10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 4, 2010

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 001-32843

TIM HORTONS INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Canada	98-0641955
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)
874 Sinclair Road, Oakville, ON, Canada	L6K 2Y1
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

905-845-6511

(Registrant’s phone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at August 9, 2010
Common shares	173,922,810 shares

Exhibit Index on page 55.

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

	Pages
PART I: Financial Information	3
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited):	3
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the quarters and year-to-date periods ended July  4, 2010 and June 28, 2009	3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010	4
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year-to-date periods ended July  4, 2010 and June 28, 2009	5
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity for the year-to-date period ended July  4, 2010 and year ended January 3, 2010	6
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	50
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	50
PART II: Other Information	51
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	51
Item 1A. Risk Factors	51
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	53
Item 6. Exhibits	53
Signature	54
Index to Exhibits	55

On July 2, 2010, the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was US$0.9392 for Cdn$1.00.

Availability of Information

As a result of the September 28, 2009 reorganization of the Delaware incorporated Tim Hortons Inc. (“THI USA”) as a Canadian public company, we are currently a foreign private issuer in the U.S. for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and as a result, we are no longer subject to the same Exchange Act filing requirements to which THI USA was subject. However, for purposes of providing continuity with our previous periodic reports under the Exchange Act as a U.S. domestic registrant, we currently continue to file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), instead of the reporting forms available for foreign private issuers.

We make available, through our internet website for investors (www.timhortons-invest.com), our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with the SEC and with the Canadian Securities Administrators. The reference to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website and should not be considered part of this document.

2

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

	Second quarter ended				Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009		July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009
			(note 1)				(note 1)
Revenues
Sales	$	444,344	$	425,348	$	850,292	$	816,464
Franchise revenues:
Rents and royalties		175,879		160,824		335,839		304,988
Franchise fees		19,639		19,287		36,343		39,714
		195,518		180,111		372,182		344,702
Total revenues		639,862		605,459		1,222,474		1,161,166
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales		375,347		365,711		722,394		703,584
Operating expenses		61,560		58,909		120,285		115,502
Franchise fee costs		20,379		19,615		38,205		39,393
General and administrative expenses (note 9)		36,745		35,694		71,417		69,170
Equity (income)		(3,760)		(3,367)		(7,017)		(6,432)
Other (income), net		(260)		(152)		(397)		(316)
Total costs and expenses, net		490,011		476,410		944,887		920,901
Operating income		149,851		129,049		277,587		240,265
Interest (expense)		(6,878)		(5,058)		(12,325)		(10,515)
Interest income		113		120		460		784
Income before income taxes		143,086		124,111		265,722		230,534
Income taxes (note 2)		42,161		40,648		80,224		75,689
Net income		100,925		83,463		185,498		154,845
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		6,804		5,703		12,488		10,646
Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	94,121	$	77,760	$	173,010	$	144,199
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. (note 3)	$	0.54	$	0.43	$	0.99	$	0.80
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. (note 3)	$	0.54	$	0.43	$	0.99	$	0.80
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — Basic (in thousands) (note 3)		174,586		180,731		175,318		180,975
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — Diluted (in thousands) (note 3)		174,873		180,923		175,571		181,140
Dividend per common share	$	0.13	$	0.10	$	0.26	$	0.20

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - (Unaudited)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars)

	As at
	July 4, 2010			January 3, 2010
				(note 1)
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	157,495		$    121,653
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		49,958		60,629
Restricted investments		4,997		20,186
Accounts receivable, net		160,105		179,942
Notes receivable, net (note 11)		19,204		20,823
Deferred income taxes		2,064		3,475
Inventories and other, net (note 4)		109,592		80,490
Advertising fund restricted assets (note 11)		25,661		26,681
Total current assets (note 11)		529,076		513,879
Property and equipment, net (note 11)		1,489,517		1,494,032
Notes receivable, net (note 11)		2,641		3,475
Deferred income taxes		10,771		8,919
Intangible assets, net		7,444		8,405
Equity investments		46,594		45,875
Other assets		25,876		19,706
Total assets (note 11)	$	2,111,919		$ 2,094,291
Liabilities and Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable (note 5)	$	128,214		$135,248
Accrued liabilities:
Salaries and wages		15,092		23,268
Taxes		25,239		27,586
Other (note 5)		109,862		111,401
Deferred income taxes		117		376
Advertising fund restricted liabilities (note 11)		40,850		43,944
Current portion of long-term obligations (note 6)		109,128		7,821
Total current liabilities (note 11)		428,502		349,644
Long-term obligations
Long-term debt (note 6)		237,100		336,302
Advertising fund restricted debt (note 11)		344		415
Capital leases		68,314		67,156
Deferred income taxes		12,545		10,159
Other long-term liabilities (note 11)		73,114		74,929
Total long-term obligations		391,417		488,961
Commitments and contingencies (note 7)
Equity
Equity of Tim Hortons Inc.
Common shares ($2.84 stated value per share), Authorized: unlimited shares, Issued: 174,348,514 and 177,318,614 shares, respectively (note 8)		494,512		502,872
Common shares held in Trust, at cost: 330,405 and 278,500 shares, respectively (note 11)		(11,337	)	(9,437	)
Contributed surplus		1,937		0
Retained earnings		834,184		796,235
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(115,405	)	(120,061	)
Total equity of Tim Hortons Inc.		1,203,891		1,169,609
Noncontrolling interests		88,109		86,077
Total equity		1,292,000		1,255,686
Total liabilities and equity	$	2,111,919		$2,094,291

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars)

	Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010			June 28, 2009
				(note 1)
Cash flows provided from (used in) operating activities
Net income	$	185,498		$ 154,845
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		57,874		54,972
Stock-based compensation expense		5,447		4,073
Equity income, net of cash dividends		(696	)	2,513
Deferred income taxes		1,493		3,714
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		10,697		25,316
Accounts and notes receivable		19,835		19,659
Inventories and other		(27,206	)	3,978
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(15,899	)	(74,610	)
Settlement of cash flow hedges (note 6)		(4,791	)	0
Other, net		2,817		315
Net cash provided from operating activities		235,069		194,775
Cash flows (used in) provided from investing activities
Capital expenditures		(48,494	)	(69,324	)
Proceeds from sale of restricted investments		15,240		0
Principal payments received on notes receivable		1,644		733
Other investing activities		(7,418	)	(11,841	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(39,028	)	(80,432	)
Cash flows (used in) provided from financing activities
Purchase of common shares/treasury stock		(98,018	)	(16,701	)
Purchase of common shares held in trust		(3,252	)	(713	)
Purchase of common shares for settlement of restricted stock units		(377	)	(232	)
Dividend payments to common shareholders		(45,413	)	(36,253	)
Distributions and other to noncontrolling interests		(10,456	)	(14,147	)
Proceeds from issuance of debt, net of issuance costs (note 6)		200,359		1,150
Principal payments on other long-term debt obligations (note 6)		(203,218	)	(2,551	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(160,375	)	(69,447	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		176		(1,552	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		35,842		43,344
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		121,653		124,717
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	157,495		$ 168,061
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	10,862		$     9,760
Income taxes paid	$	82,977		$   77,998
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Capital lease obligations incurred	$	4,913		$     4,737

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars)

