0001262463-14-000134.txt : 20140214 0001262463-14-000134.hdr.sgml : 20140214 20140214082851 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001262463-14-000134 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 10 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20131231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20140214 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20140214 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Independent Film Development CORP CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001425883 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: INVESTORS, NEC [6799] IRS NUMBER: 562676759 STATE OF INCORPORATION: NV FISCAL YEAR END: 0930 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-53103 FILM NUMBER: 14610643 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 420 NORTH CAMDEN DRIVE RETAIL LEVEL CITY: BEVERLY HILLS STATE: CA ZIP: 90210 BUSINESS PHONE: 310-295-1711 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 420 NORTH CAMDEN DRIVE RETAIL LEVEL CITY: BEVERLY HILLS STATE: CA ZIP: 90210 10-Q 1 ifdcq2.htm FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2013

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From to

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

(Name of small business issuer specified in its charter)



Nevada	56-2676759
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

420 North Camden Dr. Retail Level Beverly Hills, California. 90210	90210
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 295-1711 9107 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 450 Beverly Hills, California (Former address of principle offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, a non–accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Section 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of February 14, 2014, the issuer had 76,663,670 shares of common stock outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes ¨ No x

Independent Film Development Corporation

(a Development Stage Company)

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2013

INDEX


PART I	Financial Information	4
Item 1.	Financial Statements	4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25

PART II	Other Information	26
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	26
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	26
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	31
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	31
Item 5.	Other Information	31
Item 6.	Exhibits	32
Signatures		33

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013 (unaudited)	5

Statements of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and from inception on September 14, 2007 through December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	6

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) from inception on September 14, 2007 through December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	7


Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and from inception on September 14, 2007 through December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	9


Notes to the Financial Statements (unaudited)	11

Independent Film Development Corporation
(a Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets (unaudited)
	December 31, 2013			September 30, 2013
ASSETS

Cash	$	623		$	2,713
Total Assets	$	623		$	2,713

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	70,467		$	24,115
Accounts payable, related party		69,985			70,705
Accrued officer compensation		553,819			499,827
Accrued interest and penalties		816,673			681,761
Advances from officers		10,187			15,417
Accrued interest, related party		396			854
Due to a related party		3,460			4,210
Note payable		18,550			18,550
Derivative liability		738,761			755,167
Convertible debentures in default		915,600			915,600
Total Liabilities		3,197,898			2,986,206

Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):
Preferred Stock, $.0001 par value, 15,000,0000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 485,000,000 shares authorized, 72,913,670 and 62,313,670 issued and outstanding, respectively		7,291			6,231
Additional paid in capital		3,843,386			3,709,946
Common stock payable		684,010			684,010
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(7,731,962	)		(7,383,680	)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(3,197,275	)		(2,983,493	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$	623		$	2,713

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Independent Film Development Corporation (a Development Stage Company) Statements of Operations (unaudited)
	For the Three Months Ended December 31,						September 14, 2007 (inception) through
	2013			2012			December 31, 2013

Revenue	$	—		$	—		$	3,770

Expenses:
Officer compensation		55,275			40,275			1,426,982
Professional fees		6,425			1,500			577,925
Director fees		—			—			38,000
Loss on impairment of websites		—			—			818,521
Bad debt expense		—			—			72,635
General and administrative		167,991			992			3,023,832
Total operating expenses		229,691			42,767			5,957,895
Net loss from operations	$	(229,691	)	$	(42,767	)	$	(5,954,125	)

Other income and (expense):
Gain (loss) on derivative liability		16,406			151,953			(601,891	)
Loss on settlement of debt		—			—			(18,537	)
Penalty expense		(93,000	)		(46,000	)		(490,509	)
Debt discount		—			(72,592	)		(288,935	)
Interest expense		(41,997	)		(42,028	)		(377,965	)
Total other expense		(118,591	)		(8,667	)		(1,777,837	)
Net loss	$	(348,282	)	$	(51,434	)	$	(7,731,962	)

Loss per share
Basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)

Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted		69,385,409			38,440,825



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Independent Film Development Corporation
(a Development Stage Company)
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (unaudited)

	Number of Shares Outstanding		Common Stock at Par Value		Paid in Capital		Deficit Accumulated During Development			Common Stock Subscribed		Stock Subscription Receivable			Total

Beginning balance	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—
Stock issued for cash	125		—		500		—			—		—			500
Balance at September 30, 2007	125		—		500		—			—		—			500
Stock issued for cash	18,492		2		35,940		—			—		—			35,942
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2008	—		—		—		(33,413	)		—		—			(33,413	)
Balance at September 30, 2008	18,617		2		36,440		(33,413	)		—		—			3,029
Stock issued for cash	34,803		3		109,997		—			—		(85,000	)		25,000
Stock issued for compensation	22,300,000		2,230		2,227,770		—			—		—			2,230,000
Net loss for year ended September 30, 2009	—		—		—		(2,258,311	)		—		—			(2,258,311	)
Balance at September 30, 2009	22,353,420		2,235		2,374,207		(2,291,724	)		—		(85,000	)		(282	)
Stock issued for cash	626,571		63		197,032		—			—		—			197,095
Stock issued for compensation	4,000		—		2,000		—			—		—			2,000
Stock subscription receivable	—		—		—		—			—		22,660			22,660
Net loss for year ended September 30, 2010	—		—		—		(217,881	)		—		—			(217,881	)
Balance at September 30, 2010	22,983,991		2,298		2,573,239		(2,509,605	)		—		(62,340	)		3,592
Stock for other services	556,000		56		211,224		—			171,000		—			382,280
Stock for officer compensation	—		—		—		—			570,000		—			570,000

