10-Q 1 d601993d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 1-35144

 

 

Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   98-0536317
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)

1901 N. Roselle Road, Suite 700

Schaumburg, Illinois

  60195
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (847) 908-1600

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

At October 31, 2013, there were 31,772,253 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Table of Contents

 

         Page No.  

PART I –

  FINANCIAL INFORMATION   

Item 1.

  Financial Statements   
  Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012      1   
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012      2   
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012      3   
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012      4   
  Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements      5   

Item 2.

  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations      15   

Item 3.

  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk      27   

Item 4.

  Controls and Procedures      28   

PART II –

  OTHER INFORMATION   

Item 1.

  Legal Proceedings      29   

Item 1A.

  Risk Factors      29   

Item 2.

  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds      29   

Item 3.

  Defaults Upon Senior Securities      29   

Item 4.

  Mine Safety Disclosures      29   

Item 5.

  Other Information      29   

Item 6.

  Exhibits      30   
  Signature      31   

In this report, “Sagent,” “we,” “us” and “our” refers to Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries, and “Common Stock” refers to Sagent’s common stock.


Table of Contents

Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share amounts)

 

     September 30,     December 31,  
     2013     2012  
     (Unaudited)        

Assets

  

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 45,937      $ 27,687   

Short-term investments

     110,251        36,605   

Accounts receivable, net of chargebacks and other deductions

     24,792        31,609   

Inventories, net

     48,620        47,106   

Due from related party

     2,981        1,440   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     7,456        2,821   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     240,037        147,268   

Property, plant, and equipment, net

     57,883        780   

Investment in joint ventures

     1,873        19,622   

Goodwill

     6,038        —     

Intangible assets, net

     3,282        4,277   

Other assets

     331        368   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 309,444      $ 172,315   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 23,134      $ 21,813   

Due to related party

     2,480        7,026   

Accrued profit sharing

     7,824        4,246   

Accrued liabilities

     10,209        7,369   

Current portion of deferred purchase consideration

     5,812        —     

Current portion of long-term debt

     4,880        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     54,339        40,454   

Long term liabilities:

    

Long-term portion of deferred purchase consideration

     8,233        —     

Long-term debt

     14,314        —     

Other long-term liabilities

     1,619        6   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     78,505        40,460   

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Common stock—$0.01 par value, 100,000,000 authorized and 31,764,278 and 28,116,489 outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively

     318        281   

Additional paid-in capital

     348,127        272,725   

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     111        2,500   

Accumulated deficit

     (117,617     (143,651
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     230,939        131,855   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 309,444      $ 172,315   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

1


Table of Contents

Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three months ended September 30,     Nine months ended September 30,  
     2013     2012     2013     2012  

Net revenue

   $ 60,842      $ 49,429      $ 180,644      $ 130,389   

Cost of sales

     42,255        42,208        120,381        110,900   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     18,587        7,221        60,263        19,489   

Operating expenses:

      

Product development

     6,888        4,011        15,629        12,700   

Selling, general and administrative

     9,083        7,169        26,030        22,089   

Management reorganization

     —          739        —          739   

Equity in net loss (income) of joint ventures

     (485     (940     118        (589
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     15,486        10,979        41,777        34,939   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Termination fee

     —          —          5,000        —     

Gain on previously held equity interest

     —          —          2,936        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

     3,101        (3,758     26,422        (15,450

Interest income and other

     44        60        94        210   

Interest expense

     (319     (52     (482     (1,515
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     2,826        (3,750     26,034        (16,755

Provision for income taxes

     —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,826      $ (3,750   $ 26,034      $ (16,755
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share:

      

Basic

   $ 0.10      $ (0.13   $ 0.92      $ (0.60

Diluted

   $ 0.10      $ (0.13   $ 0.90      $ (0.60

Weighted-average of shares used to compute net income (loss) per common share:

      

Basic

     28,745        27,977        28,349        27,943   

Diluted

     29,568        27,977        29,051        27,943   

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

2


Table of Contents

Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

 

     Three months ended September 30,     Nine months ended September 30,  
     2013      2012     2013     2012  
         

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,826       $ (3,750   $ 26,034      $ (16,755

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

         

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     170         362        464        641   

Reclassification of cumulative currency translation gain

     —           —          (2,782     —     

Unrealized (losses) gains on available for sale securities

     21         15        (71     120   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

     191         377        (2,389     761   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ 3,017       $ (3,373   $ 23,645      $ (15,994
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

     Nine months ended September 30,  
     2013     2012  

Cash flows from operating activities

    

Net income (loss)

   $ 26,034      $ (16,755

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

    

Depreciation and amortization

     4,166        5,198   

Stock-based compensation

     4,230        4,297   

Equity in net loss (income) of joint ventures

     118        (589

Dividends from unconsolidated joint venture

     1,995        2,755   

Gain on previously held equity interest

     (2,936     —     

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisition:

    

Accounts receivable, net

     6,818        (1,733

Inventories

     892        2,131   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     (4,435     (1,793

Due from related party

     (6,261     1,370   

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities

     1,128        (13,322
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     31,749        (18,441
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

    

Capital expenditures

     (783     (54

Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired

     (7,296     —     

Return of principal balance of restricted cash

     —          23   

Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures

     (19     (517

Purchases of investments

     (220,719     (144,897

Sale of investments

     146,528        178,937   

Purchase of product rights

     (2,364     (3,026
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

     (84,653     30,466   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

    

Reduction in short-term notes payable

     —          (24,867

Repayment of long-term debt

     —          (12,273

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

     71,158        585   

Payment of deferred financing costs

     (28     (884
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     71,130        (37,439
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate movements on cash

     24        —     

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     18,250        (25,414

Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period

     27,687        52,203   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period

   $ 45,937      $ 26,789   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(in thousands, except for share and per share information)

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Basis of presentation:

Our interim condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited. We prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements following rules for interim reporting as prescribed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As permitted under those rules, we have condensed or omitted a number of footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). It is management’s opinion that these financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, operating results and cash flows. Operating results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of future or annual results.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include Sagent as well as our wholly owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. We account for our investment in Sagent Agila LLC (formerly Sagent Strides LLC) using the equity method of accounting, as our interest in the entity provides for joint financial and operational control.

On June 4, 2013, we acquired (the “SCP Acquisition”) the remaining 50% equity interest in Kanghong Sagent (Chengdu) Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (“KSCP”) from our former joint venture partner, and accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2013 include KSCP as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Prior to the SCP Acquisition, we accounted for our investment in KSCP using the equity method of accounting, as our interest in the entity provided for joint financial and operational control, and operating results of KSCP were reported on a one-month lag. In August 2013, we formally changed the name of this entity to Sagent (China) Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (“SCP”).

You should read these statements in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2012, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2013.

Goodwill

Goodwill is recognized as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if circumstances require. Impairment losses are recognized whenever the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually on October 1.

Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed when incurred, while expenditures for refurbishments and improvements that significantly add to the productive capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Provisions for depreciation are computed for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset and for leasehold improvements over the lesser of the estimated useful life of the related asset or the term of the related lease as follows:

 

5


Table of Contents
Land and land improvements    Remaining term of Chinese land use right (June 2057)
Building and improvements    5 to 40 years or remaining term of lease
Machinery, equipment, furniture, and fixtures    3 to 10 years

Property, plant and equipment that is purchased or constructed which requires a period of time before the assets are ready for their intended use are accounted for as construction-in-progress. Construction-in-progress is recorded at acquisition cost, including installation costs and associated interest costs. Construction-in-progress is transferred to specific property, plant and equipment accounts and commences depreciation when these assets are ready for their intended use. The capitalization of interest costs commences when expenditures for the asset have been made, activities that are necessary to prepare the asset for its intended use are in progress and interest cost is being incurred. The capitalization period ends when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use.

