Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2022

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Basis of Presentation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements include estimates of costs incurred but not yet invoiced for research and development accruals as well as the estimated fair value of the Company's indefinite-lived intangible asset and the estimated fair value of the Company's reporting unit for purposes of evaluating goodwill impairment, both of which were fully impaired in 2021.

The Company’s estimates could be affected by external conditions, including those unique to the Company and general economic conditions. It is reasonably possible that these external factors could have an effect on the Company’s estimates and could cause actual results to differ from those estimates and assumptions.

Other Risks and Uncertainties

The Company relies on contract research organizations (CROs), including one located in Ukraine which shut down operations due to Russia’s invasion. Though this CRO has resumed operations, the Company has reallocated certain work to other global CROs in case the CRO shuts down operations again.

U.S. and global financial markets have experienced volatility and disruption due to other macroeconomic and geopolitical events such as rising inflation, the risk of a recession, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, as well as the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company cannot predict at this time to what extent, if at all, it and its employees, CROs, vendors and/or collaborators could potentially be negatively impacted by these events.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments, including money market funds, with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. All of the Company’s cash equivalents have liquid markets and high credit ratings. The Company maintains its cash in bank deposits and other accounts, the balances of which, at times as of and during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, exceed federally insured limits.

Investments in Marketable Securities

The Company invests its excess cash in debt securities with high credit ratings including but not limited to money market funds classified as cash equivalents, asset backed securities, securities issued by the U.S. government and its agencies, corporate debt securities and commercial paper. The Company has designated its investments in marketable securities as available-for-sale and measures these securities at their respective fair values. Marketable securities are classified as short-term or long-term based on the maturity date and their availability to meet current operating requirements. Marketable securities that mature in one year or less from the consolidated balance sheet date are classified as short-term available-for-sale securities, while marketable securities with maturities in one year or beyond one year from the consolidated balance sheet date are classified as long-term.

Securities that are classified as available-for-sale are measured at fair value with temporary unrealized gains and losses reported in other comprehensive loss, and as a component of stockholders' equity until their disposition. The Company reviews all available-for-sale securities at each period end to determine if they remain available-for-sale based on their current intent and ability to sell the security if it is required to do so. Realized gains and losses from the sale of marketable securities, if any, are calculated using the specific-identification method.

Marketable securities are subject to a periodic impairment review. The Company may recognize an impairment charge when a decline in the fair value of investments below the cost basis is determined to be other-than-temporary. In determining whether a decline in market value is other-than-temporary, various factors are considered, including the cause, duration of time and severity of the impairment, any adverse changes in the investees’ financial condition, and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in market value. To date, there have been no declines in value deemed to be other than temporary for any of the Company’s investments in marketable securities.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset

Prior to their full impairment in 2021, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets were reviewed for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter, and more frequently if events or other changes in circumstances indicated that the carrying amount of the assets may not have been recoverable.

Goodwill

The difference between the purchase price and the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination is allocated to goodwill. Goodwill was evaluated for impairment on an annual basis as of October 1, and more frequently if indicators were present or changes in circumstances suggested impairment may have existed. In performing each annual impairment assessment and any interim impairment assessment, the Company determined if it should qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not the fair value of goodwill was less than its carrying amount (the qualitative impairment test). If the Company concluded it was more likely than not the fair value of the

reporting unit was less than its carrying amount, or elected not to use the qualitative impairment test, a quantitative impairment test was performed. The Company’s annual or interim quantitative impairment testing was performed by comparing the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. An impairment charge was recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeded the reporting unit’s fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill.

Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset

The Company’s indefinite-lived intangible asset consisted of in-process research and development (IPR&D) associated with small molecule core inhibitors that directly target and allosterically inhibit core protein functions associated with HBV which were acquired with the acquisition of Assembly Pharmaceutics, Inc. in 2014. IPR&D represented the fair value assigned to incomplete research projects the Company acquired through a business combination which, at the time of acquisition, had not reached technological feasibility, regardless of whether they had alternative future use. The primary basis for determining the technological feasibility or completion of these projects was obtaining regulatory approval to market the underlying products in an applicable geographic region. The Company classified IPR&D acquired in a business combination as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until the associated research and development efforts were either completed or abandoned. Upon completion of the associated research and development efforts, the Company would perform a final test for impairment and would determine the useful life of the technology and would begin amortizing the assets to reflect their use over their remaining lives. Upon permanent abandonment, the Company would write-off the remaining carrying amount of the associated IPR&D intangible asset.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets were not amortized, but instead were reviewed for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events occurred or circumstances changed that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. In performing each annual impairment assessment and any interim impairment assessment, the Company determined if it should qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not the fair value of its IPR&D asset was less than its carrying amount (the qualitative impairment test). If the Company concluded that was the case, or elected not to use the qualitative impairment test, the Company would proceed with quantitatively determining the fair value of the IPR&D asset and compared its fair value to its carrying value to determine the amount of impairment, if any (the quantitative impairment test).

