XML 58 R32.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 29, 2018
Text Block [Abstract]  
Consolidation
Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, certain financial statement disclosures at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may vary from these estimates.
Foreign Currency Translation
Foreign Currency Translation
Foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates existing at the respective balance sheet dates. Translation adjustments resulting from fluctuations in exchange rates are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCI”) within stockholders’ equity. The Company translates the results of operations of its foreign operations at the average exchange rates during the respective periods. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in both the “Cost of sales” and “Selling, general and administrative expenses” lines of the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Sales Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue when obligations under the terms of a contract with a customer are satisfied, which occurs at a point in time, upon either shipment or delivery to the customer. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring goods, which includes estimates for variable consideration. The Company records a sales reduction for returns and allowances based upon historical return experience. The Company earns royalty revenues through license agreements with manufacturers of other consumer products that incorporate certain of the Company’s brands. The Company accrues revenue earned under these contracts based upon reported sales from the licensee.
Sales Incentives
The Company offers a variety of sales incentives to resellers and consumers of its products, and the policies regarding the recognition and display of these incentives within the Consolidated Statements of Income are as follows:
Discounts, Coupons, and Rebates
The Company provides customers with discounts and rebates that are explicitly stated in the Company’s contracts and are
recorded as a reduction of revenue in the period the product revenue is recognized. The cost of these incentives is estimated
using a number of factors, including historical utilization and redemption rates. The Company includes incentives offered in the
form of free products in the determination of cost of sales.
For all variable consideration, where appropriate, the Company estimates the amount using the expected value, which
takes into consideration historical experience, current contractual requirements, specific known market events and forecasted
customer buying and payment patterns. Overall, these reserves reflect the Company’s best estimates of the amount of
consideration to which the customer is entitled based on the terms of the contracts.
Volume-Based Incentives
Volume-based incentives involve rebates or refunds of cash that are redeemable only if the customer completes a specified
number of sales transactions. Under these incentive programs, the Company estimates the anticipated rebate to be paid and
allocates a portion of the estimated cost of the rebate to each underlying sales transaction with the customer. The Company records volume-based incentives as a reduction of revenue.
Cooperative Advertising
Under cooperative advertising arrangements, the Company agrees to reimburse the retailer for a portion of the costs
incurred by the retailer to advertise and promote certain of the Company’s products. The Company recognizes the cost of
cooperative advertising programs in the period in which the advertising and promotional activity takes place as a reduction of revenue.
Fixtures and Racks
Store fixtures and racks are periodically used by resellers to display Company products. The Company expenses the cost of these fixtures and racks in the period in which they are delivered to the resellers. The Company includes the costs of fixtures and racks incurred by resellers and charged back to the Company in the determination of net sales. Fixtures and racks purchased by the Company and provided to resellers are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
Sales Returns
Product Returns
The Company generally offers customers a limited right of return for a purchased product. The Company estimates the
amount of its product sales that may be returned by its customers and records this as a reduction of revenue in the period the
related product revenue is recognized.
Advertising Expense
Advertising Expense
Advertising costs represent one of several brand building methods used by the Company. Advertising costs, which include the development and production of advertising materials and the communication of these materials through various forms of media, are expensed in the period the advertising first takes place. The Company recognized advertising expense in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” caption in the Consolidated Statements of Income of $152,670, $154,969 and $154,416 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs
Shipping and Handling Costs
Revenue received for shipping and handling costs is included in net sales and was $19,315, $19,738 and $19,446 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Shipping costs, which comprise payments to third party shippers, and handling costs, which consist of warehousing costs in the Company’s various distribution facilities, were $409,098, $376,449 and $324,845 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognizes shipping, handling and distribution costs in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line of the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Research and Development
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are included in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line of the Consolidated Statements of Income. Research and development includes expenditures for new product, technological improvements for existing products and process innovation, which primarily consist of salaries, consulting and supplies attributable to time spent on research and development activities. Additional costs include depreciation and maintenance for research and development equipment and facilities. Research and development expense was $59,313, $65,457 and $70,096 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Defined Contribution Benefit Plans
Defined Contribution Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors 401(k) plans as well as other defined contribution benefit plans. Expense for these plans was $25,799, $21,251 and $26,434 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash that is subject to legal restrictions or in unavailable for general operating purposes is classified as restricted cash and is included with in “Other current assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 29, 2018, the Company’s restricted cash balance was $22,710, which represents cash paid into the escrow account for the Bras N Things acquisition that closed in the first quarter of 2018.
