UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended November 30, 2009

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File Number: 000-52951

HERE ENTERPRISES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	N/A
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2908 – 30 Harrison Garden Blvd., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M2N 7A9
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(416) 704-0105
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)

Yes [   ]    No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [   ]	Accelerated filer                   [   ]
Non-accelerated filer   [   ]	Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [X]    No [   ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable
date: 8,190,000 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 19, 2010.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

It is the opinion of management that the interim consolidated financial statements for the six months ended November 30, 2009 include all adjustments necessary in order to ensure that the interim consolidated financial statements are not misleading.

Our interim consolidated financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
November 30, 2009

	Index
Consolidated Balance Sheets	F–1
Consolidated Statements of Operations	F–2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	F–3
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	F–4

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)

	November 30,		May 31,
	2009		2009
	$		$
	(Unaudited)
Current Assets
Cash	15,112		7,644
Accounts receivable	1,209		901
Total Current Assets	16,321		8,545
Property and equipment (Note 3)	699		1,236
Website (Note 4)	3,491		5,936
Total Assets	20,511		15,717
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	13,428		4,670
Accrued liabilities	10,755		8,071
Due to related parties (Note 5(a))	9,483		10,096
Short-term loans payable (Note 6)	47,000		40,000
Total Current Liabilities	80,666		62,837
Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business (Note 1)
Stockholders’ Deficit
Common stock
Authorized: 75,000,000 shares, par value $0.001
Issued and outstanding: 8,190,000 shares	8,190		8,190
Additional paid-in capital	72,810		72,810
Donated capital (Note 5(b))	79,875		66,375
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,752	)	(874	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(219,278	)	(193,621	)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit	(60,155	)	(47,120	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	20,511		15,717

F-1

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)

	Accumulated from
	November 15,		Six		Six		Three		Three
	2006		Months		Months		Months		Months
	(Date of Inception)		Ended		Ended		Ended		Ended
	to November 30,		November 30,		November 30,		November 30,		November 30,
	2009		2009		2008		2009		2008
	$		$		$		$		$
Revenue	21,627		2,801		3,441		1,679		1,747
Operating Expenses
Amortization	14,798		3,123		3,130		1,596		1,474
General and administrative (Note 5(b))	241,107		40,335		50,612		18,117		32,815
Total Operating Expenses	255,905		43,458		53,742		19,713		34,289
Operating Loss	(234,278	)	(40,657	)	(50,301	)	(18,034	)	(32,542	)
Other Income (Note 7)	15,000		15,000		–		15,000		–
Net Loss	(219,278	)	(25,657	)	(50,301	)	(3,034	)	(32,542	)
Other Comprehensive Loss
Foreign currency translation adjustments	(1,752	)	(878	)	981		(558	)	1,325
Comprehensive Loss	(221,030	)	(26,535	)	(49,320	)	(3,592	)	(31,217	)
Net Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted			–		(0.01	)	–		–
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding – Basic
and Diluted			8,190,000		8,190,000		8,190,000		8,190,000

F-2

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)

	Six		Six
	Months		Months
	Ended		Ended
	November 30,		November 30,
	2009		2008
	$		$
Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	(25,657	)	(50,301	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Amortization	3,123		3,130
Donated services and rent	13,500		13,500
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(308	)	972
Accounts payable	8,758		3,872
Accrued liabilities	2,684		12,865
Due to related parties	(613	)	(4,009	)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities	1,487		(19,971	)
Financing Activities
Proceeds from loan payable	20,000		30,000
Repayment of loan payable	(13,000	)	–
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	7,000		30,000
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash	(1,019	)	3,444
Change in Cash	7,468		13,473
Cash, Beginning of Period	7,644		9,628
Cash, End of Period	15,112		23,101
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Property and equipment acquired from a related party	–		–
Website acquired from a related party	–		–
Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid	–		–
Income taxes paid	–		–

F-3

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)

1.	Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business
	Here Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on November 15, 2006. On December 12, 2006, the Company incorporated Here Network Corp. (the “Subsidiary”), a company incorporated in the province of British Columbia, Canada. On December 12, 2006, the Subsidiary acquired a website www.dinehere.ca which provides restaurant listings and reviews to a broad spectrum of Internet visitors. The Company derives advertising revenue from this website. The Company is a development stage company as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915, “Development Stage Enterprises”.
	These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As of November 30, 2009, the Company has generated minimal revenue, has a working capital deficit of $64,345, and has incurred losses from operations of $219,278 since inception. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
	The Company intends to fund operations through revenue and equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund its capital expenditures, working capital and other cash requirements for the year ending May 31, 2010.
2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

a)	Basis of Presentation
	These consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, Here Network Corp. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company’s fiscal year end is May 31. In accordance with ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through January 19, 2010, the date of issuance of the unaudited interim financial statements. During this period, the Company did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.
b)	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful lives and recoverability of long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, donated expenses and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
c)	Cash and Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

