UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

x Quarterly report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006

or

¨ Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File No. 0-51669

STERLING MINING COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

IDAHO	82-0300575
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

2201 Government Way, Suite E, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83814

(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)

(208) 666-4070

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨            Accelerated Filer  ¨            Non-Accelerated Filer  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 19,719,274 shares of common stock as of May 19, 2006.

The registrant is amending its 10-Q filed on May 22, 2006 solely to delete extraneous information that was erroneously included on page 27 of the original filing due to a printer error.

STERLING MINING COMPANY

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

		Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Balance Sheets — March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 (audited)	3
	Income Statements — Three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005	4
	Statements of Cash Flows — Three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005	5
	Notes to Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	25
Item 4.	Control and Procedures	25
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	25
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities	25
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	26
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	26
Item 5.	Other Information	26
Item 6.	Exhibits	27
Signatures		28

- 2 -

STERLING MINING COMPANY & SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31 2006 (unaudited) (as restated)			December 31 2005 (as restated)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	1,435,957		$	1,270,849
Marketable securities		646,472			288,715
Accounts receivable		80,796			42,934
Notes receivable		25,000			25,000
Inventories		382,080			252,275
Prepaid expenses and deposits		325,343			82,645
Other current assets		143,327			58,581
Total current assets		3,038,975			2,020,999
INVESTMENTS		931,532			724,853
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Office and mining equipment		678,952			506,240
Less accumulated depreciation		(44,286	)		(38,392	)
Total property and equipment		634,666			467,848
OTHER ASSETS
Prepaid long-term leases		1,064,720			441,806
TOTAL ASSETS	$	5,669,893		$	3,655,506
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable		318,433		$	403,001
Accrued expenses		156,283			365,492
Unearned revenue		104,789			80,885
Total current liabilities		579,505			849,378
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Convertible notes payable, net		246,125			—
Derivative from convertible notes		206,425			—
Total long-term liabilities		452,550			—
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES		—			—
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common stock, $.05 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized. 19,294,637 and 18,477,419 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively		964,732			923,871
Additional paid in capital		19,441,680			16,871,941
Accumulated deficit		(15,951,750	)		(14,725,159	)
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss)		183,176			(264,525	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)		4,637,838			2,806,128
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	5,669,893		$	3,655,506

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

- 3 -

STERLING MINING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

	Three Months Ended
	March 31 2006 (unaudited)			March 31 2005 (unaudited)
REVENUES	$	280,524		$	7,497
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Cost of revenues		224,448			4,570
Exploration		548,404			877,425
General and administrative		406,661			217,979
Depreciation and amortization		5,894			4,477
Professional services		92,969			17,863
Total Expenses		1,278,376			1,122,314
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(997,852	)		(1,114,817	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Gain (loss) on investments		40,032			7,661
Interest and dividends		3,723			1,388
Interest expense		(8,329	)		(124	)
Gain (loss) on derivative instruments		(206,425	)		—
Miscellaneous income, loss on exchange		(57,740	)		(79,896	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(228,739	)		(70,971	)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(1,226,591	)		(1,185,788	)
INCOME TAXES		—			—
NET LOSS		(1,226,591	)		(1,185,788	)
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments		447,701			(315,348	)
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS	$	(778,890	)	$	(1,501,136	)
Basic and Fully Diluted Loss per Share	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.07	)
Basic and fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding		19,108,600			16,313,300

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

- 4 -

STERLING MINING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	For the Three Months Ended March 31 2006 (unaudited)			For the Three Months Ended March 31 2005 (unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	(1,226,591	)	$	(1,185,788	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		5,894			4,477
Gain (loss) on investments		(40,032	)		(7,661	)
Gain (loss) on derivatives		206,425			73,993
Payment of exploration lease expenses with stock		887,500			241,275
Payment of general & admin. expenses with stock		—			40,200
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable		(37,862	)		13,818
Inventories		(129,805	)		(17,824	)
Prepaid expenses		(865,612	)		(1,250	)
Other current assets		(84,746	)		(69,348	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable		(84,568	)		71,268
Accrued expenses		(176,065	)		3,868
Other current liabilities-unearned revenue		23,904			—
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		(1,521,558	)		(832,972	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of investments		(145,442	)		—
Proceeds from investments		56,319			34,646
Equipment purchases		(172,711	)		(1,340	)
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		(261,834	)		33,306
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sales of common stock net of costs		1,360,000			1,205,292
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants		13,500			344,082
Proceeds from (payments for) notes payable		575,000			(160,000	)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities:		1,948,500			1,389,374
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		165,108			589,708
Cash beginning of period		1,270,849			363,464
Cash at end of period	$	1,435,957		$	953,172
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
Income taxes paid		—			—
Interest paid		8,329			142
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock issued for services		—			40,200
Common stock issued for lease expenses		887,500			241,275

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

- 5 -

Sterling Mining Company and Subsidiary

Condensed Notes to Financial Statements

March 31, 2006

Note 1: Basis of Presentation of Financial Statements

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), consolidated statements of cash flows and notes to interim consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sterling Mining Company and its consolidated subsidiaries (the “Company” or “we” or “our” or “us”). Management has made all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes as set forth in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as it may be amended from time to time.

