Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the exchange act). Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 402 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (of for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this form, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. 

The aggregate market value of the issuer’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2010 was $2,748,556.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

The discussion contained in this 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The issuer's actual results could differ significantly from those discussed herein. These include statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, which we indicate by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "will," "we believe," "the Company believes," "management believes" and similar language, including those set forth in the discussions under "Notes to Financial Statements" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation" as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K. We base our forward-looking statements on information currently available to us, and we assume no obligation to update them. Statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that are subject to the "safe harbor" created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

As used herein the terms “we”, “us”, “our”, the “Registrant,” “ISA” and the “Company” means, Information Systems Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation.

We have been in business since May of 1994. During the first twelve (12) years of operation, the primary focus of the business was to offer for sale, through ISA’s Value Added Reseller Agreements in place in several of the industry leaders, software products and services that allow companies to track and manage assets, primarily in the realm of corporate real estate and corporate IT network infrastructure including equipment maintained in corporate data centers. We refer to our product and services suite as asset management solutions. Our solutions reduce sourcing, procurement and tracking costs, improve tracking of data center assets.

In 1995, we became a Business Partner (a/k/a Value Added Reseller) with Avocent Huntsville Corp. (formerly Aperture Technologies Inc.) of Stamford, CT. At that time, Avocent’s Network Management tools (“System”), was one of the leading solutions in the IT field. For more than five years, Avocent Huntsville Corp. provided enterprise asset management solutions to customers in the United States, Europe and Asia and Pacific Rim. During this same timeframe, we offered Advocent’s enterprise asset management solutions to customers and prospects in North America.

The typical Value Added Reseller Agreement allows the vendor’s partner/subcontractor (in this case ISA) the ability to offer to its client’s and prospects a Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) software solution to address a particular business problem. The primary focus of ISA’s business is working data center operations, network management department and corporate real estate department to identify and then implement a software solution which addresses their needs based upon extensive research done prior to the selection and culminating in the purchase by the client and implementation by ISA of the chosen solution.

All of the products listed under our Value Added Reseller relationships (Vista, Vision FM, and RACKWISE DCM) are products developed by third parties.

The products obtained from third parties are done so through executed Value Added Reseller Agreements. Although each of the vendor’s agreements differs to some degree, the basic understandings are the same. Information Systems Associates, Inc. is authorized by each of the vendors to offer the vendor’s software as solutions to Information Systems Associates’ clients. In return, Information Systems Associates Inc. receives a commission on the sale of the software. The percentage ranges between twenty (20) and thirty (35) percent of the sale. The Company also may provide pre-sales support services to the vendor’s clients. In addition, Information Systems Associates, Inc. implements the software solution and provides training to its clients. On an ongoing basis, ISA can and does provide additional consulting services beyond those provided initially to the client.

The need for a better way to capture corporate IT asset information became evident to ISA’s management team. After reviewing the methods and technology in use at that time (1^st Quarter 2006) for the purpose of data collection, it was decided within ISA to define a data collection process and subsequently to design and build a software solution capable of delivering quality data (output) through the use of programming techniques that incorporated many of the much needed features and capabilities, especially real time data validation. The result was that by year end of 2007 ON SITE PHYSICAL INVENTORY^®(OSPI® ) was available for resale.

Our customer list includes a number of leading organizations, such as Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems, Verizon, Huntington National Bank, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc. and General Electric.

Our application products are also used by corporate Real Estate departments to manage their real property lease obligations (as both tenant and landlord), to determine their company’s use of corporate space and to develop plans for relocations, mergers and acquisitions as it relates to the use of space (office, manufacturing, warehousing).

On April 17, 2009, we entered into a strategic alliance and became an investor with Rubicon Software Group, plc. This agreement will create an opening into the European market as well as provide cost effective software development. We continue to retain Rubicon as a provider of maintenance and product updates for OSPI®

Asset management software has existed for more than thirty years, initially through computerized maintenance management systems, and more recently including more comprehensive and robust enterprise asset management and enterprise resource planning solutions. The early computerized maintenance management systems automated daily management of assets, while enterprise resource planning solutions consolidate basic asset information with financial information at the corporate level. Enterprise asset management solutions encompass elements of both, serving as the next evolution of computerized maintenance management system solutions by bridging the gap between asset management and corporate-level planning and tracking requirements.

The key value proposition for enterprise asset management solutions is that they can provide a quick and quantifiable return on investment and return on assets. Cost and productivity improvements can immediately and measurably benefit organizations, and thus are highly desirable to potential customers, particularly in difficult economic times where the focus is increasingly bottom line oriented.

In addition to enterprise asset management solutions, we offer facilities solutions. These are natural extensions to enterprise asset management solutions, as organizations seek to extend asset management and corporate-level planning and tracking onto other elements of the asset lifecycle. The reference to “facilities solutions” includes software application products that are used by corporate Real Estate departments and to software application products used by Data Center Management (Information Technology) to track their computer assets from a financial perspective as well as their usage and connectivity within the corporate IT (Information Technology) network.

In order to reduce operational risk and increase operational efficiency, it is essential for IT organizations to define best practices and implement IT frameworks (for example, the IT Infrastructure Library, ITIL) that create a more service-oriented organization. This includes standardizing and automating IT processes from a disparate set of ad hoc tasks to a cohesive, consolidated environment and developing a central repository of information to create institutional memory for the IT organization.

Many organizations have assessed the various facets of the IT organization to improve the logical environment. However, one component which seems to be overlooked quite frequently and that continuously operates within individual silos is the overall physical infrastructure of the data center.

VISTA600 by Avocent Huntsville Corp. provides IT Management with the key information and intelligence to reduce operational risk and improve efficiency in the data center. ISA has in the past and continues to provide consulting services, including data collection using its patented OSPI® system to Aperture’s clients.

VisionFM includes a very flexible asset management system capable of tracking everything from building components such as space utilization to office supplies. The Facilities Manager can define maintenance schedules for which the VisionFM system will generate alerts to those responsible for performing those services and track their status to completion.

ISA assists clients in the selection of VisionFM and provides implementation and training services as needed.

RACKWISE DMC^TM services and products deliver key features to simplify and reduce the time consumed designing, modeling and operating the physical infrastructure of a datacenter. The features of Rackwise include:

Rubicon Software works closely with organizations to develop customized software solutions. Rubicon worked closely with ISA in the development of OSPI® v2.

In connection with our software offerings, we provide the following services to our customers: Consulting

A significant number of our customers request our advice regarding their business and technical processes, often in conjunction with a scoping exercise conducted both before and after the execution of a contract. This advice can relate to the selection of a DCIM or Facilities Management software system, assisting in the development of technical specifications, and recommendations regarding internal workflow activities.

Based generally upon the up-front scoping activities, we are able to customize solutions to meet the customer’s particular needs. This process can vary in length depending on the degree of customization, the resources applied by the customer and the customer’s business requirements. We work closely with our customers to ensure that features and functionality meet their expectations. We also provide the professional services work required for the implementation of the selected solutions, including the loading of data, documentation of business processes, and integration to other systems.

Upon completion of implementation (and often during implementation), we train customer personnel to utilize the chosen Solutions.. Training can be conducted in one-on-one or group situations. We also conduct “train the trainer” sessions.

We have been providing consulting, customization and implementation, training, maintenance and support services to our customers since 1994.

In addition to the sale of our core solutions and services, we entered into marketing or co-marketing agreements with companies that offer services that are complementary to our offerings. We market these complementary services to our customers and prospects and earn a referral fee if these services are purchased. In some cases our marketing partner markets our solutions to its customers and prospects and can earn a referral fee. At the present time, we have two marketing partners. They are Forsythe Solutions Group, Inc. (Forsythe) and Total Site Solutions, Inc. (TSS)

Forsythe serves as a technology infrastructure solutions provider, helping organizations across all industries, including Fortune 1000 companies, manage the cost and risk of their information technology. Forsythe’s data center services help organizations navigate through some of the more infrequent aspects of owning and operating a mission-critical environment—data center planning and information technology relocation. Our data collection solution OSPI®,and the services offered by us in conjunction with OSPI® are perfectly matched to the needs of Forsythe’s customer’s, for whom they (Forsythe) are either planning a new data center, expanding an existing data center or moving a data center to a new location. In the current environment of corporate acquisitions and downsizing, the services offered by Forsythe and in turn complimented by our offerings are well suited for these purposes.

TSS specializes in providing a single source solution for companies requiring highly technical facility integration and precision project execution for mission-critical facilities. ISA’s data collection solution OSPI® and the services offered by us in conjunction with OSPI® are perfectly matched to the needs of TSS’s customers. We have completed data collection services for two TSS clients.

Since many of our customers are large organizations or quasi-governmental entities, we may experience increasingly longer sales and collection cycles.

We provide our solutions to customers in a variety of industries, including: healthcare, public authorities, and financial services sectors. Our services are not industry specific and therefore are not limited by industry.

The services provided vary depending upon the needs of the customer and the solution concerned. We collect service fees for implementation and training, and support and maintenance fees. The criteria used to select the customers listed in the business section and other sections of the document are based on their prominence within their industry, such as Northrop Grumman, General Electric and Comcast Communications. We do not list companies based upon any specific amount of revenue derived or whether or not they are currently active clients, but rather we have selected these clients based upon the scope of the consulting engagement. This approach provides us with clients from various industries as this sometimes becomes crucial to a prospect in their vendor selection process.

We began our relationship with General Electric in 2008 by providing data center audit services. This was followed by providing data collection services. In September, 2008 GE purchased one of the first licenses for OSPI® and the related handheld devices and support services.

We previously marketed our services primarily through referrals from companies with whom ISA had either a reseller’s agreement in place, are authorized to provide consulting service to their client’s, or both.

Potential customers were identified through direct contact, responses to requests for information, attendance at trade shows and through industry contacts. We principally focused on professionals and ongoing lead generation through our partner relationships and their VAR (Valued Added Reseller) program referrals.

We use reference customers to assist us in our marketing efforts, both through direct contact with potential customers and through site branding and case studies. We also rely on our co-marketing partners to assist in our marketing efforts.

In January 2011, the company hired sales and marketing representatives to pursue potential customers and channel distribution relationships.

As Valued Added Resellers, Information Systems Associates, Inc. has sought out and identified those solutions that are based upon proven technology platforms and contain the desired functionality to meet or exceed its client’s expectations.

Our partner’s technology platform are based on Microsoft core applications, including the Windows operating system and a relational database, all residing on scalable server hardware.

This platform is widely accepted within commercial business and government entities worldwide.

