ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý

As of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant's Class A common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $793.7 million

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Class A common stock, par value $1.00 per share, as of March 25, 2015 was 70,940,013.

The information required by Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from the registrant's definitive proxy statement relating to the 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this Annual Report on Form 10-K relates.

Statements included in this report that are not historical in nature are intended to be, and are hereby identified as, forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The words "may," "will," "anticipate," "should," "would," "believe," "contemplate," "expect," "estimate," "continue," "may" and "intend," as well as other similar words and expressions of the future, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements related to our projected growth, anticipated future financial performance, and management's long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on results of operations and financial condition from expected developments or events, or business and growth strategies, including anticipated internal growth and plans to establish or acquire banks or the assets of failed banks.

These forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Potential risks and uncertainties include those described under "Risk Factors" and the following:

You should not place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. See Item 1A, Risk Factors, for a description of some of the important factors that may affect actual outcomes.

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Michigan in February 2003 and it became the bank holding company for Talmer Bank and Trust in 2007. Talmer Bank and Trust is a Michigan state-chartered bank that opened in August 2007 in Troy, Michigan. Between April 30, 2010 and December 31, 2014, we successfully completed seven acquisitions totaling $5.9 billion in assets and $5.8 billion in liabilities. In addition, on February 6, 2015, we closed on our acquisition of First of Huron Corp. and its subsidiary bank, Signature Bank. First of Huron Corp. was immediately merged into the Company followed by the merger of Signature Bank with and into Talmer Bank and Trust. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we operated through three subsidiary banks, Talmer Bank and Trust, First Place Bank, a federal savings association, and Talmer West Bank, a Michigan state-chartered bank. First Place Bank was merged with and into Talmer Bank and Trust on February 10, 2014. Following the merger of First Place Bank into Talmer Bank and Trust on February 10, 2014, we now operate two subsidiary banks, Talmer Bank and Trust and Talmer West Bank. Our banks principally operate through 78 branches in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Nevada and four lending offices located primarily in the Midwest.

In this report, unless the context suggests otherwise, references to "Talmer Bancorp, Inc.," "the Company," "we," "us," and "our" mean the combined business of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary banks, Talmer Bank and Trust ("Talmer Bank") and Talmer West Bank. However, if the discussion relates to a period before our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013, the terms refer to Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and Talmer Bank; if the discussion relates to a period before our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014, the terms refer to Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Talmer Bank and First Place Bank; and if the discussion relates to a period following the merger of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank on February 10, 2014, the terms refer to Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank. References to our "Class A common stock" and "common stock" refer to our Class A voting common stock, par value $1.00 per share.

We have grown substantially since our operations began in August of 2007, with much of the growth occurring through acquisitions. On April 30, 2010, we closed on a private placement of our common stock that raised $200.0 million from new investors. Also on April 30, 2010, Talmer Bank acquired certain of the assets and certain of the deposits of CF Bancorp, a Michigan chartered savings bank, from the FDIC, as receiver. Since April 30, 2010, Talmer Bank has completed the following three additional FDIC-assisted acquisitions, all of which have been fully integrated into our operations:

In each of our FDIC-assisted acquisitions, Talmer Bank entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC that cover certain of the acquired assets, including 100% of the acquired loans (other than consumer loans with respect to our acquisitions of First Banking Center, People State Bank and Community Central Bank) and other real estate.

On December 15, 2011, we closed on the acquisition of Lake Shore Wisconsin Corporation, which divested its subsidiary, Hiawatha National Bank, to its shareholders prior to closing. Lake Shore Wisconsin Corporation's remaining assets consisted of approximately $26.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, which we acquired in the transaction. We issued 4.2 million shares of our common stock at $6.24 per share in the transaction.

On February 21, 2012, we closed on a private placement of our common stock consisting of an initial drawdown by us of approximately $21.0 million and commitments from investors for up to approximately $153.0 million of event driven capital at $8.00 per share to support growth strategies. On December 27, 2012, we closed on the remaining $153.0 million of capital commitments from our investors, which was used to fund the acquisition of First Place Bank.

On January 1, 2013, we purchased substantially all of the assets of First Place Financial Corp., including all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of First Place Bank, in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, for cash consideration of $45 million. Under the asset purchase agreement, we assumed $60.0 million in subordinated notes issued to First Place Capital Trust, First Place Capital Trust II and First Place Capital Trust III, of which $45.0 million was immediately retired.

First Place Bank had operated under a Cease and Desist Order with its regulator since July13, 2011. The Cease and Desist Order remained in effect following our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013. Following our acquisition, we devoted significant internal management resources as well as engaged third party professionals to assist us in evaluating and improving internal and risk management controls of First Place Bank, including hiring a nationally recognized third party to evaluate the internal and risk management controls over the bank's mortgage banking operations. Additionally, substantial resources were deployed to enhance the core operating technology, build and implement a disaster recovery plan and improve consumer compliance processes. First Place Bank achieved compliance with the Cease and Desist Order, and on January 28, 2014, the FDIC approved the consolidation of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank, which occurred on February 10, 2014. At the effective time of the consolidation, the Cease and Desist Order had no further force or effect.

On January 1, 2014, we purchased Financial Commerce Corporation's wholly-owned subsidiary banks and certain other bank-related assets from Financial Commerce Corporation and its parent holding company, Capitol Bancorp Ltd. in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The purchase price consisted of cash consideration of $4.0 million and a separate $2.5 million payment to fund an escrow account to pay the post-petition administrative fees and expenses of the professionals in the bankruptcy cases of Financial Commerce Corporation and Capitol Bancorp Ltd., each of which filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on August 9, 2012, with any unused escrowed funds to be refunded to us.

Immediately prior to our consummation of the acquisition, Capitol Bancorp Ltd. merged Indiana Community Bank, Bank of Las Vegas and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque with and into Michigan Commerce Bank, with Michigan Commerce Bank as the surviving bank in the merger. Simultaneously with the merger, Michigan Commerce Bank changed its name to Talmer West Bank. In connection with the acquisition, we contributed approximately $79.5 million of additional capital to Talmer West Bank in order to recapitalize the bank. In order to support the acquisition and recapitalization of Talmer West Bank, Talmer Bancorp, Inc. borrowed $35.0 million under a senior unsecured line of credit and received $33.0 million in dividend capital from Talmer Bank. We used a portion of the net proceeds from our initial public offering to repay, in full, the $35.0 million line of credit. References in this report to Talmer West Bank refer to Talmer West Bank as the surviving bank in the merger of Indiana Community Bank, Bank of Las Vegas and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque with and into Michigan Commerce Bank.

Although we acquired five branches in Nevada and New Mexico that are outside of our target markets, 12 of the branches we acquired, or 70% of the total number of branches acquired in the acquisition, fit squarely within our target market areas. As noted below, we sold the single branch in New Mexico in July 2014 and consolidated our four branches in Nevada into one branch in September 2014. We will continue to evaluate our long-term strategy with respect to our Nevada branch in light of our Midwest regional bank focus.

On April 5, 2010, Michigan Commerce Bank consented to the issuance of a Consent Order by the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (the "Consent Order"), which remains in effect following our acquisition. Under the terms of the Consent Order, Talmer West Bank, as the surviving bank in the merger, is required to take certain actions, including, among other things: assessing and retaining qualified management; achieving and maintaining specified capital ratios; reducing certain classified assets, including the charge-off of loans classified "loss;" reviewing the allowance for loan and lease losses policy; implementing a comprehensive profit plan and budget; implementing a plan to manage concentrations of credit; and revising the bank's policies governing interest rate risk.

The Consent Order also prohibits Talmer West Bank, without prior regulatory approval, from:

For a further discussion of the Consent Order, see "Risk Factors—Michigan Commerce Bank was subject to a Consent Order issued by its regulators on April 5, 2010 that requires it to take specified actions, and the Consent Order remains in effect following the consummation of our acquisition of Michigan Commerce Bank, now Talmer West Bank, on January 1, 2014." Once the Consent Order is lifted, we plan to consolidate Talmer West Bank with Talmer Bank.

On July 18, 2014, we sold our single Talmer West Bank branch office located in Albuquerque, New Mexico along with its $34.1 million of deposits and $23.7 million of loans to Grants State Bank, a unit of First Bancorp of Durango, Inc.

Additionally, on August 8, 2014, we sold ten branch offices of Talmer Bank located in Wisconsin to Town Bank, a wholly owned bank subsidiary of Wintrust Financial Corporation. Town Bank assumed all of our deposits in Wisconsin totaling $354.8 million as of August 8, 2014.

In September 2014, we consolidated our four Talmer West Bank branch offices located in Las Vegas, Nevada into one branch.

Effective February 6, 2015, we completed our merger with First of Huron Corp. for aggregate cash consideration of $13.4 million. In connection with the merger, First of Huron Corp. merged with Talmer Bancorp, Inc., with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. as the surviving company in the merger. Immediately following the merger, Signature Bank, a Michigan state-chartered bank and wholly owned subsidiary of First of Huron Corp., merged with and into Talmer Bank, with Talmer Bank as the surviving bank. Signature Bank had total assets of $230.4 million as of December 31, 2014, including $170.0 million of net total loans. We also assumed approximately $5.0 million of trust preferred securities.

In this report, we refer to our seven completed acquisitions collectively as the "acquisitions" and refer to CF Bancorp, First Banking Center, Peoples State Bank, Community Central Bank, First Place Bank, Talmer West Bank and Signature Bank collectively as the "Acquired Banks." In addition, we refer to loans subject to loss share agreements with the FDIC as "covered loans" and loans that are not subject to loss share agreements with the FDIC as "uncovered loans." All of the loans and other real estate covered under the loss share agreements with the FDIC are referred to as "covered assets." We refer to our loans acquired in our acquisitions as "acquired loans," regardless of whether they are covered under loss share agreements with the FDIC.

On February 17, 2015, we repurchased an aggregate of 2,529,416 warrants to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock issued to WLR Recovery Fund IV, L.P. and WLR IV Parallel ESC, L.P. (the "WL Ross Funds"). The warrants were originally granted to the WL Ross Funds in 2010 and 2012 in connection with our private offerings, in which we raised capital to support the acquisition of various troubled institutions. The purchase price, determined utilizing the closing price of our stock on the date of repurchase, resulted in an aggregate purchase price of $19.9 million. The warrants that were repurchased contributed 1.3 million shares to our average diluted common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2014.

We are a regional banking franchise concentrated in Michigan and Ohio, and we operate in multiple additional markets located primarily in the Midwest. At December 31, 2014, our Michigan market included our headquarters in north suburban Troy, Michigan with 45 additional branches in Oakland, St. Clair, Wayne, Genesee, Macomb, Lapeer, Sanilac, Huron, Kalamazoo, Livingston, Washtenaw, Muskegon and Kent counties. In addition, at December 31, 2014, our Ohio market included 28 branches in Mahoning, Trumbull, Lorain, Cuyahoga, Portage and Franklin counties; our Indiana market included two branches in Elkhart County; and our Illinois market included one branch in Chicago. As of December 31, 2014, we also operated one branch in Clark County, Nevada.

On February 6, 2015, we acquired Signature Bank, which expanded our presence into new and existing metropolitan statistical areas in Michigan, with the addition of five branches in Huron County, one branch in Saginaw County and one branch in Tuscola County.

The following table shows key deposit and demographic information about our Midwest market areas and our presence in these markets as of December 31, 2014, and has not been adjusted to reflect our acquisition of Signature Bank on February 6, 2015.

(Dollars in thousands, except for Household Income, which is in actual dollars)

Talmer Bancorp Inc.							Total Market Area
Metropolitan Statistical Area	Number of Branches 12/31/2014		Company Deposits in Market ($000) 12/31/2014		Deposit Market Share (%)(1)		Total Deposits in Market Area(2)		2014 Population(3)		2014 - 2019 Projected Population Growth(3)			2014 Median Household Income(3)		2014 - 2019 Projected Growth in Household Income(3)			Unemployment Rate(4)
Michigan
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI		33		2,642,678		1.82		105,326,972		4,291,337		(0.09	)		48,514		0.73			8.1
Flint, MI		5		155,380		4.38		3,591,545		412,977		(3.11	)		41,617		2.50			6.2
Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI		2		43,385		0.61		17,841,736		1,017,542		2.75			50,978		4.73			4.2
Ann Arbor, MI		1		149,964		2.33		6,935,901		354,530		2.55			58,718		5.70			4.1
Kalamazoo-Portage, MI		1		63,941		2.03		3,479,392		332,269		1.62			43,721		0.03			4.9
Muskegon, MI		1		29,579		1.85		1,409,184		169,536		(1.25	)		37,778		1.96			5.5
Ohio
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA		17		763,892		8.68		8,910,220		552,757		(2.29	)		41,401		4.01			5.0
Cleveland-Elyria, OH		8		237,786		0.44		56,680,823		2,054,146		(1.08	)		46,431		2.02			5.4
Akron, OH		2		64,647		0.51		12,764,346		701,083		(0.32	)		46,959		1.18			4.3
Columbus, OH		1		10,607		0.02		49,341,108		1,971,051		3.33			53,413		6.35			3.9
Indiana
Elkhart-Goshen, IN		2		55,473		2.78		2,377,059		200,879		2.07			42,250		(5.78	)		4.8
Illinois
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI		1		39,798		0.01		354,010,632		9,557,430		1.13			57,972		0.84			6.1
Nevada
Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV		1		131,074		0.46		39,357,103		2,034,918		5.54			46,704		(7.79	)		6.8
MSA Totals		75						662,026,021		23,650,455
Weighted Average: MSA												(0.19	)		46,848		1.38
Branches not in any MSA totals*		3		160,659				23,724,160
Weighted Average: Branches not in any MSA												(0.28	)		46,668		1.45

At December 31, 2014, approximately 50.0% of our loans were to borrowers located in Michigan, 22.0% were to borrowers located in Ohio, 7.0% were to borrowers located in Illinois, 4.0% were to borrowers located in Indiana, 4.0% were to borrowers located in Wisconsin and 3.0% were to borrowers located in Nevada. Our largest geographic concentration of loans is in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia metropolitan statistical area (MSA), which includes borrowers located in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair and Lapeer counties in the state of Michigan. Loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $1.5 billion, or 36.1% of total loans, at December 31, 2014, of which $259.3 million, or 16.9%, were covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC. Of the loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA that were not covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC, $501.0 million were commercial real estate loans, $437.0 million were residential real estate loans and $257.0 million were commercial and industrial loans.

The banking business is highly competitive, and we experience competition in our market areas from many other financial institutions. Competition among financial institutions is based on interest rates offered on deposit accounts, interest rates charged on loans, other credit and service charges relating to loans, the quality and scope of the services rendered, the convenience of banking facilities, and, in the case of loans to commercial borrowers, relative lending limits. We compete with commercial banks, credit unions, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds and other mutual funds, as well as super-regional, national and international financial institutions that operate offices in our market areas and elsewhere.

We compete with these institutions both in attracting deposits and in making loans. In addition, we have to attract our customer base from other existing financial institutions and from new residents. Many of our competitors are well-established, larger financial institutions, which have greater financial resources, access to more capital and higher lending capacity than we do. In addition, many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive federal regulations that govern bank holding companies and federally insured banks. Without adjusting for our acquisition of Signature Bank, our largest deposit market areas included the Detroit-Warren-Livonia Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), Youngstown-Warren-Boardman MSA, Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor MSA, Flint, MI MSA and Ann Arbor, MI MSA of which we held 1.82%, 8.68%, 0.44%, 4.38% and 2.33%, respectively, of the deposit market share as of June 30, 2014.

As described above, we have completed four FDIC-assisted acquisitions that significantly grew our asset and liability base. In connection with each of our FDIC-assisted acquisitions, we entered into two loss share agreements with the FDIC. The first type of loss share agreement covers single-family residential mortgage loans (the "Single Family Loss Agreement") and the second type of loss share agreement covers construction, commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, other real estate owned and other commercial assets (the "Commercial Loss Agreement"). As of December 31, 2014, 8.2% of our loans were covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC. Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks associated with the loans and foreclosed real estate we acquired in our FDIC-assisted acquisitions are significantly different from the risks associated with our loans and foreclosed real estate that are not covered under FDIC loss share agreements. As of December 31, 2014, our covered loans totaled $346.5 million and our uncovered loans totaled $3.9 billion.

Both the Commercial Loss Agreement and the Single Family Loss Agreement for each of our acquisitions contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that

we must follow to receive reimbursement on losses from the FDIC. In general, under the loss share agreements, we must:

In addition, under the Commercial Loss Agreement, coverage will be lost on a covered loan if we make certain advances, amendments, modifications, renewals or extensions that are not permitted under the agreement. For instance, coverage will be lost if we make any additional advance or commitment on a covered loan unless:

Covered loans also cannot be amended, modified, renewed or extended, or any term, right or remedy thereunder waived, unless made in good faith and otherwise in accordance with our credit policy guidelines, provided that no such amendment, modification, renewal, extension or waiver can:

Under both the Single Family Loss Agreement and Commercial Loss Agreement, the FDIC is not required to make any payments with respect to any charge-off or loss event that it determines we should not have effected. For instance, under the Single Family Loss Agreement, the FDIC can deny coverage if it finds we failed to undertake reasonable and customary loss mitigation efforts in accordance with the applicable modification guidelines or failed to follow customary servicing procedures. Under both loss share agreements, the FDIC must provide Talmer Bank with notice and an opportunity to cure any such deficiency. Any unresolved disputes with the FDIC regarding losses or payments will be subject to binding arbitration.

To ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the loss share agreements, we use several departments to monitor, manage and administer the different aspects of the loss share agreements. We have a Special Assets Group that is part of our commercial collection and consumer collection functions and reports to our Chief Legal Counsel. All of the members of our collections teams are experienced loan workout officers and have 20 or more years of experience in commercial lending and commercial collections. The immediate objective of our Special Assets Groups is to remediate the covered problem assets to a satisfactory level of performance or, when that cannot be achieved, liquidate the collateral securing a loan in a manner to minimize the loss to us and the FDIC.

In addition, we also have a separate Loss Share Group with a Loss Share Manager and two dedicated support staff. The Loss Share Group assists in the administration of acquired assets to insure that we are in compliance with the requirements of the various loss share agreements with the FDIC, acts as the liaison between the FDIC and the Special Assets and Collection Officers, and keeps accurate accounting records of loss share activity to insure the integrity of our financial reporting and to insure compliance with the loss share agreements.

We offer a range of lending services, including commercial and industrial loans, commercial and residential real estate loans, real estate construction loans, and consumer loans. Our customers are generally commercial businesses, professional services and retail consumers within our market areas. At December 31, 2014, we had net total loans of $4.2 billion, representing 71.4% of our total assets. Net total loans is the remaining balance after subtracting the accretable discount, non-accretable discount, allowance for loan losses and unamortized loan origination fees.

We recorded the loans we acquired in each of our acquisitions at their estimated fair values on the date of each acquisition. We calculated the fair value of loans by discounting projected future cash flows from the loan using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit risk inherent in the loan at the date of acquisition. We refer to the excess cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value as the "accretable discount." The accretable discount is accreted into interest income over the expected remaining life of the loan. The "non-accretable discount" is the difference, calculated at acquisition, between contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected. Cash flow expectations are re-estimated periodically for purchased credit impaired loans which involves complex cash flow projections and significant judgment on timing of loan resolution. If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our current allowance may not be sufficient, and adjustments may be necessary to allow for different economic conditions or adverse developments in our loan portfolio.

At December 31, 2014, commercial and industrial loans amounted to $902.1 million, or 21.2% of our total loan portfolio. Of these loans, 3.6% are covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC.

We make loans for commercial purposes in various lines of businesses, including the manufacturing industry, service industry,professional service areas and agricultural. In our credit underwriting process, we carefully evaluate the borrower's industry, management skills, operating performance, liquidity and financial condition. We underwrite commercial and industrial credits based on a multiple of repayment sources, including operating cash flow, liquidation of collateral and guarantor support, if any. We closely monitor the operating performance, liquidity and financial condition of the borrowers through analysis of required periodic financial statements and meetings with the borrower's management.

Loans secured by real estate are the principal component of our loan portfolio. Real estate loans are subject to the same general risks as other loans and are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in the value of real estate. Fluctuations in the value of real estate, as well as other factors arising after a loan has been made, could negatively affect a borrower's cash flow, creditworthiness and ability to repay the loan. When we make new real estate loans, we obtain a security interest in real estate whenever possible, in addition to any other available collateral, to increase the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loan. To control concentration risk, we monitor collateral type and industry concentrations within this portfolio.

As of December 31, 2014, loans secured by first or second mortgages on real estate comprised $3.0 billion, or 71.4% of our loan portfolio. Of these loans, 9.7% are covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC. These loans generally fall into one of two categories: commercial real estate loans or residential real estate loans.

The mortgage loans that we originate to be held by us in our portfolio have generally been priced competitively with current market rates for such loans. We currently offer a number of ARM loans with terms of up to 30 years and interest rates that adjust at scheduled intervals based on the product selected. These interest rates can adjust annually, or remain fixed for an initial period of three, five or seven years and thereafter adjust annually. The interest rates for ARM loans are generally indexed to the one-year U.S. Treasury Index or the one year LIBOR rate. The ARM loans generally provide for periodic (not more than 2%) and overall (not more than 6%) caps on the increase or decrease in the interest rate at any adjustment date and over the life of the loan.

Because the majority of loans originated and retained in the residential portfolio are adjustable-rate one- to four-family mortgage loans, we limit our exposure to fluctuations in interest income due to rising interest rates. However, adjustable-rate loans generally pose credit risks not inherent in fixed-rate loans, primarily because as interest rates rise, the underlying payments of the borrower rise, thereby increasing the potential for default. Periodic and lifetime caps on interest rate

increases help to reduce the credit risks associated with adjustable-rate loans but also limit the interest rate sensitivity of such loans. We require that adjustable-rate loans held in the loan portfolio have payments sufficient to amortize the loan over its term and the loans do not have negative principal amortization.

Our underwriting criteria for, and the risks associated with, home equity loans and lines of credit are generally the same as those for first mortgage loans. Home equity lines of credit typically have terms of 60 months or less, and we generally limit the extension of credit to less than 85% of the available equity of each property.

At December 31, 2014, real estate construction loans amounted to $141.1 million, or 3.3% of our loan portfolio. Of these loans, 6.7% are covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC. We offer fixed and adjustable rate residential and commercial real estate construction loans to builders and developers and to consumers who wish to build their own homes. Construction loans to consumers to build their own homes are often structured to be converted to permanent loans at the end of the construction phase, which is typically twelve months. These construction loans have rates and terms that are similar to other one- to four-family loans we offer, except that during the construction phase, the borrower pays interest only and the maximum loan-to-value ratio is 95% on an as-completed basis. On construction loans exceeding an 80% loan-to-value ratio, private mortgage insurance is required to reduce credit exposure. Residential construction loans are generally underwritten based on the same credit guidelines used for originating permanent residential loans. In addition, we perform a review of the construction plans to verify that the borrower will be able to complete the residence with the funds available.

We make commercial land loans to commercial entities for the purpose of financing land on which to build a commercial project. These loans are for projects that typically involve small-and medium-sized single and multi-use commercial buildings.

We make commercial construction loans to the borrower for the purpose of financing the construction of a commercial development. These loans are further categorized depending on whether the borrower intends (a) to occupy the finished development (owner-occupied) or (b) to lease or sell the finished development (non owner-occupied).

We make residential land loans to both commercial entities and consumer borrowers for the purpose of financing land upon which to build a residential home. Residential land loans are reclassified as residential construction loans once construction of the residential home commences. These loans are further categorized as:

The term of our real estate construction loans to builders are generally limited to 18 months. In some instances a real estate construction loan may have a longer amortization period, with a balloon maturity of not more than five years. Real estate construction loans generally carry a higher degree of risk than long-term financing of existing properties because repayment depends on the ultimate completion of the project and usually on the subsequent lease-up and/or sale of the property. Specific risks include:

We attempt to reduce the risks associated with real estate construction loans by obtaining personal guarantees and by keeping the loan-to-value ratio of the completed project at or below 80%. Generally, we do not build interest reserves into loan commitments but require periodic cash payments for interest from the borrower's cash flow.

At December 31, 2014, consumer and other loans amounted to $174.1 million, or 4.1% of our loan portfolio. Of these loans, 5.5% are covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC. We make a variety of loans to individuals for personal and household purposes, including secured and unsecured installment loans and revolving lines of credit. We underwrite consumer loans based on the borrower's income, current debt level, balance sheet composition, past credit history and the availability and value of collateral. Consumer rates are both fixed and variable, with negotiable terms. Our installment loans typically amortize over periods up to 60 months. Although we typically require monthly payments of interest and a portion of the principal on our loan products, we may offer consumer loans with a single maturity date when a specific source of repayment is available. Consumer loans not secured by real estate are generally considered to have greater risk than first or second mortgages on real estate because they may be unsecured, or, if they are secured, the value of the collateral may be difficult to assess and more likely to decrease in value, and is more difficult to control, than real estate.

We engage in mortgage banking as part of an overall strategy to deliver loan products to customers. As a result, we sell a significant majority of the residential loans we originate to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or, to a lesser extent, private investors, while typically retaining the rights to provide loan servicing to our customers. As part of our overall asset/liability management strategic objectives, we may also originate and retain certain adjustable-rate residential loans. To reduce the interest rate risk associated with commitments made to borrowers for mortgage loans that have not yet been closed and that we intend to sell in the secondary markets, we routinely enter into commitments to sell loans or mortgage-backed securities, considered to be derivatives, to limit our exposure to potential movements in market interest rates. We monitor our interest rate risk position daily to maintain appropriate coverage of our loan commitments made to borrowers.

We use derivative instruments to mitigate the interest rate risk associated with commitments to make mortgage loans that we intend to sell. We also enter into contracts for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans in order to economically hedge potential adverse effects of changes in interest rates. These contracts are also derivative instruments. Derivative instruments are recognized at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets as either assets or liabilities.

We service residential, commercial, and agricultural mortgage loans for investors under contracts where we receive a fee for performing mortgage servicing activities on mortgage loans that are not owned by us and are not included on our balance sheet. This process involves collecting monthly mortgage payments on behalf of investors, reporting information to those investors on a timely basis and maintaining custodial escrow accounts for the payment of principal and interest to investors, and property taxes and insurance premiums on behalf of borrowers. At December 31, 2014, we had approximately 41 thousand loans serviced for others totaling $7.3 billion. In the second quarter of 2013, we began utilizing a third-party sub-servicer for a majority of our serviced loans. While we choose to utilize a servicing vendor to assist us in the conduct of our mortgage servicing activities, we continue to own the mortgage servicing assets for which we are compensated as described below.

As compensation for our mortgage servicing activities, we receive servicing fees of approximately 0.25% per year of the loan balances serviced, plus any late charges collected from the delinquent borrowers and other fees incidental to the services provided, offset by applicable subservicing fees. In the event of a default by the borrower, we receive no servicing fees until the default is cured. In times when interest rates are rising or at high levels, servicing mortgage loans can represent a steady source of noninterest income and can, at times, offset decreases in mortgage banking gains. Conversely, in times when interest rates are falling or at very low levels, servicing mortgage loans can become comparatively less profitable due to the rapid payoff of loans and the negative impact due to the change in fair value of the asset. We account for our mortgage servicing rights at fair value. The amount of mortgage servicing rights initially recorded is based on the fair value of the mortgage servicing rights determined on the date when the underlying loan is sold. Our determination of fair value and the amount we record is based on a valuation model using discounted cash-flow analysis and available market pricing. Third party valuations of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio are obtained on a regular basis and are used to determine the fair value of the servicing rights at the end of the reporting period. Estimates of fair value reflect the following variables:

We monitor the level of our investment in mortgage servicing rights in relation to our other mortgage banking activities in order to limit our exposure to significant fluctuations in loan servicing income. Over the past several years, the volume and dollar amount of our mortgage servicing rights has grown, due not only to a strong mortgage origination environment but also because of our acquisitions. As a result, our exposure to volatility in total mortgage banking revenues has also increased. In the

future, we may sell mortgage servicing rights depending on a variety of factors, including capital sufficiency, the size of the mortgage servicing rights portfolio relative to total assets and current market conditions.

Certain credit risks are inherent in making loans. These include repayment risks, risks resulting from uncertainties in the future value of collateral, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions and risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers. We attempt to mitigate repayment risks by adhering to internal credit policies and procedures. We employ consistent analysis and underwriting to examine credit information and prepare underwriting documentation. We monitor and approve exceptions to policy as required, and we also track and address technical exceptions.

Our loan approval policy contains modest officer lending limits, with approval concurrence between the market manager and credit officer for all loans. As such, no lending officer can approve credit acting alone, regardless of the size of the loan. The Loan and Credit Risk Committee of the Board reviews and approves loan policy changes, monitors loan portfolio trends and credit trends, and reviews and approves loan transactions that exceed management thresholds as set forth in our loan policies. Loan pricing is established in conjunction with the loan approval process based on pricing guidelines for non-consumer and non-residential mortgage loans that are set by our Asset-Liability Committee.

Each loan officer has the primary and initial responsibility for appropriately risk rating each loan that is made. Once a loan is made, our credit administration department is responsible for the ongoing monitoring of loan portfolio performance through the review of ongoing financial reports, loan officer reports, audit reviews and exception reporting and concentration analysis. This monitoring process also includes an ongoing review of loan risk ratings and management of our allowance for loan losses. Our chief credit officer is responsible for maintaining a loan risk rating system which both facilitates the continuous monitoring of the quality of our loan portfolio and helps identify existing and potential problem loans so that our management team can employ and develop plans for corrective action.

Our Board of Directors supports a strong loan review program and is committed to its effectiveness as part of the independent process of assessing our lending activities. We have communicated to our credit and lending staff that the identification of emerging problem loans begins with the lending personnel knowing their customer and, supported by credit personnel, actively monitoring their customer relationships. The loan review process is meant to augment this active management of customer relationships and to provide an independent and broad-based look into our lending activities. The end goal of a thorough and consistently applied loan review program is multi-faceted.

We maintain a robust loan review function by utilizing an internal loan review team as well as third-party loan review firms that report to Enterprise Risk and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to ensure independence and objectivity. The Audit Committee shares loan review reports with the Loan and Credit Risk Committee of the Board of Directors to assist that committee with its obligations, and it provides a quarterly summary to the Board that describes trends and identifies significant changes in the overall quality of the portfolio identified by the loan review department. The examinations performed by the loan review department are based on risk assessments of individual loan commitments within our loan portfolio over a period of time. At the conclusion of each unit review, the loan review department provides senior management with a report that summarizes the findings of the review. At a minimum, the report addresses risk rating accuracy, compliance with regulations and policies, loan documentation accuracy, the timely receipt of financial statements, and any additional material issues.

Our lending activities are subject to a variety of lending limits imposed by federal law. In general, each of our bank subsidiaries are subject to a legal limit on loans to a single borrower equal to 15% of the bank's capital and unimpaired surplus, or 25% if the loan is fully secured. This limit increases or decreases as the bank's capital increases or decreases. Based upon the capitalization of Talmer Bank at December 31, 2014, Talmer Bank's legal lending limits were approximately $90.0 million (15%) and $150.0 million (25%), and Talmer Bank maintains an internal lending limit of $30.0 million. Based upon the capitalization of Talmer West Bank at December 31, 2014, Talmer West Bank's legal lending limits were approximately $23.1 million (15%) and $38.5 million (25%) and Talmer West Bank maintained an internal lending limit of $14.0 million. We may seek to sell participations in our larger loans to other financial institutions, which will allow us to manage the risk involved in these loans and to meet the lending needs of our customers requiring extensions of credit in excess of these limits.

We offer a full range of deposit services that are typically available from most banks and savings institutions, including checking accounts, commercial accounts, savings accounts and other time deposits of various types, ranging from daily money market accounts to longer-term certificates of deposit. Transaction accounts and time deposits are tailored to and offered at rates competitive with those offered in our primary market areas. In addition, we offer certain retirement account services. We solicit accounts from individuals, businesses, associations, organizations and governmental authorities. We believe that our significant branch network will assist us in continuing to attract deposits from local customers in our market areas.

As of December 31, 2014, we had 1,239 full-time employees and 169 part-time employees.

Talmer Bancorp, Inc., and its subsidiary banks, Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank are subject to extensive banking regulations that impose restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight of their operations. These laws generally are intended to protect consumers and depositors and not shareholders. The following summary is qualified by reference to the statutory and regulatory provisions discussed. Changes in applicable laws or regulations may have a material effect on our business and prospects. Our operations may be affected by legislative changes and the policies of various regulatory authorities. We cannot predict the effect that fiscal or monetary policies, economic conditions or new federal or state legislation may have on our business and earnings in the future.

The following discussion is not intended to be a complete list of all the activities regulated by the banking laws or of the impact of those laws and regulations on our operations. It is intended only to briefly summarize some material provisions.

Recent Legislative and Regulatory Initiatives to Address the Financial and Economic Crises

Markets in the United States and elsewhere experienced extreme volatility and disruption beginning in the latter half of 2007. These circumstances exerted significant downward pressure on prices of equity securities and virtually all other asset classes, and resulted in substantially increased market volatility, severely constrained credit and capital markets, particularly for financial institutions, and caused an overall loss of investor confidence. Loan portfolio performances deteriorated at many institutions resulting from, among other factors, a weak economy and a decline in the value of the collateral supporting their loans. Dramatic slowdowns in the housing industry, due in part to falling home prices and increasing foreclosures and unemployment, created strains on financial institutions. Many borrowers became unable to repay their loans, and the collateral securing these loans, in some cases, declined below the loan balance. In response to the challenges facing the financial services sector, the following laws have been enacted and other regulatory and governmental actions have recently been taken.

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act which, among other things, changes the oversight and supervision of financial institutions, includes new minimum capital requirements, creates a new federal agency to regulate consumer financial products and services and implements changes to corporate governance and compensation practices. The act is focused in large part on the financial services industry, particularly bank holding companies with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, and contains a number of provisions that will affect us, including:

The act also authorizes the SEC to issue rules allowing shareholders to include their own nominations for directors in a company's proxy solicitation materials. Many provisions of the act require the adoption of additional rules to implement the changes. In addition, the act mandates multiple studies that could result in additional legislative action. Governmental intervention and new regulations under these programs could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In December 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), an international forum for cooperation on banking supervisory matters, announced the "Basel III" capital standards, which substantially revised the existing capital requirements for banking organizations. Modest revisions were made in June 2011. The Basel III standards operate in conjunction with portions of standards previously released by the BCBS and commonly known as "Basel II" and "Basel 2.5." On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve adopted a final rule to implement the Basel regulatory capital reforms through what we refer to herein as the "Basel III capital framework" and, on July 9, 2013, the OCC also adopted a final rule and the FDIC adopted the same provisions in the form of an "interim" final rule. The rule applies to all national and state banks and savings associations and most bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies, which we collectively refer to herein as "covered" banking organizations. Bank holding companies with less than $500 million in total consolidated assets are not subject to the final rule, nor are savings and loan holding companies substantially engaged in commercial activities or insurance underwriting. In certain respects, the rule imposes more stringent requirements on "advanced approaches" banking organizations—those organizations with $250 billion or more in total consolidated assets, $10 billion or more in total foreign exposures, or that have opted in to the Basel II capital regime. The requirements in the rule began to phase in on January 1, 2014, for advanced approaches banking organizations, and began to phase in on January 1, 2015, for other covered banking organizations, including ourselves. The requirements in the rule will be fully phased in by January 1, 2019.

The rule imposes higher risk-based capital and leverage requirements than those previously in place. Specifically, the rule imposes the following minimum capital requirements:

Under the rule, Tier 1 capital is redefined to include two components: Common Equity Tier 1 capital and additional Tier 1 capital. The new and highest form of capital, Common Equity Tier 1 capital, consists solely of common stock (plus related surplus), retained earnings, accumulated other

comprehensive income, and limited amounts of minority interests that are in the form of common stock. Additional Tier 1 capital includes other perpetual instruments historically included in Tier 1 capital, such as non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock. The rule permits bank holding companies with less than $15.0 billion in total consolidated assets to continue to include trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock issued before May 19, 2010 in Tier 1 capital, but not in Common Equity Tier 1 capital, subject to certain restrictions. Tier 2 capital consists of instruments that currently qualify in Tier 2 capital plus instruments that the rule has disqualified from Tier 1 capital treatment. Cumulative perpetual preferred stock, formerly includable in Tier 1 capital, is now included only in Tier 2 capital.

In addition, in order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions or discretionary bonus payments to executives, a covered banking organization must maintain a "capital conservation buffer" on top of its minimum risk-based capital requirements. This buffer must consist solely of Tier 1 Common Equity, but the buffer applies to all three measurements (Common Equity Tier 1, Tier 1 capital and total capital). The capital conservation buffer will be phased in incrementally over time, becoming fully effective on January 1, 2019, and will consist of an additional amount of common equity equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets.

The previous capital rules required certain deductions from or adjustments to capital. The final rule retains many of these deductions and adjustments and also provides for new ones. As a result, deductions from Common Equity Tier 1 capital are required for goodwill (net of associated deferred tax liabilities); intangible assets such as non-mortgage servicing assets and purchased credit card relationships (net of associated deferred tax liabilities); deferred tax assets that arise from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards (net of any related valuations allowances and net of deferred tax liabilities); any gain on sale in connection with a securitization exposure; any defined benefit pension fund net asset (net of any associated deferred tax liabilities) held by a bank holding company (this provision does not apply to a bank or savings association); the aggregate amount of outstanding equity investments (including retained earnings) in financial subsidiaries; and identified losses. Savings associations also must deduct investments in certain subsidiaries. Other deductions will be necessary from different levels of capital.

Additionally, the final rule provides for the deduction of three categories of assets: (i) deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that cannot be realized through net operating loss carrybacks (net of related valuation allowances and of deferred tax liabilities), (ii) mortgage servicing assets (net of associated deferred tax liabilities) and (iii) investments in more than 10% of the issued and outstanding common stock of unconsolidated financial institutions (net of associated deferred tax liabilities). The amount in each category that exceeds 10% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital must be deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 capital. The remaining, non-deducted amounts are then aggregated, and the amount by which this total amount exceeds 15% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital must be deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 capital. Amounts of minority investments in consolidated subsidiaries that exceed certain limits and investments in unconsolidated financial institutions may also have to be deducted from the category of capital to which such instruments belong.

Accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is presumptively included in Common Equity Tier 1 capital and often would operate to reduce this category of capital. The final rule provides a one-time opportunity at the end of the first quarter of 2015 for covered banking organizations to opt out of much of this treatment of AOCI. The final rule also has the effect of increasing capital requirements by increasing the risk weights on certain assets, including high volatility commercial real estate, mortgage servicing rights not includable in Common Equity Tier 1 capital, equity exposures, and claims on securities firms, that are used in the denominator of the three risk-based capital ratios.

The ultimate impact of the rule on the Company and our subsidiary banks is currently being reviewed and is dependent upon when certain requirements of the rule will be fully phased in. While

the rule contains several provisions that would affect the mortgage lending business, at this point we cannot determine the ultimate effect that the rule will have upon our earnings or financial position.

We own 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank and, therefore, we are required to be registered as a bank holding company under the federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "Bank Holding Company Act"). As a result, we are primarily subject to the supervision, examination and reporting requirements of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act and the regulations promulgated under it. As a bank holding company located in Michigan, the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services also regulates and monitors our operations.

Permitted Activities. Under the Bank Holding Company Act, a bank holding company is generally permitted to engage in, or acquire direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in, the following activities:

Activities that the Federal Reserve has found to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident to the business of banking include:

As a bank holding company, we also can elect to be treated as a "financial holding company," which would allow us to engage in a broader array of activities. In sum, a financial holding company can engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to financial activities, including insurance underwriting, sales and brokerage activities; providing financial and investment advisory services and underwriting services; and engaging in limited merchant banking activities. We have not sought financial holding company status, but we may elect that status in the future as our business matures. If we were to elect in writing for financial holding company status, we would be required to be well capitalized and well managed, and each insured depository institution we

control would also have to be well capitalized, well managed and have at least a satisfactory rating under the CRA (discussed below).

The Federal Reserve has the authority to order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any of these activities or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary when it has reasonable cause to believe that the bank holding company's continued ownership, activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of it or any of its bank subsidiaries.

Change in Control. In addition, and subject to certain exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with regulations promulgated under them, require Federal Reserve approval or non-objection before any person or company acquires "control" of a bank or a bank holding company. Under the Bank Holding Company Act, control is deemed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of a bank holding company; controls the election of a majority of the members of the board of directors; or exercises a controlling influence over the management or policies of a bank or bank holding company. Pursuant to its previously issued guidance, the Federal Reserve has stated that it would not expect control to exist if a person acquires, in aggregate, less than 33% of the total equity of a bank or bank holding company (voting and nonvoting equity), provided such person's ownership does not include 15% or more of any class of voting securities. Under the Change in Bank Control Act, a person or company is required to file a notice if it will, as a result of the transaction, own or control 25% or more of any class of voting securities or direct the management or policies of a bank or bank holding company. In some cases, notice will be required if the acquirer will own or control 10% or more of any class of voting securities.

Source of Strength. There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed by law and regulatory policy on bank holding companies with regard to their depository institution subsidiaries that are designed to minimize potential loss to depositors and to the FDIC insurance funds in the event that the depository institution becomes in danger of defaulting under its obligations to repay deposits. Under a policy of the Federal Reserve, which was confirmed in the Dodd-Frank Act, a bank holding company is required to serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary depository institutions and to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so absent the Federal Reserve's policy. Under the FDIC Improvement Act, to avoid receivership of its insured depository institution subsidiary, a bank holding company is required to guarantee the compliance of any insured depository institution subsidiary that may become "undercapitalized" within the terms of any capital restoration plan filed by such subsidiary with its appropriate federal banking agency up to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to 5% of the institution's total assets at the time the institution becomes undercapitalized, or (ii) the amount which is necessary (or would have been necessary) to bring the institution into compliance with all applicable capital standards as of the time the institution fails to comply with such capital restoration plan.

The Federal Reserve also has the authority under the Bank Holding Company Act to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or relinquish control of a nonbank subsidiary (other than a nonbank subsidiary of a bank) upon the Federal Reserve's determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness or stability of any subsidiary depository institution of the bank holding company. Further, federal law grants the Federal banking agencies additional discretion to require a bank holding company to divest itself of any bank or nonbank subsidiary if the agency determines that divestiture may aid the depository institution's financial condition.

In addition, the "cross guarantee" provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act require each insured depository institution under common control with another insured depository institution to reimburse the FDIC for any loss suffered or reasonably anticipated by the FDIC as a result of the default of a commonly controlled insured depository institution or for any assistance provided by the

FDIC to the commonly controlled insured depository institution in danger of default. The FDIC's claim for damages is superior to claims of shareholders of the insured depository institution providing the reimbursement or its holding company, but is subordinate to claims of depositors, secured creditors and holders of subordinated debt (other than affiliates) of each insured depository institutions.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act also provides that amounts received from the liquidation or other resolution of any insured depository institution by any receiver must be distributed (after payment of secured claims) to pay the deposit liabilities of the institution prior to payment of any other general or unsecured senior liability, subordinated liability, general creditor claims or shareholder claims. This provision would give depositors a preference over general and subordinated creditors and shareholders in the event a receiver is appointed to distribute the assets of any of our banks.

Any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary bank. In the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment.

Capital Requirements. The Federal Reserve imposes certain capital requirements on Talmer Bancorp, Inc. under the Bank Holding Company Act, including a minimum leverage ratio and a minimum ratio of "qualifying" capital to risk-weighted assets. These requirements are essentially the same as those that apply to our subsidiary banks and are described above under "Basel Capital Standards" and below under "Bank Regulation—Prompt Corrective Action." Subject to our capital requirements and certain other restrictions, including the consent of the Federal Reserve, we are able to borrow money to make a capital contribution to our subsidiary banks, and these loans may be repaid from dividends paid from our subsidiary banks to the Company. Our ability to pay dividends depends on the ability of our bank subsidiaries to pay dividends to us, which is subject to regulatory restrictions as described below in "Bank Regulation—Dividends." We are also able to raise capital for contribution to our bank subsidiaries by issuing securities without having to receive regulatory approval, subject to compliance with federal and state securities laws.

Emerging Growth Company Status. We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting and other requirements that are generally unavailable to other public companies. As an emerging growth company,

We may take advantage of some or all of the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements that will be available to us as long as we continue to qualify as an emerging growth company.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards affecting public companies. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected not to take advantage of this extended transition period, which means the financial statements included in this report, as well as financial

statements we file in the future, will be subject to all new or revised accounting standards generally applicable to public companies. Our election not to take advantage of the extended transition period is irrevocable.

We can remain an emerging growth company for up to five years from our initial public offering in February 2014, or until the earliest of (a) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (b) the date that the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (c) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.

Talmer Bank operates as a state bank incorporated under the laws of the State of Michigan and is subject to examination by the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services and the FDIC. Talmer Bank's deposits are insured by the FDIC up to the standard deposit insurance amount of $250,000.

Talmer West Bank operates as a state bank incorporated under the laws of the State of Michigan and is subject to examination by the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services and the FDIC. Talmer West Bank's deposits are insured by the FDIC up to the standard deposit insurance amount of $250,000.

The Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services and the FDIC regulate or monitor virtually all areas of Talmer Bank's and Talmer West Bank's operations including:

These agencies, and the federal and state laws applicable to our subsidiary banks' operations, respectively, extensively regulate various aspects of our banking business, including, among other things, permissible types and amounts of loans, investments and other activities, capital adequacy, branching, interest rates on loans and on deposits, the maintenance of non-interest bearing reserves on deposit accounts, and the safety and soundness of our banking practices.

All insured depository institutions must undergo regular on-site examinations by their appropriate banking agency. The cost of examinations of insured depository institutions and any affiliates may be assessed by the appropriate agency against each institution or affiliate as it deems necessary or appropriate. Insured depository institutions file quarterly call reports with their federal regulatory agency and their state supervisor when applicable. The FDIC has developed a method for insured depository institutions to provide supplemental disclosure of the estimated fair market value of assets and liabilities, to the extent feasible and practicable, in any balance sheet, financial statement, report of condition or any other report of any insured depository institution.

The FDIC Improvement Act also requires the federal banking regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation, standards for all insured depository institutions and depository institution holding companies relating, among other things, to the following:

A summary of the principal requirements placed on Talmer West Bank by the Consent Order is set forth below.

Talmer Bank, the Company, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and certain of our investors must comply with the applicable provisions of the FDIC Statement of Policy on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions (the "FDIC Policy Statement"). The FDIC Policy Statement imposes restrictions and requirements on certain institutions and their investors, to the extent that those institutions seek to acquire a failed bank from the FDIC. Certain provisions of the FDIC Policy Statement are summarized below. As the agency responsible for resolving failed banks, the FDIC has discretion to determine whether a party is qualified to bid on a failed institution. The FDIC adopted the FDIC Policy Statement on August 26, 2009. The FDIC issued guidance under the FDIC Policy Statement on January 6, 2010 and April 23, 2010.

In general, the FDIC Policy Statement imposes the following provisions, among others, on those institutions and investors to which it applies. First, the insured depository institution is required to maintain a ratio of Tier 1 common equity to total assets of at least 10% for a period of three years, and thereafter maintain a capital level sufficient to be well capitalized under regulatory standards during the remaining period of ownership by the investors covered by the FDIC Policy Statement ("covered investors"). Our most recent failed bank acquisition closed on April 29, 2011 and, therefore, our heightened capital requirement expired on April 29, 2014. Now that the heightened capital requirement has expired, management intends to maintain a ratio of Tier 1 common equity to total assets of 8.5%. Second, covered investors that collectively own 80% or more of two or more insured

depository institutions are required to pledge to the FDIC their proportionate interests in each institution to indemnify the FDIC against any losses it incurs in connection with the failure of one of the institutions. Third, the depository institution is prohibited from extending credit to its covered investors and to affiliates of its covered investors. Fourth, covered investors may not employ ownership structures that use entities domiciled in bank secrecy jurisdictions. The FDIC has interpreted this prohibition to apply to a wide range of non-U.S. jurisdictions. In its guidance, the FDIC has required that non-U.S. investors subject to the FDIC Policy Statement invest through a U.S. subsidiary and adhere to certain requirements related to record keeping and information sharing. Fifth, without FDIC approval, covered investors generally are prohibited from selling or otherwise transferring their securities in the institution for a three-year period following the time of certain acquisitions. This three-year period expired on April 30, 2013 with respect to our covered investors. Sixth, covered investors may not employ complex and functionally opaque ownership structures to invest in insured depository institutions. Seventh, investors that own 10% or more of the equity of a failed depository institution are not eligible to bid for that failed institution in an FDIC auction. Eighth, covered investors may be required to provide information to the FDIC, such as with respect to the size of the capital fund or funds, their diversification, their return profiles, their marketing documents, their management teams, and their business models. Ninth, the FDIC Policy Statement does not replace or substitute for otherwise applicable regulations or statutes. We believe that we are in compliance with each of the requirements of the FDIC Policy Statement applicable to us.

As an insured depository institution, each of our subsidiary banks is required to comply with the capital requirements promulgated under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the regulations under it, which set forth five capital categories, each with specific regulatory consequences. The following is a list of the criteria for each prompt corrective action category under the prompt corrective actions rules that took effect on January 1, 2015:

Talmer West Bank is subject to heightened capital requirements under the Consent Order, which requires Talmer West Bank to have and maintain a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 9.0% and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 12.0%. Talmer West Bank cannot be considered well capitalized while it remains under the Consent Order, even if the bank's capital ratios exceed the requirements set forth in the Consent Order.

If the applicable federal regulator determines, after notice and an opportunity for hearing, that the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition, the regulator is authorized to reclassify the institution to the next lower capital category (other than critically undercapitalized) and require the submission of a plan to correct the unsafe or unsound condition.

If the institution is not well capitalized, it cannot accept brokered deposits without prior FDIC approval. Even if approved, the rates the institution may pay on the brokered deposits will be limited. In addition, a bank that is undercapitalized cannot offer an effective yield in excess of 75 basis points over the "national rate" paid on deposits (including brokered deposits, if approval is granted for the bank to accept them) of comparable size and maturity. The "national rate" is defined as a simple average of rates paid by insured depository institutions and branches for which data are available and is published weekly by the FDIC. Institutions subject to the restrictions that believe they are operating in an area where the rates paid on deposits are higher than the "national rate" can use the local market to determine the prevailing rate if they seek and receive a determination from the FDIC that it is operating in a high-rate area. Regardless of the determination, institutions must use the national rate to determine conformance for all deposits outside their market area.

Moreover, if the institution becomes less than adequately capitalized, it must adopt a capital restoration plan acceptable to the FDIC. The institution also would become subject to increased regulatory oversight, and is increasingly restricted in the scope of its permissible activities. Each company having control over an undercapitalized institution also must provide a limited guarantee that the institution will comply with its capital restoration plan. Except under limited circumstances consistent with an accepted capital restoration plan, an undercapitalized institution may not grow. An undercapitalized institution may not acquire another institution, establish additional branch offices or engage in any new line of business unless it is determined by the appropriate federal banking agency to be consistent with an accepted capital restoration plan or unless the FDIC determines that the proposed action will further the purpose of prompt corrective action. The appropriate federal banking agency may take any action authorized for a significantly undercapitalized institution if an undercapitalized institution fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails in any material respect to implement a plan accepted by the agency. A critically undercapitalized institution is subject

to having a receiver or conservator appointed to manage its affairs and for loss of its charter to conduct banking activities.

An insured depository institution may not pay a management fee to a bank holding company controlling that institution or any other person having control of the institution if, after making the payment, the institution would be undercapitalized. In addition, an institution cannot make a capital distribution, such as a dividend or other distribution that is in substance a distribution of capital, to the owners of the institution if following such a distribution the institution would be undercapitalized.

Under the prompt corrective action criteria in effect on December 31, 2014, a well capitalized institution was one (i) having a total capital ratio of 10% or greater, (ii) having a tier 1 capital ratio of 6% or greater, (iii) having a leverage capital ratio of 5% or greater and (iv) that is not subject to any order or written directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure. As of December 31, 2014, Talmer Bank's regulatory capital surpassed the levels required to be considered "well capitalized." As of December 31, 2014, Talmer West Bank's regulatory capital surpassed the levels required to be in compliance with the Consent Order.

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiary banks. Various legal limitations restrict our bank subsidiaries from lending or otherwise supplying funds to the Company or its non-bank subsidiaries. The Company and our subsidiary banks are subject to Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Regulation W.

Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act places limits on the amount of loans or extensions of credit by a bank to any affiliate, including its holding company and on a bank's investments in, or certain other transactions with, affiliates and on the amount of advances by a bank to third parties that are collateralized by the securities or obligations of any affiliates of the bank. Section 23A also applies to derivative transactions, repurchase agreements and securities lending and borrowing transactions that cause a bank to have credit exposure to an affiliate. The aggregate of all covered transactions is limited in amount, as to any one affiliate, to 10% of each subsidiary bank's capital and surplus and, as to all affiliates combined, to 20% of each bank's capital and surplus. Furthermore, within the foregoing limitations as to amount, each extension of credit or certain other credit exposures must meet specified collateral requirements. These limits apply to any transaction with a third party if the proceeds of the transaction benefit an affiliate of a bank. Our subsidiary banks are forbidden to purchase low quality assets from an affiliate.

Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, among other things, prohibits a bank from engaging in certain transactions with certain affiliates unless the transactions are on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to such bank or its subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with or involving other nonaffiliated companies. If there are no comparable transactions, a bank's (or one of its subsidiaries') affiliate transaction must be on terms and under circumstances, including credit standards, that in good faith would be offered to, or would apply to, nonaffiliated companies. These requirements apply to all transactions subject to Section 23A as well as to certain other transactions.

The affiliates of a bank include any holding company of the bank, any other company under common control with the bank (including any company controlled by the same shareholders who control the bank), any subsidiary of the bank that is itself a bank, any company in which the majority of the directors or trustees also constitute a majority of the directors or trustees of the bank or holding company of the bank, any company sponsored and advised on a contractual basis by the bank or an affiliate, and any mutual fund advised by a bank or any of the bank's affiliates. Regulation W generally excludes all non-bank and non-savings association subsidiaries of banks from treatment as affiliates,

except for subsidiaries engaged in certain nonbank financial activities or to the extent that the Federal Reserve decides to treat these subsidiaries as affiliates.

