Exhibit 99.1

Agenda

Thursday, November 5, 2015

8:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.	Interactive Product Display Open (available all day)
9:00 a.m. – 9:15 a.m.	Introduction: HeartWare Today and Tomorrow
	Doug Godshall, CEO, HeartWare International, Inc.
	Amir Gross, CEO, Valtech Cardio, Ltd.
9:15 a.m. – 9:35 a.m.	HeartWare Market View and the Strategic Combination
	Doug Godshall
9:35 a.m. – 9:50 a.m.	Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation Overview: The Need, Anatomy,
	Treatment Today and Challenges
	Michael Mack, M.D., Baylor Health Care System
9:50 a.m. – 10:05 a.m.	Valtech Portfolio Overview
	Prof. Francesco Maisano, M.D., University Hospital of Zurich
10:05 a.m. – 10:25 a.m.	Repair and Replacement
	Prof. Francesco Maisano, M.D.
10:25 a.m. – 10:35 a.m.	Q&A
10:35 a.m. – 10:45 a.m.	Break
10:45 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.	Cardioband® Deep Dive
	Prof. Karl-Heinz Kuck, M.D., Ph.D., Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
11:00 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.	Cardioband® Deeper Dive: Core Lab Insights
	Paul Grayburn, M.D., Baylor University Medical Center
11:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.	MVAD® Overview and User Experience
	Paul Jansz, M.D., St. Vincent’s Hospital
11:30 a.m. – 11:45 a.m.	The HeartWare-Valtech Combination: The Physician’s View
	Steven Boyce, M.D., MedStar Washington Hospital
11:45 a.m. – 12:05 p.m.	Physician Panel – Moderated by Dr. Michael Mack
12:05 p.m. – 12:15 p.m.	Q&A
12:15 p.m. – 12:35 p.m.	Lunch Break
12:35 p.m. – 12:50 p.m.	The Combined Company Overview
	Peter McAree, CFO, HeartWare International, Inc.
12:50 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.	Closing Remarks
	Doug Godshall

Doug Godshall

President and Chief Executive Officer, HeartWare

Mr. Godshall has been President and Chief Executive Officer of HeartWare since September 2006 and became a director in October 2006. Prior to joining HeartWare, Mr. Godshall served in various executive and managerial positions at Boston Scientific Corporation, where he had been employed since 1990, including as a member of Boston Scientific’s Operating Committee and as President, Vascular Surgery since January 2005. Prior to that, he spent five years as Vice President, Business Development at Boston Scientific, where he focused on acquisition strategies for the cardiology, electrophysiology, neuroradiology and vascular surgery divisions. Mr. Godshall has a Bachelor of Arts degree in business from Lafayette College and an M.B.A. from Northeastern University.

Amir Gross

Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Valtech Cardio

Mr. Gross founded Valtech Cardio in March 2005 to design and develop solutions for percutaneous mitral valve repair technology. Prior to founding Valtech, Mr. Gross gained broad experience in the medical device space as part of Rainbow Medical, and held various positions in a series of Israeli medical device startups, including EarlySense, BetaStim, GluSense and BioControl. He holds an LLB degree in medicine and ethics from the University of Manchester. At Valtech, Mr. Gross has overall responsibility for the company’s strategy and vision and is responsible for building the Valtech culture and overseeing all company functions, including operations, marketing, finance, human resources, compliance with safety regulations and public relations.

1

Michael Mack, M.D., FACC

Dr. Mack has practiced cardiothoracic surgery in Dallas, Texas since 1982. He is board-certified in internal medicine, general surgery, and thoracic surgery and is currently the Director of Cardiovascular Surgery for Baylor Scott & White Health, Chair of the Baylor Scott & White Health Cardiovascular Governance Council and Director of Cardiovascular Research at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano. He also co-founded and is Chair of the Board of Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute (CRSTI). He has more than 450 peer-reviewed medical publications.

Dr. Mack was President of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in 2011 and is Past President of the Thoracic Surgery Foundation for Research and Education (TSFRE) 2009-2011, the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association (STSA) 2009, and the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2000.

He has served on the Board of Directors of the STS and is currently on the Board of Directors of CTSNet, and is a member of the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) Board of Trustees and the ACC Interventional Scientific Council, the ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Management Board and the ACC Governance Task Force. He is an honorary Fellow of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and the Indian Association of Cardiothoracic Surgery. He was the first Chair of the STS/ACC National Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry Steering Committee and is the liaison to the TVT Registry from the ACCF NCDR Management Board and is on the Steering Committee of the Cardiothoracic Surgery Network (CTSN) of the NIH. He is a member of the FDA MDEpiNet Advisory and Research and Publications Committees, and the Brookings Institute National Medical Device Postmarket Surveillance System Planning Board.

2

Francesco Maisano, M.D., FESC

Professor Maisano is the Chair of Cardiovascular Surgery at the University Hospital of Zurich. Earlier in his career, Professor Maisano served as Senior Staff Heart Surgeon at San Raffaele University Hospital in Milan, where he developed significant expertise in the surgical and endovascular treatment of cardiovascular diseases. He has held several international academic roles, has served as a scientific advisor, and serves on professional, review and editorial boards.

Professor Maisano’s main area of focus is on heart valve treatment and innovative technologies, which he was able to extend from the surgical to the catheter-based pathway, training on interventional approaches. He was instrumental in initiating and advancing the Transcatheter Valve Treatment program at San Raffaele Hospital.

In 2013, he held the same position at the Division of Cardiovascular Surgery of the University Hospital in Zurich, where, in 2014, he was appointed Full Professor and Chair of Cardiovascular Surgery. Professor Maisano has extended his vision of the Heart Team approach into clinical practice, leading the full spectrum of multidisciplinary cardiovascular therapies and research programs, from heart failure to valvular therapies. From 2008 to 2013, Dr. Maisano was Chief Medical Officer of Valtech Cardio, and helped pioneer the Cardioband^® procedure.

Professor Maisano qualified in medicine at the University La Sapienza in Rome in 1990, completed a postgraduate fellowship at the University of Alabama at Birmingham in 1994, and earned a master’s specialization in cardiac surgery in 1995 at Catholic University in Rome.

3

Karl-Heinz Kuck, M.D., Ph.D.

Professor Kuck is the current President of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and Head of the Second Medical Department (Cardiology) at St. Georg Hospital in Hamburg, Germany. He has built a global reputation as a scientist, cardiologist and electrophysiologist, authoring more than 450 scientific papers – many related to his specialization in catheter ablation. He also leads cardiology at one of Europe’s largest hospital groups in Hamburg, Germany. Professor Kuck serves as a reviewer for multiple medical journals, including European Heart Journal, Europace, Heart Rhythm, Journal of Clinical Electrophysiology, JACC and Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. He received his Doctor of Medicine degree from the University of Cologne.

Paul Grayburn, M.D., FACC

Dr. Grayburn is the Director of Cardiology Research at Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute in Dallas, Texas. Dr. Grayburn also holds faculty positions at Johns Hopkins, Mayo Clinic, Vanderbilt, UT Southwestern and the University of Maryland. Earlier in his career, Dr. Grayburn served as Assistant and Associate Professor of Medicine at UT Southwestern Medical School.

Dr. Grayburn has served on multiple editorial boards and boards of directors of publications and professional medical associations. He currently serves on the editorial boards of Circulation, American Journal of Cardiology, Heart and JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. He is also Associate Editor of the American Journal of Cardiology. Dr. Grayburn has participated as an investigator in multiple clinical trials and has authored numerous peer-reviewed publications. Dr. Grayburn earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from Texas A&M University and his degree in medicine from the University of Texas Medical Branch. He received further training in internal medicine, cardiology and interventional cardiology from St. Paul Medical Center in Dallas and from the University of Kentucky.

4

Paul Jansz, BMed, FRACS, Ph.D.

Dr. Jansz is Consultant Cardiothoracic and Transplant Surgeon at St. Vincent’s Hospital in Sydney, Australia and previously held a similar position at Papworth Hospital in the United Kingdom. Dr. Jansz’s clinical research experience encompasses multiple trials within advanced heart failure research. Among these, he served as a lead investigator in HeartWare’s HVAD^® System clinical trial and was also a sub-investigator in a clinical trial of an investigational mitral valve implant and for the MitraClip^® System. He is also an investigator in HeartWare’s clinical trial of the MVAD^® System. Dr. Jansz received a Bachelor of Medicine degree from the University of Newcastle, is a Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and earned his Doctor of Philosophy degree from the University of New South Wales.

Steven Boyce, M.D.

Dr. Boyce, surgical director of the advanced heart failure program at MedStar Washington Hospital Center, is an internationally known cardiothoracic surgeon and one of the busiest in the country, performing over 425 heart surgeries per year.

Dr. Boyce received his undergraduate degree at Johns Hopkins, his medical degree from the University of Maryland, and completed his internship and residency in surgery at the University of California, San Francisco. He completed his chief residency in cardiothoracic surgery and fellowship in cardiac transplantation at UCLA. Following a faculty appointment at Harvard Medical School, he moved to Washington, D.C.

5

Dr. Boyce has been instrumental in the development of the field of mechanical circulatory assist devices, in particular mini left ventricular assist devices, also known as LVADs. He has been an investigator in more than 60 clinical trials, including HeartWare’s ADVANCE and ENDURANCE trials. He has authored over 100 peer-reviewed papers. He is also the Founder of MyLVAD.com. For many years, Dr. Boyce has been named one of the “Best Doctors in America,” “America’s Top Surgeons” and a Washingtonian “Top Doctor.”

Peter McAree

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, HeartWare

Mr. McAree joined HeartWare in July 2012 as Chief Financial Officer with overall responsibility for the strategy and operations of the company’s accounting and finance functions, as well as oversight of the Information Technology department. Mr. McAree has more than 25 years of financial management and public accounting experience, serving most recently as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Caliper Life Sciences prior to its acquisition by PerkinElmer in November 2011. Before that, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Zymark Corporation prior to the company’s merger with Caliper in 2003. Mr. McAree is a Certified Public Accountant in Massachusetts and holds a degree from Bentley University.

6

HeartWare ®

November 5, 2015

A MEETING WITH HEARTWARE AND VALTECH MANAGEMENT

2

Safe Harbor Statement

Forward-Looking Statements

This announcement contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s beliefs, assumptions and expectations and on information currently available to management. All statements that address operating performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future are forward-looking statements, including without limitation our expectations with respect to the: commercialization of the HeartWare HVAD System and introduction of the MVAD System; timing, progress and outcomes of clinical trials; regulatory and quality compliance; research and development activities; consummation of our proposed acquisition of Valtech and our ability to take advantage of acquired and pipeline technology. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made. However, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because they speak only as of the date when made. HeartWare does not assume any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by federal securities laws and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. HeartWare may not actually achieve the plans, projections or expectations disclosed in forward-looking statements, and actual results, developments or events could differ materially from those disclosed in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation those described in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in HeartWare’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. HeartWare may update risk factors from time to time in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, or other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

3

Additional Shareholder Information

Participants in the Solicitation

HeartWare, Valtech and their respective directors, executive officers, certain members of management and certain employees may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed acquisition of Valtech Cardio, Ltd. A description of the interests in HeartWare of its directors and executive officers is set forth in HeartWare’s proxy statement for its 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on April 30, 2015. Additional information regarding the persons who may, under the rules of the SEC, be deemed participants in the solicitation of proxies in connection with the proposed transaction, and a description of their direct and indirect interests in the proposed transaction, which may differ from the interests of HeartWare stockholders or Valtech shareholders generally, are set forth in a preliminary proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC on October 16, 2015.