	Year-to-date period  ended July 4, 2010			Year ended January 3,  2010
Common shares
Balance at beginning of period	$	502,872		$              0
Converted from common stock		0		513,318
Repurchase of common shares (note 8)		(8,360	)	(10,446	)
Balance at end of period	$	494,512		$   502,872
Common stock
Balance at beginning of period	$	0		$289
Converted to common shares		0		(289	)
Balance at end of period	$	0		$              0
Capital in excess of par value
Balance at beginning of period	$	0		$   929,102
Stock-based compensation, net		0		(322	)
Converted to common shares		0		(928,780	)
Balance at end of period	$	0		$              0
Treasury stock
Balance at beginning of period	$	0		$(399,314	)
Purchased during the period		0		(16,701	)
Reissued during the period		0		264
Cancelled and retired during the period		0		415,751
Balance at end of period	$	0		$              0
Contributed surplus
Balance at beginning of period	$	0		$              0
Stock-based compensation, net		1,937		0
Balance at end of period	$	1,937		$              0
Common shares held in Trust
Balance at beginning of period	$	(9,437	)	$  (12,287	)
Purchased during the period		(3,252	)	(713	)
Disbursed or sold from Trust during the period		1,352		3,563
Balance at end of period	$	(11,337	)	$    (9,437	)
Retained earnings
Balance at beginning of period	$	796,235		$   677,550
Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.		173,010		296,367
Dividends		(45,413	)	(72,506	)
Stock-based compensation		0		(2,221	)
Repurchase of common shares – excess of stated value (note 8)		(89,648	)	(102,955	)
Balance at end of period	$	834,184		$   796,235
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Balance at beginning of period	$	(120,061	)	$  (55,348	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		4,656		(64,713	)
Balance at end of period	$	(115,405	)	$(120,061	)
Total equity of Tim Hortons Inc.	$	1,203,891		$1,169,609
Noncontrolling interests (notes 1 and 11)
Balance at beginning of period	$	86,077		$     91,811
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		12,488		23,446
Capital contribution from noncontrolling interests		0		1,305
Distributions and other to noncontrolling interests		(10,456	)	(30,485	)
Balance at end of period	$	88,109		$     86,077
Total equity	$	1,292,000		$1,255,686

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY –

NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OF TIM HORTONS INC.

(Unaudited)

(in thousands of common shares)

	Year-to-date period ended    July 4, 2010		Year ended January 3,  2010
Common shares
Balance at beginning of period	177,319		180,997
Repurchased during the period (note 8)	(2,971	)	(3,678	)
Balance at end of period	174,348		177,319
Common stock
Balance at beginning of period	0		193,303
Converted to common shares	0		(193,303	)
Balance at end of period	0		0
Treasury stock
Balance at beginning of period	0		(11,754	)
Purchased during the period	0		(560	)
Reissued during the period	0		8
Cancelled and retired during the period	0		12,306
Balance at end of period	0		0
Common shares held in Trust
Balance at beginning of period	(279	)	(358	)
Purchased during the period	(91	)	(25	)
Disbursed or sold from Trust during the period	40		104
Balance at end of period	(330	)	(279	)
Common shares issued and outstanding	174,018		177,040

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

NOTE 1 MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Description of business

Tim Hortons Inc. is a corporation governed by the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”). For periods on or before September 27, 2009, Tim Hortons Inc. was a Delaware corporation (together with its subsidiaries, collectively referred to herein as “THI USA”).

References herein to “Tim Hortons,” or the “Company” refer to THI USA and its subsidiaries for periods on or before September 27, 2009 and to Tim Hortons Inc., the CBCA corporation, and its subsidiaries for periods on or after September 28, 2009, unless specifically noted otherwise.

At 12:00 a.m. on September 28, 2009, THI USA effected a merger that resulted in the conversion of issued and outstanding common stock of THI USA, US$0.001 par value per share, into an equal number of common shares, without par value, in the Company. The Company conducts the business previously conducted by THI USA in substantially the same manner. The merger was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control; therefore, there was no revaluation of THI USA’s consolidated assets and liabilities, and the Company continues to use the historical cost basis method of accounting.

The Company’s principal business is the development and franchising and, to a minimal extent, operation of quick service restaurants that serve coffee and other hot and cold beverages, baked goods, sandwiches, soups, and other food products. In addition, the Company has vertically integrated manufacturing, warehouse and distribution operations which supply a significant portion of the system restaurants with paper and equipment, as well as food products, including shelf-stable products, and, from one distribution centre, refrigerated and frozen food products. The Company also controls the real estate underlying a substantial majority of the system restaurants, which generates another source of revenue. As of July 4, 2010, the Company and its franchisees operated 3,040 restaurants in Canada (99.5% franchised) and 587 restaurants in the United States (“U.S.”) (99.5% franchised) under the name “Tim Hortons^®” and the Company had 291 primarily self-serve licensed locations in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom.

Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation

The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In the opinion of management, the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contain all adjustments (all of which are normal and recurring in nature) necessary to state fairly the Company’s financial position as of July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010, and the condensed consolidated results of operations, comprehensive income (see note 10) and cash flows for the quarters and year-to-date periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009. All of these financial statements are unaudited. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements which are contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Canadian Securities Administrators on March 4, 2010. The January 3, 2010 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was derived from the same audited 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP, and has been adjusted to reflect the retroactive application of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 810—Consolidation (“ASC 810”) (see below).

The functional currency of Tim Hortons Inc. is the Canadian dollar, as the majority of the Company’s cash flows are in Canadian dollars. The functional currency of each of the Company’s subsidiaries and legal entities is the local currency in which each subsidiary operates, which is the Canadian dollar, the U.S. dollar or the Euro. The majority of the Company’s operations, restaurants and cash flows are based in Canada, and the Company is primarily managed in Canadian dollars. As a result, the Company’s reporting currency is the Canadian dollar.

8

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the results and balances of Tim Hortons Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries and certain independent operators and joint ventures consolidated in accordance with ASC 810 (see note 11). Intercompany accounts and transactions among consolidated entities have been eliminated upon consolidation. Investments in non-consolidated affiliates over which the Company exercises significant influence, but for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary and does not have control, are accounted for using the equity method. The Company’s share of the earnings or loss of these non-consolidated affiliates is included in equity income, which is included as part of operating income since these investments are operating ventures closely integrated in the Company’s business operations.

Restricted cash and cash equivalents and restricted investments

Amounts presented as Restricted cash and cash equivalents and Restricted investments on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet relate to the Company’s Tim Card^® quick pay cash card program. The combined balances as of July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010 represent the net amount of cash loaded on the cards by customers, less redemptions. The balances are restricted, and cannot be used for any purpose other than application to settle obligations under the cash card program. Since the inception of the program, the interest on the restricted cash and cash equivalents and restricted investments has been contributed by the Company to the Company’s advertising and promotion funds to help offset costs associated with this program. Obligations under the cash card program are included in Accrued liabilities, Other on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and are disclosed in note 5.

From time to time, the Company invests some of these funds for periods in excess of three months, but less than one year. Only restricted cash and cash equivalents balances in excess of expected net redemptions over the investment time horizon are used for such investments, and the Company does not intend to redeem these investments prior to maturity. As a result, these investments are deemed to be held-to-maturity and are recorded at amortized cost on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The carrying amount of the restricted investments approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the investments. All restricted investments mature by August 2010.

Increases or decreases in restricted cash and cash equivalents are reflected in Net cash provided from operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows since the funds will be used to fulfill current obligations to customers recorded in Accrued liabilities, Other on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in the customer obligations are included in Net cash provided from operating activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as the offset to changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents balances. Purchases of and proceeds upon the maturity of restricted investments are included in Net cash used in investing activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Funding for these investments are drawn from restricted cash and cash equivalents balances.

Accounting changes – new accounting standards

Effective January 4, 2010, the Company adopted FASB Statement of Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 167—Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS No. 167”), now codified within ASC 810. This Statement amended Interpretation 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics: (i) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. Additionally, an enterprise is required to assess whether it has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity operates as designed when determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. This statement also amended Interpretation 46(R) to focus on a more qualitative approach, rather than a quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, amended certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, added an additional requirement to assess whether an entity is a variable interest entity, on an ongoing basis, and required enhanced disclosures that provides users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. The Company has retroactively applied this standard to comparative periods. See note 11 for additional information regarding the impact of the adoption of this standard.

9

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

Effective January 4, 2010, the Company adopted certain provisions within Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06—Fair Value Measurements: Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, as codified in ASC 820—Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”). This ASU provides amendments to ASC 820 that requires more enhanced disclosures about (i) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (ii) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (iii) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (iv) the transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 fair value measurements. This ASU was effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for certain disclosures applicable to Level 3 fair value measurements which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those years. The adoption of this update did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements or related disclosures (see note 13).