Each of our subsidiary banks is also subject to certain restrictions on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, certain principal shareholders, and their related interests. Extensions of credit include derivative transactions, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions to the extent that such transactions cause a bank to have credit exposure to an insider. Any extension of credit to an insider:

In addition, none of our subsidiary banks may purchase an asset from or sell an asset to an insider unless the transaction is on market terms and, if representing more than 10% of capital, is approved in advance by the majority of disinterested directors.

Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank, as Michigan state-chartered banks, have authority under Michigan law to establish branches throughout Michigan and in any state, the District of Columbia, any U.S. territory or protectorate, and foreign countries, subject to the receipt of all required regulatory approvals. Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes a state or national bank to branch into any state as if they were chartered in that state.

Under amendments to the Bank Holding Company Act and Federal Reserve regulations, a bank is prohibited from engaging in certain tying or reciprocity arrangements with its customers. In general, a bank may not extend credit, lease, sell property, or furnish any services or fix or vary the consideration for these on the condition that:

Certain arrangements are permissible: a bank may offer combined-balance products and may otherwise offer more favorable terms if a customer obtains two or more traditional bank products; and certain foreign transactions are exempt from the general rule. A bank holding company or any bank affiliate also is subject to anti-tying requirements in connection with electronic benefit transfer services.

The Community Reinvestment Act requires a financial institution's primary regulator, which is the FDIC for Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank, to evaluate the record of each financial institution in meeting the credit needs of its local communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. These factors are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions and applications to open a branch or facility. Failure to adequately meet these criteria could result in the imposition of additional requirements and limitations on the institution. Additionally, the institution must publicly disclose the terms of various Community Reinvestment Act-related agreements. In their most recent CRA examinations, each of Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank received "satisfactory" ratings.

Activities of our bank subsidiaries are subject to a variety of statutes and regulations designed to protect consumers. Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by our bank subsidiaries are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. The loan operations of our bank subsidiaries are also subject to federal laws and regulations applicable to credit transactions, such as:

The deposit operations of our bank subsidiaries are also subject to federal laws, such as:

Our subsidiary banks and each of their respective "institution-affiliated parties," including their respective management, employees, agents, independent contractors, and consultants such as attorneys and accountants and others who participate in the conduct of the financial institution's affairs, are subject to potential civil and criminal penalties for violations of law, regulations or written orders of a government agency. These practices can include the failure of an institution to timely file required reports or the filing of false or misleading information or the submission of inaccurate reports. Civil

penalties may be as high as $1,375,000 a day for certain violations. Criminal penalties for some financial institution crimes have been increased to 20 years.

In addition, regulators are provided with considerable flexibility to commence enforcement actions against institutions and institution-affiliated parties. Possible enforcement actions include the termination of deposit insurance. Furthermore, banking agencies have expansive power to issue cease-and-desist orders. These orders may, among other things, require affirmative action to correct any harm resulting from a violation or practice, including restitution, reimbursement, indemnifications or guarantees against loss. A financial institution may also be ordered to restrict its growth, dispose of certain assets, rescind agreements or contracts or take other actions as determined by the ordering agency to be appropriate.

The number of government entities authorized to take action against our bank subsidiaries has expanded under the Dodd-Frank Act. The FDIC continues to have primary enforcement authority over Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank. In addition, the CFPB also has back-up enforcement authority with respect to the consumer protection statutes above. Specifically, the CFPB may request reports from and conduct limited examinations of our bank subsidiaries in conducting investigations involving the consumer protection statutes. Further, state attorneys general may bring civil actions or other proceedings under the Dodd-Frank Act or regulations against state-chartered banks, including Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank. Prior notice to the CFPB and the FDIC would be necessary for an action against Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank. The CFPB may intervene in any of these actions.

Financial institutions must maintain anti-money laundering programs that include established internal policies, procedures and controls; a designated compliance officer; an ongoing employee training program; and testing of the program by an independent audit function. Financial institutions are prohibited from entering into specified financial transactions and account relationships and must meet enhanced standards for due diligence and "knowing your customer" in their dealings with foreign financial institutions, foreign customers and other high risk customers. Financial institutions must take reasonable steps to conduct enhanced scrutiny of account relationships to guard against money laundering and to report any suspicious transactions. Recent laws provide law enforcement authorities with increased access to financial information maintained by banks. Anti-money laundering obligations have been substantially strengthened as a result of the USA PATRIOT Act, enacted in 2001 and renewed through 2015, as described below. Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations, and this area has become a particular focus of the regulators in recent years. In addition, the regulators are required to consider compliance in connection with the regulatory review of applications. In recent years, a handful of merger and acquisition transactions have been held up because of regulatory concerns about compliance with anti-money laundering requirements. The regulatory authorities have been active in imposing "cease and desist" orders and money penalty sanctions against institutions found to be violating these obligations.

The USA PATRIOT Act became effective on October 26, 2001 and amended the Bank Secrecy Act. The USA PATRIOT Act provides, in part, for the facilitation of information sharing among governmental entities and financial institutions for the purpose of combating terrorism and money laundering by enhancing anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws, as well as enhanced information collection tools and enforcement mechanisms for the U.S. government, including:

The USA PATRIOT Act requires financial institutions to undertake enhanced due diligence of private bank accounts or correspondent accounts for non-U.S. persons that they administer, maintain, or manage. Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations and are required to consider compliance in connection with the regulatory review of applications.

Under the USA PATRIOT Act, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network ("FinCEN") can send our subsidiary banks lists of the names of persons suspected of involvement in terrorist activities or money laundering. Each of our subsidiary banks may be requested to search their respective records for any relationships or transactions with persons on those lists. If the subsidiary bank finds any relationships or transactions, it must report those relationships or transactions to FinCEN.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"), which is an office in the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is responsible for helping to ensure that U.S. entities do not engage in transactions with "enemies" of the United States, as defined by various Executive Orders and Acts of Congress. OFAC publishes lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts; owned or controlled by, or acting on behalf of target countries, and narcotics traffickers. If a bank finds a name on any transaction, account or wire transfer that is on an OFAC list, it must freeze or block the transactions on the account. Each of our subsidiary banks has appointed a compliance officer to oversee the inspection of its accounts and the filing of any notifications. Each of our subsidiary banks actively checks high-risk OFAC areas such as new accounts, wire transfers and customer files. These checks are performed using software that is updated each time a modification is made to the lists provided by OFAC and other agencies of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons.

Financial institutions are required to protect the confidentiality of the non-public personal information of individual customers and to disclose their policies for doing so. Customers generally may prevent financial institutions from sharing nonpublic personal financial information with nonaffiliated third parties except under narrow circumstances, such as the processing of transactions requested by the consumer or when the financial institution is jointly sponsoring a product or service with a nonaffiliated third party. Additionally, financial institutions generally may not disclose consumer account numbers to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing to consumers. Each of our subsidiary bank's policy is not to disclose any personal information unless permitted by law.

Recent cyber attacks against bank and other institutions that resulted in unauthorized access to confidential customer information have prompted the Federal banking agencies to issue extensive guidance on cyber security. The agencies are likely to devote more resources to this party of their safety and soundness examination than they may have in the past.

Like other lending institutions, our subsidiary banks use credit bureau data in their respective underwriting activities. Use of that data is regulated under the Federal Credit Reporting Act on a uniform, nationwide basis. The act and its implementing regulation, Regulation V, cover credit reporting, prescreening, sharing of information between affiliates, and the use of credit data. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 allows states to enact identity theft laws that are not inconsistent with the conduct required by the provisions of the act.

The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. While there are various legal and regulatory limitations under federal and state law on the extent to which our subsidiary banks can pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to the Company, the principal source of the Company's cash revenues is dividends from our subsidiary banks. The relevant federal and state regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit a bank or bank holding company, which would include the Company and our subsidiary banks, from engaging in what, in the opinion of the regulatory body, constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business. The payment of dividends could, depending upon the financial condition of the subsidiary, be deemed to constitute an unsafe or unsound practice in conducting its business.

Under Michigan law, a Michigan state-chartered bank, including Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank, cannot declare or pay a cash dividend or dividend in kind unless such bank will have a surplus amounting to not less than 20% of its capital after payment of the dividend. In addition, Michigan state-chartered banks may pay dividends only out of net income then on hand, after deducting its bad debts. Further, Michigan state-chartered banks may not declare or pay a dividend until cumulative dividends on preferred stock, if any, are paid in full. These limitations can affect Talmer Bank's and Talmer West Bank's ability to pay dividends. Under the terms of the Consent Order, Talmer West Bank is prohibited from paying dividends without the prior written approval of the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services.

The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act gives "substitute checks," such as a digital image of a check and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check. Some of the major provisions include:

Our earnings are affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary policies of the United States government and its agencies. The Federal Open Market Committee's monetary policies have had, and are likely to continue to have, an important effect on the operating results of commercial banks. These policies have major effects on the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits through the Federal Reserve's open market operations in United States government securities and through its regulation of the discount rate on borrowings of member banks and the reserve requirements against member bank deposits. We cannot predict the nature or effect of future changes in monetary policies.

The deposits of our subsidiary banks are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. The Dodd Frank Act permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings associations and credit unions to $250,000 per account. As insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of and to require reporting by FDIC insured institutions. It also may prohibit any FDIC insured institution from engaging in any activity the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious risk to the insurance fund.

FDIC insured institutions are required to pay a Financing Corporation assessment to fund the interest on bonds issued to resolve thrift failures in the 1980s. These assessments, which may be revised based upon the level of deposits, will continue until the bonds mature in the years 2017 through 2019.

The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository institution if it determines after a notice and hearing that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the permanent termination of insurance if the institution has no tangible capital. If insurance of accounts is terminated, the accounts at the institution at the time of the termination, less subsequent withdrawals, remain insured for a period of six months to two years, as determined by the FDIC.

New regulations and statutes are regularly proposed that contain wide-ranging provisions for altering the structures, regulations and competitive relationships of the nation's financial institutions. We cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed regulation or statute will be adopted or the extent to which our business may be affected by any new regulation or statute.

Our business is subject to certain risks, including those described below. If any of the events described in the following risk factors actually occurs, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. More detailed information concerning these risks is contained in other sections of this report, including "Business" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

A return of recessionary conditions could result in increases in our level of nonperforming loans and/or reduced demand for our products and services, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Economic recession or other economic problems, including those affecting our primary markets in Michigan and Ohio, and our other markets in Indiana, Illinois and Nevada, but also those affecting the U.S. or world economies, could have a material adverse impact on the demand for our products and services. Since the conclusion of the last recession, economic growth has been slow and uneven, and unemployment levels remain high. In addition, the values of real estate collateral supporting many commercial loans and home mortgages have declined and may continue to decline. If economic conditions deteriorate, or if there are negative developments affecting the domestic and international credit markets, the value of our loans and investments may be harmed, which in turn would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and the price of our common stock.

Our strategic growth plan contemplates additional acquisitions, which could expose us to additional risks.

Since April 2010, we have completed seven acquisitions and continue to periodically evaluate opportunities to acquire additional financial institutions, including purchases of failed banks from the FDIC. As a result, we may engage in acquisitions and other transactions that could have a material effect on our operating results and financial condition, including short and long-term liquidity.

Our acquisition activities could require us to use a substantial amount of cash, other liquid assets, and/or incur debt. In addition, if goodwill recorded in connection with our potential future acquisitions were determined to be impaired, then we would be required to recognize a charge against our earnings, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations during the period in which the impairment was recognized.

Our acquisition activities could involve a number of additional risks, including the risks of:

We may be exposed to difficulties in combining the operations of acquired institutions into our own operations, which may prevent us from achieving the expected benefits from our acquisition activities.

We may not be able to fully achieve the strategic objectives and operating efficiencies that we anticipate in our acquisition activities. Inherent uncertainties exist in integrating the operations of an acquired institution. In addition, the markets in which we and our potential acquisition targets operate are highly competitive. We may lose customers or the customers of an acquired institution as a result of an acquisition. We also may lose key personnel from the acquired institution as a result of an acquisition. We may not discover all known and unknown factors when examining an institution for acquisition during the due diligence period. These factors could produce unintended and unexpected consequences. Undiscovered factors as a result of an acquisition could bring civil, criminal and financial liabilities against us, our management and the management of the institutions we acquire. These factors could contribute to our not achieving the expected benefits from our acquisitions within desired time frames, if at all.

Michigan Commerce Bank was subject to a Consent Order issued by its regulators on April 5, 2010 that requires it to take specified actions, and the Consent Order remains in effect following the consummation of our acquisition of Michigan Commerce Bank, now Talmer West Bank, on January 1, 2014.

On April 5, 2010, Michigan Commerce Bank consented to the issuance of a Consent Order by the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services, which remains in effect following our acquisition of Michigan Commerce Bank, now Talmer West Bank, on January 1, 2014. Our failure to comply with the terms of the Consent Order could result in significant enforcement actions against us, up to and including a regulatory takeover of Talmer West Bank, which comprises a significant portion of our business. Under the terms of the Consent Order, Talmer West Bank is required to take certain actions, including, among other things: assessing and retaining qualified management; achieving and maintaining specified capital ratios; reducing certain classified assets, including the charge-off of loans classified "loss;" reviewing the allowance for loan and lease losses

policy; implementing a comprehensive profit plan and budget; implementing a plan to manage concentrations of credit; and revising the bank's policies governing interest rate risk.

The Consent Order also prohibits Talmer West Bank, without prior regulatory approval, from:

Talmer West Bank's regulators have considerable discretion in whether to grant required approvals, and we may not be able to obtain those approvals if requested. Until we achieve compliance with the Consent Order and the Consent Order is lifted, we will have higher operating expenses and we will not fully recognize anticipated cost savings and synergies related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, all of which will adversely affect our financial performance.

Decreased residential mortgage origination, volume and pricing decisions of competitors may adversely affect our profitability.

We currently operate a residential mortgage business. Changes in interest rates and pricing decisions by our loan competitors may adversely affect demand for our residential mortgage loan products, the revenue realized on the sale of loans and revenues received from servicing such loans for others, and ultimately reduce our net income. New regulations, increased regulatory reviews, and/or changes in the structure of the secondary mortgage markets which we would utilize to sell mortgage loans may be introduced and may increase costs and make it more difficult to operate a residential mortgage origination business.

We have recognized significant income from bargain purchase gains in connection with our acquisitions that may be non-recurring in future periods.

In connection with our four FDIC-assisted acquisitions and our acquisitions of First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank, we recorded pre-tax bargain purchase gains totaling an aggregate of $206.9 million. These gains were included as a component of noninterest income in our statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011, 2013 and 2014. The amount of each bargain purchase gain recorded for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2011, 2013 and 2014 was equal to the amount by which the fair value of the assets purchased in the applicable acquisition exceeded the fair value of the liabilities assumed and any consideration paid. The bargain purchase gain recorded in connection with each acquisition is a one-time extraordinary gain and would only be repeated in the event that we consummated future acquisitions where the fair value of the assets purchased exceeded the fair value of the liabilities assumed and any consideration paid. If market conditions improve, the bidding process for banks could become more competitive, and the increased competition may make it more difficult for us to acquire banks in transactions that generate bargain purchase gains, or at all. If we are unable to generate bargain purchase gains in future acquisitions or if we are unable to offset such income with other sources of income, our financial condition and earnings may be adversely affected.

Our business is subject to interest rate risk, and fluctuations in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings and capital levels and overall results.

The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature and, as a result, we are subject to significant risk from changes in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect our net interest income as well as the valuation of our assets and liabilities. Our earnings depend significantly on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as

loans and securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. We expect to periodically experience "gaps" in the interest rate sensitivities of our assets and liabilities, meaning that either our interest-bearing liabilities will be more sensitive to changes in market interest rates than our interest-earning assets, or vice versa. In either event, if market interest rates move contrary to our position, this "gap" may work against us, and our earnings may be adversely affected.

An increase in the general level of interest rates may also, among other things, adversely affect the demand for loans and our ability to originate loans. Conversely, a decrease in the general level of interest rates, among other things, may lead to prepayments on our loan and mortgage-backed securities portfolios and increased competition for deposits. Accordingly, changes in the general level of market interest rates may adversely affect our net yield on interest-earning assets, loan origination volume and our overall results.

Although our asset-liability management strategy is designed to control and mitigate exposure to the risks related to changes in the general level of market interest rates, those rates are affected by many factors outside of our control, including inflation, recession, unemployment, money supply, international disorder, instability in domestic and foreign financial markets and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, particularly the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (the "Federal Reserve"). Adverse changes in the U.S. monetary policy or in economic conditions could materially and adversely affect us. We may not be able to accurately predict the likelihood, nature and magnitude of those changes or how and to what extent they may affect our business. We also may not be able to adequately prepare for or compensate for the consequences of such changes. Any failure to predict and prepare for changes in interest rates or adjust for the consequences of these changes may adversely affect our earnings and capital levels and overall results.

Our mortgage banking profitability could significantly decline if we are not able to originate and resell a high volume of mortgage loans.

Mortgage production, especially refinancing activity, declines in rising interest rate environments. While we have been experiencing historically low and further declining interest rates throughout 2014 and into early 2015, this low interest rate environment likely will not continue indefinitely. Further, despite the favorable interest rate environment that we have operated under throughout 2014, our mortgage origination volume has dropped by approximately 50% during 2014 compared to the prior year, and we expect these comparatively lower, yet stabilized, volume levels to continue for the immediate future, particularly since we exited the wholesale lending market during the fourth quarter of 2013. Moreover, when interest rates increase further, there can be no assurance that our mortgage production will continue at current levels. Because we sell a substantial portion of the mortgage loans we originate, the profitability of our mortgage banking business also depends in large part on our ability to aggregate a high volume of loans and sell them in the secondary market at a gain. In the face of a favorable interest rate environment in 2014, our marketing gain percentage for mortgage loans sold increased marginally throughout 2014 compared to the prior year, a trend which we expect to continue in 2015, provided the continuation of a lower interest rate market. Thus, in addition to our dependence on the interest rate environment, we are dependent upon (i) the existence of an active secondary market and (ii) our ability to profitably sell loans or securities into that market. If our level of mortgage production declines, the profitability will depend upon our ability to reduce our costs commensurate with the reduction of revenue from our mortgage operations.

Our ability to originate and sell mortgage loans readily is dependent upon the availability of an active secondary market for single-family mortgage loans, which in turn depends in part upon the continuation of programs currently offered by government-sponsored entities ("GSEs") and other institutional and non-institutional investors. These entities account for a substantial portion of the secondary market in residential mortgage loans. Because the largest participants in the secondary

market are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, GSEs whose activities are governed by federal law, any future changes in laws that significantly affect the activity of these GSEs could, in turn, adversely affect our operations. In September 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into conservatorship by the U.S. government. The federal government has for many years considered proposals to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but the results of any such reform, and their impact on us, are difficult to predict. To date, no reform proposal has been enacted.

In addition, our ability to sell mortgage loans readily is dependent upon our ability to remain eligible for the programs offered by the GSEs and other institutional and non-institutional investors. Any significant impairment of our eligibility with any of the GSEs could materially and adversely affect our operations. Further, the criteria for loans to be accepted under such programs may be changed from time to time by the sponsoring entity, which could result in a lower volume of corresponding loan originations. The profitability of participating in specific programs may vary depending on a number of factors, including our administrative costs of originating and purchasing qualifying loans and our costs of meeting such criteria.

The geographic concentration of our core markets in Michigan and Ohio makes our business highly susceptible to downturns in these local economies and depressed banking markets, which could materially and adversely affect us.

Unlike larger financial institutions that are more geographically diversified, we are a regional banking franchise concentrated in Michigan and Ohio. We operate banking centers located in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Nevada. At December 31, 2014, prior to our acquisition of Signature Bank, approximately 50.0% of our loans were to borrowers located in Michigan, 22.0% were to borrowers located in Ohio, 7.0% were to borrowers located in Illinois and 4.0% were to borrowers located in Indiana, 4.0% were to borrowers located in Wisconsin and 3.0% were to borrowers located in Nevada. A deterioration in economic conditions in the loan or residential or commercial real estate markets in these areas could have a material adverse effect on the quality of our portfolio, the demand for our products and services, the ability of borrowers to timely repay loans and the value of the collateral securing loans. In addition, if the population, employment or income growth in one of our core markets is negative or slower than projected, income levels, deposits and real estate development could be adversely impacted and we could be materially and adversely affected.

To the extent that we are unable to identify and consummate attractive acquisitions, or increase loans through organic loan growth, we may be unable to successfully implement our growth strategy, which could materially and adversely affect us.

We intend to continue to grow our business through strategic acquisitions of banking franchises coupled with organic loan growth. Previous availability of attractive acquisition targets may not be indicative of future acquisition opportunities, and we may be unable to identify any acquisition targets that meet our investment objectives. As our acquired loan portfolio, which produces higher yields than our originated loans due to loan discount accretion on our purchased credit impaired loan portfolio (a component of the accretable yield), is paid down, we expect downward pressure on our income to the extent that the run-off is not replaced with other high-yielding loans. The accretable yield represents the excess of the net present value of expected future cash flows over the acquisition date fair value and includes both the expected coupon of the loan and the discount accretion. For example, the total loan yield for the year ended December 31, 2014 was 5.77%, while the yield generated using only the expected coupon would have been 4.69% during the same period. As a result of the foregoing, if we are unable to replace loans in our existing portfolio with comparable high-yielding loans or a larger volume of loans, we could be adversely affected. We could also be materially and adversely affected if we choose to pursue riskier higher-yielding loans that fail to perform.

Because we intend to make acquisitions that involve distressed assets, we may not be able to realize the value we predict from these assets or make sufficient provision for future losses in the value of, or accurately estimate the future writedowns to be taken in respect of, these assets.

Delinquencies and losses in the loan portfolios and other assets we acquire may exceed our initial forecasts developed during our due diligence investigation prior to their acquisition and, thus, produce lower risk-adjusted returns than we believed our purchase price supported. Furthermore, our due diligence investigation may not reveal all material issues. The diligence process in FDIC-assisted transactions is also expedited due to the short acquisition timeline that is typical for these transactions. If, during the diligence process, we fail to identify all relevant issues related to an acquisition, we may be forced to later write down or write off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in significant losses. Any of these events could materially and adversely affect us. Current economic conditions have created an uncertain environment with respect to asset valuations and there is no certainty that we will be able to sell assets or institutions after we acquire them if we determine it would be in our best interests to do so. In addition, currently there is limited or no liquidity for certain asset classes we hold, including commercial real estate and construction and development loans.

We depend on our executive officers and other key individuals to continue the implementation of our long-term business strategy and could be harmed by the loss of their services.

We believe that our continued growth and future success will depend in large part on the skills of our management team and our ability to motivate and retain these individuals and other key individuals. In particular, we rely on the leadership and experience in the banking industry of our Chief Executive Officer, David Provost. The loss of service of Mr. Provost or one or more of our other executive officers or key personnel could reduce our ability to successfully implement our long-term business strategy, our business could suffer and the value of our common stock could be materially adversely affected. Leadership changes will occur from time to time and we cannot predict whether significant resignations will occur or whether we will be able to recruit additional qualified personnel. We believe our management team possesses valuable knowledge about the banking industry and that their knowledge and relationships would be very difficult to replicate. Although Mr. Provost has entered into an employment agreement with us, it is possible that we or Mr. Provost may not renew the agreement, which automatically renews for successive one-year terms unless notice of termination is given by either party. Our success also depends on the experience of our branch managers and lending officers and on their relationships with the customers and communities they serve. The loss of key personnel, or the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Our success is dependent upon our management team, which may be unable to successfully implement their proposed business strategy.

Our success is largely dependent upon the ability of our management team to execute our business strategy. Our management team will need to, among other things:

Failure to achieve these strategic goals could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategies and could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Competitive and regulatory dynamics may make FDIC-assisted acquisition opportunities unacceptable to us.

Our business strategy includes the consideration of potential acquisitions of failing banks that the FDIC plans to place in receivership. The FDIC may not place banks that meet our strategic objectives into receivership. Failed bank transactions are attractive opportunities in part because of loss-sharing arrangements with the FDIC that limit the acquirer's downside risk on the purchased loan portfolio and, apart from our assumption of deposit liabilities, we have significant discretion as to the non-deposit liabilities that we assume. In addition, assets purchased from the FDIC are marked to their fair value and in many cases there is little or no addition to goodwill arising from an FDIC-assisted transaction.

The bidding process for failing banks in our desired markets has become very competitive, and the increased competition may make it more difficult for us to bid on terms we consider to be acceptable. Our prior acquisitions should be viewed in the context of the recent opportunities available to us as a result of the confluence of our access to capital at a time when market dislocations of historical proportions resulted in attractive asset acquisition opportunities.

Additionally, pursuant to the FDIC Policy Statement on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions, we are subject to significant regulatory burdens as a result of having previously acquired failed banks. For specific details of these requirements and restrictions see "Supervision and Regulation—Bank Regulation—FDIC Statement of Policy on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions." The FDIC has informed us that these requirements and restrictions of the FDIC Policy Statement could be extended or reinstated if we complete additional failed bank acquisitions. As a result, prior to pursing any failed bank acquisition, we would consult closely with the FDIC prior to making a bid for a failed bank. It is possible that these regulatory burdens would make the failed bank acquisition undesirable and we would not place a bid. As economic and regulatory conditions change, we may be unable to execute this aspect of our growth strategy, which could impact our future earnings, reputation and results of operations.

If Talmer Bank, the Company and certain of our shareholders are not in compliance with the applicable provisions of the FDIC Policy Statement on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions, we may be unable to bid on failed institutions in the future.

As the agency responsible for resolving the failure of banks, the FDIC has discretion to determine whether a party is qualified to bid on a failed institution. The FDIC's Policy Statement on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions imposes restrictions and requirements on certain institutions—including us and our bank subsidiary—and their investors. Unless we, together with all of our investors who have agreed to become subject to the FDIC Policy Statement are then in compliance with the FDIC Policy Statement, the FDIC may not permit us to bid on failed institutions.

The FDIC Policy Statement imposes the following restrictions and requirements, among others. First, Talmer Bank was required to maintain a ratio of Tier 1 common equity to total assets of at least 10% for a period of three years, and thereafter must maintain a capital level sufficient to be well capitalized under regulatory standards during the remaining period of ownership of the investors covered by the FDIC Policy Statement ("covered investors"). Our most recent failed bank acquisition closed on April 29, 2011 and, therefore, our heightened capital requirement expired on April 29, 2014. Second, covered investors that collectively own 80% or more of two or more depository institutions are required to pledge to the FDIC their proportionate interests in each institution to indemnify the FDIC

against any losses it incurs in connection with the failure of one of the institutions. Third, Talmer Bank is prohibited from extending credit to our covered investors and to affiliates of our covered investors. Fourth, covered investors may not employ ownership structures that use entities domiciled in bank secrecy jurisdictions (which the FDIC has interpreted to apply to a wide range of non-U.S. jurisdictions). Fifth, covered investors generally were prohibited from selling or otherwise transferring shares of our common stock that they own for a three-year period, which expired on April 30, 2013. Sixth, covered investors may not employ complex and functionally opaque ownership structures to own a beneficial interest in our bank subsidiary. Seventh, covered investors may be required to provide information to the FDIC, such as with respect to the size of the capital fund or funds, their diversification, their return profiles, their marketing documents, their management teams, and their business models. We believe that we are in compliance with each of the requirements of the FDIC Policy Statement applicable to us. The FDIC has informed us that if we acquire additional failed banks, it would review the matter closely to determine whether certain of the restrictions and requirements of the FDIC Policy Statement would be extended or reinstated. Given the capital and shareholder burdens associated with such restrictions and requirements, it is possible that we would choose not to bid on the failed bank.

We may be terminated as a servicer of mortgage loans, be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or reimburse investors for credit losses on a mortgage loan, or incur costs, liabilities, fines and other sanctions if we fail to satisfy our servicing obligations, including our obligations with respect to mortgage loan foreclosure actions.

We act as servicer for approximately $7.3 billion of residential and commercial loans owned by third parties as of December 31, 2014. As a servicer for those loans we have certain contractual obligations, including foreclosing on defaulted mortgage loans or, to the extent applicable, considering alternatives to foreclosure such as loan modifications or short sales. If we commit a material breach of our obligations as servicer, we may be subject to termination if the breach is not cured within a specified period of time following notice, causing us to lose servicing income.

For certain investors and/or certain transactions, we may be contractually obligated to repurchase a mortgage loan or reimburse the investor for credit losses incurred on the loan as a remedy for servicing errors with respect to the loan. If we have increased repurchase obligations because of claims that we did not satisfy our obligations as a servicer, or increased loss severity on such repurchases, we may have a significant reduction to net servicing income within our mortgage banking noninterest income. We may incur costs if we are required to, or if we elect to, re-execute or re-file documents or take other action in our capacity as a servicer in connection with pending or completed foreclosures. We may incur litigation costs if the validity of a foreclosure action is challenged by a borrower. If a court were to overturn a foreclosure because of errors or deficiencies in the foreclosure process, we may have liability to the borrower and/or to any title insurer of the property sold in foreclosure if the required process was not followed. These costs and liabilities may not be legally or otherwise reimbursable to us. In addition, if certain documents required for a foreclosure action are missing or defective, we could be obligated to cure the defect or repurchase the loan. We may incur liability to securitization investors relating to delays or deficiencies in our processing of mortgage assignments or other documents necessary to comply with state law governing foreclosures. The fair value of our mortgage servicing rights may be negatively affected to the extent our servicing costs increase because of higher foreclosure costs. We may be subject to fines and other sanctions imposed by federal or state regulators as a result of actual or perceived deficiencies in our foreclosure practices or in the foreclosure practices of other mortgage loan servicers. Any of these actions may harm our reputation or negatively affect our home lending or servicing business.

We may be required to repurchase mortgage loans or indemnify buyers against losses in some circumstances, which could harm our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition.

When mortgage loans are sold, whether as whole loans or pursuant to a securitization, we are required to make customary representations and warranties to purchasers, guarantors and insurers, including the GSEs, about the mortgage loans and the manner in which they were originated. Whole loan sale agreements require repurchase or substitute mortgage loans, or indemnify buyers against losses, in the event we breach these representations or warranties. In addition, we may be required to repurchase mortgage loans as a result of early payment default of the borrower on a mortgage loan. With respect to loans that are originated through our broker or correspondent channels, the remedies available against the originating broker or correspondent, if any, may not be as broad as the remedies available to purchasers, guarantors and insurers of mortgage loans against us. We face further risk that the originating broker or correspondent, if any, may not have financial capacity to perform remedies that otherwise may be available. Therefore, if a purchaser, guarantor or insurer enforces its remedies against us, we may not be able to recover losses from the originating broker or correspondent. If repurchase and indemnity demands increase and such demands are valid claims and are in excess of our provision for potential losses, our liquidity, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

If we fail to effectively manage credit risk and interest rate risk, our business and financial condition will suffer.

We must effectively manage credit risk. There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks relating to proper loan underwriting and guidelines, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers and risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral. In addition, a primary component of our strategy is to grow our middle market and small business lending activity and to increase retail lending activity. There is no assurance that our credit risk monitoring and loan approval procedures are or will be adequate or will reduce the inherent risks associated with lending. Our credit administration personnel, policies and procedures may not adequately adapt to changes in economic or any other conditions affecting customers and the quality of our loan portfolio. Any failure to manage such credit risks may materially adversely affect our business and our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

We must also effectively manage interest rate risk. Because mortgage loans typically have much longer maturities than deposits or other types of funding, rising interest rates can raise the cost of funding relative to the value of the mortgage. We manage this risk in part by holding adjustable rate mortgages in portfolios and through other means. Conversely, the value of our mortgage servicing assets may fall when interest rates fall, as borrowers refinance into lower-yield loans. Given current rates, material reductions in rates may not be probable, but as rates rise, then the risk increases. There can be no assurance that we will successfully manage the lending and servicing businesses through all future interest-rate environments.

If our allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments with respect to acquired loans is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings will be adversely affected.

We are exposed to the risk that our customers may not repay their loans according to their terms, and the collateral securing the payment of these loans may be insufficient to fully compensate us for the outstanding balance of the loan plus the costs to dispose of the collateral. As a result, we may experience significant loan losses that may have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses in an attempt to cover loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio. In addition, as we increase our loan origination, the percentage of our loan portfolio not covered by FDIC loss share agreements will increase. As such, the long-term success of our business will be largely attributable to the quality of our assets, particularly newly-originated loans. In determining the size of the allowance, we rely on an analysis of our loan portfolio, our experience and our evaluation of general economic conditions. We also make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the diversification in our loan portfolio, the effect of changes in the economy on real estate and other collateral values, the results of recent regulatory examinations, the effects on the loan portfolio of current economic indicators and their probable impact on borrowers, the amount of charge-offs for the period and the amount of non-performing loans and related collateral security.

The application of the acquisition method of accounting in our acquisitions has impacted our allowance for loan losses. Under the acquisition method of accounting, all acquired loans were recorded in our consolidated financial statements at their fair value at the time of acquisition and the related allowance for loan loss was eliminated because credit quality, among other factors, was considered in the determination of fair value. To the extent that our estimates of fair value are too high, we will incur losses (some of which may be covered by our loss sharing arrangements with the FDIC) associated with the acquired loans. The allowance associated with our purchased credit impaired loans reflects deterioration in cash flows since acquisition resulting from our quarterly re-estimation of cash flows which involves complex cash flow projections and significant judgment on timing of loan resolution.

If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our current allowance may not be sufficient, and adjustments may be necessary to allow for different economic conditions or adverse developments in our loan portfolio. Material additions to the allowance for loan losses would materially decrease our net income and adversely affect our financial condition generally. In addition, federal regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different from our management's. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs required by these regulatory agencies could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

We are exposed to higher credit risk by commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and real estate construction lending.

Commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and real estate construction lending usually involve higher credit risks than single-family residential lending. As of December 31, 2014, the following loan types accounted for the stated percentages of our total loan portfolio: commercial real estate—35.2%, commercial and industrial—21.2%, and real estate construction—3.3%. As of December 31, 2014, of these loans, 9.0% are covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC. These types of loans involve larger loan balances to a single borrower or groups of related borrowers.

Commercial real estate loans may be affected to a greater extent than residential loans by adverse conditions in real estate markets or the economy because commercial real estate borrowers' ability to repay their loans depends on successful development of their properties, in addition to the factors affecting residential real estate borrowers. These loans also involve greater risk because they generally are not fully amortizing over the loan period, but have a balloon payment due at maturity. A borrower's ability to make a balloon payment typically will depend on being able to either refinance the loan or sell the underlying property in a timely manner.

Commercial and industrial loans are typically based on the borrowers' ability to repay the loans from the cash flow of their businesses. These loans may involve greater risk because the availability of funds to repay each loan depends substantially on the success of the business itself. In addition, the

assets securing the loans have the following characteristics: (a) they depreciate over time, (b) they are difficult to appraise and liquidate, and (c) they fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.

Risk of loss on a real estate construction loan depends largely upon whether our initial estimate of the property's value at completion of construction equals or exceeds the cost of the property construction (including interest), the availability of permanent take-out financing and the builder's ability to ultimately sell the property. During the construction phase, a number of factors can result in delays and cost overruns. If estimates of value are inaccurate or if actual construction costs exceed estimates, the value of the property securing the loan may be insufficient to ensure full repayment when completed through a permanent loan or by seizure of collateral.

Commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and real estate construction loans are more susceptible to a risk of loss during a downturn in the business cycle. Our underwriting, review and monitoring cannot eliminate all of the risks related to these loans.

At December 31, 2014, our outstanding commercial real estate loans were equal to 207.8% of our total risk-based capital. The banking regulators are giving commercial real estate lending greater scrutiny, and may require banks with higher levels of commercial real estate loans to implement improved underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as possibly higher levels of allowances for losses and capital levels as a result of commercial real estate lending growth and exposures.

We may not be able to retain or develop a strong core deposit base or other low-cost funding sources.

We depend on checking, savings and money market deposit account balances and other forms of customer deposits as our primary source of funding for our lending activities. Our future growth will largely depend on our ability to retain and grow a strong deposit base. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain core deposits, to obtain third party financing on favorable terms, or to have access to interbank or other liquidity sources, our cost of funds will increase, adversely affecting the ability to generate the funds necessary for lending operations, reducing net interest margin and negatively affecting results of operations. We derive liquidity through core deposit growth, maturity of money market investments, and maturity and sale of investment securities and loans. Additionally, we have access to financial market borrowing sources on an unsecured and a collateralized basis for both short-term and long-term purposes including, but not limited to, the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Banks, of which we are a member. If these funding sources are not sufficient or available, we may have to acquire funds through higher-cost sources.

Changes in local economic conditions where we operate could have a negative effect.

Our success depends significantly on growth, or lack thereof, in population, income levels, deposits and housing starts in the geographic markets in which we operate. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on our commercial, real estate and construction loans, the ability of borrowers to repay these loans, and the value of the collateral securing these loans. Unlike financial institutions that are more geographically diversified, we are a regional banking franchise. Adverse changes in, and further deterioration of, the economic conditions of the Midwest United States in general or in our primary markets in Michigan and Ohio, our other markets in Indiana and Illinois or any one or more of our local markets could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and profitability. A continuing deterioration in economic conditions could result in the following consequences, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business:

We face strong competition for customers, which could prevent us from obtaining customers or may cause us to pay higher interest rates to attract customer deposits.

The banking business is highly competitive, and we experience competition in our markets from many other financial institutions. Customer loyalty can be easily influenced by a competitor's new products, especially offerings that could provide cost savings or a higher return to the customer. Moreover, this competitive industry could become even more competitive as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. We compete with commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds and other mutual funds, as well as super-regional, national and international financial institutions that operate offices in our primary market areas and elsewhere.

We compete with these institutions both in attracting deposits and in making loans. In addition, we have to attract our customer base from other existing financial institutions and from new residents. Many of our competitors are well-established, larger financial institutions that may have higher lending limits. Because we will have a lower lending limit than some of our competitors it may discourage borrowers with lending needs that exceed those limits from doing business with us. While we may try to serve these borrowers by selling loan participations to other financial institutions, this strategy may not succeed in this current market because the number of institutions that are willing to act as loan participants is decreasing. We also compete with local community banks in our market. We may not be able to compete successfully with other financial institutions in our market, and we may have to pay higher interest rates to attract deposits, accept lower yields on loans to attract loans and pay higher wages for new employees, resulting in reduced profitability. In addition, competitors that are not depository institutions are generally not subject to the extensive regulations that apply to us.

We may also face a competitive disadvantage as a result of our relatively smaller size, lack of significant geographic diversification beyond the Midwest United States and the States of Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois and inability to spread our operating costs across a broader market.

Our deposit insurance premiums could be substantially higher in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our future earnings.

The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC-insured depository institutions, such as our subsidiary banks, up to $250,000 per account. The amount of a particular institution's deposit insurance assessment is based on that institution's risk classification under an FDIC risk-based assessment system. An institution's risk classification is assigned based on its capital levels and the level of supervisory concern the institution poses to its regulators. Market developments and bank failures in 2008 and the following years significantly depleted the FDIC's Deposit Insurance Fund, and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits. As a result of these economic conditions and the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, banks are now assessed deposit insurance premiums based on the bank's average consolidated total assets, and the FDIC has modified certain risk-based adjustments which increase or decrease a bank's overall assessment rate. This has resulted in increases to the deposit insurance assessment rates and thus raised deposit premiums for many insured depository institutions. If these increases are insufficient for the Deposit Insurance Fund to meet its funding requirements, further special assessments or increases in deposit insurance premiums may be required. We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. If there are additional bank or financial institution failures, we may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently increased levels. If our financial condition deteriorates or if the bank regulators otherwise have supervisory concerns about us, then our assessments could rise. Any future additional assessments, increases or required prepayments in FDIC insurance premiums could reduce our profitability, may limit our ability to pursue certain business opportunities, or otherwise negatively impact our operations.

The accuracy of our financial statements and related disclosures could be affected if the judgments, assumptions or estimates used in our critical accounting policies are inaccurate.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosure in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our critical accounting policies, which are included in the section captioned "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this report, describe those significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements that we consider "critical" because they require judgments, assumptions and estimates that materially affect our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. As a result, if future events differ significantly from the judgments, assumptions and estimates in our critical accounting policies, those events or assumptions could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Any requested or required changes in how we determine the impact of loss share accounting on our financial information could have a material adverse effect on our reported results.

Our financial results are significantly affected by loss share accounting, which is driven by accounting rule interpretations, assumptions and judgments made by us, and subject to ongoing review by our accountants and the regulatory agencies to whom we report such information. Loss share accounting is a complex accounting methodology. Many of the decisions management makes regarding the application of this accounting methodology are subject to question or revision by our accountants and the various regulatory agencies to whom we report. As such, any financial information generated through the use of loss share accounting is subject to modification or change. Any significant modification or change in such information could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our previously reported results. In some cases, we could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in us restating prior period financial statements.

Our financial information reflects the application of purchase accounting. Any change in the assumptions used in such methodology could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We have acquired a significant majority of our assets and assumed a significant majority of our liabilities in our six acquisitions and our financial results are heavily influenced by the application of purchase accounting. Purchase accounting requires management to make assumptions regarding the assets purchased and liabilities assumed to determine their fair value at acquisition. If these assumptions are incorrect or our accountants or the regulatory agencies to whom we report do not concur with our judgments and require that we change or modify our assumptions, such change or modification could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations or our previously reported results.

The banking industry is heavily regulated and that regulation or future regulation could limit or restrict our activities and adversely affect our financial results.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and we are subject to examination, supervision, and comprehensive regulation by various federal and state agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services. Our compliance with banking regulations is costly and restricts some of our activities, including payment of dividends, mergers and acquisitions, investments, loans and interest rates and locations of offices. We are also subject to capitalization guidelines established by our regulators, which require us to maintain adequate capital to support our business, and, under the Consent Order, Talmer West Bank is subject to heightened capitalization requirements.

The burden of regulatory compliance has increased under current legislation and banking regulations and is likely to continue to have or may have a significant impact on the financial services industry. Recent legislative and regulatory changes, as well as changes in regulatory enforcement policies and capital adequacy guidelines, are increasing our costs of doing business and, as a result, may create an advantage for our competitors who may not be subject to similar legislative and regulatory requirements. In addition, future regulatory changes, including changes to regulatory capital requirements, could have an adverse impact on our future results. Furthermore, the federal and state bank regulatory authorities who supervise us have broad discretionary powers to take enforcement actions against banks for failure to comply with applicable regulations and laws. If we fail to comply with applicable laws or regulations, we could become subject to enforcement actions that have a material adverse effect on our future results.

We are periodically subject to examination and scrutiny by a number of banking agencies and, depending upon the findings and determinations of these agencies, we may be required to make adjustments to our business that could adversely affect us.

Federal and state banking agencies periodically conduct examinations of our business, including compliance with applicable laws and regulations. If, as a result of an examination, a banking agency were to determine that the financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, asset concentration, earnings prospects, management, liquidity sensitivity to market risk or other aspects of any of our operations has become unsatisfactory, or that we or our management are in violation of any law or regulation, or in the case of Talmer West Bank, the Consent Order, the banking agency could take a number of different remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin "unsafe or unsound" practices, to require affirmative actions to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth, to change the asset composition of our portfolio or balance sheet, to assess civil monetary penalties against our officers or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance. If we become subject to such regulatory actions, our business, results of operations and reputation may be negatively impacted.

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act, which imposes significant regulatory and compliance changes. The key effects of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business are:

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act restricts the ability of banks to engage in certain proprietary trading or to sponsor or invest in private equity or hedge funds. The Dodd-Frank Act also contains provisions designed to limit the ability of insured depository institutions, their holding companies and their affiliates to conduct certain swaps and derivatives activities and to take certain principal positions in financial instruments.

Some provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act became effective immediately upon its enactment. Many provisions, however, will require regulations to be promulgated by various federal agencies in order to be implemented, some but not all of which have been proposed or finalized by the applicable federal agencies. The provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act may have unintended effects, which will not be clear until after implementation. Certain changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of our business activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage requirements or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make any changes necessary to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements. Failure to comply with the new requirements may negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition. While we cannot predict what effect any presently contemplated or future changes in the laws or regulations or their interpretations would have on us, these changes could be materially adverse to investors in our common stock.

New capital rules that were recently issued generally require insured depository institutions and their holding companies to hold more capital, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operations.

In 2013, the Federal Reserve, FDIC and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency adopted capital rules based on the Basel III capital framework. These rules substantially amended the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to us. The rules phase in over time beginning in 2015 and will become fully effective in 2019. The rules apply to the Company as well as our subsidiary banks.

The final rules increase capital requirements and generally include two new capital measurements that will affect us, a risk-based common equity Tier 1 ratio and a capital conservation buffer. Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital is a subset of Tier 1 capital and is limited to common equity (plus related surplus), retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income and certain other items. Other instruments that have historically qualified for Tier 1 treatment, including non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, are consigned to a category known as Additional Tier 1 capital and must be phased out of CET1 over a period of nine years beginning in 2014. The rules permit bank holding companies with less than $15 billion in assets (such as us) to continue to include trust preferred securities and non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock issued before May 19, 2010 in Additional Tier 1 capital, but not CET1. Tier 2 capital consists of instruments that have historically been placed in Tier 2, as well as cumulative perpetual preferred stock.

The final rules adjust all three categories of capital by requiring new deductions from and adjustments to capital that will result in more stringent capital requirements. Among other things, the current rule on the deduction of mortgage servicing assets from Tier 1 capital has been revised in ways that are likely to require a greater deduction than we currently make and that will require the deduction to be made from CET1. This deduction phases in over a three-year period from 2015 through 2017. We closely monitor our mortgage servicing assets, and we expect to maintain our mortgage servicing asset at levels below the deduction thresholds by a combination of sales of portions of these assets from time to time either on a continuous basis as we originate mortgages or through bulk sale transactions. Additionally, any gains on sale from mortgage loans sold into securitizations must be deducted in full from CET1. This requirement phases in over three years from 2015 through 2017. Under the earlier rule and through 2014, no deduction was required.

Beginning on January 1, 2015, our new minimum capital requirements are (i) a CET1 ratio of 4.5%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital (CET1 plus Additional Tier 1 capital) of 6% (up from 4%) and (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (the current requirement). Our leverage ratio requirement will remain at the 4% level now required. Beginning in 2016, a capital conservation buffer will phase in over three years, ultimately resulting in a requirement of 2.5% on top of the CET1, Tier 1 and total capital requirements, resulting in a require CET1 ratio of 7%, a Tier 1 ratio of 8.5%, and a total capital ratio of 10.5%. Failure to satisfy any of these three capital requirements will result in limits on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases and paying discretionary bonuses. These limitations will establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.

In addition to the higher required capital ratios and the new deductions and adjustments, the final rules increase the risk weights for certain assets, meaning that we will have to hold more capital against these assets. For example, commercial real estate loans that do not meet certain new underwriting requirements must be risk-weighted at 150%, rather than the current 100%. There are also new risk weights for unsettled transactions and derivatives. We also will be required to hold capital against short-term commitments that are not unconditionally cancelable; currently, there are no capital requirements for these off-balance sheet assets. All changes to the risk weights take effect in 2015.

In addition, in the current economic and regulatory environment, bank regulators may impose capital requirements that are more stringent than those required by applicable existing regulations. Talmer West Bank is subject to heightened capital requirements under the Consent Order. The application of more stringent capital requirements for us could, among other things, result in lower returns on equity, require the raising of additional capital, and result in regulatory actions if we were to be unable to comply with such requirements. Implementation of changes to asset risk weightings for risk-based capital calculations, items included or deducted in calculating regulatory capital or additional capital conservation buffers, could result in management modifying our business strategy and could limit our ability to make distributions, including paying dividends or buying back our shares.

The federal banking agencies have proposed new liquidity standards that could result in our having to lengthen the term of our funding, restructure our business lines by forcing us to seek new sources of liquidity for them, and/or increase our holdings of liquid assets.

As part of the Basel III capital process, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has finalized a new liquidity standard, a liquidity coverage ratio, which requires a banking organization to hold sufficient "high quality liquid assets" to meet liquidity needs for a 30 calendar day liquidity stress scenario, as well as a net stable funding ratio, which imposes a similar requirement over a one-year period. The U.S. banking regulators have proposed a liquidity coverage ratio for systemically important banks. Although the proposal would not apply directly to us, the substance of the proposal may inform the regulators' assessment of our liquidity. We could be required to reduce our holdings of illiquid assets and adversely affect our results and financial condition. The U.S. regulators have not yet proposed a net stable funding ratio requirement.

We face a risk of noncompliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering statutes and regulations and corresponding enforcement proceedings.

The federal Bank Secrecy Act, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (which we refer to as the "PATRIOT Act") and other laws and regulations require financial institutions, among other duties, to institute and maintain effective anti-money laundering programs and to file suspicious activity and currency transaction reports as appropriate. The federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, established by the U.S. Treasury Department to administer the Bank Secrecy Act, is authorized to impose significant civil money penalties for violations of those requirements and has recently engaged in coordinated enforcement efforts with the individual federal banking regulators, as well as the U.S. Department of

Justice, Drug Enforcement Administration and Internal Revenue Service. There is also increased scrutiny of compliance with the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (which we refer to as "OFAC"). Federal and state bank regulators also have begun to focus on compliance with Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering regulations. If our policies, procedures and systems are deemed deficient or the policies, procedures and systems of the financial institutions that we have already acquired or may acquire in the future are deficient, we would be subject to liability, including fines and regulatory actions such as restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and the necessity to obtain regulatory approvals to proceed with certain aspects of our business plan, including our acquisition plans, which would negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. Failure to maintain and implement adequate programs to combat money laundering and terrorist financing could also have serious reputational consequences for us.

Federal, state and local consumer lending laws may restrict our ability to originate certain mortgage loans or increase our risk of liability with respect to such loans and could increase our cost of doing business.

Federal, state and local laws have been adopted that are intended to eliminate certain lending practices considered "predatory." These laws prohibit practices such as steering borrowers away from more affordable products, selling unnecessary insurance to borrowers, repeatedly refinancing loans and making loans without a reasonable expectation that the borrowers will be able to repay the loans irrespective of the value of the underlying property. Over the course of 2013, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") has issued several rules on mortgage lending, notably a rule requiring all home mortgage lenders to determine a borrower's ability to repay the loan. The origination of loans with certain terms and conditions and that otherwise meet the definition of a "qualified mortgage" may protect us from liability to a borrower for failing to make the necessary determinations. In either case, we may find it necessary to tighten our mortgage loan underwriting standards in response to the CFPB rules, which may constrain our ability to make loans consistent with our business strategies. It is our policy not to make predatory loans and to determine borrowers' ability to repay, but the law and related rules create the potential for increased liability with respect to our lending and loan investment activities. This law increases our cost of doing business and, ultimately, may prevent us from making certain loans and cause us to reduce the average percentage rate or the points and fees on loans that we do make.

We are subject to federal and state fair lending laws, and failure to comply with these laws could lead to material penalties.

Federal and state fair lending laws and regulations, such as the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, impose nondiscriminatory lending requirements on financial institutions. The Department of Justice, CFPB and other federal and state agencies are responsible for enforcing these laws and regulations. Private parties may also have the ability to challenge an institution's performance under fair lending laws in private class action litigation. A successful challenge to our performance under the fair lending laws and regulations could adversely impact our rating under the Community Reinvestment Act and result in a wide variety of sanctions, including the required payment of damages and civil money penalties, injunctive relief, imposition of restrictions on merger and acquisition activity and restrictions on expansion activity, which could negatively impact our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Federal Reserve may require us to commit capital resources to support our subsidiary banks.

The Federal Reserve requires a bank holding company to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to a subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support such subsidiary bank. Under the "source of strength" doctrine, the Federal Reserve may require a bank holding company to make capital injections into a troubled subsidiary bank and may charge the bank holding company with

engaging in unsafe and unsound practices for failure to commit resources to such a subsidiary bank. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act directs the federal bank regulators to require that all companies that directly or indirectly control an insured depository institution serve as a source of strength for the institution. Under these requirements, in the future, we could be required to provide financial assistance to our subsidiary banks if they experience financial distress.

A capital injection may be required at times when we do not have the resources to provide it, and therefore we may be required to borrow the funds. In the event of a bank holding company's bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee will assume any commitment by the holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank. Moreover, bankruptcy law provides that claims based on any such commitment will be entitled to a priority of payment over the claims of the holding company's general unsecured creditors, including the holders of its note obligations. Thus, any borrowing that must be done by the holding company in order to make the required capital injection becomes more difficult and expensive and will adversely impact the holding company's cash flows, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management's attention and affect our ability to attract and retain executive management and qualified board members.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of The NASDAQ Stock Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an "emerging growth company." The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and operating results. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management's attention may be diverted from other business concerns, including the integration of our acquired banks, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. Although we have already hired additional employees to comply with these requirements, we may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants, which will increase our costs and expenses.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management's time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.

As a result of disclosure of information in filings required of a public company, our business and financial condition has become more visible, which may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business and

operating results could be adversely affected, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of our management and adversely affect our business and operating results.

We are dependent on our information technology and telecommunications systems and third-party servicers, and systems failures, interruptions or breaches of security could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is highly dependent on the successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems and third-party servicers. We outsource many of our major systems, such as data processing, loan servicing and deposit processing systems. The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third-party software license or service agreement on which any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations. Because our information technology and telecommunications systems interface with and depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services exceeds capacity or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. If sustained or repeated, a system failure or service denial could result in a deterioration of our ability to process new and renewal loans, gather deposits and provide customer service, compromise our ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss of customer business and/or subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, we provide our customers the ability to bank remotely, including online over the Internet. The secure transmission of confidential information is a critical element of remote banking. Our network could be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses, phishing schemes, spam attacks, human error, natural disasters, power loss and other security breaches. We may be required to spend significant capital and other resources to protect against the threat of security breaches and computer viruses, or to alleviate problems caused by security breaches or viruses. Further, we outsource some of the data processing functions used for remote banking, and accordingly we are dependent on the expertise and performance of our third-party providers. To the extent that our activities, the activities of our customers, or the activities of our third-party service providers involve the storage and transmission of confidential information, security breaches and viruses could expose us to claims, litigation and other possible liabilities. Any inability to prevent security breaches or computer viruses could also cause existing customers to lose confidence in our systems and could adversely affect our reputation, results of operations and ability to attract and maintain customers and businesses. In addition, a security breach could also subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, expose us to civil litigation and possible financial liability and cause reputational damage.

