DEF 14A

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒

Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐ Preliminary Proxy Statement

☐ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

☒ Definitive Proxy Statement

☐ Definitive Additional Materials

☐ Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12

EPAM Systems, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

☒ No fee required

☐ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

☐ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

Dear Fellow Stockholders,

On behalf of our Board of Directors, we are pleased to invite you to attend the EPAM Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on June 2, 2023, beginning at 10:00 am EDT. Details for attending the Annual Meeting via live audio webcast are in the Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders following this letter.

After I concluded my 2022 stockholder letter acknowledging the events in Ukraine, we soon realized our response to this unimaginable event would become our most important priority in 2022. Without question, the war and our response mark the year as one of the most disruptive in our 30-year history. With a focus on ensuring the safety and well-being of our people and continuity of service for our customers, our teams across the world quickly mobilized to:

• Do everything possible to ensure the safety of our people in Ukraine, providing mobility and financial support as our people adapted and persevered through a dynamic and stressful environment.

• Accelerate our geographic diversification strategy with the repurposing and scaling of our global mobility efforts to support the relocation of more than 10,000 employees and their immediate families.

• Adapt our business continuity strategy to include an exit of our business from Russia.

• Maintain an elevated customer focus throughout the year to ensure that even with an environment that was anything but normal, our clients continued to receive the consistently high-quality delivery and level of service expected from EPAM.

Despite all the disruption caused by events in the impacted region, we delivered a set of strong results in 2022, which included:

• Revenue growth of 28% reported (32% growth on a constant currency basis),

• GAAP diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $7.09, and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $10.90, and

• We finished the year with a strong balance sheet and approximately $1.7 billion in cash and cash equivalents.

Further, we continued to:

• Leverage our engineering DNA, as well as our innovation, digital transformation, and learning and development strengths to create a meaningful impact for our customers, our employees, and the communities in which we operate, and

• Advance our progress along our sustainability journey, expanding our ESG program—whose core pillars include operating ethically, protecting the environment, and supporting our global and local communities.

Looking forward, we are committed to accelerating our mission of becoming a true value orchestrator for our customers, and we are working every day to stay focused on our customers’ needs and demands, even while we continue evolving our geographic expansion, our capabilities, and our commercial offerings as a larger, more diversified, and more capable EPAM.

Thank you for your ongoing support of EPAM. We look forward to seeing you at this year’s Annual Meeting.

Arkadiy Dobkin

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board

April 21, 2023

* Non-GAAP EPS and revenue growth on a constant currency basis are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to “Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Comparable GAAP Measures” for additional information.

Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Time and Date	10:00 a.m. EDT - June 2, 2023
Place	Live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting will be available at https://www.proxydocs.com/EPAM
Access	In order to attend the live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/EPAM. Upon completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including unique links that will allow you access to the Annual Meeting and to vote and submit questions during the meeting
Record Date	The record date for the determination of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting (“Record Date”), or any adjournments or postponements thereof, was the close of business on April 10, 2023.
Additional Information	Additional information regarding the matters to be acted on at the Annual Meeting is included in the accompanying proxy statement.
Proxy Voting	PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROXY THROUGH THE INTERNET OR MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD.
		Board Recommended Vote
Items of Business	1. To elect three Class II directors to hold office for a three-year term or until their successors are elected and qualified.	FOR
	2.  To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023.	FOR
	3.  To approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation for our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.	FOR
	4.  To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.	N/A
	By Order of the Board of Directors of EPAM Systems, Inc.: Edward Rockwell Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary April 21, 2023
	Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on June 2, 2023. The Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 are available at https://www.proxydocs.com/EPAM.

Table of Contents

General Information	1
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials	1
Board of Directors	2
Director Selection Process	2
Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations of Director Candidates	3
Board Composition	3
Corporate Governance	10
Board Leadership Structure	10
Director Independence	11
Risk Oversight and Succession Planning	11
Board Meetings	12
Communications to the Board	12
Code of Ethical Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines	12
Environmental, Social, and Governance Commitment	13
Committees of the Board	14
Our Executive Officers	16
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	19
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	21
Report of the Audit Committee	22
Compensation of Directors	23
Executive Compensation	25
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation	25
Compensation Committee Report	25
Compensation Discussion and Analysis	25
Overview	25
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives	27
Compensation-Setting Process	30
Elements of Compensation	31
Other Employment Arrangements	34
Compensation Risk Assessment	34
Tax Deductibility	34
Stock Ownership Guidelines, Prohibition on Hedging or Pledging EPAM Stock, and Clawback Policy	34
Summary Compensation Table	35
Grants of Plan-Based Awards	36
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End	37
Options Exercised and Stock Vested	38
Potential Payments on Termination and Change of Control	38
2022 Pay Ratio Disclosure	40
Pay Versus Performance	41
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	44
Proposal 1: Election of Directors	45
Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	46
Proposal 3: Annual Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation	47
Householding	48
Questions and Answers About the 2023 Annual Meeting and Voting Your Shares	49
Stockholder Proposals for the 2024 Annual Meeting	54
Other Matters	55
Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Comparable GAAP Measures	A-1

General Information

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of EPAM Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“we” or “EPAM”), is soliciting proxies to be used at the annual meeting of stockholders of EPAM to be held on Thursday, June 2, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. EDT through a live audio webcast available via https://www.proxydocs.com/EPAM and any postponement, adjournment or continuation thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying notice and form of proxy are first being distributed to stockholders on or about April 21, 2023. The Board is requesting that you permit your common stock to be represented at the Annual Meeting by the persons named as proxies for the Annual Meeting.

The proxy solicitation materials, including the Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this Proxy Statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, which includes our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 (the “2022 Annual Report”) and the proxy card or voting instruction card (collectively, the “Proxy Materials”), are being furnished to the holders of our common stock, par value $.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board for use in voting at the Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement contains important information for you to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the Annual Meeting. Please read it carefully.

Throughout this Proxy Statement you will find links to our website. The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement or into our 2022 Annual Report. The Proxy Materials are available at https://www.proxydocs.com/EPAM on or about April 21, 2023 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials

As permitted by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are making the Proxy Materials available to our stockholders primarily electronically via the Internet rather than mailing printed copies of these materials to each stockholder. We believe that this process expedites stockholders’ receipt of the Proxy Materials, lowers the costs incurred by EPAM for the Annual Meeting and helps to conserve natural resources.

On or about April 21, 2023, we mailed a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) in the form of a mailing titled “Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials.” The Notice contains instructions on how to access the Proxy Materials, and how to vote on the Internet.

If you received the Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the Proxy Materials unless you request a printed copy, currently or on an ongoing basis. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a paper or email copy of the Proxy Materials, follow the instructions on the Notice. Stockholders who requested paper copies of the Proxy Materials or previously elected electronic receipt did not receive a Notice and will receive the Proxy Materials in the format requested.

1

Board of Directors

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the Board will consist of no fewer than three and no more than nine persons and that the exact number of members of the Board will be determined from time to time by resolution of a majority of our entire Board. The Board currently consists of nine members.

The Board is divided into three classes, with each director serving a three-year term and one class being elected at each annual meeting of stockholders.

Director Selection Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board the directors to stand as nominees for election at the annual meeting of stockholders and makes recommendations to the Board for appointment of a director to fill any vacancy. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the composition of the Board and its committees at each regular meeting, and considers the individual and aggregate characteristics, professional backgrounds, and areas of expertise with the goal of a well-balanced and effective Board. All of our directors and director candidates must possess integrity and high ethical standards, excellent business judgment, and be willing to commit appropriate time and effort to service on the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews feedback from the most recent Board and committee evaluations in assessing the makeup of the Board, its committees, and future needs.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the appropriate size of the Board from time to time and considers new director candidates for potential expansion of the Board or to fill any vacancies. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through current Board members, professional search firms engaged by the committee, stockholders, members of management, or others. The committee reviews recommendations, evaluates biographical information and considers background checks and material relating to potential candidates and, as appropriate, interviews selected candidates. A candidate may meet with our management as appropriate. These candidates may be evaluated at meetings of the committee and may be considered at any point during the year.

At this time, neither the Board nor the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has established any minimum qualifications or skills for directors, however the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will apply the criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Corporate Governance Guidelines – Director Selection
The Board considers several criteria when evaluating candidates for director, including a nominee’s:
•   Judgment •   Diversity •   Personal integrity •   Skills •   Actual or potential conflicts of interest •   Knowledge of our business and industry •   Independence	•   Background and experience •   Experience in various geographies •   Other board commitments •   Risk oversight experience and strategy •   Ability to address the needs of the Board and its committees •   Financial literacy and expertise •   Ability to devote time and attention to the Board and its committees

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criteria is a prerequisite for, or necessarily applicable to, any prospective nominee. We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of our directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. The Board is committed to creating a diversified membership and it is the Board’s policy to include, and to instruct search firms to include, diverse candidates in the pool of potential director candidates to be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated the three director nominees identified below for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting. These directors will hold office until the annual

2

meeting of stockholders in 2026, or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. The director nominees set forth below have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement as nominees for election as director and have agreed to serve as directors if elected. Stockholders are not entitled to cumulate votes in the election of directors and may not vote for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named.

Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations of Director Candidates

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods to identify and evaluate director nominees, including nominees recommended by stockholders. Our bylaws permit stockholders to nominate directors for consideration at our annual stockholder meeting. If any materials are provided by a stockholder in connection with the nomination of a director candidate, such materials are forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The committee’s policy is to consider properly submitted stockholder nominations. In evaluating all director nominations, the committee seeks to balance an individual’s knowledge, experience, capabilities, and compliance with the membership criteria established by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Our bylaws also provide for proxy access stockholder nominations of director candidates by eligible shareholders. Appropriately nominated proxy access candidates will be included in the Company’s proxy statement and ballot. A stockholder who wishes to formally nominate a candidate, whether for inclusion in our proxy statement or not, must follow the procedures described in our bylaws, which are summarized in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Stockholder Proposals for the 2024 Annual Meeting.”

Board Composition

Our Board is comprised of active and engaged experts in fields related to EPAM’s business, from a variety of professional backgrounds. Moreover, our Board believes that a diverse representation of characteristics broadens our Board’s views on issues that matter to our people, customers, and other stakeholders.

The table below summarizes the key qualifications, skills, and attributes in up to five areas of focused expertise that each director possesses. Many of our directors have more than five of these qualifications, however. Our Board and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe that the overall mix of professional qualifications and experience of our directors creates an environment for effective oversight of the business and its management.

In addition to these varied qualifications and expertise areas, our Board believes every member should possess high integrity and a commitment to EPAM’s values, an understanding of our business, and creation of stockholder value.

Key Qualifications		Dobkin	Vargo	Aguirre	Mayoras	Robb	Roman	Segert	Shan	Smart
	Financial		✓		✓		✓	✓	✓
	Leadership	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
	Global Business	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓		✓	✓
	Human Capital	✓		✓	✓			✓		✓
	Technology & Innovation	✓		✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
	Mergers & Acquisitions	✓	✓				✓	✓	✓
	Sales & Marketing				✓	✓			✓
	Public Company Board		✓	✓		✓				✓

3

	Key Qualification Definitions
	Financial	Experience with complex financial management, financial reporting, and strategic capital allocation
	Leadership	Demonstrated executive leadership, including delivering operating results and long-term growth
	Global Business	Experience in business enterprises in global markets, including understanding geopolitical, cultural, operational, regulatory, and other relevant aspects
	Human Capital	Experience ensuring the organization has the talent (human capital) that it needs to deliver on its stated mission and outcomes by defining the talent needs, creating an inclusive and values-driven culture, and creating a value proposition to attract, develop and retain talent in competitive markets
	Technology & Innovation	Experience in relevant technology; understanding of technology trends; ability to anticipate and plan for new business models
	Mergers & Acquisitions	Experience leading inorganic growth through acquisitions, including understanding of valuation, synergy planning, and operational integration execution
	Sales & Marketing	Experience growing sales, branding, and developing market awareness
	Public Company Board	Service as a member of a public company board of directors (other than EPAM)

Our Board includes directors that have served a range of tenures to allow for institutional knowledge and continuity, balanced with diversity as well as refreshed perspectives. The graphic below summarizes the age, tenure, gender, and committee leadership characteristics of the Board.

Biographical information concerning the nominees and the current directors of the Board whose terms will continue after the Annual Meeting appears below. Ages are as of April 21, 2023.

Name	Age	Position	Director Since	Class	Board Committees			Term Ends
					AC*	NGC*	CC*
Arkadiy Dobkin	62	Chairman, President and CEO	2002	III				2024
Ronald Vargo	69	Independent Director	2012	II	Member	Member		2023
DeAnne Aguirre	62	Independent Director	2023	III		Member		2024
Richard Michael Mayoras	60	Independent Director	2013	I		Member	Member	2025
Karl Robb	60	Independent Director	2004	I				2025
Eugene Roman	65	Independent Director	2020	II	Member			2023
Robert Segert	54	Independent Director	2012	III		Chair		2024
Helen Shan	55	Independent Director	2018	I	Chair		Member	2025
Jill Smart	63	Independent Director	2016	II			Chair	2023

*AC = Audit Committee; NGC = Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; CC = Compensation Committee

4

Director Nominees (Class II Directors with Terms Expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2023 and in 2026 if elected)

The Board nominees possess specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led the Nominating and Governance Committee to the conclusion that such persons should serve as directors of EPAM, in light of our business and structure.

Eugene Roman
	Career Highlights •   Principal – Design AI Ltd. (2019 – Present) •   Chief Information Officer – Metrolinx (2020-2021) •   Executive Vice President – Canadian Tire Corporation (2012 – 2018) •   Nortel Networks Corporation, Bell Canada Enterprises Inc., and Open Text Corporation ○  Progressively senior business and technology roles Board Roles and Committees •   Member – Audit Committee	Select Professional and Community Contributions •   Lakeland Holding Ltd. – Director •   Community Trust Co. – Director •   York University – Board of Governors ○  Finance and Audit Committee ○  Governance and Human Resources Committee Other Public Company Boards •   Current ○  None •   Past Five Years ○  The Stars Group
Age: 65 Director Since: 2020 Birthplace: Canada Independent Director
Our Board believes that Mr. Roman’s more than 35 years of experience as an information technology and telecommunications executive in the retail and business services industries and his financial background provide him with the necessary skills to serve as a member of our Board and enable him to provide valuable insight to the Board regarding technology, financial, and strategic issues.
Jill Smart
	Career Highlights •   Founder and CEO – JBSmart Consulting, LLC (2021 – Present) •   President Emeritus – National Academy of Human Resources (2023 – Present) ○  President (2015 – 2022) •   Chief Human Resources Officer – Accenture (2004-2014) ○  Various positions of increasing authority (1981 – 2004) Board Roles and Committees •   Chair – Compensation Committee	Select Professional and Community Contributions •   AlixPartners – Director •   Cerity Partners – Advisory Board Member •   University of Illinois Chicago Athletic Advisory Board - Member Other Public Company Boards •   World Fuel Services Corporation •   HireRight Holdings Corporation
Age: 63 Director Since: 2016 Birthplace: USA Independent Director
Our Board believes Ms. Smart’s industry experience, more than 20 years of consulting experience, and human resources leadership expertise enable Ms. Smart to provide valuable insight to the Board regarding human capital, executive compensation, and strategy.

5

Ronald Vargo
	Career Highlights •   Executive Vice President and CFO – ICF International, Inc. (2010 – 2011) •   Executive Vice President and CFO – Electronic Data Systems Corporation (2006 – 2008) ○  Vice President and Treasurer (2004 – 2006) •   Vice President – TRW, Inc. (1991 – 2003) ○  Investor Relations and Treasurer (1991 – 1994, 1999 – 2002) ○  Strategic Planning and Business Development (1999 – 2002)	Board Roles and Committees •   Lead Independent Director •   Member – Audit Committee •   Member – Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Other Public Company Boards •   Current ○  Enersys •   Past Five Years ○  Ferro Corporation
Age: 69 Director Since: 2012 Birthplace: USA Independent Director
Our Board believes Mr. Vargo’s 30-plus years of experience as a financial and business executive, and his experience serving as a member of the board of directors of other public companies, provide him with the necessary skills to serve as a member of our Board and enable him to provide valuable insight to the Board regarding strategic, financial, compliance and investor relations issues.

Continuing Directors

Class III with Terms Expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2024

Arkadiy Dobkin
	Career Highlights •   Co-Founder (1993 – Present) •   Chairman and CEO (2002 – Present) Board Roles and Committees •   Chairman	Select Professional and Community Contributions •   GLOBSEC Tatra Summit Business Leadership Award - 2021 •   Ernst & Young World Entrepreneur of the Year Academy (Inducted 2015) Other Public Company Boards •   None
Age: 62 Director Since: 2002 Birthplace: Belarus
Our Board believes Mr. Dobkin’s experience as an IT professional and executive in the IT services industry coupled with his in-depth understanding of our global delivery model provide him with the necessary skills to serve as a member of our Board and will enable him to provide valuable insight to the Board and our management team regarding operational, strategic and management issues as well as general industry trends.

6

Robert Segert
	Career Highlights •   Chairman and CEO – athenahealth, Inc. (2019 – Present) •   Chairman and CEO – Virence Health Technologies (2018 – 2019) •   Executive Chairman – Aspect Software (2016-2018) •   President and CEO – Expert Global Solutions, Inc. (2014 – 2016) •   President and CEO – GXS Worldwide, Inc. (2008 – 2014)	Board Roles and Committees •   Chair – Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Other Public Company Boards •   None
Age: 54 Director Since: 2012 Birthplace: USA Independent Director
Our Board believes Mr. Segert’s 20-plus years of experience as an executive in the business services and consulting industry provide him with the necessary skills to serve as a member of our Board and enable him to provide valuable insight to the Board regarding financial and investor relations issues.

DeAnne Aguirre
	Career Highlights •   Managing Partner – PricewaterhouseCoopers (2015 – 2020) ○  North America Strategy Business ○  Health Strategy Business ○  Global Leader – Katzenbach Center •   Global and Regional Leadership Positions – Booz Allen & Hamilton, Inc./Booz & Co. (1996 – 2015) ○  Global Co-Leader – Organization & Strategic Leadership Business ○  Technology Leader – Southern Cone ○  Global Chief Human Resources Officer	Board Roles and Committees •   Member – Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Select Professional and Community Contributions •   Cisive – Director Other Public Company Boards •   Hercules Capital, Inc.
Age: 62 Director Since: 2023 Birthplace: United States Independent Director
Our board believes Ms. Aguirre is qualified to serve as a director based more than 30 years of experience in leadership roles in the global strategy and technology consulting industry along with her experience as a member of both public and private company boards and their committees.