NOTE 2 INCOME TAXES

The effective income tax rate for the second quarter ended July 4, 2010 was 29.5%, compared to 32.8% for the second quarter ended June 28, 2009. The effective income tax rate for the year-to-date periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009 was 30.2% and 32.8%, respectively. The variance between periods is primarily attributable to the reorganization of the Company as a Canadian public company that took place on September 28, 2009 and, to a lesser extent, the favourable resolution of tax audits in the second quarter of 2010. The reorganization allowed the Company to benefit from the reduction in the Canadian statutory rates in 2010, address certain adverse implications of the Fifth Protocol to the Canada – U.S. Treaty (the “Treaty”), and realize lower withholding tax rates pursuant to the Treaty.

NOTE 3 EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO TIM HORTONS INC.

Basic earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. are computed by dividing net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted computations are based on the treasury stock method and include assumed issuances of outstanding restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and stock options with tandem stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), as prescribed in ASC 260—Earnings per share, as the sum of: (i) the amount, if any, the employee must pay upon exercise; (ii) the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized; and (iii) the amount of tax benefits (both current and deferred), if any, that would be credited to contributed surplus assuming exercise of the options, net of shares assumed to be repurchased from the assumed proceeds, when dilutive.

10

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

The computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. are shown below:

	Second quarter ended				Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009		July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009
Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. for computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	94,121	$	77,760	$	173,010	$	144,199
Weighted average shares outstanding for computation of basic earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. (in thousands)		174,586		180,731		175,318		180,975
Dilutive impact of restricted stock units (in thousands)		253		192		239		165
Dilutive impact of stock options with tandem SARs (in thousands)		34		0		14		0
Weighted average shares outstanding for computation of diluted earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. (in thousands)		174,873		180,923		175,571		181,140
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	0.54	$	0.43	$	0.99	$	0.80
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	0.54	$	0.43	$	0.99	$	0.80

NOTE 4 INVENTORIES AND OTHER, NET

Inventories and other, net include the following as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010:

	July 4, 2010			January 3,   2010
Raw materials	$	29,634		$	11,489
Work-in-process		329			0
Finished goods		62,249			57,411
		92,212			68,900
Inventory obsolescence provision		(1,506	)		(2,181	)
Inventories, net		90,706			66,719
Prepaids and other		18,886			13,771
Total inventories and other, net	$	109,592		$	80,490

NOTE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES – OTHER

Included within Accounts payable are the following obligations as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010:

	July 4,       2010		January 3,   2010
Accounts payable	$	111,235	$	114,973
Construction holdbacks and accruals		16,979		20,275
	$	128,214	$	135,248

11

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

Included within Accrued liabilities, Other are the following obligations as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010:

	July 4,       2010		January 3,   2010
Gift certificate obligations	$	6,866	$	8,348
Cash card obligations		54,118		74,292
Other accrued liabilities		48,878		28,761
	$	109,862	$	111,401

Other accrued liabilities include deferred revenues, accrued rent expense, deposits, and various equipment and other accruals.

NOTE 6 LONG-TERM DEBT

The following table outlines the Company’s long-term debt obligations as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010:

	July 4, 2010		January 3, 2010
Senior unsecured notes, series 1 (4.20% coupon rate)	$200,000		$	0
Term debt	100,000			300,000
Other debt	39,201			37,186
	$339,201		$	337,186
Less: current portion (1)	(102,101	)		(884	)
Long-term debt	$237,100		$	336,302

⁽¹⁾ Excludes current portion due under capital leases.

The Company has an unsecured five-year senior bank facility (“Senior Bank Facility”) with a syndicate of Canadian and U.S. financial institutions that includes a revolving facility of $200 million and US$100 million along with a $300 million (at inception) term loan (“Term Debt”), all of which mature on February 28, 2011. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company repaid $200 million of the Term Debt, prior to maturity and without penalty. The prepayment was made primarily with net proceeds from the issuance of $200 million of senior unsecured notes (“Senior Notes”). The remaining $100 million of Term Debt matures on February 28, 2011 upon expiration of the Senior Bank Facility.

As noted above, the Company issued $200 million of Senior Notes, which were offered on a private placement basis in Canada with a term of seven years, maturing June 1, 2017. The Senior Notes bear a fixed interest rate of 4.20% with interest payable in semi-annual installments, in arrears, commencing December 1, 2010. The Senior Notes rank equally and pari passu with each other and with the notes of every other series (regardless of their actual time of issue), with all other senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Tim Hortons Inc. (the “Borrower”), including amounts owing under the Senior Bank Facility, except as to any sinking fund which pertains exclusively to any particular indebtedness of the Borrower and statutory preferred exceptions. The Senior Notes are initially guaranteed by The TDL Group Corp. (“TDL”), the Borrower’s main Canadian subsidiary. Together, the Borrower’s and TDL’s third party revenues must represent at least 75% of the consolidated revenues of the Company (or such threshold percentage established under the new Senior Bank Facility, upon amendment or after maturity thereof on or before March 31, 2011). These must be tested quarterly, on a rolling twelve-month basis. To the extent combined third party revenues of these two entities is less than 75% of consolidated revenues, additional guarantors must be added until 75% of consolidated revenues are reached or exceeded. Alternatively, if the Borrower’s third party revenues reach or exceed 75% of consolidated revenues, the guarantors will be released. There are also certain covenants limiting liens to secure borrowed money (subject to permitted exceptions), and limiting the Company’s ability to undertake certain acquisitions and dispositions, but there are no financial covenants.

The Senior Notes are redeemable, at the Borrower’s option, at any time, upon not less than 30 days notice, but no more than 60 days notice, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) a price calculated to provide a yield to maturity (from the redemption date) equal to the yield on a non-callable Government of Canada bond with a maturity equal to, or as close as possible to, the remaining term to maturity of the Senior Notes, plus 0.30% and (ii) par, together, in each case, with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date fixed for redemption. In the event of a change of control and a rating downgrade to below investment grade, the Borrower will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Senior Notes at a redemption price of 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.

12

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

In March 2010, the Company entered into bond forwards with a notional amount of $195 million as a cash flow hedge to limit the interest rate volatility in the period prior to the issuance of the Senior Notes. These bond forwards were settled in June 2010, resulting in an Other comprehensive loss of $4.9 million (see note 13). This loss will be recognized in Interest expense over the seven-year term of the Senior Notes resulting in an effective interest rate of the Senior Notes of 4.59%.

In connection with the issuance of the Senior Notes, the Company incurred a total of $1.2 million in financing costs, which were deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Senior Notes.

In connection with the Term Debt, the Company entered into interest rate swaps in 2006 and 2007 with a notional amount of $130 million (see note 13) which were used to fix a portion of the variable rate Term Debt at 5.04%. Upon partial prepayment of the Term Debt, the Company also settled an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $30 million, resulting in recognition of $0.9 million from Other comprehensive loss to Interest (expense) in the second quarter of 2010. The remaining interest rate swaps fix the interest rate on the $100 million of outstanding Term Debt at 4.925%.

NOTE 7 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company has guaranteed certain leases and debt payments, primarily related to franchisees, amounting to $0.8 million and $0.5 million as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively. In the event of default by a franchise owner of a guaranteed obligation, the Company generally retains the right to acquire possession of the related restaurants. At July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010, the Company is also the guarantor on $11.8 million and $9.7 million, respectively, in letters of credit and surety bonds with various parties; however, management does not expect any material loss to result from these instruments because management does not believe performance will be required as the underlying event(s) that would require payment are not expected to occur and have not occurred as of July 4, 2010. The length of the arrangements guaranteed by the Company or for which the Company is contingently liable varies, but generally does not exceed seven years.

The Company has entered into purchase arrangements with some of its suppliers for terms which generally do not exceed one fiscal year. The range of prices and volume of purchases under the agreements may vary according to the Company’s demand for the products and fluctuations in market rates. These agreements help the Company secure pricing stability from suppliers and product availability. The Company does not believe these agreements expose the Company to significant risk.