In performing the qualitative impairment test, the Company considered the results of the most recent quantitative impairment test and identified the most relevant drivers of the fair value for the IPR&D asset. The most relevant drivers of fair value identified were consistent with the assumptions used in the quantitative estimate of the IPR&D asset. Using these drivers of fair value, the Company identified events and circumstances which may have had an effect on the fair value of the IPR&D asset since the last time the IPR&D’s fair value was quantitatively determined. The Company then weighed these factors to determine and conclude if it was not more likely than not the IPR&D asset was impaired. If it was more likely than not the IPR&D asset was impaired, the Company proceeded with quantitatively determining the fair value of the IPR&D asset.

When performing the quantitative impairment test, the Company used the income approach to determine the fair value of its IPR&D asset. This approach calculates fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to an in-process project over its useful life and then discounting these after-tax cash flows back to a present value. This estimate included judgmental assumptions regarding the estimates that market participants would make in evaluating the IPR&D asset, including the probability of successfully completing clinical trials and obtaining regulatory approval to market the IPR&D asset, the timing of and the expected costs to complete IPR&D projects, future net cash flows from potential drug sales, which were based on estimates of the sales price of the drug, the size of the patient population and cure rate, the Company's competitive position in the marketplace, and appropriate discount and tax rates. Any

impairment to be recorded was calculated as the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the IPR&D asset on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Leases

All of the Company’s leases are operating leases for facilities and equipment. The Company recognizes a lease asset for its right to use the underlying asset and a lease liability for the corresponding lease obligation. The Company determines whether an arrangement is or contains a lease at contract inception. Operating leases with a duration greater than one year are included in operating lease ROU assets, operating lease liabilities - short-term, and operating lease liabilities - long-term in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. In determining the net present value of lease payments, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date. The incremental borrowing rate represents the interest rate the Company would incur at lease commencement to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments on a collateralized basis over the term of a lease. The Company considers a lease term to be the noncancelable period that it has the right to use the underlying asset, including any periods where it is reasonably assured the Company will exercise the option to extend the contract. Periods covered by an option to extend are included in the lease term if the lessor controls the exercise of that option.

The operating lease ROU assets also include any lease payments made and exclude lease incentives. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. Variable lease expenses are recorded when incurred. The Company has elected not to separate lease and non-lease components for its leased assets and accounts for all lease and non-lease components of its agreements as a single lease component.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company monitors the carrying value of long-lived assets, including ROU operating lease assets, for potential impairment and tests the recoverability of such assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If a change in circumstance occurs, the Company performs a test of recoverability by comparing the carrying value of the asset or asset group to its undiscounted expected future cash flows. If cash flows cannot be separately and independently identified for a single asset, the Company will determine whether impairment has occurred for the group of assets for which the Company can identify the projected cash flows. If the carrying values are in excess of undiscounted expected future cash flows, the Company measures any impairment by comparing the fair value of the asset or asset group to its carrying value. There were no indicators of impairment of long-lived assets during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment are stated at cost and consist of lab and office equipment and leasehold improvements. The Company records depreciation under the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of its property and equipment ranging from three to seven years.

Leasehold improvements are amortized over the remaining terms of the respective leases or the estimated useful life of the leasehold improvements, whichever is less. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows accounting guidance on fair value measurements for financial instruments measured on a recurring basis, as well as for certain assets and liabilities that are initially recorded at their estimated fair values. Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company uses the following three-level hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs to value its financial instruments:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

Level 2: Quoted prices for similar instruments that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar

techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.

Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires the Company to make judgments and consider factors specific to the asset or liability. The use of different assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on estimated fair values. Accordingly, the fair value estimates disclosed or initial amounts recorded may not be indicative of the amount the Company or holders of the instruments could realize in a current market exchange.

The carrying amounts of cash equivalents and marketable securities approximate their fair value based upon quoted market prices. Certain of the Company’s financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are recorded at amounts which approximate their fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature, such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses.

