10-Q

UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2015

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______________ to _______________

Commission File No. 000-54336

GRAPHITE CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	26-0641585
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

616 Corporate Way, Suite 2-9011
Valley Cottage, NY 10989 

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(844) 804-5599 

 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

_______________________________________________________________ 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ¨ No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY 

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ¨ No ¨

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

As of May 20, 2015, there were 195,601,362 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

GRAPHITE CORP. 

(An Exploration Stage Company) 

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q 

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2015

INDEX

Index		Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements		4
	Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2015 (unaudited) and December 31, 2014.		4
	Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (unaudited).		5
	Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (unaudited).		6
	Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (unaudited).		7
	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited).		8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		16
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.		21
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.		21
Part II. Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.		22
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.		22
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		22
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.		22
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.		22
Item 5.	Other Information.		22
Item 6.	Exhibits.		23
Signatures			24

2

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Graphite Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements. The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results. Additional factors that could materially affect these forward-looking statements and/or predictions include, among other things: the volatility of minerals prices, the possibility that exploration efforts will not yield economically recoverable quantities of minerals, accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration and development operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration and development plans, other factors over which we have little or no control; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Our management has included projections and estimates in this Form 10-Q, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

3

 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 

Graphite Corp.

Consolidated Balance Sheet

(unaudited)

			March 31,			December 31,
			2015			2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
	Cash		$	2,269		$	129,152
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
	License, net of amortization of $1,933 and $0, respectively			38,027			40,000
		TOTAL ASSETS	$	40,296		$	169,152
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
	Accounts payable		$	57,456		$	61,501
	Accounts payable - related party			142,168			59,517
	Accrued interest			5,360			4,472
	Related party payable			14,776			14,776
	Loan payable			10,000			10,000
	Loan payable - default			35,000			35,000
		Total Current Liabilities		264,760			185,266
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
	Preferred stock: $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares
	authorized, none issued and outstanding			-			-
	as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014
	Common stock: $0.0001 par value, 300,000,000 shares
	authorized, 195,601,362 as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014			19,560			19,560
	Stock payable			868,645			716,305
	Addiitional paid-in capital			2,732,747			2,732,747
	Other comprehense income			371			310
	Accumulated deficit			(3,845,787	)		(3,485,036	)
		Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(224,464	)		(16,114	)
		TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
		EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	40,296		$	169,152

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

Graphite Corp.

Consolidated Statement of Operations 

(unuadited)

		Three Months
		Ended
		March 31,
		2015
REVENUES		$	-
EXPENSES
	Accounting and legal		6,000
	Consulting		244,850
	Interest expense		888
	Investor relations		12,689
	Research and development		63,000
	Website costs		3,976
	General and administrative		9,736
	Travel		19,612
TOTAL EXPENSES			360,751
NET LOSS			(360,751	)
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE		$	(0.00	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING,
	BASIC AND DILUTED		195,601,362

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

5

Graphite Corp.

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

(unaudited)

	Three Months
	Ended
	March 31,
	2015
Net Loss	$	(360,751	)
Foreign Currency Translation Gain		61
Other Comprehensive Income		61
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS)	$	(360,690	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

6

Graphite Corp.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

				Three Months
				Ended
				March 31,
				2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
	Net loss				(360,751	)
	Changes in non-cash items:
		Consulting fees in stock payable			152,340
		Amortization of license			1,973
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities
		Increase in accounts payable			(4,045	)
		Increase in accounts payable - related party			82,651
		Increase in accrued interest			888
			Net Cash Used in
			Operating Activities		(126,944	)
INVESTING ACTIVITY
			Net Cash used in
			Investing Activity		-
FINANCING ACTIVITY
			Net Cash used in
			Financing Activity		-
Foreign currency adjustment					61
		NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH			(126,883	)
		CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD			129,152
		CASH AT END OF PERIOD		$	2,269
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF
	CASH FLOW INFORMATION
	CASH PAID FOR:
		Interest		$	-
		Income Taxes		$	-

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

7

GRAPHITE CORP. 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

March 31, 2015 

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND REVERSE MERGER

Nature of Operations

Graphite Corp. (formerly First Resources Corp.) (the “Company”) was organized on August 3, 2007, under the laws of the State of Nevada to engage in any lawful activity. The Company intends engage in the exploration of certain mineral interests in the states of Alabama and Montana.

