fgb10q33111.htm

0001408534-11-000011.txt : 20110516 0001408534-11-000011.hdr.sgml : 20110516 20110516160842 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001408534-11-000011 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 6 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20110331 FILED AS OF DATE: 20110516 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20110516 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001408534 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SAVINGS INSTITUTION, FEDERALLY CHARTERED [6035] IRS NUMBER: 260513559 STATE OF INCORPORATION: LA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-52748 FILM NUMBER: 11846885 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 400 EAST THOMAS STREET CITY: HAMMOND STATE: LA ZIP: 70401 BUSINESS PHONE: 985-345-7685 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 400 EAST THOMAS STREET CITY: HAMMOND STATE: LA ZIP: 70401 10-Q 1 fgb10q33111.htm FIRST QUARTER 2011 FORM 10-Q fgb10q33111.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011

Commission File Number 000-52748

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Louisiana	26-0513559
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)

400 East Thomas Street
Hammond, Louisiana	70401
(Address of principal executive office)	(Zip Code)

(985) 345-7685

(Telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company T

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

As of May 12, 2011, the registrant had 5,559,644 shares of $1 par value common stock which were issued and outstanding.

Table of Contents

		Page
Part I.	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010	3

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	4

	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010	6

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	28

Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	30

Part II.	Other Information	30

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	30

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	30

Item 2.	Exhibits	30

Signatures

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks	$	34,797		$	35,695
Interest-earning demand deposits with banks		14			13
Federal funds sold		20,355			9,129
Cash and cash equivalents		55,166			44,837

Investment securities:
Available for sale, at fair value		323,879			322,128
Held to maturity, at cost (estimated fair value of $187,928 and $155,326, respectively)		193,783			159,833
Investment securities		517,662			481,961

Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		812			1,615
Loans held for sale		168			-

Loans, net of unearned income		569,447			575,640
Less: allowance for loan losses		8,229			8,317
Net loans		561,218			567,323

Premises and equipment, net		16,329			16,023
Goodwill		1,999			1,999
Intangible assets, net		1,705			1,729
Other real estate, net		766			577
Accrued interest receivable		7,773			7,664
Other assets		7,880			9,064
Total Assets	$	1,171,478		$	1,132,792

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	142,674		$	130,897
Interest-bearing demand		193,628			192,139
Savings		49,395			46,663
Time		667,815			637,684
Total deposits		1,053,512			1,007,383

Short-term borrowings		13,408			12,589
Accrued interest payable		4,268			3,539
Other liabilities		1,863			11,343
Total Liabilities		1,073,051			1,034,854

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock:
Series A - $1,000 par value - authorized 5,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2,069.9 shares		19,915			19,859
Series B - $1,000 par value - authorized 5,000 shares; issued and outstanding 103 shares		1,111			1,116
Common stock:
$1 par value - authorized 100,600,000 shares; issued and outstanding 5,559,644 shares		5,560			5,560
Surplus		26,461			26,461
Retained earnings		46,375			45,201
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(995	)		(259	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		98,427			97,938
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	1,171,478		$	1,132,792

See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)
(in thousands, except share data)
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Interest Income:
Loans (including fees)	$	8,461		$	8,804
Loans held for sale		1			1
Deposits with other banks		10			9
Securities (including FHLB stock)		4,762			3,419
Federal funds sold		5			2
Total Interest Income		13,239			12,235

Interest Expense:
Demand deposits		227			201
Savings deposits		11			10
Time deposits		3,506			2,718
Borrowings		6			41
Total Interest Expense		3,750			2,970

Net Interest Income		9,489			9,265
Less: Provision for loan losses		464			679
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses		9,025			8,586

Noninterest Income:
Service charges, commissions and fees		1,010			983
Net gains on securities		41			261
Loss on securities impairment		(97	)		-
Net gains on sale of loans		48			59
Other		287			339
Total Noninterest Income		1,289			1,642

Noninterest Expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		3,035			2,898
Occupancy and equipment expense		813			752
Other		2,786			2,606
Total Noninterest Expense		6,634			6,256

Income Before Income Taxes		3,680			3,972
Less: Provision for income taxes		1,284			1,389
Net Income		2,396			2,583
Preferred Stock Dividends		(333	)		(333	)
Income Available to Common Shareholders	$	2,063		$	2,250

Per Common Share:
Earnings	$	0.37		$	0.40
Cash dividends paid	$	0.16		$	0.16

Average Common Shares Outstanding		5,559,644			5,559,644
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)


		Series A		Series B								Accumulated
		Preferred		Preferred		Common						Other
		Stock		Stock		Stock				Retained		Comprehensive
		$1,000 Par		$1,000 Par		$1 Par		Surplus		Earnings		Income/(Loss)		Total

Balance December 31, 2009	$	19,630	$	1,140	$	5,560	$	26,461	$	40,067	$	2,077	$	94,935
Net income		-		-		-		-		2,583		-		2,583
Change in unrealized loss on AFS securities, net of reclassification adjustments and taxes		-		-		-		-		-		1,832		1,832
Comprehensive Income		-		-		-		-		-		-		4,415
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.16 per share)		-		-		-		-		(889	)	-		(889	)
Preferred stock dividend, amortization and accretion		56		(6	)	-		-		(333	)	-		(283	)
Balance March 31, 2010	$	19,686	$	1,134	$	5,560	$	26,461	$	41,428	$	3,909	$	98,178

Balance December 31, 2010	$	19,859	$	1,116	$	5,560	$	26,461	$	45,201	$	(259	) $	97,938
Net income		-		-		-		-		2,396		-		2,396
Change in unrealized loss on AFS securities, net of reclassification adjustments and taxes		-		-		-		-		-		(736	)	(736	)
Comprehensive Income		-		-		-		-		-		-		1,660
Cash dividends on common stock ($0.16 per share)		-		-		-		-		(889	)	-		(889	)
Preferred stock dividend, amortization and accretion		56		(5	)	-		-		(333	)	-		(282	)
Balance March 31, 2011	$	19,915	$	1,111	$	5,560	$	26,461	$	46,375	$	(995	) $	98,427
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
(in thousands)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income	$	2,396		$	2,583
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		464			679
Depreciation and amortization		371			120
Amortization/Accretion of investments		161			(76	)
(Gain) Loss on securities		(41	)		(261	)
(Gain) Loss on sale of assets		(48	)		(58	)
Other than temporary impairment charge on securities		97			-
ORE writedowns and loss on disposition		54			33
FHLB stock dividends		(2	)		(2	)
Net (increase) in loans held for sale		(168	)		(264	)
Change in other assets and liabilities, net		2,666			3,629
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities		5,950			6,383

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities, calls and sales of HTM securities		-			106
Proceeds from maturities, calls and sales of AFS securities		12,071			335,474
Funds invested in HTM securities		(43,907	)		-
Funds Invested in AFS securities		(15,159	)		(330,365	)
Proceeds from sale/redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		1,028			-
Funds invested in Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(223	)		(237	)
Net decrease (increase) in loans		5,346			(13,929	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(606	)		(536	)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		52			73
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities		(41,398	)		(9,414	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits		46,129			27,711
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and short-term borrowings		819			(2,265	)
Repayment of long-term borrowings		-			(2,492	)
Dividends paid		(1,171	)		(889	)
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities		45,777			22,065

Net Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents		10,329			19,034
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the Beginning of the Period		44,837			46,718
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the End of the Period	$	55,166		$	65,752

Noncash Activities:
Loans transferred to foreclosed assets	$	295		$	864
Cash Paid During The Period:
Interest on deposits and borrowed funds	$	3,021		$	2,464
Income taxes	$	-		$	500

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles. The consolidated financial statements and the footnotes of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and note disclosures for the Company previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary First Guaranty Bank. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Those adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term are the allowance for loan losses, valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and other purchase accounting adjustments.

Note 2. Fair Value

The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Valuation techniques use certain inputs to arrive at fair value. Inputs to valuation techniques are the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. They may be observable or unobservable. The Company uses a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds or credit risks) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value follows, as well as the classification of such instruments within the valuation hierarchy.

Securities available for sale

Securities are classified within Level 1 where quoted market prices are available in an active market. Inputs include securities that have quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. If quoted market prices are unavailable, fair value is estimated using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, at which point the securities would be classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy. Securities classified Level 3 in the Company's portfolio as of March 31, 2011 include municipal bonds from two local municipalities.

Impaired loans

Loans are measured for impairment using the methods permitted by ASC Topic 310. Fair value of impaired loans is measured by either the loans obtainable market price, if available (Level 1), the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent (Level 2), or the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loans effective interest rate (Level 3). Fair value of the collateral is determined by appraisals or independent valuation.

Other real estate owned

Properties are recorded at the balance of the loan or at estimated fair value less estimated selling costs, whichever is less, at the date acquired. Fair values of other real estate owned ("OREO") at March 31, 2011 are determined by sales agreement or appraisal, and costs to sell are based on estimation per the terms and conditions of the sales agreement or amounts commonly used in real estate transactions. Inputs include appraisal values on the properties or recent sales activity for similar assets in the property’s market, and thus OREO measured at fair value would be classified within Level 2 of the hierarchy.

Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis including assets and liabilities related to reporting units measured at fair value in the testing of goodwill impairment, as well as intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment.

The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

		March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
Securities available for sale measured at fair value	$	323,879	$	322,128
Fair Value Measurements Using:
Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)	$	6,499	$	14,374
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	$	308,998	$	299,366
Significant Unoberservable Inputs (Level 3)	$	8,382	$	8,388

The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the methodologies used are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value. The change in level 3 securities available for sale was due to the princial payment of a municipal bond in the amount of $6,000.

Gains and losses on securities (realized and unrealized) included in earnings (or changes in net assets) for the first three months of 2011 on a recurring basis are reported in noninterest income or other comprehensive income as follows:

		Noninterest Income		Other Comprehensive Income
		(in thousands)
Total gains included in earnings (or changes in net assets)	$	41
Impairment loss	$	(97	)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at March 31, 2011			$	(736	)

The following table measures financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2011, segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

		At March 31,
		2011		2010
		(in thousands)
Impaired loans measured at fair value	$	47,490	$	47,763
Fair Value Measurements Using:
Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		-		-
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	$	12,532	$	30,364
Significant Unoberservable Inputs (Level 3)	$	34,958	$	17,399


Other real estate owned measured at fair value	$	766	$	577
Fair Value Measurements Using:
Quoted Prices in Active Markets For Identical Assets (Level 1)		-		-
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	$	766	$	577
Significant Unoberservable Inputs (Level 3)		-		-

ASC 825-10 provides the Company with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The fair value option established by this statement permits the Company to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates and report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each reporting date subsequent to implementation.

The Company has chosen not to elect the fair value option for any items that are not already required to be measured at fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and as such has not included any gains or losses in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Note 3. Securities

A summary comparison of securities by type at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is shown below.