Note 2. Acquisition:

On April 30, 2013, in furtherance of the SCP Acquisition, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Chengdu Kanghong Pharmaceuticals (Group) Co. Ltd. (“CKT”) to acquire CKT’s 50% equity interest in SCP for $25,000, payable in installments through September 2015. The SCP Acquisition closed on June 4, 2013, following approval by the Chengdu Hi-Tech Industrial Development Zone Bureau of Investment Services. Concurrent with the closing of the SCP Acquisition, we paid $10,000 of the aggregate purchase consideration, and recorded a liability of $13,836 representing the fair value of our future payments as of the SCP Acquisition date to CKT under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement. Concurrent with the execution of the Share Purchase Agreement, we entered into a Share Pledge Agreement with CKT pursuant to which we pledged a portion of the shares to be acquired as collateral securing our future installment payment obligations. Future installment payments are payable as follows:

 

     (in thousands)  

2013

   $ 2,500   

2014

     3,500   

2015

     9,000   

The SCP Acquisition was financed with cash and short term investments. The SCP Acquisition provided us with full control of the SCP manufacturing facility and will better serve our long term strategic goals, including a strategy of additional investment in product development and capacity expansion.

As a result of the SCP Acquisition, we remeasured the previously held equity interest in SCP to fair value, resulting in a gain of $2,936 reported as gain on previously held equity interest in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The gain includes $2,782 reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and previously recorded as currency translation adjustments. Both the gain on previously held equity interest and the fair value of the non-controlling interest in SCP that we acquired were based on an asset approach valuation method. Acquisition related costs of $479 were recognized as product development expenses.

The acquisition date fair value transferred for the purchase of SCP is as follows:

 

     (in thousands)  

Cash

   $ 10,000   

Present value of remaining purchase consideration

     13,836   

Previously held equity interest

     15,949   

Gain on remeasurement of previously held equity interest in SCP

     154   
  

 

 

 

Total purchase consideration

   $ 39,939   
  

 

 

 

 

6


Table of Contents

The estimated fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the SCP Acquisition is shown in the table below:

 

     (in thousands)  

Goodwill

   $ 6,038   

Acquired tangible assets, net of assumed liabilities

     33,901   
  

 

 

 

Total allocation of fair value

   $ 39,939   
  

 

 

 

The net tangible assets acquired consist primarily of cash of $2,704, inventory of $2,396, prepaid assets of $196, and property, plant and equipment of $56,654, net of assumed liabilities, primarily long term bank loans of $19,095 and accrued compensation and other liabilities of $8,954. We recorded goodwill of $6,038 due to the synergies achieved by having control over the products and manufacturing at the SCP facility.

The results of SCP are now included in the company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information reflects the consolidated results of operations of Sagent as if the SCP Acquisition had closed on January 1, 2012 and January 1, 2013. The pro forma information includes acquisition and integration expenses. The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations as they would have been had the SCP Acquisition been effected on the assumed date.

 

     Three months ended September 30,     Nine months ended September 30,  
     2013      2012     2013      2012  

Net revenues

   $ 60,842       $ 49,429      $ 180,644       $ 130,389   

Net income (loss)

     2,826         (5,094     19,405         (16,979

Diluted income (loss) per common share

     0.10         (0.18     0.67         (0.61

Note 3. Investments:

Our investments at September 30, 2013 were comprised of the following:

 

     Cost basis      Unrealized
gains
     Unrealized
losses
    Recorded
basis
     Cash and
cash
equivalents
     Short term
investments
 

Assets

                

Cash

   $ 30,810       $ —         $ —        $ 30,810       $ 30,810       $ —     

Money market funds

     15,127         —           —          15,127         15,127         —     

Commercial paper

     50,196         2         (1     50,197         —           50,197   

Corporate bonds and notes

     60,114         3         (63     60,054         —           60,054   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 156,247       $ 5       $ (64   $ 156,188       $ 45,937       $ 110,251   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Investments with continuous unrealized losses for less than twelve months and their related fair values at September 30, 2013 were as follows:

 

     Fair
value
     Unrealized
losses
 

Commercial paper

   $ 34,097       $ (1

Corporate bonds and notes

     50,571         (63
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 84,668       $ (64
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Unrealized losses from fixed-income securities are primarily attributable to changes in interest rates. Because we do not currently intend to sell these investments, and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell our investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, we do not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2013.

 

7


Table of Contents

The original cost and estimated current fair value of our fixed-income securities at September 30, 2013 are set forth below.

 

     Cost basis      Estimated
fair value
 

Due in one year or less

   $ 66,786       $ 66,782   

Due between one and five years

     43,524         43,469   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 110,310       $ 110,251   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 4. Inventories:

Inventories at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

 

     September 30, 2013     December 31, 2012  
     Approved     Pending
regulatory
approval
    Inventory     Approved     Pending
regulatory
approval
     Inventory  

Finished goods

   $ 47,498      $ 1,437      $ 48,935      $ 46,410      $ 1,437       $ 47,847   

Raw materials

     3,935        19        3,954        1,280        —           1,280   

Inventory reserve

     (2,832     (1,437     (4,269     (2,021     —           (2,021
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 48,601      $ 19      $ 48,620      $ 45,669      $ 1,437       $ 47,106   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 5. Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

 

     September 30,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Land and land improvements

   $ 2,216      $ —     

Buildings and improvements

     19,578        103   

Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures

     37,496        1,764   

Construction in process

     306        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     59,596        1,867   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (1,713     (1,087
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 57,883      $ 780   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation expense was $502 and $626 for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2013, respectively. We placed $49,744 of assets related to our Chinese manufacturing facility into service in September 2013, as production of the first commercial batches from the facility occurred during the period.

Note 6. Goodwill and Intangible assets, net:

We recorded goodwill of approximately $6,038 related to the SCP Acquisition. There were no reductions of goodwill relating to impairments.

Intangible assets at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

 

     September 30, 2013      December 31, 2012  
     Gross
carrying
amount
     Accumulated
amortization
    Intangible
assets, net
     Gross
carrying
amount
     Accumulated
amortization
    Intangible
assets, net
 

Product licensing rights

   $ 3,690       $ (1,935   $ 1,755       $ 3,156       $ (1,541   $ 1,615   

Product development rights

     1,527         —          1,527         2,662         —          2,662   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 5,217       $ (1,935   $ 3,282       $ 5,818       $ (1,541   $ 4,277   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

8


Table of Contents

Movements in intangible assets were due to the following:

 

     Product
licensing
rights
    Product
development
rights
 

December 31, 2012

   $ 1,615      $ 2,662   

Acquisition of product rights

     535        1,829   

Amortization of product rights

     (395     (2,964
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

September 30, 2013

   $ 1,755      $ 1,527   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The weighted-average period prior to the next extension or renewal for the 18 products comprising our product licensing rights intangible asset was 51 months at September 30, 2013.

We currently estimate amortization expense over each of the next five years as follows:

 

For the year ending:    Amortization
expense
 

September 30, 2014

   $ 1,784   

September 30, 2015

     427   

September 30, 2016

     191   

September 30, 2017

     144   

September 30, 2018

     133   

Note 7. Investment in Sagent Agila:

Changes in our investment in Sagent Agila during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were as follows:

 

Investment in Sagent Agila at January 1, 2013

   $ 2,161   

Equity in net income of Sagent Agila

     1,707   

Dividends paid

     (1,995
  

 

 

 

Investment in Sagent Agila at September 30, 2013

   $ 1,873   
  

 

 

 

Condensed statement of operations information of Sagent Agila is presented below.