On August 19, 2010, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State. As a result of the Amendment the Registrant, among other things, has: (i) changed its name to “First Resources Corp.;” and, (ii) increased the aggregate number of authorized shares to 310,000,000 shares, consisting of 300,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

On June 22, 2012, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State. As a result of the Amendment the Registrant has changed its name to “Graphite Corp.”

The Company's financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a December 31 year-end.

Reverse Merger

On August 11, 2014, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with Advance Graphene Ltd. (“AGL”). Pursuant to the agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of AGL by issuing 120,000,000 common shares. As a result of the share exchange, the former shareholders of the AGL controlled approximately 80.85% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company resulting in a change in control. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization transaction, as the Company qualifies as a non-operating public shell company given the fact that the Company held nominal net monetary assets, consisting of only cash at the time of merger transaction. As AGL is deemed to be the purchaser for accounting purposes under recapitalization accounting, the equity of the Company is presented as the equity of the combined company and the capital stock account of the Company is adjusted to reflect the part value of the outstanding and issued common stock of the legal acquirer (AGL) after giving effect to the number of shares issued in the share exchange agreement.

No comparative statement of operations or cash flows has been provided as the Company’s inception date has been changed to AGL, which was incorporated May 22, 2014.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The Company's financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

8

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management's plan is to obtain such resources for the Company by obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses and seeking equity and/or debt financing. However management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to employees based on ASC Topic “Share Based Payment” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments.

The Topic does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans”.

9

It requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award – the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). It further requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The scope of the Topic includes a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

As at March 31, 2015, the Company had not adopted a stock option plan.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.

Income Taxes

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740, Income Taxes, as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

Comprehensive Income

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. As at March 31, 2015, the Company had comprehensive gain of $61 as a result of foreign currency transactions.

10

Financial Instruments

The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

· Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

· Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

· Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. The recorded values of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.

The following table presents assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
March 31, 2015	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
December 31, 2014	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

11

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.

On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

12

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY PAYABLES

As of March 31, 2015, the Company has a payable balance owing of $14,776 (December 31, 2014: $14,776), to a company affiliated with a former officer of the Company.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had a payable balance owing of $113,001 (December 31, 2014: $55,502) to two officers.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had a payable balance owing of $29,167 (December 31, 2014: $4,015) to a company 50% owned by a major shareholder.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owed an officer of the Company 9% of the issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of December 12, 2014. This amounted to 17,641,234 common shares payable with a fair market value of $511,596.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owed an officer of the Company 8% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of July 15, 2014. This amounted to 2,274,547 common shares payable with a fair market value of $204,709.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 1% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of January 9, 2015. This amounted to 159,278 common shares payable with a fair market value of $5,113.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 6% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of January 9, 2015. This amounted to 955,669 common shares payable with a fair market value of $30,677.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 1,500,000 bonus common shares payable with a fair market value of $48,150.

During the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 40,000,000 common shares as a finder’s fee related to the introduction of the Rice University license agreement.

13

NOTE 5 – LICENSE

The Company purchased a royalty-bearing license to develop, exploit, utilize and commercialize licensed intellectual property and products.

Consideration for the license is an annual license fee of $7,500 for the first three years and $20,000 for each year thereafter and $350,000 of research and development expenses until October 1, 2015 and royalties ranging between 3% and 5% subject to a $50,000 minimum. These expenditures were expensed as incurred.

The Company entered into a license agreement to license Rice University’s grapheme carbon nanotube hybrid material technology in exchange for $40,000. The term of the agreement is from signing until the final licenses patent expires in approximately 17 years. Upon the fifth anniversary of the agreement, should the Company become insolvent, as defined within the agreement, shall result in any amounts owing from sub-licensees to the Company shall be payable directly to Rice University.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company has recorded $1,973 in amortization expense related to this license.