Additional Information and Where To Find It

In connection with the proposed transactions, HW Global, Inc. (“Holdco”), has filed a Registration Statement on Form S-4 that contains a preliminary proxy statement/prospectus, which is not yet final and will be amended. Holdco intends to file a final prospectus and other relevant materials and HeartWare intends to file a definitive proxy statement and other relevant materials with the SEC in connection with the proposed transactions. Investors and security holders of HeartWare and Valtech are urged to read these materials (when they become available) before making any voting or investment decision with respect to the transactions because they will contain important information about HeartWare, Valtech and the transactions. The proxy statement/prospectus and other relevant materials, and any other documents filed by Holdco or HeartWare with the SEC, may be obtained free of charge at the SEC website at www.sec.gov. In addition, investors and security holders may obtain free copies of these documents by directing a written request to HeartWare’s investor relations department at HeartWare International, Inc., 500 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, MA 01701, Attention: Investor Relations.

This communication shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, nor shall there be any sale of securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. No offering of securities shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

4

HeartWare Today and Tomorrow

Doug Godshall

President and CEO, HeartWare International

5

Agenda

Time Topic Presenter(s)

8:30 Interactive Product Display Open (available all day)

Doug Godshall

9:00 Introduction: HeartWare Today and Tomorrow Amir Gross

9:15 HeartWare Market View and the Strategic Combination Doug Godshall

Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation Overview: The Need,

9:35 Dr. Michael Mack

Anatomy, Treatment Today and Challenges

9:50 Valtech Portfolio Overview Prof. Francesco Maisano

10:05 Repair and Replacement Prof. Francesco Maisano

10:25 Q&A

10:35 Break

10:45 Cardioband® Deep Dive Prof. Karl-Heinz Kuck

11:00 Cardioband® Deeper Dive: Core Lab Insights Dr. Paul Grayburn

11:15 MVAD® Overview and User Experience Dr. Paul Jansz

11:30 The HeartWare-Valtech Combination: The Physician’s View Dr. Steven Boyce

11:45 Physician Panel Guest Physicians

12:05 Q&A

12:15 Lunch Break

12:35 The Combined Company Overview Peter McAree

12:50 Closing Remarks Doug Godshall

6

Mission

We create revolutionary technology for the treatment of heart failure to allow patients to get back to life.

9,000+ ~125

Patients U.S.

Implanted Centers

Globally

47 ~180

Intl.

Countries Centers

2009: CE Mark

2012: FDA Approval

HVAD® System—A Proven Track Record

Note: Data as of November 2, 2015.

7

Commercial Execution Excellence: Strong Commercial and Clinical Team Accustomed to Breaking Into Competitive Markets

Broad Global Presence

HVAD® is the most-implanted LVAD internationally for the past 3 years Industry-leading sales and marketing serving top global heart centers 25% of sales team, including both North American and International Senior Directors of Sales, has deep valve experience Highly skilled clinical specialists, many with advanced technical or clinical degrees Best-in-class distributor partners with backgrounds in interventional cardiology and structural heart

– Over 90% of partners have valve experience

8

Ventricular Assist Devices (VADs) Meet a Significant Unmet Need for the Large Advanced Heart Failure Population

U.S. Heart Failure Prevalence

By NYHA Functional Classification

4 3.8 3.6

3.1

3

Valves 3.2M VADs today:

(Millions) FMR potential 6K patients of

2 500K potential

Patients 1 0.8 0.4

0

I II III Early IV Late IV

Heart Failure Class(shock)

VAD devices target treatment of Class III & Class IV patients Valve devices target treatment of Class I through IV patients

Note: New York Heart Association (NYHA)

9

MCS Portfolio and Pipeline: Maintaining and Enhancing Competitiveness

Pumps

HVAD

Longer sintering

DT indication

MVAD

Next-gen, more

versatile pump

CircuLite

Class III, partial-

assist device

Longhorn

Eliminates

outflow graft

Electronics

Lavare

HVAD pulsatility

algorithm

HVAD Controller

Upgrade

Improved

patient

management

Pal

Versatile,

simple and

smart controller

TET

Eliminates

driveline

Remote

Monitoring

Connected

patient care

Tools

MVAD Gimbal

Angle and

depth

adjustment

Thoracotomy

Tools

HVAD and

MVAD

10

MVAD System Commentary

Controller assembly fix complete, software patch progressing towards submission efficiently Investigation continues with no anticipated design modifications Narrowing our focus to specific areas within our manufacturing process, which we may elect to further tighten up Working with investigators to review status and develop restart plan Finalizing decision tree for return to the clinic

11

HeartWare Leadership Team Here Today

Doug Godshall Peter McAree Mark Strong Jeff LaRose

President & CEO SVP, CFO SVP, Research & Executive VP, Chief

Development and Scientific Officer

Quality

Jim Schuermann Larry Knopf Chris Taylor Stuart Logan

SVP, Sales and SVP, General VP, Corporate Director, New Business

Marketing Counsel and Communications and Development and

Secretary Investor Relations Strategic Planning

12

Why Mitral and Why Valtech? Because We Can Win BIG

Heart Failure Cardioband is a leading interventional MR technology, and

Leadership Valtech offers technology leadership throughout its pipeline

Significant Market Mitral market likely > TAVR

Only 1 significant mitral repair competitor today, replacement

Opportunity years away

Better Meet Our Mitral regurgitation is either secondary to HF or leads to HF

Patients’ Needs Tricuspid and mitral regurgitation are common in VAD patients

Concentrated customer base with significant VAD center overlap

Service Our Heart Increasing involvement of Heart Team in VAD and with HTWR

Team Customer HTWR becomes a more sophisticated clinical partner with

meaningful cross-selling and market development synergies

Attractive Growth Better gross margin and accelerated growth

Goal is to build a $1B+ revenue company – Valtech a key

Platform contributor

13

Valtech Overview

Larry Best

Executive Chairman, Valtech Cardio

Amir Gross

Founder and CEO, Valtech Cardio

14

Why HeartWare?

Strategic fit

Size and stage

Management, track record and culture

Stock vs. cash

Risk / reward

Valtech commitment

15

Valtech: Valve Expertise Has Yielded Best-in-Class Repair and Replacement Portfolio for Mitral and Tricuspid Valves

Products

Leveraging proven surgical solutions

– Annuloplasty

– Chord repair

– Valve replacement

Near-term revenue generation

– Multiple commercial-stage products

over next few years

Serving multiple large, untapped markets

– Portfolio potentially serving – and

expanding – current mitral and tricuspid

markets

Team

Experienced

– 62 deep; broad functional experience

– Exceptional R&D; significant valve and

transcatheter delivery experience

Proven execution

– Since 2010: 4 FIM (>120 patients

treated), 2 CE Mark products

16

Valtech Cardio Leadership Team Here Today

Amir Gross Nitza Shoham, Ph.D. Tal Sheps Ilia Hariton, Ph.D.

Founder & CEO VP, Clinical & VP, Cardioband VP, Research &

Regulatory Affairs Development

17

Valtech Offers a Comprehensive Set of Interventional and Surgical Valve Solutions

Late-Stage

Cardinal Cardinal V-Chordal Cardioband Cardioband Cardiovalve

Mitral Tricuspid Mitral Mitral Tricuspid Mitral

d

CE Marked, Adjustable, Surgical and CE Marked Transcatheter, Transcatheter,

adjustable, semi-rigid, transcatheter transcatheter, transfemoral- transfemoral-

semi-rigid, surgical mitral transfemoral- transseptal transseptal

surgical tricuspid chordae transseptal tricuspid valve and

mitral valve valve repair system mitral valve reconstruction transapical

annuloplasty annuloplasty reconstruction system mitral valve

ring system ring system system replacement

Surgical Therapy Interventional (Transcatheter) Therapy

18

Valtech Management’s Perspective

Early HeartWare investment enabled creation of a strong partnership

Appreciation for HeartWare’s achievements with VADs and its proven commercial execution

Strong alignment of cultures and shared vision; we have watched HeartWare for 8 years

We want to develop technologies and evaluate them clinically; we want an aggressive partner to commercialize them

With HeartWare, we will be able to continue our mission; we chose the best partner

Stock transaction further aligns interests and allows for employees to participate in long-term success; structure is highly motivating to the team

19

HeartWare Market View and the Strategic Combination

Doug Godshall

President and CEO, HeartWare International

20

Intensive 3+ Year Valve Diligence Process

Activity

HeartWare

Strategy

Market Research

Market Tracking

Diligence

Valtech

Investment

2013

2014

2015

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Strategic Valve Vision Set

Initial Valve IC

Comprehensive qualitative and

and CT

quantitative market analysis by

2015 update to

Surgeon

independent consulting firm

market analysis

Interviews

Discussions with VAD Customers

Major Valve Conference Attendance

In-Person Valve KOL Interviews

Valtech

Other Companies

$5M Bridge Loan

$10M Investment

in Valtech (~3% equity)

Business Combination Announced

21

HeartWare Customer Feedback

Valtech Deal

“Good acquisition as this reflects

Heartware’s dedication to heart failure”

“Makes sense from a portfolio perspective”

“Great products and the next step forward for mitral therapy”

“You guys hit a home run”

Cardinal Surgical Device

“Easier to implant”

“Great results”

“Sizing is better and easier then with the other rings”

“Better positioning than rigid rings”

“No issue with higher pricing as results are good”

Cardioband Transcatheter Repair Device

“Incredible technology! I’m a fan of MitraClip but there is a bigger application for Valtech, I can’t wait to get it”

“Cardioband is the best approach to mitral repair that we have seen so far”

“Ingenious design. When are you looking for clinical trial sites?”

VADs and Valves

“I would repair the tricuspid with

Cardioband before implanting a VAD”

“As a VAD surgeon, I think about mitral regurgitation every day of the week”

22

Structural Heart Market: High Unmet Need in Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation

Structural Heart Disease

Estimated U.S. Prevalence

Other Aortic

~1M Stenosis

1.0M

Tricuspid

Regurgitation

1.6M

Mitral

Regurgitation

4.2M

Primary Disease Available Currently

Cause Treatments Treated

Aortic Age-related Surgical

replacement 80,000

Stenosis calcification TAVR

Surgical repair &

Mitral Left heart replacement

Regurgitation failure Transcatheter 60,000

repair: MitraClip®

Tricuspid Right and left Surgical repair

and 8,000

Regurgitation heart failure replacement

Surgical atrial

Other Varies by and ventricular Varies by

indication septal defect indication

repair

U.S. mitral and tricuspid opportunities in total estimated to be ~6x the aortic stenosis market

Note: Tricuspid prevalence numbers estimate population of moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation patients only. Source: AHA Heart Disease & Stroke Statistics 2015, Nkomo 2006 Lancet, Stuge 2006 JTCS, US Census Data.

MitraClip is a registered trademark of Abbott Laboratories.

