10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number 000-53969

SENTIO HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

MARYLAND	20-5721212
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
189 South Orange Avenue, Suite 1700, Orlando, FL	32801
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

407-999-7679

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Sec.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Check one:

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of May 9, 2012, there were 12,874,401 shares of common stock of Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc. outstanding.

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FORM 10-Q

SENTIO HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements:
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December  31, 2011 (unaudited)	1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three months ended March  31, 2012 (unaudited) and 2011 (unaudited)	2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Three months ended March  31, 2012 (unaudited) and 2011 (unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three months ended March  31, 2012 (unaudited) and 2011 (unaudited)	4
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	5
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	29
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	29
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION	30
Item 1A. Risk Factors	30
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	30
Item 5. Other Information	31
Item 6. Exhibits	31
SIGNATURES	33
EX-31
EX-32

SENTIO HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	27,063,000		$	28,258,000
Investments in real estate:
Land		21,270,000			21,270,000
Buildings and improvements, net		113,805,000			114,584,000
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net		2,432,000			2,562,000
Development costs and construction in progress		6,437,000			5,218,000
Intangible lease assets, net		5,054,000			5,581,000
		148,998,000			149,215,000
Deferred financing costs, net		1,109,000			1,121,000
Tenant and other receivables, net		2,073,000			1,808,000
Restricted cash		3,324,000			3,873,000
Deferred costs and other assets		1,988,000			1,948,000
Goodwill		5,965,000			5,965,000
Total assets	$	190,520,000		$	192,188,000
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Notes payable	$	100,931,000		$	100,059,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		6,430,000			7,683,000
Prepaid rent and security deposits		1,775,000			1,740,000
Distributions payable		801,000			814,000
Total liabilities		109,937,000			110,296,000
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Equity:
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized; no shares were issued or outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 580,000,000 shares authorized; 12,883,604 and 12,916,612 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		129,000			129,000
Additional paid-in capital		95,412,000			96,542,000
Accumulated deficit		(17,303,000	)		(17,054,000	)
Total stockholders’ equity		78,238,000			79,617,000
Noncontrolling interests		2,345,000			2,275,000
Total equity		80,583,000			81,892,000
Total liabilities and equity	$	190,520,000		$	192,188,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

1

SENTIO HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Revenues:
Rental revenues	$	8,361,000		$	7,560,000
Resident services and fee income		2,277,000			1,702,000
Tenant reimbursements and other income		465,000			323,000
		11,103,000			9,585,000
Expenses:
Property operating and maintenance expenses		6,604,000			5,688,000
General and administrative expenses		835,000			664,000
Asset management fees and expenses		481,000			431,000
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs		112,000			1,127,000
Depreciation and amortization		1,588,000			1,861,000
		9,620,000			9,771,000
Income/(loss) from operations		1,483,000			(186,000	)
Other income (expense):
Interest income		4,000			4,000
Interest expense		(1,636,000	)		(1,476,000	)
Net loss		(149,000	)		(1,658,000	)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interests		100,000			(65,000	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(249,000	)	$	(1,593,000	)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.13	)
Weighted average number of common shares		12,891,895			12,207,623
Distribution declared, per common share	$	0.06		$	0.19

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

2

SENTIO HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock
	Number of Shares			Common Stock Par Value		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance — December 31, 2011		12,916,612		$	129,000	$	96,542,000		$	(17,054,000	)	$	79,617,000		$	2,275,000		$	81,892,000
Redeemed shares		(33,008	)				(329,000	)					(329,000	)					(329,000	)
Distributions		—			—		(801,000	)		—			(801,000	)		(30,000	)		(831,000	)
Net (loss) income										(249,000	)		(249,000	)		100,000			(149,000	)
Balance — March 31, 2012		12,883,604		$	129,000	$	95,412,000		$	(17,303,000	)	$	78,238,000		$	2,345,000		$	80,583,000

	Common Stock
	Number of Shares			Common Stock Par Value			Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity
Balance — December 31, 2010		11,592,883		$	116,000		$	91,588,000		$	(11,722,000	)	$	79,982,000		$	2,782,000		$	82,764,000
Issuance of common stock		1,278,151			13,000			12,682,000			—			12,695,000			—			12,695,000
Redeemed shares		(43,790	)		(1,000	)		(409,000	)		—			(410,000	)		—			(410,000	)
Offering costs		—			—			(1,539,000	)		—			(1,539,000	)		—			(1.539,000	)
Distributions		—			—			(2,276,000	)		—			(2,276,000	)		(13,000	)		(2,289,000	)
Net (loss)		—			—			—			(1,593,000	)		(1,593,000	)		(65,000	)		(1,658,000	)
Balance — March 31, 2011		12,827,244		$	128,000		$	100,046,000		$	(13,315,000	)	$	86,859,000		$	2,704,000		$	89,563,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

3

SENTIO HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(149,000	)	$	(1,658,000	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Amortization of deferred financing costs		136,000			154,000
Depreciation and amortization		1,588,000			1,861,000
Straight-line rent amortization		(225,000	)		(200,000	)
Real estate earn out costs		110,000			521,000
Bad debt expense		10,000			1,630,000
Change in deferred taxes		(191,000	)		(572,000	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Tenant and other receivables		(49,000	)		34,000
Prepaid expenses and other assets		150,000			(159,000	)
Restricted cash		549,000			264,000
Prepaid rent and tenant security deposits		35,000			276,000
Payable to related parties		—			(38,000	)
Receivable from related parties		—			(1,630,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(420,000	)		1,100,000
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,544,000			1,583,000
Cash flows from investing activities:
Real estate acquisitions		—			(10,750,000	)
Additions to real estate		(153,000	)		(179,000	)
Restricted cash		—			(146,000	)
Development of real estate		(1,173,000	)		(779,000	)
Acquisition deposits		—			(170,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,326,000	)		(12,024,000	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			11,609,000
Redeemed shares		(329,000	)		(410,000	)
Proceeds from notes payable		1,138,000			10,302,000
Repayments of notes payable		(266,000	)		(209,000	)
Offering costs		—			(1,565,000	)
Deferred financing costs		(132,000	)		(50,000	)
Payment of real estate earn out costs		(980,000	)		—
Distributions paid to stockholders		(814,000	)		(1,105,000	)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests		(30,000	)		(13,000	)
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities		(1,413,000	)		18,559,000
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,195,000	)		8,118,000
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period		28,258,000			29,819,000
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period	$	27,063,000		$	37,937,000
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	$	1,557,000		$	1,260,000
Cash paid for income taxes		104,000			—
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
Distributions declared not paid		801,000			807,000
Accrued construction in progress		634,000			—
Distribution reinvested		—			1,086,000
Capitalized interest		—			19,000
Accrued promote monetization liability		—			2,018,000
Deferred financing amortization capitalized to real estate		—			12,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

4

SENTIO HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)

1. Organization

Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc. (formerly known as Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc.), a Maryland corporation, was formed on October 16, 2006 under the Maryland General Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning commercial real estate. As used in this report, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where context otherwise requires. Effective January 1, 2012, subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by Sentio Investments, LLC, a Florida limited liability company that was formed on December 20, 2011 (the Advisor”). Sentio Investments, LLC is a newly formed company controlled by John Mark Ramsey, our Chief Executive Officer and formerly an owner of our prior sub-advisor, Servant Healthcare Investments, LLC. Prior to January 1, 2012, Cornerstone Leveraged Realty Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was formed on October 16, 2006, was our advisor (the “Prior Advisor”).

Sentio Healthcare Properties OP, LP (formerly Cornerstone Healthcare Plus Operating Partnership, L.P)., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), was formed on October 17, 2006. At December 31, 2011, we owned 100% of the interest in the Operating Partnership and the HC Operating Partnership, LP (formerly CGI Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P.), a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership. We anticipate that we will conduct all or a portion of our operations through the Operating Partnership. Our financial statements and the financial statements of the Operating Partnership are consolidated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

For federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008. REIT status imposes limitations related to operating assisted-living properties. Generally, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot directly operate assisted-living facilities. However, such facilities may generally be operated by a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) pursuant to a lease with the Company. Therefore, we have formed Master HC TRS, LLC (“Master TRS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of HC Operating Partnership, LP, to lease any assisted-living properties we acquire and to operate the assisted-living properties pursuant to contracts with unaffiliated management companies. Master TRS and the Company have made the applicable election for Master TRS to qualify as a TRS. Under the management contracts, the management companies will have direct control of the daily operations of these assisted-living properties.

2. Public Offering

Our charter authorizes the issuance of up to 580,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.

On June 20, 2008, we commenced an initial public offering of up to 50,000,000 shares of our common stock, consisting of 40,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to a primary offering and 10,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. We stopped making offers under our initial public offering on February 3, 2011 after raising gross offering proceeds of $123.9 million from the sale of 12.4 million shares, including shares sold under the distribution reinvestment plan.

On February 4, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) declared the registration statement for our follow-on offering effective and we commenced a follow-on offering of up to 55,000,000 shares of our common

5

stock, consisting of 44,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to a primary offering and 11,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. As of March 31, 2012, we had sold a total of 12.7 million shares of our common stock pursuant to our initial and follow-on public offerings for aggregate gross proceeds of $127.0 million.

On April 29, 2011 we informed our stockholders that the Independent Directors Committee of our board of directors had directed us to suspend our follow-on offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. On October 18, 2011, we announced that the Independent Directors Committee had suspended its analysis of strategic alternatives for the Company and concluded that the Company is well positioned as an investment program with a continued focus on healthcare real estate. The Independent Directors Committee identified strategies in its evaluation process that it believes will enhance this position and is implementing operating changes designed to increase portfolio cash flow and increase shareholder value. In particular, the Company will focus on portfolio performance, identifying investment and financing opportunities, implementing operational efficiencies and the potential for growth in the future. As of March 31, 2012, sales pursuant to our follow-on offering remained suspended.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

For more information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates, please refer to “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these estimates on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, and these estimates form the basis for our judgments concerning the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We periodically evaluate these estimates and judgments based on available information and experience. Actual results could differ from our estimates under different assumptions and conditions. If actual results significantly differ from our estimates, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially impacted.

Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity and requires the presentation of components of net income and components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB deferred the requirement to present reclassification adjustments for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income in both net income and other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had no components of other comprehensive income.

Interim Financial Information

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by our management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and note disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying financial information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of our management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012. Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included on our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC.

6

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825-10, “Financial Instruments”, requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). The amendments in this update result in additional fair value measurement and disclosure requirements within U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The impact on the Company’s disclosures was not material.

Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:

Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

Level 2. Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3. Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified according to the lowest level input that is significant to their valuation. A financial instrument that has a significant unobservable input along with significant observable inputs may still be classified as a Level 3 instrument.

We generally determine or calculate the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate information for similar types of instruments and our estimates for non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads, and estimates of future cash flow.

Our balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, tenant and other receivables, restricted cash, security deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, including accrued promote liabilities, distributions payable, and notes payable. With the exception of accrued promote liabilities and notes payable discussed below, we consider the carrying values of our financial instruments to approximate fair value because they generally expose the Company to limited credit risk and because of the short period of time between origination of the financial assets and liabilities and their expected settlement.

Under the fair value hierarchy, cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are classified as Level 1. Tenant and other receivables, security deposits and accounts payable and accrued liabilities (except for the accrued promote liabilities) are classified as Level 2.

The fair market value of notes payable is estimated using lending rates available to us for financial instruments with similar terms and maturities and are classified as Level 2. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of notes payable was $101.6 million and $101.1 million, compared to the carrying values of $100.9 million and $100.0 million, respectively.

The fair value of accrued promote liabilities is estimated using projected operating results and capitalization rates and discount rates that are derived from market data and other inputs from comparable properties and transactions (see Note 5). Accordingly, we consider promote liabilities to be Level 3. For the first quarter of 2012, the additional promote liability amount was a calculated value agreed upon with the partner to whom the payment was made in April 2012. The following is a reconciliation of activity for Level 3 liabilities:

Balance December 31, 2011	$	2,933,000
Total (losses)/gains included in earnings for changes in net assets		(95,000	)
Balance March 31, 2012	$	3,028,000

7

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

4. Investment in Real Estate

The following table provides summary information regarding our current property portfolio.

Property	Location	Date Purchased		Gross Square Feet			Purchase Price			March  31, 2012 Debt		March 31, 2012 %  Occupancy
Caruth Haven Court	Highland Park, TX		01/22/09		74,647		$	20,500,000		$	9,764,000		95	%
The Oaks Bradenton	Bradenton, FL		05/01/09		18,172		$	4,500,000		$	2,687,000		100	%
GreenTree at Westwood (1)	Columbus, IN		12/30/09		50,249		$	5,150,000		$	2,832,000		100	%
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center	San Antonio, TX		12/31/09		55,525		$	13,000,000		$	7,085,000		100	%
Rome LTACH Project	Rome, GA		01/12/10		52,944			(2	)	$	10,861,000		100	%
Oakleaf Village Portfolio
Oakleaf Village at — Lexington	Lexington, SC		04/30/10		67,000		$	14,512,000		$	9,448,000		84	%
Oakleaf Village at — Greenville	Greer, SC		04/30/10		65,000		$	12,488,000		$	8,143,000		72	%
Global Rehab Inpatient Rehab Facility	Dallas, TX		08/19/10		40,828		$	14,800,000		$	7,418,000		100	%
Terrace at Mountain Creek (3)	Chattanooga, TN		09/03/10		109,643		$	8,500,000		$	5,700,000		90	%
Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility	Littleton, CO		12/16/10		26,808	(4)		(5	)	$	4,296,000		—
Carriage Court of Hilliard	Hilliard, OH		12/22/10		69,184		$	17,500,000		$	13,402,000		96	%
Hedgcoxe Health Plaza	Plano, TX		12/22/10		32,109		$	9,094,000		$	5,060,000		100	%
River’s Edge of Yardley	Yardley, PA		12/22/10		26,146		$	4,500,000		$	2,500,000		99	%
Forestview Manor	Meredith, NH		01/14/11		34,270		$	10,750,000		$	5,935,000		98	%
Woodland Terrace	Allentown, PA		04/14/11		50,400		$	9,000,000		$	5,800,000		73	%

⁽¹⁾  The earn-out agreement associated with this acquisition was estimated to have a fair value of $1.0 million as of December 31, 2011 and an earn-out payment of approximately $1.0 million was made in January of 2012. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, expense of $0 and approximately $0.3 million related to the increased earn-out liability associated with the earn-out payment have been included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations under real estate acquisition costs and earn-out costs.

⁽²⁾  Rome LTACH, a development project, was completed in February 2011 and its first tenant moved in on February 1, 2011. As of March 31, 2012 the real estate assets costs for the property were $16.2 million. We are obligated to monetize a portion of our partner’s interest in the appreciation of value in this joint venture. Refer to Note 5 for more information on the project’s promote monetization feature and the purchase of our partners’ interests in this project in April 2012.

⁽³⁾  The earn-out agreement associated with this acquisition was estimated to have a fair value of $1.0 million as of March 31, 2011. During the first quarter of 2011, we received an earn-out request from seller and we made an earn-out payment in the amount of $1.0 million during the second quarter of 2011.

⁽⁴⁾  Represents estimated gross square footage upon completion of development.

⁽⁵⁾  As of March 31, 2012, a total of approximately $1.6 million had been invested in this project.

8

As of March 31, 2012, cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization related to real estate assets and related lease intangibles were as follows:

	Land		Buildings and improvements			Furniture, fixtures and equipment			Development costs and construction in progress		Intangible lease assets
Cost	$	21,270,000	$	119,841,000		$	3,629,000		$	6,437,000	$	12,444,000
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(6,036,000	)		(1,197,000	)		—		(7,390,000	)
Net	$	21,270,000	$	113,805,000		$	2,432,000		$	6,437,000	$	5,054,000

As of December 31, 2011, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to investments in real estate and related lease intangibles were as follows:

	Land		Buildings and improvements			Furniture, fixtures and equipment			Development costs and construction in progress		Intangible lease assets
Cost	$	21,270,000	$	119,739,000		$	3,578,000		$	5,218,000	$	12,444,000
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(5,155,000	)		(1,016,000	)		—		(6,863,000	)
Net	$	21,270,000	$	114,584,000		$	2,562,000		$	5,218,000	$	5,581,000

Depreciation expense associated with buildings and improvements, site improvements and furniture and fixtures for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Amortization associated with the intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Estimated amortization for April 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 and each of the subsequent years is as follows:

	Intangible assets
April 2012 — December 2012	$	823,000
2013	$	416,000
2014	$	356,000
2015	$	356,000
2016	$	355,000
2017	$	354,000
2018 and thereafter	$	2,395,000

The estimated useful lives for intangible assets range from approximately one to twenty years. As of March 31, 2012, the weighted-average amortization period for intangible assets was 12.4 years.

