Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2012
Basis of Presentation	Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our subsidiaries, which are wholly-owned or controlled by us. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In our opinion, all estimates and adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been made.
Segment Reporting	Segment Reporting Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 280 Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”) establishes standards for the way that public entities report information about operating segments in the financial statements. Our focus is on originating and acquiring healthcare-related real estate and commercial mortgage debt and currently operate in only one reportable segment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents	Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2012 and 2011 is approximately $46.4 million and $52.3 million, respectively, deposited with one major financial institution.
Real Estate and Identified Intangible Assets	Real Estate and Identified Intangible Assets Real estate and identified intangible assets are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Betterments, major renewals and certain costs directly related to the improvement and leasing of real estate are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which range from 9 to 40 years. Amortization is provided on a straight-line basis over the life of the in-place leases. Upon the acquisition of real estate, we assess the fair value of acquired assets (including land, buildings and improvements, personal property and identified intangible assets such as above and below market leases, acquired in-place leases and customer relationships) and acquired liabilities in accordance with ASC 805 Business Combinations (“ASC 805”), and ASC 350 Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), and we allocate purchase price based on these assessments. We assess fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates and available market information. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, leases in place, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values that are based on the Company’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each property and the respective tenant’s lease. Factors considered include estimates of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods and market conditions. In estimating carrying costs, the Company includes estimates of lost rents at estimated market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which are dependent on local market conditions and expected trends. We review the carrying value of our real estate assets and intangibles for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable in accordance with ASC 360, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“ASC 360”). If such reviews indicate that the asset is impaired, the asset’s carrying amount is written down to its fair value. An impairment loss is measured based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value. We determine fair value by using a discounted cash flow model and appropriate discount and capitalization rates. Estimates of future cash flows are based on a number of factors including the historical operating results, leases in place, known trends, and market/economic conditions that may affect the property. The evaluation of anticipated cash flows is subjective and is based, in part, on assumptions regarding future occupancy, rental rates and capital requirements that could differ materially from actual results. If our anticipated holding periods change or estimated cash flows decline based on market conditions or otherwise, an impairment loss may be recognized. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are recorded at the lower of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. There were no impairments of our wholly-owned real estate investments and intangibles for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Investments in Loans	Investments in Loans We account for our investment in loans in accordance with ASC 948 Financial Services — Mortgage Banking (“ASC 948”). Under ASC 948, loans expected to be held for the foreseeable future or to maturity should be held at amortized cost, and all other loans should be held at lower of cost or market (“LOCOM”), measured on an individual basis. In accordance with ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), the Company includes nonperformance risk in calculating fair value adjustments. As specified in ASC 820, the framework for measuring fair value is based on observable inputs of market data. We periodically review our loans held for investment for impairment. Impairment losses are taken for impaired loans based on the fair value of collateral and a recoverability analysis on an individual loan basis. The fair value of the collateral may be determined by an evaluation of operating cash flow from the property during the projected holding period, and/or estimated sales value computed by applying an expected capitalization rate to the current net operating income of the specific property, less selling costs. Whichever method is used, other factors considered relate to geographic trends and project diversification, the size of the portfolio and current economic conditions. When it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts contractually due, the loan would be considered impaired. Interest income is generally recognized using the effective interest method or on a basis approximating a level rate of return over the term of the loan. Nonaccrual loans are those on which the accrual of interest has been suspended. Loans are placed on nonaccrual status and considered nonperforming when full payment of principal and interest is in doubt, or when principal or interest is 90 days or more past due or if cash collateral, if any, is insufficient to cover principal and interest. Interest accrued but not collected at the date a loan is placed on nonaccrual status is reversed against interest income. In addition, the amortization of net deferred loan fees is suspended. Interest income on nonaccrual loans may be recognized only to the extent it is received in cash. However, where there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of loan principal, cash receipts on such nonaccrual loans are applied to reduce the carrying value of such loans. Nonaccrual loans may be returned to accrual status when repayment is reasonably assured and there has been demonstrated performance under the terms of the loan or, if applicable, the restructured terms of such loan. The Company did not have any loans on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2012 or 2011. As discussed in Note 4, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we own a loan investment which is part of a syndicated loan in which we have an approximately one-third interest. Our intent is to hold the remaining loan to maturity and as such it is carried on the December 31, 2012 and 2011 balance sheets at its amortized cost basis, net of principal payments received.