The results of operations for the periods presented may not be indicative of those which may be expected for a full year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted as permitted by GAAP.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and the disclosures of contingent liabilities. Accordingly, ultimate results could differ materially from those estimates.

Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Accounting Method

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Accounts Receivable

The Company carries its accounts receivable at cost. On a periodic basis, the Company evaluates its accounts receivable and determines if an allowance for doubtful accounts is necessary, based on a history of past write-offs and collections and current credit conditions.

- 6 -

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Compensated Absences

Employees of the Company may be paid vacation, sick, and personal days off. The Company did not accrue compensated absences expense during the quarter because no policy on compensated absences had been adopted at March 31, 2006, and management has deemed that any liability arising from these provisions in the future would be immaterial.

Concentration of Risk

The Company maintains its domestic cash in several commercial banks in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. Accounts are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $100,000. The Company also maintains cash in a Mexican bank. The Mexican accounts, one denominated in dollars and one denominated in pesos, are considered to be un-insured.

Derivative Instruments

The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (hereinafter “SFAS No. 133”) as amended by SFAS No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB No. 133”, and SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. These statements establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. They require that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, an Amendment of FASB Standards No. 133 and 140.” See Recent Accounting Pronouncements.

If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as a hedge, the objective of which is to match the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging derivative with the recognition of (i) the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk or (ii) the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transaction. For a derivative not designated as a hedging instrument, the gain or loss is recognized in income in the period of change.

Historically, the Company has not entered into derivatives contracts to hedge existing risks.

The Company has issued convertible debt and accounts for that debt according to SFAS 133 and subsequent pronouncements. Consequently, management recognizes the convertible debt contract as a derivative instrument and accounts for the derivative according to generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S.

During the first quarter of 2006 the Company issued two debentures for a total of $575,000. The debentures included provisions for the conversion of the debt to a total of 230,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The debentures also had $3.50 warrants attached for an additional

- 7 -

230,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company has discounted the debentures payable for the fair market value of the warrants, $69,000 and for the fair market value of the conversion provision of the debt and the associated derivative liability of $280,600. The Company is amortizing the derivative liability, net of interest paid, over the 18 month life of the debentures. The Company re-valued the derivative liability at March 31, 2006 and recognized a realized loss of $206,425 as reported in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Earnings Per Share

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Exploration Costs

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the Company expenses exploration costs as incurred.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” include cash, marketable securities, investments in stocks, purchase options, purchase warrants, receivables, payables and accrued expenses. Cash, receivables, payables and accrued expenses are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial instruments, approximate fair value at March 31, 2006 and 2005. Marketable securities, investments in stocks, purchase options and purchase warrants are accounted for by market prices when available, or by other valuation methods described in these notes when market prices are not available.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company created a Mexican subsidiary during 2004 for the purpose of exploration and exploitation of silver bearing minerals in Mexico. The Company translates into United States dollars the assets and liabilities of its Mexico subsidiary according to generally accepted accounting principles. The Company translates into United States dollars the revenues, expenses, gains and losses of its Mexican subsidiary at the transaction date and records them according to generally accepted accounting principles. Management has concluded that for the purposes of financial reporting, the functional currency of the Mexican subsidiary is the United States dollar. Consequently, management uses the temporal method of foreign currency translation.

Going Concern

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has limited revenues, has a large net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and has an accumulated deficit. These

- 8 -

factors indicate that the Company may be unable to continue in existence. The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

The Company’s management believes that significant and imminent private placements of stock and continuing contracted agreements will generate sufficient cash for the Company to continue to operate based on current expense projections. The Company anticipates it will require approximately ten million dollars to continue operations in calendar year 2006 as the Company continues mining operations in Mexico and prepares to begin mining operations at the Sunshine Mine in Idaho.

Inventories

Metals inventories are carried at the lower of current market value or average unit cost. Production costs include the cost of direct labor and materials, depreciation, amortization, and overhead costs relating to mining and processing activities. Materials and supplies inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or fair market value. The inventories balance at March 31, 2006 represented supplies inventory in Mexico, minerals inventory in Mexico and silver coins inventory in Idaho.

Mineral Development Costs

The Company will capitalize property acquisition costs for undeveloped mineral interests that have significant potential to develop an economic ore body. The Company will amortize the capital costs based on proven and probable ore reserves if an economic ore body is developed. If an economic ore body is not discovered, previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the property does not contain an economic ore body. Costs to develop new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operating mines, are capitalized and will be amortized on a unit of production basis over proven and probable reserves. Gains and losses on the sales or retirement of assets are recorded as other income or expense.

