XML 25 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Significant accounting policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Significant accounting policies  
Significant accounting policies
2.         Significant accounting policies
 
Please see the Company's 10-K filing for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 for a description of all significant accounting policies.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 605-10-S99, “Revenue Recognition”.
 
Sales revenue is recognized when the products are shipped. Advance payments received for products are recorded as deferred revenue and are generally recognized when the product is shipped. The Company reduces sales revenue for estimated customer returns and other allowances. The Company recorded $17,268 and $22,481 for net sales returns provisions for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.   For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, there were net sales returns provisions of $20,749 and $24,449, respectively.

Net loss per share
 
Basic net loss per common share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted net loss per common share is typically computed using the weighted-average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares from stock options, warrants and convertible debt using the treasury stock method.
 
For all periods presented, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share, as the inclusion of equivalent shares from outstanding common stock options, warrants and convertible debt would be anti-dilutive.
 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share:
 
   
Three months ended June 30,
  
Six months ended June 30,
 
   
2011
  
2010
  
2011
  
2010
 
Net loss
 $(2,503,505) $(2,696,569) $(5,851,067) $(5,838,654)
Denominator for basic earnings per share - weighted average shares
  71,819,017   60,635,877   71,098,976   55,918,851 
Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options and warrants outstanding and convertible debt (a)
  -   -   -   - 
                  
Denominator for diluted earnings per share - weighted average shares adjusted for dilutive securities
  71,819,017   60,635,877   71,098,976   55,918,851 
                  
Loss per common share - basic and diluted
 $(0.03) $(0.04) $(0.08) $(0.10)
 
 
(a)
Securities outstanding that were excluded from the computation, because they would have been anti-dilutive are as follows:
 
   
June 30, 2011
  
June 30, 2010
 
Outstanding Stock Options
  10,434,667   7,935,650 
Outstanding Warrants
  8,023,917   4,426,185 
Convertible line of credit with related party
  1,300,000   - 
Convertible Debt, promissory note
  1,250,000   - 
    21,008,584   12,361,835 
 
Goodwill
 
The Company accounts for goodwill under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (ASC 350). Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject to impairment tests on an annual basis or at an interim date if certain events or circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The most recent annual test as of December 31, 2010, indicated that goodwill was not impaired. There were no indicators of impairment as of June 30, 2011.

Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
 
In December 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-28: Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts (Topic 350).  The amendments to the Codification in this update modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. Goodwill of a reporting unit is required to be tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This update is effective starting in the first quarter of 2011 with early adoption not permitted.  Adoption of this update had no impact on our financial statements.
 
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29: Business Combinations: Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (Topic 805).  The amendments to the Codification in this ASU apply to any public entity that enters into business combination that are material on an individual or aggregate basis and specify that the entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The update also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The update is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning in January 2011 with early adoption permitted. We adopted this update for the acquisition completed in 2011. 
 
Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
 
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The amendments to the Codification in this ASU will require companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. It eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The standard does not change the items which must be reported in other comprehensive income, how such items are measured or when they must be reclassified to net income. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Because this ASU impacts presentation only, it will have no effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
 
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  The amendments to the Codification in this ASU will provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements.  This guidance is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2012.  Its adoption is not expected to significantly impact the Company's consolidated financial statements.