Accounts Receivable Valuation
Accounts Receivable Valuation
Accounts receivable are stated at their net realizable value. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects the Company’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the accounts receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience, aging of trade receivables, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and other currently available information.
Inventory Valuation
Inventory Valuation
Inventories are stated at the estimated lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out, or “FIFO,” method for inventories. Obsolete, damaged, and excess inventory is carried at the net realizable value, which is determined by assessing historical recovery rates, current market conditions and future marketing and sales plans. Rebates, discounts and other cash consideration received from a vendor related to inventory purchases are reflected as reductions in the cost of the related inventory item, and are therefore reflected in cost of sales when the related inventory item is sold.
Property
Property
Property is stated at historical cost and depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Machinery and equipment is depreciated over periods ranging from three to 15 years and buildings and building improvements over periods of up to 40 years. A change in the depreciable life is treated as a change in accounting estimate and the accelerated depreciation is accounted for in the period of change and future periods. Additions and improvements that substantially extend the useful life of a particular asset and interest costs incurred during the construction period of major properties are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Upon sale or disposition of an asset, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts.
Property is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying value may not be recoverable. Such events include significant adverse changes in the business climate, several periods of operating or cash flow losses, forecasted continuing losses or a current expectation that an asset or an asset group will be disposed of before the end of its useful life. Recoverability of property is evaluated by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. If these comparisons indicate that an asset is not recoverable, the impairment loss recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value. When an impairment loss is recognized for assets to be held and used, the adjusted carrying amount of those assets is depreciated over its remaining useful life. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is not permitted under U.S. GAAP.
Trademarks and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
Trademarks and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
The primary identifiable intangible assets of the Company are trademarks, licensing agreements, customer and distributor relationships and computer software. Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized and those with indefinite lives are not amortized. The estimated useful life of a finite-lived intangible asset is based upon a number of factors, including the effects of demand, competition, expected changes in distribution channels and the level of maintenance expenditures required to obtain future cash flows. Trademarks with finite lives are being amortized over periods ranging from ten to 12 years, license agreements are being amortized over periods ranging from three to 17 years, customer and distributor relationships are being amortized over periods ranging from one to 15 years and computer software and other intangibles are being amortized over periods ranging from one to seven years.
Identifiable intangible assets that are subject to amortization are evaluated for impairment using a process similar to that used in evaluating elements of property. Identifiable intangible assets not subject to amortization are assessed for impairment at least annually, as of the first day of the third fiscal quarter, and as triggering events occur. The impairment test for identifiable intangible assets not subject to amortization consists of comparing the fair value of the intangible asset to its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to such excess. In assessing fair value, management relies on a number of factors to discount anticipated future cash flows including operating results, business plans and present value techniques. Rates used to discount cash flows are dependent upon interest rates and the cost of capital at a point in time. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and management’s judgment in applying them to the analysis of intangible asset impairment.
In connection with the Company’s annual impairment testing performed in the third quarter of 2018, it performed a quantitative assessment for each indefinite-lived asset. The tests indicate that the indefinite-lived intangible assets have fair values that exceeded their carrying amounts and no impairment of trademarks or other identifiable intangible assets was identified as a result of the testing conducted in 2018.
