EX-99.1 2 dex991.htm INVESTOR PRESENTATION Investor Presentation
Noranda
Aluminum Holding Corp
August 12, 2010
Exhibit 99.1


2
Forward Looking Statements
The
following
information
contains,
or
may
be
deemed
to
contain,
"forward-
looking statements" (as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995).  By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that
may or may not occur in the future.  The future results of the issuer may vary
from the results expressed in, or implied by, the following forward looking
statements, possibly to a material degree.  For a discussion of some of the
important factors that could cause the issuer's results to differ from those
expressed in, or implied by, the following forward-looking statements, please
refer to our filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K.


3
Management Attendees
Mr. Mahoney was appointed Chief Financial Officer in May 2009
Mr. Mahoney has over 23 years of cyclical industry experience in
senior financial management positions for semiconductor and
electrical components companies including Hi-P International
Limited and Molex Inc.
Mr. Mahoney received a BA in Economics and History from the
University of Virginia and an MBA from the University of Michigan
President
and
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Robert B. Mahoney
Mr. Smith was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director in 2008
Mr. Smith has diverse leadership experience, including various
management assignments with The Dow Chemical Company and
positions as COO of Resolution Performance Products and CEO of
Covalence Specialty Materials
Mr. Smith holds a BA in Chemistry and an MBA from Harvard
University
Layle “Kip”
Smith


4
Second quarter results: Successful performance while completing foundational projects that strengthened Noranda


5
Second Quarter Highlights
Noranda
produced strong current quarter results…
Net income was $6.9 million ($0.14 per share), and includes the net negative
impact of $11 million, or $0.21 per share, from special items
Operating cash flow was $118 million
Adjusted EBITDA was $79 million total, and $62 million excluding
hedges
External volumes grew over 2Q-09 and 1Q-10
Integrated
cash
cost
for
primary
aluminum
production
improved
to
$0.66/lb
CORE contributed over $15 million in cost reduction, capital avoidance, and cash
generation
Total
indebtedness
was
$554
million,
representing
a
24%
decrease
from
1Q-10
Cash and cash equivalents balances totaled $32 million. Senior revolving credit
facility had no outstanding borrowings and $215 million available capacity
while setting a foundation for long-term value
Completed IPO as part of broad program to increase strategic flexibility, position
company for growth and improve financial profile
Obtained favorable result in New Madrid power rate case
Signed final agreements for Jamaican fiscal regime


6
2009
Normalized(1)
3MOE
6/30/10
6MOE
6/30/10
Total primary aluminum shipments
580
       
147
         
267
         
Integrated upstream margin on cash cost
0.39
$     
0.38
$     
0.37
$     
Integrated upstream EBITDA
224
$      
55
$         
99
$         
Rolled products fabrication margin
35
         
15
           
26
           
Run-rate corporate expenses
(29)
        
(7)
            
(14)
          
Total Unhedged EBITDA
230
$      
62
$         
111
$      
Summary by Business
(1)
Normalized
based
on
$1.00
LME,
$0.06
Mid-west
Premium
Rolled Products Business
Rolled Products Business
Upstream Business
Upstream Business
Business-wide
summary
2009
Normalized
3MOE 6/30/10
6MOE
6/30/10
LME
1.00
       
0.97
                
0.98
       
Midwest Premium
0.06
       
0.06
                
0.06
       
Midwest Transaction Price
1.06
       
1.04
                
1.04
       
Net integrated cash cost of primary aluminum
0.67
       
0.66
                
0.67
       
Integrated upstream margin per pound
0.39
       
0.38
                
0.37
       
Dollars per Pound
Integrated cash cost is $0.66 for Q2-10;
normalizing Q1-10 for smelter volume and
alumina ramp up, YTD cost is $0.67
Strong Q2-10 demand in key primary aluminum
product groups. Billet and rod up 40% and 7%
against Q2-09. Billet and rod shipments up 21%
and 22% against Q1-10
CORE initiatives and favorable input prices offset
bauxite shipping delays, alumina ramp-up, and
legal costs related to power case
Fabrication margin was $14.5 million
YTD 2010 fabrication margin ahead of YTD 2009
by nearly $16 million
Q2-10 fabrication margin was $0.15 per pound
driven by greater leverage on fixed costs because
of exceptional throughput and by CORE results
CORE generated savings through purchasing
efficiency, labor efficiency and labor cost reduction


