New Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)	6 Months Ended
Jun. 29, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]	2. New Accounting Pronouncements In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (“ASU 2017-07”). ASU 2017-07 requires entities to report the service cost component of net periodic pension and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. Further, ASU 2017-07 requires the other components of net periodic pension and net periodic postretirement benefit cost to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2017-07 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on eight specific cash flow classification issues that GAAP does not address. ASU 2016-15 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). This update requires recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet of lessees. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition approach and provides certain optional transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09,” which includes “ASC 606” and “ASC 340-40”). ASU 2014-09 requires recognition of revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The FASB has issued several updates to ASU 2014-09 that must be adopted concurrently with ASU 2014-09. Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when control of promised goods or services transfers to a customer and is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The major provisions include determining enforceable rights and obligations between parties, defining performance obligations as the units of accounting under a contract, accounting for variable consideration, and determining whether performance obligations are satisfied over time or at a point of time. Additionally, ASC 606 requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASC 606 will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2018. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (“full retrospective method”), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASC 606 recognized at the date of initial application (“modified retrospective method”). The Company is adopting ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018 and the Company expects to do so using the modified retrospective method. Under ASC 606, the units-of-delivery method is no longer viable and production costs will generally not be deferred. The Company has determined that some of our contracts will have performance obligations that are satisfied over time as control transfers during production. For these contracts, the revenue recognition pattern will change with revenue being recognized earlier in the year of adoption as compared to the previous year. Subsequently, year over year revenue comparisons under ASU 2014-09 will be consistent with production levels. We expect to use an input method as the basis for recognizing revenue for performance obligations satisfied over time. Input methods recognize revenue on the basis of an entity’s efforts or inputs toward satisfying a performance obligation (for example, resources consumed, labor hours expended, costs incurred, time lapsed, or machine hours used) relative to the total expected inputs to satisfy the performance obligation. Contracts that do not meet the criteria for over time recognition are recognized at a point in time. Under ASU 2014-09, the performance obligations recognized at a point in time may be different than under the units-of-delivery method. This could change the amount of revenue allocated to each performance obligation, resulting in a different revenue recognition pattern. ASU 2014-09 requires application of ASC 340-40 only if existing guidance does not apply. We expect to continue accounting for preproduction, tooling and certain other costs under existing guidance. Additionally, production costs for performance obligations that are satisfied over time will generally be recognized as incurred. However, we are continuing to evaluate the impact of ASC 340-40 for certain contracts. ASU 2014-09 will result in changes to our existing disclosures as well as new disclosures, which will impact the information reported in our financial statements. The Company believes that the additional information will be useful to the users of our financial statements as the Company must disclose the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from our contracts. In 2016, the Company established a cross-functional team to assess and prepare for implementation of the new standard. While the Company continues to assess some elements of ASU 2014-09, the Company has reviewed substantially all of our contracts with customers and has determined the business process and technology requirements. This includes documenting process changes, determining data requirements, and identifying changes in system mapping and configuration. The Company has substantially completed designing our processes, including internal controls, and related systems solutions and is currently implementing the required changes.

2. New Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (“ASU 2017-07”). ASU 2017-07 requires entities to report the service cost component of net periodic pension and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. Further, ASU 2017-07 requires the other components of net periodic pension and net periodic postretirement benefit cost to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. Additionally, only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization, when applicable. The amendments of this ASU are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2017-07 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on eight specific cash flow classification issues that GAAP does not address. ASU 2016-15 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). This update requires recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet of lessees. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective transition approach and provides certain optional transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it may have to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09,” which includes “ASC 606” and “ASC 340-40”). ASU 2014-09 requires recognition of revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The FASB has issued several updates to ASU 2014-09 that must be adopted concurrently with ASU 2014-09.

Under ASC 606, revenue is recognized when control of promised goods or services transfers to a customer and is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The major provisions include determining enforceable rights and obligations between parties, defining performance obligations as the units of accounting under a contract, accounting for variable consideration, and determining whether performance obligations are satisfied over time or at a point of time. Additionally, ASC 606 requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

ASC 606 will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2018. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (“full retrospective method”), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying ASC 606 recognized at the date of initial application (“modified retrospective method”). The Company is adopting ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018 and the Company expects to do so using the modified retrospective method.

Under ASC 606, the units-of-delivery method is no longer viable and production costs will generally not be deferred. The Company has determined that some of our contracts will have performance obligations that are satisfied over time as control transfers during production. For these contracts, the revenue recognition pattern will change with revenue being recognized earlier in the year of adoption as compared to the previous year. Subsequently, year over year revenue comparisons under ASU 2014-09 will be consistent with production levels. We expect to use an input method as the basis for recognizing revenue for performance obligations satisfied over time. Input methods recognize revenue on the basis of an entity’s efforts or inputs toward satisfying a performance obligation (for example, resources consumed, labor hours expended, costs incurred, time lapsed, or machine hours used) relative to the total expected inputs to satisfy the performance obligation.

Contracts that do not meet the criteria for over time recognition are recognized at a point in time. Under ASU 2014-09, the performance obligations recognized at a point in time may be different than under the units-of-delivery method. This could change the amount of revenue allocated to each performance obligation, resulting in a different revenue recognition pattern.

ASU 2014-09 requires application of ASC 340-40 only if existing guidance does not apply. We expect to continue accounting for preproduction, tooling and certain other costs under existing guidance. Additionally, production costs for performance obligations that are satisfied over time will generally be recognized as incurred. However, we are continuing to evaluate the impact of ASC 340-40 for certain contracts.

ASU 2014-09 will result in changes to our existing disclosures as well as new disclosures, which will impact the information reported in our financial statements. The Company believes that the additional information will be useful to the users of our financial statements as the Company must disclose the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from our contracts.

In 2016, the Company established a cross-functional team to assess and prepare for implementation of the new standard. While the Company continues to assess some elements of ASU 2014-09, the Company has reviewed substantially all of our contracts with customers and has determined the business process and technology requirements. This includes documenting process changes, determining data requirements, and identifying changes in system mapping and configuration. The Company has substantially completed designing our processes, including internal controls, and related systems solutions and is currently implementing the required changes.