting in liability classification were removed and the instruments were re-measured and reclassified to equity

8(b) MAY 2010 PRIVATE PLACEMENT

On May 12, 2010, the Company commenced a private placement of (i) 2,089,593 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $5,809,000, or $2.78 per share, (ii) Closing Warrants to purchase up to 1,044,803 shares of common stock, and (iii) Make Good Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of common stock (the “May 2010 Private Placement). In connection with the May 2010 Private Placement, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement related to the common stock and warrants that requires the Company to, among other things, file a Registration Statement within 65 days from the closing of the May 2010 Private Placement and achieve effectiveness as soon as possible , but in no event later than the 180^th day following the Final Closing Date or the 5^th trading day following the date on which the Company is notified that the initial Registration Statement will not be reviewed or is no longer subject to review and comments. The Registration Rights Agreement does not provide for an alternative or contain a penalty in the event the Company is unable to fulfill its requirements. As a result of the registration rights obligation to file within a specified period, which is presumed not to be within the Company’s control, the Company is required to classify the common stock outside of stockholders’ equity as redeemable common stock. At March 31, 2012, the Company reclassified these securities to permanent equity due to the fact that the registration requirement had been met.

The Closing warrants included in the May 2010 Private Placement are indexed to 1,044,803 shares of the Company’s common stock and may be exercised until the fourth anniversary of their issuance at an exercise price of $3.61 per share. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company also agreed to issue Make Good warrants to investors to purchase up to an aggregate amount of 2,089,593 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share which became exercisable when the Company did not meet certain financial performance targets in 2011 and 2012. The “make good” provisions established minimum net income thresholds of $14,382,102 and $15,179,687 for the 2011 and 2012 fiscal years, respectively. If, in a given fiscal year 90% of the applicable minimum net income threshold was not met, such aggregate number of Make Good warrants became exercisable equal to the amount by which the Company’s actual net income was less than the applicable financial target, divided by the financial target, and multiplied by 50% of the total warrant shares underlying the warrant agreement. The Closing and Make Good warrants were evaluated under the guidance of ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities and Equity for purposes of their classification. Due to the Make Good warrants contingent exercise provisions, they did not meet the definition of “indexed to a Company’s own stock” and were required to be classified as liabilities and measured at inception and an ongoing basis at fair value. As of March 31, 2012 the Make Whole warrants were no longer contingently exercisable and the registration rights agreement had been fulfilled. Accordingly, at March 31, 2012, the warrants met the 8 conditions for equity classification provided in ASC 815-40 and were revalued and reclassified to equity.

The total basis in the financing was allocated first to derivative instruments, required to be classified as liabilities with the remaining basis being allocated to the common stock.

15

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

The following table illustrates the initial allocation:

					Financing
		Proceeds			Cost			Final
		Allocation			Allocation			Allocation
Gross proceeds	$	5,809,000		$	-		$	5,809,000
Financing costs paid in cash		-			(522,810	)		(522,810	)
		5,809,000			(522,810	)		5,286,190
Derivative liabilities:
Closing warrants:
Investor warrants		(1,519,144	)		-			(1,519,144	)
Broker warrants		-			(273,442	)		(273,442	)
Credit facility warrants		-			(523,440	)		(523,440	)
Make Good warrants		(131,891	)		-			(131,891	)
Total derivative liabilities		(1,651,035	)		(796,882	)		(2,447,917	)
Redeemable common stock		(4,157,965	)		-			(4,157,965	)
Financing costs paid in cash		-			407,792			407,792
Financing costs paid with warrants		-			621,568			621,568
Total redeemable common stock		(4,157,965	)		1,029,360			(3,128,605	)
Deferred finance costs	$	-		$	290,332		$	290,332

The Company amortized deferred finance cost by $nil during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 (2012: $27,275). Deferred finance costs outstanding as of June 30, 2013 relating to this financing is $ Nil (2012: $81,043).

The direct financing costs are allocated to the financial instruments (redeemable common stock and warrants), based upon their relative fair values. Amounts related to the warrants are recorded as deferred finance costs and amortized through charges to interest expense over the term of the arrangement using the effective interest method while amounts related to the common stock directly offset the carrying value of the redeemable common stock.

8(c) CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE AND MAKE GOOD WARRANT

HFG provided certain advisory services to the Company in connection with the acquisition of Minera and the May 2010 Private Placement. Pursuant to an advisory agreement that Minera entered into with HFG on April 16, 2009, HFG agreed to (a) advise Minera with regard to its desire to effect a combination transaction with a U.S. domiciled public shell corporation, (b) help Minera identify suitable investment bank(s) to act as placement agent for its contemplated private placement transactions and (c) counsel management on matters related to the operating a U.S. domiciled public company. Under the terms of the advisory agreement, HFG was entitled to receive a cash payment of $450,000 at the closing of the reverse acquisition of Minera. In lieu of such cash payment, HFG agreed to accept a cash payment of $260,000 and the HFG Note in the principal amount of $190,000 that accrues simple annual interest at a rate of 3% per annum. The HFG Note is due and payable on the sooner of the closing of the next equity financing (including the receipt of additional funds by the Company from any subsequent closing of the May 12 private placement) or the 180th day following the date of its issuance. In addition, at any time that the HFG Note remains outstanding, it may be converted at HFG’s option into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $2.78.

The Company has evaluated the terms and conditions of the HFG Note under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The embedded conversion feature (“ECF”) is an equity-linked feature that is not clearly and closely related to the risks of the host debt instrument. However, current accounting standards afforded an exemption to bifurcation of the ECF because it is both indexed to the Company’s own stock and otherwise met the definition of Conventional Convertible based upon the fixed conversion price.

16

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

At the closing, the Company had also issued to HFG the HFG Make Good Warrant for the purchase of up to 985,104 shares of common stock. The terms of the HFG Make Good Warrant are identical to the terms of the Make Good Warrants issued to the investors in the private placement and accordingly, they did not meet the definition of “indexed to a Company’s own stock” and were required to be classified as liabilities and measured at inception and an ongoing basis at fair value. As of December 31, 2012, HFG had exercised warrants for 492,552 common shares.

The fair value of the HFG Note was estimated based upon the present value of its future cash flows, using credit risk adjusted rates, as enhanced by the fair value of the ECF. Since the Company does not have an established credit rating, the credit risk adjusted yield of 15.51% was determined by reference to comparable instruments in public markets and industry-specific risk. The fair value of the ECF was determined using the Monte Carlo Simulation (“MCS”). MCS is an option-based model that embodies assumptions that would likely be considered by market participants who trade the financial instrument. In addition to more traditional assumptions, such as stock price, trading volatilities and risk-free rates, MCS assumptions include credit risk, interest risk and redemption considerations. Significant assumptions included in the MSC valuation technique were as follows:

		Assumption
Linked common shares		68,345
Stock price	$	2.78
Expected life (years)		4.00
Volatility (based on peers)		58.24%- 63.55%
Risk adjusted yield		15.51%- 16.94%
Risk adjusted interest rate		1.52%- 1.65%

The advisory fee expense was determined based upon the fair value of the HFG Note and the HFG Make Good Warrants. In accordance with APB 14, the premium on the HFG Note, representing the difference between the fair value and the face value of the note, was recorded to additional paid in capital.

On May 8, 2012, the Company also entered into Loan Repayment Agreements (the “Repayment Agreements”) with HFG (“Lender”). Pursuant to the Repayment Agreements, Lender agreed that the Company is entitled to defer payment, and the Lender shall not demand payment, of any amounts due under certain loans made by the Lender to the Company, and the Lender shall not commence the exercise of any remedies it may have against the Company or any of its assets arising out of the Company’s breach of its obligations under the loans until the later of: (i) twelve (12) months from the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and (ii) such time as the Company reports positive net income in quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the deferment shall be operative only so long as any notes remain outstanding.

The following table illustrates the initial allocation:

		Initial
		Allocation
Convertible Promissory Note	$	190,000
Make Good warrants		62,176
Additional paid in capital		13,835
Total	$	266,011

17

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

Fair value Disclosures:

ASC 820, Fair value Measurements and Disclosures, provides requirements for disclosure of liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in periods subsequent to the initial recognition. Financial instruments arising from the May 2010 Private Placement that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are (i) the investor warrants, (ii) the broker warrants, (iii) the credit facility warrants and (iii) Make Good warrants, respectively.

The warrants were valued using the Lattice technique, and the Company estimated (i the volatility, based upon a reasonable peer group, (iii) the risk free rate as the published rate for zero coupon government securities with terms consistent with the contractual term.

Information and significant assumptions embodied in our warrant valuations (including ranges for certain assumptions) as of March 31, 2012 are illustrated in the following tables:

	Fair value	Closing	Make Good
	hierarchy	Warrants	warrants
Warrants to purchase common stock:
Stock price (1)	(2)	$2.00	$2.00
Strike price	n/a	$3.61	$0.01
Volatility (2)	(2)
Range of volatilities		55.47% - 78.29%	55.47% - 78.29%
Equivalent volatility		65.65%	65.65%
Term (years) (3)	(3)	2.12	2.12
Risk-free rate (2)	(2)
Range of risk free rates		0.07% -0.33%	0.07% -0.33%
Equivalent risk free rate		0.18%	0.18%
Dividends	n/a	--	--

Fair value hierarchy:

(1)	Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, or derived there from. The Company used its trading market price as of March 31, 2012 as input into the model which is a Level 1 input.
(2)	Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable. The Binomial Lattice model provides for multiple assumptions related to volatility and risk free rate over the remaining term of the warrants. The equivalents or averages of these assumptions are also provided above. The Company uses the current published yields for zero- coupon US Treasury Securities for its risk free rate. The Company did not have a historical trading history sufficient to develop an internal volatility rate for use in the Binomial Lattice model. As a result, the Company has used a peer approach wherein the historical trading volatilities of certain companies with similar characteristics and who had a sufficient trading history were used as an estimate of the Company’s volatility. In developing this model, no one company was weighted more heavily.
(3)	Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs. Inputs for which any parts are Level 3 inputs are classified as Level 3 in their entirety. The remaining term used equals the remaining contractual term as our best estimate of the expected term. The probability-weighted outcomes of achieving the performance conditions are also a Level 3 input.

Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of the Company’s common stock, which has a high estimated volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, our income will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.

18

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

The following tables summarize the effects on the Company’s income (loss) associated with changes in the fair values of the derivative financial instruments for the year ended March 31 2012:

May 2010 Private Placement:
Investor warrants	$	468,072
Broker warrants		84,251
Credit facility warrants		304,200
Make Good warrants		(1,086,244	)
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants		(512,091	)
	$	(741,812	)

The following represents a reconciliation of the changes in our derivatives and the related changes in fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and three month period ended June 30, 2013:

Balances at March 31, 2011	$	5,866,285
Fair value adjustments		741,812
Transfer to additional paid in capital		(6,608,097	)
Balances at March 31, 2012	$	-
Balances at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013	$	-

9 (a) SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES

$3,135,000 Face Value Secured Convertible Notes, due May 8, 2017 $  1,684,544

On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Investors (i) up to $3.5 million of eleven percent (11%) secured convertible notes (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. The Notes and warrants were issued in two tranches. The first tranche issued on May 8, 2012 contained (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $2,120,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 530,000 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,120,000. The second tranche issued on June 7, 2012 contained (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $1,015,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 253,750 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,015,000. The notes are payable quarterly in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, with the first payment due on September 30, 2012. The Notes mature on May 8, 2017. The notes are convertible at the option of the holder at any time on or prior to the Maturity Date into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $2.00 per share (subject to appropriate adjustments for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination, reclassification or similar transaction after the issuance date). The Investor Warrants have a strike price of $2.00 per share (subject to appropriate adjustments for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination, reclassification or similar transaction after the issuance date). The Investor Warrants are immediately exercisable, on a net exercise or cashless basis, and have a term of five years.

The Company has evaluated the terms and conditions of the convertible notes and warrants under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The conversion features meet the definition of conventional convertible for purposes of applying the conventional convertible exemption. The definition of conventional contemplates a limitation on the number of shares issuable under the arrangement. The notes are convertible into a fixed number of shares and there are no down round protection features contained in the contracts. Since the convertible notes achieved the conventional convertible exemption, the Company was required to consider whether the hybrid contracts embody a beneficial conversion feature. A beneficial conversion feature is present when the fair value of the underlying common share exceeds the effective conversion price of the conversion option. The effective conversion price is calculated as the basis in the financing arrangement allocated to the hybrid convertible debt agreement, divided by the number of shares into which the instrument is indexed. As a result of this evaluation under the aforementioned standards, the Company concluded that a beneficial conversion feature was present in the amount of $1,024,247 in the $3,135,000 face value convertible note. The warrants did not contain any terms or feature that would preclude equity classification.

