NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION
(A) Organization and Basis of Presentation
Max Sound Corporation (f/k/a So Act Network, Inc.) (the "Company") was incorporated in Delaware on December 9, 2005. The Company is currently in the development stage, and on or around February 2011, the Company changed its business operations to focus primarily on developing and launching audio technology software.
Prior to February 2011, the Company's business operations were focused on creating search technologies within an online networking platform.
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in The United States of America and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position and results of operations.
It is management's opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statements presentation. The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year.
Activities during the development stage include developing the online networking platform and raising capital.
Effective March 1, 2011, the Company filed with the State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation changing our name from So Act Network, Inc. to Max Sound Corporation.
(B) Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(C) Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no cash equivalents.
(D) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of three to five years.
(E) Research and Development
The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 350, Intangibles – Goodwill & Other. Costs incurred in the planning stage of a website are expensed as research and development while costs incurred in the development stage are capitalized and amortized over the life of the asset, estimated to be three years. Expenses subsequent to the launch have been expensed as website development expenses.
(F) Revenue Recognition
The Company recognized revenue on arrangements in accordance with FASB Codification Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition” (“ASC Topic 605”). Under ASC Topic 605, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. We had revenue of $0 and $2,358 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
(G) Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and include the costs of public relations activities. These costs are included in consulting and general and administrative expenses and totaled $14,120 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
(H) Identifiable Intangible Assets
As of June 30, 2011 and 2010, $7,800,275 and $7,500,275, respectively of costs related to registering a trademark and acquiring technology rights have been capitalized. It has been determined that the trademark and technology rights have an indefinite useful life and are not subject to amortization. However, the trademark and technology rights will be reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.
(I) Loss Per Share
In accordance with accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding the effects of any potentially dilutive securities. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential of shares of common stock outstanding during the period including stock options or warrants, using the treasury stock method (by using the average stock price for the period to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants), and convertible debt or convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential of shares of common stock if their effect is anti-dilutive. Because of the Company’s net losses, the effects of stock warrants and convertible debt would be anti-dilutive and accordingly, is excluded from the computation of earnings per share. The number of such shares excluded from the computations of diluted loss per share totaled 1,760,000 and 650,000 for stock warrants, 12,000,000 and 0 for stock options, and 282,532 and 0 shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible debt, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
(J) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”) Income Taxes. Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
(K) Business Segments
The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.
(L) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU No. 2011-02; Receivables. In April, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, to provide additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a restructuring of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and are to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired. Early adoption is permitted. The Company intends to adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and does not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on its financial position or results of operation.
ASU No. 2011-03; Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. In April, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03. The amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control the criterion relating to the transferor’s ability to repurchase or redeem financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee. The amendments in this ASU also eliminate the requirement to demonstrate that the transferor possesses adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement financial assets.
The guidance in this ASU is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and does not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
ASU No. 2011-04; Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04. The amendments in this ASU generally represent clarifications of Topic ASC 820, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. This ASU results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this ASU are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted.
The Company will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and does not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
ASU No. 2011-05; Amendments to Topic 220, Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The amendments in this ASU do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.
The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures.
The Company will adopt the methodologies prescribed by this ASU by the date required, and does not anticipate that the ASU will have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
(M) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts on the Company’s financial instruments including accounts payable, accrued expenses, derivative liability, convertible note payable, and loan payable-related party, approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.
(N) Stock-Based Compensation
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Under FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the financial statements over the period during which employees are required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the date of grant at their fair value. Such compensation amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option grant. The Company applies this statement prospectively.
Equity instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 718. FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 505, Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees defines the measurement date and recognition period for such instruments. In general, the measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
(O) Reclassification
Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the Company's net loss or cash flows.
(P) Derivative Financial Instruments
Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.
Once determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
NOTE 2 GOING CONCERN
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company is in the development stage with minimal operations, has an accumulated deficit of $12,361,523 for the period from December 9, 2005 (inception) to June 30, 2011, and has negative cash flow from operations of $864,225 from inception. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 3 NOTE PAYABLE – PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDER
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received $18,803 from the principal stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the loan is bearing an annual interest rate of 3.25% and due on demand. In 2008, the Company repaid $15,000 in principal to the principal stockholder. In 2009, the Company repaid $3,803 in principal to the principal stockholder. As of December 31, 2010, the principal portion of this principal stockholder loan balance has been repaid (See Note 9).
On May 11, 2009, the Company received $9,500 from the principal stockholder. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company repaid $1,500 in principal to the principal stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the loan is bearing an annual interest rate of 3.25% and is due on demand (See Note 9).
On May 22, 2009 the Company received $15,000 from the principal stockholder. In January of 2010, the Company repaid $3,000 in principal to the principal stockholder under the terms of the loan. In June of 2010, the Company repaid $3,000 in principal to the principal stockholder under the terms of the loan. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the loan is bearing an annual interest rate of 3.25% and is due on demand (See Note 9).
On May 26, 2009 the Company received $16,700 from the principal stockholder. In May of 2010, the Company repaid $15,700 in principal to the principal stockholder under the term of this loan. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the loan is bearing an annual interest rate of 3.25% and is due on demand (See Note 9).
As of June 30, 2011, the Company owes $18,000 in principal and $1,925 of accrued interest to the principal stockholder related to these principal stockholder loans (See Note 9).
NOTE 4 LINE OF CREDIT – PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDER
On May 28, 2009, the Company entered into a two year line of credit agreement with the principal stockholder in the amount of $100,000. The line of credit carries an interest rate of 3.25%. As of June 30, 2011, the principal stockholder has advanced the Company $100,000 and was repaid $100,000 under the terms of this line of credit agreement (See Note 9).
