Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No T

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes T No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No T

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes T No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. T

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No T

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of the close of business on June 30, 2014 was zero.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, as of March 18, 2015 was 84,842,535.

The following description of our business is current as of December 31, 2014 and does not give effect to or incorporate any subsequent events unless otherwise noted.

Affinion Holdings is one of the world’s leading customer engagement and loyalty solutions companies. We design, market and service programs that strengthen and extend customer relationships for many of the world’s largest and most respected companies. Our programs and services include:

We design customer engagement and loyalty solutions with an attractive suite of benefits and ease of usage that we believe are likely to interest and engage consumers based on their needs and interests. For example, we provide discount travel services, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution, accidental death and dismemberment insurance (“AD&D”), roadside assistance, various checking account and credit card enhancement services, loyalty program design and management, disaggregated loyalty points redemptions for gift cards, travel and merchandise, as well as other products and services.

We are a global leader in the designing, marketing and servicing of comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions that enhance and extend the relationship of millions of consumers with many of the largest and most respected companies in the world. We generally partner with these leading companies in two ways: 1) by developing and supporting programs that are natural extensions of our partner companies’ brand image and that provide valuable services to their end-customers, and 2) by providing the back-end technological support and redemption services for points-based loyalty programs. Using our expertise in customer engagement, product development, creative design and data-driven targeted marketing, we develop and market programs and services that enable the companies we partner with to generate significant, high-margin incremental revenue, enhance our partners’ brands among targeted consumers as well as strengthen and enhance the loyalty of their customer relationships. The enhanced loyalty can lead to increased acquisition of new customers, longer retention of existing customers, improved customer satisfaction rates, and greater use of other services provided by such companies. We refer to the leading companies that we work with to provide customer engagement and loyalty solutions as our marketing partners or clients. We refer to the consumers to whom we provide services directly under a contractual relationship as subscribers, insureds or members. We refer to those consumers that we service on behalf of a third party, such as one of our marketing partners, and with whom we have a contractual relationship as end-customers.

We utilize our substantial expertise in a variety of direct engagement media to market valuable products and services to the customers of our marketing partners on a highly targeted, campaign basis. The selection of the media employed in a campaign corresponds to the preferences and expectations the targeted customers have demonstrated for transacting with our marketing partners, as we believe this optimizes response, thereby improving the efficiency of our marketing investment. Accordingly, we maintain significant capabilities to market through direct mail, point-of-sale, direct response television, the internet, inbound and outbound telephony and voice response unit marketing, as well as other media as needed.

We believe our portfolio of the products and services that are embedded in our engagement solutions is the broadest in the industry. Our scale, combined with the industry’s largest proprietary database, proven marketing techniques and strong marketing partner relationships developed over our 40 year operating history, positions us to deliver consistent results in a variety of market conditions.

Our comprehensive portfolio of customer engagement and loyalty solutions include:

Our business model is characterized by substantial recurring revenues, strong operating margins and significant cash flows. We generate revenues primarily through the sale of our value-added subscription-based products and services to the end-customers of our marketing partners and customers whom we bill on a monthly, quarterly or annual basis. Further, we generate revenues from our marketing partners that choose to directly market our products and services to their customers on a wholesale basis and typically pay us a monthly fee per enrolled customer. We also generate revenues through our loyalty customer engagement business by designing and administering points-based loyalty programs on a contractual, fee-for-service basis. As a result, a substantial portion of our revenues consists of subscription payments and service fees that are recurring in nature or otherwise highly predictable given the terms of our contracts with marketing partners. Revenue from our existing customer base and long-term marketing partner relationships has historically generated approximately 80% of our next twelve months net revenue. We structure our contractual relationships with our marketing partners to support our strategy of pursuing the most profitable opportunities for our marketing, and related commission, expenditures.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, we had net revenues, net loss attributable to us and Adjusted EBITDA (as defined below) of $1,242.8 million, $428.7 million and $292.1 million, respectively.

We seek to address the needs of three primary parties in developing and implementing our customer engagement and loyalty solutions:

Our marketing partners are many of the leading companies in the United States and Europe. They enter into agreements with us to:

Our marketing partners value our services because we enhance their customer relationships and strengthen customer loyalty, promote their brands and provide them with incremental, high-margin revenue because we often bear the costs of marketing and servicing these programs. Given the extent of our competencies in direct response media and the efficiencies in our marketing, we believe that we implement and operate our customer engagement and loyalty programs more effectively than a typical partner could on a stand-alone basis, thereby allowing our marketing partners to focus on their core businesses.

As of December 31, 2014, we had more than 5,500 marketing partners in a variety of industries including financial services, retail, travel, telecommunications and utilities. Some of our leading marketing partners, based on revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014, include Wells Fargo, Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, Transworld Entertainment and Royal Bank of Scotland. Revenues generated from our largest marketing partner, Wells Fargo, and its customers, accounted for 11.2% of total revenues in 2014. We have several contracts with Wells Fargo and in 2014, 76% of the revenues from these contracts were attributable to the individual subscribers who paid us directly. By providing services directly to the end-customers of our marketing partners, we become an important part of our marketing partners’ businesses. Many of our marketing partners have been working with us for over ten years.

Our customers value participation in our programs because of the attractive benefits we provide either to address their fundamental needs in lifestyle and protection services at a reasonable price or to reward them for continued activity with our marketing partners, the ease of use and the wide range of benefits available with our products and the high level of service we deliver. Depending on the nature of the relationship we have with a given marketing partner, customers may either purchase our programs directly from us or receive the program from our marketing partner. We derived approximately 35% of our net revenues from members and end-customers we obtained through our 10 largest marketing partners.

As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately 59 million subscribers and end-customers enrolled in our membership, insurance and package programs worldwide and approximately 62 million customers who received credit or debit card enhancement services or loyalty points-based management services.

When we are unable to provide a benefit or service with our in-house capabilities, we contract with one or more of our many third-party vendors to provide components for our products and services, such as credit reports, supplemental insurance coverage, travel discounts, gift cards and merchandise. Our vendors value their relationships with us because we provide them with significant incremental revenue by bundling their content with our own and offering these solutions through unique and supplementary marketing channels. Generally, our relationships with key vendors are governed by long-term contracts (typically with initial terms of up to five years that renew automatically unless notice of non-renewal is given by either party prior to renewal). By combining the services of our vendors with our in-house capabilities, we are able to offer 14 core products and services on a subscription basis with 351 unique benefits, support almost 5,200 versions of products and services representing different combinations of pricing, benefits configurations and branding and provide a wide range of desirable options for the redemption of loyalty rewards points.

See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Operating Segment Results” and Note 17 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for additional financial information about these business segments. In addition, see Note 17 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for additional financial information by geographic area.

We offer our products and services through our affinity marketing partners or through affinity marketing relationships and through direct-to-consumer marketing. Affinity marketing is a subset of the larger direct marketing industry and involves marketing products and services to a marketing partner’s base of customers. This generally results in higher customer receptiveness as those customers recognize and trust products that are offered through the marketing partner and its brands. In addition, incorporating our marketing partners’ logos and trademarks in our marketing materials, or co-branding with our marketing partners, provides customers with additional assurances and validation as to the quality of the program or service we are offering. We believe that products approved by, and marketing associated with, well-known brands of leading, well-respected companies provides a significant advantage over other forms of direct marketing. We also market to consumers directly through internet and television advertising. By leveraging our vast expertise in direct response media and campaign strategy and execution, we believe that marketing directly to consumers provides us with an effective alternate distribution channel for our programs and services and at attractive returns, as we are able to retain the full value of the subscription fee as compared to affinity marketing, where we enter into revenue-sharing agreements with our marketing partners.

We attribute our success and competitive advantage in providing comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions and marketing services to our ability to leverage a number of key strengths, including:

Expertise in Various Marketing Methods and Types of Media. We have conducted more than 53,000 customer engagement and loyalty program marketing campaigns over the last five years. We utilize a variety of direct engagement media to market our programs and services, including direct mail, online marketing, point-of-sale marketing, direct response and television marketing, inbound and outbound telephony and voice response unit marketing. To promote awareness of our programs and services when we are marketing directly to the consumer, we employ various methods, including search engine marketing and search engine optimization, which ensures our programs are exposed to consumers who have conducted a search for such services, and affiliate networking, all of which generates incremental traffic directly to our direct-branded product sites. We operate a full-service creative agency with expertise in utilizing a wide variety of customer acquisition media.

We believe that our expertise allows us to provide our marketing partners with substantial flexibility in managing and enhancing their customer relationships and also provides us with superior returns on our marketing expenditures.

Strong, Long-Term Relationships with Marketing Partners. We have a long history of providing comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions and marketing services to leading companies in the U.S. and Europe. We believe that the strength and breadth of our relationships with our marketing partners provide us with a competitive advantage in maintaining stable, diversified and predictable sources of revenue. Because our services have broad consumer appeal and are relevant to any industry looking to enhance and extend the quality of their relationship across large-scale populations, our marketing partner relationships span a wide variety of industries, such as financial services, retail, travel, telecommunications and utilities, among others.

We believe that our strong network of marketing partner relationships, together with our success in delivering customized, revenue enhancing customer engagement and loyalty programs, will enable us to continue to grow our business and generate new marketing partner relationships.

Proprietary Technology, Models and Databases. Based on the length of our operating history, we believe our database of actual customer interactions, with approximately 1.1 billion unique records, is the largest and most comprehensive in the industry and cannot be replicated. We track the performance of all of our marketing campaigns across all different media and measure consumer preferences, response rates, and other engagement-related performance and profitability data while adhering to the highest standards of consumer data protection and privacy. We utilize this data to develop highly targeted, individualized marketing programs across multiple media and product offerings for each partner with the goal of strengthening their customer relationships and more precisely identifying types of customers likely to find our products and services of value.

We believe our proprietary database increases the efficacy of our marketing, enhances the profitability of our marketing expenditures, allows us to better engage with customers, and helps us to continue to secure and maintain long-term relationships with marketing partners.

Expertise in Developing Valuable, Relevant Products. We manage a broad range of benefits that are embedded into the customer engagement and loyalty solutions we market to the customers of our marketing partners. Our products are designed to address fundamental consumer needs or reward consumers for performing certain behaviors, such as increasing their spending with our marketing partners, and incorporate a range of lifestyle and valuable protection benefits related to insurance, travel, health care, automotive, identity theft protection, entertainment, shopping and merchandise or gift card rewards, among other things. We continually research, develop and test new products and benefits that are relevant to customers and build loyalty and value for our marketing partners. We market both our own customer engagement and loyalty solutions as well as those of our marketing partners, where appropriate, to meet customer needs.

We believe that our ability to customize products utilizing the broad range of benefits that we provide enables us to better meet the complex and highly specialized customer engagement needs of our marketing partners and our customers. We believe that our ability to identify and successfully enter new product and growth areas is a key competitive advantage and we will continue to seek new opportunities to expand the range of our proprietary product offerings.

Range of Capabilities for Loyalty Program Solutions. We monitor changing patterns of consumer preference to better understand the options consumers are more likely to respond to when redeeming points that have been awarded by a credit card issuer, travel service provider, retailer or other sponsor of a loyalty points program for rewards. We are able to fulfill consumers’ most preferential options because we have established direct relationships with hundreds of merchandise and gift card providers, representing more than 1,000 brands and we operate one of the largest travel agencies in the United States. Our clients are able to leverage these abilities to ensure that their loyalty programs are providing rewards that the consumer finds relevant and meaningful, which increases the likelihood that the program will positively influence consumer behavior.

We believe that the range of the services we are able to provide to support our clients’ loyalty programs provides us with a sustainable advantage over competitors who are not able to offer an advanced solution.

Diversified, Global Marketing Platform. Because we have marketing capabilities in 18 countries outside of the U.S., with a significant and long-standing presence in the majority of Europe’s largest markets, including the United Kingdom, the Nordic countries, Spain, Italy, France and Germany, we are able to provide our customer engagement and loyalty solutions on a global basis to better serve our marketing partners who may have operations and customers in multiple countries. We benefit from the substantial synergies generated across all of our operations, including the ability to leverage our customer engagement, marketing, loyalty and product expertise by sharing the knowledge and experience we gain from one country into a new territory, thereby improving the efficiency of our overall global operations.

We believe that our ability to focus our business development and marketing expenditures on our most profitable marketing opportunities in the most attractive markets, media and industries, domestically and internationally, is a key advantage that allows us to maximize our profitability and cash flows.

Attractive Operating Model with Significant Free Cash Flow Generation. We derive a substantial portion of our revenues on a recurring basis from our marketing partners and their customers. Subscribers who have been acquired through previous marketing efforts become a part of our membership base. The performance of our existing base typically follows a pattern that is consistent with our historical observations, providing us with insight with respect to planning our future business activities. Our business requires very little capital to support our growth, and annual capital expenditures typically represent a small percentage of our revenues. In addition, we benefit from certain tax attributes under §338(h)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code that will reduce our cash taxes in the future and further enhance our ability to generate strong, recurring cash flows. Tax deductions remaining under this provision as of December 31, 2014 amounted to approximately $0.7 billion and are expected to result in deductions of up to approximately $119.0 million per year for the next six years. Consequently, we benefit from high predictability in the operation of our business, low volatility in our revenues and earnings, and enhanced ability to manage our business, service our indebtedness and pay dividends to stockholders.

Committed and Experienced Management Team. We believe that our senior management and our talented and experienced professionals are a principal reason why we have achieved significant success in all of our businesses. Led by our Chief Executive Officer, Todd Siegel, who has been with us for over fifteen years, our ten senior executives have a combined seventy years of experience with Affinion. We believe that the extensive experience and financial acumen of our management and marketing professionals provide us with a significant competitive advantage.

In 2014, we appointed discrete leaders for each of our four business segments in an effort to provide the specialized focus each segment requires to pursue growth initiatives; each business is supported by shared services for operations, information technology, human resources and finance. We believe the specialized focus will ensure that each segment has the right resources in place to execute on our strategic plans, which include the development of new markets for our loyalty redemption programs, geographic expansion, the expansion of our insurance portfolio, and the roll-out of our domestic subscription-based services in our newest channels.

Our strategy is to pursue initiatives that maintain and enhance our position as a global leader in the designing, marketing and servicing of comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions that enhance and extend the relationship of millions of

consumers with our marketing partners by creating and/or delivering valuable products and services that generate incremental loyalty and to focus on attractive opportunities that will increase our profitability and cash flows. The key elements of our strategy are to:

Optimize Our Marketing Investment. Our ability to adjust and optimize the allocation of our marketing expenditures across all of our marketing partners, media channels, products and geographic regions based on the available opportunities will help us continue to maximize the returns on each customer engagement and loyalty services marketing campaign. We target minimum returns on investment for all of our marketing expenditures, incorporating the expected revenues, persistency of customer tenure, commission rates and servicing and other variable costs for those customers who subscribe to our programs. Our goal is to maximize the average contribution per customer over the lifetime of that customer relationship, which we expect will maximize the growth of our cash flows, even though the aggregate number of customers we serve may grow at a slower rate or decline. For example, in the past three years we have grown the average revenue per member in our global membership business at a compound annual rate of approximately 4%, from $79.74 in 2012 to $86.20 in 2014.

Grow Our International Operations. We believe that we are well positioned to provide our marketing partners with comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions offerings on a global basis. We have grown our international retail membership operations by leveraging our significant U.S. experience to offer subscription products similar to existing U.S. subscription products to the customers of our international marketing partners. In addition, our European package business has continued its evolution through unique product offerings, enhanced customer services and delivery of benefits and, as loyalty points programs continue to become more widely available throughout the world, we believe we have opportunities to extend our U.S.-style loyalty program services across our international footprint with both new and existing clients. We are also continuing to execute on our plan to extend our operations into new countries and geographic regions, including, most recently, Brazil and Australia. We intend to continue our growth in the international markets through both organic initiatives, including geographic expansion, as well as the continued evaluation of strategic acquisitions that strengthen our customer engagement solutions, grow our distribution capabilities or enhance our scale.

Grow Our Loyalty Operations. We believe there are additional opportunities to expand our loyalty business as both current and prospective clients increasingly determine that a loyalty program is a meaningful way to differentiate their services in highly-competitive industries and as consumers continue to respond to these programs as a cost-effective method of acquiring travel services and other rewards. We believe we have opportunities to increase the range of administrative and redemption services we currently provide to our clients, and we intend to leverage our experience and capabilities to broaden the addressable market to include other industries where rewards programs can be used to favorably influence consumer behavior. In July 2014, we acquired Propp Corp., a provider of one-time use incentives for customer acquisition and retention. In September 2014, we completed the acquisition of SkyMall Ventures LLC, a provider of loyalty solutions for well-established brands in the financial services, hospitality and gaming industries.

Expand Our Vertical Market Penetration and Range of Marketing Media. We believe there are substantial opportunities to add new marketing partners in the retail, financial, travel, Internet, cable, telecom and utilities industries, in both North America and internationally, where prospective partners desire to add incremental revenue and strengthen and enhance the loyalty of their customer relationships. We also believe there are significant opportunities to expand our marketing channels. This includes (1) direct-to-consumer marketing via internet and television advertising, in which we market proprietarily branded products and services that are comparable to what we offer through our affinity marketing channels, and (2) point-of-sale marketing with retailers, in which we leverage the benefits and services from our existing product portfolio to create and market a uniquely customized configuration that is relevant and meaningful to a particular retail marketing partner’s customers.

Focus on New Program Development. We continually develop and test new programs to identify consumer trends that can be converted into revenue-enhancing and customer engagement-building opportunities. These programs may include loyalty and enhancement services, identity theft protection products, fully underwritten insurance programs, and purchase warranty offerings. We also consider acquisitions of new and complementary products and technology to further enhance our offerings and generate additional revenue. In addition, we believe we have opportunities to grow our existing services by expanding the ways that consumers may access their program benefits, thereby enhancing the value of the underlying service. For instance, many of our programs, such as roadside assistance, loyalty rewards redemptions, leisure and travel discounts, and identity theft resolution are well-suited for consumer use via mobile applications due to the real-time availability of the information the consumer desires to employ the service.

Leverage Best Practices for Growth and Acquisitions. We intend to leverage the integration of our businesses globally by applying best practices and cross-selling products and services across business lines and geographical regions. For instance, we intend to continue expanding our loyalty services by bringing the capabilities we enjoy in the U.S. to those international markets where the issuance and acceptance of points as a reward currency provide us with opportunities to provide our points management and redemption capabilities. We will continue to consider acquisitions of selected assets, businesses and companies to enhance our scale and market share.

Loyalty programs and services provide incentives and benefits to major brands to support their loyalty and customer experience objectives. Businesses use loyalty programs to further integrate their relationships with existing customers and to attract new

customers. Loyalty programs offer many redemption options, including gift card, travel, merchandise, cash back and various other options. We believe the market for loyalty program services is substantial and growing, and we also believe redemption volumes continue to grow. In the United States, the number of loyalty program memberships was approximately 2.65 billion in 2012, increasing by 26.7% since 2010, according to the 2013 Colloquy Loyalty Consensus report. Internationally, we believe the market for loyalty program and redemption management is largely untapped and offers significant growth opportunities.

Direct marketing is any direct communication to a consumer or business that is designed to generate a response in the form of an order. Affinity marketing is a subset of the larger direct marketing industry which involves direct marketing to the customers of institutions, such as financial service providers and retailers, using the brand name and customer contacts of such institution. We believe that marketing products and services that are associated with the brand of a marketing partner can provide a significant advantage over other forms of direct marketing. Affinity marketing provides us with access to our marketing partners’ large customer base, which generally results in higher response rates as customers recognize and trust our marketing partners’ brands and provides additional credibility and validation as to the quality of the program or service we are offering. Marketing partners benefit as they are able to promote their brands while offering additional programs and services that are relevant and meaningful to their customers, which strengthens their relationships with their customers and generates incremental revenue.

We have 40 years of operational history. The business started with membership products in 1973 through the formation of Comp-U-Card of America, Inc. (“CUC”). Between 1985 and 1986, CUC acquired the insurance and package enhancement products of Financial Institution Services, Inc. and Madison Financial Corporation, both of which were formed in 1971. In 1988, CUC acquired National Card Control, Inc., which was formed in 1981 and provided loyalty solutions and package enhancement programs. Our international products were started by CUC in the early 1990s. In 1997, CUC merged with HFS Incorporated to form Cendant. The international products were rebranded as Cendant International Membership Services after the formation of Cendant. In 2001, the U.S. membership products were rebranded as Trilegiant and the loyalty solutions products were rebranded as Trilegiant Loyalty Solutions. The insurance and U.S. package enhancement products were rebranded as Progeny in 2002. In 2004, we realigned our organizational structure and began integrating the historically separate businesses in order to have a unified approach to the marketplace.

In 2005, we entered into a purchase agreement with Cendant pursuant to which we purchased from Cendant all of the equity interests of Affinion Group, LLC or AGLLC (known as Cendant Marketing Services Group, LLC prior to the consummation of the Apollo Transactions (as defined in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”)) and all of the share capital of Affinion International Holdings Limited or AIH (known as Cendant International Holdings Limited prior to the consummation of the Apollo Transactions). See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence—The Acquisition—Purchase Agreement.”

We provide our customer engagement and loyalty solutions through retail and wholesale arrangements, or combinations of both, with our marketing partners, in addition to our direct to consumer marketing efforts. Under a retail arrangement, we usually market our products to a marketing partner’s customers by leveraging that marketing partner’s brand name and customer contacts. In retail arrangements, we typically bear or share the acquisition marketing costs. Under structures where we bear all or most of the acquisition marketing costs, we typically incur higher up-front expenses related to the customer solicitation and acquisition but share a lower amount of the related revenue (which we generally call a “commission”) with our marketing partners. Insurance programs are typically marketed under such arrangements, either through direct mail or through an offer placed on a marketing partner’s website. Under structures where our marketing partners share more of the acquisition marketing costs, we typically have lower up-front expenses, but pay higher commissions on related revenue to such partners. While the negotiated commission rates may vary considerably by marketing partner, the range of rates also varies based on the media that is used in the acquisition of the member, and are generally structured to compensate the marketing partner when its own resources are used in the marketing solicitation. For example, commission rates associated with direct mail campaigns are typically lower than those associated with in-branch campaigns.

Under a wholesale arrangement, the marketing partner bears the expense to market our products and services to its customers, collects revenue from the customer, and typically pays us a monthly fee per end-customer. Under this type of arrangement, we may also provide other services to our marketing partners, including enrollment, fulfillment, customer service, website and mobile application development.

We utilize a variety of media to offer our customer engagement solutions, including direct mail, online marketing, point-of-sale marketing, direct response television and internet marketing, inbound and outbound telephony and voice response unit marketing. We have a full-service, in-house creative agency with expertise in utilizing all varieties of customer acquisition media. We use a network of third-party operators for inbound and outbound telemarketing and develop all direct mail programs in-house, utilizing third parties only for limited services such as printing. In addition, we use standardized scripts for any person-to-person interactions in the solicitation or servicing of a member and direct mail materials that are repeatedly tested and updated to ensure regulatory compliance, consistency of quality and the maximum effectiveness for each marketing campaign.

We utilize financial models that are designed to target and predict returns over a five-year period for marketing expenditures related to membership programs and a seven-year period for marketing expenditures related to insurance programs. These models are used to determine the minimum response rate required to attain a targeted return per marketing campaign, net of attrition, applying an appropriate cost of capital. Our marketing systems model individual customer engagement and loyalty program marketing campaigns across multiple media and product offerings utilizing extensive data, customer contacts and the results of over 53,000 marketing campaigns conducted over the last five years. We typically target a minimum profitability return after all costs for all marketing expenditures related to our customer engagement solutions have been taken into account.

Direct Mail. We have developed considerable expertise in direct mail marketing. Our direct mail experience includes a variety of mailing types, including solo direct mail, detachable inserts, credit card inserts, statement inserts, promotion inserts, and other printed media. We have extensively tested variations of these forms of direct mail solicitations to help drive higher customer response rates.

Online Marketing. We use the Internet for the marketing of our products and services, both with marketing partners and via direct to consumer marketing, in both North America and internationally, and for the delivery of certain product benefits where it is relevant and beneficial to the consumer’s experience to do so. Our online marketing initiatives include pursuing new marketing partnerships (e.g. online retailers, travel providers, and service providers), offering our products and services directly to customers, and expanding relationships with traditional marketing partners via the Internet (notably financial institutions who allow us to market to their online banking customers). We use advertising, search engine optimization and marketing techniques (SEO and SEM) and email marketing methods to enhance our online customer acquisition techniques.

Point-of-Sale Marketing. Point-of-sale marketing is offered at our retail marketing partners’ stores, and the branch networks are the primary distribution medium for our checking account package enhancement as well as certain membership products with our financial institution marketing partners. Point-of-sale marketing utilizes a variety of promotional and display materials at these locations to create interest and drive program inquiries and enrollments, such as the discount of various purchasing activities with the marketing partner. Customer service representatives of our marketing partners may coordinate sales with the opening of new accounts and sale transactions. We also train our marketing partners’ point-of-sale personnel in the sales for our programs.

Live Operator Inbound Telemarketing (“Transfer Plus” and “Customer Service Marketing”). Transfer Plus is a live-operator call transfer program which operates out of our marketing partners’ call centers, and has proven successful in converting customer service calls into revenue opportunities. In Transfer Plus, qualified callers of a marketing partner are invited to hear about a special offer, and those callers who express interest in that offer are transferred to our representatives to hear more about the product or service. Customer Service Marketing is similar to Transfer Plus, however, our marketing partner’s or other third party’s representative continues with the sales process instead of transferring the call to us. We handle all training and promotions for these programs. It also provides a no-cost employee retention program for our marketing partners as agents earn cash/awards from us for every call handled or transferred.

Outbound Telemarketing. We use extensive modeling to target calling efforts to likely responders. Calls are fully scripted, and our representatives market only to those who are interested in hearing about our products and services. Our outbound telemarketing programs are designed to comply with the “Do-Not-Call” Registry and other privacy rules and requirements.

Voice Response Unit Marketing. When a consumer contacts a marketing partner’s call center to make an inquiry that can be handled electronically, the automated voice response system offers our product while the customer is waiting for, or after the completion of, the transaction or inquiry. The consumer then has the opportunity to accept or decline the offer.

Membership Products. We market various membership products and services in North America, primarily to the customers of our domestic marketing partners, but also through direct to consumer initiatives. These products are typically offered on a subscription basis and may be categorized generally as addressing one of two broad categories of fundamental consumer needs: (1) protection and peace-of-mind services or (2) savings on lifestyle oriented purchases and loyalty solutions. For example, our products offer members benefits and value-added services in the growing market of credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution services, which are intended to improve the member’s sense of security and well-being, or discounts on many brand categories along with shop-at-home convenience in such areas as retail merchandise travel, automotive and home improvement.

We utilize all forms of direct marketing to acquire new members and end-customers in the Membership business segment including direct mail, telemarketing, customer service marketing, voice response unit marketing, direct response internet and television marketing, point-of-sale marketing and our online initiatives. In the affinity channel, membership programs are mostly offered on a retail basis, where customers directly pay us a subscription fee. In return, we usually pay our marketing partners’ commissions on initial and renewal subscriptions based on a percentage of the subscription fees we collect. The existing subscriber base contains members who originally enrolled and subsequently renewed under annual or monthly subscription terms, but our new subscribers enroll principally on monthly subscription terms. We also offer our membership products and services under wholesale arrangements in which our marketing partners incur the marketing expense and risk of campaign performance and pay us a monthly fee and other fees for the administration and fulfillment of these programs. In the direct to consumer channel, we fund the marketing and retain the full value of the subscription fee.

Merchant-Funded Programs and Solutions. We provide our clients with online performance marketing, lead acquisition and consumer acquisition services. Our services result in qualified marketing leads and customers for our clients, as well as incremental revenue streams for our online publisher clients. We also provide a program that offers our marketing partners’ customers with relevant and robust cash-back savings, points that can be used across our extensive network of merchants and gift card providers, and individualized promotional offers generated from our proprietary modeling and data analytical capabilities, which are then distributed to customers through our patented technologies.

Our campaign management tools allow our clients to track campaign performance, consumer engagement metrics, consumer demographics and conversion rates through a web-based dashboard which provides real-time reporting.

Insurance. We offer three primary insurance programs that pertain to supplemental health or life insurance. These programs, including AD&D, represent our core insurance offerings and the majority of our annual insurance revenue.

We market our insurance products primarily by direct mail and the Internet. We use retail arrangements with our marketing partners when we market our insurance products to their customers. We earn revenue in the form of commissions from premiums collected, and in some cases, from economic sharing arrangements with the insurance carriers that underwrite the policies that we market. While these economic sharing arrangements have a loss-sharing feature that is triggered in the event that the claims made against an insurance carrier exceed the premiums collected over a specified period of time, historically, we have never had to make a payment to insurance carriers under such loss-sharing feature.

Package. We design and provide checking account enhancement programs to approximately 1,650 financial institutions in the United States. We provide these marketing partners with a portfolio of approximately 48 benefits in such areas as travel and shopping discounts, insurance and identity-theft resolution to create customized package offerings for their customers which are generally embedded in our marketing partners’ checking or deposit account and which enhance the value proposition for the growing trend of “fee-based” checking. For example, a financial institution can bundle enhancements such as cash back rewards, medical emergency data cards, discounted gift cards, telephone shopping services, car rental discounts, pharmacy discounts, hotel savings, dining discounts, and other benefits, with a standard checking or deposit account and offer these packages to its customers at no additional cost or for an additional monthly fee.

A customer service representative at a marketing partner’s branch site offers package enhancement programs to checking account, deposit account and credit card customers at the time of enrollment. We typically offer package enhancement products, such as Enhanced Checking, under wholesale arrangements where we earn an upfront fee for implementing the package enhancement program and a monthly fee based on the number of customers enrolled in the program.

Global Loyalty Products. We manage loyalty solutions products for points-based loyalty programs for many large financial institutions and other significant businesses. As of December 31, 2014, we managed programs representing an aggregate estimated redemption value of approximately $2.85 billion for financial, travel, auto, gaming and other companies. We provide our clients with solutions that meet the most popular redemption options desired by their program points holders, including travel, gift cards and merchandise, and, in 2014, we facilitated approximately $2 billion in redemption volume. Our loyalty programs are private-label, customizable, full-service rewards solutions that consist of a variety of configurations that are offered on a stand-alone and/or bundled basis depending on customer requirements.

In 2008, we assumed all of the liabilities and obligations of certain ex-Cendant entities relating to a loyalty program operated by these ex-Cendant entities for a major financial institution in exchange for an administrative fee. The obligations that we assumed included the fulfillment of the then-outstanding loyalty program points. With the exception of the loyalty program points assumed in connection with that transaction and the loyalty points earned by credit card holders under this program, we do not typically retain any loyalty points-related liabilities, although we expect this may be a source of incremental growth for our business in the future given that our predictive modeling capabilities provide us with opportunities to fairly value the economics of such programs. We typically charge a per-member and/or a per-activity administrative fee to clients for our services.

We also provide credit card enhancements, such as travel insurance and concierge services. The enhancement product line, which has been offered by us for approximately 20 years, addresses the same categories of consumer needs as our subscription-based programs, offering both protection (such as travel accident insurance) and lifestyle (such as concierge services) benefits. The benefits are sold wholesale to our marketing partners, who then provide the benefits at no cost to their customers as an added value of doing business with them. Historically, these benefits have been predominantly offered within the financial services industry as credit card enhancements.

Global Loyalty Fulfillment. We provide and manage travel reward products for loyalty programs through Connexions Loyalty, Inc. (“Connexions”), our wholly owned subsidiary, which is a service provider for points-based loyalty programs such as Chase Ultimate Rewards and Citibank’s ThankYou Rewards. We believe we are a leader in online and offline travel reward fulfillment as we fulfilled approximately 2.6 million travel redemptions on an annualized basis. Connexions’ loyalty program services are private-label, customizable, full-service travel rewards solutions that consist of a variety of configurations that are offered on a stand-alone and/or bundled basis depending on our customer’s requirements. We do not retain any loyalty points-related liabilities. We typically charge a per-member and/or a per-activity administrative fee to clients for our services.

Connexions also provides clients with the ability to offer leisure travel as a member benefit in a purchase environment, and a travel gift card which can be used on all travel components, including airfare, rental car, hotel stays and cruise vacations.

International Products. Through our Affinion International operations, we market our membership and package enhancement product lines internationally. Based upon the wide range of international membership and package enhancement programs we offer under retail and wholesale arrangements, we believe we are the largest provider of membership programs and package enhancement products in Europe. These membership services and package enhancement products are offered under retail and wholesale arrangements comparable to those in the U.S.

Our principal package enhancement products are marketed through our financial institution marketing partners and provide a broad array of benefits, including shopping, travel and security, to checking account customers in Europe. In addition to the identity-theft resolution and credit monitoring programs launched in the U.K., Affinion International markets its travel program, its shopping program and its dining and leisure programs in the U.K. and across our international footprint.

We are able to provide our customer engagement and loyalty solutions by utilizing the brand names and customer contacts of our marketing partners. Our diversified base of marketing partners includes more than 5,500 companies in a wide variety of industries, including financial services, retail, travel, telecommunications, utilities and Internet. Select marketing partners include Wells Fargo, Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, Transworld Entertainment and Royal Bank of Scotland. In 2014, we derived approximately 35% of our net revenues from members and end-customers obtained through our 10 largest marketing partners.

Typically, our agreements with our marketing partners for the marketing and servicing of our retail membership products are for fixed terms (typically one to three years, in the case of membership, and three to five years, in the case of insurance and package), which automatically renew for one-year periods and may be terminated at any time upon at least 90 days’ written notice. Our marketing partners are not subject to minimum marketing commitments that are material, individually or in the aggregate. While we generally do not have continued marketing rights following the termination of any marketing agreements, the vast majority of our marketing agreements allow us to extend or renew existing memberships and bill and collect associated subscription fees following

any termination. While we usually do not have rights to use marketing partner branding in new marketing following termination of a marketing agreement, the products we provide to subscribers are either our standard products, which do not require our marketing partner’s branding, or are co-branded products for which we typically have the ability to continue to service as co-branded products. With respect to our loyalty operations, many of our principal partner agreements have a term of at least two years, which automatically renew for one-year periods and may be terminated at any time upon at least 90 days’ written notice, and we typically charge a per-member and/or a per-activity administrative fee to clients for our services. Generally, our marketing partners agree not to solicit our subscribers for substantially similar services both during the term of our agreement and following any termination thereof.

Membership Products. We have approximately 1,000 marketing partners in multiple industries. Our relationships with our largest partners typically encompass multiple products and/or types of marketing media. In general, we have long-standing relationships with our partners.

Insurance and Package Products. Our insurance marketing partners consist of approximately 3,350 financial institutions including national financial institutions, regional financial institutions and credit unions at December 31, 2014. Customers of our top 10 marketing partners generated approximately 29% of our gross insurance revenue in 2014. Our package enhancement marketing partners are comprised of approximately 1,650 national financial institutions, regional financial institutions and credit unions at December 31, 2014. Customers of our top 10 U.S. marketing partners generated approximately 23% of our U.S. package enhancement revenue in 2014. In addition, we have held the endorsement of the American Bankers Association of our account enhancement programs in the U.S. for over 15 years.

Global Loyalty Products. We have over 50 clients, which include leading financial institutions, gaming companies, brokerage houses, automotive companies, premier hotels and travel-related companies.

International Products. Our international marketing partners include some of Europe’s most prominent retail banks and telecommunications companies.

As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately 59 million membership, insurance and package subscribers and end-customers enrolled in our programs worldwide and approximately 62 million customers who received credit or debit card enhancement services and loyalty points-based management services. We offer our programs and services to our customers through more than 5,500 marketing partners as of December 31, 2014. We market to customers using direct mail, online marketing, point-of-sale marketing, telemarketing and other marketing methods.

Membership Products. As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately 9.7 million subscribers and end-customers in the U.S. We target customers of our marketing partners who are willing to pay a fee to gain access to a multitude of discount programs or want to improve their sense of security and well-being.

Insurance and Package Products. As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately 23.5 million insurance customers in the U.S. We rely on access to our marketing partners’ large customer bases to market our insurance programs. The insurance products we market, such as AD&D, provide customers with peace of mind benefits should they suffer a serious injury or loss.

As of December 31, 2014, we provided our U.S. package products to approximately 3.4 million members and end-customers. Approximately 1,800 financial institutions utilize our package products to increase customer affinity, increase response and retention rates and generate additional fee income.

Global Loyalty Products. As of December 31, 2014, we provided enhancement and loyalty products to approximately 62 million customers. We provide points-based loyalty products and benefit package enhancement products to our clients, who in turn, offer those products to their customers.

International Products. As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately 19.7 million international package customers and approximately 2.7 million members and end-customers in 18 countries, primarily in Europe.

We partner with a large number of third-party vendors to provide fulfillment of many of our programs and services. Generally, our relationships with key vendors are governed by long-term contracts (typically, with initial terms of up to five years that renew automatically unless notice of non-renewal is given by either party prior to renewal). As we have a large number of vendors, we are generally not dependent on any one vendor and have alternative vendors should we need to replace an existing vendor. We believe we have very good relationships with our vendors who value their relationship with us as we are able to provide them with access to a large customer base through our marketing partners, many of whom are leaders in their respective industries. In addition, because we purchase large volumes of services across our various businesses, we are able to achieve significant price discounts from our vendors.

Membership Products. We partner with a variety of third-party vendors to provide services, benefits and fulfillment for many of our membership programs. Some of our largest vendor relationships relate to the provisions of certain benefits embedded in our PrivacyGuard^R membership product and AutoVantage membership product.

Insurance and Package Products. As of December 31, 2014, our carriers for our insurance programs were Transamerica Premier Life Insurance Company, Minnesota Life Insurance Company, Chubb & Son, a division of Federal Insurance Company, Mutual of Omaha and The Hartford, Inc.

Our package enhancement products combine both insurance and membership products to create a unique enhancement package that our marketing partners provide to their end-customers. Generally, programs include travel discounts and AD&D insurance that are supplied by our loyalty and insurance benefit vendors, respectively.

Global Loyalty Products. Connexions acts as a business process outsourcer for points-based loyalty products and provides enhancement benefits to credit and debit card issuers. While many of the services Connexions provides are sourced in-house as a result of Connexions’ proprietary technology platform and program design support, third-party suppliers are used to provide additional benefit enhancements. These benefit enhancements are supplied by our loyalty and insurance benefits vendors.

International Products. Affinion International services its marketing partners using a variety of third-party vendors to provide benefits, fulfillment and delivery for some of our programs. In addition, Affinion International also has key supplier relationships with third parties for its benefits related to sports and entertainment events as well as the provision of certain benefits embedded in our identity theft protection products. Affinion International also uses third-party suppliers for its print and fulfillment products.

Product development is integral to our ability to maximize value from each of our marketing campaigns and marketing partner relationships. In developing our products, we focus on maximizing margins and cash flows, leveraging marketplace trends and increasing loyalty, with a critical key focus on the needs of the consumer.

When we develop new products, we take into account not only the combination of benefits that will make up the product, but the characteristics of the customers to whom we will market the product and the marketing channel that will be used to reach these customers. Developing new products involves the creation of test products and feasibility studies to evaluate their potential value, as well as bundling existing products and benefits into new packages.

We also research, build and launch custom partner programs that we create uniquely for marketing partners to address the specific needs of these marketing partners and their customers.

Our operations group provides global operational support for all of our customer engagement and loyalty solution initiatives, including management of our internal and outsourced contact centers, as well as certain key third-party relationships. The group is charged with improving cost performance across our operations while enhancing revenue and bottom-line profitability through increased customer satisfaction and retention.

The processing responsibilities of the operations group can be divided into: (1) enrollments; (2) fulfillment packages; (3) billing; (4) merchandise delivery; and (5) travel fulfillment.

Enrollments. Enrollment information is sent to us through a variety of different media, including mail, electronic file transfer from marketing partners and telemarketing vendors and the Internet. Average turnaround time from receipt to enrollment is approximately 24 hours.

Fulfillment Packages. Fulfillment packages, which include enrollment materials and premiums (e.g., coupons and “hard” premiums such as MP3 players) sent to customers via mail and electronically, are produced in thousands of combinations for our membership, insurance and package enhancement programs. Fulfillment orders are generally transmitted to the appropriate fulfillment vendor by the next business day following receipt of the order. Physical fulfillment assembly and distribution in North America totals around 13.3 million pieces per year. Approximately 98% of these pieces are completed by our facility in Franklin, Tennessee, with the remainder completed by outsourced vendors.

Physical fulfillment assembly and distribution in Europe is completed in six locations across Europe and totals around 5.4 million pieces per year. Approximately 6% of these pieces are completed by third-party vendors with the remainder being completed in-house by Affinion International employees. We are increasingly employing electronic delivery of membership materials and fulfillment packages, which drives further cost reductions.

Billing. We have the ability to accept a variety of different payment account types, including Visa (debit and credit), MasterCard (debit and credit), Discover, American Express, retail company proprietary cards, PayPal, and checking and savings accounts. Domestically, we process approximately 78 million billing transactions each year for our membership, insurance and package products. We use both generic and direct processing methods and work closely with a variety of payment processors and our marketing partners to maximize our ultimate collection rates.

Merchandise Delivery. Shoppers Advantage maintains a virtual inventory of more than 6,500 items, covering more than 650 brands sourced through a best-in-class direct-ship network of 60 direct-ship vendors. We manage the process of customers purchasing these products, but we outsource delivery logistics to back-end suppliers. While we manage the fulfillment process, we generally do not take ownership or physical possession of any of the products being delivered. By pooling the purchasing power of our membership products and other products, including our loyalty programs, we achieve price reductions on the products we offer, and deliver value to our customers. Merchandise sales between our merchandise vendors and our customers was more than 126,500 units and almost $11 million in 2014. Related commissions on merchandise revenue totaled approximately $0.5 million which is included in our 2014 net revenues.

Travel Fulfillment. Loyalty Travel Agency LLC (“LTA”), our full-service travel agency, is dedicated primarily to servicing our customers; however, it also provides travel agency services to our clients, mainly for loyalty rewards redemptions and related services.

LTA travel consultants use Travelport’s Worldspan GDS booking system, which offers 288 airlines, 11 car rental companies, and over 215,000 hotel properties. This system provides us with access to online fares and electronic ticketing capability with the air carriers. Reservation and support services are provided by a combination of internally managed call centers, outsourcing relationships, and branded websites.

Our contact call centers provide high-quality customer service, retention support and inbound telemarketing services. We are committed to using internally managed and outsourced contact call centers to effectively handle peak service levels while achieving a semi-variable cost structure. As of December 31, 2014, 29 facilities handled the call volume, of which 18 are internally managed (7 in North America and 11 in Europe) and 11 are outsourced.

Our contact call centers handle approximately 20 million customer contacts per year, 9 million of which are related to our North American business and 11 million to our international business. The contact call centers provide a primary point of interaction with our customers. To this end, we are focused on implementing ways to improve service levels and set the necessary quality benchmarks to assure third-party vendors are performing at high levels. At the same time, we have reduced the number of our internally managed contact call centers and increased the use of outsourcers, producing significant cost reductions and an improved variable cost structure.

We are a leading affinity marketer of value-added membership, insurance and package enhancement programs and services with a network of more than 5,500 marketing partners as of December 31, 2014, approximately 59 million membership, insurance and package members and end-customers enrolled in our programs worldwide and approximately 62 million customers who received credit or debit card enhancement services and loyalty points-based management services as of December 31, 2014. Our leadership position in the affinity marketing and loyalty points program management industries is due to our nearly 40-year track record, our experience from over 53,000 customer engagement and loyalty program marketing campaigns conducted over the last five years and our core strengths in the areas of multi-media marketing, data analytics, customer service and operations. We also believe our portfolio of programs and benefits is the broadest in the industry, and that we are capable of providing the full range of administrative services for loyalty points programs. At December 31, 2014, we offered 14 core products and services with 351 unique benefits and supported almost 5,200 versions of products and services representing different combinations of pricing, benefit configurations and branding.

Our competitors include any company seeking direct and regular access to large groups of customers through any affinity-based direct media contact, as well as any company capable of managing loyalty points programs or providing redemption options for those programs. Our products and services compete with those marketed by financial institutions and other third parties who have marketing relationships with our competition, including large, fully integrated companies that have financial, marketing and product development resources that are greater than ours. We face competition in all areas of our business, including price, product offerings and product performance. As a whole, the direct marketing services industry is extremely fragmented, while competition in loyalty points program administration is somewhat more concentrated. Most companies in the direct marketing services industry are relatively small and provide a limited array of products and services. In general, competition for the consumer’s attention is intense, with a wide variety of players competing in different segments of the direct marketing industry. More specifically, competition within our business lines comes from companies that vary significantly in size, scope and primary core competencies.

Membership Products. The membership services industry is characterized by a high degree of competition. Participants in this industry include membership services companies, such as United Marketing Group, Encore, Synapse, AAA, LifeLock and

Intersections, as well as the credit bureaus, Experian, Equifax and TransUnion, and large retailers, travel agencies, insurance companies and financial service institutions.

Insurance and Package Products. Participants in the U.S. in the direct marketing of insurance programs include AIG, Assurant, CUNA Mutual Group, New York Life, Securian, Transamerica, and marketing firms who, in some instances, utilize our insurance underwriters.

The U.S. package enhancement operation faces competition from both direct marketing companies and financial institutions that choose to provide package enhancement programs in-house. Some of the direct marketers that participate in this space include Sisk, Generations Gold, Econocheck and Strategy Corp.

Global Loyalty Products. Examples of participants in the loyalty arena provide in-house rewards programs and utilize third-party providers. Such third-party providers design, market and manage rewards-based loyalty programs for businesses that either have no desire to manage such programs or lack the core competencies necessary to compete in the industry effectively. Key industry participants include Maritz Loyalty Marketing, Epsilon and Orbitz.

International Products. In our international operations, on the membership side of the business, competitors include Card Protection Plan, LV8, Plebicom S.A., as well as large retailers, travel agencies, insurance companies and financial service institutions. Key competitors in the package business include Card Protection Plan, MobileServ Limited, and Lifestyle Service Group in the United Kingdom, Serisystem and Jakala in Italy, MehrWert Servicegesellschaft in Germany and Falck in Norway.

Our information technology team, comprised of approximately 500 employees worldwide, operates and supports approximately 240 individual applications at December 31, 2014. Membership, package and insurance products and services are distributed through a multiple media approach, which allows us to interface with our marketing partners’ customers in a variety of ways to enhance file penetration in a cost effective manner. Our systems are able to manage marketing campaigns across all media. Servicing and enrollment requests are processed through a workflow and messaging interface with our vendors and are stored within our subscriber management platform. This framework allows us to keep a virtual inventory of programs and services, as well as store customer information for future marketing analysis. Customer servicing and billing information is fed into the financial ledger and business intelligence platform for billing and future marketing analysis.

We own or have licenses to use a large number of patents relating to a significant number of programs and processes. We also have certain significant material trademarks including, but not limited to Affinion Group, Affinion Benefits Group, Connexions Loyalty, Affinion International, AutoVantage, Buyers Advantage, CompleteHome, Enhanced Checking, HealthSaver, Hot-Line, NHPA, PrivacyGuard, Shoppers Advantage, Small Business Solutions, Travelers Advantage, Trilegiant and Wellness Extras. We use our trademarks in the marketing of our services and products offerings. We renew our trademarks on a regular basis. No individual patent or trademark is considered to be material to our business; however, our overall portfolio of patents and trademarks are valuable assets.

As of December 31, 2014, we employed approximately 3,700 people, of which approximately 54% are located in North America and the remaining 46% are in our international offices.

The direct marketing industry is subject to U.S. federal and state regulation as well as regulation by governments and authorities in foreign jurisdictions. Certain regulations that govern our operations include: federal, state and foreign marketing laws; federal, state and foreign privacy laws; and federal, state and foreign insurance and consumer protection regulations. Federal regulations are primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and the Consumer Financial Protection Board (“CFPB”). State regulations are primarily enforced by individual state attorneys general. Foreign regulations are enforced by a number of regulatory bodies in the relevant jurisdictions.

Federal and State Marketing Laws. The FTC and each of the states have enacted consumer protection statutes designed to ensure that consumers are protected from unfair and deceptive marketing practices. We review all of our marketing materials for compliance with applicable FTC regulations and state marketing laws.