Our initial software development was aimed at defining the core functionality elements of our software application OSPI® , the features and functionality of the follow-up releases, the development of new software components, and the integration of superior third party technology into our environment. .

The strategic alliance with Rubicon allowed us to rewrite OSPI®, version 2, on budget and within the prescribed time frame. OSPI®, version 2 became available December 1, 2009.

The market for our asset management suite is moderately competitive based on the most recent competitive analysis conducted by ISA. The companies we compete with have much greater financial, technical, research and development resources than us.

The system integration consulting field is comprised of many categories of specialties. There are integrators who specialize in software integration by industry (automotive, manufacturing, pharmaceutical, defense, etc.) and therefore are not considered to be competitors. Our primary competitors in this space are the other Value Added Resellers representing the same products as Information Systems Associates. The relationship with the vendor (software developers) is crucial in gaining an edge on the competition. This relationship is usually strengthened by such factors as the client relationships that the Value Added Reseller already has in place as well as the Value Added Resellers ability to successfully implement and maintain the vendor’s solution to the vendor’s satisfaction. We believe that Information Systems Associates has developed strong relationships with the solution vendors that it represents which in turn has and will continue to provide Information Systems Associates with sales of its consulting service offerings. We at Information Systems Associates believe that the foundation for this relationship is built upon trust.

The data collection services field has been in existence for many industries for years. The idea of hiring outside companies to conduct inventories of corporate data centers is not new. There are many vendors in this space today that are using techniques that employ the use of text based list or a formatted spread sheet. Information Systems Associates has developed a data collection process for IT assets that employs real time data validation, combined bar code scanning which as best as can be determined is unique in the industry. The major importance of this approach is that the data exported (extracted) from Information Systems Associates’ data collection application has been validated and is available immediately to be imported into the client’s asset management solution. This saves a significant amount of time (could be days or even weeks) in researching errors that are uncovered by the application at the time of the data import.

To become more competitive, we will need to make investments in new product development and improve our market visibility and financial situation. A prime example of this investment is OSPI®, version 2 which provides a cost efficient solution.

Although we offer a broad range of asset network and facilities management solutions as Value Added Resellers, we face significant competition in each of the component product areas from the following companies:

§ Enterprise asset management – related solutions – ShowRack, Nlyte, iTRACS

In addition, we face competition from organizations that use in-house developers to develop solutions for certain elements of the asset management.

ISA considers data collection and the software it has developed to perform these services, OSPI®^, to be one of the two areas of focus for our business. It is the intent of ISA management to promote the software as the practical solution to the specific problems encountered during the data collection process for IT (Information Technology) assets. The promotion of the product and services occurs through direct sales and marketing as well as via industry trade show exhibition and mailings to a targeted audience.

ISA competes for business based on the recommendations of the software vendors for whose product solutions our data collection software is compatible. At the present time, OSPI® is compatible with two vendor’s solution; VISTA600 by Avocent Huntsville Corp. (formally Aperture Technologies Inc.) and RACKWISE DCM by Visual Network Design. ISA believes that its current pricing structure combined with the extensive number of data validation processes included in its product make it very competitive. The vast majority of data collection services in existence are focused on the retail industry. Of the competitors that we have been able to identify, our research has not produced any information that would lead us to believe that the competitors can provide the same level of quality services that ISA is capable of delivering with its software solution.

Visual Network Design (VND) does not assign exclusive geographical areas to Value Added Resellers as this would limit the VAR’s potential as it relates to the sale of software and services. ISA in now being actively engaged by Visual Network Design to deliver consulting services to its customers (solution installation, data load and training) and offers a “turnkey” service to their clients in which ISA provides the IT asset data collection, RACKWISE DMC software installation, data import (using the data collected previously) and client training in the use of the RACKWISE DMC software. ISA and VND management have identified the role that ISA will play in supporting Visual Network Design’s deployment of RACKWISE DCM.

Our major activity is around the sale of asset management software and services related to the software. We have recently:

We have hired Dom Lesme as our Chief Operating Officer. Initially, Dom’s primary responsibilities are to build an internal sales and marketing staff whereby ISA can directly market and sell its systems and services directly to potential customers. In addition, Dom has hired Bill Nelson as our Director of Product Strategy. Dom, along with Bill and the CEO, Joe Coschera, are developing the short and long term evolution of OSPI creating a Product Requirements Document (PRD) that will become ISA’s product roadmap.

Our business strategy is to expand our customer base, through superior software functionality and the industry expertise of our employees. In particular, our strategy is comprised of the following key components:

Expand Joint Venture with Visual Network Design, Inc. and Increase Our Customer Base

Working alongside Visual Network Design, Inc., we anticipate an increase in services revenue due largely to the fact that our core service competencies are in alignment with the needs of Visual Network Design, Inc.’s customer base. We have executed a Value Added Reseller Agreement by which ISA is identified on each services quotation submitted by Visual Network Design, Inc. to its prospective clients. ISA is the exclusive provider of data collection services for Visual Network Design’s customers. Visual Network Design Inc. utilizes ISA’s technical services to support their software solution (RACKWISE DCM) at their client locations which includes the installation, implementation and training of their clients in the proper use and maintenance of the RACKWISE DCM solution.

Strengthen our position as an enterprise asset management solution integrator and improve our visibility among target sectors. Information Systems Associates, Inc. has earned the reputation of a capable solution integrator. While we have expanded our customer base, Information Systems Associates, Inc. is committed to solidifying our position as an enterprise asset management company.

Based on the relative pricing and functionality of our product and service offerings as compared with those of our competitors, we consider our service offerings to be competitive, however it is critical that we continue to maintain and enhance our approach to delivering technology solutions. It is our understanding that the current pricing for the services we provide is in some cases significantly less than that charged by the other solution vendors as it relates to our systems integration consulting services. Relative to data collection we believe that based on information received from prospects to which we have spoken that our data collection services are approximately 20% of the project implementation cost to the customer. In addition, because our solution is provided “ready to use” the time (cost) to implement the solution is also decreased which is a direct savings for the client.

We have marketing and other relationships with Avocent Huntsville Corp., Visual Network Design, Inc., and Vision Facilities Management LTD. We believe that these and future relationships will help provide us with access to important industry participants and will help increase our brand awareness.

We plan to expand by seeking technologies, products, and services that complement our existing business. If appropriate opportunities are available, we may acquire businesses, technologies or products or enter into strategic relationships that may further diversify revenue sources and product offerings, expand our customer base or enhance our technology platform.

The following is a summary of material risks and uncertainties which we face in our business.

Our Limited Operating History and Lack of Revenues Makes Evaluating Our Business and Prospects Difficult

While our competitors have operated software development companies for a significant period of time, we have only had limited operations and revenues since our inception in May of 1994. As a result, we have a limited operating history upon which you can evaluate us and our prospects. In addition, we show losses of $808,773, $1,009,195, and $626,108 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

To date, we have not paid any dividends on our common stock. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of future dividends and the amounts thereof will depend upon our earnings, financial requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

Now That Our Common Stock Has Become Tradable On The Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, Sales Of Our Common Stock By Our Principal Shareholder Could Affect The Level Of Public Interest In Our Common Stock As Well As Depress Its Price.

Now that our common stock has become tradable on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, prospective purchasers will be able to purchase our common stock in the open market. The Selling Security Holders will be able to sell the shares covered by this prospectus on the open market. In addition, because our principal stockholder, Joseph Coschera, owns approximately 29% of our common stock he may dispose of a substantial percentage of his stock after a six month holding period subject to the limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In general, these limitations impose a maximum sale requirement equal to the greater of an amount during the preceding three months of 1% of our outstanding shares or an amount equal to the average weekly reported volume of trading in our common stock on all national securities exchanges and/or reported through the automated quotation system of a registered securities association during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a Rule 144 notice. In addition, there are other requirements imposed by Rule 144, including manner of sale and other requirements. If substantial amounts of any of these shares are sold either on the open market or pursuant to Rule 144, there may be downward price pressures on our common stock price, causing the market price of our common stock to decrease in value. In addition, this selling activity could:

· Inhibit buying activity that might otherwise help support the market price of our common stock; and

We May Be Unable To Obtain The Additional Funding Needed To Enable Us To Operate Profitably In The Future.

Other than the line of credit, we have no other credit facility or other committed sources of capital sufficient to fund our business plan. We may be unable to establish credit arrangements on satisfactory terms. If capital resources are insufficient to meet our future capital requirements, we may have to raise funds to continue development of our operations. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity and/or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution to our shareholders and/or increased debt service commitments. If adequate funds are not available, we may be unable to sufficiently develop our operations to become profitable.

Our Principal Stockholder Controls Our Board Of Directors And Thereby Controls Our Business Affairs In Which Case You Will Have Little Or No Participation In Our Business Affairs.

Currently, our President, CEO and Director, Mr. Joseph P. Coschera owns 29% of the outstanding shares of Information Systems Associates. Mr. Coschera controls the Board of Directors and therefore controls our business affairs. In addition, Joseph Coschera, by virtue of his 29% share ownership percentage, will have significant influence over all matters requiring approval by our stockholders without the approval of minority stockholders. In addition, he will be able to elect all of the members of our Board of Directors, which will allow him to significantly control our affairs and management. Accordingly, you will be limited in your ability to affect change in how we conduct our business.

Our Common Stock Is A “Penny Stock”, And Compliance With Requirements For Dealing In Penny Stocks May Make It Difficult For Holders Of Our Common Stock To Resell Their Shares.

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in “penny stocks.” Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on NASDAQ, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. Prior to a transaction in a penny stock, a broker-dealer is required to:

· deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC;

· provide the customer with current bid and offer quotation for the penny stock;

· explain the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction;

· provide monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account;

· make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s approval; and

· provide a written agreement for the transaction.

These requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for our stock. Because our shares are subject to the penny stock rules, you may find it more difficult to sell your shares.

Potential Fluctuations In Our Financial Results Make Financial Forecasting Difficult.

· General economic conditions as well as economic conditions specific to our industry;

· Our operating results have varied on a quarterly basis in the past and may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control. Factors that may affect our quarterly operating results include:

· long sales cycles, which characterize our industry

· implementation delays, which can affect payment and recognition of revenue;

· any decision by us to reduce prices for our solutions in response to price reductions by competitors

· the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to monitoring or expanding our business, operations and infrastructure

· the timing of, and our ability to integrate, any future acquisition, technologies or products or any strategic investments or relationships into which we may enter

Due to these factors, our quarterly revenues and operating results are difficult to forecast. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. In addition, it is likely that in one or more future quarters, our operating results will fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In such event, the trading price of our common shares would almost certainly be materially adversely affected.