In addition to the guarantees described above, the Company is party to many agreements executed in the ordinary course of business that provide for indemnification of third parties under specified circumstances, such as lessors of real property leased by the Company, distributors, service providers for various types of services (including commercial banking, investment banking, tax, actuarial and other services), software licensors, marketing and advertising firms, securities underwriters and others. Generally, these agreements obligate the Company to indemnify the third parties only if certain events occur or claims are made, as these contingent events or claims are defined in each of the respective agreements. The Company believes that the resolution of any such claims that might arise in the future, either individually or in the aggregate, would not materially affect the earnings or financial condition of the Company.

On June 12, 2008, a claim was filed against the Company and certain of its affiliates in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) by two of its franchisees, Fairview Donut Inc. and Brule Foods Ltd., alleging, generally, that the Company’s Always Fresh baking system and expansion of lunch offerings have led to lower franchisee profitability. The claim, which seeks class action certification on behalf of Canadian franchisees, asserts damages of approximately $1.95 billion. The plaintiffs filed a motion for certification of the putative class in May of 2009, and the Company filed its responding materials as well as a motion for summary judgment in November of 2009. Cross examinations on both sides’ affidavits are being scheduled. The Court has reserved the week of November 29, 2010 for the hearing on this matter. Plaintiffs filed a motion requesting that the Company’s summary judgment motion be heard following hearing and determination of plaintiffs’ motion for certification. It was the Company’s position that the motions should be heard together. A hearing on plaintiffs’ motion to separate the certification and summary judgment motions was heard on May 13, 2010, and the court ruled in favour of the Company that the two motions should be heard together. Both motions are scheduled for the week of November 29, 2010, subject to the delivery of required materials and completion of examinations. The Company believes the claim is frivolous and completely without merit, and intends to oppose the certification motion and defend the claim vigorously. However, there can be no assurance that the outcome of the claim will be favourable to the Company or that it will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position or liquidity in the event that the ultimate determinations by the Court and/or appellate court are not in accordance with the Company’s evaluation of this claim. Neither the probability of this claim’s success nor the ultimate amount payable, if any, is determinable at this time, and, coupled with the Company’s position that this claim is without merit, the Company has not recorded any provisions in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements related to this claim.

13

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various legal actions and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. Reserves related to the resolution of legal proceedings are included in Accounts payable on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. It is the opinion of the Company that the ultimate resolution of such matters will not materially affect the Company’s financial condition or earnings.

NOTE 8 COMMON SHARES

On March 1, 2010, the Company obtained regulatory approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) to commence its 2010 share repurchase program (“2010 program”) for up to $200 million in common shares, not to exceed the regulatory maximum of 8,817,291 shares, equivalent to 5% of the outstanding common shares as of February 19, 2010. Purchases of common shares are planned to be made through a combination of automatic trading plan purchases (10b5-1) and at management’s discretion in compliance with regulatory requirements, given prevailing market, cost, and other considerations. Purchases under the program are planned to be made by the Company on either the TSX, the New York Stock Exchange and/or other Canadian marketplaces, subject to applicable regulatory requirements. The 2010 program commenced March 3, 2010 and will end on March 2, 2011, or sooner if the $200 million or 5% share maximum has been reached. The 2010 program may also be discontinued at the Company’s discretion in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. All shares purchased pursuant to the 2010 program will be cancelled.

In the year-to-date period ended July 4, 2010, the Company purchased and cancelled approximately 3.0 million common shares for a total cost of approximately $98.0 million under the Company’s 2009 repurchase program and the 2010 program of which $8.4 million reduced the stated value of Common shares and the remainder was recorded as a reduction to Retained earnings.

In the year-to-date period ended June 28, 2009, the Company purchased approximately 0.6 million shares of common stock for a total cost of approximately $16.7 million under the Company’s 2009 repurchase program to be held in treasury. No shares were purchased during the second quarter of 2009 due to the suspension of purchases until the fourth quarter of 2009 when the Company completed its reorganization as a Canadian public company. All treasury shares were subsequently cancelled upon the reorganization of THI USA as a Canadian public company in September 2009.

NOTE 9 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Total stock-based compensation expense included in General and administrative expenses on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations is detailed as follows:

	Second quarter ended				Year-to-date period  ended
	July 4,   2010		June 28,   2009		July 4,     2010		June 28,   2009
Restricted stock units	$	1,868	$	1,713	$	3,316	$	2,919
Stock options and tandem SARs		997		772		1,453		723
Deferred stock units		287		103		678		431
Total stock-based compensation expense	$	3,152	$	2,588	$	5,447	$	4,073

The Company begins expensing performance-based RSUs at the time the performance measures are set. As a result, amounts relating to the planned May 2011 grants are being expensed assuming the achievement of the performance condition is probable.

The Company has entered into total return swaps (“TRS”) as economic hedges for a portion of its outstanding stock options with tandem SARs (see note 13). The Company recognized a gain relating to the TRS of less than $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to a loss of $0.4 million during the second quarter of 2009 (gain of $0.4 million year-to-date 2010 and a loss of $0.5 million year-to-date 2009).

Details of stock-based compensation grants and settlements during 2010, on a year-to-date basis, are set forth below.

Deferred share units

Approximately 15,200 deferred share units (“DSUs”) were granted during the year-to-date period ended July 4, 2010 (26,500 year-to-date 2009) at a fair market value of $33.92 ($30.88 year-to-date 2009). Approximately 5,200 DSUs were settled during the year-to-date period ended July 4, 2010 (nil year-to-date 2009). DSU’s are liability-based awards and, as such, are revalued each reporting period to the Company’s closing share price.

14

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

Restricted stock units

The Company’s Human Resource and Compensation Committee (“HRCC”) approved awards of 14,487 and 174,946 of RSUs with dividend equivalent rights, which were granted in March 2010 and May 2010, respectively. The fair market value of each RSU awarded as part of this grant (the closing price of the Company’s common shares traded on the TSX on the business day preceding the grant) in March 2010 and May 2010 was $32.78 and $35.23, respectively. The awards granted in March 2010 vest in equal installments in May 2010 and May 2011 and the awards granted in May 2010 are scheduled to vest either in equal installments over, or in one lump sum at the end, of a 30-month period. In accordance with ASC 718 – Compensation – Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), RSUs granted to retirement-eligible employees are expensed immediately, unless the RSUs contain a performance measure. Performance-based RSUs expected to be granted to retirement eligible employees are expensed evenly over the period from the date on which the performance measure is set to the date on which the grant is expected to be made.

In the second quarter ended July 4, 2010, the Company funded its employee benefit plan trust (the “Trust”), which, in turn, purchased approximately 91,000 common shares for approximately $3.3 million (25,000 shares for $0.7 million in Q2 2009). For accounting purposes, the cost of the purchase of shares held in trust has been accounted for as a reduction in outstanding common shares, and the Trust has been consolidated in accordance with ASC 810, since the Company is the primary beneficiary, as that term is defined by ASC 810. The Trust is used to fix the Company’s future cash requirements in connection with the settlement, after vesting, of outstanding RSUs by delivery of common shares held in the Trust to most of the Canadian officers and employees that participate in the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated from time to time (the “2006 Plan”).

In the second quarter ended July 4, 2010, approximately 92,000 (150,000 in Q2 2009) RSUs that were previously granted vested in accordance with the terms of such awards. The Company’s settlement obligations, after provision for the payment of minimum statutory withholding tax requirements for which employees are responsible, were satisfied by the disbursement of approximately 40,000 (66,000 in Q2 2009) shares held in the employee benefit plan trust and approximately 11,000 shares (8,000 shares in Q2 2009) were purchased by an agent of the Company on behalf of the respective eligible employees on the open market in May 2010, at an average purchase price of $35.63 ($28.94 in Q2 2009). In 2009, approximately 8,000 shares were also issued from treasury (nil in 2010 as the Company does not have treasury shares).

