UNITED STATES
                             SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                   WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                          FORM 10-K


  (Mark one)

  /X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
      For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

      OR



  / / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


       Commission file number:  333-131727-13

       ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-NC2
       (exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)

       ACE Securities Corp.
       (exact name of the depositor (as registrant on behalf of the issuing
       entity) as specified in its charter)

       DB Structured Products, Inc.
       (exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)


  Delaware                                          06-1442101
  (State or other jurisdiction of                   Depositor
  incorporation or organization)                    (I.R.S. Employer
                                                    Identification No.)


   ACE Securities Corp.
   6525 Morrison Boulevard Suite 318
   Charlotte, NC                                 28211
  (Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip Code)


  Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (704) 365-0569


  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

        NONE.


  Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

        NONE.


  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,
  as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

        Yes  ___     No  X


  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
  pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

        Yes  ___     No  X


  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
  required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
  that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
  subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

        Yes  X       No  ___


  Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
  Item 405 of Regulation S-K ( 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained
  herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge,
  in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
  in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

        Not applicable.


  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
  an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
  "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the
  Exchange Act. (Check one):


  Large accelerated filer ___  Accelerated filer ___  Non-accelerated filer X


  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
  defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

        Yes  ___     No  X


  State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
  equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which
  the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of
  such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most
  recently completed second fiscal quarter.

        Not applicable.


     Documents Incorporated by Reference

  List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and
  the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the
  document is incorporated: (1)Any annual report to security holders; (2)
  Any proxy or information statement; and (3)Any prospectus filed pursuant
  to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed
  documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g.,
  annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

        Not applicable.


                                   PART I
  Item 1.  Business.

            Omitted.


  Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

            Omitted.


  Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.

            None.


  Item 2.  Properties.

            Omitted.


  Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.

            Omitted.


  Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

            Omitted.


                                PART II

  Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder
         Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

            Omitted.


  Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.

            Omitted.


  Item 7.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
           Results of Operations.

            Omitted.


  Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

            Omitted.


  Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

            Omitted.


  Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
           Financial Disclosure.

            Omitted.


  Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

            Omitted.


  Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures.

            Omitted.


  Item 9B. Other Information.

            None.


                                PART III

  Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

            Omitted.


  Item 11. Executive Compensation.

            Omitted.

  Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
           Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

            Omitted.


  Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
           Independence.

            Omitted.


  Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

            Omitted.



            ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS PURSUANT TO GENERAL INSTRUCTION J

  Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant Obligor Financial Information.

            None.


  Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Credit Enhancement and Other Support,
             except for certain Derivative Instruments (Information regarding
             Significant Enhancement Providers Financial Information).

            No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external
            credit enhancement, uses any derivative instruments or other support
            for the certificates within this transaction as described under
            Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

  Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain Derivative Instruments.

            The significance percentage related to each entity or group of
            affiliated entities providing derivative instruments described in
            Item 1115 of Regulation AB is less than 10%.

  Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.

            New Century Financial Corporation

            DOL Investigation. On August 2, 2004, the U.S. Department of Labor,
            Wage and Hour Division, or DOL, informed New Century  Mortgage
            Corporation ("New Century Mortgage"), an indirect wholly owned
            subsidiary of New Century Financial Corporation (the "Company"),
            that it is conducting an investigation to determine whether New
            Century Mortgage is in compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act,
            or FLSA. The DOL narrowed the scope of its investigation to
            overtime compensation paid to retail loan officers in an Irvine,
            California operation. New Century Mortgage believes it is in
            compliance with the FLSA and that it properly pays overtime wages.
            In April 2005, New Century Mortgage provided requested documents
            and awaits a response from the DOL.

            Rubio. In March 2005, Daniel J. Rubio, a former retail loan officer
            of New Century Mortgage, filed a class action complaint against
            New Century Mortgage in the Superior Court of Orange County,
            California. The complaint alleges failure to pay overtime wages,
            failure to provide meal and rest periods, and that New Century
            Mortgage engaged in unfair business practices in violation of the
            California Labor Code. The complaint seeks recovery of unpaid wages,
            interest, and attorneys' fees and costs. New Century Mortgage filed
            a motion to strike and demurrer to the complaint in May 2005. On
            July 8, 2005, the court overruled the demurrer and granted the
            motion to strike. A First Amended Complaint was filed in July 2005
            and New Century Mortgage filed its answer in August 2005. In
            December 2005, New Century Mortgage filed a motion to strike
            portions of the complaint, which was granted in New Century
            Mortgage's favor, limiting the statute of limitations for
            plaintiff's meal and rest period claims to one year. The court
            reconsidered and reversed its ruling in May 2006. A Second Amended
            Complaint was filed by plaintiff, adding a cause of action for
            failure to pay overtime in violation of the FLSA. In July 2006,
            mediation occurred, followed by New Century Mortgage's removal of
            the case to the United States District Court, Central District of
            California in August 2006. In September 2006, the court granted
            New Century Mortgage's motion to strike, limiting the statute of
            limitations for plaintiff's meal and rest period claims to one
            year. Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint was filed in October 2006.
            In December 2006, the Court granted New Century Mortgage's motion
            to strike the punitive damages allegations from the plaintiff's
            Third Amended Complaint and denied New Century Mortgage's motion
            to dismiss the sixth cause of action for alleged wage statement
            violations.  In December 2006, the parties stipulated to plaintiff
            filing a Fourth Amended Complaint adding plaintiffs John Hicks
            and David Vizcarra.