 

     Three months ended September 30,      Nine months ended September 30,  
Condensed statement of operations information    2013      2012      2013      2012  

Net revenues

   $ 3,212       $ 7,469       $ 13,924       $ 19,224   

Gross profit

     1,093         4,537         3,817         8,282   

Net income

     969         4,110         3,413         7,453   

Note 8. Investment in SCP:

Changes in our investment in SCP during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were as follows:

 

Investment in SCP at January 1, 2013

   $ 17,461   

Equity in net loss of SCP

     (1,825

Currency translation adjustment

     294   

Investments in SCP

     19   

Acquisition of remaining equity interest in SCP

     (15,949
  

 

 

 

Investment in SCP at September 30, 2013

   $ —     
  

 

 

 

 

9


Table of Contents

Condensed statement of operations information of SCP for the period through the closing of the SCP Acquisition.

 

     Three months ended September 30,     Nine months ended September 30,  
Condensed statement of operations information    2013      2012     2013     2012  

Net revenues

   $ —         $ —        $ —        $ —     

Gross profit

     —           —          —          —     

Net loss

     —           (2,459     (2,805     (5,766

Note 9. Debt:

Credit facilities acquired under the SCP Acquisition

SCP had outstanding debt obligations with the Agricultural Bank of China at the time of the SCP Acquisition. SCP originally entered into two credit facilities in the amount of RMB 37,000 ($5,987) and RMB 83,000 ($13,431) in June 2011 and August 2010, respectively, each with a five year term. Both credit facilities are secured by the property, plant and equipment of SCP. Amounts outstanding under the credit facilities bear an interest rate equal to the benchmark lending interest rate published by the People’s Bank of China. During the term of the loan, the rate is subject to adjustment every three months. As of September 30, 2013, RMB 118,000 ($19,193) was outstanding under these credit facilities, at an interest rate of 6.00% per annum. As the interest rate resets on a quarterly basis, the fair value of our long-term debt approximates its carrying value. Repayment will be accelerated if the liabilities to assets ratio of our SCP subsidiary exceed 70% and 80% during the term of the RMB 37,000 and RMB 83,000 credit facilities, respectively, or if our SCP subsidiary is unable to achieve 50% of its projected revenues when it commences commercial activities.

Principal payments due on the credit facility draws as of September 30, 2013 were as follows:

 

For the year ending:

  

September 30, 2014

   $ 4,880   

September 30, 2015

     14,314   

Silicon Valley Bank Loan and Security Agreement

In February 2012, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (the “SVB Agreement”). The SVB Agreement provides for a $40,000 asset based revolving loan facility, with availability subject to a borrowing base consisting of eligible accounts receivable and inventory and the satisfaction of conditions precedent specified in the SVB Agreement. The SVB Agreement matures on February 13, 2016, at which time all outstanding amounts will become due and payable. Borrowings under the SVB Agreement may be used for general corporate purposes, including funding working capital. Amounts drawn bear an interest rate equal to, at our option, either a Eurodollar rate plus 2.50% per annum or an alternative base rate plus 1.50% per annum. We also pay a commitment fee on undrawn amounts equal to 0.30% per annum.

The SVB Agreement contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants restrict our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create or permit to exist liens, make certain investments, dividends and other payments in respect of capital stock, sell assets or otherwise dispose of our property, change our lines of business, or enter into a merger or acquisition, in each case, subject to thresholds and exceptions as set forth in the SVB Agreement. The financial covenants in the original SVB Agreement are limited to maintenance of a minimum adjusted quick ratio and a minimum free cash flow. The SVB Agreement also contains customary events of default, including non-payment of principal, interest and other fees after stated grace periods, violations of covenants, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, certain bankruptcy and liquidation events, certain material judgments and attachment events, cross-default to other debt in excess of a specified amount and material agreements, failure to maintain certain material governmental approvals, and actual or asserted invalidity of subordination terms, guarantees and collateral, in each case, subject to grace periods, thresholds and exceptions as set forth in the SVB Agreement. Loans under the SVB Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of our and our principal US operating subsidiary’s assets, other than our equity interests in our joint ventures and certain other limited exceptions.

 

10


Table of Contents

On September 23, 2013, we entered into a Second Loan Modification Agreement (the “Modification”) to our SVB Agreement. The Modification altered the calculation methodology of the borrowing base that is used to determine our borrowing availability and the covenant for the Adjusted Quick Ratio tested at the end of each month and eliminated the covenant to maintain a specified level of free cash flow in quarters where we maintain eligible cash balances of $30 million or greater. We did not amend the term, the maximum availability, or the interest rate applicable to the amounts drawn under the SVB Agreement. As of September 30, 2013, no borrowings were outstanding and we were in compliance with all of our covenants under the SVB Agreement.

Note 10. Accrued liabilities:

Accrued liabilities at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

 

     September 30,
2013
     December 31,
2012
 

Payroll and employee benefits

   $ 4,820       $ 1,211   

Sales and marketing

     4,832         5,649   

Other accrued liabilities

     557         509   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 10,209       $ 7,369   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 11. Fair value measurements:

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2013 consisted of the following:

 

     Total fair
value
     Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets

(Level 1)
     Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets

           

Money market funds

   $ 15,127       $ 15,127       $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Corporate bonds and notes

     60,054         —           60,054         —     

Commercial paper

     50,197         —           50,197         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Short-term investments

   $ 110,251       $ —         $ 110,251       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 125,378       $ 15,127       $ 110,251       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The fair value of our Level 2 investments is based on a combination of quoted market prices of similar securities and matrix pricing provided by third-party pricing services utilizing securities of similar quality and maturity.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2012 consisted of the following:

 

     Total fair
value
     Quoted prices in
active markets
for identical
assets

(Level 1)
     Significant other
observable inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
 

Assets

           

Money market funds

   $ 18,141       $ 18,141       $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Corporate bonds and notes

     13,358         —           13,358         —     

Commercial paper

     23,247         —           23,247         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Short-term investments

   $ 36,605       $ —         $ 36,605       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 54,746       $ 18,141       $ 36,605       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

There were no transfers of assets between Level 1 and Level 2 during the periods presented.

 

11


Table of Contents

Note 12. Accumulated other comprehensive income:

Accumulated other comprehensive income at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is comprised of the following:

 

     September 30,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Currency translation adjustment, net of tax

   $ 170      $ 2,488   

Unrealized (losses) gains on available for sale securities, net of tax

     (59     12   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive income

   $ 111      $ 2,500   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the changes in balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax as of September 30, 2013.

 

     Currency
translation
adjustment
    Unrealized gains
(losses) on
available for sale
securities
    Total  

Balance as of December 31, 2012

   $ 2,488      $ 12      $ 2,500   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

     464        (71     393   

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     (2,782     —          (2,782
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net current-period other comprehensive loss

     (2,318     (71     (2,389
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2013

   $ 170      $ (59   $ 111   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

No amounts were reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The table below presents the significant amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Type of reclassification    Amount
reclassified from
accumulated other
comprehensive
income
     Affected line item in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations

Currency translation adjustment – reclassification of cumulative currency translation gain

   $ 2,782       Gain on previously held equity interest
  

 

 

    

Total reclassification for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net of tax

   $ 2,782      
  

 

 

    

Note 13. Earnings per share:

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Because of their anti-dilutive effect, the following common share equivalents, comprised of restricted stock and unexercised stock options, have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

 

12


Table of Contents
     Anti-dilutive
shares
 

Three months ended September 30, 2013

     923,415   

Three months ended September 30, 2012

     2,403,630   

Nine months ended September 30, 2013

     1,212,899   

Nine months ended September 30, 2012

     2,403,630   

The table below presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

 

     Three months ended September 30,     Nine months ended September 30,  
     2013      2012     2013      2012  

Basic and dilutive numerator:

          

Net income (loss), as reported

   $ 2,826       $ (3,750   $ 26,034       $ (16,755
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator:

          

Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic (in thousands)

     28,745         27,977        28,349         27,943   

Net effect of dilutive securities:

          

Stock options and restricted stock

     823         —          702         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted-average common shares outstanding—diluted (in thousands)

     29,568         27,977        29,051         27,943   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share (basic)

   $ 0.10       $ (0.13   $ 0.92       $ (0.60
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share (diluted)

   $ 0.10       $ (0.13   $ 0.90       $ (0.60
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

On September 16, 2013, we completed a registered equity offering, issuing 3,542,470 new shares of our common stock at $21.25 per share in exchange for total consideration of $75,277. We received proceeds from the offering, net of the underwriting discount and expenses, of $70,647.