The Markets In Which We Operate Are Competitive.

The market for asset lifecycle management solutions is rapidly evolving and intensely competitive. We face significant competition in each segment of our business (sourcing, procurement, enterprise asset management and asset disposition). We expect that competition will further intensify as new companies enter the different segments of our market and larger existing companies expand their product lines.

Some of our competitors have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater brand recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete with them effectively. If we fail to do so, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Significant Delays In Product Development Would Result In Loss Of Revenue.

If we experience significant product development delays, our revenues could be substantially reduced, which would adversely affect our operating results. As a result of the complexities inherent in our software, major new product enhancements and new products often require long development and test periods before they are released. On occasion, we have experienced delays in the scheduled release date of new or enhanced products, and we may experience delays in the future. Delays may occur for many reasons, including an inability to hire a sufficient number of developers, discovery of bugs and errors or a failure of our current or future products to conform to industry requirements. Any such delay, or the failure of new products or enhancements in achieving market acceptance, could materially impact our business and result in a decrease in our revenues.

We May Have To Expend Significant Resources To Keep Pace With Rapid Technological Change.

Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, changes in user and customer requirements, frequent new service or product introductions embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards and practices. Any of these could hamper our ability to compete or render our proprietary technology obsolete. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to:

· develop new proprietary technology that addresses the increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our existing and prospective customers

· anticipate and respond to technological advances and emerging industry standards and practices on a timely and cost-effective basis

· continually improve the performance, features and reliability of our products in response to evolving market demands

· license leading technologies

We may be required to make substantial expenditures to accomplish the foregoing or to modify or adapt our services or infrastructure.

Our Business Could Be Substantially Harmed If We Have To Correct Or Delay The Release Of Products Due To Software Bugs Or Errors.

Our software products may contain undetected errors or bugs when first introduced or as new versions are released. Errors may result in any of the following:

· adverse customer reactions

· negative publicity regarding our business and our products

· harm to our reputation

· loss of or delay in market acceptance

· loss of revenue or required product changes

· diversion of development resources and increased development expenses

· increased service and warranty costs

· legal action by our customers

· increased insurance costs

If We Are Unable To Successfully Protect Our Intellectual Property Or Obtain Certain Licenses, Our Competitive Position May Be Weakened.

Our performance and ability to compete are dependent in part on our technology. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws as well as confidentiality agreements and technical measures, to establish and protect our rights in the technology we develop. We cannot guarantee that any patents issued to us will afford meaningful protection for our technology. Competitors may develop similar technologies which do not conflict with our patents. Others may challenge our patents and, as a result, our patents could be narrowed or invalidated.

Our software is protected by registration The source code for our proprietary software is protected as a trade secret. As part of our confidentiality protection procedures, we generally enter into agreements with our employees and consultants and limit access to, and distribution of, our software, documentation and other proprietary information. We cannot assure you that the steps we take will prevent misappropriation of our technology or that agreements entered into for that purpose will be enforceable. In order to protect our intellectual property, it may be necessary for us to sue one or more third parties. While this has not been necessary to date, there is no guarantee that we will not be required to do so in future to protect our rights. The laws of other countries may afford us little or no protection for our intellectual property. We also rely on a variety of technology that we license from third parties, including our database and Internet software, which is used to perform key functions.

Others Could Claim That We Infringe On Their Intellectual Property Rights, Which May Result In Costly And Time-Consuming Litigation.

Our success will also depend partly on our ability to operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others, as well as our ability to prevent others from infringing on our proprietary rights. We may be required at times to take legal action in order to protect our proprietary rights. Also, from time to time, we may receive notice from third parties claiming that we infringe their patent or other proprietary rights.

We believe that infringement claims will increase in the technology sector as competition intensifies. Despite our best efforts, we may be sued for infringing on the patent or other proprietary rights of others. Such litigation is costly, and even if we prevail, the cost of such litigation could harm us. If we do not prevail or cannot fund a complete defense, in addition to any damages we might have to pay, we could be required to stop the infringing activity or obtain a license. We cannot be certain that any required license would be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain a license, or if the terms of a license are burdensome to us, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Our Business Is Sensitive To The Overall Economic Environment. Any Slowdown In Information Technology Spending Budgets Could Harm Our Operating Results.

Any significant downturn in our customers' markets or in general economic conditions that results in reduced information technology spending budgets would likely result in a decreased demand for our products and services, longer selling cycles and lower prices, any of which may harm our business.

Although We Have Not Yet Issued Any Preference Shares, If Issued, Our Preference Shares Could Prevent Or Delay A Takeover That Some Or A Majority Of Shareholders Consider Favorable.

Our Board of Directors, without any further vote of our shareholders, may issue preference shares and determine the price, preferences, rights and restrictions of those shares. The rights of the holders of common shares will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any series of preference shares that may be issued in the future. That means, for example, that we can issue preference shares with more voting rights, higher dividend payments or more favorable rights upon distribution than those for our common shares. If we issue certain types of preference shares in the future, it may also be more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting shares and such issuance may, in certain circumstances, deter or delay mergers, tender offers or other possible transactions that may be favored by some or a majority of our shareholders.

EMPLOYEES

We have six employees none of which are subject to a collective bargaining agreement.

REPORTS TO SECURITY HOLDERS

We are not required to deliver an annual report to security holders and will not voluntarily deliver a copy of the annual report to security holders. If we should choose to create an annual report, it will contain audited financial statements. We intend to file all of our required information with the SEC. We plan to file our Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and all other forms that are or may become applicable with the SEC.

The public may read and copy any materials that are filed by us with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The Public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The statements and forms filed by us with the SEC have been filed electronically and are available for viewing or copy on the SEC maintained Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, as well as other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The Internet address for this site can be found at http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We do not own any real property nor do we have any contracts or options to acquire any real property in the future. Presently, we are renting an office located at Suite E, 1151 SW 30^th Street, Palm City FL 34990. We occupy 1,208 square feet. This space is adequate for our present and our planned future operations. We pay approximately $1,278.00 per month in rent for use of this space.

We also own computer equipment and office furniture for our business. We own several computers, handhelds, storage drives, and network devices which we use to conduct business. These devices are used in the development of our software products and delivery of services to our clients. We also own standard office furniture including desks, chairs, and other personal property relating to our industry. All of this equipment is in good condition. The net book value of property and equipment is $19,684

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEEDINGS

From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. On April 24, 2009, Phuture World, Inc. filed a complaint in the case captioned Phuture World, Inc. v. Information Systems Associates, Inc. and Joseph Coschera, Case No. 562009 CA 3086, 19th Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County Florida. Phuture World originally alleged that the Company and its President breached the terms of a certain software development contract, and it sought damages in excess of $15,000. The plaintiff dropped all claims against the President and eliminated some of its other claims against the Company. The Company terminated the software contract at issue in the case prior to the filing of the case, and it no longer uses the services of Phuture World. The Company is contesting this lawsuit and believes that it has defenses to the claims made by Phuture World. The Company is vigorously defending itself and has filed and is pursuing damage claims of its own against Phuture World for Phuture World's failure to provide the software required under the contract between Phuture World and the Company. The Company believes that the outcome of this lawsuit will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES MARKET INFORMATION

Our shares of common stock are quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. The Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board is a quotation medium for subscribing members only. Only market makers can apply to quote securities on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. We cannot guarantee that we will obtain a market maker or such a quotation. Although we will seek a market maker for our securities, our management has no agreements, understandings or other arrangements with market makers to begin making a market for our shares. There is no limited trading activity in our securities, and there can be no assurance that a regular trading market for our common stock will ever be developed, or if developed, will be sustained.

Stock Price
	2010								2009
		12/31		9/30		6/30		3/31		12/31		9/30		6/30		3/31
High	$	.11	$	.10	$	.19	$	.14	$	.16	$	.31	$	.40	$	.65
Low	$	.11	$	.10	$	.19	$	.14	$	.16	$	.31	$	.40	$	.65

A shareholder in all likelihood, therefore, will not be able to resell their securities should he or she desire to do when eligible for public resale. Furthermore, it is unlikely that a lending institution will accept our securities as pledged collateral for loans unless a regular trading market develops. We have no plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with any person with regard to the development of a trading market in any of our securities.

AGREEMENTS TO REGISTER

Not applicable.

STOCKHOLDERS

As of December 31, 2010 there were 51 stockholders of record of our common stock.

SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE

Upon effectiveness of the registration statement effective on January 24, 2008, only the 5,193,834 shares of common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restrictions under the Securities Act of 1933. The shares held by our affiliates will be restricted by the resale limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933.

In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, any of our affiliates and any person or persons whose sales are aggregated who has beneficially owned his or her restricted shares for at least one year, may be entitled to sell in the open market within any three-month period a number of shares of common stock that does not exceed the greater of (i) 1% of the then outstanding shares of our common stock, or (ii) the average weekly trading volume in the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding such sale. Sales under Rule 144 are also affected by limitations on manner of sale, notice requirements, and availability of current public information about us. Non-affiliates, who have held their restricted shares for one year, may be entitled to sell their shares under Rule 144 without regard to any of the above limitations, provided they have not been affiliates for the three months preceding such sale.

Further, Rule 144A as currently in effect, in general, permits unlimited resale of restricted securities of any issuer provided that the purchaser is an institution that owns and invests on a discretionary basis at least $100 million in securities or is a registered broker-dealer that owns and invests $10 million in securities. Rule 144A allows our existing stockholders to sell their shares of common stock to such institutions and registered broker-dealers without regard to any volume or other restrictions. Unlike under Rule 144, restricted securities sold under Rule 144A to non-affiliates do not lose their status as restricted securities.

The availability for sale of substantial amounts of common stock under Rule 144 could adversely affect prevailing market prices for our securities.

DIVIDENDS

We have not declared any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future. We plan to retain any future earnings for use in our business. Any decisions as to future payment of dividends will depend on our earnings and financial position and such other factors, as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

(9)

DIVIDEND POLICY

All shares of common stock are entitled to participate proportionally in dividends if our Board of Directors declares dividends out of the funds legally available. These dividends may be paid in cash, property or additional shares of common stock. We have not paid any dividends since our inception and presently anticipate that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development of our business. Any future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, our future earnings, operating and financial condition, capital requirements, and other factors.

Our shares are "Penny Stocks" within the Meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Our Shares are "penny stocks" within the definition of that term as contained in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00. Our shares will then be subject to rules that impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on certain broker-dealers who engage in certain transactions involving a penny stock.

Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or "accredited investor" must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and must receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the sale, unless the broker-dealer is otherwise exempt. Generally, an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 individually or $300,000 together with his or her spouse is considered an accredited investor. In addition, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market. A broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the Registered Representative and current bid and offer quotations for the securities. In addition a broker-dealer is required to send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the penny stock held in a customer's account, the account’s value and information regarding the limited market in penny stocks. As a result of these regulations, the ability of broker-dealers to sell our stock may affect the ability of Selling Security Holders or other holders to sell their shares in the secondary market. In addition, the penny stock rules generally require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock, the broker-dealer make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of Information Systems Associate's securities. In addition, the liquidity for Information Systems Associate's securities may be adversely affected, with concomitant adverse effects on the price of Information Systems Associate's securities. Our shares are subject to such penny stock rules.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in this report and is qualified in its entirety by the foregoing.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this report, including statements of our expectations, intentions, plans and beliefs, including those contained in or implied by "Management's Discussion and Analysis" and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, are "forward -looking statements", within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), that are subject to certain events, risks and uncertainties that may be outside our control. The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “optimistic”, “intend”, “will”, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements of management's plans and objectives for our future operations and statements of future economic performance, information regarding our expansion and possible results from expansion, our expected growth, our capital budget and future capital requirements, the availability of funds and our ability to meet future capital needs, the realization of our deferred tax assets, and the assumptions described in this report underlying such forward-looking statements. Actual results and developments could differ materially from those expressed in or implied by such statements due to a number of factors, including, without limitation, those described in the context of such forward-looking statements, our expansion and acquisition strategy, our ability to achieve operating efficiencies, our dependence on network infrastructure, capacity, telecommunications carriers and other suppliers, industry pricing and technology trends, evolving industry standards, domestic and international regulatory matters, general economic and business conditions, the strength and financial resources of our competitors, our ability to find and retain skilled personnel, the political and economic climate in which we conduct operations and the risk factors described from time to time in our other documents and reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: 1) our ability to successfully develop, manufacture and deliver our products on a timely basis and in the prescribed condition; 2) our ability to compete effectively with other companies in the same industry; 3) our ability to raise sufficient capital in order to effectuate our business plan; and 4) our ability to retain our key executives.

(10)

OUR COMPANY

We were incorporated in Florida on May 31, 1994 to engage in the business of developing software for the financial and asset management industries. We are currently engaged and plan to continue in the sale of asset management software for both corporate real estate and corporate information technology networks. Our executive offices are currently located 1151 SW 30^th Street, Suite E, Palm City, FL 34990. Our telephone number is (772) 403-2992. Information Systems Associates, Inc. is a "Solution Provider" positioned to develop and deliver comprehensive asset management systems for both real estate and data center assets. Our application products are also used by corporate Real Estate departments to manage their real property lease obligations (as both tenant and landlord), to determine their company’s use of corporate space, to develop plans for relocations, mergers and acquisitions as it relates to the use of space (office, manufacturing, warehousing). Utilizing the latest Computer Aided Facilities Management (CAFM) Technology solutions generally available provides the end-user with enhanced application usability. We offer project assessment and development, process review and recommendations as well as project management and training services necessary to successfully achieve your objectives.

Our company delivers turnkey software and service solutions that give large corporations control of their IT assets. Our asset solutions address Data Center equipment inventory, Space Utilization, Power and Connectivity management, Office Space and Occupancy, Office Equipment and Furniture, and Real Estate Portfolio Management.

In conjunction with our CAFM solutions, ISA now offers state of the art asset data collection services focusing on the enterprise IT infrastructure. The data collection service is based on our solution OSPI®.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Because this is only a financial summary, it does not contain all the financial information that may be important to you. It should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes presented in a later section.

The following tables set forth certain operating information in dollars and as a percentage of net sales:

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2010						2009

	Amount			% of Net Sales			Amount			% of Net Sales			Increase (Decrease)
Revenue	$	1,070,704			100.00	%	$	780,244			100.00	%	$	290,460
Cost of sales		31,397			2.93	%		37,567			4.81	%		(6,170	)
Gross profit		1,039,307			97.07	%		742,677			95.19	%		296,630
Operating expenses		1,790,546			167.23	%		1,751,433			224.47	%		39,113
Loss before other income (expenses)		(751,239	)		-70.16	%		(1,008,756	)		-129.29	%		257,517
Other income (expenses), net		(57,534	)		-5.37	%		(439	)		-0.06	%		(57,095	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(808,773	)		-75.54	%		(1,009,195	)		-129.34	%		200,422
Provision for income taxes		—			0.00	%		—			0.00	%		—
Net loss	$	(808,773	)		-75.54	%	$	(1,009,195	)		-129.34	%		200,422

Year ended December 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009

Revenues were $1,070,704 and $780,244 for the years ended December 31 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in the current period was due primarily to the increased sale of professional services, maintenance contracts and time and materials arrangements. We recognize professional services revenue, which includes installation, training, consulting and engineering services, upon delivery of the services. If the professional service project includes independent milestones, revenue is recognized as milestones are met and upon acceptance from the customer. As part of our ongoing operations to provide services to our customers, incidental expenses, if reimbursable under the terms of the contracts, are billed to customers. These expenses are recorded as both revenues and direct cost of services.

Gross profit was $1,039,307 and $742,677 for the years ended December 31 2010 and 2009, respectively, while gross margin percentage for the same period was 97.07% and 95.19%. The primary cost for 2010 was maintenance and support while the primary cost for 2009 was software.

Operating expenses for the years December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $1,790,546 and $1,751,433, respectively. Increases in Amortization and Travel and Entertainment were partially offset by a decrease in Professional Fees. Although two new positions were added to payroll in 2009, only one position was maintained throughout 2010.

We had a net loss of $808,773 and $1,009,195 from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. ISA entered into several consulting agreements that have had an immediate impact on activity for the year by increasing operating expenses. Likewise, the Company has taken a write off for the production of software. Overall, the Company has kept operating expenses constant, thereby allowing all increases in revenue to decrease the net loss.

(11)

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2010					2009

		Amount		% of Net Sales			Amount		% of Net Sales			Increase (Decrease)
Revenue	$	1,070,704		100.00	%	$	780,244		100.00	%	$	290,460
Cost of sales		31,397		2.93	%		37,567		4.81	%		(6,170	)
Gross profit		1,039,307		97.07	%		742,677		95.19	%		296,630
Operating expenses		1,790,546		167.23	%		1,752,071		224.55	%		38,475
Loss before other income (expenses)		(751,239	)	-70.16	%		(1,009,394	)	-129.37	%		258,155
Other income (expenses), net		(57,534	)	-5.37	%		199		0.03	%		(57,733	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(808,773	)	-75.54	%		(1,009,195	)	-129.34	%		200,422
Provision for income taxes		—		0.00	%		—		0.00	%		—
Net loss	$	(808,773	)	-75.54	%	$	(1,009,195	)	-129.34	%		200,422

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2009					2008

		Amount		% of Net Sales			Amount		% of Net Sales			Increase (Decrease)
Revenue	$	780,244		72.87	%	$	1,225,461		157.06	%	$	(445,217	)
Cost of sales		37,567		3.51	%		44,689		5.73	%		(7,122	)
Gross profit		742,677		69.36	%		1,180,772		151.33	%		(438,095	)
Operating expenses		1,752,071		163.64	%		1,769,356		226.77	%		(17,285	)
Loss before other income (expenses)		(1,009,394	)	-94.27	%		(588,584	)	-75.44	%		(420,810	)
Other income (expenses), net		199		0.02	%		267		0.03	%		(68	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(1,009,195	)	-94.26	%		(588,317	)	-75.40	%		(420,878	)
Provision for income taxes		—		0.00	%		37,791		4.84	%		(37,791	)
Net loss	$	(1,009,195	)	-94.26	%	$	(626,108	)	-80.25	%		(383,087	)

	As of December 31,
	2010		2009

Available cash	$	70,326	$	21,047
Total current assets	$	280,028	$	254,045
Property and equipment, net	$	19,684	$	174,288
Investments	$	—	$	60,559
Total assets	$	299,712	$	488,892
Current liabilities	$	113,510	$	113,316
Stockholders’ equity	$	186,202	$	375,576
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	299,712	$	488,892

December 31 2010 compared to December 31, 2009

Available cash was $70,326 and $21,047 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase is primarily due to the Company having issued stock.

Total current assets were $280,028 and $254,045 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively. The Company used an increase in cash and accounts receivable to offset a decrease in prepaid expenses.

Property and equipment, net were $19,684 and $174,288 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively. The decrease is due primarily to the amortization of software development costs for version 2 of OSPI® .

Current liabilities were $113,510 and $113,316 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Increases in borrowing on the line of credit were offset by decreases in accrued expenses and other liabilities.

IMPACT OF INFLATION

We believe that inflation has had a negligible effect on operations during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. We believe that we can offset inflationary increases in the cost of revenue by increasing revenue and improving operating efficiencies.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash flows used in operations were $135,030 and $183,645 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash flows used in operations in 2010 were primarily attributable to a net loss of $808,773 and an increase in accounts receivable of $60,709, which were partially offset by non-cash expenses for depreciation, common stock issued for services and loss on the sale of an investment of $156,309, $527,313 and $47,347, respectively.. Cash flows used in operations in 2009 were primarily attributable to a net loss of $1,009,195. This was partially offset by common stock issued for services of $671,438, a decrease in accounts receivable of $59,312 and an increase in accounts payable of 82,626.

Cash flows provided/ (used) in investing activities were $8,295 and ($173,407) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash flows provided by investing activities in 2010 were attributable to a payment received from the sale of an investment, less purchases of property and equipment. Cash flows used in investing activities in 2009 were from the cost of developing software for resale.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $176,014 and $173,331 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash flows provided by financing activities in 2010 were funded from the additional sale of stock and additional borrowing on the line of credit. Cash flows provided by financing activities for 2009 were attributable to the sale of stock and additional borrowing.

Overall, we have funded our cash needs from inception through December 31, 2010 and 2009 with a series of debt and equity transactions.

We had cash on hand of $70,326 and a working capital of $166,518 as of December 31, 2010. If the projected revenues fall short of needed capital we may not be able to sustain our capital needs. We will then need to obtain additional capital through equity or debt financing to sustain operations for an additional year. Our current level of operations would require capital of approximately $600,000 to sustain operations through year 2011. Modifications to our business plans may require additional capital for us to operate. For example, if we want to offer a greater number of products or increase our marketing efforts, we may need additional capital. Failure to raise capital may result in lower revenues and market share for us. In addition, there can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us when needed or available on terms favorable to us.

