EX-99.2 3 noaex9923-31x2013.htm EXHIBIT 99.2 NOA Ex 99.2 3-31-2013

Exhibit 99.2








NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY PARTNERS INC.
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended March 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian Dollars)
 




 
KPMG LLP
  
Telephone
  
(780) 429-7300
 
Chartered Accountants
  
Fax
  
(780) 429-7379
 
10125 – 102 Street
  
Internet
  
www.kpmg.ca
 
Edmonton AB  T5J 3V8
  
 
  
 
 
Canada
  
 
  
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of North American Energy Partners Inc.
We have audited North American Energy Partners Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). North American Energy Partners Inc.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting in the accompanying Management's Discussion and Analysis for the year ended March 31, 2013. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on North American Energy Partners Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.






KPMG LLP, is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
KPMG Confidential

2
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, North American Energy Partners Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of North American Energy Partners Inc. as at March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2013, and our report dated June 10, 2013, expressed an unmodified (unqualified) opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Chartered Accountants
Edmonton, Canada
June 10, 2013































KPMG Confidential

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
3


 
KPMG LLP
  
Telephone
  
(780) 429-7300
 
Chartered Accountants
  
Fax
  
(780) 429-7379
 
10125 – 102 Street
  
Internet
  
www.kpmg.ca
 
Edmonton AB  T5J 3V8
  
 
  
 
 
Canada
  
 
  
 
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of North American Energy Partners Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of North American Energy Partners Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at March 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2013, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Management's Responsibility for the Consolidated Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors' Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the company's preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.



KPMG LLP, is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
KPMG Confidential

4
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of North American Energy Partners Inc. as at March 31, 2013 and 2012 and its consolidated results of operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2013 in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Other Matter
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), North American Energy Partners Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated June 10, 2013 expressed an unmodified (unqualified) opinion on the effectiveness of North American Energy Partners Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting.

Chartered Accountants
Edmonton, Canada
June 10, 2013




























KPMG Confidential

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
5


Consolidated Balance Sheets
As at March 31
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian Dollars)
 
 
2013

 
2012

Assets
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
598

 
$
1,400

Accounts receivable, net (note 5 and 17(d))
 
100,469

 
214,129

Unbilled revenue (note 6)
 
56,183

 
86,859

Inventories (note 7)
 
5,751

 
11,855

Prepaid expenses and deposits (note 8)
 
2,498

 
6,315

Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture (note 9)
 

 
1,574

Assets held for sale (note 10, 23(b) and 17(a))
 
157,464

 
1,841

Deferred tax assets (note 11)
 
33,694

 
2,991

 
 
356,657

 
326,964

Property, plant and equipment, net (note 12)
 
274,246

 
312,775

Other assets (note 13(a))
 
14,362

 
19,902

Goodwill (note 14)
 

 
32,901

Deferred tax assets (note 11)
 
14,673

 
57,451

Total Assets
 
$
659,938

 
$
749,993

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
 
$
73,727

 
$
171,130

Accrued liabilities (note 15)
 
32,482

 
36,795

Billings in excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts (note 6)
 
7,085

 
7,514

Current portion of long term debt (note 16(a))
 
21,409

 
14,402

Current portion of derivative financial instruments (note 17(a))
 
4,261

 
3,220

Liabilities held for sale (note 23(b))
 
38,846

 

Deferred tax liabilities (note 11)
 
13,392

 
21,512

 
 
191,202

 
254,573

Long term debt (note 16(a))
 
290,655

 
300,066

Derivative financial instruments (note 17(a))
 
2,180

 
5,926

Other long term obligations (note 18(a))
 
6,746

 
8,860

Deferred tax liabilities (note 11)
 
41,211

 
52,788

 
 
531,994

 
622,213

Shareholders' equity
 
 
 
 
Common shares (authorized – unlimited number of voting common shares; issued and outstanding – March 31, 2013 - 36,251,006 (March 31, 2012 - 36,251,006) (note 19(a))
 
304,908

 
304,908

Additional paid-in capital
 
10,307

 
8,711

Deficit
 
(187,283
)
 
(185,820
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
 
12

 
(19
)
 
 
127,944

 
127,780

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
 
$
659,938

 
$
749,993

Commitments (note 20)
 

 

Contingencies (note 21)
 

 


Approved on behalf of the Board
 
/s/ Ronald A. McIntosh
 
 
/s/ Allen R. Sello
 
Ronald A. Mclntosh, Director
 
 
Allen R. Sello, Director
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Loss
For the years ended March 31
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian Dollars, except per share amounts)
 
 
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Revenue
 
$
544,609

 
$
670,720

 
$
667,037

Project costs
 
244,444

 
310,463

 
284,241

Equipment costs
 
193,843

 
220,738

 
234,933

Equipment operating lease expense
 
34,723

 
62,870

 
68,349

Depreciation
 
37,722

 
44,642

 
35,062

Gross profit
 
33,877

 
32,007

 
44,452

General and administrative expenses
 
44,076

 
41,333

 
48,725

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
 
2,628

 
1,741

 
1,948

Loss (gain) on disposal of assets held for sale (note 10)
 
98

 
(466
)
 
825

Amortization of intangible assets (note 13(b))
 
3,694

 
4,287

 
2,150

Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated joint venture (note 9)
 
(596
)
 
(86
)
 
2,720

Operating (loss) income before the undernoted
 
(16,023
)
 
(14,802
)
 
(11,916
)
Interest expense (note 22)
 
23,743

 
22,146

 
22,533

Foreign exchange loss (gain)
 
84

 
52

 
(1,659
)
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments (note 17(a))
 
(2,705
)
 
(2,382
)
 
(2,305
)
Loss on debt extinguishment (note 16(d))
 

 

 
4,346

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
 
(37,145
)
 
(34,618
)
 
(34,831
)
Income tax (note 11):
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current (benefit) expense
 
(2,209
)
 
(677
)
 
2,892

Deferred (benefit)
 
(6,627
)
 
(8,558
)
 
(7,997
)
Net loss from continuing operations
 
(28,309
)
 
(25,383
)
 
(29,726
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax (note 23)
 
26,846

 
4,221

 
(4,924
)
Net loss
 
(1,463
)
 
(21,162
)
 
(34,650
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized foreign currency translation gain (loss)
 
31

 
40

 
(59
)
Comprehensive loss
 
(1,432
)
 
(21,122
)
 
(34,709
)
Per share information (note 19(b))
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from continuing operations - basic and diluted
 
$
(0.78
)
 
$
(0.70
)
 
$
(0.82
)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations - basic and diluted
 
$
0.74

 
$
0.12

 
$
(0.14
)
Net loss - basic and diluted
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.58
)
 
$
(0.96
)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 


2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
7


Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’
Equity
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian Dollars)
 
 
 
Common
shares

 
Additional
paid-in
capital

 
Deficit

 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
(loss) income

 
Total

Balance at March 31, 2010
 
$
303,505

 
$
7,439

 
$
(129,886
)
 
$

 
$
181,058

Net loss
 

 

 
(34,650
)
 

 
(34,650
)
Unrealized foreign currency translation loss
 

 

 

 
(59
)
 
(59
)
Share option plan
 

 
1,455

 

 

 
1,455

Deferred performance share unit plan
 

 
(44
)
 

 

 
(44
)
Stock award plan
 

 
780

 

 

 
780

Exercised stock options
 
1,349

 
(386
)
 

 

 
963

Senior executive stock option plan
 

 
(2,237
)
 

 

 
(2,237
)
Balance at March 31, 2011
 
$
304,854

 
$
7,007

 
$
(164,536
)
 
(59
)
 
$
147,266

Net loss
 

 

 
(21,162
)
 

 
(21,162
)
Unrealized foreign currency translation gain
 

 

 

 
40

 
40

Share option plan
 

 
1,373

 

 

 
1,373

Reclassified to restricted share unit liability
 

 
(121
)
 

 

 
(121
)
Stock award plan
 

 
256

 

 

 
256

Exercised stock options
 
54

 
(19
)
 

 

 
35

Repurchase of shares to settle stock award plan
 

 
(700
)
 
(122
)
 

 
(822
)
Senior executive stock option plan
 

 
915

 

 

 
915

Balance at March 31, 2012
 
$
304,908

 
$
8,711

 
$
(185,820
)
 
$
(19
)
 
$
127,780

Net loss
 

 

 
(1,463
)
 

 
(1,463
)
Unrealized foreign currency translation gain
 

 

 

 
31

 
31

Share option plan
 

 
1,333

 

 

 
1,333

Stock award plan
 

 
14

 

 

 
14

Repurchase of shares to settle stock award plan
 

 
(148
)
 

 

 
(148
)
Senior executive stock option plan
 

 
397

 

 

 
397

Balance at March 31, 2013
 
$
304,908

 
$
10,307

 
$
(187,283
)
 
$
12

 
$
127,944

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 


8
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended March 31
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian Dollars)
 
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Cash (used in) provided by:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from continuing operations
 
$
(28,309
)
 
$
(25,383
)
 
$
(29,726
)
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation
 
37,722

 
44,642

 
35,062

Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated joint venture (note 9)
 
(596
)
 
(86
)
 
2,720

Amortization of intangible assets (note 13(b))
 
3,694

 
4,287

 
2,150

Amortization of deferred lease inducements (note 18(b))
 
(107
)
 
(107
)
 
(107
)
Amortization of deferred financing costs (note 13(c))
 
1,607

 
1,591

 
1,609

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
 
2,628

 
1,741

 
1,948

Loss (gain) on disposal of assets held for sale (note 10)
 
98

 
(466
)
 
825

Unrealized foreign exchange gain on 8 3/4% senior notes
 

 

 
(732
)
Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments (note 17(a))
 
(2,705
)
 
(2,382
)
 
(2,305
)
Loss on debt extinguishment (note 16(d))
 

 

 
4,346

Stock-based compensation expense (recovery) (note 24(a))
 
3,619

 
(2,263
)
 
8,156

Cash settlement of restricted share unit plan (note 24(e))
 
(1,677
)
 
(318
)
 

Cash settlement of directors' deferred share unit plan (note 24(f))
 
(175
)
 

 

Settlement of stock award plan (note 24(g))
 
(148
)
 
(822
)
 

Accretion of asset retirement obligation (note 18(c))
 
43

 
39

 
35

Deferred income tax (benefit) (note 11)
 
(6,627
)
 
(8,558
)
 
(7,997
)
Net changes in non-cash working capital (note 25(b))
 
43,862

 
45,183

 
(28,162
)
 
 
52,929

 
57,098

 
(12,178
)
Investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
 
(32,639
)
 
(49,465
)
 
(32,596
)
Additions to intangible assets (note 13(b))
 
(5,081
)
 
(3,537
)
 
(4,748
)
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture (note 9)
 

 

 
(1,291
)
Proceeds on the wind up of unconsolidated joint venture (note 9)
 
2,170

 

 

Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment
 
9,301

 
176

 
499

Proceeds on disposal of assets held for sale
 
2,014

 
920

 
826

 
 
(24,235
)
 
(51,906
)
 
(37,310
)
Financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Repayment of credit facilities
 
(390,921
)
 
(196,203
)
 
(85,000
)
Increase in credit facilities
 
357,396

 
203,000

 
128,524

Financing costs (note 13(c))
 
(439
)
 
(60
)
 
(7,920
)
Redemption of 8 3/4% senior notes (note 16(d))
 

