XML 76 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

Note 8. Fair Value Measurements

We apply the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for fair value measurements of financial assets and financial liabilities and for fair value measurements of nonfinancial items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 also establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

Financial assets and financial liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated financial statements are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, which are directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to the valuation of these assets or liabilities are as follows:

Level 1—Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires management to make judgments and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2014 (in thousands):

 

     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Cash equivalents:

           

Money market funds

   $ 170,235      $ —        $ —        $ 170,235  

Commercial paper

     —          9,999        —          9,999  

U.S. treasury securities

     —          33,154        —          33,154  

Short-term investments

           

Corporate notes and bonds

     —          10,507        —          10,507  

U.S. agency obligations

     —          15,117        —          15,117  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 170,235      $ 68,777      $ —        $ 239,012  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 

     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Cash equivalents:

           

Money market funds

   $ 7,637      $      $ —        $ 7,637  

Short-term investments

           

Commercial paper

     —          2,097        —          2,097  

Corporate notes and bonds

     —          11,479        —          11,479  

Certificate of deposits

     —          700        —          700  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 7,637      $ 14,276      $ —        $ 21,913  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

We determine the fair value of our security holdings based on pricing from our pricing vendors. The valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of financial instruments having Level 2 inputs were derived from non-binding consensus prices that are corroborated by observable market data, quoted market prices for similar instruments, or pricing models such as discounted cash flow techniques using market prices from a variety of industry-standard independent data providers. Such market prices may be quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 inputs) or pricing determined using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2 inputs). We perform procedures to ensure that appropriate fair values are recorded such as comparing prices obtained from other sources.