10-Q 1 ifdc10q.htm FORM10-Q

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

   
   
_X_ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
  For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2014
   
____ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Transition Period From                          to                        

 

 

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

(Name of small business issuer specified in its charter)

 

   
   
                  Nevada                                      56-2676759                
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)  
   

845 Third Ave. 6th Floor

New York, NY

10022
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 295-1711

 

420 North Camden Dr. Retail Level

Beverly Hills, California 90210

(Former address of principle offices)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:   Yes  x       No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.)  Yes x   No ¨   

1
 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a nonaccelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.   See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Section 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

       
       
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer                       ¨
Non-accelerated filer                 ¨ Smaller reporting company     x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes  ¨     No x

 

As of May 15, 2014, the issuer had 88,438,670 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format:    Yes    ¨      No   x

 

 

 

 

2
 

 

 

Independent Film Development Corporation

(a Development Stage Company)

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2014

 

INDEX

  

     
PART I Financial Information 4
Item 1. Financial Statements 4
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 25
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 25
     
PART II Other Information 26
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 26
Item 1A. Risk Factors 26
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 28
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 32
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures 32
Item 5. Other Information 32
Item 6. Exhibits 32
Signatures 33

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3
 

 

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 (unaudited) 5
   

Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013,

    and from inception on September 14, 2007 through March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

6
   

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) from inception on September 14, 2007

  through March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

7
   

Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013,

    and from inception on September 14, 2007 through March 31, 2014 (unaudited)

   
Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited) 11

 

 

4
 

 

 

Independent Film Development Corporation
(a Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
   March 31,
2014
  September 30,
2013
ASSETS          
           
   Cash  $12,428   $2,713 
          Total Assets  $12,428   $2,713 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)          
           
 Current Liabilities:          
   Accounts payable  $63,218   $24,115 
 Accounts payable, related party   69,957    70,705 
   Accrued officer compensation   535,650    499,827 
   Accrued interest and penalties   317,338    681,761 
   Advances from officers   8,687    15,417 
   Accrued interest, related party   85    854 
   Due to a related party   —      4,210 
 Notes payable   18,550    18,550 
 Derivative liability   124,954    755,167 
Convertible notes, net of discount of $55,842   24,158    —   
   Convertible debentures in default   86,050    915,600 
          Total Liabilities   1,248,647    2,986,206 
           
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):          
  Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value, 15,000,0000
   shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
   —      —   
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 485,000,000 shares authorized, 88,438,670 and 62,313,670 issued and outstanding, respectively   8,843    6,231 
  Additional paid in capital   5,143,252    3,709,946 
  Common stock payable   38,000    684,010 
  Deficit accumulated during development stage    (6,426,314)   (7,383,680)
          Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)   (1,236,219)   (2,983,493)
          Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity  (Deficit)  $12,428   $2,713 
           

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

5
 

 

 

          
Independent Film Development Corporation
(a Development Stage Company)
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
   For the Six Months Ended  For the Three Months Ended  September 14, 2007
   March 31,  March 31,  (inception) through
   2014  2013  2014  2013  March 31, 2014
                
Revenue  $—     $—     $—     $—     $3,770 
                          
Operating Expenses:                         
  Officer compensation   197,350    83,318    142,075    43,043    1,569,057 
  Professional fees   23,803    17,948    17,378    16,448    595,303 
  Director fees   —      —      —      —      38,000 
Loss on impairment of websites   —      —      —      —      818,521 
  Bad debt expense   —      —      —      —      72,635 
  General and administrative   188,906    2,313    20,915    1,321    3,044,747 
    Total operating expenses   410,059    103,579    180,368    60,812    6,138,263 
Loss from operations   (410,059)   (103,579)   (180,368)   (60,812)   (6,134,493)
                          
Other income and (expense):                         
Gain (loss) on derivative liability   179,931    81,796    163,525    (70,157)   (438,366)
Gain on extinguishment of debt   1,360,227    —      1,360,227    —      1,360,227 
Loss on settlement of debt   —      —      —      —      (18,537)
Penalty expense   (118,000)   (91,000)   (25,000)   (45,000)   (515,509)
  Interest expense   (54,733)   (218,282)   (12,736)   (103,662)   (679,636)
Total other income (expense)   1,367,425    (227,486)   1,486,016    (218,819)   (291,821)
                          
Net income (loss)  $957,366   $(331,065)  $1,305,648   $(279,631)  $(6,426,314)
                          
Income (loss) per share                         
  Diluted  $0.01   $   $0.01   $      
  Basic  $0.01   $(0.01)  $0.02   $(0.01)     
                          
Weighted average shares                         
 Outstanding diluted   81,878,529    —      98,576,432    —        
Outstanding basic   74,924,796    38,808,166    80,587,281    39,183,670      
                          

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6
 

 

Independent Film Development Corporation
(a Development Stage Company)
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
(unaudited)
 
    Number of Shares Outstanding    Common Stock at Par Value    Paid in Capital       

Deficit Accumulated During

Development

    Common Stock Subscribed    Stock Subscription Receivable    Total      
                                    
Beginning balance   —     $—     $—     $—     $—     $—     $—   
Stock issued for cash   125    —      500    —      —      —      500 
Balance at September 30, 2007   125    —      500    —      —      —      500 
Stock issued for cash   18,492    2    35,940    —      —      —      35,942 
Net loss for the  year ended September 30, 2008   —      —      —      (33,413)   —      —      (33,413)
Balance at September 30, 2008   18,617    2    36,440    (33,413)   —      —      3,029 
Stock issued for cash   34,803    3    109,997    —      —      (85,000)   25,000 
Stock issued for compensation   22,300,000    2,230    2,227,770    —      —      —      2,230,000 
Net loss for year ended September 30, 2009   —      —      —      (2,258,311)   —      —      (2,258,311)
Balance at September 30, 2009   22,353,420    2,235    2,374,207    (2,291,724)   —      (85,000)   (282)
Stock issued for cash   626,571    63    197,032    —      —      —      197,095 
Stock issued for compensation   4,000    —      2,000    —      —      —      2,000 
Stock subscription receivable   —      —      —      —      —      22,660    22,660 
Net loss for year ended September 30, 2010   —      —      —      (217,881)   —      —      (217,881)
Balance at September 30, 2010   22,983,991    2,298    2,573,239    (2,509,605)   —      (62,340)   3,592 
Stock for other services   556,000    56    211,224    —      171,000    —      382,280 
Stock for officer compensation   —      —      —      —      570,000    —      570,000 
7
 