In 2003, the FTC amended its Telemarketing Sales Rule to establish a National “Do-Not-Call” Registry. As of December 2014, the “Do-Not-Call” Registry included more than 219 million phone numbers. To comply with the rule, companies are required to match their call lists against the “Do-Not-Call” Registry prior to conducting outbound telemarketing and remove the names of consumers who have requested they not be called. In addition, the amended Telemarketing Sales Rule requires additional disclosures

and sales practices for goods and services sold over the phone. We match our call lists with the “Do Not Call Registry” and implement telemarketing scripts to comply with this regulation.

On December 29, 2010, legislation entitled the “Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act” was enacted (“ROSCA”). The legislation prohibits the acquisition of consumers’ credit or debit card account numbers automatically from our partners when a consumer enrolls in one of our programs immediately after making a purchase through one of our partners’ web sites (“Online Data-pass Marketing”), and requires additional disclosure relating to the online marketing of, and billing for, membership programs in the online post-transaction environment. The Company ceased Online Data-pass Marketing in January 2010, more than eleven months prior to the enactment of such legislation, and we have put procedures in place to ensure compliance with ROSCA.

Effective October 2011, Florida passed legislation similar to ROSCA, but with some additional requirements, and effective January 2012, Oregon passed legislation regulating free trial offers. The Florida law, like ROSCA, requires that an on-line post-transaction third party seller must obtain the express informed consent of the consumer to the sale by obtaining from the consumer the full account number of the account to be charged. The Florida law also requires that on-line post-transaction third party sellers must send a written notice confirming the transaction to the consumer by first class U.S. mail or by email. The Oregon legislation prohibits a person from causing a consumer to incur a financial obligation as a result of accepting a free offer unless the person obtains the consumer’s billing information directly from the consumer. We have put procedures in place to ensure compliance with these laws.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) mandates the most wide-ranging overhaul of financial industry regulation in decades. Dodd-Frank was signed into law on July 21, 2010, and is in the process of being fully implemented. Dodd-Frank provides a regulatory framework and requires that regulators draft, review and approve, and implement numerous regulations and conduct studies that are likely to lead to more regulations. As part of this, Dodd-Frank created the CFPB that became operational on July 21, 2011, and has been given authority to regulate all consumer financial products sold by banks and non-bank companies.

Billing Regulations. In 1978, Regulation E was issued by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors to implement the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (the “EFT”). The EFT provides for rights and duties of consumers and financial institutions in connection with debit or credit “electronic fund transfers”- transfers to or from demand, savings, or other deposit accounts initiated through computer or magnetic tape, telephones, point-of-sale terminals, ATMs, or any other electronic device. It includes all transfers resulting from debit card transfers, whether or not they involve an electronic terminal. We have implemented billing solutions across our businesses to comply with the EFT.

Additionally, in connection with the sale of its products and services, the Company permits customers to make payment by means of automated clearing house (ACH) funds transfers from bank accounts, direct bank account debits, credit cards and debit cards. The Company accepts authorizations for these customer payments by means of the telephone, the Internet and postal mail. In connection with its payment acceptance activities, the Company is subject to the operating rules and procedures of the card associations and card networks (including Visa and MasterCard) and the payment rules governing ACH payments and electronic funds transfers. The Company is also subject to federal and state laws that impose certain requirements on merchants when accepting payments, including recurring payments, from customers. These payment system rules and laws are subject to amendment and new interpretations from time to time which may impose new costs on the Company’s operations and materially impact the services we provide. The Company has adopted policies and procedures across our businesses to comply with these payment system rules and laws.

Federal Privacy Laws. The Financial Modernization Act of 1999, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB”), includes provisions to protect consumers’ personal financial information held by financial institutions. GLB places restrictions on the ability of financial institutions to disclose non-public personal information about their customers to non-affiliated third parties and also prohibits financial institutions from disclosing account numbers to any non-affiliated third parties for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing to consumers. We have implemented privacy solutions across our businesses designed to comply with GLB.

Additionally, several bills have been proposed in Congress that could restrict the collection and dissemination of personal information for marketing purposes. If any such legislation is passed, we would implement appropriate procedures and practices to comply with such laws.

State Privacy Laws. In addition to federal legislation, some states are considering or have passed laws restricting the sharing of customer information. For example, the California Financial Information Privacy Act (“SB 1”) places restrictions on financial institutions’ ability to share the personal information of their California customers. We have established a privacy solution that is designed to comply with the requirements of SB 1.

Domestic and International Insurance Regulations. As a marketer of insurance programs, we are subject to state and foreign rules and regulations governing the business of insurance including, without limitation, laws governing the administration, underwriting, marketing, solicitation and/or sale of insurance programs. Domestically, the insurance carriers that underwrite the programs that we sell are required to file their rates for approval by state regulators. Additionally, certain state laws and regulations govern the form and content of certain disclosures that must be made in connection with the sale, advertising or offer of any insurance

program to a consumer. We review all marketing materials we disseminate to the public for compliance with applicable insurance regulations. We are required to maintain certain licenses and approvals in order to market insurance programs. In addition, our international products are regulated by various national and international entities, including the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom (the “FCA”), in the sale of insurance programs. The FCA is the United Kingdom’s financial services regulator responsible for the conduct of organizations authorized under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 which, among other things, implements the European Union’s (the “EU”) Insurance Mediation Directive.

Other Foreign Regulations. Our European operations are subject to privacy and consumer protection regulations. Many of these regulations are based on EU Directives which are adopted as laws by countries within the EU in which Affinion International conducts its operations. These include:

In addition, there are various self-regulatory codes of advertising and direct marketing practice. We have established procedures designed to comply with the requirements of these codes and practices. Further, the FCA and other international regulators and competent authorities may change or introduce new laws or regulations that materially impact the membership, package enhancement and other services we provide.

We believe we carry sufficient insurance coverage to protect us from material losses incurred by any of our operations due to an insurance recoverable circumstance.

We are a Delaware corporation formed in July 2005 and are a holding company whose assets consist of the capital stock of our direct subsidiaries.

Our headquarters and principal executive offices are located at 6 High Ridge Park, Stamford, Connecticut 06905. Our telephone number is (203) 956-1000.

You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below as well as the other information contained in this Report. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flow, or results of operations

and prospects. The following is a description of the most significant factors that might cause the actual results of operations in future periods to differ materially from those currently desired or expected. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations and prospects.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and prevent us from servicing our debt.

We are a highly leveraged company. As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately $2.3 billion principal amount of outstanding indebtedness. Our annual debt service payment obligations, exclusive of capital lease obligations, require quarterly principal payments on Affinion’s first lien term loan equal to 1% per annum and annual required repayments based on excess cash flow. As of December 31, 2014, our estimated annual 2015 principal and interest payments on our debt will be approximately $187.0 million. Our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make scheduled payments on our debt will depend on a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. If we are unable to meet our expenses, debt service obligations and other obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, sell assets and/or raise equity. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, sell assets or raise equity on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could cause us to default on our obligations.

Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences, including the following:

All of the debt under our senior secured credit facility is variable-rate debt, subject to a minimum LIBOR floor.

The terms of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing Affinion’s 7.875% senior notes due 2018 (the “Affinion senior notes”), Affinion’s 13.50% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (the “Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes”) and our 13.75%/14.50% PIK Toggle senior notes (the “PIK Toggle senior notes”) may restrict our current and future operations, particularly our ability to respond to changes in our business or to take certain actions.

The terms of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing the Affinion 2010 senior notes and the Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes and our PIK Toggle senior notes contain a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to, among other things:

In addition, Affinion’s senior secured credit facility requires Affinion to maintain a maximum senior secured leverage ratio. As a result of these covenants, we will be limited in the manner in which we conduct our business and we may be unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs.

If we fail to comply with the covenants contained in Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, an event of default, if not cured or waived, could result under Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, and the lenders thereunder:

any of which could result in an event of default under the Affinion 2010 senior notes, the Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes and our PIK Toggle senior notes.

If the indebtedness under Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, Affinion 2010 senior notes, Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes or our PIK Toggle senior notes were to be accelerated, there can be no assurance that Affinion’s or our assets would be sufficient to repay such indebtedness in full.

Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significantly more debt. This could intensify the risks described above.

The terms of the indentures governing the Affinion 2010 senior notes, the Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes, Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and our PIK Toggle senior notes contain restrictions on our and our subsidiaries’ ability to incur additional indebtedness. However, these restrictions are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions and the indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Accordingly, we or our subsidiaries could incur significant additional indebtedness in the future, much of which could constitute secured or senior indebtedness. As of December 31, 2014, we had $61.7 million available for additional borrowing under the revolving loan commitments under Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, after giving effect to $13.3 million of outstanding letters of credit. In addition, the covenants under our existing debt agreements would allow us to borrow a significant amount of additional debt. The more we become leveraged, the more we, and in turn our security holders, become exposed to the risks described above under “—Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry and prevent us from servicing our debt.”

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness that may not be successful.

Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations will depend upon, among other things:

We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our senior secured credit facility or otherwise, in an amount sufficient to fund our liquidity needs. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cautionary Statements for Forward-Looking Information.”

If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to service our indebtedness, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements, including Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing the Affinion 2010 senior notes, the Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes and our PIK Toggle senior notes may restrict us from adopting some of these alternatives. In the absence of sufficient operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions for fair market value or at all. Furthermore, any proceeds that we could realize from any such dispositions may not be adequate to meet our debt service obligations then due. Furthermore, none of our equityholders, including Apollo (as defined below), General

Atlantic, the holders of warrants and their respective affiliates, have any continuing obligation to provide us with debt or equity financing.

We are a holding company with no direct operations and no significant assets other than the direct and indirect ownership of its subsidiaries and all of its net revenues are earned by our direct and indirect subsidiaries. Our ability to service our indebtedness depends upon the performance of these subsidiaries and their ability to make distributions.

We are a holding company and all of our operations are conducted by our subsidiaries. Therefore, our cash flows and our ability to service indebtedness will be dependent upon cash dividends and distributions or other transfers from our subsidiaries. Payments to us by our subsidiaries will be contingent upon our subsidiaries’ earnings.

The terms of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, the terms of the indentures governing our PIK Toggle senior notes and the terms of the indentures governing the Affinion senior notes and Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes each significantly restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to us. The terms of each of those debt instruments provide us with “baskets” that can be used to make certain types of “restricted payments,” including dividends or other distributions to us. The terms of any future indebtedness incurred by us or any of our subsidiaries may include additional restrictions on their ability to make funds available to us, which may be more restrictive than those contained in the terms of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, the terms of the indenture governing our PIK Toggle senior notes and the terms of the indentures governing the Affinion senior notes and the Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes.

Our subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and they will have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay amounts due under our indebtedness or to make any funds available to pay those amounts, whether by dividend, distribution, loan or other payments.

Since the consummation of the Acquisition, we have had a history of net losses and negative working capital. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had net losses attributable to us of $428.7 million, $135.5 million and $139.6 million, respectively. We cannot assure you that we will not continue to report net losses in future periods. Our working capital deficit as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $192.2 million, $138.4 million and $111.9 million, respectively.

Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

As part of the Acquisition, we made a special tax election referred to as a “338(h)(10) election” with respect to the companies constituting Cendant Marketing Services (“Predecessor”), a division of Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”). Under the 338(h)(10) election, the companies constituting the Predecessor were deemed for U.S. federal income tax purposes to have sold and repurchased their assets at fair market value. By adjusting the tax basis in such assets to fair market value for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the aggregate amount of our tax deductions for depreciation and amortization increased, which we expect to reduce our cash taxes in the future. We expect that tax deductions attributable to the 338(h)(10) election to be up to approximately $119 million per year ending in 2020. However, our ability to utilize these deductions in any taxable period will be limited by the amount of taxable income we earn in such period. In addition, pursuant to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, if we undergo an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in our stock ownership within a three-year period), our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards (including those attributable to the 338(h)(10) election) and certain other pre-change tax attributes to offset our post-change income may be limited. Similar rules and limitations may apply for state tax purposes as well. The rules under Section 382 are highly complex, and we cannot give you any assurance that any transfers of our stock will not trigger an “ownership change” and cause such limitation to apply.

We provide periodic reports as a “voluntary filer” pursuant to our contractual obligations in the indentures governing the notes, which contractual obligations may be amended without your consent.

Our obligation to file periodic reports pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act was automatically terminated when our 11.625% senior notes due 2015 (the “11.625% senior notes”) were held by fewer than 300 persons on January 1, 2014 and the PIK Toggle senior notes have not been, and are not required to be, registered under the Securities Act. Notwithstanding this automatic suspension of our reporting obligations pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, we intend to continue filing periodic reports with the SEC and to provide holders of our PIK Toggle senior notes with copies of any filed reports as a “voluntary filer” in compliance with the indentures governing the PIK Toggle senior notes. We expect that such periodic reports filed by us as a voluntary filer will comply fully with all applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. However, we could eliminate the periodic reporting covenant in the indenture governing the PIK Toggle senior notes with the consent of the holders of at least a majority of the notes, in which case we would no longer be obligated to file periodic reports with the SEC and may cease doing so.

We must replace the clients, including marketing partners, and customers we lose in the ordinary course of business and if we fail to do so our revenue may decline and our client and customer base will decline, resulting in material adverse effects to our financial condition.

We lose a substantial number of our customers each year in the ordinary course of business. The loss of clients, including marketing partners, or customers has occurred historically, and in the future may occur, due to numerous factors, including:

Further, we also have experienced a net loss of members and end-customers due to the regulatory issues at our financial institution marketing partners, which have and may continue to cause, such partners to cancel the membership of certain members and end-customers. Partially as a result of these factors, we have experienced a decline in our domestic membership customer base and domestic membership revenues, and we anticipate this trend will continue. Additionally, we expect to continue to see a net loss of members and end-customers as we continue our ongoing strategy to focus on overall profitability and generating higher revenue from each member rather than the size of our member base and as we increase our level of marketing investment with non-financial clients and in media where we have less response history from prior marketing efforts, which could result in lower overall consumer response and longevity than what we historically observed from our financial clients or through direct mail. Failure to obtain new customers who produce revenue at least equivalent to the revenue from the lost customers would result in a reduction in our revenue as well as a decrease in the number of our customers. Because of the large number of customers we need to replace each year, there can be no assurance that we can successfully replace them. In addition, even if we are successful in adding new customers to replace lost revenues, our profitability may still decline.

If we fail to implement our business strategy successfully, our financial performance could be harmed.

Our future financial performance and success are dependent in large part upon our ability to implement our business strategy successfully. Our business strategy is to pursue initiatives that maintain and enhance our position as a global leader in the designing, marketing and servicing of comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions that enhance and extend the relationship of millions of consumers with our marketing partners by creating and/or delivering valuable products and services that generate incremental loyalty and to focus on attractive opportunities that will increase our profitability and cash flows. We may not be able to implement our business strategy successfully or achieve the anticipated benefits. If we are unable to do so, our long-term growth, profitability and ability to service our debt may be materially adversely affected. Even if we are able to implement some or all of the key elements of our business plan successfully, our operating results may not improve to the extent we anticipate, or at all. Implementation of our business strategy could also be affected by a number of factors beyond our control, such as legal developments, government regulation, general economic conditions or increased operating costs or expenses.

We derive a substantial amount of our revenue from the members and end-customers we obtain through only a few of our marketing partners. If one or more of our agreements with our marketing partners were to be terminated or expire, or one or more of our marketing partners were to reduce the marketing of our services, we would lose access to prospective members and end-customers and could lose sources of revenue.

We derive a substantial amount of our net revenue from the customers we obtain through only a few of our marketing partners. In 2014, we derived approximately 35% of our net revenues from members and end-customers we obtained through the 10 largest marketing partners of our more than 5,500 marketing partners.

Many of our key marketing partner relationships are governed by agreements that may be terminated at any time without cause by our marketing partners upon notice of as few as 90 days without penalty. Some of our agreements may be terminated at any time by our marketing partners upon notice of as few as 30 days without penalty. Our marketing partners are not subject to minimum marketing commitments that are material, individually or in the aggregate. Moreover, under many of these agreements, our marketing partners may cease or reduce their marketing of our services without terminating or breaching our agreements. Further, in the ordinary course of business, at any given time, one or more of our contracts with key marketing partners may be selected for bidding through a request for proposal process. As a result of the regulatory supervisory audits and inquiries of certain of our financial institution marketing partners, certain partners have terminated their agreements with us or ceased marketing our services to, or ceased billing, their customers. The loss of such marketing partners, the cessation of their marketing of our services or the billing of their customers

or a decline in their businesses could have a material adverse effect on our future revenue from existing services of which such marketing partner’s customers are customers of ours and could adversely affect our ability to further market new or existing services through such marketing partner to prospective customers. There can be no assurance that more of our or other marketing partners will not terminate their relationship with us, cease or reduce their marketing of our services, cease the billing of their customers or suffer a decline in their business. If other marketing partners terminate or do not renew their relationships with us and we are required to cease providing our services to, or cease billing, their customers, then we could lose significant sources of revenue and there can be no assurances that we will be able to replace such lost revenue, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.

Our typical membership products agreements with marketing partners provide that after termination of the contract we may continue to provide our services to existing members under the same economic arrangements that existed before termination. However, in some cases, our marketing partners have violated, and others may in the future nonetheless violate, their contractual obligations and cease facilitating the billing of such existing members. Under certain of our insurance products agreements, however, marketing partners may require us to cease providing services to existing customers after time periods ranging from 90 days to five years after termination of the agreement. Also, under agreements with our marketing partners for which we market under a wholesale arrangement and have not incurred any marketing expenditures, our marketing partners generally may require us to cease providing services to existing customers upon termination of the wholesale arrangement. Further, marketing partners under certain agreements also have required, and may continue to require, us to cease providing services to their customers under existing arrangements if the contract is terminated for material breach by us or due to a change in the law or regulations. If more of these marketing partners were to terminate our agreements with them, and require us to cease providing our services to, or cease billing, their customers, then we could continue to lose significant sources of revenue and there can be no assurances that we will be able to replace such lost revenue, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profitability.

Our profitability depends on members and end-customers continuing their relationship with us. Increased loss of customers could impair our profitability.

We generally incur losses and negative cash flow during the initial year of an individual member or end-customer relationship, as compared to renewal years. This is due primarily to the fact that the costs associated with obtaining and servicing a new retail member and end-customer often exceed the fee paid to us for the initial year. In addition, we experience a higher percentage of cancellations during the initial membership period compared to renewal periods. Members and end-customers may cancel their arrangement at any time during the program period and, for our annual bill customers, we are typically obligated to refund the unused portion of their annual program fee. Additionally, an increase in cancellations of our members’ credit and debit cards by their card issuers as a result of payment delinquencies or for any other reason could result in a loss of members and end-customers and reduce our revenue and profitability. Accordingly, our profitability depends on recurring and sustained renewals and an increase in the loss of members or end-customers could result in a loss of significant revenues and reduce our profitability.

We depend on various third-party vendors to supply certain products and services that we market and to market certain of our products and services on our behalf. The failure of these vendors for any reason to provide these products or services or market these products and services in accordance with our requirements could result in customer dissatisfaction, expose us to increased liability and harm our business, financial condition and reputation.

We depend on various third-party vendors, including travel and hospitality suppliers, credit content providers, and insurance carriers, to supply the products and services that we market, and the quality of service they provide is not entirely within our control. If any third-party vendor were to cease operations, or terminate, breach or not renew its contract with us, we may not be able to substitute a comparable third-party vendor on a timely basis or on terms as favorable to us. Additionally, if any third party vendor suffers interruptions, delays or quality problems, it could result in negative publicity and customer dissatisfaction which could reduce our revenues and profitability. With respect to the insurance programs that we offer, we are dependent on the insurance carriers that underwrite the insurance to obtain appropriate regulatory approvals and maintain compliance with insurance regulations. If such carriers do not obtain appropriate state regulatory approvals or comply with such changing regulations, we may be required to use an alternative carrier or change our insurance products or cease marketing certain insurance related products in certain states, as a result of which our revenue and profitability could be adversely affected. If we are required to use an alternative insurance carrier or change our insurance related products, it may materially increase the time required to bring an insurance related product to market. As we are generally obligated to continue providing our products and services to our customers even if we lose a third-party vendor, any disruption in our product offerings could harm our reputation and result in customer dissatisfaction.

Furthermore, we utilize third-party vendors to market certain of our products and services on our behalf. The failure of any of our third-party vendors to satisfy our contractual or other requirements, including the failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, could subject us to private lawsuits or governmental investigations or proceedings, may result in our liability for damages and fines, and/or harm our reputation. If any third-party vendor marketing our products and services on our behalf suffers interruptions, delays or quality problems, it could reduce our revenues and profitability.

With respect to both vendors that supply certain products and services and vendors that market certain of our products and services, replacing existing third-party vendors with more expensive third-party vendors could increase our costs and reduce our profitability. Additionally, if third-party vendors increase their prices for their services, it would increase our costs and could result in a reduction of our profitability.

We depend, in part, on payment processors to obtain payments for us. If our payment processors are interrupted or negatively affected in any way it could result in delays in collecting payments or loss of future business and negatively impact our revenues and profitability.

We depend, in part, on payment processors to obtain payments for us. The payment processors operate pursuant to agreements that may be terminated with limited prior notice. In the event a payment processor ceases operations or terminates its agreement with us, there can be no assurance a replacement payment processor could be retained on a timely basis, if at all. Any service interruptions, delays or quality problems could result in delays in our collection of payments, which would reduce our revenues and profitability. Changes to the Visa and MasterCard Rules, the American Express Rules, or other rules and regulations governing card issuers or our marketing partners that negatively impact payment processors’ operations or ability to obtain payments for us, could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. Further, to the extent payment processors or issuing banks suffer a loss of revenues or business as a result of internal policy changes or any future enacted regulations or legislation, our revenues and profitability may be adversely affected.

The increase in the share of monthly payment programs in our program mix may adversely affect our cash flows.

We have traditionally marketed membership programs which have up-front annual membership fees. However, over the last six years, we expanded our marketing of membership programs for which membership fees are payable in monthly installments. In excess of 95% of our domestic new member and end-customer enrollments for the year ended December 31, 2014 were in monthly payment programs. Our increased emphasis on monthly payment programs adversely affects our cash flow in the short term because the membership fee is collected over the course of the year rather than at the beginning of the membership term as with annual billing.

We have experienced recent declines in our Adjusted EBITDA and may be unable to achieve annual Adjusted EBITDA growth in future periods.

In 2014, we experienced a decline in our Adjusted EBITDA compared to 2013. We may not be able to achieve annual Adjusted EBITDA growth in future periods and our Adjusted EBITDA may continue to decline. A variety of risks and uncertainties could cause us to not achieve Adjusted EBITDA growth, including, among others, business, economic and competitive risks and uncertainties discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Cautionary Statements for Forward-Looking Information.” In order to achieve Adjusted EBITDA growth in future periods, we must continue to implement our business strategy, achieve our target minimum returns on investment for our marketing expenditures, maintain or exceed the renewal rate and profitability of our customer base, retain key marketing partners and loyalty clients and expand those relationships, develop relationships with new key marketing partners and loyalty clients, grow our loyalty and international operations, and experience no material adverse developments that would impact our cost structure, or material adverse developments in the regulatory environment in which we operate, among other things. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will be able to achieve Adjusted EBITDA growth for any future period.

Increases in insurance claim costs will negatively impact the revenues and profitability of our Insurance business.

Our commission revenue from insurance programs is reported net of insurance cost. The major component of insurance cost represents claim costs, which are not within our control. While we seek to limit our exposure on any single insured and to recover a portion of benefits paid by ceding reinsurance to reinsurers, significant unfavorable claims experience will reduce our revenues and profitability.

Our business is highly competitive. We may be unable to compete effectively with other companies in our industry that have financial or other advantages and increased competition could lead to reduced market share, a decrease in margins and a decrease in revenue.

We believe that the principal competitive factors in our industry include the ability to identify, develop and offer innovative membership, insurance, package enhancement and loyalty programs, products and services, the quality and breadth of the programs, products and services offered, competitive pricing and in-house marketing expertise. Our competitors offer programs, products and services similar to, or which compete directly with, those offered by us. These competitors include, among others, Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, Intersections, Sisk, Epsilon, Assurant and Card Protection Plan. In addition, we could face competition if our current marketing partners were to develop and market their own in-house programs, products and services similar to ours. Furthermore,

certain of our marketing partners (who may have greater financial resources and less debt than we do) have attempted, or are attempting, to market and/or provide certain competitive products to their customers, the marketing and servicing of which historically were provided by us.

Some of these existing and potential competitors have substantially larger customer bases and greater financial and other resources than we do. There can be no assurance that:

In order to compete effectively with all of these competitors, we must be able to provide superior programs and services at competitive prices. In addition, we must be able to adapt quickly to evolving industry trends, a changing market, and increased regulatory requirements. Our ability to grow our business may depend on our ability to develop new programs and services that generate consumer interest. Failure to do so could result in our competitors acquiring additional market share in areas of consumer interest. Any increase in competition could result in price reductions, reduced gross margin and loss of market share.

Additionally, because contracts between marketing partners and program providers are often exclusive with respect to a particular program, potential marketing partners may be prohibited for a period of time from contracting with us to promote a new program if the benefits and services included in our program are similar to, or overlap with, the programs and services provided by an existing program of a competitor.

Internationally, package programs similar to ours are offered by some of the largest financial institutions in Europe. As these banks attempt to increase their own net revenues and margins by offering such programs in-house, we have been required to significantly reduce our prices when our agreements with these financial institutions come up for renewal in order to remain competitive. This pricing pressure on our international package offerings may continue in the future, thereby lowering the contribution to our operating results from such programs in the future.

Our business is increasingly subject to U.S. and foreign government regulation, which could impede our ability to market and provide our programs and services and reduce our profitability.

We market our programs and services through various distribution media, including direct mail, point-of-sale marketing, telemarketing, online marketing and other methods. These media are regulated by state, federal and foreign laws and we believe that these media will be subject to increasing regulation. Such regulation may limit our ability to solicit or sign up new customers or to provide products or services to existing customers.

Our U.S. programs and services are subject to extensive regulation and oversight by the FTC, the FCC, the CFPB, state attorneys general and/or other state regulatory agencies, including state insurance regulators. Our programs and services involve the use of non-public personal information that is subject to federal consumer privacy laws, such as the Financial Modernization Act of 1999, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and various state laws governing consumer privacy, such as California’s SB 1, SB 1386 and others. Additionally, telemarketing related to our programs and services is subject to federal and state telemarketing regulations, including the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule, the FCC’s Telephone Consumer Protection Act and related regulations, as well as various state telemarketing laws and regulations. Furthermore, our insurance products are subject to various state laws and regulations governing the business of insurance, including, without limitation, laws and regulations governing the administration, underwriting, marketing, solicitation or sale of insurance programs. Our travel products and services are subject to regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation, as well as other U.S. laws and regulations governing the offer and sale thereof. The gift cards that we provide to our clients, their customers and members are subject to the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 and similar state laws, which contain specific disclosure requirements, prohibitions or limitations on the use of expiration dates and the ability to impose certain fees. Additional federal or state laws, including subsequent amendments to existing laws, could impede our ability to market and/or provide our programs and services and reduce our revenues and profitability.

Similarly our operations in the European Economic Area are also often subject to strict regulation and oversight by regulatory agencies, including the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom (the “FCA”). These laws include, in particular, restrictions on our insurance intermediary activities as a regulated financial service requiring prior authorization and adherence to various rules on management and controls, documentation, complaints handling, minimum financial resources and the contracting

process with consumers. In addition, our European and international business, as a whole, is subject to regulation including data protection legislation requiring notification and obtaining consent for certain marketing limitations on the transfer of personal data from and within the European Economic Area and advertising rules regarding the content of marketing. “Distance selling” information and cancellation rules must also be followed in the European Union and other international countries when we contract with consumers at a distance including via post, phone, email, text or website. In the latter case, electronic commerce rules also come into play. In the European Union, these distance selling and e-commerce rules had to be implemented by each member state no later than June 13, 2014, and which include requirements regarding the purchase of goods and services on the internet or by phone. Some of our products in the U.K. also involve the provision of services classified as consumer credit and therefore require additional licenses to be applied for and maintained. Additionally, individuals in the U.K. and other European countries have rights to prevent direct marketing to them by telephone, fax or email. Other rules to which we are subject in the European Economic Area include restrictions on what are considered to be unfair or misleading commercial practices and general rules on providing services involving information and basic complaint handling rules to be followed. While many of these rules are based on European Directives, different member states have varying implementation and enforcement approaches which can be difficult to navigate. New rules or changes in existing ones at a European or Member State level in countries where we operate could restrict our current practices resulting in a reduction in our revenues and profitability.

Our global operations are also subject to trade sanctions administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. These trade sanctions generally prohibit U.S. persons, including our controlled international subsidiaries, from engaging in certain types of transactions, such as travel bookings, with designated foreign countries, nationals, organizations, and others, which prohibitions may conflict with laws of other jurisdictions in which we operate. We are also subject to U.S. and international anti-corruption laws and regulations, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the UK Bribery Act and other laws in other jurisdictions that prohibit the making, receiving or offering of improper payments or other benefits for the purpose of influencing decisions, obtaining or retaining business, or obtaining preferential treatment and require us to maintain adequate record-keeping and internal controls to ensure that our books and records accurately reflect our transactions. We have implemented policies, training and compliance programs designed to prevent such prohibited practices and transactions, as well as detect such prohibited practices and transactions if they were to occur. However, there can be no assurance that our policies, training and compliance programs will effectively prevent violation of such laws and regulations. Any such violation may subject us to criminal and/or civil penalties, prohibit or limit the conduct of our business in such jurisdictions, and/or disrupt our operations as we develop new compliance procedures, any of which could adversely affect our business, our reputation and our profitability.

Some of our products, including our insurance products, require us to apply for, renew, and maintain licenses issued by state, federal or foreign regulatory authorities. Such regulatory authorities have relatively broad discretion to grant, renew and revoke such licenses. Accordingly, any failure by us to comply with the then current licensing requirements, which may include any determination of financial instability by such regulatory authorities, could result in such regulators denying our initial or renewal applications for such licenses, modifying the terms of licenses or revoking licenses we currently possess, which could severely inhibit our ability to market and/or provide these products.

Our marketing partners are subject to a wide variety of federal, state and foreign laws and regulations, including banking, insurance and privacy laws and supervisory audits and inquiries. Changes in the laws or regulations applicable to our marketing partners or the failure of our marketing partners to comply with such laws and regulations or the outcome of supervisory audits and inquiries have resulted in some of our financial institution marketing partners terminating, and may cause others to in the future to terminate, their contracts with us, to cease facilitating payment processing or to cease marketing our services to their members or end-consumers, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our business. In addition, our marketing partners are subject to various federal and state consumer protection laws designed to ensure that consumers are protected from unfair and deceptive marketing practices. Moreover, our financial institution marketing partners are subject to oversight by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the CFPB and the FCA as described below. Pursuant to such oversight, the financial institutions are required to oversee their service providers, vendors or products sold to customers of such financial institutions. As a result, our financial institution marketing partners may impose requirements and processes that could impede our ability to market our programs and services and reduce our revenues and profitability.

The enactment of Dodd-Frank and the regulations promulgated thereunder, including those implemented by the CFPB, have imposed additional reporting, supervisory and regulatory requirements on, as well as resulted in inquiries of, us and our marketing partners. In addition, the CFPB or other bank oversight federal agencies, such as the OCC and FCA, have issued and may continue to issue rulings or findings or enter into a settlement or consent orders with one or more of our financial institution marketing partners that relate to the products or services we provide to such financial institution, which could adversely affect our marketing with those marketing partners or require changes to our products or services to consumers and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, other financial institutions may view such existing or future rulings, findings, settlements or consent orders as imposing a standard they will comply with. As a result of these regulations, supervisory audits and inquiries, settlements and consent orders, certain financial institution marketing partners have, and others could, delay or cease marketing with us, terminate their agreements with us, require us to cease providing services to members or end-consumers, or

require changes to our products or services to consumers that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, even an inadvertent failure to comply with these laws and regulations, as well as rapidly evolving expected standards, could adversely affect our business or our reputation.

Compliance with these federal, state and foreign regulations is generally our responsibility, and we could be subject to a variety of enforcement and/or private actions for any failure to comply with such regulations. Consumer complaints with respect to our industry have resulted in, and may in the future result in, state, federal and foreign regulatory and other investigations. Any changes to applicable regulations could materially increase our compliance costs. The risk of our noncompliance with any rules and regulations enforced by a federal or state consumer protection authority or an enforcement agency in a foreign jurisdiction may subject us (and in some cases our management) to fines, consumer restitution, or various forms of civil or criminal prosecution, any of which could impede our ability to market our programs and services and reduce our revenues and profitability. Certain types of noncompliance may also result in giving our marketing partners the right to terminate certain of our contracts or assert claims under our contracts. Also, the media often publicizes perceived noncompliance with consumer protection regulations and violations of notions of fair dealing with customers, and our industry is susceptible to peremptory charges by the media and others of regulatory noncompliance and unfair dealing. For further discussion of current legal and regulatory actions against us, see “—We are subject to legal actions and governmental investigations that could require us to incur significant expenses and, if resolved adversely to us, could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers, reduce revenues and profitability and damage our reputation.”

Over the past several years, there has also been proposed legislation in several states and the European Economic Area that may impact our business. For example, various state insurance commissions are reviewing the various health insurance model acts and regulations, which could change the manner in which certain supplemental insurance products may be offered to consumers. Several bills also have been proposed in Congress that could restrict the collection and dissemination of personal information for marketing purposes. If such legislation is passed in one or more states or by Congress, it could impede our ability to market our programs and services and reduce our revenues and profitability. Legislation relating to consumer privacy may also affect our ability to collect data that we use in providing our services, which, among other things, could negatively affect our ability to satisfy our clients’ needs.

We are subject to legal actions and governmental investigations that could require us to incur significant expenses and, if resolved adversely to us, could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers, reduce revenues and profitability and damage our reputation.

We are involved in claims, legal proceedings and state, federal and foreign governmental inquiries related to employment matters, contract disputes, business and marketing practices, trademark and copyright infringement claims and other commercial matters. Additionally, certain of our marketing partners have become, and others may become, involved in legal proceedings or governmental inquiries relating to our products or marketing practices. As a result, we may be subject to indemnification obligations under our marketing agreements. For example, on April 7, 2014 and April 9, 2014, Bank of America, N.A. and FIA Card Services, N.A. entered into consent orders (the “OCC and CFPB Consent Orders”) with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), respectively, relating to their credit protection products and identity theft protection products (which included certain of our identity theft protection products). On April 18, 2014, Bank of America, N.A. and FIA Card Services, N.A. notified us that they have commenced an arbitration proceeding against us seeking, among other things, indemnification for losses, costs, and liabilities that Bank of America and FIA Card Services, N.A. incurred relating to our identity theft protection products that were the subject of the OCC and CFPB Consent Orders, which losses include customer refunds and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses. For additional information regarding this matter, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”

The Company has received in the past, and may receive in the future, inquiries from numerous state attorneys general and U.S. federal agencies and U.K. regulatory agencies relating to the marketing of its membership programs and its compliance with consumer protection statutes. The Company responded to these regulatory bodies’ requests for documents and information and is in active discussions with them regarding their investigations and, in some cases, the resolution of these matters. For example, in September 2014, the Company received a Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise (“NORA”) letter indicating that the CFPB was considering taking legal action against the Company for violations of Sections 1031 and 1036 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Company has responded to the NORA letter, but has not yet commenced discussions with the CFPB regarding settlement. By way of further example, in January 2015, following voluntary discussions with the FCA during which no formal investigation was required, Affinion International Limited (“AIL”), one of our UK subsidiaries, and 11 UK retail banks and credit card issuers, announced a proposed joint arrangement, which will allow eligible consumers to make claims for compensation in relation to a discontinued benefit in one of AIL’s products. The proposed arrangement must be approved by a majority of those affected consumers who vote at a creditors’ meeting due to be held on June 30, 2015, and must then be approved by the High Court in London at a hearing due to be held in July 2015. Settlement or other final resolution of such governmental regulatory matters may include payment by the Company of the costs of the investigation, restitution to consumers and injunctive relief. For example, as reported in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed

with the SEC on October 10, 2013, we entered into a settlement agreement with 47 state attorneys general with respect to the legacy marketing practices in our membership business known as “online data pass” and “live-check marketing.”

While we cannot predict the outcome of pending suits, claims, investigations and inquiries, the cost of responding to and defending such suits, as well as the ultimate resolution of any of these matters, could require us to incur significant expenses and, if resolved adversely to us, could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers, reduce revenues and profitability and damage our reputation and otherwise have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that our accruals for legal actions or governmental investigations will be sufficient to satisfy all related claims and expenses.

We rely on our marketing partners to provide limited customer information to us for certain marketing purposes and to approve our marketing materials. If our marketing partners make significant changes to the materials that decrease results or if they limit the information that they provide to us, our ability to generate new customers may be adversely affected.

Certain of our marketing efforts depend in part on certain limited customer information being made available to us by our marketing partners. There can be no assurance that our marketing partners will, or will be able to, continue to provide us with the use of such customer information.

Our marketing efforts are largely dependent on obtaining approval of the solicitation materials from our marketing partners. We market our programs and services based on tested marketing materials, and any significant changes to those materials that are required by our marketing partners could negatively affect our results. The material terms of each marketing campaign must be mutually agreed upon by the parties. There can be no assurance that we will obtain approvals of our marketing materials from our marketing partners, and the failure to do so could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers, and reduce our revenues and profitability.

A significant portion of our business is conducted with financial institution marketing partners. A prolonged downturn in the financial institution industry may have an adverse impact on our business.

Our future success is dependent on continued demand for our programs and services within our marketing partners’ industries. In particular, the customers of our financial institution marketing partners accounted for a significant amount of our members and end-customers and revenues in 2014. A significant and prolonged downturn in the financial institution industry, or the continued trend in that industry to reduce or eliminate its use of our programs, products and services, could result in a further loss of members and end-customers and could continue to reduce our revenues and profitability. Additionally, our financial institution marketing partners are subject to extensive regulations, such as Dodd-Frank. The Dodd-Frank regulatory framework included the creation of the CFPB which has the authority to regulate all consumer financial products sold by banks and non-bank companies. These regulations have subjected our financial institution marketing partners to increased regulatory oversight and scrutiny regarding their compliance with consumer laws and regulations that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, even an inadvertent failure of our financial institution marketing partners to comply with these laws and regulations, as well as rapidly evolving social expectations of corporate fairness, could adversely affect our business or our reputation.

We may lose members or end-customers and significant revenue if we reduce our planned expenditures to grow our business, our existing services become obsolete, or if we fail to introduce new services with broad consumer appeal or fail to do so in a timely or cost-effective manner.

Our growth depends upon investing in our business. Although revenue from our existing customer base has historically generated approximately 80% of our next twelve months net revenue, we cannot assure you that this will continue. Accordingly, our growth will depend on our developing and successfully introducing new products and services that generate member and end-customer interest. Our failure to invest in our business, introduce these products or services or to develop new products or services, or the introduction or announcement of new products or services by competitors, could render our existing offerings non-competitive or obsolete. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing or introducing new products and services. Our failure to develop, introduce or expand our products and services or to make other investments in our business, such as marketing or capital expenditures, could result in a loss of members and end-customers and reduce our revenues and profitability.

We have recently recorded a significant impairment to goodwill and may record future impairment charges that could materially adversely impact our consolidated financial statements.

We perform our annual impairment assessment of goodwill as of December 1, or more frequently if impairment indicators exist. We determine the estimated fair value of each reporting unit utilizing a combination of the income and market approaches and incorporate assumptions that we believe marketplace participants would utilize. Based on the impairment test, which utilized a combination of the income and market approaches and incorporated assumptions that we believe marketplace participants would

utilize to determine the fair value of our Membership Products segment, we recorded an impairment loss during the fourth quarter of 2014 of $292.4 million, representing approximately 76.6% of the goodwill ascribed to our Membership Products segment.

We have experienced a net loss of members and end-customers due to the regulatory issues at our financial institution marketing partners and we anticipate this trend will continue. We may not be successful in adding new members from our large financial institutional marketing partners or retail marketing partners as estimated, or even if we do add new members as estimated, that such new members will be as profitable as estimated. To the extent that net revenues in our Membership Products segment continue to deteriorate in the near future, or we do not meet our expected performance in our Membership Products segment or our other reporting units, additional goodwill impairment charges may be required in future periods. If we are required to record additional impairment charges in the future, this could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Our failure to protect private data could damage our reputation and cause us to expend capital and other resources to protect against future security breaches.

Certain of our services are based upon the collection, distribution and protection of sensitive private data. Such data is maintained by the Company, as well as by certain of our third-party vendors that provide components for our products and services or assist in the billing for membership programs. Although we maintain a global risk management program to minimize the risks of a data breach, including conducting periodic audits of the security risk programs of our third-party vendors, unauthorized users might access or disrupt that data, and human error or technological failures might cause the wrongful dissemination or disruption of that data. If we experience a security breach, the integrity of certain of our services may be affected and such a breach could violate certain of our marketing partner agreements. We have incurred, and may incur in the future, significant costs to protect against the threat of a security breach. Although we maintain insurance coverage for certain computer network security and privacy-related risks, we may also incur significant costs to alleviate problems that may be caused by future breaches. Any breach or perceived breach could subject us to legal claims from marketing partners or customers under laws (such as California’s SB 1386 and regulations promulgated by the FCA and European data protection regimes) that govern breaches of electronic data systems containing non-public personal information. There is no assurance that we would prevail in such litigation. Moreover, any public perception that we have engaged in the unauthorized release of, or have failed to adequately protect, private information could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain marketing partners, members and end-customers. In addition, unauthorized third parties might alter information in our databases, which would adversely affect both our ability to market our services and the credibility of our information.

Our success and growth depends to a significant degree upon intellectual property rights.

We have a significant intellectual property portfolio and have allocated considerable resources toward intellectual property maintenance, prosecution and enforcement. We may be unable to deter infringement or misappropriation of our data and other proprietary information, detect unauthorized use or take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual property rights. Any unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive for us to do business and consequently harm our business. Failure to protect our existing intellectual property rights may result in the loss of valuable technologies or having to pay other companies for infringing on their intellectual property rights. We rely on patent, trade secret, trademark and copyright law as well as judicial enforcement to protect such technologies. Some of our technologies are not covered by any patent or patent application. In addition, our patents could be successfully challenged, invalidated, circumvented or rendered unenforceable. Furthermore, pending patent applications may not result in an issued patent, or if patents are issued to us, such patents may not provide meaningful protection against competitors or against competitive technologies. We also license patent rights from third parties. To the extent that such third parties cannot protect and enforce the patents underlying such licenses or, to the extent such licenses are cancelled or not renewed, our competitive position and business prospects may be harmed.

We could face patent infringement claims from our competitors or others alleging that our processes or programs infringe on their proprietary technology. If we were subject to an infringement suit, we may be required to (1) incur significant costs to license the use of proprietary technology, (2) change our processes or programs or (3) stop using certain technologies or offering the infringing program entirely. Even if we ultimately prevail in an infringement suit, the existence of the suit could cause our customers to seek other programs that are not subject to infringement suits. Any infringement suit could result in significant legal costs and damages, impede our ability to market or provide existing programs or create new programs, reduce our revenues and profitability and damage our reputation.

In addition, effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries. In some countries we do not apply for patent, trademark, or copyright protection. We also rely upon unpatented proprietary expertise, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop and maintain our competitive position. While we generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and third parties to protect our intellectual property, such confidentiality agreements could be breached and may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or proprietary expertise. Adequate remedies may not be available in the event of an unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets and expertise. In addition, others may obtain knowledge of our trade secrets through independent development or other access by legal means. The

failure of our patents or confidentiality agreements to protect our processes, apparatuses, technology, trade secrets and proprietary expertise and methods could jeopardize our critical intellectual property, which could give our competitors an advantage in the marketplace, reduce our revenues and profitability and damage our reputation.

Our business is highly dependent on our existing computer, billing, communications and other technological systems. Any temporary or permanent loss of any of our systems could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business depends upon ongoing investments in advanced computer database and telecommunications technology as well as our ability to protect our telecommunications and information technology systems against damage or system interruptions from natural disasters, technical failures and other events beyond our control. In order to compete effectively and to meet our marketing partners’ and customers’ needs, we must maintain our systems as well as invest in improved technology. A temporary or permanent loss of any of our systems or networks could cause significant damage to our reputation and could result in a loss of revenue.

In addition, we receive data electronically, and this delivery method is susceptible to damage, delay or inaccuracy. A significant portion of our business involves telephonic customer service as well as mailings, both of which depend upon the data generated from our computer systems. Unanticipated problems with our telecommunications and information technology systems may result in a significant system outage or data loss, which could interrupt our operations. Our infrastructure may also be vulnerable to computer viruses, hackers or other disruptions entering our systems from the credit reporting agencies, our marketing partners and members and end-customers or other authorized or unauthorized sources. Any damage to our telecommunications and information technology systems, failure of communication links or other loss that causes interruption in, or damage to, our operations could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers and reduce our revenues and profitability.

If we are unable to meet the rapid changes in technology, our services and proprietary technology and systems may become obsolete.

Due to the cost and management time required to introduce new services and enhancements, we may not be able to respond in a timely manner to avoid becoming uncompetitive. To remain competitive, we must meet the challenges of the introduction by our competitors of new services using new technologies or the introduction of new industry standards and practices. Additionally, the vendors we use to support our technology may not provide the level of service we expect or may not be able to provide their product or service on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

We depend, in part, on the postal and telephone services we utilize to market and service our programs. An interruption of, or an increase in the billing rate for, such services could adversely affect our business.

We market and service our programs by various means, including through mail and via telephone. Accordingly, our business is dependent on the postal and telephone services provided by the U.S. Postal Service and international postal service, and various local and long distance telephone companies. Any significant interruption of such services or any limitations in their ability to provide us with increased capacity could impede our ability to market our programs and services, result in a loss of members and end-customers and reduce our revenues and profitability. In addition, the U.S. Postal Service and international postal service increase rates periodically and significant increases in rates could adversely impact our business.

We may not realize anticipated benefits from recent or future acquisitions or have the ability to complete future acquisitions.

From time to time, we pursue acquisitions as a means of enhancing our scale and market share. In general, the success of our acquisition strategy will depend upon our ability to find suitable acquisition candidates on favorable terms and to finance and complete these transactions. In addition, upon completion of an acquisition, we may encounter a variety of difficulties, including trouble integrating the acquired business into our operations, the possible defection of key employees or of a significant number of employees, the loss in value of acquired intangibles, the diversion of management’s attention and unanticipated problems or liabilities. These difficulties may adversely affect our ability to realize anticipated cost savings and revenue growth from our acquisitions. In addition, acquisitions we have made in the past such as Prospectiv Direct, Inc. (“Prospectiv”) and any future acquisitions may not be as accretive to our earnings as we expect or at all, and may negatively impact our results of operations through, among other things, the incurrence of debt to finance any acquisition, non-cash write-offs of goodwill or intangibles and increased amortization expenses in connection with intangible assets. Acquisition integration activities can also put further demands on management, which could negatively impact operating results.

Our international operations are subject to additional risks not encountered when doing business in the U.S., and our exposure to these risks will increase as we expand our international operations.

We have a limited history of conducting certain of our international operations, which involve risks that may not exist when doing business in the U.S. In order to achieve widespread acceptance in each country we enter, we must tailor our services to the unique customs and cultures of that country. Learning the customs and cultures of various countries, particularly with respect to consumer preferences, is a difficult task and our failure to do so could slow our growth in international markets.

In addition, we are subject to certain risks as a result of having international operations, and from having operations in multiple countries generally, including:

We cannot assure you that one or more of these factors will not have a material adverse effect on our international operations and consequently on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are dependent on the services of Todd H. Siegel, our Chief Executive Officer, and other members of our senior management team to remain competitive in our industry. The loss of Mr. Siegel or any other member of our senior management team could have an adverse effect on us. There is a risk that we will not be able to retain or replace these key employees. All of our current executive officers are subject to employment conditions or arrangements that contain post-employment non-competition provisions. However, these arrangements permit the employees to terminate their employment.

We are controlled by Apollo who will be able to make important decisions about our business and capital structure.

