XML 24 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
NOTE 7: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels as described below:
Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2: Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data
Level 3: Inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement
Our assets and liabilities that are subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis are summarized below:
                         
 
                 
            Level 1        
    June 30     December 31     June 30  
in thousands   2011     2010     2010  
 
                 
Fair Value Recurring
                       
Rabbi Trust
                       
Mutual funds
    $14,836       $13,960       $10,787  
Equities
    8,413       9,336       7,236  
 
                 
Total asset
    $23,249       $23,296       $18,023  
 
                 
                         
 
                       
    Level 2
    June 30   December 31     June 30  
in thousands   2011     2010     2010  
 
                       
Fair Value Recurring
                       
Medium-term investments
    $0       $0       $3,910  
Interest rate swaps
    (7,419 )     0       (5,614 )
Rabbi Trust
                       
Common/collective trust funds
    1,368       2,431       3,185  
 
                       
Net asset (liability)
    ($6,051 )     $2,431       $1,481  
 
                       
The Rabbi Trust investments relate to funding for the executive nonqualified deferred compensation and excess benefit plans. The fair values of these investments are estimated using a market approach. The Level 1 investments include mutual funds and equity securities for which quoted prices in active markets are available. Investments in common/collective trust funds are stated at estimated fair value based on the underlying investments in those funds. The underlying investments are comprised of short-term, highly liquid assets in commercial paper, short-term bonds and treasury bills.
The medium-term investments were comprised of money market and other money funds, as more fully described in Note 5. Using a market approach, we estimated the fair value of these funds by applying our historical distribution ratio to the liquidated value of investments in The Reserve funds. Additionally, we estimated a discount against our investment balances to allow for the risk that legal and accounting costs and pending or threatened claims and litigation against The Reserve and its management would reduce the principal available for distribution.
Interest rate swaps are measured at fair value using quoted market prices or pricing models using prevailing market interest rate as of the measurement date. These interest rate swaps are more fully described in Note 6.
The carrying values of our cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts and notes receivable, current maturities of long-term debt, short-term borrowings, trade payables and other accrued expenses approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Additional disclosures for derivative instruments and interest-bearing debt are presented in Notes 6 and 11, respectively.
Assets that were subject to fair value measurement on a nonrecurring basis are summarized below:
                 
 
               
    As of December 31, 2010  
            Impairment  
in thousands   Level 3     Charges  
 
Fair Value Nonrecurring
               
Property, plant & equipment
    $1,536       $2,500  
Assets held for sale
    9,625       1,436  
 
Totals
    $11,161       $3,936  
 
We recorded a $3,936,000 loss on impairment of long-lived assets in 2010. We utilized an income approach to measure the fair value of the long-lived assets and determined that the carrying value of the assets exceeded the fair value. The loss on impairment represents the difference between the carrying value and the fair value (less costs to sell for assets held for sale) of the impacted long-lived assets.