Stock for Director fees   —      —      —      —      38,000    —      38,000 
Stock issued for cash   575,000    57    39,918    —      —      (8,025)   31,950 
Common stock issued for lock up agreement   6,000    1    2,279    —      —      —      2,280 
Write off of stock subscription receivable   —      —      —      —      —      70,365    70,365 
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2011   —      —      —      (1,448,150)   —      —      (1,448,150)
Balance at September 30, 2011   24,120,991    2,412    2,826,660    (3,957,755)   779,000    —      (349,683)
Write off of stock payable   —      —      95,000    —      (95,000)   —      —   
Stock for officer compensation   50,000    5    25,495    —      213    —      25,713 
Settlement of derivative liability   —      —      186,830    —      —      —      186,830 
Stock issued in conversion of note payable   5,115,384    512    175,988    —      —      —      176,500 
Stock issued for services   —      —      —      —      66,459    —      66,459 
Stock issued to settle debt   —      —      —      —      978    —      978 
Contributed capital   —      —      13,500    —      —      —      13,500 
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2012   —      —      —      (1,881,717)   —      —      (1,881,717)
Balance at September 30, 2012   29,286,375    2,929    3,323,473    (5,839,472)   751,650    —      (1,761,420)
Stock for officer compensation   7,300,000    729    95,841    —      (203)   —      96,367 
Settlement of derivative liability   —      —      16,998    —      —      —      16,998 
Stock issued in conversion of note payable   2,052,795    205    13,745    —      —      —      13,950 
Stock issued for stock payable   8,281,500    828    66,609    —      (67,437)   —      —   
Stock issued to settle debt   6,038,000    604    77,776    —      —      —      78,380 
Stock issued for services   4,855,000    486    97,954    —      —      —      98,440 
Stock issued for cash   4,500,000    450    17,550    —      —      —      18,000 
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2013   —      —      —      (1,544,208)   —      —      (1,544,208)
Balance at September 30, 2013   62,313,670    6,231    3,709,946    (7,383,680)   684,010    —      (2,983,493)
Stock issued for services   7,200,000    720    131,780    —      —      —      132,500 
Stock issued for cash   8,350,000    835    23,165    —      —      —      24,000 
Stock for officer compensation   8,000,000    800    48,500    —      —      —      49,300 
Stock for accrued salary   875,000    87    69,913    —      —      —      70,000 
Stock issued for stock payable   1,700,000    170    645,840    (646,010)   —      —      —   
Discount on convertible note   —      —      63,826    —      —      —      63,826 
Settlement of derivative liability   —      —      450,282    —      —      —      450,282 
Net loss for the period ended March 31, 2014(unaudited)   —      —      —      (957,366)   —      —      (957,366)
Balance at March 31, 2014 (unaudited)   88,418,670   $8,843   $5,143,252   $(6,426,314)   38,000   $—     $(1,236,219)

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

8
 

Independent Film Development Corporation
(a Development Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
          
   For the Six Months Ended  September 14, 2007
   March 31,  (inception) through
   2014  2013  March 31, 2014
          
Cash flows from operating activities:               
Net loss  $957,366   $(331,065)  $(6,426,314)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to total cash used in operations:               
Common stock for compensation   49,300    2,767    2,973,380 
Common stock for other services   132,500    —      675,459 
Common stock for Director's fees   —      —      38,000 
Loss on settlement of debt   —      —      18,537 
Amortization expense   —      —      31,479 
Loss on impairment of website properties   —      —      818,521 
Bad debt expense for stock subscription  receivable    —      —      70,365 
(Gain) loss on derivative liability   (179,931)   (81,796)   438,366 
Gain on extinguishment of debt   (1,360,227)   —      (1,360,227)
Debt discount amortization   7,984    134,899    348,681 
Change in assets and liabilities:               
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable   39,945    989    62,061 
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, related party   —      —      72,705 
Increase in accrued expenses   164,665    173,962    846,426 
Accrued interest, related party   (770)   422    84 
Increase in accrued compensation   105,823    79,550    672,150 
           Net cash used in operating activities   (83,345)   (20,272)   (720,327)
                
Cash flows from investing activities   —      —      —   
                
Cash flows from financing activities:               
Cash overdraft   —      10    —   
Cash advances (payments) related party   (4,210)   1,250    (2,420)
      Proceeds from debenture/loans   80,000    18,550    354,600 
      Proceeds from subscriptions receivable   —      —      22,660 
Contributed capital   —      —      13,500 
Advances from officers   —      462    32,062 
Payments to officers   (6,730)   —      (20,134)
      Proceeds from the sale of common stock   24,000    —      332,487 
          Net cash provided by financing activities   93,060    20,272    732,755 
Net increase (decrease) in cash   9,715    —      12,428 
Cash at beginning of period   2,713    —      —   
Cash at end of period  $12,428   $—     $12,428 
                
Cash paid for:               
   Interest  $770   $—     $770 
   Taxes  $—     $—     $—   
                

 

 

9
 

 

Supplemental disclosure of non cash activities               
   Website property acquired with convertible  debenture  $—     $—     $850,000 
   Common stock issued for conversion of debt  $—     $10,380   $190,450 
Common stock issued for conversion of debt to related parties  $70,000    —      136,880 
   Settlement of derivative liability  $450,282   $11,368   $641,110 
   Debt discount on convertible notes payable  $63,826   $—     $339,009 
   Forgiveness of stock payable  $—     $—     $95,000 
Common stock issued for stock payable  $646,010   $67,641   $713,651 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

10
 

 

 Independent Film Development Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2014

(Unaudited)

 

 

NOTE 1: HISTORY OF OPERATIONS

 

Business Activity

 

Independent Film Development Corporation was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 14, 2007. Effective April 24, 2008 we commenced operating as a Business Development Company ("BDC") under Section 54(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act").  On September 30, 2009, our board of directors elected to cease operating as a BDC.  

 

The company’s plan of operations seeks to acquire real estate assets primarily, but not exclusively, in the hospitality space, which present value creation potential due to the complexity or illiquidity of their existing ownership and / or capital structure. In such situations, IFLM will seek to actively work through the complexities, gain control of the asset, actively manage, recapitalize and thereby create value. For those assets lying outside of the hospitality space, IFLM will sell the assets at a price which realizes that value created. For those assets lying within the hospitality space, IFLM will then leverage its film, entertainment and hospitality capabilities to transform the property into genre themed hotels and resorts. The final product will be a paradigm-shifting convergence of hospitality and entertainment, providing guests with a full immersion experience during their stay. Additionally, should any opportunities for content creation/distribution projects present themselves, IFLM will pursue those that align with the company’s strategic vision.

 

Since the change in leadership in January 2014, IFLM has made significant progress in focusing and executing on its business plan of operations, as well as addressing outstanding liabilities on the company’s balance sheet and laying a foundation for the long-term profitability of the company.

 

On February 6, 2014, the Company created two new subsidiaries, the IFLM LA Realty Fund, LLC and the Hilltop Manor Fund, LLC. The Companies will be used to hold two separate offerings for real estate investment funds.  The net cash proceeds from these two offerings, less working capital expenses, will be used to invest in real estate and/or the costs associated with the acquisition and development of real estate.  The real estate investments under the IFLM LA Realty Fund will focus on undervalued properties on the West Coast of the United States.  The Hilltop Manor Fund will focus on the initial costs associated with the acquisition and development of the Hilltop Manor theme park and resort concept.

 

The Company is in the development stage as defined under Statement on Financial Accounting Standards Accounting Standards Codification FASB ASC 915-205 "Development-Stage Entities.”

 

 

NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary in order for the financial statements to be not misleading have been reflected herein. The Company has adopted a September 30 year end.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of March 31, 2014 or September 30, 2013.

 

Stock Based Compensation

 

We account for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from non-employees. Costs are measured at the fair market value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earlier of the date on which there first exists a firm commitment for performance by the provider of goods or services or on the date performance is complete. The Company recognizes the fair value of the equity instruments issued that result in an asset or expense being recorded by the Company, in the same period(s) and in the same manner, as if the Company has paid cash for the goods or services.

11
 

The Company accounts for equity based transactions with non-employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“Topic No. 505-50”). Topic No. 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of common stock issued for payments to non-employees is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of equity instruments, other than common stock, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In general, the Company recognizes an asset or expense in the same manner as if it was to pay cash for the goods or services instead of paying with or using the equity instrument.

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.  The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered. There has been no stock-based compensation issued to employees.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount of cash, notes receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes payable, as applicable, approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The fair value of the related party notes payable cannot be determined because of the Company's affiliation with the parties with whom the agreements exist. The use of different assumptions or methodologies may have a material effect on the estimates of fair values.