On November 10, 2009, the Company entered into a two year line of credit agreement with the principal stockholder in the amount of $100,000. The line of credit carries an interest rate of 3.25%. As of June 30, 2011, the principal stockholder has advanced $100,000 to the Company and was repaid $100,000 under the terms of this line of credit agreement (See Note 9).
On March 25, 2010, the Company entered into a two year line of credit agreement with the principal stockholder in the amount of $500,000. The line of credit carries an interest rate of 3.25%. On February 17, 2011, the principal stockholder converted $100,000 of the line of credit owed into 909,091 shares of common stock at $0.11 per share. As of June 30, 2011, the principal stockholder has advanced $223,680 to the Company and was repaid $6,050 under the terms of this line of credit agreement. (See Note 7(G) and Note 9).
As of June 30, 2011, the Company owes $117,630 in principal and $10,816 of accrued interest to the principal stockholder related to these lines of credit (See Note 9).
NOTE 5 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
At June 30, 2011, respectively, property and equipment is as follows:
| |
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Website Development
|
|
$ |
112,722 |
|
|
$ |
112,722 |
|
|
Software
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
Office Equipment
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
2,185 |
|
| Domain Name |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(70,573 |
) |
|
|
(51,437 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
46,234 |
|
|
$ |
65,370 |
|
Depreciation/amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, was $19,136 and $18,826, respectively.
On July 6, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement whereby the Company will issue up to $50,000 in a convertible note. The note matured on March 30, 2011, and bears an interest rate of 8%. Any unpaid amount as of the maturity date bears an interest rate of 22%. The holder of the note has a right to convert all or any part of the outstanding an unpaid principal amount into shares of common stock. The conversion prices equals the "Variable Conversion Price", which is 59% of the "Market Price", which is the average of the lowest six trading prices for the Common Stock during the ten trading day period prior to the conversion. In July of 2010, the Company received $50,000 proceeds less the $3,000 finder’s fee pursuant to the terms of this convertible note. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the note holder converted $52,003 of the note payable and accrued interest into 1,545,350 shares of the company stock. As of June 30, 2011, the Company owed $772 in accrued interest on this note. (See Note 7 (G)).
The Company computed the fair value of the conversion feature at the commitment date, based on the following management assumptions:
|
Exercise price
Expected dividends
|
$0.1377
0%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
172.27%
|
|
Expected term: conversion feature
|
267 days
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
0.32%
|
The fair value of the embedded conversion option on the commitment date was $15,409. The Company recorded a related debt discount of $15,409, which was amortized over the life of the debt. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company amortized $10,273 of debt discount. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company amortized $5,136 of debt discount.
At June 30, 2011 the Company remeasured the derivative liability and recorded a fair value of $949. As a result of the remeasurement, the Company recorded a change in fair value associated with this derivative liability as a decrease in the expense totaling $20,051 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The following management assumptions were considered:
|
Exercise price
|
$0.0393
|
|
Expected dividends
|
0%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
471.81%
|
|
Risk fee interest rate
|
0.30%
|
|
Expected life of warrant in days
|
0
|
On February 17, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement whereby the Company will issue up to $40,000 in a convertible note. The note matures on November 17, 2011, and bears an interest rate of 8%. The holder of the note has a right to convert all or any part of the outstanding an unpaid principal amount into shares of common stock. The conversion prices equals the "Variable Conversion Price", which is 59% of the "Market Price", which is the average of the lowest six trading prices for the Common Stock during the ten trading day period prior to the conversion. In February of 2011, the Company received $40,000 proceeds less the $2,500 finder’s fee pursuant to the terms of this convertible note. As of June 30, 2011, the Company owed $40,000 in principal and $1,184 in accrued interest on this note.
The Company computed the fair value of the conversion feature at the commitment date, based on the following management assumptions:
|
Exercise price
Expected dividends
|
$0.0738
0%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
456.63%
|
|
Expected term: conversion feature
|
365 days
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
0.27%
|
The fair value of the embedded conversion option on the commitment date was $9,523. The Company recorded a related debt discount of $9,523, which is amortized over the life of the debt. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company amortized $4,235 of debt discount.
At June 30, 2011 the Company remeasured the derivative liability and recorded a fair value of $53,921. As a result of the remeasurement, the Company recorded a change in fair value associated with this derivative liability as an expense totaling $3,011 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The following management assumptions were considered:
|
Exercise price
|
$0.035
|
|
Expected dividends
|
0%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
514.06%
|
|
Risk fee interest rate
|
0.19%
|
|
Expected life of warrant in days
|
140
|
NOTE 7 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(A) Common Stock Issued for Cash
On December 31, 2005, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for cash of $100 in exchange for acceptance of the incorporation expenses for the Company ($0.001/share). As a result of the forward split, the 100,000 shares were increased to 400,000 shares ($0.00025/share) (See Note 7(D)).
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued 473,000 shares of common stock for cash of $118,250 ($0.25/share), of which $67,750 was a subscription receivable. During the month of January 2009, $67,750 of stock subscription receivable was collected. As a result of the forward split, the 473,000 shares were increased to 1,892,000 shares ($0.0625/share). (See Note 7(D)).
On January 2, 2009, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements to issue 20,000 shares of common stock for cash of $5,000 ($0.25/share). As a result of the forward split, the 20,000 shares were increased to 80,000 shares ($0.0625/share) (See Note 7(D)).