NOTE 6 – LOANS PAYABLE

The Company received a loan of $15,000 on June 27, 2013 that bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on June 27, 2014.

The Company received a loan of $15,000 on August 22, 2013 that bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on August 22, 2014.

The Company received a loan of $5,000 on January 16, 2014 that bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on January 16, 2015.

The Company received a loan of $10,000 on March 12, 2014 that bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on March 12, 2016.

As of March 31, 2015, there is accrued interest on the above loans in the amount of $5,360 (December 31, 2014: $4,472)

14

NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On August 11, 2014, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with AGL. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 120,000,000 common shares for 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of AGL. The agreement results in management and shareholders of AGL to hold 81% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company, resulting in a reverse capitalization transaction (see Note 1). Following the above events, there were 148,431,837 shares outstanding including:

Shares		Held by:
	120,000,000	AGL Shareholders
	28,431,837	Graphite Corp. Shareholders

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 7,169,525 common shares for $385,000.

During the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 40,000,000 common shares as a finder’s fee related to the introduction of the Rice University license agreement (see Note 4).

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owed an officer of the Company 9% of the issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of December 12, 2014. This amounted to 17,641,234 common shares payable with a fair market value of $511,596.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owed an officer of the Company 8% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of July 15, 2014. This amounted to 2,274,547 common shares payable with a fair market value of $204,709.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 1% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of January 9, 2015. This amounted to 159,278 common shares payable with a fair market value of $5,113.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 6% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of January 9, 2015. This amounted to 955,669 common shares payable with a fair market value of $30,677.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 1,500,000 bonus common shares payable with a fair market value of $48,150.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed two consultants an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares for services provided, valued at $68,400 using a closing price on the grant date February 23, 2015.

NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to March 31, 2015 through the date these financial statements were issued, and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose.

15

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following information should be read in conjunction with (i) the financial statements of Graphite Corp., a Nevada corporation and exploration-stage company, and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q together with (ii) the more detailed business information and the December 31, 2014 audited financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 000-54336), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 14, 2015. Statements in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical or current fact constitute “forward-looking” statements.

OVERVIEW

Graphite Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 3, 2007 and established a fiscal year end of December 31.

On August 11, 2014, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with Advance Graphene Ltd. (“AGL”). Pursuant to the agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of AGL by issuing 120,000,000 common shares. As a result of the share exchange, the former shareholders of the AGL controlled approximately 80.85% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company resulting in a change in control. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization transaction, as the Company qualifies as a non-operating public shell company given the fact that the Company held nominal net monetary assets, consisting of only cash at the time of merger transaction. As AGL is deemed to be the purchaser for accounting purposes under recapitalization accounting, the equity of the Company is presented as the equity of the combined company and the capital stock account of the Company is adjusted to reflect the part value of the outstanding and issued common stock of the legal acquirer (AGL) after giving effect to the number of shares issued in the share exchange agreement.

Going Concern

To date the Company has no revenues and consequently has incurred recurring losses from operations. No revenues are anticipated until we implement our new business plan, as described in our current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 13, 2014. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on raising capital to fund our business plan and ultimately to attain profitable operations. Accordingly, these factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company plans to raise additional funds through debt or equity offerings. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise any capital through this or any other offerings.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and to the understanding of our financial results:

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 the Company had no cash equivalents.

16

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to employees based on ASC Topic “Share Based Payment” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments.

The Topic does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans”.

It requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award – the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). It further requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The scope of the Topic includes a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

As at March 31, 2015, the Company had not adopted a stock option plan.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.

Income Taxes

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740, Income Taxes, as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

Comprehensive Income

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. As at March 31, 2015, the Company had comprehensive income of $61 as a result of foreign currency transactions.

17

Financial Instruments

The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; 

Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and 

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. The recorded values of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.