Mr. Coschera is a personal guarantor on a line of credit to provide additional working capital to the Company. At year end December 31, 2010 there was borrowing against the line of credit in the amount of $36,141. No other person or entity is liable for, surety or otherwise provides a guarantee for our debt financing from outside resources. Demand for the products and services will be dependent on, among other things, market acceptance of our services, the computer software market in general, and general economic conditions, which are cyclical in nature. In as much as a major portion of our activities is the receipt of revenues from services rendered, our business operations may be adversely affected by our competitors and prolonged recession periods.

Our success will be dependent upon implementing our plan of operations and the risks associated with our business plan.

No significant amount of our trade payables has been unpaid within the stated trade term. We are not subject to any unsatisfied judgments, liens or settlement obligations.

(12)

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no-off balance sheet contractual arrangements, as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments. We believe that the determination of the carrying value of our long-lived assets, the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets and valuation of share-based payment compensation are the most critical areas where management’s judgments and estimates most affect our reported results. While we believe our estimates are reasonable, misinterpretation of the conditions that affect the valuation of these assets could result in actual results varying from reported results, which are based on our estimates, assumptions and judgments as of the balance sheet date.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Security Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition" and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 605-25, “Revenue Recognition Multiple-element Arrangements”

Consulting services and training revenues are accounted for separately from subscription and support revenues when these services have value to the customer on a standalone basis and there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value of each deliverable. When accounted for separately, revenues are achieved and accepted by the customer for fixed price contracts. The majority of our consulting service contracts are on a time and material basis. Training revenues are recognized after the services are performed. For revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables, we allocate the total customer arrangement to the separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values, as determined by the price of the undelivered items when sold separately.

In determining whether the consulting services can be accounted for separately from subscription and support revenues, we consider the following factors for each consulting agreement: availability of the consulting services from other vendors, whether objective and reliable evidence for fair value exists for the undelivered elements, the nature of the consulting services, the timing of when the consulting contract was signed in comparison to the subscription service start date, and the contractual dependence of the subscription service on the customer’s satisfaction with the consulting work. If a consulting arrangement does not qualify for separate accounting, we recognize the consulting revenue ratably over the remaining term of the subscription contract. Additionally, in these situations, we defer the direct costs of the consulting arrangement and amortize these costs over the same time period as the consulting revenue is recognized. We did not have any revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables for the periods ending December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated economic life of the property and equipment (three to ten years). When assets are sold or retired, their costs and accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any gain or loss resulting from their disposal is included in the statement of operations.

We recognize an impairment loss on property and equipment when evidence, such as the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), indicates that future operations will not produce sufficient revenue to cover the related future costs, including depreciation, and when the carrying amount of the asset cannot be realized through sale. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the assets.

Software Development Costs

The Company accounts for costs incurred to develop computer software for internal use in accordance with FASB ASC 350-40 “Internal-Use Software”. As required by ASC 350-40, the Company capitalizes the costs incurred during the application development stage, which include costs to design the software configuration and interfaces, coding, installation, and testing. Costs incurred during the preliminary project along with post-implementation stages of internal use computer software are expensed as incurred. Capitalized development costs are amortized over a period of one to three years. Costs incurred to maintain existing product offerings are expensed as incurred. The capitalization and ongoing assessment of recoverability of development costs requires considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors, including, but not limited to, technological and economic feasibility, and estimated economic life.

On December 31, 2009, the Company released Version 2 of the OSPI software for sale in the marketplace. The Company accounts for internally produced software with FASB ASC 985-20 “Cost of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed”. Costs were capitalized when the second version was established as technically feasible and will be written off on a straight line method over the estimated useful life.

(13)

RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

ASU 2010-09 e addresses both the interaction of the requirements of this pronouncement with the SEC’s reporting requirements and the intended breadth of the reissuance disclosure provision related to subsequent events. An entity that either is (a) an SEC filer or (b) is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets) is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. If an entity meets neither of those criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are available to be issued. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between ASC 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. The adoption of this provision will not impact the Company’s financial statements.

ASU 2010-06 was issued to improve disclosure requirements related to Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall Subtopic (ASC 820-10 originally issued as FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. Under this update, a reporting entity should disclose separately the amount of significant transfer in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. For Level 3 fair value measurements, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchase, sales, issuances and settlements. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 will not impact the Company’s financial statements.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS – NOT YET ADOPTED

In April, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13 to address the classification of an employee share-based payment with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which the underlying equity security trades. ASC 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, provides guidance on the classification of a share-based payment award as either equity or a liability. A share-based payment award that contains a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition is required to be classified as a liability. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company believes there will no impact to their financial statements due to the implementation of ASU 2010-13.

Under ASU 2010-28, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (ASC 350) testing for goodwill impairment is a two-step test. When a goodwill impairment test is performed (either on an annual or interim basis), an entity must assess whether the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value (Step 1). If it does, an entity must perform an additional test to determine whether goodwill has been impaired and to calculate the amount of that impairment (Step 2). The objective of this Update is to address questions about entities with reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts.

For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not anticipate any material impact on the Company’s financial statements due to this update

ASU 2011-01, “Receivables”, temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in ASU 2010-20 for public entities. Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. Under the existing effective date in ASU 2010-20, public-entity creditors would have provided disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments in this Update temporarily defer that effective date, enabling public-entity creditors to provide those disclosures after the Board clarifies the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The deferral in this Update will result in more consistent disclosures about troubled debt restructurings. This amendment does not defer the effective date of the other disclosure requirements in ASU 2010-20. The Company does not believe ASU 2011-01 will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

We are exposed to market risks, including changes in interest rates. The interest payable under our credit facility, under which we had $36,141 at December 31, 2010, is based on a specified bank’s prime interest rate and, therefore, is affected by changes in market interest rates. Historically, the effects of movements in the market interest rates have been immaterial to our operating results, as we have not borrowed to any significant degree.

(14)

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Information Systems Associates, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Information Systems Associates, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Information Systems Associates Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Information Systems Associates, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 18, the Company has incurred significant losses. The Company’s viability is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and the success of its future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/Lake & Associates CPA’s LLC

Lake & Associates CPA’s LLC

Boca Raton, Florida

March 25, 2011

(15)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS


ASSETS
	As of December 31,
	2010			2009
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	70,326		$	21,047
Accounts receivable		92,893			34,809
Prepaid consulting		109,187			190,500
Prepaid expenses		7,622			7,689

Total Current Assets		280,028			254,045

Property and Equipment (net)		19,684			174,288

Other Assets
Investments		—			60,559

TOTAL ASSETS	$	299,712		$	488,892

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current Liabilities
Note payable - line of credit	$	36,141		$	20,055
Note payable - insurance		3,204			3,276
Accounts payable		68,568			66,910
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,405			21,196
Deferred revenue		3,192			1,879

Total Current Liabilities		113,510			113,316

Stockholders' Equity
Common stock-$.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized, 22,266,084 and 18,266,084 issued
and outstanding for 2010 and 2009, respectively		22,266			18,266
Additional paid in capital		2,781,213			2,179,213
Accumulated deficit		(2,617,277	)		(1,808,504	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)		—			(13,399	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		186,202			375,576

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY	$	299,712		$	488,892

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

(16)

INFORMATION SYSTEM ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,


	2010			2009

Revenue	$	1,070,704		$	780,244

Cost of Sales		31,397			37,567

Gross Profit		1,039,307			742,677

Operating Expenses
Administrative and general		543,044			308,437
Salaries and employee benefits		282,408			224,206
Professional		965,094			1,218,790
Total Operating Expenses		1,790,546			1,751,433

(Loss) Before Other Income (Expense)		(751,239	)		(1,008,756	)

Other Income (Expense)
Interest income		—			191
Miscellaneous income		30			—
Interest expense		(10,217	)		—
Loss on sale of investments		(47,347	)		—
Loss on sale of property and equipment		—			(630	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(57,534	)		(439	)

(Loss) From Operations Before
Income Taxes		(808,773	)		(1,009,195	)

Provision for Income Taxes		—			—


Net (Loss)		(808,773	)		(1,009,195	)

Other Comprehensive (Loss)
Unrealized gain/(loss) on securities:
Arising during the year		13,399			(13,399	)
Reclassification to net income		—			—

Total other comprehensive (loss)		13,399			(13,399	)

Comprehensive (Loss)	$	(795,374	)	$	(1,022,594	)



Basic and Fully Diluted (Loss) per Share:
Basic and fully diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.06	)
Weighted average common shares
outstanding		20,536,920			17,187,439

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

(17)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

	Common Stock				Preferred Stock				Additional		Accumulated			Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Paid in Capital		Deficit			Other Comprehensive			Total
														Income (Loss)

Balance, January 1, 2009		16,309,834	$	16,310		—	$	—	$	1,587,669	$	(799,309	)	$	—		$	804,670

Issuance of stock for services		956,250		956		—		—		342,544		—			—			343,500

Proceeds from issuance of stock		1,000,000		1,000		—		—		249,000		—			—			250,000

Net (loss)		—		—		—		—		—		(1,009,195	)		—			(1,009,195	)

Comprehensive Income:
Unrealized loss on investment		—		—		—		—		—		—			(13,399	)		(13,399	)


Balance, December 31, 2009		18,266,084		18,266		—		—		2,179,213		(1,808,504	)		(13,399	)		375,576

Issuance of stock for services		2,400,000		2,400		—		—		443,600		—			—			446,000

Proceeds from issuance of stock		1,600,000		1,600		—		—		158,400		—			—			160,000

Net (loss)		—		—		—		—		—		(808,773	)		—			(808,773	)

Comprehensive Income:
Unrealized gain on investment		—		—		—		—		—		—			13,399			13,399

Balance, December 31, 2010		22,266,084	$	22,266		—	$	—	$	2,781,213	$	(2,617,277	)	$	—		$	186,202

(18)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

	2010			2009

Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net (Loss)	$	(808,773	)	$	(1,009,195	)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net
cash provided from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		156,309			19,657
Bad debt expense		2,625			—
Common stock for services		527,313			671,438
Loss on sale of security		47,347			—
(Loss) on abandonment of fixed assets		—			630

(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable		(60,709	)		59,312
Prepaid expenses		67			(7,689	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable		1,658			82,626
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(2,180	)		(803	)
Deferred revenue		1,313			379

Net Cash (Used in) Operating
Activities		(135,030	)		(183,645	)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Computer software development costs		—			(159,203	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(1,705	)		(14,204	)
Proceeds from sale of investment		10,000			—

Net Cash (Used In)
Investing Activities		8,295			(173,407	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Proceeds from line of credit		19,000			20,055
Payments made on line of credit		(2,914	)		—
Borrowings from note payable		7,559			9,615
Payments made on note payable		(7,631	)		(6,339	)
Proceeds from issuance of stock		160,000			150,000

Net Cash Provided by
Financing Activities		176,014			173,331

Net Change in Cash and Cash
Equivalents		49,279			(183,721	)

Cash and Cash Equivalents at
Beginning of period		21,047			204,768

End of Period	$	70,326		$	21,047

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

(19)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business Activity

Information Systems Associates, Inc. (Company) was incorporated under the laws of the state of Florida on May 31, 1994. The Company provides services and software system design for the planning and implementation of Computer Aided Facilities Management (CAFM) based asset management tools.