19

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

The purchase price allocation for the convertible notes resulted in a debt discount of $1,734,994. The discount on the notes will be amortized through periodic charges to interest expense over the term of the debenture using the effective interest method. Amortization of debt discount amounted to $65,480 during the quarter ended June 30, 2013. In addition, amortization of deferred finance charges amounted to $30,955 for the period ended June 30, 2013, resulting in balance of $472,741 as of June 30, 2013. The purchase price allocation is as follows:

					Inception
Gross proceeds				$	3,135,000
Less: Financing costs				$	614,394
Net proceeds				$	2,520,606
Allocated as follows:
Carrying value (fair value of debt component)					(1,400,006	)
Paid in capital (warrants)	$	(710,747	)
Paid in capital (beneficial conversion feature)	$	(1,024,247	)	$	(1,734,994	)

Significant assumptions included in the MSC valuation technique to determine the fair value of the debt component were as follows:

	Assumption
Linked common shares	1,567,500
Stock price	$ 2.20
Expected life (years)	5.00
Volatility (based on peers)	58.43%- 83.82%
Risk adjusted interest rate	0.15%- 0.77%

9(b) UNSECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES

On December 13, 2012, CMT consummated a private placement financing with a group of accredited investors for an aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $150,000 In connection with the financing, the Company issued to investors unsecured convertible notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $150,000. The convertible notes have a five year term, carry an interest rate of 11% per annum, and are convertible into the Company’s common stock at $2.00 per share. Net proceeds from the offering are expected to be used for general corporate purposes and working capital.

10. SEGMENT INFORMATION

As at June 30, 2013, the Company operated in one reportable segment, being the exploration for and the development of mining rights in the Republic of Chile.

20

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

11. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, based on the funds available to the Company, in order to maintain its daily operations. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company's management to sustain the future development of the business.

The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. The Company upon approval from its Board of Directors will balance its overall capital structure through new share issues or by undertaking other activities as deemed appropriate under the specific circumstances. As such, the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its daily operations. In order to procure materials and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts as needed.

Management reviews its capital management approach on an ongoing basis and believes that this approach, given the foregoing paragraph and the relative size of the Company, is reasonable.

There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

12. INVENTORY

The quantity of material in ore on the leach pad is based on surveyed volumes of mined material. Sampling and assaying determine the estimated amount of copper contained in material delivered to the leach pad. As at March 31, 2013 there was only supply inventory ($nil as at June 30, 2013).

13. SUNDRY ASSETS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

		June 30, 2013		March 31,2013
Prepaid expenses	$	7,381	$	6,195
Advance for materials	$	22,018		-
Other advances		-		21
	$	29,399		6,216

14. DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS

		June 30, 2013		March 31, 2013
Value added taxes (“VAT”) (i)		420,571		448,810
Equipment deposit		64,695		69,550
	$	485,266	$	518,360

i) Value added tax balance represents net VAT recoverable which may be refunded or applied toward future corporate income tax liability.

15. LOAN FROM NON RELATED PARTIES

(a) During the year ended March 31, 2012, Minera received a loan from Exportadora e Importadora Bengolea (Bengolea), a non-related party for $500,000 for additional working capital. This loan is free of interest and payable in six monthly equal installments commencing six months after the receipt of loan. Minera will be obligated to pay interest at 10% per annum in the event of default. The Company defaulted on the loan and in settlement of the $500,000, Bengolea agreed to accept a one-time payment of interest of $60,000. On May 19, 2012 Minera finalized an agreement between one of its debtors and Bengolea that released Minera from this obligation. The loan was fully paid during the year ended March 31, 2013.

21

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

(b) The Company received a loan of $285,441 from a non-related party. This loan is secured on personal assets of a Company’s director and payable on demand.

16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK FACTORS

The fair value of a financial instrument is the estimated amount that the Company would receive or pay to settle the financial assets and financial liabilities as at the balance sheet date. The book value of sundry assets and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related party approximate fair values at the balance sheet dates.

The fair value of the long-term debt has been estimated by discounting future cash flows at a rate offered for debt of similar maturities and credit quality.

All financial instruments except for derivative financial instruments and cash and cash equivalent are classified as level 3. Both cash and cash equivalents and derivative financial instruments are classified as level 1.

		June 30, 2013				March 31, 2013
		Carrying				Carrying
Assets/Liabilities		Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value
Cash	$	-	$	-	$	7,572	$	7,572
Restricted cash	$	194,660	$	194,660	$	344,850	$	344,850
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1,694,268	$	1,694,268	$	1,636,219	$	1,636,219
Due to related party	$	2,319,995	$	2,319,995	$	2,488,556	$	2,488,556
Loan from related party	$	1,274,007	$	1,274,007	$	1,307,422	$	1,307,422
Loan from non related party	$	285,441	$	285,441	$	188,903	$	188,903
Convertible promissory note	$	190,000	$	190,000	$	190,000	$	190,000
Promissory notes	$	2,232,533	$	2,232,533	$	2,419,398	$	2,419,398
Unsecured convertible note	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	150,000
Secured convertible notes	$	1,684,544	$	1,684,544	$	1,619,064	$	1,619,064

Interest rate risk

The company’s exposure to interest rate fluctuations is not significant.

Credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of amounts receivable. The Company is not exposed to material losses on its accounts receivable and future revenues.

Commodity price risk

The ability of the Company to develop its properties and the future profitability of the Company is directly related to the market price of certain minerals. The Company does not currently use derivative financial instruments to reduce its exposure to commodity price risk.

Liquidity risk

The Company’s exposure to liquidity risk is dependent on the collection of amounts receivable and the ability to raise funds to meet purchase commitments and to sustain operations. The company controls its liquidity risk by managing working capital and cash flows.

22

CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(Formerly Latin America Ventures, Inc.)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2013

(Amounts expressed in U.S. Dollars)

(Unaudited)

Foreign currency risk

The Company is exposed to foreign currency risk as substantially all of the Company’s cash is denominated in Chilean Pesos. This risk is partially mitigated by the fact that a significant portion of the costs associated with the mining claims and deferred exploration expenditures are incurred in Chilean Pesos.

17. RESTRICTED CASH

On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Investors (i) up to $3.5 million of eleven percent (11%) secured convertible notes (the “Notes”), which mature on the five year anniversary of the date of issuance and shall be convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), at $2.00 per share (subject to adjustment) and (ii) warrants (the “Investor Warrants,” and together with the Notes, the “Securities”) to purchase such number of shares of Common Stock equal to fifty percent (50%) of the number of shares of Common Stock that the Notes purchased by the Investors may be convertible into, at an exercise price of $2.00 per share (subject to adjustment).

On May 8, 2012, the Company completed an initial closing pursuant to the Purchase Agreement in which the Company issued and sold to Investors (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $2,120,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to initially purchase an aggregate of 530,000 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,120,000.

On June 7, 2012, the Company completed its second and final closing pursuant to the Purchase Agreement in which the Company issued and sold to investors (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $1,015,000 and (ii) investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 507,500 shares of Common Stock, for an aggregate gross proceeds of $1,015,000.

As a result of the two closings, the Company issued and sold to investors a total amount of $3,135,000 in notes and warrants to purchase a total of 1,037,500 shares of Common Stock. In accordance with these agreements, the Company must keep the equivalent of one year worth of interest payments in an escrow account at all times. As interest payments become due, the Company must continually maintain one year’s worth of payments in the escrow account and as such cannot use this for any other purpose. As of June 30, 2013, the Company was in default of the restricted cash balance required from this agreement. The Company plans to replenish the account in the second quarter of the current fiscal year.

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On July 12, 2013, the Company secured a loan from Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”) in the amount of $73,500. In consideration for the loan, the Company issued to Asher a convertible promissory note in principal amount of $73,500. The note will mature nine months from the date of issuance, has an interest rate of 8% per annum, and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at Asher’s option beginning 180 days from the date of issuance.

23

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “target,” “plan,” “optimistic,” “intend,” “aim,” “will” or similar expressions which are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements include, among others, those concerning market and industry segment growth and demand and acceptance of new and existing products; any projections of sales, earnings, revenue, margins or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; as well as all assumptions, expectations, predictions, intentions or beliefs about future events. You are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, including those identified in Item 1A “Risk Factors” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013, as well as assumptions, which, if they were to ever materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and our other filings with the SEC. These reports attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and prospects. The forward-looking statements made in this report speak only as of the date hereof and we disclaim any obligation, except as required by law, to provide updates, revisions or amendments to any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in our expectations or future events.

Use of Terms

Except where the context otherwise requires and for the purposes of this report only, references in this report to:

• “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our,” are to the combined business of CMT and its 99.9% owned subsidiary, Minera, but do not include the stockholders of CMT;
• “CMT” are to Chile Mining Technologies Inc., a Nevada corporation;
• “Minera” are to Sociedad Minera Licancabur, S.A., a Chilean company;
• “Chile” and “Chilean” are to the Republic of Chile;
• “Peso” are to the Chilean peso, the legal currency of Chile;
• “U.S. dollar,” “$” and “US$” are to the legal currency of the United States.
• “SEC” are to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission;
• “Securities Act” are to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;
• “Exchange Act” are to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
• “Exploration” means the process of locating commercially viable concentrations of minerals to mine; and
• “Exploitation” means the act of extracting a mineral resource from source material.

Overview

We are a mineral extraction company based in the Republic of Chile, with copper as our principal “pay metal.” Our founders, Messrs. Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana and Jorge Fernando Pizarro Arriagada, have refined the electrowin process in a way that permits it to be used at a relatively small mine and/or tailings sites. Electrowinning is a process in which positive and negative electrodes are placed in an acidic solution containing copper ions, and an electric current passed through the solution causes the copper to be deposited on the negative electrodes so that it can be collected. We have obtained rights to conduct our mineral extraction operations at several sites in and around the Coquimbo region, which is located in north-central Chile, approximately 400 kilometers north of Santiago. While these sites each have their own mineral deposits, we will procure the majority of our source material from non-traditional sources, including tailings, ore, or a combination thereof, by purchasing rights to such source material at smaller sites, where it is not economical for larger open-pit mining companies to operate, due largely to the transportation costs associated with moving source materials to fixed processing sites.

24

By utilizing Minimum Intrusion Non-traditional Input, or MINI, plants, we are able to build scalable, less expensive plants closer to source material deposits, thereby resulting in significant processing savings. In addition, since smaller sites generally require higher copper prices, due to transportation costs, to operate profitably, these deposits can currently be purchased at a discount. By utilizing this strategy, we are able to reduce costs and operate profitably with smaller deposits.

The initial design capacity of each MINI plant is between approximately 1,200 and 2,000 metric tons of annual copper cathode output. Each MINI plant can be expanded on a modular basis in increments of 1,500 metric tons. We believe that the installed cost for a new 1,500 metric ton MINI plant, with the ability to produce tailings, at the average location, is about $3,000,000, or $2,000 per metric ton of annual capacity. Expanding the capacity of an existing MINI plant will cost between $400 and $800 per metric ton, depending on the site. Once the available source material deposits at and around the site of an existing MINI plant have been depleted, we anticipate that we can recover up to 70% of the cost of constructing a new MINI plant by relocating the support structures and processing equipment from the original MINI plant.

By reducing unit costs and carefully managing the average source material grade, we estimate that the MINI plant technology will allow us to break even at copper prices as low as US$1.00 per pound, or US$2,204 per metric ton. As of August 13, 2013, copper was trading at $7,295 per metric ton on the London Metals Exchange, or LME. As the price of finished copper has increased, however, there has been increased interest in raw copper ore from a number of “higher cost” producers that can increase their production volumes by buying ore in the market from small miners. Historically, these producers would not have been interested in raw ore purchases, as they could not generate profits at lower finished copper prices. However the increase in finished copper prices has made third-party purchase attractive for a number of additional producers. While the additional producers entering the market for minerals has not had an effect on the cost of the ore, it has put the miners into a stronger negotiating position on the sales of their ore. As such, the market now demands that producers must purchase the ore by providing payment upon delivery of the ore, as opposed to the historical practice of providing payment following the sale of the finished copper. This shift in the market has affected our need for working capital substantially, in that we now require approximately $1 million per MINI plant to purchase enough ore to operate at full capacity.

Initially, we plan to sell our copper cathodes to Madeco, the largest cable producer in Chile. Based on our discussions with Madeco, we expect that the selling price will be at a 3% discount from the price for copper, adjusted for purity, on the LME. We expect that sales will be made under purchase orders where cash will be paid upon delivery. We anticipate that this arrangement will provide us with immediate cash flow with which we will use to fund our current operations. In the future, as business volume grows, we may elect to sell our copper cathodes at the generally higher prices prevailing on the LME.

Since our inception on January 2, 2008, we have focused our activities on acquiring mineral rights and sites on which to construct our MINI plants. Since starting construction in the fall of 2008, we have successfully completed our first scalable MINI plant, designated as the Ana Maria plant, located about 30 kilometers northeast of the town of Illapel, in the mining district of Matancilla. We have been testing the production of copper cathodes at the Ana Maria plant since late April 2009. In July 2009, we produced our first commercial run of copper cathodes.

We commenced operations at the Ana Maria plant in July 2009. The Ana Maria plant was taken off-line the first week of May 2010 in order to increase the capacity of this facility. As a result, the total capacity of the Ana Maria plant increased from 120 metric tons per month to 180 metric tons per month, effectively increasing its capacity by 50%. We resumed operations at the plant with the additional capacity in place at the beginning of August 2010. We believe that the site can be progressively expanded to about 5,000 metric tons per annum on a modular basis in increments of 500 to 1,000 metric tons, subject to the market price for copper and the grade and quantity of source materials available to be processed. In addition, we are also further enhancing our electrowin-based recovery techniques to reduce costs and improve the yield of the copper out of the mineral spectrum.

