10-Q

UNITED STATES

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

 [X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

[_] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from __________ to ___________

Commission File Number 000-54035

BLUGRASS ENERGY INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer in its charter)

Nevada	20-4952339
(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

13465 Midway Road, Suite 114, LB 10, Dallas, TX  75244

(Address of principal executive offices)

(972) 404-9995

(Telephone Number) 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 Yes  [X]   No  [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  

Yes [X]     No [_]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  

Large accelerated filer [_]	Accelerated Filer [_]
Non-accelerated filer   [_]	Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  [_]    No  [X]

There were 70,866,638 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of September 30, 2011.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
			Page
	Balance Sheets – September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		1
	Statements of Operations -
		Three and Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and
		From December 11, 2007 (Inception) to September 30, 2011	2
	Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)		3
	Statements of Cash Flows –
		Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and
		From December 11, 2007 (Inception) to September 30, 2011	4
	Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements		5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		12
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	– Not Applicable		15
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		15
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		16
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		16
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		16
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		17
Item 4.	Reserved		17
Item 5.	Other Information		17
Item 6.	Exhibits		17
SIGNATURES			17

Item 1.  Financial Statements

BLUGRASS ENERGY INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	-		$	-
Other receivable		39,811			-
Total current assets		39,811			-
Oil and gas properties - undeveloped		1,984,383			1,984,383
Other assets:
Investment in Quad Energy		15,000			-
Total other assets		15,000			-
Total assets	$	2,039,194		$	1,984,383
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	775,935		$	-
Notes payable		20,000			-
Convertible notes payable, net		286,271			-
Derivative liability		141,742			-
Accrued interest		225,545			-
Total current liabilities		1,449,493			-
Long-term note payable		3,500,000			-
Total liabilities		4,949,493			-
COMMITMENTS AND CONTENGENCIES
Shareholders' equity (deficit):
Common stock par value $.005, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
70,866,638 and 0 issued and outstanding, respectively		354,333			-
Additional paid-in-capital		(1,586,561	)		1,984,383
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(1,678,071	)		-
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)		(2,910,299	)		1,984,383
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit)	$	2,039,194		$	1,984,383

(See accompanying notes to the financial statements)

1

BLUGRASS ENERGY INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended			Nine Months Ended		December 11, 2007 (Inception) to
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011
Operating expenses:
Land development costs	$	-		$	-	$	176,130		$	-	$	176,130
Professional fees		39,943			-		291,722			-		291,722
General and administrative expenses		192,192			-		497,399			-		497,399
Total operating expenses		232,135			-		965,251			-		965,251
Other expense:
Loss on investment in Quad Energy		(10,000	)		-		(485,000	)		-		(485,000	)
Interest expense		(111,005	)		-		(227,820	)		-		(227,820	)
Total other expense		(121,005	)		-		(712,820	)		-		(712,820	)
Net Loss		(353,140	)		-		(1,678,071	)		-		(1,678,071	)
Per share information:
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(0.00	)	$	-	$	(0.03	)	$	-
Weighted average shares outstanding		70,866,638			-		56,639,796			-

 (See accompanying notes to the financial statements)

2

BLUGRASS ENERGY INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

December 11, 2007 (Inception) through

September 30, 2011

	Common Stock				Additional			Deficit Accumulated During Development			Total Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Paid-in-Capital			Stage			Equity (Deficit)
Balance at December 11, 2007		-	$	-	$	1,984,383		$	-		$	1,984,383
Balance at December 31, 2010		-		-		1,984,383			-			1,984,383
Recapitalization - February 23, 2011		69,254,294		346,272		(3,873,848	)		-			(3,527,576	)
Conversion of debentures		528,344		2,641		31,159						33,800
Common stock issued for services March 31, 2011		180,000		900		26,100			-			27,000
Stock compensation expense  - March 31, 2011		-		-		24,123			-			24,123
Net loss		-		-		-			(523,844	)		(523,844	)
Balances at March 31, 2011		69,962,638		349,813		(1,808,083	)		(523,844	)		(1,982,114	)
Stock issued for compensation - Fullerton - April 5, 2011		64,000		320		9,280			-			9,600
Common stock and warrants issued		840,000		4,200		46,200			-			50,400
Stock compensation expense  - June 30, 2011		-		-		83,021			-			83,021
Net loss		-		-		-			(801,087	)		(801,087	)
Balances at June 30, 2011		70,866,638		354,333		(1,669,582	)		(1,324,931	)		(2,640,180	)
Stock compensation expense  - September 30, 2011		-		-		83,021			-			83,021
Net loss		-		-		-			(353,140	)		(353,140	)
Balances at September 30, 2011		70,866,638	$	354,333	$	(1,586,561	)	$	(1,678,071	)	$	(2,910,299	)

(See accompanying notes to the financial statements)

3

BLUGRASS ENERGY INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

						December 11, 2007
	Nine months ended			Nine months ended		(Inception) to
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2010		September 30, 2011
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(1,678,071	)	$	-	$	(1,678,071	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Debt discount amortization		86,097			-		86,097
Impairment of assets		485,000			-		485,000
Common stock issued for services		36,600			-		36,600
Stock compensation		190,165			-		190,165
Changes in working capital:
Accounts payable		514,683			-		514,683
Other receivable		(39,811	)		-		(39,811	)
Accrued interest payable		139,937			-		139,937
Net cash used in operating activities		(265,400	)		-		(265,400	)
Cash Flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of short term notes		20,000			-		20,000
Proceeds from convertible promissory notes		195,000			-		195,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants		50,400			-		50,400
Net cash provided by financing activities		265,400			-		265,400
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		-			-		-
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		-			-		-
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	-		$	-	$	-
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest expense	$	-		$	-	$	-
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-	$	-
Debt and interest converted to equity	$	33,800		$	-	$	33,800

(See accompanying notes to the financial statements)

4

BLUGRASS ENERGY INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

Organization – Nature of Operations

Blugrass Energy Inc. (the “Company” or “Blugrass”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 19, 2006, as Coastal Media Inc.  The Company was originally formed to engage in the business of manufacturing, marketing, distributing and selling its marine DVDs.  On September 11, 2008, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to change its name from "Coastal Media Inc." to "Blugrass Energy Inc.", to reflect the change in direction of the Company’s business to the Oil and Gas Industry. As a result of the name change, the Company’s trading symbol was changed to “BLUG”.

On February 23, 2011, Petro Grande, LLC (“Petro Grande”) consummated a transaction with Blugrass whereby Petro Grande acquired a controlling interest in Blugrass.  This transaction effected a change of control and Blugrass’ management team was replaced with Petro Grande’s management team.  Upon the reverse merger recapitalization on February 23, 2011 the inception date of the Company changed to December 11, 2007, the date of the acquisition of the lease by Petro Grande, LLC.  As a result of the reverse merger recapitalization, Blugrass’ new management team has implemented a new business strategy (discussed in detail in the section on Management’s Discussion and Analysis below).

The Company is in the development stage. Its activities to date have been limited to capital formation, organization and development of its business plan.  

The Company has not earned  revenues from planned operations.  Accordingly, the Company’s activities have been accounted for as those of a “Development Stage Company”.  Among the disclosures required are that the Company’s financial statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows disclose activity since the date of the Company’s inception.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Change in Fiscal Year – On March 10, 2011 the Board of Directors approved the change of the Company’s fiscal year from a June 30 fiscal year end to a December 31 calendar year end.  The Company filed a transition report on Form 10-KT for the six-month transition period ended December 31, 2010.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods.  Key estimates in the accompanying financial statements include, among others, revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances.

Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.

Other Receivable – There was an other receivable totaling $39,811 and $0 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  The balance of other receivable as of September 30, 2011 consisted of amounts representing business related expenses owed to the Company.

5

Oil and Gas Properties – We follow the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Unsuccessful exploration drilling costs are expensed and can have a significant effect on reported operating results. Successful exploration drilling costs and all development costs are capitalized and systematically charged to expense using the units of production method based on proved developed oil and gas reserves as estimated by our engineers and reviewed by independent engineers. Costs incurred for exploratory wells that find reserves that cannot yet be classified as proved are capitalized if (a) the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and (b) there is sufficient progress being made in assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Proven property leasehold costs are amortized to expense using the units of production method based on total proved reserves. Properties are assessed for impairment as circumstances warrant and impairments to value are charged to expense. The successful efforts method inherently relies upon the estimation of proved reserves, which includes proved developed and proved undeveloped volumes.

Proved reserves are defined by the SEC as those volumes of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty are recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are volumes expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Although engineers are knowledgeable of and follow the guidelines for reserves established by the SEC, including the rule revisions designed to modernize the oil and gas company reserves reporting requirements, the estimation of reserves requires engineers to make a significant number of assumptions based on professional judgment. Reserve estimates are updated periodically and consider recent production levels and other technical information. Estimated reserves are often subject to future revisions, which could be substantial, based on the availability of additional information, including: reservoir performance, new geological and geophysical data, additional drilling, technological advancements, price and cost changes and other economic factors. Changes in oil and gas prices can lead to a decision to start-up or shut-in production, which can lead to revisions to reserve quantities.  It is difficult to predict what reserve revisions may be required in future periods.

Depletion rates are determined based on reserve quantity estimates and the capitalized costs of producing properties. As the estimated reserves are adjusted, the depletion expense for a property will change, assuming no change in production volumes or capitalized costs. While total depletion expense for the life of a property is limited to the property’s total cost, proved reserve revisions result in a change in timing when depletion expense is recognized. Downward revisions of proved reserves result in an acceleration of depletion expense, while upward revisions tend to lower the rate of depletion expense recognition.   Estimated reserves are used as the basis for calculating the expected future cash flows from a property, which are used to determine whether that property may be impaired. Reserves are also used to estimate the supplemental disclosure of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to oil and gas producing activities and reserve quantities. Changes in the estimated reserves are considered a change in estimate for accounting purposes and are reflected on a prospective basis.

Income Taxes – The Company estimates its current tax position together with its future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation and other reserves for tax and accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Management must then assess the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, prior year carryback, or future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. To the extent management believes that recovery is unlikely, management establishes a valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, its deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against its deferred tax assets.  At September  30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty these assets will be used in the future.

6

Reverse Merger

On February 23, 2011, the Company was acquired by Petro Grande, which contributed a significant oil and gas working interest lease covering acreage located in Crockett County, Texas from Petro Grande as consideration in exchange for 52,294,336 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock plus a promissory note in the amount of $3.5 million. On the closing date of the PG Transaction, a change in control of the Company occurred and the senior management and directors of Blugrass resigned and were replaced by Petro Grande’s management team. Although Blugrass is the surviving legal entity; the contributed Petro Grande working interest lease remained the financial reporting entity and the merger was treated as a reverse recapitalization as, prior to the PG transaction, Blugrass was a public holding company with limited assets or operations and, upon completion of the PG transaction, Petro Grande shareholders emerged with a controlling 77% interest in the merged Company.

The PG Transaction was initially valued by Petro Grande management at approximately $8.7 million and, as such, the Company recorded an increase to the value of undeveloped leasehold costs of Blugrass of approximately $6.7 million.  After reviewing the PG Transaction, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporate Finance recommended that the consideration provided in the transaction should be valued at its historical cost as is consistent with a reverse recapitalization.  As a result, management has reduced the amount recorded as “Oil and gas properties – undeveloped” and additional paid in capital as of September 30, 2011 balance sheet, to $1,984,383.

The oil and gas lease contributed as consideration as part of the PG Transaction (the Soto Lease defined below) includes an option to participate as a working interest partner in drilling programs sponsored on an additional 9,850 acres (currently held by Petro Grande) located in close proximity to the oil and gas lease properties contributed.  This acreage also benefits from 3D seismic imaging.

Investment in Quad Energy

On February 23, 2011, upon the reverse merger recapitalization the Company acquired an asset purchase agreement with Quad Energy Corp. (“Quad Energy”) for the sale of 100% of the Company’s rights, title and interest to certain properties located in and around the Cave Pool Unit (Marks and Garner Productions) in Eddy County, New Mexico (the “Eddy County Properties”). The Eddy County Properties consist of leasehold interests in approximately 2,800 acres and all existing equipment used to produce oil and natural gas located on the Eddy County Properties. As consideration for the transaction the Company was to receive 5,000,000 shares of Quad Energy’s common stock, valued at $.10 per share. The transaction closed on January 25, 2011 pre-recapitalization, and the Company recorded an investment in Quad Energy in the amount of $500,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the value of the investment in Quad Energy had decreased and the Company recorded a loss on the statement of operations of $485,000 as the Company considers the loss other than temporary.

7

Oil & Gas Properties

On February 23, 2011, in conjunction with the PG Transaction, the Company acquired a 4,808 acre undeveloped lease located in the Permian Basin in Crockett County, Texas (the “Soto Lease”).   Acquisition of the Soto Lease, representing an 87.5% working interest in the underlying acreage, includes full access to Petro Grande’s complete three-dimensional (3D) seismic imaging of the land under lease.  The lease expiration date is July 12, 2013 with a 2011 lease obligation to drill one Strawn formation well and one Ellenburger formation well by December 31, 2011.  The Company’s plans to drill by December 31, 2011, are contingent upon management raising additional funding to finance drilling costs.  This lease has a continuous drilling clause of 120 days provided the drilling obligations previously described are satisfied.

Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company reported a net loss of $1,678,071 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, and an accumulated deficit during the development stage of $1,678,071 as of September 30, 2011.  At September 30, 2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $1,409,682 and the Company had no revenues from its activities during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern may be dependent on the success of management’s plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Notes Payable

In conjunction with the PG Transaction, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $3.5 million (the “PG Note Payable”) on February 23, 2011.  The PG Note Payable accrues interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum beginning on February 23, 2011 with accrued interest payable in semi-annual installments beginning on October 1, 2011.  Past due principal and accrued interest accrue interest at a rate of 10% per annum.  The balance of the PG Note Payable along with any accrued and unpaid interest is due on February 22, 2013.  The PG Note Payable is secured by a first priority interest in the Company’s Soto Lease.

On May 12, 2011 the Company issued an unsecured note payable in the amount of $20,000 (the “Ladner Note”).  The Ladner Note matured on August 31, 2011, and is considered to be in default.  The note includes a “bonus payment” of $2,500 due at maturity.  The “bonus payment” is equivalent to interest which accrues at an annual rate of 12.5%.

8

Convertible Promissory Notes

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding $361,666 of unsecured convertible commercial promissory notes (the “Convertible Promissory Notes”). 

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, $33,800 of Convertible Promissory Notes were converted to 528,344 shares of common stock.

On April 8, 2011 the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note totaling $75,000 to a third party (the “April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note”). The April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum.  The principal balance and accrued interest under the April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is due on January 12, 2012.  

Holders of the April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest to shares of common stock of the Company beginning 180 days after April 8, 2011.  The April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is convertible at a per share price equal to 60% of the average of the lowest 5 closing bid prices of the Company’s common stock as listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board over the 10 trading days immediately prior to conversion.   In the event of a default, the minimum amount due is 150% of outstanding principal and unpaid interest, and the April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 22% per annum until paid or converted.

On May 19, 2011 the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note totaling $42,500 to a third party (the “May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note”). The May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum.  The principal balance and accrued interest under the May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is due on January 12, 2012.  Holders of the May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest to shares of common stock of the Company beginning 180 days after May 19, 2011.  The May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is convertible at a per share price equal to 60% of the average of the lowest 5 closing bid prices of the Company’s common stock as listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board over the 10 trading days immediately prior to conversion. In the event of a default, the minimum amount due is 150% of outstanding principal and unpaid interest, and the May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 22% per annum until paid or converted.

On July 12, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note (the “July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note”) in the amount of $35,000.  The balance of the July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is payable in full on April 17, 2012.  The July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 8.0% per annum.  Holders of the July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest to shares of common stock of the Company beginning 180 days after July 12, 2011.  The July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is convertible at a per share price equal to 55% of the average of the lowest 3 closing bid prices of the Company’s common stock as listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board over the 10 trading days immediately prior to conversion. In the event of a default, the minimum amount due is 150% of outstanding principal and unpaid interest, which accrues interest at a rate of 22% per annum until paid or converted.

On August 11, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note (the “August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note”) in the amount of $42,500.  The balance of the August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is payable in full on May 15, 2012.  The August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 8.0% per annum.  Holders of the August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest to shares of common stock of the Company beginning 180 days after August 15, 2011.  The August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is convertible at a per share price equal to 55% of the average of the lowest 3 closing bid prices of the Company’s common stock as listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board over the 10 trading days immediately prior to conversion. In the event of a default, the minimum amount due is 150% of outstanding principal and unpaid interest, which accrues interest at a rate of 22% per annum until paid or converted.

9

The Company determined that the conversion features in the April, May, July, and August 2011 Convertible Promissory Notes (collectively, the “Convertible Promissory Notes”) should be accounted for as a convertible note derivative liability. The conversion features are treated as a derivative and recorded at their fair value. Accordingly, the Company recorded a derivative liability and debt discount for each of the notes in the amount of $141,742. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 a charge to debt discount in the amount of $66,347 was expensed through interest expense. At September 30, 2011 the debt discount was $75,395. The Company will continue to reevaluate the derivative liability in future reporting periods and adjust the derivative liability as necessary. This derivative will continue to be marked to market in accordance with FASB ASC 815.

As of September 30, 2011, Convertible Promissory Notes totaling $166,666 were in payment default and, accordingly, accrued interest at a rate of 18% per annum.  For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, the Company accrued interest related to the Convertible Promissory Notes totaling $87,169.

The balance of the Convertible Promissory Notes consists of the following instruments:

			Ending	Stated	Default			Effective
		Debt	Balance	Interest	Interest	Current		Interest
Date of Issuance	Principal	Discount	@ 9/30/11	Rate	Rate	Rate		Rate
11/17/2008	50,000	-	50,000	6.0%	18.0%	18.0%	(1)	72.55%
12/9/2008	33,333	-	33,333	6.0%	18.0%	18.0%	(1)	88.00%
12/9/2008	33,333	-	33,333	6.0%	18.0%	18.0%	(1)	88.00%
1/29/2009	50,000	-	50,000	6.0%	18.0%	18.0%	(1)	88.00%
4/8/2011	75,000	16,667	58,333	8.0%	22.0%	8.0%		74.67%
5/19/2011	42,500	12,592	29,908	8.0%	22.0%	8.0%		74.67%
7/12/2011	35,000	19,090	15,910	8.0%	22.0%	8.0%		89.82%
8/11/2011	42,500	27,046	15,454	8.0%	22.0%	8.0%		89.82%
Total	361,666	75,395	286,271
(1) Currently in default.

Fair Value of Instruments

The Company's financial instruments, including cash, other receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximated fair value due to the short-term nature of those instruments.  The carrying value of notes payable and convertible notes payable approximates fair value as these instruments bear market rates of interest.  None of these instruments are held for trading purposes.

10

Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)

On February 23, 2011, in conjunction with the PG Transaction, the Company issued to Petro Grande 52,294,336 shares of its restricted common stock, or approximately 77% of its restricted common stock outstanding at that time.  Upon closing of the PG Transaction, Petro Grande held a controlling interest in the Company. These shares are included in the recapitalization line on the Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit).

On February 23, 2011, the Company awarded options to purchase 2,400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Option Grants”).  The Option Grants include options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to each of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, plus an option to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an advisor.  Each of the Option Grants provides the option holder the right to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share, subject to vesting requirements.  Options to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock vest on February 23, 2012.  Beginning on February 23, 2012, options to purchase the remaining 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock vest pro rata on a monthly basis over the succeeding twelve months; accordingly, the Option Grants will vest in full on February 23, 2013.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the Company recorded stock related compensation expense of $190,165 in connection with the Option Grants.

On March 18, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 5-to-1 reduction in the number of shares of the Company’s authorized common stock, and a corresponding 5-to-1 decrease in the number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (reverse split).  The reverse split was effective May 17, 2011.

As a result of the reverse split, the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock has been reduced, from 500,000,000 shares to 100,000,000 shares.  Also as a result of the reverse split, each five shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding on the Effective Date represented one share of the Company’s common stock. Fractional shares existing as a result of the reverse split were rounded up to the nearest whole share.

On April 13, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 64,000 shares of its common stock to a provider of professional services to the Company, in lieu of the payment of cash for such services, at $.15 per share.  The value of the transaction was $9,600.

On June 29, 2011, the Company issued 840,000 shares of common stock and 840,000 warrants.  As consideration the Company received net cash proceeds of $50,400.  The fair value of the 840,000 warrants at the date of issuance was $.04 per warrant.   During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 180,000 shares of restricted common stock in lieu of cash payment for services to a related party.

11

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “seeks,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions identify some of the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or future results and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q could also cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the Company’s forward-looking statements.  The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Business and Plan of Operations

General

Blugrass Energy Inc. is a publicly held Nevada corporation listed on the OTC under the symbol BLUG.PK.   The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 19, 2006 as Coastal Media Inc.  On September 11, 2008, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to change its name to Blugrass Energy Inc. Upon the reverse merger recapitalization on February 23, 2011, the new inception date is December 11. 2007.

Business Strategy

Our goal is to build shareholder value through consistent growth in reserves and production on a cost-efficient basis.  In addition, the Company is looking for merger opportunities.

Strategic initiatives for the Company are defined and driven by a carefully selected management team and business partners that have long, proven records of successes in their specialized disciplines.  We are of the belief that the extensive experience and past successes of the professionals on our team are the best indicators of future success.  This strategy requires the following principal elements.

·    Commitment to Advanced Seismic Technology.  The Company committed to a 3D seismic data acquisition program, plus advanced processing of the 3D seismic data, as 3D is the most sophisticated technology available for analyzing the formations, faults, integrating land culture, etc.  The distinct advantage of 3D seismic surveys over 2D surveys is that 3D provides a continuity of subsurface rocks and fluids (including hydrocarbons), the ability to extract new information from data, and a common focus for integration of reservoir data from all sources. This technology -- both the 3D data and the processing of that data -- significantly reduces risk in the drilling program.  This heavy front-end commitment provides current state-of-the-art technology that, in turn, contributes significantly to lowering project risk and identifying potential targets with a much higher degree of accuracy.

12

·    Results of the 3D Analysis.  The Company’s 3D analysis was performed by our outsourced Geoscientist and trusted member of our advisory team, whose experience spans more than 35 years. He has a high level of expertise with the geology of the Permian and Val Verde Basins, where the Company holds a mineral rights lease, and his expertise extends to the Strawn and Ellenburger Formations which are located beneath the Company’s leased acreage.  The results of his analysis were used to generate structural maps and seismic attributes for the Strawn and Ellenburger reservoirs, and comparable structural maps for the shallower Canyon Sands formation also located beneath the Company’s leased acreage. Premised upon the 3D seismic interpretations, the Company believes that there is significant natural gas in its current acreage position.

·    Acreage Acquisition.  Blugrass holds a lease covering 4,808 acres in Crockett County, located in West Texas, for the purpose of drilling and developing. The Company is required to drill an Ellenburger formation natural gas well and a Strawn formation natural gas well, each on the Company’s Soto Lease acreage in Crockett County, Texas by December 31, 2011. The Company is in discussion with the lessor to extend the lease obligations.

·    Drilling Targets and HBP Acreage.  Drilling targets are carefully evaluated by the Blugrass management and advisory team.  A number of considerations are factored into each decision and incorporated into the overall drilling plan. These include the seismic results and analysis of possible well locations, the potential reserves at a specific target, the ease or difficulty of building on specific terrain and the associated cost of the location construction (incorporated into the total drilling expenditures), the overall risk associated with a specific target based on geology and depth of the well, and other known factors that may impact success in the immediate geographic area.  Since successful commercial wells hold production acreage, known as HBP (Held by Production) acreage for long-term production for working and royalty interest owners, the overall drilling plan includes the careful selection of drilling locations to maximize HBP acreage within the contracted lease terms.  The drilling plan also incorporates the state’s spacing and other requirements while trying to maximize the desired HBP acreage.   The principal target formations in the Permian and Val Verde Basins are the Strawn formation at approximately 12,500 feet total depth, and the Ellenburger formation at approximately 14,000 feet total depth.  These formations are known to contain natural gas in relatively large quantities, based on previous wells drilled either in adjacent properties or in close proximity to the Company’s acreage position.
Premised upon the 3D seismic interpretations, the Company has also identified numerous drilling targets in the Canyon Sands formation at a shallower depth of approximately 6,500 feet.  Regionally, the Company’s land position is on trend with numerous giant, multipay gas fields which include the Gomez Field, the Brown Bassett, the JM Field, and others.

·    Advanced Drilling Technology.  Blugrass has selected air drilling technology that uses an air hammer for drilling. This technology has the advantage of being more economical, as well as time-effective. Air hammers drill straight holes because their drilling power comes from high frequency percussion rather than from high rotation and pulldown, and because the air hammer piston impacts directly on the bit rather than through a drill string, which can bend over long hole depths. This technology minimizes hole deviations and doglegs, and the speed of the process, coupled with open hole completions, results in significant savings in total drilling costs.

13

·    Continuous Monitoring, Cost Controls, and Auditing.  Since control activities are a vital part of making business processes work effectively, Blugrass uses the extensive internal audit and contract compliance experience of its Financial Advisor in reviewing bid processes, contract compliance with operators, contractors, and vendors including expenditure and revenue audits and reviewing gas measurement controls and contract terms that eventually determine the gas volumes that go into gas settlement statements.

Results of Operations

For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 compared to the Nine months Ended September 30, 2010

We are still in our development stage and have no revenues to date.  

We incurred operating expenses of $965,251 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.  There were no expenses incurred for the same nine months ended post-recapitalization (described in Acquisitions and Dispositions section). The operating expenses were primarily related to general and administrative expenses of $497,399, and professional fees of $291,722. In addition, the Company recorded land development costs of $176,130, which related to a reserve booked to the Soto Lease related to a lien on that property (described in Oil & Gas Properties section) during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.  

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized a net loss of $1,678,071.

For the Three months Ended September 30, 2011 compared to the Three months Ended September 30, 2010

We incurred operating expenses of $232,135 for the three-months ended September 30, 2011. There were no expenses incurred for the same three months ended post-recapitalization 2010 (described in Reverse Merger Note in the financial statement section).  The operating expenses were primarily related to general and administrative expenses of $192,192. In addition, the Company incurred $39,943 in professional fees. There were no expenses incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2010 pre-acquisition as noted in acquisitions and dispositions above.  During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized a net loss of $353,140.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At September 30, 2011, we had total assets of $2,039,194, consisting primarily of $1,984,383 in undeveloped leases (the Soto Lease) acquired in conjunction with the PG Transaction as well as an investment in Quad Energy valued at $15,000. At September 30, 2011, we had total current liabilities of $1,449,493, consisting of accounts payable and accrued liabilities totaling $775,935, accrued interest totaling $225,545 and $286,271 of convertible promissory notes outstanding.

14

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we used $265,400 in operations.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we used $0 in operations.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we received $265,400 from our financing activities. We had no cash inflows during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. 

We have only one class of common stock.  We have no material commitments for capital expenditures within the next year, however, if drilling and exploration operations are commenced, substantial capital will be needed to pay for participation, investigation, exploration, acquisition and working capital.

Our auditors have expressed their doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern unless we are able to generate profitable operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of September 30, 2011, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, new management, including our Chief Executive and Accounting Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive and Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based upon the evaluation, our Chief Executive and Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2011 at the reasonable assurance level.

15

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As a result of our change in management subsequent to year end, the Company’s new management performed an evaluation of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting for the six-month period ended December 31, 2010, and such controls were determined to be ineffective at the reasonable assurance level, as disclosed in the Company’s 10-KT filing for that period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company’s new management team, including the Company’s Chief Executive and Accounting Officer, developed and implemented new internal controls over financial reporting which replaced the existing internal controls over financial reporting and evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s new internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 404.  Accordingly, new management determined the design and operation of the Company’s newly implemented internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

The Company is not currently involved in any legal proceedings and we are not aware of any pending or potential legal actions.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

We are subject to various risks and uncertainties in the course of our business. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this report, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under Item 1A. Risk Factors filed in our Transition Report on Form 10-KT for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in that Form 10-KT.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

In a series of transactions commencing February 24, 2011 and ending September 30, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 528,344 shares of its common stock to the holders of convertible promissory notes, upon conversion of all or part of the principal amount of such notes.  The shares of common stock issued upon conversion were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.  The issuance of these shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.  The Company made this determination based on the representations of each note holder that it is an “accredited investor,” as defined in Regulation D of the Securities Act.

On February 24, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 180,000 shares of its common stock to an executive officer of the Company, in lieu of the payment of accrued salary.  Such shares of common stock were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.  The issuance of these shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.  The Company made this determination based on the executive officer’s tenure with the Company and his knowledge and experience in financial and business matters.

On April 13, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 64,000 shares of its common stock to a provider of professional services to the Company, in lieu of the payment of cash for such services.  The issuance of these shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.  The Company made this determination based on the individual’s long-standing business relationship with the Company and his knowledge and experience in financial and business matters.  Appropriate legends have been affixed to all shares of the Company’s common stock issued in the transaction.

On June 29, 2011, the Company issued 840,000 shares of common stock and 840,000 warrants.  As consideration the Company received net cash proceeds of $50,400.  

16

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the period covered by this report.

Item 4.  Reserved.

Item 5.  Other Information.

Item 6.  Exhibits.

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

November 21, 2011

Blugrass Energy Inc. (Registrant)

By:	/s/ Abram Janz
	Abram Janz, Chief Executive Officer
By:	/s/ Abram Janz
	Abram Janz, Chief Accounting Officer

17

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Abram Janz, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Blugrass Energy Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

     (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of our annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Abram Janz  

Abram Janz  

Chief Executive and Accounting Officer 

November 21, 2011

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Abram Janz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Blugrass Energy Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Blugrass Energy Inc.

By:	/s/ Abram Janz
	Name:	Abram Janz
	Title:	Chief Executive and Accounting Officer

November 21, 2011

XML

Reverse Merger

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Reverse Merger

Reverse Merger

On February 23, 2011, the Company was acquired by Petro Grande, which contributed a significant oil and gas working interest lease covering acreage located in Crockett County, Texas from Petro Grande as consideration in exchange for 52,294,336 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock plus a promissory note in the amount of $3.5 million. On the closing date of the PG Transaction, a change in control of the Company occurred and the senior management and directors of Blugrass resigned and were replaced by Petro Grande’s management team. Although Blugrass is the surviving legal entity; the contributed Petro Grande working interest lease remained the financial reporting entity and the merger was treated as a reverse recapitalization as, prior to the PG transaction, Blugrass was a public holding company with limited assets or operations and, upon completion of the PG transaction, Petro Grande shareholders emerged with a controlling 77% interest in the merged Company.

The PG Transaction was initially valued by Petro Grande management at approximately $8.7 million and, as such, the Company recorded an increase to the value of undeveloped leasehold costs of Blugrass of approximately $6.7 million.  After reviewing the PG Transaction, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporate Finance recommended that the consideration provided in the transaction should be valued at its historical cost as is consistent with a reverse recapitalization.  As a result, management has reduced the amount recorded as “Oil and gas properties – undeveloped” and additional paid in capital as of September 30, 2011 balance sheet, to $1,984,383.

The oil and gas lease contributed as consideration as part of the PG Transaction (the Soto Lease defined below) includes an option to participate as a working interest partner in drilling programs sponsored on an additional 9,850 acres (currently held by Petro Grande) located in close proximity to the oil and gas lease properties contributed.  This acreage also benefits from 3D seismic imaging.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Change in Fiscal Year – On March 10, 2011 the Board of Directors approved the change of the Company’s fiscal year from a June 30 fiscal year end to a December 31 calendar year end.  The Company filed a transition report on Form 10-KT for the six-month transition period ended December 31, 2010.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods.  Key estimates in the accompanying financial statements include, among others, revenue recognition, allowances for doubtful accounts, valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances.

Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.

Other Receivable – There was an other receivable totaling $39,811 and $0 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  The balance of other receivable as of September 30, 2011 consisted of amounts representing business related expenses owed to the Company.

Oil and Gas Properties – We follow the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Unsuccessful exploration drilling costs are expensed and can have a significant effect on reported operating results. Successful exploration drilling costs and all development costs are capitalized and systematically charged to expense using the units of production method based on proved developed oil and gas reserves as estimated by our engineers and reviewed by independent engineers. Costs incurred for exploratory wells that find reserves that cannot yet be classified as proved are capitalized if (a) the well has found a sufficient quantity of reserves to justify its completion as a producing well and (b) there is sufficient progress being made in assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project. Proven property leasehold costs are amortized to expense using the units of production method based on total proved reserves. Properties are assessed for impairment as circumstances warrant and impairments to value are charged to expense. The successful efforts method inherently relies upon the estimation of proved reserves, which includes proved developed and proved undeveloped volumes.

Proved reserves are defined by the SEC as those volumes of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids and natural gas that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty are recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Proved developed reserves are volumes expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods. Although engineers are knowledgeable of and follow the guidelines for reserves established by the SEC, including the rule revisions designed to modernize the oil and gas company reserves reporting requirements, the estimation of reserves requires engineers to make a significant number of assumptions based on professional judgment. Reserve estimates are updated periodically and consider recent production levels and other technical information. Estimated reserves are often subject to future revisions, which could be substantial, based on the availability of additional information, including: reservoir performance, new geological and geophysical data, additional drilling, technological advancements, price and cost changes and other economic factors. Changes in oil and gas prices can lead to a decision to start-up or shut-in production, which can lead to revisions to reserve quantities.  It is difficult to predict what reserve revisions may be required in future periods.

Depletion rates are determined based on reserve quantity estimates and the capitalized costs of producing properties. As the estimated reserves are adjusted, the depletion expense for a property will change, assuming no change in production volumes or capitalized costs. While total depletion expense for the life of a property is limited to the property’s total cost, proved reserve revisions result in a change in timing when depletion expense is recognized. Downward revisions of proved reserves result in an acceleration of depletion expense, while upward revisions tend to lower the rate of depletion expense recognition.   Estimated reserves are used as the basis for calculating the expected future cash flows from a property, which are used to determine whether that property may be impaired. Reserves are also used to estimate the supplemental disclosure of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to oil and gas producing activities and reserve quantities. Changes in the estimated reserves are considered a change in estimate for accounting purposes and are reflected on a prospective basis.

Income Taxes – The Company estimates its current tax position together with its future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as depreciation and other reserves for tax and accounting purposes. These temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Management must then assess the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, prior year carryback, or future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. To the extent management believes that recovery is unlikely, management establishes a valuation allowance against these deferred tax assets. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s provision for income taxes, its deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against its deferred tax assets.  At September  30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty these assets will be used in the future.

XML

Balance Sheets (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Current assets:
Cash	$ 0	$ 0
Other receivable	39,811	0
Total current assets	39,811	0
Oil and gas properties - undeveloped	1,984,383	1,984,383
Other assets:
Investment in Quad Energy	15,000	0
Total other assets	15,000	0
Total assets	2,039,194	1,984,383
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	775,935	0
Notes payable	20,000	0
Convertible notes payable, net	286,271	0
Derivative liability	141,742	0
Accrued interest	225,545	0
Total current liabilities	1,449,493	0
Long-term note payable	3,500,000	0
Total liabilities	4,949,493	0
COMMITMENTS AND CONTENGENCIES
Shareholders' equity (deficit):
Common stock par value $.005, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 70,866,638 and 0 issued and outstanding, respectively	354,333	0
Additional paid-in-capital	(1,586,561)	1,984,383
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	(1,678,071)	0
Total shareholders' equity (deficit)	(2,910,299)	1,984,383
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit)	$ 2,039,194	$ 1,984,383

XML

Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	9 Months Ended		46 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities
Net loss	$ (1,678,071)	$ 0	$ (1,678,071)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Debt discount amortization	86,097	0	86,097
Impairment of assets	485,000	0	485,000
Common stock issued for services	36,600	0	36,600
Stock compensation	190,165	0	190,165
Changes in working capital:
Accounts payable	514,683	0	514,683
Other receivable	(39,811)	0	(39,811)
Accrued interest payable	139,937	0	139,937
Net cash used in operating activities	(265,400)	0	(265,400)
Cash Flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of short term notes	20,000	0	20,000
Proceeds from convertible promissory notes	195,000	0	195,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants	50,400	0	50,400
Net cash provided by financing activities	265,400	0	265,400
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	0	0	0
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period	0	0	0
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	0	0	0
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for interest expense	0	0	0
Cash paid for income taxes	0	0	0
Debt and interest converted to equity	$ 33,800	$ 0	$ 33,800

XML

Organization - Nature of Operations

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Organization - Nature of Operations

Organization – Nature of Operations

Blugrass Energy Inc. (the “Company” or “Blugrass”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 19, 2006, as Coastal Media Inc.  The Company was originally formed to engage in the business of manufacturing, marketing, distributing and selling its marine DVDs.  On September 11, 2008, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to change its name from "Coastal Media Inc." to "Blugrass Energy Inc.", to reflect the change in direction of the Company’s business to the Oil and Gas Industry. As a result of the name change, the Company’s trading symbol was changed to “BLUG”.

On February 23, 2011, Petro Grande, LLC (“Petro Grande”) consummated a transaction with Blugrass whereby Petro Grande acquired a controlling interest in Blugrass.  This transaction effected a change of control and Blugrass’ management team was replaced with Petro Grande’s management team.  Upon the reverse merger recapitalization on February 23, 2011 the inception date of the Company changed to December 11, 2007, the date of the acquisition of the lease by Petro Grande, LLC.  As a result of the reverse merger recapitalization, Blugrass’ new management team has implemented a new business strategy (discussed in detail in the section on Management’s Discussion and Analysis below).

The Company is in the development stage. Its activities to date have been limited to capital formation, organization and development of its business plan.  

The Company has not earned  revenues from planned operations.  Accordingly, the Company’s activities have been accounted for as those of a “Development Stage Company”.  Among the disclosures required are that the Company’s financial statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows disclose activity since the date of the Company’s inception.

XML

Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Shareholders' equity (deficit):
Common stock, par value	$ 0.005	$ 0.005
Common stock, shares authorized	100,000,000	100,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	70,866,638	0
Common stock, shares outstanding	70,866,638	0

XML

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Blugrass Energy, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001365748
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Sep. 30, 2011
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	No
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	No
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	70,866,638
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011

XML

Statements of Operations (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		46 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011	Sep. 30, 2010	Sep. 30, 2011
Operating expenses:
Land development costs	$ 0	$ 0	$ 176,130	$ 0	$ 176,130
Professional fees	39,943	0	291,722	0	291,722
General and administrative expenses	192,192	0	497,399	0	497,399
Total operating expenses	232,135	0	965,251	0	965,251
Other expense:
Loss on investment in Quad Energy	(10,000)	0	(485,000)	0	(485,000)
Interest expense	(111,005)	0	(227,820)	0	(227,820)
Total other expense	(121,005)	0	(712,820)	0	(712,820)
Net Loss	$ (353,140)	$ 0	$ (1,678,071)	$ 0	$ (1,678,071)
Per share information:
Basic and diluted loss per common share	$ 0.00	$ 0.00	$ (0.03)	$ 0.00
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic	70,866,638	0	56,639,796	0
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted	70,866,638	0	56,639,796	0

XML

Going Concern

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Going Concern

Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company reported a net loss of $1,678,071 for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, and an accumulated deficit during the development stage of $1,678,071 as of September 30, 2011.  At September 30, 2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $1,409,682 and the Company had no revenues from its activities during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern may be dependent on the success of management’s plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

XML

Oil & Gas Properties

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Oil & Gas Properties

Oil & Gas Properties

On February 23, 2011, in conjunction with the PG Transaction, the Company acquired a 4,808 acre undeveloped lease located in the Permian Basin in Crockett County, Texas (the “Soto Lease”).   Acquisition of the Soto Lease, representing an 87.5% working interest in the underlying acreage, includes full access to Petro Grande’s complete three-dimensional (3D) seismic imaging of the land under lease.  The lease expiration date is July 12, 2013 with a 2011 lease obligation to drill one Strawn formation well and one Ellenburger formation well by December 31, 2011.  The Company’s plans to drill by December 31, 2011, are contingent upon management raising additional funding to finance drilling costs.  This lease has a continuous drilling clause of 120 days provided the drilling obligations previously described are satisfied.

XML

Fair Value of Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Fair Value of Instruments

Fair Value of Instruments

The Company's financial instruments, including cash, other receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximated fair value due to the short-term nature of those instruments.  The carrying value of notes payable and convertible notes payable approximates fair value as these instruments bear market rates of interest.  None of these instruments are held for trading purposes.

XML

Notes Payable

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Notes Payable

Notes Payable

In conjunction with the PG Transaction, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $3.5 million (the “PG Note Payable”) on February 23, 2011.  The PG Note Payable accrues interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum beginning on February 23, 2011 with accrued interest payable in semi-annual installments beginning on October 1, 2011.  Past due principal and accrued interest accrue interest at a rate of 10% per annum.  The balance of the PG Note Payable along with any accrued and unpaid interest is due on February 22, 2013.  The PG Note Payable is secured by a first priority interest in the Company’s Soto Lease.

On May 12, 2011 the Company issued an unsecured note payable in the amount of $20,000 (the “Ladner Note”).  The Ladner Note matured on August 31, 2011, and is considered to be in default.  The note includes a “bonus payment” of $2,500 due at maturity.  The “bonus payment” is equivalent to interest which accrues at an annual rate of 12.5%.

XML

Convertible Promissory Notes

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Convertible Promissory Notes

Convertible Promissory Notes

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had outstanding $361,666 of unsecured convertible commercial promissory notes (the “Convertible Promissory Notes”). 

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, $33,800 of Convertible Promissory Notes were converted to 528,344 shares of common stock.

On April 8, 2011 the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note totaling $75,000 to a third party (the “April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note”). The April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum.  The principal balance and accrued interest under the April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is due on January 12, 2012.  

Holders of the April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest to shares of common stock of the Company beginning 180 days after April 8, 2011.  The April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is convertible at a per share price equal to 60% of the average of the lowest 5 closing bid prices of the Company’s common stock as listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board over the 10 trading days immediately prior to conversion.   In the event of a default, the minimum amount due is 150% of outstanding principal and unpaid interest, and the April 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 22% per annum until paid or converted.

On May 19, 2011 the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note totaling $42,500 to a third party (the “May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note”). The May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 8% per annum.  The principal balance and accrued interest under the May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is due on January 12, 2012.  Holders of the May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest to shares of common stock of the Company beginning 180 days after May 19, 2011.  The May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is convertible at a per share price equal to 60% of the average of the lowest 5 closing bid prices of the Company’s common stock as listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board over the 10 trading days immediately prior to conversion. In the event of a default, the minimum amount due is 150% of outstanding principal and unpaid interest, and the May 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 22% per annum until paid or converted.

On July 12, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note (the “July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note”) in the amount of $35,000.  The balance of the July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is payable in full on April 17, 2012.  The July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 8.0% per annum.  Holders of the July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest to shares of common stock of the Company beginning 180 days after July 12, 2011.  The July 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is convertible at a per share price equal to 55% of the average of the lowest 3 closing bid prices of the Company’s common stock as listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board over the 10 trading days immediately prior to conversion. In the event of a default, the minimum amount due is 150% of outstanding principal and unpaid interest, which accrues interest at a rate of 22% per annum until paid or converted.

On August 11, 2011, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note (the “August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note”) in the amount of $42,500.  The balance of the August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is payable in full on May 15, 2012.  The August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at a rate of 8.0% per annum.  Holders of the August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note have the right to convert all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued interest to shares of common stock of the Company beginning 180 days after August 15, 2011.  The August 2011 Convertible Promissory Note is convertible at a per share price equal to 55% of the average of the lowest 3 closing bid prices of the Company’s common stock as listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board over the 10 trading days immediately prior to conversion. In the event of a default, the minimum amount due is 150% of outstanding principal and unpaid interest, which accrues interest at a rate of 22% per annum until paid or converted.

The Company determined that the conversion features in the April, May, July, and August 2011 Convertible Promissory Notes (collectively, the “Convertible Promissory Notes”) should be accounted for as a convertible note derivative liability. The conversion features are treated as a derivative and recorded at their fair value. Accordingly, the Company recorded a derivative liability and debt discount for each of the notes in the amount of $141,742. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 a charge to debt discount in the amount of $66,347 was expensed through interest expense. At September 30, 2011 the debt discount was $75,395. The Company will continue to reevaluate the derivative liability in future reporting periods and adjust the derivative liability as necessary. This derivative will continue to be marked to market in accordance with FASB ASC 815.

As of September 30, 2011, Convertible Promissory Notes totaling $166,666 were in payment default and, accordingly, accrued interest at a rate of 18% per annum.  For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2011, the Company accrued interest related to the Convertible Promissory Notes totaling $87,169.

The balance of the Convertible Promissory Notes consists of the following instruments:

			Ending	Stated	Default			Effective
		Debt	Balance	Interest	Interest	Current		Interest
Date of Issuance	Principal	Discount	@ 9/30/11	Rate	Rate	Rate		Rate
11/17/2008	50,000	-	50,000	6.0%	18.0%	18.0%	(1)	72.55%
12/9/2008	33,333	-	33,333	6.0%	18.0%	18.0%	(1)	88.00%
12/9/2008	33,333	-	33,333	6.0%	18.0%	18.0%	(1)	88.00%
1/29/2009	50,000	-	50,000	6.0%	18.0%	18.0%	(1)	88.00%
4/8/2011	75,000	16,667	58,333	8.0%	22.0%	8.0%		74.67%
5/19/2011	42,500	12,592	29,908	8.0%	22.0%	8.0%		74.67%
7/12/2011	35,000	19,090	15,910	8.0%	22.0%	8.0%		89.82%
8/11/2011	42,500	27,046	15,454	8.0%	22.0%	8.0%		89.82%
Total	361,666	75,395	286,271
(1) Currently in default.

XML

Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)

Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)

On February 23, 2011, in conjunction with the PG Transaction, the Company issued to Petro Grande 52,294,336 shares of its restricted common stock, or approximately 77% of its restricted common stock outstanding at that time.  Upon closing of the PG Transaction, Petro Grande held a controlling interest in the Company. These shares are included in the recapitalization line on the Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit).

On February 23, 2011, the Company awarded options to purchase 2,400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Option Grants”).  The Option Grants include options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to each of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, plus an option to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an advisor.  Each of the Option Grants provides the option holder the right to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share, subject to vesting requirements.  Options to purchase 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock vest on February 23, 2012.  Beginning on February 23, 2012, options to purchase the remaining 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock vest pro rata on a monthly basis over the succeeding twelve months; accordingly, the Option Grants will vest in full on February 23, 2013.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the Company recorded stock related compensation expense of $190,165 in connection with the Option Grants.

On March 18, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 5-to-1 reduction in the number of shares of the Company’s authorized common stock, and a corresponding 5-to-1 decrease in the number of issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock (reverse split).  The reverse split was effective May 17, 2011.

As a result of the reverse split, the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock has been reduced, from 500,000,000 shares to 100,000,000 shares.  Also as a result of the reverse split, each five shares of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding on the Effective Date represented one share of the Company’s common stock. Fractional shares existing as a result of the reverse split were rounded up to the nearest whole share.

On April 13, 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 64,000 shares of its common stock to a provider of professional services to the Company, in lieu of the payment of cash for such services, at $.15 per share.  The value of the transaction was $9,600.

On June 29, 2011, the Company issued 840,000 shares of common stock and 840,000 warrants.  As consideration the Company received net cash proceeds of $50,400.  The fair value of the 840,000 warrants at the date of issuance was $.04 per warrant.   During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued 180,000 shares of restricted common stock in lieu of cash payment for services to a related party.

XML

Statement of Shareholders' Deficit (USD $)	Common Stock	Additional Paid-in-Capital	Deficit Accumulated During Development Stage	Total
Balance at Dec. 11, 2007	$ 0	$ 1,984,383	$ 0	$ 1,984,383
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 11, 2007	0
Net loss			0	0
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	0	1,984,383		1,984,383
Balance (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2010	0
Recapitalization	346,272	(3,873,848)		(3,527,576)
Recapitalization (in shares)	69,254,294
Conversion of debentures	2,641	31,159		33,800
Conversion of debentures (in shares)	528,344
Common stock issued for services	900	26,100		27,000
Common stock issued for services (in shares)	180,000
Stock compensation expense		24,123		24,123
Net loss			(523,844)	(523,844)
Balance at Mar. 31, 2011	349,813	(1,808,083)	(523,844)	(1,982,114)
Balance (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2011	69,962,638
Stock issued for compensation	320	9,280		9,600
Stock issued for compensation (in shares)	64,000
Common stock and warrants issued	4,200	46,200		50,400
Common stock and warrants issued (in shares)	840,000
Stock compensation expense		83,021		83,021
Net loss			(801,087)	(801,087)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2011	354,333	(1,669,582)	(1,324,931)	(2,640,180)
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2011	70,866,638
Stock compensation expense		83,021		83,021
Net loss			(353,140)	(353,140)
Balance at Sep. 30, 2011	$ 354,333	$ (1,586,561)	$ (1,678,071)	$ (2,910,299)
Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2011	70,866,638

XML

Investment in Quad Energy

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Notes to Financial Statements

Investment in Quad Energy

Investment in Quad Energy

On February 23, 2011, upon the reverse merger recapitalization the Company acquired an asset purchase agreement with Quad Energy Corp. (“Quad Energy”) for the sale of 100% of the Company’s rights, title and interest to certain properties located in and around the Cave Pool Unit (Marks and Garner Productions) in Eddy County, New Mexico (the “Eddy County Properties”). The Eddy County Properties consist of leasehold interests in approximately 2,800 acres and all existing equipment used to produce oil and natural gas located on the Eddy County Properties. As consideration for the transaction the Company was to receive 5,000,000 shares of Quad Energy’s common stock, valued at $.10 per share. The transaction closed on January 25, 2011 pre-recapitalization, and the Company recorded an investment in Quad Energy in the amount of $500,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the value of the investment in Quad Energy had decreased and the Company recorded a loss on the statement of operations of $485,000 as the Company considers the loss other than temporary.