Cash and Cash Equivalent

For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be a cash equivalent.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The Company grants credit to its customers during the normal course of business. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally requires no collateral from its customers.

At times throughout the year the Company may maintain certain bank accounts in excess of the FDIC insured limits. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, amounts on deposit at institutions did not exceed FDIC insured limits.

Revenue Recognition

Consulting services and training revenues are accounted for separately from subscription and support revenues when these services have value to the customer on a standalone basis and there is objective and reliable evidence of fair value of each deliverable. When accounted for separately, revenues are recognized as the services are rendered for time and material contracts, and when the milestones are achieved and accepted by the customer for fixed price contracts. The majority of the Company’s consulting service contracts are on a time and material basis. Training revenues are recognized after the services are performed. For revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables, we allocate the total customer arrangement to the separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values, as determined by the price of the undelivered items when sold separately.

(20)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

Revenue Recognition (cont’d)

In determining whether the consulting services can be accounted for separately from subscription and support revenues, we consider the following factors for each consulting agreement: availability of the consulting services from other vendors, whether objective and reliable evidence for fair value exists for the undelivered elements, the nature of the consulting services, the timing of when the consulting contract was signed in comparison to the subscription service start date, and the contractual dependence of the subscription service on the customer's satisfaction with the consulting work. If a consulting arrangement does not qualify for separate accounting, we recognize the consulting revenue ratably over the remaining term of the subscription contract. Additionally, in these situations we defer the direct costs of the consulting arrangement and amortize those costs over the same time period as the consulting revenue is recognized. We did not have any revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables for the periods ending December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company adopted FASB ASC Codification 220 “Comprehensive Income”, which establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements.

Comprehensive income (loss) is the total of (1) net income (loss) plus (2) all other changes in the net assets arising from non-owner sources, which are referred to as comprehensive income. The Company has presented statements of income which includes other comprehensive income or loss.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided in accordance FASB ASC 740 “Income Taxes”. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax and net operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effect of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts receivable and payables and loans payable approximate fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt approximated its fair value based on the current market conditions for similar debt instruments.

(21)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts. In determining the collections on the account, historical trends are evaluated and specific customer issues are reviewed to arrive at appropriate allowances.

Property and Equipment

The Company recognizes an impairment loss on property and equipment when evidence, such as the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), indicates that future operations will not produce sufficient revenue to cover the related future costs, including depreciation, and when the carrying amount of the asset cannot be realized through sale. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluated the recoverability of its property, equipment, and other assets in accordance with FASB ASC 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment”, which requires recognition of impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceed the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets or the business to which such intangible assets relate.

Software Development Costs

(22)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

Software Development Costs

On December 31, 2009, the Company released Version 2 of the “On Site Physical Inventory” software (OSPI) for sale in the marketplace. The Company accounts for internally produced software with FASB ASC 985-20 “Cost of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed”. Costs were capitalized when the second version was established as technically feasible and will be written off on a straight line method over the estimated useful life.

Share-Based Payments

The Company accounts for payments of goods and services with stock with FASB ASC 719 “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, which establishes standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services.

This standard requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services using an option-pricing model, such as the Black-Scholes Model, received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Shares of common stock issued for services rendered by a third party are recorded at the fair market value of the shares issued or services rendered, whichever is more readily determinable.

Dividends

The Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends. No dividends have been paid or declared since inception.

Advertising Expenses

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 advertising expenses totaled $641 and $983, respectively.

(23)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 260 “Earnings per Share”. This statement requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) with a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the loss per share computations. Basic earnings per share amounts are based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding. If applicable, diluted earnings per share assume the conversion, exercise or issuance of all common stock equivalents such as options, warrants and convertible securities, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share. Accordingly, this presentation has been adopted for the periods presented. There were no adjustments required to net income for the period presented in the computation of diluted earnings per share. There were no common stock equivalents (CSE) necessary for the computation of diluted loss per share.

Recent Accounting Literature

Compensation—Stock Compensation

(Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-13)

Subsequent Events

(ASU 2010-09)

This Update addresses both the interaction of the requirements of this pronouncement with the SEC’s reporting requirements and the intended breadth of the reissuance disclosure provision related to subsequent events.

An entity that either is (a) an SEC filer or (b) is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets) is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. If an entity meets neither of those criteria, then it should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are available to be issued.

(24)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 1 – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)

An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between ASC 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. The adoption of this provision will not impact the Company’s financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

(ASU2010-06)

Under this update, a reporting entity should disclose separately the amount of significant transfer in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. For Level 3 fair value measurements, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchase, sales, issuances and settlements. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 will not impact the Company’s financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements presented to conform to 2010. Such reclassifications had no effect on reported income.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a net operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 of $808,773. The total accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2010 was $2,617,277. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and raise capital. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

(25)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 3 – CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENT

	2010		2009
Wachovia Bank (FDIC insured to $250,000)	$	70,149	$	20,805
Petty cash		177		242
Total cash and cash equivalent	$	70,326	$	21,047

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

	2010		2009
Computer software (developed for internal use)	$	162,346	$	162,346
Computer software (purchased)		590		590
Web site development		10,072		10,072
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment		27,752		26,047
		200,760		199,055
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		181,076		24,767
Property and equipment (net)	$	19,684	$	174,288

Depreciation and amortization expense	$	156,309	$	19,657

NOTE 5 – COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPED FOR INTERNAL USE

In 2009, the Company completed development of an updated version of the “On Site Physical Inventory” (OSPI) product. Version 2 was available as of December 1, 2009. The Company has capitalized the cost of the OSPI software using FASB Accounting Standards Codifications 350-40 “Internal Use Software” as follows:

	2010			2009
Development costs	$	297,603		$	297,603
Software license agreement – payments received		(135,257	)		(135,257	)

		162,346			162,346
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		162,346			13,528
	$	—		$	148,818

NOTE 6 – INVESTMENT

On April 30, 2010 the Company entered into an agreement whereby 2,500,000 shares of stock held in Rubicon Software Group, plc, a company registered under the laws of England and Wales, (“Rubicon”) were sold to Rubicon. In remuneration for this stock the Company received $10,000 and was relieved from paying $16,611 worth of outstanding invoices. In connection with this transaction, the Company recorded a loss on sale of security of $47,347.

(26)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 6 – INVESTMENT (cont’d)

On April 17, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Rubicon. The Company will be Rubicon’s exclusive agent in the United States for reselling Rubicon’s software and services. In return, Rubicon will be a software development partner and provide consulting services to the Company.

The Company agreed to purchase 2,500,000 ordinary shares for a subscription price two pence a share. The total cost of the subscription was £50,000 or $73,958, USD. Within ninety days of the subscription date, the Company could have purchase an additional 2,500,000 shares at the same subscription price in British pounds. The ninety day period has lapsed with the Company not purchasing any additional shares.

Securities investments not classified as either held-to-maturity or trading securities are classified as available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value in investments and other assets on the balance sheet, with the change in fair value during the period excluded from earnings and recorded net of taxes as a component of other comprehensive income.

Available –for-sale securities were as follows:

	December 31, 2010						December 31, 2009
	Cost		Market		Unrealized		Cost		Market		Unrealized
					Gain/(Loss)						Gain/(Loss)
Type of securities:
Common stock	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	73,958	$	60,559	($	13,399	)

Total	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	73,968	$	60,559	($	13,399	)

NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

In 2009, the Company implemented FASB ASC 850 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” relative to its financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least annually.

In determining the fair value of investments held by the Company, the Level 1 valuation technique of “Quoted Market Price in Active Market” was implemented as the Company was able to obtain a quote from the London Stock Exchange as of December 31, 2009.

As of December 31, 2010, there were no investments held by the Company. As of December 31, 2009 the Company’s investments that were carried at fair value on a recurring basis included the following:

		Fair Value Measurements Using
		Quoted	Significant	Significant
	Total	Prices in	Other Observable	Unobservable
		Active Markets	Inputs	Inputs
		(Level 1)	(Level 2)	(Level 3)

Available –for-sale securities	$60,559	$60,559	$ -	$ -

(27)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 8 – NET (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, and the dilutive EPS adds the dilutive effect of stock options and other stock equivalents. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, outstanding options to purchase an aggregate of 15,000,000 shares of stock were excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per share because the inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES

No provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 has been made.

Deferred tax assets reflect the net tax effects of net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards and temporary differences between the carrying amounts used for income tax purposes.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows:

	2010			2009
Net operating losses	$	449,935		$	325,247
Common stock for services		—			21,520
Capital loss carryover		10,496			1,181
Contributions		314			251
		460,745			348,199
Less: deferred tax liabilities		(24,932	)		(5,521	)
		435,813			342,678
Valuation allowance		(435,813	)		(342,678	)
Net tax asset	$	—		$	—

A reconciliation of income tax at the statutory rate to the Company’s effective rate is as follows:

	2010			2009
Computed tax at the expected statutory rate		15.00	%		15.00	%
State income tax – net of federal tax benefit		4.68	%		4.78	%
Income tax expense – effective rate		19.68	%		19.78	%

(28)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES (cont’d)

Realization of the deferred tax asset is dependent on future earnings, if any, the timing of which is uncertain. Accordingly, the Company’s net deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance.


The Company has the following net operating
loss carryovers for income tax purposes:
Expiring 2026	$	82,899
Expiring 2027		131,828
Expiring 2028		236,311
Expiring 2029		1,202,060
Expiring 2030		633,736
	$	2,286,834

For tax year 2008, the Company has applied for a change in accounting method with the Internal Revenue Service to report under the accrual method of accounting rather than report under the cash-basis method.