	March 31, 2011									December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross							Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value		Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
	(in thousands)
Available for sale:
U.S. Government Agencies	$	166,082	$	30	$	(5,163	)	$	160,949	$	172,958	$	242	$	(3,982	)	$	169,218
Corporate debt securities		148,672		4,918		(1,154	)		152,436		138,925		4,804		(1,331	)		142,398
Mutual funds or other equity securities		1,250		21		(158	)		1,113		1,250		20		(132	)		1,138
Municipal bonds		9,382		-		(1	)		9,381		9,388		-		(14	)		9,374
Total available for sale securities	$	325,386	$	4,969	$	(6,476	)	$	323,879	$	322,521	$	5,066	$	(5,459	)	$	322,128

Held to maturity:
U.S. Government Agencies	$	193,783	$	-	$	(5,855	)	$	187,928	$	159,833	$	-	$	(4,507	)	$	155,326
Total held to maturity securities	$	193,783	$	-	$	(5,855	)	$	187,928	$	159,833	$	-	$	(4,507	)	$	155,326

The scheduled maturities of securities at March 31, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	March 31, 2011
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
	(in thousands)
Available For Sale:
Due in one year or less	$	9,643	$	9,895
Due after one year through five years		68,200		71,570
Due after five years through 10 years		160,232		158,370
Over 10 years		87,311		84,044
Total available for sale securities	$	325,386	$	323,879

Held to Maturity:
Due in one year or less	$	-	$	-
Due after one year through five years		31,953		31,817
Due after five years through 10 years		121,831		118,130
Over 10 years		39,999		37,981
Total held to maturity securities	$	193,783	$	187,928

At March 31, 2011 approximately $351.1 million in securities were pledged to secure public fund deposits, and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

The following is a summary of the fair value of securities with gross unrealized losses and an aging of those gross unrealized losses at March 31, 2011.

	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
	Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses		Fair Value		Losses
	(in thousands)
Available for sale:
U.S. Treasury and U.S.
Government agencies	$	145,919	$	5,163	$	-	$	-	$	145,919	$	5,163
Corporate debt securities		52,008		1,050		1,493		104		53,501		1,154
Municipals		999		1		-		-		999		1
Mutual funds or other equity securities		-		-		342		158		342		158
Total available for sale securities	$	198,926	$	6,214	$	1,835	$	262	$	200,761	$	6,476

Held to maturity:
U.S. Treasury and U.S.
Government agencies	$	182,928	$	5,855	$	-	$	-	$	182,928	$	5,855
Total held to maturity securities	$	182,928	$	5,855	$	-	$	-	$	182,928	$	5,855

At March 31, 2011, 284 debt securities and two equity securities have gross unrealized losses of $12.3 million or 3.1% of amortized cost. The gross unrealized losses in the portfolio resulted from increases in market interest rates, illiquidity, and declines in net income and other financial indicators caused by the national economy in the market and not from deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuer. The Company believes that it will collect all amounts contractually due and has the intent and the ability to hold these securities until the fair value is at least equal to the carrying value. The Company had 84 U.S. Government agency securities, 196 corporate debt securities and one municipal that had gross unrealized losses for less than 12 months. The Company had three corporate debt securities and two equity securities which have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer. All securities with unrealized losses greater than 12 months were classified as available for sale. Securities with unrealized losses less than 12 months included $198.9 million classified as available for sale and $182.9 million in held to maturity agency securities.

Irrespective of the classification, accounting and reporting treatment as AFS or HTM securities, if any decline in the market value of a security is deemed to be other than temporary, then the security’s carrying value shall be written down to fair value and the amount of the write down will be reflected in earnings. Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least quarterly and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (iii) the recovery of contractual principal and interest and (iv) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, Management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred and industry reports.

The amount of investment securities issued by government agencies, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities with unrealized losses and the amount of unrealized losses on those investment securities are primarily the result of market interest rates and illiquidity in the market. The company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until recovery, which may be until maturity.

The corporate debt securities consist primarily of corporate bonds issued by the following types of organizations: financial, insurance, utilities, manufacturing, industrial, consumer products and oil and gas. Also included in corporate debt securities are trust preferred capital securities, many issued by national and global financial services firms. The market values of some corporate bonds have declined over the last several months due to increases in market interest rates. The Company believes that the each of the issuers will be able to fulfill the obligations of these securities. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until they recover, which could be at their maturity dates.

The held to maturity portfolio is comprised of government sponsored enterprise securities such as FHLB, FNMA, FHLMC, and FFCB. The securities have maturities of 15 years or less and the securities are used to collateralize public funds. The Company has maintained public funds in excess of $175.0 million since December 2007. As of March 31, 2011 public funds deposits totaled $364.4 million. Management believes that public funds will continue to be a significant part of the Company's deposit base and will need to be collateralized by securities in the investment portfolio.

Other than the corporate debt securities, the Company attributes the unrealized losses mainly to increases in market interest rates over the yield available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. The Company does not expect to incur a loss unless the securities are sold prior to maturity.

Overall market declines, particularly in the banking and financial institutions, as well as the real estate market, are a result of significant stress throughout the regional and national economy. Securities with unrealized losses, in which the Company has not already taken an OTTI charge, are currently performing according to their contractual terms. Management has the intent and ability to hold these securities for the foreseeable future. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. As a result of uncertainties in the market place affecting companies in the financial services industry, it is at least reasonably possible that a change in the estimate will occur in the near term.

Securities that are other-than-temporarily impaired are evaluated at least quarterly. The evaluation includes performance indications of the underlying assets in the security, loan to collateral value, third-party guarantees, current levels of subordination, geographic concentrations, industry analysts reports, sector credit ratings, volatility of the securities fair value, liquidity, leverage and capital ratios, the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. If the company is in bankruptcy, the status and potential outcome is also considered.

The Company believes that the securities with unrealized losses reflect impairment that is temporary and that there are currently no securities with other-than-temporary impairment.

During the first quarter 2011, the Company recorded an impairment writedown on one security of $97,000.

During 2010, the Company did not record an impairment write-down on its securities.

At March 31, 2011, the Company's exposure to four investment security issuers exceeded 10% of stockholders’ equity as follows:

	At March 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(in thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)	$	167,954	$	162,580
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)		38,991		38,266
Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae)		32,999		32,182
Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB)		117,921		113,859
Total	$	357,865	$	346,887

Note 4. Loans

The following table summarizes the components of the Company's loan portfolio as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	March 31, 2011						December 31, 2010
				As % of						As % of
	Balance			Category			Balance			Category
	(in thousands)
Real estate
Construction & land development	$	68,428			12.0	%	$	65,570			11.4	%
Farmland		13,366			2.3	%		13,337			2.3	%
1-4 Family		70,369			12.4	%		73,158			12.7	%
Multifamily		14,386			2.5	%		14,544			2.5	%
Non-farm non-residential		291,205			51.1	%		292,809			50.8	%
Total real estate		457,754			80.3	%		459,418			79.7	%

Agricultural		17,446			3.0	%		17,361			3.0	%
Commercial and industrial		72,362			12.7	%		76,590			13.3	%
Consumer and other		22,627			4.0	%		22,970			4.0	%
Total loans before unearned income		570,189			100.0	%		576,339			100.0	%
Less: unearned income		(742	)					(699	)
Total loans net of unearned income	$	569,447					$	575,640

The following table summarizes fixed and floating rate loans by maturity and repricing frequencies as of March 31, 2011:

	March 31, 2011
	Fixed		Floating		Total
	(in thousands)
One year or less	$	66,937	$	160,983	$	227,920
One to five years		129,383		125,373		254,756
Five to 15 years		2,378		36,495		38,873
Over 15 years		8,730		11,786		20,516
Subtotal	$	207,428		334,637		542,065
Nonaccrual loans						28,124
Total loans before unearned income					$	570,189
Unearned income						(742	)
Total loans net of unearned income					$	569,447

The majority of floating rate loans have interest rate floors. As of March 31, 2011, $276.7 million of these loans were at the floor rate. Nonaccrual loans have been excluded from the calculation.

The following table presents the age analysis of past due loans at March 31, 2011:

	As of March 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
	30-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans			Recorded Investment 90 Days Accruing

Real estate
Construction & land development	$	337	$	2,588	$	2,925	$	65,503	$	68,428		$	-
Farmland		-		38		38		13,328		13,366			-
1 - 4 family		1,058		5,813		6,871		63,498		70,369			2,025
Multifamily		-		-		-		14,386		14,386			-
Non-farm non-residential		1,804		19,231		21,035		270,170		291,205			-
Total real estate		3,199		27,670		30,869		426,885		457,754			2,025

Agricultural		177		444		621		16,825		17,446			-
Commercial and industrial		3,113		1,137		4,250		68,112		72,362			-
Consumer and other		164		-		164		22,463		22,627			-
Total loans before unearned income	$	6,653	$	29,251	$	35,904	$	534,285	$	570,189		$	2,025
Less: unearned income										(742	)
Total loans net of unearned income									$	569,447

The Company's management monitors the credit quality of its loans on an ongoing basis. Measurement of delinquency and past due status are based on the contractual terms of each loan.

For all loan classes, past due loans are reviewed on a monthly basis to identify loans for nonaccrual status. Generally, when collection in full of the principal and interest is jeopardized, the loan is placed on nonaccrual. The accrual of interest income on commercial and most consumer loans generally is discontinued when a loan becomes 90 to 120 days past due as to principal or interest. When interest accruals are discontinued, unpaid interest recognized in income is reversed. The Company's method of income recognition for loans that are classified as nonaccrual is to recognize interest income on a cash basis or apply the cash receipt to principal when the ultimate collectibility of principal is in doubt. Nonaccrual loans will not normally be returned to accrual status unless all past due principal and interest has been paid.

The following is a summary of non-accrual loans by class:

	As of March 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Real estate:
Construction & land development	$	2,588
Farmland		38
1 - 4 family		3,788
Multifamily		-
Non-farm non-real estate		19,231
Total real estate		25,645

Agricultural		444
Commercial and industrial		1,137
Consumer and other		-
Total	$	27,226

The Company assigns credit quality indicators of pass, special mention, and substandard to its loans. For the Company's loans with a corporate credit exposure, the Company internally assigns a grade based on the creditworthiness of the borrower. For loans with a consumer credit exposure, the Bank internally assigns a grade based upon an individual loan’s delinquency status.

Loans included in the Pass category are performing loans with satisfactory debt coverage ratios, collateral, payment history, and documentation.

Special mention loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loans or in the Company's credit position at some future date. Borrowers may be experiencing adverse operating trends (declining revenues or margins) or an ill proportioned balance sheet (e.g., increasing inventory without an increase in sales, high leverage, tight liquidity). Adverse economic or market conditions, such as interest rate increases or the entry of a new competitor, may also support a special mention rating. Nonfinancial reasons for rating a credit exposure special mention include management problems, pending litigation, an ineffective loan agreement or other material structural weakness, and any other significant deviation from prudent lending practices.