The following tables present the fair value of the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the above input categories (in thousands):


	December 31, 2022
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
Cash equivalents
Money market fund	$	49,676	$	—	$	—	$	49,676
Total cash equivalents		49,676		—		—		49,676
Short-term marketable securities
U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities		—		18,597		—		18,597
U.S. treasury securities		—		11,744		—		11,744
U.S. and foreign commercial paper		—		8,851		—		8,851
Total short-term marketable securities		—		39,192		—		39,192
Total assets measured at fair value	$	49,676	$	39,192	$	—	$	88,868


	December 31, 2021
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
Cash equivalents
Money market fund	$	42,507	$	—	$	—	$	42,507
Total cash equivalents		42,507		—		—		42,507
Short-term marketable securities
U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities		—		7,013		—		7,013
Asset-backed securities		—		29,059		—		29,059
U.S. and foreign commercial paper		—		64,928		—		64,928
Total short-term marketable securities		—		101,000		—		101,000
Long-term marketable securities
U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities		—		19,043		—		19,043
U.S. treasury securities		—		8,929		—		8,929
Total long-term marketable securities		—		27,972		—		27,972
Total assets measured at fair value	$	42,507	$	128,972	$	—	$	171,479

Money market funds are highly liquid and actively traded marketable securities that generally transact at a stable $1.00 net asset value representing its estimated fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of its U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities, asset backed securities, U.S. treasury securities and U.S. and foreign commercial paper by taking into consideration valuations obtained from third-party pricing services. The pricing services utilize industry standard valuation models, including both income and market-based approaches, for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, to estimate fair value. These inputs include reported trades of and broker/dealer quotes on the same or similar securities, issuer credit spreads; benchmark securities; prepayment/default projections based on historical data; and other observable inputs.

The Company recognized an impairment charge of $41.6 million for its goodwill and indefinite-lived asset in 2021. The Company considered the fair value used to determine the impairment charge to be a Level 3 measurement. See additional discussion relating to the Company’s impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived asset in Note 6.

There have been no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 for any of the periods presented. See Note 3 for further information regarding the carrying value of the Company’s investments in marketable securities.

Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable from Collaboration

The Company analyzes its collaboration arrangements to assess whether such arrangements, or transactions between arrangement participants, involve joint operating activities performed by parties that are both active participants in the activities and exposed to significant risks and rewards dependent on the commercial success of such activities or are more akin to a vendor-customer relationship. In making this evaluation, the Company considers whether the activities of the collaboration are considered to be distinct and deemed to be within the scope of the collaborative arrangement accounting standard and those that are more reflective of a vendor-customer relationship and, therefore, within the scope of the revenue with contracts with customers accounting standard. This assessment is performed throughout the life of the arrangement based on changes in the responsibilities of all parties in the arrangement.

For elements of collaboration arrangements that are not accounted for pursuant to the revenue from contracts with customers accounting standard, an appropriate recognition method is determined and applied consistently, generally by analogy to the revenue from contracts with customers accounting standard. Amounts related to transactions with a counterparty in a collaborative arrangement that is not a customer are presented as collaboration revenue and on a separate line item from revenue recognized from contracts with customers, if any, in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Under certain collaborative arrangements, the Company has been reimbursed for a portion of its research and development expenses or participates in the cost-sharing of such research and development expenses. Such reimbursements and cost-sharing arrangements are reflected as a reduction of research and development expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, as the Company does not consider performing these activities for reimbursement to be a part of its ongoing major or central operations.

For arrangements or transactions between arrangement participants determined to be within the scope of the contracts with customers accounting standard, the Company evaluates the term of the arrangement and recognizes revenue when the customer obtains control of promised goods or services in a contract for an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. For contracts with customers, the Company applies the following five-step model in order to determine this amount: (1) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (2) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations, including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (3) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (5) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation.

The Company has provided standard indemnification and protection of licensed intellectual property for its customer. These provisions are part of assurance that the licenses meet the agreements, representations and are not obligations to provide goods or services.

The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable the Company will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer. As part of the accounting for contracts with customers, the Company must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the estimated relative standalone selling price (SSP) of each performance obligation identified in the contract. The Company then allocates the total transaction price to each performance obligation based on the SSP of each performance obligation.

The Company recognizes the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when the performance obligation is satisfied or as it is satisfied as revenue.