Note 14. Stock-based compensation:

We granted 4,700 and 379,874 stock options during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and granted 14,522 restricted stock units and 41,702 restricted stock awards during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. We granted 124,900 and 322,770 stock options during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. There were 28,984 and 95,642 stock options exercised during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, with an aggregate intrinsic value of $489 and $1,225, respectively.

Note 15. Net revenue by product:

Net revenue by product line is as follows:

 

     Three months ended September 30,      Nine months ended September 30,  
     2013      2012      2013      2012  

Therapeutic class:

           

Anti-infective

   $ 24,026       $ 18,173       $ 65,921       $ 57,314   

Critical care

     15,638         20,897         48,381         53,885   

Oncology

     21,178         10,359         66,342         19,190   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 60,842       $ 49,429       $ 180,644       $ 130,389   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

13


Table of Contents

Note 16. Management reorganization:

In August 2012, we completed a reorganization of our executive management team in which we eliminated certain positions within the Company. Costs associated with the reorganization, primarily severance related charges, are reflected under the Management Reorganization caption in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Note 17. Related party transactions:

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, we had a receivable of $2,981 and $1,404 from Sagent Agila LLC, which is expected to offset future profit-sharing payments. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, we had a payable of $2,480 and $7,026 to Sagent Agila LLC, principally for the acquisition of inventory and amounts due under profit-sharing arrangements. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, Sagent Agila LLC distributed $1,256 and $3,990, respectively, of profit sharing receipts to its joint venture partners. As the Sagent Agila joint venture had sufficient cumulative earnings at September 30, 2013, our share of the distribution for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 has been treated as a dividend received in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

Note 18. Commitments and contingencies:

Litigation

From time to time, we are subject to claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. These claims may include assertions that our products infringe existing patents and claims that the use of our products has caused personal injuries. We intend to vigorously defend any such litigation that may arise under all defenses that would be available to us.

Zoledronic Acid (Generic versions of Zometa® and Reclast®).

On February 20, 2013, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Novartis”) sued the Company and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging, among other things, that sales of the Company’s (i) zoledronic acid premix bag (4mg/100ml), made by ACS Dobfar Info S.A. (“Info”), also a defendant, a generic version of Novartis’ Zometa® ready to use bottle , would infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,932,241 (the “241 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 8,324,189 (the “189 Patent”) and (ii) zoledronic acid premix bag (5mg/100ml), also made by Info, a generic version of Novartis’ Reclast® ready to use bottle, would infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,052,987 and the 241 Patent, and (iii) zoledronic acid vial (4mg/5ml), made by Actavis LLC, also a defendant, a generic version of Novartis’ Zometa® vial, would infringe the 189 Patent. (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Actavis, LLC, et. al., Case No. 13-cv-1028) On March 1, 2013, the District Court denied Novartis’ request for a temporary restraining order against the Company and the other defendants, including Actavis and Info. On March 6, 2013, the Company, began selling Actavis’ zoledronic acid vial, the generic version of Zometa®. Also, as of August 27, 2013 and October 1, 2013, the Company began selling zoledronic acid premix bags in 4mg/100ml and 5mg/100ml presentations, respectively. The Company believes it has substantial meritorious defenses to the case, and the Company has sold and will continue to sell these products. Therefore, an adverse final determination that one of the patents is valid and infringed could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

 

14


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report and with our audited financial statements and the notes found in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2013. Unless otherwise noted, all dollar amounts are in thousands.

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could have,” “likely” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. For example, all statements we make relating to our estimated and projected costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates and financial results, our plans and objectives for future operations, growth or initiatives, strategies or the expected outcome or impact of pending or threatened litigation are forward-looking statements. In addition, this report contains forward-looking statements regarding the adequacy of our current cash balances to fund our ongoing operations; our utilization of our net operating loss carryforwards; and our ability to meet our obligations under our loan facilities at the Agricultural Bank of China.

The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and the cautionary statements set forth below, as well as elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and those contained in Part II, Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 6, 2013, identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by our forward-looking statements. Such factors, include, but are not limited to:

 

    we rely on our business partners for the manufacture of substantially all of our products, and if our business partners fail to supply us with high-quality active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) or finished products in the quantities we require on a timely basis, sales of our products could be delayed or prevented, and our revenues and margins could decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations;

 

    if we or any of our business partners are unable to comply with the quality and regulatory standards applicable to pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, or if approvals of pending applications are delayed as a result of quality or regulatory compliance concerns or merely backlogs at the US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), we may be unable to meet the demand for our products, may lose potential revenues and our business, financial position and results of operations could be materially adversely affected;

 

    changes in the regulations, enforcement procedures or regulatory policies established by the FDA and other regulatory agencies are expected to increase the costs and time of development of our products and could delay or prevent sales of our products and our revenues could decline and our business, financial position and results of operations could be materially adversely affected;

 

    three of our products, heparin, levofloxacin in pre-mix bags, and zoledronic acid vials, each of which is supplied to us by a single vendor, represent a significant portion of our net revenues and, if the volume or pricing of any of these products declines, or we are unable to satisfy forecasted demand for any of these products, such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations;

 

    we participate in highly competitive markets, dominated by a few large competitors, and if we are unable to compete successfully, our revenues could decline and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially adversely affected;

 

    if we are unable to maintain our group purchasing organization and distributor relationships, our revenues could decline and our results of operations could be negatively impacted;

 

    we rely on a limited number of pharmaceutical wholesalers to distribute our products;

 

15


Table of Contents
    we depend to a significant degree upon our key personnel, the loss of whom could adversely affect our operations;

 

    we may be exposed to product liability claims that could cause us to incur significant costs or cease selling some of our products;

 

    our products may infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, and if so we may incur substantial liabilities and may be unable to commercialize products in a profitable manner or at all;

 

    if reimbursement by government-sponsored or private sector insurance programs for our current or future products is reduced or modified, our business could suffer;

 

    current and future decline of national and international economic conditions could adversely affect our operations;

 

    we are subject to risks associated with managing our international network of collaborations which include business partners and other suppliers of components, API and finished products located throughout the world;

 

    we may never realize the expected benefits from our manufacturing facility in China and it will require substantial capital resources to reach its manufacturing potential and be profitable; and

 

    we may seek to engage in strategic transactions, including the acquisition of products or businesses, that could have a variety of negative consequences, and we may not realize the intended benefits of such transactions.

We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our work in preparing, reviewing and evaluating our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based upon many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and, it is impossible for us to anticipate or accurately calculate the impact of all factors that could affect our actual results. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this report in the context of these risks and uncertainties.

We cannot assure you that we will realize the results or developments we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the consequences or affect us or our operations in the way we expect. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation and do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

Introduction

We are a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing, manufacturing, sourcing and marketing pharmaceutical products, with a specific emphasis on injectables, which we sell primarily in the United States of America through our highly experienced sales and marketing team.

With a primary focus on generic injectable pharmaceuticals, we offer our customers a broad range of products across anti-infective, oncolytic and critical care indications in a variety of presentations, including single- and multi-dose vials, pre-filled ready-to-use syringes and premix bags. We generally seek to develop injectable products where the form or packaging of the product can be enhanced to improve delivery, product safety or end-user convenience. Our management team includes industry veterans who have previously served critical functions at other injectable pharmaceutical companies and key customer groups and have long-standing relationships with customers, regulatory agencies, and suppliers. We have rapidly established a growing and diverse product portfolio and product pipeline as a result of our innovative business model, which combines an extensive network of international development, sourcing and manufacturing collaborations with our proven and experienced U.S.-based regulatory, quality assurance, business development, project management, and sales and marketing teams. In June 2013, we acquired the remaining 50% interest in SCP from our former joint venture partner. Accordingly, SCP is now a wholly-owned subsidiary and provides us with a dedicated, state-of-the-art manufacturing facility. Prior to the SCP Acquisition, we accounted for our investments in SCP using the equity method of accounting, as our interest in the entity provided for joint financial and operational control. Operating results of SCP prior to the SCP Acquisition were reported on a one-month lag.