7
Noranda is well positioned to take advantage of a recovery in Aluminum prices


8
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2500
2700
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Market Fundamentals –
Medium to Long Term
Global demand for aluminum is expected to
continue to increase…
Aluminum’s consensus estimated sustainable
price is meaningfully above current prices…
We hold a positive outlook for Aluminum’s fundamentals
over the medium and long-term, based on two views:
Prices Below Consensus Sustainable Level
Source:
Harbor intelligence
ALUMINUM LONG TERM  MINIMUM EQUILIBRIUM PRICE
(annual average; consensus forecasts from up to 20 analysts)
ESTIMATED
LT MINIMUM
EQUILIBRIUM
$2,450
CASH PRICE
$2,109 so far
2010
Consumption Growth Driven by China
Source:
CRU
(1) In millions of tonnes
Total
Consumption
(1)
30.4
37.4
46.5
59.1
69.2
% Growth
--
23%
24%
27%
17%
China
Consumption
(1)
6.1
12.6
20.4
27.5
33.0
% Growth
--
108%
62%
35%
20%


9
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.30
1.40
25%
35%
45%
55%
65%
75%
85%
95%
1995
97
99
01
03
05
07
09
11
China Urban population, %
China Rural population, %
China Total population, bn
Amplified Growth
Globally, substitution trends favor aluminum
China historically has produced at or near its aluminum consumption
China has imposed severe export taxes on aluminum; exports are highly unlikely
CRU forecasts China being net importers of aluminum in the medium term
Power is a key production constraint for China
China Population & Urbanization
_________________
Source:  CRU.
1.4
1.3
1.2
Chinese Aluminum Consumption & Production
_________________
Source:  Davenport.


10
Though we can’t control the LME, we exercise significant control and influence
over the basic drivers of our success


11
Noranda’s
Integrated Operating Footprint
Downstream Business
Downstream Business
Annual Capacity:  495mm lbs
(2)
St. Ann  
Bauxite Mine
New Madrid
Aluminum
Smelter
Newport
Rolling Mills
Salisbury
Rolling Mills
East
Mill
West
Mill
Huntingdon
Rolling Mills
Bauxite
Discovery Bay,
Jamaica
4.5mm Mt
Alumina
Gramercy, LA
1.2mm Mt
Aluminum
Primary  Metal
New Madrid, MO
263k Mt (580mm lbs)
Fin stock (HVAC) and Auto, Semi-Rigid Container Stock, Flexible
Packaging, Transformer Windings
Huntingdon, TN
Huntingdon West
235mm lbs
(2)
Huntingdon East
130mm lbs
Newport, AR
35mm lbs
Salisbury, NC
95mm lbs
Products:
Location:
Annual
Capacity:
Upstream Business
Upstream Business
Annual Capacity: 580mm lbs
2009 Cash Cost at Full Production: $0.72 / lb
(1)
Gramercy
Refinery
Revenue
Drivers:
Volume & LME
Residential construction / remodeling, packaging, U.S. consumer
_______________________
(1)
We
estimate
that
due
to
lost
production
volume
in
2009
from
the
smelter
outage,
which
caused
lost
efficiency
and
fixed
cost
absorption,
our
upstream
cash
cost
of
primary
aluminum
for
FYE
2009
of
$0.77
per
poundwas
negatively
impacted
by
$0.05
per
pound.
(2)
Maximum
capacity,
with
actual
capacity
depending
upon
production
mix.