Stock for Director fees	—		—		—		—		38,000			—			38,000
Stock issued for cash	575,000		57		39,918		—		—			(8,025	)		31,950
Common stock issued for lock up agreement	6,000		1		2,279		—		—			—			2,280
Write off of stock subscription receivable	—		—		—		—		—			70,365			70,365
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2011	—		—		—		(1,448,150	)	—			—			(1,448,150	)
Balance at September 30, 2011	24,120,991		2,412		2,826,660		(3,957,755	)	779,000			—			(349,683	)
Write off of stock payable	—		—		95,000		—		(95,000	)		—			—
Stock for officer compensation	50,000		5		25,495		—		213			—			25,713
Settlement of derivative liability	—		—		186,830		—		—			—			186,830
Stock issued in conversion of note payable	5,115,384		512		175,988		—		—			—			176,500
Stock issued for services	—		—		—		—		66,459			—			66,459
Stock issued to settle debt	—		—		—		—		978			—			978
Contributed capital	—		—		13,500		—		—			—			13,500
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2012	—		—		—		(1,881,717	)	—			—			(1,881,717	)
Balance at September 30, 2012	29,286,375		2,929		3,323,473		(5,839,472	)	751,650			—			(1,761,420	)
Stock for officer compensation	7,300,000		729		95,841		—		(203	)		—			96,367
Settlement of derivative liability	—		—		16,998		—		—			—			16,998
Stock issued in conversion of note payable	2,052,795		205		13,745		—		—			—			13,950
Stock issued for stock payable	8,281,500		828		66,609		—		(67,437	)		—			—
Stock issued to settle debt	6,038,000		604		77,776		—		—			—			78,380
Stock issued for services	4,855,000		486		97,954		—		—			—			98,440
Stock issued for cash	4,500,000		450		17,550		—		—			—			18,000
Net loss for the year ended September 30, 2013	—		—		—		(1,544,208	)	—			—			(1,544,208	)
Balance at September 30, 2013	62,313,670		6,231		3,709,946		(7,383,680	)	684,010			—			(2,983,493	)
Stock issued for services (unaudited)	6,000,000		600		119,900		—		—			—			120,500
Stock issued for cash (unaudited)	4,600,000		460		13,540		—		—			—			14,000
Net loss for the period ended December 31, 2013(unaudited)	—		—		—		(348,282	)	—			—			(348,282	)
Balance at December 31, 2013(unaudited)	72,913,670	$	7,291	$	3,843,386	$	(7,731,962	)	684,010		$	—		$	(3,197,275	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Independent Film Development Corporation
(a Development Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended						September 14, 2007
	December 31,						(inception) through
	2013			2012			September 30, 2013

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(348,282	)	$	(51,434	)	$	(7,731,962	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to total cash used in operations:
Common stock for compensation		—			—			2,924,080
Common stock for other services		120,500			—			663,459
Common stock for Director's fees		—			—			38,000
Loss on settlement of debt		—			—			18,537
Amortization expense		—			—			31,479
Loss on impairment of website properties		—			—			818,521
Bad debt expense for stock subscription receivable		—			—			70,365
(Gain) loss on derivative liability		(16,406	)		(151,953	)		601,891
Debt discount amortization		—			72,592			340,697
Change in assets and liabilities:
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		46,352			(544	)		68,468
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, related party		(720	)		—			71,985
Increase in accrued expenses		134,912			—			816,673
Accrued interest, related party		(458	)		244			396
Increase in accrued compensation		53,992			128,059			620,319
Net cash used in operating activities		(10,110	)		(3,036	)		(647,092	)

Cash flows from investing activities		—			—			—

Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash overdraft		—			7			—
Cash advances (payments) related party		(750	)		—			1,040
Proceeds from debenture/loans		—			3,000			274,600
Proceeds from subscriptions receivable		—			—			22,660
Contributed capital		—			—			13,500
Advances from officers		—			29			32,062
Payments to officers		(5,230	)		—			(18,634	)
Proceeds from the sale of common stock		14,000			—			322,487
Net cash provided by financing activities		8,020			3,036			647,715
Net increase (decrease) in cash		(2,090	)		—			623
Cash at beginning of period		2,713			—			—
Cash at end of period	$	623		$	—		$	623

Cash paid for:
Interest	$	543		$	—		$	543
Taxes	$	—		$	—		$	—

Supplemental disclosure of non cash activities
Website property acquired with convertible debenture	$	—	$	—	$	850,000
Common stock issued for conversion of debt	$	—	$	10,380	$	190,450
Common stock issued for conversion of debt to related parties	$	—		—		66,880
Settlement of derivative liability	$	—	$	11,368	$	203,828
Debt discount on convertible notes payable	$	—	$	—	$	275,183
Forgiveness of stock payable	$	—	$	—	$	95,000
Common stock issued for stock payable	$	—	$	67,641	$	67,641

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Independent Film Development Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

December 31, 2013

(unaudited)

NOTE 1: HISTORY OF OPERATIONS

Business Activity

Independent Film Development Corporation was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 14, 2007. Effective April 24, 2008 we commenced operating as a Business Development Company ("BDC") under Section 54(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("1940 Act"). On September 30, 2009, our board of directors elected to cease operating as a BDC.

Independent Film Development Corporation (“IFLM”) is a diversified publicly held entertainment company, whose common stock trades on the over-the-counter bulletin board under the trading symbol, “IFLM.” We have developed a business plan of operations of developing genre themed studio style resorts. Building on the synergies inherent within IFLM’s film production and distribution background, the company’s plan of operations seeks opportunities to acquire real estate assets in the hospitality space, which present value creation potential due to the complexity or illiquidity of their existing ownership and/or capital structure. In such situations, IFLM will seek to actively work through the complexities, gain control of the asset, actively manage, recapitalize and thereby cause value creation.