Our second plant, Santa Filomena, is approximately 75% complete as of the date of this report, and we have also begun preparatory work at one additional site we have under our control, in anticipation of the construction of additional MINI plants over the next 18 to 24 months.

The table below summarizes the capacity of each of our current and planned MINI plants.

District	Plant	Initial Production	Initial Capacity/Year
Matancilla	Ana Maria	Operating	1,200 MT (1)
Salamanca	Santa Filomena	4th Calendar Quarter 2013	1,200 MT
Combarbala	Gabriella	2nd Calendar Quarter 2014	1,200 MT

(1) Since we commenced operations at the Ana Maria plant, total annual capacity has been increased to 2,225 metric tons. To date, the majority of our capital expenditures have been used for the construction of our facilities.

25

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012

The following tables set forth key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated, both in dollars and as a percentage increase/decrease over prior year numbers for the periods indicated in dollars. The financial data for the three months ended June 30, 2013, reflects the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2014, while the financial data for the same period in 2012 reflects the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2013.

The following table sets forth key components of our results of operations for the periods indicated.

		Three Months Ended
		June 30,					% Increase/
		2013			2012		(Decrease)
Sales	$	50,326		$	34,829		44%
Cost of sales		325,779			378,361		(14%	)
Gross loss		(275,453	)		(343,532	)	(20%	)
Operating expenses:
Impairment of mining rights		2,922			3,528		(17%	)
Salaries and wages		58,310			22,694		157%
General and administrative expenses		284,026			497,657		(43%	)
Professional fees		91,800			198,000		(54%	)
Total operating expenses		437,058			721,879		(39%	)
Operating loss before the undernoted		(712,511	)		(1,065,411	)	(33%	)
Amortization of deferred finance costs		(30,955	)		(45,108	)	(31%	)
Imputed interest expense		(65,480	)		(106,405	)	(38%	)
Net Loss		(808,946	)		(1,216,924	)	(34%	)
Foreign exchange translation adjustment		204,534			49,361		(314%	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(604,412	)	$	(1,167,563	)	(48%	)

Sales. We had $50,326 in sales for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared with sales of $34,829 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we consummated a financing transaction and were working on repair and maintenance at our Ana Maria plant in order to resume production. As a result, we operated at a very limited capacity. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Ana Maria plant was operating at less than full capacity due to limited working capital.

Cost of sales. Cost of sales includes direct costs associated with the sale of our products. Cost of sales was $325,779 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared with $378,361 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of 14%. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we were working to resume and increase copper production at the Ana Maria plant. In addition, we also developed several mines in order to deliver mineral to the plant during the quarter. Due to our capital infusion coming in the middle of the quarter ended June 30, 2012, our cost of sales expenses were limited by the timing. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we were operating with limited working capital, which resulted in limited production and cost of sales expenses.

Gross loss. Gross loss is equal to the difference between our sales and the cost of sales. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we had a gross loss of $275,453, as compared with a gross loss of $343,532 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in gross loss was primarily due to the increase in sales and decrease in cost of sales as discussed above.

Operating expenses. Our operating expenses consist of impairment of mining rights, salaries and wages, general and administrative expenses and professional fees.

26

    Impairment of mining rights. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, impairment of mining rights was $2,922, as compared with $3,528 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. We have expensed mining rights, where we currently have no formal plans to exploit these mining rights.

    Salaries and wages. Salaries and wages amounted to $58,310 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $22,694 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, an increase of 157%. During the middle of the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company received an infusion of capital. For more than half of the quarter, the Company was operating on a very limited basis, which held salaries and wages to a minimum. During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company operated well below capacity. As a result, it maintained a much smaller staff, and minimized salaries and wages.

    General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of building maintenance and repairs, energy costs, and general expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2013, were $284,026, as compared with $497,657 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of 43%. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we had limited production and worked to minimize expenses. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company received an infusion of capital and was preparing and growing the Company to support the production of copper.

    Professional fees. Professional fees consist of legal fees, accounting fees and other fees associated with our operations as a public company. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, professional fees were $91,800, as compared with $198,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of 54%. It is necessary to hire specialized professionals at times to complete tasks outside of the Company’s current expertise. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company completed a fund raise, which resulted in a spike in professional fees. As a result, during the past quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company was able to rely less on outside professional fees as compared to the same period ended 2012.

Amortization of deferred finance costs. On May 12, 2010, we consummated a private placement of common shares, warrants and make good warrants. The direct financing costs were allocated to the financial instruments (redeemable common stock and warrants), based upon their relative fair values. Amounts related to the warrants were recorded as deferred finance costs and amortized through charges to interest expense over the term of the arrangement using the effective interest method, while amounts related to the common stock directly offset the carrying value of the redeemable common stock. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we amortized deferred finance costs of $nil, as compared to $27,275 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain accredited investors for issue of eleven percent (11%) secured convertible notes and warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. The Company evaluated the terms and conditions of the convertible notes and warrants under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The financing costs are being amortized over the term of the notes. Amortization of the deferred finance charges amounted to $30,955 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, and $17,833 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Imputed interest expense. Imputed interest expense is related to unsecured, no interest promissory notes from related parties . These loans were valued at fair value at inception. We recognized a discount on the face value of the loans at inception to adjust the carrying value to the fair value. Discounts associated with these notes are being amortized over the lives of the promissory notes using the effective interest method, with interest expense being recorded as an expense in the related period. We recognized interest expense to amortize discounts on promissory notes to related parties for the three months ended June 30, 2013, in the amount of $nil, as compared with $76,563 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

The Company has evaluated the terms and conditions of the convertible notes and warrants under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The conversion features meet the definition of conventional convertible for purposes of applying the conventional convertible exemption. The definition of conventional contemplates a limitation on the number of shares issuable under the arrangement. The notes are convertible into a fixed number of shares and there are no down round protection features contained in the contracts. Since the convertible notes achieved the conventional convertible exemption, the Company was required to consider whether the hybrid contracts embody a beneficial conversion feature. A beneficial conversion feature is present when the fair value of the underlying common share exceeds the effective conversion price of the conversion option. The effective conversion price is calculated as the basis in the financing arrangement allocated to the hybrid convertible debt agreement, divided by the number of shares into which the instrument is indexed. As a result of this evaluation under the aforementioned standards, the Company concluded that a beneficial conversion feature was present in the amount of $1,024,247 in the $3,135,000 face value convertible note. The warrants did not contain any terms or feature that would preclude equity classification. The purchase price allocation for the convertible notes resulted in a debt discount of $1,734,994. The discount on the notes will be amortized through periodic charges to interest expense over the term of the debenture using the effective interest method. Amortization of debt discount amounted to $65,480 during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 ($ 29,842 for June 30, 2012).

27

Net loss. As a result of the cumulative effect of the foregoing factors, we generated a net loss of $808,946 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to a net loss of $1,216,924 for three months ended June 30, 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2013, we had cash of $nil and had a working capital deficit of $8,131,594. The following table provides detailed information about our net cash flow for the periods indicated.

Cash Flow

		Three Months Ended
		June 30,
		2013			2012
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(353,292	)	$	(1,177,611	)
Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities		147,268			(361,923	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		240,804			2,539,480
Effect of exchange rate change in cash		(42,352	)		18,333
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(7,572	)		1,018,279
Cash at beginning of the period		7,572			300
Cash at end of the period	$	-		$	1,018,579

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $353,292 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $1,177,611 for the same period in 2012. The decrease during the three month period ended June 30, 2013, was mainly due to the decreased net loss, as well as the increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company was operating with limited capital, whereas during the prior period the Company had received additional capital and was working to resume production.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities was $147,268 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to net cash used of $361,923 for the same period in 2012. This increase was due to the decrease in restricted cash during the three months ended June 30, 2013

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $240,804 for the three months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to $2,539,480 for the same period in 2012. This decrease was mainly due to the proceeds from our capital leasing and the private placement completed in the quarter ended June 30, 2012.

In the first fiscal quarter of 2013, we completed a private placement in which we issued and sold to certain accredited investors (i) eleven percent (11%) secured convertible notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $3,135,000, which notes are convertible into shares our common stock at $2.00 per share (subject to adjustment) and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 783,750 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.00 per share (subject to adjustment). As a result of this private placement, we raised approximately $3.1 million in gross proceeds, which left us with approximately $2.6 million in net proceeds after the deduction of offering expenses.

Overall Liquidity and Capital Resources

Through the course of our operations we have realized that MINI plants which process tailings will now require an additional module at a cost of $500,000 in order to more efficiently process the tailings. Accordingly, the total cost of construction per such MINI plant has increased from our initial estimates of $2,500,000 to approximately $3,000,000. In addition, due to the higher copper prices, there has been a significant increase in demand for raw copper ore. As a result, the market now demands that any producer must purchase the ore by providing payment at the delivery of the ore, and therefore, we now require approximately $500,000 per MINI plant to purchase enough ore to operate at full capacity.

28

Initially, we estimated that it would cost approximately $2,500,000 in working capital per plant to construct and operate the plant to capacity. However, as discussed above, we now require approximately $3,500,000 in working capital per MINI plant in order to construct and operate the plant to capacity.

As discussed above, in May and June 2012 we raised $3,135,000 in a private placement transaction. Approximately $1.9 million of the proceeds of the transaction were used for upgrades to our Ana Maria facilities and attempting to secure sources of mineral for our plants for the future, with the remaining proceeds used for working capital and transaction expenses, including interest payments due on the convertible notes sold in the transaction. In order to operate our existing facilities at full capacity we will require additional funding, primarily for the procurement of raw minerals.

Obligations under Material Contracts

As of March 31, 2013, there were outstanding loans made to the Company in the aggregate amount of $5,160,583. On May 8, 2012, we and certain creditors which had loaned us an aggregate of approximately $4,267,774 entered into separate loan repayment agreements whereby the creditors each agreed to allow us to defer repayment of their respective loans until the later of (i) May 8, 2013, and (ii) such time as we report positive net-income on our quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the SEC.

The following table lists the loans which will be deferred in accordance with the loan repayment agreements:

Creditor	Amount of Loan(s) Deferred
Jorge Fernando Pizarro Arriagada	CLP$104,579,970
Iván Orlando Vergara Huerta	CLP$165,770,750
Jorge Orellana	CLP$103,985,073
Geominco E.I.R.L	CLP$1,409,005,176
Halter Financial Group	US$190,000

Inflation

Inflation does not materially affect our business or the results of our operations.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our stockholders.

Seasonality

The price of copper on the LME fluctuates during the year, with prices tending to be stronger in the April to September period, and weaker in the October to March period, subject to global supply and demand.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those we believe are most important to portraying our financial conditions and results of operations and also require the greatest amount of subjective or complex judgments by management. Judgments and uncertainties regarding the application of these policies may result in materially different amounts being reported under various conditions or using different assumptions. There have been no material changes to the critical accounting policies previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of this report.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

29

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Disclosure controls and procedures refer to controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15(e), our management has carried out an evaluation, with the participation and under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana, and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Gerard Pascale, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2013. Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation, Messrs. Orellana and Pascale, determined that because of the material weaknesses described in Item 9A “Controls and Procedures” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, which we were still in the process of remediating as of June 30, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. See Item 9A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, for the description of these weaknesses.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes.

During its evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013, our management identified material weaknesses related to our need to increase our qualified accounting personnel and to enhance the supervision, monitoring and reviewing of financial statements preparation processes. As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, our management has identified the steps necessary to address the material weaknesses, and in the three months ended June 30, 2013, we continued to implement these remedial procedures. In addition to holding regular Board and Audit Committee meeting, the Company has increased its qualified accounting staff.

Other than in connection with the implementation of the remedial measures described above and in the 10-K, there were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these, or other matters, may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Not applicable.

30

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

We have not sold any equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2013, that were not previously disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or a current report on Form 8-K that was filed during the quarter.

No repurchases of our common stock were made during the three months ended June 30, 2013.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

We have no information to disclose that was required to be in a report on Form 8-K during the three months ended June 30, 2013, but was not reported. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

The list of exhibits in the Exhibit Index to this report is incorporated herein by reference.

31

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1935, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 19, 2013	CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
	By:	/s/ Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana
		Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana, Chief Executive
		Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
	By:	/s/ Gerard Pascale
		Gerard Pascale, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
		Accounting Officer)

32

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description
31.1	Certifications of Principal Executive Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certifications of Principal Financial Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certifications of Principal Executive Officer furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certifications of Principal Financial Officer furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101	Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (furnished herewith).

33

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chile Mining Technologies Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2013

/s/ Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana
Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Gerard Pascale, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Chile Mining Technologies Inc.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 19, 2013

/s/ Gerard Pascale
Gerard Pascale
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana, the Chief Executive Officer of CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 19^th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana
Jorge Osvaldo Orellana Orellana
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Chile Mining Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Chile Mining Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gerard Pascale, the Chief Financial Officer of CHILE MINING TECHNOLOGIES INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 19^th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Gerard Pascale
Gerard Pascale
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Chile Mining Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Chile Mining Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

XML

INVENTORY

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

INVENTORY [Text Block]

12. INVENTORY

The quantity of material in ore on the leach pad is based on surveyed volumes of mined material. Sampling and assaying determine the estimated amount of copper contained in material delivered to the leach pad. As at March 31, 2013 there was only supply inventory ($nil as at June 30, 2013).