23

Uniquely Complex Anatomy of the Mitral Apparatus Makes Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Design More Challenging

Atrial Septal Defect

Valve size critical to prevent atrial wall damage from transseptal delivery

LVOT Obstruction

Blocks blood path causing increased after-load on the left ventricle

Leaflet Control

Prevent systolic anterior motion (SAM) LVOT obstruction

Chordae Interference

Transapical delivery may damage chordae

High Pressure System

Risk of valve dislodgement, requires secure fixation

Irregular & Variable Mitral Annulus Shape

Inadequate fit may result in paravalvular leak

Valve Positioning and Placement

Non-planar annulus, optimal placement can be challenging

Anchoring Without Radial Force

Establish secure fixation in non-distinct annulus, prevent conduction system interference

Left Ventricle Trauma

Transapical access damages diseased left ventricle tissue

24

Our Mitral and Tricuspid Market Investment Thesis Consistent With Valtech’s Portfolio Approach

Repair’s Value Surgical mitral repair long understood to be the preferred approach

Understood From

Surgery Annuloplasty the most frequently performed surgical mitral repair

Mitral Anatomy Multiple tools required to serve the spectrum of MR patients

Complex A leading player in the mitral market needs repair and replacement

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) will be much more

Physicians Will Prefer challenging than TAVR

to Repair First Repair will be a safer treatment and therefore the cardiologist’s first

choice when, possible

Transseptal Required The majority of inoperable mitral and tricuspid regurgitation patients

to Meet TMVR are sick heart failure patients; left ventricular trauma a watch-out

Potential Transseptal delivery necessary to achieve large market opportunity

Tricuspid regurgitation is drastically undertreated today, and there is a

Tricuspid Next growing body of evidence supporting intervention

Horizon Tricuspid is a repair story; annuloplasty is preferred surgical approach

25

Physicians Prefer a Transseptal Approach for its Better Safety Profile

Transapical

First-generation transcatheter replacement valve access method, requires surgical thoracotomy and left ventricle puncture

“Transapical is relatively invasive. We often need to crack ribs and collapse a lung to gain adequate access.” –U.S. CT

Surgeon

“Transapical is relatively a straight shot to the mitral valve but you risk chordal interference and left ventricle damage.”

–U.S. CT Surgeon

Transseptal

Transseptal is expected to be a next- generation alternative to transapical and is perceived to be less invasive

“If transseptal was feasible, I think you would have a winner there in terms of the access.” –U.S. CT Surgeon

“If I had an equivalent transseptal device, I would consider a patient for a transseptal over transapical.” –U.S. CT

Surgeon

Source: Robin Cooper Interviews 2015 (n=15).

26

Replacement Will Eventually Have Strong Place in the Market; Repair Represents Much Stronger Near- and Mid-Term Opportunity as Valve Technology Matures

Repair

Transapical Replacement Transseptal Replacement

Phase I

Phase II

Phase III

Repair + Early TA Replacement

Repair + Mature TA and Early TS Replacement

Repair + Mature TS Replacement

Mature repair market

Repair proven Repair safer and more disease Broader stages use in earlier and Younger FMR patients

Growth in DMR

lower-risk patients segment

Mostly reserved for

high-risk severe FMR

Replacement Early transapical patients Mature transseptal

replacement replacement valves

Mature transapical,

outcomes varied Older FMR patients

early transseptal

replacement Select DMR etiologies

Note: Transapical (TA), Transseptal (TS).

27

Covering the Spectrum of Heart Failure

Heart Failure Continuum

Today

Cardioband Mitral

Tomorrow

Cardinal Mitral and Cardioband Mitral MVAD HVAD

Tricuspid and Tricuspid

Future

Cardinal Mitral and Cardioband Mitral Cardiovalve Circulite MVAD HVAD Longhorn

Tricuspid and Tricuspid

28

Powerful Investment Thesis: Consistent, Meaningful Milestone Cadence

2016 2017 2018 2019

MVAD CE MVAD long-

MVAD restart MVAD short- term submission

HVAD DT term indication

MVAD IDE CircuLite IDE

CircuLite FIM TET FIM Longhorn FIM

Cardioband

Launch Cardioband

Cardiovalve PMA

Cardioband FIM Cardioband TR Cardiovalve

IDE CE

Cardioband TR CE Mark

Cardinal IDE Cardinal PMA Cardioband TR

Launch EU PMA

Cardioband TR Cardinal IDE Cardiovalve

FIM IDE

VAD Milestones Valve Milestones

29

HeartWare + Valtech: Creating the Technology Leader in Advanced Heart Failure

MVAD System will lead a transformation of MCS portfolio and

VAD market, picking up where HVAD leaves off

Synergies with disease, customer, referral channel and

delivery system will create compounding benefits over next

decade

Adjustable repair of MR and TR expected to emerge as first-

line option, whether surgical or interventional

Nearer-term commercial opportunity in established surgical

and interventional mitral repair market with >$450M in sales

Sophisticated Cardiovalve design and delivery system to

enable HeartWare leadership in mitral replacement

Combined pipeline creates unique opportunity for

differentiated value creation

30

Welcome to Our Guest Clinicians

Michael Mack, M.D., FACC Prof. Francesco Maisano, M.D., FESC

Director of Cardiovascular Surgery Chair of Cardiovascular Surgery

Baylor Scott & White Health University Hospital of Zurich

Prof. Karl-Heinz Kuck, M.D., Ph.D. Paul Grayburn, M.D., FACC

Head of Cardiology Director of Cardiology Research

St. Georg Hospital Hamburg Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute

Paul Jansz, BMed, FRACS, Ph.D. Steven Boyce, M.D.

Deputy Director of Heart & Lung Director of the Advanced Heart

Transplant Program, Surgical Director MCS Failure Program

St. Vincent’s Hospital MedStar Washington Hospital

31

Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation Overview:

The Need, Anatomy, Treatment Today and Challenges

Michael Mack, M.D., FACC

Baylor Scott & White Health

32

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Co-PI- COAPT Trial- Abbott Vascular Sponsor

– Uncompensated

33

Mitral Regurgitation (MR)

Mitral

Regurgitation

Primary

(Degenerative)

34

Secondary MR: Disease of the Left Ventricle Not the Mitral Valve

Normal LV Dilated LV tethering one or both leaflets

35

Why Do We Care About Secondary MR?

It is Associated with Advanced CHF !

36

Heart Failure: A Growing Global Concern

Prevalence and Incidence Mortality

Overall 2.1% prevalence: For AHA/ACC stage C/D

5.1M heart failure patients in patients diagnosed with HF:

2010 – 30% will die in the first

825,000 people ? 45 years of year. 3-5

age are newly diagnosed – 60% will die within 5

each year with HF1 years.5

15 M heart failure patients in

the ESC 51-member

countries2

– Overall 2-3% prevalence2

HF prevalence in the US is projected to increase 46% from 2012 to 2030, resulting in > 8M people ? 18 years of age with HF.6

37

Frequency of MR in a CHF Population = 90% Heart Failure Clinic, EF<35%, Class III-IV

Severe

Retrospective Mod-Sev 4.3

12.5 0-Trace

1996-2001 10.4

Echo reports

Quantitative MR

Mild

Moderate 31.9

21.9

Mild-Mod N = 558

11.8

Patel JB- J Cardiac Failure 10:285, 2004

38

FMR: A Vicious Cycle

MR

Annular-Ventricular Volume overload

dilatation

39

100 Ischemic or Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

(%)

80

Survival 60 No FMR

51%

Free 40 Mild-Mod FMR

-

20 p<0.0001 24%

Hospital Severe FMR 11%

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Time (years)

Rossi et al. Heart 2011;97:1675-1680

40

100 Ischemic or Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

(%)

80

Survival 60 No FMR

51%

Free 40 Mild-Mod FMR

-

20 p<0.0001 ERO ?20 24%

Hospital Severe FMR 11%

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Time (years)

Rossi et al. Heart 2011;97:1675-1680

41

100 Ischemic or Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

(%) EF 34%

80 LVSD 51mm

Survival 60 EF 33% No FMR

LVSD 53mm 51%

Free 40 EF 29% Mild-Mod FMR

—LVSD 57mm

20 p<0.0001 24%

Hospital Severe FMR 11%

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Time (years)

Rossi et al. Heart 2011;97:1675-1680

42

Degree of MR Predicts Survival Post MI

Bursi, F. et al. Circulation 2005;111:295-301

43

Degree of MR Predicts Survival in CHF (Ischemic and Dilated Cardiomyopathy)

Trichon, AJC 2003;91:538-543

44

Heart Failure is Associated with High Hospitalization and Readmission Rates

In 2010, there were 1 million hospitalizations in the US with HF as the principal diagnosis

Hospitalization rate did not change significantly from 2000

Average length of hospital stay

Approximately 5 days (US)

11 days (Europe)

HF is also associated with high readmission rates:

~25% all-cause readmission within 30 days and ~50% within 6 months

45

Medically Managed Patients With Severe MR Outcomes

100%

Mortality

90%

90%

Proportion of Surviving Patients Hospitalized for Heart

80% Failure

70% 68%

Patients 60% 58%

50% 50%

of 50% 46%

41%

40% 37%

Percentage 30% 29%

20%

20%

10%

0%

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

46

Chronic Severe Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Intervention

Recommendations COR LOE

MV surgery is reasonable for patients with chronic severe

secondary MR (stages C and D) who are undergoing CABG or IIa C

AVR

MV repair may be considered for patients with chronic

moderate secondary MR (stage B) who are undergoing other IIb C

cardiac surgery

Repair or Replacement not stipulated

47

Secondary MR – Undersized Annuloplasty

Disease of the left ventricle NOT of the mitral valve

MR caused by apical lateral distraction of the papillary muscles tethering the leaflets

Annular dilation is secondary and occurs greatest in the septal-lateral (anterior-posterior) dimension

Surgical repair based on over correction of the annular dilation

48

Braun J, et al., Leiden Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:430 –437

49

Braun J, et al., Leiden Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:430 –437

50

Secondary MR Before and After Mitral Valve Annuloplasty

51

Surgical Options to Correct Secondary MR

After GDMT and Resynchronization When Appropriate

52

251 Patients Randomized November 18, Primary endpoint- LVESVI at One Year 2013, at NEJM.org.

53

Treatment of Patients with 3-4+ FMR, LVEF>20%, no CABG from 2000-10 (n=1,538)

Conservative Management Isolated MV Surgery 100%

6% 8%

11% 12%

90% 18% 80%

Patients 70% of

60% 50%

% %

% %

40% %

Percentage 30% 20% 10% 0%

All Patients 20%-30% 30-40% 40%-50% 50-60%

Duke Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

Database

54

Medical Therapy/ Resynchronization

Surgical Intervention

Advanced HF Transplantation

Bridge To

LVAD

Recovery

Destination Therapy

55

â-Blockade therapy in chronic heart failure: Diastolic function and mitral regurgitation improvement by carvedilol

Soccorso Capomolla, MD, Oreste Febo, MD, Marco Gnemmi, mD, Giorgio Riccardi, MD, Cristina Opasich, MD, Angelo Caporotondi, MD, Andrea Mortara, MD, GianDomenico Pinna, BME, and Franco Cobelli, MD, Pavia, Italy

Am Heart J 2000;139:596 Jet Area

9

88 p<0.05

) 2 7 (cm 66 Area 5 Jet 44

3

MR 22 1

00 Baseline 6 Months Baseline 6 Months Carvedilol Control

Capomolla et al. Am Heart J 2000;139:596-608

56

CARE HF

100

CRT

880 72%

(percent) 660 No CRT

56%

440

Survival p<0.002

220

00

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Time (days)

from Cleland et al. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1539-1549

57

Adult and Pediatric Heart Transplants Number of Transplants by Year and Location

5000

Other 4500 Europe 4000 North America 3500 transplants 3000 of 2500

Number 2000 1500

1000 500 0

JHLT. 2013 Oct; 32(10): 951-964 58

Medical Therapy and Resynchronization

Transcatheter Mitral and Tricuspid Intervention

Surgical Intervention

Advanced HF Transplantation

Bridge To Recovery

Destination Therapy

59

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair MitraClip System

60

Commercial MitraClip Experience: Worldwide

– Treating Centers:

Patients:

Implant Rate:

Etiology:

Functional MR

Etiology

463

25,508 Mixed 96% 13%

65% DMR 22%

Degenerative MR 22% FMR 65%

Mixed 13%

Data as of 01/31/2015. Source: Abbott Vascular.