We must respond to rapid technological changes, and these changes may be more difficult or expensive than anticipated.

We will have to respond to future technological changes. Specifically, if our competitors introduce new banking products and services embodying new technologies, or if new banking industry standards and practices emerge, then our existing product and service offerings, technology and systems may be impaired or become obsolete. Further, if we fail to adopt or develop new technologies or to adapt our products and services to emerging industry standards, then we may lose current and future customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The financial services industry is changing rapidly, and to remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve the functionality and features of our products, services and technologies. These changes may be more difficult or expensive than we anticipate.

We are subject to losses due to the errors or fraudulent behavior of employees or third parties.

We are exposed to many types of operational risk, including the risk of fraud by employees and outsiders, clerical recordkeeping errors and transactional errors. Our business is dependent on our employees as well as third-party service providers to process a large number of increasingly complex transactions. We could be materially adversely affected if one of our employees causes a significant operational breakdown or failure, either as a result of human error or where an individual purposefully sabotages or fraudulently manipulates our operations or systems or if one of our third-party service providers experiences an operational breakdown or failure. When we originate loans, we rely upon information supplied by loan applicants and third parties, including the information contained in the loan application, property appraisal and title information, if applicable, and employment and income documentation provided by third parties. If any of this information is misrepresented and such misrepresentation is not detected prior to loan funding, we generally bear the risk of loss associated with the misrepresentation. Any of these occurrences could result in a diminished ability of us to operate our business, potential liability to customers, reputational damage and regulatory intervention, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Future growth or operating results may require us to raise additional capital, but that capital may not be available or may be dilutive.

We are required by federal regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. We may at some point need to raise additional capital to support our operations and any future growth.

Our ability to raise capital will depend on conditions in the capital markets, which are outside of our control and largely do not depend on our financial performance. Accordingly, we may be unable to raise capital when needed or on favorable terms. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, we will be subject to increased regulatory supervision and the imposition of restrictions on our growth and business. These restrictions could negatively affect our ability to operate or further expand our operations through loan growth, acquisitions or the establishment of additional branches. These restrictions may also result in increases in operating expenses and reductions in revenues that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our common stock.

Shareholders affiliated with one of our directors own a significant percentage of our common stock and may vote their shares in a manner that you may consider not to be consistent with your best interest or the best interest of our shareholders as a whole.

WLR Recovery Fund IV L.P. and WLR IV Parallel ESC L.P. (the "WL Ross Funds"), which have the right to designate one representative to the Company's and Talmer Bank's Boards of Directors and have appointed Denny Kim, a Vice President of WL Ross & Co. LLC, as such director representative, currently beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 13.6% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, the WL Ross Funds, in their capacity as shareholders, have the ability to vote a significant percentage of our outstanding common stock on all matters put to a vote of our shareholders, including the election of our board of directors and certain other significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or acquisition transaction. On any such matter, the interests of the WL Ross Funds may not coincide with the interests of the other holders of our common stock and any such difference in interests may result in the WL Ross Funds voting their shares in a manner inconsistent with the interest of other shareholders of the Company. In addition, it is possible that the WL Ross Funds may sell or otherwise dispose of all or a significant portion of the shares they hold which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Certain of our directors may have conflicts of interest in determining whether to present business opportunities to us or another entity with which they are, or may become, affiliated.

Certain of our directors are or may become subject to fiduciary obligations in connection with their service on the boards of directors of other corporations, including financial institutions. A director's association with other financial institutions, which give rise to fiduciary or contractual obligations to such institutions, may create conflicts of interest. To the extent that any of our directors become aware of acquisition opportunities that may be suitable for entities other than us to which they have fiduciary or contractual obligations, or they are presented with such opportunities in their capacities as fiduciaries to such entities, they may honor such obligations to such other entities. You should assume that to the extent any of our directors become aware of an opportunity that may be suitable both for us and another entity to which such person has a fiduciary obligation or contractual obligation to present such opportunity as set forth above, he or she may first give the opportunity to such other entity or entities and may give such opportunity to us only to the extent such other entity or entities reject or are unable to pursue such opportunity. In addition, you should assume that to the extent any of our directors become aware of an acquisition opportunity that does not fall within the above parameters, but that may otherwise be suitable for us, he or she may not present such opportunity to us.

Our financial condition may be affected negatively by the costs of litigation.

We may be involved from time to time in a variety of litigation, investigations or similar matters arising out of our business. In many cases, we may seek reimbursement from our insurance carriers, or with respect to covered assets, from the FDIC to cover such costs and expenses. Our insurance may not cover all claims that may be asserted against us, and any claims asserted against us, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, may harm our reputation. In addition, there may be limitations on reimbursements from the FDIC with respect to litigation expenses related to covered assets under Talmer Bank's loss share agreements. Should the ultimate judgments or settlements in any litigation or investigation significantly exceed our insurance coverage or anticipated reimbursements from the FDIC, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may not be able to obtain appropriate types or levels of insurance in the future, nor may we be able to obtain adequate replacement policies with acceptable terms, if at all.

We may be adversely affected by the lack of soundness of other financial institutions.

Our ability to engage in routine funding and other transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty or other relationships. Defaults by, or even rumors or questions about, one or more financial institutions, or the financial services industry generally, may lead to market-wide liquidity problems and losses of depositor, creditor and counterparty confidence and could lead to losses or defaults by us or by other institutions.

The ultimate success of our past acquisitions, including our acquisition of Signature Bank, and any acquisitions (whether FDIC-assisted or unassisted transactions) in which we may participate in the future will depend on a number of factors, including our ability:

As with any acquisition involving a financial institution, there may be higher than average levels of service disruptions that would cause inconveniences to our new customers or potentially increase the effectiveness of competing financial institutions in attracting our customers. We anticipate challenges and opportunities because of the unique nature of each acquisition. Integration efforts will also likely divert our management's attention and resources. We may be unable to integrate acquired branches successfully, and the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of ongoing business or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers, depositors and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of our acquisition transactions. We may also encounter unexpected difficulties or costs during the integration that could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition, perhaps materially. Additionally, we may be unable to achieve results in the future similar to those achieved by our existing banking business, to compete effectively in the market areas previously served by the acquired branches or to manage effectively any growth resulting from our acquisition transactions.

Our ability to continue to receive the benefits of our loss share arrangements with the FDIC is conditioned upon our compliance with certain requirements under the agreements.

We are the beneficiary of loss share agreements with the FDIC that call for the FDIC to fund a portion of our losses on a majority of the assets we acquired in connection with our FDIC-assisted transactions. To recover a portion of our losses and retain the loss share protection, we must comply with certain requirements imposed by the agreements. The requirements of the agreements relate primarily to our administration of the assets covered by the agreements. Any failure to comply with the requirements of the loss share agreements, or to properly service the loans and other real estate owned covered by the agreements may cause such covered loans and other real estate to lose their eligibility for loss share reimbursement payments from the FDIC, resulting in material losses that are currently not anticipated. In addition, under the loss share agreements, we are subject to audits by the FDIC through its designated agent to monitor our compliance with the agreements. As the loan servicing standards evolve, we may experience difficulties in complying with the requirements of the loss share agreements.

In addition, under the loss share agreements, we must obtain the consent of the FDIC to engage in certain corporate transactions that may be deemed under the agreements to constitute a transfer of the loss share benefits. For example, any merger or consolidation of the Company or Talmer Bank with or into another company, if the shareholders of the Company or Talmer Bank will own less than 66.66% of the consolidated entity, requires the consent of the FDIC. When the consent of the FDIC is required under the loss share agreements, the FDIC may withhold its consent or may condition its consent on terms that we do not find acceptable. If the FDIC does not grant its consent to a

transaction we would like to pursue, or conditions its consent on terms that we do not find acceptable, we may be unable to engage in a corporate transaction that might otherwise benefit our shareholders or we may elect to pursue such a transaction without obtaining the FDIC's consent, which could result in termination of our loss share agreements with the FDIC which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The accounting for loans acquired in connection with our acquisitions is based on numerous subjective determinations that may prove to be inaccurate and have a negative impact on our results of operations.

The loans we acquired in connection with our acquisitions have been recorded at their estimated fair value on the respective acquisition date without a carryover of the related allowance for loan losses. In general, the determination of estimated fair value of acquired loans requires management to make subjective determinations regarding discount rate, estimates of losses on defaults, market conditions and other factors that are highly subjective in nature. Although we have recorded fair value adjustments, based on our estimates at the date of acquisition, the loans we acquired may become impaired or may further deteriorate in value, resulting in additional losses and charge-offs to the loan portfolio. The fluctuations in national, regional and local economic conditions, including those related to local residential, commercial real estate and construction markets, may increase the level of charge-offs that we make to our loan portfolio and consequently reduce our capital. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled and may have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition even if other favorable events occur.

Loans acquired in connection with acquisitions that have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at the date of acquisition that we will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments are accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, or ASC 310-30. These credit-impaired loans, like non-credit-impaired loans acquired in connection with our acquisitions, have been recorded at their estimated fair value on the respective acquisition date, based on subjective determinations regarding risk ratings, expected future cash flows and fair value of the underlying collateral, without a carryover of the related allowance for loan losses. We evaluate these loans quarterly to assess expected cash flows. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows will generally result in a provision for loan losses. Subsequent increases in cash flows result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior charges or a reclassification of the difference from non-accretable to accretable with a positive impact on interest income. Because the accounting for these loans is based on subjective measures that can change frequently, we may experience fluctuations in our net interest income and provisions for loan losses attributable to these loans. These fluctuations could negatively impact our results of operations.

Our loss sharing arrangements with the FDIC will not cover all of our losses on loans we acquired in our four FDIC-assisted transactions.

Although we have entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC that provide that the FDIC will bear a significant portion of losses related to specified loan portfolios that we acquired in our four FDIC-assisted transactions, we are not protected for all losses resulting from charge-offs with respect to those specified loan portfolios. Additionally, the loss sharing agreements have limited terms (ten years for losses on single-family residential real estate loans, five years for losses on non-residential real estate loans and eight years with respect to recoveries on non-residential real estate loans). Therefore, the FDIC will not reimburse us for any charge-off or related losses that we experience after the term of the loss share agreements, and any such charge-offs would negatively impact our net income. Moreover, the loss share provisions in the loss share agreement may be administered improperly, or the FDIC may interpret those provisions in a way different than we do. In any of those events, our losses could increase.

The FDIC requires that we make a "true-up" payment to the FDIC in connection with certain of our FDIC-assisted transactions if our realized losses are less than expected.

The loss share agreements between Talmer Bank and the FDIC with respect to the acquisition of CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank contain a provision that obligates us to make a "true-up" payment to the FDIC if the realized losses of each of these acquired banks are less than expected. The "true-up" calculation is scheduled to be made as of the 45^th day following the last day of the calendar month of the tenth anniversary of the closing of the acquisition of CF Bancorp, the tenth anniversary of the closing of the acquisition of First Banking Center, and the tenth anniversary of the closing of the acquisition of Peoples State Bank. We estimate the present value of any such "true-up" payment and record the current estimate as "FDIC clawback liability" on our consolidated balance sheets. Any "true-up" payment that is materially higher than our recorded estimate could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

As of December 31, 2014, we had 70,532,122 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. As of December 31, 2014, we had warrants outstanding to purchase 2,568,271 shares of our Class A common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $6.77 per share (of which 2,529,416 were repurchased by us in February 2015), warrants outstanding to purchase 390,000 shares of our Class B common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $6.00 per share, options to purchase 7,958,108 shares of our Class A common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $6.96 per share and 1,227,772 unallocated shares under our Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, that remain available for future grants. The vesting and terms of options granted are determined by our Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. A significant portion of our options time-vest over a three year period from the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of the grant. Unless earlier exercised or terminated pursuant to the terms of the grant, 462,924 expire in 2019, 3,015,000 expire in 2020, 998,184 expire in 2021, 3,447,000 expire in 2023 and 35,000 expire in 2024. The issuance of shares subject to warrants and options under the plan will further dilute your ownership of our common stock.

The market price of our common stock could decline due to the large number of outstanding shares of our common stock eligible for future sale.

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. These sales could also make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future, at a time and place that we deem appropriate.

As of December 31, 2014, we had 70,532,122 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Of the outstanding shares of common stock, all of the 17,888,888 shares that were sold in our initial public offering are freely tradable, except that any shares purchased by "affiliates" (as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (which we refer to as the "Securities Act"), only may be sold in compliance with certain limitations. The remaining 52,643,234 shares of our common stock outstanding may be sold into the market over time in transactions made in accordance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act or otherwise in future public offerings. Accordingly, the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected by actual or anticipated sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the future.

We may issue shares of preferred stock that would adversely affect the rights of our common shareholders.

Our authorized capital stock includes 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock of which no preferred shares are issued and outstanding. Our board of directors, in its sole discretion, may designate and

issue one or more series of preferred stock from the authorized and unissued shares of preferred stock. Subject to limitations imposed by law or our articles of incorporation, our board of directors is empowered to determine:

We could issue preferred stock with voting and conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the shares of our common stock and with preferences over the common stock with respect to dividends and in liquidation.

The market price of our common stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of an investment in our common stock to decline.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

The stock markets in general have experienced substantial volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These types of broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our common stock. In the past, shareholders have sometimes instituted securities class action litigation against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. Any similar litigation against us could result in substantial costs, divert management's attention and resources and harm our business or results of operations. For example, we are currently operating in, and have benefited from, a protracted period of historically low interest rates that will not be sustained indefinitely, and future fluctuations in interest rates could cause an increase in volatility of the market price of our common stock.

We are an "emerging growth company" and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an "emerging growth company," as defined in the JOBS Act. As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are generally unavailable to other public companies. As an emerging growth company,

We may take advantage of some or all of the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements that will be available to us as long as we continue to qualify as an emerging growth company. It is possible that some investors could find our common stock less attractive because we may take advantage of these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

We could remain an emerging growth company for up to five years from our initial public offering in February 2014, or until the earliest of (a) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (b) the date that the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (c) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.

Certain provisions of our loss sharing agreements may have anti-takeover effects and could limit our ability and the ability of our shareholders to engage in certain transactions.

The loss share agreements we entered into with the FDIC in connection with our four FDIC-assisted acquisitions require that we receive prior FDIC consent, which may be withheld by the FDIC in its sole discretion, prior to us or our shareholders engaging in certain transactions, including those that may otherwise be in their best interests. If any such transaction is completed without prior FDIC consent, the FDIC would have the right to discontinue the loss sharing arrangement with us.

Among other things, prior FDIC consent is required for (1) a merger or consolidation of us with or into another company if our shareholders will own less than 66.66% of the combined company, or of our bank subsidiary with or into another company, if we will own less than 66.66% of the combined company, (2) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of our bank subsidiary and (3) a sale of shares by a shareholder, or a group of related shareholders, that will effect a change in control of our bank subsidiary, as determined by the FDIC with reference to the standards set forth in the Change in

Bank Control Act of 1978, as amended (generally, the acquisition of between 10% and 25% of our voting securities where the presumption of control is not rebutted, or the acquisition by any person, acting directly or indirectly or through or in concert with one or more persons, of more than 25% of our voting securities). If we or any shareholder desired to enter into any such transaction, the FDIC may not grant its consent in a timely manner, without conditions, or at all. If one of these transactions were to occur without prior FDIC consent and the FDIC withdrew its loss share arrangement with us, we could be materially and adversely affected.

Anti-takeover provisions in the corporate statutes and charter documents governing our organization could discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of the Company and diminish the value of our common stock.

Some of the provisions of the Michigan Business Corporation Act ("MBCA") and our articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it difficult for our shareholders to change the composition of our board of directors, preventing them from changing the composition of management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that our shareholders may consider favorable.

These anti-takeover provisions could impede the ability of our common shareholders to benefit from a change of control and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on the value of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change-in-control premium.

Shareholders may be deemed to be acting in concert or otherwise in control of us and our bank subsidiaries, which could impose prior approval requirements and result in adverse regulatory consequences for such holders.

We are a bank holding company regulated by the Federal Reserve. Any entity (including a "group" composed of natural persons) owning 25% or more of a class of our outstanding shares of voting stock, or a lesser percentage if such holder or group otherwise exercises a "controlling influence" over us, may be subject to regulation as a "bank holding company" in accordance with the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. In addition, (1) any bank holding company or foreign bank with a U.S. presence is required to obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act to acquire or retain 5% or more of a class of our outstanding shares of voting stock, and (2) any person other than a bank holding company may be required to obtain prior regulatory approval under the Change in Bank Control Act to acquire or retain 10% or more of our outstanding shares of voting stock. Any shareholder that is deemed to "control" the Company for bank regulatory purposes

would become subject to prior approval requirements and ongoing regulation and supervision. Such a holder may be required to divest amounts equal to or exceeding 5% of the voting shares of investments that may be deemed incompatible with bank holding company status, such as an investment in a company engaged in non-financial activities. Regulatory determination of "control" of a depository institution or holding company is based on all of the relevant facts and circumstances. Potential investors are advised to consult with their legal counsel regarding the applicable regulations and requirements.

Our common stock owned by holders determined by a bank regulatory agency to be acting in concert would be aggregated for purposes of determining whether those holders have control of a bank or bank holding company. Each shareholder obtaining control that is a "company" would be required to register as a bank holding company. "Acting in concert" generally means knowing participation in a joint activity or parallel action towards the common goal of acquiring control of a bank or a parent company, whether or not pursuant to an express agreement. The manner in which this definition is applied in individual circumstances can vary and cannot always be predicted with certainty. Many factors can lead to a finding of acting in concert, including where: (i) the shareholders are commonly controlled or managed; (ii) the shareholders are parties to an oral or written agreement or understanding regarding the acquisition, voting or transfer of control of voting securities of a bank or bank holding company; (iii) the shareholders are immediate family members; or (iv) both a shareholder and a controlling shareholder, partner, trustee or management official of such shareholder own equity in the bank or bank holding company.

Our ability to pay dividends is subject to regulatory limitations and each of our subsidiary bank's ability to pay dividends to us is also subject to regulatory limitations.

Our ability to pay dividends is subject to restrictions under applicable banking laws and regulations, and depends upon the results of operations of our subsidiary banks. The Company is a bank holding company that conducts substantially all of its operations through Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank. As a result, our ability to make dividend payments on our common stock depends primarily on certain federal regulatory considerations and the receipt of dividends and other distributions from our subsidiary banks.

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to certain regulatory restrictions on the payment of cash dividends. In addition, the Federal bank regulatory agencies have the authority to prohibit bank holding companies from engaging in unsafe or unsound practices in conducting their business. The payment of dividends could be deemed an unsafe or unsound practice if such dividends are not supported by recent earnings or we or our subsidiary banks do not, in the view of the regulators, have sufficient capital. Our ability to pay dividends will directly depend on the ability of our subsidiary banks to pay dividends. Under the Consent Order, Talmer West Bank is prohibited from paying any dividends without obtaining prior regulatory approval of the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services.

Finally, holders of our common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our board of directors may, in its unilateral discretion, declare out of funds legally available for such purpose based on a variety of considerations, including, without limitation, our historical and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, capital levels, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory prohibitions and other limitations, general economic conditions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

If equity research analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they publish reports with unfavorable commentary or downgrade our common stock, the price and trading volume of our common stock could decline.

The trading price of our common stock is expected to be impacted in part by research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us and our business. We do not control these analysts. Equity research analysts may elect not to provide research coverage of our common stock, which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. If equity research analysts do provide research coverage of our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline if one or more of these analysts downgrade our common stock or if they issue other unfavorable commentary about us or our business. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of the Company, we could lose visibility in the market, which in turn could cause our common stock price or trading volume to decline.

Our securities, including our common stock, are not savings or deposit accounts or other obligations of our subsidiary banks, are not insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund, the FDIC or any other governmental agency and are subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of principal.

Our principal executive offices and Talmer Bank's main office is located at 2301 West Big Beaver Rd., Suite 525, Troy, Michigan 48084. Talmer West Bank's main office is located at 2950 State Street South, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104. In addition, we currently operate 45 additional branches located in Michigan, 28 branches located in Ohio, two branches located in Indiana, one branch located in Illinois, and one branch located in Nevada. We lease our principal executive office, 14 of our branches in Michigan, 12 of our branches in Ohio, our Illinois branch and our branch in Nevada. Management believes the terms of the various leases are consistent with market standards and were arrived at through arm's-length bargaining.

From time to time we are a party to various litigation matters incidental to the conduct of our business. We are not presently party to any legal proceedings the resolution of which we believe would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, liquidity, results of operation, cash flows or capital levels.

Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our Class A common stock began trading on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol "TLMR" on February 12, 2014. The following table contains a summary of the high and low sales price for our common stock and the dividends we paid per common share for the periods indicated.

As of December 31, 2014, we had 120 shareholders of record for our common stock. This figure does not represent the actual number of beneficial owns of common stock because shares are frequently held in "street name" by securities dealers and others for the benefit of individual owners who may vote the shares.

We are a bank holding company and accordingly, any dividends paid by us are subject to various federal and state regulatory limitations and also may be subject to the ability of our subsidiary depository institutions to make distributions or pay dividends to us. Our ability to pay dividends is limited by minimum capital and other requirements prescribed by law and regulation. Banking regulators have authority to impose additional limits on dividends and distributions by us and our subsidiaries. Under the Consent Order, Talmer West Bank is prohibited from paying dividends to us without the prior regulatory approval of the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services. Certain restrictive covenants in future debt instruments, if any, may also limit our ability to pay dividends or the ability of our subsidiary depository institutions to make distributions or pay dividends to us. Any determination to pay cash dividends in the future will be at the unilateral discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a variety of considerations, including, without limitation, our historical and projected financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, capital levels, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory prohibitions and other limitations, general economic conditions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. See "Supervision and Regulation."

As noted in the above table, we paid cash dividends of $0.01 per common share to our common shareholders in the third and fourth quarters of 2014. We expect that we will continue to pay a comparable quarterly dividend to our common shareholders.

The following stock performance graph compares the cumulative total shareholder returns for our common stock, the SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ Index and the SNL U.S. Bank and Thrift Index for the periods indicated. The graph assumes that an investor originally invested $100 in shares of our common stock at its closing price on February 12, 2014, the first day that our shares were traded, and assumes reinvestment of dividends and other distributions to shareholders. The following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or "filed" with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing. The stock performance graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance.

The following table sets forth our selected historical consolidated financial data for the periods and as of the dates indicated. We derived our balance sheet and income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 from our audited financial statements. You should read this information together with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report. On January 1, 2013, we acquired all the issued and outstanding shares of First Place Bank. The selected historical consolidated financial information in the following tables as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, includes the results of Talmer West Bank, but does not include the results of Signature Bank, which we acquired on February 6, 2015. Our historical results shown below and elsewhere in this Annual Report are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.

	As of and for the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010
Earnings Summary
Interest income	$	217,023		$	179,722		$	102,564		$	119,478		$	50,249
Interest expense		12,760			11,725			5,695			7,076			5,968
Net interest income		204,263			167,997			96,869			112,402			44,281
Provision for loan losses—uncovered		23,082			15,520			3,614			3,571			4,484
Provision (benefit) for loan losses—covered		(18,755	)		(10,422	)		32,258			64,748			17,850
Bargain purchase gains		41,977			71,702			—			39,385			53,842
Noninterest income		117,499			181,138			74,309			113,774			86,583
Noninterest expense		218,880			250,814			103,404			106,591			41,765
Income before income taxes		98,555			93,223			31,902			51,266			66,765
Income tax provision (benefit)		7,705			(5,335	)		10,232			17,817			22,089
Net income		90,850			98,558			21,670			33,449			44,676
Per Share Data
Basic earnings per common share	$	1.30		$	1.49		$	0.46		$	0.85		$	1.60
Diluted earnings per common share		1.21			1.41			0.44			0.82			1.56
Dividends paid per share		0.02			—			—			—			—
Dividend payout ratio		1.54	%		—	%		—	%		—	%		—	%
Book value per common share	$	10.80		$	9.32		$	7.86		$	7.23		$	6.44
Tangible book value per share(1)		10.61			9.12			7.77			7.06			6.29
Shares outstanding (in thousands)		70,532			66,234			66,229			44,469			38,956
Average diluted common shares (in thousands)		75,150			69,664			48,806			40,639			28,589
Selected Period End Balances
Total assets	$	5,870,780		$	4,547,361		$	2,347,508		$	2,123,560		$	1,689,645
Securities available-for-sale		740,819			620,083			345,405			223,938			298,094
Total loans		4,249,127			3,003,984			1,322,151			1,254,879			890,345
Uncovered loans		3,902,637			2,473,916			604,446			324,486			139,784
Covered loans		346,490			530,068			717,705			930,393			750,561
FDIC indemnification asset		67,026			131,861			226,356			358,839			270,332
Total deposits		4,548,863			3,600,865			1,730,226			1,695,599			1,388,424
Total liabilities		5,109,173			3,930,346			1,826,765			1,802,234			1,438,710
Total shareholders' equity		761,607			617,015			520,743			321,326			250,935
Tangible shareholders' equity(1)		748,572			603,810			514,672			314,017			245,108
Performance and Capital Ratios
Return on average assets		1.61	%		2.09	%		0.98	%		1.60	%		4.55	%
Return on average equity		12.47			16.33			6.16			11.95			25.69
Net interest margin (fully taxable equivalent)(2)		4.04			3.90			4.69			5.81			4.75
Average equity to average assets		12.91			12.77			15.88			13.35			17.71
Tangible average equity to tangible average assets(1)		12.68			12.50			15.63			13.04			17.45
Tier 1 leverage ratio		11.56			12.19			22.71			14.58			18.41
Tier 1 risk-based capital		15.20			18.29			44.36			35.65			30.27
Total risk-based capital		16.44			19.21			45.66			36.91			31.53
Asset Quality Ratios:
Net charge-offs to average loans, excluding covered loans		0.20	%		0.36	%		0.18	%		0.05	%		1.03	%
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets		1.78			1.55			1.79			1.20			1.18
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans		1.34			1.40			1.30			0.41			0.14
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans, excluding covered loans		0.90			0.98			0.12			0.65			0.63
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of period-end loans		1.30			1.93			4.72			5.04			1.93
Allowance for loan losses-uncovered as a percentage of period-end uncovered loans		0.87			0.72			1.81			2.43			3.16
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30		39.39			43.52			94.75			344.68			350.79

GAAP Reconciliation and Management Explanation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Some of the financial data included in our selected historical consolidated financial information are not measures of financial performance recognized by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures are "tangible shareholders' equity," "tangible book value per share" and "tangible average equity to tangible average assets." Our management uses these non-GAAP financial measures in its analysis of our performance.

We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to management and investors that is supplementary to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows computed in accordance with GAAP; however, we acknowledge that our non-GAAP financial measures have a number of limitations. As such, you should not view these disclosures as a substitute for results determined in accordance with GAAP, and they are not necessarily comparable to non-GAAP financial measures that other companies use. The following reconciliation table provides a more detailed analysis of these non-GAAP financial measures:

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands, except per share date)	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010
Total shareholders' equity	$	761,607		$	617,015		$	520,743		$	321,326		$	250,935
Less:
Core deposit intangibles		13,035			13,205			6,071			7,309			5,827

Tangible shareholders' equity	$	748,572		$	603,810		$	514,672		$	314,017		$	245,108



Shares outstanding		70,532			66,234			66,229			44,469			38,956
Tangible book value per share	$	10.61		$	9.12		$	7.77		$	7.06		$	6.29
Average assets	$	5,642,704		$	4,725,785		$	2,215,501		$	2,096,325		$	982,233
Average equity		728,693			603,657			351,909			279,817			173,916
Average core deposit intangibles		15,055			14,524			6,672			7,488			3,075
Tangible average equity to tangible average assets		12.68	%		12.50	%		15.63	%		13.04	%		17.45	%

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion describes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and also analyzes our financial condition as of December 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the "Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Information" and our audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Historical results of operations and the percentage relationships among any amounts included, and any trends that may appear, may not indicate trends in operations or results of operations for any future periods.

We have made, and will continue to make, various forward-looking statements with respect to financial and business matters. Comments regarding our business that are not historical facts are considered forward-looking statements that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in these forward-looking statements. For additional information regarding our cautionary disclosures, see the "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 1 of this Annual Report.

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Troy, Michigan. Between April 30, 2010 and December 31, 2014, we successfully completed seven acquisitions totaling $5.9 billion in assets and $5.8 billion in liabilities. In addition, on February 6, 2015, we closed on our acquisition of First of Huron Corp. and its subsidiary bank, Signature Bank, which had total assets of $230.4 million as of December 31, 2014, including $170.0 million of net total loans. First of Huron Corp. was immediately merged into the Company followed by the merger of Signature Bank with and into Talmer Bank. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary banks, Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank, we are a full service community bank offering a full suite of commercial banking, retail banking, mortgage banking, wealth management and trust services to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals primarily within Southeastern Michigan, Western Michigan and in smaller communities in Northeastern Michigan, as well as Northeastern Ohio, Chicago, Illinois, Northern Indiana, and Las Vegas, Nevada.

Given our strong capital position, local market knowledge and experienced leadership team, management believes we have a competitive advantage in the markets that we serve. We have retained a seasoned community bank management team with executive management experience in community banks located in our Midwest markets. With a well-managed, financially sound and well-capitalized Talmer Bank, management believes it has significant opportunities to expand in the current market environment through organic growth and strategic acquisitions of banking franchises in our concentrated markets of Michigan, Ohio and Indiana, as well as the Chicago Metropolitan area of Illinois.

Our product line includes loans to small and medium-sized businesses, residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, residential and commercial construction and development loans, farmland and agricultural production loans, home equity loans, consumer loans and a variety of commercial and consumer demand, savings and time deposit products. We also offer online banking and bill payment services, online cash management, safe deposit box rentals, debit card and ATM card services and the availability of a network of ATMs for our customers.

We have grown substantially since our operations began in August of 2007 through a combination of organic growth and acquisitions. Since April 30, 2010, Talmer Bank has acquired the following four banks from the FDIC, as receiver, all of which have been fully integrated into our operations:

On January 1, 2013, we closed on the acquisition of First Place Bank acquiring $2.6 billion in assets at fair value, including $1.5 billion in loans, net of unearned income, $139.8 million in investment securities, $42.0 million in loan servicing rights, and $18.4 million of other real estate owned. We also acquired $2.5 billion of liabilities at fair value, including $2.1 billion of retail deposits with a core deposit intangible of $9.8 million, and $334.8 million of debt. First Place Bank was merged into Talmer Bank on February 10, 2014.

On January 1, 2014, we closed on the acquisition of Talmer West Bank, formerly Michigan Commerce Bank, acquiring $910.3 million in assets at a fair value, including $571.7 million in loans, net of unearned income, $13.6 million in investment securities, $30.9 million in other real estate owned and $767 thousand in loan servicing rights. We also acquired $861.8 million of liabilities at fair value, including $857.8 million of retail deposits with a core deposit intangible of $3.6 million. At the time of our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014, Talmer West Bank was subject to a Consent Order with its regulators, which remains in effect. For a further discussion of the Consent Order, see "Talmer West Bank Consent Order with the FDIC and Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services" in "Supervision and Regulation" of this Annual Report.

As of December 31, 2014, we had $4.2 billion in total loans, compared to $3.0 billion at December 31, 2013. Over 50% of our total loans were generated through organic growth primarily as a result of the various commercial and residential lenders that we hired over the past five years. Of the $4.2 billion in total loans at December 31, 2014, $1.8 billion, or 41.7%, consisted of loans we acquired in transactions discussed above (all of which were adjusted to their estimated fair values at the time of acquisition).

We had net income of $90.9 million, $98.6 million and $21.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2014, included a bargain purchase gain of $42.0 million resulting from our acquisition of Talmer West Bank and $14.4 million net gain resulting from the sale of Talmer Bank's former Wisconsin branches and Talmer West Bank's former New Mexico branch. We also incurred $13.6 million of transaction and integration related expenses during the year ended December 31, 2014, including severance expense, bank acquisition and due diligence fees, bonus payments related to our successful acquisition of Talmer West Bank, the merger of First Place Bank and Talmer Bank and the completion of our initial public offering, as well as expenses incurred related to the termination of certain software contracts. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 included a bargain purchase gain of $71.7 million resulting from our acquisition of First Place Bank which was the largest contributing factor to the $76.9 million increase in net income for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012. We incurred $30.8 million of transaction and integration related expenses during the year ended December 31, 2013. There was no bargain purchase gains included in net income for the year ended December 31, 2012, however, there was $1.4 million in bank acquisition and due diligence fees primarily related to the pending acquisition of First Place Bank.

As a result of our significant growth from our acquisitions, we have substantially increased our employee headcount and number of branches, and we have incurred substantial transaction and integration related expenses, all of which have increased our total noninterest expense since we

completed our first acquisition on April 30, 2010. These transaction and integration related expenses are detailed in the tables below for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

	For the year ended December 31, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)	Actual		Transaction and integration related expenses		Excluding transaction and integration related expenses
Noninterest expense
Salary and employee benefits	$	121,744	$	5,810	$	115,934
Occupancy and equipment expense		31,806		2,844		28,962
Data processing fees		6,399		—		6,399
Professional service fees		12,952		400		12,552
FDIC loss sharing expense		2,158		—		2,158
Bank acquisition and due diligence fees		3,765		3,765		—
Marketing expense		4,923		449		4,474
Other employee expense		2,674		—		2,674
Insurance expense		5,697		—		5,697
Other expense		26,762		341		26,421

Total noninterest expense	$	218,880	$	13,609	$	205,271

	For the year ended December 31, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)	Actual		Transaction and integration related expenses		Excluding transaction and integration related expenses
Noninterest expense
Salary and employee benefits	$	146,609	$	11,553	$	135,056
Occupancy and equipment expense		26,755		160		26,595
Data processing fees		7,591		23		7,568
Professional service fees		16,640		5,806		10,834
FDIC loss sharing expense		2,007		—		2,007
Bank acquisition and due diligence fees		8,693		8,693		—
Marketing expense		3,484		54		3,430
Other employee expense		3,096		637		2,459
Insurance expense		9,974		3,823		6,151
Other expense		25,965		100		25,865

Total noninterest expense	$	250,814	$	30,849	$	219,965

While we continue to explore additional acquisition opportunities, there is no certainty that bargain purchase gains of any amount will be recognized as a result of any future closed transactions. In addition, we seek to realize operating efficiencies from our recently completed acquisitions by utilizing technology to streamline our operations. We continue to centralize the back-office functions of our acquired banks, as well as realize cost savings through the use of third party vendors and technology, in order to take advantage of economies of scale as we continue to grow. We place our focus on initiatives that we believe will provide opportunities to enhance earnings, including the continued rationalization of our retail banking footprint through the evaluation of possible branch consolidations or opportunities to sell branches. For instance, in 2014, we sold Talmer West Bank's single branch office in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Talmer Bank's ten branch offices in Wisconsin and consolidated the four Talmer West Bank branch offices in Las Vegas, Nevada into one branch office.

Our efforts to improve our operating efficiency are evidenced by the decline in operating expenses less transaction and integration related costs in each quarter of the year ended December 31, 2014.

Our core operating efficiency ratio improved to 72.8% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 80.4% for the year ended December 31, 2013. The efficiency ratio is a measure of noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and noninterest income. Our core efficiency ratio begins with the efficiency ratio and then excludes certain items deemed by management to not be related to regular operations including bargain purchase gains, the fair value adjustment to our loan servicing rights, transaction and integration related costs, FDIC loss sharing income and gain on sales of branches.

On February 6, 2015, we acquired First of Huron Corp., the holding company for Signature Bank, headquartered in Bad Axe, Michigan. We paid approximately $13.4 million in cash for all of the outstanding shares of common stock of First of Huron Corp. in the transaction, and assumed all of First of Huron Corp.'s obligations with respect to its approximately $5.0 million in outstanding trust preferred securities. Immediately following the acquisition, we paid off $3.5 million in outstanding First of Huron Corp. subordinated debentures including accrued interest. Shareholders of First of Huron Corp. common stock received $25.00 in cash for each outstanding share of First of Huron Corp. common stock. With the closing of the transaction, First of Huron Corp. merged with and into Talmer Bancorp, Inc., and Signature Bank merged with and into Talmer Bank. In order to support the acquisition of First of Huron Corp., we received $15.0 million in dividend capital from Talmer Bank.

The assets and liabilities associated with the acquisition were recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date. Because the fair value of the liabilities assumed and consideration paid was greater than the assets acquired and core deposit intangible asset created in the acquisition, on February 6, 2015, we recorded goodwill of $2.8 million.

We acquired $231.4 million in assets at fair value, including $163.0 million in loans, net of unearned income and $34.0 million in investment securities. We also assumed $218.0 million of liabilities at fair value, including $201.5 million of retail deposits with a core deposit intangible asset value of $2.4 million.

Approximately 25% of the fair value of loans acquired in the acquisition was accounted for as purchased credit impaired loans. On the February 6, 2015 acquisition date, the contractual cash flows for the purchased credit impaired loans acquired in the acquisition were $53.8 million and the estimated fair value of the loans was $41.1 million. The estimated total cash flow from these loans was $46.4 million. The difference between the total estimated cash flows and the fair market value created an accretable discount in the amount of $5.3 million, which represents the undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected in excess of the estimated fair value of the purchased credit impaired loans. This accretable discount is accreted into interest income on a method that approximates level yield over the estimated life of the related loans. Adjustments created when the loans were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition are amortized or accreted over the remaining term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loan's yield.

The acquired non-purchased credit impaired loans were recorded at their fair value of $121.8 million on the acquisition date, which included the recording of a $2.7 million discount primarily reflecting estimated credit marks over the life of the non-purchase credit impaired loans.

connection with our private offerings, in which we raised capital to support the acquisition of various troubled institutions. The purchase price, determined utilizing the closing price of our stock on the date of repurchase, resulted in an aggregate purchase price of $19.9 million. The warrants that were repurchased contributed 1.3 million shares to our average diluted common shares outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Growth in the Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") in each of the final three quarters of 2014 resumed the trend of increases after the first quarter's weather related decline of 2.1%. Over the past 13 quarters, GDP growth has increased 12 times. GDP for the fourth quarter of 2014 increased at an annualized rate of 2.6%, as indicated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis report published by the U.S. Department of Commerce.

According to the U.S. Bureau Labor Statistics, the unemployment rate (seasonally adjusted) continued to fall to 5.8% as of November 30, 2014, down from 6.1% as of June 30, 2014 and 6.7% as of December 31, 2013. Unemployment fell below 6.0% in September 2014 and was the first time this occurred since July 2008.

Total home sales in the U.S., as indicated by the National Association of Realtors, showed mixed signs with existing home sales at a seasonally adjusted 4.33 million units for the rolling 12 months ended November 30, 2014, up 2.4% from the rolling 12 month total of 4.23 million units as of November 30, 2013. Inventory levels were flat at a 5.2 months' supply, or 1.86 million units, as of November 30, 2014, compared to a 5.2 months' supply of 1.83 million units as of November 30, 2013. New home sales were down with a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 438 thousand units as of November 30, 2014, down 1.6% from 445 thousand as of November 30, 2013. Inventory for new homes increased to a 5.8 months' supply as of November 30, 2014 versus a 5.0 month supply as of November 30, 2013, while the median sales price of new homes increased 1.4%, to $281 thousand, for the same period. Home values of existing homes, as indicated by the Case-Shiller 20 city index (seasonally adjusted), showed an increase of 4.4% from November 2013 to November 2014. However, the pace of increasing values has fallen from the January 2014 year over year increase of 13.2%.

Bankruptcy filings, per the U.S. Court Statistics, also improved with total filings down 12.6% for the 12 months ending December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, with business filings down 18.8% and personal filings down 12.4% for the period. Bankruptcy filings fell across all regions where we have branches in the 12 months ending December 31, 2014, compared to the prior year.

According to the Beige Book published by the Federal Reserve Board in January 2015, overall economic activity was improved with all of the 12 districts during the reporting period of mid-November through late December, reporting modest or moderate growth. The Fourth (Cleveland) Federal Reserve District reported modest growth, the Seventh (Chicago) Federal Reserve District reported moderate growth, and the twelfth District (San Francisco) reported moderate growth. In the Cleveland District, the economy expanded at a modest pace during the final six weeks of 2014. Manufacturers reported that business activity increased at a modest rate. Demand for nonresidential construction strengthened, while the residential market was stable. Consumer spending at retail outlets grew slightly above year-ago levels, and year-to-date auto sales posted moderate gains compared to 2013. District coal production is up slightly year-over-year, while shale gas activity remains at a high level. Freight shipments were strong, but capacity constraints are limiting growth. The demand for business and consumer credit moved higher. Growth in economic activity in the Chicago District remained moderate in December 2014, and Federal Reserve Bank sources expected growth to continue at a similar pace in 2015. Consumer and business spending and manufacturing production all increased moderately, while construction and real estate activity increased modestly. Credit conditions changed

little on balance. Prices were also little changed with the exception of energy and some agricultural commodities.

The economy in the state of Michigan noted slow improvements during 2014. The unemployment rate, as indicated by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, improved to 6.7% as of November 30, 2014, down from 8.3% as of December 31, 2013 and 8.9% as of December 31, 2012. November 2014 is the first month since May 2007 that the unemployment level in Michigan fell below 7.0% and is the lowest level since April 2006. Wage growth was up 4.1% for the 12 months ending September 30, 2014. Other improvements included a 15.6% decline in total bankruptcies, per the U.S. Court Statistics, during the 12 months ending December 31, 2014 compared the same period in 2013.

As of December 31, 2014, $1.5 billion, or 36.1% of our total loans, are to businesses and consumers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia metropolitan statistical area ("MSA"), which includes Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair and Lapeer counties in the state of Michigan. Unemployment in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA, as indicated by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, was 7.0% as of November 30, 2014, down from 8.0% at December 31, 2013, and is the lowest unemployment level since April of 2008. The Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA has been experiencing a recovery in the housing market and showed an increase in home prices as reported in the Case-Shiller index (seasonally adjusted) of 2.6% for the rolling 12 months ending November 30, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, approximately $40.0 million, or less than one percent, of our loan portfolio were loans to borrowers located in the city of Detroit, and of this amount, $6.7 million, or 16.9% of the total loans to borrowers located in the city of Detroit were covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC.

The Ohio economy also showed signs of recovery. Unemployment was down to 5.0% as of November 30, 2014, compared to 7.1% as of December 31, 2013, the lowest level in over ten years. The Cleveland MSA showed lower unemployment of 5.4% as of November 30, 2014, their lowest level since November of 2006. Wage growth for the 12 months ending September 30, 2014 was up 3.8%, compared to the same period in the prior year. Bankruptcies in Ohio, per the U.S. Court Statistics, were down 13.8% during the 12 months ending December 31, 2014 from the same period in 2013. The Case-Shiller index for the Cleveland market indicates housing prices increases have cooled and were up only 0.8% in the 12 month period ending October 31, 2014.

The Illinois economy also showed signs of recovering. Unemployment was down to 6.4% as of November 30, 2014 compared to 8.9% as of December 31, 2013. This is the lowest rate since June of 2008. Unemployment in the Chicago MSA was at 5.8% as of November 30, 2014, down from 9.1% as of December 31, 2013. This is Chicago's lowest unemployment level since April of 2008. Wage growth for the 12 months ending September 30, 2014 was 2.7%. Bankruptcies in the Northern Illinois region were down 6.9% for the 12 months ending December 31, 2014. Home values, as indicated by the Case-Shiller index for the Chicago MSA were up 1.9% for the 12 month period ending October 31, 2014.

The Indiana economy continued to recover. The unemployment rate decreased to 5.7% as of November 30, 2014, down from 6.8% as of December 31, 2013. This is the lowest unemployment rate in Indiana since June 2008. Unemployment in the Elkhart MSA was also down at 5.3% as of November 30, 2014 versus 6.4% as of December 31, 2013. Wage growth for the 12 months ending September 30, 2014 was up 3.1% from the same period in 2013. In addition, personal and business bankruptcy filings in Northern Indiana, per the U.S. Court Statistics, for the 12 months ending December 31, 2014 decreased 14.5% from the same period in 2013. Real estate values have improved according to statistics from Zillow with prices increasing 1.1% for the 12 months ending October 31, 2014.

The Nevada economy also showed signs of recovering. Unemployment was down at 6.9% as of November 31, 2014 compared to 9.0% as of December 31, 2013. This is Nevada's lowest rate since June of 2008. Wage growth for the 12 months ending September 30, 2014 was 4.0%. Bankruptcies in

the Nevada region, according to Department of Justice reports, were down 19.7% for the 12 months ending December 31, 2014. Home values, as indicated by the Case-Shiller index for the Las Vegas MSA were up 8.0% as of October 31, 2014 versus one year prior.

We determined the fair value of our acquired assets and liabilities in accordance with accounting requirements for fair value measurement and acquisition transactions as promulgated in Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Subtopic 310-30, "Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality" ("ASC 310-30"), ASC Topic 805, "Business Combinations" ("ASC 805"), and ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures." The determination of the initial fair values on loans and other real estate purchased in an acquisition and the related FDIC indemnification asset require significant judgment and complexity.

At the time of each respective acquisition, we determine the fair value of our acquired loans on a loan by loan basis by dividing the loans into two categories: (1) specifically reviewed loans—loans where the future cash flows are estimated based on a specific review of the loan, and (2) non-specifically reviewed loans—loans where the future cash flows for each loan are estimated using an automated cash flow calculation model. For specifically reviewed loans, a designated group of credit officers, specialized in loan workouts and credit quality assessment, work with personnel from the acquired institution to review borrower cash payment activity, current appraisals, loan write ups, and watch list reports (including the current past due status and risk ratings assigned) to estimate future cash flows on the acquired loans. The estimated future cash flows are then discounted to determine initial fair value. For our acquisition of CF Bancorp, the specifically reviewed loan population included all loans with credit quality indicators of special mention or worse, all loans that had an outstanding balance of $2.0 million or more, and all loans with a matured status as of the April 30, 2010 acquisition date, resulting in approximately 50% of the acquired loan portfolio being specifically reviewed loans. For our acquisitions of First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank, the specifically reviewed loan population included all loans with a principal balance of $350 thousand or more, and for our acquisition of Community Central Bank, the specifically reviewed loan population included all loans with a principal balance of $475 thousand or more, resulting in approximately 60% of the acquired loan portfolios being specifically reviewed loans for each of these acquisitions. For our acquisition of First Place Bank, the specifically reviewed loan population included all commercial loans with an outstanding balance of $750 thousand or more, all residential mortgage loans with an outstanding balance of $1.0 million or more, and all impaired loans with a balance of $250 thousand or more as of the January 1, 2013 acquisition date, resulting in approximately 30% of the acquired loan portfolio being specifically reviewed. For our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, the specifically reviewed loan population included all loans with an outstanding balance of $500 thousand or more and a substantial portion of impaired loans with a balance of $250 thousand or more as of the January 1, 2014 acquisition date, resulting in approximately 50% of the acquired loan portfolio being specifically reviewed.

Non-specifically reviewed loans are categorized by risk profile and processed through an automated cash flow calculation model to generate expected cash flows on a loan by loan basis using contractual loan payment information such as coupon, payment type and amounts, and remaining maturity, along with assumptions that are assigned to each individual loan based on risk cohorts. Risk profiles are determined based on loan type, risk rating, delinquency history, current delinquency status, vintage, and collateral type. For our non-specifically reviewed loans, we apply life of loan default and loss assumptions, defined at a cohort level, to estimate future cash-flows. The assumptions are based on credit migration (migration of risk rating and past due status) combined with default, severity and prepayment data indicative of the market based upon market experience and benchmarking analysis of similar loans and/or portfolio sales and valuation. This information is captured through observation of comparable market transactions. Estimated future cash flows are discounted for each loan to determine initial fair value.

Where a loan exhibits evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the acquisition date that we will not collect all principal and interest payments in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement, we account for the loan under ASC 310-30, as a purchased credit impaired loan. At the date of acquisition, the majority of loans acquired in the CF Bancorp, First Banking Center, People State Bank and Community Central Bank acquisitions, as well as approximately 30% of the loans acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank and 40% of the loans acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank were accounted for under ASC 310-30 as purchased credit impaired loans. We account for all purchased credit impaired loans on a loan by loan basis. We recognize the expected shortfall of expected future cash flows on these loans, as compared to the contractual amount due, as a nonaccretable discount. Any excess of the net present value of expected future cash flows over the acquisition date fair value is recognized as accretable yield. The accretable yield includes both the expected coupon of the loan and the discount accretion. We recognize accretable discount as interest income over the expected remaining life of the purchased credit impaired loan using a method that approximates the level yield method.

Fair value premiums and discounts established on acquired loans accounted for outside the scope of ASC 310-30 fall under FASB ASC Subtopic 310-20, "Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs" ("ASC 310-20") and are accreted or amortized into interest income over the remaining term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loan's yield.

Because we record all acquired loans at fair value, we do not record an allowance for loan losses related to acquired loans on the acquisition date. We re-estimate expected cash flows on our purchased credit impaired loans on a quarterly basis. This re-estimation process is performed on a loan by loan basis and replicates the methods used in determining the initial fair value at the acquisition date. We aim to segment the purchased credit impaired loan portfolio between those that are specifically reviewed and those that are non-specifically reviewed loans to maintain similar or greater coverage as at the acquisition date in the specifically reviewed loan population.

Any decline in expected cash flows identified during the quarterly re-estimation process results in impairment which is measured based on the present value of the new expected cash flows, discounted using the pre-impairment accounting yield of the loan, compared to the recorded investment in the loan. An impairment that is due to a decline in expected cash flows is known as credit impairment, while an impairment that is due to a change in the expected timing of such cash flows is known as timing impairment. If any portion of the impairment is due to credit impairment, we record all of the impairment as provision for loan losses during the period. However, if the impairment is only related to a change in the expected timing of the cash flows, the impairment is recognized prospectively as a decrease in yield on the loan. Declines in cash flow expectations on covered loans which are due to credit impairment also result in an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset which is recorded as noninterest income in "FDIC loss sharing income" in our consolidated statements of income in the period. Any improvements in expected cash flows and the effect of changes in expected timing in the receipt of the expected cash flows, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the accretable yield on the loan. Improvements in cash flows on loans covered by a loss share agreement result in a decline in the expected indemnification cash flows which are reflected as a downward yield adjustment on the FDIC indemnification assets.

We modify loans in the normal course of business and assess all loan modifications to determine whether a modification constitutes a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") in accordance with ASC 310-40, "Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors" ("ASC 310-40"). For non-purchased credit impaired loans excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting, a modification is considered a TDR when a borrower is experiencing difficulties and we have granted a concession to the borrower that we would not normally consider and we conclude the concession results in an inability to collect all amounts due, including interest accrued at the original contractual terms. The concessions granted may include: principal deferral, interest rate concession, forbearance, principal reduction or

A/B note restructure (where the original loan is restructured into two notes where, one reflects the portion of the modified loan which is expected to be collected, and one that is fully charged off). None of the modifications to date were due to partial satisfaction of the loan.

For purchased credit impaired loans accounted for individually under ASC 310-30 (which is all of our purchased credit impaired loans), a modification is considered a TDR when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the effective yield after the modification is less than the effective yield at the time of the purchase in association with consideration of qualitative factors included within ASC 310-40. When a modification qualifies as a TDR and was initially individually accounted for under ASC 310-30, the loan is required to be moved from ASC 310-30 accounting and accounted for under ASC 310-40. In order to accomplish the transfer of the accounting for the TDR from ASC 310-30 to ASC 310-40, the loan is essentially retained in the ASC 310-30 accounting model and subject to the periodic cash flow re-estimation process. Similar to loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, deterioration in expected cash flows results in the recognition of impairment and an allowance for loan loss. However, unlike loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, improvements in estimated cash flows on these loans result only in recapturing previously recognized allowance for loan losses and the yield remains at the last yield recognized under ASC 310-30.

Acquired loans that are paid in full or are otherwise settled results in accelerated recognition of any remaining loan discount through "Accelerated discount on acquired loans" in our consolidated statements of income in the period. If such loans are covered loans, any remaining FDIC indemnification asset no longer expected to be received is also written off through "Accelerated discount on acquired loans" in our consolidated statements of income in the corresponding period.

The loss share agreements from our FDIC-assisted acquisitions and the purchase accounting impact from our acquisitions create volatility in our cash flows and operating results. The effects of the loss share agreements and purchase accounting, primarily on purchased credit impaired loans, on cash flows and operating results following an acquisition can create volatility as we work with borrowers to determine appropriate repayment terms or alternate resolutions. The effects will depend primarily on the ability of borrowers to make required payments over an extended period of time. At acquisition, management believes sufficient inherent discounts representing the expected losses compared to their acquired contractual payment amounts, were established. As a result, our operating results would only be adversely affected by losses to the extent that those losses exceed the expected losses reflected in the fair value at the acquisition date. In addition, as the loss share agreements cover up to a 10-year period (five years for loans other than single family residential mortgage loans), changing economic conditions will likely affect the timing of future charge-offs and the resulting reimbursements from the FDIC. Management believes that any recapture of interest income and recognition of cash flows from borrowers or amounts received from the FDIC as part of the FDIC indemnification asset may be incurred unevenly over this period, as we exhaust our collection efforts under our normal practices.

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of accounting policies generally accepted in the United States, the most significant of which are described in Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," to our audited consolidated financial statements. These policies require the reliance on estimates and assumptions, which may prove inaccurate or are subject to variations. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions, or estimates could have a material impact on our future financial condition and results of operations. The most critical of these significant accounting policies are the policies related to the allowance for loan losses, fair valuation methodologies, purchased loans, the FDIC indemnification asset and income taxes. These policies were reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and are discussed more fully below.