 

 
(202,410
)
Issuance of Series 1 Debentures (note 16(e))
 

 

 
225,000

Settlement of swap liabilities (note 17(a))
 

 

 
(91,125
)
Proceeds from stock options exercised (note 24(b))
 

 
35

 
963

Repayment of capital lease obligations
 
(10,845
)
 
(4,870
)
 
(5,127
)
 
 
(44,809
)
 
1,902

 
(37,095
)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations
 
(16,115
)
 
7,094

 
(86,583
)
Cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations (note 23)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
 
38,191

 
6,175

 
11,681

Investing activities
 
(22,061
)
 
(12,294
)
 
(27,322
)
Financing activities
 
(848
)
 
(337
)
 

 
 
15,282

 
(6,456
)
 
(15,641
)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
(833
)
 
638

 
(102,224
)
Effect of exchange rate on changes in cash and cash equivalents
 
31

 
40

 
(59
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
 
1,400

 
722

 
103,005

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
 
$
598

 
$
1,400

 
$
722

Supplemental cash flow information (note 25(a))
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
9


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the years ended March 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
(Expressed in thousands of Canadian Dollars, except per share amounts or unless otherwise specified)
1. Nature of operations
North American Energy Partners Inc. (the “Company”), formerly NACG Holdings Inc., was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act on October 17, 2003. On November 26, 2003, the Company purchased all the issued and outstanding shares of North American Construction Group Inc. (“NACGI”), including subsidiaries of NACGI, from Norama Ltd. which had been operating continuously in Western Canada since 1953. The Company had no operations prior to November 26, 2003. The Company provides a wide range of mining and heavy construction services to customers in the resource development and industrial construction sectors, primarily within Western Canada.
2. Significant accounting policies
a) Basis of presentation
These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”). Material inter-company transactions and balances are eliminated upon consolidation.
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, NACGI, North American Fleet Company Ltd., NACG International Inc., North American Construction Holdings Inc. (“NACHI”) and NACG Properties Inc., and the following 100% owned subsidiaries of NACHI:
• North American Caisson Ltd.
  
• North American Site Development Ltd.
• North American Engineering Inc.
  
• North American Tailings and Environmental Ltd.
• North American Enterprises Ltd.
  
• DF Investments Limited
• North American Foundation Engineering Inc.
 
• Drillco Foundation Co. Ltd.
• North American Maintenance Ltd.
  
• Cyntech Canada Inc.
• North American Mining Inc.
  
• Cyntech Services Inc.
• North American Pile Driving Inc.
  
• Cyntech U.S. Inc.
• North American Services Inc.
  
 
b) Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures reported in these consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Significant estimates made by management include the assessment of the percentage of completion on time-and-materials, unit-price, lump-sum and cost-plus contracts with defined scope (including estimated total costs and provisions for estimated losses) and the recognition of claims and change orders on revenue contracts; assumptions used to value free standing and embedded derivatives and other financial instruments; assumptions used in periodic impairment testing; and, estimates and assumptions used in the determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts, the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
The accuracy of the Company’s revenue and profit recognition in a given period is dependent on the accuracy of its estimates of the cost to complete each project. Cost estimates for all significant projects use a detailed “bottom up” approach and the Company believes its experience allows it to provide reasonably dependable estimates. There are a number of factors that can contribute to changes in estimates of contract cost and profitability that are recognized to the extent contract remedies are unavailable in the period in which such adjustments are determined. The most significant of these include:
the completeness and accuracy of the original bid;
costs associated with added scope changes;
extended overhead due to owner, weather and other delays;

10
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

subcontractor performance issues;
changes in economic indices used for the determination of escalation or de-escalation for contractual rates on long-term contracts;
changes in productivity expectations;
site conditions that differ from those assumed in the original bid;
contract incentive and penalty provisions;
the availability and skill level of workers in the geographic location of the project; and
a change in the availability and proximity of equipment and materials.
The foregoing factors as well as the mix of contracts at different margins may cause fluctuations in gross profit between periods. With many projects of varying levels of complexity and size in process at any given time, changes in estimates can offset each other without materially impacting the Company’s profitability. Major changes in cost estimates, particularly in larger, more complex projects, can have a significant effect on profitability.
c) Revenue recognition
The Company performs its projects under the following types of contracts: time-and-materials; cost-plus; unit-price; and lump-sum. Revenue is recognized as costs are incurred for time-and-materials and cost-plus service contracts with no clearly defined scope. Revenue on cost-plus, unit-price, lump-sum and time-and-materials contracts with defined scope is recognized using the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the ratio of costs incurred to date to estimated total costs. The estimated total cost of the contract and percent complete is determined based upon estimates made by management. The costs of items that do not relate to performance of contracted work, particularly in the early stages of the contract, are excluded from costs incurred to date. The resulting percent complete methodology is applied to the approved contract value to determine the revenue recognized. Customer payment milestones typically occur on a periodic basis over the period of contract completion.
The length of the Company’s contracts varies from less than one year for typical contracts to several years for certain larger contracts. Contract project costs include all direct labour, material, subcontract and equipment costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance such as indirect labour and supplies. General and administrative expenses are charged to expense as incurred. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in project performance, project conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and revenue that are recognized in the period in which such adjustments are determined. Profit incentives are included in revenue when their realization is reasonably assured.
Once a project is underway, the Company will often experience changes in conditions, client requirements, specifications, designs, materials and work schedule. Generally, a “change order” will be negotiated with the customer to modify the original contract to approve both the scope and price of the change. Occasionally, however, disagreements arise regarding changes, their nature, measurement, timing and other characteristics that impact costs and revenue under the contract. When a change becomes a point of dispute between the Company and a customer, the Company will then consider it as a claim.
Costs related to unapproved change orders and claims are recognized when they are incurred.
Revenues related to unapproved change orders and claims are included in total estimated contract revenue only to the extent that contract costs related to the claim have been incurred and when it is probable that the unapproved change order or claim will result in:
a bona fide addition to contract value; and
revenues can be reliably estimated.
These two conditions are satisfied when:
the contract or other evidence provides a legal basis for the unapproved change order or claim, or a legal opinion is obtained providing a reasonable basis to support the unapproved change order or claim;
additional costs incurred were caused by unforeseen circumstances and are not the result of deficiencies in the Company’s performance;
costs associated with the unapproved change order or claim are identifiable and reasonable in view of work performed; and

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
11


evidence supporting the unapproved change order or claim is objective and verifiable.
This can lead to a situation where costs are recognized in one period and revenue is recognized when customer agreement is obtained or claim resolution occurs, which can be in subsequent periods. Historical claim recoveries should not be considered indicative of future claim recoveries.
The Company’s long term contracts typically allow its customers to unilaterally reduce or eliminate the scope of the work as contracted without cause. These long term contracts represent higher risk due to uncertainty of total contract value and estimated costs to complete; therefore, potentially impacting revenue recognition in future periods.
A contract is regarded as substantially completed when remaining costs and potential risks are insignificant in amount.
The Company recognizes revenue from equipment rental as performance requirements are achieved in accordance with the terms of the relevant agreement with the customer, either at a monthly fixed rate or on a usage basis dependent on the number of hours that the equipment is used. Revenue is recognized from the foregoing activity once persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, fees are fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
d) Balance sheet classifications
A one-year time period is typically used as the basis for classifying all other current assets and liabilities. However, included in current assets and liabilities are amounts receivable and payable under construction contracts (principally holdbacks) that may extend beyond one year.
e) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, bank balances net of outstanding cheques and short-term investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased.
f) Accounts receivable and unbilled revenue
Accounts receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are primarily comprised of amounts billed to clients for services already provided, but which have not yet been collected. Unbilled revenue represents revenue recognized in advance of amounts billed to clients.
g) Billings in excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
Billings in excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts represent amounts invoiced in excess of revenue recognized.
h) Allowance for doubtful accounts
The Company evaluates the probability of collection of accounts receivable and records an allowance for doubtful accounts, which reduces accounts receivable to the amount management reasonably believes will be collected. In determining the amount of the allowance, the following factors are considered: the length of time the receivable has been outstanding, specific knowledge of each customer’s financial condition and historical experience.
i) Inventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of weighted average cost and market, and consist primarily of spare tires, job materials, manufacturing raw materials and finished goods. Finished goods cost includes raw materials, labour and a reasonable allocation of appropriate overhead costs.

12
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

j) Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Major components of heavy construction equipment in use such as engines and drive trains are recorded separately. Equipment under capital lease is recorded at the present value of minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease. Depreciation is not recorded until an asset is available for use. Depreciation for each category is calculated based on the cost, net of the estimated residual value, over the estimated useful life of the assets on the following bases and annual rates:
Assets
 
Basis
 
Rate
Heavy equipment
 
Straight-line
 
Operating hours
Major component parts in use
 
Straight-line
 
Operating hours
Other equipment
 
Straight-line
 
5 – 10 years
Licensed motor vehicles
 
Declining balance
 
30%
Office and computer equipment
 
Straight-line
 
4 years
Buildings
 
Straight-line
 
10 years
Leasehold improvements
 
Straight-line
 
Over shorter of estimated useful life and lease term
 
The costs for periodic repairs and maintenance are expensed to the extent the expenditures serve only to restore the assets to their normal operating condition without enhancing their service potential or extending their useful lives.
k) Capitalized interest
The Company capitalizes interest incurred on debt during the construction of assets for the Company’s own use. The capitalization period covers the duration of the activities required to get the asset ready for its intended use, provided that expenditures for the asset have been made and interest cost incurred. Interest capitalization continues as long as those activities and the incurrence of interest cost continue. The capitalized interest is amortized at the same rate as the respective asset.
l) Goodwill
Goodwill is an asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. Goodwill is not amortized but instead is assessed for impairment quarterly or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may be impaired. Goodwill is assigned, as of the date of the business combination, to reporting units that are expected to benefit from the business combination. The Company assesses qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If the qualitative assessment results in a determination that goodwill has more-likely-than-not been impaired, the Company performs the two-step goodwill impairment test. In the first step, the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including goodwill, is compared to its fair value. When the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. The second step is carried out when the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, in which case, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, determined in the same manner as the value of goodwill is determined in a business combination, is compared with its carrying amount to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any.
m) Intangible assets
Intangible assets include:
Customer relationships and backlog, which are being amortized over the remaining lives of the related contracts and relationships;
trade names, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of between five and ten years;
non-competition agreements, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis between the three and five-year terms of the respective agreements;
capitalized computer software and development costs, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a maximum period of four years; and
patents, which are being amortized on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of up to six years.
The Company expenses or capitalizes costs associated with the development of internal-use software as follows:

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
13


Preliminary project stage: Both internal and external costs incurred during this stage are expensed as incurred.
Application development stage: Both internal and external costs incurred to purchase and develop computer software are capitalized after the preliminary project stage is completed and management authorizes the computer software project. However, training costs and the process of data conversion from the old system to the new system, which includes purging or cleansing of existing data, reconciliation or balancing of old data to the converted data in the new system, are expensed as incurred.
Post implementation/operation stage: All training costs and maintenance costs incurred during this stage are expensed as incurred.
Costs of upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if the expenditures will result in adding functionality to the software.
n) Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets or asset groups held and used including plant, equipment and identifiable intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of an asset or group of assets is less than its carrying amount, it is considered to be impaired. The Company measures the impairment loss as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets exceeds its fair value, which is charged to depreciation or amortization expense. In determining whether an impairment exists, the Company makes assumptions about the future cash flows expected from the use of its long-lived assets, such as: applicable industry performance and prospects; general business and economic conditions that prevail and are expected to prevail; expected growth; maintaining its customer base; and, achieving cost reductions. There can be no assurance that expected future cash flows will be realized, or will be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of long-lived assets. Furthermore, the process of determining fair values is subjective and requires management to exercise judgment in making assumptions about future results, including revenue and cash flow projections and discount rates.
o) Assets held for sale
Long-lived assets are classified as held for sale when certain criteria are met, which include:
management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the assets;
the assets are available for immediate sale in their present condition;
an active program to locate buyers and other actions to sell the assets have been initiated;
the sale of the assets is probable and their transfer is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year;
the assets are being actively marketed at reasonable prices in relation to their fair value; and
it is unlikely that significant changes will be made to the plan to sell the assets or that the plan will be withdrawn.
Assets to be disposed of by sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell and are disclosed separately on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These assets are not depreciated.
p) Asset retirement obligations
Asset retirement obligations are legal obligations associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment that result from their acquisition, lease, construction, development or normal operations. The Company recognizes its contractual obligations for the retirement of certain tangible long-lived assets. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation is the amount at which that liability could be settled in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation transaction and, in the absence of observable market transactions, is determined as the present value of expected cash flows. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and then amortized using a systematic and rational method over its estimated useful life. In subsequent reporting periods, the liability is adjusted for the passage of time through an accretion charge and any changes in the amount or timing of the underlying future cash flows are recognized as an additional asset retirement cost.
q) Foreign currency translation
The functional currency of the Company and the majority of its subsidiaries is Canadian Dollars. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange on the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities, denominated in foreign currencies, are translated into Canadian Dollars at the rate of exchange

14
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

prevailing at the balance sheet date. Foreign exchange gains and losses are included in the determination of earnings.
Accounts of the Company’s US-based subsidiary, which has a US Dollar functional currency, are translated into Canadian Dollars using the current rate method. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date, and revenue and expense items (including depreciation and amortization) are translated at the average rate of exchange for the period. The resulting unrealized exchange gains and losses from these translation adjustments are included as a separate component of the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances held in foreign currencies is separately reported as part of the reconciliation of the change in cash and cash equivalents for the period.
r) Fair value measurement
Fair value measurements are categorized using a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs used to measure fair value, which prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Fair values included in Level 1 are determined by reference to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Fair values included in Level 2 include valuations using inputs based on observable market data, either directly or indirectly other than the quoted prices. Level 3 valuations are based on inputs that are not based on observable market data. The classification of a fair value within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
s) Derivative financial instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments to manage financial risks from fluctuations in exchange rates and interest rates. These instruments include cross-currency and interest rate swap agreements as well as embedded price escalation features in revenue and supplier contracts. All such instruments are only used for risk management purposes. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Derivative financial instruments are subject to standard credit terms and conditions, financial controls, management and risk monitoring procedures. These derivative financial instruments are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes and are recorded at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
t) Income taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period of enactment. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not (greater than 50%) of being sustained. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgement occurs. The Company accrues interest and penalties for uncertain tax positions in the period in which these uncertainties are identified. Interest and penalties are included in “General and administrative expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. A valuation allowance is recorded against any deferred tax asset if it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized.
u) Stock-based compensation
The Company has a Share Option Plan which is described in note 24(b). The Company accounts for all stock-based compensation payments that are settled by the issuance of equity instruments at fair value. Compensation cost is measured using the Black-Scholes model at the grant date and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the award’s vesting period, with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital. Upon exercise of a stock option, share capital is recorded at the sum of proceeds received and the related amount of additional paid-in capital.
The Company has a Senior Executive Stock Option Plan which is described in note 24(c). This compensation plan allows the option holder the right to settle options in cash. The liability is measured at fair value using the Black-Scholes model at the modification date and subsequently at each period end date. Changes in fair value of the liability are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has a Deferred Performance Share Unit (“DPSU”) Plan which is described in note 24(d). This compensation plan is settled, at the Company’s option, either by the issuance of equity instruments or by cash payment. Compensation cost is measured using the Black-Scholes model at the grant date and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the award’s vesting period, with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital. The

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
15


vesting of awards under the DPSU plan is contingent upon certain performance criteria being achieved. The fair value of each share option grant under the DPSU plan assumes that the relevant performance criteria will be achieved and compensation cost is recorded to the extent that vesting of the award is considered probable. When it is determined that such criteria are not probable of being achieved, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed.
The Company has a Restricted Share Unit (“RSU”) Plan which is described in note 24(e). RSUs are granted effective April 1 of each fiscal year with respect to services to be provided in that fiscal year and the following two fiscal years. The RSUs vest at the end of a three-year term. The Company classifies RSUs as a liability as the Company has the ability and intent to settle the awards in cash. Compensation expense is calculated based on the number of vested shares multiplied by the fair market value of each RSU as determined by the volume weighted average trading price of the Company’s common shares for the five trading days immediately preceding the day on which the fair market value is to be determined. The Company recognizes compensation expense over the three-year term of the RSU in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has a Director’s Deferred Stock Unit (“DDSU”) Plan which is described in note 24(f). The DDSU plan enables directors to receive all or a portion of their fee for that fiscal year in the form of deferred stock units. The deferred stock units are settled in cash and are classified as a liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The measurement of the liability and compensation costs for these awards is based on the fair value of the unit and is recorded as a charge to operating income when issued. Subsequent changes in the Company’s payment obligation after issuing the unit and prior to the settlement date are recorded as a charge to operating income in the period such changes occur.
The Company had a Stock Award Plan which is described in note 24(g). The stock awards were settled at the Company’s option, either by the issuance of equity instruments if all necessary shareholder approvals and regulatory approvals are obtained or by cash payment. Compensation cost was measured using the market price of the Company’s common shares at the grant date and was expensed on a straight-line basis over the award’s vesting period, with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital.
v) Net (loss) income per share
Basic net (loss) income per share is computed by dividing net (loss) income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year (see note 19(b)). Diluted per share amounts are calculated using the treasury stock method. The treasury stock method increases the diluted weighted average shares outstanding to include additional shares from the assumed exercise of stock options, if dilutive. The number of additional shares is calculated by assuming outstanding in-the-money stock options were exercised and the proceeds from such exercises, including any unamortized stock-based compensation cost, were used to acquire shares of common stock at the average market price during the year.
w) Leases
Leases entered into by the Company in which substantially all the benefits and risks of ownership are transferred to the Company are recorded as obligations under capital leases and under the corresponding category of property, plant and equipment. Obligations under capital leases reflect the present value of future lease payments, discounted at an appropriate interest rate, and are reduced by rental payments net of imputed interest. All other leases are classified as operating leases and leasing costs, including any rent holidays, leasehold incentives, and rent concessions, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Certain operating lease and rental agreements provide a maximum hourly usage limit, above which the Company will be required to pay for the over hour usage as a contingent rent expense. These contingent expenses are recognized when the likelihood of exceeding the usage limit is considered probable and are due at the end of the lease term or rental period. The contingent rental expenses are included in “Equipment operating lease expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
x) Deferred financing costs
Underwriting, legal and other direct costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt not measured under the fair value option are presented as deferred financing costs. The deferred financing costs related to the senior notes, debentures and the revolving and term loan facilities are amortized over the term of the related debt using the effective interest method.
y) Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures or affiliates
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures or affiliates over which the Company has significant influence including the Company’s investment in Noramac Ventures Inc. are accounted for under the equity method of accounting,

16
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

whereby the investment is carried at the cost of acquisition, including subsequent capital contributions and loans from the Company, plus the Company’s equity in undistributed earnings or losses since acquisition. Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures are included as investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
z) Business combinations
The Company accounts for all business combinations using the acquisition method. Acquisition related costs which include finder’s fees, advisory, legal, accounting, valuation, other professional or consulting fees, and administrative costs are expensed as incurred.
aa) Discontinued operations
As of March 31, 2013, the Company has divested, or is in the process of divesting, certain of its business operations. These businesses are presented as discontinued operations in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss and, collectively, are included in the line item "Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax" for all periods presented. The cash flows from discontinued operations are included in the "Cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations" section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for all periods presented. Net assets and net liabilities related to discontinued piling operations are included in the line items "Assets held for sale" and "Liabilities held for sale" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2013. The Company allocates interest expense incurred on debt that is required to be repaid as a result of the disposal transaction to discontinued operations. The allocation to discontinued operations of other consolidated interest that is not directly attributable to or related to other operations of the Company is allocated based on a ratio of net assets to be sold to total consolidated net assets. 
3. Accounting pronouncements recently adopted
a) Comprehensive income
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This new accounting guidance requires the presentation of the components of net income and other comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement, or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The accounting standard eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income and its components as part of the statement of shareholders' equity. The Company adopted this ASU effective April 1, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
b) Goodwill Impairment
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, which amended the guidance on the annual testing of goodwill for impairment. The amended guidance allows companies to assess qualitative factors to determine if it is more-likely-than-not that goodwill might be impaired and whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test required under current accounting standards. The Company adopted this ASU effective April 1, 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
4. Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
a) Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU requires companies to disclose both gross and net information about financial instruments that have been offset on the consolidated balance sheet. This ASU will be effective commencing April 1, 2013. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
b) Intangibles - Goodwill and other
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. This ASU gives an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If it is determined that it is more likely than not the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, a quantitative impairment test is required. However, if it is concluded otherwise, the quantitative test is not necessary. This ASU will be effective commencing April 1, 2013. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
17


c) Comprehensive Income
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Under this standard, an entity is required to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the financial statements or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income, but only if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional details about those amounts. This standard does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements. This ASU will be effective commencing April 1, 2013. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
5. Accounts receivable
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Accounts receivable – trade
 
$
66,823

 
$
180,917

Accounts receivable – holdbacks
 
26,628

 
32,134

Income and other taxes receivable
 
3,375

 

Accounts receivable – other
 
3,643

 
1,288

Allowance for doubtful accounts (note 17(d))
 

 
(210
)
 
 
$
100,469

 
$
214,129

Accounts receivable – holdbacks represent amounts up to 10% under certain contracts that the customer is contractually entitled to withhold until completion of the project or until certain project milestones are achieved. As of March 31, 2013 there were $nil holdback balances (March 31, 2012$6,038) which relate to contracts whereby the normal operating cycle is greater than one year and therefore are not expected to be collected within a year.
6. Costs incurred and estimated earnings net of billings on uncompleted contracts
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Costs incurred and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
 
$
512,339

 
$
587,220

Less billings to date
 
(463,241
)
 
(509,511
)
 
 
$
49,098

 
$
77,709

Costs incurred and estimated earnings net of billings on uncompleted contracts is presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the following captions:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Unbilled revenue
 
$
56,183

 
$
86,859

Billings in excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
 
(7,085
)
 
(7,514
)
 
 
$
49,098

 
$
79,345

 
Unbilled revenue related to non-construction activities amounted to $nil (March 31, 2012$1,636).
An amount of $16,139 (March 31, 2012$18,302) is recognized within unbilled revenue relating to a single long-term customer contract, whereby the normal operating cycle for this project is greater than one year. As described in note 2(b) the estimated balances within unbilled revenue are subject to uncertainty concerning ultimate realization.
7. Inventories
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Spare tires
 