XML

Schedule of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation 1	$ 3,135,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation 2	614,394
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation 3	2,520,606
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation 4	(1,400,006)
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation 5	(710,747)
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation 6	(1,024,247)
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation 7	$ (1,734,994)

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$ (808,946)	$ (1,216,924)
Impairment of mining rights	2,922	3,528
Depreciation	149,582	108,754
Imputed interest expense	65,480	106,405
Amortization of deferred finance costs	30,955	45,108
Changes in non-cash working capital:
Increase in sundry assets and other receivables	(24,735)	(32,794)
Decrease (Increase) in inventory	54,274	(6,273)
Decrease (Increase) in deposits and other assets	(3,232)	20,924
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	180,408	(206,339)
Net Cash used by Operating Activities	(353,292)	(1,177,611)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Restricted cash	150,190	(344,850)
Acquisition of mining rights	(2,922)	(3,528)
Acquisition of property plant and equipment	0	(13,545)
Net Cash provided by (used) in Investing Activities	147,268	(361,923)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Advances from related parties	5,128	93,851
Loan from related party	57,837	175,867
Proceeds from (repayment to) non- related party	109,723	(145,596)
Capital lease proceeds (repayment)	68,116	(105,248)
Proceeds from secured convertible notes, net	0	2,520,606
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities	240,804	2,539,480
Effects of foreign currency exchange rate changes	(42,352)	18,333
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash	(7,572)	1,018,279
Cash at beginning of the period	7,572	300
Cash at end of the period	0	1,018,579
Supplemental information:
Income tax paid	0	0
Interest paid	$ 86,212	$ 0

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS [Text Block]

5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

a) Transactions with related parties

i) As of June 30, 2013, the Company has loans payable to related parties for $1,274,007. Loan for $147,043 is unsecured, free of interest and was originally payable on March 31, 2012. The balance of the outstanding loans for $1,126,964 is unsecured, free of interest and payable on demand. On May 8, 2012, the Company entered Loan Repayment Agreements (the “Repayment Agreements”) with related parties of the Company (each, a “Lender”). Pursuant to the Repayment Agreements, each Lender agreed that the Company is entitled to defer payment, and the Lender shall not demand payment, of any amounts due under certain loans made by the Lender to the Company, and the Lender shall not commence the exercise of any remedies it may have against the Company or any of its assets arising out of the Company’s breach of its obligations under the loans until the later of: (i) twelve (12) months from the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and (ii) such time as the Company reports positive net income in quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the deferment shall be operative only so long as any Notes remain outstanding.  See note 4.

ii) During the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company expensed fees to three directors for total of $50,000. The Company expensed fees to the CFO for $37,800. The expense for the CFO for the three month includes a commitment to issue 6,000 shares of common stock.

iii) During the quarter, the Company had equipment rental and consulting expenses of $nil to a related party, related by virtue of common control.

The transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at the exchange amount, which is the amount of consideration established and agreed to by the related parties under common control.

b) The company owes the following amounts to related parties:

(i) Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities are amounts owing for services provided to directors and officers for a total of $150,000

ii) As of June 30, 2013, the Company owes to Geominco E.I.R.L. $2,139,243 and Geominco S.A, $180,752, entities in which a director has an interest for a total of $2,319,995. This advance is unsecured non-interest bearing and due on demand.

On May 8, 2012, the Company entered Loan Repayment Agreements (the “Repayment Agreements”) with related parties of the Company (each, a “Lender”). Pursuant to the Repayment Agreements, each Lender agreed that the Company is entitled to defer payment, and the Lender shall not demand payment, of any amounts due under certain loans made by the Lender to the Company, and the Lender shall not commence the exercise of any remedies it may have against the Company or any of its assets arising out of the Company’s breach of its obligations under the loans until the later of: (i) twelve (12) months from the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and (ii) such time as the Company reports positive net income in quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the deferment shall be operative only so long as any Notes remain outstanding.  See Note 4.

XML

PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Schedule of Property, Plant and Equipment [Table Text Block]

	June 30, 2013			March 31, 2013
		Accumulated
	Cost	Depreciation	Net	Net
	$	$	$	$
Santa Filomena Plant	1,026,655	-	1,026,655	1,103,687
Land-Santa Filomena Plant	49,277	-	49,277	52,974
Land- Mina Al Abuelo Plant	256,376	-	256,376	275,613
Ana Maria Plant and equipment	5,712,701	1,507,356	4,205,345	4,674,415
Machinery under construction	162,296	-	162,296	174,474
	7,207,305	1,507,356	5,699,949	6,281,163

XML

Schedule of Deposits and Other Assets (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Deposits And Other Assets Schedule Of Deposits And Other Assets 1	$ 420,571
Deposits And Other Assets Schedule Of Deposits And Other Assets 2	448,810
Deposits And Other Assets Schedule Of Deposits And Other Assets 3	64,695
Deposits And Other Assets Schedule Of Deposits And Other Assets 4	69,550
Deposits And Other Assets Schedule Of Deposits And Other Assets 5	485,266
Deposits And Other Assets Schedule Of Deposits And Other Assets 6	$ 518,360

XML

SUNDRY ASSETS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

SUNDRY ASSETS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES [Text Block]

13. SUNDRY ASSETS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES

		June 30, 2013		March 31,2013
Prepaid expenses	$	7,381	$	6,195
Advance for materials	$	22,018		-
Other advances		-		21
	$	29,399		6,216

XML

Schedule of Initial Allocation of Convertible Promissory Note and Make Good Warrant (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Convertible Promissory Note And Make Good Warrant 1	$ 190,000
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Convertible Promissory Note And Make Good Warrant 2	62,176
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Convertible Promissory Note And Make Good Warrant 3	13,835
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Convertible Promissory Note And Make Good Warrant 4	$ 266,011

XML

Schedule of Fair Value of Financial Instruments, by Balance Sheet Grouping (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 1	$ 0
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 2	0
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 3	7,572
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 4	7,572
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 5	194,660
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 6	194,660
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 7	344,850
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 8	344,850
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 9	1,694,268
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 10	1,694,268
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 11	1,636,219
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 12	1,636,219
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 13	2,319,995
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 14	2,319,995
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 15	2,488,556
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 16	2,488,556
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 17	1,274,007
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 18	1,274,007
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 19	1,307,422
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 20	1,307,422
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 21	285,441
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 22	285,441
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 23	188,903
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 24	188,903
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 25	190,000
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 26	190,000
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 27	190,000
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 28	190,000
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 29	2,232,533
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 30	2,232,533
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 31	2,419,398
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 32	2,419,398
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 33	150,000
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 34	150,000
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 35	150,000
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 36	150,000
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 37	1,684,544
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 38	1,684,544
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 39	1,619,064
Fair Value Of Financial Instruments And Risk Factors Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Instruments, By Balance Sheet Grouping 40	$ 1,619,064

XML

INVENTORY (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Inventory 1	$ 0

XML

SECURED AND UNSECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Schedule of Secured Convertible Debt [Table Text Block]

$3,135,000 Face Value Secured Convertible Notes, due May 8, 2017 $ 1,684,544

Schedule of Convertible Note Purchase Price Allocation [Table Text Block]

					Inception
Gross proceeds				$	3,135,000
Less: Financing costs				$	614,394
Net proceeds				$	2,520,606
Allocated as follows:
Carrying value (fair value of debt component)					(1,400,006	)
Paid in capital (warrants)	$	(710,747	)
Paid in capital (beneficial conversion feature)	$	(1,024,247	)	$	(1,734,994	)

Schedule of assumptions included in the MSC valuation [Table Text Block]

	Assumption
Linked common shares	1,567,500
Stock price	$2.20
Expected life (years)	5.00
Volatility (based on peers)	58.43%- 83.82%
Risk adjusted interest rate	0.15%- 0.77%

XML

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Schedule of Derivative Liabilities at Fair Value [Table Text Block]

May 2010 Private Placement:		June 30, 2013		Inception May 12, 2010
Investor warrants	$	-	$	1,519,144
Broker warrants		-		273,442
Credit facility warrants		-		523,440
Make Good warrants		-		131,891
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants		-		62,176
Total derivative liabilities	$	-	$	2,510,093

Schedule of Common Shares Indexed to Derivative Instrument [Table Text Block]

May 2010 Private Placement:	June 30, 2013	Inception May 12, 2012
Investor warrants	-	1,044,803
Broker warrants	-	188,062
Credit facility warrants	-	360,000
Make Good warrants	-	47,597
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants	-	22,438
	-	1,662,900

Schedule of Initial Allocation of Total Basis for Derivative Instruments [Table Text Block]

					Financing
		Proceeds			Cost			Final
		Allocation			Allocation			Allocation
Gross proceeds	$	5,809,000		$	-		$	5,809,000
Financing costs paid in cash		-			(522,810	)		(522,810	)
		5,809,000			(522,810	)		5,286,190
Derivative liabilities:
Closing warrants:
Investor warrants		(1,519,144	)		-			(1,519,144	)
Broker warrants		-			(273,442	)		(273,442	)
Credit facility warrants		-			(523,440	)		(523,440	)
Make Good warrants		(131,891	)		-			(131,891	)
Total derivative liabilities		(1,651,035	)		(796,882	)		(2,447,917	)
Redeemable common stock		(4,157,965	)		-			(4,157,965	)
Financing costs paid in cash		-			407,792			407,792
Financing costs paid with warrants		-			621,568			621,568
Total redeemable common stock		(4,157,965	)		1,029,360			(3,128,605	)
Deferred finance costs	$	-		$	290,332		$	290,332

Schedule of Fair Value of HFG Note, Monte Carlo Simulation and Risk-Free Rates [Table Text Block]

		Assumption
Linked common shares		68,345
Stock price	$	2.78
Expected life (years)		4.00
Volatility (based on peers)		58.24%- 63.55%
Risk adjusted yield		15.51%- 16.94%
Risk adjusted interest rate		1.52%- 1.65%

Schedule of Initial Allocation of Convertible Promissory Note and Make Good Warrant [Table Text Block]

		Initial
		Allocation
Convertible Promissory Note	$	190,000
Make Good warrants		62,176
Additional paid in capital		13,835
Total	$	266,011

Schedule of significant assumptions embodied in our warrant valuations [Table Text Block]

	Fair value	Closing	Make Good
	hierarchy	Warrants	warrants
Warrants to purchase common stock:
Stock price (1)	(2)	$2.00	$2.00
Strike price	n/a	$3.61	$0.01
Volatility (2)	(2)
Range of volatilities		55.47% - 78.29%	55.47% - 78.29%
Equivalent volatility		65.65%	65.65%
Term (years) (3)	(3)	2.12	2.12
Risk-free rate (2)	(2)
Range of risk free rates		0.07% - 0.33%	0.07% - 0.33%
Equivalent risk free rate		0.18%	0.18%
Dividends	n/a	- -	- -

Schedule of changes in the fair values of our derivative financial instruments [Table Text Block]

May 2010 Private Placement:
Investor warrants	$	468,072
Broker warrants		84,251
Credit facility warrants		304,200
Make Good warrants		(1,086,244	)
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants		(512,091	)
	$	(741,812	)

Schedule of reconciliation of the changes in our derivatives [Table Text Block]

Balances at March 31, 2011	$	5,866,285
Fair value adjustments		741,812
Transfer to additional paid in capital		(6,608,097	)
Balances at March 31, 2012	$	-
Balances at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013	$	-

XML

Schedule of Initial Allocation of Total Basis for Derivative Instruments (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 1	$ 5,809,000
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 2	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 3	5,809,000
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 4	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 5	(522,810)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 6	(522,810)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 7	5,809,000
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 8	(522,810)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 9	5,286,190
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 10	(1,519,144)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 11	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 12	(1,519,144)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 13	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 14	(273,442)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 15	(273,442)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 16	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 17	(523,440)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 18	(523,440)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 19	(131,891)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 20	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 21	(131,891)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 22	(1,651,035)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 23	(796,882)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 24	(2,447,917)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 25	(4,157,965)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 26	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 27	(4,157,965)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 28	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 29	407,792
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 30	407,792
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 31	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 32	621,568
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 33	621,568
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 34	(4,157,965)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 35	1,029,360
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 36	(3,128,605)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 37	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 38	290,332
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Initial Allocation Of Total Basis For Derivative Instruments 39	$ 290,332

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Related Party Transactions 1	$ 1,274,007
Related Party Transactions 2	147,043
Related Party Transactions 3	1,126,964
Related Party Transactions 4	50,000
Related Party Transactions 5	37,800
Related Party Transactions 6	6,000
Related Party Transactions 7	0
Related Party Transactions 8	150,000
Related Party Transactions 9	2,139,243
Related Party Transactions 10	180,752
Related Party Transactions 11	$ 2,319,995