Investment in Partially-Owned Entities	Investment in Partially-Owned Entities We invest in common equity and preferred equity interests that allow us to participate in a percentage of the underlying property’s cash flows from operations and proceeds from a sale or refinancing. At the inception of the investment, we must determine whether such investment should be accounted for as a loan, joint venture or as real estate. Investments in partially-owned entities where we exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the subsidiary, but do not control the subsidiary, are reported under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company’s share of the investee’s earnings or loss is included in the Company’s operating results. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we held one (1) such equity investment and account for such investment under the equity method. We assess whether there are indicators that the value of our partially owned entities may be impaired. An investment’s value is impaired if we determine that a decline in the value of the investment below its carrying value is other than temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the estimated value of the investment. For the year ended December 31, 2012, we did not recognize any impairment on investments in partially owned entities. We recognized impairment on our investments in partially-owned entities of approximately $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 related to our Senior Management Concepts, LLC (“SMC”) investment due to lower occupancy. ASC Topic 810 Consolidation (“ASC 810”), requires a company to identify investments in other entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and to determine which business enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. A variable interest entity is broadly defined as an entity where either the equity investors as a group, if any, do not have a controlling financial interest or the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company consolidates investments in VIEs when it is determined that the Company is the primary beneficiary of the VIE at either the date the Company became involved with the variable interest entity or upon the occurrence of a reconsideration event. The Company has concluded that neither of its partially-owned entities are a VIE. Investments in partially-owned entities where the Company exercises significant influence over operating and financial policies of the subsidiary, but does not control the subsidiary, are reported under the equity method of accounting. Generally under the equity method of accounting, the Company’s share of the investee’s earnings or loss is included in the Company’s operating results.
Comprehensive Income	Comprehensive Income We have no items of other comprehensive income, and accordingly net income (loss) is equal to comprehensive income (loss) for all periods presented.
Rental Revenue	Rental Revenue We recognize rental revenue in accordance with ASC 840 Leases (“ASC 840”). ASC 840 requires that revenue be recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease unless another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the time pattern in which the use benefit is derived from the leased property. Renewal options in leases with rental terms that are higher than those in the primary term are excluded from the calculation of straight line rent if the renewals are not reasonably assured. We commence rental revenue recognition when the tenant takes control of the leased space. The Company recognizes lease termination payments as a component of rental revenue in the period received, provided that there are no further obligations under the lease. Amortization expense of above-market leases reduces rental income on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable term of the lease. Taxes, insurance and reserves collected from tenants are separately shown as reimbursable income and corresponding payments are included in reimbursed property expenses.
Deferred Financing Costs	Deferred Financing Costs Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal and other third party costs associated with obtaining such financing. These costs are amortized over the terms of the respective financing agreements and the amortization of such costs is reflected in interest expense. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions that do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans	Stock-based Compensation Plans We have two stock-based compensation plans. We recognize compensation cost for stock-based compensation ratably over the service period of the award for employees, board members and non-employees. Compensation cost recorded for employees (including awards to non-employee directors) is measured based on the estimated fair value of the award on the grant date, and such amount is charged to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Compensation cost recorded for our non-employees is adjusted in each subsequent reporting period based on the fair value of the award at the end of the reporting period until such time as the award has vested and the service being provided, if required, is substantially completed or, under certain circumstances, likely to be completed, whichever occurs first.
Derivative Instruments	Derivative Instruments We account for derivative instruments in accordance with ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”). In the normal course of business, we may use a variety of derivative instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risk. We will require that hedging derivative instruments be effective in reducing the interest rate risk exposure they are designated to hedge. This effectiveness is essential for qualifying for hedge accounting. Some derivative instruments may be associated with an anticipated transaction. In those cases, hedge effectiveness criteria also require that it be probable that the underlying transaction will occur. Instruments that meet these hedging criteria, to the extent we elect to utilize hedge accounting, will be formally designated as hedges at the inception of the derivative contract. To determine the fair value of derivative instruments, we may use a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date including standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option-pricing models, replacement cost, and termination cost. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of fair value, and such value may never actually be realized. Unrealized gain or loss on the change in the value of a derivative instrument for which hedge accounting is elected, to the extent that it is determined to be an effective hedge, is included in other comprehensive income. Realized gain or loss on a derivative instrument, as well as the unrealized gain or loss on a derivative instrument for which hedge accounting is not elected, or the portion of such derivative instrument which is not an effective hedge, will be included in net income (loss) from operations. We may use a variety of commonly used derivative products that are considered “plain vanilla” derivatives. These derivatives typically include interest rate swaps, caps, collars and floors. Similarly, we may also become a party to the sale or “short” of U.S. Treasury securities in anticipation of entering into a fixed rate mortgage of approximately equal duration. We expressly prohibit the use of unconventional derivative instruments and using derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Further, we have a policy of only entering into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors; therefore, we do not anticipate nonperformance by any of our counterparties.