$
5,751

 
$
6,620

Job materials
 

 
2,188

Manufacturing raw materials
 

 
1,669

Finished goods
 

 
1,378

 
 
$
5,751

 
$
11,855


18
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

8. Prepaid expenses and deposits
Current:
 
 
 
 
  
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Prepaid insurance and property taxes
 
$
793

 
$
1,257

Prepaid lease payments
 
1,408

 
4,624

Prepaid interest
 
297

 
434

 
 
$
2,498

 
$
6,315

Long term:
 
 
 
 
  
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Prepaid lease payments (note 13(a))
 
$
764

 
$
895

9. Investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture
The Company was engaged in a joint venture, Noramac Joint Venture (JV), of which the Company had joint control (50% proportionate interest). The JV was formed for the purpose of expanding the Company’s market opportunities and establishing strategic alliances in Northern Alberta. The Company owned a 49% interest in Noramac Ventures Inc., a nominee company established by the two joint venture partners. On March 25, 2011, the Company and its joint venture partner decided to wind up Noramac Ventures Inc. and terminate the joint venture. In May 2012, the Company received proceeds of $2,170 on the wind up of the JV. At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the assets and liabilities of the joint venture are stated at the lower of carrying value and fair market value less costs to sell. The difference between carrying value and fair market value of assets and liabilities was recognized in the income statement of the joint venture during the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.
As of March 31, 2013, the Company’s investment in and advances to the unconsolidated joint venture totalled $nil (2012$1,574). The condensed financial data for investment in and advances to unconsolidated joint venture is summarized as follows:
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Current assets
 
 
 
$

 
$
6,556

Current liabilities
 
 
 

 
10,716

Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Gross revenues
 
$
1,192

 
$
1,922

 
$
12,196

Gross (profit) loss
 
(1,192
)
 
(1,922
)
 
2,483

Net (income) loss
 
(1,192
)
 
(172
)
 
5,440

Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated joint venture
 
$
(596
)
 
$
(86
)
 
$
2,720

10. Assets held for sale
Equipment disposal decisions are made using an approach in which a target life is set for each type of equipment. The target life is based on the manufacturer’s recommendations and the Company’s past experience in the various operating environments. Once a piece of equipment reaches its target life it is evaluated to determine if disposal is warranted based on its expected operating cost and reliability in its current state. If the expected operating cost exceeds the target operating cost for the fleet or if the expected reliability is lower than the target reliability of the fleet, the unit is considered for disposal. Expected operating costs and reliability are based on the past history of the unit and experience in the various operating environments. Such equipment assets held for sale are sold on the Company’s used equipment website and syndicated on third party equipment sale websites. If a sale is not realized after a reasonable length of time, the equipment will be sent to auction for disposal.
During the year ended March 31, 2013, impairment of equipment assets held for sale amounting to $3,346, largely due to the writedown of several haul trucks to fair value, have been included in depreciation expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations (2012$8,748; 2011$141). The writedown is the amount by which the carrying value of the related assets exceeded their fair value less costs to sell. The loss on disposal of equipment assets held for sale was $98 for the year ended March 31, 2013 (2012gain of $466; 2011loss of $825).
The carrying amount of equipment assets held for sale at March 31, 2013 amounted to $2,724 (2012 - $1,841). The carrying amount of piling assets held for sale at March 31, 2013 amounted to $154,740 (note 23(b)).

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
19


11. Income taxes
Income tax provision differs from the amount that would be computed by applying the Federal and Provincial statutory income tax rates to income before income taxes. The reasons for the differences are as follows:
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
 
$
(37,145
)
 
$
(34,618
)
 
$
(34,831
)
Tax rate
 
25.12
%
 
26.25
%
 
27.75
%
Expected benefit
 
$
(9,331
)
 
$
(9,087
)
 
$
(9,666
)
Increase (decrease) related to:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Impact of enacted future statutory income tax rates
 
9

 
151

 
134

Income tax adjustments and reassessments
 
82

 
170

 
742

Valuation allowance
 

 
(91
)
 
962

Stock-based compensation
 
344

 
(393
)
 
1,443

Non deductible portion of capital losses
 

 

 
932

Other
 
60

 
15

 
348

Income tax benefit
 
$
(8,836
)
 
$
(9,235
)
 
$
(5,105
)
Classified as:
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Current income tax (benefit) expense
 
$
(2,209
)
 
$
(677
)
 
$
2,892

Deferred income tax (benefit)
 
(6,627
)
 
(8,558
)
 
(7,997
)
 
 
$
(8,836
)
 
$
(9,235
)
 
$
(5,105
)
The deferred tax assets and liabilities are summarized below:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Deferred tax assets:
 
 
 
 
Non-capital losses carried forward
 
$
43,307

 
$
51,614

Derivative financial instruments
 
1,618

 
2,296

Billings in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts
 
1,781

 
1,887

Capital lease obligations
 
10,508

 
2,689

Deferred lease inducements
 
111

 
134

Stock-based compensation
 
1,508

 
1,402

Other
 
539

 
420

 
 
$
59,372

 
$
60,442

  
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Deferred tax liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Unbilled revenue and uncertified revenue included in accounts receivable
 
$
7,965

 
$
13,039

Assets held for sale
 
684

 
462

Accounts receivable – holdbacks
 
6,787

 
8,071

Property, plant and equipment
 
49,864

 
52,323

Deferred financing costs
 
300

 
224

Intangible assets
 
8

 
8

Other
 

 
173

 
 
$
65,608

 
$
74,300

Net deferred income tax liability
 
$
(6,236
)
 
$
(13,858
)

20
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

Classified as:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Current asset
 
$
33,694

 
$
2,991

Long term asset
 
14,673

 
57,451

Current liability
 
(13,392
)
 
(21,512
)
Long term liability
 
(41,211
)
 
(52,788
)
 
 
$
(6,236
)
 
$
(13,858
)
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the Canadian federal jurisdictions, five provincial jurisdictions, Colombia and US federal, Indiana, Oklahoma and Texas state jurisdiction. For years before 2007, the Company is no longer subject to Canadian federal or provincial examinations.
The Company has a full valuation allowance against capital losses in deferred tax assets of $962 as at March 31, 2013 (2012$962; 2011$962). At March 31, 2013, the Company has non-capital losses for income tax purposes of $172,372 which predominately expire after 2027.
  
 
March 31, 2013

2027
 
$
158

2028
 
128

2029
 
13,676

2030
 
360

2031
 
41,074

2032
 
25,357

2033
 
91,619

 
 
$
172,372

12. Property, plant and equipment
March 31, 2013
 
Cost

 
Accumulated
Deprecation

 
Net Book Value

Heavy equipment
 
$
259,711

 
$
96,046

 
$
163,665

Major component parts in use
 
58,763

 
23,512

 
35,251

Other equipment
 
25,193

 
9,970

 
15,223

Licensed motor vehicles
 
28,862

 
22,996

 
5,866

Office and computer equipment
 
13,931

 
11,488

 
2,443

Buildings
 
4,015

 
2,943

 
1,072

Leasehold improvements
 
9,512

 
5,682

 
3,830

Assets under capital lease
 
59,160

 
12,264

 
46,896

 
 
$
459,147

 
$
184,901

 
$
274,246

March 31, 2012
 
Cost

 
Accumulated
Deprecation

 
Net Book Value

Heavy equipment
 
$
347,699

 
$
124,982

 
$
222,717

Major component parts in use
 
74,444

 
28,741

 
45,703

Other equipment
 
35,736

 
17,017

 
18,719

Licensed motor vehicles
 
27,120

 
19,775

 
7,345

Office and computer equipment
 
13,438

 
8,977

 
4,461

Buildings
 
4,355

 
3,235

 
1,120

Land
 
281

 

 
281

Leasehold improvements
 
6,620

 
2,232

 
4,388

Assets under capital lease
 
16,579

 
8,538

 
8,041

 
 
$
526,272

 
$
213,497

 
$
312,775


2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
21


Assets under capital lease are comprised predominately of heavy equipment and licensed motor vehicles.
During the year ended March 31, 2013, additions to property, plant and equipment included $42,229 of assets that were acquired by means of capital leases (2012$7,215; 2011$427). Depreciation of equipment under capital lease of $8,554 (2012$1,935; 2011$2,535) was included in depreciation expense for continuing operations in the current year.
13. Other assets
a) Other assets are as follows:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Prepaid lease payments (note 8)
 
$
764

 
$
895

Intangible assets (note 13(b))
 
8,625

 
12,866

Deferred financing costs (note 13(c))
 
4,973

 
6,141

 
 
$
14,362

 
$
19,902

b) Intangible assets
March 31, 2013
 
Cost

 
Accumulated
Amortization

 
Net Book Value

Other intangible assets
 
$
350

 
$
328

 
$
22

Internal-use software
 
21,914

 
13,311

 
8,603

 
 
$
22,264

 
$
13,639

 
$
8,625

March 31, 2012
 
Cost

 
Accumulated
Amortization

 
Net Book Value

Customer relationships and backlog
 
$
4,442

 
$
1,445

 
$
2,997

Other intangible assets
 
2,364

 
1,204

 
1,160

Internal-use software
 
16,825

 
9,644

 
7,181

Patents
 
2,017

 
489

 
1,528

 
 
$
25,648

 
$
12,782

 
$
12,866

During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company capitalized $5,081 (2012$3,537; 2011$4,748) related to internally developed computer software. There was no internal-use software written down during the year and writedown expense of $nil was included in amortization of intangible assets during the year ended March 31, 2013 (2012$249; 2011$nil).
Amortization of intangible assets for the year ended March 31, 2013 was $3,694 (2012$4,287; 2011$2,150). The estimated amortization expense for future years is as follows:
For the year ending March 31,
 
 
2014
 
$
3,430

2015
 
2,612

2016
 
1,801

2017
 
782

2018 and thereafter
 

 
 
$
8,625


22
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

c) Deferred financing costs
March 31, 2013
 
Cost

 
Accumulated
Amortization

 
Net Book Value

Term and Revolving Facilities
 
$
5,861

 
$
5,384

 
$
477

Series 1 Debentures
 
6,886

 
2,390

 
4,496

 
 
$
12,747

 
$
7,774

 
$
4,973

March 31, 2012
 
Cost

 
Accumulated
Amortization

 
Net Book Value

Term and Revolving Facilities
 
$
5,422

 
$
4,652

 
$
770

Series 1 Debentures
 
6,886

 
1,515

 
5,371

 
 