On January 3, 2009, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements to issue 2,000 shares of common stock for cash of $500 ($0.25/share). As a result of the forward split, the 2,000 shares were increased to 8,000 shares ($0.0625/share) (See Note 7(D)).
On January 3, 2009, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements to issue 2,000 shares of common stock for cash of $500 ($0.25/share). As a result of the forward split, the 2,000 shares were increased to 8,000 shares ($0.0625/share) (See Note 7(D)).
On January 11, 2009, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements to issue 32,000 shares of common stock for cash of $8,000 ($0.25/share). As a result of the forward split, the 32,000 shares were increased to 128,000 shares ($0.0625/share) (See Note 7(D)).
On January 12, 2009, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements to issue 2,000 shares of common stock for cash of $500 ($0.25/share). As a result of the forward split, the 2,000 shares were increased to 8,000 shares ($0.0625/share) (See Note 7(D)).
On January 15, 2009, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements to issue 4,000 shares of common stock for cash of $1,000 ($0.25/share). As a result of the forward split, the 4,000 shares were increased to 16,000 shares ($0.0625/share) (See Note 7(D)).
In February of 2009, the Company paid direct offering costs of $850 related to the securities sold.
On May 27, 2010 the Company issued one unit; each unit consisted of 100,000 shares of common stock and 100,000 warrants to purchase common stock, for cash of $22,500 net of the $2,500 finder’s fee ($0.25/share). Each warrant is exercisable for a three year period and has an exercise price of $0.50 per share (See Note 7(C)).
On July 23, 2010, the Company issued one unit; each unit consisted of 100,000 share of common stock and 100,000 warrants to purchase common stock, for cash of $25,000 ($0.25/share). Each warrant is exercisable for a three year period and has an exercise price of $0.50 per share (See Note 7(C).
On August 5, 2010, the Company issued 10 units; each unit consisted of 100,000 shares of common stock and 100,000 warrants to purchase common stock, for cash of $250,000 ($0.25/share). Each warrant is exercisable for a three year period and has an exercise price of $0.50 per share (See Note 7(C).
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company paid direct offering costs of $2,900 related to the securities sold.
On January 24, 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock for cash of $1,000 ($0.10/share).
On February 23, 2011, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for cash of $30,000 ($0.10/share).
On March 21, 2011, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000 ($0.10/share).
On May 2, 2011, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for cash of $200,000 ($0.10/share).
During the month of June 2011, the Company issued 5,460,000 shares of common stock for cash of $546,000 ($0.10/share) of which $397,000 was a subscription receivable. The Company accrued $41,000 in finder’s fees and are obligated to issue 465,000 warrants within thirty (30) days of the stock issuance pursuant to the consulting agreements with certain individuals. However, as of June 30, 2011, the Company has not issued any of these warrants (See Note 7(C)).
(B) Stock Issued for Services
On October 14, 2008, the Company issued 44,900,000 shares of common stock to its founder having a fair value of $44,900 ($0.001/share) in exchange for services provided. As a result of the forward split, the 44,900,000 shares were increased to 179,600,000 shares and its purchase price was similarly adjusted to $0.00025((See Note 7(D) and Note 9).
On November 24, 2008, the Company issued 4,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $1,000 ($0.25/share) in exchange for consulting services. As a result of the forward split, the 4,000 shares were increased to 16,000 shares and its purchase price was similarly adjusted to $0.0625/share (See Note 7(D)).
On December 5, 2008, the Company issued 4,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $1,000 ($0.25/share) in exchange for consulting services. As a result of the forward split, the 4,000 shares were increased to 16,000 shares and its purchase price was similarly adjusted to $0.0625/share (See Note 7(D)).
On December 20, 2008, the Company issued 4,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $1,000 ($0.25/share) in exchange for consulting services. As a result of the forward split, the 4,000 shares were increased to 16,000 shares and its purchase price was similarly adjusted to $0.0625/share (See Note 7(D)).
On January 12, 2009, the Company issued 4,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $1,000 ($0.25/share) in exchange for consulting services. As a result of the forward split, the 4,000 shares were increased to 16,000 shares and its purchase price was similarly adjusted to $0.0625/share (See Note 7(D)).
On January 14, 2009, the Company issued 20,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $5,000 ($0.25/share) in exchange for services related to a development services agreement entered on January 19, 2009. As a result of the forward split, the 20,000 shares were increased to 80,000 shares and its purchase price was similarly adjusted to $0.0625/share (See Note 7(D) and Note 8(B)).
On August 25, 2009, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $3,125 ($0.0625/share), based upon the fair value on the date of grant, in exchange for professional services.
On August 31, 2009, the Company issued 885,714 shares of common stock in exchange for services valued at $62,000 related to the development services agreement entered into on January 19, 2009. Based on the most recent fair market value at that time, the shares were valued at $55,357 ($0.0625/share), resulting in the recognition of a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $6,643 (See Note 8(B)).
On September 18, 2009, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of a consulting agreement, having a fair value of $175,000 ($0.35/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. On November 11, 2009, the Company cancelled the agreement and 300,000 shares of common stock were returned to the Company. As of December 31, 2009, $70,000 is recorded as consulting expense and $105,000 of deferred compensation was reclassified to $0 (See Note 8(B)).
On September 18, 2009, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of a consulting agreement, having a fair value of $210,000 ($0.35/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. On November 18, 2009, the Company cancelled the agreement and 400,000 shares of common stock were returned to the Company. As of December 31, 2009, $70,000 is recorded as consulting expense and $140,000 of deferred compensation was reclassified to $0. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the consultant returned an additional 150,000 shares of common stock to the Company (See Note 8(B)).