61

COAPT: Trial design

~420 patients enrolled at up to 75 US sites

Significant FMR (?3+ by core lab)

Not appropriate for mitral valve surgery (local heart team) Specific anatomical criteria

November, 2015

Randomized oup

M care

300 Patients at

84 Sites

PIs: Michael Mack and Gregg W. Stone

Sponsor: Abbott Vascular 62

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement -TMVR

63

64

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement -TMVR

>$1 Billion spent in last 3 months for 5 companies with a combined total of ~50 cases !

65

Increases in Pressure Start the Cycle of Worsening Heart Failure

Pulmonary Artery Pressure

Left Heart Failure

Right Heart Failure

Left Atrial Pressure Cardiac Output Right Atrial Pressure

Dyspnea Fatigue Heptic Insufficiency

Orthopnea Confusion Renal Insufficiency

Pulmonary Edema Renal Insufficiency Peripheral Edema

Peripheral Edema

66

Pathophysiology of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

Left-sided heart disease

Atrial fibrillation

RV afterload increase (+/- PH)

RV remodeling

Altered RV function

Tricuspid annular dilation

Abnormalities in tricuspid anatomy and function lead to FTR

Source: Dreyfus 2015 JACC.

67

68

Majority of TR Surgical Procedures are Repairs Performed in Combination with Mitral Valve Surgery

STS Database Tricuspid Valve Procedures

6000

Repair Replacement

5000

Operations 4000

of 3000

Number 2000

1000

0

2004 2005 2006 2007

Bicuspidizatio De Vega Annuloplasty Clover

n Cinch Repair Prosthetic Technique

posterior Suture around ring Leaflet suture

leaflet the annulus

Source: Kilic 2013 Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Rogers 2009 Circulation, Taramasso 2012 JACC.

69

FMR / FTR Summary

Advanced CHF is a growing problem with significant mortality and repeat hospitalization

Most patients with CHF have FMR and in very advanced stages FTR

GDMT and resynchronization therapy work

Surgery is seldom used

Transcatheter therapy and MCS are major opportunities

A vertically integrated device company capable of managing different stages of CHF disease state makes total sense

70

Valtech Portfolio Overview

Prof. Francesco Maisano, M.D., FESC

University Hospital of Zurich

71

Valtech Cardio Portfolio:

A Journey from Valve Surgery to Interventions

FRANCESCO MAISANO, MD

72

73

Increasing Prevalence of Valvular Heart Disease in the Elderly

Population-based Studies Olmsted County, MN

All valve disease Mitral valve disease Aortic valve disease

14 14

severe Almost 1 in 10 people or 12 >75 years old have 12

(%)

10 mod-severe MR! 10

moderate disease 8 8

6 6 of valve 4 4

2 2

Prevalence 0 0

<45 45-54 55-64 65-74 >75 <45 45-54 55-64 65-74 >75

Source: Nkomo VT at al. Lancet 2006;368:1005-1011

74

Management of 3+/4+ MR with HF (CCF)

1,095 pts* with 3+/4+ MR and HF between 2000 and 2008 (74% FMR, 21% DMR). Rx before 10/2011:

DMR pts (n=226): 84% MV surgery, 16% medical Rx

FMR pts (n=814): 36% MV surgery (77% w/CABG), 64% med Rx.

Un-operated pts had lower LVEF (mean 27% vs. 42%, p<0.0001 and higher STS score (median 5.8 vs. 4.0, p<0.001) compared with operated pts.

100

Prognosis of Mortality 90

Surviving pts hospitalized for HF 171 of 474 (36%)

un-operated 80

68 un-operated pts pts with 58 60 with FMR and 3+/4+ MR 50 50 Patients 46 good echos

41

and HF 40 37 of would have been

29

% eligible for

20 20

MitraClip based 0 on published

1 2 3 4 5 criteria

Years

Source: Goel SS et al. JACC 2014;63,:185–90

75

Isolated MV Surgery: STS Database 2002-2010

n = 77,836 cases; 58.4% repair, 41.6% replacement

2 eras: 2002-2006, 2007-2010 Overall op mortality

MV repair rate ’d from 54.8% to 61.8% ?’d from 3.2% to 2.9% (P=0.03),

(p=0.002); seen in every risk strata. and RR of observed vs. expected

MV repair pts were much lower risk; STS <1% mortality ?’d from 1.13 (1.06–1.19) to

in 67% repair vs. 18% replacement. 1.02 (0.97–1.08), P=0.02

Source: Chatterjee S et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1587–95

76

Isolated MV Surgery: STS database 2002-2010

Proportion Treated with MV Repair vs. Replacement According to Predicted Risk

N = 77,836 cases; 58.4% repair, 41.6% replacement

2002—2006 2007—2010

Repair Replacement Repair Replacement

100% 100% 80% 80% 60% 60%

40% 40%

70.0

62.4

20% 20%

24.5 29.6 22.7

17.8 12.8 17.7

0% 0%

Low risk Int risk (4- High risk Extreme Low risk Int risk (4- High risk Extreme (<4%) <8%) (8-<12%) risk (?12%) (<4%) <8%) (8-<12%) risk (?12%)

Source: Chatterjee S et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1587–95

77

Transcatheter Replacement Valves

Company NeoVasc CardiAQ Tendyne / Lutter Edwards Medtronic

Valve Name Tiara TMVI-TA, TMVI-TF Tendyne TMVR Fortis Twelve

Device

Image

Leaflet and radial Barbs

Description Ridge fixation Apical tether Leaflet clipping

force fixation attachment

Simplicity,

Strengths D shape TF versatility Simple design Simple design

Several sizes

Sealing? Sealing?

Weaknesses Sizes, fractures Atrial protrusion TA only thrombosis Durability?

10 patients About 20 pts >20 pts, trial About 5

Status* 10- patients Acquired by Acquired by stopped for patients

Edwards Abbott thrombosis Acquired by

Medtronic

Alexei Marco / Jeff Franco / St. Paul, Mike Mussallem / CEO Andrew

CEO / Loc. Rob Michiels / Irvine, CA Cleeland / Menlo

Vancouver, B.C. MN Irvine, CA Park, CA

78

Mitral Regurgitation Disease Process

Mitral

Regurgitation

Annular- Volume

Ventricular Overload

Dilatation

79

Rationale for Interventional Treatment of FMR in HF

To reduce symptoms To prevent acute HF

by reducing LA by reducing the

pressure under resting chance of flash

conditions pulmonary edema

To improve To initiate reverse

compliance to remodeling by

therapy by increasing reducing volume

cardiac output overload

80

LA pressure acute reduction in a HF patient undergoing adjustable transcatheter mitral annuloplasty

81

Significant Clinical Benefits Have Been Reported in Severe Heart Failure Despite Optimal Medical Therapy

94% successful implant rate (cohort of 50 patients) THERAPY OUTCOMES

Improved short-term survival related to NYHA

functional class

Significant improvements in 6-minute walk test, 94% IMPLANT

MLHFQ score, and NT-proBNP plasma levels, as well RATE*

as EF, LV ESV and LVEDV which supports reverse

remodeling of the LV Success

CLINICAL IMPROVEMENTS at 6 months

MR GRADE NYTHA CLASS MLHFQ SCORE

87% less than 72% in class I or II Mean improvement

or equal to 2+ of -22 points

6 MINUTE WALK TEST

Median of 311 meters 81 meters Median of 230 meters(P <0.0005)

at 6 months at baseline 19 patients

Source: Franzen et al. MitraClip Therapy In Patients With End-Stage Systolic Heart Failure. Eur J Heart Failure. 2011; 13: 569-576.

82

Hospitalizations for Heart Failure

1.6 % reduction 0.0001

1.4 1.52 Rate 1.2 Year

1.0

Patient 0.8 Hospitalization Per 0.6

0.4 0.47 HF

0.2 0.0

6 Months Prior to MitraClip 6 Months Post-Discharge

N=135 N=128†

† Patients who died before discharge are excluded from the post-discharge analysis.

Source: ACCESS-EU Phase II – PCR London Valves 2014.

83

Timing

NYHA Treatment Stage Setting

Stage I

Outpatient Clinic Stage II

Stage III

Hospitalization

Stage IV

Inotrope Use

Time From Diagnosis

84

Timing

NYHA EARLY MID LATE Treatment Stage Setting

Stage I

Outpatient Clinic Stage II

Medical + CRT LVAD Stage III Therapy Mitral HTx

Hospitalization

Stage IV

Inotrope Use

Time From Diagnosis

85

Timing

NYHA Treatment Stage Setting

Stage I

Outpatient Clinic Stage II

Stage III

Hospitalization

Stage IV

Inotrope Use

Time From Diagnosis

86

TAVI vs. Transcatheter Valve Interventions

Variability of mitral valve

disease

– Multiple devices

– Multiple techniques

Anatomical complexity

– Most techniques are different

from a “stent-based”

approach

Image guidance is more

sophisticated

– Echocardiography is the

leading image guidance

method

87

The Landscape of Valve Surgery and Interventions

Conventional Minimally

Robotic Transcatheter Surgery invasive

88

Overlapping Targets

SURGERY INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Less invasive

89

TEAMWORK

90

CardioBand is an example of the natural evolution of a surgical technique into a percutaneous intervention

91

History of Mitral and Tricuspid Interventions

Annuloplasty from Evolution to Revolution

1960 2015

First steps Classic Physio Etiologix Cardinal Cardioband

1968 1982 2006 2010

Carpentier A. Carpentier- First Adjustable

La Edwards asymmetric Semi-Rigid

valvuloplastie CLASSIC ring designed Annuloplasty

reconstitutive annuloplast to treat Ring System

ring asymmetric

dilatation

92

Unhappy FMR Repair Surgeon

93

Etiology Specific Annuloplasty Rings

US2015230920 (A1)—METHODS FOR REPAIR OF ABNORMAL MITRAL VALVES

94

Maisano et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58: 2174–82

95

Analysis of Overall Outcomes With a Specific Technique (1998)

96

Endovascular Evolution Preclinical Testing (2007)

97

Structure vs. Function

Structure

Function

Lesion

Dysfunction

98

Mechanism of Regurgitation Functional Classification

« Surgeons are not basically concerned with lesions. We care more about function. Therefore one may define the aim of a valve reconstuction as restoring normal leaflet function rather than normal valve anatomy »

—A. Carpentier, the French Correction 1984

99

The Future of Valve Interventions

Cross-fertilization between surgical and interventional devices, will offer a better individualized treatment

Innovative solutions for the treatment of mitral valve disease should be simple, easy to use, reproducible, effective in the long term

To simplify minimally invasive approach, more sutureless devices should be developed

To optimize outcomes, fine tuning of devices under physiologic conditions are needed

100

Sutureless/knot-less Technologies

Cor-Knot

SAPIEN in MAC Open Access

101

Annuloplasty

Annuloplasty is the most commonly performed surgical repair procedure

As a stand-alone in patients with FMR

In combination with leaflet repair in DMR patients

Source: http://my.clevelandclinic.org/services/heart/services/valve-treatment/mitral-valve-mitral-valve-repair