Section 107 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected not to take advantage of this extended transition period, which means the financial statements included in this Annual Report, as well as financial statements we file in the future, will be subject to all new or revised accounting standards generally applicable to public companies. Our election not to take advantage of the extended transition period is irrevocable.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies may additionally take advantage of some or all of the reduced regulatory and reporting requirements as long they qualify as an emerging growth company, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory shareholder vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe is sufficient to absorb probable, incurred credit losses in our loan portfolio given the conditions at the time. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio and other factors. These evaluations are inherently subjective as they require management to make material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by actual charge-offs, net of recoveries or previous amounts charged-off.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses on purchased loans based on credit deterioration subsequent to the acquisition date. In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, because we recorded all acquired loans at fair value, we did not establish an allowance for loan losses on any of the loans we purchased as of the acquisition date as any credit deterioration evident in the loans was included in the determination of the acquisition date fair values. For purchased credit impaired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 and troubled debt restructurings previously individually accounted for under ASC 310-30, management establishes an allowance for loan losses subsequent to the date of acquisition by re-estimating expected cash flows on these loans on a quarterly basis, with any decline in expected cash flows due to credit triggering impairment recorded as provision for loan losses. The allowance established is the excess of the loan's carrying value over the present value of projected future cash flows, discounted at the current accounting yield of the loan. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. While the determination of specific cash flows involves estimates, each estimate is unique to the individual loan, and none is individually significant. For non-purchased credit impaired loans acquired in the First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank transactions that are accounted for under ASC 310-20, the historical loss estimates are based on the historical losses experienced by First Place Bank, or Talmer Bank following the merger, and Talmer West Bank for loans with similar characteristics as those acquired other than purchased credit impaired loans. We record an allowance for loan losses only when the calculated amount exceeds the remaining credit mark established at acquisition. For all other purchased loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 or under ASC 310-40, the allowance is calculated in accordance with the methods used to calculate the allowance for loan losses for originated loans.

For loans we originate, the allowance consists of specific allowances, based on individual evaluation of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.

Our specific allowance relates to impaired loans that we individually evaluate based on a defined dollar threshold for commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and real estate construction loans, unless they are non-collateral dependent, in which case no threshold applies. In addition, all impaired loans held by Talmer West Bank are individually evaluated for impairment. For residential real estate and consumer loans, our specific allowance relates to all impaired loans. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. For individually evaluated impaired loans, a specific allowance is established when the discounted expected cash flows or the fair value of the underlying collateral of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of the loan. The valuations are reviewed and updated on a quarterly basis. While the determination of specific allowance may involve estimates, each estimate is unique to the individual loan, and none is individually significant.

Loans that do not meet the criteria to be evaluated individually are evaluated in homogeneous pools of loans with similar characteristics. The allowance for commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans that are not individually evaluated for impairment begins with a process of estimating probable incurred losses in the portfolio. These estimates are established based on our internal credit risk ratings and historical loss data. We assign internal credit risk ratings to each business loan at the time the loan is approved and these risk ratings are subjected to subsequent periodic reviews by senior management, at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of a circumstance that affects the credit risk of the loan. Since the operating history of Talmer Bank is limited and it has grown rapidly, the historical loss estimates for loans are based on a combination of actual historical loss experienced by all banks in Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin and our own historical losses. For loans originated by Talmer West Bank subsequent to the acquisition date, the historical loss rates are based on actual historical loss experienced by all banks in Michigan and Nevada and our own historical losses. Loss estimates are established by loan type including residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and real estate construction, and further segregated by region, including Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada, where applicable. In addition, management consideration is given to borrower rating migration experience and trends, industry concentrations and conditions, changes in collateral values of properties securing loans and trends with respect to past due and nonaccrual amounts and any adjustments are made accordingly.

The principal assumption used in deriving the allowance for loan losses is the estimate of probable, incurred credit loss for loans in each risk rating. Since a loss ratio is applied to a large portfolio of loans, any variation between actual and assumed results could be significant. To illustrate, if recent loss experience dictated that the estimated loss ratios would be changed by five percent (of the estimate) across all risk ratings, the allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2014 would change by approximately $361 thousand.

Note 6, "Allowance for Loan Losses," to our consolidated financial statements includes additional information about the allowance for loan losses.

The use of fair values is required in determining the carrying values of certain assets and liabilities, as well as for specific disclosures. Fair value is an estimate of the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction (i.e. not a forced transaction, such as a liquidation or distressed

sale) between market participants at the measurement date and is based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability.

In determining the fair value of financial instruments, market prices of the same or similar instruments are used whenever such prices are available. If observable market prices are unavailable or impracticable to obtain, we are required to make judgments about assumptions market participants would use in estimating the fair value of the financial instrument. Fair value is estimated using modeling techniques and incorporates assumptions about interest rates, duration, prepayment speeds, risks inherent in a particular valuation technique and the risk of nonperformance. These assumptions are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The models used to determine fair value adjustments are periodically evaluated by management for relevance under current facts and circumstances.

Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance differentiates between those assets and liabilities required to be carried at fair value at every reporting period ("recurring") and those assets and liabilities that are only required to be adjusted to fair value under certain circumstances ("nonrecurring"). Note 3, "Fair Value," to our audited consolidated financial statements includes information about the extent to which fair value is used to measure assets and liabilities and the valuation methodologies and key inputs used.

We record purchased loans at fair value at the date of acquisition based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considers various factors, including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, whether the loan has a fixed or variable interest rate, its term and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and our assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

We account for and evaluate purchased credit impaired loans for impairment in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-30. We estimate the cash flows expected to be collected on purchased loans based upon the expected remaining life of the loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. Cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. We perform re-estimations for each purchased credit impaired loan portfolio on a quarterly basis. Any decline in expected cash flows as a result of these re-estimations, due in any part to a change in credit, is deemed credit impairment, and recorded as provision for loan losses during the period. Any decline in expected cash flows due only to changes in expected timing of cash flows is recognized prospectively as a decrease in yield on the loan and any improvement in expected cash flows, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the yield on the loan. Acquired loans accounted for outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are included in the population assessed for impairment under the methods used to calculate the allowance for loan losses for originated loans.

The re-estimation process for purchased credit impaired loans is performed on a loan by loan basis and replicates the methods used in determining fair value at each acquisition date as described above in "Summary of Acquisition and Loss Share Accounting." We aim to segment the purchased credit impaired loan portfolio between specifically reviewed loans and non-specifically reviewed loans to maintain similar or greater coverage as at the acquisition date in the specifically reviewed loan population.

Purchased loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are accounted for under ASC 310-20 or ASC 310-40, where applicable. Adjustments created when the loans were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition are amortized or accreted over the remaining term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loan's yield.

Note 5, "Loans," to our audited consolidated financial statements includes additional information about purchased loans.

In conjunction with our FDIC-assisted acquisitions, Talmer Bank entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC and we recorded an FDIC indemnification asset that reflects the reimbursements we expect to receive from the FDIC for losses incurred on covered assets. The FDIC indemnification asset is measured separately from the related covered assets because it is not contractually embedded in those assets and is not transferable if we sell the assets. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will generally reimburse us for 80% of losses incurred on covered loans, although for certain pools of covered loans, the reimbursement rate for losses may be reduced if losses go above certain thresholds.

We recorded the FDIC indemnification assets at their estimated fair values at the time of each respective FDIC-assisted acquisition. Fair values are estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. These cash flows are discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing of the loss sharing reimbursement from the FDIC. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require management to make material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

The accounting for FDIC indemnification assets is closely related to the accounting for the underlying, indemnified assets. We re-estimate our expected cash flows on our indemnification asset in conjunction with our quarterly re-estimation of cash flows on covered assets accounted for under ASC 310-30. Improvements in cash flow expectations on covered assets generally result in a related decline in the expected indemnification cash flows and are reflected as a downward yield adjustment on the indemnification assets. When the expected cash flows on the indemnified assets increase such that a previously recorded covered allowance for loan losses is reversed, we account for the associated decrease in the indemnification asset immediately in earnings. Any remaining decrease in the indemnification asset is amortized over the lesser of the contractual term of the loss share agreement and the remaining life of the indemnified asset. Declines in cash flow expectations on these covered assets which are due to credit impairment are generally reflected as an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset and are recorded as noninterest income in "FDIC loss sharing income" in our consolidated statements of income. When covered assets are disposed of, through collection, charge-off or other settlement, any associated remaining indemnification asset, not recoverable from the FDIC, is written off as an offset to "FDIC loss sharing income" in our consolidated statements of income.

The calculation of our income tax provision, tax-related accruals and deferred taxes is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgments. Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due to taxing jurisdictions, currently or in the future, and are included net in "income tax benefit" on the consolidated balance sheets. We evaluate and assess the relative risks and appropriate tax treatment of transactions after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and other relevant information and maintain tax accruals consistent with our evaluation of these relative risks. Changes to the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in tax rates, interpretations of tax laws, the status of examinations being conducted by taxing authorities and changes to statutory, judicial, and regulatory guidance that impact the relative risks of tax positions. These changes, when they occur, can affect deferred and accrued taxes as well as the current period's income tax expense and can be material to our operating results.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. A deferred tax asset or liability is

recognized for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences, deductions and tax credits that can be carried forward and utilized in future years. We assess whether a valuation allowance should be established against our deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all available evidence using a "more likely than not" standard. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. The valuation of current and deferred tax liabilities and assets is considered critical as it requires management to make estimates based on provisions of the enacted tax laws and other future events. The assessment of tax assets and liabilities involves the use of estimates, assumptions, interpretations, and judgments concerning certain accounting pronouncements and federal and state tax codes. There can be no assurance that future events, such as court decisions or positions of federal and state taxing authorities, will not differ from management's current assessment, the impact of which could be significant to the consolidated results of operations and reported earnings.

We are subject to audit by taxing authorities that could question and/or challenge the tax positions taken by us. Note 16, "Income Taxes," to our audited consolidated financial statements includes additional information about income taxes.

We had net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 of $90.9 million, or $1.21 per average diluted share, compared to $98.6 million, or $1.41 per average diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2013. These results reflect the increased revenues and expenses related to the acquisition of Talmer West Bank which are discussed below, including a $42.0 million bargain purchase gain. The results for the year ended December 31, 2013 included a $71.7 million bargain purchase gain as a result of our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013. Excluding the operating results of Talmer West Bank, which includes $1.6 million recognized on the sale of the Albuquerque, New Mexico branch office, and the bargain purchase gains related to our acquisitions of Talmer West Bank and First Place Bank recognized in 2014 and 2013, respectively, net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased $17.3 million, compare to the prior year. This increase primarily reflects a decrease in noninterest expense of $73.1 million and a $12.8 million gain recognized on the sale of our Wisconsin branches, partially offset by decreases in mortgage banking and other loan fees of $29.7 million and a decrease in net gain on sales of loans of $23.5 million. The decline in noninterest expenses was primarily due to overall operating efficiencies we have created through the merger of First Place Bank into Talmer Bank, including a reduction in employee headcount as we have eliminated duplicative positions and streamlined operations. The decline in mortgage banking and other loans fees primarily reflects the change in the fair value of loan servicing rights due to adjustments to fair value assumptions driven by interest rate fluctuations which impact assumed prepayment speeds, which was a detriment to earnings of $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to a benefit to earnings of $14.2 million for the same period in 2013. Additionally, lower levels of mortgage origination volume and mortgage banking revenue are due to both fluctuations in mortgage interest rates and the closure of our wholesale mortgage lending division in the fourth quarter of 2013, which adversely impacted mortgage banking and other loan fees for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in net gain on sales of loans for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, was primarily due to reduced levels of residential mortgage loans originated for sale.

We had net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 of $98.6 million, or $1.41 per average diluted share, compared to $21.7 million, or $0.44 per average diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The $76.9 million increase in net income for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, was primarily due to the combined impact of increases in interest income and noninterest income related to our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013 and the benefit related to the reversal of a portion of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets that were established upon our acquisition of First Place Bank discussed below. The First Place

Bank acquisition more than doubled our loan portfolio, meaningfully added to our mortgage banking operations, and resulted in $71.7 million of bargain purchase gain recorded in the first quarter of 2013. These revenue increases were substantially offset by heightened noninterest expenses related to the addition of First Place Bank which more than doubled our employee headcount, expanded our branch operations, and significantly increased third party professional fees, acquisition and due diligence fees, deposit insurance costs, data processing fees and other expenses. In addition, during 2013, we operated First Place Bank as a separately chartered subsidiary bank as we worked to resolve the Cease and Desist Order, which limited the operating efficiencies we could gain from the acquisition during 2013. First Place Bank achieved compliance with the Cease and Desist Order, and on January 28, 2014, the FDIC approved the consolidation of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank, which occurred on February 10, 2014. At the effective time of the consolidation, First Place Bank merged with and into Talmer Bank and the Cease and Desist Order had no further force or effect.

Net interest income is the difference between interest income and yield-related fees earned on assets and interest expense paid on liabilities. Adjustments are made to the yields on tax-exempt assets in order to present tax-exempt income and fully taxable income on a comparable basis. The "Analysis of Net Interest Income-Fully Taxable Equivalent" tables within this financial review provide an analysis of net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. The "Rate/Volume Analysis" tables describe the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent ("FTE") basis for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

We had net interest income of $204.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $36.3 million, from $168.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in net interest income in 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, resulted primarily from the addition of $38.2 million of net interest income related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank and its inclusion into our operations beginning January 1, 2014. Our net interest margin (FTE) for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased 14 basis points to 4.04% from 3.90% for the comparable period in 2013. The increase in net interest margin was primarily due to the benefit of a shift in our loan composition from residential real estate loans, which increased as a result of our acquisition of First Place Bank in 2013, to a larger percentage of commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans, which, on average, have a higher yield than residential real estate loans, and, as discussed below, a decrease in the impact of the negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset, as the size of the indemnification asset has decreased substantially. These benefits were partially offset by the run-off of higher yielding covered loans and higher yielding uncovered purchased credit impaired loans.

We had net interest income of $168.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, an increase of $71.1 million, from $96.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in net interest income in 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, resulted primarily from the addition of $80.3 million of net interest income related to our acquisition of First Place Bank, partially offset by an $8.9 million increase in the negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset. The negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset resulted from improvements in our expected cash flows from purchased credit impaired covered loans which, in turn, reduced our expected payments from the FDIC. Our net interest margin (FTE) for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased 79 basis points to 3.90%, from 4.69% for the comparable period in 2012. The decrease in net interest margin was due to a combination of several factors, the largest being the acquisition of First Place Bank, which had a significantly higher proportion of its loan portfolio in residential mortgage loans that, on average, have a lower yield than Talmer Bank's predominantly commercial loan portfolio, the run-off of higher yielding covered loans, and, as discussed below, the decline in the combined net interest margin benefit

from the excess accretable yield on purchased credit impaired loans and the negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset.

Our net interest margin benefits from discount accretion on our purchased credit impaired loan portfolios, a component of our accretable yield. The accretable yield represents the excess of the net present value of expected future cash flows over the acquisition date fair value and includes both the expected coupon of the loan and the discount accretion. The accretable yield is recognized as interest income over the expected remaining life of the purchased credit impaired loan. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the yield on total loans was 5.77% and 6.30%, respectively, while the yield on total loans generated using only the expected coupon (with respect to purchased credit impaired loans) would have been 4.69% and 4.78%, respectively. The difference between the actual yield earned on total loans and the yield generated based on the contractual coupon (not including any interest income for loans in nonaccrual status) represents excess accretable yield.

Our net interest margin is also adversely impacted by the negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset. Because our quarterly cash flow re-estimations have continuously resulted in improvements in overall expected cash flows on covered loans, our expected payments from the FDIC under our loss share agreements have declined, resulting in a negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset, which partially offsets the benefits provided by the excess accretable yield discussed above. The negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset was 25.16% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 15.43% for the year ended December 31, 2013. The combination of the excess accretable yield and the negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset benefited net interest margin by 30 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 43 basis points for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The following tables set forth information related to our average balance sheet, average yields on assets, and average costs of liabilities. We derived these yields by dividing income or expense by the average balance of the corresponding assets or liabilities. We derived average balances from the daily balances throughout the periods indicated.

	For the years ended December 31,

	2014									2013									2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balance			Interest(1)			Average Rate(2)			Average Balance			Interest(1)			Average Rate(2)			Average Balance			Interest(1)			Average Rate(2)
Earning assets:
Interest-earning balances	$	265,155		$	640			0.24	%	$	307,256		$	776			0.25	%	$	58,946		$	133			0.23	%
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		73,453			527			0.72			111,239			930			0.84			67,764			507			0.75
Investment securities(3):
Taxable		505,754			8,509			1.68			451,517			6,097			1.35			287,134			4,977			1.73
Tax-exempt		197,786			6,232			4.22			179,382			4,230			3.18			129,808			3,478			3.61
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		17,841			867			4.86			16,162			872			5.40			2,820			95			3.38
Gross uncovered loans(4)		3,473,608			171,196			4.93			2,431,647			117,117			4.82			304,173			28,995			9.53
Gross covered loans(4)		451,590			55,478			12.28			659,820			77,740			11.78			940,510			83,535			8.88
FDIC indemnification asset		105,034			(26,426	)		(25.16	)		181,768			(28,040	)		(15.43	)		301,109			(19,156	)		(6.36	)

Total earning assets		5,090,221			217,023			4.31			4,338,791			179,722			4.18			2,092,264			102,564			4.96

Non-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks		97,935									107,249									48,008
Allowance for loan losses		(56,094	)								(59,123	)								(58,900	)
Premises and equipment		53,142									56,885									41,187
Core deposit intangible		15,055									14,524									6,672
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		53,513									37,700									24,192
Loan servicing rights		75,863									61,848									4,762
FDIC receivable		7,592									12,520									32,585
Company-owned life insurance		81,245									38,843									—
Other non-earning assets		224,232									116,548									24,731

Total assets	$	5,642,704								$	4,725,785								$	2,215,501



Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	689,225		$	824			0.12	%	$	564,447		$	673			0.12	%	$	305,039		$	571			0.19	%
Money market and savings deposits		1,289,388			1,930			0.15			1,231,066			1,889			0.15			555,348			1,105			0.20
Time deposits		1,247,907			6,080			0.49			1,079,779			5,864			0.54			489,206			3,210			0.66
Other brokered funds		268,080			879			0.33			76,134			142			0.19			6,317			16			0.25
Short-term borrowings		153,951			420			0.27			49,493			105			0.21			24,143			42			0.17
Long-term debt		257,487			2,627			1.02			260,514			3,052			1.17			46,060			751			1.63

Total interest-bearing liabilities		3,906,038			12,760			0.33			3,261,433			11,725			0.36			1,426,113			5,695			0.40

Noninterest-bearing liabilities and shareholders' equity:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		943,321									765,853									391,327
FDIC clawback liability		25,823									23,364									21,196
Other liabilities		38,829									71,478									24,956
Shareholders' equity		728,693									603,657									351,909

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	5,642,704								$	4,725,785								$	2,215,501



Net interest income				$	204,263								$	167,997								$	96,869



Interest spread								3.98	%								3.82	%								4.56	%



Net interest margin as a percentage of interest earning assets								4.01	%								3.87	%								4.63	%



Tax equivalent effect								0.03	%								0.03	%								0.06	%



Net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis								4.04	%								3.90	%								4.69	%

The tables below present the effect of volume and rate changes on interest income and expense. Changes in volume are changes in in the average balance multiplied by the previous year's average rate. Changes in rate are changes in the average rate multiplied by the average balance from the previous year. The net changes attributable to the combined impact of both rate and volume have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.

	For the years ended December 31, 2014 vs. 2013

	Increase (Decrease) Due to:
	Increase (Decrease) Due to:						Net Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in thousands)	Rate			Volume			Net Increase (Decrease)
Interest earning assets
Interest earning balances	$	(33	)	$	(103	)	$	(136	)
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		(119	)		(284	)		(403	)
Investment securities:
Taxable		1,621			791			2,412
Tax-exempt		1,534			468			2,002
FHLB stock		(91	)		86			(5	)
Gross uncovered loans		2,786			51,293			54,079
Gross covered loans		3,194			(25,456	)		(22,262	)
FDIC indemnification asset		(13,217	)		14,831			1,614

Total interest income		(4,325	)		41,626			37,301

Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing demand deposits		2			149			151
Money market and savings deposits		(47	)		88			41
Time deposits		(641	)		857			216
Other brokered funds		170			567			737
Short-term borrowings		38			277			315
Long-term debt		(390	)		(35	)		(425	)

Total interest expense		(868	)		1,903			1,035

Change in net interest income	$	(3,457	)	$	39,723		$	36,266

	For the years ended December 31, 2013 vs. 2012

	Increase (Decrease) Due to:
	Increase (Decrease) Due to:						Net Increase (Decrease)
(Dollars in thousands)	Rate			Volume			Net Increase (Decrease)
Interest earning assets
Interest earning balances	$	18		$	625		$	643
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		65			358			423
Investment securities:
Taxable		(1,275	)		2,395			1,120
Tax-exempt		(455	)		1,207			752
FHLB stock		88			689			777
Gross uncovered loans		(20,973	)		109,095			88,122
Gross covered loans		23,023			(28,818	)		(5,795	)
FDIC indemnification asset		(18,830	)		9,946			(8,884	)

Total interest income		(18,339	)		95,497			77,158

Interest-bearing liabilities
Interest-bearing demand deposits		(260	)		362			102
Money market and savings deposits		(302	)		1,086			784
Time deposits		(637	)		3,291			2,654
Other brokered funds		(5	)		131			126
Short-term borrowings		11			52			63
Long-term debt		(268	)		2,569			2,301

Total interest expense		(1,461	)		7,491			6,030

Change in net interest income	$	(16,878	)	$	88,006		$	71,128

We established an allowance for loan losses on both covered and uncovered loans through a provision for loan losses charged as an expense in our consolidated statements of income. Management reviews our loan portfolio, consisting of originated loans and purchased loans that are not covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, on a quarterly basis to evaluate our outstanding loans and to measure both the performance of the portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

We did not record an allowance for loan losses at acquisition for purchased uncovered or covered loans as these loans were recorded at fair value, based on a discounted cash flow methodology, at the date of each respective acquisition. We re-estimate expected cash flows on a quarterly basis for all loans purchased with credit impairment. We record a provision for loan losses during the period for any decline in expected cash flows. Conversely, any improvement in expected cash flows is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the yield on the loan once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured.

The provision for credit losses on off balance sheet items, a component of "other expense" in our consolidated statements of income, reflects management's assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments.

For a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses, refer to the "Critical Accounting Policies" and the "Allowance for Loan Losses" sections of this financial review.

The provision for loan losses on uncovered loans was $23.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Our allowance for loan losses was $33.8 million, or 0.87% of uncovered loans at December 31, 2014, compared to $17.7 million, or 0.72% of uncovered loans, at December 31, 2013. The provision for loan losses on uncovered loans for the year ended December 31, 2014 reflects impairment recorded as a result of our re-estimation of cash flows for uncovered purchased credit impaired loans, additional provisions for organic loan growth and an increase in provisions for impaired loans individually evaluated, partially, offset by the impact of improvements in historical loss factors. We recorded impairment related to re-estimations of cash flows for uncovered purchased credit impaired loans of $14.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, and $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The re-estimations also resulted in improvements in gross cash flow expectations on uncovered purchased credit impaired loans of $57.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, and $33.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, which will be recognized prospectively as an increase in the accretable yield and accreted into interest income over the expected remaining life of the related uncovered purchased credit impaired loan.

The provision for loan losses on uncovered loans was $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The allowance for loan losses on uncovered loans was $17.7 million, or 0.72% of uncovered loans, at December 31, 2013, compared to $10.9 million, or 1.81% of uncovered loans, at December 31, 2012. The decline in the uncovered allowance for loan losses as a percentage of uncovered loans was due primarily to the addition of loans we acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank which were recorded at their estimated fair value, including a credit mark representing approximately 6.4% of the balance of the acquired loans at the acquisition date, and which did not include a separate allowance for loan losses, partially offset by additions to the allowance for losses for newly originated loans and impairment recorded as a result of our quarterly re-estimations of cash flows on uncovered purchased credit impaired loans.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, we had a provision benefit for covered loan losses of $18.8 million, compared to a provision benefit for covered loans of $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Our allowance for loan losses on covered loans was $21.4 million, or 6.16% of total covered loans, at December 31, 2014, compared to $40.4 million, or 7.62% of total covered loans, at December 31, 2013. The provision benefit for covered loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 primarily reflects the relief of allowance for loan losses due to payments received on covered loans previously carrying an allowance for loan loss, partially offset by net impairment of $1.5 million and $11.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, resulting from our re-estimation of cash flows for covered purchased credit impaired loans. The re-estimations completed for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 also resulted in $41.5 million and $49.1 million, respectively, of improvements in gross cash flow expectations on covered purchased credit impaired loans, which will be recognized prospectively as an increase in the accretable yield and accreted into interest income over the expected remaining life of the related covered purchased credit impaired loan.

The year ended December 31, 2013 included a provision benefit for covered loan losses of $10.4 million, compared to a provision expense of $32.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our allowance for loan losses on covered loans was $40.4 million, or 7.62% of total covered loans, at December 31, 2013, compared to $51.5 million, or 7.17% of total covered loans, at December 31, 2012. The decrease in provision expense to a net benefit for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to

the year ended December 31, 2012 was primarily due to a $15.0 million decrease in the impairment recorded due to re-estimations of cash flows for covered purchased credit impaired loans.

Many of our covered loans were originated prior to or during the recession and these loans typically have weak credit metrics such as high loan to value ratios and low debt service coverage ratios. Therefore, the ultimate credit outcome for the covered loans can be volatile. As the economy has begun to stabilize, we have started to see many of these covered loans perform better than expected, while some are performing worse than expected.

A substantial portion of the provision or benefit for loan loss on covered loans is offset by FDIC loss sharing income. An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, including charge-offs and recoveries by loan category, is provided in the "Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses—Uncovered" and the "Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses—Covered" tables in this financial review.

The following table details the components of the provision for loan losses on covered loans and the impact to net income.

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Provision (benefit) for loan losses—covered:
Net impairment recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30(1)	$	1,491		$	11,179		$	26,219
Additional provision (benefit) recorded, net of charge-offs, for covered loans		(20,246	)		(21,601	)		6,039

Total provision (benefit) for loan losses—covered	$	(18,755	)	$	(10,422	)	$	32,258

Less: FDIC loss share income:
Income recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30(1)		4,015			5,598			16,883
Income (expense) recorded, to offset provision (benefit), for covered loans		(11,729	)		(17,281	)		4,831

Total loss sharing income (expense) due to provision for loan losses—covered		(7,714	)		(11,683	)		21,714

Net (increase) decrease to income before taxes:
Net (income) expense recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30(1)		(2,524	)		5,581			9,336
Net (income) expense recorded, for covered loans including those accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-40		(8,517	)		(4,320	)		1,208

Net (increase) decrease to income before taxes	$	(11,041	)	$	1,261		$	10,544

The following table presents noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

	For the year ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Noninterest income
Deposit fee income	$	12,225		$	15,886		$	5,353
Mortgage banking and other loan fees		1,163			30,853			3,195
Net gain on sales of loans		17,747			41,212			13,449
Net gain on sale of branches		14,410			—			—
Bargain purchase gain		41,977			71,702			—
FDIC loss sharing income		(6,211	)		(10,226	)		21,498
Accelerated discount on acquired loans		18,197			17,154			18,914
Net gain (loss) on sales of securities		(2,066	)		392			6,057
Other income		20,057			14,165			5,843

Total noninterest income	$	117,499		$	181,138		$	74,309

Noninterest income decreased $63.6 million to $117.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $181.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease in noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily due to the recognition of $42.0 million of bargain purchase gain related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank in 2014, compared to $71.7 million of bargain purchase gain related to our acquisition of First Place Bank in 2013. In addition, the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, included decreases in mortgage banking and other loan fees of $29.7 million and net gain on sales of loans of $23.5 million, partially offset by $14.4 million of net gain on sale of branches recognized in the year ended December 31, 2014 related to the sales of our Wisconsin branches and New Mexico branch discussed below. The decline in mortgage banking and other loan fees was driven by several factors including a change in the fair value of loan servicing rights due to adjustments to fair value assumptions driven by interest rate fluctuations that impacted assumed prepayment speeds, which was a detriment to earnings of $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to a benefit of $14.2 million for the same period in 2013. Lower levels of both mortgage origination volume and mortgage banking revenue due to both fluctuations in mortgage interest rates and the closure of our wholesale mortgage lending division in the fourth quarter of 2013 also negatively impacted our mortgage banking and other loan fees. The decrease in net gain on sales of loans during the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, was primarily due to reduced levels of residential mortgage loans originated for sale.

On July 18, 2014, we sold our single branch office located in Albuquerque, New Mexico along with its $34.1 million of deposits and $23.7 million of loans to Grants State Bank, a unit of First Bancorp of Durango, Inc. The net impact to pre-tax income related to this transaction recorded in the third quarter of 2014 was a $1.6 million benefit, representing the gain on the sale of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, partially offset by the write-off of the related core deposit intangible of $91 thousand and other costs associated with the transaction of approximately $170 thousand. The benefit of $1.6 million is recorded in "Net gain on sale of branches" on our consolidated statements of income.

Additionally, on August 8, 2014, we sold our ten branch offices located in Wisconsin to Town Bank, a wholly owned bank subsidiary of Wintrust Financial Corporation. Town Bank assumed all of our deposits in Wisconsin totaling $354.8 million as of August 8, 2014. The net impact to pre-tax income related to this transaction recorded in the third quarter of 2014 is a $12.8 million benefit,

representing the gain on the sale of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, partially offset by the write-off of the related core deposit intangible of $911 thousand and other costs associated with the transaction of approximately $248 thousand. The benefit of $12.8 million is recorded in "Net gain on sale of branches" on our consolidated statements of income.

Noninterest income increased $106.8 million to $181.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, from $74.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to the same period in 2012, was primarily due to the recognition of $71.7 million of bargain purchase gain related to our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013, a $27.8 million increase in net gain on sales of loans and a $27.7 million increase in mortgage banking and other loan fees primarily as a result of our acquisition of First Place Bank, partially offset by a $31.7 million decline in FDIC loss sharing income. First Place Bank contributed $32.5 million of net gain on sales of loans, $25.1 million of mortgage banking and other loan fees, and $10.4 million of deposit fee income. We experienced reductions in our mortgage origination volume of approximately 40% during the third and fourth quarters of 2013, compared to the first half of the year, and our total mortgage banking related revenue declined approximately 50% over the same period. In the fourth quarter of 2013, we reduced our expenses by closing our wholesale mortgage division and made other meaningful mortgage staff reductions. The decline in FDIC loss sharing income to an expense primarily reflects the shift of the provision for loan losses on covered loans from an expense to a benefit, which resulted in the establishment of amounts owed to the FDIC related to recoveries on previously claimed charge-offs.

The following table presents noninterest expenses for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

	For the year ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		2012
Noninterest expense
Salary and employee benefits	$	121,744	$	146,609	$	59,252
Occupancy and equipment expense		31,806		26,755		14,044
Data processing fees		6,399		7,591		4,111
Professional service fees		12,952		16,640		4,925
FDIC loss sharing expense		2,158		2,007		3,024
Bank acquisition and due diligence fees		3,765		8,693		1,382
Marketing expense		4,923		3,484		1,934
Other employee expense		2,674		3,096		1,268
Insurance expense		5,697		9,974		2,436
Other expense		26,762		25,965		11,028

Total noninterest expense	$	218,880	$	250,814	$	103,404

Noninterest expenses decreased $31.9 million to $218.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $250.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Total noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 reflects the inclusion of Talmer West Bank into our operations beginning January 1, 2014, which added approximately $41.2 million of operating costs. The decrease in noninterest expense for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 2013, was primarily due to decreases of $24.9 million in salary and employee benefits, $4.9 million in bank acquisition and due diligence fees, $4.3 million in insurance expense and $3.7 million in professional service fees, partially offset by an increase of $5.1 million in occupancy and equipment expense. Salary and employee benefits during the year ended December 31, 2014 included $5.8 million of transaction and integration related expenses, including severance expense and bonus payments related to our successful acquisition of Talmer West Bank, the merger of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank and the completion of our initial public offering, while the year ended December 31, 2013, included $11.6 million of transaction and integration related expenses, including First Place Bank acquisition related bonuses, stock options issued and the accrual of anticipated severance payments for planned reductions in the work force. The remaining decline in salary and employee benefits for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, relates significantly to a reduction in employee headcount as we have eliminated duplicative positions and streamlined operations with the merger of First Place Bank into Talmer Bank. These declines in operating expense reflect management's efforts to improve our operating efficiency, resulting in operating expenses, less transaction and integration related costs, decreasing in each quarter of 2014. Our core operating efficiency ratio improved to 72.8% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 80.4% for the year ended December 31, 2013. The efficiency ratio is a measure of noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and noninterest income. Our core efficiency ratio begins with the efficiency ratio and then excludes certain items deemed by management to not be related to regular operations including bargain purchase gains, the fair value adjustment to our loan servicing rights, transaction and integration related costs, FDIC loss sharing income and gain on sales of branches.

Noninterest expenses increased $147.4 million to $250.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, from $103.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily due to the addition of First Place Bank's operating costs which totaled $129.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we added an additional 839 full-time equivalent employees for a total of 1,434, primarily as a result of our acquisition of First Place Bank. We also had a $9.1 million increase in salary and employee benefits expense outside of our acquisition of First Place Bank, and a $7.3 million increase in bank acquisition and due diligence fees. The increase in salary and employee benefits outside of our acquisition of First Place Bank was primarily due to acquisition related bonuses, stock options issued, and severance payments for reductions in the work force. Our bank acquisition and due diligence fees are expenses related to both the integration of First Place Bank and our due diligence expenses incurred in 2013 related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recognized income tax expense of $7.7 million on $98.6 million of pre-tax income resulting in an effective tax rate of 7.8%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2013, in which we recognized an income tax benefit of $5.3 million on $93.2 million of pre-tax income, resulting in an effective tax rate of a negative 5.7%. Low effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, resulted primarily because the $42.0 million bargain purchase gain resulting from our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014 and the $71.7 million bargain purchase gain resulting from our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013 are non-taxable given the tax structure of the acquisitions.

The low effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2014 was also impacted by the elimination of the remaining valuation allowance of $10.1 million on the deferred tax assets acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013 resulting from a conclusion reached in the second quarter of 2014, with the assistance of legal and tax accounting experts, regarding the calculation of the annual Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code limitation related to the ownership change of First Place Bank. The low effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2013 was also impacted by a reduction of $14.4 million of the $24.5 million valuation allowance established at acquisition date on the deferred tax assets associated with First Place Bank pre-tax losses. The $14.4 million decrease in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance during 2013 was largely due to post-acquisition date reductions in our original estimates of projected realized built-in losses on loans (i.e. bad debt deductions) occurring in the one year period following the acquisition date.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized an income tax expense of $10.2 million on pre-tax income of $31.9 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 32.1%. Further information on income taxes is presented in Note 14, "Income Taxes," of our audited consolidated financial statements.

Total assets were $5.9 billion at December 31, 2014, an increase of $1.3 billion compared to December 31, 2013. Of the $1.3 billion increase, $910.3 million was related to the acquisition date fair value of assets acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank. The increase in total assets of $413.1 million, setting aside the fair value of assets acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, was primarily due to an increase in net uncovered loans of $841.0 million, securities available-for-sale of $107.1 million and company-owned life insurance of $58.3 million, partially offset by decreases in cash and cash equivalents of $338.0 million, net covered loans of $164.6 million and the FDIC indemnification asset of $64.8 million. The increase in net uncovered loans reflects $945.3 million of net uncovered loan growth in Talmer Bank's portfolio, partially offset by $104.3 million of net loan run-off in Talmer West Bank's loan portfolio subsequent to acquisition. The increases in securities available-for-sale and company-owned life insurance primarily reflect management's plan to more fully deploy excess liquidity [with a diverse mix of investments including U.S. government sponsored agency obligations, tax exempt obligations of state and political subdivisions and privately issued residential mortgage backed securities, partially offset by a decrease in small business administration and corporate debt securities]. The decrease in net covered loans reflects the run-off of $183.6 million in covered loans partially offset by a reduction in the allowance for covered loan losses of $19.0 million. The decrease in the FDIC indemnification asset is primarily the result of the negative accretion on the indemnification asset resulting from improvements in expected cash flows on covered loans, the write-off of our FDIC indemnification asset due to pay downs on covered loans and new claims filed with the FDIC for losses incurred on covered loans.

Total assets were $4.5 billion at December 31, 2013, compared to $2.3 billion at December 31, 2012. The acquisition date fair value of assets acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank increased assets by $2.6 billion. The primary drivers of the change in assets year over year were a $1.7 billion increase in net total loans, a $274.7 million increase in securities available-for-sale, a $109.7 million increase in income tax benefit, and a $73.0 million increase in loan servicing rights, partially offset by a $94.5 million decrease in the FDIC indemnification asset. The $1.7 billion increase in net total loans primarily reflects $1.5 billion acquired in the acquisition of First Place Bank at January 1, 2013, and net originated loan growth of approximately $600.0 million, partially offset by covered and uncovered acquired loan run-off of approximately $400.0 million. Of the $274.7 million increase in securities available-for-sale, $139.8 million was related to the fair value of securities available-for-sale acquired in the First Place Bank acquisition, with the remainder of the increase primarily reflecting management's plan to more fully deploy excess liquidity with a diverse mix of investments including mortgage-backed

securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies, U.S. government sponsored agency obligations, corporate debt securities, Small Business Administration Pools and tax-exempt obligations of state and political subdivisions. The $109.7 million increase in income tax benefit during the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily reflects the acquisition date fair value of income tax benefit of $82.0 million related to the First Place Bank acquisition. Of the $73.0 million increase in loan servicing rights, $42.0 million was related to the fair value of loan servicing rights acquired in the First Place Bank acquisition with the remainder of the increase primarily driven by $23.8 million of residential mortgage loan servicing rights added to the portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease in the FDIC indemnification asset is primarily the result of adjustments due to recoveries received on loans previously claimed, new claims filed for losses on covered loans and the negative accretion on the indemnification asset resulting from improvements in expected cash flows on covered loans.

Total liabilities were $5.1 billion at December 31, 2014, compared to $3.9 billion at December 31, 2013. The acquisition date fair value of liabilities assumed in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank increased liabilities by $861.8 million. The $1.2 billion increase in liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2014 was primarily due to increases in total deposits of $948.0 million, long-term debt of $154.9 million and short-term borrowings of $63.9 million. The $948.0 million increase in total deposits primarily reflects the acquisition date fair value of deposits assumed of $857.8 million related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank and Talmer Bank deposit growth of $557.8 million driven largely by an increase in other brokered funds, partially offset by $389.5 million of deposits sold in our Wisconsin and New Mexico branch office sales and Talmer West Bank deposit run-off of $166.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. The decline in deposits due to the sales of our Wisconsin and New Mexico branch offices created a need for additional funding which was replaced largely by additional brokered funds. The increases in long-term debt and short-term borrowings primarily reflect Federal Home Loan Bank advances added during the year ended December 31, 2014, partially offset by the repayment of our $35.0 million line of credit related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank.

Total liabilities were $3.9 billion at December 31, 2013, compared to $1.8 billion at December 31, 2012. The acquisition date fair value of liabilities assumed in our acquisition of First Place Bank increased liabilities by $2.5 billion. The primary drivers of the year over year change in liabilities were a $1.9 billion increase in total deposits and a $160.6 million increase in long-term debt. The $1.9 billion increase in total deposits reflects the acquisition date fair value of deposits assumed of $2.1 billion related to our acquisition of First Place Bank, partially offset by deposit run-off as a result of management's efforts to reduce the level of higher cost certificates of deposit acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank. The increase in long-term debt is primarily the result of our assumption of $313.0 million of long-term debt at fair value in our acquisition of First Place Bank, partially offset by $45.0 million of long-term debt associated with our acquisition of First Place Bank that was immediately retired at closing and other net debt payments throughout the year.

Total shareholders' equity at December 31, 2014 was $761.6 million, an increase of $144.6 million from $617.0 million at December 31, 2013. The increase primarily reflects net income of $90.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and our initial public offering completed in February 2014 that raised $42.0 million of capital, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

Total shareholders' equity at December 31, 2013 was $617.0 million, an increase of $96.3 million from $520.7 million at December 31, 2012. The increase was due to net income of $98.6 million and a $9.6 million increase in additional paid-in-capital, partially offset by an $11.9 million reduction to accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of shifts in the fair value of investment securities available-for-sale. The increase to additional paid-in-capital in 2013 was largely due to expenses related to stock options incurred during the year on stock options granted and fully vested during 2013.

Our loan portfolio represents a broad range of borrowers primarily in the Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin and Nevada markets, comprised of residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, real estate construction and consumer financing loans. All loans acquired in the CF Bancorp acquisition and all loans (except consumer loans) acquired in the First Banking Center, Peoples State Bank and Community Central Bank acquisitions were acquired under loss share agreements with the FDIC that call for the FDIC to reimburse us for a portion of our losses incurred on such loans, and we present covered loans separately from uncovered loans due to these loss share agreements.

Residential real estate loans represent loans to consumers for the purchase or refinance of a residence. These loans are generally financed over a 15- to 30-year term and, in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence with both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate terms. Residential real estate loans also include home equity loans and lines of credit that are secured by a first- or second-lien on the borrower's residence. Home equity lines of credit consist mainly of revolving lines of credit secured by residential real estate.

Commercial real estate loans consist of term loans secured by a mortgage lien on the real property, such as apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, retail shopping centers and farmland.

Commercial and industrial loans include financing for commercial purposes in various lines of businesses, including manufacturing, service industry, professional service areas and agricultural. Commercial and industrial loans are generally secured with the assets of the company and/or the personal guarantee of the business owners.

Real estate construction loans are term loans to individuals, companies or developers used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property. Generally, these loans are for construction projects that have been either presold, preleased, or have secured permanent financing, as well as loans to real estate companies with significant equity invested in the project.

Consumer loans include loans made to individuals not secured by real estate, including loans secured by automobiles or watercraft, and personal unsecured loans.

Concentrations of credit risk can exist in relation to individual borrowers or groups of borrowers, certain types of collateral, certain types of industries or certain geographic regions. Credit risk associated with these concentrations could arise when a significant amount of loans or other financial instruments, related by similar characteristics, are simultaneously impacted by changes in economic or other conditions that cause their probability of repayment or other type of settlement to be adversely affected. Our uncovered loan portfolio is managed to a risk-appropriate level as to not create a collateral, industry or geographic concentration. As of December 31, 2014, we do not have any significant concentrations to any one industry or borrower. Our largest geographic concentration of loans is in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia metropolitan statistical area ("MSA"), which includes borrowers located in Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Livingston, St. Clair and Lapeer counties in the state of Michigan. Loans to borrowers in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA totaled $1.5 billion, or approximately 36.1% of total loans, at December 31, 2014, of which approximately $259.3 million, or 16.9% of the total Detroit-Warren-Livonia MSA loans, were covered by loss share agreements with the FDIC.

The following tables detail our loan portfolio by loan type and geographic location as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. Geographic location is primarily determined by the domicile of the borrower and in some instances, the location of the collateral.

(Dollars in thousands)	Michigan		Ohio		Wisconsin		Illinois		Indiana		Nevada		Other		Total

December 31, 2014
Uncovered loans
Residential real estate(1)(2)	$	603,480	$	535,024	$	12,555	$	42,059	$	100,955	$	11,921	$	120,018	$	1,426,012
Commercial real estate(3)(4)		748,098		276,292		43,670		89,763		37,557		90,847		24,711		1,310,938
Commercial and industrial(5)		388,039		118,089		23,452		135,350		24,419		22,489		157,639		869,477
Real estate construction		63,042		19,279		8,897		17,151		16,317		4,402		2,598		131,686
Consumer		34,941		4,567		1,649		4,861		2,332		3,964		112,210		164,524

Total uncovered loans		1,837,600		953,251		90,223		289,184		181,580		133,623		417,176		3,902,637
Covered loans
Residential real estate(1)		82,399		280		22,984		1,005		1,461		97		—		108,226
Commercial real estate(3)		161,364		—		23,536		1,182		74		—		506		186,662
Commercial and industrial(5)		21,147		80		10,951		351		—		—		119		32,648
Real estate construction		4,689		—		3,913		787		—		—		—		9,389
Consumer		9,494		54		3		4		10		—		—		9,565

Total covered loans		279,093		414		61,387		3,329		1,545		97		625		346,490

Total loans	$	2,116,693	$	953,665	$	151,610	$	292,513	$	183,125	$	133,720	$	417,801	$	4,249,127

(Dollars in thousands)	Michigan		Ohio		Wisconsin		Illinois		Indiana		Other		Total

December 31, 2013
Uncovered loans
Residential real estate(1)(2)	$	411,176	$	500,407	$	11,825	$	33,670	$	59,808	$	68,567	$	1,085,453
Commercial real estate(3)(4)		348,950		244,788		62,330		71,267		5,338		23,166		755,839
Commercial and industrial(5)		295,456		53,268		20,263		75,802		731		1,124		446,644
Real estate construction		49,950		82,774		2,425		1,086		35,098		4,893		176,226
Consumer		5,693		3,175		703		94		—		89		9,754

Total uncovered loans		1,111,225		884,412		97,546		181,919		100,975		97,839		2,473,916
Covered loans
Residential real estate(1)		95,658		344		24,472		1,263		1,597		—		123,334
Commercial real estate(3)		221,020		—		71,412		6,896		73		—		299,401
Commercial and industrial(5)		41,579		106		34,575		2,177		—		—		78,437
Real estate construction		8,866		—		7,237		990		125		—		17,218
Consumer		11,582		57		23		5		11		—		11,678

Total covered loans		378,705		507		137,719		11,331		1,806		—		530,068

Total loans	$	1,489,930	$	884,919	$	235,265	$	193,250	$	102,781	$	97,839	$	3,003,984

The following table details our loan portfolio by loan type for the periods presented.

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		2012		2011		2010
Uncovered loans
Residential real estate	$	1,426,012	$	1,085,453	$	159,523	$	95,705	$	37,394
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied		888,650		581,651		91,231		63,036		9,794
Owner-occupied		417,843		148,545		83,820		36,416		32,943
Farmland		4,445		25,643		17,155		17,111		2,671

Total commercial real estate		1,310,938		755,839		192,206		116,563		45,408
Commercial and industrial		869,477		446,644		238,423		101,651		48,079
Real estate construction		131,686		176,226		5,866		1,518		890
Consumer		164,524		9,754		8,428		9,049		8,013

Total uncovered loans		3,902,637		2,473,916		604,446		324,486		139,784
Covered loans
Residential real estate		108,226		123,334		148,144		177,861		205,670
Commercial real estate
Non-owner occupied		108,692		154,951		183,987		249,880		202,108
Owner-occupied		70,492		115,435		163,863		206,948		78,351
Farmland		7,478		29,015		47,825		61,988		89,925

Total commercial real estate		186,662		299,401		395,675		518,816		370,384
Commercial and industrial		32,648		78,437		129,535		170,480		96,157
Real estate construction		9,389		17,218		29,540		43,581		51,640
Consumer		9,565		11,678		14,811		19,655		26,710

Total covered loans		346,490		530,068		717,705		930,393		750,561

Total loans	$	4,249,127	$	3,003,984	$	1,322,151	$	1,254,879	$	890,345

Total loans were $4.2 billion at December 31, 2014, an increase of $1.2 billion from December 31, 2013, resulting from the acquisition of $571.7 million of loans at fair value in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014 and $857.1 million of uncovered loan growth outside of the acquisition, partially offset by $183.6 million in covered loan run-off. The $857.1 million of uncovered loan growth is the result of $955.1 million of uncovered loan growth in Talmer Bank's loan portfolio, partially offset by $98.1 million of loan run-off in Talmer West Bank's loan portfolio subsequent to acquisition. The uncovered loan growth in the Talmer Bank portfolio reflects organic loan growth and the purchase of $130.0 million of consumer loans, partially offset by net loan sales of $55.4 million from our Wisconsin market and other loan run-off. The loan run-off in Talmer West Bank's loan portfolio includes $23.7 million of portfolio loans sold in the Albuquerque branch sale completed July 18, 2014. The total increase in uncovered loans of $1.4 billion at December 31, 2014, compared to December 31, 2013, including loans acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, represented increases in commercial real estate loans of $555.1 million, commercial and industrial loans of $422.8 million, residential real estate loans of $340.6 million and consumer loans of $154.8 million, partially offset by a decline in real estate construction loans of $44.5 million. The covered loan run-off for the year ended December 31, 2014, which included loan sales of $37.9 million from our Wisconsin market, resulted from decreases in commercial real estate loans of $112.8 million, or 37.7%, commercial and industrial loans of $45.8 million, or 58.4%, residential real estate loans of $15.1 million, or 12.3%, real estate construction loans of $7.8 million, or 45.5%, and consumer loans of $2.1 million, or 18.1%. Long term, we expect to increase our concentration in commercial and industrial and owner-occupied commercial real estate while decreasing our concentration in residential real estate, with a goal of our overall loan portfolio

mix to be approximately one-third commercial and industrial loans, approximately one-third commercial real estate loans, and the remaining to be a mix of residential real estate and consumer loans.

Total loans were $3.0 billion at December 31, 2013, an increase of $1.7 billion from December 31, 2012, reflecting the impact of $1.5 billion of loans acquired at fair value in our acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013 and $339.1 million of net uncovered loan growth outside of the acquisition, partially offset by $187.6 million in covered loan run-off. The total increase in uncovered loans of $1.9 billion for the year ended December 31 2013, including loans acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank, represented increases in residential real estate loans of $925.9 million, commercial real estate loans of $563.6 million, commercial and industrial loans of $208.2 million, real estate construction loans of $170.4 million and consumer loans of $1.3 million. The covered loan run-off for the year ended December 31, 2013 resulted from decreases in commercial real estate loans of $96.3 million, or 24.3%, commercial and industrial loans of $51.1 million, or 39.4%, residential real estate loans of $24.8 million, or 16.7%, real estate construction loans of $12.3 million, or 41.7%, and consumer loans of $3.1 million, or 21.2%.

We originate both fixed and adjustable rate residential real estate loans conforming to the underwriting guidelines of the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, home equity loans and lines of credit that are secured by first or junior liens, and a limited amount of other secured high credit quality jumbo loans. We have not originated or purchased a material amount of high-risk products, such as subprime, option adjustable rate or Alternative A-paper mortgage loans as of December 31, 2014.

Residential real estate loans totaled $1.5 billion at December 31, 2014, of which $1.4 billion were uncovered and $108.2 million were covered. Of the $1.5 billion of residential real estate loans outstanding at December 31, 2014, $19.2 million (consisting of $17.4 million of uncovered loans and $1.8 million of covered loans) were on nonaccrual status. Included in residential real estate loans are $240.8 million of home equity loans and lines of credit (consisting of $187.2 million of uncovered loans and $53.6 million of covered loans) of which $69.7 million have interest only payment terms. These loans are generally secured by junior liens and represent interest only residential real estate loans that we held as of December 31, 2014. Also included in residential real estate loans are $149.1 million of uncovered jumbo adjustable rate mortgages and $47.8 million of residential real estate loans with balloon payment terms (consisting of $40.5 million of uncovered loans and $7.3 million of covered loans) of which $744 thousand were on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2014.

Real estate construction loans totaled $141.1 million at December 31, 2014, of which $131.7 million were uncovered loans and $9.4 million were covered loans. Of the $141.1 million of real estate construction loans outstanding at December 31, 2014, $887 thousand (consisting of $174 thousand of uncovered loans and $713 thousand of covered loans) were on nonaccrual status. Included in real estate construction loans are $15.1 million of loans with balloon payment terms (consisting of $13.3 million of uncovered loans and $1.8 million of covered loans), of which $174 thousand were on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2014.

The following tables show the contractual maturities of our uncovered and covered loans for the periods presented.

	Loans Maturing

(Dollars in thousands)	One year or less		After one but within five years		After five years		Total
December 31, 2014
Uncovered loans:
Residential real estate	$	72,086	$	97,641	$	1,256,285	$	1,426,012
Commercial real estate		221,617		818,219		271,102		1,310,938
Commercial and industrial		208,568		502,798		158,111		869,477
Real estate construction		21,211		34,933		75,542		131,686
Consumer		3,399		52,986		108,139		164,524

Total uncovered loans	$	526,881	$	1,506,577	$	1,869,179	$	3,902,637



Sensitivity of loans to changes in interest rates:
Predetermined (fixed) interest rates				982,520		1,003,759
Floating interest rates				524,057		865,420

Total			$	1,506,577	$	1,869,179



Covered loans:
Residential real estate	$	9,056	$	44,691	$	54,479	$	108,226
Commercial real estate		101,226		63,945		21,491		186,662
Commercial and industrial		22,165		9,095		1,388		32,648
Real estate construction		6,579		2,181		629		9,389
Consumer		178		871		8,516		9,565

Total covered loans	$	139,204	$	120,783	$	86,503	$	346,490



Sensitivity of loans to changes in interest rates:
Predetermined (fixed) interest rates				112,362		44,806
Floating interest rates				8,421		41,697

Total			$	120,783	$	86,503

	Loans Maturing

(Dollars in thousands)	One year or less		After one but within five years		After five years		Total
December 31, 2013
Uncovered loans:
Residential real estate	$	23,500	$	48,930	$	1,013,023	$	1,085,453
Commercial real estate		100,614		490,468		164,757		755,839
Commercial and industrial		155,673		201,290		89,681		446,644
Real estate construction		6,657		11,799		157,770		176,226
Consumer		2,663		4,495		2,596		9,754

Total uncovered loans	$	289,107	$	756,982	$	1,427,827	$	2,473,916



Sensitivity of loans to changes in interest rates:
Predetermined (fixed) interest rates				556,077		807,531
Floating interest rates				200,905		620,296

Total			$	756,982	$	1,427,827



Covered loans:
Residential real estate	$	11,053	$	46,271	$	66,010	$	123,334
Commercial real estate		158,912		122,596		17,893		299,401
Commercial and industrial		48,970		25,211		4,256		78,437
Real estate construction		12,944		3,651		623		17,218
Consumer		331		906		10,441		11,678

Total covered loans	$	232,210	$	198,635	$	99,223	$	530,068



Sensitivity of loans to changes in interest rates:
Predetermined (fixed) interest rates				186,643		47,250
Floating interest rates				11,992		51,973

Total			$	198,635	$	99,223

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe is sufficient to absorb probable, incurred losses in our loan portfolio given the conditions at the time. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on periodic evaluations of the loan portfolio and other factors. These evaluations are inherently subjective as they require management to make material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by actual charge-offs, net of recoveries or previous amounts charged-off.