Upfront License Fees

If a license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenues from nonrefundable, upfront license fees based on the relative value prescribed to the license compared to the total value of the arrangement. The revenue is recognized when the license is transferred to the collaborator and the collaborator is able to use and benefit from the license. For licenses that are not distinct from other obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company utilizes judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time. If the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time, the Company applies an appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue from nonrefundable, upfront license fees. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

Development and Regulatory Milestone Payments

Depending on facts and circumstances, the Company may record revenues from certain milestones in a reporting period before the milestone is achieved if the Company concludes achievement of the milestone is probable and recognition of revenue related to the milestone will not result in a significant reversal in amounts recognized in future periods. The Company records a corresponding contract asset when this conclusion is reached. Milestone payments that have not been included in the transaction price to date are fully constrained. The Company re-evaluates the probability of achievement of such milestones and any related constraint each reporting period. The Company adjusts its estimate of the overall transaction price, including the amount of collaborative revenue that was recorded, if necessary.

Sales-based Milestone and Royalty Payments

The Company’s customer may be required to pay the Company sales-based milestone payments or royalties on future sales of commercial products. The Company recognizes revenues related to sales-based milestone and royalty payments upon the later to occur of (i) achievement of the collaborator’s underlying sales or (ii) satisfaction of any performance obligation(s) related to these sales, in each case assuming the Company’s licensed intellectual property is deemed to be the predominant item to which the sales-based milestones and/or royalties relate.

The Company receives payments from its customer based on billing schedules established in the contract. Upfront payments and fees are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt or when due until the Company performs its obligations under the arrangement. If the related performance obligation is expected to be satisfied within the next twelve months, these amounts will be classified in current liabilities. The Company recognizes a contract asset relating to its conditional right to consideration that is not subject to a constraint. Amounts are recorded as accounts receivable when the Company’s right to consideration is unconditional.

A net contract asset or liability is presented for each contract with a customer. The Company does not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of the promised goods or services to the customer will be one year or less.

At December 31, 2022 and 2021, all accounts receivable from collaboration are deemed collectible.

Contract Liabilities

The following tables present changes in the Company’s contract liabilities (in thousands):


	Balance at Beginning of Period		Additions		Deductions			Balance at End of Period
Year Ended December 31, 2022
Contract liabilities:
Deferred revenue	$	2,733	$	—	$	—		$	2,733

	Balance at Beginning of Period		Additions		Deductions			Balance at End of Period
Year Ended December 31, 2021
Contract liabilities:
Deferred revenue	$	8,987	$	—	$	(6,254	)	$	2,733


	Year Ended December 31,
	2022		2021
Collaboration revenue recognized in the period from
Amounts included in deferred revenue at the beginning of the period	$	—	$	6,254
Performance obligations satisfied in previous period	$	—	$	—

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures stock-based compensation to employees, consultants, Board members, and non-employees at fair value on the grant date of the award. The fair value of RSUs is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. If stock-based awards are granted in contemplation of or shortly before a planned release of material nonpublic information, and such information is expected to result in a material increase in the Company’s share price, the Company considers whether an adjustment to the observable market price is required when estimating fair values. Compensation cost is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. Stock-based awards with graded vesting schedules are recognized using the accelerated attribution method on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award. For awards that have a performance condition, compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the award on the grant date, the date performance targets are established, and is expensed over the requisite service period for each separately vesting tranche when achievement of the performance condition becomes probable. The Company assesses the probability of the performance conditions being met on a continuous basis. For awards that have a market condition, compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the award and is expensed over the derived service period regardless of whether the underlying market condition is met. Forfeitures are recognized when they occur.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock option grants that do not contain market-based vesting conditions using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used in estimating the fair value of these awards, such as expected term, expected dividend yield, volatility and risk-free interest rate, represent management’s best estimates and involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. The Company uses the Monte-Carlo model to calculate the fair value on the date of grant of awards which contain market-based vesting conditions. This pricing model uses multiple simulations to evaluate the probability of achieving the market condition to calculate the fair value of the awards which includes the recent market price and volatility of the Company's shares. The Company is also required to make estimates as to the probability of achieving the specific performance conditions. If actual results are not consistent with the Company’s assumptions and judgments used in making these estimates, the Company may be required to increase or decrease compensation expense, which could be material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations.

Research and Development Expense and Accruals

Research and development costs include personnel-related costs, outside contracted services including clinical study costs, facilities costs, fees paid to consultants, milestone payments prior to FDA approval, license fees prior to FDA

approval, professional services, travel costs, dues and subscriptions, depreciation and materials used in clinical trials and research and development and costs incurred under the Company’s collaboration agreements. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred unless there is an alternative future use in other research and development projects. Payments made prior to the receipt of goods or services to be used in research and development are capitalized until the goods or services are received. Such payments are evaluated for current or long-term classification based on when they will be realized or consumed.