            Bonner. In April 2005, Perrie Bonner and Darrell Bruce filed a
            class action lawsuit against New Century Mortgage and Home123
            Corporation, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
            ("Home123") in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of
            Indiana, Hammond Division, alleging violations of the Fair Credit
            Reporting Act, or FCRA, claiming that New Century Mortgage and
            Home123 accessed consumer credit reports without authorization
            because the prescreened offers of credit did not qualify as firm
            offers of credit. New Century Mortgage and Home 123 filed their
            answer to the complaint on June 30, 2005. In September 2005,
            plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and on November
            1, 2005, New Century Mortgage and Home123 filed a motion for
            judgment on the pleadings. The court never ruled on the motion for
            judgment on the pleadings. In August 2006, the court granted
            plaintiffs' motion for class certification. The class size is
            limited to the Northern District of Indiana. On December 13, 2006,
            the court heard oral argument in Indiana on the parties' summary
            judgment motions. On March 9, 2007, the court ruled on the motion
            for summary judgment that defendants' solicitation did not
            constitute a "firm offer of credit", and ruled that plaintiff
            Bonner's claim that the disclosure was not "clear and conspicuous"
            was moot. On March 12, 2007, this action settled on a class-wide
            basis (Northern District of Indiana). On March 16, 2007, the
            parties moved for preliminary approval of the settlement. The court
            has not yet ruled on the motion.

            Phillips. In July 2005, Pamela Phillips filed a class action
            lawsuit against the Company, New Century Mortgage and Home123 in
            the District Court, Central District of California.  Plaintiff
            alleges violations of FCRA, claiming that the Company, New Century
            Mortgage and Home123 accessed consumer credit reports without
            authorization because the prescreened offers of credit did not
            qualify as firm offers of credit. The case also alleges that
            certain disclosures were not made in a clear and conspicuous manner.
            The complaint seeks damages of not more than $1,000 for each
            alleged violation, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, attorneys'
            fees and costs. The Company, New Century Mortgage and Home123 filed
            a motion to dismiss certain claims in October 2005. In November
            2005, the court granted the motion to dismiss, in part. In early
            March 2006, the court, on its own motion, reversed its prior ruling
            on the motion to dismiss citing the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
            recent decision in the Murray v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation case. On
            November 14, 2006, plaintiff filed a Motion for Class Certification
            proposing that the class be limited to all individuals throughout
            Harris County, Texas whose consumer reports were obtained or used
            by New Century Mortgage or Home123 in connection with a credit
            transaction not initiated by them and who received the same written
            solicitation to entered into a credit transaction received by
            plaintiff. In late December 2006, plaintiff filed a Third Amended
            Complaint to limit the class size to Harris County, Texas. On
            January 22, 2007, the Company, New Century Mortgage and Home123
            filed their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Class
            Certification. On January 31, 2007, the Company, New Century
            Mortgage and Home123 filed a Motion to Stay. On February 22, 2007,
            the court denied the Motion to Stay. On March 11, 2007, this action
            settled. The parties agreed to dismissal with prejudice of
            individual claims and dismissal without prejudice of claims of
            putative class members.

            Jeppesen. In October 2005, Patricia and Stephen Jeppesen filed a
            class action lawsuit against New Century Mortgage in the U.S.
            District Court, Northern District of Indiana. Plaintiffs allege
            that New Century Mortgage violated the Indiana High Cost Loan Act
            by allegedly making loans with fees greater than permitted by law
            unless certain disclosures are made. The class is defined as all
            persons who obtained a mortgage loan from New Century Mortgage
            after January 1, 2005 on their principal residence in Indiana. A
            second claim in the complaint alleges that New Century Mortgage
            improperly charged a document preparation fee. On January 12, 2007,
            the Office of the Attorney General, State of Indiana, issued a
            no-action letter and, in response to a letter dated September 19,
            2005 from plaintiff's counsel about alleged violations of the
            Indiana Home Loan Practices Statute, concluded its inquiry and
            declined to take any action against New Century Mortgage. In
            February 2007, the parties reached a settlement on an individual
            basis. On February 14, 2007, the court entered an order dismissing
            this case and approving the Stipulation of Dismissal.

           Forrest. In January 2006, Mary Forrest filed a class action lawsuit
           against New Century Mortgage in the U.S. District Court for the
           Eastern District of Wisconsin, Milwaukee Division. Plaintiff alleges
           violations of FCRA, claiming that New Century Mortgage accessed
           prescreened credit reports without authorization because the offers
           of credit allegedly did not qualify as firm offers of credit. The
           proposed class consists of persons with Wisconsin addresses to whom
           New Century Mortgage sent a particular prescreened offer of credit
           after November 20, 2004. In February 2006, New Century Mortgage
           filed both its answer and a motion to transfer the case to the
           U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. In June
           2006, the court granted New Century Mortgage's motion to transfer
           and ordered the case transferred from the U.S. District Court in
           Wisconsin to the U.S. District Court, Central District of California.
           In July 2006, New Century Mortgage filed a Notice of Related Case to
           consolidate this matter with the Phillips class action. On March 11,
           2007, this action settled. On March 20, 2007, a stipulation for
           dismissal of individual claims dismissed with prejudice and claims
           of putative class members dismissed without prejudice was filed with
           the court.

           Securities Class Action Litigation

           On February 8, 2007, Avi Gold filed a securities class action
           complaint in the United States District Court for the Central
           District of California against the Company and certain of its
           directors and officers (the "Original Complaint"). The Original
           Complaint alleges that defendants violated federal securities laws
           by issuing false and misleading statements and failing to disclose
           material facts about the Company, which resulted in artificially
           inflated market prices of the Company's common stock. The purported
           class period is between April 7, 2006 and February 7, 2007. The
           Original Complaint seeks money damages in favor of its purported
           class of purchasers of the Company's securities, the costs and
           expenses of the action and other relief that may be granted by the
           court.