102

History of Mitral and Tricuspid Interventions

Annuloplasty from Evolution to Revolution

1960

2015

First steps

1968

Carpentier A. La valvuloplastie reconstitutive

Classic

1982

Carpentier-Edwards CLASSIC annuloplasty ring

Physio

1995

Phisio II Global Shape optimisation

Etiologix

dilatation

Cardinal

2010

Adjustable Semi-Rigid Annuloplasty Ring System

Cardioband

103

Cardinal Adjustable Annuloplasty Ring

104

Anterior section (Rigid)

Posterior section (Flexible)

Cardinal System

Adjustment Handle

9 Sizers

(24-40mm)

Sizer Handle

Ring (3 sizes)

Cardinal Ring Sizes Corresponding Sizers

Small 24-32

Medium 28-36

Large 32-40

105

Standard Implant

106

Weaning from CPB

107

10.00

8.00

4.00

2.00 p<0,0001

0.00

before adjustment after adjustment

108

History of Mitral and Tricuspid Interventions

Annuloplasty from Evolution to Revolution

1960 2015

First steps

1968

Carpentier A. La valvuloplastie reconstitutive

Classic

1982

Carpentier-Edwards CLASSIC annuloplasty ring

Physio

1995

Phisio II Global Shape optimisation

Etiologix

2006

First asymmetric ring designed to treat asymmetric dilatation

Cardinal

Cardioband

109

Surgical Annuloplasty Delivered With a Catheter

110

Cardioband

111

Benefits of Percutaneous Direct Annuloplasty by Cardioband

Trans-femoral venous access (transseptal) –best for safety

Supraannular fixation like in surgery

Significant Reduction of Annular dimensions –device enables reduction of up to size 28 surgical ring Preserves the native anatomy –keeps future options open

112

Direct Annuloplasty

Cardioband implantation

Implantation completed

Annular reduction

113

Fluoro and Echo Guidance

114

Baseline

Final Size

115

95% patients with MR2+ At 12 Months By Core Lab

Cardioband MR Reduction

Core Lab; Dr. Paul Grayburn, Baylor University

100%

Patients 80% of

60%

Percentage 40% 20%

0%

+

+

Baseline n=45

88% MR 2+ at Discharge

+

+

0-1+

Discharge n=42

83% MR 2+ at 1 Month

+

+

0-1+

1 Month n=41

87% MR 2+ at 6 Months

+

+

0-1+

6 Months n=24

95% MR 2+ at 12 Months

+

+

0-1+

1 Year n=19

116

Septo-lateral Diameter Reduction (Intraop TEE)

A-P Diameter [mm]

15 20 25 30 35 40 45

P<0.01

36±5 mm

20% average reduction

Baseline

29±6mm

Post procedure

117

Surgical MVR

Interventional MV Rep

Interventional MVR

Surgical MV Rep

118

Cardioband Evolution (Pipeline)

2006

2017

Cardinal

2010

Adjustable Semi-Rigid Annuloplasty Ring System

Cardioband

2013

Transfemoral “Surgical-like” annuloplasty for Mitral Valve Repair

Cardioband TR

2016

Transfemoral “Surgical-like” annuloplasty for Tricuspid Valve Repair

Cardioband Leaflet

2017

Transfemoral “Surgical-like” leaflet augmentation for Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Repair

More to Come…

Cardioband is a Platform

119

120

Cardioband Tricuspid

Tricuspid

121

Steve Bolling TVT 2015

122

Steve Bolling TVT 2015

123

Steve Bolling TVT 2015

124

Cardioband TR

125

Feasibility

P S

P S

A

P S

A

S A

FTR Surgical Annuloplasty

127

Mirror the Cardioband delivery system

MR TR

128

Considerations When Evaluating Design Approaches For a Interventional TR Solution

Navia, JTCVS 2010

129

130

Transcatheter Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation

Repair / Replacement

Atrial fibrillation ablation, left appendage closure, tricuspid valve treatment, (left ventricle)

131

Cardiovalve

132

Cardiovalve’s Mission

To provide a repeatable and reproducible mitral valve replacement solution via a fully controlled trans-femoral access

Trans-femoral = Safety

(And…

The Interventionalist prefers not to need a surgeon in the room) Cardiovalve is uniquely designed for Trans femoral/trans septal delivery By novel delivery system/implant integrated design a safe and robust procedure is made possible

133

Cardiovalve Transfemoral Procedure and Delivery System

Femoral vein, transseptal access to LA, fully-percutaneous procedure Echo and fluoroscopy based navigation No AV loop required The delivery system:

Multiple degrees of control for accurate positioning High control plus gradual deployment for safety Low profile (<28) to be safely accommodated through the venous system

134

The Implant

Low ventricular presence Cylindrical, robust and classic valve design Ventricular and Atrial anchoring mechanism Highly effective sealing

135

Preclinical Validation

TF procedures in challenging porcine anatomy Chronic proof of concept and clinical effect Pre-Clinical safety demonstrated Technology tested and established

Crossing the Fossa Lower legs deployed Grasping native leaflets Implant is fully deployed

136

Cardiovalve Pre-Clinical

>50 acute, sub-chronic and chronic successful pigs Chronic animals show favorable tissue coverage and good anatomical response

137

Case In a Box Movie

138

Summary and Next Steps

Chronic trials on going

Procedural standardization in full animal set up

Expected FIM within 18 months

139

TMV Replacement AND Repair Valtech’s Vision

Cardioband TF for early and intermediate (late) stage FMR patients Cardiovalve TF for DMR and (late) end stage FMR If Cardiovalve is denied a combined repair of Cardioband and a Clip may be considered Eliminating risk from the equation by using the venous TF approach enables to cover all population in a manner that best fits the patients and their specific disease

There is a place for both!

140

Mitral

Tricuspid

Cardiovalve

Mitral

Tricuspid

Mitral

Tricuspid

Allen et al, Circulation 2012

141

Treating Valve Disease in the Future Today

Patient-optimized care

Transcatheter Interventions

Minimally Invasive Surgery

Open Heart Procedures

Tailored approach – the best option for the patient

142

Complementary Role of Surgery and Interventions

Minimal invasiveness Maximal safety Tailored approach

Unbiased choice

143

144

Device Performance Procedural standards Imaging guidance

Heartware

Preprocedural Planning of TIARA MV implant

(Courtesy of C. Ruiz)

145

Coregistration

146

Repair and Replacement

Prof. Francesco Maisano, M.D., FESC

University Hospital of Zurich

147

The Challenges for Transcatheter Mitral Interventions

Anatomical complexity

– Most technologies are different from a “stent-based” approach

Image guidance is sophisticated

– Echocardiography is the leading image guidance method

Variability of mitral valve disease

– Multiple devices

– Multiple techniques

– Associated procedures

Surgical standards are high

148

FIH transcatheter Mitral Valve Implantation: CardiaQ in 2012

149

8 years before…not even on the radar

150

2003, FIH MitraClip implant in DMR

151

MitraClip Therapy is Routine in Most High-Volume Centers

More than 25,000 patients have been treated with the MitraClip device worldwide

– Nearly 2,000 patients have been enrolled in prospective clinical trials

– A majority are considered high risk for mitral valve (MV) surgery

In 2008, MitraClip received CE Mark for reconstruction of the insufficient MV through tissue approximation

In 2013, FDA approved MitraClip for treating significant symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) in patients who have been determined to be at prohibitive risk for MV surgery by a Heart Team

152

Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation

Repair and Replacement

+

Atrial fibrillation ablation, left appendage closure, tricuspid valve treatment, (left ventricle)

153

Has transcatheter mitral valve implantation finally arrived and is there a place for transcatheter repair?

Company NeoVasc CardiAQ Tendyne / Lutter Edwards Medtronic

Valve Name Tiara TMVI-TA, TMVI-TF Tendyne TMVR Fortis Twelve

Device Image

Leaflet and radial Barbs Description Ridge fixation Apical tether Leaflet clipping force fixation attachment

Simplicity,

Simple design Strengths D shape TF versatility Simple design

Several sizes

Sealing? Sealing?, Weaknesses Sizes, fractures Atrial protrusion TA only thrombosis durability?

About 5

10 patients About 20 pts >20 pts, trial patients Status* 10- patients Aquired by Aquired by stopped for

Acquired by Edwards Abbott thrombosis Medtronic

CEO Andrew Alexei Marco / Jeff Franco / St. Paul, Mike Mussallem / CEO / Loc. Rob Michiels / Irvine, CA Cleeland / Menlo Vancouver, B.C. MN Irvine, CA

Park, CA

154

Patient Device Procedura Something Bad luck? selection? issues? issues? else?

Higher early mortality compared to early experience with transcatheter repair

155

Considerable work has been performed in the develpment of a total mitral prosthesis…

Problems of fixation, valve function and thrombotic occlusion of the prosthesis have prevented long-term survival in most instances

While early satisfactory results were obtained in some patients, survival beyond three months has not been reported to now

Source: Starr, Edwards. Ann Surg. Oct 1961; 154(4): 726–740

156

….the advantage of prosthesis over plastic procedures on the mitral valve in terms of predictability of hemodynamic result must be balanced by the unknown long-term hazards involved in total dependence upon an intracardiac appliance…

Starr, Edwards. Ann Surg. Oct 1961; 154(4): 726–740 157

50’s Early stages CPB and prostheses not available off-pump repair

60’s CPB available prostheses not available open repair

70-80’s Mechanica an tissue prostheses

MVR becomes standard

80-90’s Imaging improvement , ring prostheses

Repair becomes standard

90’s today evidence based segmentation complementary role of MVR and Repair 158

Repair and Replacement for FMR

Similar clinical benefit while MR recurrence is 30% in repair

Is MR recurrence a problem? Is MVR relieving symptoms?

Tendency for higher mortality rate in MVR

Repair is probably safer Is MVR safe?

The best reverse remodeling happened in successful repair

MVR provides the same degree of Patient selection is important reverse remodeling as a failed repair…

Acker MA et al. N Engl J Med 2014;370:23-32 159

Is It Better To Survive With Recurrent Regurgitation Or Die With A Competent Mitral Valve?

160

Mitral Valve Functions

Hemodynamic

Direction of the blood flow from the LA to the LV

Structural

Integrity of the shape and function of the left ventricle

161

The Mitro-Ventricular Architecture

162

163

Can We Reproduce This?

Any technique will impact physiologic behaviour of the mitral valve apparatus

– Repair is probably better than Replacement and should be first line option in case of early intervention

164

The Challenges

Fixation Sealing Delivery Imaging Indications Durability

Complex and

No More than Patient TMVI vs. Stent dynamic calcifications just a stent selection repair durability structure

Large High pressure Need for Leaflet

Planning Timing anatomy environament orientation degeneration

Non circular Risk of LVOT Additional Fixation fixation and and dynamic Guidance Anticoagulation obstruction sealing elements anatomy features

165

Different Devices. Different Solutions.