The Company capitalizes internal software development costs incurred during the application development stage, which include the actual costs to purchase software from vendors and generally include personnel and related costs for employees who were directly associated with the enhancement and implementation of purchased computer software. Additions to computer software are included in purchases of property, plant and equipment in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Goodwill
Goodwill
Goodwill is the amount by which the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. When a business combination is completed, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are assigned to the reporting unit or units of the Company given responsibility for managing, controlling and generating returns on these assets and liabilities. In many instances, all of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities are assigned to a single reporting unit and in these cases all of the goodwill is assigned to the same reporting unit. In those situations in which the acquired assets and liabilities are allocated to more than one reporting unit, the goodwill to be assigned to each reporting unit is determined in a manner similar to how the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination is determined.
Goodwill is not amortized; however, it is assessed for impairment at least annually and as triggering events occur. The Company’s annual measurement date is the first day of the third fiscal quarter. In evaluating the recoverability of goodwill, the Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units and compares it to the carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the next step of the process involves comparing the implied fair value to the carrying value of the goodwill of that reporting unit. If the carrying value of the goodwill of a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to such excess. No impairment of goodwill was identified as a result of the testing conducted in 2018. In estimating the fair values of the reporting units, management relies on a number of factors to discount anticipated future cash flows including operating results, business plans and present value techniques. Rates used to discount cash flows are dependent upon interest rates and the cost of capital at a point in time. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and management’s judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment.
Insurance Reserves
Insurance Reserves
The Company is self-insured for property, workers’ compensation, medical and other casualty programs up to certain stop-loss limits. Undiscounted liabilities for self-insured exposures are accrued at the present value of the expected aggregate losses below those limits and are based on a number of assumptions, including historical trends, actuarial assumptions and economic conditions.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company established the Hanesbrands Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated), (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”) to award stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, performance shares and cash to its employees, non-employee directors and employees of its subsidiaries to promote the interests of the Company, incent performance and retention of employees. Stock-based compensation is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. The Company estimates forfeitures for stock-based awards granted that are not expected to vest.
Income Taxes
Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are recognized for the future tax effects of temporary differences between financial and income tax reporting using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Given continuing losses in certain jurisdictions in which the Company operates on a separate return basis, a valuation allowance has been established for the deferred tax assets in these specific locations. The Company periodically estimates the probable tax obligations using historical experience in tax jurisdictions and informed judgment. There are inherent uncertainties related to the interpretation of tax regulations in the jurisdictions in which the Company transacts business. The judgments and estimates made at a point in time may change based on the outcome of tax audits, as well as changes to, or further interpretations of, regulations. Income tax expense is adjusted in the period in which these events occur, and these adjustments are included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. If such changes take place, there is a risk that the Company’s effective tax rate may increase or decrease in any period. A company must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.
The recently enacted Tax Act significantly revised U.S. corporate income tax law by, among other things, reducing the corporate income tax rate to 21% and implementing a modified territorial tax system that included a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriated earnings foreign subsidiaries. The Company has completed the accounting for the enactment of the Tax Act based upon its current interpretation of the Tax Act in accordance with available notices and regulations issued and proposed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service.
In addition, the Tax Act implemented a new minimum tax on GILTI. A company can elect an accounting policy to account for GILTI in either of the following ways:
As a period charge in the future period the tax arises; or
As part of deferred taxes related to the investment or subsidiary.
The Company has elected to account for GILTI as a period cost.
Financial Instruments
Financial Instruments
The Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts to manage its exposures to movements in foreign exchange rates. The use of these financial instruments modifies the Company’s exposure to these risks with the goal of reducing the risk or cost to the Company. Depending on the nature of the underlying risk being hedged, these financial instruments are either designated as cash flow hedges or are economic hedges against changes in the value of the hedged item and therefore not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. The Company does not use derivatives for trading purposes and is not a party to leveraged derivative contracts.
On the date the derivative is entered into, the Company determines whether the derivative meets the criteria for cash flow hedge accounting treatment or whether the financial instrument is serving as an economic hedge against changes in the value of the hedged item and therefore is not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes. The accounting for changes in fair value of the derivative instrument depends on whether the derivative has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship.