The following table presents assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
March 31, 2015	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
December 31, 2014	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.

On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

18

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

PLAN OF OPERATION

Our plan of operation for the next twelve months is to continue to execute on the following business plan, which was started in August of 2014.

Overview

We switched our business model in fiscal 2014 and are now engaged in the commercialization of nanomaterials through the use of proprietary manufacturing techniques to create scalable processes for the production and sale of graphene flakes (“GF”) for use in composite materials and other applications and graphene carbon nanotube hybrid material (“GCNT”) for use as an electrode.

GF

On August 11, 2014, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with Advance Graphene Ltd., an Israeli company holding a license from Graphene Materials Ltd., an Israeli company (“AGL”), that, in turn, holds a license from Ben Gurion University for the production of high-quality, low-defect GF at a cost that is expected to be substantially lower than current production costs for graphene of similar quality. Pursuant to the share exchange agreement, AGL became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Graphene is:

- derivative of Graphite

- a thin layer of carbon atoms bonded in a honeycomb lattice

- thinnest compound known

- lightest material known (1 sq.mt. weighs 0.77 mg)

- strongest compound discovered (200x > steel), but very flexible

- best conductor of heat

- better electric conductor than copper

GF is utilized as an additive and can considerably improve the barrier, mechanical, physical and electrical properties of composites. GF offers potential applications for industries that manufacture microelectronics, coatings and composites. GF demonstrates high stiffness and thermal conductivity. Owing to these superior properties, graphene is now one of the most promising materials in nanomaterial research.

The commercialization of GF is expected to require an investment of up to $1,000,000 and up to one year to scale-up and optimize GF production.

19

GCNT

On December 19, 2014, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Tubz, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Tubz”), and Rice University entered into and signed a license agreement in respect of Rice University’s patented graphene carbon nanotube electrode technology, which is expected to provide dramatic performance improvement over electrodes made from conventional material today at a comparable cost. The commercialization of this technology will require raising sufficient funds for the development of a prototype product (currently intended to be a smartphone battery) to demonstrate proof of concept and then production on an industrial scale.

Carbon Nanotubes (“CNT”) are allotropes of carbon with a cylindrical nanostructure. Nanotubes have been constructed with length-to-diameter ratio of up to 132,000,000:1, significantly larger than for any other material. CNTs have unusual properties, including, but not limited to 200x better energy charge, storage and discharge performance than any other technology on the market today, which are valuable for nanotechnology, electronics, optics and other fields of materials science and technology.

Strategy

Our primary focus is to identify promising nanomaterials and nanomaterial applications, secure binding rights to exploit and commercialize such materials and applications, finance their development and market and distribute such materials and applications to a wide range of industries and end-users. We are currently focused on two nanomaterials – GF and GCNT. Our plan is to produce samples of GF and GCNT, in each case, based on their respective methods of fabrication and then offer them for sale to relevant customers. Once we are able to consistently produce samples of GF and GCNT to the specifications we desire, we intend identify and try to form an alliance with strategic partners with the facilities and know-how to fabricate GG and/or GCNT in industrial quantities and at competitive prices. With such fabrication secured, we will approach the respective markets and commence marketing and sale activities.

GF

With significant breakthroughs in GF production we will seek to capture a share of the high-end (few-layer) graphene market. Current production worldwide is boutique or lab production only, the primary reason being that the cost of production is too high to warrant large-scale adoption into commercial processes. Our primary advantage over other graphene flakes is that our production cost is expected to be 333x – 1,000x less expensive than the current market price of and our GF will be of a higher quality (i.e., fewer layers and defects) than the graphene flakes available on the market today.

GCNT

We intend to develop a battery based on GCNT. Developed by the Tour group (www.jmtour.com) at Rice University and licensed to the Company, the GCNT electrode is expected to provide a 200%+ increase in the overall specific energy of lithium ion batteries. This patented innovation requires no process changes for battery manufacturers other than use of GCNT in lieu of conventional electrode materials such as graphite. Proof of concept in the form of a cellphone battery will enable us to offer a compelling competitive advantage to original equipment manufacturers that purchase pre-fabricated electrode stock and incorporate it into their processes for making batteries for use in both defense and commercial applications.