7

Class I with Terms Expiring at the Annual Meeting in 2025

Richard Michael Mayoras
	Career Highlights •   Executive Chairman – OnSolve, LLC (2018 – Present) •   President and CEO – RedPrairie Corporation (2007 – 2013) ○  Various executive roles (2004 – 2007) •   President – DigiTerra, Inc. (2001 – 2004) Board Roles and Committees •   Member – Compensation Committee •   Member – Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	Select Professional and Community Contributions •   Softeon Inc. – Director •   Truecommerce, Inc. – Director Other Public Company Boards •   None
Age: 64 Director Since: 2013 Birthplace: USA Independent Director
Our Board believes that Mr. Mayoras is qualified to serve as a director based on his prior executive leadership roles in the IT services industry and his experience and prior service as a member of the boards of directors of technology companies, which enable him to provide valuable insight to the Board regarding financial and business strategy issues.
Karl Robb
	Career Highlights •   Executive Vice President and President of EU Operations – EPAM Systems, Inc. (2004 – 2015) •   Co-Founder – Fathom Technology Kft. (2001 – 2004) Board Roles and Committees •   None	Select Professional and Community Contributions •   Ajax Systems – Director •   Visiquate, Inc. – Director Other Public Company Boards •   Noventiq Holdings plc
Age: 60 Director Since: 2004 Birthplace: United Kingdom Independent Director
Our Board believes that Mr. Robb’s extensive experience in and knowledge of the IT services industry in North America and Europe, as well as his experience starting two software companies and his extensive service and responsibilities at EPAM prior to his retirement, provide him with the necessary skills to serve as a member of our Board. Our Board also believes this background enables Mr. Robb to provide valuable insight to the Board regarding strategy, business development, sales, operational and management issues, and general industry trends.

8

Helen Shan
	Career Highlights •   Executive Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer – FactSet (2021 – Present) •   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer – FactSet (2018 – 2021) •   Chief Financial Officer – Mercer (2014 – 2018) •   Vice President and Treasurer – Marsh & McLennan Companies – (2013 – 2014) Board Roles and Committees •   Chair – Audit Committee •   Member – Compensation Committee	Select Professional and Community Contributions •   S.C. Johnson College of Business, Cornell University – Member of Johnson Advisory Council Other Public Company Boards •   None
Age: 55 Director Since: 2018 Birthplace: USA Independent Director
Our Board believes Ms. Shan’s financial management expertise, as well as her previous experience in global strategy development and execution, provide her with the necessary skills to serve as a member of our Board and enable her to contribute valuable insight regarding financial and strategic business issues.

9

Corporate Governance

Our corporate governance practices cultivate and support our long-term organizational achievements. Our Board brings a mix of backgrounds, experience, and other factors that are essential to strong oversight. The Board is responsible for directing and overseeing our business and affairs. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Board selects and monitors our top management, provides oversight of our financial reporting processes and determines and implements our corporate governance policies. The Board and management are committed to good corporate governance to ensure that we are managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders, and we have a variety of policies and procedures to promote such goals.

Corporate Governance Highlights

• Eight of the Board’s nine directors are independent

• The Board annually elects a Lead Independent Director

• Each of the Board’s Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees consist of only independent directors

• The independent directors regularly schedule executive sessions

• The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts annual Board and committee evaluations

• The “Say-On-Pay” advisory vote is conducted annually

• Our bylaws provide for majority voting with a resignation policy for directors in uncontested elections and provide proxy access rights for stockholders

• We do not have a shareholder rights, or “poison pill,” plan

• Our stock ownership guidelines are applicable to both executives and directors

Board Leadership Structure

The Board recognizes that one of its key responsibilities is to evaluate and determine its optimal leadership structure to provide independent oversight of management. The Board understands that the optimal Board leadership structure may vary as circumstances warrant. Consistent with this understanding, our independent directors consider the Board’s leadership structure on an annual basis.

The Board believes it is important to retain its flexibility to allocate the responsibilities of the offices of Chairman of the Board (the “Chairman”) and Chief Executive Officer in a way that is in EPAM’s best interests at a given point in time. The Board has determined that it is in the best interests of EPAM and our stockholders for both the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to be held by our co-founder, Arkadiy Dobkin, at this time. If circumstances change in the future, the Board may determine that these positions should be separated. This policy allows the Board to evaluate regularly whether EPAM is best served at any particular time by having the Chief Executive Officer or another director hold the position of Chairman. Our Board considers this issue carefully in light of the structure the Board believes will be in the best interests of EPAM and our stockholders.

The Board believes that Mr. Dobkin is best suited to serve as Chairman because, as our co-founder, he is the director most familiar with our business and industry and can lead the Board in identifying and prioritizing our strategies and initiatives. The combined role fosters greater communication between the Board and management and facilitates development and implementation of our Board-approved corporate strategy and oversight of risk management practices.

In April 2015, our Board established the position of Lead Independent Director, and appointed Ronald Vargo to serve in this role. The Lead Independent Director Charter establishes a defined set of responsibilities, including Board leadership, presiding over executive sessions of independent directors, liaising with the Chairman, and facilitating distribution of information to the Board and its committees. Annually, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board a candidate to fill this position, selected from among the independent members of the Board. The Board considers this recommendation and elects the Lead Independent Director. Mr. Vargo has been re-elected to this position each year since his initial appointment.

10

We believe this current leadership structure is effective. Our independent directors and management have different perspectives and roles in business and strategy development. Our independent directors bring experience, oversight and expertise from outside EPAM and both from within and outside our industry.

Director Independence

Director independence is a key component of our governance standards, enabling the Board to be objective in fulfilling its responsibilities. The Board elects a Lead Independent Director each year.

Except for our Chairman and CEO, Arkadiy Dobkin, all directors are independent. In making its determinations about the independence of each Board member, the Board considered, among other things, all transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and EPAM and its subsidiaries and affiliates. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.” There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers, directors, or nominees for director.

Only independent directors serve on EPAM’s committees. The compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee is independent of the Company and management. At each regular meeting of the Board and each Committee, time is allocated for executive session, in which the Board or the committee meets without management present.

Risk Oversight and Succession Planning

The Board is responsible for oversight of EPAM’s risk management practices while management is responsible for the day-to-day risk management processes. The Board has direct oversight of EPAM’s strategic risks and other risk areas not specifically delegated to one of the Board’s committees. The Board receives and provides regular feedback on periodic reports from management regarding the most significant risks we face and receives reports from its committees on specific risk areas at each quarterly meeting. The Board exercises its oversight directly over areas of strategic importance. The specific areas of risk oversight for which the Board and each committee are responsible are summarized below:

11

Under this oversight framework, our management team has built and continuously improves our culture of risk awareness so EPAM operates at an appropriate level of risk when executing our business objectives. We have a robust enterprise risk management program, which involves a cross-functional team to identify and prioritize the mitigation of risks facing the Company. This process is also supported by the regular work of our internal audit, compliance, and legal functions at EPAM.

The additional responsibilities of the Board’s Committees, the members of each committee and the number of meetings held in 2022, and additional information about the written charter of each committee can be found later in this Proxy Statement under the heading “Committees of the Board.”

As reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board (with Compensation Committee input) is responsible for planning for CEO succession, as well as monitoring and advising on management’s succession planning for other senior executives. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term and continuing program for effective senior leadership development and succession. Succession planning is a regular item on the Board and Compensation Committee agendas throughout the year.

Board Meetings

The Board held 16 meetings in 2022. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of the total number of all meetings of the Board and committees on which the director served that were held during 2022.

Directors are expected to attend the meetings of the Board and of any committees on which the director serves and are encouraged, but not required, to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. All of our directors attended our annual meeting of stockholders in 2022.

Communications to the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Lead Independent Director or our independent directors as a group by sending a written communication in an envelope addressed to: Board of Directors, Attention: Lead Independent Director, c/o General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940.

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with the full Board by sending a written communication in an envelope addressed to: Board of Directors, c/o General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940.

Our Audit Committee has established an anonymous, confidential process for communicating complaints regarding accounting or auditing matters or other matters that may violate EPAM’s Code of Ethical Conduct. In order to submit a complaint, you may call our hotline at the dedicated local phone number found at ethics.epam.com (+1 866 786-9137 in the U.S.) or submit a written report at the EthicsLine webpage at ethics.epam.com. Any such complaints received or submitted are reviewed with the Audit Committee in accordance with a standard escalation protocol to take such action as may be appropriate.

Code of Ethical Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines

EPAM has a Code of Ethical Conduct that applies to all of our directors, officers and other employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Our Chief Compliance Officer has the responsibility of maintaining an effective ethics and compliance program and to provide updates to our ethics and compliance programs to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board. The foundational principles in our Code of Ethical Conduct and our core values mean that we strive for excellence and do the right things in the right way by:

• Respecting, valuing and supporting people

• Showing integrity in our communications, records and business activities

• Protecting and enhancing EPAM’s information and assets

• Complying with laws

12

The Code of Ethical Conduct is approved and reviewed annually by the Board. Any amendments (other than technical, administrative or non-substantive amendments) to, and any waivers from a provision of the Code of Ethical Conduct for directors and officers must be approved by the Board and will be promptly disclosed to our stockholders. The Board has also adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines in accordance with NYSE corporate governance rules that serve as a flexible framework within which our Board and its committees operate. These guidelines cover a number of areas including: the size and composition of the Board; Board membership criteria and director qualifications; Board diversity; director responsibilities; Board agendas; roles of the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Lead Independent Director; meetings of independent directors; committee responsibilities and assignments; Board member access to management and independent advisors; director communications with third parties; director compensation; director orientation and continuing education; evaluation of senior management; and management succession planning.

Our Code of Ethical Conduct and our Corporate Governance Guidelines are publicly available through the “Investor Relations – Leadership & Governance” section of our website at http://investors.epam.com/investors/leadership-and-governance/documents. A copy will be provided in print without charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940.

Environmental, Social, and Governance Commitment

The Board oversees EPAM’s ongoing commitment to integrate positive and ethical environmental, social, and governance, or ESG, practices into our overall ESG strategy. The Board is regularly involved in assessing the progress and activity of individual components that make up our ESG program, including corporate social responsibility, human capital, ethics and governance, environmental footprint, data privacy and information security, and supplier sustainability. Our approach to material ESG topics is key to our continual development as a business and drives value for our employees, clients, business partners, stockholders and the community.

One important way EPAM lives out the key principles of our Code of Ethical Conduct and our core values is our commitment to making positive contributions in the communities in which we operate. Through our focused efforts in the areas of education, environment and community, we are committed to sharing the expertise and attributes of our highly skilled global workforce to effectively support the needs of the world at large and the communities in which we work and live. We sponsor and support global technology education initiatives, invest in local green initiatives that result in energy-saving and carbon-footprint reduction practices, and are strongly committed to respecting our employees’ fundamental human rights at work and ask our vendors and suppliers to do the same. More information about EPAM’s Corporate Social Responsibility, or CSR program can be found at https://www.epam.com/about/who-we-are/corporate-responsibility.

Highlights of our positive social, environmental and ethical practices include our efforts in our traditional areas of focus and additional contributions to mitigating the economic and public health impacts in the communities where we work and live and at a global level:

• Our social impact community includes almost 14,500 participants volunteering more than 28,000 hours in more 300 events in 50 countries.

• EPAM collaborated with five different organizations across our geographic footprint to empower girls and women with the skills and confidence needed to pursue their ambitions in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, or STEM, related opportunities.

• EPAM sponsored BIMA Digital Day for the fourth consecutive year. BIMA, the United Kingdom’s digital and technology trade body, brought digital and technology companies together with students to give 11-16 year olds a view into the world of careers.

• EPAM continued to support Raspberry Pi’s Coolest Projects, the world-leading technology fair where young people are empowered to show the world their technology inventions.

• EPAM enhanced its own EPAM E-KIDS program by developing courses and content and delivering it through EPAM’s Learn platform to provide virtual STEM learning content to students in 25 countries.

• EPAM supported its employees, their families, and their communities in Ukraine by securing internet access, providing games, activities, and comfort to displaced families and children, providing shelter and critical supplies, collecting medical and hospital supplies, and providing an employee-run support hotline for EPAM employees impacted by the war in Ukraine.

13

• EPAM subsidiaries, including those located in Poland, Singapore, Ukraine, Hungary, Mexico, United States, India, Vietnam, Germany, Switzerland, and Hong Kong, each won recognition, some for the second time, for our employee experience and culture.

• EPAM was named a 2022 Barron’s 100 Most Sustainable Company and was No. 94 on Investor’s Business Daily’s fourth annual Best ESG Companies List.

• EPAM maintains a Supplier Code of Conduct, holding suppliers accountable for complying with certain labor practices, safety and health standards, ethical business practices and social responsibility commitments.

Committees of the Board

The Board uses committees to work on certain issues in detail. Each committee reports the progress and results of its meetings to the Board and makes recommendations to the Board when appropriate. The Board currently has three standing committees – an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of our committees operates under a written charter that has been approved by our Board. The charters are reviewed annually by each respective committee, which recommends any proposed changes to our Board. The charters are available on the “Investor Relations – Leadership & Governance” section of our website at http://investors.epam.com/investors/leadership-and-governance/documents and will be provided in print without charge upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940. The primary responsibilities of each of our committees, as well as the current composition of our committees and the number of committee meetings held during 2022, are described below:

Audit Committee
The primary responsibilities of our Audit Committee include: •  appoint, compensate, retain and oversee our independent auditors; •  pre-approve the independent auditors’ audit and non-audit services rendered, and recognize and prevent prohibited non-audit services; •  review the proposed scope and results of the audit; •  review, in conjunction with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of our Company, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting with the independent auditors and our financial and accounting staff; •  establish procedures for complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal control over financial reporting, or auditing matters;	Committee Members: Helen Shan (Chair) Eugene Roman Ronald Vargo Number of Meetings in 2022: 8
•  oversee internal audit functions; and •  prepare the report of the Audit Committee that SEC rules require to be included in our annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee currently consists exclusively of directors who are financially literate, and each of the members of the Audit Committee is considered an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K. The Board has determined that each of the current members of the Audit Committee is an “independent director” within the meaning of the applicable NYSE rules and as defined by Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.

14

Compensation Committee
The primary responsibilities of our Compensation Committee include: •  review and approve cash compensation arrangements, and recommend to the Board equity-based compensation arrangements, for executive officers, including for our Chief Executive Officer; •  identify corporate goals and objectives relevant to executive compensation; •  review, evaluate and recommend to the Board for approval, if applicable, any equity-based incentive plan; •  retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser in its sole authority and be responsible for the appointment, compensation, termination and oversight of the work of any such adviser that is retained;	Committee Members: Jill B. Smart (Chair) Richard Michael Mayoras Helen Shan Number of Meetings in 2022: 7
•  delegate its authority to subcommittees or the chair of the Compensation Committee when it deems it appropriate and in our best interests and to delegate to one or more of our officers the authority to make grants and awards of stock rights or options to any of our non-Section 16 officers under our equity-based incentive plan as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and in accordance with the terms of the plans; •  review, evaluate, and recommend to the Board for approval any changes in Board compensation •  consider the results of the most recent stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation; and •  prepare the report of the Compensation Committee to the extent required by SEC rules to be included in our annual proxy statement. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Compensation Committee is an “independent director” within the meaning of the rules set forth in Rule 10C-1 and Section 303A.02(a)(ii) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The processes and procedures followed by our Compensation Committee in considering and determining executive compensation, including the use of consultants and other outside advisors, are described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The primary responsibilities of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include: •  identify and nominate members for election to the Board; •  recommend to the Board a candidate for the position of Lead Independent Director of the Board from among the independent members of the Board; •  develop and recommend to the Board a set of corporate governance principles and code of conduct applicable to EPAM and to oversee compliance thereof; and •  oversee the evaluation of the Board and management.	Committee Members: Robert Segert (Chair) Richard Michael Mayoras Ronald Vargo DeAnne Aguirre (appointed in 2023) Number of Meetings in 2022: 5
The Board has determined that each of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is an “independent director” within the meaning of the applicable NYSE rules.

15

Our Executive Officers

Executive officers are appointed by the Board. The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our executive officers as of April 21, 2023:

Name	Age	Position
Arkadiy Dobkin	62	Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer
Balazs Fejes	48	President of EU and APAC markets
Viktar Dvorkin	50	Senior Vice President, Head of Global Delivery
Jason Peterson	60	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Edward Rockwell	55	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Elaina Shekhter	53	Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing and Strategy Officer
Boris Shnayder	66	Senior Vice President, Co-Head of Global Business
Larry Solomon	58	Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer
Sergey Yezhkov	49	Senior Vice President, Co-Head of Global Business
Gary Abrahams	55	Vice President, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer

Information about Mr. Dobkin is provided under “Board of Directors” in this Proxy Statement. A brief biography for each of our other executive officers follows.

Balazs Fejes

Balazs Fejes is our President of Europe and APAC Markets, where he heads market activities across the regions and co-leads global business operations. Mr. Fejes also oversees the strategy of our Banking and Financial Services Industry business unit, helping to drive evolution of key service lines across the unit’s global portfolio. From 2015 through March 2021, Mr. Fejes was our Executive Vice President, Co-Head of Global Business, and before that, he held the position of Senior Vice President, Global Head of Banking and Financial Services business unit from 2012 to 2015. From 2004 to August 2012, Mr. Fejes served as EPAM’s Chief Technology Officer (“CTO”) and was responsible for ensuring that all global offshore and nearshore software development centers of EPAM were at the leading edge of industry standards for efficiency and quality. Mr. Fejes joined EPAM in 2004 as part of the acquisition of Fathom Technology, a Hungarian software engineering firm which he co-founded and where he served as CTO. Prior to co-founding Fathom Technology, Mr. Fejes was a chief software architect/line manager with Microsoft Great Plains (Microsoft Business Solutions). He also served as chief software architect of Scala Business Solutions. He is the recipient of numerous awards for programming excellence and has worked extensively in the US and Russia.

Viktar Dvorkin

Viktar Dvorkin is our Senior Vice President, Head of Global Delivery, and is responsible for the strategy and operation of the company’s Delivery Organization as well as our Solution Practices and Competency Centers. In his current role, Mr. Dvorkin also oversees EPAM’s Advanced Technology programs including EngineeringX and Delivery Excellence. Prior to his current role, he led the North American business unit, where he oversaw the operation of EPAM’s largest book of business, with overall responsibility for services delivered in the North American region. Mr. Dvorkin joined EPAM in 1997 and has been instrumental in driving our growth in key technology and solution practices, and in helping EPAM to build and deploy multi-disciplinary teams for successful client engagements. Having worked and lived in the United States and Eastern Europe, Mr. Dvorkin has in-depth understanding of global delivery models and brings hands-on technology experience and working knowledge of multiple industries including travel, healthcare, insurance and oil & gas. Mr. Dvorkin holds a master’s degree in Applied Mathematics from the Belarusian National Technical University.

16

Jason Peterson

Jason Peterson joined EPAM in 2017 and is our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Peterson leads EPAM’s Global Finance, Corporate Development, and Procurement organizations and has over 25 years of finance experience. From 2008 to 2017, he was employed by Cognizant Technology Solutions, and in his most recent role, he was Vice President of Finance, M&A and Due Diligence, a position that he held while leading a large-scale corporate business process transformation program. Prior to that, he was CFO of the Emerging Business Accelerator and led the Corporate Financial Planning and Analysis Function. Before joining Cognizant, Mr. Peterson was the CFO for E&C Medical Intelligence, a venture-backed software and services company, and prior to that, he served in various accounting and finance roles at ATI Technologies, Philips Semiconductors, and Hewlett-Packard. Mr. Peterson holds an MBA from Columbia Business School and a Bachelor’s degree in economics from Claremont McKenna College.

