SKADDEN,
ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM
LLP
FOUR
TIMES SQUARE
NEW
YORK
10036-6522
________
(212)
735-3000
Fax:
(212) 735-2000
http://www.skadden.com
May
1,
2008
Mr.
John M. Ganley
Securities
and Exchange Commission
100
F Street, NE
Washington,
DC 20549
|
|
RE:
|
The
Cushing MLP Total Return Fund
|
|
|
(File
Nos.
333-149923 and 811-22072)
|
Mr.
Ganley:
We
are in
receipt of your letter, dated April 25, 2008, which sets forth your comments
to
the registration statement on Form N-2 filed by The Cushing MLP Total Return
Fund (the “Fund”) on March 27, 2008 (the “Registration Statement”). We have
considered your comments to the Registration Statement and, on behalf of the
Fund, our responses to these comments are set forth below.
These
changes will be reflected in Amendment No. 6 to the Registration Statement,
which the Fund intends to file on or about May 1, 2008 and will be marked to
show all changes made since the initial filing of the Registration
Statement.
Prospectus
Summary — The Offering (Page 7)
1. This
paragraph states that two or fewer investors will participate in the offering
and that no underwriters will be involved. In an appropriate location of the
prospectus, please provide the information required by Item 5.10 of Form N-2
(“briefly outline the plan of distribution of any securities that are to be
offered other than through underwriters”). Further, please explain to us whether
an investor in this offering may be deemed to be an “underwriter” within the
meaning of Section 2(a)(40) of the Investment Company Act of
1940.
Mr.
John
M. Ganley
April
13,
2007
Page
2
Information
required by Item 5.10 of Form N-2 has been added. As a result, the document
states:
"The
securities will distributed by the Fund directly to one or more investors.
The
investors will not pay a commission or similar charge."
In
response to your second request, an investor in this offering will not be deemed
to be an "underwriter" within the meaning of Section 2(a)(40) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 because the purchasers do not have an intention to
distribute the securities. The Purchase Agreement that the purchasers will
execute contains a representation confirming this fact.
Principal
Risks of the Fund — Valuation Risk (Page 29)
2. The
third paragraph of this section states that “[f]air value is defined as the
amount for which assets could be sold
in an orderly disposition over a reasonable period of
time,
taking into account the nature of the asset.” (Emphasis added.) The Commission
has stated that fair value represents the price a fund could reasonably expect
to receive from the current
sale
of an asset. See
ASR No. 113, Financial Reporting Codification (CCH) § 404.04 (Oct. 21, 1969);
ASR No. 118, Financial Reporting Codification (CCH) § 404.03 (Dec. 23, 1970).
Please revise the disclosure to be consistent with the Commission’s position. We
note that elsewhere in the filing the Fund correctly stated: “When determining
the fair value of an asset, the Investment Adviser will seek to determine the
price that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive from the current sale
of
that asset in an arm’s length transaction.” See
Prospectus p. 74 (last paragraph of Net Asset Value —
Valuations).
The
disclosure has been revised to be consistent with the Commission's position.
As
a result, disclosure throughout the document states:
“When
determining the fair value of an asset, the Investment Adviser will seek to
determine the price that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive from the
current sale of that asset in an arm’s length transaction."
Mr.
John
M. Ganley
April
13,
2007
Page
3
Summary
of Fund Expenses (Page 38)
3. The
line item captioned “Offering Expenses Borne by the Fund (as a percentage of
offering price)” reflects an amount of 100%. This appears to be an error. Please
revise this to show offering expenses as
a percentage of the offering price.
The
Summary of Fund Expenses has been revised to delete the reference to 100%.
Please note, offering expenses as a percentage of the offering price will be
determined when the offering price is struck and such percentage will be
included in the final amendment to the Registration Statement. The dollar value
of offering expenses is approximately $100,000 and is included in the footnote
to the line item in the table.
4. Page
32 of the prospectus describes the risks of short selling. Please estimate
in
the fee table the expenses associated with dividends paid on sales of securities
sold short. See
AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide: Investment Companies ¶ 7.43(j) (With
Conforming Changes as of May 1, 2007).
The
line
item "Expenses Associated with Dividends Paid on Sales of Securities Sold Short"
has been added to the fee tables.
5.
Footnote (2) to the fee table shows a table of expenses assuming that no
leverage is used. To prevent investors from confusing the footnote table from
the actual fee table, please indent the footnote table and use a font different
from the actual fee table.
The
footnote table has been indented and a font different from the actual fee table
has been used.
6. Footnote
(4) to the table states that the costs of the offering are not included in
the
expenses shown in the table. Please clarify that although offering expenses
are
not included as an Annual Expense, they are included in the fee table as a
Shareholder Transaction Expense. Please also provide a cross-reference to
footnote (1).
Clarification
stating that although offering expenses are not included as an Annual Expense,
they are included in the fee table as a Shareholder Transaction Expense has
been
added. A cross-reference to footnote (1) has also been added.
Mr.