$
12,308

 
$
6,167

 
$
6,141

During the year ended March 31, 2013, financing fees of $439 were incurred in connection with modifications made to the amended and restated credit agreement (2012$60; 2011$1,034) (note 16(b)). During the year ended March 31, 2013, financing fees of $nil were incurred in connection with the Series 1 Debentures (2012$nil; 2011 - $5,846) (note 16(e)). These fees have been recorded as deferred financing costs and are being amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the credit agreement and the Series 1 Debentures, respectively.
Amortization of deferred financing costs included in interest expense for the year ended March 31, 2013 was $1,607 (2012$1,591; 2011$1,609). Upon redemption of the 8 3/4% senior notes on April 28, 2010, the unamortized deferred financing costs related to the 8 3/4% senior notes of $4,324 were expensed and included in the loss on debt extinguishment (note 16(d)). In addition, $183 related to amortization of deferred financing costs incurred up to the redemption date was included in interest expense for the year ended March 31, 2011.
14. Goodwill
The Company's goodwill relates to the piling business. At March 31, 2013, as a result of the decision to discontinue piling operations and sell piling related assets (note 23(b)), the Company classified the full amount of goodwill to assets held for sale. For the year ended March 31, 2013, the carrying value of goodwill was assessed for impairment along with the other assets of the piling business. Assets held for sale are carried at the lower of their net book value and estimated net disposal proceeds (note 23(b)).
In prior years, the Company conducted an annual two-step goodwill impairment test on October 1 of each year and when a triggering event occurred between annual impairment tests. The Company completed annual goodwill impairment tests on October 1, 2011 and 2010 and determined that there was no goodwill impairment as the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying value.
15. Accrued liabilities
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Accrued interest payable
 
$
9,863

 
$
9,866

Payroll liabilities
 
19,040

 
15,228

Liabilities related to equipment leases
 
687

 
4,238

Income and other taxes payable
 
2,892

 
7,463

 
 
$
32,482

 
$
36,795


2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
23


16. Long term debt
a) Long term debt is as follows:
Current:
 
 
 
 
  
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Credit facilities (note 16(b))
 
$
9,392

 
$
10,000

Capital lease obligations (note 16(c))
 
12,017

 
4,402

 
 
$
21,409

 
$
14,402

Long term:
 
 
 
 
  
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Credit facilities (note 16(b))
 
$
35,850

 
$
68,767

Capital lease obligations (note 16(c))
 
29,805

 
6,299

Series 1 Debentures (note 16(e))
 
225,000

 
225,000

 
 
$
290,655

 
$
300,066

b) Credit Facilities
  
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Term A Facility
 
$
17,202

 
$
20,950

Term B Facility
 
5,644

 
37,496

Total Term Facilities
 
$
22,846

 
$
58,446

Revolving Facility
 
22,396

 
20,321

Total credit facilities
 
$
45,242

 
$
78,767

Less: current portion of Term Facilities
 
(9,392
)
 
(10,000
)
 
 
$
35,850

 
$
68,767

As of March 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $22.8 million (March 31, 2012$58.4 million) under the Term Facilities, $22.4 million (March 31, 2012$20.3 million) under the Revolving Facility and had issued $3.2 million (March 31, 2012$15.0 million) in letters of credit under the Revolving Facility to support performance guarantees associated with customer contracts. The funds available for borrowing under the Revolving Facility are reduced by any outstanding letters of credit. The Company's unused borrowing availability under the Revolving Facility was $59.4 million.
On September 28, 2012, the Company entered into a Fourth Amending Agreement to the April 2010 credit agreement to extend the maturity date of the credit agreement by one year to October 31, 2014 provided the Company repaid the Term B Facility in full by April 30, 2013. The balance of the Term B Facility was repaid in April 2013. Following repayment of the Term B Facility portion, 50 per cent of net proceeds from any subsequent asset sales will be used to reduce the existing Term A Facility. During the year ended March 31, 2013, in addition to regularly scheduled repayments, $10.2 million of net proceeds from asset sales and $15.4 million in net proceeds from the sale of pipeline related assets (note 23(a)) were applied against the Term B Facility.
The Term Facilities require scheduled principal repayments of $2.5 million (Term A Facility - $0.9 million; Term B Facility - $1.6 million) on the last day of each quarter commencing June 30, 2010 and continuing until the earlier of the maturity date or when the Term Facilities have been permanently repaid. The Company has classified the amounts contractually due under the Term Facilities over the next twelve months as current. Outstanding amounts may be prepaid under the amended Credit Facility in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty.
The amendment also provides relief from the credit agreement’s Consolidated EBITDA related covenants by temporarily amending the covenants. Under the terms of the amended agreement the Company will be able to increase its capital leasing capacity from $30.0 million to $75.0 million, supporting the Company’s planned conversion of up to $50.0 million of existing operating leases into capital leases. This amendment is also accompanied by restrictions on net capital expenditures that can be made by the Company through the term of the agreement.
Interest on Canadian prime rate loans is paid at variable rates based on the Canadian prime rate plus the applicable pricing margin (as defined in the credit agreement). Interest on US base rate loans is paid at a rate per annum equal to the US base rate plus the applicable pricing margin. Interest on Canadian prime rate and US base rate loans is payable monthly in arrears. Stamping fees and interest related to the issuance of Bankers’ Acceptances is

24
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

paid in advance upon the issuance of such Bankers’ Acceptance. The weighted average interest rate on Revolving Facility and Term Facility borrowings at March 31, 2013 was 7.62%.
The credit facilities are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s existing and after-acquired property and contain certain restrictive covenants including, but not limited to, incurring additional debt, transferring or selling assets, making investments including acquisitions, paying dividends or redeeming shares of capital stock. The Company is also required to meet certain financial covenants under the credit agreement and as at March 31, 2013 the Company was in compliance with both the standard and the amended covenants.
c) Capital lease obligations
The Company’s capital leases primarily relate to heavy equipment and licensed motor vehicles. The minimum lease payments due in each of the next five fiscal years are as follows:
2014
 
$
14,442

2015
 
13,490

2016
 
12,156

2017
 
6,887

2018
 

Subtotal:
 
$
46,975

Less: amount representing interest
 
(5,153
)
Present value of minimum lease payments
 
$
41,822

Less: current portion
 
(12,017
)
Long term portion
 
$
29,805

d) 8 3/4% Senior Notes
The 8 3/4% senior notes were issued on November 26, 2003 in the amount of US $200.0 million (Canadian $263.0 million). On April 28, 2010, the Company redeemed the 8 3/4% senior notes for $202,410 and recorded a $4,346 loss on debt extinguishment including a $4,324 write off of deferred financing costs (note 13(c)).
e) Series 1 Debentures
On April 7, 2010, the Company issued $225.0 million of 9.125% Series 1 Debentures (the “Series 1 Debentures”). The Series 1 Debentures mature on April 7, 2017. The Series 1 Debentures bear interest at 9.125% per annum, payable in equal instalments semi-annually in arrears on April 7 and October 7 in each year.
The Series 1 Debentures are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally with all other existing and future unsecured senior debt and senior to any subordinated debt that may be issued by the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Series 1 Debentures are effectively subordinated to all secured debt to the extent of collateral on such debt.
The Series 1 Debentures are redeemable at the option of the Company, in whole or in part, at any time on or after: April 7, 2014 at 103.042% of the principal amount; April 7, 2015 at 101.520% of the principal amount; April 7, 2016 and thereafter at 100% of the principal amount; plus, in each case, interest accrued to the redemption date.
If a change of control occurs, the Company will be required to offer to purchase all or a portion of each debenture holder’s Series 1 Debentures, at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount of the Series 1 Debentures offered for repurchase plus accrued interest to the date of purchase.
17. Financial instruments and risk management
In determining the fair value of financial instruments, the Company uses a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing on each reporting date. Standard market conventions and techniques, such as discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models, are used to determine the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, including derivatives. All methods of fair value measurement result in a general approximation of value and such value may never actually be realized.
The fair values of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, unbilled revenue, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the relatively short periods to maturity for the instruments.
The fair values of amounts due under the Term and Revolving Facilities are based on management estimates which are determined by discounting cash flows required under the instruments at the interest rate currently estimated to

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
25


be available for instruments with similar terms. Based on these estimates, and by using the outstanding balance of $45.2 million at March 31, 2013 and $78.8 million at March 31, 2012 (note 16(b)), the fair value of amounts due under the Term and Revolving Facilities as at March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 are not significantly different than their carrying value.
Financial instruments with carrying amounts that differ from their fair values are as follows:
 
 
March 31, 2013
 
 
March 31, 2012
 
  
 
Carrying
Amount

 
Fair
Value

 
Carrying
Amount

 
Fair
Value

Capital lease obligations (i)
 
$
41,822

 
$
37,369

 
$
10,701

 
$
10,657

Series 1 Debentures (ii)
 
225,000

 
220,079

 
225,000

 
203,624

(i)
The fair values of amounts due under capital leases are based on management estimates which are determined by discounting cash flows required under the instruments at the interest rates currently estimated to be available for instruments with similar terms.
(ii)
The fair value of the Series 1 Debentures is based upon the expected discounted cash flows and the period end market price of similar financial instruments.
a) Fair value measurements
The Company has segregated all financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date.
The fair values of the Company’s embedded derivatives are based on appropriate price modeling commonly used by market participants to estimate fair value. Such modeling includes option pricing models and discounted cash flow analysis, using observable market based inputs including foreign currency rates, implied volatilities and discount factors to estimate fair value. The Company considers its own credit risk or the credit risk of the counterparty in determining fair value, depending on whether the fair values are in an asset or liability position. Fair value determined using valuation models requires the use of assumptions concerning the amount and timing of future cash flows. Fair value amounts reflect management’s best estimates using external, readily observable, market data such as futures prices, interest rate yield curves, foreign exchange rates and discount rates for time value. It is possible that the assumptions used in establishing fair value amounts will differ from future outcomes and the effect of such variations could be material.
At March 31, 2013, the Company had no financial assets or financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis which were classified as Level 1 or Level 3 under the fair value hierarchy. Since the Company primarily uses observable inputs of similar instruments and discounted cash flows in its valuation of its derivative financial instruments, these fair value measurements are classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value net of accrued interest on a recurring basis, all of which are classified as Derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are summarized below:
March 31, 2013
 
Carrying
Amount

Embedded price escalation features in certain long term supplier contracts
 
$
6,441

Less: current portion
 
(4,261
)
 
 
$
2,180

March 31, 2012
 
Carrying
Amount

Embedded price escalation features in certain long term supplier contracts
 
$
9,146

Less: current portion
 
(3,220
)
 
 
$
5,926

On April 8, 2010, the Company settled the cross-currency and interest rate swaps, including accrued interest for a total of $91,125 in conjunction with the settlement of the 8 3/4% senior notes (note 16(d)).