XML

RESTRICTED CASH (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Restricted Cash 1	$ 3,500,000
Restricted Cash 2	11.00%
Restricted Cash 3	$ 0.001
Restricted Cash 4	$ 2.00
Restricted Cash 5	50.00%
Restricted Cash 6	$ 2.00
Restricted Cash 7	2,120,000
Restricted Cash 8	530,000
Restricted Cash 9	2,120,000
Restricted Cash 10	1,015,000
Restricted Cash 11	507,500
Restricted Cash 12	1,015,000
Restricted Cash 13	$ 3,135,000
Restricted Cash 14	1,037,500

XML

Schedule of significant assumptions embodied in our warrant valuations (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 1	$ 2.00
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 2	2.00
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 3	3.61
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 4	0.01
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 5	55.47%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 6	78.29%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 7	55.47%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 8	78.29%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 9	65.65%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 10	65.65%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 11	2.12
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 12	2.12
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 13	0.07%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 14	0.33%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 15	0.07%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 16	0.33%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 17	0.18%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 18	0.18%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 19	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Significant Assumptions Embodied In Our Warrant Valuations 20	$ 0

XML

NATURE OF OPERATIONS (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Nature Of Operations 1	99.99%
Nature Of Operations 2	99.90%
Nature Of Operations 3	6,000,000
Nature Of Operations 4	$ 0.001
Nature Of Operations 5	83.33%
Nature Of Operations 6	0.10%
Nature Of Operations 7	3,600,500
Nature Of Operations 8	2,089,593
Nature Of Operations 9	5,809,000
Nature Of Operations 10	$ 2.78
Nature Of Operations 11	1,044,803
Nature Of Operations 12	$ 3.61
Nature Of Operations 13	2,089,593
Nature Of Operations 14	$ 0.01
Nature Of Operations 15	14,382,102
Nature Of Operations 16	15,179,687
Nature Of Operations 17	90.00%
Nature Of Operations 18	2,089,593
Nature Of Operations 19	450,000
Nature Of Operations 20	260,000
Nature Of Operations 21	190,000
Nature Of Operations 22	3.00%
Nature Of Operations 23	2.78
Nature Of Operations 24	985,104
Nature Of Operations 25	8,131,594
Nature Of Operations 26	18,238,151
Nature Of Operations 27	3,500,000
Nature Of Operations 28	11.00%
Nature Of Operations 29	2,120,000
Nature Of Operations 30	530,000
Nature Of Operations 31	2,120,000
Nature Of Operations 32	1,015,000
Nature Of Operations 33	253,750
Nature Of Operations 34	1,015,000
Nature Of Operations 35	$ 150,000
Nature Of Operations 36	11.00%

XML

Schedule of Promissory Notes (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 1	$ 0
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 2	315,124
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 3	341,500
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 4	0
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 5	199,144
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 6	215,813
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 7	0
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 8	1,718,265
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 9	1,862,085
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 10	2,232,533
Promissory Notes Schedule Of Promissory Notes 11	$ 2,419,398

XML

PROMISSORY NOTES (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Schedule of Promissory Notes [Table Text Block]

Company	Interest Rate		June 30,		March 31,
			2013		2013
Ivan Vergara	nil	$	315,124	$	341,500
Jorge Pizarro	nil		199,144		215,813
Geominco EIRL	nil		1,718,265		1,862,085
Total Long Term		$	2,232,533	$	2,419,398

XML

NATURE OF OPERATIONS

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

NATURE OF OPERATIONS [Text Block]

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.

The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and Notes thereto together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state the financial position of the Company at June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, the results of its operations for the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, and its cash flows for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012. In addition, some of the Company’s statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q may be considered forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected results. The results of operations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chile Mining Technologies, Inc. (the “Company” or “Chile Mining”), and its subsidiary Minera Licancabur S.A. (“Minera”) ( 99.99% owned by the Company). All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Organization

On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into and closed a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with Minera, a Chilean company, and its shareholders, pursuant to which the Company acquired 99.9% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Minera in exchange for 6,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, which constituted 83.33% of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement and after giving effect to the Cancellation Agreement described below. The acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein Minera is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entity have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized.

The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), who is also one of the former shareholders of Minera, retained one share of Minera, constituting 0.1% of Minera’s issued and outstanding capital stock. The acquisition of Minera was structured to allow the CEO to retain one share of Minera in order to comply with Chilean legal requirements to have at least two record owners of its capital stock. Upon the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, the CEO entered into a nominee agreement with the Company pursuant to which he agreed to act as the record holder of such share, but agreed that all other rights to the share, including the right to receive distributions on the share, vote the share and be the beneficial owner of the share, rest in the Company.

As a condition precedent to the consummation of the Share Exchange Agreement, on May 12, 2010, the Company also entered into a cancellation agreement (the “Cancellation Agreement”) with Halter Financial Investments, LP (“HFI”) and Mr. Pierre Galoppi, the controlling stockholders, whereby HFI and Mr. Galoppi agreed to the cancellation of an aggregate of 3,600,500 shares of common stock owned by them.

Private Placement Transaction

On May 12, 2010, the Company also completed a private placement transaction with a group of accredited investors. Pursuant to a securities purchase agreement that was entered into with the investors and Minera (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”), the Company issued to the investors an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $5,809,000, or $2.78 per share, and warrants (the “Closing Warrants”) to purchase up to 1,044,803 shares of our common stock. The Closing Warrants have a term of four years, with an exercise price of $3.61 per share (subject to customary adjustments), are exercisable on a net exercise or cashless basis and are exercisable by investors at any time after the closing date.

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company also agreed to certain “make good” provisions. Under the “make good” provisions, the Company issued additional warrants (the “Make Good Warrants”) to the investors to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of its common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which will only become exercisable if the company does not meet certain financial performance targets in 2011 and 2012. The “make good” provisions established minimum net income thresholds of $14,382,102 and $15,179,687 for the 2011 and 2012 fiscal years, respectively. If, in a given fiscal year, 90% of the applicable minimum net income threshold is not met, such aggregate number of Make Good Warrants will become exercisable equal to the amount by which the Company’s actual net income is less than the applicable financial target, divided by the financial target, and multiplied by 2,089,593. In connection with the private placement, the Company also entered into (i) a registration rights agreement, pursuant to which the Company is obligated to register the shares of common stock issued to investors, including the shares of common stock underlying the warrants, within a pre-defined period and (ii) a closing escrow agreement, with Halter Financial Securities, Inc., as placement agent, and Securities Transfer Corporation, as escrow agent, for deposit of funds by the investors. The company also entered into lock-up agreements with each of its directors and officers, pursuant to which each of them agreed not to transfer any shares of capital stock held directly or indirectly by them for a one year period following the effective date of a registration statement covering the shares issued in connection with the private placement.

Convertible Promissory Note and Make Good Warrant

Halter Financial Group, L.P. (“HFG”) provided certain advisory services to the Company in connection with the acquisition of Minera and the private placement transaction described above. Pursuant to an advisory agreement that Minera entered into with HFG on April 16, 2009, HFG agreed to (a) advise Minera with regard to its desire to effect a combination transaction with a U.S. domiciled public shell corporation, (b) help Minera identify suitable investment bank(s) to act as placement agent for its contemplated private placement transactions and (c) counsel management on matters related to the operating a U.S. domiciled public company. Under the terms of the advisory agreement, HFG was entitled to receive a cash payment of $450,000 at the closing of the reverse acquisition of Minera. In lieu of such cash payment, HFG agreed to accept a cash payment of $260,000 and a promissory note issued by the Company in the principal amount of $190,000 that accrues simple annual interest at a rate of 3% per annum (the “HFG Note”). The HFG Note is due and payable on the sooner of the closing of our next equity financing (including the receipt of additional funds by the Company from any subsequent closing of the May 12 private placement) or the 180th day following the date of its issuance. In addition, at any time that the HFG Note remains outstanding, it may be converted at HFG’s option into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $2.78. At the closing, HFG was also issued a “Make Good” warrant, to purchase up to 985,104 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “HFG Make Good Warrant”). The terms of the HFG Make Good Warrant are identical to the terms of the Make Good Warrants issued to the investors in the private placement.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. This contemplates that assets will be realized and liabilities and commitments satisfied in the normal course of business.

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $8,131,594 and has incurred a deficit of $18,238,151 for the cumulative period to June 30, 2013. On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Investors (i) up to $3.5 million of eleven percent ( 11%) secured convertible notes (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. The Notes and warrants were issued in two tranches. The first tranche issued on May 8, 2012 contained (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $2,120,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 530,000 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,120,000. The second tranche issued on June 7, 2012 contained (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $1,015,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 253,750 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,015,000.

In addition, during the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company raised and issued to an accredited investor $150,000 of eleven percent ( 11%) unsecured convertible note to purchase the Company’s common stock. The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing and upon future profitable operations from the production of copper. Management has plans to seek additional capital through private placements and public offering of its capital stock. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Although there are no assurances that management’s plans will be realized, management believes that the Company will be able to continue operations in the future. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)-Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”), to establish an optional two- step analysis for impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles other than goodwill. The standard is effective for financial statements of periods beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income , which requires entities to disclose additional information for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). For items reclassified out of AOCI and into net income in their entirety, entities are required to disclose the effect of the reclassification on each affected line item of net income. For AOCI reclassification items that are not reclassified in their entirety into net income, a cross reference to other required U.S. GAAP disclosures is required. This information may be provided either in the notes or parenthetically on the face of the statement that reports net income, provided that all the information is disclosed in a single location. However, an entity is prohibited from providing this information parenthetically on the face of the statement that reports net income, if it has items that are not reclassified in their entirety into net income. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.

XML

PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT [Text Block]

3. PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

	June 30, 2013			March 31, 2013
		Accumulated
	Cost	Depreciation	Net	Net
	$	$	$	$
Santa Filomena Plant	1,026,655	-	1,026,655	1,103,687
Land-Santa Filomena Plant	49,277	-	49,277	52,974
Land- Mina Al Abuelo Plant	256,376	-	256,376	275,613
Ana Maria Plant and equipment	5,712,701	1,507,356	4,205,345	4,674,415
Machinery under construction	162,296	-	162,296	174,474
	7,207,305	1,507,356	5,699,949	6,281,163

Property Plant and Equipment is translated into U.S. Dollars using the rate of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date. The Santa Filomena Plant is not being amortized as plant is under construction. Depreciation for the period amounted to $149,582 ($108,754 in 2012). Included in property, plant and equipment are amounts relating to capital leases having a cost of $2,122,132 ($2,281,360 as at March 31, 2013) and accumulated depreciation of $285,431 ($249,253 as at March 31, 2013).

XML

CAPITAL STOCK

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

CAPITAL STOCK [Text Block]

6. CAPITAL STOCK

Authorized:

Preferred Stock; $0.001 par value 10,000,000 shares
Common Stock: $0.001 par value 100,000,000 shares

Issued and outstanding:

Preferred Stock: nil
Common Stock: 11,151,634 common shares (March 31, 2013: 11,151,634 common shares)

On May 12, 2010, the Company entered into and closed the Share Exchange Agreement with Minera and its shareholders, pursuant to which the Company acquired 99.9% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Minera in exchange for 6,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, which constituted 83.33% of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock on a fully-diluted basis as of and immediately after the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Share Exchange Agreement and after giving effect to the Cancellation Agreement.

As a condition precedent to the consummation of the Share Exchange Agreement, on May 12, 2010, the Company also entered into the Cancellation Agreement HFI and Mr. Pierre Galoppi, the controlling stockholders, whereby HFI and Mr. Galoppi agreed to the cancellation of an aggregate of 3,600,500 shares of common stock owned by them.

On May 6, 2010, the Company entered into a letter agreement that outlined the proposed terms of a standby facility of credit with AIBC International Corp. (SR), or AIBC. Under the letter agreement, the Company could request an advance from AIBC for up to an aggregate of $3 million, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions. In connection with the execution of the letter agreement, the Company issued to AIBC 75,000 shares of common stock.

On May 12, 2010, the Company also completed a private placement transaction with a group of accredited investors. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement that was entered into with the investors and Minera, the Company issued to the investors an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $5,809,000, or $2.78 per share, and the Closing Warrants to purchase up to 1,044,803 shares of common stock. The Closing Warrants have a term of four years, bear an exercise price of $3.61 per share (subject to customary adjustments), are exercisable on a net exercise or cashless basis and are exercisable by investors at any time after the closing date (refer to Note 8 (b)).

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company also agreed to certain “make good” provisions. Under the “make good” provisions, the Company issued additional warrants (the “Make Good Warrants”) to the investors to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of its common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which will only become exercisable if the company does not meet certain financial performance targets in 2011 and 2012. The “make good” provisions established minimum net income thresholds of $14,382,102 and $15,179,687 for the 2011 and 2012 fiscal years, respectively. If, in a given fiscal year, 90% of the applicable minimum net income threshold is not met, such aggregate number of Make Good Warrants will become exercisable equal to the amount by which the Company’s actual net income is less than the applicable financial target, divided by the financial target, and multiplied by 2,089,593. Halter Financial Group, L.P. (“HFG”) provided certain advisory services to the Company in connection with the acquisition of Minera and the private placement transaction. At the closing, HFG was also issued a “Make Good” warrant, to purchase up to 985,104 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “HFG Make Good Warrant”). The terms of the HFG Make Good Warrant are identical to the terms of the Make Good Warrants issued to the investors in the private placement.