Approximately 68% of the common stock of Affinion Holdings is beneficially owned by investment funds affiliated with Apollo, and 20.6% is beneficially owned by investment funds affiliated with General Atlantic (44.5% and 13.5%, respectively, of our common stock after giving effect to the exercise of the outstanding Series A warrants, but before giving effect to outstanding vested options and the outstanding Series B warrants). As a result, investment funds affiliated with Apollo control us and have the power to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors, appoint new management and approve any action requiring the approval of the holders of Affinion Holdings’ stock, including approving acquisitions or sales of all or substantially all of our assets, subject to the terms of the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement (as defined in “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Agreements with Certain Investors”), as amended. Under the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement, as amended, and the Warrantholder Rights Agreement, as amended, investment funds affiliated with Apollo have the right to nominate seven of our directors, certain limited partnerships sponsored by General Atlantic have the right to nominate three of our directors, and the holders of Series A warrants (together with the holders of any shares of Class B common stock issued upon the exercise thereof) have the right to nominate one of our directors until the fourth anniversary of the issuance of the Series A warrants. Our Board of Directors currently consists of nine directors; however, pursuant to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement, upon the demand of either the investment funds affiliated with Apollo or the limited partnerships sponsored by General Atlantic, we will be required to increase the size of our Board of Directors in order to permit such demanding part(ies) to fully exercise their rights to nominate directors under the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement. If a Control Event shall have occurred, thereafter, subject to applicable law and the Warrantholder Rights Agreement, the holders of Class B common stock will have the right to nominate and elect a majority of our directors. See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Agreements

with Certain Investors” for a more detailed summary of the terms of the Warrantholder Rights Agreement. In addition, the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement, as amended, provides for the nomination of Mr. Todd Siegel as a director in his capacity as our Chief Executive Officer and for the nomination of Mr. Nathaniel J. Lipman as a director. The directors elected by Apollo have the ability to control decisions affecting our capital structure, including the issuance of additional capital stock, the implementation of stock repurchase programs, the declaration of dividends and the purchase of our indebtedness or Affinion Holdings’ indebtedness, in each case, subject to the terms of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing the PIK Toggle senior notes, the Affinion 2010 senior notes and the Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes. Additionally, Apollo is in the business of investing in companies and may, from time to time, acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Apollo may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.

The agreement governing the rights of holders of our Series A warrants and Series B warrants imposes certain restrictions on our ability to conduct our business.

On December 12, 2013, in connection with the private offer to exchange our 11.625% senior notes for PIK Toggle senior notes, Series A warrants and Series B warrants, we entered into a Warrantholder Rights Agreement with Apollo, General Atlantic and the tendering holders of 11.625% senior notes. As a result, the holders of Series A warrants have certain consent rights pertaining to our ability to enter into transactions with affiliates, restructure or reorganize, repurchase common stock, declare or pay dividends or amend our organizational documents.

We are currently headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut in a 140,000 square foot facility that houses management offices as well as the marketing and sales operations for our largest customers. Our corporate data center is in Trumbull, Connecticut, with disaster recovery operations provided by a backup site in Westerville, Ohio. Some applications are also housed in Centennial, Colorado, Slough, U.K., and Oslo, Norway. The table below lists all of our facilities as of December 31, 2014, all of which are leased.

We have non-cancelable operating leases covering various facilities and equipment. Our rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $18.5 million, $21.8 million and $20.0 million, respectively.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in claims, governmental inquiries and legal proceedings related to employment matters, contract disputes, business practices, trademark and copyright infringement claims and other commercial matters. The Company is also a party to lawsuits which were brought against it and its affiliates and which purport to be a class action in nature and allege that the Company violated certain federal or state consumer protection statutes (as described below). The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against such lawsuits.

On June 17, 2010, a class action complaint was filed against the Company and Trilegiant Corporation (“Trilegiant”) in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The complaint asserts various causes of action on behalf of a putative nationwide class and a California-only subclass in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs, including claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”), the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, the California Unfair Competition Law, the California False Advertising Law, and for unjust enrichment. On September 29, 2010, the Company filed a motion to compel arbitration of all of the claims asserted in this lawsuit. On February 24, 2011, the court denied the Company’s motion. On March 28, 2011, the Company and Trilegiant filed a notice of appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, appealing the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. On September 7, 2012, the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court denying arbitration. While that issue was on appeal, the matter proceeded in the district court. There was written discovery and depositions. Previously, the court had set a briefing schedule on class certification that called for the completion of class certification briefing on May 18, 2012. However, on March 28, 2012, the court suspended the briefing schedule on the motion due to the filing of two other overlapping class actions in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. The first of those cases was filed on March 6, 2012, against the Company, Trilegiant, Chase Bank USA, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., Capital One Financial Corp., Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., Apollo Global Management, LLC, 1-800-Flowers.Com, Inc., United Online, Inc., Memory Lane, Inc., Classmates Int’l, Inc., FTD Group, Inc., Days Inn Worldwide, Inc., Wyndham Worldwide Corp., People Finderspro, Inc., Beckett Media LLC, Buy.com, Inc., Rakuten USA, Inc., IAC/InteractiveCorp., and Shoebuy.com, Inc. The second of those cases was filed on March 25, 2012, against the same defendants as well as Adaptive Marketing, LLC, Vertrue, Inc., Webloyalty.com, Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co. These two cases assert similar claims as the claims asserted in the earlier-filed lawsuit in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs. On April 26, 2012, the court consolidated these three cases. The court also set an initial status conference for May 17, 2012. At that status conference, the court ordered that Plaintiffs file a consolidated amended complaint to combine the claims in the three previously separate lawsuits. The court also struck the class certification briefing schedule that had been set previously. On September 7, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint asserting substantially the same legal claims. The consolidated amended complaint added Priceline, Orbitz, Chase Paymentech, Hotwire, and TigerDirect as Defendants and added three new Plaintiffs; it also dropped Webloyalty and Rakuten as Defendants. On December 7, 2012, all Defendants filed motions seeking to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint and to strike certain portions of the complaint. Plaintiff’s response brief was filed on February 7, 2013, and Defendants’ reply briefs were filed on April 5, 2013. On September 25, 2013, the court held oral argument on the motions to dismiss. On March 28, 2014, the court ruled on the motions to dismiss, granting them in part and denying them in part. The court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ RICO claims and claims under the California Automatic Renewal Statute as to all defendants. The court also dismissed certain named Plaintiffs as their claims were barred either by the statute of limitations and/or a prior settlement agreement. Certain Defendants were also dismissed from the case. The court also struck certain allegations from the consolidated amended complaint, including certain of Plaintiffs’ class action allegations under CUTPA. As to the Company and Trilegiant, the court denied the motion to dismiss certain Plaintiffs’ claims under ECPA and for unjust enrichment, as well as certain other claims of Plaintiffs under CUTPA.

Also, on December 5, 2012, the Plaintiffs’ law firms in these consolidated cases filed an additional action in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. That case is identical in all respects to this case except that it was filed by a new Plaintiff (the named Plaintiff from the class action complaint previously filed against the Company, Trilegiant, 1-800-Flowers.com, and Chase Bank USA, N.A., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on November 10, 2010). On January 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to consolidate that case into the existing set of consolidated cases. On June 13, 2013, the Court entered an order staying the date for all Defendants to respond to the Complaint until 21 days after the Court ruled on the motion to consolidate. On March 28, 2014, the Court entered an order granting the motion to consolidate.

On May 12, 2014, remaining Defendants in the consolidated cases filed answers in which they denied the material allegations of the consolidated amended complaint. On April 28, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking interlocutory appellate review of portions of the court’s order of March 28, 2014. Briefing on the motion was completed on June 5, 2014. The Company does not know when the Court will rule on that motion.

On August 27, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed against Webloyalty, one of its former clients and one of the credit card associations in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging, among other things, violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, Electronic Communications Privacy Act, unjust enrichment, civil theft, negligent misrepresentation, fraud and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act violation (the “Connecticut Action”). This lawsuit relates to Webloyalty’s alleged conduct occurring on and after October 1, 2008. On November 1, 2010, the defendants moved to dismiss the initial complaint, which plaintiff then amended on November 19, 2010. On December 23, 2010, Webloyalty filed a second motion to dismiss this lawsuit. On May 15, 2014, the Court heard oral argument on plaintiff’s motion to strike the Company’s request for judicial notice of the plaintiff’s membership enrollment documents filed in support of the Company’s second motion to dismiss. On July 17, 2014, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion to strike. The Court, at the same time, dismissed those claims grounded in fraud, but reserved until further proceedings the determination as to whether all of plaintiff’s claims are grounded in fraud and whether those claims not grounded in fraud are dismissible. The Court permitted the plaintiff until August 15, 2014 to amend his complaint and allowed the parties the opportunity to conduct limited discovery, to be completed by September 26, 2014, concerning the issues addressed in its dismissal order. All other discovery is currently stayed in the case. The July 17, 2014 order indicated that the Court will set a further motion to dismiss briefing schedule following the conclusion of this limited discovery. The plaintiff amended his complaint as scheduled, and the parties conducted limited discovery as ordered. After this limited discovery, the parties proposed a motion to dismiss briefing schedule calling for the defendants to file their opening briefs on January 9, 2015. The plaintiff’s opposition brief is due on March 24, 2015, and the defendants’ reply briefs in response to that opposition are due on April 24, 2015. The Court has not yet scheduled a hearing on the defendants’ motions to dismiss the second amended complaint.

On June 7, 2012, another class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California against Webloyalty that was factually similar to the Connecticut Action. The action claims that Webloyalty engaged in unlawful business practices in violation of California Business and Professional Code § 17200, et seq. and in violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act. Both claims are based on allegations that in connection with enrollment and billing of the plaintiff, Webloyalty charged plaintiff’s credit or debit card using information obtained through a data pass process and without obtaining directly from plaintiff his full account number, name, address, and contact information, as purportedly required under Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act. On September 25, 2012, Webloyalty filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety and the Court scheduled a hearing on the motion for January 14, 2013. Webloyalty also sought judicial notice of the enrollment page and related enrollment and account documents. Plaintiff filed his opposition on December 12, 2012, and Webloyalty filed its reply submission on January 7, 2013. Thereafter, on January 10, 2013, the Court cancelled the previously scheduled January 14, 2013 hearing and indicated that it would rule based on the parties’ written submissions without the need for a hearing. On August 28, 2013, the Court sua sponte dismissed plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice with leave to amend by September 30, 2013. The plaintiff filed his amended complaint on September 30, 2013, adding purported claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and for unjust enrichment, money had and received, conversion, civil theft, and invasion of privacy. On December 2, 2013, the Company moved to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint. Plaintiff responded to the motion on January 27, 2014. On February 6, 2014, the Court indicated that it would review the submissions and issue a decision on plaintiff’s motion without oral argument. On September 29, 2014, the Court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims on substantive grounds and/or statute of limitations grounds. The Court allowed the plaintiff 28 days to file a motion demonstrating why a further amendment of the complaint would not be futile. On October 27, 2014, the plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint and attached a proposed amended complaint. The Company responded to the motion on November 10, 2014. However, the Court has not yet decided or scheduled a hearing on the plaintiff’s motion.

On February 7, 2014 a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and one of its clients in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging, among other things, violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Electronic Communications Privacy Act, unjust enrichment, money had and received, conversion, misrepresentation, violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and equitable relief. Claims are based on allegations that plaintiff was enrolled and billed for a package program without plaintiff’s proper consent and knowledge. On April 4, 2014, the Company filed a motion to dismiss. A hearing on that motion was held on July 24, 2014. On March 11, 2015, the magistrate judge to whom the motion was referred by the district court judge issued a report and recommendation granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss. The magistrate judge granted the motion to dismiss on the fraud claim, which was dismissed as time-barred, but denied the remainder of the

motion. By rule, the Company has until March 25, 2015, to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Any objection will be decided by district court judge, and the Company intends to pursue such an objection.

On May 12, 2014, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Company and one of its clients in the United States District Court, Northern District of California – San Francisco Division. The complaint alleges plaintiff was unknowingly enrolled in and charged for an Identity Theft Protection program. The defendants moved to compel individual arbitration of the case or in the alternative to dismiss the case, and briefing on that motion concluded on September 26, 2014. On October 31, 2014, the court granted the Company’s motion to compel individual arbitration of the case. There has been no activity in the matter since that time.

From time to time, the Company receives inquiries from federal and state agencies which may include the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), state attorneys general and other state regulatory agencies, including state insurance regulators. The Company responds to these matters and requests for documents, some of which may lead to further investigations and proceedings.

Between December 2008 and February 2011, the Company and its subsidiaries, Trilegiant Corporation and Webloyalty.com, Inc. received inquiries from numerous state attorneys general relating to the legacy marketing practices in their membership business known as “online data pass” and “live-check marketing” and their compliance with state consumer protection statutes. On October 10, 2013, the Company reached a settlement with the following 47 states and the District of Columbia: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Under the settlement, the Company admitted no wrong-doing with respect to such legacy marketing practices and agreed to refrain from engaging in such marketing practices, which the Company voluntarily eliminated in early 2010. In addition, it agreed to fund a $19.4 million restitution program covering eligible consumers in all 48 jurisdictions participating in the settlement and reimburse the participating jurisdictions for their investigatory costs in an amount of $13.5 million. At December 31, 2014, all payments to the jurisdictions and consumers had been made. The settlement did not include any fine or penalty payments.

From time to time, our international operations also receive inquiries from consumer protection, insurance or data protection agencies. The Company responds to these matters and requests for documents, some of which may lead to further investigations and proceedings. On January 27, 2015, following voluntary discussions with the FCA during which no formal investigation was required, and from which no fines or finding of fault will result, Affinion International Limited (“AIL”), one of our UK subsidiaries, and 11 UK retail banks and credit card issuers, announced a proposed joint arrangement, which will allow eligible consumers to make claims for compensation in relation to a discontinued benefit in one of AIL’s products. The proposed arrangement must be approved by a majority of those affected consumers who vote at a creditors’ meeting due to be held on June 30, 2015, and must then be approved by the High Court in London at a hearing due to be held in July 2015. Based on the information currently available, the Company has recorded an estimated liability that represents AIL’s portion of potential consumers’ refunds to be paid as part of such joint arrangement.

On April 18, 2014, Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) and FIA Card Services, N.A. (“FIA Card Services”) commenced an arbitration proceeding against Trilegiant and Affinion pursuant to the terms of the parties’ servicing agreements. In the arbitration proceeding, Bank of America asserted various causes of action and requests for monetary and other relief, including a demand for contractual indemnification of the losses and costs, including in particular customer refunds and reasonable attorneys’ fees that Bank of America incurred related to consent orders entered into by Bank of America with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency on April 7, 2014 and with the CFPB on April 9, 2014. On May 16, 2014, Trilegiant commenced two separate arbitration proceedings against Bank of America, asserting that Bank of America breached the parties’ servicing agreements. On July 7, 2014, the parties agreed to stay one of the arbitrations initiated by Trilegiant and to dismiss the other arbitrations without prejudice, pending mediation. On September 22, 2014, Bank of America and Trilegiant participated in a mediation to attempt to resolve their outstanding disputes. The mediation process was ultimately unsuccessful in resolving the parties’ disputes. As such, the parties have resumed the arbitration process. Dispositive motions will be briefed in August 2015, and assuming those are unsuccessful in resolving all outstanding disputes between the parties, the final arbitration hearing is scheduled to take place in mid-October 2015. Assuming the parties submit post-hearing memoranda, a decision is not expected until late 2015 or early 2016.

In September 2014, the Company received a Notice and Opportunity to Respond and Advise ("NORA") letter indicating that the CFPB was considering taking legal action against the Company for violations of Sections 1031 and 1036 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act relating to the Company’s identity theft protection products. The Company has responded to the NORA letter, but has not yet commenced discussions with the CFPB regarding settlement. Based on the information currently available, the Company has recorded an estimated liability that represents potential consumer refunds and civil monetary penalties to be paid as part of a potential

future settlement of the CFPB’s allegations. In connection with the contemplated action, the CFPB may also seek injunctive relief. At this time, it is not possible to predict what, if any, injunctive relief will be sought.

The Company believes that the amount accrued for the above litigation and contingencies matters, including the CFPB matter, is adequate, and the reasonably possible loss beyond the amounts accrued will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, based on information currently available. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable and, although the Company believes that accruals are adequate and it intends to vigorously defend itself against such matters, unfavorable resolution could occur, which could have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole.

We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Affinion Group Holdings, LLC, an affiliate of Apollo, our principal equity sponsor, and there is no established trading market for our common stock. As of February 25, 2015, approximately 68% of our common stock was beneficially owned by investment funds affiliated with Apollo. There were approximately 90 holders of record of our Class A common stock and no holders of our Class B common stock.

During 2012, 2013 and 2014, we made no cash distributions to our shareholders. We are a holding company and have no direct operations and no significant assets other than ownership of 100% of the stock of Affinion. As a result, the terms of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing the Affinion senior notes and the Affinion 2013 senior subordinated notes, which significantly restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to us, significantly limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock. See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources.” In addition, the Warrantholder Rights Agreement restricts our ability to make non-pro rata redemptions, dividends or distributions in which the exercisable warrants are not permitted to participate, See “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Agreements with Certain Investors.”

The following table presents our selected historical consolidated financial data for the periods indicated. The following information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified by reference to, the section entitled “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

The consolidated balance sheet data of Affinion Holdings as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income data and cash flows data of Affinion Holdings for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein. The consolidated balance sheet data of Affinion Holdings as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 has been derived from the audited balance sheet of Affinion Holdings as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income data and cash flow data of Affinion Holdings for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 have been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Affinion Holdings for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, none of which is included herein.

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2014 (1)			2013			2012 (2)			2011 (3)			2010 (4)
	(in millions)
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income Data:
Net revenues	$	1,242.8		$	1,334.7		$	1,494.6		$	1,535.2		$	1,376.3
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		481.9		533.2			600.1			637.7			583.3
Operating costs		411.9		439.4			459.5			441.5			375.8
General and administrative		172.9			157.0		150.7			167.9			157.9
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		292.4		1.6			39.7				—			—
Facility exit costs		2.7		0.5				(0.9	)	6.2				8.0
Depreciation and amortization		109.7		113.9			184.5			238.7			195.2
Total expenses		1,471.5			1,245.6			1,433.6			1,492.0			1,320.2
Income (loss) from operations		(228.7	)		89.1			61.0			43.2			56.1
Interest income	0.3			0.4			0.9				1.1		0.8
Interest expense		(223.7	)		(206.5	)		(190.4	)		(188.8	)		(192.6	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(14.6	)		(4.6	)		—			—			(39.7	)
Loss on redemption of preferred stock		—			—			—			(6.5	)		—
Other income (expense), net		—		0.1				(0.2	)	0.2				(1.9	)
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(466.7	)		(121.5	)		(128.7	)		(150.8	)		(177.3	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		38.5			(13.6	)		(10.2	)		(5.2	)		(12.8	)
Net loss		(428.2	)		(135.1	)		(138.9	)		(156.0	)		(190.1	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.5	)		(0.4	)		(0.7	)		(0.9	)		(1.0	)
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.	$	(428.7	)	$	(135.5	)	$	(139.6	)	$	(156.9	)	$	(191.1	)
Cash distributions to common shareholders (5)		—			—			—		$	241.6			—
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Cash and cash equivalents (excludes restricted cash)	$	32.3		$	20.1		$	51.9		$	106.4		$	164.2
Working capital deficit		(192.2	)		(138.4	)		(111.9	)		(112.6	)		(31.6	)
Total assets		1,019.6			1,368.2			1,496.6			1,676.7			1,564.9
Total debt		2,272.7			2,258.2			2,246.0			2,255.9			2,014.8
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		—			—			—			—			39.8
Total Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. deficit		(1,847.6	)		(1,520.9	)		(1,414.1	)		(1,281.1	)		(1,174.8	)
Consolidated Cash Flows Data:
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	37.0		$	1.2		$	31.1		$	65.1		$	78.5
Investing activities		(70.9	)		(51.1	)		(68.3	)		(61.0	)		(210.2	)
Financing activities		48.1			18.1			(18.0	)		(61.1	)	228.7
Other Financial Data:
Capital expenditures	$	51.0		$	46.3		$	51.7		$	56.9		$	39.9
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (6)		—			—			—			—			—

The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Statements for Forward-Looking Information.”

Management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition (“MD&A”) is provided as a supplement to and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere herein to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of our operations. The MD&A is organized as follows:

We are one of the world’s leading customer engagement and loyalty solutions companies. We design, market and service programs that strengthen and extend customer relationships for many of the world’s largest and most respected companies. Our programs and services include:

greater use of other services provided by such companies. We refer to the leading companies that we work with to provide customer engagement and loyalty solutions as our marketing partners or clients. We refer to the consumers to whom we provide services directly under a contractual relationship as subscribers, insureds or members. We refer to those consumers that we service on behalf of a third party, such as one of our marketing partners, and with whom we have a contractual relationship as end-customers.

We believe our portfolio of the products and services that are embedded in our engagement solutions is the broadest in the industry. Our scale, combined with the industry’s largest proprietary database, proven marketing techniques and strong marketing partner relationships developed over our 40 year operating history, position us to deliver consistent results in a variety of market conditions.

We offer our products and services through both retail and wholesale arrangements with our marketing partners as well as through direct-to-consumer marketing. Currently, we primarily provide wholesale services and benefits derived from our credit card registration, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution products. In the majority of our retail arrangements, we incur the marketing solicitation expenses to acquire new customers for our subscription-based membership, insurance and package enhancement products with the objective of building a base of highly profitable and predictable recurring future revenue streams and cash flows. For our membership, insurance and package enhancement products, these upfront marketing costs are expensed when the costs are incurred in support of a launched campaign.

Our membership programs are offered under a variety of terms and conditions. Prospective members are usually offered incentives (e.g. free credit reports or other premiums) and one to three month risk-free trial periods to encourage them to evaluate and use the benefits of membership before the first billing period takes effect. We do not recognize any revenue during the trial period and expense the cost of all incentives and program benefits and servicing costs as incurred.

Customers of our membership programs typically pay their subscription fees either annually or monthly. Our membership products may have significant timing differences between the receipt of membership fees for annual members and revenue recognition. Historically, memberships were offered primarily under full money back terms whereby a member could receive a full refund upon cancellation at any time during the current membership term. These revenues were recognized upon completion of the membership term when they were no longer refundable. Depending on the length of the trial period, this revenue may not have been recognized for up to 16 months after the related marketing spend was incurred and expensed. Currently, annual memberships are primarily renewed under pro-rata arrangements in which the member is entitled to a prorated refund for the unused portion of their membership term. This allows us to recognize revenue ratably over the annual membership term. Upon completion of the subscription term, the membership renews under generally the same billing terms in which it originated. Given that we had historically offered a significant amount of subscriptions offering annual terms, our existing base continues to reflect a blend of both monthly and annual terms, and will continue doing so for as long as a substantial percentage of the annual subscribers renew. However, the majority of our recent solicitation activity has been for subscriptions offering monthly terms, and during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, in excess of 95% of our new member and end-customer enrollments were in monthly payment programs. Revenue is recognized monthly under both annual pro rata and monthly memberships, allowing for a better matching of revenues and related servicing and benefit costs when compared to annual full money back memberships.

When marketing with a marketing partner, we generally utilize the brand names and customer contacts of the marketing partner in our marketing campaigns. We usually compensate our marketing partners either through commissions based on revenues we receive from members (which we expense in proportion to the revenue we recognize) or up-front marketing payments, commonly referred to as “bounties” (which we expense when incurred). In addition, we enter into arrangements with certain marketing partners where we pay the marketing partners advance commissions which provide the potential for recovery from the marketing partners if certain targets are not achieved. These payments are capitalized and amortized over the expected life of the acquired members. The commission rates that we pay to our marketing partners differ depending on the arrangement we have with the particular marketing partner and the type of media we utilize for a given marketing campaign.

In a direct-to-consumer campaign, we invest in a variety of media to generate consumer awareness of our programs and services and stimulate responses from our targeted markets. The media channels we employ in direct-to-consumer include television advertising as well as Internet marketing, such as search engine optimization and related techniques. When marketing directly to the consumer, we generally use our proprietary brands and avoid incurring any commission expense.

We serve as an agent and third-party administrator on behalf of a variety of underwriters for the marketing of AD&D and our other insurance products. Free trial periods and incentives are generally not offered with our insurance programs. Insurance program participants typically pay their insurance premiums either monthly or quarterly. We earn revenue in the form of commissions collected on behalf of the insurance carriers and participate in profit-sharing relationships with certain of the carriers that underwrite the insurance policies that we market, where profit is measured by the excess amount of premium remitted to the carrier less the cost for claim activities and any related expenses. In 2014, we transitioned a significant portion of our AD&D business from our former primary insurance carrier to new carriers that receive a fixed distribution of collected premiums rather than participating in the profit-sharing arrangement. As a result of the substantial completion of this transition, a significant portion of the business is no longer subject to profit-sharing arrangements. Our estimated share of profits from these arrangements is reflected as profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers on the accompanying audited consolidated balance sheets and any changes in estimated profit sharing in connection with the actual claims activities are periodically recorded as an adjustment to net revenue. Insurance revenues are recognized ratably over the insurance period for which a policy is in effect and there are no significant differences between cash flows and related revenue recognition. Revenue from insurance programs is reported net of insurance costs in the accompanying audited consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

In our wholesale arrangements, we provide our products and services as well as customer service and fulfillment related to such products and services to support programs that our marketing partners offer to their customers. In such arrangements, our marketing partners are typically responsible for customer acquisition, retention and collection and generally pay us one-time implementation fees and on-going monthly service fees based on the number of members enrolled in their programs. Implementation fees are recognized ratably over the contract period while monthly service fees are recognized in the month earned. Wholesale revenues also include revenues from transactional activities associated with our programs, such as the sales of additional credit reports, discount shopping or travel purchases by members. The revenues from such transactional activities are recognized in the month earned.

We have a highly variable-cost structure because the majority of our expenses are either discretionary in nature or tied directly to the generation of revenue. In addition, we have achieved meaningful operating efficiencies by combining similar functions and processes, consolidating facilities and outsourcing a significant portion of our call center and other back-office processing, particularly with respect to previously acquired businesses. This added flexibility better enables us to deploy our discretionary marketing expenditures globally across our operations to maximize returns.

As a leader in the affinity direct marketing industry, we compete with many other organizations, including certain of our marketing partners as well as other benefit providers, to obtain a share of the end-consumer’s spending in each of our respective product categories. As an affinity direct marketer, we derive our leads from a marketing partner’s contacts, which our competitors also seek access to, and we must therefore generate sufficient earnings per lead for our marketing partners to compete effectively for access to their end-customers.

As direct-to-consumer marketers, we compete with any company who offers comparable benefits and services to what we market from our own product portfolio.

We compete with companies of varying size, financial strength and availability of resources. Our competitors include marketing solutions providers, financial institutions, insurance companies, consumer goods companies, internet companies and others, as well as direct marketers offering similar programs. Some of our competitors are larger than we are and are able to deploy more resources in their pursuit of the limited target market for our products.

Historically, financial institutions have represented a significant majority of our marketing partner base. Consumer banking is a highly regulated industry, with various federal, state and international authorities governing various aspects of the marketing and servicing of the products we offer through our financial institution partners.

For instance, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) mandates the most wide-ranging overhaul of financial industry regulation in decades. Dodd-Frank created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) which became operational on July 21, 2011, and has been given authority to regulate all consumer financial products sold by banks and non-bank companies. These regulations have imposed additional reporting, supervisory, and regulatory requirements on our financial institution marketing partners which has adversely affected our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, even an inadvertent failure of our financial institution marketing partners to comply with these laws and regulations, as well as rapidly evolving social expectations of corporate fairness, could adversely affect our business or our reputation going forward. Some of our marketing partners have become involved in governmental inquiries that include our products or marketing practices. As a result, certain financial institution marketing partners have, and others could, delay or cease marketing with us, terminate their agreements with us, require us to cease providing services to members or end-consumers, or require changes to our products or services to consumers that could also have a material adverse effect on our business. Partially as a result of these factors, we have experienced a decline in our domestic membership customer base and domestic membership revenues, and we anticipate this trend will continue.

In certain circumstances, our financial marketing partners have sought to source and market their own in-house programs, most notably programs that are analogous to our credit card registration, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution services. As we have sought to maintain our market share in these areas and to continue these programs with our marketing partners, in some circumstances, we have shifted from a retail marketing arrangement to a wholesale arrangement which results in lower net revenue, but unlike our retail arrangement, has no related commission expense, thereby preserving our ability to earn a suitable rate of return on the campaign. During periods of increased interest from our marketing partners for wholesale activity, partially as a result of this trend, we have experienced a revenue reduction in our membership business.

Internationally, our package products have been primarily offered by some of the largest financial institutions in Europe. As these banks attempt to increase their own net revenues and margins, we have experienced significant price reductions when our agreements come up for renewal from what we had previously been able to charge these institutions for our programs. We expect this pricing pressure on our international package offerings to continue in the future.

We are allocating an increasing percentage of our domestic marketing investment to the direct-to-consumer channel. We have tested various direct-to-consumer media and we believe we will be able to achieve returns on our investments that are comparable to our traditional channels.

We are subject to federal and state regulation as well as regulation by foreign authorities in other jurisdictions. Certain laws and regulations that govern our operations include: federal, state and foreign marketing and consumer protection laws and regulations; federal, state and foreign privacy and data protection laws and regulations; federal, state and foreign insurance and insurance mediation laws and regulations; and federal, state and foreign travel laws and regulations. Federal regulations are primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission and the CFPB. State regulations are primarily enforced by individual state attorneys general and insurance departments. Foreign regulations are enforced by a number of regulatory bodies in the relevant jurisdictions.

These regulations primarily impact the means we use to market our programs, which can reduce the acceptance rates of our solicitation efforts, impact our ability to obtain information from our members and end-customers and impact the benefits we provide and how we service our members and end-customers. In addition, new and contemplated regulations enacted by, or marketing partner settlement agreements or consent orders with, the CFPB could impose additional reporting, supervisory and regulatory requirements on, as well as result in inquiries of, us and our marketing partners that could delay or terminate marketing campaigns with certain marketing partners, impact the services and products we provide to consumers, and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We incur significant costs to ensure compliance with these regulations; however, we are party to lawsuits, including class action lawsuits, and regulatory investigations involving our business practices which also increase our costs of doing business. See “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”

Historically, seasonality has not had a significant impact on our business. Our revenues are more affected by the timing of marketing programs that can change from year to year depending on the opportunities available and pursued. More recently, in connection with the growth in our loyalty business, we have experienced increasing seasonality in the timing of our cash flows, particularly with respect to working capital. This has been due primarily to the consumer’s increasing acceptance and use of certain categories for points redemptions, such as travel services and gift cards. These categories typically present a delay from the time we incur a cash outlay to provision the redemption until we are reimbursed by the client for the activity, and in certain instances, these delays may extend across multiple reporting periods. Redemptions for some categories, such as gift cards, have been weighted more heavily to the end of the year due to consumers’ increasing usage of points in connection with seasonal gift giving.

Our business started with our North American membership products in 1973. Over a decade later, we expanded our business to include North American insurance and package products. In 1988, we acquired a loyalty and enhancement programs business and in the early 1990s, we expanded our membership and package products internationally. During these periods, the various products operated independently and were subject to certain non-compete agreements between them which limited their access to new channels, marketing partners, products and markets.

In 2012, we began to organize our internal resources into two broadly-defined areas: customer engagement solutions, which included our relationships with financial institutions, hospitality companies and other traditional marketing partners, and retail solutions, which included our online and point-of-sale retail relationships as well as our direct-to-consumer marketing efforts. We adopted this approach because we believe these channels carry unique requirements with respect to customer acquisition, client servicing and marketing services.

On October 17, 2005, Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) completed the sale of the Cendant Marketing Services Division (the “Predecessor”) to Affinion Group, Inc. (“Affinion”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “Affinion Holdings”) and an affiliate of Apollo Global Management, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”), pursuant to a purchase agreement dated July 26, 2005 for approximately $1.8 billion. The purchase price consisted of approximately $1.7 billion of cash, net of estimated closing adjustments, plus $125 million face value of 125,000 shares of newly issued preferred stock (with a fair value at issuance of $80.4 million) of Affinion Holdings, and a warrant (with a fair value at issuance of $16.7 million) that was exercisable for 4,437,170 shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, and $38.1 million of transaction related costs (collectively, the “Apollo Transactions”). The warrants expired in 2011 and the remaining outstanding shares of preferred stock were redeemed in 2011.

As part of the Apollo Transactions, we made a special tax election referred to as a “338(h)(10) election” with respect to the Predecessor. Under the 338(h)(10) election, the companies constituting the Predecessor were deemed to have sold and repurchased their assets at fair market value. By adjusting the tax basis in such assets to fair market value for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the aggregate amount of our tax deductions for depreciation and amortization have increased, which has reduced our cash taxes and further enhanced our free cash flow generation. We expect these tax deductions for U.S. federal income tax purposes to continue until 2020.

On November 14, 2012, the Company entered into, and consummated, a Share Sale and Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) that resulted in the acquisition of Boyner Bireysel Urunler Satis ve Pazarlama A.S (“Back-Up”), a Turkish provider of assistance and consultancy services to its members, and a sister company, Bofis Turizm ve Ticaret A.S. (“Travel”), a Turkish travel agency. In accordance with the Agreement, on November 14, 2012, the Company acquired 90% of the outstanding capital stock of Back-Up and 99.99% of the outstanding capital stock of Travel for an upfront cash payment of approximately $12.5 million and contingent consideration payable ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the acquisition date aggregating approximately $8.4 million.

Back-Up and Travel were owned by Turkey’s largest retail group at that time and the Company believes that Back-Up’s and Travel’s assistance and concierge service model fits well with the Company’s global product offerings. The acquisition enabled the Company to expand into Turkey, which the Company deems a key market, given both its size as well as the attractive demographics of its population, and enables the expansion of the Company’s product offerings to a new customer base.

On September 8, 2014, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “SkyMall Agreement”) that resulted in the acquisition on September 9, 2014 of SkyMall Ventures, LLC (“SkyMall”), a provider of merchandise, gift cards and experiential rewards for loyalty programs. In accordance with the SkyMall Agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding membership interests in SkyMall for an upfront cash payment of approximately $18.4 million, plus a working capital adjustment of $0.4 million, and contingent consideration of up to $3.9 million payable approximately one year after the acquisition date.

In addition to providing merchandise, gift cards and experiential rewards for loyalty programs, it provides services including strategy, creative, technology and fulfillment. The acquisition of SkyMall is expected to enhance the Company’s position as a leading loyalty program administrator and incentives provider, as well as solidify the Company’s position within certain current verticals and provide access to certain new verticals.

On June 9, 2014, Affinion Holdings completed an offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes for Affinion Holdings’ Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock. In connection with the exchange offer, approximately $88.7 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes were exchanged for Series A warrants to purchase up to approximately 30.3 million shares of Affinion Holdings Class B common stock. In addition, on June 9, 2014, in connection with a pre-emptive rights offer, Affinion Holdings issued Series A warrants to purchase up to approximately 1.2 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of approximately $3.8 million.

We manage our business using a portfolio approach, meaning that we allocate and reallocate our marketing investments in the ongoing pursuit of the highest and best available returns, allocating our resources to whichever products, geographies and programs offer the best opportunities. With the globalization of our clients, the continued evolution of our programs and services and the

ongoing refinement and execution of our marketing allocation strategy, we have developed the following table that we believe captures the way we look at the businesses (subscriber and insured amounts in thousands except per average subscriber and insured amounts).

	Three Months Ended				Year Ended
	December 31,				December 31,
	2014		2013		2014		2013		2012
Global Average Subscribers, excluding Basic Insureds		38,666		39,242		39,334		40,692		43,855
Annualized Net Revenue Per Global Average Subscriber, excluding Basic Insureds (1)	$	27.61	$	27.62	$	27.00	$	28.66	$	30.30
Global Membership Subscribers
Average Global Retail Subscribers (2)		7,429		8,122		7,606		8,851		10,563
Annualized Net Revenue Per Global Average Subscriber (1)	$	83.42	$	79.81	$	86.20	$	80.84	$	79.74
Global Package Subscribers and Wholesale
Average Global Package Subscribers and Wholesale (2)		27,539		27,268		27,972		27,902		29,147
Annualized Net Revenue Per Global Average Package and Wholesale Subscriber (1)	$	6.59	$	7.17	$	6.61	$	7.33	$	7.61
Global Insureds
Average Supplemental Insureds (2)		3,698		3,852		3,756		3,939		4,145
Annualized Net Revenue Per Supplemental Insured (1)	$	72.02	$	62.34	$	59.00	$	62.46	$	63.87
Global Average Subscribers, including Basic Insureds		58,543		59,864		59,461		61,664		65,821

Wholesale members include end-customers where we typically receive a monthly service fee to support programs offered by our marketing partners. Certain programs historically offered as retail arrangements have switched to wholesale arrangements with lower annualized price points and no commission expense.

Basic insureds typically receive $1,000 of AD&D coverage at no cost to the consumer since the marketing partner pays the cost of this coverage. Supplemental insureds are customers who have elected to pay premiums for higher levels of coverage.

Segment EBITDA consists of income from operations before depreciation and amortization. Segment EBITDA is the measure management uses to evaluate segment performance and we present Segment EBITDA to enhance your understanding of our operating performance. We use Segment EBITDA as one criterion for evaluating our performance relative to that of our peers. We believe that Segment EBITDA is an operating performance measure, and not a liquidity measure, that provides investors and analysts with a measure of operating results unaffected by differences in capital structures, capital investment cycles and ages of related assets among otherwise comparable companies. However, Segment EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under U.S. GAAP (as defined in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein), and Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. You should not consider Segment EBITDA as an alternative to operating or net income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of operating performance or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, or as an indicator of cash flows, or as a measure of liquidity.

The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

	Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			Increase
	2014			2013			(Decrease)
	(in millions)
Net revenues	$	1,242.8		$	1,334.7		$	(91.9	)
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions	481.9			533.2				(51.3	)
Operating costs	411.9			439.4				(27.5	)
General and administrative	172.9				157.0			15.9
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets	292.4			1.6				290.8
Facility exit costs	2.7			0.5				2.2
Depreciation and amortization	109.7			113.9				(4.2	)
Total expenses		1,471.5			1,245.6			225.9
Income (loss) from operations		(228.7	)		89.1			(317.8	)
Interest income	0.3			0.4				(0.1	)
Interest expense		(223.7	)		(206.5	)		(17.2	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(14.6	)		(4.6	)		(10.0	)
Other income (expense), net	−−			0.1				(0.1	)
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(466.7	)		(121.5	)		(345.2	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		38.5			(13.6	)		52.1
Net loss		(428.2	)		(135.1	)		(293.1	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.5	)		(0.4	)		(0.1	)
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.	$	(428.7	)	$	(135.5	)	$	(293.2	)

The following is a summary of changes affecting our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Net revenues decreased $91.9 million, or 6.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period of the prior year primarily from lower retail revenues from a decline in retail member volumes in our Membership Products business and lower revenue in our Insurance and Package Products business primarily from a higher cost of insurance and lower Package members partially offset by an increase in International net revenues primarily from higher retail membership revenue associated with increased members.

Segment EBITDA decreased $322.0 million as the impact of an impairment charge of $292.4 million recorded in 2014 related to the Membership business, the lower net revenues and higher general and administrative costs were partially offset by lower marketing and commissions and lower operating costs.

The following section provides an overview of our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013.

Net Revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2014 we reported net revenues of $1,242.8 million, a decrease of $91.9 million, or 6.9%, as compared to net revenues of $1,334.7 million in the comparable period of 2013. Net revenues of our Membership Products decreased $85.0 million primarily due to a decline in retail member volumes related to the continuing regulatory challenges facing our large financial institution partners with respect to new marketing campaign launches. Insurance and Package Products revenues decreased $34.5 million primarily due to a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience principally in the second and third quarters partially offset by lower claims in the fourth quarter. We continue to believe this is largely due to an acceleration of claims from future periods into this period in connection with the conversion to our new primary insurance carrier. Package revenue declined primarily due to the impact of lower average Package members. Global Loyalty Products net revenues increased $1.1 million as revenue from higher travel volume and the SkyMall Ventures acquisition in mid-September was partially offset by lower revenues due to the slower ramp-up of new client programs. International Products net revenues increased $26.2 million primarily from higher retail membership revenue in both our online and offline acquisition channels associated with increased members and the absence of a non-recurring, non-cash charge of $8.2 million recorded in 2013 in connection with the recognition of retail revenue on a basis consistent with the Membership business.

Marketing and Commissions Expense. Marketing and commissions expense decreased by $51.3 million, or 9.6%, to $481.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $533.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Marketing and commission expense decreased $43.2 million in Membership primarily due to lower commissions from lower retail member volumes, fewer marketing opportunities and a migration of certain partner compensation arrangements from traditional bounty to advance commissions whereby the partner has the potential for additional revenue sharing. Costs decreased in our Insurance and Package business by $16.2 million primarily due to higher marketing spend incurred in 2013 related to the conversion to our new primary insurance carrier along with lower commissions. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $7.6 million in our International business primarily from increased spending in our offline retail channel, higher commissions and an increase due to foreign exchange.

Operating Costs. Operating costs decreased by $27.5 million, or 6.3%, to $411.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $439.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Operating costs decreased $28.5 million in our Membership business primarily due to lower product and servicing costs associated with lower retail member volumes and lower product and servicing costs in our Insurance and Package business of $2.6 million primarily from lower Package members. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $4.9 million in our International business primarily due to higher product, servicing and employee related costs.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased by $14.8 million, or 9.4% to $171.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $156.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. General and administrative costs increased $20.9 million in our International business primarily due to recording additional legal reserves and fees of $22.4 million related to the FCA inquiry. Costs increased $8.1 million in our Membership business primarily due to an increase in legal reserves of $12.0 million related to the CFPB inquiry, partially offset by lower employee related costs. Corporate costs decreased $0.5 million primarily from a decrease of $4.3 million in professional fees associated with debt amendments partially offset by $3.4 million from the unfavorable impact of unrealized foreign exchange on intercompany borrowings recorded in 2014 as compared to 2013. Costs decreased in our Insurance and Package business by $13.8 million primarily due to the benefit of the absence in 2014 of a charge recorded in 2013 for $14.5 million related to a contract termination settlement with our former primary insurance carrier as part of our decision to transfer a significant portion of our AD&D business to a new carrier.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets. Our 2014 operating results include an impairment charge of $292.4 million based on a failure of the annual goodwill impairment test in our Membership Products business which utilized a combination of the income and market approaches and incorporated assumptions that we believe marketplace participants would utilize in determining the fair value of Membership Products. Our 2013 operating results include an impairment charge of $1.6 million related to Prospectiv’s remaining unamortized intangible assets of $1.3 million and the net book value of property and equipment of $0.3 million, primarily the result of lower projected future cash flows.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 to $109.7 million from $113.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily from recording lower amortization of $2.4 million on the intangible assets acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the Cendant Marketing Services Division as the majority of those intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis. This amortization expense is based upon an allocation of values to intangible assets and is being amortized over lives ranging from 3 years to 15 years. In addition, lower amortization expense was recorded in 2014 as compared to 2013 in the amount of $6.7 million related to intangible assets acquired in

various acquisitions, principally member relationships which are amortized on an accelerated basis. Depreciation expense increased $4.5 million primarily the result of recent capital expenditures related to various upgrades in international systems.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $17.2 million, or 8.3%, to $223.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $206.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to higher interest expense from higher interest rate debt as a result of the debt exchange completed in the fourth quarter of 2013, higher interest expense associated with higher Affinion revolving credit facility borrowings and higher interest rates and increased principal amount of term loan borrowings associated with the May 2014 amendment of the Affinion senior secured credit facility. These increases were partially offset by a favorable reserve adjustment recorded in the third quarter of 2014.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt in 2014 includes $14.6 million of unamortized deferred financing costs and debt discount associated with the May 2014 amendment to Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and the debt exchange completed in the second quarter of 2014.

Income Tax Benefit (Expense). The income tax provision decreased by $52.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to a decrease in the current state and foreign tax liabilities and the deferred federal and state tax liabilities primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge for the year ended December 31, 2014, partially offset by an increase in the foreign deferred tax liabilities for the same period.

The Company’s effective income tax rates for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were 8.3% and (11.2)%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is primarily a result of the increase in loss before income taxes from $121.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 to $466.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and a decrease in income tax expense from $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 to a benefit of $38.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The Company’s tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income it earns in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition to state and foreign income taxes and related foreign tax credits, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

	Year Ended December 31,
	Net Revenues									Segment EBITDA (1)
							Increase									Increase
	2014			2013			(Decrease)			2014			2013			(Decrease)
	(in millions)
Membership Products	$	446.9		$	531.9		$	(85.0	)	$	62.2		$	85.9		$	(23.7	)
Insurance and Package Products		264.0		298.5				(34.5	)		63.1			65.0			(1.9	)
Global Loyalty Products	170.9			169.8			1.1				68.1			67.0			1.1
International Products	362.9			336.7			26.2			2.6			9.8				(7.2	)
Eliminations		(1.9	)		(2.2	)		0.3			—			—			—
Total products		1,242.8			1,334.7			(91.9	)		196.0			227.7			(31.7	)
Corporate		—			—			—			(22.6	)		(23.1	)		0.5
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		—			—			—			(292.4	)		(1.6	)		(290.8	)
Total	$	1,242.8		$	1,334.7		$	(91.9	)		(119.0	)		203.0			(322.0	)
Depreciation and amortization											(109.7	)		(113.9	)		4.2
Income (loss) from operations										$	(228.7	)	$	89.1		$	(317.8	)

Membership Products. Membership Products net revenues decreased by $85.0 million, or 16.0%, to $446.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $531.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Net revenues decreased primarily due to a decline in retail member volumes related to the continuing regulatory challenges facing our large financial institution partners with respect to new marketing campaign launches.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $23.7 million, or 27.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. Segment EBITDA decreased as the impact of the lower net revenues of $85.0 million and higher general and administrative costs of $8.1 million was partially offset by lower marketing and commissions of $43.2 million and lower operating costs of $28.5 million. The lower marketing and commissions were primarily the result of reduced commissions principally from lower retail member volumes, fewer marketing opportunities and a migration of certain partner commission arrangements from traditional bounty to advance commissions whereby the partner has the potential for additional revenue sharing. Operating costs decreased primarily from lower product and servicing costs associated with the lower retail member volumes. General and administrative costs increased primarily due to an increase in legal reserves of $12.0 million related to the CFPB inquiry, partially offset by lower employee related costs.

Insurance and Package Products. Insurance and Package Products net revenues decreased by $34.5 million, or 11.6%, to $264.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $298.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Insurance revenue decreased approximately $25.2 million primarily due to a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience principally in the second and third quarters partially offset by lower claims in the fourth quarter. We continue to believe this is largely due to an acceleration of claims from future periods into this period in connection with the conversion to our new primary insurance carrier. Package revenue decreased approximately $9.3 million primarily due to the impact of lower average Package members.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $1.9 million, or 2.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 as the lower net revenue of $34.5 million was partially offset by lower marketing and commissions of $16.2 million, lower general and administrative costs of $13.8 million and lower operating costs of $2.6 million. The lower marketing and commissions was primarily due to higher marketing spend incurred in 2013 related to the conversion to our new primary insurance carrier. General and administrative costs decreased primarily from the absence in 2014 of costs associated with a contract termination settlement with our former primary insurance carrier recorded in 2013 totaling $14.5 million. Operating costs decreased from lower product and servicing costs related to lower Package members.

Global Loyalty Products. Revenues from Global Loyalty Products increased by $1.1 million, or 0.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2014 to $170.9 million as compared to $169.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as increased revenues from higher travel volume and the contributions from the acquisition of SkyMall Ventures on September 9, 2014 were partially offset by lower revenues due to the slower ramp-up of new client programs.

Segment EBITDA increased by $1.1 million, or 1.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily due to the increase in net revenues as total operating expenses were essentially flat in 2014 as compared to 2013.

International Products. International Products net revenues increased by $26.2 million, or 7.8%, to $362.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to $336.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Net revenues increased primarily from higher retail membership revenue in both our online and offline acquisition channels associated with increased members and the absence of a non-recurring, non-cash charge of $8.2 million recorded in 2013 in connection with the recognition of retail revenue on a basis consistent with the Membership business.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $7.2 million, or 73.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 as the positive impact of the higher revenue of $26.2 million was more than offset by higher marketing and commissions of $7.6 million, higher operating costs of $4.9 million and higher general and administrative expenses of $20.9 million. Marketing and commissions increased primarily from increased spending in our offline retail channel, higher commissions and the impact of foreign exchange. Operating costs increased primarily from higher product, servicing and employee related costs. General and administrative costs increased primarily due to recording additional legal reserves and fees of $22.4 million related to the FCA inquiry.