F–4

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
	d)	Financial Instruments and Concentrations
		ASC 825, Financial Instruments requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 825 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
		Level 1
		Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
		Level 2
		Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
		Level 3
		Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
		The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, amounts due to related parties and short-term notes payable. Pursuant to ASC 825, the fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents, when applicable, is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company estimates that the carrying values of all of its other financial instruments approximate their fair values due to the immediate or relatively short maturities of these instruments.
		The Company’s operations are in Canada and virtually all of its assets and liabilities are giving rise to significant exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The financial risk is the risk to the Company’s operations that arise from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.
		Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by placing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions. The Company does not require collateral and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the age of the receivable and the specific identification of receivables the Company considers at risk.
		For the six-month periods ended November 30, 2009 and 2008, revenue from a single customer represented 100% of total revenue. As at November 30, 2009 and 2008, 100% of accounts receivable are due from this customer.
	e)	Property and Equipment
		Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Amortization has been provided using the following rates and methods:

Computer hardware	3 years straight-line
Furniture and office equipment	5 years straight-line

F–5

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
	f)	Website
		The Company recognizes the costs associated with developing a website in accordance with ASC 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”.
		The Company acquired its website from a third party. The Company is capitalizing costs of computer software obtained for internal use in web design and network operations. These capitalized costs will be amortized based on their estimated useful life over three years. Payroll and related costs will not be capitalized, as the amounts principally relate to maintenance. Internal costs related to the development of website content will be expensed as incurred.
	g)	Long-lived Assets
		In accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”, the carrying values of long-lived assets are reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstances that may suggest impairment. The Company recognizes impairment when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.
	h)	Foreign Currency Translation
		The functional currency of the Subsidiary is the Canadian dollar. The financial statements of the Subsidiary are translated to United States dollars under the current rate method in accordance with ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Translation Matters”. Under the current rate method, all assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date and revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange during the year. The effect of this translation is recorded in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. A cumulative translation adjustment of $1,752 as of November 30, 2009 has been included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
		Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the approximate rate of exchange at the transaction date. Assets and liabilities resulting from these transactions are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. All differences are recorded in the results of operations.
	i)	Income Taxes
		The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. The asset and liability method provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed more likely than not to be realized.
	j)	Revenue Recognition
		The Company’s revenue is derived from pay per click advertising placed on its website. The Company recognizes this advertising revenue in accordance with ASC 605, “Revenue Recognition” when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the revenue has been earned, and collectibility is reasonably assured.
	k)	Comprehensive Income
		ASC 220, “Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. As at November 30, 2009, the Company’s only component of comprehensive loss consisted of foreign currency translation adjustments.

F–6

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)

2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
	l)	Earnings (Loss) per Share
		The Company computes earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share". ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.
	m)	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
		In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as ASC 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.
		In May 2009, FASB issued ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”, which establishes general standards of for the evaluation, recognition and disclosure of events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. Although there is new terminology, the standard is based on the same principles as those that currently exist in the auditing standards. The standard, which includes a new required disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 (see Note 2(a)). The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
		The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
3.	Property and Equipment

	November 30, 2009			May 31,2009
		Accumulated	Net Book	Net Book
	Cost	Amortization	Value	Value
	$	$	$	$
Computer hardware	3,140	2,704	436	929
Furniture and equipment	545	282	263	307
	3,685	2,986	699	1,236

4. Website

	November 30,		May 31,
	2009		2009
	$		$
Website	15,859		15,345
Less: Accumulated amortization	(12,368	)	(9,409	)
Net Carrying Value	3,491		5,936

F–7

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)

The following is the estimated annual amortization expense for each of the next three years:

	$
Remainder of 2010	2,648
2011	843
	3,491

5.	Related Party Transactions
	a)	As at November 30, 2009, the Company was indebted to the directors of the Company in the amount of $9,483 (May 31, 2009 - $10,096), which is non-interest bearing, unsecured, and due on demand.
	b)	One employee of the Company provided management services and office premises to the Company at no charge. The donated services have an estimated fair value of $2,000 per month and office premises have an estimated fair value of $250 per month. During the six-month period ended November 30, 2009, $12,000 (2008 - $12,000) in donated services and $1,500 (2008 - $1,500) in donated rent were charged to operations and recorded as donated capital.
6.	Short-term Loans Payable
	On October 8, 2008, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated company in exchange for $30,000. The promissory note bears interest at 20% per annum, is unsecured and repayable on demand.
	On April 8, 2009, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated company in exchange for $10,000. The promissory note bears no interest, is unsecured and has no fixed term for repayment.
	On June 26, 2009, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated company in exchange for $20,000. The promissory note bears no interest, is unsecured and has no fixed term for repayment. The Company repaid $5,000 on October 20, 2009, and $8,000 on November 19, 2009.
7.	Commitment
	On May 15, 2009, the Company signed Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with Magnolia Solar, Inc. (“Magnolia”) and the Company’s controlling shareholders to enter into a reverse takeover transaction. Under the reverse takeover transaction, Magnolia was to acquire a majority interest in the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company from the Company’s controlling shareholders for $300,000.
	Under the MOU, the parties agreed to use their best efforts to negotiate in good faith a definitive agreement, which is contemplated to contain, among other things, the following provisions: (i) at the closing, Magnolia will own a majority of the fully diluted shares of the Company’s common stock, with the understanding that post-bridge funding, Magnolia will hold approximately 85% of the issued and outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. The certain controlling shareholders of the Company will sell their shares as part of this transaction and new shares will be issued from authorized, leaving a total post-transaction capitalization to be finalized between the parties, in good faith, in the definitive agreement; (ii) the Company will eliminate all liabilities from its balance sheet and have no ongoing operations as of the closing date; (iii) the Company will deliver to Magnolia fiscal years 2007 and 2008 audits by an accounting firm accredited with the PCAOB and a member of the SEC practice section; (iv) the Company will deliver to Magnolia certified transfer sheets (or make same available through the transfer agent) as well as all corporate books and records and support documents for the audits; and (v) all officers and employees will resign from the Company in all current capacities, with no further compensation due under their existing employment agreement.
	In June 2009, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Magnolia, pursuant to which Magnolia agreed to advance the Company $20,000 upon the execution of the letter agreement, which amount was to be utilized by the Company solely for expenses related to the completion of the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009. In addition, upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the MOU, $20,000 is to be applied as a credit against the purchase price for the controlling interest in the Company as contemplated by the MOU. If such transactions fail to close on or before August 31, 2009 or such later date as