Graphite Mining

As a result of entering into the GF production and GCNT license agreements, the Company decided to switch its business model to the commercialization of GF and GCNT production. Following on from this decision, management has decided not to extend the Crystal Project lease when it expires in August 2015 and to exit the mining business altogether.

Results of Operations

The three months ended March 31, 2015

We recorded no revenues for the three-month period ended March 31, 2015.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, total operating expenses were $360,751, of which professional fees were $6,000, consulting fees were $244,850, research and development were $63,000, investor relations were $12,689, interest expense was $888, website costs were $3,976, travel was $19,612 and general and administrative expenses were $9,736.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2015, we had a cash balance of $2,269 (December 31, 2014: $129,152). We do not have sufficient cash on hand to fund our ongoing operational expenses. We will need to raise funds to commence our exploration program and fund our ongoing operational expenses. Additional funding will likely come from equity financing from the sale of our common stock or sale of part of our interest in our mineral claims. If we are successful in completing an equity financing, existing shareholders will experience dilution of their interest in our Company. We do not have any financing arranged and we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock to fund our exploration activities and ongoing operational expenses. In the absence of such financing, our business will likely fail. There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve further sales of our common stock or any other form of additional financing. If we are unable to achieve the financing necessary to continue our plan of operations, then we will not be able to continue our exploration of our minerals claims and our business will fail.

20

Cashflow from Operating Activities

During the period ended March 31, 2015, the Company used $126,944 of cash for operating activities resulting from a loss of $360,751 offset by consulting fees in stock payable of $152,340, amortization of license of $1,973, decreases in accounts payable, and increases in accounts payable to related party and accrued interest of $(4,045), $82,651 and $888, respectively.

Cashflow from Investing Activities

During the period ended March 31, 2015, the Company did not have investing activites.

Cashflow from Financing Activities

During the three-month period ended March 31, 2015, the Company did not have financing activities.

 ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 3.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer are responsible for conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures means that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to our company, including any consolidating subsidiaries, and was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2015.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

21

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

The Company is not currently subject to any legal proceedings. From time to time, the Company may become subject to litigation or proceedings in connection with its business, as either a plaintiff or defendant. There are no such pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 1A.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

 ITEM 4. MINING SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

 ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.

22

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation SK.

(a) The following Exhibits, as required by Item 601 of Regulation SK, are attached or incorporated by reference, as stated below.

Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation*
3.2	Bylaws*
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS **	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

_________________

* Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form SB-2 (File No. 333-148719), filed with the Commission on January 17, 2008.

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	GRAPHITE CORP.
	(Name of Registrant)
Date: May 20, 2015	By:	/s/ Mark Radom
	Name:	Mark Radom
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer

24

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF GRAPHITE CORP.

I, Mark Radom, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Graphite Corp.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 20, 2015	By:	/s/ Mark Radom
		Mark Radom
		Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF GRAPHITE CORP.

I, Mark Radom, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Graphite Corp.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 20, 2015	By:	/s/ Mark Radom
		Mark Radom
		Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF GRAPHITE CORP.

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Graphite Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the undersigned, Brian Goss, President, principal executive officer, principal accounting officer and principal financial officer, of Graphite Corp., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Graphite Corp.

Date: May 20, 2015	By:	/s/ Mark Radom
		Mark Radom
		Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer)

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Notes to Financial Statements

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to employees based on ASC Topic “Share Based Payment” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments.

The Topic does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans”.

It requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award – the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). It further requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The scope of the Topic includes a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

As at March 31, 2015, the Company had not adopted a stock option plan.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.

Income Taxes

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740, Income Taxes, as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

Comprehensive Income

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. As at March 31, 2015, the Company had comprehensive gain of $61 as a result of foreign currency transactions.

Financial Instruments

The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

· Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

· Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

· Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. The recorded values of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.