Corporate costs decreased by $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily from a decrease of $4.3 million in professional fees associated with debt amendments partially offset by $3.4 million from the unfavorable impact of unrealized foreign exchange on intercompany borrowings recorded in 2014 as compared to 2013.

Our 2014 operating results include an impairment charge of $292.4 million based on a failure of the annual goodwill impairment test in our Membership Products business which utilized a combination of the income and market approaches and incorporated assumptions that we believe marketplace participants would utilize in determining the fair value of Membership Products. Our 2013 operating results include an impairment charge of $1.6 million related to Prospectiv’s remaining unamortized intangible assets of $1.3 million and the net book value of property and equipment of $0.3 million, primarily the result of lower projected future cash flows.

The following table summarizes our historical consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

	Year Ended			Year Ended
	December 31,			December 31,			Increase
	2013			2012			(Decrease)
	(in millions)
Net revenues	$	1,334.7		$	1,494.6		$	(159.9	)
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions	533.2			600.1				(66.9	)
Operating costs	439.4			459.5				(20.1	)
General and administrative		157.0		150.7				6.3
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets	1.6			39.7				(38.1	)
Facility exit costs	0.5				(0.9	)		1.4
Depreciation and amortization	113.9			184.5				(70.6	)
Total expenses		1,245.6			1,433.6			(188.0	)
Income from operations		89.1			61.0			28.1
Interest income	0.4			0.9				(0.5	)
Interest expense		(206.5	)		(190.4	)		(16.1	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(4.6	)		—			(4.6	)
Other income (expense), net	0.1				(0.2	)		0.3
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(121.5	)		(128.7	)		7.2
Income tax expense		(13.6	)		(10.2	)		(3.4	)
Net loss		(135.1	)		(138.9	)		3.8
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.4	)		(0.7	)		0.3
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.	$	(135.5	)	$	(139.6	)	$	4.1

The following is a summary of changes affecting our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Net revenues decreased $159.9 million, or 10.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily from lower retail revenues from a decline in retail member volumes in our Membership Products business and lower revenue in our Insurance and Package Products business primarily from lower supplemental insureds, a higher cost of insurance, and lower package members which was partially offset by growth from existing clients in our Global Loyalty Products business. International Products net revenues increased primarily from higher retail membership revenue associated with increased members.

Segment EBITDA decreased $42.5 million, as the negative impact of the lower net revenues and higher general and administrative costs were partially offset by lower marketing and commissions, lower operating costs and decreased impairment charges of goodwill and certain other intangible assets related to the acquisition of Prospectiv.

The following section provides an overview of our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012.

Net Revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2013 we reported net revenues of $1,334.7 million, a decrease of $159.9 million, or 10.7%, as compared to net revenues of $1,494.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Net revenues of our Membership Products decreased $174.2 million primarily due to a decline in retail member volumes related to the regulatory challenges facing large financial institution marketing partners with respect to new marketing campaign launches and a change in deal structure terms with a large client from traditional retail to a fee-for-service arrangement. Revenue also declined from the continued, but anticipated, attrition of the domestic member base of Webloyalty. Insurance and Package Products revenues decreased $33.5 million primarily from the impact of lower average supplemental insureds along with a higher cost of insurance from higher claims experience. Package revenue decreased from the impact of lower average package members. Global Loyalty Products net revenues

increased $14.2 million which was primarily attributable to increased revenues from existing client programs. International Products net revenues increased $33.5 million primarily from higher retail membership revenue associated with increased members, revenue from our Turkish business acquired in the fourth quarter of 2012 and a favorable currency impact from the weaker U.S. dollar of $4.7 million partially offset by a non-recurring, non-cash adjustment in connection with the recognition of retail revenue on a basis consistent with that of the Membership business.

Marketing and Commissions Expense. Marketing and commissions expense decreased by $66.9 million, or 11.1%, to $533.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $600.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Marketing and commissions expense decreased $89.9 million in our Membership business primarily due to lower commissions from lower retail member volumes, a change in deal structure terms with a large client from traditional retail to a fee-for-service arrangement and fewer marketing opportunities with our large financial institution marketing partners. Marketing and commission cost increases of $32.4 million in our International business, primarily from increased spending in our offline retail channel along with higher commissions, were partially offset by cost decreases of $10.2 million in our Insurance and Package business primarily the result of lower commissions due to the reduction of the supplemental insured base.

Operating Costs. Operating costs decreased by $20.1 million, or 4.4%, to $439.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $459.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Operating costs decreased $39.6 million in our Membership business primarily due to lower product and servicing costs associated with lower retail member volumes and were partially offset by increased costs in our International business of $20.3 million primarily due to higher product and servicing costs in response to the higher member base.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased by $6.3 million, or 4.2%, to $157.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $150.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Insurance and Package costs increased $15.8 million primarily due to a contract termination related to our decision to transfer a significant portion of our AD&D business to a new carrier by 2014. The contract termination required payments totaling $14.5 million for a settlement with our primary insurance carrier which relieved us of our obligation to maintain certain business volume commitments with that carrier that will no longer be met as a result of the migration of the AD&D insureds to a replacement carrier, and payments for estimated premium refunds owed to certain insureds as specified in the terminated carrier agreement. In our Membership business, general and administrative costs decreased $6.7 million as the benefit realized from lower employee related costs and lower professional fees more than offset the negative impact from the absence in 2013 of a 2012 reversal of a liability of $14.6 million in connection with anticipated earn-out payments originally recorded for the Prospectiv acquisition in 2011. Expenses in our International business decreased by $9.4 million primarily from lower restructuring costs (primarily severance and professional fees) and lower costs associated with certain legal matters. Corporate costs increased $5.0 million as higher professional fees associated with corporate financing activities of $7.6 million were partially offset by lower stock compensation costs recorded in 2013 as compared to 2012 and a favorable impact in foreign exchange on intercompany borrowings totaling $2.3 million.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets. An impairment charge for goodwill and certain intangible assets in the amount of $39.7 million related to our 2011 Prospectiv acquisition was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily the result of lower projected future cash flows and other negative marketplace events in the daily deals business. The impairment charge included $31.5 million related to all of the goodwill for Prospectiv and $8.2 million related to certain intangible assets ascribed in the August 1, 2011 acquisition, primarily tradenames and technology. An additional charge of $1.6 million for Prospectiv’s remaining unamortized intangible assets of $1.3 million and the net book value of property and equipment of $0.3 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily the result of continued lower projected future cash flows.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $70.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 to $113.9 million from $184.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily from recording lower amortization of $45.0 million on the intangible assets acquired in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the Cendant Marketing Services Division as the majority of those intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis. This amortization expense is based upon an allocation of values to intangible assets and is being amortized over lives ranging from 3 years to 15 years. In addition, lower amortization expense was recorded in 2013 as compared to 2012 in the amount of $14.2 million related to intangible assets acquired in the Webloyalty acquisition, principally member relationships which were amortized on an accelerated basis. Depreciation expense decreased $9.8 million primarily due to higher depreciation expense recorded in 2012 in our International business principally the result of a reduction in the estimated useful lives of certain computer systems.

Interest Expense. Interest expense increased by $16.1 million, or 8.5%, to $206.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $190.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to higher interest accrued on the Affinion term loan as a result of the amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility in the fourth quarter of 2012 which increased the interest rates on LIBOR and base rate loans.

Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense increased by $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily due to an increase in the current state tax liabilities and the deferred state and foreign tax liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2013, partially offset by a decrease in the current foreign tax liabilities for the same period.

Our effective income tax rates for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were (11.2)% and (7.9)%, respectively. The difference in the effective tax rates for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is primarily a result of the decrease in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest from $128.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $121.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and an increase in income tax expense from $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 to $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Our tax rate is affected by recurring items, such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income we earn in those jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. In addition, the requirement to maintain valuation allowances had the most significant impact on the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%.

	Year Ended December 31,
	Net Revenues									Segment EBITDA (1)
							Increase									Increase
	2013			2012			(Decrease)			2013			2012			(Decrease)
	(in millions)
Membership Products	$	531.9		$	706.1		$	(174.2	)	$	85.9		$	125.2		$	(39.3	)
Insurance and Package Products	298.5				332.0			(33.5	)		65.0		103.9				(38.9	)
Global Loyalty Products	169.8			155.6				14.2			67.0		54.6				12.4
International Products	336.7			303.2				33.5		9.8			19.6				(9.8	)
Eliminations		(2.2	)		(2.3	)		0.1			—		—				-
Total products		1,334.7			1,494.6			(159.9	)		227.7			303.3			(75.6	)
Corporate	—			—			—				(23.1	)		(18.1	)		(5.0	)
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets	—			—			—				(1.6	)		(39.7	)		38.1
Total	$	1,334.7		$	1,494.6		$	(159.9	)	$	203.0		$	245.5			(42.5	)
Depreciation and amortization											(113.9	)		(184.5	)		70.6
Income from operations										$	89.1		$	61.0		$	28.1

Membership Products. Membership Products net revenues decreased by $174.2 million, or 24.7%, to $531.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to $706.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Net revenues decreased primarily due to a decline in retail member volumes related to the regulatory challenges facing large financial institution marketing partners with respect to new marketing campaign launches and a change in deal structure terms with a large client from traditional retail to a fee-for-service arrangement. Net revenues also declined from the continued, but anticipated, attrition of the domestic member base of Webloyalty.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $39.3 million, or 31.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. Segment EBITDA decreased as the impact of the lower net revenues of $174.2 million was partially offset by lower marketing and commissions of $89.9 million, lower operating costs of $39.6 million and lower general and administrative costs of $6.7 million. The lower marketing and commissions were primarily the result of reduced commissions principally from lower retail member volumes, a change in deal structure terms with a large client from retail to fee-for-service and fewer marketing opportunities with our large financial institution marketing partners. Operating costs decreased primarily from lower product and servicing costs associated with the lower retail member volumes. General and administrative costs decreased as the absence in 2013 of a reversal of a liability recorded in 2012 of $14.6 million in connection with potential earn-out payments related to the Prospectiv acquisition was more than offset by lower employee related costs and lower professional fees.

Insurance and Package Products. Insurance and Package Products net revenues decreased by $33.5 million, or 10.1%, to $298.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to $332.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Insurance revenue decreased approximately $19.7 million primarily due to the impact of lower average supplemental insureds and a higher cost

of insurance from higher claims experience. Package revenue decreased approximately $13.8 million primarily due to the impact of lower average Package members.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $38.9 million, or 37.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, as the lower net revenues of $33.5 million and higher general administrative costs of $15.8 million were partially offset by lower marketing and commissions expense of $10.2 million, primarily lower commissions expense due to the reduction of the supplemental insured base. The higher general and administrative costs were primarily attributable to payments required as part of a contract termination with our primary insurance carrier. The contract termination required payments totaling $14.5 million which included a termination settlement which relieved us of business volume commitments with that carrier that will no longer be met as a result of the migration of the AD&D insureds to a replacement carrier, and an additional payment for estimated premium refunds owed to certain insureds as specified in the terminated carrier agreement.

Global Loyalty Products. Revenues from Global Loyalty Products increased by $14.2 million, or 9.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 to $169.8 million as compared to $155.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to growth from existing clients.

Segment EBITDA increased by $12.4 million, or 22.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily due to the increase in net revenue.

International Products. International Products net revenues increased by $33.5 million, or 11.0%, to $336.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to $303.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Net revenues increased primarily from $30.4 million of higher retail membership revenue in both our online and offline acquisition channels associated with increased members along with $9.2 million of revenues from our business in Turkey which was acquired in the fourth quarter of 2012. Net revenues were also positively impacted by $4.7 million from the weakness in the U.S. dollar. Net revenue declined $8.2 million primarily from a non-recurring, non-cash adjustment in connection with the recognition of retail revenue on a basis consistent with that of the North American business.

Segment EBITDA decreased by $9.8 million, or 50.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 as the positive impact of the higher revenue and lower general administrative costs was more than offset by higher marketing and commissions and higher operating costs. Marketing and commissions expense increased $32.4 million primarily from higher spending in our offline retail channel and higher commissions expense. Operating costs increased $20.3 million primarily from higher product and servicing costs associated with the higher membership base. General and administrative expenses decreased $9.4 million primarily due to lower restructuring costs (primarily severance and professional fees) and lower costs associated with certain legal matters.

Corporate costs increased by $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, as higher professional fees associated with corporate financing activities of $7.6 million were partially offset by lower stock compensation costs recorded in 2013 as compared to 2012 and a favorable impact in foreign exchange on intercompany borrowings totaling $2.3 million.

An impairment charge for goodwill and certain intangible assets in the amount of $39.7 million related to our 2011 Prospectiv acquisition was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily the result of lower projected future cash flows and other negative marketplace events in the daily deals business. The impairment charge included $31.5 million related to all of the goodwill for Prospectiv and $8.2 million related to certain intangible assets ascribed in the August 1, 2011 acquisition, primarily tradenames and technology. An additional charge of $1.6 million for Prospectiv’s remaining unamortized intangible assets of $1.3 million and the net book value of property and equipment of $0.3 million was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily the result of continued lower projected future cash flows.

Total assets decreased by $348.6 million principally due to (i) a decrease in goodwill of $284.1 million, principally due to the write-off of $292.4 million of goodwill attributed to Membership Products, partially offset by acquired goodwill of $15.8 million, (ii) a decrease in other intangibles, net of $50.5 million, principally due to amortization expense of $62.7 million, partially offset by acquired intangibles of $15.0 million, and (iii) a decrease in profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers of $36.0 million as the Company substantially completed its transition from its former primary insurance carrier to other insurance carriers and a significant portion of the business is no longer subject to profit-sharing arrangements.

Total liabilities decreased by $21.9 million, primarily due to (i) a decrease in deferred income taxes of $41.5 million due to the tax impact of the $292.4 million goodwill impairment charge and (ii) a decrease in deferred revenue of $15.9 million due to the continuing shift of the membership base to monthly memberships. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in long-term debt of $14.5 million principally due to the increase in the PIK Toggle senior notes as a result of the Company’s election to pay interest by increasing the face amount of the debt, partially offset by net repayments of Affinion’s revolving credit facility (see “– Credit Facilities and Long-term Debt”).

Total deficit increased by $326.7 million, principally due to a net loss attributable to the Company of $428.7 million, partially offset by the issuance of $99.0 million of warrants in connection with the Company’s debt exchange and a pre-emptive rights offering, and stock-based compensation of $7.5 million.

Our primary sources of liquidity on both a short-term and long-term basis are cash on hand and cash generated through operating and financing activities. Our primary cash needs are to service our indebtedness and for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes. Many of the Company’s significant costs are variable in nature, including marketing and commissions. The Company has a great degree of flexibility in the amount and timing of marketing expenditures and focuses its marketing expenditures on its most profitable marketing opportunities. Commissions correspond directly with revenue generated and have been decreasing as a percentage of revenue over the last several years. We believe that, based on our current operations and anticipated growth, our cash on hand, cash flows from operating activities and borrowing availability under Affinion’s revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the next twelve months and in the foreseeable future including quarterly amortization payments on Affinion’s first lien term loan facility under Affinion’s $1.3 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility. The first lien term loan facility also requires mandatory prepayments based on excess cash flows as defined in Affinion’s amended and restated senior secured credit facility.

Affinion Holdings is a holding company, with no direct operations and no significant assets other than the ownership of 100% of the stock of Affinion. Because we conduct our operations through our subsidiaries, our cash flows and our ability to service our indebtedness is dependent upon cash dividends and distributions or other transfers from our subsidiaries. The terms of Affinion’s amended and restated senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing Affinion’s 2010 senior notes and Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes significantly restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends and otherwise transferring assets to us. The terms of each of these debt instruments provide Affinion with “baskets” that can be used to make certain types of “restricted payments,” including dividends or other distributions to us. If Affinion does not have sufficient payment capacity in the baskets with respect to its existing debt agreements in order to make payments to us, we may be unable to service any cash payments on Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes or 2013 senior notes. During the year ended December 31, 2012, Affinion paid cash dividends to us of $37.0 million. Affinion did not pay any cash dividends to us during the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013. On November 13, 2013, Affinion loaned $18.9 million to Affinion Holdings to be utilized by Affinion Holdings to make the November 2013 interest payments on its 2010 senior notes. On December 11, 2013, the Company loaned $2.6 million to Affinion Holdings to be utilized by Affinion Holdings to make interest payments on its 2010 senior notes to tendering debt holders participating in Affinion Holdings’ debt exchange. On May 13, 2014 and November 14, 2014, the Company loaned $1.9 million to Affinion Holdings to be utilized by Affinion Holdings to make interest payments on its 2010 senior notes.

Although we historically have a working capital deficit, a major factor included in this deficit is deferred revenue resulting from the cash collected from annual memberships that is deferred until the appropriate refund period has concluded. In spite of our historical working capital deficit, we have been able to operate effectively primarily due to our cash flows from operations and our available revolving credit facility. However, as the membership base continues to shift away from memberships billed annually to memberships billed monthly, it will have a negative effect on our operating cash flow. We anticipate that our working capital deficit will continue for the foreseeable future.

At December 31, 2014, we had $32.3 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand, an increase of $12.2 million from $20.1 million at December 31, 2013. The following table summarizes our cash flows and compares changes in our cash and cash equivalents on hand to the same period in the prior year.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we generated $35.8 million more cash from operating activities than during the year ended December 31, 2013. Segment EBITDA decreased by $322.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, which includes the impact in 2014 of the $292.4 million charge for the impairment of goodwill attributed to Membership Products (see “—Results of Operations”). In addition, Segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2013 was adversely impacted by $11.7 million of general and administrative expenses related to the refinancing of the 2006 senior subordinated notes. Accounts payables and accrued expenses generated cash flows in 2014 that were $45.5 million more favorable than in 2013, principally due to accruals and payments related to litigation matters and lower interest payments. In addition, profit sharing receivables from insurance carriers generated cash flows in 2014 that were $26.0 million more favorable than in 2013, primarily due to the transition of a portion of the insurance business to carriers with whom the Company does not have profit sharing arrangements.

We used $19.8 million more cash in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we used $51.0 million for capital expenditures and $22.0 million for acquisition-related payments. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we used $46.3 million for capital expenditures and $3.6 million for acquisition-related payments.

We generated $30.0 million more cash from financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we had net repayments under Affinion’s revolving credit facility of $41.0 million, refinanced a portion of Affinion’s debt resulting in new Affinion second-lien term loan borrowings of $425.0 million and repayments of Affinion’s term loan debt of $311.6 million, paid financing costs of $23.0 million and made other principal payments on our debt of $4.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we had net borrowings under Affinion’s revolving credit facility of $46.0 million, made principal payments on borrowings of $11.8 million and paid financing costs of $15.5 million in connection with the exchanges for our 11.625% senior notes and Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes.

At December 31, 2013, we had $20.1 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand, a decrease of $31.8 million from $51.9 million at December 31, 2012. The following table summarizes our cash flows and compares changes in our cash and cash equivalents on hand to the same period in the prior year.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we generated $29.9 million less cash from operating activities than during the year ended December 31, 2012. Segment EBITDA decreased by $42.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, which includes the favorable impact of the absence in 2013 of the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets of Prospectiv of $39.7 million recorded in 2012 and the unfavorable impact of the absence in 2013 of the reversal of the liability for additional consideration for the Prospectiv acquisition based on the earn-out of $14.6 million recorded in 2012 (see “—Results of Operations”). In addition, Segment EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2013 was adversely impacted by $11.7 million of general and administrative expenses related to the refinancing of the Affinion 2006 senior subordinated notes. During the year ended December 31, 2013, deferred revenue generated cash flows that were $28.1 million more favorable due to the lessening impact of the continued shift from annual memberships to monthly memberships and lower membership levels, and receivables generated cash flows that were $18.5 million more favorable, due to a decline in the December 31, 2013 receivable balance resulting from a reduction in the global retail membership base.

We used $17.2 million less cash in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we used $46.3 million for capital expenditures and $3.6 million for acquisition-related payments. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we used $51.7 million for capital expenditures and $13.5 million for acquisition-related payments.

We provided $18.1 million of cash from financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to using $18.0 million of cash for financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we had net borrowings under Affinion’s revolving credit facility of $46.0 million, made principal payments on borrowings of $11.8 million and paid financing costs in connection with the exchanges for our 11.625% senior notes and the Affinion 2006 senior subordinated notes of $15.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we made principal payments on our debt of $11.8 million and paid financing costs of $6.3 million in connection with an amendment to Affinion’s senior secured credit facility.

As a result of the Apollo Transactions, we became a highly leveraged company, and we have incurred additional indebtedness and refinancing indebtedness since the Apollo Transactions. In April 2010, Affinion, our wholly owned subsidiary, entered into an

amended and restated senior secured credit facility comprised of an $875.0 million term loan and a $125.0 million revolving credit facility. In December 2010, Affinion entered into an agreement with two of its lenders resulting in an increase in the revolving credit facility to $165.0 million. In February 2011, Affinion incurred incremental borrowings of $250.0 million under its term loan facility. In May 2014, Affinion entered into an amendment to its senior secured credit facility that resulted in decreasing the revolving credit facility to $80.0 million and increasing the term loan borrowings to approximately $1.2 billion.

In December 2013, we and Affinion completed exchange offers and consent solicitations pursuant to which, among other things, (i) $292.8 million principal amount of our 2010 senior notes were exchanged by the holders thereof for $292.8 million principal amount of our 2013 senior notes, 13.5 million Series A warrants and 70.2 million Series B warrants, (ii) $352.9 million principal amount of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes were exchanged by the holders thereof for $360.0 million principal amount of the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes issued by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Affinion Investments, LLC (“Affinion Investments”), (iii) Affinion issued $360.0 million principal amount of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes to Affinion Investments in exchange for all of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer, (iv) we entered into a supplemental indenture pursuant to which substantially all of the restrictive covenants were eliminated in the indenture governing our 2010 senior notes, and (v) Affinion entered into a supplemental indenture pursuant to which substantially all of the restrictive covenants were eliminated in the indenture governing Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes.

As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately $2.3 billion in indebtedness. Payments required to service this indebtedness have substantially increased our liquidity requirements as compared to prior years due to higher principal amounts and higher interest rates associated with the new indebtedness incurred in December 2013 and the related amendment to Affinion’s senior secured credit facility that increased the applicable margins and the May 2014 amendment to Affinion’s senior secured credit facility that included the issuance of second lien term debt as well as first lien term debt.

As part of the Apollo Transactions, Affinion, our wholly owned subsidiary, (a) issued $270.0 million principal amount of 10 1/8% senior notes due October 15, 2013 ($266.4 million net of discount) on October 17, 2005 and an additional $34.0 million aggregate principal amount of follow on senior notes on May 3, 2006 (collectively, the “Affinion 2005 senior notes”), (b) entered into a senior secured credit facility, consisting of a term loan facility in the principal amount of $860.0 million (which amount does not reflect the $231.0 million in principal prepayments that Affinion made prior to amendment and restatement of the senior secured credit facility in April 2010) and a revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $100.0 million and (c) entered into a senior subordinated bridge loan facility in the principal amount of $383.6 million.

Affinion’s senior subordinated bridge loan facility was refinanced in part with the proceeds from the offering of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes. On April 26, 2006, Affinion issued $355.5 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and applied the gross proceeds of $350.5 million to repay $349.5 million of outstanding borrowings under Affinion’s senior subordinated loan facility, plus accrued interest, and used cash on hand to pay fees and expenses associated with such issuance. The interest on Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes is payable semi-annually. Affinion may redeem some or all of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes at the redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the agreement governing Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes. Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes are unsecured obligations. At December 31, 2014, Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes were guaranteed by the same subsidiaries that guarantee the Affinion senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments, Affinion Investments II, Propp Corp. and SkyMall). In December 2013, Affinion Investments exchanged $352.9 million face amount of Affinion’s outstanding 2006 senior subordinated notes for $360.0 million face amount Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. Affinion Investments then exchanged with Affinion all of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer for Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes.

On January 31, 2007, we entered into a five-year $350.0 million senior unsecured term loan with certain banks at an initial interest rate of LIBOR, as defined, plus 6.25% (the “Senior Unsecured Term Loan”). In October 2010, the senior unsecured term loan was repaid utilizing the proceeds from our 2010 senior notes (see below).

On April 9, 2010, Affinion, as borrower, and Affinion Holdings, as a guarantor, entered into a $1.0 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility with its lenders, amending its senior secured credit facility. We refer to Affinion’s amended and restated senior secured credit facility, as amended from time to time, including by the Incremental Assumption Agreements (as defined below) and the May 2014 amendment as “Affinion’s senior secured credit facility.” Affinion’s senior secured credit facility initially consisted of a five-year $125.0 million revolving credit facility and an $875.0 million term loan facility.

On October 5, 2010, the Company issued $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 2010 senior notes. The interest on its 2010 senior notes is payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15 of each year. At any time prior to November 15, 2012, the Company may redeem its 2010 senior notes, at its option, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount plus an applicable premium. On or after November 15, 2012, the Company may redeem some or all of its 2010 senior notes at any time at the redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the Notes. The Company’s 2010 senior notes contain restrictive covenants related primarily to the Company’s ability to pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds of $320.3 million, along with proceeds from a cash dividend from Affinion in the amount of $115.3 million, to repay the Senior Unsecured Term Loan. A portion of the remaining proceeds from the offering of the Company’s 2010 senior notes were utilized to pay related fees and expenses, with the balance retained for general corporate purposes. The fees and expenses were capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the Company’s 2010 senior notes. In October, 2010, the Company recognized a loss of $2.8 million, representing the write-off of unamortized balances of the debt discount and deferred financing costs associated with the Senior Unsecured Term Loan, in connection with the repayment of the Senior Unsecured Term Loan. On August 24, 2011, pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the Company’s 2010 senior notes, the Company completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the Company’s then-outstanding 2010 senior notes for a like principal amount of its 2010 senior notes that have been registered under the Securities Act. In December 2013, the Company exchanged $292.8 million face amount of its 2010 senior notes for $292.8 million face amount of its 2013 senior notes and Series A warrants and Series B warrants to purchase up to approximately 13.5 million shares and approximately 70.2 million shares, respectively, of Affinion Holdings Class B common stock.

On December 13, 2010, Affinion, as borrower, Affinion Holdings and certain of Affinion’s subsidiaries entered into an Incremental Assumption Agreement with two of Affinion’s lenders (the “Revolver Incremental Assumption Agreement,” and together with the Term Loan Incremental Assumption Agreement, the “Incremental Assumption Agreements”) which resulted in an increase in the revolving credit facility from $125.0 million to $160.0 million, with a further increase to $165.0 million in January 2011. On February 11, 2011, Affinion, as borrower, and Affinion Holdings, and certain of Affinion’s subsidiaries entered into, and simultaneously closed under, the Term Loan Incremental Assumption Agreement, which resulted in an increase in the term loan facility from $875.0 million to $1.125 billion. On November 20, 2012, Affinion, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, which (i) increased the margins on LIBOR loans from 3.50% to 5.00% and on base rate loans from 2.50% to 4.00%, (ii) replaced the financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio with a financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, and (iii) adjusted the ratios under the financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio. On December 12, 2013, in connection with the refinancing of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and our 2010 senior notes, Affinion, as Borrower, and the Company, entered into an amendment to Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, which (i) provided permission for the consummation of the exchange offers for Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and our 2010 senior notes, (ii) removed the springing maturity provisions applicable to the term loan facility, (iii) modified the senior secured leverage ratio financial covenant in Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, (iv) provided additional flexibility for Affinion to make dividends to the Company to be used to make certain payments with respect to the Company’s indebtedness and to repay, repurchase or redeem subordinated indebtedness of Affinion, and (v) increased the interest margins by 0.25% to 5.25% on LIBOR loans and 4.25% on base rate loans. The amendment became effective upon the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth therein, including the payment by Affinion of the consent fee equal to 0.25% of the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of all term loans and (ii) the revolving loan commitments in effect, in each case, held by each lender that entered into the amendment on the date of effectiveness of the amendment.

On May 20, 2014, Affinion, as borrower, and the Company entered into an amendment to Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, which (i) extended the maturity to April 30, 2018 of $775.0 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loan and existing senior secured revolving loans, which loans were designated as first lien term loans (the “First Lien Term Loans”), (ii) extended the maturity to October 31, 2018 of $377.9 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loans on a second lien senior secured basis, which, together with additional borrowings obtained on the same terms, total $425.0 million (the “Second Lien Term Loans”) , (iii) extended the maturity to January 29, 2018 of $80.0 million of the commitments (and related obligations) under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility on a first lien senior secured basis, (iv) reduced the commitments under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility by $85.0 million and (v) removed the existing financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio.

Affinion’s revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility and a swingline loan subfacility. Affinion’s First Lien Term Loan facility matures in April 2018 and Affinion’s Second Lien Term Loan facility matures in October 2018. Affinion’s First Lien Term Loan facility provides for quarterly amortization payments totaling 1% per annum, with the balance payable upon the final maturity date. Affinion’s Second Lien Term Loan facility does not provide for quarterly amortization payments. Affinion’s senior secured credit facility also requires mandatory prepayments of the outstanding term loans based on excess cash flow (as defined), if any, and the proceeds from certain specified transactions. The interest rates with respect to Affinion’s First Lien Term Loans and revolving loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at Affinion’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 5.25%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal

Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 4.25%. The interest rates with respect to Affinion’s Second Lien Term Loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at Affinion’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 7.00%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50%, in each case plus 6.00%. The weighted average interest rate on the term loan for the period from January 1, 2014 through May 20, 2014 and years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 6.8%, 6.6% and 5.2% per annum, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on the First Lien Term Loan and Second Lien Term Loan for the period from May 20, 2014 through December 31, 2014 was 6.8% and 8.5%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on revolving credit facility borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was 7.2%, 7.1% and 5.7%, respectively. Affinion’s obligations under its senior secured credit facility are, and Affinion’s obligations under any interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements entered into with a lender or any of its affiliates will be, guaranteed by Affinion Holdings and by each of Affinion’s existing and subsequently acquired or organized domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. Affinion’s senior secured credit facility is secured to the extent legally permissible by substantially all the assets of (i) Affinion Holdings, which consists of a pledge of all Affinion’s capital stock and (ii) Affinion and the subsidiary guarantors, including but not limited to: (a) a pledge of substantially all capital stock held by Affinion or any subsidiary guarantor and (b) security interests in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of Affinion and each subsidiary guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. Affinion’s senior secured credit facility also contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants in Affinion’s senior secured credit facility include, among other things, limitations (all of which are subject to certain exceptions) on Affinion’s (and in certain cases, Affinion Holdings’) ability to declare dividends and make other distributions, redeem or repurchase its capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain of Affinion’s subordinated indebtedness; make loans or investments (including acquisitions); incur additional indebtedness (subject to certain exceptions); enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of Affinion’s subsidiaries to pay dividends; merge or enter into acquisitions; sell Affinion’s assets; and enter into transactions with its affiliates. Affinion’s senior secured credit facility also requires Affinion to comply with a financial maintenance covenant with a maximum ratio of senior secured debt (as defined in Affinion’s senior secured credit facility) to EBITDA (as defined in Affinion’s senior secured credit facility) of 4.25:1.00. A portion of the April 2010 proceeds of the term loan under Affinion’s senior secured credit facility were utilized to repay the outstanding balance of its then existing senior secured term loan, including accrued interest, of $629.7 million and pay fees and expenses of approximately $27.0 million. Any borrowings under the revolving credit facility are available to fund Affinion’s working capital requirements, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes.

On November 19, 2010, Affinion completed a private offering of $475.0 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion’s 2010 senior notes providing net proceeds of $471.5 million. Affinion’s 2010 senior notes bear interest at 7.875% per annum payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. Affinion’s 2010 senior notes will mature on December 15, 2018. Affinion’s 2010 senior notes are redeemable at Affinion’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing Affinion’s 2010 senior notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion’s obligations under Affinion’s 2010 senior notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under Affinion’s senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II). Affinion’s 2010 senior notes and guarantees thereof are senior unsecured obligations of Affinion and rank equally with all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future subordinated indebtedness. Affinion’s 2010 senior notes are therefore effectively subordinated to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured indebtedness, including Affinion’s obligations under Affinion’s senior secured credit facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. Affinion’s 2010 senior notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of each of Affinion’s existing and future subsidiaries that are not guarantors, including the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. On August 24, 2011, pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of Affinion’s 2010 senior notes, Affinion completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of Affinion’s then-outstanding 2010 senior notes for a like principal amount of Affinion’s 2010 senior notes that have been registered under the Securities Act. Affinion used substantially all of the net proceeds of the offering of Affinion’s 2010 senior notes to finance the purchase of the 2005 senior notes and the 2009 senior notes. On December 12, 2013, the Company completed a private offer to exchange its 2010 senior notes for its 2013 senior notes, pursuant to which $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of its 2013 senior notes were issued in exchange for $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of its 2010 senior notes. Under the terms of the exchange offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of its 2010 senior notes tendered at or prior to the consent time, holders received (i) $1,000 principal amount of its 2013 senior notes, (ii) Series A warrants to purchase 46.1069 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock, and (iii) Series B warrants to purchase 239.8612 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock. For each $1,000 principal amount of its 2010 senior notes tendered during the offer period but after the consent period, holders received (i) $950 principal amount of its 2013 senior notes, (ii) Series A warrants to purchase 46.1069 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock, and (iii) Series B warrants to purchase 239.8612 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock. The Company’s 2013 senior notes bear interest at 13.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2014. At the Company’s option (subject to certain exceptions), it may elect to pay interest (i) entirely in cash (“Cash Interest”), (ii) entirely by increasing the outstanding principal amount of its 2013 senior notes or by issuing PIK notes (“PIK Interest”), or (iii) 50% as Cash Interest and 50% as PIK Interest; provided that if (i) no Default or Event of Default (each as defined in the Affinion Credit Facility) shall have occurred and be continuing or would result from such interest payment, (ii)

immediately after giving effect to such interest payment, on a pro forma basis, the Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Affinion Credit Facility) of Affinion is less than or equal to 5.0:1.0 as of the last day of the most recently completed fiscal quarter preceding the interest payment date for which financial statements have been delivered to the agent under the Affinion Credit Facility and (iii) immediately after giving effect to such interest payment, on a pro forma basis, the Adjusted Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the note agreement governing the Investments senior subordinated notes) of Affinion is less than or equal to 5.0:1.0, then Affinion Holdings shall be required to pay interest on its 2013 senior notes for such interest period in cash. PIK Interest accrues at 13.75% per annum plus 0.75%. For the first interest period ending September 15, 2014, Affinion Holdings will pay interest by increasing the principal amount of its 2013 senior notes. The Company’s 2013 senior notes will mature on September 15, 2018. The Company may redeem some or all of its 2013 senior notes at any time on or after December 12, 2016 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing its 2013 senior notes. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, up to 100% of the Company’s outstanding 2013 senior notes are redeemable at the option of the Company, with the net proceeds raised by the Company in one or more equity offerings, at 113.75% of their principal amount. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, the Company’s 2013 senior notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of its 2013 senior notes redeemed plus a “make-whole” premium. The indenture governing the Company’s 2013 senior notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of the Company and any restricted subsidiaries of the Company to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. The Company’s 2013 senior notes are senior secured obligations of the Company and rank pari passu in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company, junior in right of payment to all secured indebtedness of the Company secured by liens having priority to the liens securing its 2013 senior notes up to the value of the assets subject to such liens, and senior in right of payment to unsecured indebtedness of the Company to the extent of the security of the collateral securing its 2013 senior notes and all future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The Company’s 2013 senior notes are secured by (i) second-priority security interests in 100% of the capital stock of Affinion, which security interests are junior to the first priority security interests granted to the lenders under Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and (ii) first-priority security interests in all other assets of Affinion Holdings, including 100% of the capital stock of Affinion Net Patents, Inc. The Series A warrants are exercisable at any time at the option of the holders at an exercise price of $0.01 per share of Class B common stock and will expire on the tenth anniversary of their issuance date. The Series B warrants will be not become exercisable until and unless on the fourth anniversary of the exchange closing date, 5% or more in aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes are then outstanding and unpaid, whereupon, if it should ever occur, the Series B warrants will become exercisable until the tenth anniversary of the exchange closing date at an exercise price of $0.01 per share of Class B common stock.

In connection with the exchange, the Company recognized a loss of $4.6 million, representing the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts of $2.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively. In connection with the exchange offer and consent solicitation relating to the Company’s 2010 senior notes and the issuance of the Company’s 2013 senior notes, the Company incurred financing costs of $4.7 million, which are included in other non-current assets on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized over the term of the Company’s 2013 senior notes.

On June 9, 2014, Affinion Holdings completed an offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes for Affinion Holdings’ Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock. In connection with the exchange offer, approximately $88.7 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes were exchanged for Series A warrants to purchase up to approximately 30.3 million shares of Affinion Holdings Class B common stock. In addition, on June 9, 2014, in connection with a pre-emptive rights offer, Affinion Holdings issued Series A warrants to purchase up to approximately 1.2 million shares of Affinion Holdings Class B common stock in exchange for cash proceeds of approximately $3.8 million.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion completed a private offer to exchange Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes for Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes, pursuant to which $360.0 million aggregate principal amount of Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes were issued in exchange for $352.9 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes. Under the terms of the exchange offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes tendered at or prior to the consent time, holders received $1,020 principal amount of Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. For each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes tendered during the offer period but after the consent period, holders received $1,000 principal amount of Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. The Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum, payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. The Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. Affinion Investments may redeem some or all of the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes at any time on or after December 12, 2016 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, up to 35% of the outstanding Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable at the option of Affinion Investments, with the net proceeds raised by Affinion or the Company in one or more equity offerings, at 113.50% of their principal amount. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes redeemed plus a “make-whole” premium. The indenture governing the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion Investments, any future restricted subsidiaries of Affinion Investments and one of Affinion’s other wholly-owned subsidiaries that guarantees the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes to engage in certain transactions and

also contains customary events of default. Affinion Investments’ obligations under the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by Affinion Investments II. Each of Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II is an unrestricted subsidiary of Affinion and guarantees Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility but does not guarantee Affinion’s other indebtedness. The Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes and guarantee thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion Investments, as issuer, and Affinion Investments II, as guarantor, and rank junior in right of payment to their respective guarantees of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Investments exchanged with Affinion all of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer for Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes. Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable at Affinion’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion’s obligations under Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II). Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes and guarantees thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion’s and rank junior to all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness, pari passu with Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated indebtedness. Although Affinion Investments is the only holder of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, the trustee for the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes, and holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes will have the right as third party beneficiaries to enforce the remedies available to Affinion Investments against Affinion, and Affinion Investments will not be able to amend the covenants in the note agreement governing the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes in favor of Affinion unless it has received consent from the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes.

In connection with the exchange offer and consent solicitation relating to Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and the issuance of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, Affinion incurred financing costs of $5.9 million, which are included in other non-current assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and are being amortized over the term of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes.

At December 31, 2014, on a consolidated basis, the Company had $769.2 million of Affinion’s First Lien Term Loans outstanding, $425.0 million of Affinion’s Second Lien Term Loans outstanding, $5.0 million outstanding under Affinion’s revolving credit facility, $226.4 million ($211.3 million, net of discount) outstanding under the Company’s 2013 senior notes, $32.2 million outstanding under the Company’s 2010 senior notes, $475.0 million ($473.3 million net of discount) outstanding under Affinion’s 2010 senior notes, $2.6 million outstanding under Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and $360.0 million ($353.3 million net of discount) outstanding under Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes. At December 31, 2014, Affinion had $61.7 million available for borrowings under its revolving credit facility after giving effect to the issuance of $13.3 million of letters of credit.

Affinion’s senior secured credit facility and the indentures governing Affinion’s 2010 senior notes, the Investments 2013 senior subordinated notes, and Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes contain various restrictive covenants that apply to Affinion Holdings. As of December 31, 2014, Affinion was in compliance with the restrictive covenants under Affinion’s debt agreements.

The indenture governing our 2013 senior notes, among other things: (a) limits our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, incur liens, pay dividends or make certain other restricted payments and enter into certain transactions with affiliates; (b) limits our ability to enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make certain payments to us; and (c) places restrictions on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to merge or consolidate with any other person or sell, assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets. However, all of these covenants are subject to significant exceptions. As of December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its debt agreements and expects to be in compliance over the next twelve months.

We have the ability to incur additional debt, subject to limitations imposed by the indenture governing our 2013 senior notes. Under the indenture governing our 2013 senior notes, in addition to specified permitted indebtedness, we will be able to incur additional indebtedness on an unconsolidated basis as long as on a pro forma basis our fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated fixed charges, as computed under such indenture) is at least 2.0 to 1.0.

Adjusted EBITDA consists of income from operations before depreciation and amortization further adjusted to exclude non-cash and unusual items and other adjustments permitted in our debt agreements to test the permissibility of certain types of transactions, including debt incurrence. We believe that the inclusion of Adjusted EBITDA is appropriate as a liquidity measure. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measurement of liquidity or financial performance under U.S. GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP, as an indicator of cash flows, as a measure of liquidity, as an alternative to operating or net income determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP or as an indicator of operating performance.

Set forth below is a reconciliation of our consolidated net cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 to Adjusted EBITDA.

Set forth below is a reconciliation of our consolidated net loss for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 to Adjusted EBITDA as required by our indenture governing the Company’s 2013 senior notes.

The following table summarizes our aggregate contractual obligations at December 31, 2014, and the estimated timing and effect that such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods. We expect to fund the contractual obligations and commitments with operating cash flow generated in the normal course of business and availability under our revolving credit facility.

	2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		2020 and thereafter		Total
	(in millions)
First-lien term loan due 2018	$	7.7	$	7.8	$	7.8	$	745.9	$	—	$	—	$	769.2
Second-lien term loan due 2018		—		—		—		425.0		—		—		425.0
Revolving credit facility (1)		—		—		—		5.0		—		—		5.0
7.875% senior notes due 2018 (2)		—		—		—		475.0		—		—		475.0
11.625% senior notes, due 2015 (2)		32.2		—		—		—		—		—		32.2
13.75%/14.50% PIK Toggle senior notes, due 2018 (2)		—		—		—		226.4		—		—		226.4
11¹/2% senior subordinated notes due 2015 (2)		2.6		—		—		—		—		—		2.6
13.50% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (2)		—		—		—		360.0		—		—		360.0
Interest payments (3)		178.5		174.5		174.0		283.2		—		—		810.2
Other purchase commitments (4)		10.6		9.5		2.6		2.6		—		—		25.3
Operating lease commitments		20.8		17.7		15.9		14.4		12.0		37.8		118.6
Capital lease obligations		0.5		0.3		—		—		—		—		0.8
Consulting agreements (5)		2.6		2.6		2.6		—		—		—		7.8
Employment agreements (6)		3.5		0.1		—		—		—		—		3.6
Total firm commitments and outstanding debt	$	259.0	$	212.5	$	202.9	$	2,537.5	$	12.0	$	37.8	$	3,261.7

The above table does not give effect to contingent obligations, such as litigation claims, standard guarantees and indemnities, deferred purchase price related to acquisitions, surety bonds and letters of credit, due to the fact that at this time we cannot determine either the amount or timing of payments related to these contingent obligations. See Note 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein for a discussion of these contingent obligations. The above table also does not include obligations in connection with our liabilities for uncertain tax positions as we have significant federal and state net operating loss carryforwards that we believe will be available to offset any liabilities for uncertain tax positions incurred. In addition, we refer you to our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

We or our affiliates have, in the past, and may, from time to time in the future, purchase any of our or Affinion’s indebtedness. Any such future purchases may be made through open market or privately negotiated transactions with third parties or pursuant to one or more tender or exchange offers or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices as we or any such affiliates may determine.

We do not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have not been disclosed in “—Contractual Obligations and Commitments.”

In presenting our audited consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported therein. We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies related to revenue recognition, accounting for marketing costs, stock-based compensation, valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, valuation of interest rate swaps and valuation of tax assets and liabilities could potentially affect our reported results and as such, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. Several of the estimates and assumptions we are required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain, as they pertain to future events. However, certain events outside our control cannot be predicted and, as such, they cannot be contemplated in evaluating such estimates and assumptions. We believe that the estimates and assumptions used when preparing our audited consolidated financial statements were the most appropriate at the time. Significant estimates include accounting for profit sharing receivables from insurance carriers, accruals and income tax valuation allowances, litigation accruals, the estimated fair value of stock based compensation, estimated fair values of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and estimated fair values of financial instruments. For a summary of all of our significant accounting policies see Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements.

On October 17, 2005, Cendant completed the sale of the Predecessor to Affinion, an affiliate of Apollo. The sale was accounted for in accordance with the purchase method of accounting, which requires judgment regarding the allocation of the purchase price based on the fair values of the assets acquired (including intangible assets) and the liabilities assumed. The purchase accounting adjustments reflected in the Company’s records primarily consist of: (1) revaluation of certain property and equipment, including internally developed software; (2) valuing intangible assets consisting of affinity and member relationships, patents, trademarks and tradenames and proprietary databases and systems; (3) recognizing deferred revenues and prepaid commissions; and (4) recognizing the liability to service certain of our members during the period in which no revenue will be received. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed was recognized as goodwill, which will be reviewed for impairment at least annually. We recorded goodwill of approximately $315.3 million related to the Apollo Transactions described above.

In addition, we have made several other acquisitions that were accounted for in accordance with the purchase method of accounting. Substantially all of the cost of these acquisitions has been allocated to intangible assets.

Our critical accounting policies in the area of revenue recognition pertain to our insurance profit-sharing arrangements. For our membership, package and loyalty programs, we operate in a business environment where we are paid a fee for a service performed and we do not recognize revenue until these services have been performed and such revenues are no longer subject to refund. Accordingly, revenue recognition for these programs is not particularly subjective or complex.

We recognize insurance program commission revenue based on premiums earned by the insurance carriers that underwrite the policies we market. Premiums are typically paid either monthly or quarterly and revenue is recognized ratably over the underlying policy coverage period. We engage in revenue and profit-sharing arrangements with certain of the insurance carriers that issue the underlying insurance policies. Commission revenue from insurance programs is reported net of insurance costs in our consolidated financial statements. On a semi-annual or annual basis, a profit-sharing settlement is made based on an analysis of the premiums paid to the insurance carriers less claims experience incurred to date, estimated claims incurred but not reported, reinsurance costs and carrier administrative fees. We accrue monthly revenue and related profit sharing receivables from insurance carriers resulting from our expected share of this excess based on the claims experience to date, including an estimate for claims incurred but not reported. Adjustments to the estimates recorded are made upon settlement with the insurance carriers. Historically, our claims experience has not resulted in a shortfall.

The estimate of the periodic amount of claims incurred but not reported to the insurance company is based on models we have developed and maintain in consultation with the insurance carriers. The models are updated periodically for the most recent loss rates that we receive from the insurance companies and current market conditions. Any change to the estimates, based on actual experience, is reported in earnings in the period the change becomes known. The impact on 2014 net revenue subject to profit sharing arrangements of a 1% change in the claims incurred but not reported estimate as of December 31, 2014 would be approximately $0.2 million.

Under current accounting guidance, there is a requirement to assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. We assess goodwill for such

impairment by comparing the carrying value of the reporting units to their fair values. Fair values of the reporting units are determined utilizing discounted cash flows and incorporate assumptions that we believe marketplace participants would utilize.

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test for those reporting units that had goodwill recorded. Key assumptions used in the goodwill impairment test were long-term growth rates ranging from no growth to 3.0% and discount rates ranging from 10.5% to 20.0%. In 2014, the fair value of each of the reporting units that have goodwill exceeded its respective carrying amount by more than 25% of the carrying amount, with the exception of Membership Products, for which carrying value exceeded its fair value, based on an assumed long-term growth rate of no growth, primarily due to the continued decreasing member base from large financial institution marketing partners partially offset by projected new member joins from our point of sale marketing with retailers, and a discount rate of 15.5% which reflects the risk associated with acquiring these new members.