The Company is in the development stage as defined under Statement on Financial Accounting Standards Accounting Standards Codification FASB ASC 915-205 "Development-Stage Entities.”

NOTE 2: SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary in order for the financial statements to be not misleading have been reflected herein. The Company has adopted a September 30 year end.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31 or September 30, 2013.

Stock Based Compensation

We account for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from non-employees. Costs are measured at the fair market value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earlier of the date on which there first exists a firm commitment for performance by the provider of goods or services or on the date performance is complete. The Company recognizes the fair value of the equity instruments issued that result in an asset or expense being recorded by the Company, in the same period(s) and in the same manner, as if the Company has paid cash for the goods or services.

The Company accounts for equity based transactions with non-employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“Topic No. 505-50”). Topic No. 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of common stock issued for payments to non-employees is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of equity instruments, other than common stock, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In general, the Company recognizes an asset or expense in the same manner as if it was to pay cash for the goods or services instead of paying with or using the equity instrument.

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered. There has been no stock-based compensation issued to employees.

Use of Estimates

The presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amount of cash, notes receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes payable, as applicable, approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The fair value of the related party notes payable cannot be determined because of the Company's affiliation with the parties with whom the agreements exist. The use of different assumptions or methodologies may have a material effect on the estimates of fair values.

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

· Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

· Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

· Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013 on a recurring basis:

December 31, 2013

Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Gains and (Losses)
Derivative		-		-		(738,761)		16,406
Total	$	-	$	-	$	(738,761)	$	16,406

September 30, 2013

Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Gains and (Losses)
Derivative		-		-		(755,167)		(303,280)
Total	$	-	$	-	$	(755,167)	$	(303,280)

Long Lived Assets

Long lived assets are carried at cost and amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally on a straight-line basis. The Company reviews identifiable amortizable assets to be held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the lowest level of identifiable estimated undiscounted cash flows resulting from use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of any impairment loss is based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value.

Income Taxes

Accounting Standards Codification Topic No. 740 “Income Taxes” (ASC 740) requires the asset and liability method of accounting be used for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

In June 2006, the FASB interpreted its standard for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, an interpretation of accounting for income taxes. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance the minimum recognition threshold and measurement attributable to a tax position taken on a tax return is required to be met before being recognized in the financial statements. The FASB’s interpretation had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2013.

Derivative Liabilities

The Company records the fair value of its derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC815, Derivatives and Hedging. The fair value of the derivatives was calculated using a multi-nominal lattice model performed by an independent qualified business valuator. The fair value of the derivative liability is revalued on each balance sheet date with corresponding gains and losses recorded in the consolidated statement of operations

Derivative financial instruments should be recorded as liabilities in the balance sheet and measured at fair value. For purposes of the Company’s financial statements fair value was used as the basis for formulating an analysis which has been defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) as “the amount for which an asset (or liability) could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, unrelated willing parties when neither party is acting under compulsion”. The FASB has provided guidance that its definition of fair value is consistent with the definition of fair market value in IRS Rev. Rule 59-60. In determining the fair value of the derivatives it was assumed that the Company’s business would be conducted as a going concern. These derivative liabilities will need to be marked-to-market each quarter with the change in fair value recorded in the income statement.

The Company has notes payable in which the holder has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Because the terms of the debentures do not specifically state that there is a minimum amount on which the price of the conversion can go and/or there is no maximum amount of shares that can be converted into, a derivative liability is triggered and must accounted for as such (see Note 3).

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock and common stock equivalents (primarily outstanding options and warrants). Common stock equivalents represent the dilutive effect of the assumed exercise of the outstanding stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method. The calculation of fully diluted earnings (loss) per share assumes the dilutive effect of the exercise of outstanding options and warrants at either the beginning of the respective period presented or the date of issuance, whichever is later. At December 31, 2013, the Company had no outstanding options or warrants.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, ''Technical Corrections and Improvements" in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 3: CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES

On July 1, 2011, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with Junior Capital Inc. (“Junior”), pursuant to which Junior exchanged a $350,000 promissory note for a $350,000 convertible debenture (the “Junior Debenture”). The Junior Debenture accrues interest of 10% and matures on July 1, 2012. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of issuance, or $0.05 per share of common stock on the date of conversion as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $50,514, $8,773 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 with the remaining $41,741 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012. During fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, $143,500 of the $350,000 debenture was converted into 4,100,000 shares of common stock. This conversion was converted within the terms of the agreement. As a result of the conversions the remaining $4,359 of debt discount amortization was accelerated and expensed, and the derivative liability decreased by $149,671. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provisions of the debenture, as a result of nonpayment as of the due date and failure to convert a portion of the debenture upon request, the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18%, effective as of the date of issuance, and a per business day penalty of $500 has been accrued from the date of default of $230,000.

On October 25, 2011 the Company issued a convertible debenture/note payable to Junior Capital, Inc. for $20,000, $15,000 of this amount was advanced to the Company prior to signing the debenture and prior to the year ended September 30, 2011. The remaining $5,000 was received in October 2011. The Debenture accrues interest of 10% beginning on October 25, 2011 and matures on October 25, 2012. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $20,000, $743 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011, $17,051 was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 and $2,206 was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2013 $20,000 of the principal face value of the Junior Debenture remains outstanding. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance.

