		Three `months ended February 29, 2008`		Three `months ended February 28, 2007`		Nine months `ended February 29, 2008`		Period June `15, 2006 (Inception) to February 28, 2007`		Cumulative `from June 15, 2006 (Inception) to February 29, 2008`

Revenue	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Total Revenue		-		-		-		-		-

Cost and expenses
General and administrative		3,461		547		9,096		729		15,843
Impairment of mineral interest acquisition costs		-		-		-		-		7,000
Total Costs and Expenses		3,461		547		9,096		729		22,843
Net Loss	$	(3,461)	$	(547)	$	(9,096)	$	(729)	$	(22,843)

Net Loss per share
Basic and diluted	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)	$	(0.00)


Number of common shares used to compute net loss per share
Basic and Diluted		5,750,000		5,750,000		5,750,000		4,475,482

	Common Stock, $0.001 Par `Value`				Additional `Paid-in Capital`		Deficit `Accumulated During the Exploration Stage`		Total Stockholders' `Equity`
	Shares		Amount		Additional `Paid-in Capital`		Deficit `Accumulated During the Exploration Stage`		Total Stockholders' `Equity`
Sales of Common stock;
- July 28, 2006 at $0.001	3,500,000	$	3,500	$	-	$	-	$	3,500
- August 12, 2006 at $0.001	800,000		800		-		-		800
- August 30, 2006 at $0.01	1,000,000		1,000		9,000		-		10,000
- September 18, 2006 at $0.01	300,000		300		2,700		-		3,000
- November 30, 2006 at $0.05	150,000		150		7,350		-		7,500
Net loss for the period June 15, 2006 (inception) to May 31, 2007	-		-		-		(13,747)		(13,747)
Balance, May 31, 2007	5,750,000		5,750		19,050		(13,747)		11,053
Unaudited:
Net loss	-		-		-		(840)		(840)
Balance, August 31, 2007	5,750,000		5,750		19,050		(14,587)		10,213
Net loss	-		-		-		(4,795)		(4,795)
Balance, November 30, 2007	5,750,000		5,750		19,050		(19,382)		5,418
Net loss	-		-		-		(3,461)		(3,461)
Balance, February 29, 2008	5,750,000	$	5,750	$	19,050	$	(22,843)	$	1,957

		Nine months `ended February 29, 2008`		Period June `15, 2006 (Inception) to February 28, 2007`		Cumulative `from June 15, 2006 (Inception) to February 29, 2008`

Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(9,096)	$	(729)	$	(22,843)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by (used for) operating activities:
Impairment of mineral interest acquisition costs		-		-		7,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(5,055)		-		945
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities		(14,151)		(729)		(14,898)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Acquisition of mineral interest		-		-		(7,000)
Net Cash provided by (used for) investing activities		-		-		(7,000)

Cash Flows from Financing activities
Proceeds from loan from related party		4,000		-		4,000
Proceeds from sales of common stock		-		24,800		24,800
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		4,000		24,800		28,800

Increase (decrease) in cash		(10,151)		24,071		6,902
Cash, beginning of period		17,053		-		-

Cash, end of period	$	6,902	$	24,071	$	6,902

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	$	-	$	-	$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-	$	-	$	-

Interfac Mining Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 15, 2006. On March 9, 2007, the Company acquired a mineral property located in Clinton Mining, British Columbia, Canada, and has not yet determined whether this property contains reserves that are economically recoverable. The recoverability of the amounts from the property will be dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves, confirmation of the Company's interest in the underlying property, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to explore and develop the property, and upon future profitable production or proceeds from the sale thereof.

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $22,843 as at February 29, 2008 and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business, raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand and loans from directors and/or private placements of common stock. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

These financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and are expressed in U.S. dollars.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the statement of operations. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares during the period. Diluted net loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share excludes all potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

The Company has no potential dilutive instruments and accordingly basic net loss and diluted net loss per share are equal.

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

Mineral interest acquisition costs are capitalized and reviewed periodically for impairment. Exploration and development costs are expensed until the establishment of proven and probable reserves. If and when proven and probable reserves are established and production is determined to be probable, subsequent exploration and development costs will be capitalized and depleted using the units-of-production method over the estimated proven and probable reserves. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to operations.

The Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”, which establishes standards for the initial measurement and subsequent accounting for obligations associated with the sale, abandonment, or other disposal of long-lived tangible assets arising from the acquisition, construction or development and for normal operations of such assets. As at February 29, 2008, any potential costs relating to the retirement of Company’s mineral property interest has not yet been determined.

The fair values of financial instruments, which consist of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related party, approximate their carrying values due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The Company’s operations are in Canada which results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying values and their respective income tax bases (temporary differences). The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

At February 29, 2008, a full deferred tax asset valuation allowance has been provided and no deferred tax asset has been recorded.

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated in accordance with SFAS No. 52 “Foreign Currency Translation”, using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses resulting from translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income. Foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars.