A substandard loan with a corporate credit exposure is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt by the borrower. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. These loans require more intensive supervision by management. Substandard loans are generally characterized by current or expected unprofitable operations, inadequate debt service coverage, inadequate liquidity, or marginal capitalization. Repayment may depend on collateral or other credit risk mitigants. For some substandard loans, the likelihood of full collection of interest and principal may be in doubt and thus, placed on nonaccrual. For loans with a consumer credit exposure, loans that are 90 days or more past due or that have been placed on nonaccrual are considered substandard.

The following table identifies the Credit Exposure of the Loan Portfolio by specific credit ratings:

	As of March 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
Corporate Credit Exposure -- by Credit Rating	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Total

Real Estate
Construction & land development	$	61,232	$	286	$	6,910	$	68,428
Farmland		13,237		-		129		13,366
1 - 4 family		57,628		3,909		8,832		70,369
Multifamily		8,605		-		5,781		14,386
Non-farm non-residential		254,923		813		35,469		291,205
Total real estate		395,625		5,008		57,121		457,754

Agricultural		17,002		-		444		17,446
Consumer and industrial		68,378		47		3,937		72,362
Consumer and other		22,492		53		82		22,627
Total loans before unearned income	$	503,497	$	5,108	$	61,584	$	570,189
Less: unearned income								(742	)
Total loans net of unearned income							$	569,447

Note 5. Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is reviewed by the Company's management on a monthly basis and additions thereto are recorded in order to maintain the allowance at an adequate level. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, several internal and external factors that might impact the performance of individual loans are considered. These factors include, but are not limited to, economic conditions and their impact upon borrowers' ability to repay loans, respective industry trends, borrower estimates and independent appraisals. Periodic changes in these factors impact the assessment of each loan and its overall impact on the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

The monitoring of credit risk also extends to unfunded credit commitments, such as unused commercial credit lines and letters of credit. A reserve is established as needed for estimates of probable losses on such commitments.

A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses, by portfolio type, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
	Real Estate Loans:																Non-Real Estate Loans:
		Construction and Land Development			Farmland			1-4 Family			Multi-family			Non-farm non-residential			Agricultural			Commercial and Industrial			Consumer and other			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for credit Losses:
Beginning balance	$	977		$	46		$	1,891		$	487		$	3,423		$	80		$	510		$	390		$	513		$	8,317
Charge-offs		(417	)		-			(157	)		-			(22	)		-			(1	)		(88	)		-			(685	)
Recoveries		-			-			6			-			7			-			63			57			-			133
Provision		(95	)		(5	)		557			(325	)		(287	)		117			900			(83	)		(315	)		464
Ending Balance	$	465	$		41	$		2,297	$		162	$		3,121	$		197	$		1,472	$		276	$		198		$	8,229

Allowance at the end of first quarter:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	197	$		-	$		669	$		156	$		2,467	$		-	$		451	$		-	$		-		$	3,940
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	268	$		41	$		1,628	$		6	$		654	$		197	$		1,021	$		276	$		198		$	4,289

Loans at end of first quarter (before unearned income)	$	68,428	$		13,366	$		70,369	$		14,386	$		291,205	$		17,446	$		72,362	$		22,627	$		-		$	570,189
Loans individually evaluated for impairment		6,607	$		-	$		4,145	$		5,781	$		34,540	$		-	$		3,731	$		-	$		-			54,804
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment	$	61,821	$		13,366	$		66,224	$		8,605	$		256,665	$		17,446	$		68,631	$		22,627	$		-		$	515,385

Negative provisions are caused by changes in the composition and credit quality of the loan portfolio. The result is a re-allocation of the loan loss reserve from one category to another.

The following table sets forth activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.

	March 31, 2011				March 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	8,317		$	7,919

Charge-offs:
Real estate loans:
Construction and land development		(417	)		(5	)
Farmland		-			-
1 - 4 family residential		(157	)		(187	)
Multifamily		-			-
Non-farm non-residential		(22	)		-
Commercial and industrial loans		(1	)		(96	)
Consumer and other		(88	)		(106	)
Total charge-offs		(685	)		(394	)

Recoveries:
Real estate loans:
Construction and land development		-			1
Farmland		-			-
1 - 4 family residential		6			-
Multifamily		-			-
Non-farm non-residential		7			-
Commercial and industrial loans		63			33
Consumer and other		57			30
Total recoveries		133			64

Net charge-offs		(552	)		(330	)
Provision for loan losses		464			679

Balance at end of period	$	8,229		$	8,268

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by Management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. As an administrative matter, this process is only applied to impaired loans or relationships in excess of $250,000.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:

	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance	$	7,314	$	8,713
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance		47,490		47,763
Total impaired loans	$	54,804	$	56,476


Valuation allowance related to impaired loans	$	3,940	$	3,537
Total nonaccrual loans	$	27,226	$	28,718
Total loans past due ninety days and still accruing	$	2,025	$	1,673

Average investment in impaired loans	$	52,148	$	37,094
Interest income recognized on impaired loans	$	1,044	$	2,402
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans	$	766	$	1,304

The following is a summary of impaired loans by class:

	As of March 31, 2011
	(in thousands)
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
Real estate
Construction & land development	$	2,759	$	2,759	$	-	$	4,601	$	72
Farmland		-		-		-		-		-
1 - 4 family		-		-		-		-		-
Multifamily		-		-		-		-		-
Non-farm non-residential		4,555		4,555		-		4,409		48
Total real estate		7,314		7,314		-		9,010		120

Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial and industrial		-		-		-		-		-
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-		-

With an allowance recorded:
Real estate
Construction & land development		3,848		4,473		197		4,295		123
Farmland		-		-		-		-		-
1 - 4 family		4,145		4,604		669		4,150		47
Multifamily		5,781		5,781		156		5,781		85
Non-farm non-residential		29,985		29,985		2,467		25,791		650
Total real estate		43,759		44,843		3,489		40,017		905

Agricultural		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial and industrial		3,731		3,731		451		3,121		19
Consumer and other		-		-		-		-		-

Total	$	54,804	$	55,888	$	3,940	$	52,148	$	1,044

Note 6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized, but are subject to annual impairment tests. Other intangible assets continue to be amortized over their useful lives. Goodwill at March 31, 2011 was $2.0 million and was acquired in the Homestead Bank acquisition in 2007. No impairment charges have been recognized since the acquisition. Mortgage servicing rights totaled $0.2 million at March 31, 2011 and $0.2 million at December 31, 2010. Other intangible assets recorded include core deposit intangibles, which are subject to amortization. The core deposits reflect the value of deposit relationships, including the beneficial rates, which arose from the purchase of other financial institutions and the purchase of various banking center locations from one single financial institution.

Note 7. Pending Acquisition

On October 22, 2010 the Company entered into a defenitive material agreement to acquire Greensburg Bancshares, Inc. and its principal subsidiary, Bank of Greensburg in Greensburg, LA. At March 31, 2011 the Bank of Greensburg had total assets of $92.5 million, $65.6 million in loans and $82.8 million in total deposits. At the effective time of the Merger, each share of common stock of Greensburg Bancshares (other than shares owned by Greensburg Bancshares and First Guaranty Bancshares), at the election of the holder thereof, will be converted into the right to receive either 13.26 shares of common stock of First Guaranty Bancshares, $247 in cash, or a combination of cash and common stock of First Guaranty Bancshares. The final structure of the Merger will depend upon the election by Greensburg Bancshares of the form of the Merger Consideration. The total consideration is valued at approximately $5.3 million. This agreement is currently in the process of awaiting regulatory approval.

Note 8. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No 2011-01, Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, that temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) that are included in ASU No 2010-20. The TDR disclosure guidance will be coordinated with the FASB’s proposed guidance for determining what constitutes a TDR and is currently anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after July 15, 2011.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310) — A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” ASU 2011-02 amended prior guidance to provide assistance in determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable meets the definition of a troubled debt restructuring. The new authoritative guidance provides clarification for evaluating whether a concession has been granted and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The new authoritative guidance will be effective for the reporting periods after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Adoption of the new guidance will have no significant impact on the Company’s statements of income and financial condition.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following management discussion and analysis is intended to highlight the significant factors affecting the Company's financial condition and results of operations presented in the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q. This discussion is designed to provide readers with a more comprehensive view of the operating results and financial position than would be obtained from reading the consolidated financial statements alone. Reference should be made to those statements for an understanding of the following review and analysis. The financial data for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 have been derived from unaudited consolidated financial statements and include, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and provisions) necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position and results of operations for such periods.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 in an effort to encourage corporations to provide information about a Company's anticipated future financial performance. This act provides a safe harbor for such disclosure, which protects us from unwarranted litigation, if actual results are different from Management expectations. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements and reflects Management’s current views and estimates of future economic circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results. The words “may,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “continue,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties, including, changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are worse than expected; competition among depository and other financial institutions; inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments; adverse changes in the securities markets; changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities; our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities, if any; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; changes in our organization, compensation and benefit plans; changes in our financial condition or results of operations that reduce capital available to pay dividends; and changes in the financial condition or future prospects of issuers of securities that we own, which could cause our actual results and experience to differ from the anticipated results and expectations, expressed in such forward-looking statements.

On October 22, 2010 the Company entered into a defenitive material agreement to acquire Greensburg Bancshares, Inc. and its principal subsidiary, Bank of Greensburg in Greensburg, LA. At March 31, 2011 Bank of Greensburg had total assets of $92.5 million, $65.6 million in loans and $82.8 million in total deposits. At the effective time of the Merger, each share of common stock of Greensburg Bancshares (other than shares owned by Greensburg Bancshares and First Guaranty Bancshares), at the election of the holder thereof, will be converted into the right to receive either 13.26 shares of common stock of First Guaranty Bancshares, $247 in cash, or a combination of cash and common stock of First Guaranty Bancshares. The final structure of the Merger will depend upon the election by Greensburg Bancshares of the form of the Merger Consideration. The total consideration is valued at approximately $5.3 million. This agreement is currently in the process of awaiting regulatory approval.

First Quarter Overview 2011

Financial highlights for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

Net income for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 was $2.4 million and $2.6 million respectively. Net income to common shareholders after preferred stock dividends was $2.1 million and $2.3 million for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, with earnings per common share of $0.37 and $0.40 respectively. The decrease in net income was primarily the result of compressed margins and a decrease in gains realized on securities when compared year over year.

Net interest income for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 was $9.5 million and $9.3 million, respectively. The net interest margin was 3.47% for the first quarter 2011 and 4.15% for the same period in 2010.

The provision for loan losses for the first quarter of 2011 was $0.5 million compared to $0.7 million for the first quarter of 2010.

Total assets at March 31, 2011 were $1.2 billion, an increase of $38.7 million or 3.4% when compared to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2010. The increase in assets from deposit growth was primarily invested in securities.