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company reflected these assumptions for Membership Products in its annual test for goodwill impairment as of December 1. Based on the impairment test, which utilized a combination of the income and market approaches and incorporated assumptions that the Company believes marketplace participants would utilize to determine the fair value of Membership Products, the Company recorded an impairment loss during the fourth quarter of 2014 of $292.4 million, representing approximately 76.6% of the goodwill ascribed to Membership Products. The impairment loss related to the goodwill of Membership Products has been reflected as Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2014. To the extent that net revenues in Membership Products continue to deteriorate in the near future, or we do not meet our expected performance either in Membership Products or our other reporting units, we could have additional impairments in the next twelve months which could be material.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment and written down to fair value, as required by current accounting guidance. We perform reviews annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. Other than the impairment of intangible assets of Prospectiv in 2012, for which the Company recorded a charge of $8.2 million, and the further impairment of Prospectiv’s intangible assets and property and equipment of $1.6 million in 2013, and the impairment of goodwill attributable to Membership Products of $292.4 million in 2014, there were no impairments identified during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Our intangible assets as of December 31, 2014 consist primarily of intangible assets with finite useful lives acquired by us in the Apollo Transactions and subsequent acquisitions and are recorded at their respective fair values in accordance with current accounting guidance.

Income taxes are presented in the consolidated financial statements using the asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary differences between the financial statements and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates. Deferred tax assets are recorded net of a valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as reductions to the income tax provision, while increases to the valuation allowance result in additional income tax provision. The realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on estimated future taxable income. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance for its U.S. federal net deferred tax assets. The Company has also recorded valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets of certain state and foreign taxing jurisdictions as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The tax effects of an uncertain tax position (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns are recognized only if it is “more likely-than-not” to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes estimated accrued interest and penalties related to UTPs in income tax expense.

The Company recognizes the benefit of a UTP in the period when it is effectively settled. Previously recognized tax positions are derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination.

This Report contains “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs and other information that is not historical information and, in particular, appear under headings “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” When used in this Report, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes,” “seeks,” “may,” “will,” “should,”

and variations of these words or similar expressions (or the negative versions of any such words) are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, are based on our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith, and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, management’s expectations, beliefs and projections may not result or be achieved.

We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Examples of forward-looking statements include:

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this Report. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements we make in this Report are set forth elsewhere in this Report, including under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” As stated elsewhere in this Report, these risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others:

These risks and other uncertainties are discussed in more detail in “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” There may be other factors, including those discussed elsewhere in this Report that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf apply only as of the date of this Report and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

In January 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap effective February 21, 2011. The swap had a notional amount of $500.0 million and terminated on October 17, 2012. Under the swap, the Company agreed to pay a fixed rate of interest of 2.985% in exchange for receiving floating payments based on a three-month LIBOR on the notional amount for each applicable period.

The interest rate swap was recorded at fair value, either as an asset or liability. The change in the fair value of the swap, which was not designated as hedging instruments, is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The following table provides information about the Company’s financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity for the Company’s long-term debt as of December 31, 2014 (dollars are in millions unless otherwise indicated).

As disclosed in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements, as a matter of policy, we do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

We generally do not utilize foreign currency forward contracts as we do not consider our foreign currency risk to be material, although the Company continues to evaluate its foreign currency exposures in light of the current volatility in the foreign currency markets.

On a limited basis the Company has entered into 30 day foreign currency forward contracts, and upon expiration of the contracts, entered into successive 30 day foreign currency forward contracts. The contracts have been entered into to mitigate the Company’s foreign currency exposures related to intercompany loans which are not expected to be repaid within the next twelve months and that are denominated in Euros and British pounds. At December 31, 2014, the Company had in place contracts to sell EUR 26.6 million and receive $32.3 million and to sell GBP 13.9 million and receive $21.6 million.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized a realized gain of $5.0 million, a realized loss of $1.7 million and a realized loss of $1.9 million, respectively, on the forward contracts. The Company had a de minimis unrealized gain as of December 31, 2014 on the foreign currency forward contracts. At December 31, 2014, the Company’s estimated fair values of its foreign currency forward contracts are based upon available market information. The fair value of a foreign currency forward contract is based on significant other observable inputs, adjusted for contract restrictions and other terms specific to the foreign currency forward contracts. The fair values have been determined after consideration of foreign currency exchange rates and the creditworthiness of the party to each foreign currency forward contract. The counterparty to each foreign currency forward contract is a major financial institution. The Company does not expect any losses from non-performance by counterparties.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of receivables, profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers, prepaid commissions and interest rate swaps. Such risk was managed by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $36.2 million of the profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers were due from one insurance carrier. Receivables and profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers are from various marketing, insurance and business partners and the Company maintains an allowance for losses, based upon expected collectability. Commission advances are periodically evaluated as to recovery.

Evaluation of Disclosure Control and Procedures. The Company, under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has established disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our “internal controls over financial reporting” (“Internal Controls”) will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.

Interpretative guidance issued by the SEC staff permits the exclusion of an evaluation of the effectiveness of a registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as they relate to the internal control over financial reporting for acquired businesses during the first year following such acquisition. As discussed in Note 3 – Acquisitions in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in September 2014, we completed the acquisition of SkyMall Ventures LLC, with total assets representing 5.8% of our consolidated total assets and net revenues representing 0.7% of our consolidated net revenues included in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014. Management’s evaluation and conclusion as to the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K excludes any evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of SkyMall Ventures LLC.

As of December 31, 2014, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon their

evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2014, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. As a result of the acquisition of SkyMall Ventures LLC, we have begun to integrate certain business processes and systems of SkyMall Ventures LLC.

There have been no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992). As a result of the acquisition of SkyMall Ventures LLC in September 2014, we have begun to integrate certain business processes and systems of SkyMall Ventures LLC. In reliance on the interpretative guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s staff, management has chosen to exclude from its assessment of the effectiveness of our financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, SkyMall Ventures LLC internal control over financial reporting associated with 5.8% of our consolidated total assets and net revenues representing 0.7% of our consolidated net revenues included in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Based on this assessment, management determined that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.

On March 16, 2015, we adopted the Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. 2015 Retention Award Program. For a description of the Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. 2015 Retention Award Program, see “Item 11. Executive Compensation—2015 Actions.”

Set forth below is certain information concerning the individuals that are currently serving as our executive officers and/or members of our Board of Directors. The ages of each officer and/or director set forth below is as of December 31, 2014. Each of Messrs. Becker, Press, Nord and Reiss was nominated by Apollo to serve as a director pursuant to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement and each of Messrs. Fernandes and Topper was nominated by General Atlantic to serve as a director pursuant to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement. Mr. Lipman was nominated to serve as a director pursuant to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement and Mr. Siegel, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, was nominated to serve as a director pursuant to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement. Mr. Victor was nominated by the holders of the Series A warrants (together with the holders of any shares of Class B common stock issued upon exercise thereof) to serve as a director pursuant to Affinion Holdings’ certificate of incorporation.

Nathaniel J. Lipman has served as a director of Affinion since October 17, 2005. He was formerly the Chief Executive Officer of Affinion from October 17, 2005 until September 20, 2012, the President of Affinion Holdings from October 17, 2005 to January 14, 2011, the President of Affinion from October 17, 2005 to January 2010, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Trilegiant starting in August 2002 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Cendant Marketing Group starting in January 2004. From September 2001 until August 2002, he was Senior Executive Vice President of Business Development and Marketing of Trilegiant. He served as Executive Vice President of Business Development for Cendant Membership Services from March 2000 to August 2001. He joined the Alliance Marketing Division of Cendant in June 1999 as Senior Vice President, Business Development and Strategic Planning. Mr. Lipman was previously Senior Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategic Planning, for Planet Hollywood International, Inc., from 1996 until April 1999. Prior to his tenure at Planet Hollywood, Mr. Lipman was Senior Vice President and General Counsel of House of Blues Entertainment, Inc., Senior Corporate Counsel at The Walt Disney Company and a corporate associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom, LLP. Mr. Lipman serves on the board of directors of Patent Properties, Inc., Novitex Enterprises Solutions, Inc. and Readers Digest Association, Inc.

Mr. Lipman has significant experience in our business. He has served as Affinion’s Chief Executive Officer and as the Chief Executive Officer of several of Affinion’s predecessor companies prior to the Acquisition. His fundamental understanding of our

business, his demonstrated leadership and his past responsibilities as Affinion’s Chief Executive Officer make him highly qualified as the Chairman of Affinion’s Board of Directors.

Todd H. Siegel was appointed Chief Executive Officer and a director of Affinion as of September 20, 2012. Mr. Siegel was formerly the Chief Financial Officer of Affinion from November 2008 to September 2012 and served as an Executive Vice President since October 17, 2005. Mr. Siegel also served as our General Counsel from October 17, 2005 to February 16, 2009. Mr. Siegel joined us in November 1999 as a member of the Legal Department of the Membership Division of Cendant and most recently served as General Counsel of Trilegiant starting in July 2003 and Cendant Marketing Group starting in January 2004. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Siegel was employed as a corporate associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom, LLP. From 1992 until 1994, he was employed as a certified public accountant with Ernst & Young. Mr. Siegel serves on the board of directors of Presidio Holdings, Inc.

Gregory S. Miller was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affinion as of January 20, 2014. From July 2011 until January 17, 2014, Mr. Miller served as Senior Vice President, Financial Planning and Divisional Operations, for The Madison Square Garden Company with responsibility for all financial matters of its operating divisions as well as its corporate strategic and financial planning divisions. From May 2007 until June 2011, Mr. Miller served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for the North American Division of Affinion with responsibility for all financial matters for North American Operating Business Units. Mr. Miller served as Senior Vice President of Finance of Affinion from June 2005 until May 2007, the Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis of Trilegiant from June 2003 until June 2005, the Director of Financial Planning and Analysis of Trilegiant from October 2000 until June 2003, and the Senior Manager of Accounting of Cendant Membership Services from December 1999 until October 2000. Prior to his tenure at Affinion, he held various positions at Citizens Communications and The Coca Cola Bottling Company of New York. From 1992 until 1994, Mr. Miller was employed with Coopers & Lybrand.

Michele Conforti was appointed President and Managing Director of Affinion International on February 26, 2014. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Affinion International beginning in 2010, having been promoted from Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a role he began in 2007. Prior to joining Affinion International in 2007, he spent ten years with American Express from 1998 to 2000 and then again from 2001 to 2007 holding various key positions including Chief Financial Officer of Establishment Services International, a Business Unit/Division of American Express. Prior to his tenure at American Express, Mr. Conforti also held positions with Enel as Vice President/Head of Corporate Financial Analysis - Investor Relations from 2000 to 2001, with DHL International as Area Controller from 1995 to 1998, and at Ansaldo Trasporti – Gruppo Finmeccanica as Senior Financial Analyst from 1993 to 1995.

Robert J. Dudacek was appointed President, Insurance Services as of October 1, 2013. Mr. Dudacek joined Affinion as General Manager of Insurance in February 2013. Prior to joining Affinion, Mr. Dudacek was Senior Vice President at Wells Fargo Insurance, leading the direct response insurance group from October 2006 to February 2013. From October 2004 to October 2006, Mr. Dudacek was Vice President of Client Management at ReMark Americas, a global insurance marketing company. Prior to that, Mr. Dudacek held various positions in the Financial Services Division of Minnesota Life, A Securian Company from June 1992 to October 2004.

Scott Lazear was appointed President, Connexions Loyalty in June of 2010. Mr. Lazear served as Senior Vice President of Sales, Client Management and Strategy for Affinion Benefits Group from July 2006 to June 2010. Mr. Lazear was Senior Vice President of Business Development and Client Solutions for Cendant Marketing Group from April 2003 to July 2006. Prior to that, he was Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Trilegiant Loyalty Solutions from March 1999 to April of 2003. Prior to his tenure at Affinion, he served as Vice President of Business Development for NCCI from October 1993 until March of 1999.

Sloane Levy was appointed President, Membership Services as of March 1, 2014. From January 1, 2011 to March 1, 2014, Ms. Levy served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel. From October 2006 to January 2011, Ms. Levy served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Webloyalty. From June 2005 to October 2006, Ms. Levy was Vice President and General Counsel for Harte-Hanks, Inc., a direct marketing company. From May 1999 to January 2005, Ms. Levy served as a Senior Vice President, General Counsel and directed the Human Resources department at Modem Media, Inc., an internet marketing and advertising company which was acquired by Digitas, Inc. in October 2004. From May 1994 to May 1999, Ms. Levy worked as a staff attorney at Witco Corporation and served as its Director of Investor Relations during the last year of her tenure. Previously, she was employed as a corporate associate at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP and at Arent Fox LLP.

James C. Daly, Jr. was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Affinion as of December 1, 2012. Mr. Daly was formerly the Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of Affinion from February 2012 to December 2012. Prior to his tenure at Affinion, Mr. Daly was employed as Vice President, Head of Human Resources at Standard & Poor’s from 2007 until 2012. From 2000 to 2006, Mr. Daly served as Principal in the investment firm, Caydal, LLC. From 1995 to 2000, Mr. Daly served as Senior Vice President, Human Resources for News America Marketing, a News Corporation company. Prior to 1995, Mr. Daly held various human resources roles with Kraft Foods, American Express and General Foods Corporation.

Brian J. Dick was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer on January 10, 2012. Prior to that time he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since December 1, 2005. Prior to joining Affinion, he was most recently an independent contractor from February 2005 through November 2005. He served as the Vice President and Controller for Modem Media, Inc., an internet marketing and advertising company which was acquired by Digitas, Inc. in October 2004, from October 2002 through January 2005, where he oversaw the global accounting, financial reporting, tax and treasury functions. From 1999 to 2001, he was the Vice President of Finance for Crompton Corporation, where he managed the Controllers, Information Systems and e-Business functions. From 1995 to 1999, he held various senior financial positions at Witco Corporation until it was acquired by Crompton Corporation. He also served as the Controller of Formica Corporation from 1989 to 1995. From 1978 to 1989, he held various positions with Price Waterhouse LLP (now PricewaterhouseCoopers).

Brian J. Fisher was appointed Executive Vice President and General Counsel on March 1, 2014. Prior to that, he served as General Counsel of Affinion’s North American business. Mr. Fisher joined us in November, 2002 as a member of the Legal Department. Prior to joining Affinion, Mr. Fisher was employed as a corporate associate at Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP.

Robert Lyons was appointed Chief Operating Officer of Affinion Group in February 2014 and has oversight of the Company’s Global Operations and Technology. Prior to joining Affinion, Mr. Lyons was Executive Vice President, Technology and Operations of Ascend Learning, LCC, a leading provider of technology-based educational, curriculum and assessment solutions for the healthcare industry and other vocational fields from January 2012 to February 2014. Prior to Ascend, Mr. Lyons held executive positions with several companies, including Stream Global Services from July 2009 to December 2011.

Marc E. Becker has been a director of Affinion since October 17, 2005. From October 17, 2005 to December 20, 2006, he served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Affinion. Mr. Becker is a senior partner of Apollo, where he has been employed since 1996 and has served as an officer of certain affiliates of Apollo since 1999. Prior to that time, Mr. Becker was employed by Smith Barney Inc. within its Investment Banking division. Mr. Becker serves on several boards of directors, including Apollo Residential Mortgage, Inc., CEVA Group plc, Pinnacle Agriculture Holdings LLC, Realogy Holdings Corp. and Vantium Management, L.P. During the past five years, Mr. Becker also served as a director of EVERTEC, Inc. (from September 2010 to December 2013), Novitex Holdings, Inc. (from October 2013 to October 2014), Quality Distribution, Inc. (from June 1998 to May 2011) and SourceHOV Holdings, Inc. (from January 2006 to April 2013). Mr. Becker has significant experience making and managing private equity investments on behalf of Apollo and its subsidiaries and has over 19 years of experience financing, analyzing and investing in public and private companies. Mr. Becker previously led the diligence team for the Acquisition, and since then has worked closely with our management.

Eric L. Press has been a director of Affinion since October 17, 2005. Mr. Press is a senior partner of Apollo, where he has been employed since 1998 and has served as an officer of certain affiliates of Apollo. From 1992 to 1998, Mr. Press was associated with the law firm of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz specializing in mergers, acquisitions, restructurings and related financing transactions. From 1987 to 1989, Mr. Press was a consultant with The Boston Consulting Group. Mr. Press serves on several boards of directors, including Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc., Caesars Entertainment Corporation, Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, Princimar Chemical Holdings, LLC and Verso Paper Corp. During the past five years, Mr. Press also served as a director of Athene Holding Ltd. (from July 2009 to February 2014), Innkeepers USA Trust (from June 2007 to April 2010), Metals USA Holdings Corp. (from May 2005 to April 2013) and Prestige Cruise Holdings, Inc. (from April 2007 to November 2014). Mr. Press has significant experience making and managing private equity investments on behalf of Apollo. Between his work at Apollo and his prior experience as an attorney and a management consultant, Mr. Press has approximately 26 years of experience in the process of financing, analyzing, investing in public and private companies and their board of directors. Mr. Press has worked closely with our management since the Acquisition.

Matthew H. Nord has been a director of Affinion since October 30, 2006. Mr. Nord is a partner of Apollo, where he has been employed since 2003. Prior to that time, Mr. Nord was a member of the Investment Banking division of Salomon Smith Barney Inc. Mr. Nord serves on several boards of directors, including Aegis Holdings, Inc., the parent of Presidio Holdings, Inc., Constellium N.V., Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and Novitex Holdings, Inc. During the past five years, Mr. Nord has also served as a director of EVERTEC, Inc. (from September 2010 to December 2013), Hughes Telematics, Inc. (from December 2006 to July 2012), MidCap Financial Holdings, LLC (from December 2013 to January 2015) and SourceHOV Holdings, Inc. (from January 2006 to April 2013). Mr. Nord has significant experience making and managing private equity investments on behalf of Apollo and has over 13 years of experience financing, analyzing and investing in public and private companies. Mr. Nord previously co-led the diligence team for the Acquisition, and since then has worked closely with our management.

Michael A. Reiss has been a director of Affinion since August 13, 2013. Mr. Reiss is an investment professional of Apollo, where he has been employed since 2008. Prior to that time, Mr. Reiss was employed by Deutsche Bank Securities as a Global Finance Analyst in the Financial Sponsors Group. Mr. Reiss serves on the board of directors of Captain Bidco SAS, the parent of Ascometal SAS. Mr. Reiss has significant experience making and managing private equity investments on behalf of Apollo and has over eight years of experience financing, analyzing and investing in public and private companies.

Richard J. Fernandes has been a director of Affinion since January 14, 2011 and currently serves as a consultant focusing on international expansion and the retail services sector. Mr. Fernandes served as the Chief Executive Officer of Global Retail Services and Co-President of Affinion from September 20, 2012 to May 2013. Following the acquisition of Webloyalty on January 14, 2011, Mr. Fernandes served as President of Affinion and the Chief Executive Officer of Affinion International until September 2012. Mr. Fernandes is the Chairman of Only Good News, LLC, a website that distributes positive news stories and videos to consumers, and is also currently an adjunct professor at Sacred Heart University. From January 1999 until January 2011, Mr. Fernandes was the founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Webloyalty. Prior to 1999, Mr. Fernandes served as an Executive Vice-President at CUC International. Mr. Fernandes brings to Affinion’s Board of Directors significant experience related to our business since he served as Chief Executive Officer of Webloyalty, a company offering similar services to those offered by Affinion, and he also served as an Executive Vice President of Affinion’s predecessor companies prior to the Acquisition.

David J. Topper has been a director of Affinion since August 13, 2013. Mr. Topper currently serves as Operating Partner at General Atlantic Service Company, LLC, where he has been employed since 2012. As Operating Partner, he provides strategic counsel to General Atlantic and its portfolio companies as a member of the Portfolio Management group. From 2005 to 2012, Mr. Topper was employed with J. P. Morgan where he was Co-Head of Equity Capital Markets, Vice Chairman of Investment Banking and Chairman of the Commitments Committee. Prior to joining J. P. Morgan, Mr. Topper spent 22 years at Morgan Stanley where he served as Co-Head of U.S. Equity Capital Markets, Managing Director and Chairman of the Equity Commitment Committee from 2001 to 2005. Mr. Topper is a director of Amherst Pierpont Securities and TASC Inc., and serves on the Board of Visitors of the Duke University Trinity College of Arts and Sciences and the Board of Directors of the Adams Memorial Foundation. Mr. Topper brings to Affinion’s Board of Directors his significant experience in analyzing, advising and investing in public and private companies.

Skip Victor has been a director of Affinion since December 16, 2013. Mr. Victor currently serves as a Managing Director and member of the Investment Committee of Balmoral Funds, where he has been employed since 2005. He also currently serves as a Senior Managing Director at Duff & Phelps in its Restructuring Group, where he has been employed since 2006. In 1990, Mr. Victor co-founded Chanin Capital Partners, a boutique investment bank focusing on corporate restructurings that was sold to Duff & Phelps in October 2006. Among other civic and charitable affiliations, Mr. Victor is a member of the board of directors of the Los Angeles Child Guidance Center and Academic Exchange. He also serves as a member of the Board of Advisors for the Price Center for Entrepreneurial Studies at the UCLA Graduate School of Management, and the Smithsonian Libraries and the Institute for Analysis of Global Security in Washington, D.C. Mr. Victor brings to Affinion’s Board of Directors his more than 27 years of experience in analyzing, advising and investing in public and private companies.

Our Board of Directors currently consists of nine directors, but is subject to increase pursuant to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement. A majority of the Board of Directors will constitute a quorum for board meetings. The convening of a special meeting will be subject to advance written notice to all directors.

Our Board of Directors has a Compensation Committee, an Executive Committee, an Audit Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

The current members of the audit committee are Messrs. Nord, Reiss and Lipman. Mr. Nord is the chairman of the audit committee. The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee are as follows:

The audit committee has the power to investigate any matter brought to its attention within the scope of its duties. It also has the authority, at its discretion, to retain counsel and advisors to fulfill its responsibilities and duties at our expense.

Although our Board of Directors has determined that each of the members of our audit committee is financially literate and has experience analyzing or evaluating financial statements, at this time we do not have an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407 of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act serving on the audit committee. As a company whose stock is privately-held and given the financial sophistication and other business experience of the members of the audit committee, we do not believe that we require the services of an audit committee financial expert at this time.

The current members of the compensation committee are Messrs. Becker, Press and Topper. The principal duties and responsibilities of the compensation committee are as follows:

The current members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are Messrs. Becker and Nord. The principal duties and responsibilities of the nominating and corporate governance committee are as follows:

The current members of the executive committee are Messrs. Becker, Nord and Topper. The principal duties and responsibilities of the executive committee are as follows:

Although as a private company we are not obligated to adopt a formal code of ethics, the Company has adopted a core policies manual which includes a formal code of ethics and an annual re-certification. Upon request, we will provide to any person without

charge a copy of the portions of our code of ethics that apply to our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer.

The information in this Executive Compensation section reflects the compensation structure and policies of the Company in effect as of December 31, 2014, unless otherwise noted.

The Compensation Committee of our board of directors, which we refer to herein as the “Committee,” is responsible for establishing, implementing and continually monitoring adherence with our compensation philosophy. The Committee also serves as the compensation committee of the board of directors of Affinion Holdings. The Committee strives to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive. Generally, the types of compensation and benefits provided to our executive officers, including the named executive officers, are similar to those provided to executive officers at comparable companies in similarly situated positions.

For 2014, our named executive officers and their respective titles were as follows:

Messrs. Siegel and Miller were named executive officers for 2014 based on their positions with us as chief executive officer and chief financial officer during 2014. Messrs. Conforti and Lyons and Ms. Levy were named executive officers based on their levels of compensation.

The Committee believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one that is designed to reward the achievement of our specific annual, long-term and strategic goals, and which aligns executives’ interests with those of our stockholders by rewarding performance above established goals, with the ultimate objective of improving stockholder value. The Committee evaluates both performance and compensation to ensure that we maintain our ability to attract and retain superior employees in key positions and that compensation provided to key employees remains competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives at companies with, among other things as discussed in greater detail below, similarly sized revenues. To that end, the Committee believes executive compensation packages provided by us to our executives, including to our named executive officers, should include both cash and share-based compensation that reward performance as measured against established goals.

The chief executive officer annually reviews the performance of each of our named executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer, whose performance is reviewed by the Committee). The conclusions reached and recommendations based on these reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and annual incentive award target and actual payout amounts, are presented to the Committee, which has the discretion to modify any recommended adjustments or awards to executives.

The Committee has final approval over all compensation decisions for our named executive officers and approves recommendations regarding cash and equity awards to all of our officers.

Based on the foregoing objectives, the Committee has structured our annual and long-term incentive cash and share-based executive compensation programs to motivate our executives to achieve the business goals set by us and to reward the executives for achieving these goals. In evaluating executive compensation, our Compensation Committee considers a variety of factors including

market demands, internal equity and external surveys which provide insight into and guidance on the pay practices of similar companies. As a general rule, we target total cash compensation at the 50^th percentile of companies with similarly sized revenues. While survey data provides us with a helpful guideline, we do not make compensation decisions based on any single factor.

We have found the Total Remuneration Surveys, produced by Mercer, Inc., provides helpful insight, as it reflects input from over 3,000 companies representing 1,200 positions, in General Industry, Service and Retail with revenues ranging from $100 million to over $10 billion. As we recruit talent from various sectors, the broad view of this survey is valuable. While the survey provides an overall list of participating companies, the data that is provided to us for comparison purposes is based on a subgroup of companies with revenues similar to ours. The identity of these companies is not provided to us. In sum, while we are familiar with the broad range of companies that participate in the survey, we are not provided with, and therefore have not listed, the names of the companies that comprise our comparison group.

We provide our named executive officers and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year. Base salary ranges for named executive officers are determined for each executive based on his or her position and scope of responsibility by using comparative market data. The initial base salary for our named executive officers is established in their employment agreements.

Salary levels are reviewed annually as part of our performance review process as well as upon a promotion or other material change in job responsibility. Merit based increases to salaries of the executives, including our named executive officers, are based on the Committee’s assessment of the individual’s performance.

In reviewing base salaries of our executives, the Committee primarily considers:

The Committee reviews these criteria collectively but does not assign a weight to any criterion when setting base salaries. Each base salary adjustment is made by the Committee subjectively based upon the foregoing.

Our annual incentive plan is an annual cash incentive program with payments determined based on performance against measurable annual financial goals. If the applicable performance goals are achieved, the payment of bonuses at target under our annual incentive plan, together with annual base salary, is designed to deliver annual cash compensation to our named executive officers on average at the 50^th percentile of the cash compensation of executives in similarly sized organizations. The annual incentive plan is intended to focus the entire organization on meeting or exceeding Adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow performance goals that are set during the early part of each year and approved by the Committee, while also providing significant opportunity to reward individual contributions.

We believe that Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted free cash flow measures are clearly understood by both our employees and stockholders, and that achievement of the stated goals is a key component in the creation of long-term value for our stockholders. Except as may be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, no bonuses are payable under the annual incentive plan if the Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted free cash flow performance goals established by the Committee for that year are not achieved.

For 2014 the Committee established an Adjusted EBITDA performance goal of $283.3 million and an adjusted free cash flow metric of $201.2 million. These goals were not achieved for 2014. For 2015, the performance goals have not been finalized.

For 2014, notwithstanding that our goals were not achieved, the Committee decided to fund a discretionary bonus pool in recognition of the achievement of results for some businesses and the performance of employees in light of a difficult economic and

regulatory environment. Such pool has been fully accrued and will be allocated based solely upon individual results and the individual’s impact on the business. On February 20, 2015, the Committee decided to allocate to our NEOs the following bonuses from the 2014 bonus pool given employee performance: (i) 95% of target (or $855,000) for Mr. Siegel, (ii) 95% of target (or $280,401) for Mr. Conforti, (iii) 100% of target (or $400,000) for Mr. Miller, (iv) 95% of target (or $299,616) for Mr. Lyons and (v) 90% of target (or $360,000) for Ms. Levy.

For each named executive officer, as well as for each eligible employee, the actual bonus payable for a particular year under the annual incentive plan is bifurcated into a performance-based element and a discretionary element, neither of which is payable if the performance-based element is not achieved unless approved by the Committee. The performance-based element is based on achieving and exceeding the Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted free cash flow performance goals (a precondition to the payment of the bonus) and the discretionary element is based on the Committee’s assessment of the individual employee’s performance (weighted at 100%). In assessing the individual performance of our named executive officers, the Committee, in its discretion, considers the recommendations of our chief executive officer (except in determining the chief executive officer’s and chairman’s bonuses) and the following list of factors (the list of factors is not exclusive and no particular weight is assigned to any factor used) and makes its determinations as of the date the bonus is payable: achievement of internal financial and operating targets, including free cash flow and customer growth; improvement of performance and customer satisfaction with our services; improvement of management and organizational capabilities and implementation of long-term strategic plans.

The target bonus percentage (which in the aggregate applies to the discretionary and performance-based elements of the annual incentive bonus, each of which is weighted equally) for our named executive officers is established in their employment agreements or as modified by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. For 2014, our named executive officers had the following bonus targets based on their respective annual base salaries: Mr. Siegel’s target remained at 150%; Mr. Miller’s target was established at 100% and, as part of his hiring arrangement, is subject to a bonus guarantee for 2014 of $400,000 per his employment agreement; Mr. Conforti’s target was increased to 75% for 2014 following promotion to President, Affinion International; Ms. Levy’s target remained at 100%; and Mr. Lyons’ target was established in his employment agreement at 100% given his responsibilities as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.

The Committee believes that a relatively greater proportion of the chief executive officer’s annual compensation should be subject to the achievement of the performance goals. The Committee retains the right to pay bonuses to the named executive officers and other employees that are in addition to, or in lieu of, the bonuses described in their employment agreements, which bonuses may be based on company or individual performance goals not reflected in our annual incentive plan or purely discretionary.

On November 7, 2007, the board of directors of Affinion Holdings adopted the 2007 Stock Award Plan (the “2007 Plan”), under which our employees, directors and other service providers are eligible to receive awards of Affinion Holdings common stock. The rationale for the plan was to provide a means through which Affinion Holdings and its affiliates may attract and retain key personnel and to provide a means for directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors (and prospective directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors) of Affinion Holdings and its affiliates to acquire and maintain an equity interest in Affinion Holdings, or be paid incentive compensation, which may (but need not) be measured by reference to Affinion Holdings’ stock price. Upon adoption of the 2007 Stock Award Plan, no additional grants may be made under Affinion Holdings’ 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The Committee has not adopted a policy of regularly timed annual grants of equity under the 2007 Plan.

On January 20, 2014, pursuant to his employment agreement, the Committee approved a Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) grant to Mr. Miller under the 2007 Plan with a fair market value of $595,500.

On April 1, 2014, to promote the retention of key employees, the Committee approved grants to Mr. Siegel of 200,000 options, Mr. Miller of 200,000 options, Mr. Conforti of 110,000 options and Mr. Lyons of 125,000 options. These options were granted under the 2007 plan with an exercise price of $1.14, the fair value per share of Affinion Holdings’ common stock as of the grant date.

On April 1, 2014, the Committee approved the re-pricing (“Re-pricing”) of certain stock options (the “Underwater Options”) previously issued under the 2007 Plan, the 2005 Plan and the Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. 2005 Equity Award Plan (the “Webloyalty Plan” and together with the 2007 Plan and the 2005 Plan, the “Plans”). All of the Underwater Options had a per share exercise price in excess of the current fair market value per share of common stock and no longer served as adequate incentive or retention tools for the recipients. Pursuant to the Re-pricing, the per share exercise price of the Underwater Options was re-priced to equal the fair market value per share of common stock as of the date of the Re-pricing, which was determined to be $1.14.

In addition to Re-pricing the Underwater Options, on April 1, 2014, the Committee approved the extension of the expiration dates of the Underwater Options to a date that is ten (10) years from April 1, 2014 (the “Term Extension”).

Vesting of the Underwater Options was not affected by the Re-Pricing or the Term Extension. The Underwater Options will continue to vest in accordance with their existing vesting schedules, to the extent not already vested. All other material terms and conditions of the Underwater Options remained the same.

Underwater Options held by the following named executive officers were subject to the Re-pricing and Term Extension: Mr. Siegel (368,900 stock options issued under the 2007 Plan and 261,324 stock options issued under the 2005 Plan) and Ms. Levy (200,000 stock options issued under the 2007 Plan and 92,610 stock options issued under the Webloyalty Plan).

On April 1, 2014, the Committee approved the 2014 Performance Incentive Award (“2014 PIA”) Program, an equity and cash incentive award program, intended to encourage the retention of certain key employees. The Committee approved 2014 PIA grants to Mr. Siegel with a fair market value of $1,900,000, Mr. Miller of $500,000, Mr. Conforti of $500,000, Ms. Levy of $500,000 and Mr. Lyons of $500,000. Fifty percent of each employee’s 2014 PIA was denominated in stock units and the remaining fifty percent was denominated in cash.

The 2014 PIA is subject to performance-based and time-based vesting conditions. First, the maximum number of stock units and the maximum number of cash in which each employee will be eligible to vest will be determined based on the achievement of certain overall corporate and business unit performance goals, as applicable, during the 2014 calendar year. Determination of actual 2014 performance occurred and it was determined that 2014 performance hurdles were not attained. Second, an employee will become vested in the stock units and cash components of the 2014 PIA in three equal installments on March 15, 2015, 2016 and 2017, subject to the employee’s continued employment on those dates.

On March 16, 2015, the Committee determined that the performance vesting criteria under the 2014 PIA were not satisfied and, accordingly, all of the 2014 PIA were canceled.

Our U.S. named executive officers (Mr. Siegel, Mr. Miller, Ms. Levy and Mr. Lyons) are eligible to participate in our Employee Savings Plan. This plan is a tax-qualified retirement savings plan pursuant to which all U.S. based employees or U.S. expatriates are able to contribute on a before-tax basis the lesser of up to 50% of their annual salary or the limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. We match 100% of the first 4% of each employee’s pay that is contributed to the Employee Savings Plan. All contributions to the Employee Savings Plan as well as any matching contributions are fully vested upon contribution.

We provide named executive officers with limited perquisites that we and the Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. Each of the named executive officers is entitled to a car allowance.

The Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites provided to our named executive officers.

Attributed costs of the perquisites described above for the named executive officers for fiscal years 2012, 2013 and 2014 are included in column (i) of the “Summary Compensation Table.”

Employment agreements are currently in effect with Messrs. Siegel, Miller, Conforti and Lyons and Ms. Levy. These employment agreements provide for severance payments in certain circumstances. The employment agreements are designed to promote stability and continuity of senior management.

In the event the employment of any of Messrs. Siegel, Miller, Conforti or Lyons or Ms. Levy is terminated by us without “cause” (including as a result of our nonrenewal of their respective employment agreement) or they terminate their respective employment with us for “good reason,” the terminating executive will be entitled under the severance provisions of his employment agreement to a lump sum payment of any unpaid annual base salary through the date of termination and any bonus earned but unpaid for any fiscal year ended prior to the year in which the date of termination occurs, as well as periodic payments in the aggregate equal to: (i) in the case of Mr. Siegel, 200% of the sum of his annual base salary and target bonus, (ii) in the case of either of Mr. Miller, Ms. Levy and Mr. Lyons, 100% of the sum of their respective annual base salary and target bonus, and (iii) in the case of Mr. Conforti, 50% of his annual base salary. If employment of any of Messrs. Siegel, Miller, Conforti or Lyons or Ms. Levy terminates due to death or disability, he or she will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 100% of base salary. Definitions referenced above can be found under the subheading “Employment Agreements” following the Summary Compensation Table.

Information regarding applicable payments under such agreements for the named executive officers is provided under the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Because we do not have a class of equity securities that is required to be registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we are not subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m).

The Company accounts for share-based payments under the 2005 Plan and the 2007 Plan in accordance with and to the extent required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation.

On February 20, 2015, the Committee approved 2014 bonus payments to Messrs. Siegel, Miller, Conforti and Lyons and Ms. Levy of $855,000, $400,000, $280,401, $360,000 and $299,616, respectively. On February 20, 2015, the Committee increased the base salaries of Messrs. Siegel, Miller, Conforti and Lyons and Ms. Levy to $615,000, $410,000, $405,000, $410,000 and $410,000, respectively.

On March 16, 2015, the Committee approved the terms of (i) the Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. 2015 Retention Award Program (the “Retention Program”), an equity and cash incentive award program intended to foster retention of key employees of Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries, and (ii) the awards (the “Retention Awards”) to each such key employee consisting of retention units (“RUs”) and a cash retention award (“CRA”) to be made by Affinion Holdings under the Retention Program. The terms of the Retention Program and Retention Awards are summarized below.

The Retention Awards were granted on March 16, 2015 to certain employees of Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries, including the following officers: Todd H. Siegel, Gregory S. Miller, Michele Conforti, Robert Lyons and Sloane Levy. The Retention Awards were made under Affinion Holdings’ 2007 Plan and evidenced by a written agreement between Affinion Holdings and each employee. Each Retention Award will entitle the employee to one share of Affinion Holdings’ common stock for each RU and a cash payment in respect of the CRA, in each case, subject to applicable withholding taxes, when the applicable vesting conditions for the Awards are met.

The Retention Awards are subject to time-based vesting conditions. An employee’s RUs and CRA will vest in two (2) substantially equal installments on each of March 15, 2016 and March 15, 2017 (each, a “Vesting Date”), subject to that employee’s continued service with Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries on each applicable Vesting Date.

An employee’s RUs and the portion of his or her CRA that become vested as of a given Vesting Date in accordance with the above vesting criteria will be settled as follows: (i) for each RU that vests on such Vesting Date, Affinion Holdings will deliver to the employee on the Settlement Date one share of common stock and (ii) for the portion of the CRA that vests on such Vesting Date, Affinion Holdings will pay to the employee on the Settlement Date an amount in cash equal to such vested portion of the CRA, in each case, subject to applicable tax withholding. An employee’s RUs and the portion of his or her CRA that become vested on a given Vesting Date will be settled as soon as practicable following such Vesting Date but in no event later than the sixtieth (60th) day following such Vesting Date (the “Settlement Date”). Upon termination of employment for any reason, an employee will forfeit the entire unvested portion of his or her Retention Award. Holders of vested RUs will be required to become a party to the Management Investor Rights Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2005, among Affinion Holdings, Affinion Holdings, LLC and certain investors and management holders, to the extent such holders are not already a party thereto.

Todd H. Siegel, Gregory S. Miller, Michele Conforti, Sloane Levy and Robert Lyons were granted Retention Awards summarized in the table below.

Our Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Disclosure and Analysis be included in this Report.

Based on our assessment, we believe that our compensation and benefit programs have been appropriately designed to attract and retain talent and properly incent employees. Although our programs are generally designed to pay-for-performance and to provide incentive-based compensation, the programs contain various mitigating factors to ensure our employees, including our named executive officers, are not encouraged to take unnecessary risks in managing our business. These factors include:

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each of our 2014 named executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, to the extent that each of the 2014 named executive officers listed below was a named executive officer for such year(s).

(a)	(b)	(c)		(d)		(e)		(f)		(g)		(h)		(i)			(j)
												Change in
												Pension Value
										Non-Equity		and
										Incentive		Nonqualified
						Stock		Option		Plan		Deferred		All Other
				Bonus		Awards		Awards		Compensation		Compensation		Compensation			Total
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		($)(1)		($)(2)		($)(2)		($)(3)		Earnings ($)		($)(4)			($)
Todd H. Siegel	2014	$	600,000	$	855,000	$	950,000	$	664,179	$	950,000	$	—	$	27,872	(5)	$	4,047,051
Chief Executive Officer	2013	$	600,000	$	810,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	27,472		$	1,437,472
	2012	$	492,442	$	387,798	$	699,997	$	-	$	—	$	—	$	27,234		$	1,607,471

Gregory Miller	2014	$	369,231	$	400,000	$	845,500	$	160,000	$	250,000	$	—	$	126,401	(6)	$	2,151,132
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (5)

Michele Conforti	2014	$	395,707	$	280,401	$	250,000		180,160	$	250,000	$	—	$	222,939	(7)	$	1,579,207
Executive Vice President and
President, Affinion International

Sloane Levy	2014	$	400,000	$	360,000	$	250,000	$	234,088	$	250,000	$	—	$	27,318	(5)	$	1,521,406
Executive Vice President and	2013	$	400,000	$	360,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	17,472		$	777,472
President, Membership Services	2012	$	400,000	$	240,000	$	349,999	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	33,367		$	1,023,366

Robert Lyons	2014	$	315,385	$	299,616	$	250,000	$	100,000	$	250,000	$	—	$	151,880	(8)	$	1,366,881
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer

The following table presents information regarding the equity awards granted to our named executive officers during fiscal year 2014.

		Estimated Future Payouts Under						Estimated Future Payouts Under
		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards						Equity Incentive Plan Awards
(a)	(b)	(c)		(d)		(e)		(f)		(g)		(h)		(i)		(j)		(k)		(l)
														All
														Other
														Stock
														Awards:		All Other				Grant
														Number		Option		Exercise		Date Fair
														of		Awards:		or Base		Value of
														Shares		Number of		Price of		Stock and
														of Stock		Securities		Option		Option
	Grant	Threshold		Target		Maximum		Threshold		Target		Maximum		or Units		Underlying		Awards		Awards
Name	Date	($)(1)		($)(1)		($)(1)		(#)(2)		(#)(2)		(#)(2)		(#)(3)		Options (#)(3)		($/sh)		($)(4)
Todd H. Siegel	4/1/2014	$	475,000	$	950,000	$	1,425,000		416,667		833,333		1,250,000		—		200,000	$	1.14	$	1,614,179
Gregory Miller	1/20/2014		—		—		—		—		—		—		522,368		—		—	$	595,500
Gregory Miller	4/1/2014	$	125,000	$	250,000	$	375,000		109,649		219,298		328,947		—		200,000	$	1.14	$	410,000
Michele Conforti	4/1/2014	$	125,000	$	250,000	$	375,000		109,649		219,298		328,947		—		110,000	$	1.14	$	430,160
Sloane Levy	4/1/2014	$	125,000	$	250,000	$	375,000		109,649		219,298		328,947		—		150,000	$	1.14	$	495,939
Robert Lyons	4/1/2014	$	125,000	$	250,000	$	375,000		109,649		219,298		328,947		—		125,000	$	1.14	$	350,000

The following paragraphs summarize the material terms of the employment agreements of our named executive officers who are currently employed by us. The severance provisions of these agreements are summarized under the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Todd H. Siegel. Effective as of November 9, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Siegel pursuant to which he served as an Executive Vice President and our General Counsel. Mr. Siegel was appointed as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer as of November 24, 2008. Effective February 17, 2009, Mr. Siegel resigned as General Counsel of the Company; Mr. Siegel served as an Executive Vice President and our Chief Financial Officer until September 20, 2012, at which time he was promoted to Chief Executive Officer. The initial term of the agreement was November 9, 2007 through June 1, 2010. After the initial term, the agreement is subject to automatic one-year renewals unless either party provides at least 90 days’ prior written notice to the other party of its intent not to renew the agreement. Although the agreement reflects an annual base salary of $275,000, Mr. Siegel’s annual base salary was increased to $284,000 on February 26, 2008 pursuant to a compensation committee resolution. Mr. Siegel’s annual base salary was further increased to $350,000 in connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer and again increased to $600,000 in connection with his promotion to Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Siegel is also eligible for an annual target bonus of 150% of his base salary, subject to the attainment of performance goals established by the Committee under our annual incentive plan.

Greg Miller. Effective as of December 16, 2013, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Miller pursuant to which he has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The initial term of the employment agreement was from January 20, 2014 through January 20, 2015. After the initial term, the agreement is subject to automatic one-year renewals unless either party provides at least 90 days’ prior written notice to the other party of its intent not to renew the agreement. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Miller’s annual base salary is $400,000 and his annual target bonus is 100% of base salary. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Miller was paid a signing bonus of $100,000 in 2014. Such signing bonus is subject to repayment if Mr. Miller terminates his employment without good reason or is terminated for Cause prior to July 20, 2015.

Michele Conforti. Effective as of May 14, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Conforti pursuant to which he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Affinion International. Effective March 1, 2014, Mr. Conforti was promoted to the role of President, Affinion International and his annual target bonus was increased to 75% of salary.

Sloane Levy. On January 14, 2011, we entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Levy pursuant to which she served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company. The initial term of the agreement is one year. After the initial term, the agreement is subject to automatic one-year renewals unless either party provides at least 90 days’ prior written notice to the other party of its intent not to renew the agreement. The agreement reflects Ms. Levy’s base salary of $300,000, subject to annual review for potential increases. Ms. Levy is eligible to receive an annual target bonus of 100% of her base salary, subject to the attainment of performance goals established by the Committee under our annual incentive plan. Ms. Levy’s annual base salary was increased to $400,000 effective May 1, 2011. On April 1, 2014, Ms. Levy assumed the role of Executive Vice President and President, Membership.

Robert Lyons. On December 27, 2014, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lyons pursuant to which he serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The initial term of the agreement is one year. After the initial term, the agreement is subject to automatic one-year renewals unless either party provides at least 90 days’ prior written notice to the other party of its intent not to renew the agreement. The agreement reflects Mr. Lyons’ base salary of $400,000, subject to annual review for potential increases. Mr. Lyons is eligible to receive an annual target bonus of 100% of his base salary, subject to the attainment of performance goals established by the Committee under our annual incentive plan. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Lyons was paid a signing bonus of $50,000 in 2014. Such signing bonus is subject to repayment if Mr. Lyons terminates his employment without good reason or is terminated for Cause prior to September 10, 2015.

Restrictive Covenants. Each of the named executive officers is subject to restrictive covenants contained in their employment agreements, which are identical to covenants they are subject to in their capacity as shareholders under the Management Investor Rights Agreement, to the extent applicable. Each named executive officer is prohibited from soliciting our employees, customers, suppliers, and licensees for three (3) years following his or her termination of employment and prohibited from competing with us and our affiliates for two (2) years following termination of employment. Each named executive officer is also subject to post-termination nondisclosure obligations relating to confidential company information.

On October 17, 2005, Affinion Holdings adopted its 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan allows Affinion Holdings to grant nonqualified stock options, rights to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings common stock and awards of restricted shares of Affinion Holdings common stock to Affinion Holdings and its affiliates’ directors, employees and consultants. The 2005 Plan is administered by the Committee, which has the power to grant awards under the 2005 Plan, select eligible persons to receive awards under the 2005 Plan, determine the specific terms and conditions of any award (including price and conditions of vesting), construe and interpret the provisions of the 2005 Plan, and generally make all other determinations and take other actions as may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2005 Plan.

In the event of a change in control of Affinion Holdings, Affinion Holdings may, but is not obligated to, purchase then-outstanding options for a per option amount equal to the amount per share received in respect of the shares sold in the change in control transaction less the option price multiplied by the number of shares subject to the option. Stock awards will have a purchase price as determined by Affinion Holdings’ compensation committee and evidenced by an award agreement. Affinion Holdings may amend or terminate the 2005 Plan at any time, but no such action as it pertains to an existing award may materially impair the rights of an existing holder without the consent of the participant.

Both time and performance-based vesting options have been awarded under the 2005 Plan. On April 1, 2014, the Company modified approximately 2.1 million of the outstanding options under the 2005 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024.

On November 7, 2007, the board of directors of Affinion Holdings adopted its 2007 Plan, under which our employees, directors and other service providers are eligible to receive awards of Affinion Holdings common stock. The rationale for the 2007 Plan was to provide a means through which Affinion Holdings and its affiliates may attract and retain key personnel and to provide a means for directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors (and prospective directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors) of Affinion Holdings and its affiliates to acquire and maintain an equity interest in Affinion Holdings, or be paid incentive compensation, which may (but need not) be measured by reference to Affinion Holdings’ stock price. Upon adoption of the 2007 Plan, no additional grants may be made under Affinion Holdings’ 2005 Plan.

Affinion Holdings’ board of directors authorized 10,000,000 shares of Affinion Holdings common stock for grants of non-qualified stock options, incentive (qualified) stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, and/or performance compensation awards under the 2007 Plan. Cash bonus awards may also be granted under the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan has a term of ten years and no further awards may be granted under the 2007 Plan after November 7, 2017.

