XML 62 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Financial Instruments [Text Block]

Note 8. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

Financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable and payable, debt instruments and derivatives. Due to their short-term maturity, the carrying amount of account receivables and payables approximate fair value. Cash equivalents primarily consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase and are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.

 

BMS has exposure to market risk due to changes in currency exchange rates and interest rates. As a result, certain derivative financial instruments are used when available on a cost-effective basis to hedge the underlying economic exposure. These instruments qualify as cash flow, net investment and fair value hedges upon meeting certain criteria, including initial and periodic assessments of the effectiveness in offsetting hedged exposures. Changes in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recognized in earnings as they occur. Derivative financial instruments are not used for trading purposes.

 

All financial instruments, including derivatives, are subject to counterparty credit risk which is considered as part of the overall fair value measurement. Counterparty credit risk is monitored on an ongoing basis and is mitigated by limiting amounts outstanding with any individual counterparty, utilizing conventional derivative financial instruments and only entering into agreements with counterparties that meet high credit quality standards. The consolidated financial statements would not be materially impacted if any counterparty failed to perform according to the terms of its agreement. Under the terms of the agreements, posting of collateral is not required by any party whether derivatives are in an asset or liability position.

 

Fair Value Measurements − The fair values of financial instruments are classified into one of the following categories:

 

Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. These instruments include U.S. treasury securities.

 

Level 2 inputs include observable prices for similar instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and other observable inputs that can be corroborated by market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. These instruments include corporate debt securities, commercial paper, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insured debt securities, certificates of deposit, money market funds, foreign currency forward contracts, interest rate swap contracts, equity funds, fixed income funds and long-term debt. Additionally, certain corporate debt securities utilize a third-party matrix-pricing model that uses significant inputs corroborated by market data for substantially the full term of the assets. Equity and fixed income funds are primarily invested in publicly traded securities and are valued at the respective net asset value of the underlying investments. There were no significant unfunded commitments or restrictions on redemptions related to equity and fixed income funds as of September 30, 2012. Level 2 derivative instruments are valued using London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) and Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR) yield curves, less credit valuation adjustments, and observable forward foreign exchange rates at the reporting date. Valuations of derivative contracts may fluctuate considerably from period-to-period due to volatility in underlying foreign currencies and underlying interest rates, which are driven by market conditions and the duration of the contract. Credit adjustment volatility may have a significant impact on the valuation of interest rate swaps due to changes in counterparty credit ratings and credit default swap spreads.

 

Level 3 unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. Valuation models for the Auction Rate Security (ARS) and Floating Rate Security (FRS) portfolio are based on expected cash flow streams and collateral values including assessments of counterparty credit quality, default risk underlying the security, discount rates and overall capital market liquidity. The fair value of the ARS was determined using an internally developed valuation which was based in part on indicative bids received on the underlying assets of the security and other evidence of fair value. The ARS is a private placement security rated 'BBB' by Standard and Poor's and represents interests in insurance securitizations. Due to the current lack of an active market for the FRS and the general lack of transparency into its underlying assets, other qualitative analysis is relied upon to value the FRS including discussions with brokers and fund managers, default risk underlying the security and overall capital market liquidity.

Available-For-Sale Securities and Cash Equivalents

 

The following table summarizes available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

      Gross Gross               
      Unrealized Unrealized            
      Gain in Loss in Gain/(Loss)         
   Amortized Accumulated Accumulated in Fair Fair Value
Dollars in Millions Cost OCI OCI Income Value  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
September 30, 2012                        
Marketable Securities                        
 Certificates of Deposit $ 121 $ - $ - $ - $ 121 $ - $ 121 $ -
 Corporate Debt Securities   4,337   94   -   -   4,431   -   4,431   -
 Commercial Paper   240   -   -   -   240   -   240   -
 U.S. Treasury Securities   150   1   -   -   151   151   -   -
 FDIC Insured Debt Securities   50   -   -   -   50   -   50   -
 Equity Funds   51   -   -   5   56   -   56   -
 Fixed Income Funds   46   -   -   1   47   -   47   -
 ARS   9   1   -   -   10   -   -   10
 FRS   21   -   (2)   -   19   -   -   19
 Total Marketable Securities $ 5,025 $ 96 $ (2) $ 6 $ 5,125 $ 151 $ 4,945 $ 29
                          
December 31, 2011                        
Marketable Securities                        
 Certificates of Deposit $ 1,051 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,051 $ - $ 1,051 $ -
 Corporate Debt Securities   2,908   60   (3)   -   2,965   -   2,965   -
 Commercial Paper   1,035   -   -   -   1,035   -   1,035   -
 U.S. Treasury Securities   400   2   -   -   402   402   -   -
 FDIC Insured Debt Securities   302   1   -   -   303   -   303   -
 ARS   80   12   -   -   92   -   -   92
 FRS   21   -   (3)   -   18   -   -   18
 Total Marketable Securities $ 5,797 $ 75 $ (6) $ - $ 5,866 $ 402 $ 5,354 $ 110

The following table summarizes the classification of available for sale securities in the consolidated balance sheet:

 September 30, December 31,
Dollars in Millions2012 2011
Current Marketable Securities$1,427 $2,957
Non-current Marketable Securities 3,698  2,909
Total Marketable Securities$5,125 $5,866

Money market funds and other securities aggregating $1,203 million and $5,469 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, were included in cash and cash equivalents and valued using Level 2 inputs. At September 30, 2012, $3,688 million of non-current available for sale corporate debt securities and FRS mature within five years.