Prepaid Expenses

The Company’s current prepaid expenses primarily consist of prepaid insurance premiums and prepaid lease payments which are paid for up to a year in advance. Prepaid lease payments for periods beyond one year are considered other non-current assets. Non-current assets are primarily comprised of the Sunshine Mine lease and the 20 year Barones lease which was prepaid in 2004 and is being amortized over the 20 year lease term.

Minority Interest

The Company owns 99% of its Mexico subsidiary, Sterling Mining de Mexico S.A. de C.V. The 1% minority in the subsidiary is owned by an individual. A minority interest is not shown on the balance sheet because there is a negative value to the capital account of the minority interest holder. Additionally, the minority holder is not expected to make additional capital contributions.

- 9 -

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiary after elimination of inter-company accounts and transactions. The majority-owned subsidiary of the Company is named above.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to ten years.

Provision for Taxes

Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by SFAS No. 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155 “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments,” which amends SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” SFAS No. 155 resolves issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. D1 “Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets,” and permits:

• Fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation;

• Clarifies which interest-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133;

• Establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation;

• Clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and

• Amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument.

FAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

- 10 -

In February 2006, the FASB issued FSP No. 123(R)-4 “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of Contingent Event.” FSP 123(R)-4 amends paragraphs 32 and A229 of SFAS No. 123(R) to incorporate the concept that a cash settlement feature that can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control does not meet the condition in paragraphs 32 and A229 until it becomes probable that the event will occur, and that an option or similar instrument that is classified as equity, but subsequently becomes a liability because the contingent cash settlement event is probable of occurring, shall be accounted for similar to a modification from an equity to liability award. FSP 123(R)-4 became effective when we adopted SFAS 123(R) and is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2005, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 04-13 “Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the same Counterparty.” The scope of EITF No. 04-13 includes guidance on the circumstances under which two or more inventory purchases and sales transactions with the same counterparty should be viewed as a single exchange transaction under the scope of Opinion 29 “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” and whether there are circumstances under which nonmonetary exchanges of inventory within the same line of business should be recognized at fair value. EITF No. 04-13 is effective for new arrangements entered into, or modifications or renegotiations of existing arrangements, beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after March 15, 2006. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 04-13 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 3: Marketable Securities and Investments

The Company’s investment portfolio consists primarily of small-cap mining stocks, options and warrants.

The Company’s investments in securities are classified as either trading, held to maturity, or available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115. During the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company did not own any securities classified as trading or held to maturity, but did own securities classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities consist of equity securities not classified as trading securities or as securities to be held to maturity.

Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-sale securities are reported as a net amount in a separate component of other comprehensive income. Gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined using the average cost method and are included in earnings. The Company determines the gain or loss on investment securities held as available-for-sale, based upon the accumulated cost bases of specific investment accounts. Certain “other investments” are in companies with very limited volume and stable trading prices. Thus, fair market values tend to shift only fractionally.

On the Company’s balance sheet, short-term available for sale securities are classified as “marketable securities.” Long-term available-for-sale securities and other investments are classified as “investments.”

- 11 -

Options and warrants are recorded at fair market value, calculated using a conventional Black Scholes pricing model. Assumptions made in estimating the fair value include the risk-free interest rate, volatility and expected life. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 the average volatility ranged from 33% to 196%. Expected life used was the number of days to expiration. The risk-free interest rate used was the Federal Reserve Boards risk-free rate most closely corresponding to the option or warrant lifetime. Management used risk free rates between 4.63% and 4.91% for the periods presented.

The changes in Marketable Securities, Long-Term Investments, and Investments-Other during the three months ended March 31, 2006 are as follows:

	Marketable Securities			Investments- Long Term			Investments- Other		Total
Fair Market Value at December 31, 2005	$	288,718		$	381,539		$	343,314	$	1,013,568
Plus Purchases		133,967			11,475			—		145,442
Less Proceeds from Sales		(54,219	)		(2,100	)		—		(56,319	)
Plus Gain on Sales		38,128			1,905			—		40,032
Plus Unrealized Gains		239,882			15,598			181,706		447,701
Fair Market Value at March 31, 2006	$	646,472		$	406,512		$	525,020	$	1,578,005

At March 31, 2006 the total basis of Marketable Securities and Investments was $1,394,829. Total accumulated unrealized gains were $183,176 and the total fair market value was $1,578,005.

Note 4: Income Tax

Income taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against deferred tax assets if management does not believe the Company has met the “more likely than not” standard imposed by SFAS No. 109 to allow recognition of such an asset.

At March 31, 2006, the Company had net deferred tax assets, calculated at an expected rate of 34%, of approximately $3,800,000, principally arising from net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes. As management of the Company cannot determine that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefit of the net deferred tax asset, a valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset has been established at March 31, 2006.

- 12 -

The Company’s deferred tax assets are estimated as follows:

	March 31, 2006			December 31, 2005
Net operating loss carryforward	$	11,200,000		$	9,970,000
Deferred tax asset		3,800,000			3,390,000
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance	$	(3,800,000	)	$	(3,390,000	)

At March 31, 2006, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $11,200,000, which expire in the years 2016 through 2025. The change in the allowance account from December 31, 2005 to March 31, 2006, was approximately $410,000.