The Committee (or Affinion Holdings’ board of directors acting as the Committee) administers the 2007 Plan and has the power to grant awards under the 2007 Plan, select eligible persons to receive awards under the 2007 Plan, determine the specific terms and conditions of any award (including price and conditions of vesting), construe and interpret the 2007 Plan, and generally make all other determinations and take other actions as may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2007 Plan. In the event of a change in control, the Committee may determine, in its sole discretion, that outstanding options and equity awards (other than performance compensation awards) issued under the 2007 Plan become fully vested and may vest performance compensation awards based on the level of attainment of the specified performance goals. The Committee may also cancel outstanding awards and pay the value of such awards to participants in connection with a change in control. On April 1, 2014, the Company modified approximately 2.4 million of the outstanding options under the 2007 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024. On April 1, 2014, the Company granted options to certain key employees and directors with an exercise price of $1.14 per option and a contractual life of ten years. Options granted to employees vest ratably on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, while options granted to directors vest immediately upon grant. On January 20, 2014, in accordance with Mr. Miller’s employment agreement, the Company granted him 522,368 restricted stock units. The restricted stock units vest ratably on each of the first two anniversaries of Mr. Miller’s date of employment and, upon vesting, may be settled at Mr. Miller’s option, in cash or shares of common stock.

In connection with the acquisition of Webloyalty in January 2011, the Company assumed the webloyalty.com, inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “webloyalty.com ISO Plan”), the webloyalty.com, inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the “webloyalty.com NQ Plan”) and the Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. 2005 Equity Award Plan (the “Webloyalty 2005 Plan”). The webloyalty.com ISO Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in February 1999, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of incentive stock options to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. Unless otherwise determined by Webloyalty’s board of directors, options granted under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan over a ten year period. As of December 31, 2014, there were no outstanding options under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan. No additional grants may be made under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan.

The webloyalty.com NQ Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in February 1999, as amended and restated in February 2004, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of stock options to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan over a ten year period. As of December 31, 2014, there were no outstanding stock options to acquire shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock granted under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan. No additional grants may be made under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan.

under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and nonqualified stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the par value of a share of Webloyalty’s common stock on the date of grant. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan over a ten year period. On April 1 2014, the Company modified approximately 0.5 million of the outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024. As of December 31, 2014, after conversion of the outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan into options to acquire shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, there were options to acquire 0.5 million shares of Affinion Holdings common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.14 to $7.32. Substantially all of the outstanding options were vested as of December 31, 2013 and expire between March 2016 and April 2024.

On April 1, 2014, the Committee approved the 2014 PIA Program, an equity and cash incentive award program consisting of performance incentive units (“PIUs”) and a cash incentive award (“CIA”). Each 2014 PIA entitles the participant to one share of common stock for each PIU and a cash payment in respect of the CIA, in each case, subject to applicable withholding taxes, when the applicable vesting conditions for the award are met.

On March 16, 2015, the Committee determined that the performance vesting criteria under the 2014 PIA were not satisfied and, accordingly, all of the 2014 PIA were canceled.

The following table presents information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by each named executive officer at the end of fiscal year 2014 (with each share amount and exercise price adjusted to reflect Affinion Holdings’ stock split and the adjustment to the exercise price in connection with the re-pricing of the Underwater Options in 2014).

	Option Awards											Stock Awards
(a)	(b)			(c)			(d)		(e)		(f)	(g)			(h)		(i)		(j)
																			Equity
																	Equity		Incentive
																	Incentive		Plan Awards:
																	Plan Awards:		Market or
							Equity										Number of		Payout
							Incentive Plan					Number of			Market Value		Unearned		Value of
	Number of			Number of			Awards: Number					Shares or			of Shares or		Shares,		Unearned
	Securities			Securities			of Securities					Units of			Units of		Units		Shares, Units
	Underlying			Underlying			Underlying		Option			Stock			Stock That		or Other		or Other
	Unexercised			Unexercised			Unexercised		Exercise		Option	That Have			Have Not		Rights That		Rights That
	Options (#)			Options (#)			Unearned Options		Price($)		Expiration	Not			Vested		Have Not		Have Not
Name	Exercisable (1)(2)			Unexercisable (1)(2)			(#)		(3)(4)(5)		Date	Vested (#)			($)		Vested		Vested
Todd H. Siegel		—			200,000			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		187,500			62,500			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		100,000			—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		18,900			—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		130,662	(Tranche A )		—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		65,331	(Tranche B)		—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		65,331	(Tranche C)		—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—

Gregory S. Miller		—			200,000			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		522,368	(6)	$	595,500		—		—

Michele Conforti		—			110,000			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		37,500			12,500			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		15,000			—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		8,200			—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		21,000	(Tranche A )		—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		—			10,500	(Tranche B)		—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		—			10,500	(Tranche C)		—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—

Sloane Levy		150,000			50,000			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—
		92,610			—			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—

Robert Lyons		—			125,000			—	$	1.14	4/1/2024		—			—		—		—

The Tranche B options vest on the eighth anniversary of the grant date, or, if earlier, the date on which a 20% or greater investor internal rate of return is realized.

The Tranche C options vest on the eighth anniversary of the grant date or, if earlier, the date on which a 30% or greater investor internal rate of return is realized.

Other than the grant of 92,610 options to Ms. Levy, options not designated as either Tranche A, Tranche B or Tranche C, which were granted under the 2007 Plan, are scheduled to vest with respect to 25% of the shares subject to such option on each of the first four anniversary dates of the grant.

The following table summarizes the vesting of stock, including restricted stock, restricted stock units and similar instruments, by each of our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

The tables below reflect the amount of compensation that would be payable to each of our named executive officers in the event of the termination of such executive’s employment as provided under the named executive officers’ employment agreements in effect for 2014. The amount of compensation payable to each named executive officer upon termination for good reason, retirement, termination without cause, the named executive officer’s disability or death or in the event of a change of control, is shown below. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2014, and thus includes amounts earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts that would be paid out to the executives upon their termination. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation from us. Outstanding unvested equity awards are generally not automatically accelerated upon a change of control.

Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer’s employment terminates, he or she is entitled to receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment. Such amounts include:

In the event of the retirement of a named executive officer, in addition to the items identified above he or she will continue to be able to exercise vested options granted under Affinion Holdings’ 2005 Plan and 2007 Plan for ninety (90) days following termination of employment (or such longer period as provided under the applicable plan documents and award agreements).

In the event of the death or disability of a named executive officer, in addition to the benefits listed under the headings “Payments Made Upon Termination, Generally” and “Payments Made Upon Retirement” above, the named executive officer will receive benefits under our disability plan or payments under our life insurance plan, as applicable.

The tables below reflect that Messrs. Siegel, Miller, Conforti and Lyons and Ms. Levy would have been entitled under their respective employment agreements to a lump sum payment equal to 100% of the respective executive’s base salary upon the executive’s termination of employment on account of death or disability.

Payments Made Upon Termination “Without Cause” or Termination for “Good Reason”

Pursuant to the executives’ employment agreements, if an executive’s employment is terminated “without cause,” or if the executive terminates employment in certain circumstances defined in the agreement that constitute “good reason,” or the executive’s employment is terminated by us for cause or by reason of death or disability, the named executive officers will receive the benefits set forth under the heading “Payments Made Upon Termination, Generally” and in the following tables.

“Good reason” generally means: (i) our material failure to fulfill our obligations under the executive’s employment agreement, (ii) a material and adverse change to, or a material reduction of, the executive’s duties and responsibilities, (iii) a reduction in the executive’s annual base salary or target bonus (excluding any reduction related to a broader compensation reduction that is not limited to executive specifically and that is not more than 10% in the aggregate or any reduction to which the executive consents) or (iv) the relocation of the executive’s primary office to a location more than 35 miles from his current work location. We have a 30 day cure right following timely notice from the executive of any event constituting good reason.

“Cause” generally means: the executive’s (i) conviction of a felony or a crime of moral turpitude; (ii) conduct that constitutes fraud or embezzlement; (iii) willful misconduct or willful gross neglect; (iv) continued willful failure to substantially perform his duties; or (v) his material breach of his employment agreement. The executive has certain cure rights with respect to the acts set forth in (iv) and (v).

The named executive officers are only entitled to receive severance payments so long as they comply with their restrictive covenants regarding non-disclosure of confidential information, non-solicitation of employees, non-competition, and proprietary rights, each during and for specified periods after employment.

Payment of severance is conditioned on the named executive officer or such executive officer’s legal representative executing a separation agreement and general release of claims against us and our affiliates.

In the event Mr. Siegel’s employment is terminated by us without cause (including as a result of our non-renewal of the agreement) or he terminates his employment with us for good reason, he will be entitled under the severance provisions of his employment agreement to a lump sum payment of any unpaid annual base salary through the date of termination and any bonus earned but unpaid for any fiscal year ended prior to the year in which the date of termination occurs, as well as the payment in six quarterly installments commencing on the date of termination of an amount equal to 100% of the aggregate amount of his annual base salary and target bonus. If Mr. Siegel’s employment is terminated due to death or disability, he will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 100% of his base salary. In the event Mr. Siegel violates any of the restrictive covenants he will have no further right to receive any severance payments.

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination of Mr. Siegel’s employment on December 31, 2014 under the circumstances described above:

							Termination		Termination
Executive Benefit	Voluntary		Early		Normal		Without		for Good						Change of
and Payments Upon Separation	Termination		Retirement		Retirement		Cause		Reason		Disability		Death		Control
Compensation:
Annual Incentive Plan		—		—		—	$	1,800,000	$	1,800,000		—		—		—
Cash Severance		—		—		—	$	1,200,000	$	1,200,000	$	600,000	$	600,000		—
Long-Term Incentive Compensation:
Stock Options (1)		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Benefits & Perquisites:
Savings Plan		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Health and Welfare Benefits		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Life Insurance Proceeds		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

In the event Mr. Miller’s employment was terminated by us without cause (including as a result of the non-renewal of his employment agreement) or he terminated his employment with us for good reason, he would have been entitled under the severance provisions of the employment agreement to a lump sum payment of any unpaid annual base salary through the date of termination and any bonus earned but unpaid for any fiscal year ended prior to the year in which the date of termination occurs, as well as the payment in 24 monthly installments commencing on the date of termination of an amount equal to 100% of the aggregate amount of his annual base salary and target bonus. If Mr. Miller’s employment had terminated due to death or disability, he would have been entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 100% of his base salary. In the event Mr. Miller violates any of the restrictive covenants he will have no further right to receive any severance payments.

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination of Mr. Miller’s employment on December 31, 2014 under the circumstances described above:

							Termination		Termination
Executive Benefit	Voluntary		Early		Normal		Without		for Good						Change of
and Payments Upon Separation	Termination		Retirement		Retirement		Cause		Reason		Disability		Death		Control
Compensation:
Annual Incentive Plan		—		—		—	$	400,000	$	400,000		—		—		—
Cash Severance		—		—		—	$	400,000	$	400,000	$	400,000	$	400,000		—
Long-Term Incentive Compensation:
Stock Options		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Benefits & Perquisites:
Savings Plan		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Health and Welfare Benefits		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Life Insurance Proceeds		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

In the event Mr. Conforti’s employment was terminated by us without cause (including as a result of the non-renewal of his employment agreement) or he terminated his employment with us for good reason, he would have been entitled under the severance provisions of the employment agreement to a lump sum payment of any unpaid annual base salary through the date of termination and any bonus earned but unpaid for any fiscal year ended prior to the year in which the date of termination occurs, as well as the payment of an amount equal to 50% of the aggregate amount of his annual base salary. In the event Mr. Conforti violates any of the restrictive covenants he will have no further right to receive any severance payments. In addition, as compensation for a non-compete covenant, Mr. Conforti is entitled to 50% of the aggregate amount of his base salary at the end of his employment.

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination of Mr. Conforti’s employment on December 31, 2014 under the circumstances described above:

							Termination		Termination
Executive Benefit	Voluntary		Early		Normal		Without		for Good						Change of
and Payments Upon Separation	Termination		Retirement		Retirement		Cause		Reason		Disability		Death		Control
Compensation:
Annual Incentive Plan		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Cash Severance	$	197,854	$	197,854	$	197,854	$	395,707	$	395,707	$	197,854	$	197,854	$	197,854
Long-Term Incentive Compensation:
Stock Options		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Benefits & Perquisites:
Savings Plan		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Health and Welfare Benefits		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Life Insurance Proceeds		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

In the event Ms. Levy’s employment is terminated by us without cause (including as a result of the non-renewal of her employment agreement) or she terminates her employment with us for good reason, she will be entitled under the severance provisions of the employment agreement to a lump sum payment of any unpaid annual base salary through the date of termination and any bonus earned but unpaid for any fiscal year ended prior to the year in which the date of termination occurs, as well as the payment in 18 monthly installments commencing on the date of termination of an amount equal to 100% of the aggregate amount of her annual base salary and target bonus. If Ms. Levy’s employment is terminated due to death or disability, she will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 100% of her base salary. In the event Ms. Levy violates any of the restrictive covenants she will have no further right to receive any severance payments.

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination of Ms. Levy’s employment on December 31, 2014 under the circumstances described above:

							Termination		Termination
Executive Benefit	Voluntary		Early		Normal		Without		for Good						Change of
and Payments Upon Separation	Termination		Retirement		Retirement		Cause		Reason		Disability		Death		Control
Compensation:
Annual Incentive Plan		—		—		—	$	400,000	$	400,000		—		—		—
Cash Severance		—		—		—	$	400,000	$	400,000	$	400,000	$	400,000		—
Long-Term Incentive Compensation:
Stock Options		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Benefits & Perquisites:
Savings Plan		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Health and Welfare Benefits		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Life Insurance Proceeds		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

In the event Mr. Lyons’ employment is terminated by us without cause (including as a result of the non-renewal of his employment agreement) or he terminates his employment with us for good reason, he will be entitled under the severance provisions of the employment agreement to a lump sum payment of any unpaid annual base salary through the date of termination and any bonus earned but unpaid for any fiscal year ended prior to the year in which the date of termination occurs, as well as the payment in 24 monthly installments commencing on the date of termination of an amount equal to 100% of the aggregate amount of his annual base salary and target bonus. If Mr. Lyons’

employment is terminated due to death or disability, he will be entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 100% of his base salary. In the event Mr. Lyons violates any of the restrictive covenants he will have no further right to receive any severance payments.

The following table shows the potential payments upon termination of Mr. Lyons’ employment on December 31, 2014 under the circumstances described above:

							Termination		Termination
Executive Benefit	Voluntary		Early		Normal		Without		for Good						Change of
and Payments Upon Separation	Termination		Retirement		Retirement		Cause		Reason		Disability		Death		Control
Compensation:
Annual Incentive Plan		—		—		—	$	400,000	$	400,000		—		—		—
Cash Severance		—		—		—	$	400,000	$	400,000	$	400,000	$	400,000		—
Long-Term Incentive Compensation:
Stock Options (1)				—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Benefits & Perquisites:
Savings Plan		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Health and Welfare Benefits		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Life Insurance Proceeds		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

We use a combination of cash and share-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the board of directors. In setting director compensation, we consider the significant amount of time that directors expend in fulfilling their duties to us as well as the skill-level required by the members of our board of directors. The members of our board of directors also serve on the board of directors of Affinion Holdings for no additional compensation.

Our non-employee directors are entitled to receive annual compensation in the amount of $45,000 payable in equal quarterly installments, plus $2,000 for each regular or special meeting of our board of directors or board committee that they attend in person, plus an additional $1,000 for each regular or special meeting of our board of directors or board committee that they attend by teleconference. In addition, in 2014, Mr. Matthew H. Nord received $15,000 for serving as the chairman of the audit committee of the board of directors and Mr. Michael A. Reiss received $7,500 for serving on the audit committee of the board of directors and Mr. Jonathan E. Ellenthal received $1,875 for serving on the audit committee of the board of directors until his resignation from the board of directors. Directors who are our employees receive no compensation for their service as directors.

Our directors are also eligible to participate in the 2007 Plan. We generally award non-employee directors 15,000 options when they join our board of directors. The chairperson of the audit committee receives an additional 7,500 options upon appointment as chairperson, and other non-employee directors who serve as members of the audit committee receive an additional 3,750 options when they join the committee.

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by us and earned or accrued by directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

(a)	(b)		(c)		(d)		(e)		(f)		(g)
							Change in
							Pension
	Fees						Value and
	Earned or						Deferred
	Paid in		Stock		Option		Compensation		All Other
Name (1)	Cash ($)		Awards ($)		Awards ($)(2)		Earnings ($)		Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Marc E. Becker	$	52,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	52,000
Matthew H. Nord	$	72,000	$	—	$	6,000	$	—	$	—	$	78,000
Stan Parker⁽³⁾	$	12,250	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	12,250
Eric L. Press	$	52,000	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	52,000
Michael A. Reiss	$	63,625	$	—	$	15,000	$	—	$	—	$	78,625
Jonathon E. Ellenthal⁽⁴⁾	$	15,125	$	—	$	3,000	$	—	$	—	$	18,125
Richard J. Fernandes	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
David J. Topper	$	53,000	$	—	$	12,000	$	—	$	—	$	65,000
Zachary J. Kaplan⁽⁵⁾	$	12,250	$	—	$	12,000	$	—	$	—	$	24,250
Skip Victor	$	54,000	$	—	$	12,000	$	—	$	—	$	66,000
Nathaniel J. Lipman⁽⁶⁾	$	270,731	$	—	$	996,240	$	—	$	40,767	$	1,307,738

During 2014, the members of our Compensation Committee consisted of Messrs. Becker, Press and Topper. Messrs. Becker and Press are principals and stockholders of Apollo, our controlling stockholder. Neither Mr. Becker nor Mr. Press has ever been one of our officers or employees. During 2014, neither Mr. Becker nor Mr. Press had any relationship that requires disclosure in this Report as a transaction with a related person. During 2014, none of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity (or other board committee of such entity performing equivalent function or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors of such entity), one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee, none of our executive officers served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on our Compensation Committee, and none of our executive officers served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity (or other board committee of such entity performing equivalent function or, in the absence of any such committee, the entire board of directors of such entity), one of whose executive officers served as one of such directors.

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of Affinion Holdings’ common stock as of February 25, 2015 by (i) each person known to beneficially own more than 5% of the common stock of Affinion Holdings, (ii) each of our named executive officers, (iii) each member of the Board of Directors of Affinion Holdings and (iv) all of our executive officers and members of the Board of Directors of Affinion Holdings as a group.

The amounts and percentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which he has no economic interest.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Holdings completed an exchange offer in which it, among other things, issued 13.5 million Series A warrants and 70.2 million Series B warrants to tendering holders of 11.625% senior notes. The Series B warrants will be not become exercisable until and unless on the fourth anniversary of the exchange closing date, 5% or more in aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes are then outstanding and unpaid, whereupon, if it should ever occur, the Series B warrants will become exercisable until the tenth anniversary of the exchange closing date at an exercise price of $0.01 per share of Class B

common stock. Because the Series B warrants are not exercisable within 60 days, the Series B warrants are not reflected below. For a description of director nomination and election rights, see “Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence—Agreements with Certain Investors”. In addition, the Warrant Agreement prohibits the transfer of warrants and the exercise of warrants if either would (1) require the approval of, or filings, registrations or notices to or with, a governmental entity, which approvals, filings, registrations or notices have not been granted or made or (2) would result in any class of securities of Affinion Holdings having more than 450 “holders of record” (as understood for purposes of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act), unless such transfer is to or exercise is by a person who is an “accredited investor” or (3) would result in any class of securities of Affinion Holdings having more than 1,900 “holders of record.”

Information regarding holders of Series A warrants is based on the warrant register maintained by the warrant agent and provided to the Company.

Except as indicated by footnote, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.

In connection with the closing of the Transactions on October 17, 2005, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2005 Plan and the 2005 Plan was approved by the stockholders of Affinion Holdings. The 2005 Plan authorizes the board of directors of Affinion Holdings to grant non-qualified, non-assignable stock options and rights to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings common stock to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries, including us. No additional grants may be made under the 2005 Plan on or after November 7, 2007, the effective date of the 2007 Plan, as defined below.

On November 7, 2007, the board of directors of Affinion Holdings adopted the 2007 Plan, under which our employees, directors and other service providers are eligible to receive awards of Holdings common stock. Affinion Holdings’ board of directors authorized 10,000,000 shares of Affinion Holdings common stock for grants of non-qualified stock options, incentive (qualified) stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, and/or performance compensation awards under the 2007 Plan. Cash bonus awards may also be granted under the 2007 Plan. The 2007 Plan has a term of ten years and no further awards may be granted under the 2007 Plan after November 7, 2017.

In connection with the acquisition of Webloyalty in January 2011, the Company assumed the webloyalty.com, inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “webloyalty.com ISO Plan”), the webloyalty.com, inc. Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the “webloyalty.com NQ Plan”) and the Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. 2005 Equity Award Plan (the “Webloyalty 2005 Plan”). The webloyalty.com ISO Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in February 1999, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of incentive stock options to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. Unless otherwise determined by Webloyalty’s board of directors, options granted under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan over a ten year period. As of December 31, 2014, there were no outstanding stock options under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan. No additional grants may be made under the webloyalty.com ISO Plan.

The webloyalty.com NQ Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in February 1999, as amended and restated in February 2004, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of stock options to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan over a ten year period. As of December 31, 2014, there were no outstanding stock options under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan. No additional grants may be made under the webloyalty.com NQ Plan.

The Webloyalty 2005 Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in May 2005, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock bonuses and performance compensation awards or any combination of these awards to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. Unless otherwise determined by Webloyalty’s board of directors, incentive stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and nonqualified stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the par value of a share of Webloyalty’s common stock on the date of grant. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan over a ten year period. As of December 31, 2014, after conversion of the outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan into options to acquire shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, there were options to acquire 0.5 million shares of Affinion Holdings common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.14 to $7.32. All of the outstanding options were vested as of December 31, 2014 and expire between March 2016 and April 2024.

For additional discussion of our equity compensation, including the 2005 Plan, the 2007 Plan, the webloyalty.com ISO Plan, the webloyalty.com NQ Plan and the Webloyalty 2005 Plan, see Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

The table below summarizes the equity issuances under the 2005 Plan, the 2007 Plan, the webloyalty.com ISO Plan, the webloyalty.com NQ Plan and the Webloyalty 2005 Plan as of December 31, 2014.

Overview. On July 26, 2005, we, along with our parent company, Affinion Holdings, entered into a purchase agreement with Cendant. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, on October 17, 2005, we purchased from Cendant all of the equity interests of AGLLC, and all of the share capital of AIH. The aggregate purchase price paid to Cendant was approximately $1.8 billion (consisting of cash and newly issued preferred stock of Affinion Holdings and after giving effect to certain fixed adjustments), subject to further adjustments as provided in the purchase agreement. In addition, Cendant received a warrant to purchase up to 7.5% of the outstanding common stock of Affinion Holdings.

Following the Acquisition, Affinion Holdings owned 100% of our common stock. At such time, with respect to the capital stock of Affinion Holdings, (i) approximately 97% of its common stock then outstanding was owned by Parent LLC, (ii) approximately 3% of its common stock was owned by the management stockholders and (iii) 100% of its preferred stock was owned by Cendant.

Indemnification . Cendant has agreed to indemnify us, Affinion Holdings and each of our and Affinion Holdings’ affiliates, and each of our and Affinion Holdings’ respective directors and officers, collectively, the indemnified parties, for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made by Cendant, as well as for other specified matters, certain of which are described below. Affinion Holdings and we have agreed to indemnify Cendant, its affiliates and each of their respective directors and officers for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made by each of us, as well as for certain other specified matters. Generally, all parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to breaches of representations and warranties (except with respect to the matters described below) (i) are subject to a $100,000 occurrence threshold, (ii) are not effective until the aggregate amount of losses suffered by the indemnified party exceeds $15.0 million (and then only for the amount of losses exceeding $15.0 million) and (iii) are limited to $275.1 million of recovery. Generally, subject to certain exceptions of greater duration, the parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to representations and warranties expired on April 15, 2007 with indemnification obligations related to covenants surviving until the applicable covenant has been fully performed.

In connection with the purchase agreement, Cendant agreed to specific indemnification obligations with respect to the matters described below.

As publicly announced, as part of a plan to split into four independent companies, Cendant has (i) distributed the equity interests it previously held in its hospitality services business (“Wyndham”) and its real estate services business (“Realogy”) to Cendant stockholders and (ii) sold its travel services business (“Travelport”) to a third party. Cendant continues as a publicly traded company which owns the vehicle rental business (“Avis/Budget,” together with Wyndham and Realogy, the “Cendant Entities”). Subject to

certain exceptions, Wyndham and Realogy have agreed to share Cendant’s contingent and other liabilities (including its indemnity obligations to the Company described above and other liabilities to the Company and Affinion Holdings in connection with the Apollo Transactions) in specified percentages. If any Cendant Entity defaults in its payment, when due, of any such liabilities, the remaining Cendant Entities are required to pay an equal portion of the amounts in default. Realogy was subsequently acquired by an affiliate of Apollo.

Excluded Litigation. Cendant has agreed to fully indemnify the indemnified parties with respect to any pending or future litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding relating to the facts and circumstances of Fortis and the accounting irregularities in the former CUC International, Inc. announced on April 15, 1998.

Certain Litigation and Compliance with Law Matters. Cendant has agreed to indemnify the indemnified parties up to specified amounts for, among others: (i) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to legal proceedings that (x) occur after the date of the purchase agreement, (y) relate to facts and circumstances related to the business of AGLLC or AIH and (z) constitute a breach or violation of its compliance with law representations and warranties; and (ii) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to compliance with laws to the extent related to the business of AGLLC or AIH.

Cendant, Affinion Holdings and we have agreed that losses up to $15.0 million incurred with respect to these matters will be borne solely by us and losses in excess of $15.0 million will be shared by the parties in accordance with agreed upon allocations. We have the right at all times to control litigation related to shared losses and Cendant has consultation rights with respect to such litigation.

In addition to the purchase agreement described above in connection with the Apollo Transactions, we and Affinion Holdings entered into the following agreements with Apollo for which payments have been made in the last three years:

On October 17, 2005, Apollo entered into a consulting agreement with us for the provision of certain structuring and advisory services, pursuant to which we paid Apollo a fee of $20.0 million for services rendered in connection with the Apollo Transactions and reimbursed Apollo for certain expenses incurred in rendering those services (the “2005 Consulting Agreement”). The 2005 Consulting Agreement has been amended and restated as described in “—Other Related Party Transactions—Agreements with Certain Investors.”

During 2006, Apollo acquired one of our vendors, SourceCorp Incorporated, that provides document and information services to us. On January 1, 2012, we entered into a new master services agreement with SourceHOV LLC (which is the successor to SOURCECORP by merger) for a term of five years, subject to our right to terminate at any time with 180 days’ notice. The fees incurred for these services for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 was $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively. As a result of the sale in 2013 of SOURCEHOV, LLC by the affiliates of Apollo, SOURCEHOV, LLC was not a related party during the year ended December 31, 2014.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company purchased $4.1 million of gift cards from AMC Entertainment, Inc., a company owned by an affiliate of Apollo. The cost of the gift cards, which were utilized primarily for loyalty program fulfillment, is included as a contra-revenue in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. As a result of the sale in 2012 of AMC Entertainment, Inc. by the affiliate of Apollo, AMC Entertainment, Inc. was not a related party during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014.

In July 2014, Novitex Enterprise Solutions, a document outsourcing provider owned by affiliates of Apollo, commenced providing administrative services to the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized expenses of $0.4 million, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

SkyMall, which was acquired by the Company in September 2014, provides fulfillment services to Caesar’s Entertainment Corporation, which is owned by an affiliate of Apollo. During the period from September 9, 2014 through December 31, 2014, the Company fulfilled merchandise and gift cards of $6.8 million and $3.2 million, respectively, which are included in revenue, net of the

cost to acquire the merchandise and gift cards, in the accompanying statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2014.

On January 28, 2010, we, through Affinion Investments, entered into a subscription and capital commitment letter with Alclear Holdings, LLC (“Alclear”), pursuant to which we agreed to (i) become a member of Alclear and (ii) fund a capital contribution to Alclear in cash in the amount of $1.0 million. In order to make its capital contribution in Alclear, Affinion Investments received a capital contribution in cash in the amount of $1.0 million from Affinion. As a result of the capital contribution, we acquired an ownership interest of approximately 5%, subsequently reduced to approximately 2.9%, in Alclear. In February 2010, Alclear was selected as the winning bidder in the bankruptcy auction sale of the assets of Verified Identity Pass, Inc., an entity that provides biometric system solutions for airports, airlines, travel agents, and business travelers in the U.S. Alclear acquired the assets of Verified Identity Pass, Inc. in April 2010. Subsequently, on December 12, 2013, Affinion Investments sold all of its membership interests in Alclear to Affinion Developments, LLC, a newly formed unrestricted subsidiary of Affinion. We provided support services to Alclear and recognized revenue in the amount of $1.1 million, $0.9 million and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively.

Alclear is controlled and partially funded by Caryn Seidman-Becker, who also serves as its Chief Executive Officer. Ms. Seidman-Becker is the spouse of Marc Becker. Mr. Becker is a director of Affinion and a partner of Apollo. Apollo beneficially owns approximately 68% of the common stock of Affinion Holdings.

On January 14, 2011, the Company and Affinion Holdings entered into, and consummated, an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) that resulted in Affinion Holdings’ indirect acquisition of all of the capital stock of Webloyalty and the conversion of Webloyalty securities into Affinion Holdings securities (the “Webloyalty Acquisition”). As a result of the Webloyalty Acquisition, (i) Parent LLC, which is an affiliate of Apollo, and Affinion Holdings’ existing management investors collectively own approximately 70.4% of Affinion Holdings’ issued and outstanding common stock; (ii) General Atlantic owns approximately 20.6% of Affinion Holdings’ issued and outstanding common stock; and (iii) other holders of Webloyalty common stock collectively own approximately 9.0% of Affinion Holdings’ issued and outstanding common stock.

On January 14, 2011, Holdings entered into the Stockholder Agreement (the “Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement”) with (i) Parent LLC; (ii) General Atlantic; (iii) Richard Fernandes and the Fernandes Family Trust A dated June 25, 1999 (collectively, “Fernandes”); and (iv) Vincent D’Agostino and the D’Agostino Family Trust (collectively with any transferee trusts, “D’Agostino,” and together with General Atlantic and Fernandes, the “Principal WL Stockholders”). On December 12, 2013, in connection with the December 2013 refinancing of the Company’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and Affinion Holdings’ 11.625% senior notes (the “2013 Refinancing”), the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement was further amended to account for the rights of holders of warrants following the maturation of their right, if ever, to elect a majority of the Company’s directors.

The Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement permits certain of Affinion Holdings’ stockholders—currently Parent LLC and General Atlantic (each, a “Major Stockholder”)—to nominate one director, as well as additional directors for so long as such stockholders own certain percentages of the issued and outstanding shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock. The Chief Executive Officer of Affinion Holdings also will serve as a director, and the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock will nominate the remaining directors. Under the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement, as amended, investment funds affiliated with Apollo and certain investment partnerships sponsored by General Atlantic currently have the right to nominate eight and three, respectively, of our twelve directors. In addition, the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement provides for the nomination of Mr. Todd H. Siegel as a director in his capacity as our Chief Executive Officer and the nomination of Nathaniel J. Lipman as a director. However, as a result of the 2013 Refinancing, the related amendments to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement and Affinion Holdings’ certificate of incorporation and by-laws, and the execution of the Warrantholder Rights Agreement, if on December 12, 2017, 5% or more in aggregate principal amount of the Affinion Holdings 2013 senior notes issued in the 2013 Refinancing are then outstanding and unpaid (the “Control Event”), the provisions of the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement regarding the rights of Major Stockholders thereunder to nominate and elect directors, exercise preemptive rights and certain other information rights will be irrevocably waived and be of no further force and effect, and replaced with a right to nominate one director (or in Apollo’s case, two directors) for so long as such stockholders own certain percentages of the issued and outstanding shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock. In addition, the amendment increased the size of Affinion Holdings’ Board to twelve, which vacancy was filled by the holders of Series A warrants.

At any time before a qualified public offering, the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement requires each Major Stockholder, if it wishes to transfer shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, to offer its shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, first, to Affinion Holdings and, second, to the other Major Stockholders. In addition, if Affinion Holdings or any of its subsidiaries proposes to

issue any equity securities or securities convertible into or exchangeable for equity securities (subject to customary exceptions), each Major Stockholder and each Principal WL Stockholder (for so long as each such Principal WL Stockholder, along with its affiliates, holds a number of shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock equal to 50% or more of the shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock issued to such Principal WL Stockholder in connection with the Webloyalty Acquisition) will have the right to purchase its pro rata share of the offering.

Before a qualified public offering, if any party or parties to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement propose to transfer to a third-party more than 5% of the shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock beneficially owned by such transferring party, all other parties to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement will have the right to participate pro rata in the transfer. In addition, Parent LLC and, following the fifth anniversary of the date of the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement, General Atlantic (for so long as it is a Major Stockholder) will each have the right to require the other holders of Affinion Holdings’ common stock to (1) sell in a transaction comprising the sale of 80% or more of Affinion Holdings’ common stock beneficially owned by Parent LLC or General Atlantic, as applicable, the same percentage of their respective shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock as Parent LLC or General Atlantic, as applicable, desires to sell or (2) vote in favor of a sale of all or substantially all of Affinion Holdings’ and its subsidiaries’ assets to unaffiliated third parties.

Without each Major Stockholder’s prior approval, Affinion Holdings will not, and will cause each of its subsidiaries not to, take or omit to take, as applicable, certain actions related to (1) non-pro rata redemptions, (2) changes to Affinion Holdings’ organizational documents, (3) asset acquisitions or dispositions and (4) affiliate transactions. The Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement shall terminate with respect to any holder thereunder on the date such holder ceases to own any shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock.

On May 7, 2014, with the consent of the holders of a majority of Affinion Holdings’ exercisable Series A warrants and Series B warrants, Affinion Holdings, along with investment funds affiliated with Apollo Global Management, LLC (such investment funds, the “Apollo Funds”) and investment funds affiliated with General Atlantic LLC (such investment funds referred to as “General Atlantic”), entered into an amendment to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement. The amendment reduced the size of Affinion Holdings’ board of directors from twelve to nine. In addition, the amendment provides that the board of directors may from time to time increase or decrease the size of the board of directors with the consent of the Apollo Funds and General Atlantic; provided, however, that upon the demand of either the Apollo Funds or General Atlantic, Affinion Holdings will be required to increase the size of the Board in order to permit such demanding party to fully exercise its rights to nominate directors under the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement.

On January 14, 2011, Affinion Holdings, Parent LLC, General Atlantic and other holders party thereto entered into a Securityholder Rights Agreement (the “Affinion Holdings Securityholder Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties thereto have certain rights with respect to Affinion Holdings’ common stock, including tag-along rights and information rights. Parent LLC and General Atlantic also are provided with drag-along rights. The Affinion Holdings Securityholder Rights Agreement contains restrictions on the transfer of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, other than Affinion Holdings’ common stock held by Parent LLC or General Atlantic (whose Affinion Holdings’ common stock is subject to the Affinion Holdings Stockholder Agreement’s transfer restrictions). The Affinion Holdings Securityholder Rights Agreement will terminate automatically upon: (i) a change of control of Affinion Holdings; (ii) a vote to dissolve Affinion Holdings; or (ii) any event that reduces the number of stockholders to one.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Holdings, Parent LLC, each of the Principal WL Stockholders and the holders of the warrants entered into a Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (the “Affinion Holdings Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which Parent LLC, General Atlantic (on behalf of the holders of the majority of the eligible shares held by the Principal WL Stockholders) and the holders of the warrants have certain demand registration rights with respect to Affinion Holdings’ common stock. In addition, each party to the agreement may exercise “piggyback” rights, and certain holders may request an unlimited number of short-form registrations (including shelf registrations). Under the Affinion Holdings Registration Rights Agreement, Affinion Holdings agreed to assume the fees and expenses associated with registration, and the agreement also contains customary provisions with respect to registration procedures, underwritten offerings and indemnity and contribution rights and obligations.

On January 14, 2011, the Company and Apollo entered into an Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement”) amending and restating the 2005 Consulting Agreement. Under the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, Apollo and its affiliates will continue to provide certain advisory services to the Company regarding proposed financial transactions, acquisitions, investments and financial related matters of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates until October 17, 2017 or until Apollo owns less than 5% of the beneficial economic interests of the Company, whichever is earlier.

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, the annual fee paid by the Company increased to $2,604,845 from $2,000,000, commencing January 1, 2012, with an additional one-time fee of $604,845 being paid promptly after January 14, 2011 in respect of calendar year 2011. Furthermore, if the Company consummates a transaction involving a change of control or an initial public offering before the termination of the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, then, in lieu of the annual consulting fee and subject to certain qualifications, Apollo may elect to receive a lump sum payment equal to the present value of all consulting fees payable through the end of the term of the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement.

In addition, we are permitted to engage Apollo to provide certain services if we engage in any merger, acquisition or similar transaction. If we engage another party to provide these services, we may be required to pay Apollo a transaction fee. We also agree to indemnify Apollo and its affiliates and their directors, officers and representatives for potential losses relating to the services provided under the Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement, which indemnification has been clarified to establish the Company as the primary indemnitor if certain indemnified parties have a right to be indemnified by their affiliates.

In connection with the December 2013 refinancing of the Company’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes, on December 12, 2013, Apollo and the Company further amended the consulting agreement, pursuant to which Apollo will not be paid any fees due under the consulting agreement until such time as none of the Affinion Holdings 2013 senior notes remain outstanding.

In connection with the December 2013 refinancing of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes, on December 12, 2013, Affinion Holdings, Apollo, General Atlantic and the holders of warrants entered into a Warrantholder Rights Agreement (the “Warrantholder Rights Agreement”) pursuant to which the parties thereto have certain rights and obligations with respect to Affinion Holdings’ warrants and common stock, including pre-emptive rights on new equity issuances, tag-along rights and drag-along rights. The Warrantholder Rights Agreement contains restrictions on the transfer of Affinion Holdings’ common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants, other than to affiliates, and prohibits any transfers of any of Affinion Holdings’ equity securities (including the warrants) unless any required regulatory approvals, registrations, filings or notices have been obtained or made. In addition, the Warrantholder Rights Agreement restricts the ability of Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries, in certain instances and subject to limited exceptions, to (i) enter into transactions with Apollo, General Atlantic or their affiliates, (ii) make non-pro rata redemptions, dividends or distributions in which the exercisable warrants are not permitted to participate, (iii) voluntarily liquidate, dissolve or wind-up the affairs of Affinion Holdings or declare bankruptcy, (iv) reorganize, reclassify, reconstruct, consolidate or subdivide Affinion Holdings’ share capital or (v) make changes to Affinion Holdings’ certificate of incorporation or by-laws.

The Warrantholder Rights Agreement shall terminate upon the dissolution of Affinion Holdings, if the number of holders is reduced to zero, upon a change of control or, if at any time following the consummation of an underwritten public offering, less than 5% of the aggregate principal amount of the Affinion Holdings 2013 senior notes issued in the exchange offer remains outstanding.

On May 7, 2014, Affinion Holdings amended the terms of the Warrantholder Rights Agreement to permit transactions with affiliates in respect of Affinion Holdings’ and its subsidiaries’ indebtedness on arm’s-length terms. Pursuant to the terms thereof, the amendment to the Warrantholder Rights Agreement was approved by Affinion Holdings, the Apollo Funds, General Atlantic, and the investors that owned a majority of the Class B common stock underlying the currently exercisable warrants.

On January 14, 2011, Mr. Richard J. Fernandes was appointed President of the Company and Affinion Holdings and as Chief Executive Officer of Affinion International Limited (“AIL”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, effective as of January 14, 2011. Since September of 1998, Mr. Fernandes served as Chief Executive Officer of Webloyalty.

Mr. Fernandes entered into an employment agreement, dated as of January 14, 2011 (the “Fernandes Employment Agreement”), with the Company and Affinion Holdings, in connection with his appointment as President of the Company and Affinion Holdings and as Chief Executive Officer of AIL. The Fernandes Employment Agreement contemplated that Mr. Fernandes would serve in these

positions for a period commencing on January 14, 2011 and ending on December 31, 2012 (the “Initial Term”), unless terminated earlier pursuant to the Fernandes Employment Agreement. After the Initial Term, the Fernandes Employment Agreement was subject to automatic one-year renewals unless either Mr. Fernandes or Affinion Holdings provided at least 90 days’ prior written notice of its intent not to renew the agreement. Effective May 10, 2013, Mr. Fernandes resigned from his positions as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer of Global Retail Services and Co-President of Affinion, as a result of which the Fernandes Employment Agreement was terminated.

Under the Fernandes Employment Agreement, Mr. Fernandes received a base salary of $425,000 and was eligible for an annual target bonus of 125% of his base salary; provided, that, performance objectives determined each year by Affinion Holdings were met.

On May 8, 2013, in connection with his resignation as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer of Global Retail Services and Co-President of Affinion, Mr. Fernandes entered into a consulting agreement with the Company effective May 13, 2013, pursuant to which he will continue working with the Company until the one-year anniversary of such resignation. The contract was subsequently amended to extend the term on a month-to-month basis and the contract may be terminated by either party upon thirty days written notice. Mr. Fernandes will provide certain consulting services to the Company on a part-time basis and will be entitled to receive a fee of $7,500 per month, subject to increase depending on the level of consulting services provided. The agreement also provides for reimbursement of Mr. Fernandes’ out-of-pocket business and travel expenses and for his healthcare insurance costs during that period.

On January 14, 2011, Mr. Fernandes, Parent LLC and Affinion Holdings entered into the Call Agreement (the “Fernandes Call Agreement”), which governs shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock and warrants to purchase Affinion Holdings’ common stock issued to Mr. Fernandes in connection with the Webloyalty Acquisition. Also on January 14, 2011, Mr. Fernandes, Parent LLC and Affinion Holdings entered into the Fernandes Investor Rights Agreement (the “FIRA”), which governs shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock and options to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock acquired by Mr. Fernandes in his capacity as an employee, officer, director or consultant of Affinion Holdings.

The Fernandes Call Agreement provides that, if Mr. Fernandes’ employment with Affinion Holdings is terminated prior to an initial public offering of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, then first Affinion Holdings, and then Parent LLC and General Atlantic Partners 79, L.P., shall have the right, but not the obligation (the “Call Option”), to purchase all of the shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock and/or warrants held by Mr. Fernandes that are subject to the Fernandes Call Agreement and any such shares and/or warrants held by a transferee of Mr. Fernandes. The aggregate purchase price shall be equal to (a) if the Call Option includes the shares and the warrants, the sum of the (1) product of (A) the fair market value per share multiplied by (B) the number of shares being acquired plus (2) the warrant valuation or (b) if the Call Option includes only shares, the product of (1) the fair market value per share multiplied by (2) the number of shares being acquired.

Similarly, the FIRA provides, among other things, that Mr. Fernandes will be prohibited from selling, pledging, distributing or otherwise transferring any shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock (except to lineal descendants and other specified permitted transferees) without Affinion Holdings’ consent. The FIRA also provides that if Mr. Fernandes’ employment with Affinion Holdings terminates for any reason or if Mr. Fernandes experiences personal insolvency or bankruptcy, Affinion Holdings or one of its subsidiaries (or, if Affinion Holdings forgoes this right, Parent LLC) may repurchase Mr. Fernandes’ shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock for a period of three months after such event (depending on the circumstances), at a purchase price equal to the amount originally paid for such shares or the fair market value on the closing date of the repurchase, depending on the circumstances, subject to Affinion Holdings’ obligation to pay additional compensation to Mr. Fernandes under certain circumstances.

In connection with the Webloyalty Acquisition, Mr. Fernandes also received warrants to purchases shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock. The warrants expired unexercised in May 2012.

Pursuant to its written charter, our audit committee must review and approve all related-party transactions, which includes any related party transactions that we would be required to disclose pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. For a discussion of the composition and responsibilities of our audit committee see “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Audit Committee.” In determining whether to approve a related party transaction, the audit committee will consider a number of factors including whether the related party transaction is on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than may reasonably be expected in arm’s-length transactions with unrelated parties.

We are not a listed issuer whose securities are listed on a national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that a majority of the board of directors be independent. However, if we were a listed issuer whose securities

were traded on the NYSE and subject to such requirements, we would be entitled to rely on the controlled company exception contained in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual for exception from the independence requirements related to the majority of our Board of Directors and for the independence requirements related to our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Pursuant to Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, a group or another company is exempt from the requirements that its board of directors consist of a majority of independent directors and that the compensation committee and nominating committee of such company be comprised solely of independent directors. At December 31, 2014, Apollo beneficially owned 68% of the voting power of the Company which would qualify the Company as a controlled company eligible for exemption under the rule.

For a discussion of the independence of members of our audit committee, see “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Audit Committee.”

The following table presents fees for audit and other services provided to the Company by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

All of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s fees for 2014 and 2013 were pre-approved by our audit committee. The audit committee reviewed the 2014 and 2013 audit and non-audit services and concluded that such services were compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence. The audit committee’s policy is to pre-approve all services by the Company’s independent accountants. The audit committee has adopted a pre-approval policy that provides guidelines for the audit, audit-related, tax and other non-audit services that may be provided by Deloitte & Touche to the Company. The policy (a) identifies the guiding principles that must be considered by the audit committee in approving services to ensure that Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence is not impaired; (b) describes the audit, audit-related, tax and other services that may be provided and the non-audit services that are prohibited; and (c) sets forth pre-approval requirements for all permitted services. Under the policy, all services to be provided by Deloitte & Touche must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

The following financial statements of Affinion Group, Inc., together with the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are included in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data:

Marketing of programs or services through a third-party channel utilizing its customer base and brand name.

Percentage of customers who cancel their membership, package benefits or insurance policy in a given period.

Refers to up-front marketing payments we make to our marketing partners as compensation to utilize their brand names and customer contacts.

Any direct communication to a consumer or business that is designed to generate a response in the form of an order, a request for further information and/or a visit to a store for a specific product or service.

Income for financial institutions generated from the sale of non-interest income products and services.

Face-to-face solicitation by a customer service representative physically located in a branch office.

Distribution vehicles of solicitations such as direct mail, telemarketing, and the Internet.

A product that offers members access to a variety of discounts on purchases and other value-added benefits, such as credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution in return for paying a monthly or annual fee.

A collection of benefits, including insurance, that are added to a checking account or credit card account to be offered to customers of our marketing partners.

A marketing mailing inserted with financial institution marketing partner’s monthly account statements.