The Company records expenses related to clinical studies and manufacturing development activities based on its estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with multiple contract research organizations and manufacturing vendors that conduct and manage these activities on its behalf. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract, and may result in uneven payment flows. There may be instances in which payments made to the Company’s vendors will exceed the level of services provided and result in a prepayment of the expense. Payments under some of these contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment of subjects and the completion of clinical study milestones. In amortizing or accruing service fees, the Company estimates the time period over which services will be performed, enrollment of subjects, number of sites activated and the level of effort expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the Company’s estimate, the Company will adjust the accrued or prepaid expense balance accordingly. To date, there have been no material differences from the Company’s estimates to the amounts actually incurred.

The Company has entered and may continue to enter into license agreements to access and utilize certain technology. In each case, the Company evaluates if the license agreement results in the acquisition of an asset or a business. To date, none of the Company’s license agreements have been considered to be acquisitions of businesses. For asset acquisitions, the upfront payments to acquire such licenses, as well as any future milestone payments, are immediately recognized as research and development expense when paid, provided there is no alternative future use of the rights in other research and development projects. These license agreements may also include contingent consideration in the form of cash payments to be made for future milestone events. The Company assesses whether such contingent consideration meets the definition of a derivative and to date the Company has determined that such contingent consideration are not derivatives.

Restructuring Charges

The Company recognizes restructuring charges related to reorganization plans that have been committed to by management and when liabilities have been incurred. In connection with these activities, the Company records restructuring charges at fair value for (1) contractual employee termination benefits when obligations are associated to services already rendered, rights to such benefits have vested, and payment of benefits is probable and can be reasonably estimated, (2) one-time employee termination benefits when management has committed to a plan of termination, the plan identifies the employees and their expected termination dates, the details of termination benefits are complete, it is unlikely changes to the plan will be made or the plan will be withdrawn and communication to such employees has occurred, and (3) contract termination costs when a contract is terminated before the end of its term.

One-time employee termination benefits are recognized in their entirety when communication has occurred, and future services are not required. If future services are required, the costs are recorded ratably over the remaining period of service. Contract termination costs to be incurred over the remaining contract term without economic benefit are recorded in their entirety when the contract is canceled.

The recognition of restructuring charges requires the Company to make certain judgments and estimates regarding the nature, timing and amount of costs associated with the reorganization plan. To the extent the Company’s actual results differ from its estimates and assumptions, the Company may be required to revise the estimates of future accrued restructuring liabilities, requiring the recognition of additional restructuring charges or the reduction of accrued restructuring liabilities already recognized. Such changes to previously estimated amounts may be material to the consolidated financial statements. Changes in the estimates of the restructuring charges are recorded in the period the change is determined. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, changes to previous estimates for restructuring charges were not material.

At the end of each reporting period, the Company evaluates the remaining accrued restructuring balances to ensure that no excess accruals are retained, and the utilization of the provisions are for their intended purpose in accordance with developed restructuring plans.

For gains and losses on the derecognition of nonfinancial assets the Company determines if a contract exists, identifies the distinct non-financial assets, and determines when control transfers and, therefore, when to derecognize the asset. Additionally, the Company applies the measurement principles of revenue from contracts with customers within U.S. GAAP to determine the amount of consideration to include in the calculation of the gain or loss for the non-financial asset. Any gains or losses have been included within research and development expenses.

Variable Interest Entities

The Company reviews agreements it enters into with third party entities, pursuant to which it may have a variable interest in the entity, in order to determine if the entity is a variable interest entity (VIE). If the entity is a VIE, the Company assesses whether or not it is the primary beneficiary of that entity. In determining whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of an entity, the Company applies a qualitative approach that determines whether it has both (1) the power to direct the economically significant activities of the entity and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity that could potentially be significant to that entity. If the Company were to determine it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the Company would consolidate the statements of operations and financial condition of the VIE into its consolidated financial statements.

The Company’s determination about whether it should consolidate such VIEs is made continuously as changes to existing relationships or future transactions may result in a consolidation event.

Income Taxes

The Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective income tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company establishes a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized based on an evaluation of objective verifiable evidence. For tax positions that are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, the Company recognizes the largest amount of the benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. For tax positions that are not more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, the Company does not recognize any portion of the benefit.