Note 5: Inventories

The Company uses the First-In-First-Out Method of inventory valuation.

Inventories in the United States consist of silver coins for sale. Inventories in Mexico consist primarily of silver in precipitate form. Other components of inventory are gold in precipitate form as well as copper and thiosulfite used in the processing of mineral bearing ore. At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 the Company reported the following inventories:

	March 31, 2006		December 31, 2005
United States
Coins	$	39,553	$	46,647
US Total		39,553		46,647
Mexico
Silver precipitate		259,938		145,521
Gold precipitate		2,318		17,886
Supplies and other inventory		80,271		42,221
Mexico Total		342,527		205,628
Consolidated Total	$	382,080	$	252,275

At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 the precipitate in Mexico was either on-site, in transit, or at the refinery.

- 13 -

Note 6: Commitments and Contingencies

Mineral Leases

The Company has secured leases of several mineral properties. Each of the leases is subject to lease payments as shown in the table below.

Mineral Lease	Production Royalties Payable (1)	2006 Annual Lease Fees
Barones Concession (2)	Yes	$	—
Chester Claim Group (3)	Yes		7,200
J.E. Prospect	Yes		7,500
Merger Mines Claim Group	Yes		2,500
Metropolitan Mines Claim Group	Yes		12,000
Mineral Mountain Claim Group	Yes		3,600
Montana Revett Claim Group (4)	Yes		—
San Acacio Concession	Yes		150,000
Sunshine Mine and Infrastructure (5)	Yes		120,000
Jestec	Yes		15,000
Rock Creek (6)	Yes		4,500

(1) All leases are subject to production royalties.

(2) $375,000 in cash and $100,000 in the Company’s common stock were prepaid in 2004 to apply to the life of the Barones lease of 225 months. There are no annual lease fees.

(3) The Chester Claim Group lease also requires an annual payment of 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

(4) Montana Revett Claim Group annual lease fee of $20,000 commences on June 1, 2007.

(5) Production royalties are not payable to lessor, but are payable to third parties. The Company issued 50,000 shares to each of four affiliates of American Reclamation Incorporated for amendments to the Sunshine Mine lease during the first quarter of 2006.

(6) On March 1, 2006 the Company entered into a lease agreement with Rock Creek Idaho. The Company issued 20,000 shares of common stock to Rock Creek Idaho and received 500,000 shares of Rock Creek’s common stock. Other provisions of the lease include a $50,000 per year work commitment and payments of $500 a month, which can be credited to the 25% net profits royalty.

- 14 -

Other Leases

The Company has entered into a lease for office space in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho for $1,711 per month through November 2006 and increasing to $1,763 from December 2006 through November 2007.

The Company’s obligations under mineral agreements and office space operating lease agreements as of March 31, 2006 are as follows:

Year Ending:
December 31, 2006	$	249,629
December 31, 2007		373,635
December 31, 2008		385,311
December 31, 2009		392,800
December 31, 2010		392,800
Total minimum lease payments	$	1,794,175

Compliance with Environmental Regulations

The Company is subject to a variety of federal, state and local statues, rules and regulations designed to protect the quality of the water and air, and threatened or endangered species, in the vicinity of many of its mining operations. These regulations include “permitting” or pre-operating approval requirements designed to ensure the environmental integrity of a proposed mining facility, operating requirements to mitigate the effects of discharges into the environment during mining operations, and reclamation or post-operation requirements designed to remediate the lands affected by a mining facility. The Company is investigating the necessary environmental requirements and any bonding necessary to comply with the regulations.

Other Taxes

The Company assumed certain property taxes in arrears as part of the Company’s obligation in the lease of the Sunshine Mine. The Company has paid property taxes in arrears for the years 1999 through 2003. Estimated tax liabilities including penalties and interest outstanding are shown below.

Tax Year:
2004	$	31,887
2005		37,762
2006		9,600
Accrued Penalties and Interest		4,617
Balance, March 31, 2006	$	83,866

Note 7: Notes Payable

During the first quarter of 2006 the Company issued two notes payable in the form of debentures for a total of $575,000. The debentures included provisions for the conversion of the debt to a

- 15 -

total of 230,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The debentures also had $3.50 warrants attached for an additional 230,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company has discounted the debentures payable for the fair market value of the warrants, $69,000 and for the fair market value of the conversion provision of the debt, the derivative liability of $280,600. The derivative amortization expense for the quarter was $20,725.