           The Company has also learned that seventeen additional purported
           class actions were filed in the United States District Court for the
           Central District of California between February 8, 2007 and March 16,
           2007. These complaints, some of which the Company has not yet been
           served with and which name the Company and certain of its officers
           and directors as defendants, present in large degree the same legal
           and factual issues as the Original Complaint and allege various
           class periods, the longest of which is from April 7, 2006 to March 2,
           2007. One of these class actions has been brought on behalf of the
           holders of the Company's 9.125% Series A Cumulative Redeemable
           Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock") and the holders of the
           Company's  9.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
           ("Series B Preferred Stock"). Another of these class actions has
           been brought on behalf of the holders of the Company's Series B
           Preferred Stock. The Company anticipates that similar actions on
           behalf of holders of the Company's common stock, Series A Preferred
           Stock and Series B Preferred Stock may be filed in the future and
           does not undertake any obligation to update this disclosure for any
           similar or related claims that may be made in this regard. The
           Company intends to review the allegations in these complaints and
           respond appropriately. The Company's management intends to
           vigorously defend these claims; however, an unfavorable outcome in
           these cases or future securities class action cases could have a
           material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition.

           Shareholder Derivative Complaint
           The Company was served with a shareholder derivative complaint on
           March 1, 2007, filed in the Superior Court of California, County of
           Orange. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of
           control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, unjust
           enrichment, and violations of California Corporations Code 25402 and
           seeks damages for breach, disgorgement, equitable relief, costs and
           fees. The case is in the very preliminary stages. The Company has
           also learned that five additional shareholder derivative actions
           were filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange
           between February 8, 2007 and March 16, 2007 and two additional
           shareholder derivative actions were filed in the United States
           District Court for the Central District of California during this
           same time period. These complaints, some of which the Company has
           not yet been served with and which name the Company and certain of
           its officers and directors as defendants, present in large degree
           the same legal and factual issues as the original shareholder
           derivative complaint. The Company anticipates that similar actions
           may be filed in the future and does not undertake any obligation to
           update this disclosure for any similar or related claims that may be
           made in this regard. The Company intends to review the allegations
           in these complaints and respond appropriately.

           U.S. Attorney's Office Investigation

           On February 27, 2007, the Company received a letter from the United
           States  Attorney's Office for the Central District of California
           (the 'U.S. Attorney's Office") indicating that it was conducting a
           criminal inquiry under the federal securities laws in connection with
           trading in the Company's securities, as well as accounting errors
           regarding the Company's allowance for repurchase losses. The Company
           has subsequently received a grand jury subpoena requesting
           production of certain documents. The Company intends to cooperate
           with the requests of the U.S. Attorney's Office.

           SEC Investigation

           On March 7, 2007, the Company received a letter from the Pacific
           Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC")
           requesting that NCFC preserve certain documents. On March 12, 2007,
           the Company received a letter from the staff of the Pacific Regional
           Office of the SEC stating that the staff was conducting a
           preliminary investigation involving the Company and requesting
           production of certain documents. The staff of the SEC had also
           previously requested a meeting with the Company to discuss the
           events leading up to the Company's previous announcement of the need
           to restate certain of its historical financial statements. The
           Company intends to cooperate with the requests of the SEC.

           State Regulatory Actions

           The Company has been engaged in recent ongoing discussions with its
           state regulators regarding the Company's funding constraints and the
           impact on consumers who are in various stages of the loan
           origination process with the Company. The Company has advised these
           regulators that it has ceased accepting loan applications. In
           addition, the Company has advised these regulators that at this
           time, the Company and its subsidiaries are unable to fund any
           mortgage loans, including mortgage loans for those consumers who
           were already in the loan origination process with the Company. The
           Company has been and is continuing to work cooperatively with these
           regulators to mitigate the impact on the affected consumers,
           including transferring pending loans and loan applications to other
           mortgage lenders. The Company has also been providing daily reports
           to its various regulators regarding the status of loans in process
           in their states, as well as responding to ad hoc information
           requests.

           The Company received cease and desist orders from the States of
           Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey and New York on March 13,
           2007 (collectively, the "March 13 Orders"). New Century Mortgage
           additionally received a Suspension Order from the state of New York
           on March 13, 2007 (the "NCMC Suspension Order"). The NCMC Suspension
           Order suspends New Century Mortgage's mortgage banking license in
           the State of New York for a period not to exceed 30 days, pending
           investigation. On March 14 and 15, 2007, the Company received
           additional cease and desist orders from the States of Connecticut,
           Maryland, Rhode Island and Tennessee (collectively, the "March 14-15
           Orders"). The March 13 Orders and the March 14-15 Orders contain
           allegations that certain of the Company's subsidiaries have engaged
           in violations of applicable state law, including, among others,
           failure to fund mortgage loans after closing. Additionally, on March
           14, 2007, New Century Mortgage and Home123 entered into a Consent
           Agreement and Order with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department
           of Banking, Bureau of Supervision and Enforcement (the
           "Pennsylvania Consent Agreement").

           The March 13 Orders, the March 14-15 Orders and the Pennsylvania
           Consent Agreement restrain the Company's subsidiaries from taking
           certain actions, including, among others, engaging in alleged
           violations of state law and taking new applications for mortgage
           loans in the relevant jurisdiction. The March 13 Orders, the March
           14-15 Orders and the Pennsylvania Consent Agreement also compel the
           subsidiaries to affirmatively take certain actions, including the
           creation of escrow accounts to hold any up front fees collected in
           connection with pending mortgage applications, the transfer to other
           lenders of the outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans held by the subsidiaries, and the provision of
           regular information to the state regulators regarding the
           subsidiaries' activities in the applicable state, including the
           status of all outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans in that state. The cease and desist order received
           from the Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation on March 14
           suspends the licenses of one or more of the Company's subsidiaries
           and seeks to assess administrative penalties.

           The Company and its subsidiaries requested hearings on the cease and
           desist orders issued by regulators in Maryland, Massachusetts,
           Connecticut and Rhode Island on March 23, 2007, and in Tennessee on
           March 27, 2007.

