Unassociated Document
September
22, 2010
Via
Edgar
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division
of Corporation Finance
100 F
Street N.E.
Washington,
DC 20549
Attn.:
|
Tom
Kluck, Legal Branch Chief
|
|
Re:
|
Florham
Consulting Corp.
|
Amendment
No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed August 31,
2010
Ladies
and Gentlemen:
We are in receipt of the comments of
the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) to
Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Florham Consulting
Corp. (the “Company”) pursuant to
a conversation that took place on September 15, 2010 between the staff and Eric
A. Pinero, Esq. of Hodgson Russ LLP, corporate and securities counsel to the
Company, and have set forth below the Company’s responses.
Business, page
33
We note
your disclosure on page 33 of the Registration Statement which states
“[s]hareholder consents by Kinder and Sanjo approving the name change, share
capital increase and 2009 plan were obtained from affiliates of our company and
the executive officers and directors of our company, and such consents did not
constitute a proxy solicitation.” Please revise this
disclosure to state that this does not constitute a solicitation on behalf of the
Company.
Response:
The
Company has revised the subject disclosure on page 33 of the Registration
Statement to state that Kinder and Sanjo proposed to execute, and on May 19,
2010 entered into, shareholder consents approving the Name Change, Share Capital
Increase and 2009 Plan and such consents did not constitute a solicitation on
behalf of the Company. A copy of these revisions to page 33 is
annexed hereto as Exhibit
A.
Part II, Information Not
Required in this Prospectus
Item 15, Recent Sales of
Unregistered Securities, page 83
We note
your disclosure stating reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for each of the sales of unregistered
securities listed in Item 15. However, we do not see any Form Ds that
have been filed or submitted to the Commission in connection with such sales
that Rule 506 was relied upon. Please file the applicable Form Ds or
explain to us why such filings are not necessary.
Response:
The
Company hereby confirms that the reference to Rule 506 of Regulation D on page
83 of the Registration Statement was intended to refer to the Company’s private
placement which was consummated in March 2007 (as described on page 80 of the
Registration Statement). Pursuant to such private offering, the
Company sold an aggregate of 65,700 shares of common stock to 96 accredited
investors at a purchase price of $1.00 per share for total gross proceeds of
$65,700. On December 5, 2006, the Company submitted 5 copies of a
Form D covering the aforementioned private offering, one of which was manually
signed, to the Commission. This Form D was stamped “received” by the
Commission on December 6, 2006 and appears on EDGAR on said date under the
filing tag “REGDEX”. The Company has provided a copy of this Form D
paper submission to the Commission.
Based
upon the foregoing, the Company will revise its Registration Statement on page
80 to state:
The
exemption from registration relied upon for each of the other sales of
unregistered securities set forth under Item 15. of the Registration Statement
is §4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). No
Form D is required to be filed for private placements made by an issuer under
§4(2) of the Securities Act.
The
unregistered equity securities issued to, without limitation (i) the EII
Securityholders under the Merger Agreement, (ii) the members of Training Direct
under the Interest Purchase Agreement, (iii) management, directors and
consultants pursuant to certain stock option agreements, and (iv) two investors
under the June 30, 2010 bridge loan transaction, were each in transactions not
involving any public offering. No form of public solicitation or general
advertising was utilized by the Company for any of the sales. Each private sale
was to a very limited number of solely accredited investors. Each of such
persons had sufficient knowledge and experience in finance and business matters
to evaluate the risks and merits on their respective investment in the Company,
and were able to bear such investment’s economic risk. In addition,
they had access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus,
including, without limitation, the Company’s filings with the
Commission. Moreover, such persons agreed not to resell or distribute
the applicable securities to the public unless pursuant to an effective
registration statement or an opinion of counsel relying upon an exemption from
the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
Based
upon the foregoing, the Company will revise its Registration Statement on page
83 to state:
“Except as otherwise indicated above,
we believe that all of the offerings and sales were deemed to be exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. No advertising or
general solicitation was employed in offering the securities. The offerings and
sales were made to a limited number of persons, all of whom were accredited
investors, business associates of the Company or executive officers of the
Company, and transfer was restricted by the Company in accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition to representations by
the above-referenced persons, we have made independent determinations that all
of the above-referenced persons were accredited or sophisticated investors, and
that they were capable of analyzing the merits and risks of their investment,
and that they understood the speculative nature of their investment.