Note 8: Common Stock, Options and Warrants

During the first quarter of 2006 the Company issued 817,218 shares of common stock as follows: 549,268 shares for $1,360,000 in cash; 250,000 shares for lease expense; and 18,000 upon the exercise of $0.75 per share stock options that were granted in June of 2003. No warrants were exercised during the quarter and 586,718 warrants were granted. The warrants were valued at $282,549 at March 31, 2006 and the weighted average exercise price of the warrants is $4.18

In February of 2006 the Company entered into a subscription agreement with a foreign investor for the purchase of 500,000 shares of common stock and 500,000 common stock purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $4.75 that expire April 10, 2008. The aggregate purchase price for the securities is $1,250,000 and the first installment of $625,000 was received with the second installment due April 10, 2006. In connection with the transaction the Company agreed to pay an overseas consultant who assisted with the financing a fee payable in shares and warrants identical to the warrants sold to the investor in the amount of 25,000 shares and 25,000 warrants on the first installment of the subscription and an additional 25,000 shares and 25,000 warrants on receipt of the final installment in April 2006.

Note 9: Loss per Common Share

The Company is authorized to issue 40,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.05 par value per share, of which 19,294,637 shares were issued at March 31, 2006. The weighted average shares of common stock outstanding at March 31, 2006 were 19,108,600.

The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in the earnings of an entity similar to fully diluted earnings per share. Although there were common stock equivalents outstanding December 31, 2005, they were not included in the calculation of earnings per share because they would have been considered anti-dilutive.

As of March 31, 2006 the Company had issued and outstanding 817,774 stock options, 1,730,035 warrants, and convertible debt that could be converted to 230,000 shares of common stock. Earnings would be fully diluted by 2,777,809 shares if the Company had earnings to report.

- 16 -

Note 10: Business Segments

The Company began reporting two business segments during 2004. One segment is the exploration segment in the United States of America. The Company engages in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in the U.S.A. in this segment. The Company’s other segment, acquired in 2004, is the Mexico exploration segment. That segment includes the Company’s 99% owned subsidiary Sterling Mining De Mexico, S.A. De C.V. The Mexico segment engages in the acquisition exploration and operation of mineral properties in Mexico. The Company’s objective in each segment is to place those properties that can be operated at a profit into production.

The following table presents information about reportable segments for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.

	Three Months Ended March 31
	2006			2005
Revenues:
United States	$	10,818		$	7,497
Mexico		269,706			—
Total		280,524			7,497
Income (loss) from operations
United States		(982,821	)		(1,009,880	)
Mexico		(15,031	)		(104,937	)
Total		(997,852	)		(1,114,817	)
Net Income (Loss)
United States		(1,193,954	)		(1,080,851	)
Mexico		(32,637	)		(104,937	)
Total		(1,226,591	)		(1,185,788	)
Identifiable Assets:
United States		5,068,128			3,621,841
Mexico		601,765			302,175
Total		5,669,893			3,924,016
Capital Expenditures:
United States		170,305			1,340
Mexico		2,406			—
Total	$	172,711		$	1,340

- 17 -

Note 11: Significant Customers

Sterling de Mexico, the Mexican subsidiary, has sold its precipitate to two refineries. During the three months ended March 31, 2006 all sales were to one refinery, Met-Mex Penoles.

Note 12: Subsequent Events

In April of 2006 the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock with full warrants attached, in exchange for $625,000. This was the second half of the financing agreement that is discussed in Note 8.

In May of 2006 the Company issued a convertible debenture to an investor, with warrants attached. The Company received $300,000 and granted the investor the option to convert the debt to approximately 59,000 shares of common stock with a full warrant exercisable at $8.00 per share, attached. The Company is accounting for the convertible debt as a derivative instrument according to generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S.

Note 13: Correction of an Error

Management restated its 2004 financial statements in order to correct the initial valuation of stock options that the company acquired from another mining company in 2004 as part of a mineral lease agreement. The company originally valued the options at $662,500. The options should have been valued at $897,620. The company recorded an impairment of the options at December 31, 2004. The correction resulted in an impairment loss of $235,120 more than previously recorded. The effect of the correction is as follows:

	As previously reported		As restated
2004 Loss on Investments	(231,126	)	(466,246	)
2004 Net Income (Loss)	(5,294,587	)	(5,529,707	)
2004 Earnings (Loss) per share	(0.35	)	(0.36	)
2004 Additional Paid in Capital	11,181,183		11,416,303
2004 Retained Earnings	(9,867,594	)	(10,102,714	)
2005 Net Income (Loss)	(4,548,957	)	(4,548,957	)
2005 Earnings (Loss) per share	(0.26	)	(0.26	)
2005 Additional Paid in Capital	16,636,821		16,871,941
2005 Retained Earnings	(14,490,039	)	(14,725,159	)
First Quarter 2006 Net Income (Loss)	(1,226,591	)	(1,226,591	)
Earnings (Loss) per Share	(0.06	)	(0.06	)
First Quarter 2006 Additional Paid in Capital	19,206,560		19,441,680
First Quarter 2006 Retained Earnings	(15,716,630	)	(15,951,750	)

- 18 -

Item 2: Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

Overview

The Company’s operating mine is the Barones silver tailings project in Mexico. At the Barones silver tailings project in Mexico, silver production was 44,303 ounces of silver and 76 ounces of gold in the first quarter of 2006 compared to no ounces of silver and gold in the first quarter of 2005. The Barones project began operating in the third quarter of 2005. Total cash cost per ounce in the first quarter of 2006 was $7.66 per ounce.