 

16


Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We report our financial results in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).

Adjusted Gross Profit

We use the non-GAAP financial measure “Adjusted Gross Profit” and corresponding ratios. We define Adjusted Gross Profit as gross profit plus our share of the gross profit earned through our Sagent Agila joint venture which is included in the Equity in net (income) loss of joint ventures line on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We believe that Adjusted Gross Profit is relevant and useful supplemental information for our investors. Our management believes that the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure, when considered together with our GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, provides a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting Sagent than could be obtained absent these disclosures. Management uses Adjusted Gross Profit and corresponding ratios to make operating and strategic decisions and evaluate our performance. We have disclosed this non-GAAP financial measure so that our investors have the same financial data that management uses with the intention of assisting you in making comparisons to our historical operating results and analyzing our underlying performance. Our management believes that Adjusted Gross Profit provides a useful supplemental tool to consistently evaluate the profitability of our products that have profit sharing arrangements. The limitation of this measure is that it includes an item that does not have an impact on gross profit reported in accordance with GAAP. The best way that this limitation can be addressed is by using Adjusted Gross Profit in combination with our GAAP reported gross profit. Because Adjusted Gross Profit calculations may vary among other companies, the Adjusted Gross Profit figures presented below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Our use of Adjusted Gross Profit is not meant to and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, any GAAP financial measure. You should carefully evaluate the following tables reconciling Adjusted Gross Profit to our GAAP reported gross profit for the periods presented (dollars in thousands).

 

     Three months ended
September 30,
                 % of net revenue, three months
ended September 30,
 
     2013      2012      $ Change     % Change     2013     2012     % Change  

Adjusted Gross Profit

   $ 19,135       $ 9,489       $ 9,646        102     31.5     19.2     12.3

Sagent portion of gross profit earned by Sagent Agila joint venture

     548         2,268         (1,720     -76     0.9     4.6     -3.7
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

         

Gross Profit

   $ 18,587       $ 7,221       $ 11,366        157     30.5     14.6     15.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

         

 

     Nine months ended
September 30,
                 % of net revenue, nine months
ended September 30,
 
     2013      2012      $ Change     % Change     2013     2012     % Change  

Adjusted Gross Profit

   $ 62,172       $ 23,629       $ 38,543        163     34.4     18.1     16.3

Sagent portion of gross profit earned by Sagent Agila joint venture

     1,909         4,140         (2,231     -54     1.1     3.2     -2.1
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

         

Gross Profit

   $ 60,263       $ 19,489       $ 40,774        209     33.4     14.9     18.5
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

         

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

We use the non-GAAP financial measures “EBITDA” and “Adjusted EBITDA” and corresponding growth ratios. We define EBITDA as net income (loss) less interest expense, net of interest income, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) less interest expense, net of interest income, provision for income taxes, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation expense, the gain recorded on our previously held equity interest in SCP in connection with the SCP Acquisition and the equity in net loss of our SCP joint venture prior to the SCP Acquisition. We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted

 

17


Table of Contents

EBITDA are relevant and useful supplemental information for our investors. Our management believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures, when considered together with our GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, provides a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting Sagent than could be obtained absent these disclosures. Management uses EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and corresponding ratios to make operating and strategic decisions and evaluate our performance. We have disclosed these non-GAAP financial measures so that our investors have the same financial data that management uses with the intention of assisting you in making comparisons to our historical operating results and analyzing our underlying performance. Our management believes that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful supplemental tools to evaluate the underlying operating performance of the company on an ongoing basis. The limitation of these measures is that they exclude items that have an impact on net income (loss). The best way that these limitations can be addressed is by using EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in combination with our GAAP reported net income (loss). Because EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA calculations may vary among other companies, the EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA figures presented below may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies. Our use of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is not meant to and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, any GAAP financial measure. You should carefully evaluate the following tables reconciling EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to our GAAP reported net income (loss) for the periods presented (dollars in thousands).

 

     Three months ended September 30,              
     2013      2012     $ Change     % Change  

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 6,222       $ 1,004      $ 5,218        520

Stock-based compensation expense

     1,073         1,641        (568     -35

Gain on previously-held equity interest1

     —           —          —          n/m   

Equity in net loss of SCP joint venture

     —           1,115        (1,115     -100
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

EBITDA

   $ 5,149       $ (1,752   $ 6,901        394
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

Depreciation and amortization expense2

     2,048         2,006        42        2

Interest expense, net

     275         (8     283        3,538

Provision for income taxes

     —           —          —          —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,826       $ (3,750   $ 6,576        175
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

18


Table of Contents
     Nine months ended September 30,              
     2013     2012     $ Change     % Change  

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 33,642      $ (3,304   $ 36,946        1,118

Stock-based compensation expense

     4,230        4,297        (67     -2

Gain on previously-held equity interest1

     (2,936     —          (2,936     n/m   

Equity in net loss of SCP joint venture

     1,825        3,137        (1,312     -42
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

EBITDA

   $ 30,523      $ (10,738   $ 41,261        384
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Depreciation and amortization expense2

     4,101        4,712        (611     -13

Interest expense, net

     388        1,305        (917     -70

Provision for income taxes

     —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net income (loss)

   $ 26,034      $ (16,755   $ 42,789        255
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

1 As a result of the SCP Acquisition, we remeasured the previously held equity interest in SCP to fair value, resulting in a gain of $2,936 reported as gain on previously held equity interest in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The gain includes $2,782 reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and previously recorded as currency translation adjustments.

 

2 Depreciation and amortization expense excludes $22 and $22 of amortization in the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $65 and $486 in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to deferred financing fees, which is included within interest expense and other in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

 

19


Table of Contents

Discussion and Analysis

Consolidated results of operations

The following compares our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 with those of the three months ended September 30, 2012:

 

     Three months ended September 30,        
     2013     2012     $ change     % change  

Net revenue

   $ 60,842      $ 49,429      $ 11,413        23

Cost of sales

     42,255        42,208        47        0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     18,587        7,221        11,366        157

Gross profit as % of net revenues

     30.5     14.6    

Operating expenses:

        

Product development

     6,888        4,011        2,877        72

Selling, general and administrative

     9,083        7,169        1,914        27

Management reorganization

     —          739        (739     -100

Equity in net income of joint ventures

     (485     (940     (455     -48
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     15,486        10,979        4,507        42
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

     3,101        (3,758     6,859        183

Interest income and other

     44        60        (16     -27

Interest expense

     (319     (52     (267     513
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     2,826        (3,750     6,576        175

Provision for income taxes

     —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 2,826      $ (3,750   $ 6,576        175
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share:

        

Basic

   $ 0.10      $ (0.13   $ 0.23        177

Diluted

   $ 0.10      $ (0.13   $ 0.23        177

Net revenue: Net revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $60.8 million, an increase of $11.4 million, or 23%, as compared to $49.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The launch of 23 new codes or presentations of 10 products since September 30, 2012, including zoledronic acid vials at market formation, contributed $17.5 million in revenue during the third quarter of 2013. Net revenue for products launched prior to September 30, 2012 decreased $6.4 million, or 13%, to $43.1 million in the third quarter of 2013 due primarily to lower volumes on certain products due primarily to reductions in demand driven by the abatement of market shortages and increased competitive pricing pressures.

