8-K/A

                     U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 8-K/A

                                 CURRENT REPORT

     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

       DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED) September 8, 2008

                         Commission File No. 333.136247


                           DOMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
        (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

           Nevada                                         20-4647578

(State or other jurisdiction of                (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 incorporation or organization)


                             1809 East Broadway #125
                              Oviedo, Florida 32765
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


                                 (757) 572-9241
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

ITEM 4.01 CHANGES IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT.

On September 8, 2008,  Kramer Wiseman and Associates,  LLP ("KWA") was appointed
as the  independent  auditor  for DoMark  International,  Inc.  (the  "Company")
commencing with the year ending May 31, 2008, and Chang G. Park, CPA.  ("Chang")
were  dismissed as the  independent  auditors for the Company as of September 8,
2008. The decision to change  auditors was approved by the Board of Directors on
September 8, 2008.

The  report  of Chang on the  financial  statements  for  either of the one most
recent  completed fiscal years did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer
of opinion or was  qualified  or  modified  as to  uncertainty,  audit  scope or
accounting principles, except for the following:

"The  accompanying  financial  statements  have been prepared  assuming that the
Company  will  continue  as a  going  concern.  As  discussed  in  Note 1 to the
financial  statements,  the accumulation of losses and shortage of capital raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's
plans  concerning  these  matters are also  described  in Note 3. The  financial
statements do not include any  adjustments  relating to the  recoverability  and
classification  of asset carrying  amounts or the amount and  classification  of
liabilities  that might  result  should the  Company be unable to  continue as a
going concern.

During the  Company's  two most fiscal year and any  subsequent  interim  period
through the date of  dismissal,  there were no  disagreements  with Chang on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing  scope  or  procedure,  which  disagreement,  if  not  resolved  to the
satisfaction  of Chang,  would have caused it to make  reference  to the subject
matter of the disagreements in connection with its report.

During the Company's one most recent interim quarter February 28, 2008, November
30, 2007,  August 31,  2007,  and annual  report May 31,  2007,  and three prior
interim  quarters  August 31, 2006,  November  30, 2006,  and February 29, 2007,
there were no "reportable events" as such term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v)
of  Regulation  S-B under the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange  Act"),  with respect to the Company.  During the  Company's  two most
fiscal year and any  subsequent  interim  period  through the date of dismissal,
there were no disagreements with Chang on any matter of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Chang, would have caused it
to make reference to the subject matter of the  disagreements in connection with
its report.

During the Company's one most recent interim quarter February 28, 2008, November
30, 2007,  August 31,  2007,  and annual  report May 31,  2007,  and three prior
interim quarters August 31, 2006,  November 30, 2006, and February 29, 2007, the
Company did not consult with KWA with respect to the Company  regarding  (i) the

                                       2

application  of  accounting  principles  to  a  specified  transaction,   either
completed  or proposed,  or the type of audit  opinion that might be rendered on
the Company's financial statements,  (ii) any matter that was either the subject
of a disagreement (as defined in Item  304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-B under the
Exchange Act and the related  instructions  to Item 304 of Regulation  S-B) or a
"reportable event" (as such term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
S-B), or (iii) any of the matters or events set forth in Item  304(a)(2)(i)  and
(ii) of Regulation S-B.

There were no  consultations  with KWA during the Company's two most fiscal year
and any  subsequent  interim  period,  prior to September 8, 2008, the date upon
which KWA was engaged.

The Company has furnished a copy of this Report to Chang and  requested  them to
furnish the Company  with a letter  addressed  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  stating  whether it agrees with the  statements  made by the Company
herein in  response to Item 304(a) of  Regulation  S-K and, if not,  stating the
respects in which it does not agree. The letter from Chang is herby submitted as
exhibit 16.1.

ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

(c) Exhibits

    Exhibit 16.1 Letter of Chang Park, CPA Ph.D.

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                 DOMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.


Date: November 17, 2008          By: /s/  R. Thomas Kidd
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     R. Thomas Kidd
                                     Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principle Executive Officer, Principle
                                     Financial Officer)

                                       3

EX-16.1

                                                                    Exhibit 16.1

                           Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph. D.
      * 2667 Camino Del Rio South Plaza B * San Diego * CALIFORNIA 92108 *
     * TELEPHONE (858) 722-5953 * FAX (858) 761-0341 * FAX (619) 422-1465 *
                         * E-MAIL changgpark@gmail.com *


November 13, 2008

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549

Dear Madams or Sirs:

I have  read  Item  4.01 of Form  8-K/A  dated  November  17,  2008,  of  Domark
International, Inc. and am in agreement with the statements made with respect to
information  provided regarding Chang G. Park, CPA. We have no basis to agree or
disagree with other statements of the registrant contained therein.

Regards,


/s/  Chang Park
- --------------------------------
Chang G. Park, CPA, Ph.D.

CORRESP

                           Domark International, Inc.
                             1809 East Broadway #125
                              Oviedo, Florida 32765

November 17, 2008

VIA EDGAR

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.W.
Division of Corporate Finance
Washington, D.C. 20549

     Re: Item 4.01 Form 8-K
         Filed September 11, 2008
         File No. 333-136247

Dear Mr. Kempf and Mr. Littlepage:

Below are the responses to your comments on to your letter of October 9, 2008:

Form 8-K
Item 4.01

1.   The disclosure in the third and fourth paragraphs of Item 4.01 of your Form
     8-K should be clarified. It should state whether during the registrants two
     most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period through the date
     of resignation,  declination or dismissal there were any disagreements with
     the former accountant on any matter of accounting  principles or practices,
     financial  statement  disclosure,  or auditing  scope or  procedure,  which
     disagreement(s),  if  not  resolved  to  the  satisfaction  of  the  former
     accountant, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of
     the  disagreement(s)  in  connection  with  its  reports.  In the  event of
     disagreement(s)   and/or   reportable   event(S),   provide  the   specific
     disclosures required by Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and (v) of Regulation S-K.

     We have noted your comment and revised the disclosure.

2.   Similarly,  please  clarify the fifth  paragraph  of Item 4.01 of your Form
     8-K.  Indicate  whether there were  consultations  with your new accountant
     during the two most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim periods,
     prior to September 8, 2008, the date your new  accountant was engaged.  See
     Item 304(a)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K.

     We have noted your comment and revised the disclosure.

Exhibit 16.1

3.   Tell us why the letter from your former accountant,  filed as an exhibit to
     this Form 8-K, was provided and signed by Chang Parker,  CPA PhD. while the
     audit report  included in your May 31, 2007 Form 10-KSB was provided by and
     signed  by  Chang  G.  Park,  CPA.  As  appropriate,  provide  us  evidence
     supporting Mr. Parker's qualification to practice before the Commission as

     he  does  not  appear  to  be  registered  with  the  California  Board  of
     Accountancy or with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

     We have noted your comment and revised the disclosure. In addition, we have
     confirmed that our prior auditor,  Chang Park,  CPA, is registered with the
     California  Board of  Accountancy  and with the Public  Company  Accounting
     Oversight Board.

The Company hereby acknowledges:

*    The Company is responsible  for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure
     in the filings;

*    Staff  comments or changes to disclosure  in response to staff  comments in
     the filings  reviewed by the staff do not  foreclose  the  Commission  from
     taking any action with respect to the filing; and

*    The Company may not assert  staff  comments as a defense in any  proceeding
     initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws
     of the United States.

Sincerely,


/s/ R. Thomas Kidd
- --------------------------------
R. Thomas Kidd
Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 17, 2008