           On March 14, 2007, the Attorney General of Ohio and the Ohio
           Department of Commerce, Division of Financial Institution (together,
           the "State") filed a lawsuit against the Company, New Century
           Mortgage and Home123 (collectively, the "Defendants") on March 14,
           2007 in Ohio state court (the "Ohio Complaint"). The Ohio Complaint
           alleges that the Company has engaged in violations of applicable
           state law, including, among others, failure to fund mortgage loans
           after closing. Also on March 14, 2007, the court granted the State's
           motion to enter a temporary restraining order, which was
           subsequently modified by the court on March 16, 2007, against the
           Defendants (as modified, the "TRO"). The TRO restrained the
           Defendants from taking certain actions, including, among others,
           (i) engaging in violations of state law, (ii) soliciting applicants
           and taking new applications for mortgage loans in Ohio and (iii)
           initiating, prosecuting or enforcing foreclosure actions in Ohio.
           The TRO required the parties to confer with respect to restrictions
           regarding foreclosure action and the sale, transfer or assignment of
           loans more than 60 days delinquent. On March 26, 2007, the
           Defendants filed a Motion for Dissolution of Modified Temporary
           Restraining Order and Motion for an Emergency Hearing, and
           Opposition to a Preliminary Injunction. On March 28, 2007, the
           Defendants and the State reached agreement on a Stipulated
           Preliminary Injunction effective for 90 days and submitted it for
           court approval. The Stipulated Preliminary Injunction replaces the
           TRO and provides for a stay of the litigation for 90 days. The
           Stipulated Preliminary Injunction restrains the Defendants from
           taking certain actions, including, among others, engaging in alleged
           violations of state law and taking new applications for mortgage
           loans. The Stipulated Preliminary Injunction also compels the
           Defendants to take certain actions, including the transfer to other
           lenders of any outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans, the placement in escrow of any upfront fees
           collected in connection with pending mortgage applications, and the
           provision of regular information to the State regarding the
           Company's activities in Ohio, including the status of all
           outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded mortgage loans. The
           Stipulated Preliminary Injunction also requires the Defendants to
           submit certain loans (and related information) as to which it
           intends to foreclose to the State for the State to review. The State
           may object to the Company proceeding with a particular foreclosure
           and if the Company is unable to convince the State to permit it to
           proceed, the foreclosure will not proceed for the duration of the
           Stipulated Preliminary Injunction. The Stipulated Preliminary
           Injunction also provides for the State to review and object to the
           Defendants selling, transferring or assigning certain loans that are
           more than 60 days delinquent.

           On March 16, 2007, the Company received additional cease and desist
           orders from the State of California (the "California Orders") and
           certain of the Company's subsidiaries entered into consent
           agreements with the State of Florida's Office of Financial
           Regulation and the State of Washington's Department of Financial
           Institutions, respectively, each dated March 16, 2007 (the "March 16
           Agreements" and together with the California Orders, the "March 16
           Orders and Consent Agreements").

           The March 16 Orders and Consent Agreements contain allegations that
           certain of the Company's subsidiaries have engaged in violations of
           state law, including, among others, failure to fund mortgage loans
           after closing. The March 16 Orders and Consent Agreements restrain
           the Company's subsidiaries from taking certain actions, including,
           among others, engaging in alleged violations of state law and taking
           new applications for mortgage loans in the relevant jurisdiction.
           The March 16 Orders and Consent Agreements also compel the
           subsidiaries to affirmatively take certain actions, including the
           creation of escrow accounts to hold any upfront fees collected in
           connection with pending mortgage applications, the transfer to other
           lenders of the outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans held by the subsidiaries, and the provision of
           regular information to the state regulators regarding the
           subsidiaries' activities in the applicable state, including the
           status of all outstanding mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans in that state.

           On March 16, 2007, Home123 received a suspension order (the "Home123
           Suspension Order") from the State of New York Banking Department.
           The Home123 Suspension Order contains allegations similar to those
           included in the NCMC Suspension Order and further provides that
           Home123's mortgage banking license in the State of New York has been
           suspended for a period not exceeding 30 days, pending investigation.
           The Company and Home123 are reviewing the Home123 Suspension Order
           and accordingly have not yet determined whether they will appeal all
           or any portion of the Home123 Suspension Order.

           On March 20, 2007, the Company entered into a Combined Statement of
           Charges and Consent Order with the State of Iowa and a Consent
           Agreement and Order with the State of Maine Office of Consumer
           Credit Regulation, Department of Professional and Financial
           Regulation (together,  the "March 20 Orders"). On March 21, 2007,
           the Company entered into a Consent Order with the State of Michigan,
           Department of Labor & Economic Growth, Office of Financial and
           Insurance  Services and a Consent Order with the State of Wyoming
           Banking Commission (the "March 21 Orders"). On March 23, 2007, the
           Company entered into a Consent Agreement and Order with the State of
           Idaho Department of Finance (the "March 23 Order"). Similar to the
           consent agreements described above, the March 20, 21 and 23 Orders
           contain allegations that certain of the Company's subsidiaries have
           engaged in violations of state law, including, among others, failure
           to fund mortgage loans after closing. They restrain the Company's
           subsidiaries from taking certain actions, including, among others,
           engaging in alleged violations of state law and taking new
           applications for mortgage loans in the relevant jurisdiction. They
           also compel the subsidiaries to affirmatively take certain actions,
           including the creation of escrow accounts to hold any upfront fees
           collected in connection with pending mortgage applications, the
           transfer to other lenders of the  outstanding mortgage applications
           and unfunded mortgage loans held by the subsidiaries, and the
           provision of regular information to the state regulators regarding
           the subsidiaries' activities in the applicable state, including the
           status of all  outstanding  mortgage applications and unfunded
           mortgage loans in that state.