Cost of sales: Cost of goods sold for the three months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $42.3 million, an increase of less than $0.1 million, as compared to $42.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenues was 30.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 14.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Adjusted Gross Profit as a percentage of net revenue was 31.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2013, and 19.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in both gross profit and Adjusted Gross Profit is primarily due to the introduction of higher margin products in the past twelve months, particularly zoledronic acid vials at market formation in March 2013, partially offset by $1.1 million of unabsorbed manufacturing costs at our SCP facility.

Product development: Product development expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $6.9 million, an increase of $2.9 million, or 72%, as compared to $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in product development expense was primarily due to increased milestone expense for projects in our pipeline and $0.6 million of costs associated with development activities at SCP, which were included as part of the equity in net income of joint ventures in 2012.

 

20


Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2013, our new product pipeline included 37 products represented by 61 ANDAs which we had filed, or licensed rights to, that were under review by the FDA and four products represented by nine ANDAs that have been recently approved and were pending commercial launch, including carboplatin, the first approved product out of our SCP facility. Also, we had an additional 28 products represented by 44 ANDAs under initial development at September 30, 2013.

Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013, totaled $9.1 million, an increase of $1.9 million, or 27%, as compared to $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was primarily due to $0.9 million of costs associated with our SCP subsidiary, which were included as part of the equity in net income of joint ventures in 2012. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of net revenue was 15% and 15% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Management reorganization: Restructuring expenses, primarily severance related charges in connection with eliminated positions, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 totaled $0.7 million. There were no such restructuring expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Equity in net income of joint ventures: Equity in net income of joint ventures for the three months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $0.5 million, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 48%, as compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Included in this amount are the following (in thousands of dollars).

 

     Three Months Ended September 30,  
     2013     2012  

Sagent Agila LLC – Earnings directly related to the sale of product

   $ 548      $ 2,268   

Sagent Agila LLC – Product development costs

     (63     (213

Kanghong Sagent (Chengdu) Pharmaceutical Co – net loss(1)

     —          (1,115
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity in net income of joint ventures

   $ 485      $ 940   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)  Following the acquisition in June 2013, the results of SCP are included within our consolidated financial results.

Interest expense: Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $0.3 million, an increase of $0.3 million, or 513%, as compared to $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Provision for income taxes: We have generated cumulative tax losses since inception and do not believe that it is more likely than not that our net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets will be utilized. As a result, we have decided that a full valuation allowance is required against our deferred tax assets. Because none of our current net operating loss carryforwards expire before 2027, we expect that we will have a reasonable opportunity to utilize all of these loss carryforwards before they expire, but such loss carryforwards will be usable only to the extent that we generate sufficient taxable income.

Net income (loss) and diluted net earnings (loss) per common share: The net income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 of $2.8 million increased by $6.6 million, or 175%, from the $3.8 million net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share increased by $0.23, or 177%. The increase in diluted net earnings (loss) per common share is due to the following factors:

 

Diluted EPS for the three months ended September 30, 2012

   $ (0.13

Increase in earnings

     0.22   

Increase in diluted common shares outstanding

     0.01   
  

 

 

 

Diluted EPS for the three months ended September 30, 2013

   $ 0.10   
  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA: Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended September 30, 2013 of $6.2 million increased by $5.2 million, or 520%, from $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The improvement in adjusted EBITDA is driven predominately by the increased cash earnings of our business in the three months ended September 30, 2013, as our gross profit increased by $11.4 million during the period, partially offset by $2.3 million of cash costs associated with the consolidation of SCP.

 

 

21


Table of Contents

The following compares our consolidated results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 with those of the nine months ended September 30, 2012:

 

     Nine months ended September 30,        
     2013     2012     $ change     % change  

Net revenue

   $ 180,644      $ 130,389      $ 50,255        38

Cost of sales

     120,381        110,900        9,481        9
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     60,263        19,489        40,774        209

Gross profit as % of net revenues

     33.4     14.9    

Operating expenses:

        

Product development

     15,629        12,700        2,929        23

Selling, general and administrative

     26,030        22,089        3,941        18

Management reorganization

     —          739        (739     -100

Equity in net loss (income) of joint ventures

     118        (589     707        120
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     41,777        34,939        6,838        20
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Termination fee

     5,000        —          5,000        n/m   

Gain on previously held equity interest

     2,936        —          2,936        n/m   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations

     26,422        (15,450     41,872        271

Interest income and other

     94        210        (116     -55

Interest expense

     (482     (1,515     1,033        -68
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

     26,034        (16,755     42,789        255

Provision for income taxes

     —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 26,034      $ (16,755   $ 42,789        255
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share:

        

Basic

   $ 0.92      $ (0.60   $ 1.52        253

Diluted

   $ 0.90      $ (0.60   $ 1.50        250

Net revenue: Net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $180.6 million, an increase of $50.3 million, or 38%, as compared to $130.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The launch of 23 codes or presentations of 10 products since September 30, 2012, including zoledronic acid vials at market formation, contributed $52.1 million of the net revenue increase in the first nine months of the current year. Net revenue for products launched prior to September 30, 2012 decreased $2.1 million, or 2%, to $128.3 million in the first nine months of 2013.

Cost of sales: Cost of goods sold for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $120.4 million, an increase of $9.5 million, or 9%, as compared to $110.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Gross profit as a percentage of net revenue was 33.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 14.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Adjusted Gross Profit as a percentage of net revenue was 34.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, and 18.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in both gross profit and Adjusted Gross Profit is primarily due to the introduction of higher margin products in the past twelve months, particularly zoledronic acid vials at market formation in March 2013, partially offset by reductions in demand driven by the abatement of market shortages and competitive pricing pressures and $1.1 million of unabsorbed manufacturing costs at our SCP facility.

Product development: Product development expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $15.6 million, an increase of $2.9 million, or 23%, as compared to $12.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in product development expense was primarily due to increased milestone expense for projects in our pipeline and $0.6 million of costs associated with development activities at SCP, which were included as part of the equity in net loss (income) of joint ventures in 2012.

Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, totaled $26.0 million, an increase of $3.9 million, or 18%, as compared to $22.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in selling, general and administrative expense was primarily due to increases in employee-related costs and $0.9 million of costs associated with our SCP facility, which were included as part of the equity in net loss (income) of joint ventures in 2012. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of net revenue was 14% and 17% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

22


Table of Contents

Equity in net loss (income) of joint ventures: Equity in net loss of joint ventures for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $0.1 million, as compared to income from joint ventures of $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Included in this amount are the following (in thousands of dollars).

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
     2013     2012  

Sagent Agila LLC – Earnings directly related to the sale of product

   $ (1,909   $ (4,141

Sagent Agila LLC – Product development costs

     202        415   

Kanghong Sagent (Chengdu) Pharmaceutical Co – net loss

     1,825        3,137   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity in net loss of joint ventures

   $ 118      $ (589
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Termination fee: Termination fee for 2013 represents the $5.0 million one-time termination fee received in connection with our agreement in March 2013 to terminate our Manufacturing and Supply Agreement with Actavis effective December 31, 2014.

Gain on previously held equity interest: As a result of the SCP Acquisition, our previously held equity interest was remeasured to fair value, resulting in a gain of $2.9 million reported as gain on previously held equity interest in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The gain includes $2.8 million reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income, and previously recorded as currency translation adjustments.

Interest expense: Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 totaled $0.5 million, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 68%, as compared to $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease was principally due to $1.1 million of deferred financing costs incurred in connection with the early termination and partial extinguishment of our former senior secured revolving and term loan credit facilities in February 2012.

Provision for income taxes: We have generated cumulative tax losses since inception and do not believe that it is more likely than not that our net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets will be utilized. As a result, we have decided that a full valuation allowance is needed against our deferred tax assets. Because none of our current net operating loss carryforwards expire before 2027, we expect that we will have a reasonable opportunity to utilize all of these loss carryforwards before they expire, but such loss carryforwards will be usable only to the extent that we generate sufficient taxable income.