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures.  The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

· Level 1:  Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

 

· Level 2:  Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

 

· Level 3:  Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of March 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013 on a recurring basis:

 

March 31, 2014

Description   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total Gains and (Losses)
Derivative     -     -     (124,954)     179,931
Total   $ -   $ -   $ (124,954)   $ 179,931

September 30, 2013

Description   Level 1   Level 2   Level 3   Total Gains and (Losses)

Derivative     -     -     (755,167)     (303,280)
Total   $ -   $ -   $ (755,167)   $ (303,280)

 

Long Lived Assets

 

Long lived assets are carried at cost and amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally on a straight-line basis. The Company reviews identifiable amortizable assets to be held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the lowest level of identifiable estimated undiscounted cash flows resulting from use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of any impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value.

 

 Income Taxes

 

Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 740 “Income Taxes” (ASC 740) requires the asset and liability method of accounting be used for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

In June 2006, the FASB interpreted its standard for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, an interpretation of accounting for income taxes.  This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance the minimum recognition threshold and measurement attributable to a tax position taken on a tax return is required to be met before being recognized in the financial statements. The FASB’s interpretation had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2014.

 

Derivative Liabilities

 

The Company records the fair value of its derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC815, Derivatives and Hedging. The fair value of the derivatives was calculated using a multi-nominal lattice model performed by an independent qualified business valuator. The fair value of the derivative liability is revalued on each balance sheet date with corresponding gains and losses recorded in the consolidated statement of operations

 

Derivative financial instruments should be recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet and measured at fair value. For purposes of the Company’s financial statements fair value was used as the basis for formulating an analysis which has been defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) as “the amount for which an asset (or liability) could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, unrelated willing parties when neither party is acting under compulsion”. The FASB has provided guidance that its definition of fair value is consistent with the definition of fair market value in IRS Rev. Rule 59-60. In determining the fair value of the derivatives it was assumed that the Company’s business would be conducted as a going concern. These derivative liabilities will need to be marked-to-market each quarter with the change in fair value recorded in the income statement.

 

 

 

The Company has notes payable in which the holder has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock.  Because the terms of the debentures do not specifically state that there is a minimum amount on which the price of the conversion can go and/or there is no maximum amount of shares that can be converted into, a derivative liability is triggered and must accounted for as such (see Note 6).

 

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents (primarily outstanding options and warrants). Common stock equivalents represent the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of the outstanding stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method. The calculation of fully diluted earnings (loss) per share assumes the dilutive effect of the exercise of outstanding options and warrants at either the beginning of the respective period presented or the date of issuance, whichever is later. At

March 31, 2014, the Company had no outstanding options or warrants.

 

12
 

 

 Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

 

-Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
-Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

 

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

 

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

 

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 3: CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

On February 7, 2014, the Company was granted a default judgment by the Central District Court of California in the case Independent Film Dev. Corp vs Junior Capital, Inc. The granting of the default judgment rescinds all debentures and releases the Company from all obligations due to Junior Capital, Inc., Editor Newswire, Inc., and iBacking Corp, including any and all accrued interest and penalties. As a result of the release of liabilities the Company has recognized a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $1,358,637 and written off $450,282 of the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

On July 1, 2011, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with Junior Capital Inc. (“Junior”), pursuant to which Junior exchanged a $350,000 promissory note for a $350,000 convertible debenture (the “Junior Debenture”). The Junior Debenture accrues interest of 10% and matures on July 1, 2012. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of issuance, or $0.05 per share of common stock on the date of conversion as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $50,514, $8,773 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 with the remaining $41,741 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. During fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, $143,500 of the $350,000 debenture was converted into 4,100,000 shares of common stock. This conversion was converted within the terms of the agreement. As a result of the conversions the remaining $4,359 of debt discount amortization was accelerated and expensed, and the derivative liability decreased by $149,671. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provisions of the debenture, as a result of nonpayment as of the due date and failure to convert a portion of the debenture upon request, the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18%, effective as of the date of issuance, and a per business day penalty of $500 has been accrued from the date of default of $230,000. As a result of the before mentioned default judgment this debt has been written off in full to gain on extinguishment of debt and the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

 

13
 

 

On October 25, 2011 the Company issued a convertible debenture/note payable to Junior Capital, Inc. for $20,000, $15,000 of this amount was advanced to the Company prior to signing the debenture and prior to the year ended September 30, 2011. The remaining $5,000 was received in October 2011.  The Debenture accrues interest of 10% beginning on October 25, 2011 and matures on October 25, 2012. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $20,000, $743 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, $17,051 was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 and $2,206 was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance. As a result of the before mentioned default judgment this debt has been written off in full to gain on extinguishment of debt and the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

 

On October 28, 2011, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with Editor Newswire Inc. (“Editor”), pursuant to which Editor exchanged a $20,000 promissory note for a $20,000 convertible debenture (the “Editor Debenture”). The Editor Debenture accrues interest of 10% and matures on October 28, 2012. Editor has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $20,000, $10,017 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $9,983 amortized in fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance. As a result of the before mentioned default judgment this debt has been written off in full to gain on extinguishment of debt and the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

 

On November 18, 2011, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with Editor Newswire Inc. (“Editor”), pursuant to which Editor exchanged a $25,000 promissory note dated November 18, 2011 for a $25,000 convertible debenture (the “Editor Debenture”). The Editor Debenture accrues interest of 10% and matures on November 18, 2012. Editor has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $25,000, $9,632 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $15,368 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance. As a result of the before mentioned default judgment this debt has been written off in full to gain on extinguishment of debt and the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

 

On January 11, 2012, the Company entered into a $33,000 convertible debenture with Junior Capital Inc. (“Junior”). The Junior Debenture accrues interest of 10% and matures on January 11, 2013. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $33,000, $8,425 of which was amortized to interest expense before conversion during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012. This conversion was converted within the terms of the agreement. As a result of the conversions, $24,575 of debt discount amortization was accelerated and expensed and the derivative liability decreased by $37,159. During the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, the entire $33,000 debenture was converted into 1,015,384 shares of common stock.

 

14
 

 

On March 15, 2012, the Company entered into a $40,000 convertible debenture with Junior Capital Inc. (“Junior”). The Junior Debenture accrues interest of 12% and matures on March 15, 2013. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $40,000, $9,760 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $30,240 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance. As a result of the before mentioned default judgment this debt has been written off in full to gain on extinguishment of debt and the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

 

On April 9, 2012, the Company entered into a $100,000 convertible debenture with Neil Linder. The debenture accrues interest of 12% and matures on April 9, 2013. Mr. Linder has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $49,532, $15,994 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $33,538 amortized the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, $13,950 of the $100,000 debenture was converted into 2,052,795 shares of common stock. This conversion was converted within the terms of the agreement. As of March 31, 2014 $86,050 of the principal face value of the Debenture remains outstanding. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance, a $1,000 per business day penalty was being imposed for failure to execute a conversion in a timely manner, and an additional accrual of $112,509 was accounted for as a result of a provision requiring additional funds due in the event that a “default payment” is made by the Company.

 

On May 29, 2012, the Company entered into a $500,000 convertible debenture with iBacking Corp. The iBacking Debenture accrues interest of 12% and matures on May 29, 2013. iBacking has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of fifty percent (50%) of the lowest closing bid price of common stock during the ten trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $84,651, $21,997 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $62,654 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance. As a result of the before mentioned default judgment this debt has been written off in full to gain on extinguishment of debt and the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

 

On June 5, 2012, the Company entered into an $18,000 convertible debenture with Junior Capital Inc. (“Junior”). The Junior Debenture accrues interest of 12% and matures on June 5, 2013. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $18,000, $1,512 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $16,488 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance. As a result of the before mentioned default judgment this has been written off in full to gain on extinguishment of debt and the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

 

15
 

 

The fair values of the derivatives for the above liabilities are calculated using a multi-nominal lattice model. The model values the derivative liability in each debenture based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. These models are based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The fair value of the derivative liability is revalued on each balance sheet date with corresponding gains and losses recorded in the statement of operations.