The following table presents assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
March 31, 2015	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
December 31, 2014	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.

On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

XML

GOING CONCERN

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Notes to Financial Statements

2. GOING CONCERN

The Company's financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations.

In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management's plan is to obtain such resources for the Company by obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses and seeking equity and/or debt financing. However management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$ 2,269	$ 129,152
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
License, net of amortization of $1,933 and $0, respectively	38,027	40,000
TOTAL ASSETS	40,296	169,152
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	57,456	61,501
Accounts payable-related party	142,168	59,517
Accrued interest	5,360	4,472
Related party payable	14,776	14,776
Loan payable	10,000	10,000
Loan payable - default	35,000	35,000
Total Current Liabilities	264,760	185,266
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock: $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014
Common stock: $0.0001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 195,601,362 as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014	19,560	19,560
Stock payable	868,645	716,305
Additional paid-in capital	2,732,747	2,732,747
Other comprehense income	371	310
Accumulated deficit	(3,845,787)	(3,485,036)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	(224,464)	(16,114)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$ 40,296	$ 169,152

XML

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015
Consolidated Statement Of Cash Flows
Net loss	$ (360,751)
Changes in non-cash items:
Consulting fees in stock payable	152,340
Amortization of license	1,973
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Increase in accounts payable	(4,045)
Increase in accounts payable - related party	82,651
Increase in accrued interest	888
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(126,944)
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net Cash used in Investing Activities
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Foreign currency adjustment	61
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH	(126,883)
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD	129,152
CASH AT END OF PERIOD	2,269
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
CASH PAID FOR: Interest
CASH PAID FOR: Income Taxes

XML

LOANS PAYABLE (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Loans Payable Details Narrative
Accrued interest on loans	$ 5,360	$ 4,472

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Officer One [Member]
Percentage of related party	9.00%	9.00%
Common shares payable related party	17,641,234
Fair market value	$ 511,596
Date of agreement	Dec. 12, 2014
Officer Two [Member]
Percentage of related party	8.00%	8.00%
Common shares payable related party	2,274,547
Fair market value	204,709
Date of agreement	Jul. 15, 2014
Director [Member]
Percentage of related party	1.00%
Common shares payable related party	159,278
Fair market value	5,113
Date of agreement	Jan. 09, 2015
Director One [Member]
Percentage of related party	6.00%
Common shares payable related party	955,669
Fair market value	30,677
Date of agreement	Jan. 09, 2015
Director Two [Member]
Common shares payable related party	1,500,000
Fair market value	48,150
Consultants [Member]
Common shares payable related party	4,000,000
Fair market value	$ 68,400
Date of agreement	Feb. 23, 2015

XML

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND REVERSE MERGER

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Notes to Financial Statements

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND REVERSE MERGER

Nature of Operations

Graphite Corp. (formerly First Resources Corp.) (the “Company”) was organized on August 3, 2007, under the laws of the State of Nevada to engage in any lawful activity. The Company intends engage in the exploration of certain mineral interests in the states of Alabama and Montana.

On August 19, 2010, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State. As a result of the Amendment the Registrant, among other things, has: (i) changed its name to “First Resources Corp.;” and, (ii) increased the aggregate number of authorized shares to 310,000,000 shares, consisting of 300,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

On June 22, 2012, the Company filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State. As a result of the Amendment the Registrant has changed its name to “Graphite Corp.”

The Company's financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a December 31 year-end.

Reverse Merger

On August 11, 2014, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with Advance Graphene Ltd. (“AGL”). Pursuant to the agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of AGL by issuing 120,000,000 common shares. As a result of the share exchange, the former shareholders of the AGL controlled approximately 80.85% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company resulting in a change in control. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization transaction, as the Company qualifies as a non-operating public shell company given the fact that the Company held nominal net monetary assets, consisting of only cash at the time of merger transaction. As AGL is deemed to be the purchaser for accounting purposes under recapitalization accounting, the equity of the Company is presented as the equity of the combined company and the capital stock account of the Company is adjusted to reflect the part value of the outstanding and issued common stock of the legal acquirer (AGL) after giving effect to the number of shares issued in the share exchange agreement.