On October 28, 2011, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with Editor Newswire Inc. (“Editor”), pursuant to which Editor exchanged a $20,000 promissory note for a $20,000 convertible debenture (the “Editor Debenture”). The Editor Debenture accrues interest of 10% and matures on October 28, 2012. Editor has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the common stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $20,000, $10,017 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $9,983 amortized in fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2013 $20,000 of the principal face value of the Debenture remains outstanding. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance.

On November 18, 2011, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with Editor Newswire Inc. (“Editor”), pursuant to which Editor exchanged a $25,000 promissory note dated November 18, 2011 for a $25,000 convertible debenture (the “Editor Debenture”). The Editor Debenture accrues interest of 10% and matures on November 18, 2012. Editor has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $25,000, $9,632 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $15,368 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2013, $25,000 of the principal face value of the Debenture remains outstanding. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance.

On January 11, 2012, the Company entered into a $33,000 convertible debenture with Junior Capital Inc. (“Junior”). The Junior Debenture accrues interest of 10% and matures on January 11, 2013. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $33,000, $8,425 of which was amortized to interest expense before conversion during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012. This conversion was converted within the terms of the agreement. As a result of the conversions, $24,575 of debt discount amortization was accelerated and expensed and the derivative liability decreased by $37,159. During the fiscal year ending September 30, 2012, the entire $33,000 debenture was converted into 1,015,384 shares of common stock.

On March 15, 2012, the Company entered into a $40,000 convertible debenture with Junior Capital Inc. (“Junior”). The Junior Debenture accrues interest of 12% and matures on March 15, 2013. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $40,000, $9,760 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $30,240 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2013 $40,000 of the principal face value of the Debenture remains outstanding. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance.

On April 9, 2012, the Company entered into a $100,000 convertible debenture with Neil Linder. The debenture accrues interest of 12% and matures on April 9, 2013. Mr. Linder has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $49,532, $15,994 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $33,538 amortized the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013, $13,950 of the $100,000 debenture was converted into 2,052,795 shares of common stock. This conversion was converted within the terms of the agreement. As of December 31, 2013 $86,050 of the principal face value of the Debenture remains outstanding. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance, a $1,000 per business day penalty is being imposed for failure to execute a conversion in a timely manner, and an additional accrual of $112,509 was accounted for as a result of a provision requiring additional funds due in the event that a “default payment” is made by the Company.

On May 29, 2012, the Company entered into a $500,000 convertible debenture with iBacking Corp. The iBacking Debenture accrues interest of 12% and matures on May 29, 2013. iBacking has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to the lesser of fifty percent (50%) of the lowest closing bid price of common stock during the ten trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $84,651, $21,997 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $62,654 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2013 $500,000 of the principal face value of the Debenture remains outstanding. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance.

On June 5, 2012, the Company entered into an $18,000 convertible debenture with Junior Capital Inc. (“Junior”). The Junior Debenture accrues interest of 12% and matures on June 5, 2013. Junior has the right to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price equal to fifty percent (50%) of the average of the closing bid price of common stock during the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date, or fifty percent (50%) of the closing bid price of the Common Stock on the date of issuance as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Pursuant to the terms of this debenture, the holder shall not be entitled to convert a number of shares that would exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. Based on the initial valuation the Company has recorded a debt discount of $18,000, $1,512 of which was amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012 with the remaining $16,488 amortized in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. As of December 31, 2013 $18,000 of the principal face value of the Debenture remains outstanding. In addition, as a consequence of the triggering of the default provision of the debenture the interest on the debenture has been instated at a rate of 18% effective as of the date of issuance.

The fair values of the derivatives are calculated using a multi-nominal lattice model. The model values the derivative liability in each debenture based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. These models are based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The fair value of the derivative liability is revalued on each balance sheet date with corresponding gains and losses recorded in the statement of operations.

The following inputs and assumptions were used to value the secured convertible notes at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2013:

The convertible promissory notes have a conversion price of the lesser of 50% of the average of the lowest closing bid stock prices (lowest closing bid price for the 5/29/12 note) over the last 5-10 days or 50% of the closing bid price at issuance (or $0.05 for the 7/1/11 note) and contains no dilutive reset feature.

The stock price would fluctuate with an annual volatility. The projected volatility curve was based on historical volatilities of the 18 comparable companies in the entertainment industry.

The Holder would redeem based on availability of alternative financing, increasing 1.0% monthly to a maximum of 10%.

The Holder will automatically convert the note at maturity if the registration was effective and the company was not in default. The following conversions were completed during the fiscal year.

The following are the conversions that have been completed as of December 31, 2013:

On March 7, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On March 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On April 20, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On June 13, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 common shares in conversion of $12,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On June 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 common shares in conversion of $20,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On July 24, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares in conversion of $32,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On July 27, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,015,384 common shares in conversion of $33,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated January 11, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On August 21, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,100,000 common shares in conversion of $11,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.01 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On October 16, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,552,795 common shares in conversion of $10,000 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.00644 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 500,000 common shares in conversion of $3,950 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0079 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

A summary of the activity of the derivative liability is shown below:

Balance at September 30, 2012	$	468,884
Decrease in derivative due to settlement of debt		(16,997	)
Derivative loss due to mark to market adjustment		303,280
Balance at September 30, 2013		755,167
Derivative (gain) due to mark to market adjustment		(16,406	)
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	738,761

NOTE 4: COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

During the period from September 14, 2007 (inception) through September 30, 2007 the Company issued 125 common shares for $500 cash.

During the year ended September 30, 2008 the Company issued 18,492 common shares for $35,942 cash.