Investment securities totaled $517.7 million at March 31, 2011, an increase of $35.7 million when compared to $482.0 million at December 31, 2010. At March 31, 2011, available for sale securities, at fair value, totaled $323.9 million, an increase of $1.8 million when compared to $322.1 million at December 31, 2010. At March 31, 2011, held to maturity securities, at amortized cost, totaled $193.8 million, an increase of $34.0 million when compared to $159.8 million at December 31, 2010.

The net loan portfolio at March 31, 2011 totaled $561.2 million, a net decrease of $6.1 million from the December 31, 2010 net loan portfolio of $567.3 million. Net loans are reduced by the allowance for loan losses which totaled $8.2 million for March 31, 2011 and $8.3 million for December 31, 2010.

Non-performing assets at March 31, 2011 were $30.0 million, a decrease of $1.0 million compared to $31.0 million at December 31, 2010.

Total deposits increased $46.1 million or 4.6% in the first three months of 2011 compared to December 31, 2010.

Return on average assets for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was 0.84% and 1.08% respectively. Return on average common shareholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was 12.36% and 13.76% respectively. Return on average assets is calculated by dividing annualized net income before preferred dividends by average assets. Return on common shareholders’ equity is calculated by dividing net earnings applicable to common shareholders by average common shareholders’ equity.

The Company's Board of Directors declared cash dividends of $0.16 per common share in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010.

Financial Condition

Changes in Financial Condition from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011

General. Total assets as of March 31, 2011 were $1.2 billion, an increase of 38.7 million or 3.4% when compared to $1.1 billion at December 31, 2010. The increase in assets resulted from increased deposits which were primarily invested in government or corporate debt securities.

Investment Securities. Investment securities at March 31, 2011 totaled $517.7 million, an increase of $35.7 million when compared to $482.0 million at December 31, 2010.

The securities portfolio consisted principally of U.S. Government agency securities, corporate debt securities and municipal bonds. The securities portfolio provides us with a relatively stable source of income and provides a balance to interest rate and credit risks as compared to other categories of assets. The Company has expanded its holding of securities as loan demand has decreased. The Company monitors the securities portfolio for both credit and interest rate risk. The Company generally limits the purchase of corporate securities to individual issuers to manage concentration and credit risk. Corporate securities generally have a maturity of ten years or less. Government agency securities generally have maturities of 15 years or less. Total corporate securities held at fair value totaled $152.4 million at March 31, 2011. U.S. Government Agency securities held at fair value were $160.9 million.

At March 31, 2011, $9.9 million or 1.9% of the securities portfolio was scheduled to mature in less than one year. Securities with maturity dates over 10 years totaled $124.0 million or 24.0% of the total portfolio. The average maturity of the securities portfolio was 7.88 years. The average maturity of the securities portfolio is affected by call options that are influenced by market interest rates.

At March 31, 2011, available for sale securities at their fair market value totaled $323.9 million and held to maturity securities at amortized cost totaled $193.8 million. On March 31, 2011, certain investment securities had continuous unrealized loss positions for more than 12 months. As of March 31, 2011, the unrealized losses on these securities totaled $0.3 million. Substantially all of these losses were in corporate securities and preferred securities. At March 31, 2011, 17 securities were graded below investment grade with a total book value of $4.8 million, and two securities had no rating with a total book value of $0.1 million. All of the non-investment grade securities referenced above were initially investment grade and have been downgraded since purchase. During the first quarter 2011, the Company wrote down one bond for OTTI impairment totaling $0.1 million.

Average securities as a percentage of average interest-earning assets were 45.3% for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 and 32.1% for the same period in 2010. At March 31, 2011, the U.S Government agency securities and municipal bonds qualified as securities pledgeable to collateralize repurchase agreements and public funds. Securities pledged at March 31, 2011 totaled $351.1 million. See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on investment securities.

Loans. The origination of loans is the primary use of our financial resources and represents the largest component of earning assets. Loans net of unearned income accounted for 48.6% of total assets at March 31, 2011, a decrease when compared to 50.8% at December 31, 2010. There are no significant concentrations of credit to any individual borrower. As of March 31, 2011, 80.3% of our loan portfolio was secured primarily or secondarily by real estate. The largest portion of our loan portfolio consists of non-farm non-residential loans secured by real estate, which accounts for 51.1% of our total portfolio.

The net loan portfolio at March 31, 2011 totaled $561.2 million, a net decrease of $6.1 million from the December 31, 2010 net loan portfolio of $567.3 million. The decrease in loans is primarily due to lower loan demand. Net loans are reduced by the allowance for loan losses which totaled $8.2 million for March 31, 2011 and $8.3 million for December 31, 2010. Total loans include $34.6 million in syndicated loans acquired by assignment. Syndicated loans meet the same underwriting criteria used when making in-house loans. Loan charge-offs totaled $0.7 million during the first three months of 2011, compared to $0.4 million during the same period of 2010. Recoveries totaled $0.1 million during the first three months of 2011 and 2010. See Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on loans and Note 5 for information on allowance for loan losses.

Nonperforming Assets. Nonperforming assets consist of loans on which interest is no longer accrued, certain restructured loans where the interest rate or other terms have been renegotiated and real estate acquired through foreclosure (other real estate).

The accrual of interest is discontinued on loans when management believes there is reasonable uncertainty about the full collection of principal and interest or when the loan is contractually past due 90 days or more and not fully secured. If the principal amount of the loan is adequately secured, then interest income on such loans is recognized only in periods in which actual payments are received.

Nonperforming Assets. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.

	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Non-accrual loans:
Real estate loans:
Construction and land development	$	2,588	$	3,383
Farmland		38		-
1 - 4 family residential		3,788		1,480
Multifamily		-		1,357
Non-farm non-residential		19,231		21,944
Non-real estate loans:
Agricultural		444		446
Commercial and industrial		1,137		76
Consumer and other		-		32
Total non-accrual loans		27,226		28,718

Loans 90 days and greater delinquent and still accruing:
Real estate loans:
Construction and land development		-		-
Farmland		-		-
1 - 4 family residential		2,025		1,663
Multifamily		-		-
Non-farm non-residential		-		-
Non-real estate loans:
Agricultural		-		-
Commercial and industrial		-		-
Consumer and other		-		10
Total loans 90 days greater delinquent and still accruing		2,025		1,673

Total non-performing loans		29,251		30,391

Real estate owned:
Construction and land development		207		231
Farmland		-		-
1 - 4 family residential		445		232
Multifamily		-		-
Non-farm non-residential		-		114
Non-real estate loans:
Agricultural		-		-
Commercial and industrial		114		-
Consumer and other		-		-
Total real estate owned		766		577

Total nonperforming assets	$	30,017	$	30,968

Restructured Loans	$	15,161	$	9,535

Nonperforming assets totaled $30.0 or 2.6% of total assets at March 31, 2011, a decrease of $1.0 million from December 31, 2010. Management has not identified additional information on any loans not already included in impaired loans or the nonperforming asset total that indicates possible credit problems that could cause doubt as to the ability of borrowers to comply with the loan repayment terms in the future.

Nonaccrual loans decreased in aggregate $1.5 million from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011. The decrease was concentrated primarily in one credit relationship secured by a climate controlled warehouse and a commercial building. During the first quarter of 2011, this relationship was brought current and these loans are now performing. The total amount of this relationship was approximately $8.6 million. The decrease in nonaccrual loans was partially offset by the addition of $7.1 million in nonaccrual loans secured by commercial real estate and residential real estate. The loans that went into nonaccrual for the quarter were concentrated in five loan relationships.

Construction and land development nonaccrual loans decreased by $0.8 million from $3.4 million to $2.6 million.

One to four family residential nonaccrual loans increased $2.3 million primarily due to one loan relationship totaling $1.8 million. This relationship is secured by two residential properties. The bank anticipates foreclosing on these properties in the second quarter of 2011.

Multifamily nonaccrual loans decreased by $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2011. The decrease was concentrated in one relationship that was secured by a condominium complex. Due to an extended probate process that resulted from the death of a guarantor, the loan went into nonaccrual during the fourth quarter. The loan is now performing as of the first quarter of 2011.

Non-farm non-residential nonaccrual loans decreased $2.7 million. The decrease in this category was due to the aforementioned relationship secured by a climate controlled warehouse and a commercial building that totaled $8.6 million. The decrease was offset by an increase of $5.9 million in nonaccrual loans in this category. The increase was primarily composed of a $3.4 million loan secured by an entertainment facility, and several commercial building loans that totaled approximately $2.5 million.

Nonaccrual loans totaled $27.2 million as of March 31, 2011. The nonaccrual loan balance is concentrated in eight credit relationships that total approximately $19.0 million or 70 percent of the nonaccrual balance. This nonaccrual loan total includes approximately $3.8 million in a participation loan secured by a hotel, $6.3 million secured by two motels, $3.4 million secured by an entertainment complex, $2.5 million secured by a church, $2.0 million secured by different commercial buildings, and $1.0 million secured by equipment.

Commercial and industrial nonaccrual loans increased by $1.1 million due to the addition of two loans secured by equipment.

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) totaled approximately $0.8 million as of March 31, 2011. OREO is composed of several one to four family residential properties totaling $0.4 million, construction and land development lots of $0.2 million, and commercial properties totaling $0.1 million.

Restructured loans totaled $15.2 million as of March 31, 2011. Restructured loans were concentrated in three credit relationships. The largest credit relationship for $8.7 million is secured by commercial real estate and land development properties. The second largest credit relationship for $5.8 million is secured by an apartment complex. The last restructured loan of $0.7 million is secured by real estate and equipment. The modifications were concessions on the interest rate charged for these loans. The effect of the modifications to the Company was a reduction in interest income. These loans still have an allocated reserve in the Compnay's reserve for loan losses.

Impaired loans totaled $54.8 million as of March 31, 2011. Impaired loans with a valuation allowance totaled $47.5 million and impaired loans without a valuation allowance totaled $7.3 million. Included in the impaired loan total were $15.2 million in restructured loans that are performing under their new terms. Also included in the impaired loan total are approximately $11.3 million in loans that are performing but which management believes that some deficiency in collateral value or payment history exists. For more information, see Note 5 to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses.

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered sufficient to absorb potential losses embedded in the loan portfolio. The allowance is increased by the provision for anticipated loan losses as well as recoveries of previously charged off loans and is decreased by loan charge-offs. The provision is the necessary charge to current expense to provide for current loan losses and to maintain the allowance at an adequate level commensurate with Management’s evaluation of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio. Various factors are taken into consideration when determining the amount of the provision and the adequacy of the allowance. These factors include but are not limited to:

·	past due and nonperforming assets;

·	specific internal analysis of loans requiring special attention;

·	the current level of regulatory classified and criticized assets and the associated risk factors with each;

·	changes in underwriting standards or lending procedures and policies;

·	charge-off and recovery practices;

·	national and local economic and business conditions;

·	nature and volume of loans;

·	overall portfolio quality;

·	adequacy of loan collateral;

·	quality of loan review system and degree of oversight by its Board of Directors;

·	competition and legal and regulatory requirements on borrowers;

·	examinations of the loan portfolio by federal and state regulatory agencies and examinations;

·	and review by our internal loan review department and independent accountants.