The Company recognizes and measures uncertain tax positions using a two-step approach set forth in authoritative guidance. The first step is to evaluate the tax position taken or expected to be taken by determining whether the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained in an audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Significant judgment is required to evaluate uncertain tax positions. The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions on a regular basis. The evaluations are based on a number of factors, including changes in facts and circumstances, changes in tax law, correspondence with tax authorities during the course of the audit, and effective settlement of audit issues. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of any accruals which the Company believes are appropriate. It is the Company’s policy to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. No interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions has been incurred or accrued for any periods presented.

In June 2020, Assembly Bill 85 (A.B. 85) was signed into California law. A.B. 85 provides for a three-year suspension of the use of net operating losses for medium and large businesses and a three-year cap on the use of business incentive tax credits to offset no more than $5.0 million of tax per year. A.B. 85 suspends the use of net operating losses for taxable years 2020, 2021 and 2022 for certain taxpayers with taxable income of $1.0 million or more. The carryover period for any net operating losses that are suspended under this provision will be extended. A.B. 85 also requires that business incentive tax credits including carryovers may not reduce the applicable tax by more than $5.0 million for taxable years 2020, 2021 and 2022. On February 9, 2022, Senate Bill No. 113 was enacted that removed the limitations on the use of NOLs and the cap on the business incentive tax credits that were suspended in accordance with AB 85 effective for tax year 2022.

In March 2021, the American Rescue Plan (H.R. 1319) was signed into law. This legislation extends and enhances a number of current-law tax incentives for businesses, but also expands the definition of a “covered employee” as defined by Section 162(m)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Effective January 1, 2022, a provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) took effect creating a significant change to the treatment of research and experimental expenditures under Section 174 of the Internal Revenue Code (Sec. 174 expenses). Historically, businesses have had the option of deducting Sec. 174 expenses in the year incurred or capitalizing and amortizing the costs over five years. The new TCJA provision, however, eliminates this option and will require Sec. 174 expenses associated with research conducted in the United States to be capitalized and amortized over a five-year period. For expenses associated with research outside of the United States, Sec. 174 expenses are required to be capitalized and amortized over a 15-year period.

The A.B. 85, H.R. 1319 and TCJA provision did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) was enacted into law. The IRA establishes a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax on corporations whose average annual adjusted financial statement income during the most recently completed three-year period exceeds $1 billion and a 1% excise tax on stock repurchases made by certain publicly traded U.S. corporations. These provisions are effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. The Company does not currently qualify for the corporate alternative minimum tax, and these provisions are not expected to have a material impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Net Loss per Share

Basic net loss per common share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity unless inclusion of such shares would be anti-dilutive. Since the Company has only incurred losses, basic and diluted net loss per share is the same.

A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted net loss per common share computations is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Year Ended December 31,
	2022			2021
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(93,092	)	$	(129,855	)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares and pre-funded warrants outstanding - basic and diluted		48,409,265			43,280,383
Net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(1.92	)	$	(3.00	)

Securities excluded from the computation of diluted loss from per share because including them would have been antidilutive are as follows:


	December 31,
	2022		2021
Options to purchase common stock		9,090,865		6,161,901
Common stock subject to purchase under ESPP		71,653		78,740
Unvested RSUs		1,699,764		970,339
Total		10,862,282		7,210,980

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and adjustments for the change in unrealized gains and losses on investments in available-for-sale marketable securities. The Company displays comprehensive loss and its components in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, net of tax effects if any.

Concentrations of Risk

Credit Risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The Company holds these investments in highly rated financial institutions, and, by policy, limits the amounts of credit exposure to any one financial institution. These amounts at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any credit losses in such accounts and does not believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk on these funds. The Company has no off-balance sheet concentrations of credit risk, such as foreign currency exchange contracts, option contracts or other hedging arrangements.

Supplier Risk

Certain materials and key components the Company utilizes in its operations are obtained through single suppliers. Since the suppliers of key components and materials must be named in a New Drug Application (NDA) filed with the FDA for a product, significant delays can occur if the qualification of a new supplier is required. If delivery of material from the Company’s suppliers were interrupted for any reason, the Company may be unable to supply any of its product candidates for clinical trials.

Accounting Pronouncements to Be Adopted

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASU 2016-13), which requires that expected credit losses relating to financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis and available-for-sale debt securities be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 limits the amount of credit losses to be recognized for available-for-sale debt securities to the amount by which carrying value exceeds fair value and requires the reversal of previously recognized credit losses if fair value increases. In April, May and November 2019, the FASB issued additional amendments to the new guidance related to transition and clarification. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates, which deferred the effective date of this standard for all entities except SEC filers that are not smaller reporting companies to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect ASU 2016-13 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.