 

The following inputs and assumptions were used to value the secured convertible notes at March 31, 2014 and September 30, 2013:

 

  • The convertible promissory notes have a conversion price of the lesser of 50% of the average of the lowest closing bid stock prices (lowest closing bid price for the 5/29/12 note) over the last 5-10 days or 50% of the closing bid price at issuance (or $0.05 for the 7/1/11 note) and contains no dilutive reset feature.

  • The stock price would fluctuate with an annual volatility. The projected volatility curve was based on historical volatilities of the 18 comparable companies in the entertainment industry.

  • The Holder would redeem based on availability of alternative financing, increasing 1.0% monthly to a maximum of 10%.

  • The Holder will automatically convert the note at maturity if the registration was effective and the company was not in default. The following conversions were completed during the fiscal year.

The following are the conversions that have been completed as of March 31, 2014:

 

  • On March 7, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

  • On March 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

  • On April 20, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

  • On June 13, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 common shares in conversion of $12,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

  • On June 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 common shares in conversion of $20,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

  • On July 24, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares in conversion of $32,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

  • On July 27, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,015,384 common shares in conversion of $33,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated January 11, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

  • On August 21, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,100,000 common shares in conversion of $11,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.01 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

  • On October 16, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,552,795 common shares in conversion of $10,000 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.00644 pursuant to the conversion
  • terms of the debenture.

  • On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 500,000 common shares in conversion of $3,950 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0079 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

A summary of the activity of the derivative liability is shown below:

 

Balance at September 30, 2012  $468,884 
Decrease in derivative due to settlement of debt   (16,997)
Derivative loss due to mark to market adjustment   303,280 
Balance at September 30, 2013   755,167 
Decrease in derivative due to extinguishment of debt   (450,282)
Derivative (gain) due to mark to market adjustment   (179,931)
Balance at March 31, 2014  $124,954 

 

NOTE 4: CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

 

On January 29, 2014, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note to Asher Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $37,500. The note bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum, is unsecured and matures on October 31, 2014. The Note is convertible into common stock in whole or in part 180 days after funding at a variable conversion price equal to a 42% discount to the average of the lowest three trading prices in the 10-day trading price prior to the conversion date. As a result of the conversion feature the Company has recorded a debt discount of $21,326, $4,808 of which has been amortized to interest expense. The discount was determined by calculating the intrinsic value of the loan based on the stock price on the date of the loan of $0.0065 and the conversion price of $0.0039. The intrinsic value was $21,326. As of March 31, 2014, there is $399 of accrued interest on this note.

 

On March 11, 2014, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note to Asher Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $42,500. The note bears interest at a rate of 8% per annum, is unsecured and matures on December 17, 2014. The Note is convertible into common stock in whole or in part 180 days after funding at a variable conversion price equal to a 42% discount to the average of the lowest three trading prices in the 10-day trading price prior to the conversion date. As a result of the conversion feature the Company has recorded a debt discount of $42,500, $3,176 of which has been amortized to interest expense. The discount was determined by calculating the intrinsic value of the loan based on the stock price on the date of the loan of $0.0123 and the conversion price of $0.0030. The intrinsic value was $130,826; however the discount is limited to the amount of the loan. As of March 31, 2014, there is $168 of accrued interest on this note.

 

NOTE 5: COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

 

During the period from September 14, 2007 (inception) through September 30, 2007 the Company issued 125 common shares for $500 cash.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2008 the Company issued 18,492 common shares for $35,942 cash.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2009 the Company issued 34,803 common shares for $25,000 cash and a subscription receivable in the amount of $85,000. During the year ended September 30, 2010 the Company received $22,660 on its subscription receivable.

 

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 common shares to Directors Robert Searcy and Patrick Peach, as compensation for two years’ services rendered, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

 

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 shares and 500,000 shares to Jeff Ritchie, the Company’s President and Director for compensation for two years’ services rendered, and 10,000,000 in exchange for business opportunities assigned to the company, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

 

16
 

 

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 shares and 500,000 shares to Kenneth Eade, a former Officer and Director for compensation for two years’ services rendered, 500,000 for two years’ legal services rendered, and 10,000,000 shares in exchange for business opportunities assigned to the company, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

 

During the three month period ended December 31, 2009 the Company issued 90,000 common stock shares for total consideration of $45,000.

 

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2010 the Company issued 406,571 common shares for total consideration of $119,595.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 4,000 common shares for services totaling $2,000. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 130,000 common shares for total consideration of $32,500.

 

On March 31, 2011 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 100,000 common shares for Director’s fees totaling $38,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization. As of March 31, 2014 these shares had not yet been issued and therefore have been recorded as a stock payable.

 

On March 31, 2011 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 750,000 shares each to Jeff Ritchie, the Company’s COO and Kenneth Eade the Company’s former CFO for compensation for services rendered in 2010, and an additional 200,000 shares to Kenneth Eade for legal services rendered, for total consideration of $646,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization. The shares were issued by the transfer agent on March 5, 2014.

 

During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 common shares for services valued at $95,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization. The payable was subsequently written off to forgiveness of stock payable.

 

On May 10, 2011 the Company issued 300,000 common shares for cash proceeds of $6,975 and a subscription receivable in the amount of $8,025. As of December 31, 2011 it was determined that the remaining receivable would not be collected; as a result the company credited the stock subscription receivable account and debited bad debt expense for $8,025.

 

On May 9, 2011 the Company issued 6,000 common shares for a lock up agreement in which the stockholder agreed not to transfer any of his shares for an agreed upon time. The Company recorded an expense of $2,280 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of issuance.

 

On May 10, 2011 the Company issued 6,000 common shares to a stockholder for shares authorized in a prior period. The Company recorded an expense of $2,280 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of issuance.

 

On June 24, 2011, the Company authorized the issuance of 550,000 common shares for services valued at $209,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 275,000 common shares for total consideration of $24,975.

 

On February 7, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 50,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.51 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $25,500.

 

On March 7, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On March 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

17
 

On April 20, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

 

On June 13, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 common shares in conversion of $12,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

 

On June 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 common shares in conversion of $20,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

 

On July 24, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares in conversion of $32,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On July 27, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,015,384 common shares in conversion of $33,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated January 11, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On August 21, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,100,000 common shares in conversion of $11,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.01 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On September 1, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 25,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.0085 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $203. The shares were issued in October 2012.

 

During September 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 8,166,500 common shares for various services. Shares were issued at $0.0075 - $0.095 for total expense of $66,459. The shares were issued in October 2012.

 

During September 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 115,000 common shares for related party debt of $440. The shares were issued at $0.0085 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization, resulting in a loss on the conversion of debt of $538. The shares were issued in October 2012.

 

On October 16, 2012, the Company issued 1,552,795 common shares in conversion of $10,000 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.00644 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On October 16, 2012, the Company issued 38,000 common shares in conversion of $380 advanced to the Company by a related party. The shares were issued at $0.01 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 8,191,500 common shares for services and 115,000 common shares for debt. All issuances were previously recorded as a stock payable.

 

On February 4, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 75,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.0369 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,767.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 200,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,600.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 505,000 common shares for services valued at $6,565 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 common shares for accrued compensation. The shares were valued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for a total of $6,500.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 500,000 common shares in conversion of $3,950 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0079 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 6,000,000 common shares in conversion of $60,000 debt. The shares were valued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for a total value of $78,000. Because the value of the stock issued for the debt was more than the debt that was extinguished the Company recorded a loss on conversion of debt of $18,000.