           The Company anticipates that cease and desist orders will continue
           to be received by the Company and its subsidiaries from additional
           states in the future and that the Company and its subsidiaries may
           enter into additional consent agreements similar to those described
           above. The Company does not undertake, and expressly disclaims, any
           obligations to update this disclosure for any such additional cease
           and desist orders or consent agreements or for any developments with
           respect to any of the state regulatory actions described herein.

           The Company intends to continue to cooperate with its regulators in
           order to mitigate the impact on consumers resulting from the
           Company's funding constraints.


  Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and Certain Relationships and
             Related Transactions.

            No applicable updates.

  Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria.

            See Item 15.

            The 1122 statements for Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
            (Corporate Trust Services) has disclosed material noncompliance with
            criterion 1122(d)(3)(i), as applicable to the Company during the
            twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Certain monthly investor or
            remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or the
            reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.

            Although each servicing criterion required by Item 1122(d) of
            Regulation AB is addressed in one or more of of the Assessment of
            Compliance with Servicing Criteria and related Attestation Reports
            included with this report, the Servicer's, Countrywide Home Loans
            Servicing LLP, Assessment of Compliance and related Attestation
            Report did not address each of the servicing criteria that the
            Servicer was required to address under the terms of the related
            Servicing Agreement. The Servicer has not identified such failure
            to provide an Assessment and Attestation for these items as a
            material failure to fulfill its obligations under the related
            servicing agreement in the Servicer's Compliance Statement provided
            under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, because the Servicer asserts that
            those items are not applicable to the Servicer.

  Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.

            See Item 15.




                                PART IV


  Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

   (a) Exhibits

    (4)  Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2006, among
         ACE Securities Corp., as depositor, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
         LP, as servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., master servicer and
         securities administrator and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as
         trustee (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the
         Current Report on Form 8-K of the registrant, as filed with the
         Commission).

    (31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

    (33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
         asset-backed securities.



               
      a) Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer 
      b) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian 
      c) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer 
      d) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator 
      e) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent 

      

      

     (34) Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
          criteria for asset-backed securities.

              
      a) Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer 
      b) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian 
      c) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer 
      d) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator 
      e) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent 

      

      

     (35) Servicer compliance statement.

               
      a) Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer 
      b) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer 
      c) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator 

      

      

   (b) See Exhibits identified in Paragraph (a) above.

   (c) Not applicable.


   Filed herewith.



                                SIGNATURES

  Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
  signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



    ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2006-NC2
    (Issuing Entity)

    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    (Master Servicer)

    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

    Date: April 1, 2007


  Exhibit Index

  Exhibit No.

    (31) Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

    (33) Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
         asset-backed securities.



               
      a) Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer
      b) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian
      c) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer
      d) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator
      e) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent

      

      

     (34) Attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
          criteria for asset-backed securities.

              
      a) Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer
      b) Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Custodian
      c) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer
      d) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator
      e) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent

      

      

     (35) Servicer compliance statement.

               
      a) Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer
      b) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer
      c) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator

      

      

  EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K of ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
     2006-NC2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer.

     Dated: April 1, 2007

     /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
     Signature

     Vice President
     Title


EX-33 (a)
(logo) Countrywide
HOME LOANS

2900 MADERA ROAD
SIMI VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 93065-6298
(805) 955-1000


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Countrywide Financial Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, including its
direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.
(CHL), Countrywide Tax Services Corporation, Newport Management Corporation, and
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL
(collectively the "Company") provides this platform-level assessment, for which
Countrywide Financial Corporation and such subsidiaries participated in
servicing functions, as such term is described under Title 17, Section 229.1122
of the Code of Federal Regulations ("Item 1122 of Regulation AB"), of compliance
in respect of the following Applicable Servicing Criteria specified in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
in regard to the following servicing platform for the following period:

Platform: publicly-issued (i.e., registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities (securities collateralized by residential mortgage
loans, including prime, alternative loan products, sub-prime, HELOC and dosed
seconds) issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides cash
collection and administration, investor remittances and reporting (except for
those activities relating to trustee and paying agent services), and pool asset
administration (except for those activities relating to custodial operations of
pool assets and related documents), collectively "Servicing Functions" and for
which the related issuer has a fiscal year end of December 31, 2006. The
platform excludes any transactions issued by any government sponsored enterprise
for which the Company provides Servicing Functions.

Period: as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: all servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required in the related agreements, except for the following
paragraphs: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), only as it relates to information
other than that contained in the monthly remittance report delivered by the
servicer to the master servicer, trustee, and/or bond administrator,
1122(d)(3)(i)(D), only as it relates to the agreeing with investors' records as
to the total unpaid principal balance and number of pool assets serviced by the
servicer, 1122(d)(3)(ii), only as it relates to amounts other than amounts
remitted by the servicer to the master servicer, trustee, and/or bond
administrator, 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and
1122(d)(4)(ii), only as 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) relate to the custodial
operations of the pool assets and related documents (collateral file) by the
document custodian responsible for such functions for the related transaction,
and 1122(d)(4)(xv), only as it relates to Item 1115 of Regulation AB (derivative
transactions).


(page)


With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the
Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of
compliance.


(page)


COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

By: /s/ Steve Bailey
Steve Bailey

Its: Senior Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer,
Loan Administration


Dated: February 28, 2007

By:/s/ Kevin Meyers
Kevin Meyers

Its: Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer,
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. Loan Administration


Dated: February 28, 2007


(page)


Schedule A


Material Instances of Noncompliance

No material instances of noncompliance: the Company has complied, in all
material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2006.