5. Investments in Consolidated Joint Ventures

Oakleaf Joint Venture

On April 30, 2010, we invested approximately $21.6 million to acquire 80% equity interests in Royal Cornerstone South Carolina Portfolio, LLC (“Portfolio LLC”) and Royal Cornerstone South Carolina Tenant Portfolio, LLC (“Tenant LLC”) (collectively, we refer to the Portfolio LLC and the Tenant LLC as the “Oakleaf Joint Venture”). The Oakleaf Joint Venture owns and operates two assisted-living properties located in Lexington and Greenville, South Carolina. As of March 31, 2012, total net assets related to Oakleaf Joint Venture were approximately $8.3 million, which includes approximately $24.0 million of real estate assets and total liabilities were approximately $18.1 million, which includes an approximately $17.6 million of secured mortgage debt. We may be required to fund additional capital contributions, including funding of any capital expenditures deemed necessary to continue to operate the entity, and any operating cash shortfalls that the entity may experience.

9

Rome LTACH Project

On January 12, 2010, we funded an investment in a joint venture with affiliates of The Cirrus Group, an unaffiliated entity, to develop a $16.3 million free-standing medical facility on the campus of the Floyd Medical Center in Rome, Georgia. We contributed approximately $2.7 million of capital to acquire a 75.0% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH Partners, LP (Rome LTH). Cornerstone Private Equity Fund Operating Partnership, LP, an affiliate of our Prior Advisor, contributed approximately $0.5 million of capital to acquire a 15.0% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH. Three affiliates of The Cirrus Group contributed an aggregate of approximately $0.3 million to acquire an aggregate 9.5% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH. A fourth affiliate of the Cirrus Group acts as the general partner and holds the remaining 0.5% interest in the Rome LTH. As of both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we owned a 75.0% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH.

The terms of the Rome LTH operating agreement included provisions obligating us to monetize a portion of our partners’ interest in the appreciation of value in the joint venture property. The obligation was exercisable by our partners at their sole discretion between years two and four of the joint ventures. In February 2011, the construction of the free-standing medical facility on the campus of the Floyd Medical Center in Rome, Georgia was completed. In March 31, 2011, we determined that payments under the promote obligation were probable; accordingly, we recorded approximately $2.2 million with respect to the monetized feature. The amount to be paid upon monetization was based on a number of factors, including the value of the property, net income earned by the property and payment of preferred returns on equity. Of the $2.2 million recorded in the first quarter of 2011, we capitalized approximately $2.0 million which amount is included in the intangible lease assets ($1.8 million) and building and improvements ($0.2 million), and expensed approximately $0.2 million which was included in real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs of our condensed consolidated statement of operations during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

The liability associated with the promote feature is adjusted to estimated fair value as of each reporting period based on an agreed upon property value derived using an income approach primarily utilizing Level 3 inputs. This approach estimates fair value based on estimates of fair value of the property as if the partners’ promote interest was redeemed at each reporting period end and calculated based on the expected promote interest pay-out, which includes estimates for preferred returns, debt repayment and a return of partners’ capital. The fair value of the property includes estimates for expected future cash flows and requires us to estimate, among other things, risk-adjusted rate of return and capitalization rates and the number of years the property would be held for investment from a market participant perspective. Level 3 inputs utilized in the valuation as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 included a capitalization rate of 8.7% and a risk-adjusted rate of return of 10%. A change in any one or more of these factors could materially impact the fair value of the liability. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we estimated the fair value of the redemption feature at $2.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively, based on a property value derived based on the Level 3 inputs described above and agreed upon by the partners.

As of March 31, 2012, total assets related to this project were $16.4 million, which includes $15.5 million of net real estate assets. Total liabilities were $14.1 million at March 31, 2012, which includes $10.9 million of secured mortgage debt.

In December 2011, The Cirrus Group notified us of their intended exercise of the promote monetization provisions of the Rome LTH operating agreement. On April 6, 2012, we entered into an agreement and acquired the interests of Cornerstone Private Equity Fund Operating Partnership, LP in the Rome LTH for $1.1 million. On April 12, 2012, we entered into an agreement and purchased the interests of The Cirrus Group in Rome LTH for $4.1 million, including payment of the promote amount. As of April 12, 2012, we owned 100% of Rome LTH. As a part of these transactions, we refinanced the Rome LTH property (See Note 10). The acquisition of interests was funded by approximately $2.6 million of equity raised in our offerings and $2.6 million of excess refinancing proceeds.

Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility

On December 16, 2010, we funded an investment in a joint venture with affiliates of The Cirrus Group, an unaffiliated entity, to develop a $7.3 million specialty rehabilitation facility in Littleton, CO. We agreed to contribute approximately $1.6 million of capital to acquire a 90.0% limited partnership interest in Littleton Med Partners, LP. Three affiliates of The Cirrus Group contributed an aggregate of approximately $0.2 million to acquire

10

an aggregate 9.5% limited partnership interest in the Littleton Med Partners, LP. A fourth affiliate of the Cirrus Group acts as the general partner and holds the remaining 0.5% interest in the Littleton Med Partners, LP. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we owned a 90.0% of limited partnership interest in Littleton Med Partners, LP.

Under the terms of this joint venture, we may be obligated to monetize a portion of our partners’ interest in the appreciation of value in the joint venture property. These obligations may be exercised by our partners at their sole discretion between years two and four of the joint ventures. The amount that would be paid upon monetization is subject to change based on a number of factors, including the value of the property, net income earned by the property and payment of preferred returns on equities. As of March 31, 2012, the specialty rehabilitation facility in Littleton, CO had not yet completed construction, and we believe that payments under these obligations, while reasonably possible are not probable, accordingly, we have not recognized these obligations in our March 31, 2012 consolidated financial statements. As of the date of this report, the amount of contingent liability with respect to the monetization feature is estimated to range from $0.2 million and $1.1 million.

6. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

As of both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had recorded $85,000 and $76,000, respectively, as allowances for doubtful accounts related to tenants and other receivables.

7. Concentration of Risks

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk are primarily cash investments; cash is generally invested in investment-grade short-term instruments. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” that includes provisions that made permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance and increase the cash limit of Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection from $100,000 to $250,000, and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until January 1, 2013 for non-interest bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions. As of March 31, 2012, we had cash accounts in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. We believe this risk is not significant.

Concentrations of credit risks arise when a number of operators, tenants or obligors related to our investments are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. We regularly monitor various segments of our portfolio to assess potential concentrations of risks. Management believes the current portfolio is reasonably diversified across healthcare related real estate and does not contain any other significant concentration of credit risks, except as disclosed herein.

11

Our senior living operations segment accounted for approximately 83.3% and 83.6% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The following table provides information about our senior living operation segment concentration for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

Operators	Percentage of Segment Revenues			Percentage of Total Revenues
Good Neighbor Care		31.8	%		26.5	%
Royal Senior Care		19.0	%		15.8	%
Woodbine Senior Living		20.8	%		17.4	%
12 Oaks Senior Living		17.9	%		14.9	%
Provision Living		5.5	%		4.6	%
Legend Senior Living		5.0	%		4.1	%
		100.0	%		83.3	%

Our triple-net leased segment accounted for approximately 14.2% and 13.7% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The following table provides information about our triple-net leased segment for the year ended March 31, 2012:

Tenant	Percentage of Segment Revenues			Percentage of Total Revenues
Babcock PM Management		31.6	%		4.5	%
Global Rehab Hospitals		29.1	%		4.1	%
The Specialty Hospital		31.4	%		4.5	%
Floyd Healthcare Management		7.9	%		1.1	%
		100.0	%		14.2	%

Our medical office building segment accounted for approximately 2.5% and 2.7% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

As of March 31, 2012, we owned 15 properties, geographically located in ten states. The following table provides information about our geographic risks by operating segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

State	Percentage of Segment Revenues			Percentage of Total Revenues
Senior living operations
South Carolina		19.0	%		15.8	%
Texas		17.9	%		14.9	%
Ohio		13.0	%		10.9	%
Pennsylvania		17.6	%		14.6	%
New Hampshire		11.3	%		9.4	%
Tennessee		10.8	%		9.0	%
Indiana		5.5	%		4.6	%
Florida		4.9	%		4.1	%
Triple net leased properties
Texas		60.8	%		8.6	%
Georgia		39.2	%		5.6	%
Colorado (1)		0.0	%		0.0	%
Medical office building
Texas		100.0	%		2.5	%

(1) Under construction as of March 31, 2012

12

8. Income Taxes

For federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008, which imposes limitations related to operating assisted-living properties. As of March 31, 2012, we had acquired ten assisted-living facilities and formed ten wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, which includes a Master TRS that consolidates our wholly owned TRSs.

Each TRS is a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would establish a valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

The TRS recognized deferred benefits of a $0.2 million and $0.6 million for Federal and State income taxes in three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively which have been recorded in general and administrative expenses. Realization of a deferred tax benefit is dependent in part upon generating sufficient taxable income in future periods. Net deferred tax assets related to the TRS entities totaled approximately $1.3 million and $1.1 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, related primarily to book and tax basis differences for straight-line rent and accrued liabilities. Realization of these deferred tax assets is dependent in part upon generating sufficient taxable income in future periods. These deferred tax assets are included in deferred costs and other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We have not recorded a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2012 as we have determined the future taxable income from the operations of the TRS entities are sufficient to cover the additional future expenses resulting from these book tax differences.

9. Segment Reporting

As of March 31, 2012, we operated in three reportable business segments: senior living operations, triple-net leased properties, and medical office building (“MOB”) properties. Our senior living operations segment primarily consists of investments in senior housing communities located in the United States for which we engage independent third-party managers. Our triple-net leased properties segment consists of investments in skilled nursing and hospital facilities in the United States. These facilities are leased to healthcare operating companies under long-term “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. Our medical office building operations segment primarily consists of investing in medical office buildings and leasing those properties to healthcare providers under long-term leases, which may require tenants to pay property-related expenses.

We evaluate performance of the combined properties in each segment based on net operating income. Net operating income is defined as total revenue less property operating and maintenance expenses. There are no intersegment sales or transfers. We use net operating income to evaluate the operating performance of our real estate investments and to make decisions concerning the operation of the property. We believe that net operating income is useful to investors in understanding the value of income-producing real estate. Net income is the GAAP measure that is most directly comparable to net operating income; however, net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating performance as it excludes certain items such as depreciation and amortization, asset management fees and expenses, real estate acquisition costs, interest expense and corporate general and administrative expenses. Additionally, net operating income as we define it may not be comparable to net operating income as defined by other REITs or companies.

13

The following tables reconcile the segment activity to consolidated net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

	For the three months ended March 31, 2012
	Senior living operations		Triple-net leased properties		Medical office building		Consolidated
Rental revenues	$	6,826,000	$	1,325,000	$	210,000	$	8,361,000
Resident services and fee income		2,277,000		—		—		2,277,000
Tenant reimbursements and other income		142,000		252,000		71,000		465,000
	$	9,245,000	$	1,577,000	$	281,000	$	11,103,000
Property operating and maintenance expenses		6,304,000		227,000		73,000		6,604,000
Net operating income	$	2,941,000	$	1,350,000	$	208,000	$	4,499,000
General and administrative expenses								835,000
Asset management fees and expenses								481,000
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs								112,000
Depreciation and amortization								1,588,000
Interest income								(4,000	)
Interest expense								1,636,000
Net loss							$	(149,000	)
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests								100,000
Net loss attributable to common stockholders							$	(249,000	)

	For the three months ended March 31, 2011
	Senior living operations		Triple-net leased properties		Medical office building		Consolidated
Rental revenues	$	6,200,000	$	1,159,000	$	201,000	$	7,560,000
Resident services and fee income		1,702,000		—		—		1,702,000
Tenant reimbursements and other income		110,000		158,000		55,000		323,000
	$	8,012,000	$	1,317,000	$	256,000	$	9,585,000
Property operating and maintenance expenses		5,445,000		173,000		70,000		5,688,000
Net operating income	$	2,567,000	$	1,144,000	$	186,000	$	3,897,000
General and administrative expenses								664,000
Asset management fees and expenses								431,000
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs								1,127,000
Depreciation and amortization								1,861,000
Interest income								(4,000	)
Interest expense								1,476,000
Net loss							$	(1,658,000	)
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests								(65,000	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders							$	(1,593,000	)

The following table reconciles the segment activity to consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Assets
Investment in real estate:
Senior living operations	$	91,982,000	$	92,975,000
Triple-net leased properties		48,609,000		47,754,000
Medical office building		8,407,000		8,486,000
Total reportable segments	$	148,998,000	$	149,215,000
Reconciliation to consolidated assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		27,063,000		28,258,000
Deferred financing costs, net		1,109,000		1,121,000
Tenant and other receivables, net		2,073,000		1,808,000
Deferred costs and other assets		1,988,000		1,948,000
Restricted cash		3,324,000		3,873,000
Goodwill		5,965,000		5,965,000
Total assets	$	190,520,000	$	192,188,000

14

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, goodwill had a balance of approximately $6.0 million and $6.0 million, respectively, all related to senior living operations segment.

10. Notes Payable

Notes payable were approximately $101.0 million and $100.0 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, we had fixed and variable rate secured mortgage loans with effective interest rates ranging from 3.45% to 6.50% per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 5.90% per annum. As of March 31, 2012, we had $32.6 million of fixed rate debt, or approximately 32% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 6.01% per annum and $68.3 million of variable rate debt, or approximately 68% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 5.84% per annum. As of December 31, 2011, we had fixed and variable rate secured mortgage loans with effective interest rates ranging from 3.45% to 6.50% per annum and a weighted-average effective interest rate of 5.91% per annum. As of December 31, 2011, we had $32.7 million of fixed rate debt, or 33% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 6.01% per annum and $67.4 million of variable rate debt, or 67% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 5.86% per annum. We are required by the terms of the applicable loan documents to meet certain financial covenants, such as debt service coverage ratios, rent coverage ratios and reporting requirements. As of March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements.

Property Name	Payment Type	Interest Rate	Outstanding Principal Balance as of March 31, 2012(1)		Outstanding Principal Balance as of December 31, 2011(1)		Maturity Date
Carriage Court of Hilliard	Principal and interest at a 35-year amortization rate	5.40% — fixed	$	13,402,000	$	13,440,000		August 1, 2044
Caruth Haven Court	Principal and interest at a 30-year amortization rate	6.43% — fixed	$	9,764,000	$	9,793,000		December 16, 2019
Greentree (4)	Interest only	30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor	$	2,832,000		2,832,000		July 31, 2012
Forestview Manor (4)	Interest only	30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor	$	5,935,000		5,935,000		July 31, 2012
Global Rehab Inpatient Rehab Facility	Principal and interest at a 30-year amortization rate	6.25% — fixed for 3 years; thereafter the greater of 6.25% and 3yr LIBOR +3.25%	$	7,418,000	$	7,441,000		December 22, 2016
Hedgcoxe Health Plaza (4)	Interest only	30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor	$	5,060,000	$	5,060,000		July 31, 2012
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center	Principal and interest at a 20-year amortization rate	6.50% — fixed	$	7,085,000	$	7,136,000		January 5, 2015
Oakleaf Village Portfolio (2)	Principal and interest at a 30-year amortization rate	5.45% plus the greater of 1% or the 3 month LIBOR	$	17,591,000	$	17,644,000		April 30, 2015
River’s Edge of Yardley (4)	Interest only	30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor	$	2,500,000	$	2,500,000		July 31, 2012
Rome LTACH Project (5)	Months 1-24 interest only, Month 25 to maturity, principal and interest at a 25-year amortization rate	1Mo LIBOR +3.00% with a 6.15% floor		$10,861,000	$	10,922,000		December 18, 2012

15

Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility	Months 1-18 interest only. Month 19 to maturity, principal and interest at a 20-year amortization rate	6.0% fixed	$	4,296,000	$	3,159,000	December 22, 2015
The Oaks Bradenton	Months 1-12 interest only. Month 13 to maturity principal and interest at a 25 year amortization rate.	(3)	$	2,687,000	$	2,697,000	May 1, 2014
Terrace at Mountain Creek	Months 1-24 interest only. Month 25 to maturity, principal and interests at a 25-year amortization rate	3Mo LIBOR +3.50% with a 5.5% floor	$	5,700,000	$	5,700,000	September 1, 2013
Woodland Terrace at the Oaks	Months 1-22 interest only. Month 23 to maturity principal and interests at a 25-year amortization rate	3Mo LIBOR +3.75% with a floor of 5.75%	$	5,800,000	$	5,800,000	May 1, 2014
			$	100,931,000	$	100,059,000

(1) As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, all notes payable are secured by the underlying real estate.