During the year ended September 30, 2009 the Company issued 34,803 common shares for $25,000 cash and a subscription receivable in the amount of $85,000. During the year ended September 30, 2010 the Company received $22,660 on its subscription receivable.

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 common shares to Directors Robert Searcy and Patrick Peach, as compensation for two years’ services rendered, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 shares and 500,000 shares to Jeff Ritchie, the Company’s President and Director for compensation for two years’ services rendered, and 10,000,000 in exchange for business opportunities assigned to the company, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

On September 30, 2009 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 200,000 shares and 500,000 shares to Kenneth Eade, a former Officer and Director for compensation for two years’ services rendered, 500,000 for two years’ legal services rendered, and 10,000,000 shares in exchange for business opportunities assigned to the company, pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

During the three month period ended December 31, 2009 the Company issued 90,000 common stock shares for total consideration of $45,000.

During the three months ended June 30, 2010 the Company issued 406,571 common shares for total consideration of $119,595.

During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 4,000 common shares for services totaling $2,000. Due to the volatility of the market and the limited trading of the Company’s stock, shares were valued at $0.10 by the Board of Directors.

During the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 130,000 common shares for total consideration of $32,500.

On March 31, 2011 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 100,000 common shares for Director’s fees totaling $38,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization. As of December 31, 2013 these shares had not yet been issued and therefore have been recorded as a stock payable.

On March 31, 2011 the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 750,000 shares each to Jeff Ritchie, the Company’s COO and Kenneth Eade the Company’s former CFO for compensation for services rendered in 2010, and an additional 200,000 shares to Kenneth Eade for legal services rendered, for total consideration of $646,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization. As of December 31, 2013 these shares had not yet been issued and therefore have been recorded as a stock payable.

During the three month period ended March 31, 2011, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 common shares for services valued at $95,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization. The payable was subsequently written off to forgiveness of stock payable.

On May 10, 2011 the Company issued 300,000 common shares for cash proceeds of $6,975 and a subscription receivable in the amount of $8,025. As of December 31, 2011 it was determined that the remaining receivable would not be collected; as a result the company credited the stock subscription receivable account and debited bad debt expense for $8,025.

On May 9, 2011 the Company issued 6,000 common shares for a lock up agreement in which the stockholder agreed not to transfer any of his shares for an agreed upon time. The Company recorded an expense of $2,280 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of issuance.

On May 10, 2011 the Company issued 6,000 common shares to a stockholder for shares authorized in a prior period. The Company recorded an expense of $2,280 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of issuance.

On June 24, 2011, the Company authorized the issuance of 550,000 common shares for services valued at $209,000, based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 275,000 common shares for total consideration of $24,975.

On February 7, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 50,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.51 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $25,500.

On March 7, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On March 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On April 20, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 450,000 common shares in conversion of $22,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

On June 13, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 250,000 common shares in conversion of $12,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

On June 28, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 400,000 common shares in conversion of $20,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.05 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture

On July 24, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 common shares in conversion of $32,500 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On July 27, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,015,384 common shares in conversion of $33,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated January 11, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0325 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On August 21, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,100,000 common shares in conversion of $11,000 of the Junior Capital debenture dated July 1, 2011. The shares were issued at $0.01 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On September 1, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 25,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.0085 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $213. The shares were issued in October 2012.

During September 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 8,166,500 common shares for various services. Shares were issued at $0.0075 - $0.095 for total expense of $66,459. The shares were issued in October 2012.

During September 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 115,000 common shares for related party debt of $440. The shares were issued at $0.0085 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization, resulting in a loss on the conversion of debt of $538. The shares were issued in October 2012.

On October 16, 2012, the Company issued 1,552,795 common shares in conversion of $10,000 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.00644 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On October 16, 2012, the Company issued 38,000 common shares in conversion of $380 advanced to the Company by a related party. The shares were issued at $0.01 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 8,191,500 common shares for services and 115,000 common shares for debt. All issuances were previously recorded as a stock payable.

On February 4, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 75,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.0369 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,767.

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 200,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,600.

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 505,000 common shares for services valued at $6,565 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 common shares for accrued compensation. The shares were valued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for a total of $6,500.

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 500,000 common shares in conversion of $3,950 of the Neil Linder debenture dated April 9, 2012. The shares were issued at $0.0079 pursuant to the conversion terms of the debenture.

On June 19, 2013, the Company issued 6,000,000 common shares in conversion of $60,000 debt. The shares were valued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for a total value of $78,000. Because the value of the stock issued for the debt was more than the debt that was extinguished the Company recorded a loss on conversion of debt of $18,000.

On June 19, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 7,000,000 common shares to George Ivakhnik, the Company’s Interim CEO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.013 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $91,000.

In August 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 3,850,000 common shares for investor relation services to various persons. These shares were valued using the closing share price of the Common Stock on the day of issuance for a total non-cash expense of $85,375.

On August 22, 2013, the Company received $2,500 from the sale of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

On September 23, 2013, the Company received $15,500 from the sale of 3,500,000 shares of Common Stock.

During October 2013, the Company issued 6,000,000 common shares for services valued at $120,500 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization.

During October 2013, the Company received $10,000 from the sale of 1,400,000 shares of common stock.

On December 18, 2013, the Company received $4,000 from the sale of 3,200,000 shares of common stock.

NOTE 5: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

During September 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 115,000 common shares for related party debt of $440. The shares were valued at $0.085, the stock price on the date of authorization. As a result of the transaction the Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt of $538.

During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company authorized the issuance of 75,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO for compensation of services. The shares were issued based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $25,713.