On September 21, 2009, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of a consulting agreement, having a fair value of $210,000 ($0.35/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. On December 18, 2009, the Company terminated the consulting agreement and 400,000 shares were returned to the Company. As of December 31, 2009, $70,000 is recorded as consulting expense and $140,000 of deferred compensation was reclassified to $0 (See Note 8(B)).
On November 12, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $178,000 ($1.78/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. During 2009 and 2010, $11,948 and $89,000 was recorded as consulting expense, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $44,134 is recorded as consulting expense and $32,918 is recorded as deferred compensation (See Note 8(B)).
On November 12, 2009, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $400,000 ($2.00/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. During 2009 and 2010, $22,466 and $200,000 was recorded as consulting expense, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $99,178 is recorded as consulting expense and $78,356 is recorded as deferred compensation (See Note 8(B)).
On November 16, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreements, having a fair value of $180,000 ($1.80/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. During 2009 and 2010, $11,096 and $90,000 was recorded as consulting expense, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $44,631 is recorded as consulting expense and $34,273 is recorded as deferred compensation (See Note 8(B)).
On November 18, 2009, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $45,000 ($1.50/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. During 2009, $5,301 was recorded as consulting expense. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $39,699 was recorded as consulting expense. (See Note 8(B)).
On November 21, 2009, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the marketing agreement, having a fair value of $53,100 ($1.77/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $53,100 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 3, 2009, the Company issued 240,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $468,000 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2009, $468,000 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 3, 2009, the Company issued 35,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the commission agreement, having a fair value of $68,250 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2009, $68,250 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 3, 2009, the Company issued 35,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $68,250 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2009, $68,250 was recorded as consulting expense (Note 8(B)).
On December 3, 2009, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the commission agreement, having a fair value of $19,500 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2009, $19,500 is recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 15, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $200,000 ($2.00/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. During 2009, $71,111 was recorded as consulting expense. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $128,889 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 27, 2009, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $19,400 ($1.94/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $19,400 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 27, 2009, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $19,400 ($1.94/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $19,400 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 27, 2009, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $19,400 ($1.94/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $19,400 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 30, 2009, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the advertising agreement, having a fair value of $2,895,000 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. In 2010, the Company cancelled a portion of the agreement and as a result, 1,000,000 shares of common stock were returned to the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $965,000 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 31, 2009, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $144,750 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $116,374 was recorded as consulting expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $28,376 is recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 31, 2009, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $144,750 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $116,374 was recorded as consulting expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $28,376 is recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On December 31, 2009, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $965,000 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $965,000 was recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
During December of 2009, the Company issued 680,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreements, having a fair value of $1,312,400 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. During 2009 and 2010, $2,802 and $709,116 was recorded as consulting expense, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $299,084 is recorded as consulting expense and $301,398 is recorded as deferred compensation (See Note 8(B)).
During December of 2009, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreements, having a fair value of $1,170,000 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. During 2009 and 2010, $34,192 and $585,000 was recorded as consulting expense, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $290,095 is recorded as consulting expense and $260,713 is recorded as deferred compensation (See Note 8(B)).
On January 15, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock as compensation pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, having a fair value of $170,000 ($1.70/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $81,507 was recorded as consulting expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $42,151 is recorded as consulting expense and $46,342 is recorded as deferred compensation (See Note 8(B)).
On February 17, 2010, the Company entered into a twelve month consulting agreement with an unrelated third party effective February 17, 2010. In exchange for the services provided, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $1,240,000 ($1.24/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. For the year ended December 31, 2010, $1,066,740 was recorded as consulting expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $173,260 is recorded as consulting expense (See Note 8(B)).
On June 1, 2010, the Company entered into a twelve month consulting agreement for consulting and business services. As part of the agreement, the Company issued 40,000 shares as a nonrefundable retainer fee having a value of $10,000 ($0.25/share) based upon fair value on the date of the agreement. (See Note 8(B)).
On July 23, 2010, the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $2,000 ($0.20/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On August 1, 2010, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $40,000 ($0.20/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On September 1, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $19,000 ($0.19/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On October 1, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $18,000 ($0.18/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On November 1, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $25,000 ($0.25/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On December 14, 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $37,500 ($0.15/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On January 17, 2011, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock to its' new CEO pursuant to an employment agreement having a fair value of $300,000 ($0.10/share) based upon fair value on the grant date. (See Note 8(A)).
On February 17, 2011, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $55,000 ($0.11/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On March 3, 2011, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $80,000 ($0.08/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On May 17, 2011, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to an employment agreement having a fair value of $140,000 ($0.07/share) based upon fair value on the grant date. (See Note 8(A)).
During June 2011, the Company issued 300,000 shares of common stock pursuant to consulting agreements for consulting services having a fair value of $75,000 ($0.25/share) based upon fair value on the grant date (See Note 8(B)).
On June 15, 2011, the Company issued 15,980 shares of common stock pursuant to a consulting agreement for consulting services having a fair value of $1,598 ($0.10/share) based upon the terms of the consulting agreement (See Note 8(B)).
(C) Common Stock Warrants
On December 30, 2009, the Company issued 500,000 warrants under a consulting agreement. The Company recognized an expense of $823,077 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The Company recorded the fair value of the warrants based on the fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2009, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 112.80%; risk-free interest rates of 1.65%, expected life of three years. The warrants vested immediately. The warrants expire in three years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $0.52 per share.
On May 27, 2010, the Company issued 10,000 warrants under a consulting agreement. The Company recognized an expense of $1,782 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company recorded the fair value of the warrants based on the fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2010, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 152.80%; risk-free interest rates of 1.35%, expected life of three years. The warrants vested immediately. The warrants expire in three years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $0.50 per share (See Note 8(B)).
