FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2016

Note 5: Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels as described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2: Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data

Level 3: Inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement

Our assets subject to fair value measurement on a recurring basis are summarized below:



	Level 1 Fair Value
	September 30	December 31	September 30
in thousands	2016	2015	2015
Fair Value Recurring
Rabbi Trust
Mutual funds	$ 6,601	$ 11,472	$ 12,081
Equities	8,574	8,992	8,778
Total	$ 15,175	$ 20,464	$ 20,859



	Level 2 Fair Value
	September 30	December 31	September 30
in thousands	2016	2015	2015
Fair Value Recurring
Rabbi Trust
Money market mutual fund	$ 2,144	$ 2,124	$ 1,464
Total	$ 2,144	$ 2,124	$ 1,464

We have established two Rabbi Trusts for the purpose of providing a level of security for the employee nonqualified retirement and deferred compensation plans and for the directors' nonqualified deferred compensation plans. The fair values of these investments are estimated using a market approach. The Level 1 investments include mutual funds and equity securities for which quoted prices in active markets are available. Level 2 investments are stated at estimated fair value based on the underlying investments in the fund (short-term, highly liquid assets in commercial paper, short-term bonds and certificates of deposit).

Net gains (losses) of the Rabbi Trust investments were $1,379,000 and $(1,964,000) for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The portions of the net gains (losses) related to investments still held by the Rabbi Trusts at September 30, 2016 and 2015 were $273,000 and $(2,068,000), respectively.

The year-to-date decrease of $5,269,000 in total Rabbi Trust asset fair values at September 30, 2016 is primarily attributable to the elections by several retired executives to receive their distributions from the nonqualified retirement and deferred compensation plans.

The carrying values of our cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and notes receivable, short-term debt, trade payables and accruals, and other current liabilities approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Additional disclosures for derivative instruments and interest-bearing debt are presented in Notes 6 and 7, respectively.

Assets subject to fair value measurement on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:



	Period ending September 30, 2016		Period ending September 30, 2015
		Impairment		Impairment
in thousands	Level 2	Charges	Level 2	Charges
Fair Value Nonrecurring
Property, plant & equipment, net	$ 0	$ 1,359	$ 0	$ 2,176
Other intangible assets, net	0	8,180	0	2,858
Other assets	0	967	0	156
Total	$ 0	$ 10,506	$ 0	$ 5,190

We recorded $10,506,000 and $5,190,000 of losses on impairment of long-lived assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, reducing the carrying value of these Aggregates segment assets to their estimated fair values of $0 and $0. Fair value was estimated using a market approach (observed transactions involving comparable assets in similar locations).

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details