Furthermore, all of the above-referenced persons were provided with access to
our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.”
A copy of
the aforementioned revisions to pages 80 and 83 are annexed hereto as Exhibit
B.
* * * * *
The Company hereby acknowledges
that:
|
·
|
the
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
its filings;
|
|
·
|
staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the
filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking
any action with respect to the filings;
and
|
|
·
|
the
Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities
laws of the United States.
|
|
Very
truly yours,
/s/
Joseph J. Bianco
Joseph
J. Bianco
Chairman
and CEO
|
Exhibit
A
BUSINESS
Prior to
the reverse merger, we were a publicly reporting Delaware corporation offering
Internet professional services, including providing our clients with an
integrated set of strategic creative and technology services that enable such
clients to effect and maximize their Internet business. As a result
of the reverse merger, we will carry out the business and operations of the EII
Group.
Introduction
We currently own and operate vocational
training and technical schools. Through our acquisition of Educational Investors
Inc., we have acquired schools that provide vocational education for the
potential employees in the heath care and medical industries. We have also
recently entered into agreements to acquire additional affiliated schools that
provide educational skills in the culinary industry.
The
Reverse Merger and Acquisition of Training Direct
The
Reverse Merger
On December 16, 2009, we executed an
agreement and plan of merger with EII Acquisition Corp. (a newly formed
acquisition subsidiary of Florham), Educational Investors, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (“EII”) and its security holders, Sanjo Squared, LLC, Kinder
Investments, LP, Joseph Bianco and Anil Narang (collectively, the “EII
Securityholders”). Under the terms of the merger agreement, Mergerco was merged
with and into EII, with EII as the surviving corporation of the merger, as a
result of which EII became a wholly-owned subsidiary of our company. In
connection with the merger, the EII Securityholders received (i) an aggregate of
6,000,000 shares of our common stock, (ii) options to acquire 2,558,968
additional shares of our common stock, 50% of which have an initial exercise
price of $0.41 per share and 50% of which have an initial exercise price of
$0.228 per share, subject to certain performance targets set forth in the merger
agreement, and (iii) 250,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, with each
share of Series A Preferred Stock automatically convertible into 49.11333 shares
of common stock upon the filing by us of an amendment to our certificate of
incorporation which increases the authorized shares of our common stock to at
least 50,000,000.
Our Board
of Directors, by written consent dated as of December 23, 2009, approved the
reverse merger and the consummation of the transactions contemplated in the
merger agreement. Prior to the consummation of the reverse merger, on December
23, 2009, David Stahler, our former sole officer and director, solicited
consents from a majority of the then stockholders via electronic mail, facsimile
and telephone seeking approval of the reverse merger and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated in the merger agreement. However, as set
forth below, (a) shareholder approval of the reverse merger consummated in
December 2009 was not required under the laws of the State of Delaware as a
precondition to consummation of such transaction, and (b) as a result we have
amended our information statement to limit the items to approval for
our name change, our share capital increase and our 2009 Stock Incentive
Plan.
The reverse merger was structured as a
“reverse triangular merger” in which we, as a public shell company, formed a
wholly-owned merger subsidiary in the State of Delaware on December 16, 2010
named EII Acquisition Corp. (“Mergerco”). Pursuant to the merger
agreement, Mergerco was merged with and into EII, with EII as the surviving
corporation of the reverse merger. Each of EII and Mergerco were the
“constituent corporations” (as defined in the Delaware General Corporation Law)
to the reverse merger. Pursuant to the merger agreement, we issued
the merger consideration (its common stock and preferred stock) to the
stockholders of EII in the reverse merger. As a result of such merger, EII (as
the surviving entity of the constituent corporations) became our wholly-owned
subsidiary. On December 28, 2009, a Certificate of Merger of Domestic
Corporations was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware,
effective as of December 31, 2009.