We maintain an allowance for loan losses on purchased loans based on credit deterioration subsequent to the acquisition date. In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, there was no allowance brought forward on any of the acquired loans as any credit deterioration evident in the loans was included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. For purchased credit impaired loans, accounted for under FASB Topic ASC 310-30 "Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality" ("ASC 310-30") and troubled debt restructurings previously individually accounted for under ASC 310-30, management establishes an allowance for credit deterioration subsequent to the date of acquisition by re-estimating expected cash flows on a quarterly basis with any decline in expected cash flows recorded as provision for loan losses. Impairment is measured as the excess of the recorded investment in a loan over the

present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the pre-impairment accounting yield of the loan. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, we first reverse only previously recorded allowance for loan losses, then adjust the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan's remaining life. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. For non-purchased credit impaired loans acquired in our acquisitions of First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank that are accounted for under ASC 310-20, the historical loss estimates are based on the historical losses experienced by First Place Bank, or Talmer Bank following the merger, and by Talmer West Bank for loans with similar characteristics as those acquired other than purchased credit impaired loans. We record an allowance for loan losses only when the calculated amount exceeds the estimated credit mark at acquisition that was established for the similar period covered in the allowance for loan loss calculation. For all other purchased loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 or under ASC 310-40, the allowance is calculated in accordance with the methods used to calculate the allowance for loan losses for originated loans.

The allowance for loan losses represents management's assessment of probable, incurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances, based on individual evaluation of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.

Impaired loans include loans placed on nonaccrual status and troubled debt restructurings. Loans are considered impaired when based on current information and events it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreements. When determining if we will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, we consider the borrower's overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support from guarantors, and the realizable value of any collateral. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

Impaired loans are identified to be individually evaluated for impairment based on a defined dollar threshold for commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and real estate construction loans, unless they are non-collateral dependent, in which case no threshold applies, while all residential real estate and consumer impaired loans are individually evaluated for impairment. In addition, all impaired loans held by Talmer West Bank are identified to be individually evaluated for impairment. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance is allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the discounted expected future cash flows or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is collateral dependent. Impaired loans which do not meet the criteria to be evaluated individually are evaluated in homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.

The allowance for our business loans, which includes commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans, that are not individually evaluated for impairment begins with a process of estimating the probable incurred losses in the portfolio. These estimates are established based on our internal credit risk ratings and historical loss data. Internal credit risk ratings are assigned to each business loan at the time of approval and are subjected to subsequent periodic reviews by senior management, at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of a circumstance that affects the credit risk of the loan. As our operating history is limited and we are growing rapidly, the historical loss estimates for loans are based primarily on the actual historical loss experienced by all

banks in our markets of Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada combined with a small factor representing our own loss history from the same time period. These estimates are established by loan type including commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction, and further segregated by region, including Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada, where applicable. In addition, consideration is given to borrower rating migration experience and trends, industry concentrations and conditions, changes in collateral values of properties securing loans and trends with respect to past due and nonaccrual amounts. Given our limited operating history, the estimate of losses for single family residential and consumer loans which are not individually evaluated is also based primarily on historical loss rates experienced in the respective loan classes by all banks in Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada. This estimate is also adjusted to give consideration to borrower rating migration experience and trends, changes in collateral values of properties securing loans and trends with respect to past due and nonaccrual amounts.

The following tables present, by loan type, the changes in the allowance for loan losses on both uncovered and covered loans for the periods presented.

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	17,746		$	10,945		$	7,887		$	4,420		$	913
Loan charge-offs:
Residential real estate		(5,691	)		(8,942	)		(491	)		(35	)		(225	)
Commercial real estate		(7,546	)		(4,070	)		(37	)		—			(805	)
Commercial and industrial		(3,425	)		(1,136	)		—			—			—
Real estate construction		(624	)		(165	)		—			—			—
Consumer		(279	)		(528	)		(142	)		(168	)		—

Total loan charge-offs		(17,565	)		(14,841	)		(670	)		(203	)		(1,030	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
Residential real estate		2,691			3,611			5			1			6
Commercial real estate		5,524			965			31			35			—
Commercial and industrial		888			458			32			—			1
Real estate construction		984			499			2			—			—
Consumer		469			589			44			63			46

Total loan recoveries		10,556			6,122			114			99			53

Net charge-offs		(7,009	)		(8,719	)		(556	)		(104	)		(977	)
Provision for loan losses		23,082			15,520			3,614			3,571			4,484

Balance at end of period	$	33,819		$	17,746		$	10,945		$	7,887		$	4,420



Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total uncovered loans at period end		0.87	%		0.72	%		1.81	%		2.43	%		3.16	%
Net loan charge-offs on noncovered loans as a percentage of average uncovered loans		0.21	%		0.40	%		0.19	%		0.05	%		1.03	%

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	40,381		$	51,473		$	55,352		$	12,798		$	—
Loan charge-offs:
Residential real estate		(2,294	)		(2,664	)		(4,381	)		(8,183	)		(4,000	)
Commercial real estate		(7,568	)		(9,211	)		(23,042	)		(10,205	)		(123	)
Commercial and industrial		(4,774	)		(4,654	)		(15,462	)		(4,352	)		(370	)
Real estate construction		(1,545	)		(1,904	)		(5,375	)		(4,176	)		(2,477	)
Consumer		(220	)		(214	)		(390	)		(1,687	)		(640	)

Total loan charge-offs		(16,401	)		(18,647	)		(48,650	)		(28,603	)		(7,610	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
Residential real estate		2,022			1,276			1,233			1,878			502
Commercial real estate		8,441			10,022			4,939			1,230			441
Commercial and industrial		4,092			4,236			4,906			594			904
Real estate construction		1,243			2,091			1,105			1,885			485
Consumer		330			352			330			822			226

Total loan recoveries		16,128			17,977			12,513			6,409			2,558

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(273	)		(670	)		(36,137	)		(22,194	)		(5,052	)
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		(18,755	)		(10,422	)		32,258			64,748			17,850

Balance at end of period	$	21,353		$	40,381		$	51,473		$	55,352		$	12,798



Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total covered loans at period end		6.16	%		7.62	%		7.17	%		5.95	%		1.71	%
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) on covered loans as a percentage of average covered loans		0.06	%		0.10	%		3.84	%		2.33	%		1.51	%

Our uncovered allowance for loan losses was $33.8 million, or 0.87% of uncovered loans, at December 31, 2014, compared to $17.7 million, or 0.72% of uncovered loans, at December 31, 2013. The $16.1 million increase in the uncovered allowance for loan losses during the year ended December 31, 2014 was primarily due to additional provision for loan growth along with allowance resulting from our quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows for our uncovered purchased credit impaired loans, partially offset by an improvement in historical loss factors.

The covered allowance for loan losses was $21.4 million, or 6.16% of covered loans, at December 31, 2014, compared to $40.4 million, or 7.62% of total covered loans, at December 31, 2013. The $19.0 million decrease from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014 was primarily driven by payments received on covered loans previously carrying an allowance for loan loss, partially offset by the additional allowance resulting from our quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows for certain of our covered purchased credit impaired loans.

Our uncovered allowance for loan losses was $17.7 million, or 0.72% of uncovered loans, at December 31, 2013, compared to $10.9 million, or 1.81%, of uncovered loans at December 31, 2012. The decline in the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of uncovered loans at December 31, 2013, compared to December 31, 2012, was primarily due to the addition of loans we acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank which were recorded at their estimated fair value, including a credit mark representing approximately 6.4% of the balance of the acquired loans at the acquisition date, and which did not include a separate allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses on uncovered loans at December 31, 2013 primarily reflects $4.5 million of impairment resulting from our quarterly

re-estimation of cash flows on the purchased credit impaired loans acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank, net of subsequent recoveries and run-off of loans carrying an allowance for loan losses, and $3.1 million of allowance for loans losses on uncovered loans originated by First Place Bank subsequent to the acquisition. Apart from the loans acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank, we recorded an allowance for loan losses on uncovered loans originated by Talmer Bank or acquired by Talmer Bank, which subsequently showed evidence of credit impairment, of $8.3 million, or 0.86% of uncovered loans at December 31, 2013, compared to $10.9 million, or 1.81% of uncovered loans at December 31, 2012. The decline in the Talmer Bank uncovered allowance for loan losses as a percentage of uncovered loans was due primarily to improvements in the historical loss factors that are used by management to estimate probable losses.

The covered allowance for loan losses was $40.4 million, or 7.62% of total covered loans, at December 31, 2013, compared to $51.5 million, or 7.17% of total covered loans, at December 31, 2012. The $11.1 million decrease from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013 was primarily driven by the reduction to the allowance for losses due to recoveries and loan run-off of covered loans, offset by the impairment recorded as a result of the re-estimation of the cash flows for certain purchased credit impaired covered loans.

The following tables present, by loan type, the allocation of the allowance for loan losses on both uncovered and covered loans for the periods presented.

	Accounted for under ASC 310-30								Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting

(Dollars in thousands)	Allocated Allowance		Allowance Ratio(1)			Percent of loans in each category to total loans			Allocated Allowance		Allowance Ratio(1)			Percent of loans in each category to total loans
December 31, 2014
Balance at end of period applicable to:
Residential real estate	$	6,233		2.60	%		52.6	%	$	5,960		0.50	%		34.4	%
Commercial real estate		5,229		2.75			41.7			5,899		0.53			32.5
Commercial and industrial		885		5.71			3.4			6,950		0.81			24.8
Real estate construction		950		11.43			1.8			649		0.53			3.6
Consumer		162		6.78			0.5			902		0.56			4.7

Total uncovered loans	$	13,459		2.95	%		100.0	%	$	20,360		0.59	%		100.0	%



December 31, 2013
Balance at end of period applicable to:
Residential real estate	$	3,088		1.22	%		69.9	%	$	4,620		0.56	%		39.4	%
Commercial real estate		1,405		1.43			27.1			2,862		0.44			31.1
Commercial and industrial		161		2.69			1.7			3,243		0.74			20.9
Real estate construction		2		0.10			0.5			2,025		1.16			8.3
Consumer		115		3.96			0.8			225		3.29			0.3

Total uncovered loans	$	4,771		1.32	%		100.0	%	$	12,975		0.61	%		100.0	%



December 31, 2012
Balance at end of period applicable to:
Residential real estate	$	—		—	%		0.1	%	$	2,059		1.29	%		26.9	%
Commercial real estate		216		3.53			56.9			4,049		2.18			31.3
Commercial and industrial		49		4.34			10.5			4,113		1.73			40.0
Real estate construction		—		—			—			268		4.57			1.0
Consumer		152		4.35			32.5			39		0.79			0.8

Total uncovered loans	$	417		3.88	%		100.0	%	$	10,528		1.77	%		100.0	%

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		2012		2011		2010
Uncovered
Nonperforming troubled debt restructurings
Residential real estate	$	3,984	$	2,469	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		2,644		3,581		—		—		—
Commercial and industrial		180		415		7		581		—
Consumer		83		3		—		—		—

Total nonperforming troubled debt restructurings		6,891		6,468		7		581		—
Nonaccrual loans other than nonperforming troubled debt restructurings
Residential real estate	$	13,390	$	12,946	$	87	$	1,320	$	—
Commercial real estate		11,112		2,010		21		—		262
Commercial and industrial		3,370		2,266		584		214		619
Real estate construction		174		510		—		—		—
Consumer		174		97		—		—		1

Total nonaccrual loans other than nonperforming troubled debt restructurings		28,220		17,829		692		1,534		882
Total nonaccrual loans		35,111		24,297		699		2,115		882
Other real estate and repossessed assets(1)		36,872		17,046		27		47		—

Total nonperforming assets		71,983		41,343		726		2,162		882
Performing troubled debt restructurings
Residential real estate		1,368		328		—		—		—
Commercial real estate		3,785		1,637		50		55		—
Residential real estate		840		1,367		1,179		—		—
Real estate construction		90		90		—		—		—
Consumer		234		30		—		—		—

Total performing troubled debt restructurings		6,317		3,452		1,229		55		—

Total uncovered impaired assets	$	78,300	$	44,795	$	1,955	$	2,217	$	882



Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30	$	53	$	539	$	—	$	—	$	46

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		2012		2011		2010
Covered
Nonperforming troubled debt restructurings
Residential real estate	$	1,363	$	900	$	176	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		14,343		6,561		11,328		—		—
Commercial and industrial		2,043		3,052		1,844		—		—
Real estate construction		272		926		208		—		—
Consumer		13		25		—		—		—

Total nonperforming troubled debt restructurings		18,034		11,464		13,556		—		—
Nonaccrual loans other than nonperforming troubled debt restructurings
Residential real estate	$	485	$	88	$	—	$	126	$	54
Commercial real estate		1,380		1,563		404		782		—
Commercial and industrial		1,517		4,149		2,142		2,094		319
Real estate construction		441		446		453		4		1
Consumer		—		6		—		—		4

Total nonaccrual loans other than nonperforming troubled debt restructurings		3,823		6,252		2,999		3,006		378
Total nonaccrual loans		21,857		17,716		16,555		3,006		378
Other real estate and repossessed assets		10,719		11,598		23,936		20,380		18,695

Total nonperforming assets		32,576		29,314		40,491		23,386		19,073
Performing troubled debt restructurings
Residential real estate		3,046		2,691		1,882		1,156		—
Commercial real estate		9,017		14,391		9,196		4,870		—
Commercial and industrial		1,137		3,802		5,176		2,429		—
Real estate construction		264		163		238		47		—

Total performing troubled debt restructurings		13,464		21,047		16,492		8,502		—

Total covered impaired assets	$	46,040	$	50,361	$	56,983	$	31,888	$	19,073



Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30	$	—	$	—	$	1,071	$	4,913	$	—

Nonperforming assets consist of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned excluding closed branches and operating facilities. We do not consider performing TDRs to be nonperforming assets. The level of nonaccrual loans is an important element in assessing asset quality. Loans are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status due to the continued failure by the borrower to adhere to contractual payment terms coupled with other pertinent factors, such as insufficient collateral value.

Purchased credit impaired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are classified as performing, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period covered loan loss provision or future period yield adjustments.

Total nonperforming assets were $104.6 million as of December 31, 2014, compared to $70.7 million as of December 31, 2013. The $33.9 million increase was primarily due to increases in

uncovered other real estate owned and repossessed assets of $19.8 million and uncovered nonaccrual loans of $10.8 million. The increase in other real estate owned and repossessed assets included the addition of $30.9 million of uncovered other real estate owned related to our acquisition of Talmer West Bank on January 1, 2014 and the repossession of the underlying assets of a set of interrelated loans totaling $9.7 million at December 31, 2014, net of charge offs taken and valuation allowance, partially offset by other real estate sales.

Total nonperforming assets were $70.7 million as of December 31, 2013, compared to $41.2 million at December 31, 2012. The $29.5 million increase was primarily the result of $23.6 million ($22.8 million of which related to First Place Bank) of uncovered loans moved to nonaccrual status due to bankruptcy or delinquent payment status and $18.4 million of uncovered other real estate related to the acquisition of First Place Bank on January 1, 2013, partially offset by a $12.3 million decrease in covered other real estate owned and repossessed assets.

In connection with our FDIC-assisted acquisitions, we entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC. At each acquisition date, we account for amounts receivable from the FDIC under the loss share agreements as an indemnification asset. Subsequent to initial recognition, the FDIC indemnification asset is reviewed quarterly and adjusted for any changes in expected cash flows. These adjustments are measured on the same basis as the related covered assets. A decline in expected cash flows on covered loans is referred to as impairment and recorded as provision for loan losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses on covered loans. Estimated reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss share agreements related to any declines in expected cash flows are recorded as noninterest income in "FDIC loss sharing income" in our consolidated statements of income and result in an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset in the same period. An improvement in expected cash flows on covered loans, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an upward adjustment to the yield on the related loan and a downward adjustment to the yield on the FDIC indemnification asset. As such, overall improvements in expected cash flows on covered loans can result in a negative yield on the FDIC indemnification asset, which is recorded in "interest income" in our consolidated statements of income, while increases to the FDIC indemnification asset are recorded as adjustments to noninterest income in "FDIC loss sharing income" in our consolidated statements of income. When covered loans payoff sooner than expected, any remaining FDIC indemnification asset is reviewed and may result in a direct write off as an adjustment to noninterest income in "Accelerated discount on acquired loans" in our consolidated statements of income. The FDIC indemnification asset is also reduced for claims submitted to the FDIC for reimbursement. We have established a FDIC receivable which represents claims submitted to the FDIC for reimbursement for which we expect to receive payment within 90 days.

Our loss share agreements for CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank include provisions where a clawback payment, calculated using formulas included within the agreements, is to be made to the FDIC ten years and 45 days following the acquisition in the event actual losses fail to reach stated levels. As of December 31, 2014, the estimated FDIC clawback liability totaled $26.9 million, including $22.6 million, $4.3 million and $4 thousand related to the CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank acquisitions, respectively.

The FDIC indemnification asset balance was $67.0 million at December 31, 2014. Of this amount, we expect approximately $35.1 million to be collected from the FDIC and the remaining $31.9 million to be amortized prior to the end of the associated loss share agreement, as a result of expected improvements in cash flow expectations on covered loans. At December 31, 2014, the FDIC indemnification asset included approximately $16.0 million related to covered loans and approximately $640 thousand related to covered other real estate under loss share agreements that will expire in the next 12 months. Any losses on covered assets after the applicable loss share agreement expires will not

be eligible for reimbursement from the FDIC. As such, to the extent that loss share coverage ends prior to the loss triggering event on a covered asset, impairment on any remaining FDIC indemnification asset associated with the covered asset would be required. Management is closely monitoring the outcome of anticipated losses on covered assets and has proactively reviewed the portfolios of covered loans and other real estate that are under loss share agreements that are expiring [in the next 12 months] to evaluate the appropriateness of the associated remaining FDIC indemnification asset.

The following table summarizes the activity related to the FDIC indemnification asset and the FDIC receivable for the periods indicated.

	For the years ended December 31,

	2014						2013						2012
(Dollars in thousands)	FDIC Indemnification Asset			FDIC Receivable			FDIC Indemnification Asset			FDIC Receivable			FDIC Indemnification Asset			FDIC Receivable
Balance at beginning of period	$	131,861		$	7,783		$	226,356		$	17,999		$	358,839		$	57,407
Accretion		(26,426	)		—			(28,040	)		—			(19,156	)		—
Sales and write-downs of other real estate owned (covered)		(1,484	)		524			(3,804	)		1,925			(1,672	)		7,381
Net effect of change in allowance on covered assets(1)		(19,213	)		—			(33,860	)		—			(4,113	)		—
Reimbursements requested from FDIC (reclassification to FDIC receivable)		(17,712	)		17,712			(28,791	)		28,791			(107,542	)		107,542
Decreases due to recoveries net of additional claimable expenses incurred(2)		—			(4,981	)		—			(8,613	)		—			7,488
Claim payments received from the FDIC		—			(14,976	)		—			(32,319	)		—			(161,819	)

Balance at end of period	$	67,026		$	6,062		$	131,861		$	7,783		$	226,356		$	17,999

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		2012
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations	$	98,358	$	98,237		43,581
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Taxable		397		396		396
Tax exempt		232,259		182,000		154,058
Small Business Administration (SBA) Pools		33,933		42,426		10,974
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises		291,759		218,922		96,480
Privately issued		18,800		4,446		13,773
Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities		5,130		5,147		5,267
Corporate debt securities:
Senior debt		39,513		43,845		5,107
Subordinated debt		20,670		24,175		15,250
Equity securities		—		489		519

Total securities available-for-sale	$	740,819	$	620,083	$	345,405
Securities held-to-maturity(1)		1,226		—		—

Total investment securities	$	742,045	$	620,083	$	345,405

The composition of our investment securities portfolio reflects our investment strategy of maintaining an appropriate level of liquidity for both normal operations and potential acquisitions while providing an additional source of revenue. The investment portfolio also provides a balance to interest rate risk and credit risk in other categories of the balance sheet, while providing a vehicle for the investment of available funds, furnishing liquidity, and supplying securities to pledge as collateral. At December 31, 2014, total investment securities were $742.0 million, or 12.6% of total assets, compared to $620.1 million, or 13.6% of total assets, at December 31, 2013. The increase from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014, primarily reflected increases in a diverse mix of U.S. government sponsored agency obligations, tax exempt obligations of state and political subdivisions and privately issued residential mortgage-backed securities which reflect management's plan to more fully deploy excess liquidity, partially offset by a decrease in small business administration and corporate debt securities. Securities with a carrying value of $337.8 million and $264.6 million were pledged at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, to secure borrowings and deposits.

The following tables show contractual maturities and yields for the investment securities portfolio at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

	Maturity as of December 31, 2014

	One Year or Less					One to Five Years					Five to Ten Years					After Ten Years
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Average Yield(1)			Amortized Cost		Average Yield(1)			Amortized Cost		Average Yield(1)			Amortized Cost		Average Yield(1)
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations(1)	$	—		—	%	$	10,000		1.65	%	$	60,995		1.88	%	$	26,751		1.15	%
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Taxable		—		—			397		6.19			—		—			—		—
Tax exempt(2)		76		2.28			42,357		3.88			120,881		4.39			66,090		4.72
SBA Pools(3)(4)		—		—			1,650		1.06			32,174		0.87			—		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities(3):
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or sponsored enterprises		6,268		2.73			234,666		2.42			48,222		2.44			—		—
Privately issued(1)		1,106		2.45			17,708		2.37			—		—			—		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities(3)		—		—			5,127		2.19			—		—			—		—
Corporate debt securities(5)		1,752		1.54			36,667		1.94			10,000		5.00			11,787		2.23

Total securities available-for-sale		9,202		2.47			348,572		2.52			272,272		3.09			104,628		3.53
Securities held-to-maturity		—		—			—		—			—		—			1,226		—

Total investment securities	$	9,202		2.47	%	$	348,572		2.52	%	$	272,272		3.09	%	$	105,854		3.49	%

(1): Average yields assume a yield to call approach where embedded call options exist, such as in certain callable U.S. government sponsored agency obligations and non-agency CMO's. $73.6 million of U.S. government sponsored agency obligations maturing beyond 5 years contain step-up coupon structures which, if were not to be called prior to stated maturities, would positively impact average yields for balances maturing in the five-to-ten years bucket and after ten years bucket by 79 basis points and 200 basis points, respectively, or resulting in average yields of 2.67% and 3.15%, respectively.
(2): Average yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis, based on a 35% federal tax rate.
(3): Maturity distributions for SBA pools, residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities are based on estimated average lives.
(4): All indicated balances in the one-to-five years bucket and five-to-ten years bucket encompass floating rate holdings indexed to Prime, which are contractually adjustable on a quarterly basis, in which the current December 31, 2014 indexed coupon rates are assumed to remain constant until maturity.
(5): Average yields on corporate debt securities in the one-to-five year maturity bucket and after ten year maturity bucket includes yields on $5.9 million and $11.8 million, respectively, of floating rate holdings indexed to 3-month LIBOR, in which the current December 31, 2014 indexed coupon rates are assumed to remain constant until maturity.

	Maturity as of December 31, 2013

	One Year or Less					One to Five Years					Five to Ten Years					After Ten Years
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Average Yield(1)			Amortized Cost		Average Yield(1)			Amortized Cost		Average Yield(1)			Amortized Cost		Average Yield(1)
Securities available-for-sale(2):
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations(1)	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	62,606		1.40	%	$	39,991		1.09	%
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Taxable(1)		—		—			—		—			397		6.19			—		—
Tax-exempt(1)(3)		2,823		2.78			20,500		3.54			116,682		3.63			44,345		3.59
SBA Pools(4)(5)		—		—			—		—			42,956		1.09			—		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities(5):
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or sponsored enterprises		7,356		3.10			134,132		2.23			82,030		2.18			—		—
Privately issued(1)		2,905		3.25			1,548		3.93			—		—			—		—
Commercial mortgage-backed securities(4)		—		—			5,181		2.19			—		—			—		—
Corporate debt securities(6)		—		—			42,635		1.52			14,158		2.29			11,640		2.24

Total securities available-for-sale	$	13,084		3.06	%	$	203,996		2.20	%	$	318,829		2.42	%	$	95,976		2.39	%

(1): Average yields assume a yield to worst call approach where embedded call options exist, such as in certain callable U.S. government sponsored agency obligations, obligations of state and political subdivisions and non-agency CMO's. $77.8 million of U.S. government sponsored agency obligations maturing beyond 5 years contain step-up coupon structures which, if were not to be called prior to stated maturities, would positively impact average yields for balances maturing in the five-to-ten years bucket and after ten years bucket by 126 basis points and 201 basis points, respectively, or resulting in average yields of 2.66% and 3.10%, respectively.
(2): This table excludes a mutual fund holding in the CRA Fund.
(3): Average yields on tax-exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis, based on a 35% federal tax rate.
(4): Maturity distributions for SBA pools, residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities are based on estimated average lives.
(5): $35.0 million of the balances in the five-to-ten years bucket encompass floating rate holdings indexed to Prime, which are contractually adjustable on a quarterly basis, in which the current December 31, 2013 indexed coupon rates are assumed to remain constant until maturity.
(6): Average yields on corporate debt securities in the one-to-five year maturity bucket and after ten year maturity bucket includes yields on $20.7 million and $11.6 million, respectively, of floating rate holdings indexed to 3-month LIBOR, in which the current December 31, 2013 indexed coupon rates are assumed to remain constant until maturity.

Loan servicing rights are created as a result of our mortgage banking origination activities, the purchase of mortgage servicing rights, the origination and purchase of agricultural servicing rights and the origination and purchase of commercial real estate servicing rights. Loans serviced for others are not reported as assets in our consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2014, we serviced loans with an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $7.3 billion.

Total loan servicing rights were $70.6 million as of December 31, 2014, compared to $78.6 million as of December 31, 2013. The $8.0 million decrease was primarily due to a $10.2 million change in the fair value of loan servicing rights from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014 due primarily to lower market interest rates and $6.8 million of reduced fair value due to loans paid off, partially offset by $9.8 million of loan servicing rights added to the portfolio. Management has made the strategic decision not to hedge loan servicing assets at this point. Therefore, any future declines in interest rates would likely cause further decreases in the fair value of the loan servicing rights, and a corresponding detriment to earnings, whereas increases in interest rates would result in increases in fair value, or a corresponding benefit to earnings. Management may choose to hedge the loan servicing assets in the future.

In January of 2015, we completed a sale of approximately $13.2 million of mortgage loan servicing rights, at a price that approximates the current fair value, which were substantially all of the servicing rights we had owned for mortgages located outside of our primarily target markets.

Total deposits were $4.5 billion at December 31, 2014 and $3.6 billion at December 31, 2013, representing 89.0% and 91.6% of total liabilities at each period end, respectively. The fair value of deposits acquired in our acquisition of Talmer West Bank totaled $857.8 million consisting of time deposits of $407.2 million, noninterest-bearing deposits of $175.1 million, money market and savings deposits of $166.0 million, and interest-bearing deposits of $109.5 million. Since the acquisition of Talmer West Bank, there has been $479.7 million of deposit growth, partially offset by $389.5 million of deposits sold in our Wisconsin and New Mexico branch office sales. The growth in deposits is primarily due to increases of $562.2 million in other brokered funds, $39.9 million in interest-bearing demand deposits and $18.5 million in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, partially offset by decreases in time deposits of $71.4 million and money market and savings deposits of $69.5 million. The growth in other brokered funds was largely due to a need for additional funding to replace the deposits sold in our Wisconsin and New Mexico branch sales. Our interest-bearing deposit costs were 28 basis points and 30 basis points for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Total deposits were $3.6 billion at December 31, 2013 and $1.7 billion at December 31, 2012, representing 91.6% and 94.7% of total liabilities at each period end, respectively. The fair value of the deposits acquired in our acquisition of First Place Bank totaled $2.1 billion consisting of time deposits of $849.0 million, money market and savings deposits of $645.7 million, noninterest-bearing deposits of $390.3 million, interest-bearing deposits of $235.7 million and other brokered funds of $496 thousand. Following the acquisition of First Place Bank, there was $250.6 million in net time deposit run-off, partially offset by a $78.5 million increase in other brokered funds. The net time deposit run-off reflected management's efforts to reduce the level of higher cost certificates of deposit acquired in the First Place Bank acquisition. Our interest-bearing deposit costs were 30 basis points and 36 basis points for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following table shows the contractual maturity of time deposits, including CDARs and IRA deposits and other brokered funds, of $100 thousand and over that were outstanding for the periods presented.

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		2012
Short-term borrowings:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	$	25,743	$	36,876	$	18,338
FHLB advances		110,000		—		—
Holding company line of credit		—		35,000		—

Total short-term borrowings		135,743		71,876		18,338

Long-term debt:
FHLB advances(1)		286,804		130,368		38,482
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase(2)		56,444		58,079		—
Subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities(3)		10,724		10,590		—

Total long-term debt		353,972		199,037		38,482

Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt:	$	489,715	$	270,913	$	56,820

Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2014 was $489.7 million, an increase of $218.8 million from $270.9 million at December 31, 2013. The increase in total borrowings was primarily due to the net additions of $266.4 million in FHLB advances, partially offset by $12.8 million in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and by the repayment of our $35.0 million line of credit used to fund our acquisition of Talmer West Bank.

Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2013 was $270.9 million, an increase of $214.1 million from $56.8 million at December 31, 2012. As part of the First Place Bank acquisition on January 1, 2013, we assumed long-term debt of $313.0 million and short-term borrowings of $21.9 million. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2013, to support the acquisition and recapitalization of Talmer West Bank, which closed on January 1, 2014, we borrowed $35.0 million under a senior unsecured line of credit. Furthermore, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we repaid a net $155.6 million of FHLB advances that resulted in $1.7 million of gain on debt extinguishment. The $313.0 million of long-term debt assumed in the acquisition of First Place Bank represented $215.5 million of FHLB advances classified as long-term debt, $50.0 million of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and $27.7 million and $9.7 million, respectively, in premiums representing the purchase accounting fair value. In addition, we assumed $60.0 million in subordinated notes issued to First Place Capital Trust, First Place Capital Trust II and First Place Capital Trust III, of which $45.0 million was immediately retired, and recorded $4.5 million in discounts, representing the purchase accounting fair value.

Total debt was collateralized by $2.4 billion of commercial and mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and bonds at December 31, 2014, compared to $949.6 million of commercial and mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and bonds at December 31, 2013. See the "Contractual Obligations" section of this financial review for maturity information.

On February 17, 2015 we drew $20.0 million on our existing line of credit in order to facilitate our February 17, 2015 repurchase of 2.5 million warrants to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock of an aggregate purchase price of $19.9 million.

The following table summarizes the changes in our shareholders' equity for the periods indicated:

On January 1, 2014, we purchased four of Financial Commerce Corporation's wholly-owned subsidiary banks, which immediately prior to our acquisition were consolidated into one bank, Michigan Commerce Bank, now Talmer West Bank, and certain other bank-related assets from Financial Commerce Corporation and its parent holding company, Capitol Bancorp Ltd., in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The purchase price consisted of cash consideration of $4.0 million and a separate $2.5 million payment to fund an escrow account to pay the

post-petition administrative fees and expenses of the professionals in the bankruptcy cases of Financial Commerce Corporation and Capitol Bancorp Ltd., each of which filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S Bankruptcy Code on August 9, 2012, with any unused escrowed funds to be refunded to us. In compliance with a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation requirement to close the acquisition, we contributed approximately $79.5 million of additional capital to Talmer West Bank in order to recapitalize the bank. Following the acquisition, an additional $20.0 million of capital was infused into Talmer West Bank to ensure capital requirements continued to be met. In order to support the acquisition and recapitalization of Talmer West Bank, Talmer Bancorp, Inc. borrowed $35.0 million under a senior unsecured line of credit. We used a portion of the net proceeds from our initial public offering that closed on February 14, 2014, to repay the $35.0 million senior unsecured line of credit, including accrued and unpaid interest.

On February 14, 2014, we completed the initial public offering of 15,555,555 shares of Class A common stock for $13 per share. Of the 15,555,555 shares sold, 3,703,703 shares were sold by us and 11,851,852 shares were sold by certain selling shareholders. In addition, on February 21, 2014, the selling shareholders sold an additional 2,333,333 shares of Class A common stock to cover the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option. We received net proceeds of $42.0 million from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders.

In February 2012, we closed on a private placement of our Class A common stock consisting of an initial drawdown by us of approximately $21.0 million and commitments from investors for up to approximately $153.0 million of event driven capital at $8.00 per share to support growth strategies. In December 2012, we closed on the remaining $153.0 million of capital commitments from our investors, which was used to fund the acquisition and recapitalization of First Place Bank.

We strive to maintain an adequate capital base to support our activities in a safe and sound manner while at the same time attempting to maximize shareholder value. We assess capital adequacy against the risk inherent in our balance sheet, recognizing that unexpected loss is the common denominator of risk and that common equity has the greatest capacity to absorb unexpected loss.

At December 31, 2014, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized Talmer Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework from prompt corrective action. Talmer Bank was required to maintain a ratio of Tier 1 common equity to total assets of at least 10% under the FDIC's Statement of Policy on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions for a period of three years after our most recent FDIC-assisted acquisition. Our last failed bank acquisition closed on April 29, 2011 and, therefore, we remained subject to the heightened capital requirements through April 29, 2014.

The capital ratios of Talmer West Bank at December 31, 2014 exceed the total capital (to risk-weighted assets) ratio of at least 12.0% and a Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets) ratio of at least 9.0% as prescribed in the Consent Order issued by the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services on April 5, 2010. Notwithstanding its capital levels, Talmer West Bank will not be categorized as well capitalized while it is subject to the Consent Order.

Our capital ratios exceeded the well capitalized regulatory requirements as follows:

	Well Capitalized Regulatory Requirement			December 31,

	Well Capitalized Regulatory Requirement			2014			2013			2012
Total risk-based capital
Consolidated		N/A			16.4	%		19.2	%		45.7	%
Talmer Bank and Trust		10.0	%		16.3			18.4			27.8
Talmer West Bank(1)		N/A			19.6
First Place Bank(2)		N/A						15.9
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Consolidated		N/A			15.2			18.3			44.4
Talmer Bank and Trust		6.0			15.0			17.1			26.5
Talmer West Bank(1)		N/A			18.4
First Place Bank(2)		N/A						15.3
Tier 1 leverage ratio
Consolidated		N/A			11.6			12.2			22.7
Talmer Bank and Trust		5.0			11.6			10.3			13.5
Talmer West Bank(1)		N/A			12.4
First Place Bank(2)		N/A						11.7

A cash dividend on our Class A common stock of $0.01 per share was declared on January 29, 2015. The dividend will be paid on February 20, 2015, to our Class A common shareholders of record as of February 9, 2015.

On February 17, 2015, we purchased an aggregate of 2,529,416 warrants to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock. The purchase price, determined utilizing the closing price of our stock on the date of repurchase representing fair value, resulted in an aggregate purchase price of $19.9 million. This transaction decreased additional paid-in-capital by $19.9 million on the date of repurchase.

In the normal course of business, we offer a variety of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include outstanding commitments to extend credit, credit lines, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit.

Our exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instrument, is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. The same credit policies are used in making commitments and conditional obligations as are used for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer's creditworthiness on an individual basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counterparty. The collateral held varies, but may include securities, real estate, inventory, plant, or equipment. Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are included in commitments to extend credit. These lines of credit are generally uncollateralized, usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may be drawn upon only to the total extent to which we are committed.

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Our portfolio of standby letters of credit consists primarily of performance assurances made on behalf of customers who have a contractual commitment to produce or deliver goods or services. The risk to us arises from our obligation to make payment in the event of the customers' contractual default to produce the contracted good or service to a third party. Management conducts regular reviews of these instruments on an individual customer basis and does not anticipate any material losses as a result of these letters of credit.

We maintain an allowance to cover probable losses inherent in our financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the allowance for off-balance sheet risk was $539 thousand and $1.0 million, respectively, and included in "Other liabilities" on our consolidated balance sheets.

A summary of the contractual amounts of our exposure to off-balance sheet risk is as follows.

We enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from our commitments to fund the loans. These commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate lock commitments) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives.

We also enter into interest rate derivatives to provide a service to certain qualifying customers to help facilitate their respective risk management strategies ("customer-initiated derivatives"). These derivatives are not used to manage interest rate risk in our assets or liabilities. We generally take offsetting positions with dealer counterparts to mitigate the inherent risk in these derivatives.

We additionally utilize interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges for risk management purposes to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. These interest rate swaps are used to manage differences in the amount, timing and duration of our known or expected cash receipts and our known or expected cash payments principally related to certain variable rate borrowings and/or deposits.

The agreements with our derivative counterparties contain a provision where, if we default on any of our indebtedness, then we could also be declared in default on our derivative obligations. In

addition, these agreements contain a provision where, if we fail to maintain our status as a well-capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions and we would be required to settle our obligations under the agreements. As of December 31, 2014, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest, but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk, related to these agreements was $1.7 million.

	December 31,

	2014						2013						2012
			Fair Value						Fair Value						Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	Notional Amount(1)		Gross Derivative Assets(2)		Gross Derivative Liabilities(2)		Notional Amount(1)		Gross Derivative Assets(2)		Gross Derivative Liabilities(2)		Notional Amount(1)		Gross Derivative Assets(2)			Gross Derivative Liabilities(2)
Risk management purposes:
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	12,000	$	—	$	222	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—

Total risk management purposes		12,000		—		222		—		—		—		—		—			—

Customer-initiated and mortgage banking activities:
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale		114,828		—		803		168,746		1,484		—		63,871		(2	)		—
Interest rate lock commitments		67,817		1,489		—		67,685		1,146		—		65,132		1,574			—
Customer-initiated derivatives		125,356		1,588		1,477		—		—		—		—		—			—

Total customer-initiated and mortgage banking activities		308,001		3,077		2,280		236,431		2,630		—		129,003		1,572			—

Total gross derivatives	$	320,001	$	3,077	$	2,502	$	236,431	$	2,630	$	—	$	129,003	$	1,572		$	—

Note 12, "Derivative Instruments," to our audited consolidated financial statements includes additional information about these derivative contracts.

loan fails to meet established criteria. The following table represents the activity related to our liability recorded in connection with these representations and warranties.

The liability for specific claims includes liability for the estimated likelihood of payment of the claims while the general allowance is developed using a model to estimate the unknown liability including inputs such as the loans sold by year, the number and dollar amount of claims to-date by year, the rate of claims being rescinded and the estimate of the amount of the loss as a percent of the loan balance.

In the normal course of business, we have various outstanding contractual obligations that will require future cash outflows. The following table represents the largest contractual obligations as of December 31, 2014.

Liquidity management is the process by which we manage the flow of funds necessary to meet our financial commitments on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost and to take advantage of earnings enhancement opportunities. These financial commitments include withdrawals by depositors, credit commitments to borrowers, expenses of our operations, and capital expenditures. Liquidity is monitored and closely managed by our Asset and Liability Committee ("ALCO"), a group of senior officers from the finance, risk management, treasury, and lending areas. It is ALCO's responsibility to ensure we

have the necessary level of funds available for normal operations as well as maintain a contingency funding policy to ensure that potential liquidity stress events are planned for, quickly identified, and management has plans in place to respond. ALCO has created policies which establish limits and require measurements to monitor liquidity trends, including modeling and management reporting that identifies the amounts and costs of all available funding sources. In addition, we have implemented modeling software that projects cash flows from the balance sheet under a broad range of potential scenarios, including severe changes in the interest rate environment.

At December 31, 2014, we had liquidity on hand of $656.8 million, compared to $694.5 million at December 31, 2013. Liquid assets include cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits with banks and unencumbered securities available-for-sale.

Each of our subsidiary banks are members of the FHLB, which provide short- and long-term funding to its members through advances collateralized by real estate-related assets and other select collateral, most typically in the form of U.S. government issued debt securities. The actual borrowing capacity is contingent on the amount of collateral available to be pledged to the FHLB. As of December 31, 2014, we had $390.1 million of outstanding borrowings from the FHLB with remaining maturities ranging from the years 2015 to 2027. We also maintain relationships with correspondent banks which could provide funds on short notice, if needed. In addition, because Talmer Bank is "well capitalized," it can accept wholesale deposits up to approximately $1.5 billion based on current policy limits. Management believes that we had adequate resources to fund all of our commitments as of December 31, 2014.

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates. Interest-rate risk is the risk to earnings and equity value arising from changes in market interest rates and arises in the normal course of business to the extent that there is a divergence between the amount of our interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid/withdrawn, re-price, or mature in specified periods. We seek to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and equity while managing volatility arising from shifts in market interest rates. ALCO oversees market risk management, monitoring risk measures, limits, and policy guidelines for managing the amount of interest-rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital. Our Board of Directors approves policy limits with respect to interest rate risk.

Interest rate risk management is an active process that encompasses monitoring loan and deposit flows complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective interest rate risk management begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate interest rate risk position given business activities, management objectives, market expectations and ALCO policy limits and guidelines.

Interest rate risk can come in a variety of forms, including repricing risk, basis risk, yield curve risk and option risk. Repricing risk is the risk of adverse consequences from a change in interest rates that arises because of differences in the timing of when those interest rate changes impact our assets and liabilities. Basis risk is the risk of adverse consequence resulting from unequal change in the spread between two or more rates for different instruments with the same maturity. Yield curve risk is the risk of adverse consequence resulting from unequal changes in the spread between two or more rates for different maturities for the same or different instruments. Option risk in financial instruments arises from embedded options such as options provided to borrowers to make unscheduled loan prepayments, options provided to debt issuers to exercise call options prior to maturity, and depositor options to make withdrawals and early redemptions.

We regularly review our exposure to changes in interest rates. Among the factors we consider are changes in the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, interest rate spreads and repricing periods. ALCO reviews, on at least a quarterly basis, our interest rate risk position.

The interest-rate risk position is measured and monitored at each bank subsidiary using net interest income simulation models and economic value of equity sensitivity analysis that capture both short-term and long-term interest-rate risk exposure. In addition, periodic Earnings at Risk analyses incorporate the expected change in the value of loan servicing rights and the net interest income simulation results.

Net interest income simulation involves forecasting net interest income under a variety of interest rate scenarios including instantaneous shocks.

The estimated impact on our net interest income as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, assuming immediate parallel moves in interest rates is presented in the table below. Simulation results for December 31, 2014 reflect the addition of Talmer West Bank.

Modeling the sensitivity of net interest income and the economic value of equity to changes in market interest rates is highly dependent on numerous assumptions incorporated into the modeling process. The models used for these measurements rely on estimates of the potential impact that changes in interest rates may have on the value and prepayment speeds on all components of our loan portfolio, investment portfolio, loan servicing rights, any hedge or derivative instruments, as well as embedded options and cash flows of other assets and liabilities. Balance sheet growth assumptions are also included in the simulation modeling process. The model includes the effects of off-balance sheet instruments such as interest rate swap derivatives. Due to the current low interest rate environment, we assumed that market interest rates would not fall below 0% for the scenarios that used the down 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis point parallel shifts in market interest rates. The analysis provides a framework as to what our overall sensitivity position is as of our most recent reported position and the impact that potential changes in interest rates may have on net interest income and the economic value of our equity.

Management strategies may impact future reporting periods, as our actual results may differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes, the difference between actual experience, and the characteristics assumed, as well as changes in market conditions. Market based prepayment speeds are factored into the analysis for loan and securities portfolios. Rate sensitivity for transactional deposit accounts is modeled based on both historical experience and external industry studies.

We use economic value of equity sensitivity analysis to understand the impact of interest rate changes on long-term cash flows, income, and capital. Economic value of equity is based on discounting the cash flows for all balance sheet instruments under different interest rate scenarios. Deposit premiums are based on external industry studies and utilizing historical experience.

The table below presents the change in our economic value of equity as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 assuming immediate parallel shifts in interest rates. Simulation results for December 31, 2014 reflect the addition of Talmer West Bank in addition to a model adjustment based upon our own historical model which resulted in longer lives of our non-core deposits.

Operational risk is the risk of loss due to human behavior, inadequate or failed internal systems and controls, and external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities, disasters, and security risks. We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls, enterprise risk management, operating processes and employee awareness to assess the impact on earnings and capital and to improve the oversight of our operational risk.

Compliance risk represents the risk of regulatory sanctions, reputational impact or financial loss resulting from our failure to comply with rules and regulations issued by the various banking agencies and standards of good banking practice. Activities which may expose us to compliance risk include, but are not limited to, those dealing with the prevention of money laundering, privacy and data protection, community reinvestment initiatives, fair lending challenges resulting from the expansion of our banking center network and employment and tax matters.

Strategic and/or reputation risk represents the risk of loss due to impairment of reputation, failure to fully develop and execute business plans, failure to assess current and new opportunities in business, markets and products, and any other event not identified in the defined risk types mentioned previously. Mitigation of the various risk elements that represent strategic and/or reputation risk is achieved through initiatives to help us better understand and report on various risks, including those related to the development of new products and business initiatives.

Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries—Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Talmer Bancorp, Inc.'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. Talmer Bancorp, Inc. is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Talmer Bancorp, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Talmer Bancorp Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013

Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	86,185		$	97,167
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks		96,551			206,160
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments		71,000			72,029

Total cash and cash equivalents		253,736			375,356
Securities available-for-sale		740,819			620,083
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		20,212			16,303
Loans held for sale, at fair value		93,453			85,252
Loans:
Residential real estate (includes $18.3 million and $16.3 million respectively, measured at fair value)(1)		1,426,012			1,085,453
Commercial real estate		1,310,938			755,839
Commercial and industrial		869,477			446,644
Real estate construction (includes $1.2 million and $1.4 million respectively, measured at fair value)(1)		131,686			176,226
Consumer		164,524			9,754

Total loans, excluding covered loans		3,902,637			2,473,916
Less: Allowance for loan losses—uncovered		(33,819	)		(17,746	)

Net loans—excluding covered loans		3,868,818			2,456,170
Covered loans		346,490			530,068
Less: Allowance for loan losses—covered		(21,353	)		(40,381	)

Net loans—covered		325,137			489,687

Net total loans		4,193,955			2,945,857
Premises and equipment		46,905			51,001
FDIC indemnification asset		67,026			131,861
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		48,743			29,982
Loan servicing rights		70,598			78,603
Core deposit intangible		13,035			13,205
FDIC receivable		6,062			7,783
Company-owned life insurance		97,782			39,500
Income tax benefit		177,472			126,200
Other assets		40,982			26,375

Total assets	$	5,870,780		$	4,547,361



Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	887,567		$	779,407
Interest-bearing demand deposits		660,697			598,281
Money market and savings deposits		1,170,236			1,215,864
Time deposits		1,188,178			927,313
Other brokered funds		642,185			80,000

Total deposits		4,548,863			3,600,865
FDIC clawback liability		26,905			24,887
FDIC warrants payable		4,633			4,118
Short-term borrowings		135,743			71,876
Long-term debt		353,972			199,037
Other liabilities		39,057			29,563

Total liabilities		5,109,173			3,930,346

Shareholders' equity
Preferred stock—$1.00 par value Authorized—20,000,000 shares at 12/31/2014 and 12/31/2013 Issued and outstanding—0 shares at 12/31/2014 and 12/31/2013		—			—
Common stock:
Class A Voting Common Stock—$1.00 par value Authorized—198,000,000 shares at 12/31/2014 and 12/31/2013 Issued and outstanding—70,532,122 shares at 12/31/2014 and 66,234,397 shares at 12/31/2013		70,532			66,234
Class B Non-Voting Common Stock—$1.00 par value Authorized—2,000,000 shares at 12/31/2014 and 12/31/2013 Issued and outstanding—0 shares at 12/31/2014 and 12/31/2013		—			—
Additional paid-in-capital		405,436			366,428
Retained earnings		281,789			192,349
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		3,850			(7,996	)

Total shareholders' equity		761,607			617,015

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	5,870,780		$	4,547,361

	Year ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2014			2013			2012
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans	$	226,674		$	194,857		$	112,530
Interest on investments
Taxable		8,509			6,097			4,977
Tax-exempt		6,232			4,230			3,478

Total interest on securities		14,741			10,327			8,455
Interest on interest-earning cash balances		640			776			133
Interest on federal funds and other short-term investments		527			930			507
Dividends on FHLB stock		867			872			95
FDIC indemnification asset		(26,426	)		(28,040	)		(19,156	)

Total interest income		217,023			179,722			102,564

Interest Expense
Interest-bearing demand deposits		824			673			571
Money market and savings deposits		1,930			1,889			1,105
Time deposits		6,080			5,864			3,210
Other brokered funds		879			142			16
Interest on short-term borrowings		420			105			42
Interest on long-term debt		2,627			3,052			751

Total interest expense		12,760			11,725			5,695

Net interest income		204,263			167,997			96,869
Provision for loan losses—uncovered		23,082			15,520			3,614
Provision (benefit) for loan losses—covered		(18,755	)		(10,422	)		32,258

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		199,936			162,899			60,997

Noninterest income
Deposit fee income		12,225			15,886			5,353
Mortgage banking and other loan fees		1,163			30,853			3,195
Net gain on sales of loans		17,747			41,212			13,449
Net gain on sale of branches		14,410			—			—
Bargain purchase gain		41,977			71,702			—
FDIC loss sharing income		(6,211	)		(10,226	)		21,498
Accelerated discount on acquired loans		18,197			17,154			18,914
Net gain (loss) on sales of securities		(2,066	)		392			6,057
Other income		20,057			14,165			5,843

Total noninterest income		117,499			181,138			74,309
Noninterest expense
Salary and employee benefits		121,744			146,609			59,252
Occupancy and equipment expense		31,806			26,755			14,044
Data processing fees		6,399			7,591			4,111
Professional service fees		12,952			16,640			4,925
FDIC loss sharing expense		2,158			2,007			3,024
Bank acquisition and due diligence fees		3,765			8,693			1,382
Marketing expense		4,923			3,484			1,934
Other employee expense		2,674			3,096			1,268
Insurance expense		5,697			9,974			2,436
Other expense		26,762			25,965			11,028

Total noninterest expense		218,880			250,814			103,404

Income before income taxes		98,555			93,223			31,902
Income tax provision (benefit)		7,705			(5,335	)		10,232

Net income	$	90,850		$	98,558		$	21,670



Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	1.30		$	1.49		$	0.46
Diluted	$	1.21		$	1.41		$	0.44
Average common shares outstanding—basic		69,605			66,230			46,987
Average common shares outstanding—diluted		75,150			69,664			48,806

	Year ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Net income	$	90,850		$	98,558		$	21,670
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale arising during the period		16,381			(17,937	)		7,255
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses on realized income		2,066			(392	)		(6,057	)
Tax effect		(6,456	)		6,415			(419	)

Net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale, net of tax		11,991			(11,914	)		779
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges		(259	)		—			—
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income		37			—			—
Tax effect		77			—			—

Net unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax		(145	)		—			—

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		11,846			(11,914	)		779

Total comprehensive income, net of tax	$	102,696		$	86,644		$	22,449

Talmer Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

	Common Stock

	Common Stock				Additional Paid in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders' Equity
(In thousands)	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders' Equity
Balance at December 31, 2011		44,469	$	44,469	$	201,628		$	72,090		$	3,139		$	321,326
Net Income		—		—		—			21,670			—			21,670
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			779			779
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		3,034			—			—			3,034
Issuance of common shares		21,760		21,760		152,174			—			—			173,934

Balance at December 31, 2012		66,229	$	66,229	$	356,836		$	93,760		$	3,918		$	520,743



Balance at December 31, 2012		66,229	$	66,229	$	356,836		$	93,760		$	3,918		$	520,743
Cumulative effect adjustment of change in accounting policy to beginning retained earnings				—		—			31			—			31
Net income		—		—		—			98,558			—			98,558
Other comprehensive loss		—		—		—			—			(11,914	)		(11,914	)
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		9,556			—			—			9,556
Issuance of common shares		5		5		36			—			—			41

Balance at December 31, 2013		66,234	$	66,234	$	366,428		$	192,349		$	(7,996	)	$	617,015



Balance at December 31, 2013		66,234	$	66,234	$	366,428		$	192,349		$	(7,996	)	$	617,015
Net income		—		—		—			90,850			—			90,850
Other comprehensive income		—		—		—			—			11,846			11,846
Stock-based compensation expense		—		—		1,132			—			—			1,132
Restricted stock awards		378		378		(378	)		—			—			—
Issuance of common shares		3,920		3,920		38,254			—			—			42,174
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.02 per share)		—		—		—			(1,410	)		—			(1,410	)

Balance at December 31, 2014		70,532	$	70,532	$	405,436		$	281,789		$	3,850		$	761,607

	Years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	90,850		$	98,558		$	21,670
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		6,482			8,048			5,193
Amortization of core deposit intangibles		2,801			2,682			2,424
Stock-based compensation expense		1,132			9,556			3,034
Provisions for loan losses		4,327			5,098			35,872
Originations of loans held for sale		(1,049,213	)		(2,339,095	)		(384,278	)
Proceeds from sales of loans		1,055,133			2,519,722			379,866
Net gain from sales of loans		(17,747	)		(41,212	)		(13,449	)
Net gain from sale of branches		(14,410	)		—			—
Net (gain)/loss on sales of securities		2,066			(392	)		(6,057	)
Gain on acquisition		(41,977	)		(71,702	)		—
Gain on extinguishment of FHLB advances		—			(1,736	)		—
Valuation allowance and writedowns on other real estate and other repossessed assets		6,139			6,874			5,306
Valuation change in Company-owned life insurance		(2,691	)		(1,328	)		—
Valuation change in loan servicing rights		17,037			(7,063	)		598
Net additions to loan servicing rights		(8,265	)		(23,916	)		(3,607	)
Net decrease in FDIC indemnification asset and receivable, net of cash payments received		51,580			72,392			10,072
Net gain on sales of other real estate owned and repossessed assets		(8,414	)		(3,909	)		(1,026	)
Net (increase)/decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets		6,169			11,585			(3,073	)
Net increase/(decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities		6,728			(3,612	)		(2,336	)
Net securities premium amortization		5,489			7,539			3,756
Deferred income tax (benefit)/expense		(5,258	)		12,647			(19,678	)
Change in valuation allowance of deferred income tax asset		(10,127	)		(14,426	)		—
Other, net		(145	)		1,617			694

Net cash from operating activities		97,686			247,927			34,981

Cash flows from investing activities
Net increase in uncovered loans		(808,182	)		(354,429	)		(291,585	)
Net decrease in covered loans		136,147			174,478			150,456
Purchases of loans		(159,585	)		—			—
Purchases of FHLB stock		(10,723	)		(490	)		—
Purchases of securities available-for-sale		(298,033	)		(421,533	)		(451,251	)
Purchases of Company-owned life insurance		(55,591	)		—			—
Purchases of premises and equipment		(11,138	)		(2,629	)		(3,639	)
Payments received from FDIC under loss sharing agreements		14,976			32,319			161,819
Proceeds from:
Maturities and redemptions of securities available-for-sale		119,312			239,835			92,147
Redemption of FHLB Stock		12,747			—			—
Sale of securities available-for-sale		82,496			31,667			241,136
Sale of loans		123,833			3,542			11,290
Sale of other real estate owned and repossessed assets		48,215			37,045			18,877
Sale of premises and equipment		12,685			109			120
Sale of deposits		(389,476	)		—			—
Net cash provided from acquisition		209,831			394,805			—

Net cash from (used in) investing activities		(972,486	)		134,719			(70,630	)

	Years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in deposits		493,632			(250,619	)		34,627
Net increase/(decrease) in short-term borrowings		98,849			(3,354	)		2,704
Issuances of long-term FHLB advances		180,000			30,000			12,000
Repayments of long-term FHLB advances		(23,564	)		(179,630	)		(20,005	)
Repayments on long-term sweep repurchase agreements		(1,635	)		(1,627	)		—
Repayments of senior unsecured line of credit		(35,000	)		—			—
Draw on senior unsecured line of credit		—			35,000			—
Other changes in long-term debt		134			128			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, including tax benefit		42,174			41			173,934
Cash dividends paid on common stock ($0.02 per share)		(1,410	)		—			—

Net cash from (used in) financing activities		753,180			(370,061	)		203,260

Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(121,620	)		12,585			167,611
Beginning cash and cash equivalents		375,356			362,771			195,160

Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	253,736		$	375,356		$	362,771



Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	12,207		$	11,084		$	5,789
Income taxes paid		5,808			15,800			46,830
Transfer from loans to other real estate owned and repossessed assets		32,808			22,660			26,095
Loans securitized		—			10,359			—
Net transfer of loans held for investment to loans held for sale		18,819			17,708			—
Transfer from premises and equipment to other real estate owned		480			4,052			1,467
Non-cash transactions:
Increase in assets and liabilities in acquisitions:
Securities		13,619			139,764			—
FHLB stock		5,933			12,993			—
Loans held for sale		—			213,946			—
Uncovered loans		571,666			1,530,376			—
Premises and equipment		4,912			22,168			—
Loan servicing rights		767			41,967			—
Company-owned life insurance		—			38,172			—
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		30,878			18,448			—
Core deposit intangible		3,633			9,816			—
Other assets		62,542			128,278			—
Deposits		857,769			2,121,258			—
Short-term borrowings		18			21,892			—
Long-term debt		—			312,956			—
Other liabilities		4,017			22,925			—

TALMER BANCORP, INC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2014

Nature of Operations and Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include Talmer Bancorp, Inc., (the "Company"), a registered bank holding company, and the accounts and operations of its wholly owned subsidiaries, Talmer Bank and Trust, Talmer West Bank and First Place Holdings. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

The Company provides financial services through 78 offices as of December 31, 2014, located in Midwest markets in Southeastern Michigan, smaller communities in Northeastern Michigan, Northeastern and Eastern Ohio and Chicago, Illinois and additionally operates one branch in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The Company is a full service community bank offering a full suite of commercial and retail banking, mortgage banking, wealth management and trust services to small and medium-sized businesses and individuals within its geographic footprint. Our product line includes loans to small and medium-sized businesses, residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, residential and commercial construction and development loans, consumer loans, home equity loans, agricultural loans, and a variety of commercial and consumer demand, savings and time deposit products. Substantially all loans are secured by specific items of collateral including business assets, consumer assets, and commercial and residential real estate. Commercial loans are expected to be repaid from cash flow from operations of businesses. There are no significant concentrations of loans to any one industry or customer. However, the customers' ability to repay their loans is dependent on the real estate and general economic conditions in the area. Approximately 8.2% of the Company's loan portfolio is covered under Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") loss sharing agreements.