Income Taxes	Income Taxes We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). To qualify as a REIT, we must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to stockholders. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will then be subject to Federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and we will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the Internal Revenue Service grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distributions to stockholders. We believe that we have operated in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes. We may, however, be subject to certain state and local taxes. As a result of the Contribution Transactions, we expect that the Combined Company will not qualify to be taxed as a REIT for Federal income tax purposes effective January 1, 2013 due to the nature of the assets and the businesses currently conducted by Tiptree. If the Combined Company is not taxed as a REIT, the Combined Company will not be subject to the 90% distribution requirement and the Board may then determine to distribute less of its taxable income than it would if the Combined Company were taxed as a REIT. Deferred tax assets and liabilities, if any, are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. As a REIT, we generally will not be subject to Federal income tax on taxable income that we distribute to our stockholders and, therefore, the inclusion of Federal deferred tax assets and liabilities in our financial statements may not be applicable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, subject to certain limitations, net operating losses (“NOLs”) incurred by the Company can be treated as a carryforward for up to 20 years and utilized to reduce our taxable income in future years, thereby reducing the amount of taxable income which we are required to distribute to our stockholders in order to maintain our REIT status. In assessing the potential realization of deferred tax assets, if any, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences reverse and/or NOL carryforwards are available. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As there is no assurance that the Company will generate taxable income in future periods, management does not believe that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these temporary differences and NOL carryforwards and therefore established a full valuation allowance at December 31, 2012 and 2011. We account for uncertain tax positions in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation (“ASC 740”) of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for how a company should recognize, measure, present, and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. ASC 740 requires that the financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of such positions presuming the taxing authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts, but without considering time values. We evaluate uncertainties of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in our tax returns based on the probability of whether it is more likely than not that those positions would be sustained upon audit by applicable tax authorities, based on technical merit for open tax years. We assessed the Company’s tax positions for open federal, state and local tax years from 2009 through 2013. The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2012 that would not be sustained on its technical merits on a more likely than not basis. Our policy is, if necessary, to account for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of our income tax provision. For 2012, we incurred a taxable loss, and therefore no federal taxes were incurred. Certain state and local tax jurisdictions, however, require a minimum tax payment. Cash paid for taxes in the year ended December 31, 2012 was not material. For 2011, our taxable income exceeded our cumulative dividend distributions. Section 382 of the Code imposes an annual limitation on the amount of a corporation’s NOLs attributable to the period prior to an ownership change which can be utilized to offset our taxable income. The Tiptree Transaction constituted a change of ownership for purposes of Section 382. Accordingly, those NOLs incurred prior to the change of control resulting from the Tiptree Transaction are subject to the limitations of Section 382 and are considered “restricted” NOLs. In general, Section 382 limits the amount of restricted NOLs which can be utilized in any given year. We intend to utilize the portion of our restricted NOLs and a portion of our unrestricted NOLs to offset our 2011 undistributed taxable income. For Federal income tax purposes, the corporate alternative minimum tax provides that 10% of the amount of NOLs used to offset federal taxable income is subject to the alternative minimum tax at rate of 20%. In addition, Utah and New York City income tax provisions impose certain limitations on Federal NOLs. Accordingly, we accrued approximately $0.2 million for Federal, state and local taxes to be paid in 2012 with respect to our 2011 operating results. Cash paid for taxes in 2011 was not material.
Earnings per Share	Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur, if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock where such exercise or conversion would result in a lower earnings per share amount. In accordance with ASC 260 Earnings Per Share, regarding the determination of whether instruments granted in share-based payments transactions are participation securities, we have applied the two-class method of computing basic EPS. This guidance clarifies that outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to non-forfeitable dividends or dividend equivalent payments participate in undistributed earnings with common stockholders and are considered participating securities. The Company’s excess of distributions over earnings relating to participating securities are shown as a reduction in net income (increase in net loss) available to common stockholders in the Company’s computation of EPS. The Company does not reallocate undistributed earnings to the participating securities and the common shares in the diluted earnings per share calculation.
Use of Estimates	Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. Significant estimates are made for the valuation of real estate and related intangibles, valuation of financial instruments, impairment assessments and fair value assessments with respect to purchase price allocations. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Concentrations of Credit Risk	Concentrations of Credit Risk Real estate triple-net leases and financial instruments, primarily consisting of cash, mortgage loan investments and interest receivable, potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk. We may place our cash investments in excess of insured amounts with high-quality financial institutions. We perform ongoing analysis of credit risk concentrations in our real estate and loan investment portfolios by evaluating exposure to various markets, underlying property types, investment structure, term, sponsors, tenant mix and other credit metrics. Our triple-net leases rely on our underlying tenants. The collateral securing our investment in our remaining loan is real estate properties located in the U.S. In addition, we are required to disclose fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the financial statements, for which it is practical to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon the application of discount rates to estimated future cash flows based on market yields or other appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize on disposition of the financial instruments. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Reclassification	Reclassification Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). The amendments in ASU 2011-04 change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments are intended to create comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”), which requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. This ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. As we have no other comprehensive income, the adoption of this standard did not have any effect on the consolidated financial statements.