Although as set forth above we elected
to obtain consents to the merger from holders of a majority of our then
outstanding shares, neither such consents nor any other shareholder approvals
were required as a pre-condition to the valid consummation of the reverse merger
in December 2009. We were not a constituent corporation to the
reverse merger and neither our existence, certificate of incorporation, or
authorized common stock was affected by the reverse merger of Mergerco with and
into EII. Pursuant to well settled Delaware law, the approval of a
corporation’s shareholders would not be
required as a condition to the valid consummation of a reverse triangular
merger, so long as the shares of common stock and preferred stock issued by us
as consideration for the acquisition of the target company (EII, in our case)
had been previously authorized under our certificate of
incorporation. As we had a sufficient number of authorized shares of
common stock and preferred stock to issue to the EII stockholders in order to
consummate the reverse triangular merger transaction between EII and Mergerco,
our directors had both the statutory and certificate of incorporation authority
to issue such shares for any permissible corporate purpose, such as the EII
acquisition. In substance, Delaware treats reverse triangular merger
transactions in the same manner as though we had issued from our authorized and
previously unissued common stock, additional shares directly to the stockholders
of EII in exchange for 100% of the EII shares.
Approval
of the reverse merger by the stockholders of EII was required and was
obtained. In addition, shareholder approval was required from the
sole stockholder of Mergerco, which in this case was our company. In
such connection, on December 23, 2009, our board of directors approved of the
reverse merger and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby by
unanimous written consent. Based upon the foregoing, since approval of the
Company’s shareholders was not required for the reverse merger, it was
permissible for the reverse merger to be consummated and effective on December
31, 2009.
The closing of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement was subject to a number of conditions
including, without limitation, completion of due diligence, approval of the
merger agreement by the boards of directors of EII and our company and the prior
or simultaneous closing of the acquisition of Training Direct, LLC (as discussed
below). Accordingly, on December 31, 2009, the parties to the merger
agreement deemed all closing conditions to be satisfied and accordingly, the
reverse merger was consummated. As a result of the reverse merger, we believe we
are no longer a shell corporation as that term is defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
On
December 23, 2009 and May 19, 2010 our board of directors, and on May 19, 2010
Kinder Investments, L.P. and Sanjo Squared, LLC, which are shareholders owning
89.5% of our outstanding shares of common stock on May 19, 2010, approved
by written consent: (i) our corporate name change; (ii) the increase in our
authorized shares of common stock; and (iii) our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan for
key employees, directors, consultants and others providing services to us,
pursuant to which up to 1,500,000 shares of common stock shall be authorized for
issuance thereunder. The General Partner of Kinder Investments, L.P. is Nesher,
LLC. The person having voting, dispositive or investment powers over Nesher is
Dov Perlysky, Managing Member. Mr. Perlysky is a member of the Company’s board
of directors and therefore, Kinder is a beneficial owner and affiliate of our
company. The persons sharing voting, dispositive or investment powers over Sanjo
Squared, LLC (50% each) are Joseph J. Bianco and Anil Narang, Managers. Mr.
Bianco is the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of
our company and Mr. Narang is the President, Chief Operating Officer and a
member of the board of directors of our company. Accordingly, Sanjo
is a beneficial owner and affiliate of the Company. Kinder and Sanjo proposed to
execute, and on May 19, 2010 entered into, shareholder consents approving the
name change, share capital increase and 2009 plan, and such consents did not
constitute a solicitation on behalf of our company.
The
determination by our existing board of directors and majority shareholders
(Kinder and Sanjo) in May 2010 to approve our name change to Oak Tree
Educational Partners, Inc., as well as the share capital increase and the 2009
Plan, was made independently of the proposed merger agreement and related
transaction with Culinary Tech Center LLC and Professional Culinary Institute
LLC and its affiliates (the “Culinary Group Acquisition”), and was in no way
related to such proposed Culinary Group Acquisition. In addition, consummation
of such Culinary Group Acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including
our obtaining external financing and the approval of the New York State
Department of Education. Our proposed Culinary Group Acquisition is
described on pages 6 and 35 of this prospectus.
Pursuant
to the terms of the reverse merger, we agreed to cause (i) the shares of our
common stock outstanding prior to the reverse merger; and (ii) up to 930,000
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants expiring on June 30,
2016 at an exercise price of $0.05 per share, to be registered for resale under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as soon as practicable following the
effective time of the reverse merger.