The Company is rehabilitating the Sunshine Mine in Idaho and expects to begin production in late 2007 or early 2008. The rehabilitation and development of the Sunshine Mine during the first quarter of 2006 included entering into a contract to drive the approximately $2.8 million Sterling Tunnel. The 5,700 foot tunnel will connect with the Silver Summit tunnel and provide exploration drill stations, ventilation, escape way and power distribution flexibility for the mine.

The Company also has exploration projects in Idaho, Montana and Mexico. During the first quarter of 2006 Sterling Silver Mining Company continued exploration on its Mexican properties in the Estate of Zacatecas, Mexico. Diamond drilling was carried out on La Esperanza and El Tesorito properties located in the Ojo Caliente district. Assay results are being evaluated to determine future action. Sampling and mapping was done at the Nueva Andromeda mine in El Morro district. Because of the emphasis put on the drilling at La Esperanza and El Tesorito, no work was done at El Griego, and La Aventurera mines in the Panfilo Natera Mines.

The results of the Company’s operations are significantly affected by the market prices of silver which may fluctuate widely and are affected by many factors beyond the Company’s control, including, without limitation, interest rates, expectations regarding inflation, currency values, governmental decisions regarding the disposal of precious metals stockpiles, global and regional political and economic conditions, and other factors. The average prices of silver (London Final) and gold (London Final) for the first three months of 2006 were $9.71 and $554 per ounce, respectively. The market prices of silver and gold on May 17, 2006 were $13.82 per ounce and $699.50 per ounce, respectively.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis includes references to total cash costs per ounce of silver produced. Total cash costs per ounce represent a non- U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) measurement that management uses to monitor and evaluate the performance of its mining operations. A reconciliation of total cash costs per ounce to U.S. GAAP “Production Expenses” is also provided herein and should be referred to when reading the total cash cost per ounce measurement.

Comparative Results of Operations

For the three Months Ended March 31, 2006 compared to three Months Ended March 31, 2005

- 19 -

Revenues

Sales of metal from continuing operations in the first quarter of 2006 consisted of sales of silver and gold to the refinery in Zacatecas, Mexico and coin sales in the USA. Sales in the first quarter in Mexico were $269,706 in 2006 and none in 2005. Sales in the first quarter in the USA were $10,818 in 2006 and $7,497 in 2005.

Costs and Expenses

The Company reported cost of revenues of $224,448 in the first quarter of 2006 and $4,570 in the first quarter of 2005. “Cost of sales and other production costs” in Mexico were $218,045 and none in the first quarters 2006 and 2005 respectively. The Cost of Revenues for coin sales in the U.S. were $6,403 and $4,570 in the first quarters of 2006 and 2005 respectively.

Other Income and Expenses

Other income and expense for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was a net loss of approximately $229,000 and $71,000 respectively. The largest component of that expense in the first quarter of 2005 was loss on foreign exchange. The largest component of that expense in the first quarter of 2006 was loss on convertible debt derivative instruments.

Income Taxes

Sterling Mining Company has a substantial net operating loss for U.S. income tax purposes. Sterling de Mexico has a net tax asset of IVA tax refundable in Mexico.

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations

As a result of the above, the Company’s net loss from continuing operations amounted to approximately $1 million compared to a net loss of $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2005. The largest component of the loss in the first quarter of both years was exploration expense. In the first quarter of 2006 the loss was reduced by sales revenue of silver and gold in Mexico.

Cash Cost Per Ounce of Silver

During the first quarter of 2006 Sterling de Mexico sold approximately 30,000 ounces of silver and small amounts of other metals for approximately $270,000 in U.S. dollars. Sterling de Mexico’s costs, on a cash basis, are presented in the table below.

- 20 -

Cash costs per ounce of silver represent measurements that are not in accordance with GAAP that management uses to monitor and evaluate the performance of our mining operations. We believe cash costs per ounce of silver provide an indicator of profitability and efficiency as well as providing a meaningful basis to compare our results to those of other mining companies and other mining operating properties. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, the most comparable GAAP measure, is presented below:

Silver: Cash Costs per Ounce

Sterling de Mexico, 1^st Quarter 2006

Total Cash Costs	$	339,335
Divided by silver ounces produced		44,303
Total cash cost per ounce produced	$	7.66
Reconciliation to GAAP
Total Cash Costs	$	339,335
Less: Refining and transportation		(40,065	)
Plus: By-product credits (gold)		17,623
Cost of operations	$	316,894
Less: increase in product inventory	$	(98,848	)
Cost of sales and other production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization (GAAP)	$	218,045

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s cash balance at March 31, 2006 was approximately $1.4 million. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company entered into agreements and/or closed on private equity and debt offerings which included two convertible debentures with full warrants attached for a total of $575,000 and 250,000 shares with full warrants attached issued to an investor for $625,000. The Company’s February 8-K filing reported the issuance of the 250,000 shares and disclosed an agreement to issue 250,000 more shares with full warrants attached in April of 2006, which issuance did take place.