Automated credit card activation technology fully scripted by us to solicit additional members.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Supplemental Information to be Furnished with Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”):

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in deficit and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

	December 31,			December 31,
	2014			2013

Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	32.3		$	20.1
Restricted cash		35.8			36.6
Receivables (net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $8.5 and $11.8, respectively)		119.3			132.5
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		28.7			64.7
Prepaid commissions		48.0			37.5
Income taxes receivable		1.3			2.6
Other current assets		104.6			87.4
Total current assets		370.0			381.4
Property and equipment, net		139.0			140.4
Contract rights and list fees, net		16.7			19.1
Goodwill		322.2			606.3
Other intangibles, net		103.3			153.8
Other non-current assets		68.4			67.2
Total assets	$	1,019.6		$	1,368.2

Liabilities and Deficit
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt	$	43.1		$	11.7
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		426.0			398.4
Deferred revenue		89.9			105.4
Income taxes payable		3.2			4.3
Total current liabilities		562.2			519.8
Long-term debt		2,229.6			2,246.5
Deferred income taxes		33.0			74.5
Deferred revenue		10.0			10.4
Other long-term liabilities		31.3			36.8
Total liabilities		2,866.1			2,888.0
Commitments and contingencies
Deficit:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 540,000,000 shares authorized, 85,129,859 shares issued and 84,842,535 and 84,913,613 shares outstanding		0.9			0.9
Additional paid in capital		144.1			136.6
Warrants		124.8			25.8
Accumulated deficit		(2,117.5	)		(1,688.8	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1.2			5.7
Treasury stock, at cost, 287,324 and 216,246 shares		(1.1	)		(1.1	)
Total Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. deficit		(1,847.6	)		(1,520.9	)
Non-controlling interest in subsidiary		1.1			1.1
Total deficit		(1,846.5	)		(1,519.8	)
Total liabilities and deficit	$	1,019.6		$	1,368.2

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012

Net revenues	$	1,242.8		$	1,334.7		$	1,494.6
Expenses:
Cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation
and amortization shown separately below:
Marketing and commissions		481.9			533.2			600.1
Operating costs		411.9			439.4			459.5
General and administrative		172.9			157.0			150.7
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		292.4			1.6			39.7
Facility exit costs		2.7			0.5			(0.9	)
Depreciation and amortization		109.7			113.9			184.5
Total expenses		1,471.5			1,245.6			1,433.6
Income (loss) from operations		(228.7	)		89.1			61.0
Interest income		0.3			0.4			0.9
Interest expense		(223.7	)		(206.5	)		(190.4	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(14.6	)		(4.6	)	−−
Other income (expense), net	−−				0.1			(0.2	)
Loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest		(466.7	)		(121.5	)		(128.7	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		38.5			(13.6	)		(10.2	)
Net loss		(428.2	)		(135.1	)		(138.9	)
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.5	)		(0.4	)		(0.7	)
Net loss attributable to Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.	$	(428.7	)	$	(135.5	)	$	(139.6	)

Net loss	$	(428.2	)	$	(135.1	)	$	(138.9	)
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax		(4.5	)		(1.1	)		1.2
Comprehensive loss		(432.7	)		(136.2	)		(137.7	)
Less: comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest		(0.5	)		(0.1	)		(0.6	)
Comprehensive loss attributable to Affinion Group Holdings, Inc.	$	(433.2	)	$	(136.3	)	$	(138.3	)

	Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. Deficit
	Common Shares		Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital		Warrants			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Non- Controlling Interest			Total Deficit
Balance, January 1, 2012		85,049,740	$	126.8	$	1.7		$	(1,413.7	)	$	5.2		$	(1.1	)	$	1.0		$	(1,280.1	)
Net loss			—		—				(139.6	)	—			—				0.7			(138.9	)
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax			—		—			—				1.3		—				(0.1	)		1.2
Total comprehensive loss																					(137.7	)
Issuance of common stock related to restricted stock units and options		78,322		0.1	—			—			—			—			—				0.1
Share-based compensation				5.2	—			—			—			—			—				5.2
Expiration of warrants				1.7		(1.7	)	—			—			—			—				-
Balance, December 31, 2012		85,128,062		133.8	—				(1,553.3	)		6.5			(1.1	)		1.6			(1,412.5	)
Net loss			—		—				(135.5	)	—			—				0.4			(135.1	)
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax			—		—			—				(0.8	)	—				(0.3	)		(1.1	)
Total comprehensive loss																					(136.2	)
Dividend paid to non-controlling interest			—		—			—			—			—				(0.6	)		(0.6	)
Issuance of common stock related to restricted stock units and options		1,797	—		—			—			—			—			—			—
Share-based compensation				3.7	—			—			—			—			—				3.7
Issuance of warrants				-		25.8		—			—			—			—				25.8
Balance, December 31, 2013		85,129,859		137.5		25.8			(1,688.8	)		5.7			(1.1	)		1.1			(1,519.8	)
Net loss			—		—				(428.7	)	—			—				0.5			(428.2	)
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax			—		—			—				(4.5	)	—			—				(4.5	)
Total comprehensive loss																					(432.7	)
Dividend paid to non-controlling interest			—		—			—			—			—				(0.5	)		(0.5	)
Share-based compensation				7.5	—			—			—			—			—				7.5
Issuance of warrants			—			99.0		—			—			—			—				99.0
Balance, December 31, 2014		85,129,859	$	145.0	$	124.8		$	(2,117.5	)	$	1.2		$	(1.1	)	$	1.1		$	(1,846.5	)

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(428.2	)	$	(135.1	)	$	(138.9	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		109.7			113.9			184.5
Amortization of debt discount and financing costs		13.8			12.7			11.0
Unrealized loss on interest rate swaps	—			—				1.2
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		292.4			1.6			39.7
Impairment of equity investment	—				0.7			1.0
Adjustment to liability for additional consideration based on earn-out	—			—				(14.6	)
Provision for loss on accounts receivable		0.3			2.7			6.9
Financing costs		6.8			11.1		−−
Loss on extinguishment of debt		14.6			4.6		−−
Facility exit costs		2.7			0.5			(0.9	)
Share-based compensation		8.6			9.6			11.2
Deferred income taxes		(43.4	)		7.3			2.3
Net change in assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(2.8	)		(0.7	)		(0.5	)
Receivables		10.1			4.5			(14.0	)
Receivables from related parties		(3.7	)	—				0.7
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		36.0			10.0			(0.6	)
Prepaid commissions		(11.0	)		5.2			10.4
Other current assets		22.7			(1.7	)		(15.4	)
Contract rights and list fees		2.1			2.7			0.1
Other non-current assets		(3.6	)		(5.6	)		5.8
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		24.0			(21.5	)		(14.4	)
Payables to related parties		0.1		—				(0.7	)
Deferred revenue		(13.0	)		(13.8	)		(41.9	)
Income taxes receivable and payable		0.3			(1.0	)		1.4
Other long-term liabilities		(9.2	)		(4.9	)		(1.5	)
Other, net		7.7			(1.6	)		(1.7	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		37.0			1.2			31.1
Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(51.0	)		(46.3	)		(51.7	)
Restricted cash		2.1			(1.2	)		(3.1	)
Acquisition-related payments, net of cash acquired		(22.0	)		(3.6	)		(13.5	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(70.9	)		(51.1	)		(68.3	)
Financing Activities
Borrowings (repayments) under revolving credit facility, net		(41.0	)		46.0		−−
Proceeds from issuance of debt		425.0		—			−−
Financing costs		(23.0	)		(15.5	)		(6.3	)
Principal payments on borrowings		(316.1	)		(11.8	)		(11.8	)
Proceeds from issuance of warrants		3.8		—			−−
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	—			—				0.1
Distribution to non-controlling interest of a subsidiary		(0.6	)		(0.6	)	−−
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		48.1			18.1			(18.0	)
Effect of changes in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		(2.0	)	—				0.7
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		12.2			(31.8	)		(54.5	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		20.1			51.9			106.4
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	32.3		$	20.1		$	51.9
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest payments	$	171.6		$	198.1		$	186.3
Income tax payments, net of refunds	$	2.5		$	6.8		$	7.6

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Basis of Presentation—On October 17, 2005, Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) completed the sale of the Cendant Marketing Services Division to Affinion Group, Inc. (“Affinion”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “Affinion Holdings”) and an affiliate of Apollo Global Management, LLC (together with its subsidiaries, “Apollo”), pursuant to a purchase agreement dated July 26, 2005 for approximately $1.8 billion (the “Apollo Transactions”).

All references to Cendant refer to Cendant Corporation, which changed its name to Avis Budget Group, Inc. in August 2006, and its consolidated subsidiaries, specifically in the context of its business and operations prior to, and in connection with, the Company’s separation from Cendant.

Business Description— The Company is one of the world’s leading customer engagement and loyalty solutions companies. The Company designs, markets and services programs that strengthen and extend customer relationships for many of the world’s largest and most respected companies. The Company’s programs and services include:

The Company designs customer engagement and loyalty solutions with an attractive suite of benefits and ease of usage that it believes are likely to interest and engage consumers based on their needs and interests. For example, the Company provides discount travel services, credit monitoring and identity-theft resolution, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, roadside assistance, various checking account and credit card enhancement services, loyalty program design and management, disaggregated loyalty points redemptions for gift cards, travel and merchandise, as well as other products and services.

The Company is a global leader in the designing, marketing and servicing of comprehensive customer engagement and loyalty solutions that enhances and extends the relationship of millions of consumers with many of the largest and most respected companies in the world. The Company generally partners with these leading companies in two ways: 1) by developing and supporting programs that are natural extensions of its partner companies’ brand image and that provide valuable services to their end-customers, and 2) by providing the back-end technological support and redemption services for points-based loyalty programs. Using its expertise in customer engagement, product development, creative design and data-driven targeted marketing, the Company develops and markets programs and services that enable the companies it partners with to generate significant, high-margin incremental revenue, enhance its partners’ brands among targeted consumers as well as strengthen and enhance the loyalty of their customer relationships. The enhanced loyalty can lead to increased acquisition of new customers, longer retention of existing customers, improved customer satisfaction rates, and greater use of other services provided by such companies. The Company refers to the leading companies that it works with to provide customer engagement and loyalty solutions as marketing partners or clients. The Company refers to the consumers to whom it provides services directly under a contractual relationship as subscribers, insureds or members. The Company refers to those consumers that it services on behalf of a third party, such as one of its marketing partners, and with whom it has a contractual relationship as end-customers.

The Company utilizes its substantial expertise in a variety of direct engagement media to market valuable products and services to the customers of its marketing partners on a highly targeted, campaign basis. The selection of the media employed in a campaign corresponds to the preferences and expectations the targeted customers have demonstrated for transacting with its marketing partners, as the Company believes this optimizes response, thereby improving the efficiency of our marketing investment. Accordingly, the Company maintains significant capabilities to market through direct mail, point-of-sale, direct response television, the internet, inbound and outbound telephony and voice response unit marketing, as well as other media as needed.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments in entities over which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not have a controlling interest are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Company considers several factors in determining whether it has the ability to exercise significant influence with respect to investments, including, but not limited to, direct and indirect ownership level in the voting securities, active participation on the board of directors, approval of operating and budgeting decisions and other participatory and protective rights and commercial business relationships. Under the equity method, the Company’s proportionate share of the net income or loss of such investee is reflected in the Company’s consolidated results of operations. Although the Company owns interests in companies that it accounts for pursuant to the equity method, the investments in those entities were not significant as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

For all stock-based awards issued by Affinion Holdings to directors and employees of the Company and consultants to the Company that are accounted for as equity awards, the Company recognizes compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures based on estimated fair values on the date of grant. For all stock-based awards issued by Affinion Holdings to directors and employees of the Company and consultants to the Company that are accounted for as liability awards, the Company recognizes compensation expense, net of forfeitures, based on estimated fair value at each reporting date. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period, which is the period during which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. The requisite service period is generally the vesting period. Stock compensation expense is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Membership — For retail memberships, subscription fees are typically paid monthly. Membership revenue is not recognized until any trial period has expired, membership fees have been collected and the membership fees become non-refundable. Monthly membership revenue is recognized when earned and no longer subject to refund. Annual pro rata membership fees (related to memberships that are cancelable for a pro rata refund) are recognized ratably over the membership term as membership revenue is earned and no longer subject to refund. In the case of annual full money back (“FMB”) membership fees, although payment is received from members at the beginning of an FMB membership, the memberships are cancelable for a full refund at any time during the membership period. Accordingly, FMB revenue is deferred and recognized at the end of the membership term when it is no longer subject to refund.

For wholesale memberships, marketing partners are provided with programs and services and, in many cases, the marketing partners market those programs and services to their customer bases. Monthly fees are received from the marketing partners based on the number of members who purchase these programs from the marketing partners and revenue is recognized as the monthly fees are earned.

Insurance — Commission revenue for marketing and administrative services earned per administrative services agreements with Carriers is based on a percentage of premiums earned by the insurance carriers that issue the policies. Premiums are typically paid either monthly or quarterly. Commission revenue is recognized ratably for the marketing and administrative services provided over the underlying policy coverage period. There are also profit-sharing arrangements with the insurance carriers which issue the underlying insurance policies. All revenue from insurance programs is reported net of insurance costs. Insurance costs totaled approximately $186.9 million in 2014, $168.5 million in 2013 and $164.1 million in 2012. Under our current profit sharing arrangements, approximately 60% % of the gross premiums collected on behalf of the insurance carrier are earned as commission revenue under administrative agreements and the remaining 40% of gross premiums are retained in a fiduciary account managed on behalf of the carrier. The remaining carrier funds are distributed monthly to the carrier to pay claims, administrative expenses, and the carrier’s retention fee. Any surplus or deficit is distributed to the Company under the profit share arrangement. No less frequently than annually, a profit-sharing settlement analysis is prepared which is based on the premiums paid to the insurance carriers less claims experience incurred to date, estimated claims incurred but not reported, reinsurance costs and carrier administrative fees. An accrual is made monthly for the expected share of this excess or shortfall based on the claims experience to date, including an estimate for claims incurred but not reported. The profit share excess is reflected in profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Historically, the claims experience has not resulted in a shortfall. In 2014 a significant portion of the insurance policies underwritten and outstanding pursuant to these arrangements were transitioned to a carrier with whom the Company does not have a profit-sharing arrangement.

Package — Monthly fees are earned based on the number of customers enrolled in a package program. The marketing partner collects revenue each month from its customers and pays a per subscriber monthly fee for the benefits and services. These monthly fees are recognized as revenue as the fees are earned. Strategic consultation, pricing and profitability consultation, competitive analysis and implementation assistance are provided and revenue is recorded at the time the services are performed.

Loyalty — Loyalty Solutions programs generate revenue from four primary product lines: loyalty, travel reservation service fees, protection and convenience. Generally, loyalty revenue consists of a monthly per member administrative fee and redemption fees that are recognized as earned. Loyalty redemption revenue is reported net of the pass through of fulfillment costs. Travel reservation service fee income is generally recognized when the traveler’s reservation or booking is made and secured by the use of points or credit card, net of estimated cancellations and “no-shows.” Protection and convenience programs are sold to marketing partners on a wholesale basis; the partner generally provides the enhancements (e.g. credit card enhancements) to their customers and a monthly fee is received from the marketing partner based on the number of marketing partner customers who have access to the enhancement program. Marketing partners also purchase incentives (such as gift cards) and revenue is recognized upon the delivery of the incentives to the marketing partner.

Other — Other revenue primarily includes royalties, co-operative advertising and shopping program revenues. Royalty revenue is recognized monthly when earned. Cooperative advertising revenue is earned from vendors that include advertising of their products and services in the membership program catalogues. Cooperative advertising revenue is recognized upon the distribution of the related travel or shopping catalogue to members. In connection with the shopping membership program, the Company operates a retail merchandising service that offers a variety of consumer products at a discount to members. Shopping program revenue is recorded net of merchandise product costs as the Company acts as an agent between the member and third-party merchandise vendor. Shopping program revenue is recorded upon the shipment of the merchandise by the vendor to the member.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Membership — Marketing expense to acquire new members is recognized when incurred, which is generally prior to both the commencement of the trial period and recognition of revenue for membership programs.

Insurance — Marketing expense to acquire new insurance business is recognized by the Company when incurred. Payments are made to marketing partners or third parties associated with acquiring rights to their existing block of insurance customers (contract rights) and for the renewal of existing contracts that provide the Company primarily with the right to retain billing rights for renewal of existing customers’ insurance policies and the ability to perform future marketing (list fees). These payments are deferred on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, with contract rights amortized to amortization expense and list fees amortized to marketing expense over the initial and renewal term of the contract, as applicable, using an accelerated method of amortization for contractual terms longer than five years and the straight line method of amortization for contractual terms of five years or less. Contract rights are considered acquisitions of intangible assets and therefore the related amortization is recorded as amortization expense. List fees primarily grant the rights to perform future marketing and therefore the related amortization is charged to marketing expense. The amortization methods employed generally approximate the expected pattern of net insurance revenue earned over the applicable contractual terms.

Package — Marketing costs associated with marketing partners’ in-branch programs are expensed as such programs are implemented. These costs include the printing of brochures, banners, posters, other in-branch collateral marketing materials, training materials, new account kits, member mailings and statement inserts. The Company performs a variety of campaigns where it incurs all associated marketing costs and, in return, receives a greater share of the revenue generated (the “Package Marketing Campaigns”). For these Package Marketing Campaigns, the marketing expense is recognized when incurred which is generally prior to the recognition of monthly revenue.

Membership — Membership commissions represent payments to marketing partners, generally based on a percentage of revenue from the marketing of programs to such marketing partners’ customers. Commissions are generally paid for each initial and renewal membership following the collection of membership fees from the customer. Commission costs are deferred on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as prepaid commissions and are recognized as expense over the applicable membership period in the same manner as the related retail membership revenue is recognized.

Insurance — Insurance administrative fees represent payments made to bank marketing partners, generally based on a fee per insured or a percentage of the revenue earned from the marketing of insurance programs to such marketing partners’ customers. Administrative fees are paid for new and renewal insurance premiums received. Additionally, for certain channels and clients, commissions are paid to brokers. Administrative fees are included within commission expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income and are recognized ratably over the underlying insurance policy coverage period.

Package — Package commissions represent payments made to bank associations and brokers who provide support for the related programs. These commissions are based on a percentage of revenue and are expensed as the related revenue is recognized.

Operating costs represent the costs associated with servicing our members and end-customers. These costs include product fulfillment costs, communication costs with members and end-customers and payroll, telecommunications and facility costs attributable to operations responsible for servicing our members and end-customers.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Income taxes are presented in the consolidated financial statements using the asset and liability approach. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated based upon the temporary differences between the financial statements and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates. Deferred tax assets are recorded net of a valuation allowance when, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the recorded deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods. Decreases to the valuation allowance are recorded as reductions to the income tax provision, while increases to the valuation allowance result in additional income tax provision. The realization of deferred tax assets is primarily dependent on estimated future taxable income. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance for its U.S. federal net deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has also recorded valuation allowances against the deferred tax assets of certain state and foreign taxing jurisdictions.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Restricted cash amounts relate primarily to insurance premiums collected from members that are held pending remittance to third-party insurance carriers. These amounts are not available for general operations under state insurance laws or under the terms of the agreements with the carriers that underwrite and issue insurance policies to the members. Changes in such amounts are included in operating cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Restricted cash also includes amounts to collateralize certain bonds and letters of credit issued on the Company’s behalf and amounts held in escrow. Changes in such amounts are included in investing cash flows in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

The Company records all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized in earnings unless specific hedge criteria are met. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges, along with the gain or loss on the hedged item, are recognized in current period earnings in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For derivative instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivative instruments is initially recorded in other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. Any ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are immediately recognized in earnings.

The Company uses derivative financial instruments, primarily foreign currency forward contracts, to manage its foreign exchange risk. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. The derivative financial instruments are not designated as hedging instruments and therefore changes in their fair value are recognized currently in earnings. The Company does not use derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Amortization of leasehold improvements and computer equipment acquired under capital leases is determined using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

the related assets or the lease term. Useful lives are from 5 to 15 years for leasehold improvements, from 3 to 5 years for capitalized software, from 3 to 5 years for computer equipment and from 5 to 7 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.

The Company capitalizes the costs of acquiring, developing and testing software to meet the Company’s internal needs. Capitalization of costs associated with software obtained or developed for internal use commences when both the preliminary project stage is completed and management has authorized further funding for the project, based on a determination that it is probable that the project will be completed and used to perform the function intended. Capitalized costs include only (1) external direct cost of materials and services consumed in developing or obtaining internal-use software, and (2) payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who are directly associated with and devote time to the internal-use software project. Capitalization of such costs ceases no later than the point at which the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use.

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill has been assigned to the Company’s reporting units and is tested for impairment at least annually based on financial data relating to the reporting unit to which it has been assigned. The Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of each reporting unit’s goodwill as of December 1, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the carrying value of each reporting unit to its fair value. The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units utilizing a combination of the income and market approaches and incorporating assumptions that it believes marketplace participants would utilize. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit is greater than its fair value, a comparison of the reporting unit’s implied goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of the goodwill to determine the amount of the impairment, if any. Any impairment is recognized in earnings in the period in which the impairment is determined.

During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test for those reporting units that had goodwill recorded. Key assumptions used in the goodwill impairment test were long-term growth rates ranging from no growth to 3.0% and discount rates ranging from 10.5% to 20.0%. In 2014, the fair value of each of the reporting units that have goodwill exceeded its respective carrying amount by more than 25% of the carrying amount, with the exception of Membership Products, for which the carrying value exceeded its fair value, based on an assumed long-term growth rate of no growth and a discount rate of 15.5%. As a result, the Company performed step 2 of the test for goodwill impairment and based on the results of step 2, recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $292.4 million, representing approximately 76.6% of the goodwill attributed to Membership Products.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets, if any, are tested for impairment annually, or sooner if events occur or circumstances change. An indefinite-lived intangible asset is tested for impairment by comparing its fair value to its carrying amount and, if the carrying amount is greater than the fair value, recognizing an impairment loss for the excess.

The Company’s intangible assets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 consist primarily of intangible assets with finite useful lives acquired by the Company in the Apollo Transactions and were initially recorded at their respective estimated fair values. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized as follows:

The Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amount of its long-lived assets when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For long-lived assets held and used by the Company, an impairment loss is recognized only if the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

disposition of the asset. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured based on the difference between the fair value of the long-lived asset and its carrying amount.

Assets and liabilities of foreign operations whose functional currency is the local currency are translated at exchange rates as of the balance sheet dates. Revenues and expenses of such local functional currency foreign operations are translated at average exchange rates during the periods presented. Translation adjustments resulting from the process of translating the functional currency foreign operation financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Foreign local currency gains and losses relating to non-operational transactions are included in other income (expense), net. Foreign currency gains and losses relating to operations are included in general and administrative expense.

Contingencies by their nature relate to uncertainties that require management to exercise judgment both in assessing the likelihood that a liability has been incurred as well as in estimating the amount of potential loss, if any. The Company accrues for costs relating to litigation, claims and other contingent matters when such liabilities become probable and reasonably estimable. Such estimates may be based on advice from third parties or on management’s judgment, as appropriate. Actual amounts paid may differ from amounts estimated, and such differences will be charged to operations in the period in which the final determination of the liability is made.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include accounting for profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers, accruals and income tax valuation allowances, litigation accruals, the estimated fair value of stock-based compensation, estimated fair values of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations and estimated fair values of financial instruments.

The Company generally derives a substantial portion of its net revenues from members and customers of 10 of the Company’s marketing partners. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company derived approximately 35%, 39% and 46%, respectively, of its net revenues from members and end-customers through marketing and servicing agreements with these 10 marketing partners. The Company’s largest marketing partner and its customers accounted for 11.2% of consolidated net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014. The Company’s largest marketing partner and its customers accounted for 13.4% of consolidated net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company’s largest marketing partner and its customers accounted for 15.3% of consolidated net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012. Many of these key marketing partner relationships are governed by agreements that may be terminated without cause by the marketing partners upon notice of as few as 90 days without penalty. Some of these agreements may be terminated by the Company’s marketing partners upon notice of as few as 30 days without penalty. Moreover, under many of these agreements, the marketing partners may cease or reduce their marketing of the Company’s services without terminating or breaching agreements with the Company. A loss of key marketing partners, a cessation or reduction in their marketing of the Company’s services, or a decline in their businesses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future revenue.

As of December 31, 2013, approximately $36.2 million of the profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers was due from one insurance carrier.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

During 2014, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test, which resulted in recognition of an impairment loss of $292.4 million, representing approximately 76.6% of the goodwill ascribed to Membership Products. As a result of the Company’s election to pay interest on its outstanding 13.75%/14.50% PIK Toggle Senior Notes by increasing the face amount of the debt, during 2014 the Company increased the carrying amount of its debt by $22.4 million. During 2014, the Company entered into a capital lease, acquiring property and equipment with a fair value of $0.7 million. At December 31, 2014, the Company had an accrual for the acquisition of property and equipment of $0.3 million.

During 2013, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $1.6 million, representing the remaining intangible assets of Prospectiv (net book value of $1.3 million) and property and equipment (net book value of $0.3 million). At December 31, 2013, the Company had accruals for the acquisition of property and equipment and for financing costs of $2.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company reversed certain accruals for additional consideration recorded as part of the Prospectiv Direct, Inc. (“Prospectiv”) acquisition ($14.6 million) as the Company did not expect to achieve the growth originally planned for these years due to market conditions. In addition, in September, 2012, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the former equity holders of Prospectiv which resulted in a $0.7 million reduction of the initial purchase price and released the Company from any future claims for additional consideration based on achievement of the performance targets. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company performed an interim impairment test of the goodwill for Prospectiv, which resulted in recognition of an impairment loss of $39.7 million, representing all of the goodwill ascribed to Prospectiv at the date of acquisition ($31.5 million) and a portion of the intangible assets of Prospectiv ($8.2 million). At December 31, 2012, the Company had an accrual for the acquisition of property and equipment of $3.1 million.

On April 11, 2014, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) that updated the requirements for reporting discontinued operations. The new standard requires that only those disposals of components of an entity that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results will be reported as discontinued operations in the financial statements. The new standard also removed the conditions in the current standard that (a) the operations and cash flows of the component have been (or will be) eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity as a result of the disposal transaction and (b) the entity will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for all disposals (or classifications as held for sale) of components of an entity that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted but only for disposals (or classifications as held for sale) that have not been reported in financial statements previously issued or available for issuance. The adoption of the new guidance as of January 1, 2015 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On May 28, 2014, the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board issued their final standard on revenue from contracts with customers. The standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The fundamental principles of the new guidance are that companies should recognize revenue in a manner that reflects the timing of transfer of goods and services to customers and the amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration that a company expects to receive for the goods and services provided. The new guidance establishes a five-step approach for the recognition of revenue. In

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

addition, the new guidance will also require significantly expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach. For public entities, the new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods (including interim reporting periods within those periods) beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted. The Company is in the process of performing an initial evaluation of the impact of the new guidance. Based on its preliminary assessment, the Company does not believe that adoption of the new guidance will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On August 27, 2014, the FASB issued an ASU that provides guidance on determining when and how reporting entities must disclose going concern uncertainties in their financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date of issuance of the financial statements (or within one year after the date on which the financial statements were available to be issued, when applicable). Further, an entity must provide certain disclosures if there is “substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.” The ASU is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. When adopted, the new guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On a preliminary basis, the Company allocated the purchase price of $19.1 million, consisting of the upfront cash payment of $18.4 million, plus the working capital adjustment of $0.4 million, and the acquisition date fair value of the up to $3.9 million contingent consideration, based on an income approach and probability model, of $0.3 million, among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in millions):

The intangible assets are comprised of affinity relationships, which are being amortized on an accelerated basis over a weighted-average useful life of eight years. The goodwill, which is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, has been attributed to the Global Loyalty Products segment. In connection with the acquisition of SkyMall, the Company incurred $0.8 million of acquisition costs, which are included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2014.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

On November 14, 2012, the Company entered into, and consummated, a Share Sale and Purchase Agreement ( the “Back-Up and Travel Agreement”) that resulted in the acquisition of Boyner Bireysel Urunler Satis ve Pazarlama A.S (“Back-Up”), a Turkish provider of assistance and consultancy services to its members, and a sister company, Bofis Turizm ve Ticaret A.S. (“Travel”), a Turkish travel agency. In accordance with the Back-Up and Travel Agreement, on November 14, 2012, the Company acquired 90% of the outstanding capital stock of Back-Up and 99.99% of the outstanding capital stock of Travel for an upfront cash payment of approximately $12.5 million and contingent consideration payable ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the acquisition date aggregating approximately $8.4 million. The Company also obtained a call option that grants the Company the ability to call the additional 10% of Back-Up’s capital stock for a nominal price no earlier than five years after the acquisition date and no later than eight years after the acquisition date. The Company also issued a put option to the former shareholders of Back-Up permitting the former shareholders to put the additional 10% of Back-Up capital stock to the Company under the same terms as the call option.

Back-Up and Travel were owned by Turkey’s largest retail group and the Company believes that Back-Up’s and Travel’s assistance and concierge service model fits well with the Company’s global product offerings. The acquisition enables the Company to expand into Turkey, which the Company deems a key market, given both its size as well as the attractive demographics of its population, and enables the expansion of the Company’s product offerings to a new customer base.

The Company allocated the purchase price of $19.0 million, consisting of the upfront cash payment of $12.5 million and the acquisition date fair value of the $8.4 million contingent consideration payable over three years, based on an income approach and probability model, at the present value of $6.5 million, among the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows (in millions):

The intangible assets are comprised principally of trade names ($5.1 million), which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over weighted-average useful lives of ten years, and member relationships ($3.7 million), which are being amortized on an accelerated basis over weighted-average useful lives of eight years. The goodwill, which is not expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, has been attributed to the International Products segment. In connection with the acquisition of Back-Up and Travel, the Company incurred $0.8 million of acquisition costs, of which $0.1 million and $0.7 million were recognized during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and the acquisition costs have been included in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

	December 31, 2014							December 31, 2013
	Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying		Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying
	Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amount		Amortization			Amount
	(in millions)
Amortizable intangible assets:
Member relationships	$	939.8	$	(932.0	)	$	7.8	$	943.2	$	(920.9	)	$	22.3
Affinity relationships		649.1		(574.4	)		74.7		647.7		(544.1	)		103.6
Proprietary databases and systems		59.9		(57.4	)		2.5		60.1		(57.2	)		2.9
Trademarks and tradenames		33.5		(18.8	)		14.7		34.3		(16.5	)		17.8
Patents and technology		47.8		(44.6	)		3.2		47.9		(41.5	)		6.4
Covenants not to compete		2.6		(2.2	)		0.4		2.7		(1.9	)		0.8
	$	1,732.7	$	(1,629.4	)	$	103.3	$	1,735.9	$	(1,582.1	)	$	153.8

In connection with the September 8, 2014 acquisition of SkyMall (see Note 3 – Acquisitions), the Company acquired intangible assets valued at approximately $11.9 million. These intangible assets are comprised of affinity relationships, which are being amortized on an accelerated basis over a weighted-average useful life of eight years. In connection with the November 14, 2012 acquisition of Back-Up and Travel (see Note 3 – Acquisitions), the Company acquired intangible assets valued at approximately $11.0 million. These intangible assets consisted primarily of trademarks and tradenames valued at $5.1 million and member relationships valued at $3.7 million. During 2014 and 2013, foreign currency translation resulted in a decrease of $17.0 million and an increase of $1.8 million, respectively, in the gross carrying amount of intangible assets and a decrease of $14.2 million and an increase of $2.5 million, respectively, in accumulated amortization.

Based on the Company’s amortizable intangible assets as of December 31, 2014, the Company expects the related amortization expense for fiscal year 2015 and the four succeeding fiscal years to be approximately $42.7 million in 2015, $13.8 million in 2016, $9.3 million in 2017, $8.4 million in 2018 and $7.1 million in 2019.

At January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 and 2014, the Company had gross goodwill of $654.3 million, $653.3 million and $661.6 million, respectively, and accumulated impairment losses of $47.0 million at January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 and $339.4 million at December 31, 2014. The accumulated impairment losses represent the $15.5 million impairment loss recognized in 2006 impairing all of the goodwill assigned to the Global Loyalty Products segment related to the Apollo Transactions, the $31.5 million impairment loss recognized in 2012 impairing all of the goodwill assigned to the Membership Products segment related to the Prospectiv acquisition, and in 2014, the $292.4 million impairment loss recognized relating to the Membership Products segment.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

The changes in the Company’s carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:

	Balance at							Balance at										Balance at
	January 1,					Currency		December 31,							Currency			December 31,
	2013		Acquisition			Translation		2013		Acquisitions		Impairment			Translation			2014
	(in millions)

Membership Products	$	382.0	$	—		$	—	$	382.0	$	—	$	(292.4	)	$	—		$	89.6
Insurance and Package Products		58.3	—			—			58.3	—		—			—				58.3
Global Loyalty Products		81.7	—			—			81.7		15.8	—			—				97.5
International Products		85.3		(1.7	)		0.7		84.3	—		—				(7.5	)		76.8
Total	$	607.3	$	(1.7	)	$	0.7	$	606.3	$	15.8	$	(292.4	)	$	(7.5	)	$	322.2

Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $5.8 million, of which $5.5 million is included in marketing expense and $0.3 million is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $6.1 million, of which $5.8 million is included in marketing expense and $0.3 million is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $6.0 million, of which $5.6 million is included in marketing expense and $0.4 million is included in depreciation and amortization expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Based on the Company’s contract rights and list fees as of December 31, 2014, the Company expects the related amortization expense for fiscal year 2015 and the four succeeding fiscal years to be approximately $4.9 million in 2015, $3.7 million in 2016, $2.5 million in 2017, $2.0 million in 2018 and $1.5 million in 2019.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment, including assets acquired under capital leases, totaled $47.9 million, $42.2 million and $52.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

On April 9, 2010, Affinion, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into a $1.0 billion amended and restated senior secured credit facility with its lenders (“Affinion Credit Facility”). On November 20, 2012, Affinion, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) increased the margins on LIBOR loans from 3.50% to 5.00% and on base rate loans from 2.50% to 4.00%, (ii) replaced the financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a maximum consolidated leverage ratio with a financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, and (iii) adjusted the ratios under the financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio. On December 12, 2013, in connection with the refinancing of Affinion’s 11 ½ % senior subordinated notes due 2015 (the “2006 senior subordinated notes”) and

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Affinion Holdings’ 11.625% senior notes due 2015 (the Affinion Holdings’ “2010 senior notes”), Affinion, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) provided permission for the consummation of the exchange offers for Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes, (ii) removed the springing maturity provisions applicable to the term loan facility, (iii) modified the senior secured leverage ratio financial covenant in the Affinion Credit Facility, (iv) provided additional flexibility to make dividends to Affinion Holdings to be used by Affinion Holdings to make certain payments with respect to its indebtedness and to repay, repurchase or redeem subordinated indebtedness of Affinion, and (v) increased the interest rate margins by 0.25%, to 5.25% on LIBOR loans and 4.25% on base rate loans. The amendment became effective upon the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth therein, including the payment by Affinion of the consent fee equal to 0.25% of the sum of (i) the aggregate principal amount of all term loans and (ii) the revolving loan commitments in effect, in each case, held by each lender that entered into the amendment on the date of effectiveness of the amendment. On May 20, 2014, Affinion, as Borrower, and Affinion Holdings entered into an amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility, which (i) extended the maturity to April 30, 2018 of $775.0 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loans and existing senior secured revolving loans, which loans were designated as first lien term loans (the “First Lien Term Loans”), (ii) extended the maturity to October 31, 2018 of $377.9 million in aggregate principal amount of existing senior secured term loans on a second lien senior secured basis, which, together with additional borrowings obtained on the same terms, total $425.0 million (the “Second Lien Term Loans”), (iii) extended the maturity to January 29, 2018 of $80.0 million of the commitments (and related obligations) under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility on a first lien senior secured basis, (iv) reduced the commitments under the existing senior secured revolving credit facility by $85.0 million and (v) removed the existing financial covenant requiring Affinion to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio.

The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility and a swingline loan subfacility. The First Lien Term Loan facility matures in April 2018 and the Second Lien Term Loan facility matures in October 2018. The First Lien Term Loan facility provides for quarterly amortization payments totaling 1% per annum, with the balance payable upon the final maturity date. The Second Lien Term Loan facility does not provide for quarterly amortization payments. The Affinion Credit Facility also requires mandatory prepayments of the outstanding term loans based on excess cash flow (as defined), if any, and the proceeds from certain specified transactions. The interest rates with respect to First Lien Term Loans and revolving loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at Affinion’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 5.25%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 4.25%. The interest rates with respect to Second Lien Term Loans under the amended Affinion Credit Facility are based on, at Affinion’s option, (a) the higher of (i) adjusted LIBOR and (ii) 1.50%, in each case plus 7.00%, or (b) the highest of (i) Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas’ prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 0.5% and (iii) 2.50% (“ABR”), in each case plus 6.00%. The weighted average interest rate on the term loan for the period from January 1, 2014 through May 20, 2014 and years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was 6.8%, 6.6% and 5.2% per annum, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on the First Lien Term Loan and Second Lien Term Loan for the period from May 20, 2014 through December 31, 2014 was 6.75% and 8.50%, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on revolving credit facility borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was 7.2%, 7.1% and 5.7%, respectively. Affinion’s obligations under the credit facility are, and Affinion’s obligations under any interest rate protection or other hedging arrangements entered into with a lender or any of its affiliates will be, guaranteed by Affinion Holdings and by each of Affinion’s existing and subsequently acquired or domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. The Affinion Credit Facility is secured to the extent legally permissible by substantially all of the assets of (i) Affinion Holdings, which consists of a pledge of all Affinion’s capital stock and (ii) the Company and the subsidiary guarantors, including but not limited to: (a) a pledge of substantially all capital stock held by Affinion or any subsidiary guarantor and (b) security interests in substantially all tangible and intangible assets of Affinion and each subsidiary guarantor, subject to certain exceptions. The Affinion Credit Facility also contains financial, affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants in the Affinion Credit Facility include, among other things, limitations (all of which are subject to certain exceptions) on Affinion’s (and in certain cases, Affinion Holdings’) ability to: declare dividends and make other distributions, redeem or repurchase Affinion’s capital stock; prepay, redeem or repurchase certain of Affinion’s subordinated indebtedness; make loans or investments (including acquisitions); incur additional indebtedness (subject to certain exceptions); enter into agreements that would restrict the ability of Affinion’s subsidiaries to pay dividends; merge or enter into acquisitions; sell assets; and enter into transactions with affiliates. The Affinion Credit Facility also requires Affinion to comply with a financial maintenance covenant with a maximum ratio of senior secured debt (as defined) to EBITDA (as defined) of 4.25:1.00.

In connection with the amendment to the Affinion Credit Facility in 2014, Affinion incurred financing costs of $5.9 million, which have been included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2014, Affinion recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $6.0 million, which represented the write-off of unamortized debt discount and deferred financing costs.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility were $5.0 million and $46.0 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, Affinion had borrowings of $162.0 million, $100.0 million and $82.9 million, respectively, under the revolving credit facility. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, Affinion had repayments of $203.0 million, $54.0 million and $82.9 million, respectively, under the revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2014, Affinion had $61.7 million available for borrowing under the Affinion Credit Facility after giving effect to the issuance of $13.3 million of letters of credit.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion completed a private offer to exchange Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes for 13.50% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (“Investments senior subordinated notes”) issued by Affinion Investments, pursuant to which $360.0 million aggregate principal amount of Investments senior subordinated notes were issued in exchange for $352.9 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes. Under the terms of the exchange offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes tendered at or prior to the consent time, holders received $1,020 principal amount of Investments senior subordinated notes. For each $1,000 principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes tendered during the offer period but after the consent period, holders received $1,000 principal amount of Investments senior subordinated notes. The Investments senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum, payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. The Investments senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. Affinion Investments may redeem some or all of the Investments senior subordinated notes at any time on or after December 12, 2016 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, up to 35% of the outstanding Investments senior subordinated notes are redeemable at the option of Affinion Investments, with the net proceeds raised by Affinion or Affinion Holdings in one or more equity offerings, at 113.50% of their principal amount. In addition, prior to December 12, 2016, the Investments senior subordinated notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Investments senior subordinated notes redeemed plus a “make-whole” premium. The indenture governing the Investments senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion Investments, any future restricted subsidiaries of Affinion Investments and one of Affinion’s other wholly-owned subsidiaries that guarantees the Investments senior subordinated notes to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion Investments’ obligations under the Investments senior subordinated notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by Affinion Investments II. Each of Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II is an unrestricted subsidiary of Affinion and guarantees Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility but does not guarantee Affinion’s other indebtedness. The Investments senior subordinated notes and guarantee thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion Investments, as issuer, and Affinion Investments II, as guarantor, and rank junior in right of payment to their respective guarantees of Affinion’s senior secured credit facility.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Investments exchanged with Affinion all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes received by it in the exchange offer for Affinion’s 13.50% senior subordinated notes due 2018 (Affinion’s “2013 senior subordinated notes”). Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 13.50% per annum payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on February 15, 2014. The 2013 senior subordinated notes will mature on August 15, 2018. The 2013 senior subordinated notes are redeemable at Affinion’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2013 senior subordinated notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion’s obligations under the 2013 senior subordinated notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under its senior secured credit facility (other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II). The 2013 senior subordinated notes and guarantees thereof are unsecured senior subordinated obligations of Affinion’s and rank junior to all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness, pari passu with Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ future subordinated indebtedness. Although Affinion Investments is the only holder of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, the trustee for the Investments senior subordinated notes, and holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the Investments senior subordinated notes will have the right as third party beneficiaries to enforce the remedies available to Affinion Investments against Affinion, and Affinion Investments will not be able to amend the covenants in the note agreement governing the Investments senior subordinated notes in favor of Affinion unless it has received consent from the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Investments senior subordinated notes.

In connection with the exchange offer and consent solicitation relating to the 2006 senior subordinated notes and the issuance of Affinion’s 2013 senior subordinated notes, Affinion incurred $5.9 million of financing costs, which have been included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

On November 19, 2010, Affinion completed a private offering of $475.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.875% senior notes due 2018 (“2010 senior notes”). The 2010 senior notes bear interest at 7.875% per annum payable semi-annually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. The 2010 senior notes will mature on December 15, 2018. The 2010 senior notes are redeemable at Affinion’s option prior to maturity. The indenture governing the 2010 senior notes contains negative covenants which restrict the ability of Affinion and its restricted subsidiaries to engage in certain transactions and also contains customary events of default. Affinion’s obligations under the 2010 senior notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of Affinion’s existing and future domestic subsidiaries that guarantee Affinion’s indebtedness under the Affinion Credit Facility, other than Affinion Investments and Affinion Investments II. The 2010 senior notes and guarantees thereof are senior unsecured obligations of Affinion and rank equally with all of Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future senior indebtedness and senior to Affinion’s and the guarantors existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The 2010 senior notes are therefore effectively subordinated to Affinion’s and the guarantors’ existing and future secured indebtedness, including Affinion’s obligations under the Affinion Credit Facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness. The 2010 senior notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of each of Affinion’s existing and future subsidiaries that are not guarantors, including the Investments senior subordinated notes. On August 24, 2011, pursuant to the registration rights agreement entered into in connection with the issuance of the 2010 senior notes, Affinion completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the then-outstanding 2010 senior notes for a like principal amount of 2010 senior notes that have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

On April 26, 2006, Affinion issued $355.5 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes and applied the gross proceeds of $350.5 million to repay $349.5 million of outstanding borrowings under a then-outstanding $383.6 million senior subordinated loan facility (the “Bridge Loan”), plus accrued interest, and used cash on hand to pay fees and expenses associated with such issuance. The 2006 senior subordinated notes bear interest at 11¹/₂% per annum, payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The 2006 senior subordinated notes mature on October 15, 2015. Affinion may redeem some or all of the 2006 senior subordinated notes at any time on or after October 15, 2010 at redemption prices (generally at a premium) set forth in the indenture governing the 2006 senior subordinated notes. The 2006 senior subordinated notes are unsecured obligations of Affinion and rank junior in right of payment with Affinion’s existing and future senior obligations and senior to Affinion’s future subordinated indebtedness. At December 31, 2014, the 2006 senior subordinated notes were guaranteed by certain, but not all, subsidiaries of Affinion that guarantee Affinion’s 2010 senior notes. On December 12, 2013, $352.9 million aggregate principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes were exchanged for $360.0 million of Investments senior subordinated notes. On September 13, 2006, Affinion completed a registered exchange offer and exchanged all of the then-outstanding 2006 senior subordinated notes for a like principal amount of 2006 senior subordinated notes that have been registered under the Securities Act.

The amended Affinion Credit Facility, the 2010 senior notes and the 2013 senior subordinated notes all contain restrictive covenants related primarily to Affinion’s ability to distribute dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. Under the Affinion Credit Facility, Affinion generally may pay dividends of up to approximately $13.8 million in the aggregate, provided that no default or event of default has occurred or is continuing, or would result from the dividend. Under the Affinion Credit Facility, payment of additional dividends requires the satisfaction of various conditions, including meeting defined leverage ratios and a defined fixed charge coverage ratio, and the total dividend paid cannot exceed a calculated amount of defined available free cash flow, or requires availability under specified baskets. The covenants in the Affinion Credit Facility also require compliance with a senior secured leverage ratio. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, Affinion did not pay any cash dividends to Affinion Holdings. During the year ended December 31, 2012, Affinion paid cash dividends to its parent company of $37.0 million. Affinion was in compliance with the covenants referred to above as of December 31, 2014. Payment under each of the debt agreements may be accelerated in the event of a default. Events of default include the failure to pay principal and interest when due, covenant defaults (unless cured within applicable grace periods, if any), events of bankruptcy and, for the amended Affinion Credit Facility, a material breach of representation or warranty and a change of control.

Debt issuance costs related to the various debt instruments are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the applicable debt issue using the effective interest rate method. The unamortized debt issuance costs totaled $29.5 million and $32.9 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and are included in other non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The debt discounts and premiums are also being amortized to interest expense over the term of the applicable debt issue using the effective interest rate method.

The Company also leases certain equipment under capital leases expiring through 2016.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

The aggregate maturities of debt, including capital leases, as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:

On October 5, 2010, Affinion Holdings issued $325.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2010 senior notes. Affinion Holdings used a portion of the proceeds of $320.3 million (net of issue discount), along with proceeds from a cash dividend from Affinion in the amount of $115.3 million, to repay its senior unsecured term loan. A portion of the remaining proceeds from the offering of the 2010 senior notes were utilized to pay related fees and expenses of approximately $6.7 million, with the balance retained for general corporate purposes. The indenture governing Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes contains restrictive covenants related primarily to Affinion’s and Affinion Holdings’ ability to distribute dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, sell assets, issue additional debt or merge with or acquire other companies. Affinion did not make any dividend distributions to Affinion Holdings during the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2012, Affinion made dividend distributions to Affinion Holdings of $37.0 million to enable Affinion Holdings to service its debt. The Company expects that, in the future, to the extent that it is permitted contractually and legally to pay cash dividends to Affinion Holdings, Affinion Holdings may require the Company to pay cash dividends to enable Affinion Holdings to service its net cash obligations under Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes (as defined below). The Company and its subsidiaries do not guarantee Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes.

On December 12, 2013, Affinion Holdings completed an offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes for 13.75%/14.50% senior secured PIK/toggle notes due 2018 (Affinion Holdings’ “2013 senior notes”). Under the terms of the exchange offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes tendered at or prior to the consent time, holders received (i) $1,000 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes, (ii) Series A warrants to purchase 46.1069 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock, and (iii) Series B warrants to purchase 239.8612 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock. For each $1,000 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes tendered during the offer period but after the consent period, holders received (i) $950 principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes, (ii) Series A warrants to purchase 46.1069 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock, and (iii) Series B warrants to purchase 239.8612 shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock. In connection with the exchange offer, $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes were exchanged for $292.8 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes. The Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes bear interest at 13.75% per annum, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2014. At Affinion Holdings’ option (subject to certain exceptions), it may elect to pay interest (i) in cash, (ii) by increasing the principal amount of the Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes (“PIK Interest”), or (iii) 50% as cash and 50% as PIK Interest. PIK Interest accrues at 13.75% per annum plus 0.75%. The Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes will mature on September 15, 2018. In June 2014, Affinion Holdings completed an offer to exchange Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes for Affinion Holdings’ Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock. In connection with the exchange offer, approximately $88.7 million aggregate principal amount of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes were exchanged for up to approximately 30.3 million Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings Class B common stock.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

As of December 31, 2014, the Company’s authorized capital is comprised of 360 million shares of $0.01 par value per share Class A common stock, 180 million shares of $0.01 par value per share Class B common stock and 10 million shares of $0.01 par value per share preferred stock. In addition, the Company may issue up to 20 million warrants to purchase shares of Class B common stock. As of December 31, 2014, 85,129,859 shares and 84,842,535 shares of Class A common stock were issued and outstanding, respectively, and 115,224,001 warrants were issued and outstanding. There were no shares of Class B common stock or preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2014.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, 76,422 shares of Class A common stock were issued upon the exercise of stock options and during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, 1,797 shares of Class A common stock and 1,900 shares of Class A common stock, respectively, were issued in connection with vesting of restricted stock unit awards. There were no shares of Class A common stock issued upon the exercise of stock options during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. There were no shares of Class A common stock issued in connection with vesting of restricted stock unit awards during the year ended December 31, 2014.

In connection with the Webloyalty acquisition, the Company issued warrants (with a fair value at issuance of $1.7 million) that were exercisable into 549,470 shares of Class A common stock of the Company. The warrants were exercisable, in whole or in part, at any time between January 14, 2011 and March 12, 2012 by surrendering such warrants and delivering the aggregate exercise price (based on an adjusted exercise price per share of $8.15, $9.73 or $11.44, depending on which warrants were exercised) to the Company. During the second quarter of 2012, the warrants issued in connection with the Webloyalty acquisition expired unexercised.