The Company also engages in mortgage banking activities and, as such, acquires, sells, and services one-to-four family residential mortgage loans and construction loans.

On February 11, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective the Company's registration statement on Form S-1 registering the shares of the Company's common stock as "TLMR" on the Nasdaq Capital Market. On February 14, 2014, the Company completed the initial public offering of 15,555,555 shares of Class A common stock for $13 per share. Of the 15,555,555 shares sold, 3,703,703 shares were sold by the Company and 11,851,852 shares were sold by certain selling shareholders. In addition, on February 21, 2014, the selling shareholders sold an additional 2,333,333 shares of Class A common stock to cover the exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $42.0 million from the offering, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders.

On July 18, 2014, Talmer West Bank sold its single branch office in Albuquerque, New Mexico along with its $34.1 million of deposits and $23.7 million of loans to Grants State Bank, a unit of First Bancorp of Durango, Inc. The net impact to pre-tax income related to this transaction recorded in the third quarter of 2014 is a $1.6 million benefit, representing the gain on the sale of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, partially offset by the write-off of related core deposit intangible of $91 thousand and other costs associated with the transaction of approximately $170 thousand. The benefit of $1.6 million is recorded in "Net gain on sale of branches" on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

On August 8, 2014 we sold our 10 branch offices located in Wisconsin to Town Bank, a wholly owned bank subsidiary of Wintrust Financial Corporation. Town Bank assumed all of our deposits in Wisconsin totaling $354.8 million as of August 8, 2014. Concurrent with the closing of this transaction, Town Bank sold two of the branch locations and related deposits in Kenosha and Genoa City, Wisconsin to its affiliate, State Bank of the Lakes, a Wintrust community bank. The net impact to pre-tax income related to this transaction recorded in the third quarter of 2014 is a $12.8 million benefit, representing the gain on the sale of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed, partially offset by the write-off of the related core deposit intangible of $911 thousand and other costs associated with the transaction of approximately $248 thousand. The benefit of $12.8 million is recorded in "Net gain on sale of branches" on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

First of Huron Corporation acquisition: For information about the Company's subsequent acquisition of First Huron Corporation effective February 6, 2015, refer to Note 25, Subsequent Acquisition.

Sale of mortgage servicing rights: For information about the Company's January 30, 2015 sale of mortgage servicing rights refer to Note 11, Loan Servicing Rights.

Repurchase of warrants: For information about the Company's February 17, 2015 repurchase of 2.5 million warrants refer to Note 17, Stock-Based Compensation and Stock Warrants.

Use of Estimates: To prepare financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), management is required to make estimates and assumptions based on available information. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ.

Cash Flows: Cash and cash equivalents include cash, deposits with other financial institutions with maturities fewer than 90 days, and federal funds sold. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, interest bearing deposits in other financial institutions, and federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements.

Interest-Bearing Deposits with Other Banks: Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions mature within one year and are carried at cost.

Investment Securities: Debt securities are classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost when management has the positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. Securities that are not held for trading purposes are accounted for as securities available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders' equity.

Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or accretion of purchase discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments, except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method.

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For debt securities in an unrealized loss position, management assesses whether it intends to sell, or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: 1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and 2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis.

Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") Stock: Talmer Bank and Trust and Talmer West Bank are members of the FHLB of Indianapolis. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. FHLB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

Loans Held for Sale: Mortgage and construction loans intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at fair value based on the Company's election of the fair value option. The fair value includes the servicing value of the loans as well as any accrued interest.

These loans are sold both with servicing rights retained and with servicing rights released. Under current business practice, the majority of loans sold are sold with servicing rights retained.

Purchased Loans: Purchased loans are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considered various factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting the Company's assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. Larger purchased loans are individually evaluated while smaller purchased loans are grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

The Company accounts for purchased credit impaired loans in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Subtopic 310-30, "Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality" ("ASC 310-30"). The cash flows expected to be collected on purchased loans are estimated based upon the expected remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. Purchased loans are considered credit impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration at the date of purchase and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected. Purchased credit impaired loans are not classified as nonperforming assets as the loans are considered performing under ASC 310-30. Interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying value of the loans and the expected cash flows is recognized on all purchased loans

accounted for under ASC 310-30. Expected cash flows are re-estimated quarterly for all loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. A decline in the present value of current expected cash flows compared to the previously estimated expected cash flows, due in any part to change in credit, is referred to as credit impairment and recorded as provision for loan losses during the period. Declines in the present value of expected cash flows only from the expected timing of such cash flows is referred to as timing impairment and recognized prospectively as a decrease in yield on the loan. Improvement in expected cash flows is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the yield on the loan once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured. Accelerated discounts on acquired loans result from the accelerated recognition of a portion of the loan discount that would have been recognized over the expected life of the loan and occur when a loan is paid in full or otherwise settled.

Purchased loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30 including purchased loans with revolving privileges, are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-20, "Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs" ("ASC 310-20") or under FASB ASC Topic 310-40, "Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors" ("ASC 310-40"), where applicable. Discounts created when the loans were recorded at their estimated fair values at acquisition are amortized over the remaining term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loan's yield.

Loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the due date of the scheduled payment. Purchased loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are classified as performing, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period provision for loan losses or future period yield adjustments. Purchased loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful. Generally, loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are placed in nonaccrual status due to the continued failure to adhere to contractual payment terms by the borrower coupled with other pertinent factors, such as insufficient collateral value.

The accrual of interest income, for loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30, on commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, residential real estate and real estate construction loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection, or if full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. The accrual of interest income for bankruptcy loans is discontinued upon notification of bankruptcy status of the borrower. Consumer loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued, but not received for a loan placed on nonaccrual, is charged against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Certain loans acquired in FDIC-assisted transactions are initially covered under loss sharing agreements and are referred to as covered loans. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will reimburse the Company for 80% of losses incurred on covered loans. For certain purchased loans, the reimbursement rate for losses are reduced for losses above a certain threshold. The Company will reimburse the FDIC for its share of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid the Company a reimbursement under the loss sharing agreement. For loans that were fully charged off prior to acquisition, the FDIC will reimburse the Company for 50% of expenses incurred to collect on the loan and the Company will reimburse the FDIC for 50% of the recoveries recognized from its collection efforts. The FDIC's obligation to reimburse the Company for losses with respect to covered loans began with the first dollar of loss incurred by the Company.

Originated Loans: Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of unearned income, deferred loan fees and costs, and any direct principal charge-offs. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income over the remaining life of the loan without anticipating prepayments.

During the normal course of business, loans originated with the initial intention to sell, but not ultimately sold, are transferred from held for sale to our portfolio of loans held for investment. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company transferred $3.5 million of loans held for sale to our portfolio of loans held for investment. In accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 825 "Financial Instruments," loans elected to be carried at fair value retain the election and continue to be carried at fair value. Loans held for sale are carried at fair value based on the Company's election of the fair value option, and as such, the loans transferred from held for sale will continue to be reported at fair value. The fair value of these loans is estimated using discounted cash flows taking into consideration current market interest rates, loan repricing characteristics and expected loan prepayment speeds, while also taking into consideration other significant unobservable inputs such as the payment history and credit quality characteristic of each individual loan, and an illiquidity discount reflecting the relative illiquidity of the market.

Loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the due date of the scheduled payment. Loans are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful. Generally, loans are placed in nonaccrual status due to the continued failure to adhere to contractual payment terms by the borrower coupled with other pertinent factors, such as, insufficient collateral value.

The accrual of interest income on single family residential mortgage, commercial and commercial real estate loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is well-secured and in process of collection, or if full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 120 days past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

All interest accrued but not received for a loan placed on nonaccrual is charged against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Purchased Loans: The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses on purchased loans based on credit deterioration subsequent to the acquisition date. In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, there was no allowance brought forward on any of the acquired loans as any credit deterioration evident in the loans was included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. For purchased credit impaired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 and troubled debt restructurings previously individually accounted for under ASC 310-30, management establishes an allowance for credit deterioration subsequent to the date of acquisition by quarterly re-estimating expected cash flows with any decline in expected cash flows recorded as impairment in the provision for loan losses. Impairment is measured as the excess of the recorded investment in a loan over the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the pre-impairment accounting yield of the loan. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company first reverses any previously recorded allowance for loan loss, then adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan's remaining life. For non-purchased credit impaired loans acquired in the First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank transactions that are accounted for under ASC 310-20, the historical loss estimates are based on the historical losses experienced by First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank, and subsequently Talmer Bank and Trust, for loans with similar characteristics as those acquired other than purchased credit impaired loans. We record an allowance for loan losses only when the calculated amount exceeds the remaining credit mark established at acquisition. For all other purchased loans accounted for under ASC 310-20 or under ASC 310-40, the allowance is calculated in accordance with the methods used to calculate the allowance for loan losses for originated loans.

For covered loans, the required allowance is recorded gross and the related estimated reimbursement for losses due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements is recorded as both FDIC loss sharing income and an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset.

Originated loans: The allowance for loan losses represents management's assessment of probable, incurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances, based on individual evaluation of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics.

delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.

All consumer and residential real estate impaired loans are identified to be individually evaluated for impairment. Commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction impaired loans are identified to be individually evaluated for impairment based on a defined dollar threshold, unless they are non-collateral dependent, in which case no threshold applies. In addition, all impaired loans held by Talmer West Bank are identified to be individually evaluated for impairment. For individually evaluated impaired loans, a specific allowance is established when the discounted expected cash flows or the fair value of the underlying collateral of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of the loan. The valuations are reviewed and updated on a quarterly basis. While the determination of the specific allowance may involve estimates, each estimate is unique to the individual loan, and none is individually significant.

Loans that do not meet the criteria to be evaluated individually are evaluated in homogeneous pools of loans with similar characteristics. The allowance for commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans that are not individually evaluated for impairment begins with a process of estimating probable incurred losses in the portfolio. These estimates are established based on our internal credit risk ratings and historical loss data. We assign internal credit risk ratings to each business loan at the time the loan is approved and these risk ratings are subjected to subsequent periodic reviews by senior management, at least annually or more frequently upon the occurrence of a circumstance that affects the credit risk of the loan. Since the operating history of Talmer Bank and Talmer West Bank is limited and it has grown rapidly, the historical loss estimates for loans are based on a combination of actual historical loss experienced by all banks in Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada and our own historical losses. Loss estimates are established by loan type including residential real estate, commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, real estate construction and consumer, and further segregated by region, including Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada, where applicable. In addition, management consideration is given to borrower rating migration experience and trends, industry concentrations and conditions, changes in collateral values of properties securing loans and trends with respect to past due and nonaccrual amounts and any adjustments are made accordingly.

The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses charged to expense and decreased by actual charge-offs, net of recoveries of previous amounts charged-off. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management's judgment, should be charged off.

For further information about the allowance for loan and lease losses, refer to Note 6.

FDIC Indemnification Asset and Clawback Liability: The FDIC indemnification asset results from the loss sharing agreements in FDIC-assisted transactions. The asset is measured separately from the related covered assets as they are not contractually embedded in those assets and are not transferable with the assets should the Company choose to dispose of them. Pursuant to the terms of

the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC will reimburse the Company for 80% of losses incurred on covered assets. For certain purchased loans, the reimbursement rate for losses are reduced for losses above a certain threshold. Expected reimbursements from the FDIC do not include reimbursable amounts related to future covered expenditures.

FDIC indemnification assets were recorded at fair value at the time of the FDIC-assisted transaction. Fair values were determined using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. These cash flows are discounted to the present value and the discount rate includes a risk premium to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and collection of the loss sharing reimbursement from the FDIC.

The accounting for FDIC indemnification assets is closely related to the accounting for the underlying, indemnified assets. The Company re-estimates the expected indemnification asset cash flows in conjunction with the quarterly re-estimation of cash flows on covered assets accounted for under ASC 310-30. Improvements in cash flow expectations on covered assets generally result in a related decline in the expected indemnification cash flows and are reflected as a downward yield adjustment on the indemnification assets. When the expected cash flows on the indemnified assets increase such that a previously recorded covered allowance for loan losses is reversed, we account for the associated decrease in the indemnification asset immediately in earnings. Any remaining decrease in the indemnification asset is amortized over the lesser of the contractual term of the indemnification agreement or the remaining life of the indemnified asset. Deterioration in cash flow expectations on covered assets generally results in an increase in expected indemnification cash flows and is reflected as both FDIC loss sharing income and an increase to the indemnification asset. If the indemnified asset is paid in full or otherwise settled, the related indemnification asset is adjusted to the current expected claimable amount.

Reimbursement requests are submitted to the FDIC on a quarterly basis for all covered assets. As of December 31, 2014, the reimbursement claims submitted by the Company to the FDIC were being reimbursed on a timely basis.

The CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank loss sharing agreements contain a provision where if losses do not exceed a calculated threshold, the Company is obligated to compensate the FDIC. This obligation is referred to as the FDIC clawback liability and, if applicable, is due to the FDIC at the end of the loss share period (ten years). The formula for the FDIC clawback liability varies from agreement to agreement and is calculated using the formula provided in the individual loss share agreements and is not consolidated into one calculation. The estimated fair value of the FDIC clawback liability is recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any valuation adjustments for the FDIC clawback liability are recorded as "Other expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Premises and Equipment: Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method with useful lives ranging from 10 to 40 years for buildings and related components, 1 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment, and 1 to 3 years for software and hardware. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their useful lives or the base term of the respective lease. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred.

Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessed Assets: Other real estate owned and repossessed assets represent property acquired by the Company as part of an acquisition or subsequently through the loan foreclosure or repossession process, or any other resolution activity that results in partial or total satisfaction of problem loans and additionally includes closed branches or operating facilities. The acquired properties are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. Losses arising at the time of acquisition of properties not acquired as part of an acquisition are charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Foreclosed properties and closed branches or operating facilities are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated costs to sell, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, all other real estate owned is valued at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs to sell, based on periodic valuations performed by management. If fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Subsequent write-downs, for amounts not expected to be recovered, in the carrying value of other real estate owned and repossessed asset properties that may be required are expensed as incurred. Improvements to the properties may be capitalized if the improvements contribute to the overall value of the property. Improvement amounts may not be capitalized in excess of the net realizable value of the property. Any gains or losses realized at the time of disposal are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For other real estate owned and repossessed assets acquired by the Company covered under a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC, pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, 80% of losses and expenses incurred while holding such covered assets are reimbursed by the FDIC. In addition, any losses recognized at foreclosure, during the holding period or realized at the time of disposal are partially offset by the FDIC loss share income reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Gains realized are shared with the FDIC in accordance with the loss sharing agreements.

Core Deposit Intangibles ("CDIs"): CDIs represent the estimated value of acquired relationships with deposit customers. The estimated fair value of CDIs are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that gives appropriate consideration to expected customer attrition rates, cost of the deposit base, reserve requirements and the net maintenance cost attributable to customer deposits. CDIs are amortized on an accelerated basis over their useful lives. CDIs are evaluated on an annual basis for impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 350, "Intangibles—Goodwill and Other".

Company-owned life insurance: Company-owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.

Loan Servicing Rights: Loan servicing rights are recognized as separate assets when such rights are purchased or when loans are sold into the secondary market, with servicing retained. Purchased servicing rights are recorded at purchase cost, which represents fair value. Upon the sale of an originated loan, the loan servicing right is established and recorded at the estimated fair value by calculating the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions. The expected and actual rates of loan prepayments are the most significant factors driving the fair value of loan servicing rights. Increases in loan prepayments reduce estimated future net servicing cash flows as the life of the underlying loan is shorter.

As of January 1, 2013, the Company elected to account for all loan servicing rights under the fair value method. The guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Subtopic 860-50, "Transfers and Servicing—Servicing Assets and Liabilities" provides that an entity may make an irrevocable decision to subsequently measure a class of servicing assets and servicing liabilities at fair value at the beginning of any fiscal year. The guidance allows for a Company to apply this election prospectively to all new and existing servicing assets and servicing liabilities. Management believes this election will provide more comparable results to peers as many of those within our industry group account for loan servicing rights under the fair value method. The change in accounting policy in the first quarter of 2013 resulted in a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings in the amount of $31 thousand. Prior to January 1, 2013, loan servicing rights were subject to impairment testing.

Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of outstanding principal and are recorded as income when earned. Late fees related to loan servicing are not material. Servicing fees are recorded as a component of "Mortgage banking and other loan fees" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Transfers of Financial Assets: Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Company, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.

Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments: Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk are offered to meet the financing needs of customers, such as outstanding commitments to extend credit, credit lines, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Pricing of these financial instruments is based on the credit quality and relationship, fees, interest rates, probability of funding and compensating balance and other covenants or requirements. Loan commitments generally have fixed expiration dates, are variable rate and contain termination and other clauses which provide for relief from funding in the event there is a significant deterioration in the credit quality of the customers. Since many commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual amount of commitments does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded. The carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of the fair value of these financial instruments. Carrying amounts, which are comprised of the unamortized fee income and, where necessary, reserves for any expected credit losses from these financial instruments, are insignificant.

Allowance for Lending-Related Commitments: The allowance for lending-related commitments provides for probable credit losses inherent in unused commitments to extend credit and letters of credit. The reserve is calculated for homogeneous pools of lending-related commitments within each internal risk rating, using the same inputs discussed above for the general component of the allowance for loan losses. An estimated draw factor is then applied to adjust for the probability of draw. The allowance for lending-related commitments is included in "Other liabilities" in the consolidated balance

sheets, with the corresponding charge reflected as a component of "Other expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Derivative Instruments: At the inception of a derivative contract, the Company designates the derivative based on the Company's intentions and belief as to likely effectiveness as a hedge. The types entered into by the Company include a risk management hedge of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability ("cash flow hedge") or a customer-initiated interest rate derivative with no hedging designation ("customer-initiated derivative").

Cash Flow Hedges: The Company enters into interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges to manage the variability of cash flows, primarily net interest income, attributable to changes in interest rates. The gain or loss on a cash flow hedge is reported in other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of a cash flow hedge that are not highly effective in hedging the changes in expected cash flows of the hedged item are recognized immediately in current earnings as noninterest income. Net cash settlements on cash flow hedges are recorded in interest income or interest expense, based on the item being hedged. Cash flows on hedges are classified in the cash flow statement the same as the cash flows of the items being hedged.

The Company formally documents the relationship between derivatives and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and the strategy for undertaking hedge transactions at the inception of the hedging relationship. This documentation includes linking cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. The Company also formally assesses, both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instruments that are used are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items, the derivative is settled or terminates, or treatment of the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate or intended.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, subsequent changes in fair value of the derivative are recorded as noninterest income. When a cash flows hedge is discontinued but the hedged cash flows are still expected to occur, gains or losses that were accumulated in other comprehensive income are amortized into earnings over the same periods which the hedged transactions will affect earnings.

Customer-Initiated Derivatives: The Company enters into interest rate derivatives to provide a service to certain qualifying customers to help facilitate their respective risk management strategies ("customer-initiated derivatives"). Therefore, these derivatives are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company's assets or liabilities. The Company generally takes offsetting positions with dealer counterparties to mitigate the valuation risk of the customer-initiated derivatives. Income primarily results from the spread between the customer derivatives and the offsetting dealer positions. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e. gains or losses) of a derivative instrument is determined by whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, further by the type of hedging relationship. The Company presents derivative instruments at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a net basis when a right of offset exists, based on transactions with a single counterparty and any cash collateral paid to and/or received from that counterparty for derivative contracts that are subject to legally enforceable master netting arrangements. For derivative instruments

not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss derived from changes in fair value are recognized in current earnings during the period of change.

Mortgage Banking Derivatives: Commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are recorded in "Other assets" and "Other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These commitments are accounted for as free standing derivatives under FASB ASC Topic 815, "Derivatives and Hedging". Fair values of these derivatives are estimated based on the fair value of the related mortgage loans determined using observable market data. The Company adjusts the outstanding interest rate lock commitments with prospective borrowers based on exercise and funding expectations. Changes in the fair values of these derivatives are included in "Net gain on sales of loans" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Stock-Based Compensation: Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock awards issued based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. The fair value of restricted stock awards is equal to the market price of the common stock at the date of grant. Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period, based on the number of shares ultimately expected to vest.

Deferred Compensation Plan: The Company maintains a deferred compensation plan for certain key employees and members of the Board of Directors which allows participants to defer a portion of their compensation. Participants had the ability to begin deferrals into the Deferred Compensation Plan beginning July 1, 2014. While the Company maintains ownership of the deferred compensation asset, the participants are able to direct the investment of the assets into a pre-determined selection of investment options. Company stock is not an investment option for the participants. The assets are recorded at fair value in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. A liability is established, in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for the fair value of the obligation to the participants. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of the deferred compensation plan assets is recorded in "Other noninterest income" on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of the deferred compensation obligation to participants is recorded as additional compensation expense or a reduction of compensation expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Income Taxes: The provision for income taxes is based on amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income (after deducting tax credits related to investments in low income housing partnerships) and includes deferred income taxes on temporary differences between the income tax basis and financial accounting basis of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are evaluated for realization based on available evidence of future reversals of existing temporary differences and assumptions made regarding future events. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more-likely-than-not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is "more likely than not" that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized

on examination. For tax positions not meeting the "more likely than not test" test, no tax benefit is recorded.

The Company records interest and penalties on income tax liabilities in "Income tax provision (benefit)" on the Consolidated Statements of Income, if applicable.

Earnings per Common Share: The Company applies the two-class method of computing earnings per share as the Company has unvested restricted stock awards which qualify as participating securities. Under this calculation, all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain right to nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities and earnings per share is determined according to dividends declared, when applicable, and participating rights in undistributed earnings.

Basic earnings per common share is net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Distributed and undistributed earnings are allocated between common and participating security shareholders based on their respective rights and then are divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options and warrants.

Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and cash flow hedges, which are recognized as separate components of equity.

Loss Contingencies: Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there are currently such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.

Restrictions on Cash: Cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank was required to meet regulatory reserve and clearing requirements.

Dividend Restriction: Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Banks to the Company or by the Company to shareholders.

Fair Value Measurements of Financial Instruments: Fair value measurement applies whenever accounting guidance requires or permits assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. Fair value is an estimate of the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction (i.e., not a forced transaction, such as a liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability. Fair value measurements and disclosures guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. Fair value measurements are separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is the Company's policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements for those items for which there is an active market.

Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities where limited or no observable market data exists are estimated based on discounted cash flows or other valuation methods. Inputs to these valuation methods are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties, and require significant judgment. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.

Operating Segments: While the chief decision makers monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Management reviews operating performance and makes decisions as one banking segment across all geographies served.

Reclassifications: Some items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Reclassifications had no effect on prior year net income or shareholders' equity.

Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards: The following provides a description of recently adopted or newly issued not yet effective accounting standards that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

In January of 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-04, "Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure" ("ASU 2014-04"), which clarifies the time at which a creditor is considered to have physical possession of residential real estate that is collateral for a residential mortgage loan. The creditor is considered to have physical possession when legal title to the collateral or a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement is completed. Consequently it should reclassify the loan to other real estate owned at that time. ASU 2014-04 is effective for public companies for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014, as such, the Company will adopt ASU 2014-04 as of January 1, 2015. Under the provisions, the Company will have the option to adopt the amendments in the ASU using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2014-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

In May of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" ("ASU 2014-09"), which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including revenue recognition guidance. The core principle of the revenue model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU is intended to clarify and converge the revenue recognition principles under U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards and to streamline revenue recognition requirements in addition to expanding required revenue recognition disclosures. ASU

2014-09 is effective for public companies for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning on or after December 15, 2016. As such, the Company will adopt ASU 2014-09 as of January 1, 2017. Under the provision, the Company will have the option to adopt the guidance using either a full retrospective method or a modified transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2014-09.

In August of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-14, "Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure" ("ASU 2014-14"), which addresses foreclosed mortgage loans that are fully or partially guaranteed under government programs to reduce diversity in practice of classification. The update requires that upon foreclosure, a mortgage loan be derecognized and a separate other receivable be recognized if the loan has an inseparable guarantee before foreclosure, if the creditor has the intent to transfer the property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee to recover under the claim, and if at foreclosure the claim determined is fixed, on the basis of fair value. ASU 2014-14 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. As such, the Company will adopt the accounting guidance under ASU 2014-14 as of January 1, 2015. Under the provision, the Company will have the option to adopt the guidance using either a prospective transition method or a modified retrospective transition method. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2014-14 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of operations.

The Company has determined that the acquisitions of Talmer West Bank (formerly known as Michigan Commerce Bank) and First Place Bank constitute business combinations as defined by FASB ASC Topic 805, "Business Combinations." Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair values on the date of acquisition, as required. Fair values were determined based on the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement." In many cases the determination of these fair values required management to make estimates about discount rates, future expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are highly subjective in nature and subject to change.

On January 1, 2014, the Company purchased 100% of the capital stock of Financial Commerce Corporation's wholly-owned subsidiary banks, Michigan Commerce Bank, a Michigan state-chartered bank, Indiana Community Bank, an Indiana state-chartered bank, Bank of Las Vegas, a Nevada state-chartered bank and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque, a New Mexico state-chartered bank, and certain other bank-related assets from Financial Commerce Corporation and its parent holding company, Capitol Bancorp Ltd., in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, for cash consideration of $4.0 million and a separate $2.5 million payment to fund an escrow account to pay the post-petition administrative fees and expenses of the professionals in the bankruptcy cases of Financial Commerce Corporation and Capital Bancorp, Ltd., each of which filed voluntary bankruptcy petitions under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on August 9, 2012, with any unused escrowed funds to be refunded to the Company.

Immediately prior to consummation of the acquisition, Capitol Bancorp Ltd. merged Indiana Community Bank, Bank of Las Vegas and Sunrise Bank of Albuquerque with and into Michigan Commerce Bank, with Michigan Commerce Bank as the surviving bank in the merger. Simultaneously with the merger, Michigan Commerce Bank changed its name to Talmer West Bank. The Company contributed $99.5 million of additional capital during the year ended December 31, 2014 to Talmer West Bank in order to recapitalize the bank. In order to support the acquisition and recapitalization of Talmer West Bank, the Company borrowed $35.0 million under a senior unsecured line of credit. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the initial public offering that closed on February 14, 2014 to repay the $35.0 million during the first quarter of 2014. The Company incurred $3.0 million of acquisition related expenses related to the acquisition of Talmer West Bank during the year ended December 31, 2014. These acquisition related expenses are included within "Bank acquisition and due diligence fees" in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Twelve of the branches acquired, or 70% of the total number of branches acquired in the acquisition, fit squarely within the Company's target market areas.

The assets and liabilities associated with the acquisition of Talmer West Bank were recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date as presented in the following table.

(Dollars in thousands)

Consideration paid:
Cash	$	6,500
Fair value of identifiable assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents		216,331
Investment securities		13,619
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		5,933
Loans		571,666
Premises and equipment		4,912
Loan servicing rights		767
Other real estate owned		30,878
Core deposit intangible		3,633
Other assets		62,542

Total identifiable assets acquired		910,281
Fair value of liabilities assumed:
Deposits		857,769
Other liabilities		4,035

Total liabilities assumed		861,804

Fair value of net identifiable assets acquired		48,477

Bargain purchase gain resulting from acquisition	$	41,977

The Talmer West Bank acquisition resulted in a pre-tax bargain purchase gain of $42.0 million as the estimated fair value of assets acquired exceeded the estimated fair value of liabilities assumed and

consideration paid. The gain was included within "Bargain purchase gain" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Loans acquired in the Talmer West Bank acquisition were initially recorded at fair value with no separate allowance for loan losses. The Company reviewed the loans at acquisition to determine which should be considered purchased credit impaired loans (i.e. loans accounted for under ASC 310-30) defining impaired loans as those that were either not accruing interest or exhibited credit risk factors consistent with nonperforming loans at the acquisition date.

Fair values for purchased loans are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considers various factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of the loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting the Company's assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. Larger purchased loans are individually evaluated while smaller purchased loans are grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques.

The Company accounts for purchased credit impaired loans in accordance with the provisions of ASC 310-30. The cash flows expected to be collected on purchased loans are estimated based upon the expected remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. Purchased loans are considered credit impaired if there is evidence of credit deterioration at the date of purchase and if it is probable that not all contractually required payments will be collected. Interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying value of the loans and the expected cash flows is recognized on the acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.

Purchased loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are accounted for under ASC 310-20. Premiums and discounts created when the loans were recorded at their fair values at acquisition are amortized over the remaining terms of the loans as an adjustment to the related loan's yield.

Information regarding acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as well as those excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting at acquisition date is as follows:

Talmer West Bank's results of operations have been included in the Company's financial results since the January 1, 2014 acquisition date.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the consolidated results of operations of the Company and Talmer West Bank as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2013 with pro forma adjustments to give effect of any change in interest income due to the accretion of the discount (premium) associated with the fair value adjustments to acquired loans, any change in interest expense due to estimated premium amortization/discount accretion associated with the fair value adjustments to acquired time deposits and borrowings and other debt and the amortization of the core deposit intangible that would have resulted had the deposits been acquired as of January 1, 2013.

On January 1, 2013, the Company purchased substantially all of the assets of First Place Financial Corp. (FPFC) including all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of First Place Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of FPFC, headquartered in Warren, Ohio, in a transaction facilitated under Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, for cash consideration of $45.0 million. Under the provisions of the asset purchase agreement, the Company assumed $60.0 million in subordinated notes issued to First Place Capital Trust, First Place Capital Trust II, and First Place Capital III, of which $45.0 million was immediately retired. Following the acquisition, the Company contributed $179.0 million of additional capital in order to recapitalize First Place Bank with commitments to contribute additional capital if needed. The Company incurred $1.4 million of acquisition related expenses during the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily related to the acquisition of First Place Bank included within "Bank acquisition and due diligence fees" in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company incurred $8.7 million of bank acquisition and due diligence fees of which $8.3 million related to costs associated with the First Place Bank transaction. First Place Bank was consolidated with and into Talmer Bank and Trust on February 10, 2014.

The assets and liabilities associated with the acquisition of First Place Bank were recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date as presented in the following table.

(Dollars in thousands)

Consideration paid:
Cash	$	45,000
Fair value of identifiable assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents		439,805
Investment securities		139,764
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		12,993
Loans held-for-sale		213,946
Loans		1,530,376
Premises and equipment		22,168
Loan servicing rights		41,967
Company-owned life insurance		38,172
Other real estate owned		18,448
Core deposit intangible		9,816
Other assets		128,278

Total identifiable assets acquired		2,595,733
Fair value of liabilities assumed:
Deposits		2,121,258
Short-term borrowings		21,892
Long-term debt		312,956
Other liabilities		22,925

Total liabilities assumed		2,479,031

Fair value of net identifiable assets acquired		116,702

Bargain purchase gain resulting from acquisition	$	71,702

The First Place Bank acquisition resulted in a pre-tax bargain purchase gain of $71.7 million as the estimated fair value of assets acquired exceeded the estimated fair value of liabilities assumed and consideration paid. The gain was included within "Bargain purchase gain" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The core deposit intangible is being amortized on an accelerated basis over the estimated life, currently expected to be 10 years.

Loans acquired in the First Place Bank acquisition were initially recorded at fair value with no separate allowance for loan losses.

Information regarding acquired loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as well as those excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting at acquisition date is as follows:

First Place Bank's results of operations have been included in the Company's financial results since the January 1, 2013 acquisition date.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the consolidated results of operation of the Company and First Place Bank as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2012 with pro forma adjustments to give effect to any change in interest income due to the accretion (amortization) of the discount (premium) associated with the fair value adjustments to acquired loans, any change in interest expense due to estimated premium amortization/discount accretion associated with the fair value adjustments to acquired time deposits and borrowings and other debt, and the amortization of the core deposit intangible that would have resulted had the deposits been acquired as of January 1, 2012.

The fair value framework as detailed by FASB ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurement" requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into a three-level hierarchy based on the markets in which the financial instruments are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. A brief description of each level follows.

Level 1—Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2—Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; or model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3—Valuation is measured through utilization of model-based techniques that rely on at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. Any necessary unobservable assumptions used reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include use of discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments and, in accordance with GAAP, do not attempt to estimate the value of anticipated future business or the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, tax ramifications related to the recognition of unrealized gains and losses, such as those within the investment securities portfolio, can have a significant effect on estimated fair values and, in accordance with GAAP, have not been considered in the estimates. For these reasons, the aggregate fair value should not be considered an indication of the value of the Company.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and key inputs used to measure financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods and any significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. For financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, the description includes the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets for liabilities are classified. Transfers of asset or liabilities between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the beginning of the reporting period, when applicable.

Cash and cash equivalents: Due to the short-term nature, the carrying amount of these assets approximates the estimated fair value. The Company classifies cash and due from banks as Level 1 and interest-bearing deposits with other banks and federal funds and other short-term investments as Level 2.

Investment securities: Investment securities classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available or the market is deemed to be inactive at the measurement date, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar investment securities. Third-party vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply such techniques as matrix pricing to determine the value of identical or similar investment securities. Management reviews the methodologies and assumptions used by the third-party pricing services and evaluates the values provided, principally by comparison with other available market quotes for similar instruments and/or

analysis based on internal models using available third-party market data. Level 1 securities include equity securities traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Level 2 securities include obligations issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, state and municipal obligations, mortgage-backed securities issued by both U.S. government-sponsored enterprises and non-agency enterprises securities, corporate debt securities, Small Business Administration Pools and privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities that have active markets at the measurement date. The fair value of Level 2 securities was determined using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or pricing models based on observable market data inputs, primarily interest rates, spreads and prepayment information.

Securities classified as Level 3, including a trust preferred security and a privately issued subordinated corporate debt security (included within "Corporate debt securities") and an obligation of a political subdivision as of December 31, 2014, represent securities in less liquid markets requiring significant management assumptions when determining fair value. The fair values of these investment securities represent less than one percent of the total available-for-sale securities. The fair values of the trust preferred security and subordinated corporate debt security are compiled by a third-party vendor through consideration of recent trades and/or auctions of comparable securities, where applicable and are presented without adjustment. Comparable securities consider credit, structure, tenor, trade flows and cash flow characteristics. Due to the limited sales of these types of securities, significant unobservable assumptions are included to determine comparable securities to be included in the analysis. The fair value of the subordinated corporate debt security and the political subdivision obligation are determined to be equal to the carrying cost since the securities were acquired. The issuers have continued to pay their obligations without fail and the Company has not received any information to question future payments. Since the purchase of these securities, no credit related concerns have come to the Company's attention, therefore no adjustment for credit loss assumptions were made.

Investment securities classified as held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost. Due to limited liquidity of these securities held-to-maturity securities are classified as Level 3. The fair value of the held-to-maturity security is determined to be equal to the carrying value. No credit related concerns have come to the Company's attention; therefore, no credit loss assumptions were made.

Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") Stock: Restricted equity securities are not readily marketable and are recorded at cost and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of initial cost. No significant observable market data is available for these instruments. The Company considers the profitability and asset quality of the issuer, dividend payment history and recent redemption experience, when determining the ultimate recoverability of cost. The Company believes its investments in FHLB stock are ultimately recoverable at cost.

Loans held for sale: Loans held for sale are carried at fair value based on the Company's election of the fair value option. These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential real estate loans originated for sale to qualified third parties. The fair value is determined based on quoted market rates and other market conditions considered relevant. The Company classifies loans held for sale as recurring Level 2.

Loans measured at fair value: During the normal course of business, loans originated with the initial intention to sell but not ultimately sold, are transferred from held for sale to our portfolio of loans held for investment at fair value as the Company adopted the fair value option at origination. The fair value of these loans is estimated using discounted cash flows, taking into consideration current market interest rates, loan repricing characteristics and expected loan prepayment speeds, while also taking into consideration other significant unobservable inputs such as the payment history and credit quality characteristic of each individual loan and an illiquidity discount reflecting the relative illiquidity of the market. Due to the adjustments made relating to unobservable inputs, the Company classifies the loans transferred from loans held for sale as recurring Level 3.

Loans: The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis other than those discussed in "Loans measured at fair value" above. However, periodically, the Company records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements. Loans, outside the scope of ASC 310-30, are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreements. Impaired loans, which include all nonaccrual loans and troubled debt restructurings, are disclosed as nonrecurring fair value measurements when an allowance is established based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Appraisals for collateral-dependent impaired loans are prepared by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties). These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. The comparable sales approach evaluates the sales price of similar properties in the same market area. This approach is inherently subjective due to the wide range of comparable sale dates. The income approach considers net operating income generated by the property and the investor's required return. This approach utilizes various inputs including lease rates and cap rates which are subject to judgment. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to account for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. These adjustments generally range from 0% to 40% depending on the property type, as well as various sales and property characteristics including but not limited to: date of sale, size and condition of facility, quality of construction and proximity to the subject property. Once received, management reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics to determine if additional downward adjustments should be made. Property values are typically adjusted when management is aware of circumstances, economic changes or other conditions, since the date of the appraisal that would impact the expected selling price. Such adjustments are usually significant and result in a nonrecurring Level 3 classification.

Estimated fair values for loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considers factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing, and a discount rate reflecting the Company's assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. Cash flows expected to be collected on these loans are estimated based upon the expected remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 as Level 3.

For loans excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting that are not individually evaluated for impairment, fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow model. The cash flows take into consideration current portfolio interest rates and repricing characteristics as well as assumptions relating to prepayment speeds. The discount rates take into consideration the current market interest rate environment, a credit risk component based on the credit characteristics of each loan portfolio, and a liquidity premium reflecting the liquidity or illiquidity of the market. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of non-collateral dependent loans excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting as Level 3.

Premises and equipment: Premises and equipment are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. Impaired premises and equipment at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were recorded at fair value based on a recent appraisal through a valuation allowance. The Company classifies impaired premises and equipment as nonrecurring Level 2.

FDIC indemnification asset: The fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset is estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. The Company re-estimates the expected indemnification asset cash flows in conjunction with the quarterly re-estimation of cash flows on covered loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. The expected cash flows are discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss sharing reimbursement from the FDIC. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be subject to significant change. The estimates used in calculating the value of the FDIC indemnification asset are reflective of the estimates utilized to determine the estimated fair value of loans accounted for under ASC 310-30. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset as Level 3.

Other real estate owned and repossessed assets: Other real estate owned and repossessed assets represents property acquired by the Company as part of an acquisition, through the loan foreclosure or repossession process, or any other resolution activity that results in partial or total satisfaction of problem loans, or by closing of branches or operating facilities. Properties are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated costs to sell, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, the assets are valued at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs to sell, based on periodic valuations performed. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised value or management's estimate of the value, using a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. The comparable sales approach evaluates the sales price of similar properties in the same market area. This approach is inherently subjective due to the wide range of comparable sale dates. The income approach considers net operating income generated by the property and the investor's required return. This approach utilizes various inputs including lease rates and cap rates which are subject to judgment. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the appraisers to account for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. These adjustments generally range from 0% to 40% depending on the property type, as well as various sales and property characteristics including but not limited to: date of sale, size and condition of facility, quality of construction and proximity to the subject property. Adjustments are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification.

Loan servicing rights: Loan servicing rights are accounted for under the fair value measurement method as of January 1, 2013 based on accounting election as described in Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies". A third party valuation model is used to determine the fair value at the end of each reporting period utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined by management. Changes in fair value of loan servicing rights are recorded in "Mortgage banking and other loan fees". Because of the nature of the valuation inputs, the company classifies loan servicing rights as Level 3. Refer to Note 11, "Loan Servicing Rights", for assumptions included in the valuation of loan servicing rights.

FDIC receivable: The FDIC receivable represents claims submitted to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") for reimbursement for which the Company expects to receive payment within 90 days. Due to their short term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of FDIC receivable as Level 2.

Company-owned life insurance and deferred compensation plan liabilities: The Company holds life insurance policies on certain officers, both for investment purposes and for the Company's deferred compensation plan. The carrying value of these policies approximates fair value as it is based on the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or amounts due that are probable at settlement. As such, the Company classifies the estimated fair value of Company-owned life insurance as Level 2. Deferred compensation plan liabilities represent the fair value of the obligation to the employee, which corresponds to the fair value of the invested assets. Deferred compensation plan liabilities are recorded with "other liabilities" and are classified by the Company as Level 2.

Derivative instruments: The Company enters into interest rate lock commitments with prospective borrowers to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors, which are carried at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value of these commitments is based on the fair value of related mortgage loans determined using observable market data. Interest rate lock commitments are adjusted for expectations of exercise and funding. This adjustment is not considered to be a material input. The Company classifies interest rate lock commitments and forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale as recurring Level 2.

Derivative instruments held or issued for risk management or customer-initiated activities are traded in over-the counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available. Fair value for over-the-counter derivative instruments is measured on a recurring basis using third party models that use primarily market observable inputs, such as yield curves and option volatilities. The fair value for these derivatives may include a credit valuation adjustment that is determined by applying a credit spread for the counterparty or the Company, as appropriate, to the total expected exposure of the derivative after considering collateral and other master netting arrangements. These adjustments, which are considered Level 3 inputs, are based on estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default. The Company assesses the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and at December 31, 2014 it was determined that the credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of its

derivatives. As a result, the company classifies its risk management cash flow hedges and customer-initiated derivatives valuations in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Accrued interest receivable and payable: Due to their short term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value; therefore, the Company classifies the estimated fair value of accrued interest receivable and payable as Level 2.

Deposits: The estimated fair value of demand deposits (e.g., noninterest and interest-bearing demand, savings, other brokered funds and certain types of money market accounts) is, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for certificates of deposit are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows at current interest rates. The estimated fair value of deposits does not take into account the value of the Company's long-term relationships with depositors, commonly known as core deposit intangibles, which are not considered financial instruments. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of deposits as Level 2.

Clawback liability: The CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank loss sharing agreements contain a provision where if losses do not exceed a calculated threshold, the Company is obligated to compensate the FDIC. The carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value. The estimated fair value requires management's assumption of what estimated losses will be, which is a significant component. As such, the Company classifies the estimated fair value of the FDIC clawback liability as Level 3.

Short-term borrowings: Short-term borrowings represent federal funds purchased, a senior unsecured line of credit and certain short-term FHLB advances. Due to their short term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of short-term borrowings as Level 2.

Long-term debt: Long-term debt includes securities sold under agreements to repurchase, FHLB advances and subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities. The estimated fair value is based on current rates for similar financing or market quotes to settle those liabilities. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of long-term debt as Level 2.

FDIC warrants payable: FDIC warrants payable represent stock warrants that were issued to the FDIC in connection with the 2010 FDIC-assisted acquisition of CF Bancorp. These warrants are recorded at net present value based on management estimates used in a discounted pricing model. The inputs into the pricing model include management's assumption of an annualized growth rate. The carrying amount of these instruments approximates the estimated fair value. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of FDIC warrants payable as Level 3.

The following tables present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, including financial assets and liabilities for which the Company has elected the fair value option, on a recurring basis:

(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

December 31, 2014
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations	$	98,358	$	—	$	98,358	$	—
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Taxable		397		—		—		397
Tax-exempt		232,259		—		232,259		—
Small Business Administration ("SBA") Pools		33,933		—		33,933		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterpries		291,759		—		291,759		—
Privately issued		18,800		—		18,800		—
Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities		5,130		—		5,130		—
Corporate debt securities		60,183		—		56,758		3,425

Total securities available-for-sale		740,819		—		736,997		3,822
Loans measured at fair value:
Residential real estate		18,311		—		—		18,311
Real estate construction		1,215		—		—		1,215
Loans held for sale		93,453		—		93,453		—
Loan servicing rights		70,598		—		—		70,598
Derivative assets:
Interest rate lock commitments		1,489		—		1,489		—
Customer-initiated derivatives		1,588		—		1,588		—

Total derivatives		3,077		—		3,077		—

Total assets at fair value	$	927,473	$	—	$	833,527	$	93,946



Derivative liabilities:
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale		803		—		803		—
Customer-initiated derivatives		1,477		—		1,477		—
Risk management derivatives		222		—		222		—

Total derivatives		2,502		—		2,502		—

Total liabilities at fair value	$	2,502	$	—	$	2,502	$	—



December 31, 2013
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations	$	98,237	$	—	$	98,237	$	—
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Taxable		396		—		—		396
Tax-exempt		182,000		—		182,000		—
Small Business Administration ("SBA") Pools		42,426		—		42,426		—
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterpries		218,922		—		218,922		—
Privately issued		4,446		—		4,446		—
Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities		5,147		—		5,147		—
Corporate debt securities		68,020		—		67,615		405
Equity securities		489		489		—		—

Total securities available-for-sale		620,083		489		618,793		801
Loans measured at fair value:
Residential real estate		16,334		—		—		16,334
Real estate construction		1,374		—		—		1,374
Loans held for sale		85,252		—		85,252		—
Loan servicing rights		78,603		—		—		78,603
Derivative assets:
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale		1,484		—		1,484		—
Interest rate lock commitments		1,146		—		1,146		—

Total derivatives		2,630		—		2,630		—

Total assets at fair value	$	804,276	$	489	$	706,675	$	97,112

There were no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013.

The following table summarizes the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

	Year ended December 31, 2014

	Securities available-for-sale
(Dollars in thousands)	Taxable obligations of state and political subdivisions		Corporate Debt Securities		Loans held for investment			Loan servicing rights
Balance, beginning of period	$	396	$	405	$	17,708		$	78,603
Additions due to acquisition		—		—		—			767
Transfers from loans held for sale		—		—		3,505			—
Gains (losses):
Recorded in earnings (realized):
Recorded in "Interest on investments"		1		4		—			—
Recorded in "Mortgage banking and other loan fees"		—		—		681			(17,037	)
Recorded in OCI (pre-tax)		—		16		—			—
Purchases		—		3,000		—			—
New originations		—		—		—			9,036
Reduction from loans ansd sevicing rights sold		—		—		—			(771	)
Repayments		—		—		(2,496	)		—
Draws on previously issued lines of credits		—		—		128			—

Balance, end of period	$	397	$	3,425	$	19,526		$	70,598

	Year-ended December 31, 2013

	Securities available-for-sale
(Dollars in thousands)	Taxable obligations of state and political subdivisions		Corporate Debt Securities			Loans held for investment			Loan servicing rights
Balance, beginning of year	$	396	$	15,250		$	—		$	—
Transfers based on new accounting policy election		—		—			—			5,657	(1)
Additions due to acquisition		—		440			—			41,967
Transfers from loans held for sale		—		—			17,707			—
Total gains (losses)
Recorded in earnings (realized):
Recorded in "Interest on investments"		—		233			—			—
Recorded in "Net gain on sales of securities"		—		166			—			—
Recorded in "Net gain on sales of loans"		—		—			(314	)		—
Recorded in "Mortgage banking and other loan fees"		—		—			—			7,063
Recorded in OCI (pre-tax)		—		(14	)		—			—
New originations		—		—			—			23,916
Sales/calls		—		(15,670	)		—			—
Repayments		—		—			(507	)		—
Draws on previously issued lines of credits		—		—			822			—

Balance, end of year	$	396	$	405		$	17,708		$	78,603

The aggregate fair value, contractual balance (including accrued interest), and gain or loss position for loans held for investment measured and recorded at fair value was as follows:

There were no gains (losses) included in the fair value above that were associated with instrument specific credit risk. The aggregate fair value and contractual principal balance of loans held for investment measured and recorded at fair value that were 90 days or more past due as of December 31, 2014 was $155 thousand and $191 thousand, respectively. Of the aggregate fair value of

loans that were 90 days or more past due as of December 31, 2014, $155 thousand were on nonaccrual status. The aggregate fair value and contractual principal balance of loans held for investment measured and recorded at fair value that were 90 days or more past due as of December 31, 2013 was $293 thousand and $301 thousand, respectively. Of the aggregate fair value of loans that were 90 days or more past due as of December 31, 2013, $252 thousand were on nonaccrual status.

Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loans in accordance with the Company's policy on loans held for investment and is recorded in "Interest and fees on loans" in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were $604 thousand and $108 thousand, respectively, of interest income earned on loans transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment.

The total amount of gains (losses) from changes in fair value of loans held for investment measured at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Income were as follows:

The Company has elected the fair value option for loans held for sale. These loans are intended for sale and the Company believes that the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loans in accordance with the Company policy on loans held for investment in "Interest and fees on loans" in the Consolidated Statements of Income. None of these loans are 90 days past due or on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2014 or 2013.

The aggregate fair value, contractual balance (including accrued interest), and gain or loss for loans held for sale carried at fair value was as follows:

The total amount of gains (losses) from changes in fair value of loans held for sale included in "Net gain on sales of loans" in the Consolidated Statements of Income were as follows:

Certain financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include assets that are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

The following table presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

December 31, 2014
Impaired loans:(1)
Uncovered
Residential real estate	$	2,898	$	—	$	—	$	2,898
Commercial real estate		4,115		—		—		4,115
Commercial and industrial		579		—		—		579
Consumer		12		—		—		12

Total uncovered impaired loans		7,604		—		—		7,604

Covered
Residential real estate		152		—		—		152
Commercial and industrial		350		—		—		350

Total covered impaired loans		502		—		—		502

Total impaired loans		8,106		—		—		8,106
Other real estate owned (uncovered)(2)		9,670		—		—		9,670
Other real estate owned (covered)(3)		3,807		—		—		3,807
Repossessed assets(4)		9,654		—		—		9,654
Premises and equipment(5)		675		—		675		—

Total	$	31,912	$	—	$	675	$	31,237



December 31, 2013
Impaired loans:(1)
Uncovered
Residential real estate	$	1,569	$	—	$	—	$	1,569
Commercial and industrial		762		—		—		762

Total uncovered impaired loans		2,331		—		—		2,331

Covered
Commercial real estate		644		—		—		644

Total covered impaired loans		644		—		—		644

Total impaired loans		2,975		—		—		2,975
Other real estate owned (uncovered)(2)		2,216		—		—		2,216
Other real estate owned (covered)(3)		4,596		—		—		4,596
Premises and equipment(5)		105		—		105		—

Total	$	9,892	$	—	$	105	$	9,787

The Company typically holds the majority of its financial instruments until maturity and thus does not expect to realize many of the estimated fair value amounts disclosed. The disclosures also do not include estimated fair value amounts for items that are not defined as financial instruments, but which have significant value. These include such items as core deposit intangibles, the future earnings potential of significant customer relationships and the value of fee generating businesses. The Company believes the imprecision of an estimate could be significant.