 

The change in fair value for the investments in equity and fixed income funds are recognized in the results of operations and are designed to offset the changes in fair value of certain employee retirement benefits.

 

The following table summarizes the activity for financial assets utilizing Level 3 fair value measurements:

  2012 2011
Fair value at January 1 $110 $110
Sales  (81)   -
Fair value at September 30 $29 $110

Qualifying Hedges

 

The following table summarizes the fair value of outstanding derivatives:

    September 30, 2012 December 31, 2011
      Fair Value   Fair Value
Dollars in MillionsBalance Sheet Location Notional (Level 2) Notional (Level 2)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:             
 Interest rate swap contracts Other assets $ 573 $ 154 $ 579 $ 135
 Foreign currency forward contracts Other assets   953   47   1,347   88
 Foreign currency forward contracts Accrued expenses   993   (23)   480   (29)

Cash Flow Hedges − Foreign currency forward contracts are primarily utilized to hedge forecasted intercompany inventory purchase transactions in certain foreign currencies. These forward contracts are designated as cash flow hedges with the effective portion of changes in fair value being temporarily reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) and recognized in earnings when the hedged item affects earnings. As of September 30, 2012, significant outstanding foreign currency forward contracts were primarily attributed to Euro and Japanese yen foreign currency forward contracts in the notional amount of $1,130 million and $504 million, respectively.

 

The net gain on foreign currency forward contracts qualifying for cash flow hedge accounting is expected to be reclassified to cost of products sold within the next two years, including $33 million of pre-tax gains to be reclassified within the next 12 months. Cash flow hedge accounting is discontinued when the forecasted transaction is no longer probable of occurring on the originally forecasted date, or 60 days thereafter, or when the hedge is no longer effective. Assessments to determine whether derivatives designated as qualifying hedges are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items are performed at inception and on a quarterly basis. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value is included in current period earnings. The earnings impact related to discontinued cash flow hedges and hedge ineffectiveness was not significant during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

Net Investment Hedges − Non-U.S. dollar borrowings of €541 million ($698 million) are designated to hedge the foreign currency exposures of the net investment in certain foreign affiliates. These borrowings are designated as net investment hedges and recognized in long-term debt. The effective portion of foreign exchange gains or losses on the remeasurement of the debt is recognized in the foreign currency translation component of accumulated OCI with the related offset in long-term debt.

 

Fair Value Hedges Fixed-to-floating interest rate swap contracts are designated as fair value hedges and are used as part of an interest rate risk management strategy to create an appropriate balance of fixed and floating rate debt. The swaps and underlying debt for the benchmark risk being hedged are recorded at fair value. When the underlying swap is terminated prior to maturity, the fair value basis adjustment to the underlying debt instrument is amortized into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt.

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements of $1.6 billion notional amount and €1.0 billion notional amount were terminated generating total proceeds of $356 million (including accrued interest of $66 million). The basis adjustment from the swap terminations is amortized as interest expense over the remaining life of the underlying debt.

The adjustment to debt from interest rate swaps that qualify as fair value hedges and other items was as follows:

  September 30, December 31,
Dollars in Millions2012 2011
Principal Value$ 6,601 $ 4,669
Adjustments to Principal Value:     
 Fair value of interest rate swaps  154   135
 Unamortized basis adjustment from swap terminations  528   594
 Unamortized bond discounts  (56)   (22)
Total$ 7,227 $ 5,376
       
 Current portion of long-term debt$ 619 $ -
 Long-term debt  6,608   5,376

During the three months ended September 30, 2012, $2.0 billion of senior unsecured notes were issued: $750 million in aggregate principal amount of 0.875% Notes due 2017, $750 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.000% Notes due 2022 and $500 million in aggregate principal amount of 3.250% Notes due 2042 in a registered public offering. Interest on the notes will be paid semi-annually on each February 1 and August 1 beginning February 1, 2013. The notes rank equally in right of payment with all of BMS's existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness. BMS may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at any time at a predetermined redemption price. The net proceeds of the note issuances were $1,950 million, which is net of a discount of $36 million and deferred loan issuance costs of $14 million.

 

Commercial paper was issued and matured during the three months ended September 30, 2012 with an average amount outstanding of $526 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 0.15%. There were no commercial paper borrowings at September 30, 2012.

 

Substantially all of the $2.0 billion debt obligations assumed in the acquisition of Amylin were repaid during the three months ended September 30, 2012, including a promissory note with Lilly with respect to a revenue sharing obligation and Amylin senior notes due 2014.

 

Debt repurchase activity was as follows:

 Nine Months Ended September 30,
Dollars in Millions2012 2011
Principal amount$ 2,052 $71
Carrying value  2,081  88
Repurchase price  2,108  78
Notional amount of interest rate swaps terminated  6  34
Swap termination proceeds  2  6
Total (gain)/loss  27  (10)

The fair value of debt was $8,350 million at September 30, 2012 and $6,406 million at December 31, 2011 and was valued using Level 2 inputs. Interest payments were $125 million and $52 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, net of amounts related to interest rate swap contracts.

 

In July 2012, BMS entered into a new $1.5 billion five year revolving credit facility. There are no financial covenants under the new facility. This revolving credit facility is in addition to the Company's existing $1.5 billion revolving credit facility which was established in September 2011 with a syndicate of lenders. There were no borrowings under either revolving credit facility at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.