12
Primary
Aluminum
Alumina
Noranda
Bauxite
Mine
Noranda
Alumina
Refinery
New Madrid
Primary Aluminum
Smelter
Bauxite
The integration of our Upstream Business is the lynchpin to
our strategy and sustainability
Significant Operating Leverage to LME
Integration provides for a more “fixed”
cost base
relative to non-integrated producers whose margins
may be eroded by rising input costs that are correlated
to LME
Third party sales of excess raw materials (e.g., bauxite
and alumina) enhance our leverage to LME
Secure Supply
For our smelter and refinery, we have the ability to
provide over 100% of our needs of alumina and bauxite
Low Cost & Operating Flexibility
Expanded portfolio of opportunities to drive cost out
and increase productivity and sales
Our strategy is founded on integrated production, cost independence from the LME, growth & productivity
Vertically Integrated Upstream Business


13
Geographic Mix
Low Cost, Leading –
Rolling Mill Operations
Low cost Production
Huntingdon West is the foil
mill with the lowest
conversion cost in North
America according to CRU
CORE Productivity
Footprint efficiency
Flexibility
10-30% of prime metal
comes from New Madrid,
but inter-company volume
can be varied based on
market conditions
Focused Growth
Grow with key customers to
“Win with Winners”
Increase share of demand
Top 10 customers 56% of
sales
Huntingdon, TN
2 plants, East and West
Started 1967 & 2000
Max. East capacity: 130mm lbs
Max. West capacity: 235mm lbs
(1)
Newport, AR
Started 1951
Max. Capacity:
35mm lbs
(1)
Salisbury, NC
Started 1965
Max. Capacity:
95mm lbs
Four Rolling Mills in Three States
_______________________
(1)
Capacity
includes
intracompany
reroll
of
approximately
45mm
lbs.
40%
17%
4%
4%
Southeast USA
West USA
Northeast USA
Midwest USA
34%
Southwest USA
Mexico
1%
HVAC fin stock
Container
Transformer
sheet
Foil products
Light gauge sheet
Products
Downstream Segment is a stable free cash flow generator


14
We have two #1 Priorities: Get the Results, and Do the Right Things the Right Way


15
Get the Results
Get the Results
Do the Right Things
Do the Right Things
the Right Way
the Right Way
Action oriented
Ethics and Values
Drive for results
Process Management
Safety Focus
Problem solving
Peer relationships
Priority setting
Managing through
systems
Existing for Customers
Caring for Customers
Respecting Suppliers
Enriching Communities
Rewarding Investors
Two #1
Two #1
Priorities
Priorities
Sustainable
Sustainable
Goals
Goals
Core
Core
Values
Values
Our Two #1 Priorities


16
Financial Success in Adverse Conditions
Reduced Production Cost
Reduced Production Cost
Improved Demand Share
Improved Demand Share
Reduced Debt
Reduced Debt
Generated More Cash (Free Cash Flow)
Generated More Cash (Free Cash Flow)
(Millions of dollars)