The Company’s cash balance at March 31, 2006 was approximately $1.4 million. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company entered into agreements and/or closed on private equity and debt offerings which included two convertible debentures with full warrants attached for a total of $575,000 and 250,000 shares with full warrants attached issued to an investor for $625,000. The issuance of these shares was reported in the Company’s February 8-K filing. The 8-K filing discloses an agreement to issue 250,000 more shares with full warrants attached in April. The April issuance did take place, as reported in Note 12 of this Form 10-Q.

Equity and debt offerings in the first quarter totaled approximately $1.8 million. The Company believes that these cash amounts will be sufficient to meet its operating needs through June of 2006, and the Company will continue to seek to raise additional capital to meet its future operating needs through private equity or convertible debt offerings. While the Company believes its cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and cash from operations will be adequate to meet its obligations through June of 2006, there can be no assurances that financing will be available when needed for the remainder of the year.

- 21 -

The financing requirements of the Company will grow as the Sunshine Mine project advances during the next stages in 2006 and 2007. To achieve internal objectives and timetables will require significantly higher capital to advance the project. A shortfall in funding raised towards this budget or lack of significant cash flow from our Mexican operations, would cause significant delays in our progress to re-open the Sunshine Mine, and determine the feasibility of a second production project in Mexico. There is no assurance the Company will be successful in its fund raising efforts in 2006, or that its Mexican operations can generate significant excess cash to help fund operating expenses.

The capital requirements of the Company’s Mexican operations will be dependent on the profits and cash flow from our Baroness operations, results of economic and technical studies on our other projects and any exploration projects the Company may select for advancement.

The Company’s recurring overhead will continue to increase and cash expenses now range from $100,000 to $400,000 per month. These expenses are partially offset by cash flow now starting to be generated from Mexico. The Company will seek to cover the capital requirements by raising capital by debt, equity or other financing avenues or the sale of assets. If the Company is not successful in obtaining the necessary financing, operations may need to be delayed or curtailed.

Contractual Obligations

The Company is obligated under certain contractual arrangements for future cash expenditures. The following table sets forth our contractual obligations for the periods shown:

	Total		Payments due by period
			Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		After 5 Years
Long-term Debt	$	—	$	—	$	—		—		—
Operating Leases:
Ebisch-Reich	$	55,000	$	7,500	$	12,500	$	15,000	$	20,000
American Reclamation		480,000		120,000		120,000		120,000		120,000
Chester Mining Company		28,800		7,200		7,200		7,200		7,200
Mineral Mountain		14,400		3,600		3,600		3,600		3,600
Merger Mines		12,500		2,500		2,500		2,500		5,000
Timberline Resources		60,000		—		20,000		20,000		20,000
Metropolitan Mines		48,000		12,000		12,000		12,000		12,000
San Acacio		600,000		150,000		150,000		150,000		150,000
Total	$	1,298,700	$	302,800	$	327,800	$	330,300	$	337,800

Critical accounting policies and estimates

The Company has determined from the significant accounting policies as disclosed in our financial statements, that the following two disclosures are critical accounting policies.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and

- 22 -

expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Estimates are essential to the financial disclosure process in determining the reserves of ore bearing rock and the future liabilities for remediation and reclamation from mining activities. The Company used recognized outside consultants to determine the essential characteristics of the important determinants concerning the Company’s future actions in moving exploration stage properties through development into production. The estimates that the Company will develop are based upon the experience of these out-side consultants and the Company’s experienced personnel. As the Company proceeds with the re-opening of the Sunshine Mine, all estimates will be reviewed on a timely basis to allow for the reporting of current and valid financial information. Management believes that all of the estimates currently being relied upon are valid and appropriate concerning the value of assets and liabilities. In the past, given the very limited operations of the Company, management has been fairly accurate as to the use of estimates and the timing of any changes.

Mineral Exploration and Development Costs

The Company has been in the exploration stage since its inception in 1998 of its current exploration phase.

In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the Company expenses exploration costs as incurred. Significant property acquisition costs for undeveloped mineral interests that have significant potential to develop an economic ore body are capitalized. The Company will amortize the capital costs based on proven and probable ore reserves if an economic ore body is developed. If an economic ore body is not discovered previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the property does not contain an economic ore body. Costs to develop new mines, to define further mineralization in existing ore bodies, and to expand the capacity of operating mines, are capitalized and will be amortized on units of production basis over proven and probable reserves. Gains and losses on the sales or retirement of assets are recorded as other income or expense.

The Company expects to have reserves in the future on any development it deems commercially viable, but at this time the Company has no current reserves, which can be demonstrated for financial reporting purposes. The essential nature of any reserves acquired or discovered will be estimates based upon ore body information presented to and reviewed by professionals. The enterprise of exploration and mining are subject to substantial uncertainties in development and operations. The Company is attempting to recruit a team of operational professionals with the highest standards for reporting always being in the forethought of management.