The Company was unable to meet minimum income thresholds in 2011 and again in 2012. The Company is obligated to issue 3,074,698 common shares on a cashless basis to meet the “make good” provisions of the “Make Good Warrants’. The Company transferred $6,608,097 from derivative liabilities to the credit of additional paid in capital (see note 8 (c)). In addition, the Company transferred $3,128,605 from redeemable common stock to additional paid in capital (see note 8(b)).

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company did not issue any shares for exercise of make good warrants on a cashless basis. During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued 1,089,359 common shares for exercise of 1,094,809 make good warrants on a cashless basis.

XML

PROMISSORY NOTES

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

PROMISSORY NOTES [Text Block]

4. PROMISSORY NOTES

Promissory notes payable to related parties were unsecured and consisted of the following:

Company	Interest Rate		June 30,		March 31,
			2013		2013
Ivan Vergara	nil	$	315,124	$	341,500
Jorge Pizarro	nil		199,144		215,813
Geominco EIRL	nil		1,718,265		1,862,085
Total Long Term		$	2,232,533	$	2,419,398

All promissory notes are valued at fair market value at inception. These notes do not bear interest and had an original maturity date of March 31, 2013. On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into Loan Repayment Agreements (the “Repayment Agreements”) with holders of promissory notes of the Company (each, a “Lender”). Pursuant to the Repayment Agreements, each Lender agreed that the Company is entitled to defer payment, and the Lender shall not demand payment, of any amounts due under certain loans made by the Lender to the Company, and the Lender shall not commence the exercise of any remedies it may have against the Company or any of its assets arising out of the Company’s breach of its obligations under the loans until the later of: (i) twelve (12) months from the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and (ii) such time as the Company reports positive net income in quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the deferment shall be operative only so long as any Notes remain outstanding.

Based on the above agreement, these notes have been classiefied as current as of June 30, 2013.

The Company recognized a discount on the face value of the loans at inception to adjust the carrying value to the fair value. Fair value was calculated by using the net present value of the loans, at an assumed interest rate of 18%. The amount of the discount, being $1,404,458 was recorded in “Additional paid in capital” on the opening balance sheet.

During the year ended March 31, 2011, the promissory note holders forgave $661,552 in debt. The transaction was accounted for as a capital transaction with related parties and the company credited ‘Additional paid in capital’ with $661,552.

In addition, the Company credited additional paid in capital with $13,835 (refer to Note 8 (c)).

The discounts are being amortized over the lives of the promissory notes using the effective interest method, with interest expense being recorded as an expense in the related period. The Company recognized interest expense to amortize discounts on promissory notes to related parties for the three month period ended June 30, 2013 in the amount of $nil ($76,563 in 2012).

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013 D
Subsequent Events 1	$ 73,500
Subsequent Events 2	$ 73,500
Subsequent Events 3	8.00%
Subsequent Events 4	180

XML

SUNDRY ASSETS AND OTHER RECEIVABLES (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Schedule of Sundry Assets and Other Receivables [Table Text Block]

		June 30, 2013		March 31,2013
Prepaid expenses	$	7,381	$	6,195
Advance for materials	$	22,018		-
Other advances		-		21
	$	29,399		6,216

XML

PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Property Plant And Equipment 1	$ 149,582
Property Plant And Equipment 2	108,754
Property Plant And Equipment 3	2,122,132
Property Plant And Equipment 4	2,281,360
Property Plant And Equipment 5	285,431
Property Plant And Equipment 6	$ 249,253

XML

SECURED AND UNSECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 3	$ 3,500,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 4	11.00%
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 5	2,120,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 6	530,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 7	2,120,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 8	1,015,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 9	253,750
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 10	1,015,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 11	$ 2.00
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 12	$ 2.00
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 13	1,024,247
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 14	3,135,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 15	1,734,994
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 16	65,480
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 17	30,955
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 18	472,741
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 19	150,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 20	$ 150,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 21	11.00%
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes 22	$ 2.00

XML

Schedule of Sundry Assets and Other Receivables (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Sundry Assets And Other Receivables Schedule Of Sundry Assets And Other Receivables 1	$ 7,381
Sundry Assets And Other Receivables Schedule Of Sundry Assets And Other Receivables 2	6,195
Sundry Assets And Other Receivables Schedule Of Sundry Assets And Other Receivables 3	22,018
Sundry Assets And Other Receivables Schedule Of Sundry Assets And Other Receivables 4	0
Sundry Assets And Other Receivables Schedule Of Sundry Assets And Other Receivables 5	0
Sundry Assets And Other Receivables Schedule Of Sundry Assets And Other Receivables 6	21
Sundry Assets And Other Receivables Schedule Of Sundry Assets And Other Receivables 7	29,399
Sundry Assets And Other Receivables Schedule Of Sundry Assets And Other Receivables 8	$ 6,216

XML

Schedule of changes in the fair values of our derivative financial instruments (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Changes In The Fair Values Of Our Derivative Financial Instruments 1	$ 468,072
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Changes In The Fair Values Of Our Derivative Financial Instruments 2	84,251
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Changes In The Fair Values Of Our Derivative Financial Instruments 3	304,200
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Changes In The Fair Values Of Our Derivative Financial Instruments 4	(1,086,244)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Changes In The Fair Values Of Our Derivative Financial Instruments 5	(512,091)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Changes In The Fair Values Of Our Derivative Financial Instruments 6	$ (741,812)

XML

Schedule of Common Shares Indexed to Derivative Instrument (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 1	$ 0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 2	1,044,803
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 3	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 4	188,062
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 5	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 6	360,000
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 7	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 8	47,597
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 9	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 10	22,438
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 11	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Common Shares Indexed To Derivative Instrument 12	$ 1,662,900

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2012
Sales	$ 50,326	$ 34,829
Cost of sales	325,779	378,361
Gross loss	(275,453)	(343,532)
Operating expenses:
Impairment of mining rights	2,922	3,528
Salaries and wages	58,310	22,694
General and administrative	284,026	497,657
Professional fees	91,800	198,000
Operating expenses	437,058	721,879
Operating loss before the undernoted	(712,511)	(1,065,411)
Amortization of deferred finance costs	(30,955)	(45,108)
Imputed interest expense	(65,480)	(106,405)
Net Loss for the period	(808,946)	(1,216,924)
Foreign exchange translation adjustment for the period	204,534	49,361
Comprehensive loss for the period	$ (604,412)	$ (1,167,563)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding-basic and diluted	11,151,634	10,089,414
Loss per share - basic and diluted	$ (0.07)	$ (0.12)

XML

SECURED AND UNSECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

SECURED AND UNSECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES [Text Block]

9 (a) SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES

$3,135,000 Face Value Secured Convertible Notes, due May 8, 2017 $ 1,684,544

On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Investors (i) up to $3.5 million of eleven percent ( 11%) secured convertible notes (the “Notes”) and warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. The Notes and warrants were issued in two tranches. The first tranche issued on May 8, 2012 contained (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $2,120,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 530,000 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,120,000. The second tranche issued on June 7, 2012 contained (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $1,015,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 253,750 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,015,000. The notes are payable quarterly in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, with the first payment due on September 30, 2012. The Notes mature on May 8, 2017. The notes are convertible at the option of the holder at any time on or prior to the Maturity Date into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $2.00 per share (subject to appropriate adjustments for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination, reclassification or similar transaction after the issuance date). The Investor Warrants have a strike price of $2.00 per share (subject to appropriate adjustments for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination, reclassification or similar transaction after the issuance date). The Investor Warrants are immediately exercisable, on a net exercise or cashless basis, and have a term of five years.

The Company has evaluated the terms and conditions of the convertible notes and warrants under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The conversion features meet the definition of conventional convertible for purposes of applying the conventional convertible exemption. The definition of conventional contemplates a limitation on the number of shares issuable under the arrangement. The notes are convertible into a fixed number of shares and there are no down round protection features contained in the contracts. Since the convertible notes achieved the conventional convertible exemption, the Company was required to consider whether the hybrid contracts embody a beneficial conversion feature. A beneficial conversion feature is present when the fair value of the underlying common share exceeds the effective conversion price of the conversion option. The effective conversion price is calculated as the basis in the financing arrangement allocated to the hybrid convertible debt agreement, divided by the number of shares into which the instrument is indexed. As a result of this evaluation under the aforementioned standards, the Company concluded that a beneficial conversion feature was present in the amount of $1,024,247 in the $3,135,000 face value convertible note. The warrants did not contain any terms or feature that would preclude equity classification.

The purchase price allocation for the convertible notes resulted in a debt discount of $1,734,994. The discount on the notes will be amortized through periodic charges to interest expense over the term of the debenture using the effective interest method. Amortization of debt discount amounted to $65,480 during the quarter ended June 30, 2013. In addition, amortization of deferred finance charges amounted to $30,955 for the period ended June 30, 2013, resulting in balance of $472,741 as of June 30, 2013. The purchase price allocation is as follows:

					Inception
Gross proceeds				$	3,135,000
Less: Financing costs				$	614,394
Net proceeds				$	2,520,606
Allocated as follows:
Carrying value (fair value of debt component)					(1,400,006	)
Paid in capital (warrants)	$	(710,747	)
Paid in capital (beneficial conversion feature)	$	(1,024,247	)	$	(1,734,994	)

Significant assumptions included in the MSC valuation technique to determine the fair value of the debt component were as follows:

	Assumption
Linked common shares	1,567,500
Stock price	$2.20
Expected life (years)	5.00
Volatility (based on peers)	58.43%- 83.82%
Risk adjusted interest rate	0.15%- 0.77%

9(b) UNSECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES

On December 13, 2012, CMT consummated a private placement financing with a group of accredited investors for an aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $150,000 In connection with the financing, the Company issued to investors unsecured convertible notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $150,000. The convertible notes have a five year term, carry an interest rate of 11% per annum, and are convertible into the Company’s common stock at $2.00 per share. Net proceeds from the offering are expected to be used for general corporate purposes and working capital.

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (USD $)	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid in capital [Member]	Deficit [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss) [Member]	Total
Beginning Balance at Mar. 31, 2012	$ 10,062	$ 11,558,314	$ (13,043,895)	$ 27,452	$ (1,448,067)
Beginning Balance (Shares) at Mar. 31, 2012	10,062,275
Issue of shares due to non- performance	1,089	(1,089)
Issue of shares due to non- performance (Shares)	1,089,359
Warrants issued along with convertible debt		710,747			710,747
Beneficial conversion feature embedded in secured convertible notes		1,024,247			1,024,247
Net loss			(4,385,310)		(4,385,310)
Foreign currency translation				(8,943)	(8,943)
Ending Balance at Mar. 31, 2013	11,151	13,292,219	(17,429,205)	18,509	(4,107,326)
Ending Balance (Shares) at Mar. 31, 2013	11,151,634
Net loss			(808,946)		(808,946)
Foreign currency translation				204,534	204,534
Ending Balance at Jun. 30, 2013	$ 11,151	$ 13,292,219	$ (18,238,151)	$ 223,043	$ (4,711,738)
Ending Balance (Shares) at Jun. 30, 2013	11,151,634

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2013
Current
Cash	$ 0	$ 7,572
Sundry assets and other receivables	29,399	6,216
Inventory	0	55,707
Total current assets	29,399	69,495
RESTRICTED CASH	194,660	344,850
DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS	485,266	518,360
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS	472,741	503,696
PROPERTY PLANT AND EQUIPMENT	5,699,949	6,281,163
Total Assets	6,882,015	7,717,564
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	1,694,268	1,636,219
Loan from related parties	1,274,007	1,307,422
Loan from non related parties	285,441	188,903
Obligation under capital lease	164,749	142,706
Due to related parties	2,319,995	2,488,556
Convertible promissory note	190,000	190,000
Promissory notes	2,232,533	2,419,398
Total Current Liabilities	8,160,993	8,373,204
OBLIGATION UNDER CAPITAL LEASE	1,598,216	1,682,622
UNSECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTE	150,000	150,000
SECURED CONVERTIBLE NOTES	1,684,544	1,619,064
Total Liabilities	11,593,753	11,824,890
Stockholders' Deficiency
Capital stock	11,151	11,151
Additional paid in capital	13,292,219	13,292,219
Accumulated other comprehensive income	223,043	18,509
Deficit	(18,238,151)	(17,429,205)
Total Stockholder Equity	(4,711,738)	(4,107,326)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficiency	$ 6,882,015	$ 7,717,564

XML

Schedule of reconciliation of the changes in our derivatives (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Reconciliation Of The Changes In Our Derivatives 1	$ 5,866,285
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Reconciliation Of The Changes In Our Derivatives 2	741,812
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Reconciliation Of The Changes In Our Derivatives 3	(6,608,097)
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Reconciliation Of The Changes In Our Derivatives 4	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Reconciliation Of The Changes In Our Derivatives 5	$ 0

XML

DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Schedule of Deposits and Other Assets [Table Text Block]

		June 30, 2013		March 31, 2013
Value added taxes (“VAT”) (i)		420,571		448,810
Equipment deposit		64,695		69,550
	$	485,266	$	518,360

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS [Text Block]

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On July 12, 2013, the Company secured a loan from Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”) in the amount of $73,500. In consideration for the loan, the Company issued to Asher a convertible promissory note in principal amount of $73,500. The note will mature nine months from the date of issuance, has an interest rate of 8% per annum, and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at Asher’s option beginning 180 days from the date of issuance.