At the
closing of the reverse merger, our sole officer resigned and Joseph Bianco was
appointed as our Chief Executive Officer, Anil Narang was appointed as our
President and Chief Operating Officer, and Kellis Veach was appointed as our
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. In addition, our sole director resigned
and Joseph Bianco, Anil Narang, Dov Perlysky, Howard Spindel and David Cohen
were appointed as our directors, with such resignation and appointments
effective on January 22, 2010, representing the tenth day after mailing our
Schedule 14f-1 Information Statement to our shareholders of record.
Acquisition
of Training Direct
On December 16, 2009, EII entered into
an interest purchase agreement with the members of Training Direct,
and our company, pursuant to which EII acquired all outstanding membership
interests, on a fully diluted basis, of Training Direct in exchange for (a)
$200,000 cash, (b) shares of our common stock having a deemed value
of $600,000 (the “Acquisition Shares”), with such number of
Acquisition Shares to be determined by dividing $600,000 by the “Discounted
VWAP” (as defined below) for the 20 “Trading Days” (as defined below)
immediately following the consummation of the reverse merger, and (c) shares of
our common stock having a deemed value of $300,000 (the “Escrow
Shares”), with such number of Escrow Shares to be determined by dividing
$300,000 by the Discounted VWAP for the 20 Trading Days immediately following
the consummation of the reverse merger. The Escrow Shares will be held in escrow
and released therefrom as provided in the purchase agreement. “Discounted VWAP”
is defined in the purchase agreement as 70% of the “VWAP” of our common stock,
but in no event less than $0.40 per share. “VWAP” is defined in the purchase
agreement as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the product of (i)
the closing trading price for our common stock on the applicable national
securities exchange on each Trading Day of the 20 Trading Days following the
consummation of the reverse merger, and (ii) the volume of our common stock on
the applicable national securities exchange for each such day and the
denominator of which is the total volume of our common stock on the applicable
national securities exchange during such twenty day period, each as reported by
Bloomberg Reporting Service or other recognized market price reporting service.
“Trading Day” is defined in the purchase agreement as any day on which the New
York Stock Exchange or other national securities exchange on which our common
stock trades is open for trading. The Discounted VWAP for the twenty
Trading Days after the effective date of the reverse merger is
$1.67. Accordingly, on March 3, 2010 we issued an aggregate of
359,281 Acquisition Shares and 179,641 Escrow Shares.
33
Exhibit
B
Item
15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
The
following is a list of securities we have sold or issued during the past three
years. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection
with the sale of these securities, except as otherwise noted.
In March 2007, we sold 65,700 shares of
common stock to 96 accredited investors at a purchase price of $1.00 per share
for total proceeds of $65,700. Such sales were made in reliance upon the
exemption provided by Rule 506 of Regulation D, promulgated under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended.
In January 2009, we issued a warrant to
purchase 5,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share to
a consultant for financial advisory services.
On
December 16, 2009, we executed an agreement and plan of merger with EII
Acquisition Corp. (a newly formed acquisition subsidiary of Florham)
(“Mergerco”), EII and its security holders, Sanjo Squared, LLC, Kinder
Investments, LP, Joseph Bianco and Anil Narang (collectively, the “EII
Securityholders”) pursuant to which Mergerco was merged with and into EII, with
EII as the surviving corporation of the merger, as a result of which EII became
a wholly-owned subsidiary of our company. Under the terms of the merger
agreement, the EII Securityholders received (i) an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares
of our common stock, (ii) options to acquire 2,558,968 additional shares of our
common stock, 50% of which have an initial exercise price of $0.50 per share and
50% of which have an initial exercise price of $0.228 per share, subject to
certain performance targets set forth in the merger agreement, and (iii) 250,000
shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, with each share of Series A Preferred
Stock automatically convertible into 49.11333 shares of common stock upon the
filing by us of an amendment to our certificate of incorporation which increases
the authorized shares of our common stock to at least 50,000,000.