On or about February 4, 2013, the Company authorized the issuance of 75,000 common shares to Rachel Boulds, the Company’s CFO, for compensation of services. The shares were issued at $0.0369 based on the market value of the common stock on the date of authorization for total compensation expense of $2,767.

During the period ended June 30, 2013, a former officer of the Company assigned $60,000 of his accrued salary to an unrelated third party.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company owed an officer $10,187. The money was advanced to the company to cover certain operating expenses. Amount is due on demand and accrues interest at 8% per year.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company was indebted to a related party for legal services in the amount of $69,985 and for cash advances to the Company in the amount of $3,460.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had total accrued compensation due to its officers of $553,819.

NOTE 6: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On or about September 1, 2011, the company and its Chief Operating Officer and counsel filed a complaint in federal court, complaint in federal court, Central District of California, Case No. CV-11-07233 DMG (MRWx), to recover 6,500,000 shares of common stock transferred to Consultants Marc Cifelli and Arriva Capital, LLC on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration. The Company received a judgment in its favor on July 30, 2012, to return 6,000,000 shares and a money judgment for the value of 500,000 shares, which is in the process of being executed. The shares have not yet been returned.

On or about August 31, 2012, the company served notices of rescission on Junior Capital, rescinding that certain $350,000 convertible debenture dated July 1, 2011, in exchange for promissory note in the amount of $350,000, that certain $20,000 convertible debenture dated October 25, 2011, that certain $40,000 convertible debenture dated March 15, 2012 and that certain $18,000 convertible debenture dated June 5, 2012, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration.

On or about August 31, 2012, the Company has served notices of rescission on ibacking Corp. that certain $500,000 convertible debenture dated May 29, 2012, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration. The Company filed a lawsuit in federal district court against Junior Capital and ibacking Corp. on February 13, 2013 in case number CV13-00259 BRO. A default against both Junior Capital and ibacking Corp. was entered on July 22, 2013, and the matter is now pending before the Court for default judgment proceedings.

On February 7, 2014, the Default Judgment in favor of the Company was granted by the court. The Judgment grants the rescission of all debentures entered into with Junior Capital, Inc., ibacking and Editor Newswire, Inc.

NOTE 7: GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has generated minimal revenue during the period September 14, 2007 (inception) through December 31, 2013, has an accumulated deficit of $7,731,962 and has funded its operations primarily through the issuance short term debt and equity. This matter raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, the Company’s ability to accomplish its business strategy and to ultimately achieve profitable operations is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing. Management plans to take the following steps that it believes will be sufficient to provide the Company with the ability to continue in existence.

Management intends to raise financing through private equity financing or other means and interests that it deems necessary. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in its endeavor.

NOTE 8: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events in accordance with ASC Topic 855. The Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements except for the following.

Subsequent to December 31, 2013, the Company received $10,000 from the sale of 3,750,000 shares of Common Stock.

On January 29, 2014, the Company executed a Convertible Promissory Note with Asher Enterprises, Inc. for $37,500.

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this filing as well as with Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operations contained in the Company’s Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended September 30, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Forward Looking Statements

This discussion and the accompanying financial statements (including the notes thereto) may contain “forward-looking statements” that relate to future events or our future financial performance, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on the Company. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include, among others, those listed under “Risk Factors” in Part II Item 1a. and those included elsewhere in this filing. For a more detailed discussion of risks and uncertainties, see the Company’s public filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements.

Plan of Operations

The company’s plan of operations seeks to acquire real estate assets in the hospitality space, which present value creation potential due to the complexity or illiquidity of their existing ownership and/or capital structure. In such situations, IFLM will seek to actively work through the complexities, gain control of the asset, actively manage, recapitalize and thereby create value. IFLM will then leverage its film and entertainment capabilities to transform the property into genre themed hotels and resorts. The final product will be a paradigm-shifting convergence of hospitality and entertainment, providing guests with a full immersion experience during their stay. Additionally, should any opportunities for content creation/distribution projects present themselves, IFLM will pursue those that align with the company’s strategic vision.

Real Estate Development

IFLM seeks to identify and develop to the full potential and highest and best use, properties for genre themed hotels and resorts. IFLM's target market for this real estate division are hotel resorts located within the U.S. IFLM has signed a memorandum of understanding for the acquisition of the first such resort property and is in the process of identifying other possible properties for potential acquisition.

In addition, IFLM will identify and acquire other properties in highly attractive locations to renovate and operate as hotels and other commercial properties within the United States. IFLM will leverage its considerable talent and experience in real estate development and operations, and combine it with its film and entertainment expertise to create themed hotels that are at the forefront of the convergence of entertainment and hospitality.

Film Sales, Distribution and Production

IFLM’s plan of operations includes developing a distribution arm with the help of its management.

Each year, independent filmmakers produce over 15,000 films while only small fractions are able to secure distribution for their product. At the same time, the proliferation of theatrical and home entertainment outlets, including DVD/video (e.g., Netflix, Fox Video, Sony Video, Wal-Mart, Blockbuster), pay-per-view/video-on-demand (e.g., IN DEMAND), pay & free cable/satellite (e.g., HBO, Showtime), free television, new media (internet, pod-casting, web series, electronic delivery systems) and international markets, has resulted in an ever-increasing demand for filmed entertainment content around the globe. However, the market connecting the filmmakers and the buyers of content is controlled by a few players in the industry.

The majority of the film distribution business will operate in a small, low risk, and profitable segment of the entertainment industry that connects the independent filmmakers and distribution outlets.

Film and Video Library

IFLM possesses a small video and film library.

Employees

As of January 30, 2014, we employed a total of five management level personnel. We may require additional employees in the future. There is intense competition for capable, experienced personnel and there is no assurance the Company will be able to obtain new qualified employees when required.