The Company formally documents its hedge relationships, including identifying the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking the hedge transaction. This process includes linking derivatives that are designated as hedges of specific assets, liabilities, firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company also formally assesses, both at inception and on a monthly basis thereafter, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged item. If it is determined that a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, or if the anticipated transaction is no longer likely to occur, the Company discontinues hedge accounting, and any deferred gains or losses are recorded in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line of the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Derivatives are recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The fair value is based upon either market quotes for actively traded instruments or independent bids for nonexchange traded instruments. Cash flows hedges are classified in the same category as the item being hedged, and cash flows from derivative contracts not designated as hedges are classified as cash flows from operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The Company may be exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by individual counterparties or the entire group of counterparties to the Company’s derivative contracts. Risk of nonperformance by counterparties is mitigated by dealing with highly rated counterparties and by diversifying across counterparties.
Cash Flow Hedges
The effective portion of the change in the fair value of a derivative that is designated as a cash flow hedge is recorded in the “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” line of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. When the hedged item affects the income statement, the gain or loss included in AOCI is reported on the same line in the Consolidated Statements of Income as the hedged item. In addition, both the changes in fair value excluded from the Company’s effectiveness assessments and the ineffective portion of the changes in the fair value of derivatives used as cash flow hedges are also reported in the same line in the Consolidated Statements of Income as the hedged item.
Derivative Contracts Not Designated as Hedges
For derivative contracts not designated as hedges, changes in fair value are reported in the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line of the Consolidated Statements of Income. These contracts are recorded at fair value when the hedged item is recorded as an asset or liability and then are revalued each accounting period.
Assets and Liabilities Acquired in Business Combinations
Assets and Liabilities Acquired in Business Combinations
Business combinations are accounted for using the purchase method, which requires the Company to allocate the cost of an acquired business to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The Company recognizes the excess of an acquired business’ cost over the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities as goodwill. Fair values are determined using the income approach based on market participant assumptions focusing on future cash flow projections and accepted industry standards.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606)”, a new accounting standard on revenue recognition that outlines a single comprehensive model for
entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has subsequently issued updates to
the standard to provide additional clarification on specific topics. The new standard was effective for the Company in the first
quarter of 2018 and applied using a modified retrospective method. The Company has included enhanced disclosures related to
disaggregation of revenue sources and accounting policies. The adoption of the new accounting rules did not have a material
impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but did result in additional disclosures regarding revenue recognition. Refer to Note, “Revenue Recognition.”
Statement of Cash Flows
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. Issues addressed in the new guidance that are relevant to the Company include debt prepayment and extinguishment costs, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination and beneficial interests in securitization transactions. The new standard was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of the new accounting rules did not have a material impact on the Company’s cash flows.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus
of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).” This standard requires that restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents be
included in cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown in the
statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-18 in the first quarter of 2018 using the retrospective transition method. The Company did not have restricted cash in prior periods; therefore, the adoption of the new guidance did not have an impact to previously reported cash flows. The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 29, 2018 includes restricted cash of $22,710.
Retirement Benefits
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost”. The new rules require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. The new standard was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018 and applied with retrospective treatment. Accordingly, the Company reclassified $21,282 and $14,402 from the “Selling, general and administrative expenses” line to the “Other expenses” line within the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The adoption of the new accounting rules did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General
(Subtopic 715-20).” The new rule expands disclosure requirements for employer sponsored defined benefit pension and other
retirement plans. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020. The Company does not expect the
new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, however expanded disclosure will be required.
Income Taxes
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than
Inventory.” The new rules eliminate the exception for an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory, which aligns the
recognition of income tax consequences for such transfers. The new rules require the recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from these transfers when the transfer occurs rather than when it is sold to an external party. The Company adopted this new standard on December 31, 2017, using the modified retrospective method, however there was no net cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to retained earnings as of that date. Upon adoption, the Company recognized additional net deferred tax assets of approximately $34,043; however, a corresponding valuation allowance was recorded against these additional deferred tax assets as these deferred tax assets are not considered to be more likely than not realizable. As a result, the adoption of this new standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, “Income Taxes (Topic 740).” The new rules amended SAB 118 to incorporate the impact of the Tax Act. The new standard was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018 and the impact was reflected in the Company’s tax related disclosures throughout the year. The Company has completed its accounting in the fourth quarter of 2018 in accordance with the rules set forth in SAB 118.