166

The Complementary Roles of Transcatheter Techniques

Stand-alone Annuloplasty: early FMR treatment

Cardioband • Stand-alone Mitraclip: FMR with asymmetric tethering (IMR)

Stand-alone Mitraclip: DMR

Combined Annuloplasty and

Replacement Mitraclip MitraClip: DMR and Advanced

FMR

MV Replacement: Advanced DMR and Advanced FMR

167

Mitral Mitral

Tricuspid Tricuspid

Cardiovalve Cardiovalve

Allen et al, Circulation 2012 168

Transapical vs. Transfemoral

169

PARTNER Study Design

Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

ASSESSMENT: High-Risk AVR Candidate 3,105 Total Patients Screened

Total = 1,057 patients Inoperabl

N = 699 High Risk 2 Parallel Trials: N = 358

e

Individually Powered

Yes ASSESSMENT: No ASSESSMENT:

Transfemoral Transfemoral Access Access

Transfemoral (TF) Transapical (TA) Yes No

1:1 Randomization 1:1 Randomization 1:1 Randomization Not In Study

N = 244 N = 248 N = 104 N = 103 N = 179 N = 179

Standard TF TAVR AVR TA TAVR AVR TF TAVR

Therapy

VS VS VS

Primary Endpoint: All-Cause Mortality at 1 yr Primary Endpoint: All-Cause Mortality (Non-inferiority) Over Length of Trial (Superiority) Co-Primary Endpoint: Composite of All-Cause Mortality and Repeat Hospitalization (Superiority)

170

Al Cause Mortality Transfemoral (N 492)

HR [95% CI] =

0.83 [0.60, 1.15] P (log rank) = 0.25

26.4

22.2

No. at Risk Months

TAVR 244 215 188 119 59 AVR 248 180 168 109 56

171

All-Cause Mortality Transapical (N 20 )

HR [95% CI] =

1.22 [0.75, 1.98] P (log rank) = 0.41

29.0

27.9

No. at Risk Months

TAVR 104 83 72 28 8 AVR 103 72 68 30 9

172

All-Cause Mortality

Transfemoral v TA vs Surgery

Months

TA approach is more invasive than TF, does not reduce the operative risk Long term results are suboptimal

selection bias?

long term effect of the apical scar?

173

Transapical Access

174

Transapical Access

175

24 Hours After Successful Intervention…TF vs TA

Transapical Transfemoral

176

Future of Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Interventions

Repair will be first line

– Leaves the options open

– Lower risks

– Lower physiologic impact

– Early indication feasible

Mitral replacement will be done in patients with suboptimal anatomy or end-stage FMR

Transfemoral approach will be the only successful method

– Safer

– Faster recovery

– Real competition with surgery

177

Evolution of Interventions

Surger i th onl treatment

Surger i th gol standard treatment

Surger i th preferred treatment fo low and intermediat risk patients

Transcathete interventions ar performed in intermediat risk patients

Surger i performed i patient with contraindicatio to transcathete approach

178

Cardioband Deep Dive

Prof. Karl-Heinz Kuck, M.D., Ph.D.

Asklepios Klinik St. Georg

179

CARDIOBAND PERCUTANEOUS

DIRECT MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY

180

Medically Managed Patients with severe MR

Have Poor Outcomes

One year mortality rate of 20%

Five year mortality rate of 50%

Very high rate of heart failure hospitalization

*Sachin S. Goel, JACC Volume 63, Issue 2, January 2014 181

How are Patients with Isolated FMR

Treated?

Duke Databank: 1,538 pts with echocardiographic 3+ to 4+ FMR

and LVEF ?20% between 2000 and 2010 not undergoing CABG

* Courtesy of Dr. Michael Mack 182

Cardioband: Surgical-Like Annuloplasty

Surgery Cardioband

Which is Cardioband?

183

Surgery Cardioband

But Via a Catheter.

184

Benefits of Percutaneous Direct Annuloplasty

by Cardioband

Trans-femoral venous access

(transseptal) – best for safety

Supraannular fixation like in

surgery

Significant Reduction of

Annular dimensions – device

enables reduction of up to size

28 surgical ring

Preserves the native anatomy –

keeps future options open

185

CT Based—Automatic Planning

Pre-procedural CT Analysis providing:

–Sizing of the Annulus

–Expected Fluoroscopy Projections

–Transseptal Puncture location

–3D preview of system position

1

2

4

8

9

7

6

3

5

10

186

Cardioband Procedure—Step by Step

1 Transseptal

Puncture 2 System

Insertion 3 Implant

Deployment 4 Implant Size

Adjustment

187

Reduction of Septo-Lateral (A-P) Diameter by

Cinching Intra Procedure

On Cadaveric Heart (TVT 2012)

Annular Cinching by 10% Annular Cinching by 20% Annular Cinching by 40%

188

And Reduction of MR

Baseline

Final size Post

Adjustment

189

UPDATE FROM EUROPEAN TRIAL -

45 PATIENTS RESULTS

190

The Study

A single arm, multi-center, prospective

study with intra-subject comparisons to

evaluate the performance and safety of

the Cardioband for repair of functional

mitral regurgitation.

191

Participating Sites

192

Highlights of Early Outcomes (N=45)

193

Study Demographics (N=45)

Variable No. (%) or Mean

Age (years) 71 (49-81) Male 34

Gender

Female 11

Euroscore II (%) 7 Baseline NYHA Class of III or IV (%) 87 Ischemic 28 Non Ischemic 17 LVEDD (mm) Avg (min-max) 61 (43-75) EF (%) Avg (min-max) 32 (15-59) Prev CABG 14 (31%)

COPD 9 (20%)

Moderate to Severe Renal Failure 31 (69%) Severe Pulmonary Hypertension 8 (18%)

Afib 36 (80%)

194

Reported Safety Events at 30 Days

Patients Experiencing Event, # (%)

30 Day Events*

All Patients N=45

-Death 2 (4.4%) Hemorrhagic Stroke** 1 (2.2%) Need for elective Mitral Operation** 1 (2.2%) -Bleeding Complications 1 (2.2%) -Renal Failure 2 (4.4%) -Myocardial Infarction 0 (0.0%) -Respiratory Failure 0 (0.0%) -Cardiac Tamponade 0 (0.0%)

* VARC Guidelines (European Heart Journal, 2012, 33:2403-2414)

** Part of the Death cases

One additional death case per ITT—compassionate

195

Primary Endpoints

Safety Performance

Overall rate of Major Serious Technical success rate of the Adverse Events (SAEs) and implantation of the Serious Adverse Device Cardioband Effects (SADE) until hospital Technical feasibility of discharge and at post- Cardioband adjustment operative 30 days Cardioband ability to reduce mitral valve regurgitation

Major SAEs: Death, (MR) Intra-procedure, at myocardial infarction, hospital discharge and at 30 cardiac tamponade, device days related cardiac surgery, stroke

*Events will be defined according to VARC II guidelines

196

Secondary Endpoints

Safety Performance

Overall rate of Major Serious MR Severity at 6, 12 and 24 Adverse Events (SAEs) and months Serious Adverse Device Change in 6 MWT in 6, 12 Effects (SADE) until 24 and 24 months months Change in quality of life (MLWHFQ) at 6, 12 and 24 months

197

Major Inclusions

Age > 18 years

Moderate to severe functional MR

Symptomatic patients (NYHA Class II-IV) despite optimal medical therapy , including CRT if indicated

LVEF ? 25%, LVEDD ? 70mm

Subject is high risk to undergo MV surgery (as assessed by a cardiac surgeon and a cardiologist, at the site and according to ESC/EACTS guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease)

198

Major Exclusions

Heavily calcified annulus or leaflets

Untreated clinically significant CAD requiring revascularization

Any recent cardiovascular intervention

CVA or TIA within 6 months or severe carotid stenosis (>70% by Ultra sound)

Renal insufficiency requiring dialysis

Pulmonary hypertension >70mmHg at rest

Mitral valve anatomy which may preclude proper device treatment

Right-sided congestive heart failure with echocardiographic evidence of severe right ventricular dysfunction and severe tricuspid regurgitation

199

95% patients with MR?2+ At 12 Months By Core Lab

Cardioband MR Reduction

Core Lab; Dr. Paul Grayburn, Baylor University

88% MR ? 2+ 83% MR ? 2+ 87% MR ? 2+ 95% MR ? 2+ at Discharge at 1 Month at 6 Months at 12 Months

100% +

+ + +

80% + + Patients + + of + 60%

40%

0-1+ 0-1+ 0-1+ Percentage 0-1+

20%

+

0%

Baseline Discharge 1 Month 6 Months 1 Year n=45 n=42 n=41 n=24 n=19

200

Annular Remodeling by Reduction in Septo Lateral (A-P) Dimension (N=45) before procedure and at discharge 20% average reduction in A-P Baseline Discharge

201

Functional Improvement at 6 Months

202

Functional Improvement at 12 Months

Six Min Walk MLHFQ Score

P<0.05 P<0.05

450 40

400 37.94

35

385.79

350

30

(mean) 300

25

250 Score

255.86 20 200

Walked 18.72 150 MLHFQ 15

100 10

Meters 50

5 0 0

Baseline 12 Months

Baseline 12 Months

N= 18 N= 18

203

Summary

Transcatheter surgical annuloplasty is feasible

Safety profile similar to equivilant transcatheter procedures

Significant and consistent reduction in SL dimension

Significant and consistent reduction in MR

Options remain open for future interventions

Cardioband—Delivering Surgical Annuloplasty Through A Catheter

204

Thank you

205

Cardioband Deeper Dive:

Core Lab Insights

Paul Grayburn, M.D., FACC

Baylor University Medical Center

206

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest

Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below.

Affiliation/Financial Relationship

Grant/Research Support (to BRI):

– Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Edwards, Tendyne, Valtech

Consulting Fees/Honoraria:

– Abbot, Tendyne

Echo Core Lab:

– Valtech

Major Stock Shareholder/Equity:

– Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital and The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano

207

Participating Sites

Zurich University Hospital (1)

Asklepios Klinik, St. Georg (8) Bic Hos Medizinische Klinik Universitätsklinikum Bonn (11)

Heart Center HSR, University of Köln Milan (7) (3)

Echo Core Laboratory Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas TX

208

Implant Technique

A B

C D

209

Insertion of the First Anchor

210

Anchor Implantation and Cinching

A B

C D

211

3D TEE Showing First Anchor

212

3D TEE Showing Final Anchor

213

3D TEE of Cardioband After Cinching

214

3D TEE Images: Pre-, During, Post-

Baseline (pre-device) Device Pre-Cinching Device After Cinching

A B C

215

3D Images (top) & Reconstruction (bottom)

216

Structural Reconstruction Seen Post-Cinch

Baseline 3D Dimensions Post-Cinch 3D Dimensions

AP = 3.63cm AP = 3.16cm

AL-PM = 4.01cm AL-PM = 3.15cm

217

Aortic-Mitral Angle Pre- and Post-Cardioband Device

Baseline Post-Cinching

A B

Ao-MV Angle = 133.1° Ao-MV Angle = 125.6°

218

Results of 3D Measurements

219

Conclusions

Acute intraoperative change in annulus geometry as measured by 3D TEE

– AP diameter and IC diameter

– Annulus circumference

– Aortomitral angle

Translates into clinical benefits

– MR reduction

– LV and LA remodeling

– Quality of life measures

220

Perspectives on the MVAD® System

Paul Jansz, BMed. FRACS, Ph.D

St. Vincent’s Hospital

221

Perspectives on the MVAD® System

No Financial Interests/Conflicts.

Investigational Devices will not be discussed in detail.