This change in accounting method will require the Company to recognize additional taxable income of $100,456. The Internal Revenue Service allows for this income to be recognized pro rata over four years. To that end, the Company will recognize $25,114 of additional income in each year through December 31, 2011.

NOTE 10 – SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 is summarized as follows:

	2010			2009
Cash paid during the periods for interest and
income taxes:
Income taxes	$	—		$	—
Interest	$	3,743		$	175
Non-Cash Investing Activities:
Balance of consulting services for contributed capital	$	190,500		$	518,438
Acquisition of consulting services for
contributed capital	$	446,000		$	343,500
Consulting services prepaid for future months	$	(109,187	)		(190,500	)
Non-cash expense of consulting services for
contributed capital	$	527,313		$	671,438

Sale of common stock	$	—	$	100,000
Reduction to accounts payable	$	—	$	(26,042	)
Investment	$	—		(73,958	)
Net change in cash proceeds	$	—	$	—

(29)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 10 – SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION (cont’d)

Forgiveness of vendor invoices for stock held
As investment		$	16,611			$	—

NOTE 11 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The Company has a SIMPLE Plan (Plan) to provide retirement and incidental benefits for its employees. Employees may contribute from 1% to 15% of their annual compensation to the Plan, limited to a maximum annual amount as set periodically by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company matches employee contributions dollar for dollar up to the IRS maximum. All matching contributions vest immediately. Such contributions to the Plan are allocated among eligible participants in the proportion of their salaries to the total salaries of all participants. Company matching contributions to the Plan for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $3,500 and $4,200, respectively.

The Company has a medical reimbursement plan that reimburses officers for all out of pocket medical expenses not covered by the Company provided insurance plan. Company expenses under the medical reimbursement plan for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 totaled $22,350 and $21,782, respectively.

NOTE 12 – OPERATING LEASE

The Company leases its primary office space on a month to month lease at a rate of $1,278 per month.

On March 2, 2009 the lease was renewed for $1,200 per month. The Company holds an additional option to renew the lease “at the market price.” This renewed lease went into effect June 1, 2009. The rent expense as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $15,336 and $16,614, respectively.

NOTE 13 – NOTE PAYABLE - LINE OF CREDIT

The Company has a line of credit with Wachovia Bank N.A. The line of credit provides for borrowings up to $40,000. The balances as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $36,141 and $20,055, respectively. The interest rate is the Prime Rate plus 3%. The President of the Company is a personal guarantor on the line of credit.

NOTE 14 – NOTE PAYABLE - INSURANCE

On August 31, 2010, the Company incurred short term financing for the purchase of insurance. The note was for $5,720. The interest rate on the debt is 4.96% and is scheduled to be repaid by May 31, 2011. The balance as of December 31, 2010 was $ 3,204.

On September 14, 2009 the Company incurred short term financing for the purchase of insurance. The note was for $9,735. The interest rate on the debt is 4.959% and the note was repaid May 17, 2010. The balance as of December 31, 2009 was $3,276.

(30)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 15 – SHARE BASED PAYMENTS FOR SERVICES

In May 2010, the Company issued 200,000 shares of restricted common stock to two directors. The stock will vest in May 2011. Shares were valued at the current market price of $.20 per share.

On May 1, 2010 the Company entered into an agreement to receive website design and development, internet marketing and search engine optimization for one year. The consultants received 100,000 shares of company common stock. Shares were valued at a current market price of $0.20 per share.

On April 29, 2010 the Company entered into an agreement to receive assistance in the development of new data center management technologies. The consultants will also investigate a variety of associated topics regarding data center management. This agreement will run for one year. The consultants received 1,000,000 shares of company common stock. Shares were valued at a current market price of $0.23 per share.

On April 27, 2010, the Company issued 700,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for investor relations services through December 31, 2010. The Company recognized professional fees of $126,000, based upon the market price of common stock on the date of issuance of $0.18, during the year ended December 31, 2010.

On April 15, 2010 the Company entered into an agreement to receive marketing strategies, digital media and social media strategies to expand the Company’s investor base and improve shareholder communication. The consultants received 400,000 shares of company common stock. Shares were valued at a current market price of $0.15 per share.

On September 11, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement to receive a variety of corporate consulting services. The contract will run for one year at a rate of $2,000 per month. In addition, the consultants will receive a commencement bonus of 300,000 shares of company common stock. Shares were valued at current market price of $0.27 per share.

On September 8, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to receive consulting services. The consultants will provide 400 hours of service for 400,000 shares of common stock. All services will be accounted for at a rate of $250 an hour. 142.75 hours and 174.25 hours at a cost of $35,688 and $43,563 respectively, were recorded as expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

On September 12, 2008, the Company entered into agreements with three companies to receive a variety of consulting services. Each agreement has a term of one year starting August 1, 2008 and remuneration will be $250,000 per annum. Each subsequent year, the annual rate will increase $12,500 while the agreement is in effect. The Company has the option of paying the consultants in cash or common stock. The Company has decided to issue 1,000,000 shares of stock to the consulting firms as payment for services. The value of stock will be at $0.25 per share. A pro-rata portion of this agreement of $437,500 and $312,500 has been expensed for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

On May 25, 2010 a notice of non renewal, was sent to the one consulting company that continued to provide services from August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010 at an agreed to rate of $262,500. The Company issued 656,200 shares of common stock for the service provided.

On July 7, 2009 a notice of non renewal was forwarded to the other two companies.

(31)

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

NOTE 15 – SHARE BASED PAYMENTS FOR SERVICES (cont’d)

These consultants were issued a series of options as follows:

1,000,000 share option to acquire shares at $1.00 per share expiring on 8/01/11

1,000,000 share option to acquire shares at $2.00 per share expiring on 8/01/11

1,000,000 share option to acquire shares at $3.00 per share expiring on 8/01/11

1,000,000 share option to acquire shares at $4.00 per share expiring on 8/01/11

1,000,000 share option to acquire shares at $5.00 per share expiring on 8/01/11

To determine the valuation of the options, FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” requires a valuation technique to estimate the fair value of the options issued. The Black-Sholes Model incorporates the various characteristics for proper valuation. As of September 30, 2008, the valuation of the options was determined to be $0.

All issued options expire three years from the date of exercise.

Following is a summary of the status of options outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively:

	For the Year Ended December 31, 2010				For the Year Ended December 31, 2009

		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at beginning of year		15,000,000	$	3.00		—	$	—
Granted		—		—		15,000,000		3.00
Exercised		—		—		—		—
Forfeited		—		—		—		—
Expired		—		—		—		—
Outstanding at end of period		15,000,000	$	3.00		15,000,000	$	3.00
Exercisable at end of period		15,000,000	$	3.00		15,000,000	$	3.00
Outstanding
Weighted average remaining contractual term				0.59				1.59
Aggregated intrinsic value				—				—
Weighted average grant date fair value				—				—
Exercisable
Weighted average remaining contractual term				0.59				1.59
Aggregated intrinsic value				—				—

NOTE 16 – MAJOR CUSTOMERS

One major customer accounted for $932,913 and $634,357 of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These amounts represent 87% and 81% of the Company’s revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, this customer accounted for 95% and 41% of accounts receivable, respectively.

NOTE 17 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In January 2011, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock to its new President, Chief Operating Officer and director in exchange for $150,000. In addition, the Company issued 50,000 shares in exchange for $5,000 to an individual investor in a private placement.

(32)

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the specified time periods. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (collectively, the “Certifying Officers”) are responsible for maintaining our disclosure controls and procedures. The controls and procedures established by us are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Certifying Officers evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation, the Certifying Officers concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Certifying Officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Certifying Officers have also concluded, based on their evaluation of our controls and procedures that as of December 31, 2010, our internal controls over financial reporting are effective and provide a reasonable assurance of achieving their objective.

The Certifying Officers have also concluded that there was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

(33)

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Article III, of our Bylaws provides that the first Board of Directors and all subsequent Boards of the Corporation shall consist of (Joseph P Coschera), unless and until otherwise determined by vote of a majority of the entire Board of Directors. Our officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at the pleasure of the Board. We have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers (Joseph P. Coschera and Loire A. Lucas). The term of each of the agreements is five (5) years renewable at the end of each period by mutual agreement.

         Name Age           Position

Joseph Coschera 63 CEO and Director

Loire Lucas 53 Vice President and Director

Adrian Goldfarb 53 Director

Mike Reisert 66 Director

Joseph Coschera

Joseph Coschera is the founder and President of Information Systems Associates, Inc. which he opened in the summer of 1992 for business. Prior to forming ISA Joe held the position of Vice President with JPMorgan Chase. Joe’s career at JPMC spanned 18 years rising from the position of Systems Engineer to Manager of Facilities and Hardware Planning for the Retail Banking Division. Joe’s responsibilities were extremely diverse and included space planning for the Division’s staff, facilities and hardware planning for several mega data centers and the network operation centers. In addition, he managed the Planning and Implementation Group whose responsibilities included the planning, acquisition and deployment of the technology infrastructure throughout the bank’s branch banking network. Joe served as both a team member and project manager during his tenure. He managed such projects as the deployment of state of the art banking technology (ATMs and Platform Automation) to more than 200 branches on three different occasions as well as data center mergers and build-outs. Joe was recognized for his contributions related to the relocation and consolidation of several large data processing centers. It was that experience that Joe utilized as the foundation for ISA’s service offerings.

Currently Joe is leading ISA’s development efforts as well as new business development and business partner relationships.   Joseph Coacher’s financial experience came as a result of his previously holding a position as Vice President with JPMorgan Chase, which spanned 18 years rising from the position of Systems Engineer to Manager of Facilities and Hardware Planning for the Retail Banking Division. Joe’s responsibilities were extremely diverse and included direct interaction with financial departments. As part of managing the deployment of state of the art banking technology (ATMs and Platform Automation) to more than 200 branches, Joe had extensive interaction with the financial systems departments in order to perform his tasks better. He has kept up to date with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 via the Internet. He has also reviewed PCAOB guidance from its web site and has read the portion of the SEC web site that deals with the Office of Chief Accountant. He surrounds himself with CPA's and reads 10-Q and 10-K from other companies. He also reads PPC checklists which mandate the exact detail disclosure requirements that will be expected of him once the company is fully reporting.