F–8

Here Enterprises, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(expressed in U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)

7.	Commitment (continued)
	agreed by Magnolia and the Company, through no fault of the Company, $20,000 is to be treated as a “break up” fee payable to the Company. If the Company or its controlling shareholders, for any reason, determine not to proceed with such transactions upon being presented with the definitive merger agreement, $20,000 is to be immediately due and payable to Magnolia within 10 days of being presented with the definitive agreement. The Company extended the closing date to December 15, 2009.
	On October 15, 2009, Magnolia advanced the Company $15,000 of the $20,000 contemplated under the letter agreement. On December 10, 2009, Magnolia decided not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the MOU and abandoned the reverse takeover transaction. Accordingly, the Company recognized the $15,000 as other income in the statement of operations for the six-month period ended November 30, 2009. Management does not expect the Company to receive from Magnolia the remaining $5,000 contemplated under the letter agreement.

F–9

- 4 -

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors”, that may cause our company’s or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our interim consolidated financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our interim consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.

In this quarterly report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars. All references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock. As used in this quarterly report, the terms “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Here Enterprises, Inc. and/or Here Network Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Here Enterprises, Inc.

Overview

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 15, 2006. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp., was incorporated in the Province of British Columbia on December 12, 2006. We commenced business operations with the acquisition of dinehere.ca on December 12, 2006.

Through our subsidiary, Here Network Corp., we operate a website dining guide at www.dinehere.ca called Dine Here. The website contains restaurant listings for British Columbia, Canada including Greater Vancouver, Victoria and Whistler. Visitors can view restaurant information for many of the restaurants in the cities covered including user contributed reviews that have a title, description of their experience and ratings for categories including food, service, ambiance and an overall rating. Internet visitors can also register at the website and submit reviews on any restaurant or add new restaurant listings.

On May 15, 2009, we, certain significant shareholders of our company, and Magnolia Solar, Inc. entered into a memorandum of understanding with respect to the potential acquisition by Magnolia of a majority interest in our company. The memorandum of understanding contemplated that pursuant to a mutually satisfactory definitive agreement between the parties, Magnolia will acquire a majority interest in the issued and outstanding common stock of our company from our company and certain significant shareholders of our company for $300,000. The purchase price of $300,000 was contemplated to be raised by Midtown Partners as part of its $1,500,000 bridge funding.

The parties agreed to use their best efforts to negotiate in good faith the definitive agreement, which was contemplated to contain, among other things, the following provisions: (i) at the closing, Magnolia will own a majority of the fully diluted shares of our common stock, with the understanding that post-bridge funding, Magnolia will hold approximately 85% of the issued and outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. The certain significant shareholders of our company will sell their shares as part of this transaction and new shares will be issued from authorized, leaving a total post-transaction capitalization to be finalized between the parties, in good faith, in the definitive agreement; (ii) we will eliminate all liabilities from our balance sheet and have no ongoing operations as of the closing date; (iii) we will deliver to Magnolia fiscal years 2007 and 2008 audits by an accounting firm

- 5 -

accredited with the PCAOB and a member of the SEC practice section; (iv) we will deliver to Magnolia certified transfer sheets (or make same available through the transfer agent) as well as all corporate books and records and support documents for the audits; and (v) all officers and employees will resign from our company in all current capacities, with no further compensation due under their existing employment agreement.

In June 2009, we entered into a letter agreement with Magnolia, pursuant to which Magnolia agreed to wire us $20,000, upon the execution of the letter agreement, which amount was to be utilized by us solely for expenses related to the completion of the audit of our financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009. In addition, upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the memorandum of understanding, $20,000 was to be applied as a credit against the purchase price for the controlling interest in our company as contemplated by the memorandum of understanding. If such transactions failed to close on or before August 31, 2009 or such later date as agreed by Magnolia and us, through no fault of our company, $20,000 was to be treated as a “break up” fee payable to us. If we or our majority shareholders, for any reason, determined not to proceed with such transactions upon being presented with the definitive merger agreement, $20,000 was to be immediately due and payable to Magnolia within 10 days of being presented with the definitive agreement. We extended the closing date to December 15, 2009.