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 222

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

St. Vincent’s Experience

Adult Hospital

1000 -1200 Cardiothoracic Cases per year

80 – 100 Transplants

– Heart

– Lung

– Heart Lung

Large ECMO Program

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 223

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

St. Vincent’s Experience

Mechanical Assist

More than 200 VADs implanted

Experience using many long-term, durable MCS device

– BVS 5000: 13

– C-Pulse: 2

– TAH: 7

– Heartmate 1 (IP,VE,XVE): 21

– VentraAssist: 33

HVAD® System

Clinical trial site in HVAD CE Mark trial

– HVAD implants: 119

– HVAD BiVADs: 13

MVAD System

Investigator

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 224

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

St. Vincent’s Experience

Surgical Valve

Aortic Program

– Homografts, Repair, Replacement

– Sutureless Valnes

– Minimally Invasive

Hemisternotomy

Right Anterior Thorocotomy

Mitral Program

– Robotic Repairs: 109

– Minimally Invasive Repairs: 304

Structural Heart

Aortic (TAVI)

– CorValve, Sapien

Trans-Aortic, Trans-Apical, Femoral

Mitral

– MitraClip: 55

– Replacement (Tendyne): 4

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 225

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

MVAD Advantage™ CE Mark Trial

Multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, single-arm trial

70 patients at 11 sites in Australia, Austria, France, Germany & the UK

Primary Endpoint: Survival at 6 months

Implantation via thoracotomy or sternotomy

First patient enrolled July 2015

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use.

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

The MVAD System Has Breakthrough Potential

Small size enables less invasive implant and improved anatomical fit

MVAD® Pump

Advanced impeller technology for advanced hemocompatibility

Lighter and thoughtfully designed peripherals to enhance patient quality of life

PAL? Patient Peripherals

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 227

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

MVAD Pump in situ

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 228

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

Advanced Impeller Technology

>50% reduction in shear stress* that may lead to fewer VAD complications

- Optimized flow paths to guide 99% of blood through ultra-low stress blood channels

- Smooth impeller edges to decrease forces applied to the blood

- Small priming volume & reduced surface contact to limit blood time in the pump

*Compared to the HVAD® Pump, HeartWare data on file

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use.

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

Smaller Pump Allows for Less Invasive Surgery

Globally, 1 in 4 HVAD System patients implanted via thoracotomy

Potential advantages:

– Reduced incision size

– Reduced bleeding

– Reduced Right Heart Failure

– Preservation of the sternum for heart transplant

– Easier procedure for re-do patients

– Shorter hospital length of stay

HVAD Pump MVAD Pump

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 230

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

Highlights of the Implant Procedure

2015 EACTS Techno College Video, Presented by J. Schmitto

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use.

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

Gimbal Adjustment Via ECHO Guidance

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 232

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

qPulseTM Cycle

Customizable speed adjustments (3 settings)

Designed to promote aortic valve opening, enable ventricular washing, and reduce bleeding complications

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use.

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

qPulse Setting Adjustments Under ECHO Guidance

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use. 234

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

PAL Patient Peripherals

Thoughtfully designed peripherals to provide improvements in patient quality of life

Simplified patient experience with streamlined design

– Integrated controller and battery system

– Snap-on, cable-free battery attachment

– Time-based (hours and minutes) battery run-time display

Increased patient safety and confidence

– Internal battery for back-up power

– Clear and actionable text-based alerts

– Enhanced data access on controller for improved TM remote troubleshooting Peripherals for an Active Lifestyle

Exclusively for Clinical Investigation.

Investigational device to be used by Qualified Investigators Only.

CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) law to investigational use.

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

THANK YOU

236

HEARTWARE, HVAD, MVAD and the HEARTWARE logo are registered trademarks of HeartWare.

The HeartWare—Valtech Combination:

A Physician’s View

Dr. Steven W. Boyce

MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute MedStar Washington Hospital Center

237

In Many Cases the FMR Valve Patient May Also Be a VAD Patient (Now or in the Future)

Clinical • Functional Mitral Regurgitation Progression Device Therapy (FMR) is a ventricular problem Myocardial insult • Valve dysfunction exacerbates ventricular dysfunction

ICD

Left Ventricular • The same Heart Failure and Surgical (LV) Remodeling team that manages a FMR patient, manages the VAD patient

Mitral Apparatus Remodeling

In fact, the FMR patient may CRT becomes a VAD patient—for many Mitral Valve severe FMR patients the Heart Team Dysfunction weighs valve intervention against Mitral Repair / VAD intervention

Further LV Replacement

Remodeling / HF • A differentiated Mitral therapy is a Progression logical complement to a VAD business…

VAD

238

Valve and VAD Patient Profiles Converging Due to Improved Technology and Patient Identification

Heart Failure Team

Convergence

Valve Patients of VAD and VAD Patients

Valv Patients

Advent of Transcatheter Improving Outcomes, Solutions Technology

? Less invasive? Improved survival and adverse ? Better QoL event profile? Potential reverse remodeling ? Enhanced QoL with smaller peripherals and non-wired systems (FIS)

239

The Heart Team Manages NYHA III and IV Patients

High-risk patients with significant MR and TR—currently treated with medication alone

With a non-invasive approach, physicians will correct the valvular pathology to slow disease progression

FUTURE: Many INTERMACS 3 and 4 patients referred for a VAD may undergo percutaneous repair prior to minimally invasive VAD (e.g. MVAD)

240

Valve Interventions and VADS

MR and VADS

MR is not a contraindications to LVAD implantation

Mitral valve repair might be indicated if lower speeds are necessary to preserve AV integrity or maintain pulsatility within the peripheral circulation

TR and VADS

Concomitant TVR provides salient benefits in patients with moderate-to-severe TR receiving LVAD support

Concomitant tricuspid valve repair in patients undergoing LVAD placement reduces incidence of acute right heart failure

Despite being contraindicated in the HeartWare ADVANCE study, 16% of those patients receive a concomitant mitral or tricuspid intervention

Source: Wang 2014 Circulation, Rodriguez 2013 JHLT, Deo 2012 J Card Surg.

241

Combined Portfolio Offers Solutions for Broader Heart Failure Population Managed by the Heart Team

Heart Failure

Primary Valve HFrEF HFpEF Right Heart Disease

MCS Valve MCS MCS Valve Valve

(mitral) (tricuspid) (mitral & tricuspid)

Note: Heart Failure Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), Heart Failure Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

242

A Focused Provider of Therapies and Support for the Advanced Heart Failure Continuum Makes Sense

Combined Heart Failure Treatment Paradigm

Company Offering

Class I Class II Class III Class IV

Early Stage Mid Stage Late Stage End Stage

Portfolio Valtech

Focus HeartWare

Medical Surgical Transcatheter Tx/CRT Valve Tx Valve Repair

Treatment Transcatheter Options Valve Replace

Mechanical Heart Circulatory Support Transplant

Patients may receive multiple valve interventions over the course of their disease

VAD patients often receive concomitant mitral or tricuspid valve procedures

VADs remain the treatment option for progressed patients

243

Logical Combination From A Physician’s Perspective

These therapies will increasingly target a similar patient profile

Valve “tune-up” would serve many VAD patients well

Common Patient • Many who are anatomically eligible but contraindicated for a VAD would benefit from valve therapy Common Clinical • Increasing role of Heart Team in HF patient care paradigm Decision • Heart Team evaluates VAD-eligible patients; cardiologists Pathway becoming increasingly involved

Common Referral

Same Cardiology referrer driving patient flow

Channel

Common Clinical • VAD clinical support specialists are some of the most Knowledge Base knowledgeable on heart failure

244

Thank You

245

Physician Panel Patient Profiles

Michael Mack, M.D., FACC

Baylor Scott & White Health

246

Patient 1

Clinical background: Echo parameters:

81 year old patient MR: severe

Male LVEDD: 67mm

NYHA class: III EF: 40%

Ischemic RV general condition: moderate

EUROSCORE II: 5.2% LV general condition: moderate-severe

Risk Factors and comorbidities: • Pulmonary pressure: 63mm/hg

Age > 80Y Tethering: 11mm

LV dysfunction

High Pulmonary pressure

Myocardial infarction

Bradycardias with pacemaker

Chronic kidney disease

Suspect for Cold (chest X-Ray)

247

Patient 1

Severe TR RV larger than LV

248

Patient 1

Echo evaluation and suggested therapy:

The patient has severe MR and severe TR. RV larger than the LV.

As the RV dysfunction is moderate and the MR is not the primary disease, the suggested treatment will be LVAD with tricuspid annuloplasty ring.

249

Patient 2

Clinical background: Echo parameters:

78 year old patient MR: moderate-severe

Female LVEDD: 55mm

NYHA class: III EF: 40%

Ischemic RV general condition: moderate

EUROSCORE II: 8.29 LV general condition: moderate-

STS score: 4.098 severe

Pulmonary pressure: 65mm/hg

Risk Factors and comorbidities: • Tethering: 7mm

STEMI

Atrial fibrillation

Stent ACI right side

Diabetes mellitus

Hypertonia

250

Patient 2

Severe MR LV

251

Patient 2

Echo evaluation and suggested therapy:

The patient has severe MR with moderate RV dysfunction and severe LV dysfunction. The LVEDD is not extremely large (55mm) and with no TR.

The patient can benefit from mitral valve repair by Cardioband with reduction of MR and improvement of the right side.

252

Patient 3

Clinical background: Echo parameters:

22 your old patient MR: severe

Female LVEDD: 78.5mm

NYHA class: III EF: 25%

None- ischemic RV general condition: severe

EUROSCORE II: 3.14 LV general condition: moderate

STS score: 0.437 Pulmonary pressure: 65mm/hg

Tethering: 9mm

Risk Factors and comorbidities:

Dilated cardiomyopathy

Asthma bronchial

253

Patient 3

Severe MR Tethering

254

Patient 3

Echo evaluation and suggested therapy:

The patient have severe MR with extremely large LV (78.5mm) and tethering. The right side dysfunction is only moderate and the EF is in low end.

Due to theses reasons, the patient will not benefit from Cardioband as the EF might decrease after implantation. The best suggested treatment will be a VAD.

255

Patient 4

Clinical background: Echo parameters:

81 year old patient MR: moderate-severe

Male LVEDD: 67mm

NYHA class: III EF: 30%

Ischemic RV general condition: moderate

EUROSCORE II: 22.2% LV general condition: severe

Pulmonary pressure: elevated

Risk Factors and comorbidities: • Tethering: 7mm

Previous CABG

PAOD

Renal disease

Polyarthritis

256

Patient 4

Severe MR Left side pressure

257

Patient 4

Echo evaluation and suggested therapy:

The patient has severe MR with moderate RV dysfunction and severe LV dysfunction, demonstrated by high left side pressure.

In this case, it is clear that the MR is the main issue, this patient can benefit from mitral valve repair by Cardioband

258

Patient 5

Clinical background: Echo parameters:

75 year old patient MR: moderate-severe

Male LVEDD: 51mm

NYHA class: IV EF: 30%

Ischemic RV general condition: severe

EUROSCORE II: 10.21 (calculated LV general condition: moderate for no mechanical ventilation at Pulmonary pressure: 52mm/hg procedure date) Tethering: 11mm

STS score: 5.374

Risk Factors and comorbidities:

ACVB (LIMA ad LAD)

Biologic aortic valve prosthesis

Persistent atrial fibrillation

Renal failure

None insulin dependent Diabetes

Bradycardias with pacemaker

259

Patient 5

260

Patient 5

Echo evaluation and suggested therapy:

The patient has severe MR, severe TR and severe right side insufficiency, well demonstrated by enlarged IVC.

In addition, the RV is larger than the LV.

As the MR is not the main issue, the suggested treatment will be double VAD (both sides) or LVAD with temporary RVAD for pressure balance.