Stock options and tandem stock appreciation rights

The HRCC approved awards of 403,269 stock options with tandem SARs, which were granted in May 2010 (533,392 in May 2009) at a fair value grant day price of $35.23 ($28.87 in May 2009), to officers of the Company. These awards were granted to retirement-eligible employees and non-retirement eligible employees. For purposes of the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, the grants were segregated based on the year of the grant and retirement eligibility, and the assumptions were adjusted accordingly. All options with tandem SARs granted in 2010 and 2009 vest over three years and expire seven years from the date of issuance, provided that if an employee retires, the term decreases to four years after retirement. The fair value of these awards was determined in accordance with ASC 718 at the grant date and each subsequent remeasurement date by applying the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model using the following assumptions:

	Assumptions
Remeasurement date	July 4, 2010	January 3, 2010
Expected volatility	18% – 26%	23% – 28%
Risk-free interest rate	1.2% – 2.3%	1.4% – 2.5%
Expected life	1.4 – 4.9 years	1.9 – 4.4 years
Expected dividend yield	1.5%	1.2%
Closing share price	$34.04	$32.13

Awards granted to retirement-eligible employees are expensed on an accelerated basis, in accordance with ASC 718. The stock option with tandem SARs awards were revalued to fair value at July 4, 2010 using the closing share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

A total of 12,245 vested SARs were exercised and cash-settled for approximately $0.1 million during the second quarter of 2010 (nil in the second quarter of 2009). The associated options were cancelled.

15

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

NOTE 10 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The components of Other comprehensive income (loss) and Total comprehensive income are shown below:

	Second quarter ended				Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009		July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009
Net income	$  100,925		$  83,463		$  185,498		$  154,845
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Translation adjustments	21,445		(32,681	)	4,377		(21,717	)
Unrealized gains (losses) from Cash flow hedges:
Net gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivatives	(986	)	1,757		(2,959	)	1,262
Amount of net (gain) loss reclassified to earnings during the period	1,732		(2,079	)	3,238		(4,971	)
Total cash flow hedges	746		(322	)	279		(3,709	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	22,191		(33,003	)	4,656		(25,426	)
Total comprehensive income	123,116		50,460		190,154		129,419
Total comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests	6,804		5,703		12,488		10,646
Total comprehensive income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$  116,312		$  44,757		$  177,666		$  118,773
Income tax (expense)/recovery components netted in the above table are detailed as follows:
	Second quarter ended				Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009		July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009
Cash flow hedges:
Net gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivatives	$    819		$     584		$  1,102		$     232
Amounts reclassified to earnings	$(1,504	)	$    (966	)	$ (1,704	)	$    (707	)

NOTE 11 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

In accordance with the new guidance adopted under SFAS No. 167, now codified within ASC 810 (see note 1), effective January 4, 2010, the Company analyzed its variable interests, including its equity investments and certain license or operator arrangements with various entities. The Company determined which interests were interests in variable interest entities (“VIEs”), and then assessed whether the Company was considered to be the primary beneficiary of those VIEs. If the Company is determined to be the primary beneficiary, the Company is required to consolidate the VIE’s assets, liabilities, results of operations and cash flows. If the Company is not the primary beneficiary, the Company accounts for such interests using other applicable U.S. GAAP. The Company has retroactively applied this standard to comparative periods.

VIEs for which the Company is the primary beneficiary

The Company’s 50-50 bakery joint venture, Maidstone Bakeries, produces and supplies our restaurant system with par-baked donuts, Timbits^TM , some bread products, and pastries. Under the joint venture, a significant portion of the joint venture’s manufacturing activities either involves, or is conducted on behalf of, the Company to benefit the Tim Hortons restaurant chain. As such, the Company is subject to terms and conditions under various agreements including the joint venture, supply, license and service agreements. The Company is considered to have power (under the accounting principles of ASC 810) over the joint venture since the Company determines which par-baked products are to be manufactured by the bakery joint venture, exclusively for Tim Hortons restaurants, and at pricing determined by both 50-50 joint venture parties. Tim Hortons restaurant owners and operators currently purchase all of their par-baked donuts and Timbits and a significant portion of other bread products from this bakery joint venture. For these reasons, the Company concluded that it is the primary beneficiary of its 50-50 bakery joint venture. Previously under FIN 46(R), the Company accounted for the bakery joint venture under the equity method based on the Company’s 50% ownership interest. In fiscal 2009, the Company made a capital contribution of $1.3 million to the joint venture and had accounts payable outstanding of $4.7 million and $3.6 million as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively.

16

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

The Company enters into arrangements, called operator agreements, in which the operator acquires the right to operate a Tim Hortons restaurant, but the Company is the owner of the equipment, signage and trade fixtures. If the legal entity within which such an operator operates does not have additional capital independently owned by the legal entity, it is considered to not be adequately capitalized and that entity is considered a VIE. The operator is required to pay a percentage of the restaurant’s weekly gross sales to the Company, thus exposing the Company to variability in rental and royalty revenues and in the collection of amounts due. The Company has the power to determine which operator will manage these restaurants and for what duration; and, both the Company and the operator have the option to terminate the agreement with 30 days notice. The Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary of such legal entities.

In addition, the Company offers a franchise incentive program (“FIP”) to certain U.S. franchisees which allows the franchisee to finance both the initial franchise fee and the purchase of certain equipment, signage and trade fixtures. These franchisees who participate in the FIP program do not have a significant amount of initial capital within their legal entities that is not financed directly by the Company. As a result, legal entities of franchisees under the FIP program, which do not have additional capital independently owned, are also considered to be VIEs. To supplement the FIP, the Company may offer additional relief and assistance to franchisees in developing markets in the U.S. where the brand is not yet established and the restaurants have lower sales levels. This additional relief may include assistance with costs of supplies; certain operating expenses, including rents and royalties; and, in certain markets, labour and other costs. The Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary in these circumstances since it absorbs losses and operating expenses of the FIP franchisee in the form of additional relief which is netted in the Company’s rents and royalties revenues. The Company is also considered to have power since it determines which U.S. franchisees will participate in the FIP program and which will be offered additional relief. Notes receivable from these FIP franchisees, which are generally non-interest bearing, are included in the table below.

The Company has consolidated 279 and 290 operator and FIP restaurants as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively, or approximately 7.7% and 8.4% of the Company’s total systemwide restaurants, respectively. On average, a total of 278 and 279 operator and FIP restaurants were consolidated in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively (274 for both year-to-date 2010 and 2009). The Company has no equity interest in any of its franchisees. None of the Company’s assets serve as collateral for the consolidated restaurants, and creditors of these operators have no recourse to the Company.

In connection with restricted stock unit awards granted to Company employees, the Company established the Trust, which purchases and retains common shares of the Company to satisfy the Company’s contractual obligation to deliver shares to settle the awards for most Canadian employees. The Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary of the Trust. Since inception, the Trust has been consolidated in accordance with ASC 810 and the cost of the shares held by the Trust of $11.3 million and $9.4 million as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively, has been accounted for as a reduction in outstanding common shares on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

17

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

The Company participates in two advertising funds established to collect and administer funds contributed for use in advertising and promotional programs designed to increase sales and enhance the reputation of the Company and its franchisees. The advertising funds are operated on behalf of the Company and its franchisees, with separate advertising funds administered for Canada and the U.S. The Company is the sole shareholder (Canada) and sole member (U.S.) and is considered to be the primary beneficiary of these funds which have historically been consolidated in accordance with ASC 952–Franchisors, and accordingly, the revenue, expenses and cash flows of the advertising funds are generally not included in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Cash Flows because the contributions to these advertising funds are designated for specific purposes, and the Company acts, in substance, as an agent with regard to these contributions. The assets and liabilities of these advertising funds have been consolidated in accordance with ASC 810. Company contributions to these advertising funds totaled $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the quarters ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009, respectively ($1.7 million and $2.1 million year-to-date 2010 and 2009, respectively).