On October 15, 2009, Magnolia advanced our company $15,000 of $20,000 contemplated under the letter agreement. On December 10, 2009, Magnolia decided not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the memorandum of understanding and we consider $15,000 from Magnolia as a “break up” fee. Accordingly, we recognized $15,000 as other income in the statement of operations for the six-month period ended November 30, 2009. Management does not expect our company to receive from Magnolia the remaining $5,000 contemplated under the letter agreement.

Sources of Revenue

We currently have one source of revenue that consists of Google Adsense advertisements. Google Adsense is an advertising solution for web publishers such as Dine Here. The web publisher agrees to place text advertisements on their website in return for a 50-50 split of all revenue derived from the advertising placed on the website.

Revenue is accrued when visitors click on advertisements on a pay per click basis. Google Adsense has a sophisticated, contextual advertisement serving system that allows them to target advertisements on Dine Here to serve only those that relate geographically or match the theme of the website. Advertisers using Google Adsense generally include local newspapers, phone book companies, restaurants, other local businesses or anyone else that pays for this marketing service. The advertisements are served within the text-based content of the site and can include up to three advertisements depending on the web page. Google Adsense pays its publishers by corporate check on a monthly basis at the end of the month, for the previous month. This is paid in US dollars and delivered by mail.

Website

Our website is hosted on a dedicated server rented to Here Network Corp. on a month to month basis by Superb Internet Corporation. Superb charges a monthly fee of $282.45. The server is hosted in Seattle, Washington. We retained Wickle Media Corp. of Vancouver, Canada to complete the development of the new website for $2,000, to be paid in full upon completion. We launched the new website on December 1, 2009. No funds have been paid for the development yet.

- 6 -

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes our operating results for the three and six months ended November 30, 2009 and November 30, 2008:

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		November 30,		November 30,		November 30,		November 30,
		2009		2008		2009		2008
Revenue	$	1,679	$	1,747	$	2,801	$	3,441
Operating Expenses	$	19,713	$	34,289	$	43,458	$	53,742
Net Loss	$	3,034	$	32,542	$	25,657	$	50,301

Three Months Ended November 30, 2009 and November 30, 2008

For the three months ended November 30, 2009, we generated revenues of $1,679 and incurred operating expenses of $19,713 as compared to revenues of $1,747 and operating expenses of $34,289 for the three months ended November 30, 2008. The decrease in revenues was caused primarily by lower advertising rates from Google Adsense and a decrease in traffic due to increased competition. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributable to lower auditing and legal fees incurred. We recognized $15,000 advanced by Magnolia Solar, Inc. under the letter agreement that we entered into in June 2009 as other income in the statement of operations for the three months ended November 30, 2009. As a result, for the three months ended November 30, 2009, we suffered a net loss of $3,034 as compared to net loss of $32,542 for the three months ended November 30, 2008.

General and administrative costs were $18,117 for the three months ended November 30, 2009 as compared to $32,815 for the three months ended November 30, 2008. The decrease in general and administrative costs was primarily attributable to lower auditing and legal fees incurred.

Six Months Ended November 30, 2009 and November 30, 2008

For the six months ended November 30, 2009, we generated revenues of $2,801 and incurred operating expenses of $43,458 as compared to revenues of $3,441 and operating expenses of $53,742 for the six months ended November 30, 2008. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to less advertising and increased competition for advertising on the website lowering the advertising rates paid. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily attributable to lower auditing and legal fees incurred. We recognized $15,000 advanced by Magnolia Solar, Inc. under the letter agreement that we entered into in June 2009 as other income in the statement of operations for the six months ended November 30, 2009. As a result, for the six months ended November 30, 2009, we suffered net loss of $25,657 as compared to net loss of $50,301 for the six months ended November 30, 2008.

General and administrative costs were $40,335 for the six months ended November 30, 2009 as compared to $50,612 for the six months ended November 30, 2008. The decrease in general and administrative costs was primarily attributable to lower auditing and legal fees incurred.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Working Capital

		At November 30,			At May 31,
		2009			2009
Current assets	$	16,321		$	8,545
Current liabilities		80,666			62,837
Working capital (deficiency)	$	(64,345	)	$	(54,292	)

At November 30, 2009, we had cash of $15,112 and working capital deficit of $64,345 as compared to cash of $7,644 and working capital deficit of $54,292 at May 31, 2009. We have suffered a net loss from inception. Our ability to meet our financial liabilities and commitments is primarily dependent upon the continued financial support

- 7 -

of our director and stockholders, the continued issuance of equity to new stockholders, and our ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations.