No comparative statement of operations or cash flows has been provided as the Company’s inception date has been changed to AGL, which was incorporated May 22, 2014.

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
NON-CURRENT ASSETS
License, net of amortization	$ 1,933	$ 0
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Common Stock, par value	$ 0.0001	$ 0.0001
Common Stock, shares authorized	300,000,000	300,000,000
Common Stock, shares issued	195,601,362	195,601,362
Common Stock, shares outstanding	195,601,362	195,601,362

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Stockholders Equity Tables

Summary of shares outstanding

Following the above events, there were 148,431,837 shares outstanding including:

Shares		Held by:
	120,000,000	AGL Shareholders
	28,431,837	Graphite Corp. Shareholders

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015	May 20, 2015
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Graphite Corp.
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2015
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Central Index Key	0001420239
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		195,601,362
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2015
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Description
Total Realized Loss
Level 1 [Member]
Description
Level 2 [Member]
Description
Level 3 [Member]
Description

XML

Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015
EXPENSES
Accounting and legal	$ 6,000
Consulting	244,850
Interest expense	888
Investor relations	12,689
Research and development	63,000
Website costs	3,976
General and administrative	9,736
Travel	19,612
Total Expenses	360,751
NET LOSS	$ (360,751)
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE	$ 0.00
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED	195,601,362

XML

LOANS PAYABLE

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Notes to Financial Statements

6. LOANS PAYABLE

The Company received a loan of $15,000 on June 27, 2013 that bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on June 27, 2014.

The Company received a loan of $15,000 on August 22, 2013 that bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on August 22, 2014.

The Company received a loan of $5,000 on January 16, 2014 that bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on January 16, 2015.

The Company received a loan of $10,000 on March 12, 2014 that bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on March 12, 2016.

As of March 31, 2015, there is accrued interest on the above loans in the amount of $5,360 (December 31, 2014: $4,472)

XML

LICENSE

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Notes to Financial Statements

5. LICENSE

The Company purchased a royalty-bearing license to develop, exploit, utilize and commercialize licensed intellectual property and products.

Consideration for the license is an annual license fee of $7,500 for the first three years and $20,000 for each year thereafter and $350,000 of research and development expenses until October 1, 2015 and royalties ranging between 3% and 5% subject to a $50,000 minimum. These expenditures were expensed as incurred.

The Company entered into a license agreement to license Rice University’s grapheme carbon nanotube hybrid material technology in exchange for $40,000. The term of the agreement is from signing until the final licenses patent expires in approximately 17 years. Upon the fifth anniversary of the agreement, should the Company become insolvent, as defined within the agreement, shall result in any amounts owing from sub-licensees to the Company shall be payable directly to Rice University.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company has recorded $1,973 in amortization expense related to this license.

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Details)	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Common Stock, shares outstanding	195,601,362	195,601,362
AGL Shareholders [Member]
Common Stock, shares outstanding	120,000,000
Graphite Corp. Shareholders [Member]
Common Stock, shares outstanding	28,431,837

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Significant Accounting Policies Details Narrative
Cash equivalents
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$ 61

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Significant Accounting Policies Policies

Basis of Presentation

These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in US dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is December 31.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation issued to employees based on ASC Topic “Share Based Payment” which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments.

The Topic does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans”.

It requires an entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award – the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). It further requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The scope of the Topic includes a wide range of share-based compensation arrangements including share options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.

As at March 31, 2015, the Company had not adopted a stock option plan.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.

Income Taxes

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740, Income Taxes, as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

Comprehensive Income

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. As at March 31, 2015, the Company had comprehensive gain of $61 as a result of foreign currency transactions.

Financial Instruments

The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

· Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

· Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

· Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. The recorded values of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.

The following table presents assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
March 31, 2015	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
December 31, 2014	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.