(2) The aggregate loan amount is composed of a restatement date balance of approximately $12.9 million outstanding with respect to a prior loan, and an additional amount of approximately $5.1 million disbursed on the closing date.

(3) Of the total loan amount, $2.4 million bears a fixed interest rate of 6.25% per annum. The remaining $0.4 million bears a variable interest rate equivalent to the prevailing market certificate of deposit rate plus a 1.5% margin. Monthly payments for the first twelve months will be interest-only. Monthly payments beginning the thirteenth month will include interest and principal based on a 25-year amortization period.

(4) In November 2010, we entered into an agreement with KeyBank National Association, an unaffiliated financial institution (“KeyBank”), to obtain a $25,000,000 revolving credit facility. The initial term of the credit facility was 24 months, maturing on November 18, 2012, and could be extended by six months subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. The actual amount of credit available under the credit facility was a function of certain loan to cost, loan to value and debt service coverage ratios contained in the credit facility. The amount outstanding under the credit facility was $16.3 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The facility included a financial covenant requiring us to raise at least $20.0 million in our public offering in the six-month period ending June 30, 2011, and to raise an additional $20.0 million in net offering proceeds during each six-month calendar period thereafter. Because we suspended our public offering on April 29, 2011, we were not able to satisfy this covenant; however, effective August 1, 2011, the Company successfully negotiated the terms of a modification to the credit facility. KeyBank agreed to remove the covenant and revise the maturity date to July 31, 2012, which can be extended to October 30, 2012 subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. The credit facility was further modified to limit the outstanding balance to the current balance outstanding, impose additional monthly reporting covenants and require the establishment of tax and insurance impound accounts. The credit facility is secured by first priority liens on our eligible real property assets that make up the borrowing base (as such term is defined) for the credit facility. The interest rate for this credit facility is one-month LIBOR plus a margin of 400 basis points, with a floor of LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The original credit facility required payment of a fee of up to 25 basis points related to unused credit available to us under the credit facility. As a result of the modification, this fee is no longer applicable. We are entitled to prepay the obligations at any time without penalty. Financing fees associated with this modification were insignificant and were incurred primarily during the third quarter of 2011.

16

(5) This loan was refinanced in April 2012 at a fixed rate of 4.5% for a five year term. Interest and principal payments at a 25 year amortization rate are payable monthly.

Principal payments due on our notes payable for April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 and each of the subsequent years is as follows:

Year	Principal amount
April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012	$	27,840,000
2013	$	6,622,000
2014	$	9,227,000
2015	$	28,169,000
2016	$	460,000
2017 and thereafter	$	28,613,000

Interest Expense and Deferred Financing Cost

The following table sets forth our gross interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The capitalized amount is a cost of development and increases the carrying value of construction in progress.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Gross interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization	$	1,760,000		$	1,508,000
Capitalized interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization		(124,000	)		(32,000	)
Interest expense	$	1,636,000		$	1,476,000

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our net deferred financing costs were approximately $1.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. All deferred amortized financing costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the loan agreements.

11. Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

Our charter authorizes the issuance of 580,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. As of March 31, 2012, including distributions reinvested, we had issued approximately 13.3 million shares of common stock for a total of approximately $132.3 million of gross proceeds in our initial and follow-on public offering. As of March 31, 2011, including distributions reinvested, we had issued approximately 13.0 million shares of common stock for total gross proceeds of approximately $129.3 million in our initial public offering and follow-on public offering.

Distributions

We have adopted a distribution reinvestment plan that allows our stockholders to have dividends and other distributions otherwise distributable to them invested in additional shares of our common stock at their election. We have registered 10,000,000 shares of our common stock for sale pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan. The purchase price per share is 95% of the price paid by the purchaser for our common stock, but not less than $9.50 per share. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, approximately 551,000 shares had been issued under the distribution reinvestment plan.

On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our offering, our dividend reinvestment plan and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. As a result, we suspended our distribution reinvestment plan effective as of May 10, 2011.

17

The following are the distributions declared during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Distribution Declared
Period	Cash		Reinvested		Total
First quarter 2011 (1)	$	1,152,000	$	1,124,000	$	2,276,000
First quarter 2012	$	801,000	$	—	$	801,000

(1) Distributions declared represented a return of capital and taxable ordinary income for tax purposes. In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must pay distributions to our stockholders each taxable year equal to at least 90% of our net ordinary taxable income. Some of our distributions have been paid from sources other than operating cash flow, such as offering proceeds. Until proceeds from our offering are fully invested and generating operating cash flow sufficient to fully cover distributions to stockholders, we intend to pay all or a portion of our distributions from the proceeds of our offerings or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow.

The declaration of distributions is at the discretion of our board of directors and our board will determine the amount of distributions on a regular basis. The amount of distributions will depend on our funds from operations, financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. On June 30, 2011, our board of directors resolved to lower our distributions to a current annualized rate of $0.25 per share (2.5% based on a share price of $10.00) from the prior annualized rate of $0.75 per share (7.5% based on a share price of $10.00), effective July 1, 2011 and continuing until and including March 31, 2012. Distributions are paid quarterly commencing with the third quarter distribution paid in October 2011. The rate and frequency of distributions is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and may change from time to time based on our operating results and cash flow.

From our inception in October 2006 through March 31, 2012, we declared aggregate distributions of $15.4 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $17.3 million.

Stock Repurchase Program

We adopted a stock repurchase program for investors who have held their shares for at least one year, unless the shares are being repurchased in connection with a stockholder’s death. Under our stock repurchase program, the repurchase price varies depending on the purchase price paid by the stockholder and the number of years the shares are held. Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the program at any time on 30 days prior notice to stockholders. . Our board of directors may modify our stock repurchase program so that we can repurchase stock using the proceeds from the sale of our real estate investments or other sources, however, we have no obligation to repurchase our stockholders’ shares Our board of directors waived the one-year holding period in the event of the death of a stockholder and adjusted the repurchase price to 100% of such stockholders purchase price if the stockholder held the shares for less than three years. Our board of directors reserves the right in its sole discretion at any time and from time to time, upon 30 days prior notice to our stockholders, to adjust the repurchase price for our shares of stock, or suspend or terminate our stock repurchase program.

On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholder value. As a result, we suspended our stock repurchase program effective as of May 29, 2011. On December 22, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a net asset valuation of $9.02 per share, and revised the share repurchase price upon the death of a shareholder to this amount.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we repurchased shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program as follows:

Period	Total Number of Shares Redeemed		Average Price Paid per Share
January		33,008	$	9.98
February		—	$	—
March		—	$	—
		33,008

18

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we repurchased 43,790 shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we received requests to have an aggregate of 40,008 shares repurchased pursuant to our stock repurchase program. Of these requests 7,000 shares were not able to be repurchased due to the limitations contained in the terms of our stock repurchase program and the suspension of our stock repurchase program as of May 29, 2011.

12. Related Party Transactions

The Company has no employees. Our Advisor is primarily responsible for managing our business affairs and carrying out the policies established by our board of directors. We have an advisory agreement that entitles the Advisor to specified fees upon the provision of certain services to us, as well as reimbursement for organizational and offering costs incurred by the Advisor on our behalf and reimbursement of certain costs and expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing services to us. Effective January 1, 2012, Sentio Investments, LLC became our Advisor under a new advisory agreement (the “2012 Advisory Agreement”). On July 29, 2011, the Company executed the Omnibus Agreement, which provided for a number of significant changes to the Company’s Advisory Agreement with the Prior Advisor (the “2011 Advisory Agreement”). The 2012 Advisory Agreement and the 2011 Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements”.

Advisory Agreements

Under the terms of the 2012 Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to present to us investment opportunities to provide a continuing and suitable investment program consistent with the investment policies and objectives adopted by our board of directors. The 2012 Advisory Agreement calls for the Advisor to provide for our day-to-day management and to retain property managers and leasing agents, subject to the authority of our board of directors, and to perform other duties. The 2011 Advisory Agreement had similar provisions.

The fees and expense reimbursements payable to the Advisor and Prior Advisor (collectively, the “Advisors”) under the 2012 Advisory Agreement and the 2011 Advisory Agreement are described below.

Organizational and Offering Costs. Organizational and offering costs of our offerings paid by the Prior Advisor on our behalf were reimbursed to the Prior Advisor from the proceeds of our offerings. Organizational and offering costs consisted of all expenses (other than sales commissions and the dealer manager fee) to be paid by us in connection with our offerings, including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees, charges of our escrow holder and other accountable offering expenses, including, but not limited to, (i) amounts to reimburse the Advisor for all marketing related costs and expenses such as salaries and direct expenses of employees of the Advisor and its affiliates in connection with registering and marketing our shares; (ii) technology costs associated with the offering of our shares; (iii) our costs of conducting our training and education meetings; (iv) our costs of attending retail seminars conducted by participating broker-dealers; and (v) payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. At times during our offering stage, the amount of organization and offering expenses that we incur, or that the Advisor and its affiliates incur on our behalf, may exceed 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds then raised, but our Advisor is required to reimburse us to the extent that our organization and offering expenses exceed 3.5% of aggregate gross offering proceeds at the conclusion of our offering. In addition, the Advisor will also pay any organization and offering expenses to the extent that such expenses, plus sales commissions and the dealer manager fee (but not the acquisition fees or expenses) are in excess of 13.5% of gross offering proceeds. In no event will we have any obligation to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs totaling in excess of 3.5% of the gross proceeds from our primary offerings. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Prior Advisor and its affiliates had incurred organizational and offering costs totaling approximately $5.1 million, including $0.1 million of organizational costs that have been expensed and $5.0 million of offering costs that reduce net proceeds of our offerings. Of this amount $4.0 million reduced the net proceeds of our initial public offering and $1.0 million reduced the net proceeds of our follow-on offering. Upon the execution of the Omnibus Agreement, we forgave $0.8 million of organization and offering costs in excess of the 3.5% of gross offering proceeds advanced to Prior Advisor pursuant to the 2011 Advisory Agreement. This amount reduced our offering proceeds and has therefore been treated as a reduction in additional paid-in capital in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

19

Acquisition Fees and Expenses. The 2012 Advisory Agreement requires us to pay the Advisor acquisition fees in an amount equal to 1.0% of the investments acquired, including any debt attributable to such investments. In addition, we are required to reimburse the Advisor for direct costs the Advisor incurs and amounts the Advisor pays to third parties in connection with the selection and acquisition of a property, whether or not ultimately acquired. The 2011 Advisory Agreement required us to pay the Prior Advisor acquisition fees in an amount equal to 2.0% of the investments acquired, including any debt attributable to such investments. A portion of the acquisition fees were paid upon receipt of offering proceeds, and the balance were paid at the time we acquired a property. However, if the 2011 Advisory Agreement was terminated or not renewed, the Prior Advisor was obligated to return acquisition fees not yet allocated to one of our investments. In addition, we were required to reimburse the Prior Advisor for direct costs the Prior Advisor incurred and amounts the Prior Advisor paid to third parties in connection with the selection and acquisition of a property, whether or not ultimately acquired. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 the Advisor earned no acquisition fees. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Prior Advisor earned approximately $0.3 million in acquisition fees. As of March 31, 2011, the amount of acquisition fees that had been paid to the Prior Advisor but not allocated to one of our investments was $0.9 million. That amount was expensed and included in real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. Upon the execution of the Omnibus Agreement, we forgave the advance not earned through services rendered in connection with future acquisitions.

Management Fees. The 2012 Advisory Agreement requires us to pay the Advisor a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 1.0% of the greater of the of (i) the average GAAP basis book carrying value of such asset before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of such values at the end of each month during such period (or if such specified period is a single month, then the average of such values during such month), or (ii) an amount determined as follows: (A) if such property, loan, or other permitted investment has been appraised by an independent appraiser within the immediately preceding twelve month period, the appraised value of such property, loan, or other permitted investment, or (B) if such property, loan, or other permitted investment has not been appraised by an independent appraiser within the immediately preceding twelve month period, the estimated fair market value of such property, loan, or other permitted investment, as approved by the Independent Directors Committee. The value of each property, loan, or other permitted investment owned by a joint venture shall be the product of the Company’s pro rata ownership interest in such joint venture, multiplied by the greater of (i) the average GAAP basis book carrying value of such asset before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of such values at the end of each month during such period (or if such specified period is a single month, then the average of such values during such month), or (ii) an amount determined as follows: (A) if such property, loan, or other permitted investment has been appraised by an independent appraiser within the immediately preceding twelve month period, the appraised value of such property, loan, or other permitted Investment, or (B) if such property, loan, or other permitted investment has not been appraised by an independent appraiser within the immediately preceding twelve month period, the estimated fair market value of such property, loan, or other permitted investment, as approved by the Independent Directors Committee. These fees and expenses are in addition to management fees that we expect to pay to third party property managers.

The Prior Advisory Agreement required us to pay the Advisor a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 1.0% of the sum of the aggregate basis in book carrying values of our assets invested, directly or indirectly, in equity interests in and loans secured by real estate before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, we reimbursed the Prior Advisor for the direct and indirect costs and expenses incurred by the Prior Advisor in providing asset management services to us, including personnel and related employment costs related to providing asset management services on our behalf and amounts paid by our Advisor to Servant Investments, LLC and Servant Healthcare Investments, LLC for portfolio management services provided on our behalf. These fees and expenses are in addition to management fees paid to third party property managers.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Advisor earned approximately $0.5 million of management fees, and for the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Prior Advisor earned approximately $0.4 million of management fees. These fees were expensed. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Prior Advisor incurred $172,000 of direct and indirect costs and expenses, which are included in asset management fees and expensed in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

20

Operating Expenses. The 2012 Advisory Agreement does not provide for the reimbursement of the Advisor’s direct or indirect costs of providing administrative services to us. Accordingly, there were no such charges for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The 2011 Advisory Agreement provided for reimbursement of the Prior Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to us. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, approximately $0.4 million of such costs were reimbursed and included in general and administrative expenses on our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Consistent with limitations set forth in our charter, the Advisory Agreements further provide that, commencing four fiscal quarters after the acquisition of our first real estate asset, we shall not reimburse the Advisor at the end of any fiscal quarter management fees and expenses and operating expenses that, in the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended exceed (the “Excess Amount”) the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for such year (the “2%/25% Guidelines”) unless the Independent Directors Committee of our board of directors determines that such excess was justified, based on unusual and nonrecurring factors which it deems sufficient. If the Independent Directors Committee does not approve such excess as being so justified, the advisory agreement requires that any Excess Amount paid to the Advisor during a fiscal quarter shall be repaid to the Company. In addition, our charter provides that, if the Independent Directors Committee does not determine that the Excess Amount is justified, the Advisor shall reimburse us the amount by which the aggregate annual expenses paid to the Advisor during the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended exceed the 2%/25% Guidelines.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, our management fees and expenses and operating expenses exceeded the greater of 2% of our average invested assets and 25% of our net income. For the four quarters ended March 31, 2012, our management fees and expenses and operating expenses totaled $5.7 million. This amount exceeded the greater of 2% of our average invested assets and 25% of our net loss by $2.5 million. Our Independent Directors Committee determined that $2.1 million of the Excess Amount was justified as unusual and non-recurring due to recent exploration of strategic alternatives for the Company and transition to a new advisor. The remaining Excess Amount was forgiven by us through the Omnibus Agreement executed on July 29, 2011.