XML

Schedule of Derivative Liabilities at Fair Value (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 1	$ 0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 2	1,519,144
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 3	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 4	273,442
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 5	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 6	523,440
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 7	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 8	131,891
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 9	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 10	62,176
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 11	0
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Derivative Liabilities At Fair Value 12	$ 2,510,093

XML

Schedule of assumptions included in the MSC valuation (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Assumptions Included In The Msc Valuation 1	$ 1,567,500
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Assumptions Included In The Msc Valuation 2	$ 2.20
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Assumptions Included In The Msc Valuation 3	5.00
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Assumptions Included In The Msc Valuation 4	58.43%
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Assumptions Included In The Msc Valuation 5	83.82%
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Assumptions Included In The Msc Valuation 6	0.15%
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Assumptions Included In The Msc Valuation 7	0.77%

XML

LOAN FROM NON RELATED PARTY (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Loan From Non Related Party 1	$ 500,000
Loan From Non Related Party 2	10.00%
Loan From Non Related Party 3	500,000
Loan From Non Related Party 4	60,000
Loan From Non Related Party 5	$ 285,441

XML

CAPITAL STOCK (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Capital Stock 1	$ 0.001
Capital Stock 2	10,000,000
Capital Stock 3	0.001
Capital Stock 4	100,000,000
Capital Stock 5	0
Capital Stock 6	11,151,634
Capital Stock 7	11,151,634
Capital Stock 8	99.90%
Capital Stock 9	6,000,000
Capital Stock 10	0.001
Capital Stock 11	83.33%
Capital Stock 12	3,600,500
Capital Stock 13	3,000,000
Capital Stock 14	75,000
Capital Stock 15	2,089,593
Capital Stock 16	5,809,000
Capital Stock 17	$ 2.78
Capital Stock 18	1,044,803
Capital Stock 19	$ 3.61
Capital Stock 20	2,089,593
Capital Stock 21	$ 0.01
Capital Stock 22	14,382,102
Capital Stock 23	15,179,687
Capital Stock 24	90.00%
Capital Stock 25	2,089,593
Capital Stock 26	985,104
Capital Stock 27	3,074,698
Capital Stock 28	6,608,097
Capital Stock 29	$ 3,128,605
Capital Stock 30	1,089,359
Capital Stock 31	1,094,809

XML

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013 D
Derivative Financial Instruments 1	1,537,349
Derivative Financial Instruments 2	1,537,349
Derivative Financial Instruments 3	2,089,593
Derivative Financial Instruments 4	$ 5,809,000
Derivative Financial Instruments 5	$ 2.78
Derivative Financial Instruments 6	1,044,803
Derivative Financial Instruments 7	2,089,593
Derivative Financial Instruments 8	65
Derivative Financial Instruments 9	180
Derivative Financial Instruments 10	5
Derivative Financial Instruments 11	1,044,803
Derivative Financial Instruments 12	$ 3.61
Derivative Financial Instruments 13	2,089,593
Derivative Financial Instruments 14	$ 0.01
Derivative Financial Instruments 15	14,382,102
Derivative Financial Instruments 16	15,179,687
Derivative Financial Instruments 17	90.00%
Derivative Financial Instruments 18	50.00%
Derivative Financial Instruments 20	0
Derivative Financial Instruments 21	27,275
Derivative Financial Instruments 22	0
Derivative Financial Instruments 23	81,043
Derivative Financial Instruments 24	450,000
Derivative Financial Instruments 25	260,000
Derivative Financial Instruments 26	190,000
Derivative Financial Instruments 27	3.00%
Derivative Financial Instruments 28	$ 2.78
Derivative Financial Instruments 29	985,104
Derivative Financial Instruments 30	492,552
Derivative Financial Instruments 31	15.51%

XML

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS [Text Block]

8(a) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Derivative financial instruments, as defined in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815-10-15-83 Derivatives and Hedging, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.

The Company generally does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company has entered into certain other financial instruments and contracts, such as secured convertible debenture and warrant financing arrangements that are either (i) not afforded equity classification or (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts. As required by ASC 815, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in the financial statements.

The following table summarizes the components of the derivative liabilities as of June 30, 2013 and inception of the instruments:

May 2010 Private Placement:		June 30, 2013		Inception May 12, 2010
Investor warrants	$	-	$	1,519,144
Broker warrants		-		273,442
Credit facility warrants		-		523,440
Make Good warrants		-		131,891
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants		-		62,176
Total derivative liabilities	$	-	$	2,510,093

At inception, warrants were classified as liabilities due to the fact that they were considered not to be indexed to the company’s own stock and due to the firm registration rights embodied in the agreements. At March 31, 2012 all variability and rights resulting in liability classification were removed and the instruments were re-measured and reclassified to equity.

The following table summarizes the common shares indexed to the derivative instruments as of June 30, 2013 and inception of the instruments:

May 2010 Private Placement:	June 30, 2013	Inception May 12, 2012
Investor warrants	-	1,044,803
Broker warrants	-	188,062
Credit facility warrants	-	360,000
Make Good warrants	-	47,597
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants	-	22,438
	-	1,662,900

Make Good warrants indexed to 1,537,349 shares of common stock vested when the Company did not meet the performance condition as of March 31, 2011 and additional Make Good warrants indexed to 1,537,349 shares of common stock vested when the Company did not meet the March 31, 2012 performance condition. At March 31, 2012, all variability and rights resulting in liability classification were removed and the instruments were re-measured and reclassified to equity

8(b) MAY 2010 PRIVATE PLACEMENT

On May 12, 2010, the Company commenced a private placement of (i) 2,089,593 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $5,809,000, or $2.78 per share, (ii) Closing Warrants to purchase up to 1,044,803 shares of common stock, and (iii) Make Good Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,089,593 shares of common stock (the “May 2010 Private Placement). In connection with the May 2010 Private Placement, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement related to the common stock and warrants that requires the Company to, among other things, file a Registration Statement within 65 days from the closing of the May 2010 Private Placement and achieve effectiveness as soon as possible , but in no event later than the 180 ^th day following the Final Closing Date or the 5 ^th trading day following the date on which the Company is notified that the initial Registration Statement will not be reviewed or is no longer subject to review and comments. The Registration Rights Agreement does not provide for an alternative or contain a penalty in the event the Company is unable to fulfill its requirements. As a result of the registration rights obligation to file within a specified period, which is presumed not to be within the Company’s control, the Company is required to classify the common stock outside of stockholders’ equity as redeemable common stock. At March 31, 2012, the Company reclassified these securities to permanent equity due to the fact that the registration requirement had been met.

The Closing warrants included in the May 2010 Private Placement are indexed to 1,044,803 shares of the Company’s common stock and may be exercised until the fourth anniversary of their issuance at an exercise price of $3.61 per share. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company also agreed to issue Make Good warrants to investors to purchase up to an aggregate amount of 2,089,593 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share which became exercisable when the Company did not meet certain financial performance targets in 2011 and 2012. The “make good” provisions established minimum net income thresholds of $14,382,102 and $15,179,687 for the 2011 and 2012 fiscal years, respectively. If, in a given fiscal year 90% of the applicable minimum net income threshold was not met, such aggregate number of Make Good warrants became exercisable equal to the amount by which the Company’s actual net income was less than the applicable financial target, divided by the financial target, and multiplied by 50% of the total warrant shares underlying the warrant agreement. The Closing and Make Good warrants were evaluated under the guidance of ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities and Equity for purposes of their classification. Due to the Make Good warrants contingent exercise provisions, they did not meet the definition of “indexed to a Company’s own stock” and were required to be classified as liabilities and measured at inception and an ongoing basis at fair value. As of March 31, 2012 the Make Whole warrants were no longer contingently exercisable and the registration rights agreement had been fulfilled. Accordingly, at March 31, 2012, the warrants met the 8 conditions for equity classification provided in ASC 815-40 and were revalued and reclassified to equity.

The total basis in the financing was allocated first to derivative instruments, required to be classified as liabilities with the remaining basis being allocated to the common stock.

The following table illustrates the initial allocation:

					Financing
		Proceeds			Cost			Final
		Allocation			Allocation			Allocation
Gross proceeds	$	5,809,000		$	-		$	5,809,000
Financing costs paid in cash		-			(522,810	)		(522,810	)
		5,809,000			(522,810	)		5,286,190
Derivative liabilities:
Closing warrants:
Investor warrants		(1,519,144	)		-			(1,519,144	)
Broker warrants		-			(273,442	)		(273,442	)
Credit facility warrants		-			(523,440	)		(523,440	)
Make Good warrants		(131,891	)		-			(131,891	)
Total derivative liabilities		(1,651,035	)		(796,882	)		(2,447,917	)
Redeemable common stock		(4,157,965	)		-			(4,157,965	)
Financing costs paid in cash		-			407,792			407,792
Financing costs paid with warrants		-			621,568			621,568
Total redeemable common stock		(4,157,965	)		1,029,360			(3,128,605	)
Deferred finance costs	$	-		$	290,332		$	290,332

The Company amortized deferred finance cost by $nil during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 (2012: $27,275). Deferred finance costs outstanding as of June 30, 2013 relating to this financing is $nil (2012: $81,043).

The direct financing costs are allocated to the financial instruments (redeemable common stock and warrants), based upon their relative fair values. Amounts related to the warrants are recorded as deferred finance costs and amortized through charges to interest expense over the term of the arrangement using the effective interest method while amounts related to the common stock directly offset the carrying value of the redeemable common stock.

8(c) CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE AND MAKE GOOD WARRANT

HFG provided certain advisory services to the Company in connection with the acquisition of Minera and the May 2010 Private Placement. Pursuant to an advisory agreement that Minera entered into with HFG on April 16, 2009, HFG agreed to (a) advise Minera with regard to its desire to effect a combination transaction with a U.S. domiciled public shell corporation, (b) help Minera identify suitable investment bank(s) to act as placement agent for its contemplated private placement transactions and (c) counsel management on matters related to the operating a U.S. domiciled public company. Under the terms of the advisory agreement, HFG was entitled to receive a cash payment of $450,000 at the closing of the reverse acquisition of Minera. In lieu of such cash payment, HFG agreed to accept a cash payment of $260,000 and the HFG Note in the principal amount of $190,000 that accrues simple annual interest at a rate of 3% per annum. The HFG Note is due and payable on the sooner of the closing of the next equity financing (including the receipt of additional funds by the Company from any subsequent closing of the May 12 private placement) or the 180th day following the date of its issuance. In addition, at any time that the HFG Note remains outstanding, it may be converted at HFG’s option into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $2.78.

The Company has evaluated the terms and conditions of the HFG Note under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The embedded conversion feature (“ECF”) is an equity-linked feature that is not clearly and closely related to the risks of the host debt instrument. However, current accounting standards afforded an exemption to bifurcation of the ECF because it is both indexed to the Company’s own stock and otherwise met the definition of Conventional Convertible based upon the fixed conversion price.

At the closing, the Company had also issued to HFG the HFG Make Good Warrant for the purchase of up to 985,104 shares of common stock. The terms of the HFG Make Good Warrant are identical to the terms of the Make Good Warrants issued to the investors in the private placement and accordingly, they did not meet the definition of “indexed to a Company’s own stock” and were required to be classified as liabilities and measured at inception and an ongoing basis at fair value. As of December 31, 2012, HFG had exercised warrants for 492,552 common shares.

The fair value of the HFG Note was estimated based upon the present value of its future cash flows, using credit risk adjusted rates, as enhanced by the fair value of the ECF. Since the Company does not have an established credit rating, the credit risk adjusted yield of 15.51% was determined by reference to comparable instruments in public markets and industry-specific risk. The fair value of the ECF was determined using the Monte Carlo Simulation (“MCS”). MCS is an option-based model that embodies assumptions that would likely be considered by market participants who trade the financial instrument. In addition to more traditional assumptions, such as stock price, trading volatilities and risk-free rates, MCS assumptions include credit risk, interest risk and redemption considerations. Significant assumptions included in the MSC valuation technique were as follows:

		Assumption
Linked common shares		68,345
Stock price	$	2.78
Expected life (years)		4.00
Volatility (based on peers)		58.24%- 63.55%
Risk adjusted yield		15.51%- 16.94%
Risk adjusted interest rate		1.52%- 1.65%

The advisory fee expense was determined based upon the fair value of the HFG Note and the HFG Make Good Warrants. In accordance with APB 14, the premium on the HFG Note, representing the difference between the fair value and the face value of the note, was recorded to additional paid in capital.

On May 8, 2012, the Company also entered into Loan Repayment Agreements (the “Repayment Agreements”) with HFG (“Lender”). Pursuant to the Repayment Agreements, Lender agreed that the Company is entitled to defer payment, and the Lender shall not demand payment, of any amounts due under certain loans made by the Lender to the Company, and the Lender shall not commence the exercise of any remedies it may have against the Company or any of its assets arising out of the Company’s breach of its obligations under the loans until the later of: (i) twelve (12) months from the date of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement, and (ii) such time as the Company reports positive net income in quarterly or annual financial statements filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the deferment shall be operative only so long as any notes remain outstanding.