On June 1, 2010, the Company issued 40,000 warrants under a consulting agreement. The Company recognized an expense of $7,184 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company recorded the fair value of the warrants based on the fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2010, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 145.70%; risk-free interest rates of 1.26%, expected life of three years. The warrants vested immediately. The warrants expire in three years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $0.50 per share (See Note 8(B)).
On July 23, 2010, the Company issued 10,000 warrants under a consulting agreement. The Company recognized an expense of $1,593 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The Company recorded the fair value of the warrants based on the fair value of each warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2010, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 172.90%; risk-free interest rates of 0.94%, expected life of three years. The warrants vested immediately. The warrants expire in three years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $0.50 per share (See Note 8(B)).
The following tables summarize all warrant grants as of June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related changes during these periods are presented below:
| |
|
Number of Options
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Stock Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,760,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,760,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
Options Exercisable at June 30, 2011
|
|
|
1,760,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
Weighted Average Fair Value of Options Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
|
|
Warrants Exercisable
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number
Outstanding at
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number
Exercisable at
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the warrants issued for cash and services, the Company has an aggregate of 1,760,000 and 650,000 warrants outstanding as June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has reserved 1,760,000 shares of common stock for the future exercise of the warrants.
The Company has recorded a warrant liability of $162,746 related to the 465,000 warrants the Company is obligated to issue in connection with the share issued during the month of June 2011, however the warrants have not been granted as of June 30, 2011 (See Note 7(A)).
(D) Stock Split Effected in the Form of a Stock Dividend
On January 16, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a four-for-one stock split to be effected in the form of a stock dividend. The stock split was distributed on January 16, 2009 to shareholders of record. A total of 136,713,000 shares of common stock were issued. All basic and diluted loss per share and average shares outstanding information has been adjusted to reflect the aforementioned stock dividend.
(E) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
On January 27, 2009, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for an increase in its authorized share capital. The authorized capital stock increased to 250,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 preferred shares at a par value of $0.001 with class and series designations, voting rights, and relative rights and preferences to be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company from time to time.
On June 2, 2010, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for an increase in its authorized share capital. The authorized capital stock increased to 295,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.001 per share.
On September 20, 2010, the Company amended its Articles of Incorporation to provide for an increase in its authorized share capital and a change in the par value per share. The authorized capital stock increased to 400,000,000 common shares at a par value of $0.0001 per share.
Effective March 1, 2011, the Company filed with the State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation changing our name from So Act Network, Inc. to Max Sound Corporation.
(F) In Kind Contribution
During the fourth quarter of 2008, a former stockholder of the Company paid $4,400 of operating expenses on behalf of the Company.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the principal stockholder contributed office space with a fair market value of $2,913 (See Note 9).
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the principal stockholder contributed office space with a fair market value of $12,600 (See Note 9).
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the principal stockholder contributed office space with a fair value of $9,450 (See Note 9).
(G) Share Conversion
On June 2, 2010, a principal stockholder converted $283,652 of accrued compensation into 945,507 shares of common stock at $0.30 per share (See Note 9).
On February 17, 2011, a principal stockholder converted $144,000 of accrued compensation into 1,309,091 shares of common stock at $0.11 per share (See Note 9).
On February 17, 2011, a principal stockholder converted $100,000 of a line of credit owed into 909,091 shares of common stock at $.011 per share (See Note 4 and Note 9).
On January 18, 2011, the Company entered into a conversion agreement executed by a note holder for 109,375 shares based on a conversion price of $0.032 per share (See Note 6).
On February 9, 2011, the Company entered into a conversion agreement executed by a note holder for 271,186 shares based on a conversion price of $0.0295 per share (See Note 6).
On February 15, 2011, the Company entered into a conversion agreement executed by a note holder for 357,143 shares based on a conversion price of $0.0336 per share (See Note 6).
On February 23, 2011, the Company entered into a conversion agreement executed by a note holder for 220,264 shares based on a conversion price of $0.0454 per share (See Note 6).
On April 11, 2011, the Company entered into a conversion agreement executed by a note holder for 587,382 shares based on a conversion price of $0.0315 per share (See Note 6).
(H) Share Exchange
On May 11, 2010, the Company acquired the rights to an audio technology known as Max Audio Technology (Max) through a share exchange, whereby the Company issued 30,000,000 shares of common stock to two individuals in exchange for their rights in Max having a value of $7,500,000 based upon recent market value ($0.25/share) (See Note 8(B)).
On January 17, 2011, the Company acquired the rights to software technology known as Blog Software, Social Media Vault, Social Media Bar and Trending Topix (BSST) through a share exchange, whereby the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock to two individuals in exchange for their rights to BSST having a value of $300,000 based upon recent market value ($0.10/share).
(I) Stock Options
On January 17, 2011, the Company issued 12,000,000 options to buy common shares of the Company's stock at $0.12 per share, good for three years, to its' new CEO pursuant to an employment agreement. The Company recognized an expense of $1,199,794 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The Company recorded the fair value of the options based on the fair value of each option grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2010; dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 436.04%, risk-free interest rates of 1.00%, expected life of three years. The options vest immediately (See Note 8 (A)).
NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS
(A) Employment Agreement
On October 13, 2008, the Company executed an employment agreement with its President and CEO. The term of the agreement is for ten years. As compensation for services, the President will receive a monthly compensation of $18,000 beginning October 13, 2008. In addition, to the base salary, the employee is entitled to receive a 10% commission of all sales of the Corporation. The agreement also calls for the employee to receive health benefits. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company has recorded $108,000 in compensation expense (See Note 9).