Net income (loss) and diluted net earnings (loss) per common share: The net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of $26.0 million increased by $42.8 million, or 255%, from the $16.8 million net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share increased by $1.50, or 250%. The increase in diluted net earnings (loss) per common share is due to the following factors:

 

Diluted EPS for the nine months ended September 30, 2012

   $ (0.60

Increase in earnings

     1.47   

Increase in diluted common shares outstanding

     0.03   
  

 

 

 

Diluted EPS for the nine months ended September 30, 2013

   $ 0.90   
  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA: Adjusted EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of $33.6 million increased by $36.9 million, or 1,118%, from negative $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The improvement in Adjusted EBITDA is driven predominately by the increased cash earnings of the business in the nine months ended September 30, 2013, as our gross profit increased by $40.8 million during the period, partially offset by $2.3 million of cash costs associated with the consolidation of SCP.

 

23


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Funding Requirements

Our future capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including the continued commercial success of our existing products, launching the 41 products that are represented by our 70 ANDAs that have been recently approved and are pending commercial launch or are pending approval by the FDA as of September 30, 2013, successfully identifying and sourcing other new product opportunities, manufacturing products at our wholly-owned Chinese manufacturing facility, and business development activity.

Based on our existing business plan, we expect that cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $156.2 million as of September 30, 2013, together with borrowings available under our SVB revolving loan facility, will be sufficient to fund our planned operations, including the continued development of our product pipeline, the further payments required in respect of the SCP Acquisition , our obligations under the ABC Loans and potential capital expansion at our Chinese facility, for at least the next 12 months. However, we may require additional funds in the event that we change our business plan, pursue additional strategic transactions, including the acquisition of businesses or products, or encounter unexpected developments, including unforeseen competitive conditions within our product markets, changes in the regulatory environment or the loss of or negative developments affecting key relationships with suppliers, group purchasing organizations or end-user customers.

If additional funding is required, it may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, the terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders. For example, if we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities or by selling convertible debt securities, dilution to our existing stockholders may result. To the extent our capital resources are insufficient to meet our future capital requirements, we will need to finance our future cash needs through public or private equity offerings or debt financings, which may not be available to us on terms we consider acceptable or at all.

If additional funding is not available, we may be required to terminate, significantly modify or delay the development or commercialization of new products and may not be able to achieve the manufacturing potential of our SCP facility. We may elect to raise additional funds even before we need them if we believe that the conditions for raising capital are favorable.

Cash Flows

Overview

On September 30, 2013, cash and cash equivalents on hand totaled $45.9 million. Short-term investments, generally U.S. government or investment grade corporate debt securities with a remaining term of two years or less, totaled $110.3 million. Working capital totaled $185.7 million and our current ratio (current assets to current liabilities) was approximately 4.4 to 1.0.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Operating activities: Net cash provided by operating activities was $31.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared with $18.4 million of cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in cash provided by operations was primarily due to the $36.9 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA and the reduction of cash used to repay accounts payables and other accrued liabilities in the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Investing activities: Net cash used in investing activities was $84.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared with $30.5 million of net cash provided by investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Cash used in investing activities during 2013 relates primarily to the investment of the proceeds from our September 2013 stock offering in short term investments, while cash provided by investing activities in 2012 relates to the net sale of short term investments of $34.0 million to repay in full all amounts due under our former term loan and senior secured revolving credit facilities in February 2012.

Financing activities: Net cash provided by financing activities was $71.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $37.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Cash provided by financing activities in 2013 primarily relates to the $70.6 million net proceeds received from the issuance of 3,542,670 shares of our common stock at $21.25 per share in September 2013. Cash used in financing activities in 2012 primarily related to the repayment in full of all outstanding amounts due under our former term loan and senior secured revolving credit facilities in February 2012.

 

24


Table of Contents

Asset based revolving loan facility

On February 13, 2012, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (the “SVB Agreement”). The SVB Agreement provides for a $40.0 million asset based revolving loan facility, with availability determined by a borrowing base consisting of eligible accounts receivable and inventory and subject to certain conditions precedent specified in the SVB Agreement. The SVB Agreement matures on February 13, 2016, at which time all outstanding amounts will become due and payable. Borrowings under the SVB Agreement may be used for general corporate purposes, including funding working capital. Amounts drawn bear an interest rate equal to, at our option, either a Eurodollar rate plus 2.50% per annum or an alternative base rate plus 1.50% per annum. We also pay a commitment fee on undrawn amounts equal to 0.30% per annum. During the continuance of an event of default, at Silicon Valley Bank’s option, all obligations will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to 5.00% per annum above the otherwise applicable rate.

Loans under the SVB Agreement are secured by substantially all of our and our principal domestic operating subsidiary’s assets, other than our equity interests in our joint ventures and certain other limited exceptions.

The SVB Agreement contains various customary affirmative and negative covenants. The negative covenants restrict our ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, create or permit to exist liens, make certain investments, dividends and other payments in respect of capital stock, sell assets or otherwise dispose of our property, change our lines of business, or enter into a merger or acquisition, in each case, subject to thresholds and exceptions as set forth in the SVB Agreement. The financial covenants in the original SVB Agreement are limited to maintenance of a minimum adjusted quick ratio and a minimum free cash flow. The SVB Agreement also contains customary events of default, including non-payment of principal, interest and other fees after stated grace periods, violations of covenants, material inaccuracy of representations and warranties, certain bankruptcy and liquidation events, certain material judgments and attachment events, cross-default to other debt in excess of a specified amount and material agreements, failure to maintain certain material governmental approvals, and actual or asserted invalidity of subordination terms, guarantees and collateral, in each case, subject to grace periods, thresholds and exceptions as set forth in the SVB Agreement.

In September 2013, we entered into the Second Loan Modification Agreement (the “Second Modification Agreement”) to the SVB Agreement. The Second Modification Agreement makes certain amendments to the SVB Agreement, including: modifying the calculation methodology of the borrowing base that is used to determine the Company’s borrowing availability, while maximum availability remains $40.0 million; eliminating the covenant to maintain a specified level of free cash flow in quarters where the Company maintains eligible cash balances of $30.0 million or greater and modifying the covenant for the adjusted quick ratio to be tested at the end of each month; and providing additional flexibility for the Company to make certain investments. The Second Modification Agreement did not amend the term of the SVB Agreement, the maximum availability under the SVB Agreement, or the interest rate applicable to amounts drawn under the SVB Agreement, which remain unchanged.

As of September 30, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding under our Silicon Valley Bank revolving loan facility, and we were in compliance with all covenants under this loan agreement.

Chinese loan facilities

SCP had outstanding debt obligations with the Agricultural Bank of China Ltd. (“ABC”) at the time of the SCP Acquisition. SCP originally entered into two loan contracts with ABC for RMB 83.0 million ($13.4 million) and RMB 37.0 million ($6.0 million) in August 2010 and June 2011, respectively (the “ABC Loans”). At September 30, 2013, RMB 118.0 million ($19.2 million) of the original loan remains outstanding, and is subject to a repayment schedule, with all amounts due and payable by August 2015. Borrowings under the ABC Loans were used for the construction of the SCP facility and funding of the ongoing operations of SCP up to the date of the SCP Acquisition. Amounts outstanding under the ABC Loans bear an interest rate equal to the benchmark lending interest rate published by the People’s Bank of China. During the term of the loan, the rate is subject to adjustment every three months. The ABC Loans are secured by the property, plant and equipment of SCP. The ABC Loans contain various covenants, including covenants that restrict SCP’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, provide guarantees, pledge or incur liens on assets, enter into merger, consolidation or acquisition transactions, or transfer assets. In addition, the ABC Loans contain financial covenants that require SCP to achieve specified minimum revenue levels and to maintain a specified liability to assets ratio. As of September 30, 2013, the interest rate for the ABC Loans was 6.00%.