The following tables present the carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets.

			Estimated Fair Value

(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Value		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2014
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	253,736	$	253,736	$	86,185	$	167,551	$	—
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		20,212		N/A
Net loans, excluding covered loans(1)		3,868,818		3,948,847		—		—		3,948,847
Net covered loans(2)		325,137		420,627		—		—		420,627
Accrued interest receivable		12,533		12,533		—		12,533		—
FDIC indemnification asset		67,026		34,572		—		—		34,572
FDIC receivable		6,062		6,062		—		6,062		—
Company-owned life insurance		97,782		97,782		—		97,782		—
Securities held-to-maturity		1,226		1,226		—		—		1,226
Financial liabilities:
Deposits:
Savings and demand deposits	$	3,288,414	$	3,288,414	$	—	$	3,288,414	$	—
Time deposits(3)		1,260,449		1,260,453		—		1,260,453		—

Total deposits		4,548,863		4,548,867		—		4,548,867		—
FDIC clawback liability		26,905		26,905		—		—		26,905
Short-term borrowings		135,743		135,743		—		135,743		—
Long-term debt		353,972		348,373		—		348,373		—
FDIC warrants payable		4,633		4,633		—		—		4,633
Accrued interest payable		1,476		1,476		—		1,476		—
Deferred compensation plan liabilities		587		587		—		587		—

			Estimated Fair Value

(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Value		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2013
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	375,356	$	375,356	$	97,167	$	278,189	$	—
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		16,303		N/A
Net loans, excluding covered loans(1)		2,456,170		2,574,109		—		—		2,574,109
Net covered loans(2)		489,687		534,857		—		—		534,857
Accrued interest receivable		7,968		7,968		—		7,968		—
FDIC indemnification asset		131,861		84,010		—		—		84,010
FDIC receivable		7,783		7,783		—		7,783		—
Company-owned life insurance		39,500		39,500		—		39,500		—
Financial liabilities:
Deposits:
Savings and demand deposits	$	2,673,552	$	2,673,552	$	—	$	2,673,552	$	—
Time deposits		927,313		928,128		—		928,128		—

Total deposits		3,600,865		3,601,680		—		3,601,680		—
FDIC clawback liability		24,887		24,887		—		—		24,887
Short-term borrowings		71,876		71,876		—		71,876		—
Long-term debt		199,037		190,420		—		190,420		—
FDIC warrants payable		4,118		4,118		—		—		4,118
Accrued interest payable		626		626		—		626		—

The following summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and securities held-to-maturity and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and gross unrecognized gains and losses.

(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

December 31, 2014
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations	$	97,746	$	791	$	(179	)	$	98,358
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Taxable		397		—		—			397
Tax-exempt		229,404		3,578		(723	)		232,259
SBA Pools		33,824		209		(100	)		33,933
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises		289,156		2,886		(283	)		291,759
Privately issued		18,814		27		(41	)		18,800
Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities		5,127		3		—			5,130
Corporate debt securities		60,206		209		(232	)		60,183

Total securities available-for-sale	$	734,674	$	7,703	$	(1,558	)	$	740,819

	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value

December 31, 2013
Securities available-for-sale:
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations	$	102,597	$	—	$	(4,360	)	$	98,237
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Taxable		396		—		—			396
Tax-exempt		184,351		2,102		(4,453	)		182,000
SBA Pools		42,956		162		(692	)		42,426
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises		223,518		729		(5,325	)		218,922
Privately issued		4,453		22		(29	)		4,446
Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities		5,181		—		(34	)		5,147
Corporate debt securities		68,433		237		(650	)		68,020
Equity securities		500		—		(11	)		489

Total securities available-for-sale	$	632,385	$	3,252	$	(15,554	)	$	620,083

Proceeds from sales of securities and the associated gains and losses recorded in earnings are listed below:

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2014 are shown below. Contractual maturity is utilized for U.S. Government sponsored agency obligations, obligations of state and political subdivisions and corporate debt securities. Securities with multiple maturity dates are classified in the period of final maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Securities with a carrying value of $337.8 million and $264.6 million were pledged at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, to secure borrowings and deposits.

At December 31, 2014 or 2013, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders' equity.

A summary of the Company's investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position is as follows:

	Less than 12 Months					More than 12 Months					Total

(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized losses			Fair Value		Unrealized losses			Fair Value		Unrealized losses
December 31, 2014
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations	$	—	$	—		$	14,821	$	(179	)	$	14,821	$	(179	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Tax-exempt		31,054		(260	)		33,650		(463	)		64,704		(723	)
SBA Pools		1,844		(4	)		17,682		(96	)		19,526		(100	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises		36,261		(85	)		27,361		(198	)		63,622		(283	)
Privately issued		7,801		(41	)		8		—			7,809		(41	)
Corporate debt securities		22,520		(162	)		8,912		(70	)		31,432		(232	)

Total securities available-for-sale	$	99,480	$	(552	)	$	102,434	$	(1,006	)	$	201,914	$	(1,558	)



December 31, 2013
U.S. government sponsored agency obligations	$	98,237	$	(4,360	)	$	—	$	—		$	98,237	$	(4,360	)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions:
Tax-exempt		102,585		(4,159	)		5,794		(294	)		108,379		(4,453	)
SBA Pools		26,498		(692	)		—		—			26,498		(692	)
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
Issued and/or guaranteed by U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises		155,028		(4,952	)		18,846		(373	)		173,874		(5,325	)
Privately issued		557		(1	)		1,746		(28	)		2,303		(29	)
Privately issued commercial mortgage-backed securities		5,147		(34	)		—		—			5,147		(34	)
Corporate debt securities		34,487		(650	)		—		—			34,487		(650	)
Equity securities		489		(11	)		—		—			489		(11	)

Total securities available-for-sale	$	423,028	$	(14,859	)	$	26,386	$	(695	)	$	449,414	$	(15,554	)

As of December 31, 2014, the Company's security portfolio consisted of 346 securities, 107 of which were in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses for these securities resulted primarily from changes in interest rates. The Company expects full collection of the carrying amount of these securities and does not intend to sell the securities in an unrealized loss position nor does it believe it will be required to sell securities in an unrealized loss position before the value is recovered. The Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2014.

The unrealized losses are spread across asset classes, primarily in those securities carrying fixed interest rates. At December 31, 2014, the combination of these security asset class holdings in an unrealized loss position had an estimated fair value of $201.9 million with gross unrealized losses of $1.6 million. Unrealized losses in these security holdings were mainly impacted by increases in benchmark U.S. Treasury rates and, to a lesser extent, widened liquidity spreads since their respective acquisition dates.

Residential real estate loans represent loans to consumers for the purchase or refinance of a residence. These loans are generally financed over a 15- to 30-year term, and in most cases, are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence with both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate terms. The majority of these loans originated by the Company conform to secondary market underwriting standards and are sold within a short timeframe to unaffiliated third parties. As such, the credit underwriting standards adhere to the underwriting standards and documentation requirements established by the respective investor or correspondent bank. Residential real estate loans also include home equity loans and lines of credit that are secured by a first or second lien on the borrower's residence. Home equity lines of credit consist mainly of revolving lines of credit secured by residential real estate. Home equity lines of credit are generally governed by the same lending policies and subject to the same credit risk as described previously for residential real estate loans.

Commercial real estate loans consist of term loans secured by a mortgage lien on the real property such as apartment buildings, office and industrial buildings, retail shopping centers, and farmland. The credit underwriting for both owner-occupied and non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans includes detailed market analysis, historical and projected cash flow analysis, appropriate equity margins, assessment of lessees and lessors, type of real estate and other analysis. Risk of loss is managed by adherence to standard loan policies that establish certain levels of performance prior to the extension of a loan to the borrower. Geographic diversification, as well as diversification across industries, are other means by which the risk of loss is managed by the Company.

Commercial and industrial loans include financing for commercial purposes in various lines of business, including manufacturing, service industry, professional service areas and agricultural. The Company works with businesses to meet their short-term working capital needs while also providing long-term financing for their business plans. Credit risk is managed through standardized loan policies, established and authorized credit limits, centralized portfolio management and the diversification of market area and industries. The overall strength of the borrower is evaluated through the credit underwriting process and includes a variety of analytical activities including the review of historical and projected cash flows, historical financial performance, financial strength of the principals and guarantors, and collateral values, where applicable. Commercial and industrial loans are generally secured with the assets of the company and/or the personal guarantee of the business owners.

Consumer loans include loans made to individuals not secured by real estate, including loans secured by automobiles or watercraft, and personal unsecured loans. Risk elements in the consumer loan portfolio are primarily focused on the borrower's cash flow and credit history, key indicators of the ability to repay and borrower credit scores. A certain level of security is provided through liens on automobile or watercraft titles, where applicable. Economic conditions that affect consumers in the Company's markets have a direct impact on the credit quality of these loans. Higher levels of unemployment, lower levels of income growth and weaker economic growth are factors that may adversely impact consumer loan credit quality.

	Covered loans						Uncovered loans

(Dollars in thousands)	Accounted for under ASC 310-30		Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting		Total covered loans		Accounted for under ASC 310-30		Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting		Total uncovered loans		Total
December 31, 2014
Residential real estate	$	86,515	$	21,711	$	108,226	$	239,523	$	1,186,489	$	1,426,012	$	1,534,238
Commercial real estate		160,886		25,776		186,662		190,148		1,120,790		1,310,938		1,497,600
Commercial and industrial		23,752		8,896		32,648		15,499		853,978		869,477		902,125
Real estate construction		8,415		974		9,389		8,309		123,377		131,686		141,075
Consumer		9,469		96		9,565		2,389		162,135		164,524		174,089

Total	$	289,037	$	57,453	$	346,490	$	455,868	$	3,446,769	$	3,902,637	$	4,249,127	(1)



December 31, 2013
Residential real estate	$	100,034	$	23,300	$	123,334	$	253,528	$	831,925	$	1,085,453	$	1,208,787
Commercial real estate		262,769		36,632		299,401		98,299		657,540		755,839		1,055,240
Commercial and industrial		51,407		27,030		78,437		5,985		440,659		446,644		525,081
Real estate construction		15,268		1,950		17,218		1,970		174,256		176,226		193,444
Consumer		11,508		170		11,678		2,907		6,847		9,754		21,432

Total	$	440,986	$	89,082	$	530,068	$	362,689	$	2,111,227	$	2,473,916	$	3,003,984	(1)

Nonperforming assets consist of loans for which the accrual of interest has been discontinued, other real estate owned acquired through acquisitions, other real estate owned obtained through foreclosure and other repossessed assets.

no longer doubtful. Loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 are classified as performing, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period provision for loan losses or future yield adjustments.

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013
Uncovered nonperforming assets
Nonaccrual loans
Residential real estate	$	17,374	$	15,415
Commercial real estate		13,756		5,591
Commercial and industrial		3,550		2,681
Real estate construction		174		510
Consumer		257		100

Total nonaccrual loans		35,111		24,297
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets(1)		36,872		17,046

Total uncovered nonperforming assets		71,983		41,343
Covered nonperforming assets
Nonaccrual loans
Residential real estate		1,848		988
Commercial real estate		15,723		8,124
Commercial and industrial		3,560		7,201
Real estate construction		713		1,372
Consumer		13		31

Total nonaccrual loans		21,857		17,716
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets(1)		10,719		11,598

Total covered nonperforming assets		32,576		29,314

Total nonperforming assets	$	104,559	$	70,657



Uncovered loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30
Residential real estate	$	12	$	539
Consumer		41		—

Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30	$	53	$	539

Loan delinquency, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 was as follows:

	December 31, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)	30 - 59 days past due		60 - 89 days past due		90 days or more past due		Total past due		Current		Total loans		90 days or more past due and still accruing
Uncovered loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30
Residential real estate	$	11,709	$	2,044	$	9,593	$	23,346	$	1,163,143	$	1,186,489	$	12
Commercial real estate		4,870		1,083		11,333		17,286		1,103,504		1,120,790		—
Commercial and industrial		4,679		184		2,960		7,823		846,155		853,978		—
Real estate construction		1,004		136		174		1,314		122,063		123,377		—
Consumer		964		152		150		1,266		160,869		162,135		41

Total	$	23,226	$	3,599	$	24,210	$	51,035	$	3,395,734	$	3,446,769	$	53



Covered loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30
Residential real estate	$	238	$	35	$	1,179	$	1,452	$	20,259	$	21,711	$	—
Commercial real estate		—		—		4,569		4,569		21,207		25,776		—
Commercial and industrial		373		7		2,923		3,303		5,593		8,896		—
Real estate construction		—		—		710		710		264		974		—
Consumer		—		—		2		2		94		96		—

Total	$	611	$	42	$	9,383	$	10,036	$	47,417	$	57,453	$	—

	December 31, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)	30 - 59 days past due		60 - 89 days past due		90 days or more past due		Total past due		Current		Total loans		90 days or more past due and still accruing
Uncovered loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30
Residential real estate	$	11,244	$	1,849	$	6,641	$	19,734	$	812,191	$	831,925	$	539
Commercial real estate		1,400		4,992		1,122		7,514		650,026		657,540		—
Commercial and industrial		136		25		560		721		439,938		440,659		—
Real estate construction		5,038		356		359		5,753		168,503		174,256		—
Consumer		207		38		4		249		6,598		6,847		—

Total	$	18,025	$	7,260	$	8,686	$	33,971	$	2,077,256	$	2,111,227	$	539



Covered loans, excluding loans accounted for under ASC 310-30
Residential real estate	$	827	$	260	$	224	$	1,311	$	21,989	$	23,300	$	—
Commercial real estate		324		558		5,681		6,563		30,069		36,632		—
Commercial and industrial		1,619		119		4,476		6,214		20,816		27,030		—
Real estate construction		—		—		1,365		1,365		585		1,950		—
Consumer		1		17		7		25		145		170		—

Total	$	2,771	$	954	$	11,753	$	15,478	$	73,604	$	89,082	$	—

Information as to total impaired loans (both individually and collectively evaluated for impairment) is as follows:

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013
Uncovered
Nonaccrual loans	$	35,111	$	24,297
Performing troubled debt restructurings:
Residential real estate		1,368		328
Commercial real estate		3,785		1,637
Commercial and industrial		840		1,367
Real estate construction		90		90
Consumer		234		30

Total uncovered performing troubled debt restructurings		6,317		3,452

Total uncovered impaired loans	$	41,428	$	27,749



Covered
Nonaccrual loans	$	21,857	$	17,716
Performing troubled debt restructurings:
Residential real estate		3,046		2,691
Commercial real estate		9,017		14,391
Commercial and industrial		1,137		3,802
Real estate construction		264		163

Total covered performing troubled debt restructurings		13,464		21,047

Total covered impaired loans	$	35,321	$	38,763

The Company assesses all loan modifications to determine whether a modification constitutes a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR"). For loans excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting, a modification is considered a TDR when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the Company grants a concession to the borrower. For loans accounted for individually under ASC 310-30, a modification is considered a TDR when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and the effective yield after the modification is less than the effective yield at the time the loan was acquired in association with consideration of qualitative factors included within ASC 310-40. All TDRs are considered impaired loans. The nature and extent of impairment of TDRs, including those which have experienced a subsequent default, is considered in the determination of an appropriate level of charge off and/or allowance for loan losses.

As of December 31, 2014, there were $25.0 million of nonperforming TDRs and $19.8 million of performing TDRs included in impaired loans. As of December 31, 2013, there were $17.9 million of nonperforming TDRs and $24.5 million of performing TDRs included in impaired loans. All TDRs are considered impaired loans in the calendar year of their restructuring. In subsequent years, a restructured obligation modified at a market rate and compliant with its modified terms for a minimum period of six months is no longer reported as a TDR. A loan that has been modified at a rate other than market will return to performing status if it satisfies the six month performance requirement; however, it will continue to be reported as a TDR and considered impaired. If a TDR is subsequently restructured under current market terms, no cumulative concession has been granted to the borrower and the borrower is not experiencing financial difficulties which is documented by a current credit evaluation the loan is no longer required to be reported as a TDR.

The following tables present the recorded investment of loans modified in TDRs during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 by type of concession granted. In cases where more than one type of concession was granted, the loans were categorized based on the most significant concession.

															Financial effects of modification

	Concession type												Total recorded investment at December 31, 2014		Financial effects of modification
	Concession type																	Provision (benefit) for loan losses(2)
(Dollars in thousands)	Principal deferral		Principal reduction(1)		Interest rate		Forbearance agreement		A/B Note Restructure		Total number of loans				Net charge-offs (recoveries)			Provision (benefit) for loan losses(2)
For the year ended December 31, 2014
Uncovered
Residential real estate	$	116	$	1,070	$	1,315	$	160	$	—		40	$	2,661	$	(135	)	$	411
Commercial real estate		448		—		2,022		2,001		—		20		4,471		30			850
Commercial and industrial		70		—		194		264		—		20		528		28			12
Consumer		142		82		54		10		—		8		288		(2	)		30

Total uncovered	$	776	$	1,152	$	3,585	$	2,435	$	—		88	$	7,948	$	(79	)	$	1,303

Covered
Residential real estate	$	594	$	45	$	238	$	—	$	—		22	$	877	$	(13	)	$	35
Commercial real estate		—		—		631		416		10,656		5		11,703		—			373
Commercial and industrial		—		—		173		86		—		8		259		—			7
Real estate construction		257		—		—		—		—		2		257		—			—

Total covered	$	851	$	45	$	1,042	$	502	$	10,656		37	$	13,096	$	(13	)	$	415

Total loans	$	1,627	$	1,197	$	4,627	$	2,937	$	10,656		125	$	21,044	$	(92	)	$	1,718

													Financial effects of modification

	Concession type										Total recorded investment at December 31, 2013		Financial effects of modification
	Concession type															Provision (benefit) for loan losses(2)
(Dollars in thousands)	Principal deferral		Interest rate		Forbearance agreement		Principal Reduction(1)		Total number of loans				Net charge-offs (recoveries)			Provision (benefit) for loan losses(2)
For the year ended December 31, 2013
Uncovered
Residential real estate	$	3	$	1,255	$	—	$	1,539		30	$	2,797	$	313		$	800
Commercial real estate		1,737		3,416		19		—		12		5,172		550			308
Commercial and industrial		636		302		—		—		11		938		—			(33	)
Real estate construction		90		—		—		—		3		90		—			—
Consumer		—		30		—		—		4		30		2			3

Total uncovered	$	2,466	$	5,003	$	19	$	1,539		60	$	9,027	$	865		$	1,078

Covered
Residential real estate	$	1,091	$	183	$	—	$	46		29	$	1,320	$	47		$	97
Commercial real estate		202		1,933		1		—		17		2,136		1,138			752
Commercial and industrial		594		468		73		54		34		1,189		218			168
Real estate construction		774		7		—		—		4		781		—			—
Consumer		6		—		—		—		3		6		(8	)		(8	)

Total covered	$	2,667	$	2,591	$	74	$	100		87	$	5,432	$	1,395		$	1,009

Total loans	$	5,133	$	7,594	$	93	$	1,639		147	$	14,459	$	2,260		$	2,087

													Financial effects of modification

	Concession type										Total recorded investment at December 31, 2012		Financial effects of modification
	Concession type															Provision (benefit) for loan losses(3)
(Dollars in thousands)	Principal deferral		Interest rate		Forbearance agreement		A/B Note Restructure(1)		Total number of loans				Net charge-offs(2)			Provision (benefit) for loan losses(3)
For the year ended December 31, 2012
Uncovered
Commercial and industrial	$	446	$	729	$	—		—	$	3	$	1,175	$	—		$	133

Total uncovered	$	446	$	729	$	—	$	—		3	$	1,175	$	—		$	133

Covered
Residential real estate	$	765	$	121	$	18	$	—		20	$	904	$	—		$	(20	)
Commercial real estate		5		3,498		5,755		8,395		31		17,653		2,063			1,982
Commercial and industrial		51		2,701		557		476		52		3,785		438			619
Real estate construction		—		307		11		—		3		318		(29	)		(1	)

Total covered	$	821	$	6,627	$	6,341	$	8,871		106	$	22,660	$	2,472		$	2,580

Total loans	$	1,267	$	7,356	$	6,341	$	8,871		109	$	23,835	$	2,472		$	2,713

When a modification qualifies as a TDR and was initially individually accounted for under ASC 310-30, the loan is required to be moved from ASC 310-30 accounting and accounted for under ASC 310-40. In order to accomplish the transfer of the accounting for the TDR from ASC 310-30 to ASC 310-40, the loan is essentially retained in the ASC 310-30 accounting model and subject to the quarterly cash flow re-estimation process. Similar to loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, deterioration in expected cash flows result in the recognition of allowance for loan losses. However, unlike loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, improvements in estimated cash flows on these loans result only in recapturing previously recognized allowance for loan losses and the yield remains at the last yield recognized under ASC 310-30.

On an ongoing basis, the Company monitors the performance of TDRs to their modified terms. The following table presents the number of loans modified in TDRs during the previous 12 months for which there was payment default during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, including the

recorded investment as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. A payment on a TDR is considered to be in default once it is greater than 30 days past due.

	For the years ended December 31,

	2014						2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Total number of loans		Total recorded investment at December 31, 2014		Charged off following a subsequent default		Total number of loans		Total recorded investment at December 31, 2013		Charged off following a subsequent default
Uncovered
Residential real estate		13	$	554	$	60		21	$	2,062	$	406
Commercial real estate		6		2,669		—		7		2,677		550
Commercial and industrial		3		44		—		1		4		—
Consumer		2		110		2		3		30		3

Total uncovered		24		3,377		62		32		4,773		959
Covered
Residential real estate		4		22		—		5		215		31
Commercial real estate		1		415		—		8		1,127		224
Commercial and industrial		—		—		—		14		318		191

Total covered		5		437		—		27		1,660		446

Total loans		29	$	3,814	$	62		59	$	6,433	$	1,405

At December 31, 2014, commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose terms have been modified in TDRs totaled $2.0 million.

The terms of certain other loans that were modified during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 that did not meet the definition of a TDR generally involved a modification of the terms of a loan to borrowers who were not deemed to be experiencing financial difficulties or a loan accounted for under ASC 310-30 that did not result in a lower effective yield than at the date of acquisition after the modification in association with consideration of qualitative factors included within ASC 310-40. The evaluation of whether or not a borrower is deemed to be experiencing financial difficulty is completed during loan committee meetings at the time of the loan approval.

Credit risk monitoring and management is a continuous process to manage the quality of the loan portfolio.

The Company categorizes commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt including, current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation and current economic trends, among other factors. The risk rating system is used as a tool to analyze and monitor loan portfolio quality. Risk ratings meeting an internally specified exposure

threshold are updated annually, or more frequently upon the occurrence of a circumstance that affects the credit risk of the loan. The following describes each risk category:

Commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and real estate construction loans by credit risk category were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total

December 31, 2014
Uncovered loans
Commercial real estate	$	1,153,132	$	63,567	$	80,483	$	13,756	$	1,310,938
Commercial and industrial		824,239		29,511		12,177		3,550		869,477
Real estate construction		123,822		1,981		5,709		174		131,686

Total	$	2,101,193	$	95,059	$	98,369	$	17,480	$	2,312,101



Covered loans
Commercial real estate	$	102,952	$	16,073	$	51,914	$	15,723	$	186,662
Commercial and industrial		16,718		1,875		10,495		3,560		32,648
Real estate construction		3,817		792		4,067		713		9,389

Total	$	123,487	$	18,740	$	66,476	$	19,996	$	228,699



December 31, 2013
Uncovered loans
Commercial real estate	$	645,276	$	43,597	$	61,375	$	5,591	$	755,839
Commercial and industrial		423,295		10,237		10,431		2,681		446,644
Real estate construction		164,466		19		11,231		510		176,226

Total	$	1,233,037	$	53,853	$	83,037	$	8,782	$	1,378,709



Covered loans
Commercial real estate	$	163,167	$	17,058	$	111,052	$	8,124	$	299,401
Commercial and industrial		43,917		6,951		20,368		7,201		78,437
Real estate construction		6,193		2,803		6,850		1,372		17,218

Total	$	213,277	$	26,812	$	138,270	$	16,697	$	395,056

For residential real estate loans and consumer loans, the Company evaluates credit quality based on the aging status of the loan and by payment activity. Residential real estate loans and consumer loans secured by a residence where the debt has been discharged but the borrower continues to make

payments are considered nonperforming. The following table presents residential real estate and consumer loans by credit quality:

(Dollars in thousands)	Performing		Nonperforming		Total

December 31, 2014
Uncovered loans
Residential real estate	$	1,408,638	$	17,374	$	1,426,012
Consumer		164,267		257		164,524

Total	$	1,572,905	$	17,631	$	1,590,536



Covered loans
Residential real estate	$	106,378	$	1,848	$	108,226
Consumer		9,552		13		9,565

Total	$	115,930	$	1,861	$	117,791



December 31, 2013
Uncovered
Residential real estate	$	1,070,038	$	15,415	$	1,085,453
Consumer		9,654		100		9,754

Total	$	1,079,692	$	15,515	$	1,095,207



Covered loans
Residential real estate	$	122,346	$	988	$	123,334
Consumer		11,647		31		11,678

Total	$	133,993	$	1,019	$	135,012

The allowance for loan losses represents management's assessment of probable, incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses consists of specific allowances, based on individual evaluation of certain loans, and allowances for homogeneous pools of loans with similar risk characteristics. Management's evaluation in establishing the adequacy of the allowance includes evaluation of actual past loan loss experience, probable incurred losses in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect a specific borrower's ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, and other pertinent factors, such as periodic internal and external evaluations of delinquent, nonaccrual, and classified loans. The evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires utilizing material estimates. The evaluation of these factors is the responsibility of certain senior officers from the credit administration, finance, and lending areas.

The Company established an allowance for loan losses associated with purchased credit impaired loans (accounted for under ASC 310-30) based on credit deterioration subsequent to the acquisition date. The Company re-estimates cash flows expected to be collected for purchased credit impaired loans on a quarterly basis, with any decline in expected cash flows recorded as provision for loan losses on a discounted basis during the period. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected, the Company first reverses any previously recorded allowance for loan loss, then adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on a prospective basis over the loan's remaining life.

For loans not accounted for under ASC 310-30, the Company individually assesses for impairment all commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and real estate construction nonaccrual loans and collateral dependent TDRs greater than $250,000 and all non-collateral dependent commercial TDRs. For residential real estate loans and consumer loans on nonaccrual status or if the loan is a TDR, the Company individually assesses the loan for impairment. In addition, all nonaccrual loans and all TDRs held by Talmer West Bank are individually evaluated for impairment.

Information as to impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded investment with no related allowance		Recorded investment with related allowance		Total recorded investment		Contractual principal balance		Related allowance

December 31, 2014
Uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans
Residential real estate	$	14,316	$	4,268	$	18,584	$	23,080	$	1,110
Commercial real estate		7,609		5,956		13,565		17,016		1,276
Commercial and industrial		915		1,884		2,799		2,807		982
Real estate construction		174		—		174		174		—
Consumer		296		176		472		610		82

Total uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans	$	23,310	$	12,284	$	35,594	$	43,687	$	3,450



Covered individually evaluated impaired loans
Residential real estate	$	2,155	$	2,583	$	4,738	$	6,388	$	417
Commercial real estate		10,400		11,985		22,385		28,755		1,277
Commercial and industrial		1,545		779		2,324		2,668		109
Real estate construction		670		—		670		994		—
Consumer		11		1		12		39		—

Total covered individually evaluated impaired loans	$	14,781	$	15,348	$	30,129	$	38,844	$	1,803



December 31, 2013
Uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans
Residential real estate	$	8,143	$	5,871	$	14,014	$	17,005	$	1,923
Commercial real estate		4,588		—		4,588		4,423		—
Commercial and industrial		1,817		1,065		2,882		3,548		284
Real estate construction		359		—		359		359		—
Consumer		3		30		33		33		1

Total uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans	$	14,910	$	6,966	$	21,876	$	25,368	$	2,208



Covered individually evaluated impaired loans
Residential real estate	$	1,141	$	1,537	$	2,678	$	3,389	$	360
Commercial real estate		17,138		924		18,062		21,814		230
Commercial and industrial		3,704		1,417		5,121		5,503		937
Real estate construction		1,138		—		1,138		2,672		—
Consumer		6		19		25		45		2

Total covered individually evaluated impaired loans	$	23,127	$	3,897	$	27,024	$	33,423	$	1,529

	For the years ended December 31,

	2014				2013				2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized		Average recorded investment		Interest income recognized
Uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans
Residential real estate	$	18,870	$	649	$	14,099	$	540	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		14,558		915		5,034		442		—		—
Commercial and industrial		2,847		76		3,221		476		700		446
Real estate construction		174		8		280		—		—		—
Consumer		464		37		33		3		—		—

Total uncovered individually evaluated impaired loans	$	36,913	$	1,685	$	22,667	$	1,461	$	700	$	446



Covered individually evaluated impaired loans
Residential real estate	$	5,095	$	306	$	2,747	$	162	$	—	$	—
Commercial real estate		24,495		1,492		18,317		1,102		15,108		2,743
Commercial and industrial		2,474		118		6,108		230		815		2,358
Real estate construction		665		24		1,082		103		452		—
Consumer		18		4		26		4		—		—

Total covered individually evaluated impaired loans	$	32,747	$	1,944	$	28,280	$	1,601	$	16,375	$	5,101

Changes in the allowance for loan losses and the allocation of the allowance for uncovered loans were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Residential real estate			Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Real estate construction			Consumer			Total

For the year ended December 31, 2014
Allowance for loan losses—uncovered:
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,708		$	4,267		$	3,404		$	2,027		$	340		$	17,746
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		7,485			8,883			6,968			(788	)		534			23,082
Gross charge-offs		(5,691	)		(7,546	)		(3,425	)		(624	)		(279	)		(17,565	)
Recoveries		2,691			5,524			888			984			469			10,556

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(3,000	)		(2,022	)		(2,537	)		360			190			(7,009	)

Ending allowance for loan losses	$	12,193		$	11,128		$	7,835		$	1,599		$	1,064		$	33,819



As of December 31, 2014
Allowance for loan losses—uncovered:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,110		$	1,276		$	982		$	—		$	82		$	3,450
Collectively evaluated for impairment		4,850			4,623			5,968			649			820			16,910
Accounted for under ASC 310-30		6,233			5,229			885			950			162			13,459

Allowance for loan losses—uncovered:	$	12,193		$	11,128		$	7,835		$	1,599		$	1,064		$	33,819



Balance of uncovered loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	18,584		$	13,565		$	2,799		$	174		$	472		$	35,594
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,167,905			1,107,225			851,179			123,203			161,663			3,411,175
Accounted for under ASC 310-30		239,523			190,148			15,499			8,309			2,389			455,868

Total uncovered loans	$	1,426,012		$	1,310,938		$	869,477		$	131,686		$	164,524		$	3,902,637



For the year ended December 31, 2013
Allowance for loan losses—uncovered:
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,059		$	4,265		$	4,162		$	268		$	191		$	10,945
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		10,980			3,107			(80	)		1,425			88			15,520
Gross charge-offs		(8,942	)		(4,070	)		(1,136	)		(165	)		(528	)		(14,841	)
Recoveries		3,611			965			458			499			589			6,122

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(5,331	)		(3,105	)		(678	)		334			61			(8,719	)

Ending allowance for loan losses	$	7,708		$	4,267		$	3,404		$	2,027		$	340		$	17,746

(Dollars in thousands)	Residential real estate			Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial		Real estate construction		Consumer			Total

As of December 31, 2013
Allowance for loan losses—uncovered:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,923		$	—		$	284	$	—	$	1		$	2,208
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,697			2,862			2,959		2,025		224			10,767
Accounted for under ASC 310-30		3,088			1,405			161		2		115			4,771

Allowance for loan losses—uncovered:	$	7,708		$	4,267		$	3,404	$	2,027	$	340		$	17,746



Balance of uncovered loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	14,014		$	4,588		$	2,882	$	359	$	33		$	21,876
Collectively evaluated for impairment		817,911			652,952			437,777		173,897		6,814			2,089,351
Accounted for under ASC 310-30		253,528			98,299			5,985		1,970		2,907			362,689

Total uncovered loans	$	1,085,453		$	755,839		$	446,644	$	176,226	$	9,754		$	2,473,916



For the year ended December 31, 2012
Allowance for loan losses—uncovered:
Balance at beginning of period	$	1,504		$	2,681		$	3,307	$	132	$	263		$	7,887
Provision for loan losses		1,041			1,590			823		134		26			3,614
Gross charge-offs		(491	)		(37	)		—		—		(142	)		(670	)
Recoveries		5			31			32		2		44			114

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(486	)		(6	)		32		2		(98	)		(556	)

Ending allowance for loan losses	$	2,059		$	4,265		$	4,162	$	268	$	191		$	10,945

Changes in the allowance and the allocation of the allowance for covered loans were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Residential real estate			Commercial real estate			Commercial and industrial			Real estate construction			Consumer			Total

For the year ended December 31, 2014
Allowance for loan losses—covered:
Balance at beginning of period	$	4,696		$	26,394		$	7,227		$	1,984		$	80		$	40,381
Benefit for loan losses		(443	)		(13,604	)		(3,968	)		(596	)		(144	)		(18,755	)
Gross charge-offs		(2,294	)		(7,568	)		(4,774	)		(1,545	)		(220	)		(16,401	)
Recoveries		2,022			8,441			4,092			1,243			330			16,128

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(272	)		873			(682	)		(302	)		110			(273	)

Ending allowance for loan losses	$	3,981		$	13,663		$	2,577		$	1,086		$	46		$	21,353



As of December 31, 2014
Allowance for loan losses—covered:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	417		$	1,277		$	109		$	—		$	—		$	1,803
Collectively evaluated for impairment		123			57			89			7			1			277
Accounted for under ASC 310-30		3,441			12,329			2,379			1,079			45			19,273

Allowance for loan losses—covered:	$	3,981		$	13,663		$	2,577		$	1,086		$	46		$	21,353



Balance of covered loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	4,738		$	22,385		$	2,324		$	670		$	12		$	30,129
Collectively evaluated for impairment		16,973			3,391			6,572			304			84			27,324
Accounted for under ASC 310-30		86,515			160,886			23,752			8,415			9,469			289,037

Total covered loans	$	108,226		$	186,662		$	32,648		$	9,389		$	9,565		$	346,490



For the year ended December 31, 2013
Allowance for loan losses—covered:
Balance at beginning of period	$	5,716		$	30,150		$	10,915		$	4,509		$	183		$	51,473
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		368			(4,567	)		(3,270	)		(2,712	)		(241	)		(10,422	)
Gross charge-offs		(2,664	)		(9,211	)		(4,654	)		(1,904	)		(214	)		(18,647	)
Recoveries		1,276			10,022			4,236			2,091			352			17,977

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(1,388	)		811			(418	)		187			138			(670	)

Ending allowance for loan losses	$	4,696		$	26,394		$	7,227		$	1,984		$	80		$	40,381



As of December 31, 2013
Allowance for loan losses—covered:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	360		$	230		$	937		$	—		$	2		$	1,529
Collectively evaluated for impairment		192			3,010			471			108			1			3,782
Accounted for under ASC 310-30		4,144			23,154			5,819			1,876			77			35,070

Allowance for loan losses—covered:	$	4,696		$	26,394		$	7,227		$	1,984		$	80		$	40,381



Balance of covered loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,678		$	18,062		$	5,121		$	1,138		$	25		$	27,024
Collectively evaluated for impairment		20,622			18,570			21,909			812			145			62,058
Accounted for under ASC 310-30		100,034			262,769			51,407			15,268			11,508			440,986

Total covered loans	$	123,334		$	299,401		$	78,437		$	17,218		$	11,678		$	530,068



For the year ended December 31, 2012
Allowance for loan losses—covered:
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,125		$	28,331		$	13,827		$	5,750		$	319		$	55,352
Provision (benefit) for loan losses		1,739			19,922			7,644			3,029			(76	)		32,258
Gross charge-offs		(4,381	)		(23,042	)		(15,462	)		(5,375	)		(390	)		(48,650	)
Recoveries		1,233			4,939			4,906			1,105			330			12,513

Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(3,148	)		(18,103	)		(10,556	)		(4,270	)		(60	)		(36,137	)

Ending allowance for loan losses	$	5,716		$	30,150		$	10,915		$	4,509		$	183		$	51,473

A significant amount of loans acquired in the CF Bancorp and First Banking Center acquisitions during the year 2010 and the Peoples State Bank and Community Central Bank acquisitions during the year 2011 are covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, whereby the FDIC generally reimburses the Bank for the 80% of losses incurred. The CF Bancorp, First Banking Center and Peoples State Bank loss share agreements also include provisions where a clawback payment, calculated using formulas included within the contracts, is to be made to the FDIC 10 years and 45 days following the acquisition in the event actual losses fail to reach stated levels. The estimated FDIC clawback liability totaled $26.9 million ($22.6 million related to the CF Bancorp acquisition, $4.3 million related to the First Banking Center acquisition and $4 thousand related to the Peoples State Bank acquisition) at December 31, 2014 compared to $24.9 million ($21.0 million related to the CF Bancorp acquisition and $3.9 million related to the First Banking Center acquisition) at December 31, 2013. No clawback liability was recorded in relation to Peoples State Bank at December 31, 2013.

Acquired loans were recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date, which includes loans acquired in each FDIC-assisted acquisition and in the First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank acquisitions. At the acquisition date, where a loan exhibits evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all principal and interest payments in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement, the Company accounts for the loan under ASC 310-30 and recognizes the expected shortfall of expected future cash flows, as compared to the contractual amount due, as a nonaccretable discount. Any excess of the net present value of expected future cash flows over the acquisition date fair value is recognized as the accretable discount, or accretable yield. We recognize accretion of the accretable discount as interest income over the expected remaining life of the purchased loan. Fair value discounts/premiums created on acquired loans accounted for outside the scope of ASC 310-30 are accounted for under ASC 310-20 and are accreted/amortized into interest income over the remaining term of the loan as an adjustment to the related loans yield.

Changes in the carrying amount of accretable discount for purchased loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 were as follows:

For loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, the Company remeasures expected cash flows on a quarterly basis. For loans where the remeasurement process results in a decline in expected cash flows, impairment is recorded. As a result of this impairment, the indemnification asset is increased to reflect anticipated future cash to be received from the FDIC. Alternatively, when a loan's remeasurement results in an increase in expected cash flows, the effective yield of the related loan is increased through an addition to the accretable discount. As a result of the improved cash flows, the indemnification asset is first reduced by the writing off of any indemnification asset related to impairment previously recorded with any remaining indemnification asset accreting off over the shorter of the expected term of the loan or the remaining life of the related loss-sharing agreement.

The total identified improvement in the cash flow expectations resulting in yield adjustments on a prospective basis during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for both covered and uncovered purchased credit impaired loans was $99.3 million, $82.5 million and $145.4 million, respectively. The Company also identified declines in the cash flow expectations of certain loans. A decline in the present value of current expected cash flows compared to the previously estimated expected cash flows, due in any part to change in credit, is referred to as credit impairment and recorded as provision for loan losses during the period. Declines in the present value of expected cash flows only from the expected timing of such cash flows is referred to as timing impairment and recognized prospectively as a decrease in yield on the loan.

Below is the composition of the recorded investment for loans accounted for under ASC 310-30 at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The following table details the components and impact of the provision for loan losses on covered loans and the related FDIC loss sharing income.

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Provision (benefit) for loan losses—covered:
Net impairment recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30(1)	$	1,491		$	11,179		$	26,219
Additional provision (benefit) recorded, net of charge-offs, for covered loans		(20,246	)		(21,601	)		6,039

Total provision (benefit) for loan losses—covered	$	(18,755	)	$	(10,422	)	$	32,258

Less: FDIC loss share income:
Income recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30(1)		4,015			5,598			16,883
Income (expense) recorded, to offset provision (benefit), for covered loans		(11,729	)		(17,281	)		4,831

Total loss sharing income (expense) due to provision for loan losses—covered		(7,714	)		(11,683	)		21,714

Net (increase) decrease to income before taxes:
Net (income) expense recorded as a result of re-estimation of cash flows on loans accounted for under ASC 310-30(1)		(2,524	)		5,581			9,336
Net (income) expense recorded, for covered loans including those accounted for under ASC 310-20 and ASC 310-40		(8,517	)		(4,320	)		1,208

Net (increase) decrease to income before taxes	$	(11,041	)	$	1,261		$	10,544

The following table summarizes the activity related to the FDIC indemnification asset and the FDIC receivable for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. For further detail on impairment and provision expense related to loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-30, refer to Note 6 "Allowance for Loan Losses."

	For the years ended December 31,

	2014						2013
(Dollars in thousands)	FDIC Indemnification Asset			FDIC Receivable			FDIC Indemnification Asset			FDIC Receivable
Balance at beginning of period	$	131,861		$	7,783		$	226,356		$	17,999
Accretion		(26,426	)		—			(28,040	)		—
Sales and write-downs of other real estate owned (covered)		(1,484	)		524			(3,804	)		1,925
Net effect of change in allowance on covered assets(1)		(19,213	)		—			(33,860	)		—
Reimbursements requested from FDIC (reclassification to FDIC receivable)		(17,712	)		17,712			(28,791	)		28,791
Decreases due to recoveries net of additional claimable expenses incurred(2)		—			(4,981	)		—			(8,613	)
Claim payments received from the FDIC		—			(14,976	)		—			(32,319	)

Balance at end of period	$	67,026		$	6,062		$	131,861		$	7,783

The Company leases certain branch properties and equipment under operating leases. Net rent expense was $8.9 million, $5.1 million and $2.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The net book value of premises and equipment sold in our New Mexico and Wisconsin branch sales was $9.0 million and $114 thousand, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company transferred $480 thousand and $4.0 million from premises and equipment to other real estate owned, respectively, due to branch or building operation closings/consolidations.

Future minimum lease payments for operating leases, before considering renewal options that generally are present, are as follows:

	Other real estate owned

(Dollars in thousands)	Uncovered			Covered			Total other real estate owned			Repossessed assets
Balance at January 1, 2012	$	—		$	20,303		$	20,303		$	124
Transfers in(1)		1,467			25,543			27,010			552
Disposals		(598	)		(16,706	)		(17,304	)		(547	)
Write-downs		—			(5,306	)		(5,306	)		—

Balance at December 31, 2012	$	869		$	23,834		$	24,703		$	129

Additions due to acquisitions		18,448			—			18,448			—
Transfers in(1)		13,714			12,489			26,203			509
Disposals		(12,656	)		(19,869	)		(32,525	)		(611	)
Write-downs		(1,991	)		(4,883	)		(6,874	)		—

Balance at December 31, 2013	$	18,384		$	11,571		$	29,955		$	27

Additions due to acquisitions		30,878			—			30,878			—
Transfers in(1)		13,859			9,307			23,166			10,122
Capitalized expenditures		—			—			—			535
Disposals		(30,867	)		(8,545	)		(39,412	)		(389	)
Write-downs		(4,007	)		(1,672	)		(5,679	)		—
Valuation allowance(2)		—			—			—			(460	)

Balance at December 31, 2014	$	28,247		$	10,661		$	38,908		$	9,835

Income and expenses related to other real estate owned and repossessed assets were as follows:

	Other real estate owned

(Dollars in thousands)	Uncovered			Covered			Total other real estate owned			Repossessed assets
For the year ended December 31, 2014
Net gain (loss) on sale	$	8,156		$	283		$	8,439		$	(25	)
Write-downs		(4,007	)		(1,672	)		(5,679	)		—
Provision for valuation allowance		—			—			—			(460	)
Net operating (expenses) income		(2,904	)		(228	)		(3,132	)		(98	)

Total	$	1,245		$	(1,617	)	$	(372	)	$	(583	)



For the year ended December 31, 2013
Net gain (loss) on sale	$	3,521		$	482		$	4,003		$	(94	)
Write-downs		(1,991	)		(4,883	)		(6,874	)		—
Net operating (expenses) income		(1,520	)		146			(1,374	)		(61	)

Total	$	10		$	(4,255	)	$	(4,245	)	$	(155	)



For the year ended December 31, 2012
Net gain (loss) on sale	$	(49	)	$	1,013		$	964		$	62
Write-downs		—			(5,306	)		(5,306	)		—
Net operating (expenses) income		(88	)		434			346			(58	)

Total	$	(137	)	$	(3,859	)	$	(3,996	)	$	4

Note that covered expenses and income are partially offset by the corresponding recording of FDIC loss share income or expense.

The Company recorded core deposit intangibles (CDIs) associated with the acquisitions of CF Bancorp, Peoples State Bank, Community Central Bank, First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank. CDIs are amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives and have an estimated remaining weighted-average useful life of 7.31years as of December 31, 2014. The Company had no other intangible assets as of December 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

Amortization expense recognized on CDIs was $2.8 million, $2.7 million and $1.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, included as a component of "other expense" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we sold our branch offices located in Wisconsin (acquired in our First Banking Center acquisition) and our single branch office in Albuquerque, New Mexico (acquired in our Talmer West Bank acquisition). The branch sales included all of the deposits of the branches, resulting in the write-off of the related core deposit intangibles totaling $1.0 million.

The estimated amortization expense of CDIs for the next five years is as follows:

Loan servicing rights are created as a result of the Company's mortgage banking origination activities, the purchase of mortgage servicing rights, the origination and purchase of agricultural servicing rights and the origination and purchase of commercial real estate servicing rights. Loans serviced for others are not reported as assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company elected as of January 1, 2013 to account for all loan servicing rights under the fair value method. This change in accounting policy resulted in a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2013 in the amount of $31 thousand. For further information on this election,

refer to Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies." The following table represents the activity for loan servicing rights and the related fair value changes.

(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural			Mortgage			Total

For the year ended December 31, 2014
Fair value, beginning of period	$	368		$	962		$	77,273		$	78,603
Additions due to acquisition		767			—			—			767
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained		8			125			8,903			9,036
Reduction from loans and servicing rights sold(1)		—			(771	)		—			(771	)
Changes in fair value due to:
Reductions from loans paid off during the period		(173	)		(220	)		(6,407	)		(6,800	)
Changes due to valuation inputs or assumptions(2)		(279	)		(96	)		(9,862	)		(10,237	)

Fair value, end of period	$	691		$	—		$	69,907		$	70,598



Principal balance of loans serviced	$	213,248		$	—		$	7,050,445		$	7,263,693

For the year ended December 31, 2013
Fair value, beginning of period	$	518		$	1,456		$	3,683		$	5,657
Additions due to acquisition		—			—			41,967			41,967
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained		—			72			23,844			23,916
Changes in fair value due to:
Reductions from loans paid off during the period		(34	)		(471	)		(6,650	)		(7,155	)
Changes due to valuation inputs or assumptions(2)		(116	)		(95	)		14,429			14,218

Fair value, end of period	$	368		$	962		$	77,273		$	78,603



Principal balance of loans serviced	$	260,771		$	43,847		$	7,173,782		$	7,478,400

Prior to January 1, 2013, the Company accounted for loan servicing rights using the amortization method. Activity for loan servicing rights and the related valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2012 is as follows:

Under the amortization method, impairment of loan servicing rights was recognized through a valuation allowance when the carrying value of the loan servicing rights exceeded the fair value. Subsequent increases in fair value, up to the original carrying value, were recorded as impairment recoveries through the valuation allowance. Activity in the valuation allowance for loan servicing rights for the year ended December 31, 2012 is shown in the following table.

Expected and actual loan prepayment speeds are the most significant factors driving the fair value of loan servicing rights. The following table presents assumptions utilized in determining the fair value of loan servicing rights as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

	Commercial Real Estate	Agricultural(1)	Mortgage

As of December 31, 2014
Prepayment speed	6.41 - 50.00%	N/A	3.63 - 40.07%
Weighted average ("WA") discount rate	19.48%	N/A	9.14%
WA cost to service/per year	$470	N/A	$61
WA ancillary income/per year	N/A	N/A	35
WA float range	0.56%	N/A	1.16 - 1.74%
As of December 31, 2013
Prepayment speed	8.50 - 50.00%	4.98 - 53.16%	3.55 - 44.49%
WA discount rate	20.00%	15.00%	10.17%
WA cost to service/per year	$467	$200	$57
WA ancillary income/per year	N/A	N/A	45
WA float range	0.56%	0.56%	0.73 - 1.54%

Custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with serviced loans were $71.0 million and $72.4 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The Company realized total loan servicing fee income of $13.8 million, $16.1 million and $2.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, recorded as a component of "Mortgage banking and other loan fees" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

In January of 2015, we completed a sale of $13.2 million of mortgage loan servicing rights, representing a principal balance of $1.2 billion of loan serviced, at a price that approximates fair value, which were substantially all of the servicing rights we had owned for mortgage loans located outside of our primary target markets. All loan servicing rights were carried at fair value at December 31, 2014.

In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various transactions involving derivative instruments to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and to meet the financing needs of customers (customer-initiated derivatives). These financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market and credit risk. Market and credit risk are included in the determination of fair value.

Commitments to fund mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives. It is the Company's practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to

economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from its commitments to fund the loans.

The Company enters into interest rate derivatives to provide a service to certain qualifying customers to help facilitate their respective risk management strategies, customer-initiated derivatives, and, therefore, are not used for interest rate risk management purposes. The Company generally takes offsetting positions with dealer counterparts to mitigate the inherent risk. Income primarily results from the spread between the customer derivative and the offsetting dealer positions.

The Company additionally utilizes interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges for risk management purposes to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. These interest rate swaps are used to manage differences in the amount, timing and duration of the Company's known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to certain variable rate borrowings and/or deposits. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in cash flows of the derivative instrument with the changes in cash flows of the designated hedged transactions. The interest rate swaps were determined to be fully effective during all periods presented. As such, no amount of ineffectiveness has been included in net income. Therefore, the aggregate fair value of the swaps is recorded in other assets (liabilities) with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) would be reclassified to current earnings should the hedge no longer be considered effective. The Company expects the hedges to remain fully effective and does not expect any amounts to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income due to ineffectiveness during the remaining terms of the swaps.

The following table presents the notional amount and fair value of the Company's derivative instruments held or issued for risk management purposes or in connection with customer-initiated and mortgage banking activities.

	December 31,

	2014						2013
			Fair Value						Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	Notional Amount(1)		Gross Derivative Assets(2)		Gross Derivative Liabilities(2)		Notional Amount(1)		Gross Derivative Assets(2)		Gross Derivative Liabilities(2)
Risk management purposes:
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate swaps	$	12,000	$	—	$	222	$	—	$	—	$	—

Total risk management purposes		12,000		—		222		—		—		—

Customer-initiated and mortgage banking activities:
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale		114,828		—		803		168,746		1,484		—
Interest rate lock commitments		67,817		1,489		—		67,685		1,146		—
Customer-initiated derivatives		125,356		1,588		1,477		—		—		—

Total customer-initiated and mortgage banking activities		308,001		3,077		2,280		236,431		2,630		—

Total gross derivatives	$	320,001	$	3,077	$	2,502	$	236,431	$	2,630	$	—

In the normal course of business, the Company may decide to settle a forward contract rather than fulfill the contract. Cash received or paid in this settlement manner is included in "Net gain on sales of loans" in the Consolidated Statements of Income and is considered a cost of executing a forward contract.

The following table reflects the net gains (losses) relating to derivative instruments related to the changes in fair value.

The following table presents the net gains (losses) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and the Consolidated Statements of Income relating to interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges for the year ended December 31, 2014:

At December 31, 2014, the Company expected $234 thousand of the unrealized loss to be reclassified as an increase to interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its forward contracts, interest rate lock commitments, customer-initiated derivatives and interest rate swaps are discussed in Note 3, "Fair Value".

Certain financial instruments, including derivatives (interest rate swaps and customer-initiated derivatives), may be eligible for offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and/or subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. The Company is party to master netting arrangements with its financial institution counterparties; however, the Company does not offset assets and liabilities under these arrangements for financial statement presentation purposes. The tables below present information about the Company's financial instruments that are eligible for offset at December 31, 2014. There were no financial instruments eligible for offset at December 31, 2013.

In the normal course of business, the Company offers a variety of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include outstanding commitments to extend credit, credit lines, commercial letters of credit and standby letters of credit.

The Company's exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instrument, is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. The credit policies used in making commitments and conditional obligations are the same as those used for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer provided there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on an individual basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counterparty. The collateral held varies, but may include securities, real estate, inventory, plant, or equipment. Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are included in commitments to extend credit. These lines of credit are generally uncollateralized, usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may be drawn upon only to the total extent to which the Company is committed.

Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Company's portfolio of standby letters of credit consists primarily of performance assurances made on behalf of customers who have a contractual commitment to produce or deliver goods or services. The risk to the Company arises from its obligation to make payment in the event of the customers' contractual default to produce the contracted good or service to a third party.

The allowance for credit losses on lending-related commitments included $539 thousand and $1.0 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, for probable credit losses inherent in the Company's unused commitments and was recorded in "Other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

A summary of the contractual amounts of the Company's exposure to off-balance sheet risk is as follows:

Commitments to make residential mortgage loans are generally made for a period of 60 days or less, and 90 days or less for commercial loans. The fixed rate loan commitments have interest rates ranging from 1.90% to 19.75% and maturities ranging from 1 month to 42 years.

The Company has originated and sold certain loans for which the buyer has limited recourse to us in the event the loans do not perform as specified in the agreements. These loans had an outstanding balance of $39.8 million and $79.5 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The maximum potential amount of undiscounted future payments that we could be required to make in the event of nonperformance by the borrower totaled $31.6 million and $42.9 million, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In the event of nonperformance, we have rights to the underlying collateral securing the loans. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had recorded a liability of $355 thousand and $567 thousand, respectively, in connection with the recourse agreements, recorded in "Other liabilities" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

We issue standby letters of credit for commercial customers to third parties to guarantee the performance of those customers to the third parties. If the customer fails to perform, we perform in their place and record the funds advanced as an interest-bearing loan. These letters of credit are underwritten using the same policies and criteria applied to commercial loans. Therefore, they represent the same risk to us as a loan to that commercial loan customer. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, our standby letters of credit totaled $73.5 million and $69.0 million, respectively.