On January 17, 2011, the Company executed an employment agreement with an executive to be CEO for five years. As compensation for services, the executive will receive a monthly compensation of $8,000 beginning after the completion of at least one million dollars of new funding to the Corporation or can be paid as commissions from sales brought to the Company, whichever comes first. In addition to the base salary, the employee is entitled to receive a 20% commission of all sales the executive is directly responsible for bringing to the Company. The agreement also calls for the executive to receive, upon execution of the agreement, three million shares of Rule 144 common stock and twelve million options, which are good for three years, to buy shares of Rule 144 common stock at $0.12/share. As a supplement to the agreement, on February 4, 2011, the executive shall receive an additional twenty million common shares directly from the President of the Company. The agreement also calls for the employee to receive health benefits (See Note 7(B) and 7(I)).
On May 17, 2011, the Company executed an employment agreement with its Chief Internet Officer (“CIO”). The term of the agreement is for five years. As compensation for services, the CIO will receive a monthly compensation of $9,000 beginning at the completion of at least one million dollars of new funding. In addition to the base salary, the employee is entitled to receive health benefits. The agreement also calls for the CIO to receive two million shares of Rule 144 common stock upon the execution of the agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company has recorded $149,000 in compensation expense. (See Note 7(B)).
On January 19, 2009, the Company entered into a development services agreement to construct social network software for a fee of $150 and $375 an hour. The contract will remain in place until either party desires to cancel. A retainer fee of $20,000 has been paid upon the execution of the agreement and will be used towards the services provided. In addition, on January 14, 2009 the Company issued 20,000 shares in exchange for services valued at $5,000 ($0.25/share). As a result of the forward split, the 20,000 shares were increased to 80,000 shares and its purchase price was similarly adjusted to $0.0625 (See Note 7(B) and Note 7(D)). On May 29, 2009 the Company amended the consulting agreement by reducing the hourly rate to $75 an hour and reducing the outstanding balance due by $17,163. On August 31, 2009, the Company issued 885,714 shares of common stock in exchange for services valued at $62,000 related to the development services agreement entered into on January 19, 2009. Based on the most recent fair market value at that time, the shares were valued at $55,357 ($0.0625/share), resulting in the recognition of a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $6,643 (See Note 7(B)).
On January 20, 2009, the Company entered into a service agreement with a transfer agent to become the Company's transfer agent for the purpose of maintaining stock ownership and transfer records for the Company.
On September 17, 2009, the Company entered into a six month consulting agreement with an unrelated third party to provide public relations services. In exchange for the services provided, on September 18, 2009 the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $175,000 ($0.35/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. The Company has an option to cancel the contract during the first ninety days of the agreement and 200,000 shares will be returned back to the Company. On November 11, 2009, the Company cancelled the agreement and 300,000 shares of common stock were returned to the Company. As of December 31, 2009, $70,000 is recorded as consulting expense and $105,000 of deferred compensation was reclassified to $0 (See Note 7(B)).
On September 18, 2009, the Company entered into a six month consulting agreement with an unrelated third party to provide public relations services. In exchange for the services provided the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $210,000 ($0.35/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. Shares will be issued on or before December 18, 2009 in six 100,000 increments. The Company has an option to cancel the contract at any time, in such event; the consultant will return a prorated amount of shares based on the months remaining in the consulting agreement. On November 18, 2009, the Company cancelled the agreement and 400,000 shares of common stock were returned to the Company. As of December 31, 2009 $70,000 is recorded as consulting expense and $140,000 of deferred compensation was reclassified to $0. During the year ended December 31, 2010, the consultant returned an additional 150,000 shares of common stock to the Company (See Note 7(B)).
On September 21, 2009, the Company entered into an eight month consulting agreement with an unrelated third party to provide public relations services. In exchange for the services provided, the Company issued 600,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $210,000 ($0.35/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. Shares will be issued on or before September 18, 2009, December 18, 2009, and March 18, 2010, in 200,000 increments. The Company has an option to cancel the contract at any time and no additional stock issuances will be due. On December 18, 2009, the Company cancelled the agreement and 400,000 shares of common stock were returned to the Company. As of December 31, 2009, $70,000 is recorded as consulting expense and $140,000 of deferred compensation was reclassified to $0 (See Note 7(B)).
On October 20, 2009, the Company entered into a marketing agreement with an unrelated third party. In exchange for the services provided, on November 21, 2009, the Company issued 30,000 shares of common stock having a fair value $53,100 ($1.77/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant, and compensation of $5,000, of which $2,500 was paid in 2009 upon the execution of the agreement and the remaining $2,500 was paid in 2010 upon completion (See Note 7(B)).
During the months of November and December 2009, the Company entered into celebrity endorsement agreements for a period of one to two years of service. In total, 1,710,000 shares of common stock were issued having a fair value of $3,285,400 based upon fair value on the respective date of grant. During 2009 and 2010, $87,805 and $1,712,815 was recorded as consulting expense, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, $777,112 is recorded as consulting expense, and $707,658 is recorded as deferred compensation (See Note 7(B)).