Edward Rockwell

Edward Rockwell joined EPAM in October of 2018 and is our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary overseeing the legal activities of the organization and providing strategic counsel and legal guidance to senior leadership and EPAM’s Board of Directors. From June 2014 to October 2018, Mr. Rockwell served as Vice President & Assistant General Counsel at Red Hat, a leading global provider of open source, enterprise IT solutions where he led a global team of legal professionals that supported all sales and operations during a period of significant company growth. From April 2012 to January 2014, Mr. Rockwell was General Counsel and Vice President, Legal and Human Resources for DDN Storage. He previously served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel at Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) with roles that included General Counsel for HP Services, HP Americas, and HP Software. Additionally, he spent five years in Milan, Italy, where he served as Director and Managing Counsel for HP’s Outsourcing Services business in EMEA and later Senior Director and Managing Counsel for Outsourcing Services worldwide. Mr. Rockwell is a member of the board of directors of the Greater Philadelphia Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel. Mr. Rockwell received a BA degree in Foreign Affairs from University of Virginia and a JD from the University of Richmond School of Law.

Elaina Shekhter

Elaina Shekhter is our Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing and Strategy Officer. Ms. Shekhter had been our Chief Marketing Officer from March 2015 through March 2021. In her role, Ms. Shekhter works to integrate a variety of functions that influence EPAM’s strategy, positioning and messaging. Ms. Shekhter has been with EPAM since 2001 in a number of roles, including the Global Head of Business Development and prior to that, the Global Head of our Travel and Consumer Business Unit. Ms. Shekhter is an advisory board member for the MACH Alliance and is active in the software startup and emerging technology communities, representing EPAM in its investment in the Go Philly Fund and as a board member of the EPAM seed investment, Sigma Ledger. Additionally, Ms. Shekter takes a special interest in artificial intelligence and sustainability initiatives. Before joining EPAM, Ms. Shekhter was with the global hospitality and travel company Carlson Companies, in a number of operational and business development roles including Head of Retail and Entertainment for 24K, a spin-off of Carlson Marketing Group. Prior to Carlson, Ms. Shekhter was a Manager with Ernst & Young Consulting, specializing in CRM and analytics engagements. Ms. Shekhter holds an MS degree in Information Systems and BS/BA degrees in Economic Theory and Political Science from The American University.

Boris Shnayder

Boris Shnayder is our Senior Vice President, Co-Head of Global Business with a primary focus on operations in the Americas. Mr. Shnayder joined EPAM in July 2015 and is responsible for a portfolio of business in the region, including oversight of service programs and client acquisition. Mr. Shnayder also oversees strategy and execution of our emerging verticals portfolio. With over 20 years of experience in the IT and telecommunications industries, Mr. Shnayder brings both industry and global operations leadership. Prior to his role at EPAM, Mr. Shnayder served in a variety of roles at GlobalLogic, Inc. from 2007 to 2015, including Chief Delivery Officer, Senior Vice President, Head of Telecom & Healthcare and General Manager, and Vice President of Telecommunications. He also held senior software management positions at Motorola and Telcordia, managing teams throughout the United States, China, India and Russia. Mr. Shnayder received his MS degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Lyiv University in Ukraine.

17

Larry Solomon

Larry Solomon is our Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer, responsible for overseeing all aspects of talent management, talent acquisition, workforce planning and management, as well as other human resource related functions within EPAM globally. Mr. Solomon joined EPAM in October 2016, and prior to that he held a number of leadership positions at Accenture beginning in 1986. His most recent responsibilities as Senior Managing Director and North America Operating Officer from 2013 to 2016 included overseeing and managing the full employee life cycle of all Accenture people in the United States and Canada, resource planning, recruitment, staffing and deployment, and performance management. Prior to that, he was Accenture’s Global COO of Human Resources from 2011 to 2013, with overall responsibility for human resources operations. Mr. Solomon received a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from the State University of New York at Albany with a Finance/MIS major and Spanish language minor. He graduated with Magna Cum Laude distinction in 1986.

Sergey Yezhkov

Sergey Yezhkov, 48, is our Senior Vice President, Co-Head of Global Business, focusing on a North American book of business. Mr. Yezhkov also oversees strategy and operation of our Life Science & Healthcare portfolio. Prior to his current role, Mr. Yezhkov served as Co-Head of Global Delivery where he oversaw delivery operations across EPAM’s diverse geographic footprint with overall responsibility for building and growing professional software engineering skills and delivery know-how. Mr. Yezhkov joined EPAM in 2006 as part of the acquisition of Vested Development Inc. (VDI), where he served as Managing Director and CTO. Through his work with EPAM’s Independent Software Vendors business unit, Mr. Yezhkov brings an in-depth understanding of commercial software product development and agile approaches as well as a working knowledge of the healthcare, life science and high-tech industries. Mr. Yezhkov has an MS in Computational Mathematics from Lomonosov Moscow State University.

Gary Abrahams

Gary Abrahams is our Vice President, Corporate Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer. Mr. Abrahams joined EPAM in June of 2016, after having served as an independent contractor for EPAM starting in March of 2016. He was named Chief Accounting Officer in April 2017. Mr. Abrahams has over 25 years of experience in global corporate financial management and public accounting. From December 2015 to March 2016, Mr. Abrahams worked as an independent contractor at CMF Associates, LLC, a management and financial services advisory firm. From June 2014 to April 2015, he served as Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer at Preferred Sands, a producer of high-performance sands and proppant materials used in the oil and gas industry. From May 2006 to April 2014, Mr. Abrahams served in several senior finance roles at Shire Pharmaceuticals, a global biotechnology company, last serving as Vice President, Finance Operations - The Americas, where he was responsible for leading the Controller’s teams in North and South America and enhancing the finance infrastructure to support the growth of the multinational business. Before joining Shire, Mr. Abrahams held finance and Controller positions at Bracco Diagnostics, a subsidiary of a multinational healthcare company, from 1994 to 2006. He began his career at Arthur Andersen LLP in New York City. Mr. Abrahams holds a BBA in Accounting from Hofstra University.

18

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

As of March 15, 2023, there were 57,744,129 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock for:

• each of our directors and executive officers individually;

• all directors and executive officers as a group; and

• each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding Common Stock.

We have calculated beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and such ownership includes voting and dispositive power with respect to shares. In the table below, shares of Common Stock issuable pursuant to options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023, shares of Common Stock issuable upon settlement of restricted stock units, and restricted Common Stock are deemed to be outstanding for calculating the percentage of outstanding shares beneficially owned by the person holding those options, but are not deemed to be outstanding for computing the percentage of shares beneficially owned by any other person.

To our knowledge, except as indicated, the stockholders named in the table have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by them, based on the information provided to us by such stockholders. Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each director and executive officer is c/o EPAM Systems, Inc., 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940.

	Shares Beneficially Owned
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number	Percent
Named Executive Officers and Directors
Arkadiy Dobkin(1)	1,975,697	2.9%
Jason Peterson(2)	27,771	*
Balazs Fejes(3)	35,162	*
Boris Shnayder(4)	54,621	*
Elaina Shekhter(5)	42,660	*
Larry Solomon(6)	34,445	*
Viktar Dvorkin(7)	73,062	*
Sergey Yezhkov(8)	69,498	*
Edward Rockwell(9)	9,790	*
Gary Abrahams(10)	1,867	*
DeAnne Aguirre	338	*
Richard Michael Mayoras	7,394	*
Eugene Roman	1,756	*
Karl Robb	4,440	*
Robert Segert	17,439	*
Helen Shan	3,000	*
Jill B. Smart	6,025	*
Ronald Vargo	7,627	*
All executive officers and directors as a group (18 people)	2,372,592	3.2%

19

	Shares Beneficially Owned
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Number	Percent
5% Stockholders
The Vanguard Group(11)	6,493,769	11.29%
Capital Research Global Investors(12)	6,840,778	11.9%
BlackRock, Inc.(13)	4,005,541	7.0%
WCM Investment Management, LLC (14)	3,414,098	5.9%
AllianceBernstein L.P. (15)	3,489,287	6.1%

* Denotes less than 1% of the shares of Common Stock beneficially owned.

(1) Includes: (i) 1,246,461 shares of Common Stock held directly by Mr. Dobkin; (ii) 293,047 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Dobkin upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023; and (iii) 436,189 shares of Common Stock held by the Arkadiy Dobkin GST Exempt Grantor Trust (the “Dobkin Grantor Trust”) for the benefit of Mr. Dobkin’s children, for which Mr. Dobkin’s spouse acts as the trustee. Mr. Dobkin may be deemed to have shared power to vote or to direct the vote, and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of the shares held by the Dobkin Grantor Trust and identified as beneficially owned by him above. Mr. Dobkin disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held by the Dobkin Grantor Trust except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(2) Includes 15,978 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Peterson upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023.

(3) Includes 22,159 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Fejes upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023.

(4) Includes 47,497 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Shnayder upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023.

(5) Includes 37,807 shares of Common Stock issuable to Ms. Shekhter upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023.

(6) Includes 24,854 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Solomon upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023.

(7) Includes: (i) 7,603 shares of Common Stock held directly by Mr. Dvorkin; (ii) 49,722 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Dvorkin upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023; and (iii) 15,737 shares of Common Stock held by the Dvorkin Family Trust for the benefit of Mr. Dvorkin’s children, for which Mr. Dvorkin’s spouse acts as the trustee. Mr. Dvorkin may be deemed to have shared power to vote or to direct the vote, and shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition of the shares held by the Dvorkin Family Trust and identified as beneficially owned by him above. Mr. Dvorkin disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities held by the Dvorkin Family Trust except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(8) Includes 58,601 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Yezhkov upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023.

(9) Includes 6,354 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Rockwell upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023.

(10) Includes 341 shares of Common Stock issuable to Mr. Abrahams upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of March 15, 2023.

(11) Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023. The Vanguard Group has sole voting power over 0 shares, shared voting power over 84,361 shares, sole dispositive power over 6,255,533 shares and shared dispositive power over 238,236 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

(12) Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2023. Capital Research Global Investors (“CRGI”) is a division of Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”), as well as its investment management subsidiaries and affiliates Capital Bank and Trust Company, Capital International, Inc., Capital International Limited, Capital International Sarl, Capital International K.K., and Capital Group Private Client Services, Inc. (together with CRMC, the “investment management entities”). CRGI’s divisions of each of the investment management entities collectively provide investment management services under the name “Capital Research Global Investors.” CRGI is deemed to be the beneficial owner of 6,840,778 shares. CRGI has sole voting power over 6,836,583 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 6,840,778 shares, and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. The address of CRGI is 333 South Hope Street, 55th Fl, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

(13) Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2023. BlackRock, Inc., a parent holding company, reports on behalf of the following subsidiaries which hold the shares: BlackRock Life Limited, BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Advisors, LLC, Aperio Group, LLC, BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd., BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A., BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited, BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited, BlackRock (Singapore) Limited, and BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power over 3,601493 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 4,005,541 shares, and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(14) Information based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2023. WCM Investment Management, LLC has sole voting power over 3,414,098 shares, has shared voting power over 0 shares, has sole dispositive power over 3,414,098 share, and shared dispositive power over 0 shares. The address of WCM Investment Management, LLC is 281 Brooks Street, Laguna Beach, California 92651.

(15) Information based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023. AllianceBernstein L.P. has sole voting power over 3,326,758 shares, shared voting power over 0 shares, sole dispositive power over 3,483,703 shares, and shared dispositive power over 5,584 shares. The address of AllianceBernstein L.P. is 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105.

20

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Our Related Person Transaction Policy

The Board first adopted EPAM’s Related Person Transaction Policy in January 2012 and reviews the policy annually. Under this policy, a “Related Person Transaction” is any transaction, arrangement or relationship involving us in which a Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest. A “Related Person” is any of our executive officers, directors or director nominees, any stockholder beneficially owning in excess of 5% of our stock or securities exchangeable for our stock and any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons.

Pursuant to such related person transaction policy:

• Any Related Person Transaction must be approved or ratified by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board or a designated committee thereof consisting solely of independent directors (each, a “Reviewing Body”).

• In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction with a Related Person, the Reviewing Body will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including without limitation the commercial reasonableness of the terms, the benefit and perceived benefit, or lack thereof, to us, opportunity costs of alternate transactions, the materiality and character of the Related Person’s direct or indirect interest, and the actual or apparent conflict of interest of the Related Person.

• The Reviewing Body will not approve or ratify a Related Person Transaction unless it has determined that, upon consideration of all relevant information, such transaction is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of EPAM and our stockholders. To facilitate compliance with the policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews relevant information, facts and circumstances relating to potential related parties quarterly.

Members of our Board may be executive officers or directors of customers or vendors that receive services from or provide services to EPAM in the ordinary course from time to time. Consistent with our Related Person Transaction Policy, and in accordance with the approval or ratification process described above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (with appropriate recusals, as necessary) reviews those ordinary course service arrangements to determine if the applicable member of the Board has a direct or indirect material interest in the arrangement and if approval or ratification of the arrangement is in the best interests of EPAM and our stockholders in the given situation.

Indemnification Agreements

Our certificate of incorporation includes provisions that authorize and require us to indemnify our officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law, subject to limited exceptions. We have separate indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers, which require us to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified.

Insider Trading Policy, Prohibition on Hedging and Transactions in Derivatives, and Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans

We have an insider trading policy that prohibits, among other things, our employees and directors from engaging in (i) any hedging transactions that are designed to hedge or speculate on any change in the market value of EPAM’s equity securities, (ii) trading in options or other derivatives involving EPAM’s stock, and (iii) pledging EPAM securities in any circumstance, including by purchasing securities in margin or holding securities in a margin account. These prohibitions apply to EPAM’s equity securities whether issued as compensation or acquired otherwise and prohibit transactions such as zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts. None of our employees or directors has pledged EPAM stock as collateral for personal loans or other obligations.

From time to time our executive officers may have Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. We do not undertake any obligation to report Rule 10b5-1 trading plans that are adopted, or may be adopted in the future, by any of our officers and directors, or to report any modification or terminations of any publicly announced plan, except to the extent required by law.

21

Report of the Audit Committee

EPAM’s Board has adopted a written charter of the Audit Committee which details the role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee, among other things, appoints, retains and oversees EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm; oversees internal audit functions; and reviews with management EPAM’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee serves a Board-level oversight role in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm based on the information it receives, discussions with management and the auditors, and the experience of the Audit Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters.

Management has primary responsibility for financial statements, accounting principles and internal control over financial reporting. EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing EPAM’s financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The members of the Audit Committee are not professional auditors or accountants, and the functions of the Audit Committee are not intended to replicate, verify or certify management’s activities or those of EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm. Moreover, the Audit Committee cannot certify that EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm is “independent” under applicable rules and regulations.

In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met eight times during 2022. During those meetings, the Audit Committee executed its responsibilities consistent with its charter, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at https://investors.epam.com/investors/leadership-and-governance/documents.

In addition to pre-approving the audit, other audit-related, tax services, and other services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP and certain of its affiliates, the Audit Committee requests and reviews fee estimates for each proposed service. These fee estimates strengthen the oversight the Audit Committee exercises over EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm. On a periodic basis, the Audit Committee reviews the status of service engagements and fees incurred year-to date against pre-approved service engagement scope and fee estimates.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with management. The Audit Committee has discussed with EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters that are required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard 1301 (“Communications with Audit Committees”) and SEC Rule 2-07. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with EPAM’s independent registered public accounting firm its independence.

Based on the review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in EPAM’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, for filing with the SEC.

THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

Helen Shan, Chair

Ronald Vargo

Eugene Roman

22

Compensation of Directors

Compensation of Directors

Our independent directors are compensated under our Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan and related policy. Directors who are employees of EPAM or any of our subsidiaries receive no compensation for serving as directors.

Under our plan and policy, each director who is not an employee of EPAM or any subsidiary of EPAM receives an annual cash retainer (which the director may elect to receive in shares), committee and meeting fees, and an annual grant of restricted stock units. In addition, new non-employee directors receive an initial award of restricted stock units upon joining the Board.

In addition to the annual cash retainer, our non-employee directors are entitled to additional cash amounts for each meeting they attend (in person or telephonically, with different amounts applicable to each) in excess of 10 meetings of the Board or committee on which such non-employee director serves, in any calendar year. In addition, the Lead Independent Director, and the chair and members of each committee of the Board of Directors each receives an additional cash fee.

We offer our directors the option to defer receipt of shares of our common stock delivered upon conversion of restricted stock units until the July 15th immediately following their retirement from the Board, or in one to five annual installments following retirement from the Board through our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan. This deferral plan permits the deferred receipt of shares relating to restricted stock units granted during or after 2017.

The Compensation Committee reviews the compensation components and levels for non-employee directors, taking into account the director compensation practices of industry and other peer companies among other factors in a report prepared by the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee most recently performed this review at the end of 2022, with changes effective January 1, 2023.

The annual retainer and fee amounts for non-employee directors, our Lead Independent Director, committee members and committee chairs for 2022 and the changes effective for 2023 are as set forth below.

	2022		As of January 1, 2023
Annual Retainer	$	65,000	$	65,000
Additional amount per meeting for attending >10 meetings	$	2,000 (in person)	$	2,000 (in person)
	$	1,000 (telephonic)	$	1,000 (telephonic)
Lead Independent Director – additional retainer	$	30,000	$	35,000
Chair:
Audit Committee	$	25,000	$	25,000
Compensation Committee	$	20,000	$	20,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	$	15,000	$	15,000
Committee Members (other than Chair):
Audit Committee	$	13,000	$	13,000
Compensation Committee	$	10,000	$	10,000
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee	$	8,000	$	8,000
Dollar value of initial equity grant (vesting in equal amounts over four years)	$	100,000	$	100,000
Dollar value of annual equity grant (vesting on the first anniversary of grant)	$	205,000	$	225,000

23

The following table contains information about the fees and other compensation earned or paid to the members of the Board in the year ended December 31, 2022. Mr. Dobkin did not receive any compensation for his service as a director, and therefore is not included in the following table. The compensation received by Mr. Dobkin for his service to EPAM as President and Chief Executive Officer in 2022 is presented in “Executive Compensation.” Ms. Aguirre is not listed in the table below because she was appointed to the Board in March 2023.