On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

XML

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Notes to Financial Statements

7. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

On August 11, 2014, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with AGL. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 120,000,000 common shares for 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of AGL. The agreement results in management and shareholders of AGL to hold 81% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company, resulting in a reverse capitalization transaction (see Note 1). Following the above events, there were 148,431,837 shares outstanding including:

Shares		Held by:
	120,000,000	AGL Shareholders
	28,431,837	Graphite Corp. Shareholders

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 7,169,525 common shares for $385,000.

During the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 40,000,000 common shares as a finder’s fee related to the introduction of the Rice University license agreement (see Note 4).

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owed an officer of the Company 9% of the issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of December 12, 2014. This amounted to 17,641,234 common shares payable with a fair market value of $511,596.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owed an officer of the Company 8% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of July 15, 2014. This amounted to 2,274,547 common shares payable with a fair market value of $204,709.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 1% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of January 9, 2015. This amounted to 159,278 common shares payable with a fair market value of $5,113.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 6% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of January 9, 2015. This amounted to 955,669 common shares payable with a fair market value of $30,677.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 1,500,000 bonus common shares payable with a fair market value of $48,150.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed two consultants an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares for services provided, valued at $68,400 using a closing price on the grant date February 23, 2015.

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Notes to Financial Statements

8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to March 31, 2015 through the date these financial statements were issued, and has determined that it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose.

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Significant Accounting Policies Tables

Fair Value Assets Measured On A Recurring Basis

The following table presents assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
March 31, 2015	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
December 31, 2014	None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

XML

LICENSE (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015
License Details Narrative
Amortization expense related to license	$ 1,973

XML

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015
Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Income
NET LOSS	$ (360,751)
Foreign Currency Translation Gain	61
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	61
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE (INCOME)	$ (360,690)

XML

RELATED PARTY PAYABLES

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

Notes to Financial Statements

4. RELATED PARTY PAYABLES

As of March 31, 2015, the Company has a payable balance owing of $14,776 (December 31, 2014: $14,776), to a company affiliated with a former officer of the Company.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had a payable balance owing of $113,001 (December 31, 2014: $55,502) to two officers.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company had a payable balance owing of $29,167 (December 31, 2014: $4,015) to a company 50% owned by a major shareholder.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owed an officer of the Company 9% of the issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of December 12, 2014. This amounted to 17,641,234 common shares payable with a fair market value of $511,596.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company owed an officer of the Company 8% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of July 15, 2014. This amounted to 2,274,547 common shares payable with a fair market value of $204,709.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 1% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of January 9, 2015. This amounted to 159,278 common shares payable with a fair market value of $5,113.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 6% of issued and outstanding common shares as at the agreement date of January 9, 2015. This amounted to 955,669 common shares payable with a fair market value of $30,677.

As of March 31, 2015, the Company owed a director of the Company 1,500,000 bonus common shares payable with a fair market value of $48,150.

During the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued 40,000,000 common shares as a finder’s fee related to the introduction of the Rice University license agreement.

XML

RELATED PARTY PAYABLES (Details Narrative) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Former officer [Member]
Accounts payable-related party	$ 14,776	14,776
Officer [Member]
Accounts payable-related party	113,001	55,502
Major shareholder [Member]
Accounts payable-related party	29,167	4,015
Percentage of related party	50.00%
Officer One [Member]
Percentage of related party	9.00%	9.00%
Common shares payable related party	17,641,234
Fair market value	511,596
Date of agreement	Dec. 12, 2014
Officer Two [Member]
Percentage of related party	8.00%	8.00%
Common shares payable related party	2,274,547
Fair market value	204,709
Date of agreement	Jul. 15, 2014
Director [Member]
Percentage of related party	1.00%
Common shares payable related party	159,278
Fair market value	5,113
Date of agreement	Jan. 09, 2015
Director One [Member]
Percentage of related party	6.00%
Common shares payable related party	955,669
Fair market value	30,677
Date of agreement	Jan. 09, 2015
Director Two [Member]
Common shares payable related party	1,500,000
Fair market value	$ 48,150