 

18
 

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 7,000,000 common shares to George Ivakhnik, the Company’s Interim CEO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $91,000.

 

In August 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 3,850,000 common shares for investor relation services to various persons. These shares were valued using the closing share price of the Common Stock on the day of issuance for a total non-cash expense of $85,375.

 

On August 22, 2013, the Company received $2,500 from the sale of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

 

On September 23, 2013, the Company received $15,500 from the sale of 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock.

 

During October 2013, the Company issued 6,000,000 common shares for services valued at $120,500 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

During October 2013, the Company received $10,000 from the sale of 1,400,000 shares of common stock.

 

On December 18, 2013, the Company received $4,000 from the sale of 3,200,000 shares of common stock.

 

On January 14, 2014, the Company received $10,000 from the sale of 3,750,000 shares of common stock.

 

On February 19, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 7,000,000 common shares to David Garland, the Company’s CEO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.006 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $44,100.

 

On March 5, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.005 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $5,200.

 

On March 5, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 875,000 common shares to C. David Pugh, the Company’s Chief Communications Officer, for conversion of accrued salary of $70,000. Shares were valued at $0.08 per the terms of the employment agreement.

 

On March 5, 2014, the Company issued 1,700,000 shares of common stock valued at $646,010, previously recorded as common stock payable.

 

On March 19, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,200,000 common shares for investor relation services. These shares were valued using the closing share price of the Common Stock on the day of issuance for a total non-cash expense of $12,000.

 

NOTE 6: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

 

During September 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 115,000 common shares for related party debt of $440. The shares were valued at $0.085, the stock price on the date of authorization. As a result of the transaction the Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $538.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 75,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO for compensation of services. The shares were issued based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $25,713.

 

On or about February 4, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 75,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.0369 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,767.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 200,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,600.

 

19
 

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 7,000,000 common shares to George Ivakhnik, the Company’s Interim CEO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $91,000.

 

During the period ended June 30, 2013, a former officer of the Company assigned $60,000 of his accrued salary to an unrelated third party.

 

As of March 31, 2014, the Company was indebted to a related party for legal services in the amount of $69,957.

 

On February 19, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 7,000,000 common shares to David Garland, the Company’s CEO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.006 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $44,100.

 

On March 5, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.005 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $5,200.

 

On March 5, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 875,000 common shares to C. David Pugh, the Company’s Chief Communications Officer, for conversion of accrued salary of $70,000.

 

On March 5, 2014, the Company issued 1,700,000 shares of common stock valued at $646,010, previously recorded as common stock payable.

 

As of March 31, 2014, the Company had total accrued compensation due to its officers of $535,650.

 

NOTE 7: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

On or about September 1, 2011, the Company and its Chief Operating Officer and counsel filed a complaint in federal court, Central District of California, Case No. CV-11-07233 DMG (MRWx), to recover 6,500,000 shares of common stock transferred to Consultants Marc Cifelli and Arriva Capital, LLC on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration. The Company received a judgment in its favor on July 30, 2012, to return 6,000,000 shares and a money judgment for the value of 500,000 shares, which is in the process of being executed. The shares have not yet been returned.

 

On or about August 31, 2012, the company served notices of rescission on Junior Capital, rescinding that certain $350,000 convertible debenture dated July 1, 2011, in exchange for promissory note in the amount of $350,000, that certain $20,000 convertible debenture dated October 25, 2011, that certain $40,000 convertible debenture dated March 15, 2012 and that certain $18,000 convertible debenture dated June 5, 2012, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration.

 

On or about August 31, 2012, the Company has served notices of rescission on ibacking Corp. that certain $500,000 convertible debenture dated May 29, 2012, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration. The Company filed a lawsuit in federal district court against Junior Capital and ibacking Corp. on February 13, 2013 in case number CV13-00259 BRO. A default against both Junior Capital and ibacking Corp. was entered on July 22, 2013, and the matter is now pending before the Court for default judgment proceedings.

 

On February 7, 2014, the Default Judgment in favor of the Company was granted by the court. The Judgment grants the rescission of all debentures entered into with Junior Capital, Inc., ibacking and Editor Newswire, Inc.

 

NOTE 8: GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has generated minimal revenue during the period September 14, 2007 (inception) through March 31, 2014, has an accumulated deficit of $6,426,314 and has funded its operations primarily through the issuance short term debt and equity. This matter raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to accomplish its business strategy and to ultimately achieve profitable operations is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing. Management plans to take the following steps that it believes will be sufficient to provide the Company with the ability to continue in existence.

 

20
 

 

Management intends to raise financing through private equity financing or other means and interests that it deems necessary. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its endeavor.

 

 

NOTE 9: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events in accordance with ASC Topic 855. The Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

21
 

 

Item 2:  Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

 

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this filing as well as with Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations contained in the Company’s Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended September 30, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

This discussion and the accompanying financial statements (including the notes thereto) may contain “forward-looking statements” that relate to future events or our future financial performance, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on the Company. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include, among others, those listed under “Risk Factors” in Part II Item 1a. and those included elsewhere in this filing.  For a more detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties, see the Company’s public filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements.

 

Plan of Operations

 

The company’s plan of operations seeks to acquire real estate assets primarily, but not exclusively, in the hospitality space, which present value creation potential due to the complexity or illiquidity of their existing ownership and / or capital structure. In such situations, IFLM will seek to actively work through the complexities, gain control of the asset, actively manage, recapitalize and thereby create value. For those assets lying outside of the hospitality space, IFLM will sell the assets at a price which realizes that value created. For those assets lying within the hospitality space, IFLM will then leverage its film, entertainment and hospitality capabilities to transform the property into genre themed hotels and resorts. The final product will be a paradigm-shifting convergence of hospitality and entertainment, providing guests with a full immersion experience during their stay. Additionally, should any opportunities for content creation/distribution projects present themselves, IFLM will pursue those that align with the company’s strategic vision.

 

On February 6, 2014, the Company created two new subsidiaries, the IFLM LA Realty Fund, LLC and the Hilltop Manor Fund, LLC. The Companies will be used to hold two separate offerings for real estate investment funds.  The net cash proceeds from these two offerings, less working capital expenses, will be used to invest in real estate and/or the costs associated with the acquisition and development of real estate.  The real estate investments under the IFLM LA Realty Fund will focus on undervalued properties on the West Coast of the United States.  The Hilltop Manor Fund will focus on the initial costs associated with the acquisition and development of the Hilltop Manor theme park and resort concept.

 

Real Estate Development

 

IFLM seeks to identify and develop to the full potential and highest and best use, properties for genre themed hotels and resorts. IFLM's target market for this real estate division is hotel resorts located within the U.S. IFLM will leverage its considerable talent and experience in real estate development and operations, and combine it with its film and entertainment expertise to create themed hotels that are at the forefront of the convergence of entertainment and hospitality.

 

In addition, IFLM will identify and acquire other undervalued or distressed properties in highly attractive locations in the United States that may lie outside of the hospitality industry. These commercial and residential properties will be renovated or otherwise developed to maximize their potential returns for IFLM and its stakeholders on a short and medium-term basis.

 

Film Sales, Distribution and Production

 

IFLM’s plan of operations includes developing a distribution arm with the help of its management.