Director Compensation

Name	Fees earned or paid in cash ($)			Stock awards(1)(2) ($)		Option awards ($)		Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)		Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings ($)		All other compensation ($)			Total ($)
Richard Michael Mayoras	$	81,000	(3)	$	204,904		—		—		—		—		$	229,956
Karl Robb	$	65,000	(4)	$	204,904		—		—		—	$	94,000	(5)	$	308,956
Eugene Roman	$	78,000	(6)	$	204,904										$	226,956
Robert Segert	$	80,000	(7)	$	204,904		—		—		—		—		$	226,956
Helen Shan	$	100,000	(8)	$	204,904		—		—		—		—		$	248,956
Jill B. Smart	$	85,000	(9)	$	204,904		—		—		—		—		$	234,956
Ronald Vargo	$	114,000	(10)	$	204,904		—		—		—		—		$	257,956

(1) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted to the directors in 2022, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For further information on how we account for stock-based compensation, please see Notes 1 and 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in our 2022 Annual Report.

(2) Represents a single annual Board service grant of 628 restricted stock units to each of Mss. Shan and Smart and Messrs. Roman, Mayoras, Robb, Segert, and Vargo on June 2, 2022 that fully vest on June 2, 2023 (or, upon termination of service from the Board at any time, a portion of restricted stock units will vest as of the date of such termination on a pro rata basis). Certain of our directors have elected to defer receipt of shares of our common stock delivered on conversion of restricted stock units until after their retirement from the Board, pursuant to our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan.

(3) Represents a fee of $10,000 earned for service as a member of the Compensation Committee; $6,000 earned for service as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and $65,000 earned as an annual retainer for service on the Board. Mr. Mayoras held an aggregate of 7,394 shares of common stock, including the 628 restricted stock units granted on June 2, 2022 and shares deferred under our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan, if any, as of December 31, 2022.

(4) Represents $65,000 earned as an annual retainer for service on the Board. Mr. Robb held an aggregate of 4,440 shares of common stock, including the 628 restricted stock units granted on June 2, 2022 and shares deferred under our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan, if any, as of December 31, 2022.

(5) Fees for consulting services pursuant to an independent contractor agreement with EPAM.

(6) Represents a fee of $13,000 earned for service as a member of the Audit Committee and $65,000 earned as an annual retainer for service on the Board. Mr. Roman held an aggregate of 1,773 shares of common stock, including the 628 restricted stock units granted on June 2, 2022 and shares deferred under our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan, if any, as of December 31, 2022.

(7) Represents a fee of $15,000 earned for service as chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and $65,000 earned as an annual retainer for service on the Board. Mr. Segert held an aggregate of 17,439 shares of common stock, including the 628 restricted stock units granted on June 2, 2022 and shares deferred under our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan, if any, as of December 31, 2022.

(8) Represents a fee of $25,000 earned for service as a chair of the Audit Committee; $10,000 earned for service as a member of the Compensation Committee, and $65,000 earned as an annual retainer for service on the Board. Ms. Shan held an aggregate of 3,000 shares of common stock, including the 628 restricted stock units granted on June 2, 2022 and shares deferred under our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan, if any, as of December 31, 2022.

(9) Represents a fee of $20,000 earned for service as chair of the Compensation Committee and $65,000 earned as an annual retainer for service on the Board. Ms. Smart held an aggregate of 6,025 shares of common stock, including the 628 restricted stock units granted on June 2, 2022 and shares deferred under our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan, if any, as of December 31, 2022.

(10) Represents a fee of $13,000 earned for service as a member of the Audit Committee; $6,000 earned for service as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; $25,000 earned for service as Lead Independent Director; and $65,000 earned as an annual retainer for service on the Board. Mr. Vargo held an aggregate of 7,627 shares of common stock, including the 628 restricted stock units granted on June 2, 2022 and shares deferred under our Non-Employee Directors Deferral Plan, if any, as of December 31, 2022.

24

Executive Compensation

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation Committee’s members are Jill Smart, Richard Michael Mayoras, and Helen Shan. No member of the Compensation Committee who served during 2022 is or was an employee during 2022, or is or has ever been an officer of our Company. None of our executive officers has served during 2022 on the board of directors of another public company with executive officers who serve as members of our Board. No member of the Compensation Committee who served during 2022 had any relationship requiring disclosure by us under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee Report

This report shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act or under the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth below with our management and the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant. Based on its review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022.

The Compensation Committee

Jill Smart, Chair

Richard Michael Mayoras

Helen Shan

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

This compensation discussion and analysis provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy and the material elements of compensation earned by our named executive officers (“NEOs”) with respect to the year ended December 31, 2022.

EPAM relies on a talented leadership team to support EPAM’s objectives for sustainable growth, client service and long-term stockholder value creation. Our executive compensation program is designed to motivate, reward and retain our executive team by awarding compensation that emphasizes performance, while remaining flexible and responsive to changing business conditions.

2022 Corporate Performance Highlights

EPAM began 2022 with optimism, following a 2021 that included the Company’s addition to the S&P 500 and one of the strongest corporate and financial performance years in EPAM’s history. The invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022 sharpened our focus on our highest priorities – the safety of our people in Ukraine, mobility support for EPAM personnel and their families from the affected region to new countries, business continuity including an exit of our business from Russia, and continuity of service for those customers impacted by circumstances in the region. As in previous economic and geopolitical events, we intend to remain committed to our people while safeguarding our operations and financial position. Despite the ongoing war and challenging macroeconomic conditions, our 2022 business increased its global delivery footprint to become a truly geo-diversified IT services company with operations in more than 50 countries.

25

2022 brought many corporate highlights for EPAM, despite the challenges of the war:

• Revenues increased to $4.825 billion, a year-over-year increase of $1.067 billion, or 28.4%.

• GAAP income from operations was $573.0 million, an increase of $30.7 million, or 5.7%, compared to $542.3 million in 2021.

• Non-GAAP income from operations* was $818.2 million, an increase of $140.0 million, or 20.6%, compared to $678.2 million in 2021.

• Diluted EPS on a GAAP basis was $7.09, a decrease of $1.06, or 13.0%, compared to $8.15 in 2021, while Non-GAAP diluted EPS* was $10.90, an increase of $1.85, or 20.4%, compared to $9.05 in 2021.

• We reallocated our concentration of delivery resources from approximately 60% being in Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia at the end of 2021 to having approximately 30% of our talent located in those countries at the end of 2022 by supporting our personnel moving to new and existing locations.

* Non-GAAP income from operations and Non-GAAP EPS are each a non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to “Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Comparable GAAP Measures” for additional information.

2022 Executive Compensation Highlights

Compensation for our NEOs in 2022 reflected the resiliency of the business despite exceptional disruption, with a focus on retaining and motivating our team through performance-based compensation. Highlights in our compensation for NEOs in 2022 included the following:

• When compared to 2021, total compensation in 2022 for our NEOs grew approximately 9.8% as a group and 10% on average, reflecting our overall approach that rewards our leadership team for strong and resilient performance despite the war and macroeconomic challenges, while keeping compensation competitive for our talented leaders.

• We provide a level of base pay meant to retain our highly qualified leadership team and allocated fixed versus variable pay consistent with prior years. We increased 2022 base salary for our NEOs 9.4% as a group and 9.3% on average. NEO base salaries remain competitive but conservative when compared to base salaries observed among peers and the broader market.

• Executive short-term, performance-based cash incentives for 2022 were paid at 100% of target, continuing our focus on paying for performance as we delivered stable revenue and profitability results for the year despite the exceptional challenges of the war and other global factors.

• In determining annual performance-based cash incentives for our NEOs, the Compensation Committee used a structured formula that assigns greater weight to corporate performance indicators and puts less emphasis on individual contributions. Despite the typical plan to formulaically fund the bonus pool based on revenue growth and profitability (as in prior years), shortly after the war began in the first quarter of 2022, the Board decided to fund the cash incentive pool for all eligible employees at not less than 100% to aid in retention and motivation during a very challenging period for EPAM.

• 2022 annual equity grants to our NEOs were comprised of stock option and restricted stock unit awards of approximately equal value at grant date (based on a grant date value of restricted stock unit awards calculated using the 30-day average closing price of our stock on the date prior to grant), balancing retention and compensation incentives.

• There were no increases or changes to executive benefits to our NEOs, who largely participate in the same broad-based programs provided to other employees, and we provided no perquisites to NEOs.

• Beginning with equity grants made in 2022, our named executive officers (and other Section 16 officers) are eligible to have a portion of their equity awards accelerated upon retirement. So long as such executive officer has a combined age and years of service of 70 (with a minimum age of 60 and minimum 5 years of service), if the executive retires, any equity award held at least one year from the date of grant will be fully accelerated upon retirement. EPAM implemented a retirement equity vesting policy after a review of competitive market practices to minimize the use of Compensation Committee discretion in cases of executive retirement and to ensure effective executive succession planning.

• Overall, the total compensation packages for our NEOs continue to be significantly performance- and results-based in the forms of short-term cash incentives heavily dependent on company performance and equity-based compensation directly linked to the future performance of EPAM common stock.

26

Our executive compensation program reflects many best practices.

What We Do

What We Don’t Do

✓  Align our executive pay with performance ✓  Appropriately balance short- and long-term incentives ✓  Provide for “double trigger” change of control vesting for all equity grants ✓  Award equity grants which vest over a four-year term ✓  Hold an annual “say-on-pay” advisory vote to approve executive compensation ✓  Maintain meaningful stock ownership guidelines for executives, members of senior management and directors ✓  Maintain a clawback policy that covers all performance-based compensation made to executive officers ✓  Retain and utilize an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee

X   No contracts with multi-year guaranteed salary increases or bonus arrangements X   No excise tax gross-ups upon a change of control X   No “single trigger” change of control vesting for equity awards X   No “golden parachutes” or automatic change of control severance payments X   No supplemental executive retirement plan or supplemental pension benefits X   No repricing of equity awards without stockholder approval X   No hedging, pledging, and speculative transactions in our securities by our executive officers, employees and directors X   No perquisites for our named executive officers

Stockholder Say-on-Pay Vote

EPAM’s relationship with our stockholders is critical to our success. We endeavor to ensure that management and our Board hear, understand and respond to issues of importance to our stockholders, including executive compensation matters. We hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation annually, as required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-20 thereunder, so at this Annual Meeting, we are asking stockholders to make an advisory vote to approve executive compensation. While the advisory vote on executive compensation is non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will carefully assess the voting results and may consult with our stockholders to better understand any issues or concerns raised through the advisory vote. See “Proposal 3: Annual Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation.” At our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 92.1% of votes cast by our stockholders were in favor of approving the 2021 compensation of our NEOs. Following the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, the Compensation Committee reviewed the results of the advisory vote of stockholders approving executive compensation. The Compensation Committee continues to refine and adjust the overall executive compensation program to ensure continued alignment with stockholder interests, including pay for performance and delivering long-term value and sustained growth.

Our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”)

Our named executive officers, or NEOs, consist of our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our three other most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2022.

For 2022, our NEOs were:

• Arkadiy Dobkin, President and Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”)

• Jason Peterson, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (our “CFO”) and Treasurer

• Balazs Fejes, Executive Vice President, President of EU and APAC Markets

• Viktar Dvorkin, Senior Vice President and Head of Global Delivery

• Larry Solomon, Senior Vice President and Chief People Officer

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

We believe that the value we deliver to our customers, and ultimately to our stockholders, depends in large part upon the quality and capability of our people. We apply the following guiding principles with respect to executive compensation:

• Attract, motivate, develop and retain quality executives who will increase long-term stockholder value.

27

• Provide total compensation to each of our NEOs that is commensurate with position and experience, largely in annual incentive and long-term incentives aligned with the long-term interests of stockholders.

• Reward exceptional performance and long-term commitment to EPAM.

We use a mix of short-term compensation, in the form of base salaries and annual cash incentive payments, and long-term compensation, in the form of equity-based awards, as the total compensation structure to meet these objectives. This compensation program serves to complement the strong alignment our NEOs have with our stockholders because of the equity holdings our NEOs have in EPAM, and our stock ownership guidelines strengthen this alignment. The Compensation Committee continues to evaluate the elements of our executive compensation program to ensure strong pay and performance alignment.

Each of the components of our executive compensation program has its own objective and alignment with stockholder value creation, as set forth below.

	Component	Objective	Alignment with Stockholder Value Creation
	Base Salary	Provide a base amount of fixed compensation to attract and retain highly qualified executives Reflects individual seniority, skills, prior experience, scope and responsibility	Salary levels and year-over-year increases set at appropriate, but generally conservative, levels to manage fixed pay
	Performance-based Cash Incentives	Reward executives for a combination of strong corporate performance and individual contributions to our success	Potential cash pool determined for all eligible employees, including NEOs, based on EPAM revenue and profitability. Annual awards for NEOs determined based on our operational and financial results as well as individual performance and collaboration
	Equity Awards	Provide annual awards to executives in equal proportions (based on grant date value) via two types of equity vehicles, stock options and time-vested RSUs to realize future stock price appreciation and serve as a retention tool for highly qualified executive leadership Reward executives for long-term success	Ultimate value of equity awards based on sustained, long-term EPAM stock performance

28

	Component	Objective	Alignment with Stockholder Value Creation
	Benefits and Perquisites	Lack of special perquisites for executives promotes EPAM’s approach and culture	EPAM does not provide supplemental executive perquisites or retirement benefits EPAM provides its executives with broad-based, non-discriminatory benefit plans available to all employees to focus executive pay on incentive-based cash or equity compensation
	Post-employment Compensation	Lack of pension plans, retiree benefits and other post-employment benefits keeps fixed compensation costs conservative Beginning with 2021 grants, equity awards vest upon death or disability (100% in the case of two or more years of service, and 50% in case of less than 2 years of service) Beginning with 2022 grants, equity awards held for at least one year from the date of grant accelerate upon retirement for Section 16 officers who retire with a combined age and service of 70 (minimum age 60 and minimum tenure 5 years)	No pre-set severance terms or employment agreements Double-trigger change of control requirements for acceleration of unvested equity awards Equity vesting in death, disability, or retirement intended to provide programmatic vesting of equity in limited circumstances to minimize need for Committee discretion
	Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)	EPAM maintains an ESPP for eligible employees, including our executive officers (available in select countries) with a market competitive design	Creates incentive for employees to share in EPAM’s value creation

2022 Compensation Components

The graphics below show the components of our CEO’s and other NEOs’ compensation relative to each other. As these charts demonstrate, a substantial amount of our CEO’s and other NEOs’ overall compensation for 2022 has value linked to the long-term stock performance of EPAM. This underscores our dedication to ensuring our executives’ interests align with those of our stockholders.

CEO Compensation Components 88% Variable Compensation	Other Named Executive Officers (Average) 83% Variable Compensation

29

Compensation-Setting Process

Role of the Board and Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of the Board is responsible for developing, implementing and administering our executive compensation policies, including salaries and cash incentive compensation, and making recommendations to the Board for executives with respect to equity incentive compensation. In considering and making executive compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee retains the services of an independent executive compensation consultant, Pay Governance LLC (“Pay Governance”). The Compensation Committee consists entirely of independent directors pursuant to applicable NYSE rules.

The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee may delegate authority when it deems appropriate and in the best interests of EPAM, including the authority to grant stock rights or options to any person other than an “officer” within the meaning of Section 16 of the Exchange Act under EPAM’s incentive compensation or other equity-based plans. Based on this authority, the Compensation Committee has delegated to our CEO and our Chief People Officer the authority to make equity grants to employees other than our Section 16 “officers” and certain key senior management personnel from a preauthorized pool of shares for such awards, subject to certain limitations. The Board approves equity incentive compensation for our NEOs on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee determines the appropriate amount and mix of compensation for each NEO considering the recommendations of our CEO and Chief People Officer (except as to themselves) and the advice and analyses provided by its compensation consultant. There is no pre-established formula to determine the total compensation of any NEO. Each member of our executive team has a target cash incentive amount set each year by the Compensation Committee, and the amount of each individual award is determined using a formula that weights corporate performance more heavily than individual contributions, using recommendations of our CEO and Chief People Officer. For equity-based incentive compensation, the timing, value and form of awards under our equity-based plans are made at the discretion of the Board based on recommendations of our CEO and Chief People Officer and the Compensation Committee.

Role of Management

Mr. Dobkin, as CEO, and Mr. Solomon, as Chief People Officer, provide substantial input in determining compensation paid to our NEOs (other than their own). The Compensation Committee meets periodically with Mr. Dobkin and Mr. Solomon to address executive compensation matters, including the rationale for our compensation programs and the effectiveness and market relevancy of the programs in achieving our compensation objectives. As part of our normal annual process, Mr. Dobkin and Mr. Solomon review with the Compensation Committee the performance of the NEOs and recommend to the Compensation Committee changes in base salary, cash incentives and equity awards for each other NEO and other members of the senior management team. Based on this process, the Compensation Committee determines and approves base salary adjustments and cash incentive and recommends to the full Board for approval equity grants for NEOs other than the CEO. For Mr. Dobkin, our Lead Independent Director solicits input from all members of the Board regarding CEO performance and shares consolidated insights with the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee evaluates the CEO’s performance, considering company performance and individual subjective and objective criteria such as leadership, business planning, financial results, succession planning, human resources, compliance, and board interface. The Compensation Committee’s evaluation informs its decisions as to Mr. Dobkin’s base salary increase and its recommendation as to equity compensation, which is subsequently approved by the Board. Mr. Dobkin’s cash incentive is based solely on corporate performance.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee uses the services of Pay Governance as its independent compensation consultant. At the Compensation Committee’s request during 2022, Pay Governance prepared analyses and reports on market pay for named executive officers, director compensation, a competitive review of peer company share usage and dilution, peer group composition, and information on trends and policies relating to compensation. In addition, Pay Governance provided advice on the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Pay Governance attends meetings as appropriate at the invitation of the Compensation Committee and meets with our management from time to time to collect compensation data and information about the business. To ensure the independence of Pay Governance, the Compensation Committee annually reviews its work, fees and relationship. During 2022, Pay Governance did not perform any other services for EPAM or any of its affiliates and the Compensation Committee concluded that there was no conflict of interest within the meaning of Section 10C-1 of the Exchange Act affecting Pay Governance’s independence.

30

Factors Considered in Determining Compensation

We do not typically enter into formal employment or consultancy, change of control or other similar agreements with our executives or other employees (except to the extent required by law), although we provide offer letters for onboarding executives and other employees. We believe in mutual trust, loyalty and commitment between EPAM and our NEOs, and that employment agreements are not necessary to achieve our goals and meet our NEOs’ needs. We believe that this assertion is supported by the long tenure of several of our NEOs and our success in adding new executives to our leadership team.

The Compensation Committee reviews executive compensation levels for the NEOs annually to ensure that they remain competitive, overall, within our industry. The Committee reviews tally sheets for all executive officers in connection with its review of total compensation and annual compensation decisions made in the first quarter of each year. The tally sheets summarize historical and current compensation for each member of management. The Compensation Committee believes that tally sheets are a useful reference tool as it considers changes to compensation and retention of key leaders.

The overall value of the compensation package for each NEO is determined by the Compensation Committee in consultation with the CEO and Chief People Officer (other than as to themselves). In these consultations, the Compensation Committee, CEO and Chief People Officer consider the overall performance of EPAM, as well as subjective factors including the individual performance of the other NEOs and their contributions to EPAM achievements. The Compensation Committee also considers information provided by Pay Governance in making its compensation decisions, but does not specifically target a percentile against the broader market or our peer group.