In June 2009, pursuant to the letter agreement between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and our company, Magnolia agreed to advance us $20,000. The advance of $20,000 was to be utilized by us solely for expenses related to the completion of the audit of our financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009. In addition, upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the memorandum of understanding dated May 15, 2009 between Magnolia and our company, $20,000 was to be applied as a credit against the purchase price for the controlling interest in our company as contemplated by the memorandum of understanding. If such transactions failed to close on or before August 31, 2009 or such later date as agreed by Magnolia and us, through no fault of our company, $20,000 was to be treated as a “break up” fee payable to us. If we or our majority shareholders, for any reason, determined not to proceed with such transactions upon being presented with the definitive merger agreement, $20,000 was to be immediately due and payable to Magnolia within 10 days of being presented with the definitive agreement. We extended the closing date to December 15, 2009.

On October 15, 2009, Magnolia advanced our company $15,000 of $20,000 contemplated under the letter agreement. On December 10, 2009, Magnolia decided not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the memorandum of understanding and we consider $15,000 from Magnolia as a “break up” fee. Accordingly, we recognized $15,000 as other income in the statement of operations for the six-month period ended November 30, 2009. Management does not expect our company to receive from Magnolia the remaining $5,000 contemplated under the letter agreement.

Management believes that our cash will not be sufficient to meet our working capital requirements for the next twelve month period. We plan to raise the capital required to satisfy our immediate short-term needs and additional capital required to meet our funding requirements for the next twelve months primarily through future debt or equity financing. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain further funds required for our continued working capital requirements. If we are not able to obtain additional funds on a timely basis, we will be unable to conduct our operations as planned. In such event, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations.

Going Concern

There is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as the continuation of our business is dependent upon the continued financial support from our stockholders, our ability to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and achieving a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

Because we have a working capital deficit, have generated minimal revenues, and have incurred losses from operations since inception, in their report on our audited financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our stockholders.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable.

- 8 -

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, being November 30, 2009. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our president (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer).

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of a control system are met. Further, any control system reflects limitations on resources, and the benefits of a control system must be considered relative to its costs. These limitations also include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of a control. The design of a control system is also based upon certain assumptions about potential future conditions; over time, currently implemented controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Due to the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

Based upon that evaluation, our president concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as at the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. There have been no changes in our internal control over financing reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the applicable time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our president to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We know of no material, active or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which our director and officer, or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to other information in this quarterly report, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. As a result of the risk factors set forth below, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently consider to be immaterial, may also impact our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition. If any such risks occur, our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition could be materially affected in an adverse manner. Under such circumstances, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

- 9 -

Risks Related to Our Business

Our limited operating history makes evaluation of our business difficult.

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 15, 2006 and our wholly owned subsidiary, Here Network Corp., was incorporated in the Province of British Columbia on December 12, 2006. We commenced business operations with the acquisition of dinehere.ca on December 12, 2006. Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our business and prospects. We have encountered, and expect to continue to encounter, many of the difficulties and uncertainties frequently encountered by early stage companies, including limited capital, delays in product development, marketing and sales obstacles and delays, inability to gain customer acceptance of our products and services, inability to attract and retain high-quality and talented executives and other personnel and significant competition. We cannot be certain that we will successfully address these risks. If we are unable to address these risks, our business may not grow, our stock price may suffer and/or we may be unable to stay in business.

The fact that we have not generated any significant revenues since our incorporation raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have not generated significant revenues since our inception on November 15, 2006. Since we are still in the early stages of an operating company and because of the lack of operating history, we will, in all likelihood, continue to incur operating expenses without significant revenues until our website gains significant popularity. Our primary source of funds has been the sale of our common stock and promissory note. We cannot assure that we will be able to generate enough interest in our website. If we cannot attract a significant customer base, we will not be able to generate any significant revenues or income. In addition, if we are unable to establish and generate material revenues, or obtain adequate future financing, our business will fail and you may lose some or all of your investment in our common stock.

Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We incurred a net loss of $219,278 for the period from November 15, 2006 (date of inception) to November 30, 2009. On November 30, 2009, we had cash of $15,112. Should we require additional funding, we intend to raise the money required to fund our operations from the sale of our equity or debt securities; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so. Because we have generated minimal revenues and have incurred a loss from operations since our inception, our independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their report dated August 4, 2009, regarding the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that led to this disclosure by our independent auditors.

We may need additional funding to support our operations and capital expenditures, which may not be available to us and which lack of availability could adversely affect our business.

We have no committed sources of additional capital. For the foreseeable future, we intend to fund our operations and capital expenditures from limited cash flow and our cash on hand. If our capital resources are insufficient, we will have to raise additional funds. We may need additional funds to continue our operations, pursue business opportunities (such as expansion, acquisitions of complementary business or the development of new products or services), to react to unforeseen difficulties or to respond to competitive pressures. There can be no assurance that any financing arrangements will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Furthermore, the sale of additional equity or convertible debt securities may result in further dilution to existing stockholders. If adequate additional funds are not available, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate material parts of the implementation of our business strategy, including the possibility of additional acquisitions or internally developed businesses.

- 10 -

We may not be able to effectively manage our growth if we expand by adding new cities to our dining website directory.