(34)

Loire Lucas

Loire Lucas began her career with the NCR Corporation upon graduation from Florida Atlantic University in 1982 where she received her Bachelors of Applied Science. As a Systems Engineer, she worked on banking clients projects in Europe and Africa. Upon her return from Africa, she continued to work at corporate headquarters in Dayton, Ohio. Following her headquarters position, Loire transferred to NCR’s New York Sales office where she worked with major financial institutions managing their banking platform migration to state of the art hardware and software platforms.

J. Michael Reisert

J. Michael Reisert became a director of the Company in April 2010. Mr. Reisert founded and has been President of J. Michael Reisert, Inc., a Financial Consulting and Investment Banking firm in Fort Lauderdale, Florida since 1993. Mr. Reisert has over 35 years of Financial and Investment Banking experience with firms in New York City and South Florida.

Adrian Goldfarb

Adrian Goldfarb became a director of the Company in April 2010. Mr. Goldfarb has been the Chief Financial Officer of Ecosphere Technologies, Inc. since February 11, 2008.. From June 2002 to December 2007, Mr. Goldfarb was on the Board of Directors of MOWIS GmbH, a Weather Technology Media company. He also was interim Chief Financial Officer where he led the management team in securing seed capital, government grants and loans and bank guarantees. Mr. Goldfarb has more than 25 years’ experience in a number of different technology companies, including IBM and a subsidiary of Fujitsu.

We plan to continue to compensate Mr. Coschera and Ms. Lucas in a similar manner into the foreseeable future provided we have enough funds to do so.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following tables set forth the ownership, as of December 31, 2010 of our common stock (a) by each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock; (b) by each of our directors, and (c) by all executive officers and our directors as a group. To the best of our knowledge, all persons named have sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares, except as otherwise noted. The notes accompanying the information in the table below are necessary for a complete understanding of the figures provided below. As of December 31, 2010, there were 21,366,084 shares of common stock outstanding.

(35)

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS (1) (2)

Title of Stock Name and Address # of Shares Current % Owned

Common Stock
Aquatica Investments Ltd

Grove House, 4^th floor

Nassau Bahamas
3,000,000 13.47%

Common Stock
Joseph Coschera

2120 SW Danforth Circle

Palm City, FL 34990
6,200,000 27.85%

Common Stock
Derek J. Leach

31 Palace Gate, Flat 2

London, UK W85LZ

2,000,000 8.98%

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS (2)

Title of Stock Name and Address # of Shares Current % Owned

Common Stock Joseph Coschera 6,200,000 27.85 %

Common Stock Adrian Goldfarb 100,000 .45 %

Common Stock J. Michael Reisert 100,000 .45 %

Common Stock Loire Lucas 0 0.00 %

Common Stock All Officers and Directors as a Group (4) 6,400,000 28.75 %

(1) Pursuant to Rule 13-d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, beneficial ownership of a security consists of sole or shared voting power (including the power to vote or direct the voting) and/or sole or shared investment power (including the power to dispose or direct the disposition) with respect to a security whether through a contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, each person indicated above has sole power to vote, or dispose or direct the disposition of all shares beneficially owned. We are unaware of any shareholders whose voting rights would be affected by community property laws.

(2) This table is based upon information obtained from our stock records. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the above tables and subject to community property laws where applicable, we believe that each shareholder named in the above table has sole or shared voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

During the period ended December 31, 2009, 1,000,000 shares of common stock were sold for cash.

During the period ended December 31, 2009, 956,250 shares of stock were issued to financial consultants as share based payments. The shares were valued at market value at the date of agreement. The shares were valued using the most recent sale of stock.

During the period ended December 31, 2010, 1,600,000 shares of common stock were sold for cash.

During the period ended December 31, 2010, 1,700,000 shares of stock were issued to consultants as share based payments. The shares were valued at market value at the date of agreement. The shares were valued using the most recent sale of stock or at a stated price

(36)

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Fees Billed For Audit and Non-Audit Services

The following table represents the aggregate fees billed for professional audit services rendered to the independent auditor, Lake & Associates CPA’s LLC, ("Lake") for our audit of the annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. Audit fees and other fees of auditors are listed as follows:

Year Ended December 31, 2010 2009 2008

Lake Lake Lake

Audit Fees (1) $14,500 (2) $20,750 (2) $24,500 (2)

Audit-Related Fees (3) - - -

Tax Fees (4) - - -

All Other Fees (5) - - -

Total Accounting fees and Services $14,500 $20,750 $24,500

(1) Audit Fees. These are fees for professional services for the audit of our annual financial statements, and for the review of the financial statements included in our filings on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, and for services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2) The amounts shown for Lake in 2010, 2009 and 2008 relate to (i) the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and (ii) the review of the financial statements included in our filings on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q..

(3) Audit-Related Fees. These are fees for the assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or the review of our financial statements.

(4) Tax Fees. These are fees for professional services with respect to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

(5) All Other Fees. These are fees for permissible work that does not fall within any of the other fee categories, i.e., Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, or Tax Fees.

Pre-Approval Policy For Audit and Non-Audit Services

We do not have a standing audit committee, however in April 2010 we appointed Adrian Goldfarb, a new director, as Chairman of the audit committee and the full Board supports him and functions as an audit committee, including the pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services before we engage an accountant. All of the services rendered by Lake & Associates CPA’s LLC were pre-approved by our Board of Directors.

We are presently working with our legal counsel to establish formal pre-approval policies and procedures for future engagements of our accountants. The new policies and procedures will be detailed as to the particular service, will require that the Board or an audit committee thereof be informed of each service, and will prohibit the delegation of pre-approval responsibilities to management. It is currently anticipated that our new policy will provide (i) for an annual pre-approval, by the Board or audit committee, of all audit, audit-related and non-audit services proposed to be rendered by the independent auditor for the fiscal year, as specifically described in the auditor's engagement letter, and (ii) that additional engagements of the auditor, which were not approved in the annual pre-approval process, and engagements that are anticipated to exceed previously approved thresholds, will be presented on a case-by-case basis, by the President or Controller, for pre-approval by the Board or audit committee, before management engages the auditors for any such purposes. The new policy and procedures may authorize the Board or audit committee to delegate, to one or more of its members, the authority to pre-approve certain permitted services, provided that the estimated fee for any such service does not exceed a specified dollar amount (to be determined). All pre-approvals shall be contingent on a finding, by the Board, audit committee, or delegate, as the case may be, that the provision of the proposed services is compatible with the maintenance of the auditor's independence in the conduct of its auditing functions. In no event shall any non-audit related service be approved that would result in the independent auditor no longer being considered independent under the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(a) On December 31, 2010, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer made an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures. In our opinion, the disclosure controls and procedures are adequate because the systems of controls and procedures are designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the respective periods being presented. Moreover, the evaluation did not reveal any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures.

(b) There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls since the last evaluation.

(37)

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)    Financial Statements

1. The following financial statements of Information Systems Associates, Inc are included in Part II, Item 7:

Independent Auditors’ Report………………………………………………………….. 15

Balance Sheet-December 31, 2010 and 2009………………………………… ....……. 16

Statements of Operations - for the years ended

December 31, 2010 and 2009……………………………………………………..……. 17

Statements of Cash Flows - for the years ended

December 31, 2010 and 2009………………………………………………………..…. 19

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity - for the years ended

December 31, 2010 and 2009……………………………………………………….….. 18

Notes to Financial Statements…………………………………………………….……. 20-32

2. Exhibits

14.1.              Code of Ethics

31.1.              Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Executive Officer

31.2.              Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of Chief Financial Officer (see Exhibit 31.1)

32.1.              Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer

(b)    Reports on Form 8-K

None.

(38)

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned majority of the Board of Directors, thereunto duly authorized.

INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Date: March 29, 2011 /s/ Joseph P. Coschera

Joseph P. Coschera

CEO and Director

Date: March 29, 2011 /s/ Adrian Goldfarb

Adrian Goldfarb

Director

Date: March 29, 2011 /s/ J. Michael Reisert

J. Michael Reisert

Director

Date: March 29, 2011 /s/ Loire Lucas

Loire Lucas

Director

Date: March 29, 2011 /s/ Dominique Lesme

Dominique Lesme

Director

Large accelerated filer	
Non-accelerated filer	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Accelerated filer	
Smaller reporting company	

Customer	Solutions(s)	Revenue % of Overall
ITRAC	Aperture VISTA	5.21%
Northrop Grumman	VisionFM	1.61%
Visual Network Design, Inc.	Aperture VISTA	6.05%

Customer	Solutions(s)	Revenue % of Overall
Comcast	Aperture VISTA	3.09%
NCCI	VisionFM	8.62%
Emerson	Aperture VISTA	3.76%

	· Received a Copyright for OSPI®
	· Received a Trademark for ON SITE PHYSICAL INVENTORY^TM
	· U.S. Patent Number 7,752,088 was issued for OSPI® method on July 6,2010

Name	Age	Position

Joseph Coschera	63	CEO and Director
Loire Lucas	53	Vice President and Director
Adrian Goldfarb	53	Director
Mike Reisert	66	Director

Title of Stock	Name and Address	# of Shares	Current % Owned
Common Stock	Aquatica Investments Ltd Grove House, 4^th floor Nassau Bahamas	3,000,000	13.47%
Common Stock	Joseph Coschera 2120 SW Danforth Circle Palm City, FL 34990	6,200,000	27.85%
Common Stock	Derek J. Leach 31 Palace Gate, Flat 2 London, UK W85LZ	2,000,000	8.98%

Year Ended December 31,	2010		2009		2008
	Lake		Lake		Lake

Audit Fees (1)	$14,500	(2)	$20,750	(2)	$24,500	(2)
Audit-Related Fees (3)	-		-		-
Tax Fees (4)	-		-		-
All Other Fees (5)	-		-		-
Total Accounting fees and Services	$14,500		$20,750		$24,500

	(2)	The amounts shown for Lake in 2010, 2009 and 2008 relate to (i) the audit of our annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and (ii) the review of the financial statements included in our filings on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q..
	(3)	Audit-Related Fees. These are fees for the assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or the review of our financial statements.

	(4)	Tax Fees. These are fees for professional services with respect to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
	(5)	All Other Fees. These are fees for permissible work that does not fall within any of the other fee categories, i.e., Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, or Tax Fees.


		INFORMATION SYSTEMS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Date: March 29, 2011		/s/ Joseph P. Coschera
		Joseph P. Coschera
		CEO and Director

Date: March 29, 2011		/s/ Adrian Goldfarb
		Adrian Goldfarb
		Director

Date: March 29, 2011		/s/ J. Michael Reisert
		J. Michael Reisert
		Director

Date: March 29, 2011		/s/ Dominique Lesme
		Dominique Lesme
		Director