The Company believes its relations with its employees are good.

Patents

The Company holds no patents for its products.

Results of Operations – Three Months Ended December 31, 2013 as Compared to the Three Months Ended December 31, 2012

Operating Expenses

Professional fees for the three months ended December 31, 2013 were $6,425, as compared to $1,500 for the three months ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $4,925. Professional fees mainly consist of auditor and other fees associated with the Company’s quarterly filings and yearend audit.

Officer compensation expense for the three months ended December 31, 2013 increased $15,000 or 37% to $55,275, as compared to $40,275 for the three months ended December 31, 2012. The expense consists of cash payments and accrued salary. The increase is due to the accrual for an additional officer.

General and administrative expense increased $166,999 to $167,991 for the three months ended December 31, 2013 from $992 for the three months ended December 31, 2012. The increase in general and administrative expense was mainly attributed to an increase in accounts payable for investor relations expense.

Overall there was a $186,924 increase in operating expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012. The increase is largely attributed to a $120,500 non cash expense for stock that was issued for services.

Other Expenses

Total other expenses increased $109,924 to $118,591 for the three months ended December 31, 2013 compared to $8,667 in the prior period. The decrease is attributed to the net effect of the increase in penalty expense being incurred for triggering a default provision on debentures, the elimination of the debt discount amortization and a $135,547 decrease in the derivative liability.

Net Loss

We recorded a net loss of $348,282 for the three months ended December 31, 2013, as compared to a net loss of $51,434 for the three months ended December 31, 2012. The increase as discussed above can be attributed to the stock for service expense and the increase in other expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $7,731,962 and a working capital deficit of $3,197,275. For the three months ended December 31, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $10,110 and we received $8,020 from financing activities.

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and plan of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates including, among others, those affecting revenue, the allowance for doubtful accounts, the salability of inventory and the useful lives of tangible and intangible assets. The discussion below is intended as a brief discussion of some of the judgments and uncertainties that can impact the application of these policies and the specific dollar amounts reported on our financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form our basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, or if management made different judgments or utilized different estimates. Many of our estimates or judgments are based on anticipated future events or performance, and as such are forward-looking in nature, and are subject to many risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Registration Statement. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise this discussion to reflect any future events or circumstances.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company’s business activities contain elements of risk. The Company considers a principal type of market risk to be a valuation risk. All assets will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of the Board of Directors and management. Market prices of common equity securities in general, are subject to fluctuations which could cause the amount to be realized upon sale to differ significantly from the current reported value. The fluctuations may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the Company’s assets, general market conditions and supply and demand.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013. In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company recognizes that there are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their desired control objectives. Additionally, in evaluating and implementing possible controls and procedures, the Company’s management was required to apply its reasonable judgment.

Based upon that evaluation, the Certifying Officers concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. We have identified material weaknesses discussed below in the Report of management on internal control over financial reporting.

Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(i) Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(ii) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

(iii) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.

As a result of management’s assessment we have concluded that our controls and procedures are not effective as of December 31, 2013. We have identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting:

Segregation of Duties – As a result of limited resources, we did not maintain proper segregation of incompatible duties. This is due to an understaffed financial and accounting function and the need for additional personnel to prepare and analyze financial information in a timely manner and to allow review and on-going monitoring and enhancement of our controls. The effect of the lack of segregation of duties potentially affects multiple processes and procedures.

We are in the continuous process of improving our internal control over financial reporting in an effort to eliminate material weaknesses through improved supervision and training of our staff, but additional effort is needed to fully remedy any deficiencies.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the current fiscal quarter of year 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On or about September 1, 2011, the company and its Chief Operating Officer and counsel filed a complaint in federal court, Central District of California, Case No. CV-11-07233 DMG (MRWx), to recover 6,500,000 shares of common stock transferred to Consultants Marc Cifelli and Arriva Capital, LLC on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration. The plaintiffs in the case received a judgment in their favor on July 30, 2012, to return 6,000,000 shares and a money judgment for the value of 500,000 shares, which is in the process of being executed. The shares have not yet been returned.

On or about August 31, 2012, the Company has served notices of rescission on Ibacking Corp. that certain $500,000 convertible debenture dated May 29, 2012, on the grounds of fraud and failure of consideration.

On February 13, 2013, the Company filed an action in federal court, Central District of California, Case No.SAV13-259-DOC, on against Junior Capital, Inc., Ibacking Corp; and Albert Aimers for securities fraud, rescission, declaratory relief, interference with contract and prospective economic advantage. On July 22, 2013, the Clerk of the Court entered the default of Junior Capital, Inc. and Ibacking Corp., and the Company intends to seek a default judgment.

Item 1A Risk Factors

We are subject to various risks which may materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this filing before deciding to purchase our common stock. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

We are a relatively young company with a limited operating history

Since we are a young company, it is difficult to evaluate our business and prospects. At this stage of our business operations, even with our good faith efforts, potential investors have a high probability of losing their investment. Our future operating results will depend on many factors, including the ability to generate sustained and increased demand and acceptance of our products, the level of our competition, and our ability to attract and maintain key management and employees. While management believes their estimates of projected occurrences and events are within the timetable of their business plan, there can be no guarantees or assurances that the results anticipated will occur.

We expect to incur net losses in future quarters.

If we do not achieve profitability, our business may not grow or operate. We may not achieve sufficient revenues or profitability in any future period. We will need to generate revenues from the sales of our products or take steps to reduce operating costs to achieve and maintain profitability. Even if we are able to generate revenues, we may experience price competition that will lower our gross margins and our profitability. If we do achieve profitability, we cannot be certain that we can sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

We will require additional funds to operate in accordance with our business plan.