Any estimates arising out of our exploration, development and operational activities will be expected to be reviewed under current internal policies. Our current environment has had only a short period of active operations and management believes that all exploration, development and operating policies are being accurately maintained. Our future operations will be heavily dependent on the market values of precious metals and our estimated costs of production. As these determinants change we would expect analysis by management of both short-term and long-term conditions, which could have a negative impact on the Company’s choices concerning development and operations of its existing and future acquired properties.

- 23 -

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155 “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments,” which amends SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and SFAS No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” SFAS No. 155 resolves issues addressed in Statement 133 Implementation Issue No. D1 “Application of Statement 133 to Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets,” and permits:

• Fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation;

• Clarifies which interest-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133;

• Establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation;

• Clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and

• Amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument.

FAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired, issued or subject to a remeasurement event occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 155 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2006, the FASB issued FSP No. 123(R)-4 “Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of Contingent Event.” FSP 123(R)-4 amends paragraphs 32 and A229 of SFAS No. 123(R) to incorporate the concept that a cash settlement feature that can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control does not meet the condition in paragraphs 32 and A229 until it becomes probable that the event will occur, and that an option or similar instrument that is classified as equity, but subsequently becomes a liability because the contingent cash settlement event is probable of occurring, shall be accounted for similar to a modification from an equity to liability award. FSP 123(R)-4 became effective when we adopted SFAS 123(R) and is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2005, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 04-13 “Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the same Counterparty.” The scope of EITF No. 04-13 includes guidance on the circumstances under which two or more inventory purchases and sales transactions with the same counterparty should be viewed as a single exchange transaction under the scope of Opinion 29 “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” and whether there are circumstances under which nonmonetary exchanges of inventory within the same line of business should be recognized at fair value. EITF No. 04-13 is effective for new arrangements entered into, or modifications or renegotiations of existing arrangements, beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after March 15, 2006. The adoption of EITF Issue No. 04-13 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

- 24 -

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange, interest rates, and commodity prices. The Company’s operations in Mexico could potentially be affected by a change in the exchange rate of Mexican pesos into American dollars.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by it in its periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures conducted by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, such officers concluded at March 31, 2006, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Based on an evaluation by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, such officers concluded that there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K/A filed on May 10, 2006.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the period February - March 2006, the Company issued an aggregate of 125,000 shares of common stock to an investor for aggregate proceeds of $250,000. In connection with this sale, the Company issued an aggregate of 62,500 warrants exercisable for a period of two years at an exercise price of $4.20. These securities were issued in an offshore transaction in reliance on Regulation S adopted under the Securities Act of 1933. The Company also issued 18,000 shares of common stock at $0.75 per share upon the exercise of outstanding options and an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock at a deemed price of $3.45 per share pursuant to the terms of a lease amendment agreement, along with an additional 50,000 shares at a deemed price of $3.95 per share in payment of a lease renewal. These shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

- 25 -

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Company held an annual shareholders’ meeting on February 8, 2006 for the purpose of electing directors and approving the auditors to perform the 2006 financial audit. The following directors were elected: Raymond DeMotte, Kevin Shiell, Carol Stephan and Dave Waisman. The respective votes cast for and against each nominee were as follows: Raymond DeMotte, 15,327,225 for, 107,440 against; Kevin Shiell, 15,326,605 for, 108,060 against; Carol Stephan, 15,328,175 for, 106,490 against; Dave Waisman, 15,327,175 for, 107,490 against. In addition, the shareholders approved the appointment of Williams & Webster, P.S., as auditors for Company. The votes cast on this proposal were 15,290,259 for, 75,839 against and 18,330 abstentions.

Item 5. Other Information

In September 2005, James D. Christianson and a small group of shareholders affiliated with Mr. Christianson filed a lawsuit against two directors of the Company, Carol Stephan and Ray De Motte, in the United States District Court, Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Case No. CV05-5590 RBL. Mr. De Motte is also an officer of the Company. The original complaint alleged, among other things, that De Motte and Stephan made misrepresentations and omitted information in conjunction with private purchases and sales of Company common stock and stock in other businesses with which De Motte and/or Stephan are associated. Sterling was not a party to the original complaint.

Recently, the plaintiffs requested permission to amend the original complaint to add claims against the Company and others, asserting that the Company and others made misrepresentations and omitted information in conjunction with private purchases and sales of Company common stock, among other allegations. Should the motion be approved and the Company be made a party to the case, the Company intends to vigorously defend the claims against it.

- 26 -

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit	Description
10.1	Amendment to Mining Lease and Agreement dated 15 February 2006 by and between Sunshine Precious Metals, Inc. and Sterling Mining Company (filed with the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 22, 2006 and incorporated herein by this reference.)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer

- 27 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	STERLING MINING COMPANY
Date: June 30, 2006	By:	/s/ Raymond DeMotte
		Raymond DeMotte, Chief Executive Officer
Date: June 30, 2006	By:	/s/ James N. Meek
		James N. Meek, Chief Financial Officer

- 28 -