The assets and liabilities associated with the Company’s consolidated bakery joint venture, restaurant VIEs (operator and FIP restaurants) and advertising funds are as follows:

	July 4, 2010					January 3, 2010
	Joint Venture VIEs	Restaurant VIEs		Advertising fund VIEs		Joint Venture VIEs	Restaurant VIEs		Advertising fund VIEs
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	$    21,451	$	7,906	$	0	$    15,714	$	6,229	$	0
Restricted assets - current	0		0		25,661	0		0		26,681
Other current assets (1)	26,755		3,979		0	26,751		5,268		0
Property and equipment, net (1)	137,990		35,628		15,060	141,756		29,448		18,159
Other long-term assets (1)	2,237		3,661		1,805	2,809		4,162		1,256
Total assets	$  188,433	$	51,174	$	42,526	$  187,030	$	45,107	$	46,096
Notes payable to Tim Hortons Inc. – current (1)	$             0	$	26,750	$	0	$             0	$	22,843	$	0
Restricted liabilities – current	0		0		40,850	0		0		43,944
Other current liabilities (1)	11,449		14,806		0	11,119		13,765		0
Notes payable to Tim Hortons Inc. – long-term (1)	0		2,909		0	0		5,584		0
Restricted liabilities – long-term	0		0		344	0		0		415
Other long-term liabilities (1)	9,561		1,409		1,332	7,818		639		1,737
Total liabilities	21,010		45,874		42,526	18,937		42,831		46,096
Equity of variable interest entities	167,423		5,300		0	168,093		2,276		0
Total liabilities and equity	$  188,433	$	51,174	$	42,526	$  187,030	$	45,107	$	46,096

⁽¹⁾ Various assets and liabilities are eliminated upon the consolidation of these variable interest entities, the most significant of which are the Notes payable to Tim Hortons Inc., which reduces the Notes receivable, net reported on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs do not necessarily represent additional claims on our general assets; rather, they represent claims against the specific assets of the consolidated VIEs. Conversely, assets recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs do not represent additional assets that could be used to satisfy claims against our general assets.

VIEs for which the Company is not the primary beneficiary

The Company also has investments in certain real estate ventures determined to be VIEs of which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. The most significant of these is TIMWEN Partnership, owned on a 50/50 basis by the Company and Wendy’s International, Inc. (“Wendy’s”) to jointly develop the real estate underlying “combination restaurants” in Canada that offer Tim Hortons and Wendy’s products at one location, typically with separate franchisees operating the Tim Hortons and Wendy’s restaurants. Control is considered to be shared by both Tim Hortons and Wendy’s since all significant decisions of the TIMWEN Partnership must be made jointly.

18

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

These real estate ventures, including TIMWEN Partnership, are accounted for using the equity method, based on the Company’s ownership percentages and, are included in Equity investments on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The maximum exposure to potential losses associated with these non-consolidated VIEs is limited to the Company’s equity investments which amounted to $46.6 million and $45.9 million as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010, respectively. The Company had no amounts payable outstanding with TIMWEN Partnership as at July 4, 2010 and $2.4 million outstanding as at January 3, 2010.

NOTE 12 SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company operates exclusively in the food-service industry and has determined that its reportable segments are those that are based on the Company’s methods of internal reporting and management structure and represent the manner in which the Company’s chief decision maker views and evaluates the various aspects of the Company’s business. The Company’s reportable segments are the geographic locations of Canada and the U.S. As set forth in the table below, there are no amounts of revenues shown between reportable segments nor do reportable segments include sales to variable interest entities.

The table below presents information about reportable segments:

	Second quarter ended										Year-to-date period ended
	July 4,         2010			% of Total		June 28,         2009			% of Total		July 4,         2010			% of Total		June 28,         2009			% of Total
Revenues
Canada	$	538,228		84.1	%	$	468,822		77.4	%	$	1,006,893		82.4	%	$	897,427		77.3	%
U.S.		30,135		4.7	%		38,717		6.4	%		57,848		4.7	%		73,044		6.3	%
Total reportable segments		568,363		88.8	%		507,539		83.8	%		1,064,741		87.1	%		970,471		83.6	%
Variable interest entities (1)		71,499		11.2	%		97,920		16.2	%		157,733		12.9	%		190,695		16.4	%
Total	$	639,862		100.0	%	$	605,459		100.0	%	$	1,222,474		100.0	%	$	1,161,166		100.0	%
Segment operating income (loss)
Canada (1) (2)	$	149,730		97.7	%	$	132,347		97.7	%	$	282,116		98.8	%	$	248,169		99.0	%
U.S.		3,580		2.3	%		3,141		2.3	%		3,334		1.2	%		2,577		1.0	%
Reportable segment operating income		153,310		100.0	%		135,488		100.0	%		285,450		100.0	%		250,746		100.0	%
Variable interest entities (1)		7,743					6,279					14,223					12,553
Corporate charges ( 3)		(11,202	)				(12,718	)				(22,086	)				(23,034	)
Consolidated operating income		149,851					129,049					277,587					240,265
Interest expense, net		6,765					4,938					11,865					9,731
Income taxes		42,161					40,648					80,224					75,689
Net income		100,925					83,463					185,498					154,845
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		6,804					5,703					12,488					10,646
Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	94,121				$	77,760				$	173,010				$	144,199

⁽¹⁾ While the adoption of SFAS No. 167 (now ASC 810) (see note 1) resulted in the consolidation of its 50-50 bakery joint venture, the Company’s chief decision maker continues to view and evaluate the performance of the Canadian segment with this 50-50 bakery joint venture accounted for on an equity accounting basis, which reflects 50% of its operating income (consistent with views and evaluations prior to the adoption of the Standard). As a result, the net revenues, and the remaining 50% of operating income of this joint venture have been included in Variable interest entities along with revenues and operating income from our non-owned consolidated restaurants.

⁽²⁾ Includes substantially all of the Company’s equity income.

⁽³⁾ Corporate charges include certain overhead costs which are not allocated to individual business segments, the impact of certain foreign currency exchange gains and losses, and the operating income from the Company’s wholly-owned Irish subsidiary, which continues to be managed corporately.

19

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

The following table provides information about capital spending:

	Second quarter ended								Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010		% of Total		June 28, 2009		% of Total		July 4, 2010		% of Total		June 28, 2009		% of Total
Capital expenditures
Canada	$	20,305	83.9	%	$	26,514	79.9	%	$	41,228	85.0	%	$	55,541	80.1	%
U.S.		3,162	13.1	%		6,583	19.8	%		6,027	12.4	%		13,277	19.2	%
Variable interest entities		738	3.0	%		93	0.3	%		1,239	2.6	%		506	0.7	%
	$	24,205	100.0	%	$	33,190	100.0	%	$	48,494	100.0	%	$	69,324	100.0	%

The following table provides a reconciliation of total reportable segment long-lived assets and total assets to total consolidated long-lived assets and total consolidated assets, respectively:

	As at
	July 4, 2010		January  3, 2010
Total long-lived assets
Canada	$	962,129	$	967,879
U.S.		356,401		356,560
Total reportable segments		1,318,530		1,324,439
Variable interest entities		158,594		156,712
Corporate long-lived assets		12,393		12,881
Consolidated long-lived assets	$	1,489,517		1,494,032
	As at
	July 4, 2010		January  3, 2010
Total assets
Canada	$	1,388,444	$	1,373,325
U.S.		447,443		478,395
Total reportable segments		1,835,887		1,851,720
Variable interest entities		232,336		226,470
Corporate assets		43,696		16,101
Consolidated total assets	$	2,111,919		2,094,291

20

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

Revenues consisted of the following:

	Second quarter ended				Year-to-date period ended
	July 4,     2010		June 28,     2009		July 4,     2010		June 28,     2009
Sales
Distribution sales	$	367,390	$	320,823	$	682,114	$	613,028
Company-operated restaurant sales		5,455		6,605		10,445		12,741
Sales from variable interest entities		71,499		97,920		157,733		190,695
		444,344		425,348		850,292		816,464
Franchise revenues
Rents and royalties		175,879		160,824		335,839		304,988
Franchise fees		19,639		19,287		36,343		39,714
		195,518		180,111		372,182		344,702
Total revenues	$	639,862	$	605,459	$	1,222,474	$	1,161,166

Cost of sales related to Company-operated restaurants were $5.7 million and $7.4 million for the second quarters ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009, respectively ($11.0 million and $15.2 million year-to-date 2010 and 2009, respectively).