We plan to add new cities to our dining website directory. Over the next 12 months, we plan on adding 3 new cities including Calgary, Toronto and Montreal. If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our financial results could be adversely affected. Growth may place a strain on our management systems and resources. We must continue to refine and expand our business development capabilities, our systems and processes and our access to financing sources. As we grow, we must continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. We cannot assure you that we will be able to:

• meet our capital needs;

• expand our systems effectively or efficiently or in a timely manner;

• allocate our human resources optimally;

• identify and hire qualified employees or retain valued employees; or

• incorporate effectively the components of any business that we may acquire in our effort to achieve growth.

If we are unable to manage our growth, our operations and financial results could be adversely affected.

We compete with many companies, some of whom are more established and better capitalized than us.

There are a significant number of competitors that offer restaurant information and reviews on dining establishments in Canada both through the Internet and in traditional markets. As we expand across Canada, we will face new competition as all major cities have a local dining guide for that region. In addition, there are several travel based websites that will also offer stiff competition to our website. Some of these companies are larger and better capitalized than us. There are also few barriers to entry in our markets and thus above average profit margins will likely attract additional competitors. Our competitors may develop services that are superior to, or have greater market acceptance than our services. For example, many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources and larger customer bases than us. These factors may allow our competitors to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. Our competitors may engage in more extensive research and development efforts, undertake more far-reaching marketing campaigns and adopt more aggressive pricing policies which may allow them to build larger registrant and membership bases. In addition, current and potential competitors are making, and are expected to continue to make, strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative, and in some cases, exclusive relationships with significant companies or competitors to expand their businesses or to offer more comprehensive products and services. To the extent these competitors or potential competitors establish exclusive relationships with major portals, search engines and ISPs, our ability to reach potential users of our website through online advertising may be restricted. Failure to compete effectively including by developing and enhancing our services offerings would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and the trading price of our common stock.

If we are unable to establish a large user base, we may have difficulty in attracting advertisers to our website, which will hinder our ability to generate advertising revenues.

An integral part of our business plan and marketing strategy requires us to establish a large user base. We will only be able to attract advertisers to our website and possibly begin to generate significant revenues if we can obtain a large enough user base. The number of users necessary to attract advertisers will be determined through discussions with the potential advertisers and their input as to whether we can obtain revenues from advertisements based upon the total numbers at that time. If for any reason our website is ineffective at attracting consumers or if we are unable to continue to develop and update our website to keep consumers satisfied with our service, our user base may decrease and our ability to generate advertising revenues may decline.

- 11 -

Our market is characterized by rapid technological change, and if we fail to develop and market new technologies rapidly, we may not become profitable in the future.

The Internet and the online commerce industry are characterized by rapid technological change that could render our existing website obsolete. The development of our website entails significant technical and business risks. We can give no assurance that we will successfully use new technologies effectively or adapt our website to customer requirements or needs. If our management is unable, for technical, legal, financial, or other reasons, to adapt in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or customer requirements, we may never become profitable which may result in the loss of all or part of your investment.

We may face liability for information displayed on or accessible via our website, and for other content and commerce-related activities, which could reduce our net worth and working capital and increase our operating losses.

We could face claims for errors, defamation, negligence or copyright or trademark infringement based on the nature and content of information displayed on or accessible via our website, which could aversely affect our financial condition. Even to the extent that claims made against us do not result in liability, we may incur substantial costs in investigating and defending such claims.

We may be subject to liability based on statements made and actions taken as a result of participation in restaurant reviews and listings by our registered users. Based on links we provide to third-party websites, we could also be subject to claims based upon online content we do not control that is accessible from our website.

Our insurance, if any, may not cover all potential claims to which we are exposed or may not be adequate to indemnify us for all liabilities that may be exposed. Any imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of insurance coverage would reduce our net worth and working capital and increase our operating losses.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products, services and brand.

Our trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights and other intellectual property rights are important assets to us. There can be no assurance that the protections provided by these intellectual property rights will be adequate to prevent our competitors from misappropriating our technology or that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. There are events that are outside our control that could pose a threat to our intellectual property rights. Additionally, protecting our intellectual property rights is costly and time consuming. Any increase in the unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business and harm our operating results.

We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims in the future, which may be costly to defend, could require the payment of damages and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.

Companies in the Internet, technology and media industries own large numbers of patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims increases. Our technologies may not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use. Any intellectual property claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management resources and attention. An adverse determination also could prevent us from offering our products and services to others and may require that we procure substitute products or services for these members.

With respect to any intellectual property rights claim, we may have to pay damages or stop using technology found to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We may have to seek a license for the technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms and may significantly increase our operating expenses. The technology also may not be available for license to us at all. As a result, we may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant effort and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for the

- 12 -

infringing aspects of our business, we may be forced to limit our product and service offerings and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results could harm our brand and operating results.

Government regulation could adversely affect our business prospects.