We may not be able to obtain additional funds that we may require. We do not presently have adequate cash from operations or financing activities to meet our short or long-term needs. If unanticipated expenses, problems, and unforeseen business difficulties occur, which result in material delays, we will not be able to operate within our budget. If we do not achieve our internally projected sales revenues and earnings, we will not be able to operate within our budget. If we do not operate within our budget, we will require additional funds to continue our business. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining those funds, we cannot assure you of our ability to generate positive returns to the Company. Further, we may not be able to obtain the additional funds that we require on terms acceptable to us, if at all. We do not currently have any established third-party bank credit arrangements. If the additional funds that we may require are not available to us, we may be required to curtail significantly or to eliminate some or all of our development, manufacturing, or sales and marketing programs.

We may seek to obtain them primarily through equity or debt financings. Such additional financing, if available on terms and schedules acceptable to us, if available at all, could result in dilution to our current stockholders and to you. We may also attempt to obtain funds through arrangement with corporate partners or others. Those types of arrangements may require us to relinquish certain rights to our intellectual property or resulting products.

We are highly dependent on David Garland, our CEO and Jeff Ritchie, our COO. The loss of either, whose knowledge, leadership, and technical expertise upon which we rely, would harm our ability to execute our business plan

We are largely dependent on our CEO and COO, for their knowledge and experience. Our ability to successfully market and distribute our products may be at risk from an unanticipated accident, injury, illness, incapacitation, or death of either. Upon such occurrence, unforeseen expenses, delays, losses and/or difficulties may be encountered. Our success may also depend on our ability to attract and retain other qualified management and sales and marketing personnel.

We compete for such persons with other companies and other organizations, some of which have substantially greater capital resources than we do. We cannot give you any assurance that we will be successful in recruiting or retaining personnel of the requisite caliber or in adequate numbers to enable us to conduct our business.

If capital is not available to us to expand our business operations, we will not be able to pursue our business plan.

We will require substantial additional capital to acquire additional properties and to participate in the development of those properties. Cash flows from operations, to the extent available, will be used to fund these expenditures. We intend to seek additional capital from loans from current shareholders and from public and private equity offerings. Our ability to access capital will depend on its success in participating in properties that are successful in exploring for and producing oil and gas at profitable prices. It will also be dependent upon the status of the capital markets at the time such capital is sought. Should sufficient capital not be available, the development of our business plan could be delayed and, accordingly, the implementation of the USD Energy's business strategy would be adversely affected. In such event it would not be likely that investors would obtain a profitable return on their investments or a return of their investments.

Nevada Law and Our Charter May Inhibit a Takeover of Our Company That Stockholders May Consider Favorable

Provisions of Nevada law, such as its business combination statute, may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company. As a result, these provisions could limit the price some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.

Our Officers and Directors Have the Ability to Exercise Significant Influence Over Matters Submitted for Stockholder Approval and Their Interests May Differ From Other Stockholders

Our executive officers and directors, whether acting alone or together, may have significant influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our stockholders for approval, including mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and also the power to prevent or cause a change in control. The interests of these executive officers and directors may differ from the interests of the other stockholders.

The Market for Our Common Stock Is Illiquid

The market for our common stock is volatile and illiquid. As a result, this could adversely affect our shareholders' ability to sell our common stock in short time periods, or possibly at all. Our common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. Substantial fluctuations in our stock price could significantly reduce the price of our stock.

The Penny Stock Rules cover our stock, which may make it difficult for a broker to sell investors shares. This may make our stock less marketable, and liquid, and result in a lower market price.

Our common stock is a penny stock, which means that SEC rules require broker dealers who make transactions in the stock to comply with additional suitability assessments and disclosures than they would in stock that were not penny stocks, as follows:

Prior to the transaction, to approve the person's account for transactions in penny stocks by obtaining information from the person regarding his or her financial situation, investment experience and objectives, to reasonably determine based on that information that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the person, and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters that the person or his or her independent advisor reasonably may be expected to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks. In addition, the broker or dealer must deliver to the person a written statement setting forth the basis for the determination and advising in highlighted format that it is unlawful for the broker or dealer to effect a transaction in a penny stock unless the broker or dealer has received, prior to the transaction, a written agreement from the person. Further, the broker or dealer must receive a manually signed and dated written agreement from the person in order to effectuate any transactions is a penny stock.

Prior to the transaction, the broker or dealer must disclose to the customer the inside bid quotation for the penny stock and, if there is no inside bid quotation or inside offer quotation, he or she must disclose the offer price for the security transacted for a customer on a principal basis unless exempt from doing so under the rules.

Prior to the transaction, the broker or dealer must disclose the aggregate amount of compensation received or to be received by the broker or dealer in connection with the transaction, and the aggregate amount of cash compensation received or to be received by any associated person of the broker dealer, other than a person whose function in solely clerical or ministerial.

The broker or dealer, who has affected sales of penny stock to a customer, unless exempted by the rules, is required to send to the customer a written statement containing the identity and number of shares or units of each such security and the estimated market value of the security. Imposing these reporting and disclosure requirements on a broker or dealer make it unlawful for the broker or dealer to effect transactions in penny stocks on behalf of customers. Brokers or dealers may be discouraged from dealing in penny stocks, due to the additional time, responsibility involved, and, as a result, this may have a deleterious effect on the market for the Company’s stock.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales and Issuances of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following securities were sold and/or issued by the registrant from inception (September 17, 2007) to December 31, 2013, that were not registered under the Securities Act: