XML 26 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
Fair Value Measurement

We have established a fair value hierarchy used to determine the fair value of our financial instruments as follows:

Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.

Level 3—Inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value; the inputs require significant management judgment or estimation.

A financial instrument’s classification within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

We had no financial instruments measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016 and amounts as of December 31, 2015 are classified based on the valuation technique level in the table below (in thousands):

 
December 31, 2015
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
6,672

 
$
6,672

 
$

Commercial paper
5,453

 

 
5,453

Corporate securities
599

 

 
599

Agency bond
1,400

 

 
1,400

Short-term investments:
 
 
 
 
 
Commercial paper
3,746

 

 
3,746

Corporate securities
10,560

 

 
10,560

Agency bonds
3,494

 

 
3,494

Long-term investments:
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate securities
3,231

 

 
3,231

Agency bond
998

 

 
998

Total assets measured and recorded at fair value
$
36,153

 
$
6,672

 
$
29,481


We value our marketable securities based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 inputs) or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2 inputs) in determining fair value. We classify all of our fixed income available-for-sale securities as having Level 2 inputs. The valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of our financial instruments having Level 2 inputs were derived from non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated by observable market data, quoted market prices for similar instruments, or pricing models such as discounted cash flow techniques.

The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.