17
Experienced Management Team
Management has created significant shareholder value at Noranda
13
members
of
the
executive
team
have
an
average
of
more
than
21
years
of
experience
in
cyclical
and
commodity
industries
Layle
“Kip”
Smith,
President
and
Chief
Executive
Officer,
has
25
years
of
leadership
experience,
including
in
various
management
positions
with
The
Dow
Chemical
Company,
as
COO
of
Resolution
Performance
Products
and
as
CEO
of
Covalence
Specialty
Materials
Kyle
D.
Lorentzen,
Chief
Operating
Officer,
has
20
years
of
experience
in
cyclical
industries,
including
senior
positions
at
Berry
Plastics,
Covalence
Specialty
Materials
and
Hexion’s
Epoxy
and
Phenolics
Division
Robert
B.
Mahoney,
Chief
Financial
Officer,
has
over
23
years
of
cyclical
industry
experience
in
senior
financial
management
positions
for
semiconductor
and
electrical
components
companies
Gail
E.
Lehman,
Vice
President
&
General
Counsel,
has
22
years
of
corporate
law
experience,
having
held
senior
roles
at
industrial
companies
Honeywell,
Covalence
Specialty
Materials
and
Hawker
Beechcraft
Scott
Croft,
President
of
Norandal
USA,
Inc,
has
24
years
of
experience
in
the
rolling
mill
business
Richard
Lapine,
Vice
President
of
Sales
&
Marketing,
has
over
30
years
of
experience
in
Chemicals,
Plastics
and
Automotive
segments
as
a
former
executive
at
The
Dow
Chemical
Company
Charles
Skoda,
Vice
President
of
Operations
Support,
has
9
years
of
experience
in
cyclical
industries,
including
as
an
executive
at
Capital
One,
following
a
decorated
career
as
an
aviator
in
the
U.S.
Navy
Remaining
executive
team
members
bring
strong
experience
and
are
experts
in
their
functional
areas
Experienced management team with a proven track record will support Noranda’s
continued success


18


19
APPENDICES


20
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income
Comments
Adjusted EBITDA for three months ended June 30, 2010
78.8
$    
Interest (Expense)/Income, Net
(8.5)
Depreciation & Amortization
(25.1)
LIFO/LCM
(9.9)
Interest Rate Swap MTM
(5.6)
MTM (Loss)/Gain on NatGas
(5.8)
AOCI Reclassification of Alim. Hedges
22.2
AOCI Reclassification of NatGas
Hedges
(1.5)
Stock Compensation Expense
(3.8)
Non-Cash Pension Expense
(1.8)
Other on-going items
(1.0)
Gain) loss on debt repurchase
(2.5)
Charges related to termination of derivatives
(4.9)
Restructuring and sponsor fees
(20.3)
Pre-Tax Income
10.3
Income tax expense
3.4
6.9
$       
Weighted average shares
49.1
Diluted options
1.0
prospectively, based on post-IPO debt balances at applicable interest rates
(1)
2Q is reasonable proxy going forward, at $25 million per quarter
(2)
Will vary from period-to-period with LME and inventory levels
Will vary from period-to-period with change in notional and market LIBOR
(3)
Will vary from period-to-period with change in hedged volume and Henry Hub
(3)
Set amount, with next 12 months disclosed
(4)
Relatively predictable amount, with estimate for next 12 months disclosed
(4)
2Q-10 contained $3.2 million of acceleration
Approximately $1.8 million per quarter, based on 2Q amounts
(5)
Represents gains and losses on asset disposals, other, say $1 million per quarter
(6)
Would continue after 2Q-10 only when there are are
debt paydowns
Doesn't continue after 2Q-10
Doesn't continue after 2Q-10
At 2Q, forecasted annual GAAP rate was disclosed as 33.6%
(7)
3Q will be based on amount outstanding at end of 2Q-10
(8)
Will vary based on stock price, but Q2-10 is appropriate proxy
(9)
Diluted shares
50.1
Diluted EPS
0.14
$    
(1)
See page 12 of June 2010 Form 10-Q for balance and rate information.
(2)
See page 50 of June 2010 Form 10-Q for 2Q-10 actual amount.
(3)
See page 19 of June 2010 Form 10-Q for hedged quantities and rates.
(4)
See page 19 of June 2010 Form 10-Q for amounts to be reclassified in future.
(5)
See page 52 of June 2010 Form 10-Q for Q2-10 actual amount.
(6)
See page 52 of June 2010 Form 10-Q for LTM "Loss on disposal" (0.4 million) and "other" (0.6 million).
(7)
See page 17 of June 2010 Form 10-Q for 33.6% annual 2010 rate.
(8)
See cover of June 2010 Form 10-Q for most recent share number.
(9)
See page 23 of June 2010 Form 10-Q for Q2-10 impact of dilutive securities.
Note: Amounts in millions, except per share data