Disposition Fee. The 2012 Advisory Agreement provides that if the Advisor or an Affiliate provides a substantial amount of the services (as determined by a majority of the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors Committee) in connection with the sale of one or more properties, other than a sale in connection with a transaction in which the Company sells, grants, transfers, conveys or relinquishes its ownership of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, the Advisor or such Affiliate shall receive at the closing of such sale a disposition fee equal to the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the sales price of such property or properties, or (ii) one-half of the Competitive Real Estate Commission for such property. Any disposition fee payable may be paid in addition to real estate commissions paid to non-Affiliates, provided that the total real estate commissions (including such disposition fee) paid to all persons by the Company for each property shall not exceed an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 6.0% of the aggregate contract sales price of each property or (ii) the competitive real estate commission for each property.

Subordinated Participation Provisions. The Advisor is entitled to receive a subordinated participation upon the sale of our properties, listing of our common stock or termination of the Advisor, as follows:

• After we pay stockholders cumulative distributions equal to their invested capital plus a 7% cumulative, non-compounded return, the Advisor will be paid a subordinated participation in net sale or refinancing proceeds of 10%. Following a listing, this fee will no longer be payable.

• Upon termination of the advisory agreement, other than for cause, the Advisor will receive the subordinated performance fee due upon termination in the form of a promissory note bearing simple interest at a rate of 5% per annum, in a principal amount equal to 10% the amount, if any, which the sum of the appraised value of our assets minus our liabilities on the date the advisory agreement is terminated plus total distributions (other than stock distributions) paid prior to termination of the advisory agreement exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 7%, less any prior payment to the Advisor of a subordinated share of cash from sales or refinancing’s.

21

• In the event we list our stock for trading, the Advisor will receive a subordinated incentive listing fee instead of a subordinated participation in net sales proceeds in an amount equal to 10% of the amount by which the market value of our common stock plus all prior distributions (other than stock distributions) exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 7% less any prior payment to the Advisor of a subordinated share of cash from sales or refinancing’s.

Dealer Manager Agreements

Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc. (“PCC”), an affiliate of the Prior Advisor, was the dealer manager for our initial and follow-on public offerings, prior to the suspension of our follow-on offering on April 29, 2011. As such, PCC was entitled to receive a sales commission of up to 7% of gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. PCC is also entitled to receive a dealer manager fee equal to up to 3% of gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. PCC was also entitled to receive a reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses up to 0.5% of the gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. The 2011 Advisory Agreement required the Prior Advisor to reimburse us to the extent that offering expenses including sales commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and offering expenses (but excluding acquisition fees and acquisition expenses discussed above) are in excess of 13.5% of gross proceeds from our primary offerings. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, PCC earned sales commission and dealer manager fee of approximately $1.1 million. Dealer manager fees and sales commissions paid to PCC are a cost of capital raised and, as such, are included as a reduction of additional paid in capital in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

We monitor our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. We are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to the properties that we believe would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.

Our commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these matters are not expected to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, cash flows and results of operations. We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company which if determined unfavorably to us would have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.

14. Business Combinations

On January 14, 2011, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we purchased an assisted-living property, Forestview Manor, from 153 Parade Road, LLC a non-related party, for a purchase price of approximately $10.8 million. The acquisition was funded with our revolving credit facility from KeyBank National Association and with proceeds from our initial public offering.

The following summary provides the allocation of the acquired assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. We have accounted for the acquisition as business combination under U.S. GAAP. Under business combination accounting, the assets and liabilities of the acquired property were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and consolidated in our financial statements. The detail of the purchase price of the acquired property is set forth below:

	Forestview Manor
Land	$	1,320,000
Buildings & improvements		6,803,000
Site improvements		1,040,000
Furniture & fixtures		350,000
Intangible assets		960,000
Goodwill		277,000
Real estate acquisition	$	10,750,000
Acquisition expenses	$	131,000

22

We did not complete any acquisitions during the first quarter of 2012. The following unaudited pro forma information for the three months ended March 31, 2011 has been prepared to reflect the incremental effect of the acquisition as if such acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2011.

	Three months Ended March 31, 2011
Revenues	$	9,783,000
Net Loss	$	(1,594,000	)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders	$	(0.13	)

The Company recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of approximately $0.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to the acquisitions during the first quarter of 2011.

15. Subsequent Events

On April 2, 2012, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we entered into joint venture with affiliates of Caddis Partners, an unaffiliated entity, and a group of unaffiliated physicians to acquire an on-campus medical office building the “Physicans Centers MOB” located in Bryan, Texas.

The Company contributed approximately $2.5 million of capital to acquire a 71.9% limited partnership interest in Bryan MOB Partners, L.P the (“Bryan LP”). Affiliates of Caddis Partners contributed an aggregate of approximately $0.35 million to acquire an aggregate 10.1% limited partnership interest in the Bryan LP and another affiliate of the Caddis Partners acts as the Bryan LP general partner, but does not own a partnership interest. The physician partners contributed approximately $0.625 million to acquire an 18.0% interest in Bryan LP. The Company’s equity investment in the joint venture was funded from proceeds from its public offerings.

The Physicans Centre MOB is a four-story medical office building constructed in 1999 and containing approximately 114,583 rentable square feet on 1.03 acres of land. Occupancy of the property was approximately 69% at acquisition. The aggregate acquisition cost of approximately $11.6 million includes approximately $0.8 million to fund tenant improvement and lease commission reserves to complete leasing of the property. The acquisition cost was funded by approximately $3.5 million of equity contributed by the limited partners of the Bryan LP and approximately $8.1 million of debt.

As further described in Notes 5 and 10 above, in April 2012, we acquired the interest of our partners in the Rome LTH joint venture and refinanced the loan on this property.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. This section contains forward-looking statements, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward —looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the SEC, and the risks identified in Part II, Item 1A of this quarterly report.

23

Our actual future results and trends may differ materially from expectations depending on a variety of factors discussed in our filings with the SEC. These factors include without limitation:

• changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate and healthcare markets specifically;

• legislative and regulatory changes impacting the healthcare industry, including the implementation of the healthcare reform legislation enacted in 2010;

• legislative and regulatory changes impacting real estate investment trusts, or REITs, including their taxation;

• the availability of debt and equity capital;

• changes in interest rates;

• competition in the real estate industry;

• the supply and demand for operating properties in our proposed market areas;

• changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP; and

• the risk factors in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011 and this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

We were incorporated on October 16, 2006 for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning commercial real estate. We intend to invest the net proceeds from our offerings primarily in investment real estate including health care, multi-tenant industrial, net-leased retail properties and other real estate related assets located in major metropolitan markets in the United States. As of March 31, 2012, we had raised approximately $127.0 million of gross proceeds from the sale of approximately 12.7 million shares of our common stock in our initial and follow-on public offerings.

On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our follow-on offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee evaluation of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. One of the alternatives under consideration is the hiring of a new dealer manager for our follow-on offering, however the Independent Directors Committee has made no determination regarding whether or when our follow-on offering may be recommenced.

Our revenues, which are comprised largely of rental income, include rents reported on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Our growth depends, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income and other earned income from leases by increasing rental rates and occupancy levels; (ii) maximize tenant recoveries given the underlying lease structures; and (iii) control operating and other expenses. Our operations are impacted by property specific, market-specific, general economic and other conditions.

Market Outlook — Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets

In recent years, both the national and most global economies have experienced substantially increased unemployment and a downturn in economic activity. Despite certain recent positive economic indicators and improved stock market performance, the aforementioned conditions, combined with low consumer confidence, have resulted in a global recession and continue to contribute to a challenging economic environment that may delay the implementation of our business strategy or force us to modify it.

Despite the economic conditions discussed above, the demand for health care services is projected to continue to grow for the foreseeable future. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services projects that national health

24

expenditures will rise to $3.4 trillion in 2015, or 17.7% of gross domestic product (“GDP”), up from $2 trillion or 15.7% of GDP in 2005. The elderly are an important component of health care utilization, especially independent living services, assisted-living services, skilled nursing services, inpatient and outpatient hospital services and physician ambulatory care. The elderly population aged 65 and over is projected to increase by 76.6% through 2030.

Critical Accounting Policies

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the SEC.

Results of Operations

As of March 31, 2012, we operated in three reportable business segments: senior living operations, triple-net leased properties, and medical office building (“MOB”) properties. Our senior living operations segment invests in and directs the operations of assisted-living, memory care and other senior housing communities located in the United States. We engage independent third party managers to operate these properties. Our triple-net leased properties segment invests in healthcare properties in the United States leased under long-term “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. Our MOB segment invests in medical office buildings and leases those properties to healthcare providers under long-term “full service” leases which may require tenants to reimburse property related expenses to us.

We began accepting subscriptions for shares under our initial public offering on June 20, 2008. We purchased our first senior housing property in January 2009, and as of March 31, 2012, we owned 15 properties. These properties included ten assisted-living facilities which comprise our senior housing segment, one medical office building, which comprises our MOB segment, and three operating healthcare facilities and one development healthcare facility, which comprise our triple-net leased segment. One of the senior living properties, Woodland Terrace, was acquired in April 2011 and one triple net leased healthcare facility, Rome LTACH, began operations during the first quarter of 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we owned 14 properties, including nine senior housing facilities, and one medical office building and one operating healthcare facilities and one development healthcare facility. Accordingly, the results of our first quarter 2012 and 2011 operations are, for the most part, comparable.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

	Three Month Ended March 31,
	2012			2011			$ Change			% Change
Net operating income, as defined (1)
Senior living operations	$	2,941,000		$	2,567,000		$	374,000			15	%
Triple-net leased properties		1,350,000			1,144,000			206,000			18	%
Medical office building		208,000			186,000			22,000			12	%
Total portfolio net operating income	$	4,499,000		$	3,897,000		$	602,000			15	%
Reconciliation to net loss:
Net operating income, as defined (1)	$	4,499,000		$	3,897,000		$	602,000			15	%
Unallocated (expenses) income:
General and administrative expenses		(835,000	)		(664,000	)		171,000			26	%
Asset management fees and expenses		(481,000	)		(431,000	)		50,000			12	%
Real estate acquisitions costs and earn out costs		(112,000	)		(1,127,000	)		(1,015,000	)		90	%
Depreciation and amortization		(1,588,000	)		(1,861,000	)		(273,000	)		15	%
Interest income		4,000			4,000			—			—
Interest expense		(1,636,000	)		(1,476,000	)		160,000			11	%
Net loss	$	(149,000	)	$	(1,658,000	)	$	1,509,000			91	%

(1) Net operating income, a non-GAAP supplemental measure, is defined as total revenue less property operating

25

and maintenance expenses. We use net operating income to evaluate the operating performance of our real estate investments and to make decisions concerning the operation of the property. We believe that net operating income is useful to investors in understanding the value of income-producing real estate. Net income is the GAAP measure that is most directly comparable to net operating income; however, net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating performance as it excludes certain items such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense and corporate general and administrative expenses. Additionally, net operating income as we define it may not be comparable to net operating income as defined by other REITs or companies.

Senior Living Operations

Total revenue for senior living operations includes rental revenue and resident fees and service income. Property operating and maintenance expenses include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other property operating costs. Net operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased to $2.9 million from $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase is primarily due to the acquisition of Woodland Terrace in April 2011 and lower property taxes for Hilliard due to a favorable property tax settlement in 2011.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011		$ Change		% Change
Senior Living Operations — Net operating income
Total revenues
Rental revenue	$	6,826,000	$	6,200,000	$	626,000		10%
Resident services and fee income		2,277,000		1,702,000		575,000		34%
Tenant reimbursement and other income		142,000		110,000		32,000		29%
Less:
Property operating and maintenance expenses		6,304,000		5,445,000		859,000		16%
Total portfolio net operating income	$	2,941,000	$	2,567,000	$	374,000		15%

Triple-Net Leased Properties

Total revenue for triple-net leased properties includes rental revenue and expense reimbursements from tenants. Property operating and maintenance expenses include insurance and property taxes and other operating expenses reimbursed by our tenants. Net operating income increased to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 due to a full quarter of operations for the Rome LTACH property in 2012.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011		$ Change		% Change
Triple-Net Leased Properties — Net operating income
Total revenues
Rental revenue	$	1,325,000	$	1,159,000	$	166,000		14%
Tenant reimbursement and other income		252,000		158,000		94,000		59%
Less:
Property operating and maintenance expenses		227,000		173,000		54,000		31%
Total portfolio net operating income	$	1,350,000	$	1,144,000	$	206,000		18%

26

Medical Office Buildings

Total revenue for medical office buildings includes rental revenue and expense reimbursements from tenants. Property operating and maintenance expenses include utilities, repairs and maintenance, insurance and property taxes. Net operating income was comparable for the three months periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Tenant reimbursement income increased in the 2012 period primarily due to higher property tax expense reimbursed by tenants and expense reimbursements from a new tenant acquired in the fourth quarter of 2011.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012		2011		$ Change		% Change
Medical Office Buildings — Net operating income
Total revenues
Rental revenue	$	210,000	$	201,000	$	9,000		4	%
Tenant reimbursement and other income		71,000		55,000		16,000		29	%
Less:
Property operating and maintenance expenses		73,000		70,000		3,000		4	%
Total portfolio net operating income	$	208,000	$	186,000	$	22,000		12	%

Unallocated (expenses) income

General and administrative expenses increased to $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The increase was principally due to a $0.3 million nonrecurring income tax benefit recognized in 2011 compared to income tax expense of approximately $0.1 million in the first quarter of 2012, higher audit and accounting fees, and expenses associated with the transition to a new advisor, including rebranding the Company, partially offset by the elimination of reimbursement of advisor expenses.

As a result of the change in calculation of asset management fees provided for in the advisory agreement effective January 1, 2012, asset management fees for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 increased to $0.5 million from $0.4 million. Depreciation and amortization for the same periods decreased to $1.6 million from $1.9 million, as a result of lower in-place lease and tenant relationship amortization costs. These costs, which relate to the allocation of property purchase price, were completely amortized in 2011 for several properties.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs were $0.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Real estate acquisition cost in 2012 consisted primarily of costs associated with changes in the Rome LTACH property promote monetization liability, while 2011 real estate acquisition costs consisted of fees paid to the Prior Advisor, acquisition costs paid directly to third-parties, an earn out provision related to GreenTree at Westwood and monetization of the Rome LTACH promote. The higher 2011 acquisition costs was due to higher third party expenses related to transactions closed or in process during the first quarter of 2011, acquisition fees paid related to equity raised in the first quarter of 2011, and estimated amounts to be paid in connection with the Greentree acquisition earn out and the Rome LTACH promote monetization provision. A portion of the acquisition fees due to our Prior Advisor were paid upon receipt of offering proceeds and the balance is paid at the time of investment acquisition.

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 increased to $1.6 million from $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 principally due to higher debt levels associated with the acquisition of Woodland Terrace in April 2011 and a higher average balance outstanding on the Rome LTACH property which was completed during the first quarter of 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with their consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. One of the alternatives under consideration is the hiring of a new dealer manager for our follow-on offering, however the Independent Directors Committee has made no determination regarding whether or when our follow-on offering may be recommenced, if at all. In addition to uncertainties associated with potentially engaging a new dealer manager or advisor and possibly restarting our public offering, financial markets continue to experience volatility and uncertainty. Our ability to fund property acquisitions or development projects, as well as our ability to repay or refinance debt maturities, could be adversely affected by an inability to successfully resume our public offering and to secure financing at reasonable terms, if at all.

We expect that primary sources of capital over the long-term will include net proceeds from the sale of our common stock, debt financing, and net cash flows from operations. We expect that our primary uses of capital will be for

27

property acquisitions, for the payment of tenant improvements, for the payment of operating expenses, including interest expense on any outstanding indebtedness, reducing outstanding indebtedness and for the payment of distributions.