The data collected from all sources in determining the adequacy of the allowance is evaluated on a regular basis by Management with regard to current national and local economic trends, prior loss history, underlying collateral values, credit concentrations and industry risks. An estimate of potential loss on specific loans is developed in conjunction with an overall risk evaluation of the total loan portfolio. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as new information becomes available.

The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as doubtful, substandard or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect Management's estimate of probable losses.

Provisions made pursuant to these processes totaled $0.5 million in the first three months of 2011 as compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2010. The provisions made in the first three months of 2011 were taken to provide for current loan losses and to maintain the allowance at an adequate level commensurate with Management’s evaluation of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio. Total charge-offs were $0.7 million for first three months of 2011 as compared to total charge-offs of $0.4 million for the same period in 2010. Recoveries were $0.1 million for the first three months of 2011 and 2010.

Charged-off real construction and land development loans totaled $0.4 million for the first three months of 2011. The majority of the charge offs in this category was comprised of two loans. There were no Charged-off farmland loans in the first quarter of 2011. Charged-off 1-4 family residential loans total $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2011. There were no Charged-off multifamily loans in the first quarter of 2011. Charged off non-farm non residential loans totaled $22,000 in the first quarter of 2011. There were no Charged-off agricultural loans in the first quarter of 2011. Charged-off commercial and industrial loans totaled $1,000 for the first three months of 2011. Charged-off consumer loans and credit cards totaled $88,000 for the first three months of 2011.

All accrued but uncollected interest related to a loan is deducted from income in the period the loan is assigned a nonaccrual status. During the period a loan is in nonaccrual status, any cash receipts are first applied to the principal balance. Once the principal balance has been fully recovered, any residual amounts are applied to expenses resulting from the collection of the payment and to the recovery of any reversed interest income and interest income that would have been due had the loan not been placed on nonaccrual status. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Company had loans totaling $27.2 million and $28.7 million, respectively, on which the accrual of interest had been discontinued. The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 was $8.2 million or 1.45% of total loans and 28.1% of nonperforming loans. Management believes that the current level of the allowance is adequate to cover losses in the loan portfolio given the current economic conditions, expected net charge-offs and nonperforming asset levels. See Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on loans and the allowance for loan losses.

Other information relating to loans, the allowance for loan losses and other pertinent statistics follows.

		March 31, 2011			March 31, 2010
		(in thousands)
Loans:
Average outstanding balance	$	568,859		$	591,858
Balance at end of period	$	569,447		$	602,637

Allowance for Loan Losses:
Balance at beginning of year	$	8,317		$	7,919
Provision charged to expense		464			679
Loans charged-off		(685	)		(394	)
Recoveries		133			64
Balance at end of period	$	8,229		$	8,268

Deposits. Managing the mix and pricing the maturities of deposit liabilities is an important factor affecting our ability to maximize our net interest margin. The strategies used to manage interest-bearing deposit liabilities are designed to adjust as the interest rate environment changes. In this regard, management regularly assesses our funding needs, deposit pricing and interest rate outlooks. From December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011, total deposits increased $46.1 million, or 4.6%, to $1.1 billion at March 31, 2011 from $1.0 billion at December 31, 2010. During the first three months of 2011, public fund deposits increased $88.2 million. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits increased $11.8 million while interest-bearing demand deposits increased by $1.5 million when comparing March 31, 2011to December 31, 2010. Time deposits increased $30.1 million, or 4.73% to $667.8 million at March 31, 2011, compared to $637.7 million at December 31, 2010.

At March 31, 2011, public fund deposits totaled $364.4 million. As of March 31, 2011, the aggregate amount of outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was approximately $443.0 million. At March 31, 2011, approximately 49.8% of the Company’s certificates of deposit had a remaining term greater than one year.

Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased to $135.2 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 from $118.4 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2010. Average noninterest-bearing deposits represented 13.0% and 14.6% of average total deposits for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

As we seek to maintain a strong net interest margin and improve our earnings, attracting core noninterest-bearing deposits will remain a primary emphasis. Management will continue to evaluate and update our product mix in its efforts to attract additional core customers. We currently offer a number of noninterest-bearing deposit products that are competitively priced and designed to attract and retain customers with primary emphasis on core deposits. We have also offered several different time deposit promotions in an effort to increase our core deposits and to increase liquidity.

The following table sets forth the distribution of our total deposit accounts, by account type, for the periods indicated.

	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010			Increase/(Decrease)
	(in thousands)					Amount	Percent
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	142,674	$	130,897	$	11,777	9.0	%
Interest-bearing demand		193,628		192,139		1,489	0.8	%
Savings		49,395		46,663		2,732	5.9	%
Time		667,815		637,684		30,131	4.7	%
Total deposits	$	1,053,512	$	1,007,383	$	46,129	4.6	%

As of March 31, 2011, the aggregate amount of outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was approximately $443.0 million.

Borrowings. The Company maintains borrowing relationships with other financial institutions as well as the Federal Home Loan Bank on a short- and long-term basis to meet liquidity needs. At March 31, 2011, short-term borrowings totaled $13.4 million compared to $12.6 million at December 31, 2010. At March 31, 2011, short-term borrowings consisted principally of $13.4 million in repurchase agreements. At December 31, 2010, short term borrowings consisted solely of $12.6 million of repurchase agreements. Overnight repurchase agreement balances are monitored daily for sufficient collateralization.

The Company had no long-term borrowings as of March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

The average amount of total short-term borrowings for the three months ended March 31, 2011 totaled $12.6 million, compared to $36.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. At March 31, 2011, the Company had $65.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank letters of credit outstanding obtained solely for collateralizing public deposits.

In the first quarter of 2011, the Company established a $6.0 million line of credit. During the first quarter there were no funds drawn on this line and as of March 31, 2011, there was no outstanding balance.

Equity. Stockholders’ equity provides a source of permanent funding, allows for future growth and the ability to absorb unforeseen adverse developments.Total equity increased to $98.4 million as of March 31, 2011 from $97.9 million as of December 31, 2010. The increase in stockholders’ equity resulted from net income of $2.4 million which was partially offset by the change in accumulated other comprehensive income of $0.7 million, dividends paid to common stockholders totaling $0.9 million and preferred stock dividends totaling $0.3 million. Cash dividends paid to common shareholders were $0.16 per share for the three month periods ending March 31, 2011 and 2010. The preferred stock equity consists of $20.9 million issued to the U.S. Treasury Department under its Capital Purchase Program in August 2009.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

Net Income.

Net Income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $2.4 million, a decrease of $0.2 million or 7.2% from $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Net income available to common shareholders for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $2.1 million which is a decrease of $0.2 million from the $2.3 million from the same period in 2010. The decrease in income can be attributed to compressed margins, decreased loans, and fewer gains on securities when compared year over year. Net gains on securities for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $41,000 and $0.3 million, respectively. In addition, loss on securities impairment was $0.1 million for the first quarter 2011 and there were no losses on impairment for 2010. Net interest income was increased by $0.2 million for the first quarter of 2011, when compared to the same period in 2010, as a result of a higher volume of securities in our investment portfolio. The provision for loan losses decreased $0.2 million from $0.7 million for the first quarter of 2010 to $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2011. Noninterest expense increased $0.4 million primarily from increased salaries expense as well as an increase in other expenses which include: professional fees, data processing, advertising, insurance, travel, depreciation, sales and franchise tax as well as tax on capital. Provision for income tax expense decreased by $0.1 million as a result of the decrease in net income. Earnings per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $0.37 per common share, a decrease of 7.5% or $0.03 per common share from $0.40 per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Net Interest Income.

Net interest income is the largest component of our earnings, and is calculated by subtracting the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from the income earned on interest-earning assets. This represents the earnings from our primary business of gathering deposits, and making loans and investments. Our long-term objective is to manage this income to provide the largest possible amount of income, while balancing interest rate risk, credit risk, and liquidity risks.

A financial institution’s asset and liability structure is substantially different from that of an non-financial company, in that virtually all assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Accordingly, changes in interest rates, which are generally impacted by inflation rates, may have a significant impact on a financial institution’s performance. The impact of interest rate changes depends on the sensitivity to the change of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The effects of the varying interest rate environment in recent years and our interest sensitivity position will be discussed below.

Net interest income in the first quarter of 2011 was $9.5 million, an increase of $0.2 million or 2.4%, when compared to $9.3 million in 2010. Loans represent the largest portion of the Company's interest-earning assets, and 55.9% of our total loans are floating rate loans which are primarily tied to the prime lending rate. After the prime rate dropped 400 basis points in 2008, management began adding floors to floating rate loans. The loan floors were the first step to improving the net interest income. This has continued through 2011 as well as continuing to build the investment portfolio. The cost of our interest-bearing liabilities reflects a lower cost of funds paid on interest-bearing liabilities. As of March 31, 2011, time deposits represented 63.4% of total deposits, which is an increase from 63.3% of total deposits at March 31, 2010.

The average yield on interest-earning assets decreased from 5.48% at March 31, 2010 to 4.83% at March 31, 2011. The interest-bearing liabilities average yield increased slightly to 1.66% at March 31, 2011, compared to 1.65% at March 31, 2010. The net yield on interest-earning assets was 3.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to 3.8% for the same period in 2010.

The net interest income yield shown below in the average balance sheet is calculated by dividing net interest income by average interest-earning assets and is a measure of the efficiency of the earnings from balance sheet activities. It is affected by changes in the difference between interest on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the percentage of interest-earning assets funded by interest-bearing liabilities.

The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments were made, as the effect thereof was not material. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in the table as loans carrying a zero yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.

		March 31, 2011					March 31, 2010
		Average Balance		Interest	Yield/Rate		Average Balance		Interest	Yield/Rate
		(dollars in thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Interest-earning deposits with banks (1)	$	25,671	$	10	0.15%	$	16,771	$	9	0.22%
Securities (including FHLB stock)		502,616		4,762	3.84%		290,345		3,419	4.78%
Federal funds sold		17,766		5	0.13%		6,836		2	0.12%
Loans, net of unearned income		564,541		8,462	6.08%		591,858		8,805	6.03%
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,110,594	$	13,239	4.83%	$	905,810	$	12,235	5.48%

Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	10,891				$	18,474
Premises and equipment, net		16,237					17,170
Other assets		19,576					9,403
Total	$	1,157,298				$	950,857

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	204,349	$	227	0.45%	$	206,173	$	201	0.40%
Savings deposits		48,303		11	0.09%		40,983		10	0.10%
Time deposits		652,754		3,506	2.18%		446,758		2,718	2.47%
Borrowings		12,582		6	0.19%		36,707		41	0.45%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	917,988	$	3,750	1.66%	$	730,621	$	2,970	1.65%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	$	135,221				$	118,449
Other		5,553					4,917
Total liabilities	$	1,058,762				$	853,987
Stockholders' equity		98,536					96,870
Total	$	1,157,298				$	950,857
Net interest income			$	9,489				$	9,265
Net interest rate spread (2)					3.18%					3.83%
Net interest-earning assets (3)	$	192,606				$	175,189
Net interest margin (4)					3.47%					4.15%

Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities					120.98%					123.98%

(1) Interest-earning deposits with banks include reserves kept with the Federal Reserve Bank that are classified on the balance sheet as "cash and due from banks". The reserves are not classified as interest-earning demand deposits on the balance sheet because interest is only paid on amounts in excess of minimum reserve requirements.