EX-33 (b)
Appendix I

MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE

Management of the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively
the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the servicing
criteria are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage
- -backed securities and other asset-backed securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee, securities
administration or paying agent services, excluding any publicly issued
transactions sponsored or issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d), except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(2)(iii),1122(d)(4)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)
(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122
(d)(4)(xiv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria").

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

Management's interpretation of Applicable Servicing Criteria: The Company's
management has determined that servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii) is applicable
only with respect to its continuing obligation to act as, or locate a,
successor servicer under the circumstances referred to in certain governing
documents. It is management's interpretation that Deutsche Bank Trust Company
America has no other active back-up servicing responsibilities in regards to
1122(d)(1)(iii) as of and for the Period.

Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria 1122(d)
(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(ii), management has engaged various
vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria. The
Company's management has determined that these vendors are not considered a
"servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company's
management has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, management has asserted that it has policies and
procedures in place to provide reasonable assurance that the vendor's
activities comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria
applicable to each vendor. The Company's management is solely responsible for
determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06
for the vendors and related criteria.

With respect to the Platform, the Company's management provides the following
assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company's
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.

2.The Company's management has assessed compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is
determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the
Period. In performing this assessment, management used the criteria set forth
by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of
Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the management's assertion of compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.


(page)


Appendix I


DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY

By: /s/ Gary R. Vaughan
Name: Gary R. Vaughan
Its: Managing Director

By: /s/ David Co
Name: David Co
Its: Director

By: /s/ Jose Sicilia
Name: Jose Sicilia
Its: Managing Director

By: /s/ Kevin Fischer
Name: Kevin Fischer
Its: Vice President

By: /s/ Robert Frier
Name: Robert Frier
Its: Director

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

By: /s/ Kevin C. Weeks
Name: Kevin C. Weeks
Its: Managing Director

By: /s/ Jenna Kaufman
Name: Jenna Kaufman
Its: Director




EX-33 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") provides this assessment of compliance with the following applicable
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required in the related transaction agreements or required by the
Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the
Company, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii),
1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria
1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to handle certain Uniform
Commercial Code filing functions required by the servicing criteria ("vendors").
The Company has determined that none of the vendors is a "servicer" as defined
in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company elects to take responsibility
for assessing compliance with the portion of the servicing criteria applicable
to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of
Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations
("Interpretation 17.06"). The Company has policies and procedures in place to
provide reasonable assurance that each vendor's activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements
to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria,
including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on
Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the
Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Any
material instances of noncompliance by a vendor of which the Company is aware
and any material deficiency in the Company's policies and procedures to monitor
vendors' compliance that the Company has identified is specified on Schedule A
hereto.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance as of
and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:/s/ Brian Bartlett
Brian Bartlett

Its:   Executive Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

Material Instances of Noncompliance by the Company

1122(d)(3)(i)- Delinquency Reporting - During the reporting period, certain
monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or
the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets, which errors may or may not
have been material. All such errors were the result of data processing errors
and/or the mistaken interpretation of data provided by other parties
participating in the servicing function. All necessary adjustments to data
processing systems and/or interpretive clarifications have been made to correct
those errors and to remedy related procedures.

Material instances of Noncompliance by any Vendor

NONE

Material Deficiencies In Company's Policies and Procedures to Monitor Vendors'
Compliance

NONE





EX-33 (d)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") provides this assessment of compliance with the following applicable
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required in the related transaction agreements or required by the
Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the
Company, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii),
1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria
1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to handle certain Uniform
Commercial Code filing functions required by the servicing criteria ("vendors").
The Company has determined that none of the vendors is a "servicer" as defined
in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company elects to take responsibility
for assessing compliance with the portion of the servicing criteria applicable
to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of
Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations
("Interpretation 17.06"). The Company has policies and procedures in place to
provide reasonable assurance that each vendor's activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements
to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria,
including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on
Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the
Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Any
material instances of noncompliance by a vendor of which the Company is aware
and any material deficiency in the Company's policies and procedures to monitor
vendors' compliance that the Company has identified is specified on Schedule A
hereto.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance as of
and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:/s/ Brian Bartlett
Brian Bartlett

Its:   Executive Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

Material Instances of Noncompliance by the Company

1122(d)(3)(i)- Delinquency Reporting - During the reporting period, certain
monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or
the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets, which errors may or may not
have been material. All such errors were the result of data processing errors
and/or the mistaken interpretation of data provided by other parties
participating in the servicing function. All necessary adjustments to data
processing systems and/or interpretive clarifications have been made to correct
those errors and to remedy related procedures.

Material instances of Noncompliance by any Vendor

NONE

Material Deficiencies In Company's Policies and Procedures to Monitor Vendors'
Compliance

NONE




EX-33 (e)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") provides this assessment of compliance with the following applicable
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the
servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform for the
period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d),
to the extent required in the related transaction agreements or required by the
Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the
Company, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii),
1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x),
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria").

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the "Period").

Third parties classified as vendors: With respect to servicing criteria
1122(d)(4)(i), the Company has engaged various vendors to handle certain Uniform
Commercial Code filing functions required by the servicing criteria ("vendors").
The Company has determined that none of the vendors is a "servicer" as defined
in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company elects to take responsibility
for assessing compliance with the portion of the servicing criteria applicable
to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of
Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations
("Interpretation 17.06"). The Company has policies and procedures in place to
provide reasonable assurance that each vendor's activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements
to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria.