As of March 31, 2012, a total of approximately 12.7 million shares of our common stock had been sold in our initial and follow-on public offerings for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $127.0 million. We intend to own our core plus properties with low to moderate levels of debt financing. We will incur moderate to high levels of indebtedness when acquiring our value-added and opportunistic properties and possibly other real estate investments. The debt levels on core plus properties during the offering period may exceed our long-term target range of debt percentages on these types of properties. However, we intend to reduce the percentage to fall within the 50% to 65% of asset value range no later than the end of our offering stage. To the extent sufficient proceeds from our public offering, debt financing, or a combination of the two are unavailable to repay acquisition debt financing down to the target ranges within a reasonable time as determined by our board of directors, we will endeavor to raise additional equity or sell properties to repay such debt so that we will own our properties with low to moderate levels of permanent financing. In the event that our public offering is not fully sold, our ability to diversify our investments may be diminished.

As of March 31, 2012, we had approximately $27.1 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand. Our liquidity will increase if additional subscriptions for shares are accepted in our follow-on public offering and if refinancing results in excess loan proceeds and decrease as net offering proceeds are expended in connection with the acquisition, operation of properties and distributions made in excess of cash available from operating cash flows.

Two loans, the KeyBank credit facility and the construction loan on the Rome LTACH project, have maturity dates in the second half of 2012. The Rome LTACH loan was refinanced in April 2012 with a loan maturing in 2017. We are pursuing opportunities to refinance the Key Bank loan and other variable rate borrowing at lower borrowing rates to take advantage of favorable interest rates and to repay the KeyBank credit facility. Although the response to our initial refinancing efforts has been positive, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to refinance its obligations at favorable rates or at all. We expect to have sufficient cash available from cash on hand and operations to fund capital improvements and principal payments due on our borrowings in the next twelve months. We expect to fund stockholder distributions from the excess of cash on hand and from the excess of cash provided by operations over required capital improvements and debt payments. This excess may be insufficient to make distributions at the current level or at all.

On November 19, 2010, we entered into an agreement with KeyBank National Association, an unaffiliated financial institution, to obtain a $25.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Facility”). The Facility included a financial covenant requiring us to raise at least $20.0 million in our public offering in the six-month period ending June 30, 2011, and to raise an additional $20.0 million in net offering proceeds during each six-month calendar period thereafter. Because we suspended our public offering on April 29, 2011, we were not able to satisfy this covenant; however, effective August 1, 2011, we successfully negotiated the terms of a modification to the credit facility. The terms of the agreement were amended to convert the Facility from a revolving loan commitment to a term loan and reduced the maximum amount of the commitment from $25.0 million to the current outstanding amount of $16.3 million. The amendment also changed the maturity date of the Facility from November 18, 2012 to July 31, 2012 (subject to one ninety-day extension option). The amendment increased the minimum amount of cash and cash equivalents that the Company must maintain from $5.0 million to $8.0 million, but eliminated the covenant that required the Company to raise equity capital of at least $20.0 million during each calendar six-month period. The interest rate for this Facility is one-month LIBOR plus a margin of 400 basis points, with a floor of 200 basis points for one-month LIBOR. We are entitled to prepay the obligations at any time without penalty. As of March 31, 2012, the Facility had a balance of approximately $16.3 million.

We will not rely on advances from our Advisor to acquire properties but our Advisor and its affiliates may loan funds to special purposes entities that may acquire properties on our behalf pending our raising sufficient proceeds from our offerings to purchase the properties from the special purpose entity.

28

There may be a delay between the sale of our shares and the purchase of properties. During this period, our public offering net offering proceeds will be temporarily invested in short-term, liquid investments that could yield lower returns than investments in real estate.

Potential future sources of capital include proceeds from future equity offerings, proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed funds from operations.

Distributions

Through June 30, 2011, we made cash distributions to our stockholders at an annualized rate of 7.5%, based on a $10.00 per-share purchase price. On June 30, 2011, our board of directors resolved to lower our distributions to a current annualized rate of $0.25 per share (2.5% based on a share price of $10.00). The distribution rate was effective July 1, 2011. This distribution rate is expected to more closely align distributions to funds available from operations. Historically, we have used a portion of the proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures on our real estate investments, tenant improvement costs and leasing costs related to our investments in real estate properties; reserves required by financings of our investments in real estate properties; and the repayment of debt. Because our distribution reinvestment plan was suspended on May 10, 2011, we will no longer have distribution reinvestment plan proceeds available for such general corporate purposes. Because such funds will not be available from the distribution reinvestment plan offering, we may have to use a greater proportion of our cash flow from operations to meet our general cash requirements, which would reduce cash available for distributions.

	Distributions Declared						Cash Flow  from Operations
Period	Cash		Reinvested		Total
First quarter 2011	$	1,152,000	$	1,124,000	$	2,276,000	$	1,583,000
First quarter 2012	$	801,000	$	—	$	801,000	$	1,590,000

From our inception in October 2006 through March 31, 2012, we declared aggregate distributions of $15.4 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $17.3million.

Item  3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. We invest our cash and cash equivalents in government-backed securities and FDIC-insured savings accounts, which, by their nature, are subject to interest rate fluctuations. However, we believe that the primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate risk relating the variable portion of our debt financing. As of March 31, 2012, we had approximately $68.4 million of variable rate debt, the majority of which is at a rate tied to the 3-month LIBOR. A 1.0% change in 3-Month LIBOR would result in a change in annual interest expense of approximately $0.7 million per year. Our interest rate risk management objectives will be to monitor and manage the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows by using certain derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on variable rate debt. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the fair value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations based on changes in the real estate capital markets, market rental rates for healthcare facilities, local, regional and national economic conditions and changes in the credit worthiness of tenants. All of these factors may also affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary.

Item  4. Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in

29

the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item  1A. Risk Factors

The following risk supplements the risks disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

We have paid, and may in the future pay, distributions from sources other than cash provided from operations.

Until proceeds from our offerings are invested and generating operating cash flow sufficient to support distributions to stockholders, we may pay a portion of our distributions from the proceeds of our offerings or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of distributions we can fund from sources other than from operating cash flow. To the extent that we use offering proceeds to fund distributions to stockholders, the amount of cash available for investment in properties will be reduced. For the four quarters ended March 31, 2012, our cash flow from operations was approximately $5.2 million. During that period we paid distributions to investors of approximately $4.5 million, of which approximately $0.0 million was reinvested pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan and approximately $4.5 million was paid to investors in cash.

Item  2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) We did not sell any equity securities that we did not register under the Securities Act of 1933 during the period covered by this Form 10-Q.

(b) On August 10, 2007, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-139704), covering a public offering of up to 40,000,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate offering amount of $400.0 million, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “IPO”). We stopped making offers under our IPO on February 3, 2011 after raising gross offering proceeds of approximately $123.9 million from the sale of approximately 12.4 million shares, including shares sold under the distribution reinvestment plan. On February 4, 2011, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-168013), covering a public offering of up to 55,000,000 shares of our common stock for an aggregate offering amount of $550.0 million, was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Follow-on Offering”). The Follow-on Offering has not terminated yet. As of March 31, 2012, we had sold an aggregate of 12.7 million shares of common stock in our IPO and the Follow-on Offering and raised aggregate gross proceeds of $127.0 million. From this amount, we incurred $12.3 million in selling commissions and dealer manager fees payable to our dealer manager and $4.2 million in acquisition fees payable to the Prior Advisor. As of March 31, 2011, we had also incurred organizational and offering costs related to the IPO and the Follow-on Offering totaling $5.1 million. We had acquired 15 properties including one development project as of March 31, 2012.

30

(c) During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we repurchased shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program as follows:

Period	Total Number of Shares Redeemed		Average Price Paid per Share
January		33,008	$	9.98
February		—	$	—
March		—	$	—
		33,008

Item 5. Other Information

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The annual meeting of stockholders of Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc. was held on May 9, 2012. The matter submitted to the stockholders for a vote was:

1. To elect seven directors to hold office for one-year terms expiring in 2013. The nominees submitted for election as directors were William A. Bloomer, Romeo R. Cefalo, Barry A. Chase, Steven M. Pearson, John Mark Ramsey, Ronald Shuck, and James M. Skorheim.

Voting results

Proposal 1

The following are the voting results (in number of shares) with respect to the election of directors:

Name	For		Withhold
William A. Bloomer		6,574,402		346,010
Romeo R. Cefalo		6,583,620		336,792
Barry A. Chase		6,574,237		346,175
Steven M. Pearson		6,589,732		330,680
John Mark Ramsey		6,577,164		343,248
Ronald Shuck		6,584,396		336,016
James M. Skorheim		6,578,716		341,696

A majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the meeting was required for the election of the directors. As a result, all of the nominees were elected to serve as directors for one-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Item 6. Exhibits

Ex.	Description
3.1	Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant, as amended on December 29, 2009 and January 24, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2012).
3.3	Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of Sentio Healthcare Properties OP, L.P., dated January 25, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed January 25, 2012).

31

4.1	Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Registrant’s prospectus filed on February 7, 2011).
4.2	Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of the Registrant’s shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-139704) filed on June 15, 2007 (“Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2”).
4.3	Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s prospectus filed on February 7, 2011).
10.1	Advisory Agreement dated as of December 22, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s current report on Form 8-K filed December 22, 2011).
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document*
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document*

* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections

32

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this 11th day of May 2012.

SENTIO HEALTHCARE PROPERTIES, INC.
By:	/s/ JOHN MARK RAMSEY
	John Mark Ramsey, President and Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)
By:	/s/ SHARON C. KAISER
	Sharon C. Kaiser, Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

33

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John Mark Ramsey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

	/s/ JOHN MARK RAMSEY
Date: May 11, 2012	John Mark Ramsey
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Sharon C. Kaiser, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

	/s/ SHARON C. KAISER
Date: May 11, 2012	Sharon C. Kaiser
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

John Mark Ramsey does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc.

	/s/ JOHN MARK RAMSEY
Date: May 11, 2012	John Mark Ramsey
	President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Sharon C. Kaiser does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc.

	/s/ SHARON C. KAISER
Date: May 11, 2012	Sharon C. Kaiser
	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

For more information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates, please refer to “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these estimates on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, and these estimates form the basis for our judgments concerning the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We periodically evaluate these estimates and judgments based on available information and experience. Actual results could differ from our estimates under different assumptions and conditions. If actual results significantly differ from our estimates, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially impacted.

Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity and requires the presentation of components of net income and components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB deferred the requirement to present reclassification adjustments for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income in both net income and other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had no components of other comprehensive income.

Interim Financial Information

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by our management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and note disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying financial information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of our management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012. Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included on our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825-10, “Financial Instruments”, requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). The amendments in this update result in additional fair value measurement and disclosure requirements within U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 on January 1, 2012 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. The impact on the Company’s disclosures was not material.

Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:

Level 1. Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

Level 2. Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3. Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified according to the lowest level input that is significant to their valuation. A financial instrument that has a significant unobservable input along with significant observable inputs may still be classified as a Level 3 instrument.

We generally determine or calculate the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate information for similar types of instruments and our estimates for non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads, and estimates of future cash flow.

Our balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, tenant and other receivables, restricted cash, security deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, including accrued promote liabilities, distributions payable, and notes payable. With the exception of accrued promote liabilities and notes payable discussed below, we consider the carrying values of our financial instruments to approximate fair value because they generally expose the Company to limited credit risk and because of the short period of time between origination of the financial assets and liabilities and their expected settlement.

Under the fair value hierarchy, cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are classified as Level 1. Tenant and other receivables, security deposits and accounts payable and accrued liabilities (except for the accrued promote liabilities) are classified as Level 2.

The fair market value of notes payable is estimated using lending rates available to us for financial instruments with similar terms and maturities and are classified as Level 2. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of notes payable was $101.6 million and $101.1 million, compared to the carrying values of $100.9 million and $100.0 million, respectively.

The fair value of accrued promote liabilities is estimated using projected operating results and capitalization rates and discount rates that are derived from market data and other inputs from comparable properties and transactions (see Note 5). Accordingly, we consider promote liabilities to be Level 3. For the first quarter of 2012, the additional promote liability amount was a calculated value agreed upon with the partner to whom the payment was made in April 2012. The following is a reconciliation of activity for Level 3 liabilities:

Balance December 31, 2011	$	2,933,000
Total (losses)/gains included in earnings for changes in net assets		(95,000	)
Balance March 31, 2012	$	3,028,000

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2012.

XML

Public Offering

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Public Offering [Abstract]

Public Offering

2. Public Offering

Our charter authorizes the issuance of up to 580,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.

On June 20, 2008, we commenced an initial public offering of up to 50,000,000 shares of our common stock, consisting of 40,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to a primary offering and 10,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. We stopped making offers under our initial public offering on February 3, 2011 after raising gross offering proceeds of $123.9 million from the sale of 12.4 million shares, including shares sold under the distribution reinvestment plan.

On February 4, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) declared the registration statement for our follow-on offering effective and we commenced a follow-on offering of up to 55,000,000 shares of our common stock, consisting of 44,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to a primary offering and 11,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan. As of March 31, 2012, we had sold a total of 12.7 million shares of our common stock pursuant to our initial and follow-on public offerings for aggregate gross proceeds of $127.0 million.

On April 29, 2011 we informed our stockholders that the Independent Directors Committee of our board of directors had directed us to suspend our follow-on offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. On October 18, 2011, we announced that the Independent Directors Committee had suspended its analysis of strategic alternatives for the Company and concluded that the Company is well positioned as an investment program with a continued focus on healthcare real estate. The Independent Directors Committee identified strategies in its evaluation process that it believes will enhance this position and is implementing operating changes designed to increase portfolio cash flow and increase shareholder value. In particular, the Company will focus on portfolio performance, identifying investment and financing opportunities, implementing operational efficiencies and the potential for growth in the future. As of March 31, 2012, sales pursuant to our follow-on offering remained suspended.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 27,063,000	$ 28,258,000
Investments in real estate:
Land	21,270,000	21,270,000
Buildings and improvements, net	113,805,000	114,584,000
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net	2,432,000	2,562,000
Development costs and construction in progress	6,437,000	5,218,000
Intangible lease assets, net	5,054,000	5,581,000
Total investments in real estate	148,998,000	149,215,000
Deferred financing costs, net	1,109,000	1,121,000
Tenant and other receivables, net	2,073,000	1,808,000
Restricted cash	3,324,000	3,873,000
Deferred costs and other assets	1,988,000	1,948,000
Goodwill	5,965,000	5,965,000
Total assets	190,520,000	192,188,000
Liabilities:
Notes payable	100,931,000	100,059,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	6,430,000	7,683,000
Prepaid rent and security deposits	1,775,000	1,740,000
Distributions payable	801,000	814,000
Total liabilities	109,937,000	110,296,000
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized; no shares were issued or outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 580,000,000 shares authorized; 12,883,604 and 12,916,612 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively	129,000	129,000
Additional paid-in capital	95,412,000	96,542,000
Accumulated deficit	(17,303,000)	(17,054,000)
Total stockholders' equity	78,238,000	79,617,000
Noncontrolling interests	2,345,000	2,275,000
Total equity	80,583,000	81,892,000
Total liabilities and equity	$ 190,520,000	$ 192,188,000

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (149,000)	$ (1,658,000)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Amortization of deferred financing costs	136,000	154,000
Depreciation and amortization	1,588,000	1,861,000
Straight-line rent amortization	(225,000)	(200,000)
Real estate earn out costs	110,000	521,000
Bad debt expense	10,000	1,630,000
Change in deferred taxes	(191,000)	(572,000)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Tenant and other receivables	(49,000)	34,000
Prepaid expenses and other assets	150,000	(159,000)
Restricted cash	549,000	264,000
Prepaid rent and tenant security deposits	35,000	276,000
Payable to related parties		(38,000)
Receivable from related parties		(1,630,000)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(420,000)	1,100,000
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,544,000	1,583,000
Cash flows from investing activities:
Real estate acquisitions		(10,750,000)
Additions to real estate	(153,000)	(179,000)
Restricted cash		(146,000)
Development of real estate	(1,173,000)	(779,000)
Acquisition deposits		(170,000)
Net cash used in investing activities	(1,326,000)	(12,024,000)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		11,609,000
Redeemed shares	(329,000)	(410,000)
Proceeds from notes payable	1,138,000	10,302,000
Repayments of notes payable	(266,000)	(209,000)
Offering costs		(1,565,000)
Deferred financing costs	(132,000)	(50,000)
Payment of real estate earn out costs	(980,000)
Distributions paid to stockholders	(814,000)	(1,105,000)
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests	(30,000)	(13,000)
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities	(1,413,000)	18,559,000
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents	(1,195,000)	8,118,000
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period	28,258,000	29,819,000
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	27,063,000	37,937,000
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	1,557,000	1,260,000
Cash paid for income taxes	104,000
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
Distributions declared not paid	801,000	807,000
Accrued construction in progress	634,000
Distribution reinvested		1,086,000
Capitalized interest		19,000
Accrued promote monetization liability		2,018,000
Deferred financing amortization capitalized to real estate		$ 12,000

XML

Organization

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Organization [Abstract]

Organization

1. Organization

Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc. (formerly known as Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc.), a Maryland corporation, was formed on October 16, 2006 under the Maryland General Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning commercial real estate. As used in this report, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Sentio Healthcare Properties, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where context otherwise requires. Effective January 1, 2012, subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by Sentio Investments, LLC, a Florida limited liability company that was formed on December 20, 2011 (the Advisor”). Sentio Investments, LLC is a newly formed company controlled by John Mark Ramsey, our Chief Executive Officer and formerly an owner of our prior sub-advisor, Servant Healthcare Investments, LLC. Prior to January 1, 2012, Cornerstone Leveraged Realty Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was formed on October 16, 2006, was our advisor (the “Prior Advisor”).