John
M. Ganley
April
13,
2007
Page
4
Investment
Restrictions (Page 66)
7. Investment
Restriction (2) provides that the Fund will not concentrate in any industry,
but
further provides that the restriction “does not apply to (a) investments in MLPs
and Other Natural Resource Companies (the Fund will concentrate more than 25%
of
its assets in MLPs and Other Natural Resource Companies) . . .” Inasmuch as the
term “MLP” refers to a form of business organization rather than an industry, it
appears the Fund may have reserved freedom of action to concentrate in any
industry in which MLPs operate. Please revise the concentration policy (i)
to
avoid referring to MLPs or other forms of business organization and (ii) to
clarify the industry or group of industries in which the Fund will concentrate.
Please supplementally explain to us whether such revisions to the Fund’s policy
will require a shareholder vote.
We
have
revised the disclosure in order to clarify that the reference to MLP refers
only
to MLPs in the natural resource sector.
Other
Comments
8. Please
include the financial statements required by Item 24 of Form
N-2.
In
the
"Financial Highlights" section of the document, there is a statement that
"financial information was derived from and should be read in conjunction with
the Financial Statements of the Fund and Notes thereto, which are incorporated
by reference into this prospectus and the SAI from the Fund's Annual Report
to
Shareholders for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007." It was intended
that
the inclusion by reference of Financial Statements would be responsive to Item
24 of Form N-2. In order to add greater clarity, a statement of incorporation
by
reference of the Financial Statements will be included under its own separate
"Financial Statements" heading in the document.
9. Exhibit
2(n) — Other Opinions and Consents — Consent of Deloitte and Touche LLP. In this
exhibit, Deloitte and Touche consents to the use of its opinion in connection
with a registration statement on Form N-14. Please provide a consent referring
to the present registration statement on Form N-2.
The
consent has been revised to provide the correct reference to the present
registration statement on Form N-2.
Mr.
John
M. Ganley
April
13,
2007
Page
5
General
Comments
10. Where
a comment is made in one location, it is applicable to all similar disclosure
appearing elsewhere in the registration statement.
In
response to your comments, the Fund has made consistent revisions throughout
the
Prospectus.
11. We
note that portions of the filing are incomplete. We may have additional comments
on such portions when you complete them in pre-effective amendments, on
disclosures made in response to this letter, on information supplied
supplementally, or on exhibits added in any pre-effective
amendments.
The
Fund
is advised that additional comments may be provided on omitted disclosure items,
information supplied supplementally or exhibits added in any further
pre-effective amendment, and the Fund will respond to any such additional
comments when and if made.
12. If
you intend to omit certain information from the form of prospectus included
with
the registration statement that is declared effective in reliance on Rule 430A
under the Securities Act, please identify the omitted information to us
supplementally, preferably before filing the final pre-effective
amendment.
The
Fund
intends only to omit certain pricing information from any future Pre-Effective
Amendment to the Registration Statement for which we will rely on Rule 430A.
This would include the total number of shares sold, the total proceeds of the
offering and the total sales loads paid. This information will be omitted,
as it
is not expected that it will be known at the time of filing. The Fund intends
to
file pursuant to Rule 497(h) a definitive prospectus containing any omitted
information in compliance with the requirements of Rule 430A.
13. Please
advise us if you have submitted or expect to submit exemptive applications
or
no-action requests in connection with your registration
statement.
No
exemptive applications or no-action requests have been submitted or are expected
to be submitted in connection with the registration statement.
Mr.
John
M. Ganley
April
13,
2007
Page
6
14. Response
to this letter should be in the form of a pre-effective amendment filed pursuant
to Rule 472 under the Securities Act. Where no change will be made in the filing
in response to a comment, please indicate this fact in a supplemental letter
and
briefly state the basis for your position.
The
Fund
believes that these responses adequately address your comments in your letter
dated April 25, 2008. As indicated above, the Fund anticipates filing Amendment
No. 6 to the Registration Statement on or about May 1, 2008.
15. We
urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the
disclosure in the filing reviewed by the staff to be certain that they have
provided all information investors require for an informed decision. Since
the
Fund and its management are in possession of all facts relating to the Fund’s
disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the
disclosures they have made.
Management
of the Fund has reviewed the disclosure set forth in Amendment No. 6 to the
Fund's Registration Statement.
* * *
In
connection with the effectiveness of the Registration Statement, the Fund
acknowledges that the disclosure included in the Registration Statement is
the
responsibility of the Fund. The Fund further acknowledges that should the
Commission or the staff acting pursuant to delegated authority declare the
filing effective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action
with respect to the filing. The Fund acknowledges that the action of the
Commission or the staff acting pursuant to delegated authority in reviewing
the
Registration Statement does not relieve the Fund from its full responsibility
for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosures in the Registration Statement;
and that the Fund will not assert this action as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws
of
the United States.
Should
you have any additional comments or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact
me at (213) 687-5632.
Sincerely,
/s/
Yousuf I. Dhamee