26
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

The unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments is comprised as follows:
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Unrealized loss on cross-currency and interest rate swaps
 
$

 
$

 
$
2,111

Unrealized gain on embedded price escalation features in a long term customer construction contract
 

 
(5,877
)
 
(604
)
Unrealized (gain) loss on embedded price escalation features in certain long term supplier contracts
 
(2,705
)
 
3,495

 
(3,812
)
 
 
$
(2,705
)
 
$
(2,382
)
 
$
(2,305
)
Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as at March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012 in the financial statements are summarized below:
  
 
March 31, 2013
 
 
March 31, 2012
 
  
 
Carrying Amount

 
Change in Fair Value

 
Carrying Amount

 
Change in Fair Value

Assets held for sale
 
$
157,464

 
$
(3,346
)
 
$
1,841

 
$
(8,748
)
Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. The fair value less cost to sell of equipment assets held for sale (note 10) is determined internally by analyzing recent auction prices for equipment with similar specifications and hours used, the residual value of the asset and the useful life of the asset. The fair value less cost to sell of piling assets held for sale (note 23(b)) was determined by comparison to offers from independent 3rd parties on the assets held for sale. The fair value of the equipment assets held for sale and piling assets held for sale are classified under Level 3 and 2, respectively, of the fair value hierarchy.
b) Risk Management
The Company is exposed to market and credit risks associated with its financial instruments. The Company will from time to time use various financial instruments to reduce market risk exposures from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The Company does not hold or use any derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Overall, the Company’s Board of Directors has responsibility for the establishment and approval of the Company’s risk management policies. Management performs a risk assessment on a continual basis to help ensure that all significant risks related to the Company and its operations have been reviewed and assessed to reflect changes in market conditions and the Company’s operating activities.
c) Market Risk
Market risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market prices such as foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The level of market risk to which the Company is exposed at any point in time varies depending on market conditions, expectations of future price or market rate movements and composition of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities held, non-trading physical assets and contract portfolios.
To manage the exposure related to changes in market risk, the Company has used various risk management techniques including the use of derivative instruments. Such instruments may be used to establish a fixed price for a commodity, an interest bearing obligation or a cash flow denominated in a foreign currency.
The sensitivities provided below are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance or indicative of earnings on these contracts.
i) Foreign exchange risk
The Company regularly transacts in foreign currencies when purchasing equipment and spare parts as well as certain general and administrative goods and services. These exposures are generally of a short-term nature and the impact of changes in exchange rates has not been significant in the past. The Company may fix its exposure in either the Canadian Dollar or the US Dollar for these short term transactions, if material.
ii) Interest rate risk
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect future cash flows or the fair values of its financial instruments. Interest expense on borrowings with floating interest rates, including the Company’s Credit Facilities, varies as market interest rates change. At March 31, 2013, the Company held $45.2 million of floating rate debt pertaining to its Credit Facilities (March 31, 2012$78.8 million). As at March 31, 2013, holding all other variables constant, a 100 basis point change to interest rates on floating rate debt

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
27


will result in $0.5 million corresponding change in annual interest expense. This assumes that the amount of floating rate debt remains unchanged from that which was held at March 31, 2013.
The fair value of financial instruments with fixed interest rates, such as the Company’s Series 1 Debentures, fluctuate with changes in market interest rates. However, these fluctuations do not affect earnings, as the Company’s debt is carried at amortized cost and the carrying value does not change as interest rates change.
The Company manages its interest rate risk exposure by using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt and may use derivative instruments to achieve the desired proportion of variable to fixed-rate debt.
d) Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk that financial loss to the Company may be incurred if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Company manages the credit risk associated with its cash by holding its funds with what it believes to be reputable financial institutions. The Company is also exposed to credit risk through its accounts receivable and unbilled revenue. Credit risk for trade and other accounts receivables, and unbilled revenue are managed through established credit monitoring activities.
The Company has a concentration of customers in the oil and gas sector. The following customers accounted for 10% or more of total revenues:
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Customer A
 
25
%
 
15
%
 
30
%
Customer B
 
23
%
 
23
%
 
10
%
Customer C
 
17
%
 
6
%
 

Customer D
 
8
%
 
10
%
 
13
%
Customer E
 
6
%
 
31
%
 
38
%
The concentration risk is mitigated primarily by the customers being large investment grade organizations. The credit worthiness of new customers is subject to review by management through consideration of the type of customer and the size of the contract.
At March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, the following customers represented 10% or more of accounts receivable and unbilled revenue:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Customer A
 
23
%
 
4
%
Customer B
 
20
%
 
31
%
Customer C
 
11
%
 
10
%
Customer D
 
11
%
 
4
%
Customer E
 
8
%
 
11
%
The Company reviews its accounts receivable amounts regularly and amounts are written down to their expected realizable value when outstanding amounts are determined not to be fully collectible. This generally occurs when the customer has indicated an inability to pay, the Company is unable to communicate with the customer over an extended period of time, and other methods to obtain payment have been considered and have not been successful. Bad debt expense is charged to project costs in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period that the account is determined to be doubtful. Estimates of the allowance for doubtful accounts are determined on a customer-by-customer evaluation of collectability at each reporting date taking into consideration the following factors: the length of time the receivable has been outstanding, specific knowledge of each customer’s financial condition and historical experience.
The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk for accounts receivable and unbilled revenue is as follows:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Trade accounts receivables
 
$
93,451

 
$
213,051

Other receivables
 
7,018

 
1,078

Total accounts receivable
 
$
100,469

 
$
214,129

Unbilled revenue
 
$
56,183

 
$
86,859



28
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

On a geographic basis as at March 31, 2013, approximately 100% (March 31, 201295%) of the balance of trade accounts receivable (before considering the allowance for doubtful accounts) was due from customers based in Western Canada.
Payment terms are generally net 30 days. As at March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, trade receivables are aged as follows:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Not past due
 
$
76,646

 
$
166,362

Past due 1-30 days
 
14,203

 
27,617

Past due 31-60 days
 
957

 
8,476

More than 61 days
 
1,645

 
10,596

Total
 
$
93,451

 
$
213,051

As at March 31, 2013, the Company has recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $nil (March 31, 2012$210) of which 100% relates to amounts that are more than 61 days past due.
The allowance is an estimate of the March 31, 2013 trade receivable balances that are considered uncollectible. Changes to the allowance are as follows:
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Opening balance
 
$
210

 
$
30

 
$
1,691

Payments received on provided balances
 
(1
)
 

 
(682
)
Current year allowance
 
365

 
180

 
518

Write-offs
 
(574
)
 

 
(1,497
)
Ending balance
 
$

 
$
210

 
$
30

Credit risk on derivative financial instruments arises from the possibility that the counterparties to the agreements may default on their respective obligations under the agreements. This credit risk only arises in instances where these agreements have positive fair value for the Company.
18. Other long term obligations
a) Other long term obligations are as follows:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Liabilities related to equipment leases
 
$
104

 
$
3,169

Deferred lease inducements (note 18(b))
 
440

 
547

Asset retirement obligation (note 18(c))
 
477

 
434

Senior executive stock option plan (note 24(c))
 
925

 
1,322

Restricted share unit plan (note 24(e))
 
2,768

 
3,170

Directors' deferred stock unit plan (note 24(f))
 
3,106

 
2,284

 
 
$
7,820

 
$
10,926

Less current portion of:
 
 
 
 
Restricted share unit plan (note 24(e))
 
(719
)
 
(2,066
)
Directors' deferred share unit plan (note 24(f))
 
(355
)
 

 
 
$
6,746

 
$
8,860

b) Deferred lease inducements
Lease inducements applicable to lease contracts are deferred and amortized as a reduction of general and administrative expenses on a straight-line basis over the lease term, which includes the initial lease term and renewal periods only where renewal is determined to be reasonably assured.
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Balance, beginning of year
 
$
547

 
$
654

Amortization of deferred lease inducements
 
(107
)
 
(107
)
Balance, end of year
 
$
440

 
$
547


2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
29


c) Asset retirement obligation
The Company recorded an asset retirement obligation related to the future retirement of a facility on leased land. Accretion expense associated with this obligation is included in equipment costs in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table presents a continuity of the liability for the asset retirement obligation:
 
 
March 31, 2013

 
March 31, 2012

Balance, beginning of year
 
$
434

 
$
395

Accretion expense
 
43

 
39

Balance, end of year
 
$
477

 
$
434

At March 31, 2013, estimated undiscounted cash flows required to settle the obligation were $1,084 (March 31, 2012$1,084). The credit adjusted risk-free rate assumed in measuring the asset retirement obligation was 9.42%. The Company expects to settle this obligation in 2021.
19. Shares
a) Common shares
Authorized:
Unlimited number of voting common shares
Unlimited number of non-voting common shares
Issued and outstanding:
 
 
Number of
Shares

 
Amount

Voting common shares
 
 
 
 
Issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010
 
36,049,276

 
$
303,505

Issued upon exercise of stock options
 
193,250

 
963

Transferred from additional paid-in capital on exercise of stock options
 

 
386

Issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011
 
36,242,526

 
$
304,854

Issued upon exercise of stock options
 
8,480

 
35

Transferred from additional paid-in capital on exercise of stock options
 

 
19

Issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and 2013
 
36,251,006

 
$
304,908

b) Net (loss) income per share
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Net loss from continuing operations
 
$
(28,309
)
 
$
(25,383
)
 
$
(29,726
)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
26,846

 
4,221

 
(4,924
)
Net loss
 
$
(1,463
)
 
$
(21,162
)
 
$
(34,650
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average number of common shares (no dilutive effect)
 
36,251,006

 
36,249,082

 
36,119,356

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic per share information (no dilutive effect)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net loss from continuing operations
 
$
(0.78
)
 
$
(0.70
)
 
$
(0.82
)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
 
0.74

 
0.12

 
(0.14
)
Net loss
 
$
(0.04
)
 
$
(0.58
)
 
$
(0.96
)
For the year ended March 31, 2013, there were 2,985,722 stock options which were anti-dilutive (March 31, 20121,834,794 and 50,000 stock options and stock awards, respectively; March 31, 20111,647,474, 75,591 and 150,000 stock options, stock awards and deferred performance share units, respectively) and therefore were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share.

30
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

20. Commitments
The annual future minimum lease payments for heavy equipment, office equipment and premises in respect of operating leases, excluding contingent rentals, for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:
For the year ending March 31,
 
2014
$
25,729

2015
16,928

2016
4,720

2017
2,601

2018 and thereafter
12,081

 
$
62,059

Total contingent rentals on operating leases consisting principally of (recovery) usage charges in excess of minimum contracted amounts for the years ended March 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 amounted to $(800), $(8,449) and $1,881, respectively.
21. Contingencies
During the normal course of the Company’s operations, various legal and tax matters are pending. In the opinion of management, these matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
22. Interest expense
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Interest on 8 3/4% senior notes and swaps
 
$

 
$

 
$
1,238

Interest on capital lease obligations
 
1,925

 
425

 
643

Amortization of deferred financing costs
 
1,607

 
1,591

 
1,609

Interest on credit facilities
 
4,414

 
4,547

 
2,992

Interest on Series 1 Debentures
 
15,230

 
15,255

 
15,089

Interest on long term debt
 
$
23,176

 
$
21,818

 
$
21,571

Other interest
 
567

 
328

 
962

 
 
$
23,743

 
$
22,146

 
$
22,533

23. Discontinued operations
During the year ended March 31, 2013, the Company elected to sell its pipeline related assets and piling related assets and discontinue the operations of these businesses. Prior to this decision, the Company had two reportable business segments consisting of Heavy Construction and Mining and Commercial and Industrial Construction. The Commercial and Industrial Construction segment was comprised of pipeline and piling operations. The operations and balance sheets of the discontinued Commercial and Industrial Construction segment are summarized in this note and the Heavy Construction and Mining operations and balance sheet are presented on the face of the financial statements.
a) Pipeline
On November 22, 2012, the Company reached an agreement with an independent third party to sell its pipeline integrity and maintenance industry related assets for total consideration of approximately $16,250. The selling costs were $781 rendering net proceeds of $15,469. The Company does not have any continuing significant involvement in the operations of pipeline. For all periods presented, the results of its pipeline operations and cash flows have been reported as discontinued operations.
The following table summarizes the book value of the disposed pipeline related assets:
Inventory
$
1,254

Property, plant and equipment, gross
17,491

Accumulated depreciation
(5,459
)
Pipeline related assets
$
13,286


2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
31

NOA

The results of pipeline discontinued operations are summarized as follows:
Year ended March 31,
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Revenue
$
35,901

 
$
150,504

 
$
85,452

Project costs
36,090

 
164,278

 
87,703

Depreciation
196

 
1,045

 
550

Gross loss
$
(385
)
 