(2) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.

(3) Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.

(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Provision for Loan Losses.

The provision for loan losses was $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decreased 2011 provision was based on the current condition of the loan porfolio as well as other qualitative and quanitative factors considered by the Company's management team. Of the loan charge-offs for the first quarter of 2011, approximately $0.6 million were loans secured by real estate and $0.1 million were loans secured by non-real estate. The majority of the loan charge-offs for the first quarter of 2010 consisted of construction and land development loans which totaled $0.4 million. Recoveries for the first quarter of 2011 of $0.1 million were recognized on loans previously charged-off as compared to $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2010. The allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2011 was $8.2 million, compared to $8.3 million at December 31, 2010, and was 1.45% and 1.44% of total loans, respectively. Management believes that the current level of the allowance is adequate to cover losses in the loan portfolio given the current economic conditions, expected net charge-offs and nonperforming asset levels.

Noninterest Income.

Noninterest income totaled $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, a decrease of $0.4 million when compared to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Service charges, commissions and fees totaled $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and were relatively unchanged when compared to the same period for 2010. Net securities gains were $41,000 for the first quarter of 2011 compared to $0.3 million in 2010. There were no other-than-temporary impairment charges in 2010 compared to a charge of $0.1 million in 2011. Net gains on sale of loans were $48,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and $59,000 for the same period in 2010. Other noninterest income decreased by $52,000 to $287,000 in the first three months of 2011 from $339,000 for the same period in 2010.

Noninterest Expense.

Noninterest expense includes salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment expense, net cost from other real estate and repossessions, regulatory assessments and other types of expenses. Noninterest expense totaled $6.6 million in the first quarter of 2011 and $6.3 million in 2010. Salaries and benefits increased $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2011 to $3.0 million compared to $2.9 million in the first quarter of 2010. This can primarily explained by the total number of employees increasing from 246 full-time equivalent employees at December 31, 2010 to 253 at March 31, 2011. The increase in employees is part of management's plan for future growth and expansion of the Company. Occupancy and equipment expense totaled $0.8 million and $0.8 million in first quarter of 2011 and 2010. Other noninterest expense totaled $2.8 million in the first quarter of 2011, compared to$2.6 million the first quarter of 2010.

The following is a summary of the significant components of other noninterest expense:	As of March 31, 2011		As of March 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Other noninterest expense:
Legal and professional fees	$	370	$	312
Data processing		564		523
Marketing and public relations		325		285
Taxes - sales, capital, and franchise		176		181
Operating supplies		133		140
Travel and lodging		28		87
Net costs from other real estate and repossessions		84		64
Regulatory assessment		473		356
Other		633		658
Total other expense	$	2,786	$	2,606

Income Taxes.

The provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The decrease in the provision for income taxes is a result of lower income for 2011 when compared to the first quarter of 2010. The Company's statutory tax rate was 34.0% which was relatively unchanged from the first quarter of 2010.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk

Asset/Liability Management.

Our asset/liability management (ALM) process consists of quantifying, analyzing and controlling interest rate risk (IRR) to maintain reasonably stable net interest income levels under various interest rate environments. The principal objective of ALM is to maximize net interest income while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and maintain adequate levels of liquidity.

The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, one of our most significant forms of market risk is interest rate risk. Our assets, consisting primarily of loans secured by real estate, have longer maturities than our liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits. As a result, a principal part of our business strategy is to manage interest rate risk and reduce the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has established an Asset/Liability Committee which is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. Senior Management monitors the level of interest rate risk on a regular basis and the Asset/Liability Committee, which consists of executive Management and other bank personnel operating under a policy adopted by the Board of Directors, meets as needed to review our asset/liability policies and interest rate risk position.

The interest spread and liability funding discussed below are directly related to changes in asset and liability mixes, volumes, maturities and repricing opportunities for interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Interest-sensitive assets and liabilities are those which are subject to being repriced in the near term, including both floating or adjustable rate instruments and instruments approaching maturity. The interest sensitivity gap is the difference between total interest-sensitive assets and total interest-sensitive liabilities. Interest rates on our various asset and liability categories do not respond uniformly to changing market conditions. Interest rate risk is the degree to which interest rate fluctuations in the marketplace can affect net interest income.

To maximize our margin, we attempt to be somewhat more asset sensitive during periods of rising rates and more liability sensitive during periods of falling rates. The need for interest sensitivity gap management is most critical in times of rapid changes in overall interest rates. We generally seek to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations by maintaining a relatively balanced mix of rate sensitive assets and liabilities on a one-year time horizon. The mix is relatively difficult to manage. Because of the significant impact on net interest margin from mismatches in repricing opportunities, the asset-liability mix is monitored periodically depending upon management’s assessment of current business conditions and the interest rate outlook. Exposure to interest rate fluctuations is maintained within prudent levels by the use of varying investment strategies.

We monitor interest rate risk using an interest sensitivity analysis set forth on the following table. This analysis, which we prepare monthly, reflects the maturity and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities over various time periods. The gap indicates whether more assets or liabilities are subject to repricing over a given time period. The interest sensitivity analysis at March 31, 2011 shown below reflects a liability-sensitive position with a negative cumulative gap on a one-year basis.

	March 31, 2011
	Interest Sensitivity Within
	3 Months			Over 3 Months			Total			Over
	Or Less			thru 12 Months			One Year			One Year		Total
	(in thousands)
Earning Assets:
Loans (including loans held for sale)	$	178,601		$	49,319		$	227,920		$	341,695	$	569,615
Securities (including FHLB stock)		3,054			6,841			9,895			508,579		518,474
Federal Funds Sold		20,355			-			20,355			-		20,355
Other earning assets		14			-			14			-		14
Total earning assets	$	202,024		$	56,160		$	258,184		$	850,274	$	1,108,458

Source of Funds:
Interest-bearing accounts:
Demand deposits	$	146,887		$	-		$	146,887		$	46,741	$	193,628
Savings deposits		12,349			-			12,349			37,046		49,395
Time deposits		143,174			191,793			334,967			332,848		667,815
Short-term borrowings		13,408			-			13,408			-		13,408
Long-term borrowings		-			-			-			-		-
Noninterest-bearing, net		-			-			-			184,212		184,212
Total source of funds	$	315,818		$	191,793		$	507,611		$	600,847	$	1,108,458

Period gap	$	(113,794	)	$	(135,633	)	$	(249,427	)	$	249,427
Cumulative gap	$	(113,794	)	$	(249,427	)	$	(249,427	)	$	-

Cumulative gap as a percent of earning assets		-10.27	%		-22.50	%		-22.50	%

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity. Liquidity refers to the ability or flexibility to manage future cash flows to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers and fund operations. Maintaining appropriate levels of liquidity allows the Company to have sufficient funds available to meet customer demand for loans, withdrawal of deposit balances and maturities of deposits and other liabilities. Liquid assets include cash and due from banks, interest-earning demand deposits with banks, federal funds sold and available for sale investment securities. Including securities pledged to collateralize public fund deposits; these assets represent 32.4% and 32.4% of the total liquidity base at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Loans maturing or repricing within one year or less at March 31, 2011 totaled $227.9 million. At March 31, 2011, time deposits maturing or within one year or less totaled $334.9 million. .

The Company maintained a net borrowing availability capacity at the Federal Home Loan Bank totaling $129.0 million and $52.2 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. This increase in availability at Federal Home Loan Bank during 2011 primarily resulted from the use of fewer FHLB letters of credit to secure public funds. We also maintain federal funds lines of credit at three correspondent banks with borrowing capacity of $48.4 million as of March 31, 2011. At March 31, 2011, the Company did not have an outstanding balance on these lines of credit. Management believes there is sufficient liquidity to satisfy current operating needs.

Capital Resources. The Company’s capital position is reflected in stockholders’ equity, subject to certain adjustments for regulatory purposes. Further, our capital base allows us to take advantage of business opportunities while maintaining the level of resources we deem appropriate to address business risks inherent in daily operations.

Total equity increased to $98.4 million as of March 31, 2011 from $97.9 million as of December 31, 2010. The increase in stockholders’ equity resulted from net income of $2.4 million offset by the change in accumulated other comprehensive income of $0.7 million, dividends paid to common stockholders totaling $0.9 million and preferred stock dividends totaling $0.3 million. Cash dividends paid to common shareholders were $0.16 per share for the three month periods ending March 31, 2011 and 2010.

Liquidity refers to the ability or flexibility to manage future cash flows to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers and fund operations. Maintaining appropriate levels of liquidity allows us to have sufficient funds available to meet customer demand for loans, withdrawal of deposit balances and maturities of deposits and other liabilities. Liquid assets include cash and due from banks, interest-earning demand deposits with banks, federal funds sold and available for sale investment securities. Including securities pledged to collateralize public fund deposits; these assets represent 32.4% and 31.8% of the total liquidity base at March 31, 2011, and 2010, respectively. In addition, we maintained borrowing availability with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas approximating $129 million and $92.2 million at March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. We also maintain federal funds lines of credit totaling $48.4 million at three other correspondent banks, of which $48.4 million was available at March 31, 2011. Management believes there is sufficient liquidity to satisfy the Company's current operating needs.

Regulatory Capital.

Risk-based capital regulations adopted by the FDIC require banks to achieve and maintain specified ratios of capital to risk-weighted assets. Similar capital regulations apply to bank holding companies. The risk-based capital rules are designed to measure “Tier 1” capital (consisting of common equity, retained earnings and a limited amount of qualifying perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities, net of goodwill and other intangible assets and accumulated other comprehensive income) and total capital in relation to the credit risk of both on- and off- balance sheet items. Under the guidelines, one of its risk weights is applied to the different on balance sheet items. Off-balance sheet items, such as loan commitments, are also subject to risk weighting. All bank holding companies and banks must maintain a minimum total capital to total risk weighted assets ratio of 8.00%, at least half of which must be in the form of core or Tier 1 capital. These guidelines also specify that bank holding companies that are experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels.