Sentio Healthcare Properties OP, LP (formerly Cornerstone Healthcare Plus Operating Partnership, L.P)., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), was formed on October 17, 2006. At December 31, 2011, we owned 100% of the interest in the Operating Partnership and the HC Operating Partnership, LP (formerly CGI Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P.), a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership. We anticipate that we will conduct all or a portion of our operations through the Operating Partnership. Our financial statements and the financial statements of the Operating Partnership are consolidated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

For federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008. REIT status imposes limitations related to operating assisted-living properties. Generally, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot directly operate assisted-living facilities. However, such facilities may generally be operated by a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) pursuant to a lease with the Company. Therefore, we have formed Master HC TRS, LLC (“Master TRS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of HC Operating Partnership, LP, to lease any assisted-living properties we acquire and to operate the assisted-living properties pursuant to contracts with unaffiliated management companies. Master TRS and the Company have made the applicable election for Master TRS to qualify as a TRS. Under the management contracts, the management companies will have direct control of the daily operations of these assisted-living properties.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Mar. 31, 2012	Dec. 31, 2011
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets [Abstract]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	20,000,000	20,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued
Preferred stock, shares outstanding
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	580,000,000	580,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	12,883,604	12,916,612
Common stock, shares outstanding	12,883,604	12,916,612

XML

Stockholders' Equity

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]

Stockholders' Equity

11. Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

Our charter authorizes the issuance of 580,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. As of March 31, 2012, including distributions reinvested, we had issued approximately 13.3 million shares of common stock for a total of approximately $132.3 million of gross proceeds in our initial and follow-on public offering. As of March 31, 2011, including distributions reinvested, we had issued approximately 13.0 million shares of common stock for total gross proceeds of approximately $129.3 million in our initial public offering and follow-on public offering.

Distributions

We have adopted a distribution reinvestment plan that allows our stockholders to have dividends and other distributions otherwise distributable to them invested in additional shares of our common stock at their election. We have registered 10,000,000 shares of our common stock for sale pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan. The purchase price per share is 95% of the price paid by the purchaser for our common stock, but not less than $9.50 per share. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, approximately 551,000 shares had been issued under the distribution reinvestment plan.

On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our offering, our dividend reinvestment plan and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. As a result, we suspended our distribution reinvestment plan effective as of May 10, 2011.

The following are the distributions declared during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Distribution Declared
Period	Cash		Reinvested		Total
First quarter 2011 (1)	$	1,152,000	$	1,124,000	$	2,276,000
First quarter 2012	$	801,000	$	—	$	801,000

(1) Distributions declared represented a return of capital and taxable ordinary income for tax purposes. In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must pay distributions to our stockholders each taxable year equal to at least 90% of our net ordinary taxable income. Some of our distributions have been paid from sources other than operating cash flow, such as offering proceeds. Until proceeds from our offering are fully invested and generating operating cash flow sufficient to fully cover distributions to stockholders, we intend to pay all or a portion of our distributions from the proceeds of our offerings or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow.

The declaration of distributions is at the discretion of our board of directors and our board will determine the amount of distributions on a regular basis. The amount of distributions will depend on our funds from operations, financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. On June 30, 2011, our board of directors resolved to lower our distributions to a current annualized rate of $0.25 per share (2.5% based on a share price of $10.00) from the prior annualized rate of $0.75 per share (7.5% based on a share price of $10.00), effective July 1, 2011 and continuing until and including March 31, 2012. Distributions are paid quarterly commencing with the third quarter distribution paid in October 2011. The rate and frequency of distributions is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and may change from time to time based on our operating results and cash flow.

From our inception in October 2006 through March 31, 2012, we declared aggregate distributions of $15.4 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $17.3 million.

Stock Repurchase Program

We adopted a stock repurchase program for investors who have held their shares for at least one year, unless the shares are being repurchased in connection with a stockholder’s death. Under our stock repurchase program, the repurchase price varies depending on the purchase price paid by the stockholder and the number of years the shares are held. Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the program at any time on 30 days prior notice to stockholders. . Our board of directors may modify our stock repurchase program so that we can repurchase stock using the proceeds from the sale of our real estate investments or other sources, however, we have no obligation to repurchase our stockholders’ shares Our board of directors waived the one-year holding period in the event of the death of a stockholder and adjusted the repurchase price to 100% of such stockholders purchase price if the stockholder held the shares for less than three years. Our board of directors reserves the right in its sole discretion at any time and from time to time, upon 30 days prior notice to our stockholders, to adjust the repurchase price for our shares of stock, or suspend or terminate our stock repurchase program.

On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholder value. As a result, we suspended our stock repurchase program effective as of May 29, 2011. On December 22, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a net asset valuation of $9.02 per share, and revised the share repurchase price upon the death of a shareholder to this amount.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we repurchased shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program as follows:

Period	Total Number of Shares Redeemed		Average Price Paid per Share
January		33,008	$	9.98
February		—	$	—
March		—	$	—
		33,008

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we repurchased 43,790 shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we received requests to have an aggregate of 40,008 shares repurchased pursuant to our stock repurchase program. Of these requests 7,000 shares were not able to be repurchased due to the limitations contained in the terms of our stock repurchase program and the suspension of our stock repurchase program as of May 29, 2011.

XML

Document and Entity Information	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	May 09, 2012
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Sentio Healthcare Properties Inc
Entity Central Index Key	0001378774
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2012
Amendment Flag	false
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2012
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		12,874,401

XML

Related Party Transactions

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions

12. Related Party Transactions

The Company has no employees. Our Advisor is primarily responsible for managing our business affairs and carrying out the policies established by our board of directors. We have an advisory agreement that entitles the Advisor to specified fees upon the provision of certain services to us, as well as reimbursement for organizational and offering costs incurred by the Advisor on our behalf and reimbursement of certain costs and expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing services to us. Effective January 1, 2012, Sentio Investments, LLC became our Advisor under a new advisory agreement (the “2012 Advisory Agreement”). On July 29, 2011, the Company executed the Omnibus Agreement, which provided for a number of significant changes to the Company’s Advisory Agreement with the Prior Advisor (the “2011 Advisory Agreement”). The 2012 Advisory Agreement and the 2011 Advisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements”.

Advisory Agreements

Under the terms of the 2012 Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to present to us investment opportunities to provide a continuing and suitable investment program consistent with the investment policies and objectives adopted by our board of directors. The 2012 Advisory Agreement calls for the Advisor to provide for our day-to-day management and to retain property managers and leasing agents, subject to the authority of our board of directors, and to perform other duties. The 2011 Advisory Agreement had similar provisions.

The fees and expense reimbursements payable to the Advisor and Prior Advisor (collectively, the “Advisors”) under the 2012 Advisory Agreement and the 2011 Advisory Agreement are described below.

Organizational and Offering Costs. Organizational and offering costs of our offerings paid by the Prior Advisor on our behalf were reimbursed to the Prior Advisor from the proceeds of our offerings. Organizational and offering costs consisted of all expenses (other than sales commissions and the dealer manager fee) to be paid by us in connection with our offerings, including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees, charges of our escrow holder and other accountable offering expenses, including, but not limited to, (i) amounts to reimburse the Advisor for all marketing related costs and expenses such as salaries and direct expenses of employees of the Advisor and its affiliates in connection with registering and marketing our shares; (ii) technology costs associated with the offering of our shares; (iii) our costs of conducting our training and education meetings; (iv) our costs of attending retail seminars conducted by participating broker-dealers; and (v) payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. At times during our offering stage, the amount of organization and offering expenses that we incur, or that the Advisor and its affiliates incur on our behalf, may exceed 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds then raised, but our Advisor is required to reimburse us to the extent that our organization and offering expenses exceed 3.5% of aggregate gross offering proceeds at the conclusion of our offering. In addition, the Advisor will also pay any organization and offering expenses to the extent that such expenses, plus sales commissions and the dealer manager fee (but not the acquisition fees or expenses) are in excess of 13.5% of gross offering proceeds. In no event will we have any obligation to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs totaling in excess of 3.5% of the gross proceeds from our primary offerings. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Prior Advisor and its affiliates had incurred organizational and offering costs totaling approximately $5.1 million, including $0.1 million of organizational costs that have been expensed and $5.0 million of offering costs that reduce net proceeds of our offerings. Of this amount $4.0 million reduced the net proceeds of our initial public offering and $1.0 million reduced the net proceeds of our follow-on offering. Upon the execution of the Omnibus Agreement, we forgave $0.8 million of organization and offering costs in excess of the 3.5% of gross offering proceeds advanced to Prior Advisor pursuant to the 2011 Advisory Agreement. This amount reduced our offering proceeds and has therefore been treated as a reduction in additional paid-in capital in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Acquisition Fees and Expenses. The 2012 Advisory Agreement requires us to pay the Advisor acquisition fees in an amount equal to 1.0% of the investments acquired, including any debt attributable to such investments. In addition, we are required to reimburse the Advisor for direct costs the Advisor incurs and amounts the Advisor pays to third parties in connection with the selection and acquisition of a property, whether or not ultimately acquired. The 2011 Advisory Agreement required us to pay the Prior Advisor acquisition fees in an amount equal to 2.0% of the investments acquired, including any debt attributable to such investments. A portion of the acquisition fees were paid upon receipt of offering proceeds, and the balance were paid at the time we acquired a property. However, if the 2011 Advisory Agreement was terminated or not renewed, the Prior Advisor was obligated to return acquisition fees not yet allocated to one of our investments. In addition, we were required to reimburse the Prior Advisor for direct costs the Prior Advisor incurred and amounts the Prior Advisor paid to third parties in connection with the selection and acquisition of a property, whether or not ultimately acquired. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 the Advisor earned no acquisition fees. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Prior Advisor earned approximately $0.3 million in acquisition fees. As of March 31, 2011, the amount of acquisition fees that had been paid to the Prior Advisor but not allocated to one of our investments was $0.9 million. That amount was expensed and included in real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. Upon the execution of the Omnibus Agreement, we forgave the advance not earned through services rendered in connection with future acquisitions.

Management Fees. The 2012 Advisory Agreement requires us to pay the Advisor a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 1.0% of the greater of the of (i) the average GAAP basis book carrying value of such asset before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of such values at the end of each month during such period (or if such specified period is a single month, then the average of such values during such month), or (ii) an amount determined as follows: (A) if such property, loan, or other permitted investment has been appraised by an independent appraiser within the immediately preceding twelve month period, the appraised value of such property, loan, or other permitted investment, or (B) if such property, loan, or other permitted investment has not been appraised by an independent appraiser within the immediately preceding twelve month period, the estimated fair market value of such property, loan, or other permitted investment, as approved by the Independent Directors Committee. The value of each property, loan, or other permitted investment owned by a joint venture shall be the product of the Company’s pro rata ownership interest in such joint venture, multiplied by the greater of (i) the average GAAP basis book carrying value of such asset before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of such values at the end of each month during such period (or if such specified period is a single month, then the average of such values during such month), or (ii) an amount determined as follows: (A) if such property, loan, or other permitted investment has been appraised by an independent appraiser within the immediately preceding twelve month period, the appraised value of such property, loan, or other permitted Investment, or (B) if such property, loan, or other permitted investment has not been appraised by an independent appraiser within the immediately preceding twelve month period, the estimated fair market value of such property, loan, or other permitted investment, as approved by the Independent Directors Committee. These fees and expenses are in addition to management fees that we expect to pay to third party property managers.

The Prior Advisory Agreement required us to pay the Advisor a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 1.0% of the sum of the aggregate basis in book carrying values of our assets invested, directly or indirectly, in equity interests in and loans secured by real estate before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, we reimbursed the Prior Advisor for the direct and indirect costs and expenses incurred by the Prior Advisor in providing asset management services to us, including personnel and related employment costs related to providing asset management services on our behalf and amounts paid by our Advisor to Servant Investments, LLC and Servant Healthcare Investments, LLC for portfolio management services provided on our behalf. These fees and expenses are in addition to management fees paid to third party property managers.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Advisor earned approximately $0.5 million of management fees, and for the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Prior Advisor earned approximately $0.4 million of management fees. These fees were expensed. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Prior Advisor incurred $172,000 of direct and indirect costs and expenses, which are included in asset management fees and expensed in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Operating Expenses. The 2012 Advisory Agreement does not provide for the reimbursement of the Advisor’s direct or indirect costs of providing administrative services to us. Accordingly, there were no such charges for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The 2011 Advisory Agreement provided for reimbursement of the Prior Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to us. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, approximately $0.4 million of such costs were reimbursed and included in general and administrative expenses on our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Consistent with limitations set forth in our charter, the Advisory Agreements further provide that, commencing four fiscal quarters after the acquisition of our first real estate asset, we shall not reimburse the Advisor at the end of any fiscal quarter management fees and expenses and operating expenses that, in the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended exceed (the “Excess Amount”) the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for such year (the “2%/25% Guidelines”) unless the Independent Directors Committee of our board of directors determines that such excess was justified, based on unusual and nonrecurring factors which it deems sufficient. If the Independent Directors Committee does not approve such excess as being so justified, the advisory agreement requires that any Excess Amount paid to the Advisor during a fiscal quarter shall be repaid to the Company. In addition, our charter provides that, if the Independent Directors Committee does not determine that the Excess Amount is justified, the Advisor shall reimburse us the amount by which the aggregate annual expenses paid to the Advisor during the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended exceed the 2%/25% Guidelines.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, our management fees and expenses and operating expenses exceeded the greater of 2% of our average invested assets and 25% of our net income. For the four quarters ended March 31, 2012, our management fees and expenses and operating expenses totaled $5.7 million. This amount exceeded the greater of 2% of our average invested assets and 25% of our net loss by $2.5 million. Our Independent Directors Committee determined that $2.1 million of the Excess Amount was justified as unusual and non-recurring due to recent exploration of strategic alternatives for the Company and transition to a new advisor. The remaining Excess Amount was forgiven by us through the Omnibus Agreement executed on July 29, 2011.

Disposition Fee. The 2012 Advisory Agreement provides that if the Advisor or an Affiliate provides a substantial amount of the services (as determined by a majority of the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Directors Committee) in connection with the sale of one or more properties, other than a sale in connection with a transaction in which the Company sells, grants, transfers, conveys or relinquishes its ownership of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, the Advisor or such Affiliate shall receive at the closing of such sale a disposition fee equal to the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the sales price of such property or properties, or (ii) one-half of the Competitive Real Estate Commission for such property. Any disposition fee payable may be paid in addition to real estate commissions paid to non-Affiliates, provided that the total real estate commissions (including such disposition fee) paid to all persons by the Company for each property shall not exceed an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 6.0% of the aggregate contract sales price of each property or (ii) the competitive real estate commission for each property.

Subordinated Participation Provisions. The Advisor is entitled to receive a subordinated participation upon the sale of our properties, listing of our common stock or termination of the Advisor, as follows:

• After we pay stockholders cumulative distributions equal to their invested capital plus a 7% cumulative, non-compounded return, the Advisor will be paid a subordinated participation in net sale or refinancing proceeds of 10%. Following a listing, this fee will no longer be payable.