The following table outlines the Company’s franchised locations and system activity for the second quarters and year-to-date periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009:

	Second quarter ended				Year-to-date period ended
	July 4,     2010		June 28,     2009		July 4,     2010		June 28,     2009
Franchise Restaurant Progression
Franchise restaurants in operation – beginning of period	3,576		3,421		3,560		3,403
Franchises opened	35		25		59		52
Franchises closed	(5	)	(7	)	(11	)	(15	)
Net transfers within the franchised system (primarily resales)	4		16		2		15
Franchise restaurants in operation – end of period	3,610		3,455		3,610		3,455
Company-operated restaurants	17		20		17		20
Total systemwide restaurants – end of period (1)	3,627		3,475		3,627		3,475

⁽¹⁾ Includes various types of standard and non-standard restaurant formats with differing restaurant sizes and menu offerings as well as self-serve kiosks, which offer primarily coffee products and a limited product selection. Collectively, the Company refers to all of these units as “systemwide restaurants.”

Excluded from the above franchise restaurant progression table are 291 licensed locations in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom as at July 4, 2010 (297 as of June 28, 2009).

21

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

NOTE 13 DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Derivatives

ASC 815—Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) requires companies to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. ASC 815 also permits companies to designate all derivatives that qualify as hedging instruments as fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. This designation is based on the exposure being hedged.

The Company has a policy prohibiting speculative trading in derivatives. The Company may enter into derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, but which largely offset the economic impact of certain foreign currency transactions.

The Company limits its counterparty risk associated with its derivative instruments by utilizing a number of different financial institutions. The Company continually monitors its positions and the credit ratings of its counterparties, and adjusts positions if appropriate. The Company did not have any significant exposure to any individual counterparty at July 4, 2010 or January 3, 2010.

Cash flow hedges: The Company’s exposure to foreign exchange risk is mainly related to fluctuations between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar. The Company is also exposed to changes in interest rates. The Company seeks to manage its cash flows and income exposures arising from these fluctuations and may use derivative products to reduce the risk of a significant impact on its cash flows or income. The Company does not hedge foreign currency and interest rate exposure in a manner that would entirely eliminate the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates or interest rates on net income and cash flows. The fair value of derivatives used by the Company are based on quoted market prices for comparable products and have therefore been classified as observable Level 2 inputs as defined by ASC 820.

The Company enters into cash flow hedges to reduce the exposure to variability in certain expected future cash flows. The types of cash flow hedges the Company may enter into include, but are not limited to: (i) interest rate swaps that effectively convert a portion of floating rate debt to fixed rate debt and are designed to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense; (ii) forward foreign exchange contracts that are entered into to fix the price of U.S.-dollar-denominated future purchases; and (iii) interest rate forward contracts that were entered into to fix the future interest payments on the issuance of the senior unsecured notes.

For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gains or losses on derivatives is reported in the cash flow hedges component of Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) in Total equity of Tim Hortons Inc. and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of gains or losses on derivatives is reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company discontinues hedge accounting: (i) when it determines that the cash flow derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item; (ii) when the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (iii) when it is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur; or (iv) when management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate.

Fair value hedges: The Company may, from time to time, enter into fair value hedges to reduce the exposure to changes in the fair values of certain assets or liabilities. For fair value hedges, the gains or losses on derivatives, as well as the offsetting gains or losses attributable to the risk being hedged, are recognized in current earnings in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in Other (income), net. The fair value of derivatives used by the Company are based on quoted market prices for comparable products and have, therefore, been classified as observable Level 2 inputs as defined by ASC 820 (see below). There are no outstanding fair value hedges as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010.

Other derivatives: The Company has a number of total return swaps outstanding that are intended to reduce the variability of cash flows and, to a lesser extent, earnings associated with stock-based compensation awards that will settle in cash, namely, the SARs that are associated with stock options (see note 9). The TRS did not qualify as accounting hedges under ASC 815, and, as such, they are being adjusted to fair value in accordance with ASC 815 at the end of each reporting period. The impact of the revaluation is reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The fair value of these derivatives was determined using Level 2 inputs, as defined by ASC 820. Changes in the fair value of this derivative are included in General and administrative expenses as an offset to fair value adjustments of the liability related to tandem SARs. The TRS each have a seven-year term but each contract allows for partial settlements, at the option of the Company, over the term, without penalty.

22

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs. The first two levels are considered observable and the last unobservable. These are used to measure fair value as follows:

• Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

• Level 2—Inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or, other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

• Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

In accordance with ASC 815 and ASC 820, the tables below outline the Company’s outstanding derivatives and fair value measurements as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010 and for the second quarters and year-to-date periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009.

23

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

Financial Assets and Liabilities

The following table summarizes the location and fair value of derivative instruments on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:

	As at July 4, 2010							As at January 3, 2010
	Notional amount		Fair value hierarchy	Fair  value asset (liability)			Location  on Condensed Consolidated Balance  Sheet	Notional amount		Fair value hierarchy	Fair  value asset (liability)			Location  on Condensed Consolidated Balance  Sheet
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments(1)
Forward currency contracts(2)	$	92,483	Level 2	$	1,163		Inventories and other, net	$	85,802	Level 2	$	(1,410	)	Accounts payable
Interest rate swaps(3)		100,000	Level 2		(2,190	)	Accrued liabilities, Other		130,000	Level 2		(5,290	)	Other long- term liabilities
Total	$	192,483		$	(1,027	)		$	215,802		$	(6,700	)
Income tax effect					283		Deferred income taxes (current asset)					2,370		Deferred income taxes (current asset)
Net of income taxes				$	(744	)					$	(4,330	)
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedging instruments(1)
TRS ( 4)	$	14,977	Level 2	$	949		Other long- term assets	$	8,958	Level 2	$	516		Other long- term assets

⁽¹⁾ In accordance with ASC 815.

⁽²⁾ Maturities as at July 4, 2010 extend between July 2010 and December 2010.

⁽³⁾ Each matures February 2011.

^{(4 )} Maturities of May 2015, May 2016 and May 2017, respectively.

The Company values most of its derivatives using valuations that are calibrated to the initial trade prices. Subsequent valuations are based on observable inputs to the valuation model. Forward currency contracts and interest rate swaps are fair valued using prevailing exchange rates and interest rates. The TRS are fair valued using the Company’s closing common share price on the last business day of the fiscal period. In addition, the Company entered into interest rate forwards during the first quarter of 2010, which were settled during the second quarter of 2010.

24

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

The tables below summarize the effect of derivative instruments on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (see note 10). The tables exclude amounts determined to be ineffective, as they were not significant:

	Second quarter ended July 4, 2010
	Amount of gain  (loss) recognized in OCI(1)			Amount of net (gain)  loss reclassified to earnings			Location  on Condensed Consolidated Statement  of Operations	Total effect on  OCI(1)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments under ASC 815
Forward currency contracts	$	3,187		$	899		Cost of sales	$	4,086
Interest rate swaps		(396	)		2,272		Interest (expense)		1,876
Interest rate forwards		(4,596	)		65		Interest (expense)		(4,531	)
Total	$	(1,805	)	$	3,236			$	1,431
Income tax effect		819			(1,504	)	Income taxes		(685	)
Net of income taxes	$	(986	)	$	1,732			$	746
	Second quarter ended June 28, 2009
	Amount of gain  (loss) recognized in OCI(1)			Amount of net (gain)  loss reclassified to earnings			Location  on Condensed Consolidated Statement  of Operations	Total effect on  OCI(1)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments under ASC 815
Forward currency contracts	$	2,970		$	(4,088	)	Cost of sales	$	(1,118	)
Interest rate swaps		(1,797	)		2,975		Interest (expense)		1,178
Total	$	1,173		$	(1,113	)		$	60
Income tax effect		584			(966	)	Income taxes		(382	)
Net of income taxes	$	1,757		$	(2,079	)		$	(322	)

⁽¹⁾ Other comprehensive income (loss).