EPAM uses a compensation peer group to help us understand pay levels, pay design and policies for similarly sized publicly traded companies. In developing and changing the composition of this peer group over time and in 2022, we have focused on technology companies of similar revenue and market cap size to EPAM that also generally have strong historical revenue growth rates and significant international operations, since there are relatively few direct competitors of similar size to EPAM. The list for the most recent year (see box to the right) is subject to change from time to time depending on the availability of the companies’ data and the continued appropriateness of the companies in terms of the factors described above and other factors. The Compensation Committee reviews the criteria, adjusts, if appropriate, and confirms the companies to be included in the peer group annually. In 2022, we removed Teradata Corporation from the compensation peer group and added CGI Inc., Cognizant Technology Solutions, and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. to the comparative group. Compensation Peer Group Akamai Technologies, Inc. Autodesk, Inc. Cadence Design Systems, Inc. CGI Inc. Citrix Systems, Inc. Cognizant Technology Solutions Fortinet, Inc. Open Text Corporation Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Science Applications Int’l Corp. ServiceNow, Inc. Splunk Inc. SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. Synopsys, Inc. Verisk Analytics, Inc. Workday, Inc.  

The Compensation Committee and management use peer group information to better understand the external marketplace; however, industry peer information is not the only factor used to determine executive pay levels. The Compensation Committee and our management consider multiple factors including experience, contribution, internal equity, and past compensation in addition to the peer group information.

Elements of Compensation

The fundamental elements of our compensation program are base salary, short-term cash incentive awards, long-term equity incentives and other broad-based benefits. Although we expect these to remain the elements of our compensation program going forward, the relative weighting of each element and specific plan and award designs may evolve. We have selected these elements as the principal components of our executive compensation program because we have found them to be effective in recruiting, retaining and motivating our NEOs within the context of our business and operating environment.

Each NEO’s compensation package is individually tailored and is intended to encourage executive performance that supports our organizational strategy, while at the same time remaining aligned with our compensation philosophy and the components described above. The Compensation Committee and the Board continue to evaluate the compensation components, the mix of long- and short-term compensation, and decision-making processes for cash incentives and equity awards to ensure we are motivating our leadership and rewarding performance and creation of stockholder value.

31

Base Salary

Base salary is used to attract and retain our NEOs. Base salaries are determined using comparisons with industry peers and other relevant factors including the seniority of the executive, the functional role of the position, the executive’s unique skills and prior experience, the executive’s responsibility level, and other subjective performance criteria for each executive. Base salaries are reviewed annually, taking into account the above factors and information provided by Pay Governance. Base salaries were increased to a more competitive level that is also consistent with our overall compensation approach of rewarding results by maintaining a ratio of fixed versus variable compensation that is consistent with prior years and heavily weighted towards performance-based variable compensation.

Short-Term Cash Incentive Awards

Short-term cash incentive awards are intended to be a meaningful component of our NEOs’ total compensation package. The Compensation Committee uses a senior management incentive framework that is designed to reward executives for achieving short-term (annual) performance goals, taking corporate performance and, to a lesser extent, individual performance into account.

Under this standard framework, the Compensation Committee approves:

• corporate performance measures and goals (and any deviation from them);

• the aggregate funding level, based on EPAM’s revenue and profitability performance for the year, and considering management’s recommendation for any adjustments based on structured judgment;

• individual annual cash incentive targets for the NEOs; and

• actual annual cash incentive awards for each NEO.

Our CEO and Chief People Officer provide recommendations as to the other NEOs’ annual targets and individual performance component of actual awards.

The framework provides that a broad-based cash incentive compensation pool is funded for all eligible employees (including our NEOs), based on EPAM’s revenue and adjusted income from operations results for the year. The Compensation Committee, based on management’s proposal, approves the total funding of incentive compensation available in this broad-based pool for all annual performance awards that are awarded to eligible EPAM personnel.

We originally planned that the overall incentive pool for 2022 would be funded based on the same framework, using revenue growth and adjusted income from operations as the determinative measures. However, the geopolitical uncertainty relating to the attack on Ukraine caused the Board and the Compensation Committee to consider necessary actions to ensure the retention, financial stability, and support of EPAM’s personnel as the Company navigated the impact to its business. In March 2022, the Board unanimously approved funding the 2022 broad-based performance incentive pool at not less than 100% in order to support EPAM’s objectives of retaining and rewarding key talent as a critical component of navigating through this unprecedented time. Following the end of 2022, the Compensation Committee confirmed funding the bonus pool at 100%, noting our year-over-year revenue growth of 28.4% during a challenging year that prioritized the safety of our people in Ukraine, relocating our people from the affected region, and delivering business continuity to our customers. The full funding of the broad-based pool did not ensure that any individual recipient (including any NEO) would receive 100% of target for the year. The Compensation Committee followed its typical process whereby individual performance of each executive officer impacted his or her ultimate cash incentive compensation payment for the year.

Actual cash incentives paid to our NEOs, except the CEO, are based 65% on corporate performance (using the funding level described above as the multiplier) and 35% on individual contributions to EPAM’s success. The cash incentive paid to our CEO is based solely on corporate performance. For the individual performance component, the Compensation Committee reviews each executive’s performance with Mr. Dobkin and Mr. Solomon (except their own) and determines the appropriate level of achievement.

32

2022 target cash incentive award levels for each NEO, the maximum cash incentive award, and the actual 2022 cash incentive award are set forth in the table below.

	2022 cash incentive target ($)		2022 cash incentive maximum ($)		2022 cash incentive award –actual ($)		Payout as a percentage of target (%)
Arkadiy Dobkin	$	1,000,000	$	2,000,000	$	1,000,000		100	%
Jason Peterson	$	500,000	$	1,000,000	$	500,000		100	%
Balazs Fejes	$	500,000	$	1,000,000	$	500,000		100	%
Viktar Dvorkin	$	400,000	$	800,000	$	400,000		100	%
Larry Solomon	$	400,000	$	800,000	$	400,000		100	%

Long Term Equity Incentives

Our NEOs receive long-term equity-based awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock units under EPAM’s 2015 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). These awards provide our NEOs with a personal financial interest in EPAM’s success through stock ownership, aligning their interests with that of our stockholders. Stock-based awards also enhance their long-term commitment to EPAM’s building of shareholder value, as the potential realized value of the awards is determined by stock price appreciation from the date of grant. These equity awards generally occur in the first quarter of each year and vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period commencing on the grant date. In addition to annual grants of equity-based awards, awards under the 2015 Plan may be made in connection with the start of employment, or to reward an extraordinary contribution to EPAM’s success at another “off-cycle” time.

EPAM’s Board, taking the recommendation of the Compensation Committee into consideration, approves awards of long-term equity incentives to our NEOs annually based on our performance and consideration of individual performance. The amounts of each 2022 grant were similar to prior years, with adjustments to reflect current market conditions, retention needs, and corporate and individual performance. In addition, Mr. Dobkin’s equity award reinforces the alignment of our CEO’s interests with those of our stockholders, as the Board determined that Mr. Dobkin’s demonstrated commitment to delivering stockholder value, and his responsibility as CEO to manage and drive overall company performance, is strengthened by linking a portion of his overall compensation to the performance of EPAM’s stock.

Annual long-term equity incentive awards to our NEOs typically consist of 50% stock options and 50% restricted stock units based on grant date fair value of the awards. The Compensation Committee has determined and recommended to the Board that this mix of equity award types aligns with EPAM’s philosophy to retain and incentivize our NEOs and reward absolute long-term stock appreciation. Through service-based vesting and forfeiture provisions included in our option and restricted stock unit award agreements, we believe that we provide an additional incentive to our leadership to act in furtherance of our long-term success and our stockholders’ interests, strongly linking pay with EPAM’s performance.

Other Broad-based Employee Benefits

We provide retirement, health and other broad-based benefits as another component of our overall compensation scheme. We have established a 401(k) retirement plan, which is a tax-qualified self-funded retirement plan, in which our U.S. employees, including our U.S.-based NEOs, may participate. Under this plan, employees may elect to defer their current compensation up to the statutory limit. We provide discretionary matching contributions to the plan equal to 100% of the employee’s contribution up to 2% of the employee’s eligible compensation, and 50% matching on the next 4% of eligible compensation contributed. In 2021, we launched an employee stock purchase plan with market competitive terms in certain countries, and our NEOs are eligible to participate in the plan.

We currently make available to our U.S. employees, including our U.S.-based NEOs, group health insurance (including medical, dental and vision), long- and short-term disability, group life, AD&D and paid time off. Mr. Fejes receives statutory benefits required by Swiss law.

We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans or any nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

We do not provide any perquisites to our NEOs because we believe that our compensation objectives are better achieved through the compensation elements described above.

33

Other Employment Arrangements

Our normal practice is to issue employment offer letters in connection with new hires, including at the executive officer level. These offer letters describe basic terms of employment, including initial compensation levels and equity awards granted at the time of hire, if any. There are no currently effective employment offer letters or employment agreements with our named executive officers other than Mr. Fejes, who has an employment agreement with our Swiss subsidiary as required by Swiss law.

Compensation Risk Assessment

Our management team has reviewed our compensation policies and practices for all our employees with the Compensation Committee. This risk assessment is performed annually, led by our Chief People Officer with input from other stakeholders, and comprises a detailed review of each compensation and incentive program, including the participants, funding, types of awards and criteria on which awards under these programs are made. The Compensation Committee has determined, based on this review, that our compensation policies, practices, plans and programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on EPAM. The Compensation Committee determined that for all employees, including our NEOs, our compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk taking and instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable value creation for our stockholders. Our Board concurred with all of the Compensation Committee’s determinations with respect to risks associated with our compensation programs.

Tax Deductibility

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally does not allow a tax deduction to public companies for compensation paid to certain executive officers in one calendar year over $1 million per executive. While the Compensation Committee considers tax deductibility as one of the many factors in determining executive compensation, it continues to have the flexibility to pay nondeductible compensation if it believes it is in EPAM’s best interests.

Stock Ownership Guidelines, Prohibition on Hedging or Pledging EPAM Stock, and Clawback Policy

Our stock ownership guidelines apply to executive officers, directors, and certain other key EPAM personnel. Our Chief Executive Officer is required to own shares of EPAM Common Stock with a value equal to 10 times his base salary, and Mr. Dobkin complies with this guideline, as evidenced by his significant beneficial ownership of EPAM’s Common Stock as set forth under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.” Other executive officers of EPAM (including our NEOs) must own shares of our Common Stock valued at two times his or her base salary. In addition, directors are required to own shares of our Common Stock with a value equal to 10 times their annual cash retainer. Our CEO’s stock ownership guideline was effective immediately in 2015, and all other individuals are required to satisfy the stock ownership guidelines within five years from the date he or she becomes subject to the guidelines. All of our NEOs and non-employee directors met or exceeded the guidelines on the 2022 testing dates or were expected to do so by the time his or her grace period for compliance ends. Notwithstanding current compliance, the Board believes that it would be unfair to require an NEO or non-employee director to buy more shares due to the volatility in the price of EPAM common stock. Therefore, participants are not required to purchase more shares in the event of decreases in the stock price that cause his or her holdings to fall below the applicable threshold, but he or she may not then cause the sale or transfer of any shares until the stock ownership guidelines have again been met. Also, as described earlier, we maintain policies that prohibit our employees and directors from pledging EPAM stock or engaging in activities considered to be hedging of our stock.

Our clawback policy, administered by the Compensation Committee, provides that all performance-based compensation made to executive officers may be subject to recoupment, or “clawback,” if the Compensation Committee determines that intentional misconduct or gross negligence of an executive officer was a material contributing factor to EPAM being required to undertake a material restatement of its financial statements filed with the SEC. We will continue to monitor our clawback policy to ensure that it is consistent with applicable laws and will review and modify the policy as necessary to reflect the final NYSE listing rules adopted to implement the compensation recovery requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

34

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation of our NEOs for services rendered to us in all capacities for 2022, 2021, and 2020.

Name and   principal position	Year		Salary ($)			Bonus ($)		Stock awards ($) (1)(2)		Option awards ($) (1)		Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)			All other compensation ($) (4)		Total ($)
Arkadiy Dobkin   President and Chief   Executive Officer		2022	$	775,000			—	$	2,166,810	$	2,500,047	$	1,000,000		$	11,400	$	6,453,257
		2021	$	687,500			—	$	2,000,063	$	1,999,961	$	1,234,000		$	8,648	$	5,930,172
		2020	$	625,000			—	$	1,625,078	$	1,625,830	$	821,000		$	7,718	$	4,704,626
Jason Peterson   Senior Vice President,   Chief Financial Officer   and Treasurer		2022	$	493,750			—	$	1,083,272	$	1,249,959	$	500,000		$	11,400	$	3,338,381
		2021	$	466,250			—	$	900,177	$	899,961	$	700,000		$	11,600	$	2,977,988
		2020	$	420,000			—	$	624,903	$	624,993	$	420,000		$	8,248	$	2,098,144
Balazs Fejes   President of EU and   APAC Markets		2022	$	512,201	(3)		—	$	1,083,272	$	1,249,959	$	500,000	(3)		—	$	3,345,432
		2021	$	488,959	(3)		—	$	950,105	$	950,006	$	700,000	(3)		—	$	3,089,070
		2020	$	448,949	(3)		—	$	624,903	$	624,993	$	425,000	(3)		—	$	2,123,845
Viktar Dvorkin   Senior Vice President,   Head of Global Delivery		2022	$	437,500			—	$	736,764	$	849,982	$	400,000		$	11,400	$	2,435,646
		2021	$	392,500			—	$	650,170	$	650,019	$	500,000		$	11,084	$	2,203,773
		2020	$	360,000			—	$	475,042	$	475,010	$	320,000		$	8,816	$	1,638,868
Larry Solomon   Senior Vice President   and Chief People Officer		2022	$	437,500			—	$	736,764	$	849,982	$	400,000		$	11,400	$	2,435,646
		2021	$	392,500			—	$	650,170	$	650,019	$	500,000		$	11,600	$	2,204,289
		2020	$	360,000			—	$	475,042	$	475,010	$	320,000		$	10,222	$	1,640,274

  (1) The amounts in these columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock unit and option awards granted to our named executive officers in 2022 and in the years provided, respectively, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. We provide information regarding the assumptions used to calculate the value of these stock-based compensation awards in Note 13 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2022 Annual Report. There can be no assurance that these awards will vest or will be exercised (in which case no value will be realized by the individual), or that the value upon vesting or exercise, as applicable, will approximate the aggregate grant date fair value.

  (2) The amounts in these columns for stock awards granted in 2020 and 2021 represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock units granted to our named executive officers computed by multiplying the 30-day average closing price of a share of EPAM Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange by the number of restricted stock units granted to the applicable named executive officer.

  (3) Mr. Fejes’ cash compensation in 2022 and 2021 was paid in Swiss francs and in 2020 was paid in Swiss francs and Hungarian forints. For 2022, 2021, and 2020, the applicable exchange rates used were $1.05, $1.09, and $1.06 per Swiss franc, and for 2020, $0.0032 per Hungarian forint, based on the average exchange rates from oanda.com.

  (4) The amounts in this column represent 401(k) plan matching contributions.

35

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information regarding grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2022.

	Grant date		Award approval date (1)		Estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards						All other stock awards: Number of shares of stock or units (#)		All other option awards: Number of securities underlying options (#)		Exercise or base price of option awards ($/Sh)		Grant date fair value of stock and option awards (2)
Name					Threshold ($)		Target ($)		Maximum ($)
Arkadiy Dobkin		2/22/2022		2/22/2022		—	$	1,000,000	$	2,000,000
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022										19,289	$	266.75	$	2,500,047
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022								8,123					$	2,166,810
Jason Peterson		2/22/2022		2/22/2022		—	$	500,000	$	1,000,000
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022										9,644	$	266.75	$	1,249,959
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022								4,061					$	1,083,272
Balazs Fejes		2/22/2022		2/22/2022		—	$	500,000	$	1,000,000
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022										9,644	$	266.75	$	1,249,959
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022								4,061					$	1,083,272
Viktar Dvorkin		2/22/2022		2/22/2022		—	$	400,000	$	800,000
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022										6,558	$	266.75	$	849,982
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022								2,762					$	736,764
Larry Solomon		2/22/2022		2/22/2022		—	$	400,000	$	800,000
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022										6,558	$	266.75	$	849,982
		3/25/2022		2/22/2022								2,762					$	736,764

  (1) On February 22, 2022, the Compensation Committee approved non-equity incentive plan award targets and recommended grants of stock options and restricted stock units to our named executive officers which our Board of Directors then approved.

  (2) The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the restricted stock unit and option awards granted to our named executive officers in 2022, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. We provide information regarding the assumptions used to calculate the value of these stock-based compensation awards in Note 12 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2022 Annual Report. There can be no assurance that these awards will vest or will be exercised (in which case no value will be realized by the individual), or that the value upon vesting or exercise, as applicable, will approximate the aggregate grant date fair value.

36

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information regarding the holdings of stock options and stock awards that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2022 for each of our NEOs.

	Option awards										Stock awards
Name   (a)	Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable (b)			Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable (c)			Option exercise price ($) (e)		Option expiration date (f)		Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#) (g)			Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#) (1) (h)
Arkadiy Dobkin		80,000					$	32.08		3/31/2024
		50,000					$	61.38		3/23/2025
		41,026					$	70.52		3/25/2026
		39,594					$	73.27		3/24/2027
		28,830(2	)				$	112.62		3/23/2028
		17,050(3	)		5,683(3	)	$	169.13		3/29/2029
		12,644(4	)		12,645(4	)	$	175.22		3/27/2030
		3,537(5	)		10,610(5	)	$	387.74		3/26/2031
					19,289(6	)	$	266.76		3/25/2032
												18,277		$	5,990,104
Jason Peterson		1,112(3	)		1,967(3	)	$	169.13		3/29/2029
		4,864(4	)		4,862(4	)	$	175.22		3/27/2030
		1,592(5	)		4,774(5	)	$	387.74		3/26/2031
					9,644(6	)	$	266.75		3/25/2032
												8,148(7	)	$	2,670,426
Balazs Fejes		6,820(3	)		2,273(3	)	$	169.13		3/29/2029
		4,864(4	)		4,862(4	)	$	175.22		3/27/2030
		1,680(5	)		5,040(5	)	$	387.74		3/26/2031
					9,644(6	)	$	266.75		3/25/2032
												8,363(7	)	$	2,740,890
Viktar Dvorkin		12,000					$	61.38		3/23/2025
		12,868					$	73.27		3/24/2027
		8,649(2	)				$	112.62		3/23/2028
		5,041(3	)		1,680(3	)	$	169.13		3/29/2029
		3,696(4	)		3,696(4	)	$	175.22		3/27/2030
		1,150(5	)		3,448(5	)	$	387.74		3/26/2031
					6,558(6	)	$	266.75		3/25/2032
												5,865(7	)	$	1,922,195
Larry Solomon		8,649(2	)				$	112.62		3/23/2028
		5,041(3	)		1,680(3	)	$	169.13		3/29/2029
		3,696(4	)		3,696(4	)	$	175.22		3/27/2030
		1,150(5	)		3,448(5	)	$	387.74		3/26/2031
					6,558(6	)	$	266.75		3/25/2032
												5,868(7	)	$	1,923,178

37

  (1) The closing market price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of 2022, was $327.74.

