EX-5.1 4 d384151dex51.htm OPINION OF LATHAM & WATKINS LLP <![CDATA[Opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP]]>

Exhibit 5.1

 

 

12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400

San Diego, California 92130-2071

Tel: +1.858.523.5400  Fax: +1.858.523.5450

www.lw.com

 

  FIRM /AFFILIATE OFFICES

LOGO

 

July 24, 2012

 

Zogenix, Inc.

12400 High Bluff Drive, Suite 650

San Diego, California 92130

 

Abu Dhabi

Barcelona

Beijing

Boston

Brussels

Chicago

Doha

Dubai

Frankfurt

Hamburg

Hong Kong

Houston

London

Los Angeles

Madrid

Milan

 

Moscow

Munich

New Jersey

New York

Orange County

Paris

Riyadh

Rome

San Diego

San Francisco

Shanghai

Silicon Valley

Singapore

Tokyo

Washington, D.C.

 

  Re: Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-179337); 37,375,000 units consisting of one share of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and one warrant to purchase 0.45 of a share of Common Stock

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have acted as special counsel to Zogenix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), in connection with the proposed issuance of 37,375,000 units (including up to 4,875,000 units subject to the underwriters’ over-allotment option) (the “Units”), each Unit consisting of (i) one share of common stock of the Company, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) (such share of Common Stock constituting a part of the Units, collectively, the “Shares”), and (ii) one warrant to purchase 0.45 of a share of Common Stock (such warrant constituting a part of the Units, collectively, the “Warrants”). The Units are included in a registration statement on Form S-3 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on February 3, 2012 (File No. 333-179337), including the information deemed to be a part of the registration statement pursuant to Rule 430B of the Act (as so filed, the “Registration Statement”), a base prospectus dated June 6, 2012 (the “Base Prospectus”), a preliminary prospectus supplement dated July 23, 2012 filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Act (together with the Base Prospectus, the “Preliminary Prospectus”) and a prospectus supplement dated July 24, 2012 filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Act (together with the Base Prospectus, the “Prospectus”). The Units are being sold pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated July 24, 2012 by and among Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters listed on Schedule I thereto, and the Company (the “Underwriting Agreement”). This opinion is being furnished in connection with the requirements of Item 601(b)(5) of Regulation S-K under the Act, and no opinion is expressed herein as to any matter pertaining to the contents of the Registration Statement, the Preliminary Prospectus or the Prospectus, other than as expressly stated herein with respect to the issue of the Units.

As such counsel, we have examined such matters of fact and questions of law as we have considered appropriate for purposes of this letter. With your consent, we have relied upon


July 24, 2012

Page 2

 

LOGO

 

certificates and other assurances of officers of the Company and others as to factual matters without having independently verified such factual matters. We are opining herein as to the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), and we express no opinion with respect to any other laws.

Subject to the foregoing and the other matters set forth herein, it is our opinion that, as of the date hereof:

1. When the Shares shall have been duly registered on the books of the transfer agent and registrar therefor in the name or on behalf of the purchasers, and have been issued by the Company against payment therefor (not less than par value) in the circumstances contemplated by the Underwriting Agreement, the issue and sale of the Shares will have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of the Company, and the Shares will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

2. When the Warrants have been duly registered on the books of the warrant agent and registrar therefor in the name or on behalf of the purchasers, and have been issued by the Company against payment therefor in the circumstances contemplated by the Underwriting Agreement, the issue and sale of the Warrants will have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of the Company, and the Warrants will be legally valid and binding obligations of the Company, enforceable against the Company in accordance with their terms.

3. When the shares of Common Stock initially issuable upon exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”) shall have been duly registered on the books of the transfer agent and registrar therefor in the name or on behalf of the Warrant holders, and have been issued by the Company against payment therefor (not less than par value) in the circumstances contemplated by the Warrants, the issue of the Warrant Shares will have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of the Company, and the Warrant Shares will have been validly reserved by all necessary corporate action of the Company, and the Warrant Shares will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

We bring your attention to the fact that Latham & Watkins LLP attorneys rendering services in connection with the offering own certain securities of the Company.

This opinion is for your benefit in connection with the Registration Statement and may be relied upon by you and by persons entitled to rely upon it pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Act. We consent to your filing this opinion as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 24, 2012 and to the reference to our firm in the Prospectus under the heading “Legal Matters.” In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Latham & Watkins LLP