 

25


Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than the contractual obligations that are discussed below and in our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2012, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 18, 2013.

Aggregate Contractual Obligations:

The following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2013. The actual amounts that may be required in the future to repay borrowings under the SVB Agreement and the ABC Loans may be different, as a result of borrowings under the facility and foreign exchange rates, respectively.

 

     Payments due by period  

Contractual obligations (1)

   Total      Less than
one year
     1-3 years      3-5 years      More than
five years
 

Long-term debt obligations (2)

   $ 19,194       $ 4,880       $ 14,314       $ —         $ —     

Operating lease obligations (3)

     993         295         617         81         —     

Contingent milestone payments (4)

     26,184         12,947         10,341         2,896         —     

SCP purchase consideration (5)

     15,000         6,000         9,000         —           —     

Joint venture funding requirements (6)

     118         118         —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 61,489       $ 24,240       $ 34,272       $ 2,977       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)  We had no material purchase commitments, individually or in the aggregate, under our manufacturing and supply agreements.
(2)  No amounts were drawn under the SVB revolving loan facility as of September 30, 2013. Includes amounts due under the ABC Loans assuming period-end foreign exchange rates.
(3)  Includes annual minimum lease payments related to non-cancelable operating leases.
(4)  Includes management’s estimate for contingent potential milestone payments and fees pursuant to strategic business agreements for the development and marketing of finished dosage form pharmaceutical products assuming all contingent milestone payments occur. Does not include contingent royalty payments, which are dependent on the introduction of new products.
(5)  Includes remaining purchase consideration payable under the SCP share purchase agreement.
(6)  Includes minimum funding requirements in connection with our Sagent Agila joint venture.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.

We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

 

    Revenue recognition;

 

    Inventories;

 

    Income taxes;

 

    Stock-based compensation;

 

    Valuation and impairment of marketable securities;

 

    Product development; and

 

    Intangible assets.

 

26


Table of Contents

For a discussion of critical accounting policies affecting us, see the discussion under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” and under Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2013.

Following the SCP Acquisition, we have identified our accounting policies for consolidations and goodwill as new critical accounting policies, as further described below.

Consolidations

The consolidated financial statements of Sagent include the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2013 include SCP as a wholly-owned subsidiary as a result of the SCP Acquisition on June 4, 2013. Prior to the SCP Acquisition, we accounted for our investment in SCP using the equity method of accounting, as our interest in the entity provided for joint financial and operational control. Operating results of SCP prior to the SCP Acquisition were reported on a one-month lag.

We account for investments in joint ventures, including Sagent Agila LLC and, prior to the SCP Acquisition, SCP, under the equity method of accounting, as our interest in each entity provides for joint financial and operational control. Our equity in the net income (loss) of Sagent Agila LLC and, prior to the SCP Acquisition, SCP, is included in the consolidated financial statements as equity in net income (loss) of joint ventures.

Goodwill

Goodwill is recognized as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if circumstances require. Impairment losses are recognized whenever the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually on October 1.

New Accounting Guidance

There are currently no new accounting pronouncements that will impact the Company.

Contingencies

See Note 18. Commitments and Contingencies, and Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings for a discussion of contingencies.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Our market risks relate primarily to changes in interest rates, and following the SCP Acquisition, currency rate fluctuations between the Chinese Renminbi and US dollar.

Our SVB revolving loan facility bears floating interest rates that are tied to LIBOR and an alternate base rate, and therefore, our statements of operations and our cash flows will be exposed to changes in interest rates. As we had no borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2013, there is no impact related to potential changes in the LIBOR rate on our interest expense at September 30, 2013. Our ABC Loans bear floating interest rates that are tied to the benchmark lending interest rate published by the People’s Bank of China, and therefore our statements of operations and our cash flows are exposed to changes in interest and foreign exchange rates. Based on the amounts outstanding at September 30, 2013, a one percentage point increase in the benchmark lending rate published by the People’s Bank of China would increase our ongoing interest expense by $0.2 million per year, and a 10% strengthening of the Chinese Renminbi relative to the US dollar, would increase our ongoing interest expense by $0.1 million per year. We historically have not engaged in hedging activities related to our interest rate or foreign exchange risks.

 

27


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $45.9 million and $110.3 million, respectively. Our cash and cash equivalents are held primarily in cash and money market funds, and our short-term investments are held primarily in corporate debt securities and commercial paper. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes. Due to the short-term nature of these investments, we believe that we do not have any material exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates.

We generally record sales in U.S. dollars and pay our expenses in the local currency of the legal entity that incurs the expense, either U.S. dollars or Chinese Renminbi. Substantially all of our business partners that supply us with API, product development services and finished product manufacturing are located in a number of foreign jurisdictions, and we believe those business partners generally incur their respective operating expenses in local currencies. As a result, both we and our business partners may be exposed to currency rate fluctuations and experience an effective increase in operating expenses in the event local currencies appreciate against the U.S. dollar. In this event, the cost of manufacturing product from our SCP facility may increase or such business partners may elect to stop providing us with these services or attempt to pass these increased costs back to us through increased prices for product development services, API sourcing or finished products that they supply to us. Historically we have not used derivatives to protect against adverse movements in currency rates.

We do not have any foreign currency or any other material derivative financial instruments.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (a) were effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (b) include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management, together with our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2013. We determined that there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

28


Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

From time to time we are subject to claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. At this time, there are no proceedings of which management is aware that are expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We intend to vigorously defend any such litigation that may arise under all defenses that would be available to us.

Zoledronic Acid (Generic versions of Zometa® and Reclast®).

On February 20, 2013, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Novartis”) sued the Company and several other defendants in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging, among other things, that sales of the Company’s (i) zoledronic acid premix bag (4mg/100ml), made by ACS Dobfar Info S.A. (“Info”), also a defendant, a generic version of Novartis’ Zometa® ready to use bottle , would infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,932,241 (the “241 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 8,324,189 (the “189 Patent”) and (ii) zoledronic acid premix bag (5mg/100ml), also made by Info, a generic version of Novartis’ Reclast® ready to use bottle, would infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,052,987 and the 241 Patent, and (iii) zoledronic acid vial (4mg/5ml), made by Actavis LLC, also a defendant, a generic version of Novartis’ Zometa® vial, would infringe the 189 Patent. (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Actavis, LLC, et. al., Case No. 13-cv-1028) On March 1, 2013, the District Court denied Novartis’ request for a temporary restraining order against the Company and the other defendants, including Actavis and Info. On March 6, 2013, the Company, began selling Actavis’ zoledronic acid vial, the generic version of Zometa®. Also, as of August 27, 2013 and October 1, 2013, the Company began selling zoledronic acid premix bags in 4mg/100ml and 5mg/100ml presentations, respectively. The Company believes it has substantial meritorious defenses to the case, and the Company has sold and will continue to sell these products. Therefore, an adverse final determination that one of the patents is valid and infringed could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There were no material changes during the three months ended September 30, 2013 to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part II, Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 6, 2013.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities during the Quarter ended September 30, 2013

There are currently no share repurchase programs authorized by our Board of Directors. We made no repurchases of our common stock during the third quarter of 2013.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

 

29


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.

 

Exhibit Number

 

Description

3.1

  Certificate of Incorporation of Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File Nos. 333-170979 and 333-173597)).

3.2

  Bylaws of Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File Nos. 333-170979 and 333-173597)).

10.1

  Second Loan Modification Agreement, dated September 23, 2013, by and among Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, and Silicon Valley Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 24, 2013).

31.1*

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

31.2*

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

32.1*

  Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.1*

  The following materials from Sagent’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 are formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and (vi) document and entity information.

 

* Filed herewith

 

30


Table of Contents

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

SAGENT PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
/s/ Jonathon M. Singer

Jonathon M. Singer

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 5, 2013

 

31