• Upon termination of the advisory agreement, other than for cause, the Advisor will receive the subordinated performance fee due upon termination in the form of a promissory note bearing simple interest at a rate of 5% per annum, in a principal amount equal to 10% the amount, if any, which the sum of the appraised value of our assets minus our liabilities on the date the advisory agreement is terminated plus total distributions (other than stock distributions) paid prior to termination of the advisory agreement exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 7%, less any prior payment to the Advisor of a subordinated share of cash from sales or refinancing’s.

• In the event we list our stock for trading, the Advisor will receive a subordinated incentive listing fee instead of a subordinated participation in net sales proceeds in an amount equal to 10% of the amount by which the market value of our common stock plus all prior distributions (other than stock distributions) exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 7% less any prior payment to the Advisor of a subordinated share of cash from sales or refinancing’s.

Dealer Manager Agreements

Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc. (“PCC”), an affiliate of the Prior Advisor, was the dealer manager for our initial and follow-on public offerings, prior to the suspension of our follow-on offering on April 29, 2011. As such, PCC was entitled to receive a sales commission of up to 7% of gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. PCC is also entitled to receive a dealer manager fee equal to up to 3% of gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. PCC was also entitled to receive a reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses up to 0.5% of the gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. The 2011 Advisory Agreement required the Prior Advisor to reimburse us to the extent that offering expenses including sales commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and offering expenses (but excluding acquisition fees and acquisition expenses discussed above) are in excess of 13.5% of gross proceeds from our primary offerings. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, PCC earned sales commission and dealer manager fee of approximately $1.1 million. Dealer manager fees and sales commissions paid to PCC are a cost of capital raised and, as such, are included as a reduction of additional paid in capital in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2012	Mar. 31, 2011
Revenues:
Rental revenues	$ 8,361,000	$ 7,560,000
Resident services and fee income	2,277,000	1,702,000
Tenant reimbursements and other income	465,000	323,000
Total revenues	11,103,000	9,585,000
Expenses:
Property operating and maintenance expenses	6,604,000	5,688,000
General and administrative expenses	835,000	664,000
Asset management fees and expenses	481,000	431,000
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs	112,000	1,127,000
Depreciation and amortization	1,588,000	1,861,000
Total expenses	9,620,000	9,771,000
Income/(loss) from operations	1,483,000	(186,000)
Other income (expense):
Interest income	4,000	4,000
Interest expense	(1,636,000)	(1,476,000)
Net loss	(149,000)	(1,658,000)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interests	100,000	(65,000)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$ (249,000)	$ (1,593,000)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders	$ (0.02)	$ (0.13)
Weighted average number of common shares	12,891,895	12,207,623
Distribution declared, per common share	$ 0.06	$ 0.19

XML

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts [Abstract]

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

6. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

As of both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had recorded $85,000 and $76,000, respectively, as allowances for doubtful accounts related to tenants and other receivables.

XML

Investments in Consolidated Joint Ventures

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Investments in Consolidated Joint Ventures [Abstract]

Investments in Consolidated Joint Ventures

5. Investments in Consolidated Joint Ventures

Oakleaf Joint Venture

On April 30, 2010, we invested approximately $21.6 million to acquire 80% equity interests in Royal Cornerstone South Carolina Portfolio, LLC (“Portfolio LLC”) and Royal Cornerstone South Carolina Tenant Portfolio, LLC (“Tenant LLC”) (collectively, we refer to the Portfolio LLC and the Tenant LLC as the “Oakleaf Joint Venture”). The Oakleaf Joint Venture owns and operates two assisted-living properties located in Lexington and Greenville, South Carolina. As of March 31, 2012, total net assets related to Oakleaf Joint Venture were approximately $8.3 million, which includes approximately $24.0 million of real estate assets and total liabilities were approximately $18.1 million, which includes an approximately $17.6 million of secured mortgage debt. We may be required to fund additional capital contributions, including funding of any capital expenditures deemed necessary to continue to operate the entity, and any operating cash shortfalls that the entity may experience.

Rome LTACH Project

On January 12, 2010, we funded an investment in a joint venture with affiliates of The Cirrus Group, an unaffiliated entity, to develop a $16.3 million free-standing medical facility on the campus of the Floyd Medical Center in Rome, Georgia. We contributed approximately $2.7 million of capital to acquire a 75.0% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH Partners, LP (Rome LTH). Cornerstone Private Equity Fund Operating Partnership, LP, an affiliate of our Prior Advisor, contributed approximately $0.5 million of capital to acquire a 15.0% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH. Three affiliates of The Cirrus Group contributed an aggregate of approximately $0.3 million to acquire an aggregate 9.5% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH. A fourth affiliate of the Cirrus Group acts as the general partner and holds the remaining 0.5% interest in the Rome LTH. As of both March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we owned a 75.0% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH.

The terms of the Rome LTH operating agreement included provisions obligating us to monetize a portion of our partners’ interest in the appreciation of value in the joint venture property. The obligation was exercisable by our partners at their sole discretion between years two and four of the joint ventures. In February 2011, the construction of the free-standing medical facility on the campus of the Floyd Medical Center in Rome, Georgia was completed. In March 31, 2011, we determined that payments under the promote obligation were probable; accordingly, we recorded approximately $2.2 million with respect to the monetized feature. The amount to be paid upon monetization was based on a number of factors, including the value of the property, net income earned by the property and payment of preferred returns on equity. Of the $2.2 million recorded in the first quarter of 2011, we capitalized approximately $2.0 million which amount is included in the intangible lease assets ($1.8 million) and building and improvements ($0.2 million), and expensed approximately $0.2 million which was included in real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs of our condensed consolidated statement of operations during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.

The liability associated with the promote feature is adjusted to estimated fair value as of each reporting period based on an agreed upon property value derived using an income approach primarily utilizing Level 3 inputs. This approach estimates fair value based on estimates of fair value of the property as if the partners’ promote interest was redeemed at each reporting period end and calculated based on the expected promote interest pay-out, which includes estimates for preferred returns, debt repayment and a return of partners’ capital. The fair value of the property includes estimates for expected future cash flows and requires us to estimate, among other things, risk-adjusted rate of return and capitalization rates and the number of years the property would be held for investment from a market participant perspective. Level 3 inputs utilized in the valuation as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 included a capitalization rate of 8.7% and a risk-adjusted rate of return of 10%. A change in any one or more of these factors could materially impact the fair value of the liability. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we estimated the fair value of the redemption feature at $2.5 million and $2.4 million, respectively, based on a property value derived based on the Level 3 inputs described above and agreed upon by the partners.

As of March 31, 2012, total assets related to this project were $16.4 million, which includes $15.5 million of net real estate assets. Total liabilities were $14.1 million at March 31, 2012, which includes $10.9 million of secured mortgage debt.

In December 2011, The Cirrus Group notified us of their intended exercise of the promote monetization provisions of the Rome LTH operating agreement. On April 6, 2012, we entered into an agreement and acquired the interests of Cornerstone Private Equity Fund Operating Partnership, LP in the Rome LTH for $1.1 million. On April 12, 2012, we entered into an agreement and purchased the interests of The Cirrus Group in Rome LTH for $4.1 million, including payment of the promote amount. As of April 12, 2012, we owned 100% of Rome LTH. As a part of these transactions, we refinanced the Rome LTH property (See Note 10). The acquisition of interests was funded by approximately $2.6 million of equity raised in our offerings and $2.6 million of excess refinancing proceeds.

Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility

On December 16, 2010, we funded an investment in a joint venture with affiliates of The Cirrus Group, an unaffiliated entity, to develop a $7.3 million specialty rehabilitation facility in Littleton, CO. We agreed to contribute approximately $1.6 million of capital to acquire a 90.0% limited partnership interest in Littleton Med Partners, LP. Three affiliates of The Cirrus Group contributed an aggregate of approximately $0.2 million to acquire an aggregate 9.5% limited partnership interest in the Littleton Med Partners, LP. A fourth affiliate of the Cirrus Group acts as the general partner and holds the remaining 0.5% interest in the Littleton Med Partners, LP. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we owned a 90.0% of limited partnership interest in Littleton Med Partners, LP.

Under the terms of this joint venture, we may be obligated to monetize a portion of our partners’ interest in the appreciation of value in the joint venture property. These obligations may be exercised by our partners at their sole discretion between years two and four of the joint ventures. The amount that would be paid upon monetization is subject to change based on a number of factors, including the value of the property, net income earned by the property and payment of preferred returns on equities. As of March 31, 2012, the specialty rehabilitation facility in Littleton, CO had not yet completed construction, and we believe that payments under these obligations, while reasonably possible are not probable, accordingly, we have not recognized these obligations in our March 31, 2012 consolidated financial statements. As of the date of this report, the amount of contingent liability with respect to the monetization feature is estimated to range from $0.2 million and $1.1 million.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

13. Commitments and Contingencies

We monitor our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. We are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to the properties that we believe would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.

Our commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these matters are not expected to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, cash flows and results of operations. We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company which if determined unfavorably to us would have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.

XML

Segment Reporting

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Segment Reporting [Abstract]

Segment Reporting

9. Segment Reporting

As of March 31, 2012, we operated in three reportable business segments: senior living operations, triple-net leased properties, and medical office building (“MOB”) properties. Our senior living operations segment primarily consists of investments in senior housing communities located in the United States for which we engage independent third-party managers. Our triple-net leased properties segment consists of investments in skilled nursing and hospital facilities in the United States. These facilities are leased to healthcare operating companies under long-term “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. Our medical office building operations segment primarily consists of investing in medical office buildings and leasing those properties to healthcare providers under long-term leases, which may require tenants to pay property-related expenses.

We evaluate performance of the combined properties in each segment based on net operating income. Net operating income is defined as total revenue less property operating and maintenance expenses. There are no intersegment sales or transfers. We use net operating income to evaluate the operating performance of our real estate investments and to make decisions concerning the operation of the property. We believe that net operating income is useful to investors in understanding the value of income-producing real estate. Net income is the GAAP measure that is most directly comparable to net operating income; however, net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating performance as it excludes certain items such as depreciation and amortization, asset management fees and expenses, real estate acquisition costs, interest expense and corporate general and administrative expenses. Additionally, net operating income as we define it may not be comparable to net operating income as defined by other REITs or companies.

The following tables reconcile the segment activity to consolidated net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

	For the three months ended March 31, 2012
	Senior living operations		Triple-net leased properties		Medical office building		Consolidated
Rental revenues	$	6,826,000	$	1,325,000	$	210,000	$	8,361,000
Resident services and fee income		2,277,000		—		—		2,277,000
Tenant reimbursements and other income		142,000		252,000		71,000		465,000
	$	9,245,000	$	1,577,000	$	281,000	$	11,103,000
Property operating and maintenance expenses		6,304,000		227,000		73,000		6,604,000
Net operating income	$	2,941,000	$	1,350,000	$	208,000	$	4,499,000
General and administrative expenses								835,000
Asset management fees and expenses								481,000
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs								112,000
Depreciation and amortization								1,588,000
Interest income								(4,000	)
Interest expense								1,636,000
Net loss							$	(149,000	)
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests								100,000
Net loss attributable to common stockholders							$	(249,000	)

	For the three months ended March 31, 2011
	Senior living operations		Triple-net leased properties		Medical office building		Consolidated
Rental revenues	$	6,200,000	$	1,159,000	$	201,000	$	7,560,000
Resident services and fee income		1,702,000		—		—		1,702,000
Tenant reimbursements and other income		110,000		158,000		55,000		323,000
	$	8,012,000	$	1,317,000	$	256,000	$	9,585,000
Property operating and maintenance expenses		5,445,000		173,000		70,000		5,688,000
Net operating income	$	2,567,000	$	1,144,000	$	186,000	$	3,897,000
General and administrative expenses								664,000
Asset management fees and expenses								431,000
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs								1,127,000
Depreciation and amortization								1,861,000
Interest income								(4,000	)
Interest expense								1,476,000
Net loss							$	(1,658,000	)
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests								(65,000	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders							$	(1,593,000	)

The following table reconciles the segment activity to consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

	March 31, 2012		December 31, 2011
Assets
Investment in real estate:
Senior living operations	$	91,982,000	$	92,975,000
Triple-net leased properties		48,609,000		47,754,000
Medical office building		8,407,000		8,486,000
Total reportable segments	$	148,998,000	$	149,215,000
Reconciliation to consolidated assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		27,063,000		28,258,000
Deferred financing costs, net		1,109,000		1,121,000
Tenant and other receivables, net		2,073,000		1,808,000
Deferred costs and other assets		1,988,000		1,948,000
Restricted cash		3,324,000		3,873,000
Goodwill		5,965,000		5,965,000
Total assets	$	190,520,000	$	192,188,000

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, goodwill had a balance of approximately $6.0 million and $6.0 million, respectively, all related to senior living operations segment.

XML

Concentration of Risks

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Concentration of Risks [Abstract]

Concentration of Risks

7. Concentration of Risks

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk are primarily cash investments; cash is generally invested in investment-grade short-term instruments. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” that includes provisions that made permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance and increase the cash limit of Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection from $100,000 to $250,000, and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until January 1, 2013 for non-interest bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions. As of March 31, 2012, we had cash accounts in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. We believe this risk is not significant.

Concentrations of credit risks arise when a number of operators, tenants or obligors related to our investments are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. We regularly monitor various segments of our portfolio to assess potential concentrations of risks. Management believes the current portfolio is reasonably diversified across healthcare related real estate and does not contain any other significant concentration of credit risks, except as disclosed herein.

Our senior living operations segment accounted for approximately 83.3% and 83.6% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The following table provides information about our senior living operation segment concentration for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

Operators	Percentage of Segment Revenues			Percentage of Total Revenues
Good Neighbor Care		31.8	%		26.5	%
Royal Senior Care		19.0	%		15.8	%
Woodbine Senior Living		20.8	%		17.4	%
12 Oaks Senior Living		17.9	%		14.9	%
Provision Living		5.5	%		4.6	%
Legend Senior Living		5.0	%		4.1	%
		100.0	%		83.3	%

Our triple-net leased segment accounted for approximately 14.2% and 13.7% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The following table provides information about our triple-net leased segment for the year ended March 31, 2012:

Tenant	Percentage of Segment Revenues			Percentage of Total Revenues
Babcock PM Management		31.6	%		4.5	%
Global Rehab Hospitals		29.1	%		4.1	%
The Specialty Hospital		31.4	%		4.5	%
Floyd Healthcare Management		7.9	%		1.1	%
		100.0	%		14.2	%

Our medical office building segment accounted for approximately 2.5% and 2.7% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

As of March 31, 2012, we owned 15 properties, geographically located in ten states. The following table provides information about our geographic risks by operating segment for the three months ended March 31, 2012:

State	Percentage of Segment Revenues			Percentage of Total Revenues
Senior living operations
South Carolina		19.0	%		15.8	%
Texas		17.9	%		14.9	%
Ohio		13.0	%		10.9	%
Pennsylvania		17.6	%		14.6	%
New Hampshire		11.3	%		9.4	%
Tennessee		10.8	%		9.0	%
Indiana		5.5	%		4.6	%
Florida		4.9	%		4.1	%
Triple net leased properties
Texas		60.8	%		8.6	%
Georgia		39.2	%		5.6	%
Colorado (1)		0.0	%		0.0	%
Medical office building
Texas		100.0	%		2.5	%

(1) Under construction as of March 31, 2012

XML

Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

8. Income Taxes

For federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008, which imposes limitations related to operating assisted-living properties. As of March 31, 2012, we had acquired ten assisted-living facilities and formed ten wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, which includes a Master TRS that consolidates our wholly owned TRSs.

Each TRS is a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would establish a valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.

The TRS recognized deferred benefits of a $0.2 million and $0.6 million for Federal and State income taxes in three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively which have been recorded in general and administrative expenses. Realization of a deferred tax benefit is dependent in part upon generating sufficient taxable income in future periods. Net deferred tax assets related to the TRS entities totaled approximately $1.3 million and $1.1 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, related primarily to book and tax basis differences for straight-line rent and accrued liabilities. Realization of these deferred tax assets is dependent in part upon generating sufficient taxable income in future periods. These deferred tax assets are included in deferred costs and other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We have not recorded a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2012 as we have determined the future taxable income from the operations of the TRS entities are sufficient to cover the additional future expenses resulting from these book tax differences.