In
addition to the merger agreement, on December 16, 2009, EII entered into an
interest purchase agreement with the members of Training Direct, and our
company, pursuant to which EII acquired all outstanding membership interests, on
a fully diluted basis, of Training Direct in exchange for (a) $200,000 cash, (b)
shares of our common stock having a deemed value of $600,000 (the “Acquisition
Shares”), with such number of Acquisition Shares to be determined by dividing
$600,000 by the “Discounted VWAP” (as defined below) for the 20 “Trading Days”
(as defined below) immediately following the consummation of the reverse merger,
and (c) shares of our common stock having a deemed value of $300,000 (the
“Escrow Shares”), with such number of Escrow Shares to be determined by dividing
$300,000 by the Discounted VWAP for the 20 Trading Days immediately following
the consummation of the reverse merger. The Escrow Shares will be held in escrow
and released therefrom as provided in the purchase agreement. “Discounted VWAP”
is defined in the purchase agreement as 70% of the “VWAP” of our common stock,
but in no event less than $0.40 per share. “VWAP” is defined in the purchase
agreement as a fraction, the numerator of which is the sum of the product of (i)
the closing trading price for our common stock on the applicable national
securities exchange on each Trading Day of the 20 Trading Days following the
consummation of the reverse merger, and (ii) the volume of our common stock on
the applicable national securities exchange for each such day and the
denominator of which is the total volume of our common stock on the applicable
national securities exchange during such twenty day period, each as reported by
Bloomberg Reporting Service or other recognized market price reporting service.
“Trading Day” is defined in the purchase agreement as any day on which the New
York Stock Exchange or other national securities exchange on which our common
stock trades is open for trading. The Discounted VWAP for the twenty Trading
Days after the effective date of the reverse merger is
$1.67. Accordingly, on March 3, 2010 we issued an aggregate of
359,281 Acquisition Shares and 179,641 Escrow Shares.
On August 20, 2009, Joseph Bianco
purchased options to purchase 1,166,667 (the “Bianco EII Stock Options”) shares
of EII common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.25 per share with respect
to 583,334 options and $0.45 per share with respect to 583,333 options in
exchange for a $10,000 principal amount promissory note from Mr. Bianco, as
compensation for services performed on behalf of EII in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer.
Under the
merger agreement, the Bianco EII Stock Options were converted into 5-year
options to purchase an aggregate of 1,279,484 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price equal to $0.228 per share with respect to 639,742 options (the
“Bianco Tier I Options”) and $0.41 per share with respect to 639,742 options
(the “Bianco Tier II Options”). The Bianco Tier I Options shall be exercisable
only if the EBTDA Per Share for the applicable measuring period exceeds the Base
Tier I EBTDA Per Share and the Bianco Tier II Options shall be exercisable only
if the EBTDA Per Share for the applicable measuring period exceeds the Base Tier
II EBTDA. The Bianco Tier I and Tier II Options shall be deemed vested as of the
date of grant.
80
Consummation of the Culinary Group
acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including, our obtaining the
requisite financing, approval by the New York State Department of Education of
the change of control of the Culinary Group, and completion of the necessary
audits of the historical financial statements of the Culinary
Group. There can be no assurance that we will be able to consummate
the Culinary Group acquisition or, if consummated, that it will prove to be
beneficial to our company.
On June 1, 2010, holders of our June
2006 warrants to purchase an aggregate of 878,000 shares of our common stock
exercised such warrants on a cashless basis pursuant to which we issued an
aggregate of 862,034 shares to such holders.
On June 30, 2010, we consummated a
private offering with two accredited investors and/or qualified institutional
buyers pursuant to which we sold and issued to the investors (i) an
aggregate of $150,000 of our 13.5% promissory notes due September 30, 2010 (the
“Maturity Date”); and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 70,500 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, subject to certain
adjustments as set forth therein, beginning on June 30, 2010 through June 30,
2015. The notes pay interest at a rate of 13.5% per annum; provided that, in the
event that the principal amount of the notes is not repaid in full on or prior
to the Maturity Date, interest at the rate equal to the lesser of (i) the
maximum legally permitted interest rate, and (ii) 18% per annum, shall accrue on
the balance of any unpaid principal and accrued interest from the Maturity Date
until such balance is paid.
Except as otherwise indicated above, we
believe that all of the offerings and sales were deemed to be exempt under Rule
506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
No advertising or general solicitation was employed in offering the securities.
The offerings and sales were made to a limited number of persons, all of whom
were accredited investors, business associates of the Company or executive
officers of the Company, and transfer was restricted by the Company in
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition to
representations by the above-referenced persons, we have made independent
determinations that all of the above-referenced persons were accredited or
sophisticated investors, and that they were capable of analyzing the merits and
risks of their investment, and that they understood the speculative nature of
their investment. Furthermore, all of the above-referenced persons were provided
with access to our Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
83