  (2) The option became exercisable as to 25% of the total grant on each of March 23, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

  (3) The option became exercisable as to 25% of the total grant on each of March 29, 2020, 2021 and 2022 and will become exercisable as to 25% of the total grant on March 29, 2023.

  (4) The option became exercisable as to 25% of the total grant on each of March 27, 2021 and 2022 and will become exercisable as to 25% of the total grant on each of March 27, 2023 and 2024.

  (5) The option became exercisable as to 25% of the total grant on March 15, 2022 and will become exercisable as to 25% of the total grant on each of March 15, 2023, 2024 and 2025.

  (6) The option becomes exercisable as to 25% of the total grant on each of March 15, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026.

  (7) Represents restricted stock units awarded in 2019 that are scheduled to vest as to 25% of the shares on March 29, 2023; restricted stock units awarded in 2020 that are scheduled to vest as to 25% of the shares on each of March 27, 2023 and 2024; restricted stock units awarded in 2021 that are scheduled to vest as to 25% of the shares on each of March 15, 2023, 2024, and 2025; and restricted stock units awarded in 2022 that are scheduled to vest as to 25% of the shares on each of March 15, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026.

Options Exercised and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth information regarding the exercise of stock options and shares acquired upon vesting of stock awards by our NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2022.

	Option awards					Stock awards
Name	Number of shares acquired on exercise (#)		Value realized on exercise ($) (1)			Number of shares acquired on vesting (#) (2)		Value realized on vesting ($) (3)
Arkadiy Dobkin		—			—		8,206		$	2,244,036
Jason Peterson		5,000		$	1,969,642		2,935		$	790,911
Balazs Fejes		47,811		$	20,238,396		3,354		$	911,993
Viktar Dvorkin		13,333		$	5,877,720		2,472		$	674,242
Larry Solomon		—			—		2,472		$	674,242

  (1) Represents the aggregate value realized upon sale of all of the shares acquired on exercise of the option at the weighted average sales price of each sales transaction. All options reflected were exercised on a cashless basis.

  (2) Represents gross number of shares acquired on vesting. EPAM’s practice is to withhold shares to satisfy the tax withholding requirement arising from the vesting of restricted stock units.

  (3) Calculated based on the closing market price of EPAM common stock on the trading day prior to the vest date.

Potential Payments on Termination and Change of Control

As discussed above, in 2022 we did not have a formal severance plan or similar arrangement that provides our NEOs (or other employees) with cash severance, equity acceleration, or other payments in connection with a termination of his or her employment with EPAM (except due to death or disability or retirement, provided age and years of service conditions are met) or a change of control of EPAM. In addition, EPAM does not provide excise tax gross-ups to any of our NEOs, and the 2015 Plan expressly prohibits us from providing such gross-ups.

Treatment of Equity Awards in Termination and Change of Control Situations

Equity awards granted to our NEOs under our 2012 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), under which awards were made until June 2015, and under the 2015 Plan, under which awards have been made beginning in July 2015, may forfeit or accelerate in certain circumstances relating to termination of employment or change of control as follows:

• Upon a termination of service for cause, any unvested restricted stock units and any unexercised portion of the option (both vested and unvested) forfeit as of the termination date.

38

• For awards granted prior to 2021, upon a termination of service due to death or disability, any unvested restricted stock units and any unvested portion of the option forfeit as of the termination date. Any vested portion of the option will remain exercisable until the earlier of one year following the termination date and the expiration date of the option, unless the Compensation Committee determines that the option should be exercisable to some greater extent or remain exercisable for some longer period (but not after the tenth anniversary of the grant date). All or a portion of equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2021 will vest upon the death or disability of the NEO, depending on years of service at the time of death or disability.

• Beginning with awards granted to our NEOs in 2022, upon a termination of service due to retirement, any unvested restricted stock units and any unvested portion of an option granted at least one year prior to the date of retirement will vest so long as the NEO is at least 60 years old, has worked for EPAM for at least five years, and the sum of the NEO’s age and years of service with EPAM equals at least 70.

• Stock options and restricted stock units awarded to our executives provide for “double-trigger” accelerated vesting upon a change of control, such that outstanding unvested awards will only accelerate upon a termination of employment by EPAM (or an affiliate) without cause, or by the executive for good reason.

• Upon termination of service for any other reason, any unvested restricted stock units and any unvested portion of the option forfeit as of the termination date. Any vested portion of the option will remain exercisable until the earlier of 90 days following the termination date and the expiration date of the option, unless the Compensation Committee determines that the option should be exercisable to some greater extent or remain exercisable for some longer period (but not after the tenth anniversary of the grant date).

The following table sets forth the estimated value of the acceleration of unvested equity awards held by each of our named executive officers assuming a termination of service by EPAM or an affiliate without cause, or by the NEO for good reason, due to the death or disability of the NEO, or due to the retirement of an NEO who met the age and tenure requirements, in each case assuming that such termination occurred on December 31, 2022. In the case of a termination of service without cause or by the NEO for good reason, the following table assumes that the date of termination of services was within two years following a change of control for awards made under the 2012 Plan, and within one year following a change of control for awards made under the 2015 Plan. In the case of a termination of service due to the death or disability of the NEO, the table assumes that the date of termination of service followed at least two years of service to EPAM or an affiliate. No equity grants made to any of our NEOs would qualify for acceleration upon retirement and are therefore not included in the table below.

Name	Value of accelerated unvested equity upon qualifying termination after change of control:				Total		Value of accelerated unvested equity upon qualifying death or disability:				Total
	Stock Options (1)		Restricted Stock Units (2)				Stock Options (1)		Restricted Stock Units (2)
Arkadiy Dobkin	$	4,006,280	$	5,990,104	$	9,996,384	$	539,836	$	3,981,713	$	4,521,549
Jason Peterson	$	1,643,153	$	2,670,426	$	4,313,579	$	301,748	$	1,924,817	$	2,226,565
Balazs Fejes	$	1,690,260	$	2,740,890	$	4,431,150	$	285,788	$	1,957,591	$	2,243,379
Viktar Dvorkin	$	1,230,151	$	1,923,178	$	3,153,329	$	193,092	$	1,333,902	$	1,526,994
Larry Solomon	$	1,230,151	$	1,923,178	$	3,153,329	$	193,092	$	1,333,902	$	1,526,994

  (1) The value associated with the acceleration of outstanding stock options is based on the closing market price of a share of our Common Stock as of December 30, 2022 ($327.74), the last trading day of 2022, minus the applicable exercise price.

  (2) The value associated with the acceleration of eligible unvested restricted stock units is based on the closing market price of a share of our Common Stock as of December 30, 2022 ($327.74), the last trading day of 2022.

39

2022 Pay Ratio Disclosure

Pay Ratio

In accordance with the requirements of Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K (which we collectively refer to as the “Pay Ratio Rule”), we are providing the following estimated information for 2022:

• the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees (other than our Chief Executive Officer) was $33,273;

• the annual total compensation of Chief Executive Officer was $6,453,257; and

• the ratio of these two amounts was 194 to 1.

Methodology for Identifying Our “Median Employee”

Employee Population

We last identified the median employee in 2020. There was no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we reasonably believe would have resulted in a significant change to or otherwise significantly impact our pay ratio disclosure, so we continued to use the same median employee in every proxy statement since 2020. However, the invasion of Ukraine by Russia in February 2022 resulted in a rebalancing of our geographic employee concentrations, primarily through increasing mobility support for EPAM personnel and their families to move from the regions affected by war to other countries and an exit of our business in Russia. Due to the resulting changes in our global delivery footprint and employee distribution, population, and compensation, we conducted an analysis to determine if our median employee had changed to the extent that it would significantly impact our pay ratio disclosure.

To identify the median employee, we first identified our total employee population from which we determined our “median employee” and then identified the median of the annual total compensation of all of our employees (other than our Chief Executive Officer). We determined that, as of December 31, 2022, our employee population consisted of approximately 57,598 individuals (of which approximately 6% were located in the United States and 94% were located in jurisdictions outside the United States) that were eligible for inclusion in our analysis under the Pay Ratio Rule. Our employee population consisted of full-time, part-time and temporary employees, and certain of our contractors were required to be included in our employee population under the Pay Ratio Rule, as described in more detail below. Included in the total employee population are employees who joined EPAM through acquisitions that were completed during 2022.

Determining our Median Employee

To identify our median employee from our total employee population, we used a total cash compensation measure consistently applied to the entire population, which included base salary or wages and all cash bonuses paid in 2022, including regular annual bonuses paid in respect of the prior year’s performance, and any special bonuses paid in 2022. In making this determination, we annualized the compensation of our full-time employees who were hired in 2022 but did not work for us for the entire year. By consistently applying this compensation measure to all of our employees identified in the employee population, we selected the median employee. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustment in identifying our median employee.

Using the methodologies described above, we determined that our median employee was a full-time, salaried professional in Hungary. The total cash compensation of the median employee for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2022, was $33,273.

Determining of Annual Total Compensation of our Median Employee and our CEO

Once we identified our median employee, we then calculated such employee’s annual total compensation for 2022 using the same methodology we used for purposes of determining the annual total compensation of our NEOs for 2022 (as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement). No cash bonus was paid to the median employee. Our CEO’s annual total compensation for 2022 is equal to the amount reported in the “Total” column in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table.

We believe our pay ratio presented above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. As SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to use different methodologies, estimates and assumptions, our pay ratio may not be comparable with the pay ratios reported by other companies.

40

Pay Versus Performance

We structure our compensation using a mix of short-term compensation, in the form of base salaries and annual cash incentive payments, and long-term compensation, in the form of equity-based awards, to meet our NEO compensation objectives of:

• Attracting, motivating, developing, and retaining quality executives who will increase long-term stockholder value.

• Providing total compensation that is commensurate with position and experience, primarily through annual and long-term incentives aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

• Rewarding exceptional performance and long-term commitment to EPAM.

Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis that begins on page 25 of this Proxy Statement provides more information on our approach and methodology for making executive compensation decisions. As noted in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, particularly in the tables starting on page 35, our compensation decisions are made using the value of equity-based awards measured as of the date the equity award was granted, which differs from the values in the table below which are calculated according to prescribed SEC rules. Particularly, the amounts listed in the tables and graphs below labeled as “Compensation Actually Paid” does not represent the value of cash and equity awards that we paid to our NEOs during any year, but rather is an amount calculated under SEC rules and includes, among other things, adjustments to values of unvested and vested equity awards based on year-end stock prices and various accounting valuation assumptions.

Pay Versus Performance Table

Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1)	Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (2)	Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (1)	Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (3)	Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:			Annual Revenue Growth (6)
					Total Shareholder Return (4)	Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (4)	Net Income (in thousands) (5)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)
2022	$6,453,257	($13,933,984)	$2,888,776	($4,103,371)	$154.48	$108.30	$419,416	28.4%
2021	$5,930,172	$26,698,904	$2,618,780	$9,947,826	$315.07	$147.70	$481,652	41.3%
2020	$4,704,626	$15,462,041	$1,875,283	$5,775,470	$168.91	$189.62	$327,160	24.5%

(1) Columns (b) and (d) respectively list compensation amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) for our CEO, Arkadiy Dobkin, and an average of the amounts from the “Total” column in the Summary Compensation Table for our four NEOs that are not our CEO, namely Jason Peterson, Balazs Fejes, Viktar Dvorkin, and Larry Solomon, for the respective years shown.

(2) Column (c) reflects the “Compensation Actually Paid” to our CEO in each of 2022, 2021 and 2020 calculated as set forth in the table below and in accordance with SEC rules. No dividends or other earnings were paid on stock or option awards in any of the covered fiscal years and no equity awards were cancelled due to a failure to meet vesting conditions. The dollar amounts reflected in column (c) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our CEO during any of the applicable years. For information regarding the decisions made by our Compensation Committee about our CEO’s compensation for each fiscal year, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement and the proxy statements for each of the fiscal years covered in the table above.

	Year
	2020	2021	2022
SCT Total Compensation	$4,704,626	$5,930,172	$6,453,257
Subtract equity award values in SCT	($3,250,908)	($4,000,024)	($4,666,857)
Add year-end value of unvested equity awards granted in the year	$8,210,331	$8,830,693	$6,369,771
Change in value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years	$7,457,887	$15,195,140	($11,264,101)
Change in value of equity awards granted in prior years which vested in the year	($1,659,895)	$742,923	($10,826,054)
Total	$15,462,041	$26,698,904	($13,933,984)

41

Stock option grant date fair values included in SCT Total Compensation are estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model as of grant date. For the purposes of calculating Compensation Actually Paid, we estimated the stock option fair values using the Black-Scholes option valuation model as of each applicable measurement date using the stock price as of the measurement date and updated assumptions (i.e., expected term, expected volatility, expected dividends, risk-free interest rate) as of the measurement date. Restricted stock unit grant date fair values are calculated as set forth in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table. For the purposes of calculating Compensation Actually Paid, adjustments were made using the stock price as of the last trading day of each applicable year and as of each applicable measurement date.

(3) Column (e) reflects the average Compensation Actually Paid to our four NEOs that are not our CEO in each of 2022, 2021 and 2020, calculated as set forth in the table below and in accordance with SEC rules. No dividends or other earnings were paid on stock or option awards in any of the covered fiscal years and no equity awards were cancelled due to a failure to meet vesting conditions. The dollar amounts reflected in column (e) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during any of the applicable years. For information regarding the decisions made by our Compensation Committee about our NEO’s compensation for each fiscal year, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement and the proxy statements for each of the fiscal years covered in the table above.

	Year
	2020	2021	2022
SCT Total Compensation	$1,875,283	$2,618,780	$2,888,776
Subtract equity award values in SCT	($1,099,974)	($1,575,157)	($1,959,989)
Add year-end value of unvested equity awards granted in the year	$2,778,712	$3,477,363	$2,675,178
Change in value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years	$2,647,489	$5,085,424	($4,009,358)
Change in value of equity awards granted in prior years which vested in the year	($426,040)	$341,416	($3,697,978)
Total	$5,775,470	$9,947,826	($4,103,371)

Stock option fair values and time-vested restricted stock unit fair values as of the applicable measurement date were calculated as set forth in footnote 2.

(4) Columns (f) and (g) represent, respectively, EPAM’s cumulative total shareholder return (EPAM TSR) and the cumulative TSR of our identified peer group (Peer Group TSR; Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (NASDAQ:CTSH), DXC Technology Company (NYSE:DXC), Endava plc (NYSE:DAVA), Globant S.A. (NYSE:GLOB), Infosys Ltd. (NYSE:INFY), Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRFT), and Wipro Limited (NYSE:WIT)) for the measurement periods ending on December 31 of each of the years shown in column (a).

(5) Reflects “Net Income” in our Consolidated Statements of Income included in our Annual Report for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

(6) Listed below in a tabular list are, in our assessment, the most important financial performance measures we use to link compensation of our NEOs for each year in the table above to EPAM’s performance. The following tabular list represents all of the financial and non-financial measures used to link compensation to performance.

Measure	Explanation
Annual Revenue Growth	Company-Selected Measure and a financial measure of revenue growth generated from year-to-year as a percentage increase over the immediately preceding year
Adjusted Income from Operations*	A non-GAAP financial measure that consists of income from operations that is then adjusted to eliminate the effect of certain expenses, costs, and impairments and is used to illustrate underlying trends in our business, establish budgets and operational goals, communicate internally and externally, and for managing our business and evaluating our performance

* Refer to “Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Comparable GAAP Measures” for additional information.

42

Below are graphs showing the relationship of Compensation Actually Paid to our CEO and average Compensation Actually Paid to our NEOs that are not the CEO in 2020, 2021 and 2022 to the EPAM TSR, Peer Group TSR, EPAM’s net income, and EPAM’s annual revenue growth.

43

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2023. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2006. Representatives from Deloitte & Touche LLP will be in attendance at the Annual Meeting to respond to any appropriate questions and will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they so desire.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Fees to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table summarizes the fees incurred by Deloitte & Touche LLP and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Deloitte Entities”) and billed to us for each of the last two years for audit services, and billed to us in each of the last two years for audit related, tax and other services:

	2022		2021
	(in thousands)
Audit Fees	$	4,110	$	3,668
Audit-Related Fees		248		203
Tax Fees		695		448
All Other Fees		2		2
Total Fees	$	5,055	$	4,321

Audit Fees. Audit Fees consist of fees billed by Deloitte Entities for professional services rendered in connection with the integrated audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, reviews of condensed consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly Form 10-Q reports, consents issued in the current year, and foreign statutory audits.

Audit-Related Fees. Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with ISAE3402 audits.

Tax Fees. Tax Fees primarily consist of fees billed for professional services rendered in connection with transfer pricing studies and tax consulting services.

All Other Fees. All Other Fees consist of subscription fees and fees billed for trainings provided in the current year.

Pre-Approval of Services

In accordance with its charter and legal requirements, the Audit Committee is required to approve in advance all audit and permitted non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. As permitted by our pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee has delegated to its Chair the authority to pre-approve audit and permitted non-audit services involving estimated fees of up to $250,000 to be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm; provided that the Chair then communicates such pre-approvals to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The pre-approval policy also includes full Audit Committee pre-approval of certain categories of audit and permitted non-audit services, up to $250,000 in the aggregate per year for each particular category of service.

As part of its review, the Audit Committee considers whether any non-audit services will, or may potentially, impact the independence of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee pre-approved all audit and non-audit services provided to EPAM by the Deloitte Entities in 2022 and 2021. None of the services described in the table above were exempt from the pre-approval requirement set forth in the SEC rules and regulations.

44

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

We are soliciting proxies in favor of the re-election of the three director nominees identified below. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them FOR the director nominees named below to serve for a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2026.

If any nominee is unable or declines to serve as director at the time of the Annual Meeting, an event that we do not currently anticipate, proxies will be voted for any nominee designated by the Board to fill the vacancy. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board has no reason to believe that any person named below will be unable or unwilling to serve as a nominee or as a director, if elected.

Directors

Upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated each of Eugene Roman, Jill Smart, and Ronald Vargo for election as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting. These directors will hold office until the annual meeting of stockholders in 2026, or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. The director nominees have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement as nominees for election as director and have agreed to serve as directors if elected. We did not pay a fee to any third party to identify or evaluate any potential Class II director nominees.

Please see the discussion under “Board of Directors” in this Proxy Statement for information concerning each of our nominees for director.

Vote Required

Directors are elected by a majority of the votes of the shares of our Common Stock cast in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote. Our bylaws contain procedures to be followed in the event that one or more Directors does not receive a majority of votes cast FOR his or her election at the Annual Meeting.

Recommendation

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the director nominees as Class II directors.

45

Proposal 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2023. In deciding to engage Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit Committee noted that there were no auditor independence issues raised with Deloitte & Touche LLP.