On December 3, 2009, the Company entered into a commission agreement with an unrelated third party. The company will pay a 10% commission in shares of common stock for every passive endorsement. In exchange for the services provided the Company issued 35,000 shares of common stock having a fair value $68,250 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On December 3, 2009, the Company entered into a commission agreement with an unrelated third party. The company will pay a 10% commission in shares of common stock for every passive endorsement. In exchange for the services provided the Company issued 240,000 shares of common stock having a fair value $468,000 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On December 3, 2009, the Company entered into a commission agreement with an unrelated third party. The company will pay a 10% commission in shares of common stock for every passive endorsement. In exchange for the services provided the Company issued 35,000 shares of common stock having a fair value $68,250 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On December 3, 2009, the Company entered into a commission agreement with an unrelated third party. The company will pay a 10% commission in shares of common stock for every passive endorsement. In exchange for the services provided the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock having a fair value $19,500 ($1.95/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On December 15, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party to provide investor services. The Company will receive a 10% of the gross receipts from the investor relations revenue for a two year period. In exchange for the satisfactory services provided, on December 15, 2009, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $200,000 ($2/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On December 27, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party to provide film work. In exchange for the services provided the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock having a fair value $19,400 ($1.94/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On December 27, 2009, the Company entered into an endorsement agreement with an unrelated third party to provide film work. In exchange for the services provided the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock having a fair value $19,400 ($1.94/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On December 27, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party to provide film scripting, editing and production work. In exchange for the services provided the Company issued 10,000 shares of common stock having a fair value $19,400 ($1.94/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On December 30, 2009, the Company entered into a marketing agreement with an unrelated third party for a period from January 2010 to December 2010. In exchange for the services provided, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $965,000 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant. An additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $1,930,000 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant, were issued for an additional sponsorship commitment. The additional 1,000,000 shares were to be held in escrow until June 30, 2010, at which point the unrelated party would have 15 days to accept or decline the additional shares. As of December 31, 2010, the shares were returned back to the Company’s treasury due to non-performance of services and no additional shares will be issued (See Note 7(B)).
On December 31, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party for a period from December 31, 2009 through March 30, 2011. In exchange for the services provided, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $144,750 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant, and deliverable in three increments of 25,000 shares of common stock each. The first 25,000 shares will be delivered upon the execution of the agreement and the other two increments will be delivered in six and twelve months upon the successful fulfillment of the agreement (See Note 7(B)).
On December 31, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party for a period from December 31, 2009 through March 30, 2011. In exchange for the services provided, the Company issued 75,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $144,750 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant, and deliverable in three increments of 25,000 each. The first 25,000 shares will be delivered upon the execution of the agreement and the other two will be delivered in six and twelve months upon the successful fulfillment of the agreement (See Note 7(B)).
On December 31, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party for a period from December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2010. In exchange for the services provided, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $965,000 ($1.93/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On January 11, 2010, the Company entered into a twelve month agreement with an unrelated third party for investor relations press release service for an annual fee of $14,250 and an initial onetime fee of $250.
On January 15, 2010, the Company entered into a two year celebrity endorsement agreement. In total, 100,000 shares of common stock were issued having a fair value of $170,000($1.70/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On February 1, 2010, the Company entered into a twelve month consulting agreement effective February 5, 2010, with an unrelated third party to produce music compositions for a fee of $500. The agreement can be renewed for up to two additional years for a fee of $500 for the first renewal year and $750 for the second renewal year.
On February 17, 2010, the Company entered into a twelve month consulting agreement with an unrelated third party effective February 17, 2010. In exchange for the services provided, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $1,240,000 ($1.24/share) based upon fair value on the date of grant (See Note 7(B)).
On June 1, 2010, the Company entered into a twelve month consulting agreement to provide for consulting and business services in raising capital. The Company agrees to pay a finder’s fee on all capital raised in stock and warrants. The Company paid an initial nonrefundable retainer fee by issuing 40,000 shares of stock having a value of $10,000 ($0.25/share) based upon fair value on the date of the agreement. In conjunction with the stock payment, the Company also issued one warrant attached to each share of stock exercisable at $0.50 per warrant. Based upon the number of shares (40,000 shares) of stock issued, the Company issued 40,000 warrants (See Note 7(B) and (C).
On May 11, 2010, the Company acquired the rights to an audio technology known as Max Audio Technology (Max) through a share exchange, whereby the Company issued 30,000,000 shares of common stock to two individuals in exchange for their rights in Max having a value of $7,500,000 based upon recent market value ($0.25/share). (See Note 7(H)).
In accordance with the share exchange, the former owners to the rights of Max became Executives of the Company. The two new executives individually entered into employment agreements with the Company on May 11, 2010. The term of the employment agreements are for ten years of service at a monthly compensation of $8,500 for each executive. In addition, the Executives are entitled to receive 5% of all revenues derived from the sale of all products and services related to the Max Audio Technology. On January 2, 2011, the agreement was cancelled.
On April 15, 2010, the Company entered into a finder’s fee agreement. For each qualified investor introduced to the Company by the consultant, the Company will pay a 10% fee in cash equal to 10% of the dollar amount of securities purchased, In addition, the Company will pay a 10% fee in warrants equal to 10% of the number of shares of stock purchased (See Note 7(C)).
On August 8, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party to provide consulting services. Upon the execution of the agreement the consultant received 100,000 shares of common stock. A monthly issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock will be issued as a compensation of services provided. The term of the agreement is for three months and will continue to renew for three month intervals unless cancelled by either party. The agreement was cancelled on November 1, 2010 (See Note 7(B)).
On August 17, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement. The agreement shall remain in effect until terminated. In exchange for the services provided, the consultant will receive a $500 a month allowance for general expenses. In addition, for all the new business brought to the Company the consultant will receive a 10% compensation for each gross dollar received by the Company. On February 15, 2011, the Company terminated the agreement.