The Company will account for any stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”, for employees and in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, for nonemployees. Through February 29, 2008, the Company has not granted any stock options or engaged in any other stock-based compensation.

Certain accounting pronouncements have been issued by the FASB and other standard setting organizations which are not yet effective and have not yet been adopted by the Company. The impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations from adoption of these pronouncements is not expected to be material.

The interim financial statements included herein as of February 29, 2008 and for the periods ended February 29, 2008 and February 28, 2007 are unaudited. However, in the opinion of management, such information includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information.

On March 9, 2007, the Company acquired a 100% interest in one mineral claim located in the northwest of Clinton Mining Division, British Columbia for total consideration of $7,000.

The mineral interest is held in trust for the Company by the vendor of the property. Upon request from the Company, the title will be recorded in the name of the Company with the appropriate mining recorder.

After a review of all relevant data relating to the mineral interest at May 31, 2007, the Company decided to record an impairment charge of $7,000 and reduced the carrying amount of the mineral interest acquisition costs to $0.

On July 28, 2006, the Company sold 3,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.001 per share for cash proceeds of $3,500.

On August 12, 2006, the Company sold 800,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.001 per share for cash proceeds of $800.

On August 30, 2006, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $10,000.

On September 18, 2006, the Company sold 300,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.01 per share for cash proceeds of $3,000.

On November 30, 2006, the Company sold 150,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.05 per share for cash proceeds of $7,500.

At February 29, 2008, no stock options, warrants, or other dilutive securities were outstanding.

The provision for income taxes (benefit) differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate of 35% to income (loss) before income taxes. The sources of the difference follow:

		Nine Months `Ended February 29, 2008`		Period June `15, 2006 (Inception) to February 28, 2007`
		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
Expected tax at 35%	$	(3,184)	$	(255)
Increase in valuation allowance		3,184		255

Income tax provision	$	0	$	(0)

Significant components of the Company’s deferred income tax assets are as follows:

Based on management’s present assessment, the Company has not yet determined it to be more likely than not that a deferred tax asset of $7,995 at February 29, 2008 attributable to the future utilization of the net operating loss carryforward of $22,843 will be realized. Accordingly, the Company has provided a 100% allowance against the deferred tax asset in the financial statements. The Company will continue to review this valuation allowance and make adjustments as appropriate. The net operating loss carryforward expires $13,747 in 2027 and $9,096 in 2028.

Current United States income tax laws limit the amount of loss available to offset against future taxable income when a substantial change on ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited.

On October 11, 2007, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to register 2,250,000 shares of common stock for resale by existing stockholders of the Company at $0.05 per share until the shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, and thereafter at prevailing market prices. On January 14, 2008, the Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the resale of shares of common stock by the shareholders.

This Form 10-QSB includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the "safe-harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.

All statements other than historical facts included in this Form, including without limitation, statements under "Plan of Operation", regarding our financial position, business strategy, and plans and objectives of management for the future operations, are forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to, market conditions, competition and the ability to successfully complete financing.

On March 9, 2007, we entered into an agreement with Ms. Phyllis Byrne of Vernon, BC, whereby she agreed to sell to us one mineral claim located approximately 100 kilometers southwest of Williams Lake, British Columbia in an area having the potential to contain gold mineralization or deposits. In order to acquire a 100% interest in this claim, we paid $7,000 to Ms. Byrne.

During the current fiscal year we obtained a geological summary report on the Zubiak property that was prepared by an independent geologist. The report discusses the geology of the area surrounding and particular to the Zubiak property, and makes a recommendation for further exploration work. In his report, the geologist opines that the Zubiak property covers an area where anomalous gold values have been detected in a regional geochemical sampling program conducted by the government of British Columbia. He advises that the property is underlain by intrusive rocks that may be host to intrusive related gold mineralization similar to that at the nearby Fame showing. The Fame showing is found in an area of poor bedrock exposure. The geologist opines that both the Fame and the Zubiak property are found in an under-explored part of British Columbia.

The author of the geological report on the Zubiak property, believes that the area has potential for gold mineralization. He is of the opinion that a Phase One exploration program consisting of stream sediment sampling program be carried out on the Zubiak property to confirm and follow up the anomalous gold value detected in regional stream sediment sampling. This program should be complemented with minor prospecting and rock sampling as appropriate.

If successful, the geologist recommends that the Phase 1 program should be followed up by a Phase Two exploration program consisting of detailed mapping, prospecting and sampling to determine the bedrock source of mineralization.

The geochemical portion of the initial phase program will consist of our consulting geologist gathering chip samples and grab samples from the property. All samples gathered will be sent to a laboratory where they are crushed and analyzed for metal content.

We anticipate that the first phase of this program will cost approximately $6,925, and that the second phase of this program will cost approximately $10,475. We have not yet been able to access the property to commence the work recommended by the report due to seasonal conditions.