In connection with our mortgage banking loan sales, we make certain representations and warranties that the loans meet certain criteria, such as collateral type and underwriting standards. We may be required to repurchase individual loans and/or indemnify the purchaser against losses if the loan fails to meet established criteria. The following table represents the activity related to our liability recorded in connection with these representations and warranties.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries are subject to various pending or threatened legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of business. Some of these claims are against entities or assets of which the Company has acquired in business acquisitions, and certain of these claims, or future claims, will be covered by loss sharing agreements with the FDIC.

The Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. Where it is probable that the Company will incur a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company records a liability in its consolidated financial statements. While the ultimate liability with respect to these litigation matters and claims cannot be determined at this time, in the opinion of management, any liabilities arising from pending legal proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial statements.

Time deposits, including certificates of deposit, Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service deposits ("CDARS") and certain individual retirement account deposits, of $250 thousand or more totaled $386.7 million and $134.7 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

At December 31, 2014, the scheduled maturities of time deposits, which includes $72.3 million of time deposits included within "Other brokered funds", for the next five years were as follows:

The following table presents the components of the Company's short-term borrowings and long-term debt.

	December 31,

	2014					2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Weighted Average Rate(1)			Amount		Weighted Average Rate(1)
Short-term borrowings:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: 0.10% variable-rate notes	$	25,743		0.10	%	$	36,876		0.20	%
FHLB advances: 0.27% - 0.31% fixed-rate notes		100,000		0.29			—		—
FHLB advances: 0.43% variable-rate notes		10,000		0.43			—		—
Holding company line of credit: floating-rate based on one-month LIBOR plus 3.00%		—		—			35,000		3.17

Total short-term borrowings		135,743		0.26			71,876		1.64

Long-term debt:
FHLB advances: 0.19% - 7.44% fixed-rate notes due April 2015 to 2027(2)		286,804		1.57			130,368		3.28
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase: 4.11% - 4.30% fixed-rate notes due 2016 to 2037(3)		56,444		4.19			58,079		4.19
Subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities: floating-rate based on three-month LIBOR plus 1.45% - 2.85% due 2034 to 2035(4)		10,724		2.48			10,590		2.49

Total long-term debt		353,972		2.02			199,037		3.50

Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt:	$	489,715		1.53	%	$	270,913		3.01	%

Selected financial information pertaining to the components of our short-term borrowings is as follows:

	For the years ended

(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase:
Average daily balance	$	90,923		$	38,205
Average interest rate during the period		0.12	%		0.24	%
Maximum month-end balance	$	166,925		$	42,864
FHLB advances:
Average daily balance	$	53,980		$	10,729
Average interest rate during the period		0.80	%		0.09	%
Maximum month-end balance	$	110,000		$	135,000
Federal funds purchased:
Average daily balance	$	1,282			N/A	(1)
Average interest rate during the period		0.29	%		N/A	(1)
Maximum month-end balance	$	—			N/A	(1)
FHLB overnight repurchase agreements:
Average daily balance	$	2,204			N/A	(1)
Average interest rate during the period		0.10	%		N/A	(1)
Maximum month-end balance	$	—			N/A	(1)
Holding company line of credit:
Average daily balance	$	5,562		$	479
Average interest rate during the period		3.17	%		3.17	%
Maximum month-end balance	$	35,000		$	35,000

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are typically held by an independent third party when they are for retail customers (short-term borrowings) and are delivered to the counterparty when they are wholesale borrowings with brokerage firms (long-term debt). At maturity, the securities underlying the agreements are returned to the banks. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are secured by mortgage-backed securities and bonds with a carrying value of $337.8 million at December 31, 2014.

Our subsidiary banks are members of the FHLB, which provides short- and long-term funding collateralized by mortgage-related assets to its members. Each advance is payable at its maturity date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed-rate advances. At December 31, 2014, FHLB advances were collateralized by $2.1 billion of commercial and mortgage loans, with $1.2 billion in the form of a blanket lien arrangement and $919 million under specific lien arrangements. Based on this collateral,

the Company is eligible to borrow up to an additional $928.3 million at December 31, 2014; however, due to Board resolutions, this amount is limited to an additional $598.8 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Holding Company entered into a senior unsecured line of credit to support the pending acquisition and recapitalization of Talmer West Bank. On December 31, 2013, the outstanding balance was $35.0 million, which was the maximum credit under the agreement. On February 14, 2014, the $35.0 million senior unsecured line of credit, included accrued interest, was paid in full. This $35.0 million senior unsecured line of credit was renewed during the year ended December 31, 2014 with no further draws.

At December 31, 2014, the contractual principal payments due and the amortization/accretion of purchase accounting adjustments for the remaining maturities of long-term debt over the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

The current and deferred components of the provision for income taxes were as follows:

A reconciliation of expected income tax expense (benefit) at the federal statutory rate to the Company's provision for income taxes and effective tax rate follows.

	For the years ended December 31,

	2014						2013						2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount			Rate			Amount			Rate			Amount			Rate
Tax based on federal statutory rate	$	34,494			35.0	%	$	32,628			35.0	%	$	11,166			35.0	%
Effect of:
Tax exempt income		(2,404	)		(2.4	)		(1,705	)		(1.8	)		(1,335	)		(4.2	)
State taxes, net of federal benefit		1,226			1.2			(46	)		(0.0	)		409			1.3
Change in valuation allowance		(10,127	)		(10.3	)		(14,426	)		(15.5	)		—			—
Bargain purchase gain		(14,692	)		(14.9	)		(25,096	)		(26.9	)		—			—
Transaction costs		226			0.2			2,748			2.9			—			—
Other, net		(1,018	)		(1.0	)		562			0.6			(8	)		(0.0	)

Income tax expense (benefit)	$	7,705			7.8	%	$	(5,335	)		(5.7	)%	$	10,232			32.1	%

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized an income tax expense of $7.7 million on $98.6 million of pre-tax income, an effective tax rate of 7.8%, compared to an income tax benefit of $5.3 million on $93.2 million of pre-tax income, an effective tax rate of negative 5.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2013 and an income tax expense of $10.2 million on $31.9 million of pre-tax income, an effective tax rate of 32.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2012. The low effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2014 resulted primarily from treating the $42.0 million bargain purchase gain resulting from the acquisition of Talmer West Bank as non-taxable, based on the tax structure of the acquisition, and a $10.1 million reduction in the valuation allowance established against the deferred tax assets associated with First Place Bank pre-ownership change tax losses, see discussion below. The negative effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2013 resulted primarily from treating the $71.7 million bargain purchase gain resulting from the acquisition of First Place Bank as non-taxable, based on the tax structure of the acquisition and by a $14.4 million reduction in the valuation allowance established at acquisition date against the deferred tax assets associated with First Place Bank pre-ownership change tax losses. The $14.4 million decrease in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance during 2013 was largely due to post-acquisition date reductions in our original estimates of projected realized built-in losses on loans (i.e. bad debt deductions) occurring in the one year period following the acquisition date.

The significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	48,078	$	51,527
Other real estate losses		4,410		3,702
Organizational costs		274		311
Accrued stock-based compensation		5,769		5,926
Loss and tax credit carry forwards		30,120		12,242
Acquisition built in loss carryforwards		10,472		7,056
Other reserves		1,750		1,988
Goodwill and other intangibles		1,306		1,494
Nonaccrual interest		11,163		10,150
Business combination adjustments		80,792		41,742
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities		—		4,306

Total deferred tax assets		194,134		140,444
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation		1,487		3,996
FHLB stock dividends		258		1,541
Deferred loan fees		471		1,229
Prepaid expenses		48		799
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities		2,073		—
Loan servicing rights		25,016		27,334
Other		219		247

Total deferred tax liabilities		29,572		35,146

Net deferred tax asset before valuation allowance		164,562		105,298
Valuation allowance		—		(10,127	)

Net deferred tax asset	$	164,562	$	95,171

It is the Company's policy not to record deferred taxes on outside basis differences in our subsidiaries if we expect we would liquidate a subsidiary in a tax-free manner, which is the case with all our banks.

On January 1, 2014, the Company acquired Talmer West Bank and recorded $60.4 million in deferred tax assets at acquisition. Upon acquisition, Talmer West Bank incurred an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, the Company's ability to benefit from the use of Talmer West Bank's pre-ownership change net operating loss carry forwards, as well as the deductibility of certain of its built-in losses if realized during a five-year recognition period (one year with respect to bad debt deductions), will be limited to $3.0 million per year, putting at risk the utilization of associated deferred tax assets before they expire. No valuation allowance was

established against the deferred tax assets associated with Talmer West Bank's pre-change losses based on management's estimate of the amount and timing of built-in losses more likely than not to be realized over the Section 382 recognition period, and the impact on the Company's utilization of pre-ownership change net operating loss carry forwards. In determining its estimate of built-in losses more likely than not to be realized within the Section 382 recognition period, management focused primarily on tax losses embedded in Talmer West Bank's loan portfolio and other real estate owned. To a lesser extent management focused on tax losses embedded in fixed assets, investments in partnerships and certain accrued expenses, and anticipated when these losses might create actual tax deductions, either through bad debt deductions, depreciation, amortization, payment, or disposition of the assets in question.

At January 1, 2014, Talmer West Bank had an estimated $28.8 million in gross federal loss carry forwards expiring in 2032 and 2033. The exact amount of pre-ownership change carry forwards cannot be determined until the finalization of Capitol Bancorp, Ltd.'s consolidated tax return (Talmer West Bank's former parent) for the year ended December 31, 2014, at which time final allocations will be made from that return to the entity acquired by the Company.

At December 31, 2014, the Company had the following federal loss and tax credit carry forwards: $88.9 million of loss carry forwards expiring between 2027 and 2034, $912 thousand in tax credits expiring between 2026 and 2033, and $8.8 million in federal alternative minimum tax credits with an indefinite life. At December 31, 2014, $41.8 million of the federal loss and tax credit carry forwards relating to the First Place Bank and affiliates acquisition on January 1, 2013 are limited to $6.6 million annually due to an ownership change, within the meaning of Section 382. At December 31, 2013, the Company determined the use of the First Place Bank related loss carry forwards and tax credits would be limited to $1.7 million annually, which resulted in a valuation allowance of $10.1 million against the Company's deferred tax assets at December 31, 2013. In the second quarter of 2014, the Company, with the assistance of legal and tax accounting external experts, reached a conclusion regarding the calculation of the annual Section 382 limitation related to the ownership change of First Place Bank, which resulted in an increase of the annual Section 382 limitation from $1.7 million to $6.6 million. Based on this new information in the second quarter of 2014, management concluded that the $10.1 million in valuation at December 31, 2013 could be reduced to zero at June 30, 2014. In addition, there are $43.5 million of gross federal loss carry forwards at December 31, 2014 relating to the Talmer West Bank acquisition on January 1, 2014 that are limited to $3.0 million annually due to Section 382. Finally, there are $3.5 million of gross federal loss carry forwards that are limited to $145 thousand annually due to a Section 382 ownership change incurred in November 2009, of which $1.4 million will expire unused and has not been included in the deferred tax assets.

Management also concluded that no valuation allowance was necessary on the remainder of the Company's net deferred tax assets at either December 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013. This determination was based on the Company's history of pre-tax and taxable income over the prior three years, as well as management's expectations for sustainable profitability in the future. Management monitors deferred tax assets quarterly for changes affecting realizability and the valuation allowance could be adjusted in future periods.

Actual outcomes could vary from the Company's current estimates, resulting in future increases or decreases in the valuation allowance and corresponding future tax expense or benefit.

At December 31, 2014, Talmer Bank and Trust had approximately $36.0 million of bad debt reserve in equity for which no provision for federal income taxes was recorded. This amount represents First Place Bank's qualifying thrift bad debt reserve at December 31, 1987, which is only required to be recaptured into taxable income if certain events occur. At December 31, 2014, the potential tax on the above amount was approximately $13.0 million. The Company does not intend to take any action that would result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserve.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into certain transactions that have tax consequences. From time to time, the IRS and state taxing authorities may review and/or challenge specific interpretive tax positions taken by the Company with respect to those transactions. The Company believes that its tax returns, as well as First Place Bank and Talmer West Bank's tax returns for open periods prior to the acquisitions, were filed based upon applicable statutes, regulations and case law in effect at the time of the transactions. The IRS, various state and other jurisdictions, if presented with the transactions, could disagree with the Company's interpretation of the tax law.

First Place Bank had received notice that the IRS had denied refund claims in amended tax returns filed by First Place Bank on a consolidated basis with its former parent company, First Place Financial Corp., for fiscal years ended June 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005. The Company disagrees with the IRS position and is working with First Place Financial Corp. to appeal the examination-level decision. Though not anticipated, an adverse result on appeal could impact the $11.7 million refund receivable recorded by the Company upon acquisition of First Place Bank. In the second quarter of 2014, the IRS commenced an examination of the consolidated federal tax returns of First Place Bank's former parent for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2013, 2012, 2011, which included First Place Bank through January 1, 2013. The results of this examination concluded with no changes. First Place Bank's federal tax return for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 is currently subject to potential examination as well. There are several years of returns that are still open to examination by various taxing authorities for Talmer West Bank.

During the first quarter 2014, the Company closed an examination by the IRS of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries' federal returns for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, with no significant tax changes. The Company's federal tax return for the years ended December 31, 2012 to present are open to potential examination. The Company's most significant states of operation, Michigan and Ohio, do not impose income-based taxes on financial institutions. The Company and/or its subsidiaries are subject to minor amounts of income tax in various other states, with varying years open to potential examination. The Company is not aware of any pending income tax examinations by any state jurisdiction.

The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2014 or 2013 and does not expect to record unrecognized tax benefits of any significance during the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense, when applicable. There are no liabilities accrued for interest or penalties at December 31, 2014 or 2013.

The Company's 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), along with amendments made to the Plan, limits the number of shares issued or issuable to employees, directors and certain consultants at 9.8 million shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2014, 1.2 million shares were available to be awarded under the Plan.

Options are granted with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market price of the Company's common stock at the date of grant. The vesting and terms of option awards are determined by the Company's Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company granted 35 thousand and 3.6 million stock options, respectively, that were fully vested upon issuance and will expire 10 years after the grant date.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the table below. Given the relatively short history of Company stock being publicly traded during the year ended December 31, 2014, post our public offering in February of 2014, and minimal trading in the Company's stock during the year ended December 31, 2013, it was not practicable for the Company to estimate volatility of its share price. For the year ended December 31, 2014 the Company used the average volatility of comparable public Bank holding companies as an input to the valuation model. For the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company used the volatility of an appropriate industry index (the ABA NASDAQ Community Bank Index) as an input in the valuation model. Since limited historical data is available, the expected term of options granted was estimated to be six years for both the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 based on expected lives used by a sample of other Midwest banks. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant corresponding with the expected life of the options. The expected dividend yield is based on historical and projected dividend patterns of the Company's common shares. At the time the shares were granted in 2014 and 2013, there were not any expected dividends projected. All shares granted have fully vested and the Company intends to issue already authorized shares to satisfy options upon exercise.

The fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were determined using the following weighted-average assumptions as of the grant date. There were no options granted during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Activity in the Plan during the year ended December 31, 2014 is summarized below:

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $4.0 million and $14 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Total cash received from option exercises during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $143 thousand and $41 thousand, respectively, resulting in the issuance of 25 thousand shares and 5 thousand shares, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, there were 191 thousand shares issued under the net-settlement option. The tax benefit realized from option exercises during the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.1 million.

Total compensation expense for stock options, included in "Salary and employee benefits" in the Consolidated Statements of Income, was $460 thousand, $9.6 million and $3.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 respectively.

A summary of changes in the Company's nonvested shares for the year ended December 31, 2014 follows:

As of December 31, 2014, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Plan.

Under the Plan, the Company can grant restricted stock awards that vest upon completion of future service requirements or specified performance criteria. The fair value of these awards is equal to the market price of the common stock at the date of grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for these awards over the vesting period, using the straight-line method, based upon the number of shares of restricted stock ultimately expected to vest. Restricted stock awards granted during the year ended December 31, 2014 vest in their entirety following a five year service period for employees and over a one year service period for directors. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. If an individual awarded restricted stock awards terminates employment prior to the end of the vesting period, the unvested portion of the stock award is forfeited.

The following table provides information regarding nonvested restricted stock awards:

Total expense for restricted stock awards totaled $672 thousand for year ended December 31, 2014, of which $504 thousand was included in "Salary and employee benefits" related to employees and $168 thousand was included in "Professional fees" related to directors in the Consolidated Statements of Income. There were no restricted stock awards outstanding prior to June of 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the total compensation costs related to nonvested restricted stock that has not yet been recognized totaled $4.8 million and the weighted-average period over which these costs are expected to be recognized is 4.3 years.

On February 10, 2010, 38,855 common stock warrants were issued to certain seed investors. These warrants have a strike price of $10.00 per share and expire April 28, 2017. These warrants have a feature that dictates that the warrants only become exercisable after an eligible capital transaction, which is either an initial public offering or a sale of the Company in which the stock of the Company is valued above certain threshold levels. These warrants were not issued concurrently with the issuance of stock and meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815-40 "Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity's Own Equity" (ASC 815-40), however, they fall under the scope exception which states that contracts issued that are both a) indexed to its own stock; and b) classified in stockholders' equity are not considered derivatives. The warrants were recorded at their fair value on the date of grant as a component of stockholder's equity. These warrants remain outstanding at December 31, 2014.

On April 30, 2010, 1,623,162 common stock warrants were issued to investment vehicles associated with an investor. The warrants have a strike price of $6.00 per share and a 10 year term. These warrants were issued concurrently with the issuance of stock to this investor and meet the definition of

a derivative under ASC 815-40, however, they fall under the scope exception which states that contracts issued that are both a) indexed to its own stock; and b) classified in stockholders' equity are not considered derivatives. The warrants were recorded at their fair value on the date of grant as a component of stockholder's equity. These warrants remain outstanding at December 31, 2014.

On April 30, 2010, 390,000 common stock warrants were issued to the FDIC. These warrants have a strike price of $6.00 and a 10 year term. These warrants have a feature that allows settlement in cash and were issued as consideration paid to the FDIC for the purchase of assets of CF Bancorp. These warrants meet the definition of a liability due to the cash settlement feature and are recorded as such in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The purchase accounting adjustments related to the CF Bancorp acquisition included an estimated present value of the potential cash settlement that may be paid to the FDIC of $2.9 million which was recorded in "FDIC warrants payable" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At each subsequent reporting period, the Company determined the potential cash settlement amount for these warrants and, to the extent that the present value of the potential cash settlement amount is greater than the initial contingent purchase accounting adjustment, the company would accrue additional expense to fully reflect the present value of the potential cash settlement amount. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, $274 thousand, $219 thousand and $195 thousand, respectively, was recognized as periodic amortization expense. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, $241 thousand, $163 thousand and $326 thousand were recognized as additional expense due to the change in potential cash settlement amount. At December 31, 2014, the Company's recorded balance of FDIC Warrants Payable was $4.6 million.

On February 21, 2012, 109,122 common stock warrants were issued to investment vehicles associated with an investor. The warrants have a strike price of $8.00 per share and a 10 year term. These warrants were issued concurrently with the issuance of stock to this investor and meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815-40, however, they fall under the scope exception which states that contracts issued that are both a) indexed to its own stock; and b) classified in stockholders' equity are not considered derivatives. The warrants were recorded at their fair value on the date of grant as a component of stockholder's equity. These warrants remain outstanding at December 31, 2014.

On December 27, 2012, 797,132 common stock warrants were issued to investment vehicles associated with an investor. The warrants have a strike price of $8.00 per share and a 10 year term. These warrants were issued concurrently with the issuance of stock to this investor and meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815-40, however, they fall under the scope exception which states that contracts issued that are both a) indexed to its own stock; and b) classified in stockholders' equity are not considered derivatives. The warrants were recorded at their fair value on the date of grant as a component of stockholder's equity. These warrants remain outstanding at December 31, 2014.

On February 17, 2015, we repurchased an aggregate of 2,529,416 warrants to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock including all the warrants discussed above issued on April 30, 2010, February 21, 2012 and December 27, 2012. The purchase price was based upon the fair value of the warrants on February 17, 2015, determined utilizing the closing price of our stock on the date of repurchase, and resulted in an aggregate purchase price of $19.9 million.

Loans to executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their related interests in 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

Deposits from executive officers, directors, principal shareholders and their related interests were approximately $9.5 million and $8.3 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Management believes as of December 31, 2014, the Company and its subsidiary banks met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.

Talmer Bank and Trust was required to maintain Tier 1 common equity to total assets ratio of at least 10% under the FDIC's Statement of Policy on Qualifications for Failed Bank Acquisitions for a period of three years following the Company's most recent failed bank acquisition, and thereafter must maintain a capital level sufficient to be well capitalized under regulatory standards during the remaining period of ownership of the investors covered by the FDIC's Statement of Policy. Talmer Bank and Trust's last failed bank acquisition closed on April 29, 2011 and, therefore, remained subject to the heightened capital requirement through April 29, 2014. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized Talmer Bank and Trust as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the institution's category.

Insurance and Financial Services on April 5, 2010. Notwithstanding its capital levels, Talmer West Bank will not be categorized as well capitalized while it is subject to the Consent Order.

On April 5, 2010, Michigan Commerce Bank consented to the issuance of the Consent Order by the FDIC and the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services, which remains in effect following our acquisition of Talmer West Bank, as the surviving bank in the merger, on January 1, 2014. The Consent Order represents an agreement to take certain actions, including, among other things: assessing and retaining qualified management; achieving and maintaining specified capital ratios; reducing certain classified assets, including the charge-off of loans classified "loss;" reviewing the allowance for loan and lease losses policy; implementing a comprehensive profit plan and budget; implementing a plan to manage concentrations of credit; and revising the bank's policies governing interest rate risk.

The Consent Order also prohibits Talmer West Bank, without prior regulatory approval, from paying dividends, retaining new directors or senior executive officers, or entering into any material transaction.

On July 13, 2011, First Place Bank consented to a Cease and Desist Order which replaced the separate supervisory agreement entered into with the Office of Thrift Supervision on March 1, 2011. The Cease and Desist Order represents an agreement to take certain actions, including the submission of capital and business plans to, among other things, preserve and enhance the capital of First Place Bank and strengthen and improve its earnings and profitability. On January 28, 2014, the FDIC approved the consolidation of First Place Bank with and into Talmer Bank and Trust. Effective February 10, 2014, First Place Bank was merged with Talmer Bank and Trust and the Cease and Desist Order has no further force or effect.

	Actual					For Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions

(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
December 31, 2014
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)	$	720,552		16.4	%	$	350,645		8.0	%		N/A		N/A
Talmer Bank and Trust		627,851		16.3			308,374		8.0		$	385,468		10.0	%
Talmer West Bank(1)		101,926		19.6			41,628		8.0			N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)		666,035		15.2			175,323		4.0			N/A		N/A
Talmer Bank and Trust		579,604		15.0			154,187		4.0			231,281		6.0
Talmer West Bank(1)		95,656		18.4			20,814		4.0			N/A		N/A
Tier 1 leverage ratio
Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)		666,035		11.6			230,546		4.0			N/A		N/A
Talmer Bank and Trust		579,604		11.6			200,128		4.0			250,160		5.0
Talmer West Bank(1)		95,656		12.4			30,786		4.0			N/A		N/A
December 31, 2013
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)	$	583,370		19.2	%	$	242,885		8.0	%		N/A		N/A
Talmer Bank and Trust		253,044		18.4			110,123		8.0		$	137,654		10.0	%
First Place Bank(2)		263,297		15.9			132,207		8.0			N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)		555,350		18.3			121,443		4.0			N/A		N/A
Talmer Bank and Trust		235,448		17.1			55,062		4.0			82,593		6.0
First Place Bank(2)		252,873		15.3			66,104		4.0			N/A		N/A
Tier 1 leverage ratio
Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (Consolidated)		555,350		12.2			182,221		4.0			N/A		N/A
Talmer Bank and Trust		235,448		10.3			91,363		4.0			114,204		5.0
First Place Bank(2)		252,873		11.7			86,521		4.0			N/A		N/A

The Company's principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from its subsidiary banks. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of regulatory agencies. Talmer Bank and Trust cannot declare or pay a cash dividend or dividend in kind unless Talmer Bank and Trust will have a surplus amounting to not less than 20% of its capital after payment of the dividend. In addition, Talmer Bank and Trust may pay dividends only out of net income then on hand, after deducting its losses and bad debts. Further, Talmer Bank and Trust may not declare or pay a dividend until cumulative dividends on preferred stock, if any, are paid in full. These limitations can affect Talmer Bank and Trust's ability to pay dividends. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, Talmer Bank and Trust paid dividends of $25.0 million and $88.0 million, respectively, to the Company.

Under FDIC regulations, limitations are imposed on all of Talmer West Bank's capital distributions, including cash dividends. As of December 31, 2014, Talmer West Bank was not able to pay any dividends without prior regulatory approval.

On January 29, 2015, a cash dividend on the Company's Class A common stock of $0.01 per share was declared. The dividend will be paid on February 20, 2015, to the Company's Class A common shareholders of record as of February 9, 2015.

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,497	$	98,411
Investment in banking subsidiaries		756,452		562,381
Income tax benefit		7,975		5,404
Other assets		655		1,783

Total assets	$	774,579	$	667,979



Liabilities
Short-term borrowings	$	—	$	35,000
Long-term debt		10,724		10,590
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		2,248		5,374

Total liabilities		12,972		50,964

Shareholders' equity		761,607		617,015

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	774,579	$	667,979

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013			2012
Income
Dividend income from subsidiary	$	25,000	$	88,000		$	—
Bargain purchase gain		41,977		71,702			—
Other noninterest income		11		481			—

Total income		66,988		160,183			—

Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		8,268		19,624			5,191
Bank acquisition and due diligence fees		2,547		8,619			52
Professional services		1,996		1,163			1,096
Insurance expense		718		136			120
Marketing expense		245		1,039			26
Interest on short-term borrowings		151		—			—
Interest on long-term debt		508		551			—
Other		282		265			328

Total expenses		14,715		31,397			6,813

Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in undistributed net earnings of subsidiaries		52,273		128,786			(6,813	)
Income tax benefit		4,945		8,568			2,382
Equity in (over)/under distributed earnings of subsidiaries		33,632		(38,796	)		26,101

Net income	$	90,850	$	98,558		$	21,670



Total comprehensive income, net of tax	$	90,850	$	98,558		$	21,670

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014			2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	90,850		$	98,558		$	21,670
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Equity in (over)/under distributed earnings of subsidiaries		(58,632	)		(49,204	)		(26,101	)
Gain on acquisition		(41,977	)		(71,702	)		—
Stock-based compensation expense		516			8,392			1,615
(Increase) decrease in income tax benefit		(2,571	)		(10,318	)		15,228
(Increase) decrease in other assets, net		1,128			8,777			(2,507	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities, net		(2,992	)		3,018			2,300

Net cash from (used in) operating activities		(13,678	)		(12,479	)		12,205
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash (used in) proceeds from acquisitions		(6,500	)		(45,000	)		—
Capital contributions to subsidiaries		(99,500	)		(179,000	)		—
Dividends received from subsidiaries		25,000			88,000			—

Net cash used in investing activities		(81,000	)		(136,000	)		—
Cash flows from financing activities
Issuance of common stock		42,074			—			173,961
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit		100			41			(27	)
Draw on senior unsecured line of credit		—			35,000			—
Repayment of senior unsecured line of credit		(35,000	)		—			—
Cash dividends paid on common stock(1)		(1,410	)		—			—

Net cash from financing activities		5,764			35,041			173,934

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(88,914	)		(113,438	)		186,139
Beginning cash and cash equivalents		98,411			211,849			25,710

Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	9,497		$	98,411		$	211,849

The two-class method is used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings available to common shareholders for the period are allocated between common shareholders and participating securities according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participating rights in undistributed earnings. Common shares outstanding include common stock and vested restricted stock awards, when applicable. On June 10, 2014 the Company awarded restricted stock to certain employees and directors of the Company which qualify as participating securities. The factors used in the earnings per share computation follow:

	For the years ended December 31,

(In thousands, except per share data)	2014			2013		2012
Net income	$	90,850		$	98,558	$	21,670
Net income allocated to participating securities		279			—		—

Net income allocated to common shareholders(1)	$	90,571		$	98,558	$	21,670



Weighted average common shares—issued		69,817			66,230		46,987
Average unvested restricted share awards		(212	)		—		—

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic		69,605			66,230		46,987
Effect of dilutive securities—Employee and director stock options		4,032			2,485		1,312
Warrants		1,513			949		507

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted		75,150			69,664		48,806



EPS available to common shareholders
Basic	$	1.30		$	1.49	$	0.46



Diluted	$	1.21		$	1.41	$	0.44

For the effect of dilutive securities, the assumed average stock valuation is $13.64 per share, $9.81 per share, and $8.02 per share for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The following average shares related to outstanding options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted net income available to common shareholders because they were antidilutive. There were no outstanding antidilutive warrants during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Changes in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, were as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale, net of tax			Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax			Total unrealized gains (losses), net of tax

Balance at December 31, 2011	$	3,139		$	—		$	3,139
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		4,716			—			4,716
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		(3,937	)(1)		—			(3,937	)

Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)		779			—			779

Balance at December 31, 2012	$	3,918		$	—		$	3,918



Balance at December 31, 2012	$	3,918		$	—		$	3,918
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		(11,659	)		—			(11,659	)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		(255	)(1)		—			(255	)

Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)		(11,914	)		—			(11,914	)

Balance at December 31, 2013	$	(7,996	)	$	—		$	(7,996	)



Balance at December 31, 2013	$	(7,996	)	$	—		$	(7,996	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		10,648			(168	)		10,480
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		1,343	(1)		23	(2)		1,366

Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)		11,991			(145	)		11,846

Balance at December 31, 2014	$	3,995		$	(145	)	$	3,850

The following is a summary of the unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

	2014

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Fourth Quarter			Third Quarter			Second Quarter			First Quarter
Interest income	$	55,002		$	55,616		$	55,213		$	51,192
Interest expense		3,539			3,399			2,835			2,987

Net interest income		51,463			52,217			52,378			48,205
Provision for loan losses (uncovered)		5,655			7,784			3,219			6,424
Benefit for loan losses (covered)		(2,661	)		(6,275	)		(7,321	)		(2,498	)
Bargain purchase gain		—			—			—			41,977
Other noninterest income		15,834			29,974			13,951			15,763
Noninterest expense		48,098			51,263			54,071			65,448

Income before income taxes		16,205			29,419			16,360			36,571
Income tax provision (benefit)		3,703			9,904			(4,246	)		(1,656	)

Net income	$	12,502		$	19,515		$	20,606		$	38,227



Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.18		$	0.28		$	0.29		$	0.56
Diluted		0.16			0.26			0.27			0.52

	2013

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Fourth Quarter			Third Quarter			Second Quarter			First Quarter
Interest income	$	41,932		$	46,869		$	47,076		$	43,845
Interest expense		2,648			2,868			3,021			3,188

Net interest income		39,284			44,001			44,055			40,657
Provision for loan losses (uncovered)		6,569			2,852			4,923			1,176
Provision (benefit) for loan losses (covered)		(3,319	)		(727	)		(7,460	)		1,084
Bargain purchase gain		—			—			—			71,702
Other noninterest income		23,557			17,984			36,006			31,889
Noninterest expense		53,009			53,373			59,849			84,583

Income before income taxes		6,582			6,487			22,749			57,405
Income tax provision (benefit)		(5,971	)		(4,057	)		7,743			(3,050	)

Net income	$	12,553		$	10,544		$	15,006		$	60,455



Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.19		$	0.16		$	0.23		$	0.91
Diluted		0.18			0.15			0.21			0.89

	2012

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	Fourth Quarter		Third Quarter			Second Quarter		First Quarter
Interest income	$	25,896	$	26,362		$	24,086	$	26,220
Interest expense		1,275		1,426			1,470		1,524

Net interest income		24,621		24,936			22,616		24,696
Provision (benefit) for loan losses (uncovered)		1,683		(700	)		1,357		1,274
Provision for loan losses (covered)		2,510		8,603			13,859		7,286
Other noninterest income		18,044		16,713			24,118		15,434
Noninterest expense		27,588		25,001			25,073		25,742

Income before income taxes		10,884		8,745			6,445		5,828
Income tax provision		3,450		2,751			2,096		1,935

Net income	$	7,434	$	5,994		$	4,349	$	3,893



Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.15	$	0.13		$	0.09	$	0.09
Diluted		0.15		0.12			0.09		0.08

In 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company sponsored a defined contribution 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees and allowing employees, at their option, to contribute up to $17,500 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and $17,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 with an additional $5,500 if age 50 or older in each calendar year, subject to certain IRS limitations and Company service requirements. The Company matched the employee's elective contributions equal to 100 percent of base salary deferrals that do not exceed 1 percent of the employee's compensation plus 50 percent of salary deferrals between 1 percent and 6 percent of the employee's compensation. The Company's matching contributions vest 100 percent upon completion of 2 years of service.

Total contributions to the 401(k) plan were $2.2 million, $2.1 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company's deferred compensation plan, which was adopted on June 26, 2014, covers all members of the Board of Directors and a select group of key management. Under the plan, participants may irrevocably elect to defer a percentage of their compensation otherwise payable to them until the date specified under the distribution option elected by the participant in their enrollment agreement over a period not to exceed 15 years. In accordance with the deferred compensation plan, distributions will be made to the participant or their beneficiary. A liability is accrued for the obligation under these plans. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded income of $4 thousand related to the deferred compensation plan, and had $587 thousand of deferred compensation liability as of December 31, 2014.

On February 6, 2015, the Company acquired First of Huron Corp. ("FHC") for aggregate cash consideration of $13.4 million. In connection with the merger, FHC merged with Talmer Bancorp, Inc., with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. as the surviving company in the merger. Immediately following the merger, Signature Bank, a Michigan state-chartered bank and wholly owned subsidiary of FHC, merged with and into Talmer Bank and Trust, with Talmer Bank and Trust as the surviving bank. The Company assumed $3.5 million in subordinated notes issued to FHC and $1.4 million of related interest. The subordinated debt was immediately retired and the interest was paid in full in accordance with the provisions of the purchase agreement. The Company also received FHC's common securities issued by the Trust Preferred Issuers and assumed $876 thousand of outstanding interest. The outstanding interest on the Trust Preferred Securities was immediately paid off in accordance with the provision of the purchase agreement. The Company received certain tax assets and all cash and cash equivalents held by FHC and incurred $444 thousand of acquisition related expenses during the year ended December 31, 2014, related to the acquisition of FHC, included within "Bank acquisition and due diligence fees" in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The assets and liabilities associated with the acquisition were recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at estimated fair value as of the acquisition date. The initial accounting for the acquisition was incomplete at the time these financial statements were issued. The following allocation is preliminary and may change as additional information becomes available and additional analyses are completed.

(Dollars in thousands)	First of Huron Corp.

Consideration paid:
Cash	$	13,395
Fair value of identifiable assets acquired:
Cash and cash equivalents		14,205
Investment securities		34,022
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		874
Loans		162,951
Premises and equipment		2,077
Other real estate owned and repossessed assets		1,260
Core deposit intangible		2,410
Company-owned life insurance		4,719
Other assets		6,067

Total identifiable assets acquired		228,585
Fair value of liabilities assumed:
Deposits		201,453
Long-term debt		12,843
Other liabilities		3,704

Total liabilities assumed		218,000

Fair value of net identifiable assets acquired		10,585

Goodwill recognized in the acquisition	$	2,810

Loans acquired in the First of Huron Corp. acquisition were initially recorded at fair value with no separate allowance for loan losses. The Company reviewed the loans at acquisition to determine which should be considered purchased impaired loans (i.e. loans accounted for under ASC 310-30) defining impaired loans as those that were either not accruing interest or exhibited credit risk factors consistent with nonperforming loans at the acquisition date.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

Based on our management's evaluation (with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer), as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Exchange Act")) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, utilizing the framework established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 is effective.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As an emerging growth company, management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the JOBS Act.

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Given the timing of the event, the following information is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 1.01 of Form 8-K, "Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement" in lieu of filing a Form 8-K.

On March 26, 2015, we further amended our one-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility with U.S. Bank National Association (the "line of credit") pursuant to the terms of a Second Amendment to Loan Agreement (the "Second Amendment"). The material changes to the line of credit resulting from the Second Amendment were to increase the line of credit from a maximum principal amount of $35.0 million to a maximum principal amount of $50.0 million. The interest on the credit facility, which accrues at an annual rate of 3.00% plus the one-month LIBOR rate (reset monthly), did not change as a result of the Second Amendment. The maturity date on the line of credit is December 18, 2015. In addition, the Second Amendment provides that, if no event of default has occurred and is existing, and the outstanding principle amount of the loan exceeds $10 million, the Company may elect by written notice to convert the then outstanding principal amount of the loan (or a portion thereof in an amount not less than $10 million) to a term loan which shall become due and payable two years after the December 18, 2015 maturity date, subject to the approval of U.S. Bank National Association, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. All interest and installment payments of principal on such term loan will be paid quarterly. We have not yet made any additional draws under the line of credit as a result of the Second Amendment.

The foregoing description of the Second Amendment does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Second Amendment, which is filed as Exhibit 10.19 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

Given the timing of the event, the following information is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 5.02 of Form 8-K, "Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensation Arrangements of Certain Officers" in lieu of filing a Form 8-K.

Effective March 25, 2015, Donald C. Coleman resigned from the board of directors of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and Talmer Bank. Mr. Coleman's decision did not involve a disagreement with Talmer Bancorp, Inc. on any matter relating to our operations, policies or practices.

As a result of Mr. Coleman's resignation the board of directors reduced the size of the board from 15 to 14 directors.

Given the timing of the event, the following information is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Item 5.02 of Form 8-K, "Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election

of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensation Arrangements of Certain Officers" in lieu of filing a Form 8-K.

On March 25, 2015, the following restricted stock awards were made to our named executive officers in accordance with the terms of the Talmer Bancorp, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Equity Plan").

The Compensation Committee of our board of directors approved the awards of restricted stock to each of our named executive officers. The awards cliff vest after five years. However, if prior to the vesting of the shares of restricted stock there is a change of control event, all of the shares of restricted stock will become vested upon the earlier of (i) the vesting of the shares of restricted stock under the terms of the agreement, (ii) the one-year anniversary of such change of control event; or (iii) the date the officer's employment is terminated by Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (or its subsidiary, Talmer Bank and Trust (or any of their respective successors)) without cause or by the officer for good reason during the one-year period following such change of control event.

A copy of the Equity Plan is filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on January 10, 2014. The foregoing description of the restricted stock awards does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of Restricted Stock Agreement attached to this report as Exhibit 10.20 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information required by Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Information required by Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

Information required by Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Information required by Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Information required by Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our proxy statement to be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

A list of financial statements filed herewith is contained in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," above of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated by reference herein. The financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not required, not applicable or the information has been included in our consolidated financial statements. The exhibits required by this Item are contained in the Exhibit Index on page 238 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints David T. Provost, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Exhibit Number			Description

	2.1		Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 30, 2010, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of CF Bancorp, Michigan, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and First Michigan Bank (now known as Talmer Bank and Trust) (Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement and Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement included as Exhibits 4.15A and 4.15B thereto, respectively) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)†
	2.2		Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2010, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of First Banking Center, Burlington, Wisconsin, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and First Michigan Bank (now known as Talmer Bank and Trust) (Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement and Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement included as Exhibits 4.15A and 4.15B thereto, respectively) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)†
	2.3		Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of February 11, 2011, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Peoples State Bank, Hamtramck, Michigan, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and First Michigan Bank (now known as Talmer Bank and Trust) (Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement and Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement included as Exhibits 4.15A and 4.15B thereto, respectively) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)†
	2.4		Purchase and Assumption Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2011, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Community Central Bank, Mount Clemens, Michigan, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Talmer Bank and Trust (Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement and Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement included as Exhibits 4.15A and 4.15B thereto, respectively) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)†
	2.5		Amended and Restated Asset Purchase Agreement by and between First Place Financial Corp. and Talmer Bancorp, Inc. dated December 14, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)†
	2.6		Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Capitol Bancorp Ltd. and Financial Commerce Corporation dated as of October 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)†
	3.1		Articles of Incorporation of Talmer Bancorp, Inc., as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
	3.2		Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Talmer Bancorp, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
	4.1		Specimen Class A Common Stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Amendment No. 3 to our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 31, 2014)
	4.2		Registration Rights Agreement entered into by Talmer Bancorp, Inc. for the benefit of WLR Recovery Fund IV, L.P. and WLR IV Parallel ESC, L.P. dated March 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)

		Description

4.3		Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement by and between Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and WLR Recovery Fund IV, L.P. and WLR IV Parallel ESC, L.P. dated February 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
4.4		Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and between Talmer Bancorp, Inc. and the other signatories thereto dated February 21, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.1	*	Employment Agreement between David T. Provost, First Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (now known as Talmer Bancorp, Inc.) and First Michigan Bank (now known as Talmer Bank and Trust) dated April 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.2	*	Employment Agreement between Gary Torgow and First Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (now known as Talmer Bancorp, Inc.) dated April 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.3	*	Employment Agreement between Dennis Klaeser and First Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (now known as Talmer Bancorp, Inc.) dated May 4, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.4	*	First Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (now known as Talmer Bancorp, Inc.) Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.5	*	First Amendment to Equity Incentive Plan dated April 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.6	*	Second Amendment to Equity Incentive Plan dated March 15, 2011(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.7	*	Third Amendment to Equity Incentive Plan dated March 26, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2014)
10.8	*	Talmer Bancorp, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (filed as Appendix A and incorporated by reference to Talmer Bancorp, Inc.'s Definitive Proxy Statement filed on Schedule 14A with the SEC on April 28, 2014)
10.9	*	Talmer Bancorp, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 27, 2014)
10.10	*	Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Amendment No. 1 to our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 21, 2014)
10.11	*	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 11, 2014)
10.12		Form of Director Restricted Stock Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2014)
10.13		Form of Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)

		Description

10.14		Form of Stock Subscription Agreement by and between First Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (now known as Talmer Bancorp, Inc.) and WLR IV Parallel ESC, L.P. and WLR Recovery Fund IV, L.P. dated March 29, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.15		Form of Agreement and Amendment to Stock Subscription Agreement by and between First Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (now known as Talmer Bancorp, Inc.) and WLR IV Parallel ESC, L.P. and WLR Recovery Fund IV, L.P. dated April 14, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.16		Warrant to Purchase Class B Common Stock issued to the FDIC dated April 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.17		Loan Agreement between U.S. Bank National Association and Talmer Bancorp, Inc. dated December 20, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
10.18		First Amendment to Loan Agreement between U.S. Bank National Association and Talmer Bancorp, Inc. dated December 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2015)
10.19		Second Amendment to Loan Agreement between U.S. Bank National Association and Talmer Bancorp, Inc. dated March 26, 2015
10.20	*	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
10.21		Consent Order effective April 5, 2010, between the FDIC, Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation (now known as the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services) and Michigan Commerce Bank (now known as Talmer West Bank) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of our registration statement on Form S-1 filed on January 10, 2014)
21.1		Subsidiaries of Talmer Bancorp, Inc.
23.1		Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP
24.1		Power of Attorney (included on signature page)
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
32.1		Section 1350 Certifications
101	**	The following materials from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, (iv) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and (vi) Notes to Consolidate Financial Statements.


Michigan (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		61-1511150 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2301 West Big Beaver Rd, Suite 525 Troy, Michigan (Address of principal executive offices)		48084 (Zip Code)

Title of each class		Name of each exchange on which registered

Class A Common Stock, $1.00 par value per share		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC


Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer ý (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

2014	High		Low		Per Share Cash Dividends

Fourth Quarter	$	14.80	$	13.47	$	0.01
Third Quarter	$	14.99	$	13.00	$	0.01
Second Quarter	$	15.42	$	13.05		—
First Quarter	$	14.15	$	13.20		—

	Cumulative Total Returns Period Ending

Index	2/12/2014		3/31/2014		6/30/2014		9/30/2014		12/31/2014
Talmer Bancorp, Inc.	$	100.00	$	106.09	$	99.93	$	100.29	$	101.89
SNL U.S. Bank NASDAQ Index		100.00		107.47		104.65		100.24		107.98
SNL U.S. Bank and Thrift Index		100.00		105.31		104.44		106.30		112.48



CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		1
Part 1
Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	35
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	63
Item 2.	Properties	63
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	63
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	63
Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	64
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	66
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	68
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	122
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	125
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	231
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	231
Item 9B.	Other Information	232
Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	234
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	234
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	234
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	234
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	234
Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	235


December 31, 2011
Balance at end of period applicable to:
Residential real estate	$	7,125	4.01	%	19.1	%
Commercial real estate		28,331	5.46		55.8
Commercial and industrial		13,827	8.11		18.3
Real estate construction		5,750	13.19		4.7
Consumer		319	1.62		2.1

Total covered loans	$	55,352	5.95	%	100.0	%


December 31, 2010
Balance at end of period applicable to:
Residential real estate	$	3,456	1.68	%	27.4	%
Commercial real estate		4,198	1.13		49.3
Commercial and industrial		2,356	2.45		12.8
Real estate construction		2,494	4.83		6.9
Consumer		294	1.10		3.6

Total covered loans	$	12,798	1.71	%	100.0	%

	December 31, 2014						December 31, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)	Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total		Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total		December 31, 2012
Commitments to extend credit	$	502,762	$	463,362	$	966,124	$	523,666	$	216,473	$	740,139	$	350,021
Standby letters of credit		69,305		4,197		73,502		68,452		561		69,013		26,365

Total commitments	$	572,067	$	467,559	$	1,039,626	$	592,118	$	217,034	$	809,152	$	376,386

(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Less than 1 year		1 to 3 years		3 to 5 years		More than 5 years

Future minimum lease payments(1)	$	35,181	$	6,937	$	10,914	$	8,381	$	8,949
FHLB borrowings		390,110		300,560		67,700		11,350		10,500
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase		75,743		25,743		40,000		—		10,000
Subordinated notes related to trust preferred securities		15,000		—		—		—		15,000

Total	$	516,034	$	333,240	$	118,614	$	19,731	$	44,449

	December 31, 2014						December 31, 2013

	Following 12 months			Following 24 months			Following 12 months			Following 24 months
+400 basis points		1.6	%		3.2	%		4.7	%		24.4	%
+300 basis points		1.0			2.3			3.3			18.3
+200 basis points		0.6			1.7			2.1			12.3
+100 basis points		0.3			0.9			0.8			6.2
–100 basis points		(4.2	)		(5.2	)		(3.3	)		(5.5	)
–200 basis points		(9.0	)		(11.2	)		(7.2	)		(10.5	)
–300 basis points		(11.3	)		(13.6	)		(8.6	)		(12.2	)
–400 basis points		(11.8	)		(14.2	)		(9.2	)		(12.8	)



+400 basis points	(22.2	)%	(33.8	)%
+300 basis points	(15.8	)	(24.2	)
+200 basis points	(8.9	)	(14.7	)
+100 basis points	(3.9	)	(6.4	)
–100 basis points	—		2.6
–200 basis points	(0.2	)	7.1
–300 basis points	0.4		9.3
–400 basis points	0.8		9.4


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		126
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013		127
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		128
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.		129
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		130
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012		131
Notes to Financial Statements		133

(Dollars in thousands)

Accounted for under ASC 310-30:
Contractual cash flows	$	331,523
Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference)		86,410

Expected cash flows		245,113
Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable yield)		32,764

Fair value at acquisition	$	212,349
Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting:
Unpaid principal balance	$	362,782
Fair value discount		(3,465	)

Fair value at acquisition		359,317

Total fair value at acquisition	$	571,666

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014(1)		2013
Net Interest and other income	$	321,762	$	393,483
Net Income		90,850		107,289
Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	1.30	$	1.62
Diluted		1.21		1.54

	December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013		2012
Maturing in
3 months or less	$	180,288	$	103,297	$	72,594
3 months to 6 months		157,599		88,492		33,918
6 months to 1 year		201,234		82,517		35,581
1 year or greater		154,046		115,508		51,504

Total	$	693,167	$	389,814	$	193,597

(Dollars in thousands)

Accounted for under ASC 310-30:
Contractual cash flows	$	738,639
Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (nonaccretable difference)		150,008

Expected cash flows		588,631
Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable yield)		158,221

Fair value at acquisition	$	430,410
Excluded from ASC 310-30 accounting:
Unpaid principal balance	$	1,094,223
Fair value premium		5,743

Fair value at acquisition		1,099,966

Total fair value at acquisition	$	1,530,376

	For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	2013(1)		2012
Net Interest and other income	$	349,352	$	416,319
Net Income		98,558		45,279
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	1.49	$	0.68
Diluted		1.41		0.67

(Dollars in thousands)	2014		2013

Land and land improvements	$	8,299	$	9,067
Buildings		29,203		36,905
Furniture and equipment		22,738		16,383
Data processing software		4,701		3,454
Leasehold improvements		3,446		2,514
Automobiles		316		312

Total		68,703		68,635
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		21,798		17,634

Premises and equipment, net	$	46,905	$	51,001

(Dollars in thousands)	Future Minimum Lease Payments(1)

Years ending December 31,
2015	$	6,937
2016		5,896
2017		5,018
2018		4,419
2019		3,962
Thereafter		8,949

Total	$	35,181

(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural			Mortgage			Total

For the year ended December 31, 2012
Carrying value, beginning of period	$	643		$	1,683		$	1,477		$	3,803
Addition of servicing assets		—			222			3,385			3,607
Net (impairment) recovery		26			(126	)		(498	)		(598	)
Amortization and other		(151	)		(351	)		(684	)		(1,186	)

Carrying value, end of period	$	518		$	1,428		$	3,680		$	5,626

Fair value, end of period	$	518		$	1,456		$	3,683		$	5,657



Principal balance of loans serviced	$	351,121		$	66,867		$	485,213		$	903,201

(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate			Agricultural			Mortgage			Total

For the year ended December 31, 2012
Balance, beginning of period	$	(124	)	$	(10	)	$	(500	)	$	(634	)
Impairment charges		(98	)		(215	)		(1,672	)		(1,985	)
Impairment recoveries		124			89			1,174			1,387

Balance, end of period	$	(98	)	$	(136	)	$	(998	)	$	(1,232	)

		For the years ended December 31,

(Dollars in thousands)	Location of Gain (Loss)	2014			2013			2012
Forward contracts related to mortgage loans to be delivered for sale	Net gain on sale of loans	$	13,862		$	23,798		$	(229	)
Interest rate lock commitments	Net gain on sale of loans		(344	)		(6,934	)		1,140
Customer-inititated derivatives	Other noninterest income		103			—			—

Total gain recognized in income		$	13,621		$	16,864		$	911

	For the year ended December 31, 2014

(Dollars in thousands)	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (Effective portion)			Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from other comprehensive income to interest income or expense (Effective portion)		Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other non interest income (Ineffective portion)
Interest rate swaps	$	(259	)	$	37	$	—

							Gross amounts not offset in the statement of financial position

			Gross amounts offset in the statement of financial condition		Net amounts presented in the statement of financial position
(Dollars in thousands)	Gross amounts recognized						Financial instruments			Collateral (received)/posted		Net Amount
December 31, 2014
Offsetting derivative assets
Derivative assets	$	1,588		—		1,588		(1,588	)		1,689	$	1,689
Offsetting derivative liabilities
Derivative liabilities	$	1,699		—		1,699		(1,588	)		111	$	—

	December 31, 2014						December 31, 2013

(Dollars in thousands)	Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total		Fixed Rate		Variable Rate		Total		December 31, 2012
Commitments to extend credit	$	502,762	$	463,362	$	966,124	$	523,666	$	216,473	$	740,139	$	350,021
Standby letters of credit		69,305		4,197		73,502		68,452		561		69,013		26,365

Total commitments	$	572,067	$	467,559	$	1,039,626	$	592,118	$	217,034	$	809,152	$	376,386

(Dollars in thousands)

2015	$	837,236
2016		283,569
2017		64,472
2018		23,576
2019		33,156
Thereafter		18,455

Total	$	1,260,464

(Dollars in thousands)

Years Ending December 31,
2015	$	195,114
2016		101,137
2017		13,337
2018		11,109
2019		512
Thereafter		32,764

Total	$	353,972

	For the years ended December 31,

	2014			2013
Fair value of options granted	$	4.77		$	2.13
Expected dividend yield		0.00	%		0.00	%
Expected volatility		30.02	%		24.37	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.98	%		0.97	%
Expected life (in years)		6.00			6.00

				Weighted Average

	Number of Shares (in thousands)			Exercise Price per Share		Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2014		8,441		$	6.88
Granted		35			14.44
Exercised(1)		(516	)		6.09
Forfeited or expired		(2	)		7.25

Outstanding at December 31, 2014		7,958			6.96		6.71		56,343
Options fully vested		7,958			6.96		6.71		56,343
Exercisable at December 31, 2014		7,958			6.96		6.71		56,343

Nonvested Shares		Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2014	348	$	2.24
Granted	35
Vested	381
Forfeited	2

Nonvested at December 31, 2014	—

	For the years ended December 31,

(Shares in thousands)	2014		2013		2012
Average outstanding options		20		40		218
Outstanding exercise prices:
Low end	$	14.44	$	10.00	$	7.00
High end	$	14.44	$	10.00	$	7.00
Average outstanding warrants		—		39		39
Outstanding exercise prices:
Low end			$	10.00	$	10.00
High end			$	10.00	$	10.00


	TALMER BANCORP, INC.
March 26, 2015	By:	/s/ DAVID T. PROVOST David T. Provost Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Name	Title	Date


/s/ DAVID PROVOST David Provost	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)	March 26, 2015
/s/ DENNIS KLAESER Dennis Klaeser	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)	March 26, 2015
/s/ MAX BERLIN Max Berlin	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ GARY COLLINS Gary Collins	Vice Chairman, Director	March 26, 2015

Name	Title	Date


/s/ JENNIFER GRANHOLM Jennifer Granholm	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ PAUL HODGES, III Paul Hodges, III	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ DENNY KIM Denny Kim	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ RONALD KLEIN Ronald Klein	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ DAVID LEITCH David Leitch	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ BARBARA MAHONE Barbara Mahone	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ ROBERT NAFTALY Robert Naftaly	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ ALBERT PAPA Albert Papa	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ THOMAS SCHELLENBERG Thomas Schellenberg	Director	March 26, 2015
/s/ GARY TORGOW Gary Torgow	Chairman of the Company and the Board	March 26, 2015
/s/ ARTHUR WEISS Arthur Weiss	Director	March 26, 2015