In connection with the December 2013 exchange of a portion of the Company’s 11.625% senior notes due in 2015 for 13.75%/ 14.50% PIK Toggle senior notes due in 2018, the Company issued 13,498,072 Series A warrants and 70,220,805 Series B warrants. Each Series A warrant has a strike price of $0.01 per warrant and is exercisable for one share of the Company’s Class B common stock. The Series A warrants, which have an issue date fair value of approximately $18.6 million, are exercisable at any time and expire in December 2023. Each Series B warrant has a strike price of $0.01 per warrant and is exercisable for one share of the Company’s Class B common stock. The Series B warrants, which have an issue date fair value of approximately $7.2 million, are not exercisable until the fourth anniversary of the closing date of the debt exchange and expire in December 2023.

In connection with the June 2014 exchange of a portion of the Company’s 13.75%/14.50% PIK Toggle senior notes for Series A warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ Class B common stock, the Company issued 30,277,979 Series A warrants. In addition, in connection with a pre-emptive rights offer, the Company issued 1,227,145 Series A warrants.

Pre-tax loss for domestic and foreign operations before non-controlling interests consisted of the following:

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

	December 31,
	2014			2013
	(in millions)
Current deferred income tax assets:
Accrued expenses and deferred revenue	$	44.2		$	43.8
Provision for doubtful accounts		2.0			2.9
Other		29.7			23.5
Current deferred income tax assets		75.9			70.2
Current deferred income tax liabilities:
Profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers		(5.8	)		(12.8	)
Accrued expenses		(0.7	)		(1.4	)
Prepaid expenses		(12.2	)		(11.5	)
Current deferred income tax liabilities		(18.7	)		(25.7	)
Valuation allowance		(57.0	)		(44.0	)
Current net deferred income tax asset	$	0.2		$	0.5
Non-current deferred income tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	416.8		$	315.8
State net operating loss carryforwards		28.2			19.3
Depreciation and amortization		827.7			718.0
Other		11.2			16.6
Foreign tax credits		38.3			36.5
Non-current deferred income tax assets		1,322.2			1,106.2
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities:
Other		(6.7	)		(7.1	)
Depreciation and amortization		(601.9	)		(528.6	)
Non-current deferred income tax liabilities		(608.6	)		(535.7	)
Valuation allowance		(746.3	)		(644.1	)
Non-current net deferred income tax liability (net of non-current
deferred income tax asset included in other non-current assets on the
December 31, 2014 and 2013 consolidated balance sheet of $0.3 and $0.9, respectively)	$	(32.7	)	$	(73.6	)

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1,033.3 million (which will expire in 2025 through 2034) and foreign tax credit carryovers of approximately $38.3 million (which will expire in 2015 through 2024). The Company has state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $675.4 million (which expire, depending on the jurisdiction, between 2015 and 2034) and state tax credits of $2.1 million (which expire between 2015 and 2019). A full valuation allowance has been recognized with respect to these carryforwards and credits net of the impact of the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences because it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized. The Company also has net operating loss carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions. These net operating losses total approximately $244.5 million (of the net operating losses that expire, expiring between 2015 and 2032). The Company has concluded that a valuation allowance relating to approximately $244.2 million of these net operating losses is required due to the uncertainty of their realization. The net operating losses for tax return purposes are different than the net operating losses for financial statement purposes, primarily due to book to tax differences associated with the Section 338 election and uncertain tax positions. The carrying value of the Company’s valuation allowance against all its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2014 and 2013 totaled $803.3 million and $688.1 million, respectively.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

The increase in valuation allowance of $115.2 million is attributable to an overall increase in net deferred tax assets primarily related to net operating losses and the valuation requirements associated with the Membership Products goodwill impairment charge.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $804.9 million (which will expire in 2025 through 2033) and foreign tax credit carryovers of approximately $36.5 million (which will expire in 2015 through 2023). Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries have state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $511.0 million (which expire, depending on the jurisdiction, between 2014 and 2033) and state tax credits of $2.1 million (which expire between 2014 and 2018). A full valuation allowance has been recognized with respect to these carryforwards and credits net of the impact of the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences because it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized. Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries also have net operating loss carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions. These net operating losses total approximately $172.6 million (of the net operating losses that expire, expiring between 2014 and 2031). Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries have concluded that a valuation allowance relating to approximately $169.0 million of these net operating losses is required due to the uncertainty of their realization. The net operating losses for tax return purposes are different than the net operating losses for financial statement purposes, primarily due to book to tax differences associated with the Section 338 election and uncertain tax positions. The carrying value of Affinion Holdings’ valuation allowance against all of its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled $688.1 million and $611.2 million, respectively. The increase in valuation allowance of $76.9 million is attributable to an overall increase in net deferred tax assets primarily related to net operating losses.

With the exception of South African, Italian and Turkish subsidiaries, foreign taxable income is recognized currently for federal and state income tax purposes because such operations are entities disregarded for federal and state income tax purposes. The Company does not provide for deferred taxes on the excess of the amount for financial reporting over the tax basis in its South African, Italian and Turkish subsidiaries because they are essentially permanent in duration. As of December 31, 2014, there is a $10.1 million deficit in retained earnings of the South African, Italian and Turkish subsidiaries.

The effective income tax rate differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate as follows:

As noted above, the effective tax rate has fluctuated significantly year over year. With the exception of the 2014 goodwill impairment charge, these fluctuations are primarily the result of the change in loss before income taxes and non-controlling interest to $466.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $121.5 million and $128.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company was granted a 50% tax holiday in the Swiss canton of Vaud in 2013. The tax holiday is valid for cantonal purposes from the 2012 start date until the end of the 2017 tax period. The tax holiday can be renewed for an additional five year period provided certain conditions are met.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company recognized $(0.6) million, $(0.1) million and $(0.1) million of interest in income tax expense related to uncertain tax positions arising in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefits decreased by $8.9 million, increased by $4.7 million and decreased by $3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, as a result of tax positions for the applicable year.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of tax reserves for uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

The Company’s income tax returns are periodically examined by various tax authorities. In connection with these and future examinations, certain tax authorities, including the Internal Revenue Service, may raise issues and impose additional assessments. The Company regularly evaluates the likelihood of additional assessments resulting from these examinations and establishes liabilities, through the provision for income taxes, for potential amounts that may result therefrom. The recognition of uncertain tax benefits are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s effective tax rate or results of operations. Federal, state and local jurisdictions are subject to examination by the taxing authorities for all open years as prescribed by applicable statute. For significant foreign jurisdictions, tax years in Germany, France, Turkey, Switzerland and the United Kingdom remain open as prescribed by applicable statute. During 2014, income tax waivers were executed in certain states that extend the period subject to examination beyond the period prescribed by statute. There are no significant changes anticipated in accordance with the extension of the income tax statutes in these jurisdictions. The Company does not believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change significantly within the next 12 months.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

People Finderspro, Inc., Beckett Media LLC, Buy.com, Inc., Rakuten USA, Inc., IAC/InteractiveCorp., and Shoebuy.com, Inc. The second of those cases was filed on March 25, 2012, against the same defendants as well as Adaptive Marketing, LLC, Vertrue, Inc., Webloyalty.com, Inc., and Wells Fargo & Co. These two cases assert similar claims as the claims asserted in the earlier-filed lawsuit in connection with the sale by Trilegiant of its membership programs. On April 26, 2012, the court consolidated these three cases. The court also set an initial status conference for May 17, 2012. At that status conference, the court ordered that Plaintiffs file a consolidated amended complaint to combine the claims in the three previously separate lawsuits. The court also struck the class certification briefing schedule that had been set previously. On September 7, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint asserting substantially the same legal claims. The consolidated amended complaint added Priceline, Orbitz, Chase Paymentech, Hotwire, and TigerDirect as Defendants and added three new Plaintiffs; it also dropped Webloyalty and Rakuten as Defendants. On December 7, 2012, all Defendants filed motions seeking to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint and to strike certain portions of the complaint. Plaintiff’s response brief was filed on February 7, 2013, and Defendants’ reply briefs were filed on April 5, 2013. On September 25, 2013, the court held oral argument on the motions to dismiss. On March 28, 2014, the court ruled on the motions to dismiss, granting them in part and denying them in part. The court dismissed the Plaintiffs’ RICO claims and claims under the California Automatic Renewal Statute as to all defendants. The court also dismissed certain named Plaintiffs as their claims were barred either by the statute of limitations and/or a prior settlement agreement. Certain Defendants were also dismissed from the case. The court also struck certain allegations from the consolidated amended complaint, including certain of Plaintiffs’ class action allegations under CUTPA. As to the Company and Trilegiant, the court denied the motion to dismiss certain Plaintiffs’ claims under ECPA and for unjust enrichment, as well as certain other claims of Plaintiffs under CUTPA.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Act. On September 25, 2012, Webloyalty filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety and the Court scheduled a hearing on the motion for January 14, 2013. Webloyalty also sought judicial notice of the enrollment page and related enrollment and account documents. Plaintiff filed his opposition on December 12, 2012, and Webloyalty filed its reply submission on January 7, 2013. Thereafter, on January 10, 2013, the Court cancelled the previously scheduled January 14, 2013 hearing and indicated that it would rule based on the parties’ written submissions without the need for a hearing. On August 28, 2013, the Court sua sponte dismissed plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice with leave to amend by September 30, 2013. The plaintiff filed his amended complaint on September 30, 2013, adding purported claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and for unjust enrichment, money had and received, conversion, civil theft, and invasion of privacy. On December 2, 2013, the Company moved to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint. Plaintiff responded to the motion on January 27, 2014. On February 6, 2014, the Court indicated that it would review the submissions and issue a decision on plaintiff’s motion without oral argument. On September 29, 2014, the Court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims on substantive grounds and/or statute of limitations grounds. The Court has allowed the plaintiff 28 days to file a motion demonstrating why a further amendment of the complaint would not be futile. On October 27, 2014, the plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint and attached a proposed amended complaint. The Company responded to the motion on November 10, 2014. However, the Court has not yet decided or scheduled a hearing on the plaintiff’s motion

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

announced a proposed joint arrangement, which will allow eligible consumers to make claims for compensation in relation to a discontinued benefit in one of AIL’s products. The proposed arrangement must be approved by a majority of those affected consumers who vote at a creditors’ meeting due to be held on June 30, 2015, and must then be approved by the High Court in London at a hearing due to be held in July 2015. If approved, this arrangement will not result in the imposition of any fines on AIL or the Company. Based on the information currently available, the Company has recorded an estimated liability that represents potential consumers’ refunds to be paid by the Company as part of such arrangement.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is required to provide surety bonds to various state authorities in order to operate its membership, insurance and travel agency programs. As of December 31, 2014, the Company provided guarantees for surety bonds totaling approximately $10.7 million and issued letters of credit totaling $15.4 million.

The Company has noncancelable operating leases covering various facilities and equipment. Rent expense totaled $18.5 million, $21.8 million and $20.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has accrued $1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively, included in other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets, in connection with asset retirement obligations relating to its leased facilities.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Future minimum lease payments required under non-cancelable operating leases, net of sublease receipts, as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into purchase agreements for its marketing and membership program support and travel services. The commitments covered by these agreements as of December 31, 2014 totaled approximately $10.6 million for 2015, $9.5 million for 2016, $2.6 million for 2017 and $2.6 million for 2018.

In December 2009, the Company entered into an operating lease for a new 140,000 square foot headquarters facility. The lease term for the new headquarters facility extends to 2024. The Company commenced occupancy of the new facility in April 2010. As a result of vacating the prior headquarters facility, the Company recognized a charge during the year ended December 31, 2010 of $8.0 million, comprised principally of future lease costs and related expenses for the prior headquarters facility. During 2011, the Company recognized a charge of $6.2 million, primarily related to the closure of several facilities previously utilized by Webloyalty and an adjustment of the liability associated with the Company’s prior headquarters facility. During 2012, the Company recorded a reduction of the charge previously recorded in connection with the closure of facilities previously utilized by Webloyalty of $0.9 million. During 2013, the Company recognized a facility closure charge of $0.5 million related to vacated premises. During 2014, the Company recognized a facility closure charge of $2.7 million related to vacated premises. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had accrued $1.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, related to these facility exit costs, of which $1.1 million is included in other long-term liabilities on the December 31, 2014 consolidated balance sheet and $1.6 million is included in other long-term liabilities and $0.2 million is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the December 31, 2013 consolidated balance sheet.

In connection with the closing of the Apollo Transactions on October 17, 2005, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”). The 2005 Plan authorizes the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Affinion Holdings to grant non-qualified, non-assignable stock options and rights to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries. Options granted under the 2005 Plan have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock awards have a purchase price determined by the Board. The Board was authorized to grant up to 4.9 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock under the 2005 Plan over a ten year period. As discussed below, no additional grants may be made under Affinion Holdings’ 2005 Plan on or after November 7, 2007, the effective date of the 2007 Plan, as defined below.

In November 2007, Affinion Holdings adopted the 2007 Stock Award Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan authorizes the Board to grant awards of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, performance compensation awards (including cash bonus awards) or any combination of these awards to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Affinion Holdings and its subsidiaries. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors, options granted under the 2007 Plan will have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Stock awards have a purchase price determined by the Board. The Board was authorized to grant up to 10.0 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock under the 2007 Plan over a ten year period. As of December 31, 2014, there were 0.4 million shares available under the 2007 Plan for future grants.

In connection with the acquisition of Webloyalty in January 2011, the Company assumed the Webloyalty Holdings, Inc. 2005 Equity Award Plan (the “Webloyalty 2005 Plan”). The Webloyalty 2005 Plan, adopted by Webloyalty’s board of directors in May 2005, authorized Webloyalty’s board of directors to grant awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock bonuses and performance compensation awards or any combination of these awards to directors and employees of, and consultants to, Webloyalty. Unless otherwise determined by Webloyalty’s board of directors, incentive stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and nonqualified stock options granted under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan were to have an exercise price no less than the par value of a share of Webloyalty’s common stock on the date of grant. The Webloyalty board of directors was authorized to grant shares of Webloyalty’s common stock under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan over a ten year period. As of December 31, 2014, after conversion of the outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan into options to acquire shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock, there were options to acquire 0.5 million shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock. On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 0.5 million of the outstanding options under the Webloyalty 2005 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024. At December 31, 2014, the outstanding options had exercise prices ranging from $1.14 to $7.32. All of the outstanding options were vested as of December 31, 2014 and expire between March 2016 and April 2024.

For employee stock awards, the Company recognizes compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is the period during which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. The Company has elected to recognize compensation cost for awards with only a service condition and have a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, there were no stock options granted to employees from the 2005 Plan. All options previously granted were granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

Stock options granted to employees from the 2005 Plan are comprised of three tranches with the following terms:

On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 1.9 million of the outstanding options under the 2005 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 1.4 million, 0.4 million and 0.5 million, respectively, of stock options were granted to employees from the 2007 Plan. All options granted were granted with an exercise price equal to the estimated fair market value of a share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

The stock options granted to employees from the 2007 Plan have the following terms:

On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 2.4 million of the outstanding options under the 2007 Plan, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, 0.1 million stock options were granted to members of the Board of Directors. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, there were no stock options granted to members of the Board of Directors. Generally, options granted to members of the Board of Directors fully vest on the date of grant and have an initial option term of 10 years. On March 28, 2014, the Company modified approximately 0.2 million of the outstanding options granted to members of the Board of Directors, adjusting the exercise price to $1.14 per common share and extending the contractual life of the modified options until April 1, 2024.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

The fair value of each option award from the 2007 Plan during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of comparable companies. The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding, and is based on the average of the requisite service period and the contractual term of the option.

A summary of option activity for the 2005 Plan and the 2007 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is presented below (number of options in thousands):

	2005 Plan			2005 Plan			2005 Plan
	Grants to			Grants to			Grants to			Grants to			2007 Plan
	Employees -			Employees -			Employees -			Board of			Grants to
	Tranche A			Tranche B			Tranche C			Directors			Employees

Outstanding options at January 1, 2012		1,558			767			767			423			3,850
Granted	—			—			—			—				495
Exercised	—			—			—			—			—
Forfeited or expired		(168	)		(86	)		(86	)	—				(783	)
Outstanding options at December 31, 2012		1,390			681			681			423			3,562
Granted	—			—			—			—				370
Exercised	—			—			—			—			—
Forfeited or expired		(44	)		(19	)		(19	)		(71	)		(638	)
Outstanding options at December 31, 2013		1,346			662			662			352			3,294
Granted	—			—			—				75			1,440
Exercised	—			—			—			—			—
Forfeited or expired		(237	)		(108	)		(108	)		(44	)		(731	)
Outstanding options at December 31, 2014		1,109			554			554			383			4,003
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2014		1,109			554			554			383			4,003
Exercisable options at December 31, 2014		1,109			538			538			383			1,991
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)		8.1			8.1			8.1			6.3			9.2
Weighted average grant date fair value per option
granted in 2012	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	3.97
Weighted average grant date fair value per option
granted in 2013	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	4.00
Weighted average grant date fair value per option
granted in 2014	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	0.83		$	0.83
Weighted average exercise price of exercisable options
at December 31, 2014	$	1.18		$	1.18		$	1.18		$	1.55		$	2.46
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options
at December 31, 2014	$	1.18		$	1.18		$	1.18		$	1.55		$	2.03

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

The weighted average exercise prices of outstanding options at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $1.72, $5.86 and $6.26, respectively. The weighted average exercise prices of options granted and forfeited during 2014 were $1.14 and $4.97, respectively. The weighted average exercise prices of options granted and forfeited during 2013 were $3.97 and $8.34, respectively. The weighted average exercise prices of options granted and forfeited during 2012 were $8.16 and $7.09, respectively. Based on the estimated fair values of options granted, stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 totaled $6.4 million, $3.7 million and $5.1 million, respectively. The stock-based compensation expense recognized during the year ended December 31, 2014 included $3.4 million of stock-based compensation expense recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2014 related to the modification of certain stock options held by approximately 200 employees. As of December 31, 2014, there was $2.2 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.1 years.

On March 30, 2012, the Board’s Compensation Committee approved the 2012 Retention Award Program (the “2012 RAP”), which provides for awards of RSUs under the 2007 Stock Award Plan. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company granted approximately 1.4 million RSUs to key employees. The RSUs awarded under the 2012 RAP have an aggregate cash election dollar value of approximately $11.3 million and are subject to time-based vesting conditions that run through December 31, 2014. Generally, the number of RSUs awarded to each participant is equal to the quotient of (i) the Dollar Award Value, divided by (ii) $8.16, the value per share of Affinion Holdings’ common stock as of the grant date. Upon vesting of the RSUs, participants are able to settle the RSUs in shares of common stock or elect to receive cash in lieu of shares of common stock upon any of the three vesting dates for such RSUs. Due to the ability of the participants to settle their awards in cash, the Company accounts for these RSUs as a liability award.

A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is presented below (number of restricted stock units in thousands):

Based on the estimated fair value of the restricted stock units granted, stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $1.1 million, $5.9 million and $6.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, there was $0.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the remaining vesting period of restricted stock units granted under the 2007 Plan. This cost will be recorded in future periods as stock-based compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 0.5 years.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

On April 1, 2014, the Compensation Committee of the Board approved the terms of the Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. 2014 Performance Incentive Award Program (the “Performance Program”), an equity and cash incentive award program intended to foster retention of key employees of the Company. The awards to key employees consist of performance incentive units (“PIUs”) and a cash incentive award (“CIA”) and the aggregate cash value of awarded PIUs and CIA comprise the Award Value. The number of PIUs awarded to a participant, which will be awarded from the 2007 Plan, will be equal to the quotient of (i) 50% of the Award Value divided by (ii) the fair market value per share of common stock as of the grant date, which was determined to be $1.14. The amount of the CIA granted to a participant is equal to 50% of the Award Value. Each of the two components of an award is subject to adjustment based on the achievement of performance goals. The awards are subject to certain performance and time-based vesting factors. The maximum number of PIUs and the maximum amount of the CIA into which a participant will be eligible to vest will be determined based on the achievement of certain overall corporate and business unit performance goals, as applicable, during the 2014 calendar year. A participant’s maximum amount of PIUs and the maximum amount of a participant’s CIA will vest in three substantially equal installments on March 15, 2015, 2016 and 2017, subject to that participant’s continued service with the Company on each applicable vesting date. Each PIU that vests on a vesting date will be settled for a share of common stock and for the portion of the CIA that vests on a vesting date the Company will pay the participant an amount equal to the vested portion of the CIA. The aggregate award value granted to participants under the Performance Program was approximately $9.6 million, subject to adjustment as described above. As of December 31, 2014, the outstanding aggregate award value granted to participants under the Performance Program was approximately $9.0 million, net of forfeitures of approximately $0.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2014, compensation expense of $2.2 million was recognized, of which $1.1 million related to the common stock portion of the Performance Program awards. As of December 31, 2014, there was $6.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the Performance Program, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.1 years.

The Company sponsors a domestic defined contribution savings plan that provides certain eligible employees an opportunity to accumulate funds for retirement. Under the domestic 401(k) defined contribution plan, the Company matched the contributions of participating employees based on 100% of the first 4% of the participating employee’s contributions up to 4% of the participating employee’s salary. The Company also sponsors certain other international defined contribution retirement plans that are customary in each local country. Under these local country defined contribution plans, the Company contributes between 6% and 10% of each participating employee’s salary or as otherwise provided by the plan. The Company recorded aggregate defined contribution plan expense of $7.4 million, $7.1 million and $6.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company sponsors certain other international defined benefit retirement plans that are customary in each local country, including a multi-employer plan in one country. Under these local country defined benefit pension plans, benefits are based on a percentage of an employee’s final average salary or as otherwise described by the plan. These plans are not material, individually or in the aggregate, to the consolidated financial statements.

Cendant has agreed to indemnify the Company, Affinion and the Company’s affiliates (collectively the “indemnified parties”) for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made by Cendant, as well as for other specified matters, certain of which are described below. Affinion and the Company have agreed to indemnify Cendant for breaches of representations, warranties and covenants made in the purchase agreement, as well as for certain other specified matters. Generally, all parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to breaches of representations and warranties (except with respect to the matters described below) (i) are subject to a $0.1 million occurrence threshold, (ii) are not effective until the aggregate amount of losses suffered by the indemnified party exceeds $15.0 million (and then only for the amount of losses exceeding $15.0 million) and (iii) are limited to $275.1 million of recovery. Generally, subject to certain exceptions of greater duration, the parties’ indemnification obligations with respect to representations and warranties survived until April 15, 2007 with indemnification obligations related to covenants surviving until the applicable covenant has been fully performed.

In connection with the purchase agreement, Cendant agreed to specific indemnification obligations with respect to the matters described below.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Excluded Litigation. Cendant has agreed to fully indemnify the indemnified parties with respect to any pending or future litigation, arbitration, or other proceeding relating to accounting irregularities in the former CUC International, Inc. announced on April 15, 1998.

Certain Litigation and Compliance with Law Matters. Cendant has agreed to indemnify the indemnified parties up to specified amounts for: (a) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to legal proceedings that (1) occur after the date of the purchase agreement, (2) relate to facts and circumstances related to the business of AGLLC or Affinion International Holdings Limited (“Affinion International”) and (3) constitute a breach or violation of its compliance with law representations and warranties and (b) breaches of its representations and warranties with respect to compliance with laws to the extent related to the business of AGLLC or Affinion International.

Cendant, Affinion and the Company have agreed that losses up to $15.0 million incurred with respect to these matters will be borne solely by the Company and losses in excess of $15.0 million will be shared by the parties in accordance with agreed upon allocations. The Company has the right at all times to control litigation related to shared losses and Cendant has consultation rights with respect to such litigation.

Prior to 2009, Cendant (i) distributed the equity interests it previously held in its hospitality services business (“Wyndham”) and its real estate services business (“Realogy”) to Cendant stockholders and (ii) sold its travel services business (“Travelport”) to a third party. Cendant continues as a re-named publicly traded company which owns the vehicle rental business (“Avis Budget,” together with Wyndham and Realogy, the “Cendant Entities”). Subject to certain exceptions, Wyndham and Realogy have agreed to share Cendant’s contingent and other liabilities (including its indemnity obligations to the Company described above and other liabilities to the Company in connection with the Apollo Transactions) in specified percentages. If any Cendant Entity defaults in its payment, when due, of any such liabilities, the remaining Cendant Entities are required to pay an equal portion of the amounts in default. Wyndham held a portion of the preferred stock issued in connection with the Apollo Transactions until the preferred stock was redeemed in 2011, and a portion of the warrants issued in connection with the Apollo Transactions until the warrants expired in 2011, while Realogy was subsequently acquired by an affiliate of Apollo and remained an affiliate of Apollo until July 2013. Therefore, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, only Realogy remained a related party and for the year ended December 31, 2014, none of the Cendant Entities were related parties.

On October 17, 2005, Apollo entered into a consulting agreement with the Company for the provision of certain structuring and advisory services. The consulting agreement allows Apollo and its affiliates to provide certain advisory services for a period of twelve years or until Apollo owns less than 5% of the beneficial economic interests of the Company, whichever is earlier. The agreement could be terminated earlier by mutual consent. The Company was required to pay Apollo an annual fee of $2.0 million for these services commencing in 2006. On January 14, 2011, the Company and Apollo entered into an Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement (“Consulting Agreement”), pursuant to which Apollo and its affiliates will continue to provide Affinion with certain advisory services on substantially the same terms as the previous consulting agreement, except that the annual fee paid by Affinion increased to $2.6 million from $2.0 million, commencing January 1, 2012, with an additional one-time fee of $0.6 million which was paid in January 2011 in respect of calendar year 2011. In connection with the December 2013 refinancing of Affinion’s 2006 senior subordinated notes and Affinion Holdings’ 2010 senior notes, Apollo and the Company further amended the consulting agreement, pursuant to which Apollo will not be paid any fees due under the consulting agreement until such time as none of Affinion Holdings’ 2013 senior notes remain outstanding. The amounts expensed related to this consulting agreement were $2.6 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income. If a transaction is consummated involving a change of control or an initial public offering, then, in lieu of the annual consulting fee and subject to certain qualifications, Apollo may elect to receive a lump sum payment equal to the present value of all consulting fees payable through the end of the term of the consulting agreement.

In addition, the Company will be required to pay Apollo a transaction fee if it engages in any merger, acquisition or similar transaction. The Company will also indemnify Apollo and its affiliates and their directors, officers and representatives for potential losses relating to the services to be provided under the consulting agreement.

In July 2006, affiliates of Apollo acquired one of the Company’s vendors, SOURCEHOV, LLC (formerly SOURCECORP Incorporated), that provided document and information services to the Company. The fees incurred for these services were $0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, which are included in cost of revenues in the

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income. As a result of the sale in 2013 of SOURCEHOV, LLC by the affiliates of Apollo, SOURCEHOV, LLC was not a related party during the year ended December 31, 2014.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company purchased $4.1 million of gift cards from AMC Entertainment, Inc., a company previously owned by an affiliate of Apollo. The cost of the gift cards, which were utilized primarily for loyalty program fulfillment, is included as a contra-revenue in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. As a result of the sale in 2012 of AMC Entertainment, Inc. by the affiliate of Apollo, AMC Entertainment, Inc. was not a related party during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

On January 28, 2010, the Company acquired an ownership interest of approximately 5%, subsequently reduced to approximately 2.9%, in Alclear Holdings, LLC (“Alclear”) for $1.0 million. A family member of one of the Company’s directors controls and partially funded Alclear and serves as its chief executive officer. The Company provides support services to Alclear and recognized revenue of $0.5 million, $0.9 million and $1.1 million, respectively, for the years ended December 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

On January 14, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of Webloyalty, Mr. Richard J. Fernandes received warrants to purchase shares of Affinion Holdings’ common stock that were exercisable, in whole or in part, at any time between January 14, 2011 and May 12, 2012. The warrants expired on May 12, 2012 without being exercised.

On May 8, 2013, in connection with his resignation as Chief Executive Officer of Global Retail Services and Co-President of Affinion, Mr. Richard J. Fernandes entered into a consulting agreement with Trilegiant Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, effective May 13, 2013, pursuant to which he would continue working with the Company until the one-year anniversary of such resignation. The contract was subsequently amended to extend the term on a month-to-month basis and the contract may be terminated by either party upon thirty days written notice. Mr. Fernandes provides certain consulting services to the Company on a part-time basis and receives a fee of $7,500 per month, subject to increase depending on the level of consulting services provided. The agreement also provides for reimbursement of Mr. Fernandes’ out-of-pocket business and travel expenses and for his healthcare insurance costs during the contract period.

In January 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap effective February 21, 2011. The swap had a notional amount of $500.0 million and terminated on October 17, 2012. Under the swap, the Company agreed to pay a fixed rate of interest of 2.985%, payable on a quarterly basis with the first interest payment due on May 12, 2011, in exchange for receiving floating payments based on a three-month LIBOR on the notional amount for each applicable period.

All outstanding interest rate swaps were recorded at fair value, either as an asset or liability. The changes in the fair value of the swaps, which were not designated as hedging instruments, are included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded interest expense of $1.2 million related to the interest rate swap. There was no interest expense recorded during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 related to the interest rate swaps.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

As disclosed in Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as a matter of policy, the Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of receivables, profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers, prepaid commissions and interest rate swaps. The Company manages such risk by evaluating the financial position and creditworthiness of such counterparties. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $36.2 million of the profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers were due from one insurance carrier. Receivables and profit-sharing receivables from insurance carriers are due from various marketing, insurance and business partners and the Company maintains an allowance for losses, based upon expected collectability. Commission advances are periodically evaluated as to recovery.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Current accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, giving the highest priority to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. Level 1 inputs to a fair value measurement are quoted market prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted market prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

There were no financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, other than foreign currency forward contracts. Such contracts have historically had a term of approximately thirty days and have been held to maturity. The fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts is measured based on significant observable inputs (Level 2).

The following tables summarize assets measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to initial recognition:

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014
									Impairment
									Losses
	Fair Value at		Quoted Prices in Active		Significant Other		Significant		Year
	December 31,		Markets for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		Ended
	2014		Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		December 31, 2014
	(in millions)
Goodwill - Membership Products	$	89.6	$	—	$	—	$	89.6	$	(292.4	)



	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
									Impairment
									Losses
	Fair Value at		Quoted Prices in Active		Significant Other		Significant		Year
	December 31,		Markets for Identical		Observable		Unobservable		Ended
	2013		Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)		December 31, 2013
	(in millions)
Property and equipment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(0.3	)
Intangible assets		—		—		—		—		(1.3	)
Equity investment		—		—		—		—		0.7

Management evaluates the operating results of each of its reportable segments based upon several factors, of which the primary factors are revenue and “Segment EBITDA,” which the Company defines as income from operations before depreciation and amortization. The presentation of Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

The Segment EBITDA of the Company’s four reportable segments does not include general corporate expenses or charges for the impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets. General corporate expenses include costs and expenses that are of a general corporate nature or managed on a corporate basis, including primarily stock-based compensation expense and consulting fees to Apollo. The 2014 impairment charge represents the write-off of a portion of the goodwill attributed to the Membership Products segment. These items have been excluded from the presentation of the Segment EBITDA for the Company’s four reportable segments because they are not reported to the chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources among operating segments or assessing operating segment performance. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Inter-segment net revenues were not significant to the net revenues of any one segment.

(Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in millions, except per share amounts)

Provided below is unaudited selected quarterly financial data for 2014 and 2013:

	First			Second			Third			Fourth
	Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Quarter
	(in millions)
2014
Net revenues	$	321.4		$	303.8		$	303.0		$	314.6
Marketing and commissions	$	125.4		$	120.1		$	114.8		$	121.6
Operating costs	$	108.0		$	106.0		$	96.7		$	101.2
General and administrative	$	50.2		$	41.4		$	50.7		$	30.6
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	292.4
Facility exit costs	$	(0.1	)	$	0.7		$	1.1		$	1.0
Depreciation and amortization	$	25.0		$	29.1		$	27.2		$	28.4
Net loss	$	(48.8	)	$	(70.3	)	$	(40.4	)	$	(268.7	)
2013
Net revenues	$	347.4		$	336.1		$	339.4		$	311.8
Marketing and commissions	$	117.7		$	127.2		$	130.2		$	158.1
Operating costs	$	116.2		$	104.5		$	107.5		$	111.2
General and administrative	$	42.2		$	44.7		$	32.0		$	38.1
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1.6
Facility exit costs	$	—		$	0.5		$	—		$	—
Depreciation and amortization	$	29.6		$	28.4		$	28.3		$	27.6
Net loss	$	(14.6	)	$	(23.5	)	$	(13.4	)	$	(83.6	)

Large Accelerated Filer	¨	Accelerated Filer	¨

Non-Accelerated Filer	T (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company	¨

a
Product	Description	Key Features

	Complete credit security solution with advanced monitoring and proactive management tools that enable members to retain more control over their personal data and prevent fraudulent activity	•Access to credit reports, credit monitoring, fraud resolution •Online monitoring of social security numbers, credit cards and other personal data •Identity-theft expense reimbursement

	Access and monitoring of credit report, credit score and credit history to help members manage their credit and prevent identity-theft	•Access to credit data from all three credit bureaus •Credit monitoring from one or all three credit bureaus •Fraud resolution •Identity-theft expense reimbursement

	Credit card and document registration	•Cancellation/replacement of credit cards with fraud liability, sales price and return guarantee protection •Emergency cash advance and airline ticket replacement



	Discount travel service program offering a low-price guarantee on booking airline, hotel and car rental reservations	•5% cash back •Full service website provides access to over 130,000 hotel properties

	Discount shopping program offering savings of 10%-50% off manufacturers’ suggested retail price on brand name consumer products	•200% low price guarantee for 60 days; automatic two-year warranty on most items •Discount on over 5,100 items from 600 brand name manufacturers •3.5% cash back on online orders of most items

	Discount program with preferred prices on new cars and discounts on maintenance, tires and parts	•Emergency roadside assistance •Up to 15% in service center network savings

	Discount program offering everyday savings on dining, shopping, and admission to individual and family-oriented entertainment Discount program offering savings on home improvement and repair	•Over 340,000 savings offers nationwide •Coupons from national retailers and local merchants •Dining discount at more than 70,000 U.S. restaurants •Discounts on home-related purchases and services •Approximately 80,000 pre-screened contractors •Over 150 home related How-to-Guides • Real estate and moving discounts


Product	Description	Key Features

AD&D	Provides coverage for accidental death or serious injury	$1,000 initial complimentary coverage; up to $300,000 in additional coverage

Hospital Accident Plan	Pays cash directly to the insured if hospitalized due to a covered accident	Up to $1,800 per day hospitalized

Recuperative Care	Provides cash directly to the insured if hospitalized due to a covered accident or illness	Up to $400 per day hospitalized


Product	Description	Key Features

	Package of benefits tied to customer checking accounts in the U.S.	Broad array of features includes shopping, travel and security benefits



	Health savings package includes discounts on prescriptions, dental and vision care and AD&D insurance	Health-oriented programs


Service	Description

Program Design	Establishes parameters for earning, redeeming, fulfilling, communicating and analyzing points

Program Management	Provides loyalty industry research, including consumer behavior and competitive program trends across various industries

Technology Platform	Scalable, customizable and flexible proprietary loyalty accounting and data management platform to meet marketing partners’ needs over the life of the programs

Rewards Fulfillment	Ownership of vendor management, inventory and fulfillment of program rewards Works directly with over 500 vendors to obtain rewards and provides loyalty clients with access to more than 13,200 available merchandise models

Points Administration	Tracks and maintains customer account records and customer activities upon which point awarding business rules are based

		Page
PART I		3
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	21
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	35
Item 2.	Properties	35
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	36
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	39
PART II		40
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	40
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	40
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	42
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	70
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	72
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	72
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	72
Item 9B.	Other Information	74
PART III		74
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	74
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	79
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	96
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	100
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	106
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	106


Service	Description
Customer Experience Management	Provides a full-service, in-house contact center as an extension of the partner’s existing contact center

Program Communications	Produces HTML-based email newsletters and surveys which increase readership and are typically less expensive than direct mail campaigns for these programs Hosts many of its partners’ loyalty websites

Performance Monitoring	Provides internal and external access to its data warehousing environment, including a dashboard of critical program performance metrics and allows for standard ad-hoc reporting

Location		Function
U.S. Facilities
Stamford, CT		Global Headquarters
Boise, ID		Call Center
Chicago, IL		Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Dublin, OH		Software Development, vacant
Eden Prairie, MN		Connexions Headquarters
Franklin, TN (2 sites)		Insurance and Package Sales, Marketing and Administration, Print Fulfillment Center and Call Center
Phoenix, AZ		Sales and Marketing
Richmond, VA		Loyalty Products Operations and Call Center
San Carlos, CA		Sales and Support
St. Louis, MO		Call Center
Trumbull, CT		Call Center/ Data Ops Center
Wakefield, MA		Data Ops Center
Westerville, OH		Call Center and Software Development

International Facilities
Slough, United Kingdom		International Headquarters
Amsterdam, Holland		Administration, Sales and Marketing
Berlin, Germany		Call Center
Brussels, Belgium		Sales and Marketing
Copenhagen, Denmark		Sales and Marketing
Ennis, Ireland		Administration, Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Hamburg, Germany		Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Istanbul, Turkey		Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Johannesburg, South Africa		Sales and Marketing

Location		Function
Kettering, United Kingdom		Call Center
London, United Kingdom		Sales and Marketing
Madrid, Spain		Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Milan, Italy		Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Nyon, Switzerland		Administration, Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Oslo, Norway		Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Paris, France (2 sites)		Sales, Marketing and Call Center
Portsmouth, United Kingdom (2 sites)		Administration and Call Center
São Paulo, Brazil		Sales and Marketing
Stockholm, Sweden		Sales and Marketing

	Twelve Months
	Ended
	December 31,
	2014
	(in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	37.0
Interest expense, net		223.4
Income tax expense		(38.5	)
Amortization of debt discount and financing costs		(13.8	)
Provision for loss on accounts receivable		(0.3	)
Deferred income taxes		43.4
Changes in assets and liabilities		(59.7	)
Effect of purchase accounting, reorganizations, certain legal costs and net cost savings (a)		66.1
Other, net (b)		24.1
Adjusted EBITDA, excluding pro forma adjustments (c)		281.7
Effect of the pro forma adjustments (d)		10.4
Adjusted EBITDA, including pro forma adjustments (e)	$	292.1

																			Fair Value At
															2020 and				December 31,
	2015			2016			2017			2018			2019		Thereafter		Total		2014
	(in millions)
Fixed rate debt	$	35.4		$	0.3		$	—		$	1,206.9		$	—	$	—	$	1,242.6	$	872.6
Average interest rate		11.26	%		11.36	%		11.47	%		11.05	%
Variable rate debt	$	7.7		$	7.8		$	7.8		$	1,175.9		$	—	$	—	$	1,199.2	$	1,101.7
Average interest rate (a)		7.38	%		7.38	%		7.38	%		7.78	%

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F–2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013		F–3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		F–4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		F–5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		F–6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company		F–7

Name	Age	Position
Nathaniel J. Lipman	50	Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
Todd H. Siegel	44	Chief Executive Officer and Director
Gregory S. Miller	44	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Michele Conforti	47	Executive Vice President and President, Affinion International
Robert J. Dudacek	46	Executive Vice President and President, Insurance
Scott Lazear	49	Executive Vice President and President, Connexions Loyalty
Sloane Levy	50	Executive Vice President and President, Membership
James C. Daly, Jr.	55	Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Brian J. Dick	58	Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Brian J. Fisher	44	Executive Vice President and General Counsel
Robert Lyons	46	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Marc E. Becker	42	Director
Eric L. Press	49	Director
Matthew H. Nord	35	Director
Michael A. Reiss	31	Director
Richard J. Fernandes	56	Director
David J. Topper	57	Director
Skip Victor	58	Director

	Stock Awards(1)
	Number of Shares		Value Realized
	Acquired on		on
	Vesting		Vesting
Name	(#)		($)
Todd H. Siegel		49,020		400,003
Michele Conforti		46,722		381,252
Sloane Levy		10,723		87,500

	Amount and Nature
	of Beneficial		Percentage
Name of Beneficial Owner	Ownership		of Class
Affinion Group Holdings, LLC^(a)		57,750,000		68.1	%
General Atlantic LLC^(b)		17,469,933		20.6	%
Empyrean^(c)		16,546,591		16.3	%
PennantPark^(d)		5,624,980		6.2	%
Nathaniel J. Lipman^(e)		1,770,300		2.1	%
Todd H. Siegel^(f)		771,444	*
Gregory S. Miller^(g)		71,000	*
Michele Conforti^(h)		142,673	*
Sloane Levy⁽ⁱ⁾		292,610	*
Robert Lyons^(j)		31,250	*
Marc E. Becker^(k)(l)		44,500	*
Matthew H. Nord^(k)(m)		43,000	*
Eric L. Press^(k)(m)		43,000	*
Michael Reiss^(k)(n)		18,750	*
Richard J. Fernandes^(o)		3,381,200		4.0	%
David J. Topper^(p)		15,000	*
Skip Victor^(q)		15,000	*
Directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)^(r)		7,200,011		8.2	%

					Number of securities remaining
	Number of securities		Weighted-average		available for future issuance under
	to be issued upon		exercise price of		equity compensation plans
	exercise of outstanding		outstanding options,		(excluding securities reflected in
	options, warrants and rights		warrants and rights		column(a))
Plan Category	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by securityholders
Options		2,492,868	$	1.19		—
Equity compensation plans not approved by securityholders
Options (1)		4,639,214	$	1.99		(3	)
2014 Performance Incentive Awards		4,925,987		—		(3	)
Restricted stock units		522,368		—		(3	)
Total		12,580,437	(2)			429,280

	For the Years Ended
	December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Audit Fees	$	3,298,000	$	3,319,000
Audit-Related Fees (1)		245,000		220,000
Tax Fees (2)		17,000		16,000
All Other Fees		—		—
Total Fees	$	3,560,000	$	3,555,000

Exhibit No.		Description
4.37	Amendment No. 4 to the Stockholder Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2014, among Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. and the Holders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, File No. 333-133895).
4.38	Amendment No. 1 to the Warrantholder Rights Agreement, dated as of May 7, 2014, among Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., Affinion Group Holdings LLC, General Atlantic Partners 79, L.P., GAP-W Holdings, L.P., GapStar, LLC, GAPCO GmbH & Co. KG, GAP Coinvestments III, LLC, GAP Coinvestments IV, LLC and the Holders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, File No. 333-133895).


4.39		Supplemental Indenture No. 6, dated as of March 9, 2015, among Connexions SMV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Affinion Group, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee under the Indenture dated as of November 19, 2010 governing the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.25 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, File No. 333-133895).

4.40		Supplement No. 3, dated as of March 9, 2015, by Connexions SMV, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Affinion Group, Inc. to the Note Agreement dated as of December 13, 2013 governing the 13.50% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.26 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, File No. 333-133895).
10.1		Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Facility, dated as of April 9, 2010, among Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Affinion Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, Banc of America Securities LLC and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as joint lead arrangers, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, as syndication agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, as documentation agents, and Banc of America Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and UBS Securities LLC, as joint bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 12, 2010, File No. 333-133895).

10.2		Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of November 20, 2012, among Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., Affinion Group, Inc., the Lenders listed on the signature pages thereto, the various agents party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and lender, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as amendment arranger, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, File No. 333-133895).
10.3		Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Guarantee and Collateral Agreement and Certain Other Loan Documents, dated as of December 21, 2012, by and among Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., Affinion Group, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as existing administrative agent, existing collateral agent, existing issuing bank and existing swingline lender, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as successor administrative agent, successor collateral agent, successor issuing bank and successor swingline lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.2 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2012, File No. 333-133895).
10.4		Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Amendment No. 3 to Amended and Restated Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2013, by and among Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., Affinion Group, Inc., the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as administrative agent and collateral agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 13, 2013, File No. 333-133895).
10.5		Resignation and Assignment Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2012, by and among Bank of America, N.A., as resigning administrative agent, resigning collateral agent and resigning swingline lender, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as successor administrative agent, successor collateral agent, successor issuing bank and successor swingline lender, Affinion Group Holdings, Inc., Affinion Group, Inc. and each subsidiary guarantor party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to Affinion Group, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2012, File No. 333-133895).

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Todd H. Siegel	Chief Executive Officer and Director	March 19, 2015
Todd H. Siegel	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Gregory S. Miller	Executive Vice President	March 19, 2015
Gregory S. Miller	and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Brian J. Dick	Executive Vice President	March 19, 2015
Brian J. Dick	and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Nathaniel J. Lipman	Director	March 19, 2015
Nathaniel J. Lipman

/s/ Marc E. Becker	Director	March 19, 2015
Marc E. Becker


/s/ Eric L. Press	Director	March 19, 2015
Eric L. Press

/s/ Matthew H. Nord	Director	March 19, 2015
Matthew H. Nord


/s/ Michael A. Reiss	Director	March 19, 2015
Michael A. Reiss

/s/ Richard J. Fernandes	Director	March 19, 2015
Richard J. Fernandes

/s/ David J. Topper	Director	March 19, 2015
David J. Topper


/s/ Skip Victor	Director	March 19, 2015
Skip Victor

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F–2
Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013		F–3
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		F–4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Deficit of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		F–5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		F–6
Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company		F–7

Intangible Asset	Amortization Method	Estimated Useful Lives
Member relationships	Declining balance	5 – 8 years
Affinity relationships	Declining balance, straight line	1 – 14 years
Proprietary databases and systems	Straight line	3 – 10 years
Trademarks and tradenames	Straight line	5 – 15 years
Patents and technology	Declining balance, straight line	5 – 12 years
Covenants not-to-compete	Straight line	Contract life

Trade receivables	$	3.8
Other current assets, including gift card inventory		37.7
Intangible assets		11.9
Goodwill		14.6
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(48.8	)
Other current liabilities		(0.1	)
Consideration transferred	$	19.1

Cash	$	2.3
Trade receivables		4.0
Other current assets		0.9
Property and equipment		1.3
Intangible assets		11.0
Goodwill		6.8
Other assets		0.1
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(6.6	)
Other current liabilities		(0.5	)
Deferred income taxes		(0.3	)
Consideration transferred	$	19.0

Vesting period		Ratably over 4 years
Initial option term		10 years

	2014 Grants			2013 Grants			2012 Grants

Expected volatility		85	%		50	%		50	%
Expected life (in years)	6.25			6.25			5.89 - 6.25
Risk-free interest rate		2.04	%		1.15	%		1.15	%
Expected dividends	—			—			—

	Number of			Weighted Average
	Restricted			Grant Date
	Stock Units			Fair Value

Outstanding restricted unvested awards at January 1, 2012		292		$	12.04
Granted		1,387			8.16
Vested		(199	)		12.20
Forfeited		(147	)		9.80
Outstanding restricted unvested awards at December 31, 2012		1,333			8.18
Granted	—				-
Vested		(838	)		8.19
Forfeited		(71	)		8.16
Outstanding restricted unvested awards at December 31, 2013		424			8.16
Granted		522			1.14
Vested		(332	)		8.16
Forfeited		(92	)		8.16
Outstanding restricted unvested awards at December 31, 2014		522		$	1.14
Weighted average remaining contractual term (in years)		0.6

Segment EBITDA
	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	(in millions)
Membership Products	$	62.2		$	85.9		$	125.2
Insurance and Package Products		63.1			65.0			103.9
Global Loyalty Products		68.1			67.0			54.6
International Products		2.6			9.8			19.6
Total products		196.0			227.7			303.3
Corporate		(22.6	)		(23.1	)		(18.1	)
Impairment of goodwill and other long-lived assets		(292.4	)		(1.6	)		(39.7	)
Total Segment EBITDA	$	(119.0	)	$	203.0		$	245.5

Segment Assets
	December 31,
	2014		2013
	(in millions)
Membership Products	$	236.3	$	545.8
Insurance and Package Products		160.5		227.1
Global Loyalty Products		265.4		216.1
International Products		282.8		312.5
Total Products		945.0		1,301.5
Corporate		74.6		66.7
Total Assets	$	1,019.6	$	1,368.2

Total Revenues
	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2014		2013		2012
	(in millions)
U.S.	$	880.0	$	998.0	$	1,191.4
U.K.		152.1		149.0		154.9
Other		210.7		187.7		148.3
Total Revenues	$	1,242.8	$	1,334.7	$	1,494.6

AFFINION GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.

Date: March 19, 2015

/s/ Todd H. Siegel

Todd H. Siegel

Chief Executive Officer