The Board recommends that stockholders ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP by stockholders is not required by law. However, as a matter of good corporate practice, such selection is being submitted to the stockholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Board and the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Deloitte & Touche LLP, but may, in their discretion, retain Deloitte & Touche LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such change would be in the best interests of EPAM and its stockholders.

The Audit Committee reviews audit and non-audit services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, as well as the fees charged by Deloitte & Touche LLP for such services. In its review of non-audit service fees, the Audit Committee considers, among other things, the possible effect of the performance of such services on the auditor’s independence. Additional information concerning the Audit Committee and its activities with Deloitte & Touche LLP can be found in the following sections of this Proxy Statement: “Corporate Governance – Committees of the Board – Audit Committee” and “Report of the Audit Committee.” For additional information about Deloitte & Touche LLP, see “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Vote Required

Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy.

Recommendation

The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023.

46

Proposal 3: Annual Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules.

As described in detail under the heading “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” our executive compensation programs are designed and individually tailored to attract, motivate, and retain our named executive officers, each of whom is critical to our success. The components of our executive compensation programs encourage performance in support of our organizational strategy, and reward our named executive officers based on Company performance and the objective and subjective evaluation of individual performance. EPAM’s equity plans are intended to align compensation with the long-term interests of our stockholders. Please read the “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for additional details about our executive compensation programs, including information about the 2022 compensation of our named executive officers. The Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee believe that the policies and procedures described and explained in “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” are effective in achieving our goals and that the compensation of our named executive officers reported in this Proxy Statement has supported and contributed to EPAM’s success in 2022 and over the long-term.

Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement by voting “FOR” the adoption of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the named executive officers of EPAM Systems, Inc., as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. While this advisory vote to approve executive compensation is non-binding, the Board and the Compensation Committee will carefully assess the voting results and may consult directly with stockholders to better understand any issues or concerns raised through the stockholder vote.

Vote Required

The advisory vote to approve executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy.

Recommendation

The Board recommends that you vote FOR approval of our executive compensation.

47

Householding

As permitted by applicable law, we intend to deliver only one copy of certain of our documents, including proxy statements, annual reports, notices of Internet availability of proxy materials and information statements, to stockholders residing at the same address, unless such stockholders have notified us of their desire to receive multiple copies thereof. Any such request should be directed to EPAM Systems, Inc., 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by telephone at (267) 759-9000 ext. 64588. We undertake to deliver separate copies of these documents promptly upon such written or oral request. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of these documents at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their broker.

48

Questions and Answers About the 2023 Annual Meeting and Voting Your Shares

Why am I receiving these materials?

Our Board has made the Proxy Materials available to you on the Internet or has delivered printed Proxy Materials to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting. As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting via a live audio webcast and are requested to vote on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement.

What is a Proxy?

Our Board is soliciting your vote at the Annual Meeting. You may vote by proxy as explained in this Proxy Statement. A proxy is your formal legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card.

Edward Rockwell and Kate Pytlewski have been designated as proxies for the Annual Meeting.

What Proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

There are three proposals that will be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

1. To elect three Class II directors specified in this Proxy Statement to hold office for a three-year term or until their successors are elected and qualified.

2. To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our year ending December 31, 2023.

3. To approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation for our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

How does the Board recommend I vote?

Our Board unanimously recommends that you vote:

• FOR election of the three nominated Class II directors specified in this Proxy Statement (Proposal 1).

• FOR ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our year ending December 31, 2023 (Proposal 2).

• FOR approval, on an advisory and non-binding basis, of the compensation for our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (Proposal 3).

What happens if additional matters are presented at the Annual Meeting?

If any other matters are properly presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting to another time or place (including, without limitation, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies), the persons named as proxy holders, Edward Rockwell and Kate Pytlewski, or either of them, will have discretion to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment, unless you direct them otherwise in your proxy instructions. We do not currently anticipate that any other matters will be raised at the Annual Meeting.

49

Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?

The Board established the Record Date for determining the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting as April 10, 2023. Stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

On the Record Date, 57,857,238 shares of our Common Stock were outstanding, and we had no other class of equity securities issued and outstanding. You are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock you own for each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, holders of Common Stock are eligible to cast an aggregate of 57,857,238 votes at the Annual Meeting.

Is my vote confidential?

All votes are confidential. Your vote will not be disclosed to EPAM, except as required by law, in contested Board elections or certain other limited circumstances. No recording of the Annual Meeting is allowed, including audio and video recording.

Can I participate in the Annual Meeting virtually?

Yes. Stockholders who attend the Annual Meeting virtually will be able to listen, submit questions, and vote regardless of location.

How can I attend the Annual Meeting virtually?

To attend the Annual Meeting virtually, you must register in advance at www.proxydocs.com/EPAM. Upon entry of your control number (located on your proxy card, voting instruction form, or Notice of Internet Availability) and completing your registration, you will receive further instructions via email, including your unique links that will allow you access to the Annual Meeting and to vote and submit questions during the meeting. Please be sure to follow instructions found on your proxy card and/or voting authorization form and subsequent instructions that will be delivered to you via email. On the day of the Annual Meeting, June 2, 2023, stockholders may begin to log in to the Annual Meeting webcast 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting at 10:00am Eastern time.

Will I have an opportunity to ask questions at the Annual Meeting?

Yes. Stockholders that attend the live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting may submit a question in advance of the Annual Meeting and during the Annual Meeting on the Annual Meeting website. During registration for the virtual Annual Meeting, there will be a link labeled ”Questions for Management” on the registration page. Questions submitted during the Annual Meeting will be in text form through the Q&A dialog box on the right side of the virtual Annual Meeting website. Questions can be submitted once logged into the live audio webcast, which starts 15 minutes before the start time of the Annual Meeting.

Following conclusion of the formal business of the Annual Meeting, questions submitted before and during the Annual Meeting will be addressed. If the question-and-answer period extends beyond the allotted time, stockholders will be provided with information to contact our Investor Relations team and ask their questions directly.

Rules of conduct and an agenda will be available to stockholders on the virtual Annual Meeting website and will explain the format and procedure of the question-and-answer session. The rules of conduct will be strictly adhered to during the Annual Meeting.

What if I have difficulty joining or using the virtual Annual Meeting website?

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have when accessing the virtual portion of the Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting platform, including any difficulties voting or submitting questions, please use the link on the meeting portal website titled “Having trouble? Please view the Meeting Access FAQs Guide.” This will have many FAQs as well as a technical support number that can be called before or during the meeting.

50

Where can I review the list of stockholders?

The list of EPAM’s stockholders of record as of April 10, 2023 that are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for viewing by stockholders for any relevant purpose for 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, as well as at the Annual Meeting, by visiting our offices at 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940 during ordinary business hours or by contacting EPAM’s Investor Relations team. Stockholders requesting access to the list will be asked to provide the control number found on their proxy card, voting instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that will be mailed or otherwise made available to stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. During the virtual portion of the Annual Meeting, the stockholder list will be available to stockholders by clicking the “Click Here to view the Registered Shareholder List” on the virtual Annual Meeting portal. This is only available at the start time of the Annual Meeting.

What constitutes a quorum?

A majority of our outstanding shares of Common Stock as of the record date must be present, in person or by proxy, at the Annual Meeting in order to conduct business. This is called a quorum. If there are not enough shares of Common Stock present both in person and by timely and properly submitted proxies to constitute a quorum, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned until such time as a sufficient number of shares are present. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

What is the difference between being a “Stockholder of Record” and a “Beneficial Owner” holding shares in street name?

Stockholder of Record: You are a “stockholder of record” if your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company LLC. The Proxy Materials are sent directly to a stockholder of record. A stockholder of record has the right to grant its proxy to vote directly to our named proxy holders or to vote via the Internet before or during the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner/Street Name: If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee (a “Broker”), you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in street name and your Broker is considered the stockholder of record. Your Broker forwarded the Proxy Materials to you. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your Broker how to vote your shares by completing the voting instruction form. Because a beneficial owner is not the stockholder of record, you are invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, but you may not vote these shares during the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the Broker that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares during the Annual Meeting.

How do I vote?

By Written Proxy: Stockholders of record can vote their shares by marking, signing and timely returning the proxy card.

By Internet Proxy: Stockholders of record can vote their shares via the Internet. The Notice contains instructions and the Internet website address in order to vote by Internet. The Internet voting procedure is designed to authenticate stockholders’ identities, to allow stockholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that stockholders’ instructions have been recorded properly.

At the Annual Meeting: All stockholders of record may vote at the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting by live audio webcast, we recommend that you also submit your proxy or voting instructions by mail or the Internet so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

Shares Held in “Street Name”: If you are a beneficial owner because your shares of stock are held in “street name” (i.e., through a bank, broker or other nominee), you will receive voting instructions from the institutions holding your shares. The methods of voting will depend upon the institution’s voting processes. Please contact the institution holding your shares of stock for more information.

51

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

It means that your shares are registered differently, or you have multiple accounts. Please vote all these shares separately to ensure all the shares you hold are voted.

If I submit a proxy via a proxy card, the Internet, or by mail, how will my shares be voted?

If you properly submit your proxy by one of these methods, and you do not subsequently revoke your proxy, your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you indicate a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon on your proxy card, your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions.

If you properly submit your proxy but do not give voting instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our Board of Directors as explained under “What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?”.

What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

Stockholders of Record: If you are a stockholder of record and you properly submit your proxy but do not give voting instructions, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares as follows: FOR the election of EPAM’s director nominees set forth in this Proxy Statement (Proposal 1); FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our year ending December 31, 2023 (Proposal 2); and FOR the approval, on an advisory and non-binding basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 3). If you do not return a proxy, your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, and your shares will not be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owners: If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you do not provide specific voting instructions to your Broker within 10 days of the Annual Meeting, your Broker will be prohibited under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) from voting your shares on “non-routine” matters. This is commonly referred to as a “broker non-vote.” The Election of Directors (Proposal 1) and the Annual Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Proposal 3) are considered “non-routine” matters and therefore may not be voted on by your Broker absent specific instructions from you. The Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Proposal 2) is considered a “routine” matter and therefore may be voted on by your Broker without instruction from you. We strongly encourage you to submit your voting instructions to your Broker and exercise your right to vote as a stockholder.

What vote is required to approve each item?

Item	Vote Required	Broker Discretionary Voting Allowed
Proposal 1 – Election of Class I Directors	Majority of the votes of the shares of Common Stock cast in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Our bylaws contain procedures to be followed in the event that one or more Directors does not receive a majority of votes cast FOR his or her election at the Annual Meeting.	No
Proposal 2 – Ratification of the Appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for our Year Ending December 31, 2023	Majority of the votes of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting.	Yes
Proposal 3 – Annual Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation	Majority of the votes of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting.	No

With respect to Proposal 1, you may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN on each of the nominees. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal 1, the abstention will not influence the outcome.

With respect to Proposals 2 and 3, you may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on these Proposals, the abstention will have the same effect as an AGAINST vote.

52

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. If you submitted your proxy by mail, you must file with EPAM’s Corporate Secretary a written notice of revocation or deliver, prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting, a valid, later-dated proxy. If you submitted your proxy via the Internet, you may revoke your proxy with a later Internet proxy. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not have the effect of revoking a proxy unless you give written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary before the proxy is exercised or you vote by written ballot during the Annual Meeting. If you are a beneficial owner, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your Broker, or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your Broker giving you the right to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, by voting during the live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting.

How will the proxies be solicited?

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting. Proxies may be solicited by our regular directors, executive officers and employees, without additional compensation, in person, or by mail, courier, telephone, email or facsimile. We may also make arrangements with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for the forwarding of solicitation material to the beneficial owners of stock held of record by such persons. We may reimburse such brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection therewith.

Who will count the votes and how can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

Our inspector of election will tabulate and certify the votes. We plan to announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting, and we will report the final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K, which we will file with the SEC shortly after the Annual Meeting.

What is an abstention and how will abstentions be treated?

An “abstention” is when a stockholder chooses to abstain or refrain from voting his or her shares on one or more matters presented for a vote. For the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum, abstentions are counted as present.

What are the fiscal year end dates?

Each of our fiscal years ends on December 31. This Proxy Statement provides information about the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting and additional information about EPAM and its executive officers and directors. Some of the information is provided as of the end of our 2020, 2021, and 2022 fiscal years and some information is provided as of a more current date.

Where can I get an Annual Report?

Our 2022 Annual Report, including consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022, is being distributed to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting together with this Proxy Statement, in satisfaction of the requirements of the SEC.

In addition, this Proxy Statement and our 2022 Annual Report are available to you at no charge electronically at https://www.proxydocs.com/EPAM.

Additional copies of the 2022 Annual Report are available at no charge upon written request. To obtain additional copies of the 2022 Annual Report, please contact us at EPAM Systems, Inc., 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940, Attention: Edward Rockwell, Corporate Secretary. The request must include a representation by the stockholder that as of our record date, April 10, 2023, the stockholder was entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

53

Stockholder Proposals for the 2024 Annual Meeting

If a stockholder wishes to present a proposal to be included in our proxy statement for our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2024 Annual Meeting”), the proponent and the proposal must comply with these instructions and the proxy proposal submission rules of the SEC. One very important requirement is that the proposal be received by our Corporate Secretary no later than December 22, 2023, based on an anticipated mailing date of this Proxy Statement date of April 21, 2023, pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8. Proposals we receive after that date will not be included in the Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting. We urge stockholders to submit proposals by certified mail, return receipt requested.

A stockholder proposal not included in our Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting will be ineligible for presentation at the 2023 Annual Meeting unless the stockholder gives timely notice of the proposal in writing to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices at EPAM Systems, Inc., 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940, Attention: Corporate Secretary. In order to be timely under our bylaws, in the case of an annual meeting of the stockholders, such notice must be received by the Corporate Secretary no later than the close of business on the 90^th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 120^th day prior to the first anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Therefore, for a stockholder to give timely notice and be eligible for presentation at the 2024 Annual Meeting, notice must be received by the Corporate Secretary no earlier than February 3, 2024 and no later than March 4, 2024. If the next annual meeting is called for a date that is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after that anniversary date, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be received no earlier than 120 days prior to such annual meeting nor later than 70 days prior to such annual meeting or the 10^th day following the day on which public announcement is first made by us of the date of such meeting.

Under the proxy access provisions of our bylaws, a stockholder, or a group of up to 20 stockholders, owning 3% or more of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock continuously for at least three years, can nominate and include in the Company’s proxy materials director candidates constituting up to the greater of two nominees or 20% of the Board (which may be adjusted in accordance with our bylaws), provided that the stockholder(s) and director candidate(s) satisfy the requirements specified in the bylaws. To nominate a director pursuant to our proxy access provisions, you must comply with all of the procedures, information requirements, qualifications and conditions set forth in our bylaws. Notice of proxy access director nominees must be received by our Corporate Secretary at the address above no earlier than the close of business on November 22, 2023 and no later than December 22, 2023. If the next annual meeting is called for a date that is more than 30 days before or more than 30 days after the anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders, in order to be timely, notice of proxy access director nominees must be received by the later of the close of business on the date that is 180 days prior to such annual meeting or the 10^th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the annual meeting is first made.

Stockholder nominations for the election of directors at a special meeting of the stockholders must be received by our Corporate Secretary no earlier than 120 days prior to such special meeting nor later than the later of 90 days prior to such special meeting or the 10^th day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of such special meeting.

A stockholder’s notice to our Corporate Secretary must be in proper written form and must include the information and consents required by our bylaws related to the stockholder giving the notice, the beneficial owner (if any) on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made and each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election as a director or the business desired to be brought before the meeting.

You may obtain a copy of the current rules for submitting stockholder proposals from the SEC at U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Corporation Finance, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 or through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. A copy of the full text of the bylaw provisions discussed above may be obtained by writing to our Corporate Secretary at EPAM Systems, Inc., 41 University Drive, Suite 202, Newtown, Pennsylvania 18940, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

54

Other Matters

We know of no other matters to be submitted at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the proxy holders to vote the shares they represent in accordance with their best judgment, unless you direct them otherwise in your proxy instructions.

Whether or not you intend to be present at the Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your signed proxy promptly.

By Order of the Board of Directors of EPAM Systems, Inc.:

Edward Rockwell

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Newtown, Pennsylvania

April 21, 2023

55

Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Comparable GAAP Measures

EPAM SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(in thousands, except percent and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

EPAM supplements results reported in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, referred to as GAAP, with non-GAAP financial measures. Management believes these measures help illustrate underlying trends in EPAM’s business and uses the measures to establish budgets and operational goals, communicate internally and externally, for managing EPAM’s business and evaluating its performance. Management also believes these measures help investors compare EPAM’s operating performance with its results in prior periods. EPAM anticipates that it will continue to report both GAAP and certain non-GAAP financial measures in its financial results, including non-GAAP results that exclude stock-based compensation expenses, acquisition-related costs including amortization of intangible assets, impairment of assets, expenses associated with EPAM’s humanitarian commitment to its professionals in Ukraine, unbilled business continuity resources resulting from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, costs associated with the geographic repositioning efforts in Russia and Belarus, employee separation costs in Russia, certain other one-time charges and benefits, changes in fair value of contingent consideration, foreign exchange gains and losses, excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation, and the related effect on income taxes of the pre-tax adjustments. Management also compares operating results on a basis of “constant currency,” which is also a non-GAAP financial measure. This measure excludes the effect of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations by translating the current period revenues and expenses into U.S. dollars at the weighted average exchange rates of the prior period of comparison. Because EPAM’s reported non-GAAP financial measures are not calculated in accordance with GAAP, these measures are not comparable to GAAP and may not be comparable to similarly described non-GAAP measures reported by other companies within EPAM’s industry. Consequently, EPAM’s non-GAAP financial measures should not be evaluated in isolation or supplant comparable GAAP measures, but rather, should be considered together with the information in EPAM’s consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Reconciliation of revenue growth as reported on a GAAP basis to revenue growth on a constant currency basis is presented in the table below:

	Year ended December 31, 2022
Revenue growth as reported		28.4%
Foreign exchange rates impact		4.0%
Revenue growth on a constant currency basis (1)		32.4%

(1) Constant currency revenue results are calculated by translating current period revenues in local currency into U.S. dollars at the weighted average exchange rates of the comparable prior period.

Reconciliation of various income statement amounts from GAAP to non-GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021:

	Year ended December 31, 2022											Year ended December 31, 2021
	GAAP				Adjustments			Non-GAAP				GAAP				Adjustments				Non-GAAP
Cost of revenues (exclusive of   depreciation and amortization)(1)		$	3,286,683			$	(69,802)		$	3,216,881			$	2,483,697			$	(51,580)			$	2,432,117
Selling, general and administrative   expenses(2)		$	872,777			$	(153,214)		$	719,563			$	648,736			$	(66,651)			$	582,085
Income from operations(3)		$	572,966			$	245,239		$	818,205			$	542,316			$	135,877			$	678,193
Operating margin			11.9	%			5.1%			17.0	%			14.4	%			3.6	%			18.0	%
Net income(4)		$	419,416			$	225,501		$	644,917			$	481,652			$	52,609			$	534,261
Diluted earnings per share		$	7.09						$	10.90			$	8.15							$	9.05

A-1

Notes:

Items (1) through (4) above are detailed in the table below with the specific cross-reference noted next to the appropriate line item.