We do not know with certainty how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyright and other intellectual property issues, taxation, illegal content, retransmission of media, personal privacy and data protection will apply to the Internet or to the distribution of proprietary content over the Internet. Most of these laws were adopted before the advent of the Internet and related technologies and therefore do not address the unique issues associated with the Internet and related technologies. Depending on how these laws developed and are interpreted by the judicial system, they could have the effect of:

• limiting the growth of the Internet;

• creating uncertainty in the marketplace that could reduce demand for our products and services;

• increasing our cost of doing business;

• exposing us to significant liabilities associated with content distributed or accessed through our products or services; or

• leading to increased product and applications development costs, or otherwise harm our business.

Our president has had limited experience in managing a publicly traded company.

Our president, Simon Au, has had limited experience in managing a publicly traded company. Such responsibilities include complying with federal securities laws and making required disclosures on a timely basis. There can be no assurance that our president will be able to implement programs and policies in an effective and timely manner that adequately respond to such legal and regulatory compliance and reporting requirements. Further, this could impair our ability to comply with legal and regulatory requirements such as those imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our failure to do so could lead to the imposition of fines and penalties and further result in the deterioration of our business.

The loss of the services of our president would disrupt our operations and interfere with our ability to compete.

We depend upon the continued contributions of our president, Simon Au. We only have one employee, our president, secretary, treasurer and director, Simon Au. He handles all of the responsibilities in the area of corporate administration, business development and research. We do not carry key person life insurance on Mr. Au’s life and the loss of his services could disrupt our operations and interfere with our ability to compete with others.

All of our assets and our officer and director are outside the United States, with the result that it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or our officer and director.

All of our assets are located outside the United States and we do not currently maintain a permanent place of business within the United States. In addition, our sole officer and director, Simon Au, is not a national or resident of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of Mr. Au’s assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or our sole officer and director, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. Consequently, you may be effectively prevented from pursuing remedies under U.S. federal securities laws against us or our sole officer and director.

- 13 -

Roger Williams’ control may prevent you from causing a change in the course of our operations and may affect the price of our common stock.

Our founder and former president, Roger Williams, beneficially owns 50.06% of our common stock. Accordingly, for as long as Mr. Williams continues to own more than 50% of our common stock, he will be able to elect our entire board of directors, control all matters that require a stockholder vote (such as mergers, acquisitions and other business combinations, and the future issuance of our shares) and exercise a significant amount of influence over our management and operations. Therefore, your ability to cause a change in the course of our operation is eliminated. As such, the value attributable to the right to vote is limited.

Our technical systems are vulnerable to interruption and damage that may be costly and time-consuming to resolve and may harm our business and reputation.

A disaster could interrupt our services for an indeterminate length of time and severely damage our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Our systems and operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, floods, network failure, hardware failure, software failure, power loss, telecommunication failures, break-ins, terrorism, war or sabotage, computer viruses, denial of service attacks, penetration of our network by unauthorized computer users and “hackers” and other similar events, and other unanticipated problems.

We may not have developed or implemented adequate protections or safeguards to overcome any of these events. We may also not have anticipated or addressed many of the potential events that could threaten or undermine our technology network. Any of these occurrences could cause material interruptions or delays in our business, result in the loss of data or render us unable to provide services to our consumers. In addition, if anyone can circumvent our security measures, he or she could destroy or misappropriate valuable information or disrupt our operations. Our insurance, if any, may not be adequate to compensate us for all the losses that may occur as a result of a catastrophic system failure or other loss, and our insurers may decline to do so for a variety of reasons.

If we fail to address these issues in a timely manner, we may lose the confidence of our online advertisers, and our revenue may decline and our business could suffer.

We rely on an outside firm to host our servers, and a failure of service by this provider could adversely affect our business and reputation.

We rely upon a third party provider to host our main server. In the event that this provider experience any interruption in operations or cease operations for any reason or if we are unable to agree on satisfactory terms for continued hosting relationships, we would be forced to enter into a relationship with other service providers or assume hosting responsibilities ourselves. If we are forced to switch hosting facilities, we may not be successful in finding an alternative service provider on acceptable terms or in hosting the computer server ourselves. We may also be limited in our remedies against these providers in the event of a failure of service. We also rely on a third party provider for revenue, Google Adsense. A failure or limitation of service or available capacity by any of these third party providers could adversely affect our business and reputation.

Our business depends in part on the growth and maintenance of the Internet and telecommunications infrastructure.

The success of our business depends in part on the continued growth and maintenance of the Internet and telecommunication infrastructure. This includes maintaining a reliable network backbone with the necessary speed, data capacity and security for providing reliable Internet services. Internet infrastructure may be unable to support the demands placed on it if the number of Internet users continue to increase or if existing or future Internet users access the Internet more often or increase their bandwidth requirements. We have no control over the providers of access services to the Internet. Interruptions, delays or capacity problems with any points of access between the Internet and our websites could adversely affect our ability to provide services to users of our websites. The temporary or permanent loss of all or a portion of our services on the Internet, the Internet infrastructure generally, or our users’ ability to access the Internet, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and the trading price of our common stock.

- 14 -

Risks Associated With Our Common Stock

There is no active trading market for our common stock and if a market for our common stock does not develop, our investors will be unable to sell their shares.