 

Each year, independent filmmakers produce over 15,000 films while only small fractions are able to secure distribution for their product.  At the same time, the proliferation of theatrical and home entertainment outlets, including DVD/video (e.g., Netflix, Fox Video, Sony Video, Wal-Mart, Blockbuster), pay-per-view/video-on-demand (e.g., IN DEMAND), pay & free cable/satellite (e.g., HBO, Showtime), free television, new media (internet, pod-casting, web series, electronic delivery

22
 

systems) and international markets, has resulted in an ever-increasing demand for filmed entertainment content around the globe.   However, the market connecting the filmmakers and the buyers of content is controlled by a few players in the industry.

 

The majority of the film distribution business will operate in a small, low risk, and profitable segment of the entertainment industry that connects the independent filmmakers and distribution outlets.  

 

Film and Video Library

 

IFLM possesses a small video and film library.

 

Employees

 

As of March 31, 2014, we employed a total of four management level personnel.  We may require additional employees in the future. There is intense competition for capable, experienced personnel and there is no assurance the Company will be able to obtain new qualified employees when required.   

 

The Company believes its relations with its employees are good.

 

Patents

 

The Company holds no patents for its products.

 

 

Results of Operations – Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 as Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013

 

Operating Expenses

 

Officer compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $99,032 or 230% to $142,075, as compared to $43,043 for the three months ended March 31, 2013.  The expense usually consists of cash payments and accrued salary as well as periodic stock compensation. The increase is due to the accrual for an additional officer as well as stock compensation in the current quarter valued at $49,300.

 

Professional fees for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $17,378 as compared to $16,448 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $930. Professional fees mainly consist of auditor and other fees associated with the Company’s quarterly filings and year-end audit.

 

General and administrative expense increased $19,594 to $20,915 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 from $1,321 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The increase in general and administrative expense was mainly attributed to an increase in rent, and other operating expenses. In addition, we issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock for investor relations services for non cash expense of $12,000.

 

Overall there was a $119,556 increase in operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to March 31, 2013. The increase is largely attributed to the increase in officer compensation as discussed above.

 

Other Expenses

 

Total other income and expenses increased from a loss of $218,819 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to other income of $1,486,016 the three months ended March 31, 2014. The increase is attributed to a gain in the derivative liability and a $1,358,637 gain on extinguishment of debt.

On February 7, 2014, the Company was granted a default judgment by the Central District Court of California in the case Independent Film Dev. Corp vs Junior Capital, Inc. The granting of the default judgment rescinds all debentures and releases the Company from all obligations due to Junior Capital, Inc., Editor Newswire, Inc., and iBacking Corp, including any and all accrued interest and penalties. As a result of the release of liabilities the Company has recognized a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $1,358,637 and written off $450,282 of the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

 

 

23
 

Net Income (Loss)

 

We recorded net income of $1,305,648 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to a net loss of $279,631 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The recognition of net income is due to the gain on extinguishment of debt.

 

Results of Operations – Six Months Ended March 31, 2014 as Compared to the Six Months Ended March 31, 2013

 

Operating Expenses

 

Officer compensation expense for the six months ended March 31, 2014 increased $114,032 or 136% to $197,350, as compared to $83,318 for the six months ended March 31, 2013.  The expense usually consists of cash payments and accrued salary as well as periodic stock compensation. The increase is due to the accrual for an additional officer as well as stock compensation in the current quarter valued at $49,300.

 

Professional fees for the six months ended March 31, 2014 were $23,803 as compared to $17,948 for the six months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $5,855. Professional fees mainly consist of auditor and other fees associated with the Company’s quarterly filings and year-end audit.

 

General and administrative expense increased $186,593 to $188,906 for the six months ended March 31, 2014 from $2,313 for the six months ended March 31, 2013. The increase in general and administrative expense was attributed to an increase in rent and other operating expenses as well as stock issued for services for non cash expense of $132,500.

 

Overall there was a $306,480 increase in operating expenses for the six months ended March 31, 2014 as compared to March 31, 2013. The increase is largely attributed to the increase in officer compensations and stock issued for other services as discussed above.

 

Other Expenses

 

Total other income and expenses increased from a loss of $227,486 for the six months ended March 31, 2013 compared to other income of $1,367,425 the six months ended March 31, 2014. The increase is attributed to a gain in the derivative liability and a $1,816,217 gain on extinguishment of debt.

On February 7, 2014, the Company was granted a default judgment by the Central District Court of California in the case Independent Film Dev. Corp vs Junior Capital, Inc. The granting of the default judgment rescinds all debentures and releases the Company from all obligations due to Junior Capital, Inc., Editor Newswire, Inc., and iBacking Corp, including any and all accrued interest and penalties. As a result of the release of liabilities the Company has recognized a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $1,358,637 and written off $450,282 of the derivative liability to additional paid in capital.

.Net Income (Loss)

We recorded net income of $957,366 for the six months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to a net loss of $331,065 for the six months ended March 31, 2013.   The recognition of net income is due to the gain on extinguishment of debt.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $6,426,314 and a working capital deficit of $1,236,219. For the six months ended March 31, 2014, net cash used in operating activities was $83,345 and we received $93,060 from financing activities.

 

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

 

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and plan of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates including, among others, those affecting revenue, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the salability of inventory and the useful lives of tangible and intangible assets. The discussion below is intended as a brief discussion of some of the judgments and uncertainties that can impact the application of these policies and the specific dollar amounts reported on our financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form our basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, or if management made different judgments or utilized different estimates. Many of our estimates or judgments are based on anticipated future events or performance, and as such are forward-looking in nature, and are subject to many risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Registration Statement. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise this discussion to reflect any future events or circumstances.

 

24
 

 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

The Company’s business activities contain elements of risk. The Company considers a principal type of market risk to be a valuation risk. All assets will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of the Board of Directors and management.  Market prices of common equity securities in general, are subject to fluctuations which could cause the amount to be realized upon sale to differ significantly from the current reported value. The fluctuations may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the Company’s assets, general market conditions and supply and demand.

 

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

 

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2014. In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company recognizes that there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their desired control objectives. Additionally, in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures, the Company’s management was required to apply its reasonable judgment.

 

Based upon that evaluation, the Certifying Officers concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. We have identified material weaknesses discussed below in the Report of management on internal control over financial reporting.

 

Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

 

(i) Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(ii) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

(iii) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

 

As a result of management’s assessment we have concluded that our controls and procedures are not effective as of March 31, 2014. We have identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting:

 

Segregation of Duties – As a result of limited resources, we did not maintain proper segregation of incompatible duties. This is due to an understaffed financial and accounting function and the need for additional personnel to prepare and analyze financial information in a timely manner and to allow review and on-going monitoring and enhancement of our controls. The effect of the lack of segregation of duties potentially affects multiple processes and procedures.

25
 

 

We are in the continuous process of improving our internal control over financial reporting in an effort to eliminate material weaknesses through improved supervision and training of our staff, but additional effort is needed to fully remedy any deficiencies.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the current fiscal quarter of year 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

 

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

On or about September 1, 2011, the company and its Chief Operating Officer and counsel filed a complaint in federal court, Central District of California, Case No. CV-11-07233 DMG (MRWx), to recover 6,500,000 shares of common stock transferred to Consultants Marc Cifelli and Arriva Capital, LLC on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration. The plaintiffs in the case received a judgment in their favor on July 30, 2012, to return 6,000,000 shares and a money judgment for the value of 500,000 shares, which is in the process of being executed. The shares have not yet been returned.

 

On or about August 31, 2012, the company served notices of rescission on Junior Capital, rescinding that certain $350,000 convertible debenture dated July 1, 2011, in exchange for promissory note in the amount of $350,000, that certain $20,000 convertible debenture dated October 25, 2011, that certain $40,000 convertible debenture dated March 15, 2012 and that certain $18,000 convertible debenture dated June 5, 2012, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration.