XML

Notes Payable

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Notes Payable [Abstract]

Notes Payable

10. Notes Payable

Notes payable were approximately $101.0 million and $100.0 million as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2012, we had fixed and variable rate secured mortgage loans with effective interest rates ranging from 3.45% to 6.50% per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 5.90% per annum. As of March 31, 2012, we had $32.6 million of fixed rate debt, or approximately 32% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 6.01% per annum and $68.3 million of variable rate debt, or approximately 68% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 5.84% per annum. As of December 31, 2011, we had fixed and variable rate secured mortgage loans with effective interest rates ranging from 3.45% to 6.50% per annum and a weighted-average effective interest rate of 5.91% per annum. As of December 31, 2011, we had $32.7 million of fixed rate debt, or 33% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 6.01% per annum and $67.4 million of variable rate debt, or 67% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 5.86% per annum. We are required by the terms of the applicable loan documents to meet certain financial covenants, such as debt service coverage ratios, rent coverage ratios and reporting requirements. As of March 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements.

Property Name	Payment Type	Interest Rate	Outstanding Principal Balance as of March 31, 2012(1)		Outstanding Principal Balance as of December 31, 2011(1)		Maturity Date
Carriage Court of Hilliard	Principal and interest at a 35-year amortization rate	5.40% — fixed	$	13,402,000	$	13,440,000		August 1, 2044
Caruth Haven Court	Principal and interest at a 30-year amortization rate	6.43% — fixed	$	9,764,000	$	9,793,000		December 16, 2019
Greentree (4)	Interest only	30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor	$	2,832,000		2,832,000		July 31, 2012
Forestview Manor (4)	Interest only	30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor	$	5,935,000		5,935,000		July 31, 2012
Global Rehab Inpatient Rehab Facility	Principal and interest at a 30-year amortization rate	6.25% — fixed for 3 years; thereafter the greater of 6.25% and 3yr LIBOR +3.25%	$	7,418,000	$	7,441,000		December 22, 2016
Hedgcoxe Health Plaza (4)	Interest only	30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor	$	5,060,000	$	5,060,000		July 31, 2012
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center	Principal and interest at a 20-year amortization rate	6.50% — fixed	$	7,085,000	$	7,136,000		January 5, 2015
Oakleaf Village Portfolio (2)	Principal and interest at a 30-year amortization rate	5.45% plus the greater of 1% or the 3 month LIBOR	$	17,591,000	$	17,644,000		April 30, 2015
River’s Edge of Yardley (4)	Interest only	30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor	$	2,500,000	$	2,500,000		July 31, 2012
Rome LTACH Project (5)	Months 1-24 interest only, Month 25 to maturity, principal and interest at a 25-year amortization rate	1Mo LIBOR +3.00% with a 6.15% floor		$10,861,000	$	10,922,000		December 18, 2012
Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility	Months 1-18 interest only. Month 19 to maturity, principal and interest at a 20-year amortization rate	6.0% fixed	$	4,296,000	$	3,159,000		December 22, 2015
The Oaks Bradenton	Months 1-12 interest only. Month 13 to maturity principal and interest at a 25 year amortization rate.	(3)	$	2,687,000	$	2,697,000		May 1, 2014
Terrace at Mountain Creek	Months 1-24 interest only. Month 25 to maturity, principal and interests at a 25-year amortization rate	3Mo LIBOR +3.50% with a 5.5% floor	$	5,700,000	$	5,700,000		September 1, 2013
Woodland Terrace at the Oaks	Months 1-22 interest only. Month 23 to maturity principal and interests at a 25-year amortization rate	3Mo LIBOR +3.75% with a floor of 5.75%	$	5,800,000	$	5,800,000		May 1, 2014
			$	100,931,000	$	100,059,000

(1) As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, all notes payable are secured by the underlying real estate.

(2) The aggregate loan amount is composed of a restatement date balance of approximately $12.9 million outstanding with respect to a prior loan, and an additional amount of approximately $5.1 million disbursed on the closing date.

(3) Of the total loan amount, $2.4 million bears a fixed interest rate of 6.25% per annum. The remaining $0.4 million bears a variable interest rate equivalent to the prevailing market certificate of deposit rate plus a 1.5% margin. Monthly payments for the first twelve months will be interest-only. Monthly payments beginning the thirteenth month will include interest and principal based on a 25-year amortization period.

(4) In November 2010, we entered into an agreement with KeyBank National Association, an unaffiliated financial institution (“KeyBank”), to obtain a $25,000,000 revolving credit facility. The initial term of the credit facility was 24 months, maturing on November 18, 2012, and could be extended by six months subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. The actual amount of credit available under the credit facility was a function of certain loan to cost, loan to value and debt service coverage ratios contained in the credit facility. The amount outstanding under the credit facility was $16.3 million at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The facility included a financial covenant requiring us to raise at least $20.0 million in our public offering in the six-month period ending June 30, 2011, and to raise an additional $20.0 million in net offering proceeds during each six-month calendar period thereafter. Because we suspended our public offering on April 29, 2011, we were not able to satisfy this covenant; however, effective August 1, 2011, the Company successfully negotiated the terms of a modification to the credit facility. KeyBank agreed to remove the covenant and revise the maturity date to July 31, 2012, which can be extended to October 30, 2012 subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. The credit facility was further modified to limit the outstanding balance to the current balance outstanding, impose additional monthly reporting covenants and require the establishment of tax and insurance impound accounts. The credit facility is secured by first priority liens on our eligible real property assets that make up the borrowing base (as such term is defined) for the credit facility. The interest rate for this credit facility is one-month LIBOR plus a margin of 400 basis points, with a floor of LIBOR plus 200 basis points. The original credit facility required payment of a fee of up to 25 basis points related to unused credit available to us under the credit facility. As a result of the modification, this fee is no longer applicable. We are entitled to prepay the obligations at any time without penalty. Financing fees associated with this modification were insignificant and were incurred primarily during the third quarter of 2011.

(5) This loan was refinanced in April 2012 at a fixed rate of 4.5% for a five year term. Interest and principal payments at a 25 year amortization rate are payable monthly.

Principal payments due on our notes payable for April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 and each of the subsequent years is as follows:

Year	Principal amount
April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012	$	27,840,000
2013	$	6,622,000
2014	$	9,227,000
2015	$	28,169,000
2016	$	460,000
2017 and thereafter	$	28,613,000

Interest Expense and Deferred Financing Cost

The following table sets forth our gross interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The capitalized amount is a cost of development and increases the carrying value of construction in progress.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Gross interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization	$	1,760,000		$	1,508,000
Capitalized interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization		(124,000	)		(32,000	)
Interest expense	$	1,636,000		$	1,476,000

As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our net deferred financing costs were approximately $1.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively. All deferred amortized financing costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the loan agreements.

XML

Subsequent Events

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

15. Subsequent Events

On April 2, 2012, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we entered into joint venture with affiliates of Caddis Partners, an unaffiliated entity, and a group of unaffiliated physicians to acquire an on-campus medical office building the “Physicans Centers MOB” located in Bryan, Texas.

The Company contributed approximately $2.5 million of capital to acquire a 71.9% limited partnership interest in Bryan MOB Partners, L.P the (“Bryan LP”). Affiliates of Caddis Partners contributed an aggregate of approximately $0.35 million to acquire an aggregate 10.1% limited partnership interest in the Bryan LP and another affiliate of the Caddis Partners acts as the Bryan LP general partner, but does not own a partnership interest. The physician partners contributed approximately $0.625 million to acquire an 18.0% interest in Bryan LP. The Company’s equity investment in the joint venture was funded from proceeds from its public offerings.

The Physicans Centre MOB is a four-story medical office building constructed in 1999 and containing approximately 114,583 rentable square feet on 1.03 acres of land. Occupancy of the property was approximately 69% at acquisition. The aggregate acquisition cost of approximately $11.6 million includes approximately $0.8 million to fund tenant improvement and lease commission reserves to complete leasing of the property. The acquisition cost was funded by approximately $3.5 million of equity contributed by the limited partners of the Bryan LP and approximately $8.1 million of debt.

As further described in Notes 5 and 10 above, in April 2012, we acquired the interest of our partners in the Rome LTH joint venture and refinanced the loan on this property.

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity (Unaudited) (USD $)	Total	Common Stock	Common Stock, Additional Paid-In Capital	Common Stock, Accumulated Deficit	Common Stock, Total Stockholders' Equity	Noncontrolling Interests
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2010	$ 82,764,000	$ 116,000	$ 91,588,000	$ (11,722,000)	$ 79,982,000	$ 2,782,000
Beginning balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2010		11,592,883
Issuance of common stock, shares		1,278,151
Issuance of common stock	12,695,000	13,000	12,682,000		12,695,000
Redeemed shares, shares		(43,790)
Redeemed shares	(410,000)	(1,000)	(409,000)		(410,000)
Offering costs	(1,539,000)		(1,539,000)		(1,539,000)
Distributions	(2,289,000)		(2,276,000)		(2,276,000)	(13,000)
Net (loss) income	(1,658,000)			(1,593,000)	(1,593,000)	(65,000)
Ending balance at Mar. 31, 2011	89,563,000	128,000	100,046,000	(13,315,000)	86,859,000	2,704,000
Ending balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2011		12,827,244
Beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2011	81,892,000	129,000	96,542,000	(17,054,000)	79,617,000	2,275,000
Beginning balance, shares at Dec. 31, 2011		12,916,612
Redeemed shares, shares		(33,008)
Redeemed shares	(329,000)		(329,000)		(329,000)
Distributions	(831,000)		(801,000)		(801,000)	(30,000)
Net (loss) income	(149,000)			(249,000)	(249,000)	100,000
Ending balance at Mar. 31, 2012	$ 80,583,000	$ 129,000	$ 95,412,000	$ (17,303,000)	$ 78,238,000	$ 2,345,000
Ending balance, shares at Mar. 31, 2012		12,883,604

XML

Investment in Real Estate

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Investment in Real Estate [Abstract]

Investment in Real Estate

4. Investment in Real Estate

The following table provides summary information regarding our current property portfolio.

Property	Location	Date Purchased		Gross Square Feet			Purchase Price			March  31, 2012 Debt		March 31, 2012 %  Occupancy
Caruth Haven Court	Highland Park, TX		01/22/09		74,647		$	20,500,000		$	9,764,000		95	%
The Oaks Bradenton	Bradenton, FL		05/01/09		18,172		$	4,500,000		$	2,687,000		100	%
GreenTree at Westwood (1)	Columbus, IN		12/30/09		50,249		$	5,150,000		$	2,832,000		100	%
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center	San Antonio, TX		12/31/09		55,525		$	13,000,000		$	7,085,000		100	%
Rome LTACH Project	Rome, GA		01/12/10		52,944			(2	)	$	10,861,000		100	%
Oakleaf Village Portfolio
Oakleaf Village at — Lexington	Lexington, SC		04/30/10		67,000		$	14,512,000		$	9,448,000		84	%
Oakleaf Village at — Greenville	Greer, SC		04/30/10		65,000		$	12,488,000		$	8,143,000		72	%
Global Rehab Inpatient Rehab Facility	Dallas, TX		08/19/10		40,828		$	14,800,000		$	7,418,000		100	%
Terrace at Mountain Creek (3)	Chattanooga, TN		09/03/10		109,643		$	8,500,000		$	5,700,000		90	%
Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility	Littleton, CO		12/16/10		26,808	(4)		(5	)	$	4,296,000		—
Carriage Court of Hilliard	Hilliard, OH		12/22/10		69,184		$	17,500,000		$	13,402,000		96	%
Hedgcoxe Health Plaza	Plano, TX		12/22/10		32,109		$	9,094,000		$	5,060,000		100	%
River’s Edge of Yardley	Yardley, PA		12/22/10		26,146		$	4,500,000		$	2,500,000		99	%
Forestview Manor	Meredith, NH		01/14/11		34,270		$	10,750,000		$	5,935,000		98	%
Woodland Terrace	Allentown, PA		04/14/11		50,400		$	9,000,000		$	5,800,000		73	%

⁽¹⁾  The earn-out agreement associated with this acquisition was estimated to have a fair value of $1.0 million as of December 31, 2011 and an earn-out payment of approximately $1.0 million was made in January of 2012. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, expense of $0 and approximately $0.3 million related to the increased earn-out liability associated with the earn-out payment have been included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations under real estate acquisition costs and earn-out costs.

⁽²⁾  Rome LTACH, a development project, was completed in February 2011 and its first tenant moved in on February 1, 2011. As of March 31, 2012 the real estate assets costs for the property were $16.2 million. We are obligated to monetize a portion of our partner’s interest in the appreciation of value in this joint venture. Refer to Note 5 for more information on the project’s promote monetization feature and the purchase of our partners’ interests in this project in April 2012.

⁽³⁾  The earn-out agreement associated with this acquisition was estimated to have a fair value of $1.0 million as of March 31, 2011. During the first quarter of 2011, we received an earn-out request from seller and we made an earn-out payment in the amount of $1.0 million during the second quarter of 2011.

⁽⁴⁾  Represents estimated gross square footage upon completion of development.

⁽⁵⁾  As of March 31, 2012, a total of approximately $1.6 million had been invested in this project.

As of March 31, 2012, cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization related to real estate assets and related lease intangibles were as follows:

	Land		Buildings and improvements			Furniture, fixtures and equipment			Development costs and construction in progress		Intangible lease assets
Cost	$	21,270,000	$	119,841,000		$	3,629,000		$	6,437,000	$	12,444,000
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(6,036,000	)		(1,197,000	)		—		(7,390,000	)
Net	$	21,270,000	$	113,805,000		$	2,432,000		$	6,437,000	$	5,054,000

As of December 31, 2011, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to investments in real estate and related lease intangibles were as follows:

	Land		Buildings and improvements			Furniture, fixtures and equipment			Development costs and construction in progress		Intangible lease assets
Cost	$	21,270,000	$	119,739,000		$	3,578,000		$	5,218,000	$	12,444,000
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		—		(5,155,000	)		(1,016,000	)		—		(6,863,000	)
Net	$	21,270,000	$	114,584,000		$	2,562,000		$	5,218,000	$	5,581,000

Depreciation expense associated with buildings and improvements, site improvements and furniture and fixtures for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Amortization associated with the intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was $0.6 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Estimated amortization for April 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 and each of the subsequent years is as follows:

	Intangible assets
April 2012 — December 2012	$	823,000
2013	$	416,000
2014	$	356,000
2015	$	356,000
2016	$	355,000
2017	$	354,000
2018 and thereafter	$	2,395,000

The estimated useful lives for intangible assets range from approximately one to twenty years. As of March 31, 2012, the weighted-average amortization period for intangible assets was 12.4 years.

XML

Business Combinations

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2012

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Business Combinations

14. Business Combinations

On January 14, 2011, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we purchased an assisted-living property, Forestview Manor, from 153 Parade Road, LLC a non-related party, for a purchase price of approximately $10.8 million. The acquisition was funded with our revolving credit facility from KeyBank National Association and with proceeds from our initial public offering.

The following summary provides the allocation of the acquired assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. We have accounted for the acquisition as business combination under U.S. GAAP. Under business combination accounting, the assets and liabilities of the acquired property were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and consolidated in our financial statements. The detail of the purchase price of the acquired property is set forth below:

	Forestview Manor
Land	$	1,320,000
Buildings & improvements		6,803,000
Site improvements		1,040,000
Furniture & fixtures		350,000
Intangible assets		960,000
Goodwill		277,000
Real estate acquisition	$	10,750,000
Acquisition expenses	$	131,000

We did not complete any acquisitions during the first quarter of 2012. The following unaudited pro forma information for the three months ended March 31, 2011 has been prepared to reflect the incremental effect of the acquisition as if such acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2011.

	Three months Ended March 31, 2011
Revenues	$	9,783,000
Net Loss	$	(1,594,000	)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders	$	(0.13	)

The Company recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of approximately $0.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to the acquisitions during the first quarter of 2011.