There has been a limited trading market for shares of our common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, our stockholder may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, shares of our common stock. This severely limits the liquidity of shares of our common stock and has a material adverse effect on the market price for shares of our common stock and on our ability to raise additional capital. An active public market for shares of our common stock may not develop, or if one should develop, it may not be sustained, and as a result, investors may not be able to resell shares of our common stock that they have purchased and may lose all of their investment

We do not intend to pay dividends on any investment in the shares of our common stock.

We have never paid any cash dividends and currently do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future. To the extent that we require additional funding currently not provided for in our financing plan, our funding sources may prohibit the payment of a dividend. Because we do not intend to declare dividends, any gain on an investment in our company will need to come through an increase in the stock’s price. This may never happen and investors may lose all of their investment in our company.

Our stock is a penny stock. Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

Our stock is a penny stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which generally defines “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our common stock. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-

- 15 -

dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Because we can issue additional shares of common stock, our stockholders may experience dilution.

We are authorized to issue up to 75,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 8,190,000 are issued and outstanding. Our board of directors has the authority to cause our company to issue additional shares of common stock without the consent of any of our stockholders. Consequently, our stockholders may experience dilution in their ownership of our company in the future.

If we fail to file our required filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an accurate and timely manner, our common stock may be no longer quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. If this happens, our stockholders would have difficulty in reselling any of their shares.

If we fail to file our required filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission in an accurate and timely manner, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority may determine that our common stock is no longer eligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board and remove our common stock from the OTC Bulletin Board quotations. If this happens, then market makers would no longer be able to enter quotations for our common stock through the OTC Bulletin Board and our stockholders would have difficulty in reselling any of their shares.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our ability to continue operations.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could reduce liquidity of our common stock and reduce our ability to raise capital. Because a significant portion of our operations have been and will be financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our liquidity and our operations. Such reductions may force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may have a significant negative effect on our business plan and operations, including our ability to continue our current operations. If our stock price declines, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital in the future, we may not be able to have the resources to continue our normal operations.

The market price for our common stock may also be affected by our ability to meet or exceed expectations of analysts or investors. Any failure to meet these expectations, even if minor, may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

- 16 -

Item 5. Other Information.

In June 2009, pursuant to the letter agreement between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and our company, Magnolia agreed to advance us $20,000. The advance of $20,000 was to be utilized by us solely for expenses related to the completion of the audit of our financial statements for the year ended May 31, 2009. In addition, upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated under the memorandum of understanding dated May 15, 2009 between Magnolia and our company, $20,000 was to be applied as a credit against the purchase price for the controlling interest in our company as contemplated by the memorandum of understanding. If such transactions failed to close on or before August 31, 2009 or such later date as agreed by Magnolia and us, through no fault of our company, $20,000 was to be treated as a “break up” fee payable to us. If we or our majority shareholders, for any reason, determined not to proceed with such transactions upon being presented with the definitive merger agreement, $20,000 was to be immediately due and payable to Magnolia within 10 days of being presented with the definitive agreement. We extended the closing date to December 15, 2009.

On October 15, 2009, Magnolia advanced our company $15,000 of $20,000 contemplated under the letter agreement. On December 10, 2009, Magnolia decided not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the memorandum of understanding and we consider $15,000 from Magnolia as a “break up” fee. Accordingly, we recognized $15,000 as other income in the statement of operations for the six-month period ended November 30, 2009. Management does not expect our company to receive from Magnolia the remaining $5,000 contemplated under the letter agreement. 

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit
Number	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)
3.2	Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)
3.3	Amended Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)
10.1	Agreement between Superb Internet Connection and our company (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)
10.2	Form of Subscription Agreement used in the private placements that closed on April 15, 2007 between our company and 32 investors (incorporated by reference from our registration statement on Form SB-2 filed on September 10, 2007, as amended)
10.3	Letter of Intent between Conversational Computing Corporation dated August 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2008)
10.4	Merger Term Sheet between Conversational Computing Corporation dated August 1, 2008 (incorporated by reference on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2008)
10.5	Promissory Note dated October 8, 2008 issued by our company to Mountain Equity Ltd. in the amount of $30,000 (incorporated by reference from our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on January 14, 2009)
10.6	Promissory Note dated April 8, 2009 issued by our company to Minerco Resources, Inc. in the amount of $10,000 (incorporated by reference from our annual report on Form 10-K filed on August 31, 2009)
10.7	Memorandum of Understanding between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and certain significant shareholders of our company and our company dated May 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference from our annual report on Form 10-K filed on August 31, 2009)
10.8	Letter Agreement between Magnolia Solar, Inc. and our company (incorporated by reference from our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on October 15, 2009)
21	Subsidiary of Here Enterprises, Inc.:           Here Network Corp., a British Columbia Corporation
31*	Section 302 Certification of Simon Au
32*	Section 906 Certification of Simon Au

* Filed herewith.

- 17 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

HERE ENTERPRISES, INC.

By:  /s/ Simon Au
         Simon Au 
         President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director 
         (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer 
         and Principal Accounting Officer) 
         Date: January 19, 2010