 

On or about August 31, 2012, the Company has served notices of rescission on ibacking Corp. that certain $500,000 convertible debenture dated May 29, 2012, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration.

 

On February 13, 2013, the Company filed an action in federal court, Central District of California, Case No.SAV13-259-DOC, on against Junior Capital, Inc., ibacking Corp; and Albert Aimers for securities fraud, rescission, declaratory relief, interference with contract and prospective economic advantage. On July 22, 2013, the Clerk of the Court entered the default of Junior Capital, Inc. and ibacking Corp., and the Company intends to seek a default judgment.

 

On February 7, 2014, the Default Judgment in favor of the Company was granted by the court. The Judgment grants the rescission of all debentures entered into with Junior Capital, Inc., ibacking and Editor Newswire, Inc.

 

Item 1A Risk Factors

 

We are subject to various risks which may materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this filing before deciding to purchase our common stock. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

 

We are a relatively young company with a limited operating history

 

Since we are a young company, it is difficult to evaluate our business and prospects. At this stage of our business operations, even with our good faith efforts, potential investors have a high probability of losing their investment. Our future operating results will depend on many factors, including the ability to generate sustained and increased demand and acceptance of our products, the level of our competition, and our ability to attract and maintain key management and employees. While management believes their estimates of projected occurrences and events are within the timetable of their business plan, there can be no guarantees or assurances that the results anticipated will occur.

 

We expect to incur net losses in future quarters.

26
 

 

If we do not achieve profitability, our business may not grow or operate. We may not achieve sufficient revenues or profitability in any future period. We will need to generate revenues from the sales of our products or take steps to reduce operating costs to achieve and maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate revenues, we may experience price competition that will lower our gross margins and our profitability. If we do achieve profitability, we cannot be certain that we can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

 

We will require additional funds to operate in accordance with our business plan.

 

We may not be able to obtain additional funds that we may require. We do not presently have adequate cash from operations or financing activities to meet our short or long-term needs.  If unanticipated expenses, problems, and unforeseen business difficulties occur, which result in material delays, we will not be able to operate within our budget. If we do not achieve our internally projected sales revenues and earnings, we will not be able to operate within our budget. If we do not operate within our budget, we will require additional funds to continue our business. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining those funds, we cannot assure you of our ability to generate positive returns to the Company. Further, we may not be able to obtain the additional funds that we require on terms acceptable to us, if at all. We do not currently have any established third-party bank credit arrangements. If the additional funds that we may require are not available to us, we may be required to curtail significantly or to eliminate some or all of our development, manufacturing, or sales and marketing programs.

 

We may seek to obtain them primarily through equity or debt financings. Such additional financing, if available on terms and schedules acceptable to us, if available at all, could result in dilution to our current stockholders and to you. We may also attempt to obtain funds through arrangement with corporate partners or others. Those types of arrangements may require us to relinquish certain rights to our intellectual property or resulting products.

 

We are highly dependent on David Garland, our CEO and Jeff Ritchie, our COO. The loss of either, whose knowledge, leadership, and technical expertise upon which we rely, would harm our ability to execute our business plan

 

We are largely dependent on our CEO and COO, for their knowledge and experience. Our ability to successfully market and distribute our products may be at risk from an unanticipated accident, injury, illness, incapacitation, or death of either. Upon such occurrence, unforeseen expenses, delays, losses and/or difficulties may be encountered.  Our success may also depend on our ability to attract and retain other qualified management and sales and marketing personnel.

 

We compete for such persons with other companies and other organizations, some of which have substantially greater capital resources than we do. We cannot give you any assurance that we will be successful in recruiting or retaining personnel of the requisite caliber or in adequate numbers to enable us to conduct our business.

 

If  capital  is  not  available  to  us to expand our business operations,  we  will  not  be able to pursue our business plan.

 

We will require substantial additional capital to acquire additional properties and to participate in the development of those properties.  Cash flows from operations, to the extent available, will be used to fund these expenditures.  We intend to seek additional capital from loans from current shareholders and from public and private equity offerings.  Our  ability  to  access capital  will  depend  on  its  success  in participating  in  properties that are successful in exploring for and producing oil  and gas at profitable prices.  It will also be dependent upon the status of the capital markets at the time such capital is sought. Should sufficient capital not be available, the development of our business plan could be delayed and, accordingly, the implementation of the USD Energy's business strategy would be adversely affected. In such event it would not be likely that investors would obtain a profitable return on their investments or a return of their investments.

 

Nevada Law and Our Charter May Inhibit a Takeover of Our Company That Stockholders May Consider Favorable

 

Provisions of Nevada law, such as its business combination statute, may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company. As a result, these provisions could limit the price some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

 

Our Officers and Directors Have the Ability to Exercise Significant Influence Over Matters Submitted for Stockholder Approval and Their Interests May Differ From Other Stockholders

 

Our executive officers and directors, whether acting alone or together, may have significant influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our stockholders for approval, including mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and also the power to prevent or cause a change in control. The interests of these executive officers and directors may differ from the interests of the other stockholders.

 

27
 

 

The Market for Our Common Stock Is Illiquid

 

The market for our common stock is volatile and illiquid.   As a result, this could adversely affect our shareholders' ability to sell our common stock in short time periods, or possibly at all. Our common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. Substantial fluctuations in our stock price could significantly reduce the price of our stock. 

 

The Penny Stock Rules  cover our stock, which may make it difficult for a broker to sell investors shares.  This may make our stock less marketable, and liquid, and result in a lower market price.

 

Our common stock is a penny stock, which means that SEC rules require broker dealers who make transactions in the stock to comply with additional suitability assessments and disclosures than they would in stock that were not penny stocks, as follows:

 

Prior to the transaction, to approve the person's account for transactions in penny stocks by obtaining information from the person regarding his or her financial situation, investment experience and objectives, to reasonably determine based on that information that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the person, and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters that the person or his or her independent advisor reasonably may be expected to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks. In addition, the broker or dealer must deliver to the person a written statement setting forth the basis for the determination and advising in highlighted format that it is unlawful for the broker or dealer to effect a transaction in a penny stock unless the broker or dealer has received, prior to the transaction, a written agreement from the person. Further, the broker or dealer must receive a manually signed and dated written agreement from the person in order to effectuate any transactions is a penny stock.

 

  • Prior to the transaction, the broker or dealer must disclose to the customer the inside bid quotation for the penny stock and, if there is no inside bid quotation or inside offer quotation, he or she must disclose the offer price for the security transacted for a customer on a principal basis unless exempt from doing so under the rules.

 

  • Prior to the transaction, the broker or dealer must disclose the aggregate amount of compensation received or to be received by the broker or dealer in connection with the transaction, and the aggregate amount of cash compensation received or to be received by any associated person of the broker dealer, other than a person whose function in solely clerical or ministerial.

 

  • The broker or dealer, who has affected sales of penny stock to a customer, unless exempted by the rules, is required to send to the customer a written statement containing the identity and number of shares or units of each such security and the estimated market value of the security. Imposing these reporting and disclosure requirements on a broker or dealer make it unlawful for the broker or dealer to effect transactions in penny stocks on behalf of customers. Brokers or dealers may be discouraged from dealing in penny stocks, due to the additional time, responsibility involved, and, as a result, this may have a deleterious effect on the market for the Company’s stock.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales and Issuances of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

The following securities were sold and/or issued by the registrant from inception (September 17, 2007) to March 31, 2014 that were not registered under the Securities Act:

 

During the period from September 14, 2007 (inception) through September 30, 2007 the Company issued 125 common shares for $500 cash.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2008 the Company issued 18,492 common shares for $35,942 cash.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2009 the Company issued 34,803 common shares for $25,000 cash and a subscription receivable in the amount of $85,000. During the year ended September 30, 2010 the Company received $22,660 on its subscription receivable.