The calculated ratios for the Bank are as follows at March 31, 2011: Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8.03% (compared to a “well capitalized” threshold of 5.0%); Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 11.68% (compared to a “well capitalized threshold of 6.00%); and total risk based capital ratio of 12.72% (compared to a “well capitalized threshold of 10.00%).

The calculated ratios for the Company are as follows at March 31, 2011: Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8.28% (compared to a “well capitalized” threshold of 5.0%); Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 12.05% (compared to a “well capitalized threshold of 6.00%); and total risk based capital ratio of 13.08% (compared to a “well capitalized threshold of 10.00%).

At March 31, 2011, we satisfied the minimum regulatory capital requirements and were well capitalized within the meaning of federal regulatory requirements.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c), a Company's “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company maintains such controls designed to ensure this material information is communicated to Management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate, to allow timely decision regarding required disclosure.

Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report are effective. There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter in the period covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to various other legal proceedings in the normal course of business and otherwise. It is management's belief that the ultimate resolution of such other claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Exhibit
Number	Exhibit
14.0	Code of Ethics

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

FIRST GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.




Date: May 16, 2011		By: /s/ Alton B. Lewis
		Alton B. Lewis
		Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 16, 2011		By: /s/ Eric J. Dosch
		Eric J. Dosch
		Chief Financial Officer
		Secretary and Treasurer