Our plan of operation is to conduct exploration work on the Zubiak property in order to ascertain whether it possesses economic quantities of gold or copper. There can be no assurance that economic mineral deposits or reserves exist on the Zubiak property until appropriate exploration work is done and an economic evaluation based on such work concludes that production of minerals from the property is economically feasible.

Even if we complete our proposed exploration programs on the Zubiak property and they are successful in identifying a mineral deposit, we will have to spend substantial funds on further drilling and engineering studies before we will know if we have a commercially viable mineral deposit.

We anticipate spending the following over the next 12 months on administrative fees:

Total expenditures over the next 12 months are therefore expected to be approximately $31,900.

Our cash reserves are not sufficient to meet our obligations for the next twelve-month period. As a result, we will need to seek additional funding in the near future. We currently do not have a specific plan of how we will obtain such funding; however, we anticipate that additional funding will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. We may also seek to obtain short-term loans from our directors, although no such arrangement has been made. At this time, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or through a loan from our directors to meet our obligations over the next twelve months. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing.

We do not expect to earn any revenue from operations until we have either commenced mining operations on the Zubiak property or have sold an interest in the property to a third party. Before this occurs, we expect that we will have to complete current recommended exploration on the property, as well as additional exploration recommended by a geologist.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the small business issuer's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

We did not earn any revenues during the three-month period ended February 29, 2008. We do not anticipate earning revenues unless we enter into commercial production on the Zubiak Property, which is doubtful.

For the three-month period ended February 29, 2008 we incurred operating expenses of $3,461, consisting of entirely of general and administrative expenses.

At February 29, 2008, we had total assets of $6,902, consisting entirely of cash, and liabilities of $4,945 consisting of $945 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and $4,000 due to related party.

We did not earn any revenues during the three-month period ended February 28, 2007.

For the three-month period ended February 28, 2007 we incurred operating expenses of $547, consisting of entirely of general and administrative expenses.

We did not earn any revenues during the nine-month period ended February 29, 2008.

For the nine-month period ended February 29, 2008 we incurred operating expenses of $9,096, consisting of entirely of general and administrative expenses.

Results of Operations for the Period From June 15, 2006 (Inception) To February 28, 2007

We did not earn any revenues during the period from June 15, 2006 (Inception) to February 28, 2007.

For the period from June 15, 2006 (Inception) to February 28, 2007 we incurred operating expenses of $729, consisting of entirely of general and administrative expenses.

Results of Operations for the Period From June 15, 2006 (Inception) To February 29, 2008

We did not earn any revenues during the period from June 15, 2006 (Inception) to February 29, 2008.

For the period from June 15, 2006 (Inception) to February 29, 2008 we incurred operating expenses of $22,843, consisting of general and administrative expenses of $15,843 and impairment of mineral interest acquisition costs of $7,000.

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue exploration activities. For these reasons our auditors believe that there is substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern.

We evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of February 29, 2008. This evaluation was conducted by Tannisah Kruse, our director, president, chief executive officer, secretary, principal accounting officer and treasurer.

Disclosure controls are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information that we are required to disclose in the reports we file pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported.

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but no absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system are met. Further, any control system reflects limitations on resources, and the benefits of a control system must be considered relative to its costs. These limitations also include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of a control. A design of a control system is also based upon certain assumptions about potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

Based upon their evaluation of our controls, Tannisah Kruse, our director, president, chief executive officer, secretary, principal accounting officer and treasurer, has concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, the disclosure controls are effective providing reasonable assurance that material information relating to us is made known to management on a timely basis during the period when our reports are being prepared. There were no changes in our internal controls that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls.

The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceeding. Management is not aware of any threatened litigation, claims or assessments.

31.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

INTERFAC MINING INC.
(Exact name of small Business Issuer as specified in its charter)


Nevada	98-0577861
(State or other jurisdiction `of incorporation or organization)`	(IRS Employer Identification No.)


3780 West Broadway `Vancouver, British Columbia Canada`	V1Y 8R4
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Postal or Zip Code)


Issuer’s telephone number, including area code:	(778) 999-6100


None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

		February 29,		May 31,
		2008		2007
		(Unaudited)		(Audited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	6,902	$	17,053
Total Current Assets		6,902		17,053
Mineral interest acquisition costs, less reserve for
impairment of $7,000		-		-
Total Assets	$	6,902	$	17,053


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	945	$	6,000
Due to related party (non-interest bearing, due on demand)		4,000		-
Total current liabilities		4,945		6,000
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $0.001 par value;
authorized 75,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding 5,750,000 and 5,750,000 shares, respectively		5,750		5,750
Additional paid-in capital		19,050		19,050
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(22,843)		(13,747)
Total stockholders' equity		1,957		11,053
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	6,902	$	17,053

		February 29,		May 31,
		2008		2007
		(Unaudited)
Net operating loss carryforword	$	7,995	$	4,811
Valuation allowance		(7,995)		(4,811)

Net deferred tax assets	$	-	$	-