261

Discussion

262

The Combined Company Overview

Peter McAree

Senior Vice President and CFO HeartWare International

263

Our Story: HeartWare has achieved exceptional growth fueled by HVAD

WW HeartWare Revenue

2009-2015 $300 Year CAGR $250 2012-2014 58% M $ 2009-2014 63% U.S. BTT $200

approval $150 (late ‘12)

278

CE Mark

Revenue, $100 approval 208 209

(early ‘09)

$50 111 83 55 24 $0

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 YTD*

Cash: $249 million NOLs: $450 million

Convertible debt: $245 million Outstanding Shares: 17.3 M shares

* 10% constant currency growth, adjusted for $16M FX impact Note: Data as of November 3, 2015.

264

Growth Objectives

Near-term Headwinds Long-term Vision

Conclusion of ENDURANCE2 $700M Total VAD+Valve

Revenue by 2020

HVAD U.S. clinical unit sales

HeartMate III U.S. trial and launch in Europe

Growing > 20%

Unrest in Middle Eastern and Eastern European markets

MVAD trial impact on HVAD GM% > 70% sales in 5 participating regions

Foreign exchange Leadership in heart failure therapy

265

Future VAD Outlook: DT Approval and MVAD Expected to Enhance Growth Potential Through 2020

$600 5,566 6,000

$500 5,000 $ M $400 4,000 2,751 $300 3,000 Units 2,079 524 Revenue, $200 2,000 1,217

278 $100 208 1,000

111

$0 -2012 2013 2014 2020

Region 2014 Revenue 2015-2020 Key Drivers 2014-2020 Unit CAGR

MVAD Clinical

DT approval

U.S. $151 ~15%

MVAD Commercial

Circulite Clinical

MVAD Commercial

International $127 • Japan Commercial ~10%

FIS

Note: Fully implantable system (FIS). Source: HTWR financials and estimates.

266

Valtech Investment: Combined VAD + Valve Portfolio

Heart Failure Growth • Combined portfolio provides leadership position in two of Platform the highest-growth areas in heart failure

Expect the transcatheter mitral market to be an even greater market opportunity than TAVR

Differentiated Value • Appreciably scales and accelerates long-term revenue Creation growth potential

Multiple opportunities for revenue growth

Significant margin expansion opportunity

Ri Mitigating • Deal structure designed to align focus on value creation Structure • Contingent structure provides attractive risk/reward

Capital Efficient • Structure preserves cash to fund operations of the combined business

267

Combined Portfolio Provides Leadership Position in Two of the Highest-Growth Areas in Heart Failure

VAD

2015 2030

Class IV Class III

$2.2B $800M

+7% CAGR

Valve

$7.5B

Mitral Tricuspid

$600M

+18% CAGR

Source: HTWR estimates.

268

The Transcatheter Mitral Market to Likely Be An Even Greater Market Opportunity than TAVR

WW TAVR Market

$1,600 2007-2014 CAGR $1,476 $1,400 Total 104% Other NA $1,200 Medtronic 83% $1,079 $ M

Edwards 125% $1,000 $848 $800

Revenue, $585 $600 $372 $400 $201 $200 $99

$0 $10

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Note: Other includes Boston Scientific, St. Jude. and other. Average of Edward’s daily close price for cited year. Source: J.P. Morgan published estimates. Google Finance.

269

Valtech Appreciably Scales and Accelerates Long-Term Revenue Growth Potential

WW Valtech Revenue Projections

Case 2 $1,200 Mitral Tricuspid $1,146

CAGR $173 $1,000 $957 2016-2020 110%

$149

2020-2025 44% $765 $800 2016-2025 70%

$129

M $600 $536 $

$87 $972

$400 $323 $807

$636 $55

$186 $449 $200 $119

$71 $269

$10 $27 $163

$0 $66 $107

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Source: HTWR estimates.

270

Building Off of Improved VAD Margins Into Even Higher Gross Margin Valve Business

Historical HeartWare VAD Gross Margins vs. Projected Valve Franchise Gross Margins

100% 90% 80% 70%

Margin 60% Gross Margin 50% Potential Gross 40% VAD 70-73%

%

30%

Valve 75-80%

20% 10% 0%

2012 2013 2014 2025

HeartWare VAD Business Combined HF

Source: HTWR estimates. Franchise

271

Combined Portfolio Provides Leadership Position in VADs and Valves, Two of the Highest-Growth Areas in Heart Failure

Pro Forma Revenue Projections

VAD and Valve Franchises $2,500 CAGR

$2,341

VAD Valve Combined

‘14-’20 11% NA 17%

$2,000 Replace

‘20-’25 18% 44% 27%

43% 1,145

$1,500 $ M $1,000

$710 Repair 57% 186 $1,196

$500

$208 $278 $111 $524

$-

2012A 2013A 2014A 2020E 2025E 2025E Valve Revenue

Note: Valve franchise includes mitral and tricuspid repair and replacement portfolios. Case 2 valve revenues. Split Source: HTWR estimates.

272

Milestone-Based Transaction Aligned With Value Creation, Preserves Cash to Operate Combined Company

Valtech WW Revenue and Transaction Terms

$1,400 2015-2025

$1,200 Repair Replacement $1,000 $ M $800 $600 $400 $200 $0

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Event and 4.4M

Payments? Close, ? Cardioband ? Warrants ? $375M stock or shares Tricuspid FIM exercisable at cash at $450M LTM or CardioValve $75M LTM net net Valtech ? Cardioband FIM, 700K Valtech product product sales CE Mark, shares sales 800K shares

Portfolio Mitral and Tricuspid Surgical Comprehensive Portfolio of Breadth and Transcatheter Repair Market Transcatheter Replacement and Repair Products

Source: HTWR estimates.

273

Cardioband Snapshot

WW Revenue and EBITDA Projections Mitral Tricuspid

Case 2, Cardioband Mitral and Tricuspid Functional, moderate and severe

Patients mitral regurgitation, moderate and $700 high surgical risk Revenue Expected EU: 2015 EU: 2020 $600 Commercial Launch US: 2018 US: 2022

EBITDA

Customer Interventional Cardiologists $500 Regulatory PMA

Clinical Moderate-large study $400 Transcatheter Transcatheter

Market

M Mitral Repair Tricuspid Repair

$ $300

2020 2025 2030

WW Transcatheter $200 Repair Procedures 25 60 75

(in thousands) $100 Cardioband’s WW

Mitral Transcatheter 20% 35% 40%

$0 Repair Market Share

50% of MR patients have moderate or severe TR

-$100 Tricuspid

Patients receiving Mitral

Opportunity

Cardioband eligible for Tricuspid

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Cardioband

Source: HTWR estimates.

274

CardioValve Snapshot

WW Revenue and EBITDA Projections

Case 2, CardioValve Mitral Transseptal Transapical

Functional and degenerative, moderate and severe mitral

700 Patients regurgitation, moderate and high Revenue surgical risk 600 EBITDA Expected EU: 2020 EU: 2021

Commercial Launch US: 2022 US: 2024

500 Customer Interventional Cardiologists

Regulatory PMA

400 Clinical Moderate-large study

M

$ 300 Market Transcatheter Mitral Replacement

200 2020 2025 2030

WW Transcatheter 100 Replacement

10 70 125

Procedures

(in thousands)

0

Cardiovalve’s WW Mitral Transcatheter

-100 10% 25% 25%

Replacement

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Market Share

Source: HTWR estimates.

275

Cardinal Snapshot

WW Revenue and EBITDA Projections Mitral Tricuspid

Case 2, Cardinal Mitral and Tricuspid

Functional moderate-severe, low-

Patients moderate surgical risk

$700

Revenue Expected EU: 2017 EU: 2018 $600 Commercial Launch US: 2018 US: 2020

EBITDA

Customer Cardiothoracic Surgeons $500 Regulatory 510K

Clinical If required, small study

$400

M Market Surgical Mitral Surgical Tricuspid

$ $300

2020 2025 2030

WW Surgical Repair $200 Procedures 100 160 180

(in thousands) $100 Cardinal’s WW

Mitral Surgical 10% 10% 10%

$0 Market Share

50% of MR patients have moderate-severe TR

-$100 Tricuspid

90% tricuspid surgeries are repairs

Opportunity

Patients receiving Mitral Cardinal

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 eligible for Tricuspid Cardinal

Source: HTWR estimates.

276

Multiple Opportunities for Differentiated Revenue Growth

$700 Revenue $600 EBITDA $500 $400 M $300 $ $200 $100 $0

-$100

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

CE Mark Pre-clinical CE Mark

Transcatheter mitral and Transcatheter mitral Surgical mitral and tricuspid tricuspid repair replacement repair

FMR + FTR moderate and FMR + DMR moderate and FMR + FTR moderate and severe regurgitation, moderate severe regurgitation, moderate severe regurgitation, low and and high surgical risk patients and high surgical risk patients moderate surgical risk patients

~60,000 TMVr patients in 2025; ~70,000 TMVR patients in 2025; ~160,000 treated surgical MR estimated market share of 35% estimated market share of 25% patients in 2025; estimated market share of 10%

Note: Functional Mitral Regurgitation (FMR), Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation (FTR), Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR). Source: HTWR estimates.

277

Cardioband Valve Repair Platform Alone Offers A Substantial Value Creation Opportunity

WW Valtech Revenue Projections

Case 2, No CardioValve $1,200

Valtech Revenue, Potential

Upside if Valves Do Not Meet • Transcatheter repair likely $1,000 Potential plays a larger role in treatment paradigm if transcatheter valves do not $800 Valtech Revenue, no achieve full potential

Cardiovalve $652

M $566 • Cardiovalve mitigates $ $600 replacement therapy class

$487

risk with safer, differentiated $369 design $400

$260

Achieves >10% IRR $200 $158

$119 $71

$10 $27

$0

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Source: HTWR estimates.

278

Cash Management: Steady Cash Improvement Since 2012

$80 CapEx Operating Cash $ M

$70 $65 $60

Usage $50

Cash $40 Current Cash

$30 $25 $24 Position: $249M $20

Historic $10 $4 $0 2012 2013 2014 2015 LTM*

September 2015 through December 2020 Cash Implications ($M)

FCF generation (full year basis) beginning in 2017 Core VAD $82

Ability to flex Portfolio Investment timing as needed

2016-2017 are peak investment periods Valve $(75)

EBITDA positive in 2019, FCF generation starting in 2020 Convertible Debt $(43) Potential to refinance (e.g. bank debt) (‘17)

*Data as of September 30, 2015 Source: HTWR financials.

279

Valtech Transaction Creates A Stronger Better HeartWare

Creating the Most Exciting, High-Growth Player in Cardiovascular Devices

Advances our technology leadership in heart failure

Broad combined platform scales and accelerates long-term revenue growth

Significant margin expansion opportunity

Transaction structure aligns focus on value creation and generates returns in excess of cost of capital

280

HeartWare Today and Tomorrow

Closing

Doug Godshall

President and CEO, HeartWare International

281

HeartWare + Valtech: Creating the Technology Leader in Heart Failure

?MVADSystem will lead a transformation of MCS portfolio and VAD market, picking up where HVAD leaves off?Synergies with disease, customer, referral channel and delivery system will create compounding benefits over next decade?Adjustable repair of MR and TR expected to emerge as first-line option, whether surgical or interventional?Nearer-term commercial opportunity in established surgical and interventional mitral repair market with >$450M in sales?Sophisticated CardioValve design and delivery system to enable HeartWare leadership in mitral replacement?Combined pipeline creates unique opportunity for differentiated value creation

282

Thank You

283

HeartWare® Valtech