GRAPHIC 2 fgblogo.jpg FGB LOGO begin 644 fgblogo.jpg M_]C_X``02D9)1@`!`0$`8`!@``#_X0!F17AI9@``24DJ``@````$`!H!!0`! M````/@```!L!!0`!````1@```"@!`P`!`````@```#$!`@`0````3@`````` M``!@`````0```&`````!````4&%I;G0N3D54('8U+C`P`/_;`$,``@$!`0$! M`@$!`0("`@("!`,"`@("!00$`P0&!08&!@4&!@8'"0@&!PD'!@8("P@)"@H* M"@H&"`L,"PH,"0H*"O_;`$,!`@("`@("!0,#!0H'!@<*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H* M"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"@H*"O_``!$(`'`` MH.$A8:'B(F*DI.4E9:7F)F:HJ.DI::GJ*FJ MLK.TM;:WN+FZPL/$Q<;'R,G*TM/4U=;7V-G:X>+CY.7FY^CIZO'R\_3U]O?X M^?K_Q``?`0`#`0$!`0$!`0$!`````````0(#!`4&!P@)"@O_Q`"U$0`"`0($ M!`,$!P4$!``!`G<``0(#$00%(3$&$D%1!V%Q$R(R@0@40I&AL<$)(S-2\!5B M7J"@X2%AH>(B8J2DY25EI>8F9JBHZ2EIJ>HJ:JRL[2UMK>X MN;K"P\3%QL?(RKR\_3U]O?X^?K_V@`,`P$` M`A$#$0`_`/W7\6^+_"O@'PKJ/C/QKX@L](TC1[66\U/5=3NH[>VL;>-#))-+ M))A(XHX^3(3@`')X__MU_\'8_@7P;K^H^`OV`_A';>,8$M;5[3XB^+KB[ ML[#[3YBR2Q+IGEQ7,L?E9B\V2:V/FDGRY(X_WN=_P=>_M_>+?"VG>'/^"=?@ MA?LVF^*=%A\1>/+J;3HY#=6<=[_H%M;RF4F/%S92RR_NL_N[;$N/-C/Y0?L' M_L%_'/\`X**?'/\`X9]_9].D+J\.BW.JWVI>(;_[-96%E$8H_-E,<4LN#++; MQ`11R',O($8DDC_KSP9\$N$*_!DN-.,Y;+_X0?A__P"0*/\` MB(S_`."S/_1YLO\`X0?A_P#^0*_47_B$>_X)S?\`1PGQB_\`"CT?_P"5M+_Q M"/?\$Y_^CA?C#_X46C__`"MK;_B+?T6_^A!'_P`)J?\`F9_4,Y_Y^_\`DS/R MX_XB-/\`@LS_`-'F3?\`A!^'_P#Y`H_XB-/^"S/_`$>9-_X0?A__`.0*_4?_ M`(A'O^"<_P#T<+\8?_"BT?\`^5M'_$(]_P`$Y_\`HX7XP_\`A1:/_P#*VC_B M+?T6_P#H01_\)J?^8O[/SK_G[_Y,S\N/^(C3_@LS_P!'F3?^$'X?_P#D"C_B M(T_X+,_]'F3?^$'X?_\`D"OU'_XA'O\`@G/_`-'"_&'_`,*+1_\`Y6T?\0CW M_!.?_HX7XP_^%%H__P`K:/\`B+?T6_\`H01_\)J?^8?V?G7_`#]_\F9^7'_$ M1I_P69_Z/,F_$/P_P#_`"!2C_@XU_X+-#I^V9-_X0?A_P#^0*_4;_B$>_X) MS_\`1POQA_\`"AT?_P"5M'_$(Y_P3I(^7]H/XPY_[&+1_P#Y6TGXM_1::L\@ M7_A-3_S'_9^=_P#/W_R9GR]^SY_P=Q?M/:5\2+67]J;]G?P3K?A&4QQ79\#I M=Z=J-IF:+S;F/[3=7,5SY7^]BYK]FOV,OVS?@/^WW\"=+_:"_ M9Z\1B^TB_;R;ZRO5$5[I%]'@RV-Y$#F*XC+@D9((:.6,R1R1R/\`ST_\%>O^ M"$GQ;_X)K:3#\.2/RHA>Q MB..28^48H3)$)>*_X(@_\%"?$'[`7[;V@ZC/=6@\%^/[VR\.>.H=8UQ[*QM+ M26ZC\O4Y)/\`5"2RS)+YDHQY4MS%F+S?-C\3C;P9\-N/>`:O%/A^W"5%7E33 M=IQN?*B'_+*/S;BX ME\L?\M)9)/\`EK7Z*?\`!HK\.O"]A^R#\3_C);Z,4U[5?B2-)U#45N)1YUE8 MZ9;RVT7EYV'RY=0O.PSYG.1''C\UO^#C,`?\%F_C0/\`IOH./_">TVOU(_X- M'6V_\$X_B&<<_P#"Y-2_],VD5_>_BM+ZK]%O(J=+15(X>]M+^YS._?77UU/E M<%KG57_MX_$_]N?]N?XZ_P#!0'XXZW\9_C3XYUB\L+S6;VX$^$[_5C%P\(PC! M7<****?]FY7_`,^8?^`H?-,****7]FY7_P`^8?\`@*%SR[A6UX8\1:]X+\0V M'B[PCK]UI&JZ3=1W>F:IIEU);W-A9'-%)'^\BECDR1)U]*Q:*XL7DN3X MJDZ56C!IIJW*M;EJ=2&I_3#_`,$^?C9J?_!<;_@C+XJ^'WQ\DLSXLN;+5/!' MBG7[OPU#):_VG':QS6NKQVPDV221QW%C<_\`+N/M4,GE"*/RC7\T)?,(3WK^ MA_\`X-'0S_\`!-_XAQJ?^:R:D<_]P;2*_G?*C&X?YXK^//`/"4LGXNXRRG#+ MEP]*:Y(=(W=5:?))>B1]%F;=7"X:I/=_\`_N!L/^/&#_`*XK_(446'_'C!_U MQ7^0HK_.:7Q,^L6Q_*M_P<9?\IG?C1_UWT+_`-1[3:_4C_@T<_Y1T?$'`_YK M'J?_`*9M)K\M_P#@XR_Y3._&C_KOH7_J/:;7ZD?\&C?_`"CJ^(`_ZK)J?_IF MTFO[X\6_^47,@_PX;_TTSYC+O^1S6_[>_,_G]^'7BW_A7WC[0O'4WA?2==70 M=:MM0?0_$%A]HT_4!;2QR_9;B+(\VVDV>7)'_P`\R:_I>\"_\$,O^")?[2/A M;3/VA_!G[*5OTJ]TWQ/KNFVL\%Y&+B.2.RCN8H[6,I)Q#Y40C^Y MY:=*_F#`WC&:_=G_`(-\/^"V?[/7A+]FG2OV+OVT/C=9^%_$'A:^EM?!.L^* M)I8[*\T8Q27$<4NH2R21126WERQ1I+]GB\HV<47FR9KZ#Z2^2\5T^',NX@R& MO6IRI14*GL9S3<9)-.T7M%K[I7>BTY,GGAI5I4ZQ]A?\0W/_``1E_P"C0I?_ M``X>O_\`R=1_Q#<_\$9CP/V0I?\`PX>O_P#R=7MA_P""HW_!-$G)_;_^"_\` MX<_2?_DFC_AZ+_P31_Z/_P#@O_X<_2?_`))K^(WQQXHK_F98S_P=6_\`DCZ; MZK@_Y(_7G@.?P'!JTMM;Z?J%DEK+=7,ES8W/F7$GF2^5'Y65T(Y3%)Y8R/6OC[_@AF0DO[6ZL^?L[N52 M;G&S=U&3=XW^U:S=DMKHB>"PGMXOV99_XAN?^"-'_1H$O_APO$'_`,G4#_@V MX_X(T'C_`(9"E'M_PL+7_P#Y.KZ`^(?[?7[#OPD\8WO@+XL_M@?"_P`+^(M, M*#4-!\0^/=.L[VWWQB2,2Q32B2/,.?$^45*.98NS_P"GU;_Y(V^J83_GW'[D>(#_`(-O_P#@C7%D M/^R/(#_"!\0O$'_R=7Y._P#!R3\!/V+/V.?B7$OV3OV5/@3:>#[W1O"^I:Y MX@U&WMO-?4H+Z^\JUCDO999+FZEBDM+LXE.(HYHQ&2/W?\`!HO_`,HY_B%_V6/4?_3/I%?SO'[GX5_1!_P: M,_\`*.KX@_\`98]2_P#3/I%?SOG[GX5^R>"G_)S^./\`$OSK'#F'^XX;T_R/ M[@;#_CQ@_P"N*_R%%%A_QXP?]<5_D**_S7E\3/K#^5;_`(.,O^4SOQH_Z[Z% M_P"H]IM?J/\`\&C?_*.GX@X_Z+'J?_IFTFORX_X.,O\`E,[\:/\`KOH7_J/: M;7ZD?\&CF?\`AW1\0D^$_$GB+3-,MM13QCX=\+3.+F^T7[%+)=/Y8_=R MQVT2?;?+EQ'FR!\R+'FQ_O/C7PK5XN\(JM'"RY:U&$:L-;>]!7:6J^*-XJ[M MJ>1EM?V..BYG]-;?\$M_^";"CY?V`?@M^/POTG_Y&I#_`,$NO^";)&'_`&`/ M@L/I\+])_P#D:O$Q_P`'(O\`P1D907_:[D#8Y7_A7_B#_P"0:[K]F#_@LE_P M3?\`VSOC%:_!3]GC]IVVU;Q5=6^']2TY[N.-6L22RA,R^4A\ MSRHY9,&..0C_`"VQ60<>X+#RKXG"XBG3CO*4*B2]6TDC[>G4PU3K'\#PK]DW MX1:!^P__`,%OO'G[)/[-M_?:%\*_'OP)/Q'O?AZ&C&E:=KYUJ+3I)K&(QYM8 MWBCYBC/E_O#_`,LXK6*+Y^M/V@/B5^S!_P`$N_\`@H;\7O@[J(LO$$/[7'C# M3;#48;B6.6R6^O=)L9;F.2&2.2*YBCN7DBDR/+DCC],'ZQG-]7@TZW_X M2+Q1XK$1:C<:O??9H8KBZ`O_M4EK'+)'YGV9)?*BWG'?/J)_P""7/\`P33; MI^P%\%NO_1+M)_\`D>NL^/7[3GP(_9(^%K_%[]I/XM:+X/\`#\".%O=6NS&; MF98I9?LUO%_K+JY:.)_+AB$DLOEGRXSTKYE'_!R+_P`$9W//[7+_`%/P_P#$ M']+&OEJ&$XVXDJU,1AJ5>L[ZRBIS^]Q3L;*6&PZ46SU/QS^Q7_P3(_9F\+ZG M^TAJG[''PE\+6G@&QE\1W7B/3?AC8B?2DLD-R;N+[/;&421^5Y@,?[SY!C/` MK^4/XU?%G6_CO\8O%7QO\1Z;96NI^,O$E[KFK6>F1R);17-Y<2W,L<0DEDD$ M7FR'&9.`?QK]A?\`@O-_P7._9`_:G_8N;]E/]C;XE'QI>^,]:M3XMO+SPS?V M,6G:=92Q7>(WNH[8_:)+J*VQB.6/RH[D2>6?*S^)10@XQ7]Y_1*X$S7*\MQF M>9O"<*U5JE",TU*,(ZMVEJN:3MJOLIK<^7SW%0J5%3@?T0?\&C/_`"CI^('_ M`&6+4O\`TSZ17\\!^Y^%?T0?\&C/_*.GX@?]ECU+_P!,^D5_.^?N?A7;X*?\ MG0XX_P`2_.L&8?[CAOZ[']P-A_QXP?\`7%?Y"BBP_P"/&#_KBO\`(45_FO+X MF?6'\JW_``<9?\IG?C1_UWT+_P!1[3:_4C_@T;_Y1T_$#_LLFI_^F;2:_+?_ M`(.,O^4SOQH_Z[Z%_P"H]IM?J/\`\&CG'_!.GX@G_JL>I_\`IFTFO[X\6_\` ME%S(/\.&_P#33/F\N_Y'5;_M[\S^>!B=H&>U>C_LK?'K7/V6/VC?!7[17AU; MN2Z\&^);74VL;#59+.6^MXI09[/SXP?+BN8O,MI#B0>7-)F.3H?-J49/`/6O M[0QF4X//>%'EV(^"K2Y&NZ<;'S<)NC6YNQ_7[8_L$_\`!-KXUVD?QD3]D/X+ M^*CXK5=8'BA?`FDWG]L&Y'F_;3<^4?M/F^89#+D^9YF-?\%#_P#@GQ^Q MG\'_`-BSXD?'KX`?LS_#_P``>._AOX9G\9^#?&'@OX?:5!J6F:EHF-2M3&_V M8_NC+9I'+'TDADEB/WZ^8/\`@C]_P7]_8@^#?[`_@7X'_MD?'J_T3QOX*MI- M$>*Y\'7MQ'=:?;R$6#PR:?;2Q^7'9FWM\R^7+YEM)Y@.1+)]<_M*_MC?LX_M MI?\`!(WX^_&+]FCXM6GBCP[)\*/%ME]MM[:6.:WN8M+N`\,UO/''+%)RDOER MQC,12E&?LY6EIRMKEDI)77='WV'K MX;$Q7LVZL;^X\WP[8B.YM[F.1)8TCO9)`!C$L<3]J]63_ M`();_P#!-10`_P"P!\%\]Q_PJ_2O_D>H/B!>V9_X*0?!V;[7'A?@AX_!/F=_ M[5\'UYO\9?\`@NY_P2R_9^^*NL_!KXH?M6V]OXE\,7C6.M6>F>&=6U"&&Y`& M^,W%M:2Q&2,CRY$$A\J421R8D0@?,8.AQ;F_L<+E4*U5P@[0I*;:7/)MVBKV MN_Q-G/#T9.,O@9^R=^SGX&_8,_9E^'?ACP5:^-_$_:'CTN]TGPW%;P:5X+T34FA^TV6EVXD\KS3"/]9)+)<71&9/*- MUY7FR1QQFOF,%B-HK_53P"X,Q7!/ASA\-CHR=_M1CRQ?2ZZ M[GQ.:XI8K&.<#^B'_@T9_P"4=/Q`_P"RQZE_Z9](K^=\_<_"OZ(/^#1?_E'/ M\0?^RQ:E_P"F?2*_G?/W/PK\G\%/^3H<I?^F;2*_-?_@Y/^'?BOP=_P5W^(GB+Q)HRV]GXLTG1 MM7T&;SHW^TV2:;:V1EQ'S'_I-G*VD\S[G[R73[KN<>7S@21Y_O/Q23QGT6NA\[@M,[J_,_G\"%AG/-(M?3/_``44_P""7?[2 MO_!-SXM7_@[XJ>%KV_\`"1NTB\-?$2RT:6+2=8CE\UXD\S!CMKGRXI?,M9)/ M,C\F0CS8O*FE^9V(+`\5_8_!_&'#G$608?%X#$PG"48ZW7;9IV:?=/5'S>(H M5Z55QDA`I/04A!'4445]54QF2U5:I4A+U<3%1JQV"BBBLE6R!;2I_P#DH6J^ M8NTGH*"K#M2455+$9%1?-3G3B_)Q"U4**`<5T?P\^'GC_P"+GBNT^'_PI\"Z MOXDU_4!*;#0O#NERWE[=>7$99/+BBS))B..23`'_`"S-98S/LFP.&E7K5X*, M5=MR6B74<:=23LD?O_\`\&CH*_\`!-_XAR*O_-9-2'_E&TBOYWRW&T?YXK^E M_P#X)]_!34_^"&W_``1F\4^/OC\EF/%EM9:IXW\4:!=^)88[;^TY+6.&UTB. MY$>R.22.WL;;_EX'VJ:3RC+'Y0K^:$IB(-GO7\=^`N+I9OQ=QEFV&?-AZLUR M3Z2LZKT^33]&CZ+,TZ>&P].>Z_X!_,'_7%?Y"BBP_X\8?^N2_R%%?Y MSR^)GUBV/QG_`.#J3_@GG\2/BSX;\+?MT_!7X?'56\$:/=Z?\3+JUN)I+R+2 M?,^T6MRMOS']FMI)+WS98_WD8NQ))F**66+\;OV1?VN/CC^PM\<](_:'_9]\ M4MIFMZ:1'01\C.W_``:L_`[XU^,-;^+_`.QG\6!\.+S4_ME[)X*U'2A&9\'\94^?`R3496/[,^L>';B7X^?LI>.]$U?[68 M[:R\)W]CJ]K);^7'B3[17Y9`P#YAR1'UO_`!%R_P#!.0CG]GSX MPG_N7='_`/EE7Q1_Q"2?\%*B>/B]\%S_`-S#JW_RLH'_``:1?\%*F/'Q<^"_ M_A1:M_\`*VOH<3PG]$NO5;5::?1.=E]\&_O;,%7S[_GU_7WGVO_Q%S?\` M!.?_`*-[^,/_`(3NC_\`RRH_XBYO^"<__1O?QA_\)W1__EE7Q/\`\0D7_!2G M=G_A;_P8_P#"BU;_`.5E'_$)%_P4I_Z+!\&/_"BU;_Y65A_J?]$__H_C#_ M`.$[H_\`\LJ^)_\`B$B_X*4_]%@^#'_A1:M_\K*/^(2+_@I3_P!%@^#'_A1: MM_\`*RC_`%/^B?\`]#FM]\O_`)6'ML^_Y]+^OF?;'_$7-_P3G_Z-[^,/_A.Z M/_\`+*C_`(BYO^"<_P#T;W\8?_"=T?\`^65?$_\`Q"1?\%*?^BP?!C_PHM6_ M^5E'_$)%_P`%*?\`HL'P8_\`"BU;_P"5E'^I_P!$_P#Z'-;[Y?\`RL/;9]_S MZ7]?,^V/^(N;_@G/_P!&]_&'_P`)W1__`)94@_X.Z/\`@G4HRO[/OQ@!_P"Q M=T?_`.65?%'_`!"1?\%*?^BP?!C_`,*+5O\`Y64G_$)'_P`%*1T^+OP7_P#" MBU;_`.5E'^I_T3_^AQ5^^7_RL/;9]_SZ7]?,\4_X*M?\%M?CQ_P5*LM+\`>( MO`6C>"O`.A:U%J^F>&+";[==M>BU^S>;(PX@^T:C:_Z38Z?;^9'( M)I#*+:25./+MB298I);;S/I3]E7_`(-&OBUJ/B][S]MS]HG1M+\.VY`BTSX7 MR275]>CRYADW-];116GER?9S_P`>]SYH\P?NCB2OV=_9Y_9D^`G[)?PVMOA% M^S9\)=&\(^'X&B9K+2+4Q&ZF6.&+[3<2G]Y=7#1Q())I2\LOECS)#UK;Q!\: MO#WA'@F?"7A]3]VK%QG42=DI:2UE:4IM:GQJ$0( ...@%%*!@8HK^*CZ0__]D_ ` end EX-31.1 3 exhibit31-1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 exhibit31-1.htm

EX-31.1 2 ex31-1.htm EXHIBIT 31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Alton B. Lewis, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves Management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

May 16, 2011	/s/ Alton B. Lewis
Date	Alton B. Lewis
	Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2 4 exhibit31-2.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 exhibit31-2.htm

EX-31.2 3 ex31-2.htm EXHIBIT 31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Eric J. Dosch, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

c)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

5.	The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves Management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

May 16, 2011	/s/ Eric J. Dosch
Date	Eric J. Dosch
	Chief Financial Officer
	Secretary and Treasurer

EX-32.1 5 exhibit32-1.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 exhibit32-1.htm

EX-32.1 4 ex32-1.htm EXHIBIT 32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alton B. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Alton B. Lewis

Alton B. Lewis

Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2011

EX-32.2 6 exhibit32-2.htm CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 exhibit32-2.htm

EX-32.2 5 ex32-2.htm EXHIBIT 32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q as of and for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric J. Dosch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Eric J. Dosch

Eric J. Dosch

Chief Financial Officer

Secretary and Treasurer

May 16, 2011