Definition of a Business
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a
Business.” The new rules provide for the application of a screen test to consider whether substantially all the fair value of the
assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If the screen test determines
this to be true, the set is not a business. The new standard was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. The
adoption of the new accounting rules did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows.
Stock Compensation
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”. The new rules provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. Under the new rules, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value, vesting conditions and classification of the modified award are the same as the original award immediately before the original award is modified. The new standard was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of the new accounting rules did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Financial Instruments
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-03, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments -
Overall (Subtopic 825-10).” The new rules clarify previously issued guidance regarding determination of the fair value of
financial instruments. The new standard was effective for the Company in the third quarter of 2018. The adoption of the new
accounting rules did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Lease Accounting
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases,” which will require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset
and a lease liability for all leases that are not short-term in nature. The standard will also result in enhanced quantitative and
qualitative disclosures surrounding leases. The FASB has subsequently issued updates to the standard to provide clarification on
specific topics, including adoption guidance and practical expedients. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the
first quarter of 2019. The Company plans to adopt the new rules utilizing the modified retrospective method and will recognize
any cumulative effect adjustment in retained earnings at the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company has established
a cross-functional implementation team to analyze the impact and implement the new standard. The Company has collected
relevant data in order to evaluate lease arrangements, assess potential embedded leases and evaluate accounting policy elections. The Company is also evaluating its processes and internal controls to identify any changes necessary as a result of the
new rules. The Company has identified a global lease management and accounting software solution, which has been tested and implemented. The Company’s assessment of the quantitative impact is an estimate and subject to change as the Company finalizes implementation of the accounting guidance. The Company expects this adoption to result in material increases in assets between $475,000 and $525,000 and liabilities between $500,000 and $550,000 in its consolidated balance sheet, as well as enhanced disclosure regarding the Company’s lease obligations, but does not expect this adoption to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.
Derivatives and Hedging
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to
Accounting for Hedging Activities.” The new rules expand the hedging strategies that qualify for hedge accounting. The new rules also allow additional time to complete hedge effectiveness testing and allow qualitative assessments subsequent to initial quantitative tests if there is a supportable expectation that the hedge will remain highly effective. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019. The Company expects to adopt the new rules in the first quarter of 2019 and does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Comprehensive Income
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220):
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The new rules allow a
reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the
Tax Act. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019. The Company is in the
process of assessing the impact of the new accounting rules on the Company’s financial condition and does not expect the
adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.

Codification Improvements
In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-09, “Codification Improvements.” The new rules clarify guidance around
several subtopics by adopting enhanced verbiage to the following subtopics: reporting comprehensive income, debt
modifications and extinguishments, distinguishing liabilities from equity, stock compensation, business combinations,
derivatives and hedging, fair value measurement and defined contribution pension plans. Some of the amendments were
effective upon issuance, none of which materially impacted the Company’s results of operations or cash flows. Many of the amendments will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.
Goodwill Impairment
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The new rules simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measures a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Fair Value
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820),” which modifies the disclosure
requirements on fair value measurements. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020. The
Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows, however its disclosures will be impacted.

Internal-Use Software
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic
340-40),” which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a
service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software.
The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of the
new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit
Losses on Financial Instruments”, which require a financial asset measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net
amount expected to be collected. The new rules eliminate the probable initial recognition threshold and, instead, reflect an
entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of
2020. The Company expects the new rules to apply to its trade receivables and standby letters of credit, but does not expect the
adoption of the new accounting rules to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
Reclassifications
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, none of which are material, have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation. These classifications within the statements had no impact on the Company’s results of operations.