On December 14, 2010, the Company entered into to a consulting agreement for consulting and advertising services. Upon the execution of the agreement, the consultant received 250,000 shares with an additional 750,000 shares to be issued upon consultant obtaining sponsorship rights in the year 2011. The sponsorship rights were not obtained and the agreement was cancelled in 2011 and the additional 750,000 shares were never issued (See Note 7(B)).
On February 17, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement for public relations and communications services. In exchange for the services provided, the consultant received 500,000 shares of common stock. The term of the agreement is for one year.
On March 3, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement for public relations and communications services. In exchange for the services provided, the consultant received 1,000,000 shares of common stock. The term of the agreement is for one year.
On June 10, 2011, the Company entered into a five year advisory board consulting agreement with three persons to provide for consulting and business services. In exchange for the services provided, the consultants received 100,000 shares of common stock each. (See Note 7(B)).
On June 15, 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an unrelated third party for software and computer technology services. In exchange for the services provided, the consultant will be paid $70 per hour with $50 per hour paid in cash and $20 per hour paid in Company stock at $0.10 per share. The term of the agreement is for one year. (See Note 7(B)).
(C) Operating Lease Agreements
On September 1, 2010 the Company executed a three-year non-cancelable operating lease for its new corporate office space. The lease began on October 1, 2010 and expires on September 30, 2013. Total base rent due during the term of the lease is $134,880.
NOTE 9 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received $18,803 from the principal stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the loan is bearing an annual interest rate of 3.25% and due on demand. In 2008, the Company repaid $15,000 in principal to the principal stockholder. In 2009, the Company repaid $3,803 in principal to the principal stockholder. As of December 31, 2010, the principal portion of this principal stockholder loan balance has been repaid (See Note 3).
On May 11, 2009, the Company received $9,500 from a principal stockholder. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company repaid $1,500 in principal to the principal stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the loan is bearing an annual interest rate of 3.25% and is due on demand (See Note 3).
On May 22, 2009, the Company received $15,000 from a principal stockholder. In January of 2010, the Company repaid $3,000 in principal to a principal stockholder under the terms of the loan. In June of 2010, the Company repaid $3,000 in principal to the principal stockholder under the terms of the loan. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the loan is bearing an annual interest rate of 3.25% and is due on demand (See Note 3).
On May 26, 2009, the Company received $16,700 from a principal stockholder. In May of 2010, the Company repaid $15,700 in principal to the principal stockholder under the terms of this loan. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the loan is bearing an annual interest rate of 3.25% and is due on demand (See Note 3).
As of June 30, 2011, the Company owes $18,000 in principal and $1,925 of accrued interest to the principal stockholder related to these principal loans (See Note 3).
On May 28, 2009, the Company entered into a two year line of credit agreement with a principal stockholder in the amount of $100,000. The line of credit carries an interest rate at 3.25%. As of June 30, 2011, the principal shareholder has advanced the Company $100,000 and was repaid $100,000 under the terms of this line of credit agreement (See Note 4).
On November 10, 2009, the Company entered into a two year line of credit agreement with a principal stockholder in the amount of $100,000. The line of credit carries an interest rate at 3.25%. As of June 30, 2011, the principal shareholder has advanced $100,000 to the Company and was repaid $100,000 under the terms of this line of credit agreement (See Note 4).
On March 25, 2010, the Company entered into a two year line of credit agreement with the principal stockholder in the amount of $500,000. The line of credit carries an interest rate of 3.25%. On February 17, 2011, the principal stockholder converted $100,000 of the line of credit owed into 909,091 shares of common stock at $0.11 per share. As of June 30, 2011, the principal stockholder has advanced $223,680 to the Company and was repaid $6,050 under this line of credit agreement (See Note 4 and Note 7(G)).
As of June 30, 2011, the Company owes $117,630 in principal and $10,816 of accrued interest to the principal stockholder related to these lines of credit (See Note 4).
On October 14, 2008, the Company issued 44,900,000 shares of common stock to its founder having a fair value of $44,900 ($0.001/share) in exchange for services provided. As a result of the forward split, the 44,900,000 shares were increased to 179,600,000 shares and its purchase price was similarly adjusted to $0.00025 (See Note 7(B) and Note 7(D)).
On October 13, 2008, the Company executed an employment agreement with its President and CEO. The term of the agreement is ten years. As compensation for services, the President will receive a monthly compensation of $18,000 beginning October 13, 2008. In addition, to the base salary, the employee is entitled to receive a 10% commission of all sales of the Corporation. The agreement also calls for the employee to receive health benefits (See Note 8(A)).
On June 2, 2010, a principal stockholder converted $283,652 of accrued compensation into 945,507 shares of common stock at $0.30 per share. (See Note 7(G)).
On February 17, 2011, a principal stockholder converted $144,000 of accrued compensation into 1,309,091 shares of common stock at $.0.11 per share. (See Note 7(G)).
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the principal stockholder contributed office space with a fair market value of $2,913 (See Note 7(F)).
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the principal stockholder contributed office space with a fair market value of $12,600 (See Note 7(F)).
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the principal stockholder contributed office space with a fair value of $9,450 (See Note 7(F)).
NOTE 10 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure as follows:
For the period July 1 to August 8, 2011, the Company issued 10,927,000 shares of common stock for cash of $1,092,700 ($0.10/share). In connection with these issuances, the Company incurred $74,510 in finder’s fees and reserved 745,100 warrants pursuant to the agreements with certain individuals.
During the month of July 2011, $397,000 of the stock subscription receivable was collected (See Note 7(A)).
During the month of July 2011, the principal stockholder was repaid $55,000 under the line of credit agreement dated March 25, 2010 (See Note 4 and 9),