$
(14,819
)
 
$
(2,801
)
General and administrative expenses
1,246

 
1,371

 
1,449

Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment
(375
)
 

 

Recovery of previously expensed tools, supplies and equipment parts
(1,095
)
 

 

Gain on sale of inventory
(714
)
 

 

Operating Income (loss)
$
553

 
$
(16,190
)
 
$
(4,250
)
Interest expense
700

 
1,050

 
1,050

Loss before income taxes
$
(147
)
 
$
(17,240
)
 
$
(5,300
)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
173

 
(4,282
)
 
(1,389
)
Net loss from discontinued operations
$
(320
)
 
$
(12,958
)
 
$
(3,911
)
Cash provided by (used in) the pipeline discontinued operations is summarized as follows:
Year ended March 31,
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Operating activities
$
928

 
$
(16,195
)
 
$
(4,750
)
Investing activities
11,986

 
(4,110
)
 
(1,124
)
 
$
12,914

 
$
(20,305
)
 
$
(5,874
)
b) Piling
At March 31, 2013, as part of its ongoing strategic evaluation of operations, the Company made the decision to sell its piling assets and liabilities, excluding accounts receivable and unbilled revenue on a certain customer contract, and exit the piling, foundation, pipeline anchor and tank services businesses. On June 10, 2013, the Company reached an agreement with Keller Group plc (the "Purchaser") to sell its piling assets and liabilities, subject to majority approval by the Purchaser's shareholders and subject to the Purchaser securing certain anti-trust approvals, for initial consideration of approximately $227,500, plus or minus customary working capital adjustments, less capital lease obligations at the closing date. The terms of the agreement entitle the Company to additional proceeds of $92,500 over the next three years, contingent on the Purchaser achieving prescribed profit milestones from the piling business. These contingent proceeds will be recognized as the profit milestones are achieved. The assets and liabilities being sold have been classified as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Upon finalization of the sale the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in piling operations. For all periods presented, the results of piling operations and cash flows are included in discontinued operations.

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
32

NOA

The following table summarizes the book value of the piling related assets classified as held for sale:
Accounts receivable, net
$
44,297

Unbilled revenue
9,324

Inventories
7,754

Prepaid expenses
181

Intangible assets
4,220

Property, plant and equipment, gross
83,359

Accumulated depreciation
(29,566
)
Goodwill
32,901

Deferred tax assets
2,270

Assets held for sale
$
154,740

The following table summarizes the book value of the piling related liabilities classified as held for sale:
Accounts payable
$
17,048

Accrued liabilities
23

Billings in excess
3,115

Capital lease obligation
5,927

Deferred tax liabilities
12,733

Liabilities held for sale
$
38,846

The results of piling discontinued operations are summarized as follows:
Year ended March 31,
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Revenue
$
236,459

 
$
185,321

 
$
105,559

Project costs
172,593

 
136,080

 
84,175

Equipment operating lease expense
2,315

 
2,315

 
1,071

Depreciation
3,592

 
3,213

 
3,828

Gross profit
$
57,959

 
$
43,713

 
$
16,485

General and administrative expenses
12,451

 
11,696

 
9,654

Amortization of intangible assets
1,408

 
1,415

 
1,390

Operating income
$
44,100

 
$
30,602

 
$
5,441

Interest expense
7,639

 
7,129

 
6,408

Income (loss) before income taxes
$
36,461

 
$
23,473

 
$
(967
)
Deferred income tax expense
9,295

 
6,294

 
46

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
$
27,166

 
$
17,179

 
$
(1,013
)
Cash provided by (used in) the piling discontinued operations is summarized as follows:
Year ended March 31,
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Operating activities
$
37,263

 
$
22,370

 
$
16,431

Investing activities
(34,047
)
 
(8,184
)
 
(26,198
)
Financing activities
(848
)
 
(337
)
 

 
$
2,368

 
$
13,849

 
$
(9,767
)

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
33


24. Stock-based compensation
a) Stock-based compensation expenses
Stock-based compensation expenses included in general and administrative expenses are as follows:
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Share option plan (note 24(b))
 
$
1,333

 
$
1,373

 
$
1,455

Senior executive stock option plan (note 24(c))
 

 
(2,878
)
 
2,878

Deferred performance share unit plan (note 24(d))
 

 

 
(44
)
Restricted share unit plan (note 24(e))
 
1,275

 
733

 
1,603

Directors' deferred stock unit plan (note 24(f))
 
997

 
(1,747
)
 
1,484

Stock award plan (note 24(g))
 
14

 
256

 
780

 
 
$
3,619

 
$
(2,263
)
 
$
8,156

 
b) Share option plan
Under the 2004 Amended and Restated Share Option Plan, which was approved and became effective in 2006, directors, officers, employees and certain service providers to the Company are eligible to receive stock options to acquire voting common shares in the Company. Each stock option provides the right to acquire one common share in the Company and expires ten years from the grant date or on termination of employment. Options may be exercised at a price determined at the time the option is awarded, and vest as follows: no options vest on the award date and twenty percent vest on each subsequent anniversary date.
 
 
Number of options

 
Weighted average
exercise price
$ per share

Outstanding at March 31, 2010
 
2,250,804

 
7.84

Granted
 
260,000

 
9.77

Exercised(i)
 
(193,250
)
 
4.98

Forfeited
 
(120,080
)
 
10.30

Modified(ii)
 
(550,000
)
 
5.00

Outstanding at March 31, 2011
 
1,647,474

 
9.25

Granted
 
287,700

 
6.56

Exercised(i)
 
(8,480
)
 
4.15

Forfeited
 
(91,900
)
 
10.42

Outstanding at March 31, 2012
 
1,834,794

 
8.79

Granted
 
1,517,400

 
2.83

Forfeited
 
(366,472
)
 
9.10

Outstanding at March 31, 2013
 
2,985,722

 
5.72

(i)
All stock options exercised resulted in new common shares being issued (note 19(a));
(ii)
550,000 stock options were modified as senior executive stock options on September 22, 2010 (note 24(c)).
Cash received from option exercises for the year ended March 31, 2013 was $nil (2012 - $35; 2011$963). The total intrinsic value of options exercised, calculated as market value at the exercise date less exercise price, multiplied by the number of units exercised, for the years ended March 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $nil, $48 and $1,084, respectively.

34
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at March 31, 2013:
  
 
Options outstanding
 
 
Options exercisable
 
Exercise price
 
Number

 
Weighted
average
remaining life
 
Weighted
average exercise
price

 
Number

 
Weighted
average
remaining life

 
Weighted
average exercise
price

$2.75
 
705,600

 
9.5 years
 
$
2.75

 

 

 

$2.79
 
750,000

 
9.2 years
 
$
2.79

 

 

 

$3.69
 
115,840

 
6.4 years
 
$
3.69

 
91,700

 
6.6 years

 
$
3.69

$4.90
 
40,000

 
9 years
 
$
4.90

 

 

 

$5.00
 
403,982

 
1.8 years
 
$
5.00

 
403,982

 
1.8 years

 
$
5.00

$6.56
 
188,260

 
8.1 years
 
$
6.56

 
42,140

 
7.4 years

 
$
6.56

$8.28
 
80,000

 
6.2 years
 
$
8.28

 
48,000

 
6.2 years

 
$
8.28

$8.58
 
60,000

 
7.5 years
 
$
8.58

 
24,000

 
7.5 years

 
$
8.58

$9.33
 
125,560

 
6.5 years
 
$
9.33

 
79,200

 
6.6 years

 
$
9.33

$10.13
 
128,780

 
7.4 years
 
$
10.13

 
55,640

 
7.3 years

 
$
10.13

$13.21
 
75,000

 
4.8 years
 
$
13.21

 
75,000

 
4.8 years

 
$
13.21

$13.50
 
194,940

 
4.6 years
 
$
13.50

 
194,940

 
4.6 years

 
$
13.50

$15.37
 
40,000

 
5 years
 
$
15.37

 
40,000

 
5 years

 
$
15.37

$16.46
 
50,000

 
5 years
 
$
16.46

 
40,000

 
5 years

 
$
16.46

$16.75
 
27,760

 
3.5 years
 
$
16.75

 
27,760

 
3.5 years

 
$
16.75

 
 
2,985,722

 
7.1 years
 
$
5.72

 
1,122,362

 
4.2 years

 
$
8.82

At March 31, 2013, the weighted average remaining contractual life of outstanding options is 7.1 years (March 31, 20126.3 years). The fair value of options vested during the year ended March 31, 2013 was $1,381 (March 31, 2012$1,652). At March 31, 2013, the Company had 1,122,362 exercisable options (March 31, 20121,031,774) with a weighted average exercise price of $8.82 (March 31, 2012$8.82).
At March 31, 2013, the total compensation costs related to non-vested awards not yet recognized was $2,768 (March 31, 2012$2,655) and these costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.6 years (March 31, 20123.2 years).
The fair value of each option granted by the Company was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Number of options granted
 
1,517,400

 
287,700

 
260,000

Weighted average fair value per option granted ($)
 
1.88

 
4.38

 
6.79

Weighted average assumptions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividend yield
 
Nil
%
 
Nil
%
 
Nil
%
Expected volatility
 
74.52
%
 
75.22
%
 
78.59
%
Risk-free interest rate
 
1.02
%
 
1.32
%
 
2.65
%
Expected life (years)
 
6.4

 
6.3

 
6.1

The Company uses company specific historical data to estimate the expected life of the option, such as employee option exercise and employee post-vesting departure behaviour.
c) Senior executive stock option plan
On September 22, 2010, the Company modified a senior executive employment agreement to allow the option holder the right to settle options in cash which resulted in 550,000 stock options (senior executive stock options) changing classification from equity to a long term liability. The liability is measured at fair value using the Black-Scholes model at the modification date and subsequently at each period end date. Previously recognized compensation cost related to the senior executive stock option plan of $2,237 was transferred from additional paid-in capital to the senior executive stock option liability on the modification date. The fair value of the compensation liability is calculated using the Black-Scholes model at each period end. Changes in fair value of the liability are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
35


The weighted average assumptions used in estimating the fair value of the senior executive stock options as at March 31, 2013 are as follows:
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Number of senior executive stock options
 
550,000

 
550,000

 
550,000

Weighted average fair value per option granted ($)
 
1.68

 
2.40

 
9.30

Weighted average assumptions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dividend yield
 
Nil
%
 
Nil
%
 
Nil
%
Expected volatility
 
71.74
%
 
74.99
%
 
76.74
%
Risk-free interest rate
 
0.26
%
 
0.54
%
 
1.77
%
Expected life (years)
 
2.1

 
3.1

 
6.1

d) Deferred performance share unit plan
The Company has no outstanding Deferred Performance Share Units (“DPSUs”) at this time. DPSUs were granted each fiscal year with respect of services to be provided in that fiscal year and the following two fiscal years. The DPSUs vested at the end of a three-year term and were subject to the performance criteria approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors at the date of grant. Such performance criterion included the passage of time and the return on invested capital calculated as operating income divided by average operating assets. The maturity date for such DPSUs was the last day of the third fiscal year following the grant date. At the maturity date, the Compensation Committee assessed the participant against the performance criteria and determined the number of DPSUs that were earned (earned DPSUs).
The settlement of the participant’s entitlement was made at the Company’s option either in cash, in an amount equivalent to the number of earned DPSUs multiplied by the fair market value of the Company’s common shares as determined by the volume weighted average trading price of the Company’s common shares for the five trading days immediately preceding the date of maturity, or in a number of common shares equal to the number of earned DPSUs. If settled in common shares, the common shares were purchased on the open market or through the issuance of shares from treasury.
The fair value of each unit under the DPSU Plan was estimated on the date of the grant using Black-Scholes option pricing model. There were no DPSUs granted in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011.
  