28
 

 

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 common shares to Directors Robert Searcy and Patrick Peach, as compensation for two years’ services rendered, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

 

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 shares and 500,000 shares to Jeff Ritchie, the Company’s President and Director for compensation for two years’ services rendered, and 10,000,000 in exchange for business opportunities assigned to the company, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

 

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 shares and 500,000 shares to Kenneth Eade, a former Officer and Director for compensation for two years’ services rendered, 500,000 for two years’ legal services rendered, and 10,000,000 shares in exchange for business opportunities assigned to the company, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

 

During the three month period ended December 31, 2009 the Company issued 90,000 common stock shares for total consideration of $45,000.

 

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2010 the Company issued 406,571 common shares for total consideration of $119,595.

 

During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 4,000 common shares for services totaling $2,000. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

 

During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 130,000 common shares for total consideration of $32,500.

 

On March 31, 2011 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 100,000 common shares for Director’s fees totaling $38,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization. As of March 31, 2014 these shares had not yet been issued and therefore have been recorded as a stock payable.

 

On March 31, 2011 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 750,000 shares each to Jeff Ritchie, the Company’s COO and Kenneth Eade the Company’s former CFO for compensation for services rendered in 2010, and an additional 200,000 shares to Kenneth Eade for legal services rendered, for total consideration of $646,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 common shares for services valued at $95,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization. The payable was subsequently written off to forgiveness of stock payable.

 

On May 10, 2011 the Company issued 300,000 common shares for cash proceeds of $6,975 and a subscription receivable in the amount of $8,025. As of December 31, 2011 it was determined that the remaining receivable would not be collected; as a result the company credited the stock subscription receivable account and debited bad debt expense for $8,025.

 

On May 9, 2011 the Company issued 6,000 common shares for a lock up agreement in which the stockholder agreed not to transfer any of his shares for an agreed upon time. The Company recorded an expense of $2,280 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of issuance.

 

On May 10, 2011 the Company issued 6,000 common shares to a stockholder for shares authorized in a prior period. The Company recorded an expense of $2,280 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of issuance.

 

On June 24, 2011, the Company authorized the issuance of 550,000 common shares for services valued at $209,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 275,000 common shares for total consideration of $24,975.

 

29
 

 

On February 7, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 50,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.51 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $25,500.

 

On March 7, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On March 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On April 20, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

 

On June 13, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 common shares in conversion of $12,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

 

On June 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 common shares in conversion of $20,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

 

On July 24, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares in conversion of $32,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On July 27, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,015,384 common shares in conversion of $33,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated January 11, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On August 21, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,100,000 common shares in conversion of $11,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.01 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On September 1, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 25,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.0085 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $203. The shares were issued in October 2012.

 

During September 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 8,166,500 common shares for various services. Shares were issued at $0.0075 - $0.095 for total expense of $66,459. The shares were issued in October 2012.

 

During September 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 115,000 common shares for related party debt of $440. The shares were issued at $0.0085 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization, resulting in a loss on the conversion of debt of $538. The shares were issued in October 2012.

 

On October 16, 2012, the Company issued 1,552,795 common shares in conversion of $10,000 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.00644 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On October 16, 2012, the Company issued 38,000 common shares in conversion of $380 advanced to the Company by a related party. The shares were issued at $0.01 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 8,191,500 common shares for services and 115,000 common shares for debt. All issuances were previously recorded as a stock payable.

 

On February 4, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 75,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.0369 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,767.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 200,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,600.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 505,000 common shares for services valued at $6,565 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

30
 

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 common shares for accrued compensation. The shares were valued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for a total of $6,500.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 500,000 common shares in conversion of $3,950 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0079 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 6,000,000 common shares in conversion of $60,000 debt. The shares were valued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for a total value of $78,000. Because the value of the stock issued for the debt was more than the debt that was extinguished the Company recorded a loss on conversion of debt of $18,000.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 7,000,000 common shares to George Ivakhnik, the Company’s Interim CEO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $91,000.

 

In August 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 3,850,000 common shares for investor relation services to various persons. These shares were valued using the closing share price of the Common Stock price on the day of issuance for a total non-cash expense of $85,375.

 

On August 22, 2013, the Company received $2,500 from the sale of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock. Proceeds from the sale were used to fund operating expenses.

 

On September 23, 2013, the Company received $15,500 from the sale of 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock. Proceeds from the sale were used to fund operating expenses.

 

During October 2013, the Company issued 6,000,000 common shares for services valued at $120,500 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

 

During October 2013, the Company received $10,000 from the sale of 1,400,000 shares of common stock. Proceeds from the sale were used to fund operating expenses.

 

On December 18, 2013, the Company received $4,000 from the sale of 3,200,000 shares of common stock. Proceeds from the sale were used to fund operating expenses.

 

On January 14, 2014, the Company received $10,000 from the sale of 3,750,000 shares of common stock. Proceeds from the sale were used to fund operating expenses.

 

On February 19, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 7,000,000 common shares to David Garland, the Company’s CEO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.006 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $44,100.

 

On March 5, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.005 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $5,200.

 

On March 5, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 875,000 common shares to C. David Pugh, the Company’s Chief Communications Officer, for conversion of accrued salary of $70,000.

 

On March 19, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,200,000 common shares for investor relation services. These shares were valued using the closing share price of the Common Stock on the day of issuance for a total non-cash expense of $1,200.

 

All shares were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. No underwriters were used in any of the above-referenced sales.

 

31
 

 

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

None.

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

None.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

             
      Incorporated by reference
Exhibit Exhibit Description Filed herewith Form Period ending Exhibit

Filing

date

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X        
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X        
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X        
             
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 X        
10.1 Convertible Debenture for $350,000 dated November 16, 2011 to Junior Capital, Inc.   10-K 9/30/2011 10.1 1/13/2012
10.2 Convertible Debenture for $20,000 dated October 25, 2011 to Junior Capital Inc.   10-K 9/30/2011 10.2 1/13/2012
10.3 Convertible Debenture for $20,000 dated October 28, 2011 to Editor Newswire Inc.   10-K 9/30/2011 10.3 1/13/2012
10.4 Convertible Debenture for $25,000 dated November 18, 2011 to Editor Newswire Inc.   10-K 9/30/2011 10.4 1/13/2012
10.5 Convertible Debenture for $33,000 dated January 11, 2012 to Junior Capital Inc.   10-Q 3/31/2012 10.5 5/18//2012
10.6 Convertible Debenture for $40,000 dated March 15, 2012 to Junior Capital Inc.   10-Q 3/31/2012 10.6 5/18//2012
10.7 Convertible Debenture for $18,000 dated June 5, 2012 to Junior Capital Inc.   10-Q 3/31/2012 10.7 8/20/2012
10.8 Convertible Debenture for $500,000 dated May 29, 2012 to iBacking Corp.   10-Q 6/30/2012 10.8 8/20/2012
10.9 Convertible Debenture for $100,000 dated April 9, 2012 Neil Linder   10-Q 6/30/2012 10.9 8/20/2012
101.INS* XBRL Instance Document X        
                         
32
 

101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document X        
101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document X        
101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document X        
101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document X        
101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Definition X        
             

 

*  Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

 

 

 

 

33
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

     
     
Date: May 16, 2014  

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

 

BY:      David Garland

 

            /s/ David Garland                                         

          David Garland

                     Chief Executive Officer

 

By:        Rachel Boulds

 

           /s/Rachel Boulds                                    

              Rachel Boulds               

              Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

34