	Year Ended December 31,
		2022			2021
Stock-based compensation expenses		$	47,470		$	51,580
Humanitarian support in Ukraine (a)			28,976			—
Unbilled business continuity resources (b)			14,712			—
Discretionary compensation (c)			(21,356	)		—
Total adjustments to GAAP cost of revenues(1)			69,802			51,580
Stock-based compensation expenses			52,439			60,075
Other acquisition-related expenses			1,537			6,397
One-time charges			7,959			179
Humanitarian support in Ukraine (a)			15,833			—
Geographic repositioning (d)			38,742			—
Russia long-lived asset impairment charges (e)			19,570			—
Russia business restructuring (f)			17,134			—
Total adjustments to GAAP selling, general and administrative expenses(2)			153,214			66,651
Amortization of purchased intangible assets			22,223			17,646
Total adjustments to GAAP income from operations(3)			245,239			135,877
Change in fair value of contingent consideration included in Interest and other income/(loss), net			11,101			8,782
Impairment of financial assets			2,050			—
Foreign exchange loss			75,733			7,197
Provision for income taxes:
Tax effect on non-GAAP adjustments			(65,030	)		(27,619	)
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation			(35,119	)		(71,628	)
Net discrete benefit from tax planning (g)			(8,473	)		—
Total adjustments to GAAP net income(4)		$	225,501		$	52,609

(a) Humanitarian support in Ukraine includes expenses related to EPAM’s $100 million humanitarian commitment in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to support EPAM professionals and their families in and displaced from Ukraine. These expenses are incremental to those expenses incurred prior to the crisis, clearly separable from normal operations, and not expected to recur once the crisis has subsided and operations return to normal.

(b) Given the uncertainty in the region introduced by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, EPAM has assigned delivery professionals in locations outside of the region to ensure the continuity of delivery for customers who have substantial delivery exposure to Ukraine or other delivery concerns resulting from the invasion. These employees are not billed to clients and operate largely in a standby or backup capacity. These expenses are incremental to those expenses incurred prior to the crisis, clearly separable from normal operations, and not expected to recur once the crisis has subsided and operations return to normal.

(c) Discretionary compensation includes the reduction of previously accrued amounts associated with the Company’s variable compensation program for the year ended December 31, 2021. This adjustment was made in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and is not expected to recur in the future.

(d) Geographic repositioning includes expenses associated with the relocation of employees in Russia and Belarus to other countries and includes the cost of accommodations, travel and food. These expenses are incremental to those expenses incurred prior to the crisis, clearly separable from normal operations, and are not expected to recur once the crisis has subsided and operations return to normal.

(e) As a result of the Company’s decision to no longer serve customers in Russia, the Company incurred impairment charges for long-lived assets in Russia including charges of $15.1 million associated with property and equipment, $3.8 million associated with right-of-use assets and $0.7 million associated with goodwill for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022. Consistent with the Company’s historical non-GAAP policy, impairment charges have been excluded from non-GAAP results as these are one-time and unusual in nature.

(f) As a result of the Company’s decision to no longer serve customers in Russia through the process of a phased exit of its operations in Russia, the Company incurred charges associated with employee separation. Consistent with the Company’s historical non-GAAP policy, employee separation costs incurred in connection with formal restructuring initiatives have been excluded from non-GAAP results as these are one-time and unusual in nature.

A-2

(g) One-time benefits related to the implementation of tax planning to disregard certain foreign subsidiaries as separate entities for U.S. income tax purposes. Consistent with the Company’s historical non-GAAP policy, the benefit related to the implementation of tax planning has been excluded from non-GAAP results as it is one-time and unusual in nature.

A-3

	YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT! PLEASE VOTE BY:
P.O. BOX 8016, CARY, NC 27512-9903		INTERNET Go To: www.proxypush.com/EPAM ●   Cast your vote online ●   Have your Proxy Card ready ●   Follow the simple instructions to record your vote
		PHONE Call 1-866-979-0843 ●   Use any touch-tone telephone ●   Have your Proxy Card ready ●   Follow the simple recorded instructions
		MAIL ●   Mark, sign and date your Proxy Card ●   Fold and return your Proxy Card in the postage-paid envelope provided
		You must register to attend the meeting online and participate at www.proxydocs.com/EPAM

EPAM Systems, Inc.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

For Stockholders of record as of April 10, 2023

TIME:	Friday, June 2, 2023 10:00 AM, Eastern Time
PLACE:	Annual Meeting to be held live via the Internet - please visit  www.proxydocs.com/EPAM for more details.

This proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors

The undersigned hereby appoints Edward Rockwell and Kate Pytlewski (the “Named Proxies”), and each or either of them, as the true and lawful attorneys of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and revocation, and authorizes them, and each of them, to vote all the shares of capital stock of EPAM Systems, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at said meeting and any adjournment thereof upon the matters specified and upon such other matters as may be properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment thereof, conferring authority upon such true and lawful attorneys to vote in their discretion on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting and revoking any proxy heretofore given.

THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, SHARES WILL BE VOTED IDENTICAL TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATIONS. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. In their discretion, the Named Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. The Named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign (on the reverse side) and return this card.

PLEASE BE SURE TO SIGN AND DATE THIS PROXY CARD AND MARK ON THE REVERSE SIDE

EPAM Systems, Inc.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Please make your marks like this:

FOR ON PROPOSAL 1, 2, AND 3.

	PROPOSAL		YOUR VOTE		BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS
1.	To elect three Class II directors to hold office for a three-year term or until their successors are elected and qualified.
		FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
	1.01 Eugene Roman	☐	☐	☐	FOR
	1.02 Jill Smart	☐	☐	☐	FOR
	1.03 Ronald Vargo	☐	☐	☐	FOR
		FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
2.	To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023.	☐	☐	☐	FOR
3.	To approve, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation for our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.	☐	☐	☐	FOR
4.	To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

You must register to attend the meeting online and participate at www.proxydocs.com/EPAM

Authorized Signatures - Must be completed for your instructions to be executed.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appears on your account. If held in joint tenancy, all persons should sign. Trustees, administrators, etc., should include title and authority. Corporations should provide full name of corporation and title of authorized officer signing the Proxy/Vote Form.

Signature (and Title if applicable)                                         Date                           Signature (if held jointly) Date                    

XML

Cover	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2022
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	DEF 14A
Amendment Flag	false
Entity Information [Line Items]
Entity Registrant Name	EPAM Systems, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001352010

XML

Pay vs Performance Disclosure

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2022

USD ($)

Dec. 31, 2021

USD ($)

Dec. 31, 2020

USD ($)

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Pay vs Performance [Table Text Block]

Pay Versus Performance

We structure our compensation using a mix of short-term compensation, in the form of base salaries and annual cash incentive payments, and long-term compensation, in the form of equity-based awards, to meet our NEO compensation objectives of:

• Attracting, motivating, developing, and retaining quality executives who will increase long-term stockholder value.

• Providing total compensation that is commensurate with position and experience, primarily through annual and long-term incentives aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders.

• Rewarding exceptional performance and long-term commitment to EPAM.

Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis that begins on page 25 of this Proxy Statement provides more information on our approach and methodology for making executive compensation decisions. As noted in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, particularly in the tables starting on page 35, our compensation decisions are made using the value of equity-based awards measured as of the date the equity award was granted, which differs from the values in the table below which are calculated according to prescribed SEC rules. Particularly, the amounts listed in the tables and graphs below labeled as “Compensation Actually Paid” does not represent the value of cash and equity awards that we paid to our NEOs during any year, but rather is an amount calculated under SEC rules and includes, among other things, adjustments to values of unvested and vested equity awards based on year-end stock prices and various accounting valuation assumptions.

Pay Versus Performance Table

Year	Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (1)	Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (2)	Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (1)	Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO Named Executive Officers (3)	Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based On:			Annual Revenue Growth (6)
					Total Shareholder Return (4)	Peer Group Total Shareholder Return (4)	Net Income (in thousands) (5)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)
2022	$6,453,257	($13,933,984)	$2,888,776	($4,103,371)	$154.48	$108.30	$419,416	28.4%
2021	$5,930,172	$26,698,904	$2,618,780	$9,947,826	$315.07	$147.70	$481,652	41.3%
2020	$4,704,626	$15,462,041	$1,875,283	$5,775,470	$168.91	$189.62	$327,160	24.5%

(1) Columns (b) and (d) respectively list compensation amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) for our CEO, Arkadiy Dobkin, and an average of the amounts from the “Total” column in the Summary Compensation Table for our four NEOs that are not our CEO, namely Jason Peterson, Balazs Fejes, Viktar Dvorkin, and Larry Solomon, for the respective years shown.

(2) Column (c) reflects the “Compensation Actually Paid” to our CEO in each of 2022, 2021 and 2020 calculated as set forth in the table below and in accordance with SEC rules. No dividends or other earnings were paid on stock or option awards in any of the covered fiscal years and no equity awards were cancelled due to a failure to meet vesting conditions. The dollar amounts reflected in column (c) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our CEO during any of the applicable years. For information regarding the decisions made by our Compensation Committee about our CEO’s compensation for each fiscal year, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement and the proxy statements for each of the fiscal years covered in the table above.

	Year
	2020	2021	2022
SCT Total Compensation	$4,704,626	$5,930,172	$6,453,257
Subtract equity award values in SCT	($3,250,908)	($4,000,024)	($4,666,857)
Add year-end value of unvested equity awards granted in the year	$8,210,331	$8,830,693	$6,369,771
Change in value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years	$7,457,887	$15,195,140	($11,264,101)
Change in value of equity awards granted in prior years which vested in the year	($1,659,895)	$742,923	($10,826,054)
Total	$15,462,041	$26,698,904	($13,933,984)

Stock option grant date fair values included in SCT Total Compensation are estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model as of grant date. For the purposes of calculating Compensation Actually Paid, we estimated the stock option fair values using the Black-Scholes option valuation model as of each applicable measurement date using the stock price as of the measurement date and updated assumptions (i.e., expected term, expected volatility, expected dividends, risk-free interest rate) as of the measurement date. Restricted stock unit grant date fair values are calculated as set forth in the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table. For the purposes of calculating Compensation Actually Paid, adjustments were made using the stock price as of the last trading day of each applicable year and as of each applicable measurement date.

(3) Column (e) reflects the average Compensation Actually Paid to our four NEOs that are not our CEO in each of 2022, 2021 and 2020, calculated as set forth in the table below and in accordance with SEC rules. No dividends or other earnings were paid on stock or option awards in any of the covered fiscal years and no equity awards were cancelled due to a failure to meet vesting conditions. The dollar amounts reflected in column (e) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during any of the applicable years. For information regarding the decisions made by our Compensation Committee about our NEO’s compensation for each fiscal year, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement and the proxy statements for each of the fiscal years covered in the table above.

	Year
	2020	2021	2022
SCT Total Compensation	$1,875,283	$2,618,780	$2,888,776
Subtract equity award values in SCT	($1,099,974)	($1,575,157)	($1,959,989)
Add year-end value of unvested equity awards granted in the year	$2,778,712	$3,477,363	$2,675,178
Change in value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years	$2,647,489	$5,085,424	($4,009,358)
Change in value of equity awards granted in prior years which vested in the year	($426,040)	$341,416	($3,697,978)
Total	$5,775,470	$9,947,826	($4,103,371)

Stock option fair values and time-vested restricted stock unit fair values as of the applicable measurement date were calculated as set forth in footnote 2.

(4) Columns (f) and (g) represent, respectively, EPAM’s cumulative total shareholder return (EPAM TSR) and the cumulative TSR of our identified peer group (Peer Group TSR; Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (NASDAQ:CTSH), DXC Technology Company (NYSE:DXC), Endava plc (NYSE:DAVA), Globant S.A. (NYSE:GLOB), Infosys Ltd. (NYSE:INFY), Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRFT), and Wipro Limited (NYSE:WIT)) for the measurement periods ending on December 31 of each of the years shown in column (a).

(5) Reflects “Net Income” in our Consolidated Statements of Income included in our Annual Report for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

(6) Listed below in a tabular list are, in our assessment, the most important financial performance measures we use to link compensation of our NEOs for each year in the table above to EPAM’s performance. The following tabular list represents all of the financial and non-financial measures used to link compensation to performance.

Measure	Explanation
Annual Revenue Growth	Company-Selected Measure and a financial measure of revenue growth generated from year-to-year as a percentage increase over the immediately preceding year
Adjusted Income from Operations*	A non-GAAP financial measure that consists of income from operations that is then adjusted to eliminate the effect of certain expenses, costs, and impairments and is used to illustrate underlying trends in our business, establish budgets and operational goals, communicate internally and externally, and for managing our business and evaluating our performance

* Refer to “Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Comparable GAAP Measures” for additional information.

Company Selected Measure Name

Annual Revenue Growth

Named Executive Officers, Footnote [Text Block]

Columns (b) and (d) respectively list compensation amounts reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table (SCT) for our CEO, Arkadiy Dobkin, and an average of the amounts from the “Total” column in the Summary Compensation Table for our four NEOs that are not our CEO, namely Jason Peterson, Balazs Fejes, Viktar Dvorkin, and Larry Solomon, for the respective years shown.

Peer Group Issuers, Footnote [Text Block]

Columns (f) and (g) represent, respectively, EPAM’s cumulative total shareholder return (EPAM TSR) and the cumulative TSR of our identified peer group (Peer Group TSR; Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. (NASDAQ:CTSH), DXC Technology Company (NYSE:DXC), Endava plc (NYSE:DAVA), Globant S.A. (NYSE:GLOB), Infosys Ltd. (NYSE:INFY), Perficient, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRFT), and Wipro Limited (NYSE:WIT)) for the measurement periods ending on December 31 of each of the years shown in column (a).

PEO Total Compensation Amount

$ 6,453,257

$ 5,930,172

$ 4,704,626

PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount

$ (13,933,984)

26,698,904

15,462,041

Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote [Text Block]

(2) Column (c) reflects the “Compensation Actually Paid” to our CEO in each of 2022, 2021 and 2020 calculated as set forth in the table below and in accordance with SEC rules. No dividends or other earnings were paid on stock or option awards in any of the covered fiscal years and no equity awards were cancelled due to a failure to meet vesting conditions. The dollar amounts reflected in column (c) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our CEO during any of the applicable years. For information regarding the decisions made by our Compensation Committee about our CEO’s compensation for each fiscal year, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement and the proxy statements for each of the fiscal years covered in the table above.

	Year
	2020	2021	2022
SCT Total Compensation	$4,704,626	$5,930,172	$6,453,257
Subtract equity award values in SCT	($3,250,908)	($4,000,024)	($4,666,857)
Add year-end value of unvested equity awards granted in the year	$8,210,331	$8,830,693	$6,369,771
Change in value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years	$7,457,887	$15,195,140	($11,264,101)
Change in value of equity awards granted in prior years which vested in the year	($1,659,895)	$742,923	($10,826,054)
Total	$15,462,041	$26,698,904	($13,933,984)

Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount

$ 2,888,776

2,618,780

1,875,283

Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount

$ (4,103,371)

9,947,826

5,775,470

Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote [Text Block]

(3) Column (e) reflects the average Compensation Actually Paid to our four NEOs that are not our CEO in each of 2022, 2021 and 2020, calculated as set forth in the table below and in accordance with SEC rules. No dividends or other earnings were paid on stock or option awards in any of the covered fiscal years and no equity awards were cancelled due to a failure to meet vesting conditions. The dollar amounts reflected in column (e) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our NEOs during any of the applicable years. For information regarding the decisions made by our Compensation Committee about our NEO’s compensation for each fiscal year, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement and the proxy statements for each of the fiscal years covered in the table above.

	Year
	2020	2021	2022
SCT Total Compensation	$1,875,283	$2,618,780	$2,888,776
Subtract equity award values in SCT	($1,099,974)	($1,575,157)	($1,959,989)
Add year-end value of unvested equity awards granted in the year	$2,778,712	$3,477,363	$2,675,178
Change in value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years	$2,647,489	$5,085,424	($4,009,358)
Change in value of equity awards granted in prior years which vested in the year	($426,040)	$341,416	($3,697,978)
Total	$5,775,470	$9,947,826	($4,103,371)

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return [Text Block]

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income [Text Block]

Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure [Text Block]

Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group [Text Block]

Tabular List [Table Text Block]

(6) Listed below in a tabular list are, in our assessment, the most important financial performance measures we use to link compensation of our NEOs for each year in the table above to EPAM’s performance. The following tabular list represents all of the financial and non-financial measures used to link compensation to performance.

Measure	Explanation
Annual Revenue Growth	Company-Selected Measure and a financial measure of revenue growth generated from year-to-year as a percentage increase over the immediately preceding year
Adjusted Income from Operations*	A non-GAAP financial measure that consists of income from operations that is then adjusted to eliminate the effect of certain expenses, costs, and impairments and is used to illustrate underlying trends in our business, establish budgets and operational goals, communicate internally and externally, and for managing our business and evaluating our performance

* Refer to “Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Comparable GAAP Measures” for additional information.

Total Shareholder Return Amount

$ 154.48

315.07

168.91

Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount

108.3

147.7

189.62

Net Income (Loss)

$ 419,416,000

$ 481,652,000

$ 327,160,000

Company Selected Measure Amount

0.284

0.413

0.245

PEO Name

Arkadiy Dobkin

Measure [Axis]: 1

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Measure Name

Annual Revenue Growth

Measure [Axis]: 2

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Measure Name

Adjusted Income from Operations

Non-GAAP Measure Description [Text Block]

A non-GAAP financial measure that consists of income from operations that is then adjusted to eliminate the effect of certain expenses, costs, and impairments and is used to illustrate underlying trends in our business, establish budgets and operational goals, communicate internally and externally, and for managing our business and evaluating our performance

PEO [Member] | equity award values in SCT [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

$ (4,666,857)

$ (4,000,024)

$ (3,250,908)

PEO [Member] | year-end value of unvested equity awards granted in the year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

6,369,771

8,830,693

8,210,331

PEO [Member] | Change in value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

(11,264,101)

15,195,140

7,457,887

PEO [Member] | Change in value of equity awards granted in prior years which vested in the year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

(10,826,054)

742,923

(1,659,895)

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | equity award values in SCT [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

(1,959,989)

(1,575,157)

(1,099,974)

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | year-end value of unvested equity awards granted in the year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

2,675,178

3,477,363

2,778,712

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in value of unvested equity awards granted in prior years [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

(4,009,358)

5,085,424

2,647,489

Non-PEO NEO [Member] | Change in value of equity awards granted in prior years which vested in the year [Member]

Pay vs Performance Disclosure [Table]

Adjustment to Compensation Amount

$ (3,697,978)

$ 341,416

$ (426,040)