 
Number of units

Outstanding at March 31, 2010
 
507,295

Forfeited
 
(74,776
)
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
 
432,519

Expired
 
(41,117
)
Converted to RSUs (note 24(e))
 
(391,402
)
Outstanding at March 31, 2012 and 2013
 

On April 1, 2011, the Company converted 262,737 and 128,665 Deferred Performance Share Units (“DPSUs”) into Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) for the April 1, 2009 and March 31, 2010 grants at a conversion factor of 50% and 75% respectively (note 24(e)).
e) Restricted share unit plan
Restricted Share Units (“RSUs”) are granted each fiscal year with respect to services to be provided in that fiscal year and the following two fiscal years. The RSUs vest at the end of a three-year term. The Company classifies RSUs as a liability as the Company has the ability and intent to settle the awards in cash.
Compensation expense is calculated based on the number of vested shares multiplied by the fair market value of each RSU as determined by the volume weighted average trading price of the Company’s common shares for the five trading days immediately preceding the day on which the fair market value is to be determined. The Company recognizes compensation expense over the three-year term of the RSU in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
On April 1, 2011, the Company converted the April 1, 2009 and March 31, 2010 DPSUs (note 24(d)) into RSUs at a conversion factor of 50% and 75% respectively.

36
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

  
 
Number of units

Outstanding at March 31, 2010
 
468,815

Forfeited
 
(86,339
)
Outstanding at March 31, 2011
 
382,476

Granted
 
695,086

Settled
 
(27,850
)
Forfeited
 
(102,022
)
Converted from DPSUs (note 24(d))
 
227,875

Outstanding at March 31, 2012
 
1,175,565

Granted
 
625,405

Settled
 
(345,679
)
Forfeited
 
(364,446
)
Outstanding at March 31, 2013
 
1,090,845

At March 31, 2013, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets the $719 current portion of RSU liabilities were included in accrued liabilities (March 31, 2012 - $2,066) and long term portion of RSU liabilities of $2,049 were included in other long term obligations (March 31, 2012$1,104). During the year ended March 31, 2013, 345,679 units were settled in cash for $1,677 (2012 - 27,850 units settled in cash for $318). At March 31, 2013, an additional 154,330 vested, which were settled in April 2013 using a redemption value of $4.66 per unit. This liability is included in the current portion of RSU liabilities at March 31, 2013.
At March 31, 2013, the weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding RSUs, including the 154,330 fully vested but unsettled units, was 1.4 years (March 31, 20121.4 years). Using a fair market value of $4.65 per unit at March 31, 2013, there were approximately $2,335 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non–vested share–based payment arrangements under the RSU Plan (March 31, 2012$2,576) and these costs are expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining contractual life of the RSUs of 1.6 years (March 31, 20121.4 years).
f) Director’s deferred stock unit plan
On November 27, 2007, the Company approved a Directors’ Deferred Stock Unit (“DDSU”) Plan, which became effective January 1, 2008. Under the DDSU Plan, non–officer directors of the Company receive 50% of their annual fixed remuneration (which is included in general and administrative expenses) in the form of DDSUs and may elect to receive all or a part of their annual fixed remuneration in excess of 50% in the form of DDSUs. The number of DDSUs to be credited to the participants deferred unit account is determined by dividing the amount of the participant’s deferred remuneration by fair market value of the Company's common shares, calculated as the Canadian Dollar equivalent of the volume weighted average trading price of the Company’s common shares for the five trading days immediately preceding the date that participants’ remuneration becomes payable. The DDSUs vest immediately upon issuance and are only redeemable upon death or retirement of the participant for cash determined by the market price of the Company’s common shares for the five trading days immediately preceding death or retirement. Directors, who are not US taxpayers, may elect to defer the redemption date until a date no later than December 1st of the calendar year following the year in which the retirement or death occurred.
  
 
Number of units

Outstanding at March 31, 2010
 
263,266

Issued
 
73,752

Outstanding at March 31, 2011
 
337,018

Issued
 
128,248

Outstanding at March 31, 2012
 
465,266

Issued
 
266,091

Redeemed
 
(63,413
)
Outstanding at March 31, 2013
 
667,944

At March 31, 2013, the fair market value of these units was 4.65 per unit (March 31, 2012$4.91 per unit). At March 31, 2013, the current portion of DDSU liabilities of $355 were included in accrued liabilities (March 31, 2012 -

2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
37


$nil) and the long term portion of DDSU liabilities of $2,751 were included in other long term obligations (March 31, 2012 - $2,284) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the year ended March 31, 2013, 63,413 units were redeemed and settled in cash for $175 (March 31, 2012 - no units were redeemed). There is no unrecognized compensation expense related to the DDSUs, since these awards vest immediately when issued.
g) Stock award plan
On September 24, 2009, the former Chief Executive Officer’s (CEO) employment agreement was extended by the Board of Directors for a further period of two years, to May 8, 2012. In addition to the existing conditions in his employment agreement, as of September 24, 2010, the effective date, the former CEO was granted the right to receive 150,000 common shares of the Company as follows:
50,000 shares on May 8, 2011;
50,000 shares on November 8, 2011; and
50,000 shares on May 8, 2012.
The former CEO’s entitlement, upon the above release dates, could be settled in common shares purchased on the open market or through the issuance of common shares from treasury, in each case net of required withholdings. The estimate of the fair value of the stock award on the grant date is equal to the market price of the Company’s common shares.
During the year ended March 31, 2013, 50,000 stock awards vested (March 31, 2012 - 100,000 stock awards) and were settled in common shares purchased on the open market for $148 (March 31, 2012 - $822). At March 31, 2013 there were no stock award plan units outstanding.
25. Other information
a) Supplemental cash flow information
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Cash paid during the year for:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest, including realized interest on interest rate swap
 
$
29,783

 
$
27,521

 
$
33,559

Income taxes
 
4,833

 
1,415

 
4,149

Cash received during the year for:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest
 
10

 
1

 
1,168

Income taxes
 
518

 
5,347

 
2,260



38
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements

NOA

Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Non-cash transactions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment for continuing operations by means of capital leases
 
$
42,229

 
$
6,614

 
$
427

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment for discontinued operations by means of capital leases
 
6,512

 
601

 

Additions to assets held for sale
 
(2,995
)
 
(10,322
)
 
(1,675
)
Additions to assets held for sale from discontinued piling operations
 
(152,470
)
 

 

Additions to liabilities held for sale from discontinued piling operations
 
26,113

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in accounts payable related to purchase of property, plant and equipment
 
4,294

 
1,380

 
(3,879
)
Net decrease in current portion of equipment lease liabilities included in accrued liabilities related to the purchase of property, plant and equipment
 
(1,574
)
 

 

Net decrease in long term portion of equipment lease liabilities related to the purchase of property, plant and equipment
 
(1,712
)
 

 

Decrease in property, plant and equipment resulting from reclassification to inventory
 
(2,219
)
 

 

(Decrease) increase in accrued liabilities related to current portion of RSU liability
 
(1,347
)
 
2,066

 

Increase in accrued liabilities related to current portion of DDSU liability
 
355

 

 

Change in non-cash working capital related to piling discontinued operations, excluded from non-cash working capital for continuing operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
 
1,849

 
17,773

 
4,277

Unbilled revenue
 
236

 
3,082

 
883

Inventories
 
3,900

 
1,026

 
1,731

Prepaid expenses
 
(47
)
 
51

 
5,502

Accounts payable
 
27,857

 
(14,135
)
 
(23,444
)
Accrued liabilities
 
103

 
252

 
(132
)
Billings in excess of costs and earnings
 
1,207

 
(2,318
)
 
(997
)
Non-cash transactions related to the buyout of contract-related assets during the year ended March 31, 2012:
 


 


 
 
Disposition of property, plant and equipment related to the buyout of contract-related assets
 

 
(27,063
)
 

Disposition of intangible assets related to the buyout of contract-related assets
 

 
(1,119
)
 

Increase in accounts receivable related to the buyout of contract-related assets
 

 
66,055

 

Decrease in unbilled revenue related to the buyout of contract-related assets
 

 
(16,457
)
 

Decrease in inventory related to the buyout of contract-related assets
 

 
(8,483
)
 

Increase in accounts payable related to the buyout of contract-related assets
 

 
12,933

 


2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
39


b) Net change in non-cash working capital
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, net
 
$
71,212

 
$
(1,819
)
 
$
(5,257
)
Unbilled revenue
 
21,588

 
2,705

 
(17,354
)
Inventories
 
3,215

 
(11,577
)
 
(930
)
Prepaid expenses and deposits
 
3,720

 
3,464

 
5,810

Accounts payable
 
(56,792
)
 
56,629

 
(2,062
)
Accrued liabilities
 
(1,621
)
 
2,167

 
(5,566
)
Long term portion of liabilities related to equipment leases
 
(1,353
)
 
(9,578
)
 
(2,196
)
Billings in excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
 
3,893

 
3,192

 
(607
)
 
 
$
43,862

 
$
45,183

 
$
(28,162
)
26. Claims revenue
Year ended March 31,
 
2013

 
2012

 
2011

Claims revenue recognized
 
$
20,994

 
$
32,612

 
$
2,521

Claims revenue uncollected (classified as unbilled revenue)
 
18,426

 
22,393

 
1,742

27. Related party transactions
Perry Partners, L.P. and Perry Partners International, Inc. are together the last remaining "Sponsors” of the Company from the time of the Company's initial public offering in November of 2006. The Company may receive consulting and advisory services provided by the Sponsors (principals or employees of such Sponsors are directors of the Company) with respect to the organization of the companies, employee benefit and compensation arrangements, and other matters, and no fee is charged for these consulting and advisory services.
In order for the Sponsors to provide such advisory and consulting services, the Company provides reports, financial data and other information to the Sponsors. This permits them to consult with and advise the Company’s management on matters relating to its operations, company affairs and finances. In addition, this permits them to visit and inspect any of the Company’s properties and facilities.
Prior to August 20, 2012, The Sterling Group Partners I, L.P. (“Sterling”) was a Sponsor of the Company.  As at that date, Sterling distributed all of its 4,626,265 common shares in the capital of the Company to its limited partners and general partner in connection with the termination of the investment term of Sterling, leaving Sterling with no common shares in the capital of the Company.  Concurrently with such distribution, Sterling and the Company entered into an agreement terminating Sterling's Advisory Services Agreement.
There were no material related party transactions during the years ended March 31, 2013, March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011. All related party transactions were in the normal course of operations and were measured at the exchange amount, being the consideration established and agreed to by the related parties.
28. Employee benefit plans
The Company and its subsidiaries match voluntary contributions made by employees to their Registered Retirement Savings Plans to a maximum of 5% of base salary for each employee. Contributions made by the Company during the year ended March 31, 2013 were $2,057 (2012$2,083; 2011$1,689).
29. Comparative figures
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified from statements previously presented to conform to the presentation of the current year consolidated financial statements.

40
2013 Consolidated Financial Statements