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria,
including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based on
Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the Period. In performing
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Other than as identified on Schedule A hereto, as of and for the Period, the
Company was in material compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Any
material instances of noncompliance by a vendor of which the Company is aware
and any material deficiency in the Company's policies and procedures to monitor
vendors' compliance that the Company has identified is specified on Schedule A
hereto.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report with respect to the Company's foregoing assessment of compliance as of
and for the Period.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

By:/s/ Brian Bartlett
Brian Bartlett

Its:   Executive Vice President

Dated: March 1, 2007


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

Material Instances of Noncompliance by the Company

1122(d)(3)(i)- Delinquency Reporting - During the reporting period, certain
monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the calculation and/or
the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets, which errors may or may not
have been material. All such errors were the result of data processing errors
and/or the mistaken interpretation of data provided by other parties
participating in the servicing function. All necessary adjustments to data
processing systems and/or interpretive clarifications have been made to correct
those errors and to remedy related procedures.

Material instances of Noncompliance by any Vendor

NONE

Material Deficiencies In Company's Policies and Procedures to Monitor Vendors'
Compliance

NONE





EX-34 (a)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
Suite 2000
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1568




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Countrywide Financial Corporation:

We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying
Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Countrywide
Financial Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries, including its direct and
indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, Countrywide Home Loans (CHL), Countrywide
Tax Services Corporation, Newport Management Corporation, and Countrywide Home
Loans Servicing L.P., a wholly owned subsidiary of CHL (collectively the
Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly issued
residential mortgage-backed securities (securities collateralized by residential
mortgage loans, including prime, alternative loan products, subprime, HELOC, and
closed seconds) issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company
provides cash collection and administration, investor remittances, and reporting
(except for those activities relating to trustee and paying agent services), and
pool asset administration (except for those activities relating to custodial
operations of pool assets and related documents), collectively "Servicing
Functions", excluding any transactions issued by any government sponsored
enterprise for which the Company provides Servicing Functions (the Platform),
except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), only as it
relates to information other than that contained in the monthly remittance
report delivered by the servicer to the master servicer, trustee, and/or bond
administrator, and 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), only as it relates to the agreeing with
investors' records as to the total unpaid principal balance and number of pool
assets serviced by the servicer, 1122(d)(3)(ii), only as it relates to amounts
other than amounts remitted by the servicer to the master services, trustee,
and/or bond administrator, 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i), and
1122(d)(4)(ii), only as 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) relate to the custodial
operations of the pool assets and related documents (collateral file) by the
document custodian responsible for such functions for the related transaction
and 1122(d)(4)(xv), only as it relates to Item 1115 of Regulation AB (derivative
transactions), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore,


(page)


our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006
is fairly stated in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
February 28, 2007


2


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.





EX-34 (b)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-5212


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
The Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National Trust
Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Appendix
I, that the Trust & Securities Services department of Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (collectively the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e.,
transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed
securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions, sponsored or issued by any government sponsored
entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(iii),
1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)
(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)
(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv ), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of
and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance
with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the
selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during
the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by
the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected
transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in management's assertion included in the accompanying Appendix I,
for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), the
Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these
servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC


(page)


(logo) KPMG


Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone
Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06,
the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed
to provide reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all
material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The
Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria, including servicing criteria 1122 (d)(2)(i),
1122 (d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) for which compliance is determined based on
Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2006 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2007


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.





EX-34 (c)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60801-5212

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:

We have examined the compliance of the Corporate Trust Services division of
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v),
1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in the accompanying management's Assessment of Compliance With
Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company
has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these
servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, in the U.S. member firm
of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.

(page)

(logo) KPMG

procedures in place designed to provide assurance that the vendors' activities
comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each
vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with criterion 1122(d)(3)(i),
as applicable to the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
Certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the
calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.

In our opinion, except for the material non-compliance described above, the
Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing
criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based
on Interpretation 17.06 as discussed above, as of and for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL 60601
March 1, 2007





EX-34 (d)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60801-5212

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:

We have examined the compliance of the Corporate Trust Services division of
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v),
1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in the accompanying management's Assessment of Compliance With
Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company
has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these
servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, in the U.S. member firm
of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.

(page)

(logo) KPMG

procedures in place designed to provide assurance that the vendors' activities
comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each
vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with criterion 1122(d)(3)(i),
as applicable to the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
Certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the
calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.

In our opinion, except for the material non-compliance described above, the
Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing
criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based
on Interpretation 17.06 as discussed above, as of and for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL 60601
March 1, 2007




EX-34 (e)
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
303 East Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60801-5212

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
The Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association:

We have examined the compliance of the Corporate Trust Services division of
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential
mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities and other
asset-backed securities, for which the Company provides master servicing,
trustee, securities administration or paying agent services, excluding
transactions issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government or
any government sponsored entity (the Platform), except for servicing criteria
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v),
1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi),
1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that
comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected
transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period
covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether
errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any
other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

As described in the accompanying management's Assessment of Compliance With
Applicable Servicing Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(i), the Company
has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required by these
servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation
17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available
Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by
Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and

KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, in the U.S. member firm
of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.

(page)

(logo) KPMG

procedures in place designed to provide assurance that the vendors' activities
comply in all material respects with the servicing criteria applicable to each
vendor. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC
requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria
as described in its assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to
the Company's eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

Our examination disclosed material noncompliance with criterion 1122(d)(3)(i),
as applicable to the Company during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006.
Certain monthly investor or remittance reports included errors in the
calculation and/or the reporting of delinquencies for the pool assets.

In our opinion, except for the material non-compliance described above, the
Company complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing
criteria, including servicing criteria for which compliance is determined based
on Interpretation 17.06 as discussed above, as of and for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chicago, IL 60601
March 1, 2007





EX-35 (a)
(logo) Countrywide
HOME LOANS

400 Countrywide Way
Simi Valley, California 93065-6298

February 28, 2007




WELLS FARGO
9062 OLD ANNAPOLIS RD
COLUMBIA, MD 21045
Laneise Foxworth


OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am an officer of Countrywide LP,
Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP (the "Servicer"). I
further certify, with respect to the applicable servicing agreement relating to
the securitization transaction(s) set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement") that:

(a)  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement has
been made under my supervision; and

(b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout such year.