The following table illustrates the initial allocation:

		Initial
		Allocation
Convertible Promissory Note	$	190,000
Make Good warrants		62,176
Additional paid in capital		13,835
Total	$	266,011

Fair value Disclosures:

ASC 820, Fair value Measurements and Disclosures, provides requirements for disclosure of liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in periods subsequent to the initial recognition. Financial instruments arising from the May 2010 Private Placement that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis are (i) the investor warrants, (ii) the broker warrants, (iii) the credit facility warrants and (iii) Make Good warrants, respectively.

The warrants were valued using the Lattice technique, and the Company estimated (i the volatility, based upon a reasonable peer group, (iii) the risk free rate as the published rate for zero coupon government securities with terms consistent with the contractual term.

Information and significant assumptions embodied in our warrant valuations (including ranges for certain assumptions) as of March 31, 2012 are illustrated in the following tables:

	Fair value	Closing	Make Good
	hierarchy	Warrants	warrants
Warrants to purchase common stock:
Stock price (1)	(2)	$2.00	$2.00
Strike price	n/a	$3.61	$0.01
Volatility (2)	(2)
Range of volatilities		55.47% - 78.29%	55.47% - 78.29%
Equivalent volatility		65.65%	65.65%
Term (years) (3)	(3)	2.12	2.12
Risk-free rate (2)	(2)
Range of risk free rates		0.07% - 0.33%	0.07% - 0.33%
Equivalent risk free rate		0.18%	0.18%
Dividends	n/a	- -	- -

Fair value hierarchy:

(1)	Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities, or derived there from. The Company used its trading market price as of March 31, 2012 as input into the model which is a Level 1 input.
(2)	Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable. The Binomial Lattice model provides for multiple assumptions related to volatility and risk free rate over the remaining term of the warrants. The equivalents or averages of these assumptions are also provided above. The Company uses the current published yields for zero- coupon US Treasury Securities for its risk free rate. The Company did not have a historical trading history sufficient to develop an internal volatility rate for use in the Binomial Lattice model. As a result, the Company has used a peer approach wherein the historical trading volatilities of certain companies with similar characteristics and who had a sufficient trading history were used as an estimate of the Company’s volatility. In developing this model, no one company was weighted more heavily.
(3)	Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs. Inputs for which any parts are Level 3 inputs are classified as Level 3 in their entirety. The remaining term used equals the remaining contractual term as our best estimate of the expected term. The probability-weighted outcomes of achieving the performance conditions are also a Level 3 input.

Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of the Company’s common stock, which has a high estimated volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, our income will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.

The following tables summarize the effects on the Company’s income (loss) associated with changes in the fair values of the derivative financial instruments for the year ended March 31 2012:

May 2010 Private Placement:
Investor warrants	$	468,072
Broker warrants		84,251
Credit facility warrants		304,200
Make Good warrants		(1,086,244	)
Acquisition advisory fees:
Make Good warrants		(512,091	)
	$	(741,812	)

The following represents a reconciliation of the changes in our derivatives and the related changes in fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the years ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 and three month period ended June 30, 2013:

Balances at March 31, 2011	$	5,866,285
Fair value adjustments		741,812
Transfer to additional paid in capital		(6,608,097	)
Balances at March 31, 2012	$	-
Balances at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013	$	-

XML

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK FACTORS (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

Schedule of Fair Value of Financial Instruments, by Balance Sheet Grouping [Table Text Block]

		June 30, 2013				March 31, 2013
		Carrying				Carrying
Assets/Liabilities		Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value
Cash	$	-	$	-	$	7,572	$	7,572
Restricted cash	$	194,660	$	194,660	$	344,850	$	344,850
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1,694,268	$	1,694,268	$	1,636,219	$	1,636,219
Due to related party	$	2,319,995	$	2,319,995	$	2,488,556	$	2,488,556
Loan from related party	$	1,274,007	$	1,274,007	$	1,307,422	$	1,307,422
Loan from non related party	$	285,441	$	285,441	$	188,903	$	188,903
Convertible promissory note	$	190,000	$	190,000	$	190,000	$	190,000
Promissory notes	$	2,232,533	$	2,232,533	$	2,419,398	$	2,419,398
Unsecured convertible note	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	150,000
Secured convertible notes	$	1,684,544	$	1,684,544	$	1,619,064	$	1,619,064

XML

Schedule of Property, Plant and Equipment (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 1	$ 1,026,655
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 2	0
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 3	1,026,655
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 4	1,103,687
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 5	49,277
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 6	0
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 7	49,277
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 8	52,974
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 9	256,376
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 10	0
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 11	256,376
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 12	275,613
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 13	5,712,701
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 14	1,507,356
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 15	4,205,345
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 16	4,674,415
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 17	162,296
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 18	0
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 19	162,296
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 20	174,474
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 21	7,207,305
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 22	1,507,356
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 23	5,699,949
Property Plant And Equipment Schedule Of Property, Plant And Equipment 24	$ 6,281,163

XML

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT [Text Block]

11. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it, based on the funds available to the Company, in order to maintain its daily operations. The Board of Directors does not establish quantitative return on capital criteria for management, but rather relies on the expertise of the Company’s management to sustain the future development of the business.

The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions and the risk characteristics of the underlying assets. The Company upon approval from its Board of Directors will balance its overall capital structure through new share issues or by undertaking other activities as deemed appropriate under the specific circumstances. As such, the Company is dependent on external financing to fund its daily operations. In order to procure materials and pay for administrative costs, the Company will spend its existing working capital and raise additional amounts as needed.

Management reviews its capital management approach on an ongoing basis and believes that this approach, given the foregoing paragraph and the relative size of the Company, is reasonable.

There were no changes in the Company’s approach to capital management during the quarter ended June 30, 2013.

XML

IMPAIRMENT OF MINING RIGHTS

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

IMPAIRMENT OF MINING RIGHTS [Text Block]

7. IMPAIRMENT OF MINING RIGHTS

The Company has expensed the mining rights, since the Company currently has no formal plan to exploit these mining rights.

XML

COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION [Text Block]

2. COMPLETION OF ACQUISITION

On May 12, 2010, Chile Mining Technologies, Inc completed an acquisition of Minera pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement. The acquisition was accounted for as a recapitalization effected by a share exchange, wherein Minera is considered the acquirer for accounting and financial reporting purposes. The assets and liabilities of the acquired entity have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized.

XML

Schedule of Secured Convertible Debt (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Secured Convertible Debt 1	$ 3,135,000
Secured And Unsecured Convertible Notes Schedule Of Secured Convertible Debt 2	$ 1,684,544

XML

Schedule of Fair Value of HFG Note, Monte Carlo Simulation and Risk-Free Rates (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 1	$ 68,345
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 2	2.78
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 3	4.00
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 4	58.24%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 5	63.55%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 6	15.51%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 7	16.94%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 8	1.52%
Derivative Financial Instruments Schedule Of Fair Value Of Hfg Note, Monte Carlo Simulation And Risk-free Rates 9	1.65%

XML

PROMISSORY NOTES (Narrative) (Details) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Promissory Notes 1	18.00%
Promissory Notes 2	$ 1,404,458
Promissory Notes 3	661,552
Promissory Notes 4	661,552
Promissory Notes 5	13,835
Promissory Notes 6	0
Promissory Notes 7	$ 76,563

XML

DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS [Text Block]

14. DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS

		June 30, 2013		March 31, 2013
Value added taxes (“VAT”) (i)		420,571		448,810
Equipment deposit		64,695		69,550
	$	485,266	$	518,360

i) Value added tax balance represents net VAT recoverable which may be refunded or applied toward future corporate income tax liability.

XML

SEGMENT INFORMATION

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

SEGMENT INFORMATION [Text Block]

10. SEGMENT INFORMATION

As at June 30, 2013, the Company operated in one reportable segment, being the exploration for and the development of mining rights in the Republic of Chile.

XML

RESTRICTED CASH

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

RESTRICTED CASH [Text Block]

17. RESTRICTED CASH

On May 8, 2012, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Investors (i) up to $3.5 million of eleven percent ( 11%) secured convertible notes (the “Notes”), which mature on the five year anniversary of the date of issuance and shall be convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), at $2.00 per share (subject to adjustment) and (ii) warrants (the “Investor Warrants,” and together with the Notes, the “Securities”) to purchase such number of shares of Common Stock equal to fifty percent ( 50%) of the number of shares of Common Stock that the Notes purchased by the Investors may be convertible into, at an exercise price of $2.00 per share (subject to adjustment).

On May 8, 2012, the Company completed an initial closing pursuant to the Purchase Agreement in which the Company issued and sold to Investors (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $2,120,000 and (ii) Investor Warrants to initially purchase an aggregate of 530,000 shares of Common Stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $2,120,000.

On June 7, 2012, the Company completed its second and final closing pursuant to the Purchase Agreement in which the Company issued and sold to investors (i) Notes in the aggregate original principal amount of $1,015,000 and (ii) investor Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 507,500 shares of Common Stock, for an aggregate gross proceeds of $1,015,000.

As a result of the two closings, the Company issued and sold to investors a total amount of $3,135,000 in notes and warrants to purchase a total of 1,037,500 shares of Common Stock. In accordance with these agreements, the Company must keep the equivalent of one year worth of interest payments in an escrow account at all times. As interest payments become due, the Company must continually maintain one year’s worth of payments in the escrow account and as such cannot use this for any other purpose. As of June 30, 2013, the Company was in default of the restricted cash balance required from this agreement. The Company plans to replenish the account in the second quarter of the current fiscal year.

XML

LOAN FROM NON RELATED PARTY

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

LOAN FROM NON RELATED PARTY [Text Block]

15. LOAN FROM NON RELATED PARTIES

(a) During the year ended March 31, 2012, Minera received a loan from Exportadora e Importadora Bengolea (Bengolea), a non-related party for $500,000 for additional working capital. This loan is free of interest and payable in six monthly equal installments commencing six months after the receipt of loan. Minera will be obligated to pay interest at 10% per annum in the event of default. The Company defaulted on the loan and in settlement of the $500,000, Bengolea agreed to accept a one-time payment of interest of $60,000. On May 19, 2012 Minera finalized an agreement between one of its debtors and Bengolea that released Minera from this obligation. The loan was fully paid during the year ended March 31, 2013.

(b) The Company received a loan of $285,441 from a non-related party. This loan is secured on personal assets of a Company’s director and payable on demand.

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013	Aug. 19, 2013
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2013
Trading Symbol	lven
Entity Registrant Name	Chile Mining Technologies Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001427714
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		11,164,134
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well Known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2013
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK FACTORS

3 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2013

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK FACTORS [Text Block]

16. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND RISK FACTORS

The fair value of a financial instrument is the estimated amount that the Company would receive or pay to settle the financial assets and financial liabilities as at the balance sheet date. The book value of sundry assets and other receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related party approximate fair values at the balance sheet dates.

The fair value of the long-term debt has been estimated by discounting future cash flows at a rate offered for debt of similar maturities and credit quality.

All financial instruments except for derivative financial instruments and cash and cash equivalent are classified as level 3. Both cash and cash equivalents and derivative financial instruments are classified as level 1.

		June 30, 2013				March 31, 2013
		Carrying				Carrying
Assets/Liabilities		Value		Fair Value		Value		Fair Value
Cash	$	-	$	-	$	7,572	$	7,572
Restricted cash	$	194,660	$	194,660	$	344,850	$	344,850
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	1,694,268	$	1,694,268	$	1,636,219	$	1,636,219
Due to related party	$	2,319,995	$	2,319,995	$	2,488,556	$	2,488,556
Loan from related party	$	1,274,007	$	1,274,007	$	1,307,422	$	1,307,422
Loan from non related party	$	285,441	$	285,441	$	188,903	$	188,903
Convertible promissory note	$	190,000	$	190,000	$	190,000	$	190,000
Promissory notes	$	2,232,533	$	2,232,533	$	2,419,398	$	2,419,398
Unsecured convertible note	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	150,000	$	150,000
Secured convertible notes	$	1,684,544	$	1,684,544	$	1,619,064	$	1,619,064

Interest rate risk

The company’s exposure to interest rate fluctuations is not significant.

Credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of amounts receivable. The Company is not exposed to material losses on its accounts receivable and future revenues.

Commodity price risk

The ability of the Company to develop its properties and the future profitability of the Company is directly related to the market price of certain minerals. The Company does not currently use derivative financial instruments to reduce its exposure to commodity price risk.

Liquidity risk

The Company’s exposure to liquidity risk is dependent on the collection of amounts receivable and the ability to raise funds to meet purchase commitments and to sustain operations. The company controls its liquidity risk by managing working capital and cash flows.

Foreign currency risk

The Company is exposed to foreign currency risk as substantially all of the Company’s cash is denominated in Chilean Pesos. This risk is partially mitigated by the fact that a significant portion of the costs associated with the mining claims and deferred exploration expenditures are incurred in Chilean Pesos.