/s/ Joseph Candelario
Joseph Candelario
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration

February 28, 2007

See Deal Name listing on following page.


(page)


Exhibit A

ACE 2006-CW1
ACE 2006-FM2
ACE 2006-NC2
ACE 2006-NC3
BAFC 2006-2
BAFC 2006-A
BAFC 2006-D
BAFC 2006-H
BCAP 2006AA1
BCAP 2006-AA2
BSALTA 2006-1
BSALTA 2006-2
BSALTA 2006-3
BSALTA 2006-4
BSALTA 2006-5
BSALTA 2006-6
BSALTA 2006-7
BSALTA 2006-8
BSARM 2006-2
BSARM 2006-4
CSAB 2006-2
CSAB 2006-3
CSAB 2006-4
CSFB ARMT 2006-1
CSFB ARMT 2006-2
CSFB ARMT 2006-3
CSMC 2006-1
CSMC 2006-2
CSMC 2006-3
CSMC 2006-4
CSMC 2006-5
CSMC 2006-7
CSMC 2006-8
CSMC 2006-9
DBALT 2006-AB3 (SUB)
DBALT 2006-AB4 (SUB)
DBALT 2006-AF1
DBALT 2006-AR1
DBALT 2006-AR2
DBALT 2006-AR3
DBALT 2006-AR4
DBALT 2006-AR5 (SUB)
DBALT 2006-AR6 (SUB)
DBALT 2006-OA1 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-10 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-11
GSAA 2006-14
GSAA 2006-16
GSAA 2006-17


(page)


Exhibit A (con't.)
GSAA 2006-19
GSAA 2006-20
GSAA 2006-4
GSAA 2006-4 (SUB)
GSAA 2006-7 SUB
GSAA 2006-8
GSAA 2006-8 (SUB)
GSR 2006-1F (SUB)
GSR 2006-1F (SUB)
GSR 2006-2F (SUB)
GSR 2006-2F (SUB)
GSR 2006-3F (SUB)
GSR 2006-3F (SUB)
GSR 2006-5F (SUB)
GSR 2006-5F (SUB)
GSR 2006-6F
GSR 2006-7F
GSR 2006-8F
GSR 2006-9F
GSR 2006-10F
GSR 2006-AR1
GSR 2006-AR2
GSR 2006-OA1
HARBORVIEW 2006-2
HARBORVIEW 2006-6
HARBORVIEW 2006-11
HARBORVIEW 2006-12
SASCO 2006-BC2
SASCO 2006-BC3
SASCO 2006-BC4
SASCO 2006-BC5
THORNBURG 2006-1
THORNBURG 2006-2
THORNBURG 2006-4
THORNBURG 2006-5
DBALT 2006-AR6
DBALT 2006-OA1
GSR 2006-1F
GSR 2006-5F
JPMMT 2006-A7
JPMMT 2006-S2
JPMMT 2006-S3
JPMMT 2006-54
LMT 2006-9
LUMINENT 2006-2
LUMINENT 2006-5
LUMINENT 2006-5
LUMINENT 2006-6
MARM 2006-2
MARM 2006-OA2
MLMI 2006-A1


(page)


Exhibit A (con't.)
MLMI 2006-A2
MLMI 2006-A3
MLMI 2006-A4
MSAC 2006-HE8
MSIX 2006-1
MSM 2006-1AR
SAIL 2006-3
SAMI II 2006-AR1
SAMI II 2006-AR2
SAMI II 2006-AR3
SAMI II 2006-AR4
SAMI II 2006-AR6
SAMI II 2006-AR7
SAMI II 2006-AR8
SARM 2006-2
SARM 2006-3
SARM 2006-4
SARM 2006-5
SARM 2006-7
SARM 2006-8
SARM 2006-9
THORNBURG 2006-3
ZUNI 2006-OA1
GSR 2006-3F
GSR 2006-2F
PRIME 2006-CL1
SARM 2006-1
THORNBURG 2006-6
JPALT 2006-A1
JPALT 2006-A2
JPALT 2006-A3
JPALT 2006-A4
JPALT 2006-A6
JPALT 2006-A7
JPALT 2006-S1
JPALT 2006-S3
JPALT 2006-S4
JPMAC 2006-CW2
JPMMT 2006-A1
JPMMT 2006-A2
JPMMT 2006-A3
JPMMT 2006-A4
JPMMT 2006-A6
HASCO 2006-HE1
SEQUOIA 2006-1
SEQUOIA 2006-1
SQALT 2006-1




EX-35 (b)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 12, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity
Loan Trust, Series  2006-NC2

Per Section 4.15 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 9/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Master Servicer), hereby
certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A) a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or such
other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer or Servicing
Function Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and

(B) to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer or Servicing
Function Participant, in all material respects throughout such year or portion
thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any
material respect, specifying each such failure known to such officer and the
nature and status thereof.

Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary





EX-35 (c)
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 12, 2007

Ace Securities Corporation
AMACAR GROUP
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan
Trust, Series 2006-NC2

Per Section 4.15 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of 9/1/2006,
the undersigned Officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (Securities Administrator),
hereby certifies the following for the 2006 calendar year or portion thereof:

(A)  a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or
     portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or
     such other applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer or
     Servicing Function Participant, has been made under such officer's
     supervision and

(B)  to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party
     has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, or such other
     applicable agreement in the case of an Additional Servicer or Servicing
     Function Participant, in all material respects throughout such year or
     portion thereof, or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such
     obligation in any material respect, specifying each such failure known to
     such officer and the nature and status thereof.


Certified By:
/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
Kristen Ann Cronin, Vice President

Certified By:
/s/ Gordon Johnson
Gordon Johnson, Assistant Secretary