25

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

	Year-to-date period ended July 4, 2010
	Amount of gain  (loss) recognized in OCI(1)			Amount of net (gain)  loss reclassified to earnings			Location  on Condensed Consolidated Statement  of Operations	Total effect on  OCI(1)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments under ASC 815
Forward currency contracts	$	1,306		$	1,266		Cost of sales	$	2,572
Interest rate swaps		(511	)		3,611		Interest (expense)		3,100
Interest rate forwards		(4,856	)		65		Interest (expense)		(4,791	)
Total	$	(4,061	)	$	4,942			$	881
Income tax effect		1,102			(1,704	)	Income taxes		(602	)
Net of income taxes	$	(2,959	)	$	3,238			$	279
	Year-to-date period ended June 28, 2009
	Amount of gain  (loss) recognized in OCI(1)			Amount of net (gain)  loss reclassified to earnings			Location  on Condensed Consolidated Statement  of Operations	Total effect on  OCI(1)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments under ASC 815
Forward currency contracts	$	1,888		$	(6,440	)	Cost of sales	$	(4,552	)
Interest rate swaps		(858	)		2,176		Interest (expense)		1,318
Total	$	1,030		$	(4,264	)		$	(3,234	)
Income tax effect		232			(707	)	Income taxes		(475	)
Net of income taxes	$	1,262		$	(4,971	)		$	(3,709	)

⁽¹⁾ Other comprehensive income (loss).

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 did not result in a material net income impact in either of the second quarter or year-to-date periods in 2010 or 2009.

Non-financial Assets and Liabilities

The Company values its assets held for sale at the lower of historical cost or fair value less cost to sell. When applicable, fair value is generally based on third-party appraisals. Assets held for sale that are valued using fair value less cost to sell were not significant as at July 4, 2010 and January 3, 2010 and have therefore not been disclosed.

26

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) – (Continued)

(in thousands of Canadian dollars, except share and per share data)

NOTE 14 RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13—Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, as codified in ASC 605—Revenue Recognition. The objective of this ASU is to address the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. The ASU also establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable and has expanded disclosures related to vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010, and the Company is currently assessing the potential impact, if any, the adoption of this ASU may have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11—Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives, as codified in ASC 815—Derivatives and Hedging. This update clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Only one form of embedded credit derivative qualifies for the exemption—one that is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. This ASU is effective for interim periods beginning after June 15, 2010 with early adoption permitted for the first interim period beginning after issuance of this ASU. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact, if any, the adoption of this update may have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-13—Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades as codified in ASC 718—Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). This update addresses the classification of a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which the underlying equity security trades. ASC 718 is amended to clarify that a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades shall not be considered to contain a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, such an award is not to be classified as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity classification. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010, and the Company is currently assessing the potential impact, if any, the adoption of this update may have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17— Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition as codified in ASC 605—Revenue Recognition. This update provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. Consideration that is contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is judged to meet certain criteria to be considered substantive. Milestones should be considered substantive in their entirety and may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones that should be evaluated individually. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods, beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and the Company is currently assessing the potential impact, if any, the adoption of this update may have on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE 15 SUBSEQUENT EVENT

In late April 2010, the Company received notice from IAWS Group Ltd., a subsidiary of Aryzta AG, the Company’s 50-50 partner under the Maidstone Bakeries joint venture, invoking the buy/sell provisions of the joint venture. The Company has decided to sell its 50% interest in the joint venture for gross proceeds of $475 million. The all-cash transaction is subject to receipt of regulatory approvals, and is expected to close before year-end 2010. The Company had a net investment of approximately $75 million in this joint venture as of the end of the second quarter of 2010. The Maidstone Bakeries joint venture is currently consolidated in the Company’s financial results in accordance with SFAS No. 167, now codified within ASC 810. After the closing of the transaction, the Company will no longer be required to consolidate this entity. Details of the joint venture’s unconsolidated balance sheet are outlined in Note 11. In fiscal 2009, the joint venture contributed $22 million to the Company’s net income, or $0.12 per share, representing the Company’s 50% share of net earnings. Upon closing, the Company’s supply obligations for donuts and Timbits^™ extend until early 2016, and it has supply rights until early 2017, at the Company’s option, allowing the Company sufficient flexibility to secure alternative means of supply, if desired.

27

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2010 (“2009 Form 10-K”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Canadian Securities Administrators on March 4, 2010, which have not been adjusted for the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Statement of Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 167—Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS No. 167”). All amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements that are not historical facts but reflect our current expectation regarding future results. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements because of a number of risks and uncertainties, including the matters discussed below. Please refer to “Risk Factors” included in our 2009 Form 10-K and set forth in our long-form Safe Harbor Statement referred to below under “Safe Harbor Statement,” as well as our other descriptions of risks set forth herein, for a further description of risks and uncertainties affecting our business and financial results. Historical trends should not be taken as indicative of future operations and financial results.

Our financial results are driven largely by changes in systemwide sales, which include restaurant-level sales at both franchise and Company-operated restaurants. As of July 4, 2010, 3,610 or 99.5% of our restaurants were franchised, representing 99.5% of the locations in Canada and 99.5% of the locations in the United States. The amount of systemwide sales affects our franchise royalties and rental income, as well as our distribution income. Changes in systemwide sales are driven by changes in average same-store sales and changes in the number of restaurants. Average same-store sales, one of the key metrics we use to assess our performance, provides information on total retail sales at restaurants, which have been open for thirteen or more months, operating systemwide and provides a useful comparison between periods. We believe systemwide sales and average same-store sales provide meaningful information to investors concerning the size of our system, the overall health and financial performance of the system, and the strength of our brand and franchisee base, which ultimately impacts our consolidated and segment financial performance. Franchise restaurant sales generally are not included in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (except for certain non-owned restaurants consolidated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810—Consolidation (“ASC 810”)); however, franchise restaurant sales result in royalties and rental income, which are included in our franchise revenues, and also generate distribution income.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). However, this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations may also contain certain non-GAAP financial measures to assist readers in understanding the Company’s performance. Non-GAAP financial measures are measures that either exclude or include amounts that are not excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Where non-GAAP financial measures are used, we have provided the most directly comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP and a reconciliation to GAAP measures.

Effective January 4, 2010, we adopted a new accounting standard, SFAS No. 167, now codified within ASC 810 which requires us to consolidate variable interest entities of which we are considered the primary beneficiary. We have retroactively applied this standard to comparative periods.

References herein to “Tim Hortons,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to Tim Hortons Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries (“THI USA”) for periods on or before September 27, 2009 and to Tim Hortons Inc., a corporation governed by the Canada Business Corporations Act, and its subsidiaries for periods on or after September 28, 2009, unless specifically noted otherwise.

Executive Overview

We franchise and, to a much lesser extent, operate Tim Hortons restaurants in Canada and the U.S. As franchisor, we collect royalty income on our franchised restaurant sales. Our business model also includes controlling the real estate for most of our franchised restaurants. As of July 4, 2010, we leased or owned the real estate for approximately 80% of our system restaurants, which generates a recurring stream of rental income. Real estate not controlled by us is generally for non-standard restaurants, including, for example, kiosks in offices, hospitals, colleges, and airports, as well as self-serve kiosks located in gas and convenience locations and grocery stores. We distribute coffee and other beverages, non-perishable food, supplies, packaging and equipment to system restaurants in Canada through our five distribution centres, and in some cases, through third-party distributors. We supply frozen and some refrigerated products from our Guelph facility to approximately 86% of our Ontario restaurants. In the U.S., we supply similar products to system restaurants through third-party distributors. In addition to our Canadian and U.S. franchising business, we have 291 licensed locations in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom, which are mainly self-serve kiosks operating primarily under the name “Tim Hortons.”

Systemwide sales grew by 9.2% in the second quarter of 2010 (5.0% in the second quarter of 2009) and 9.6% on a year-to-date basis in 2010 (5.7% 2009 year-to-date) as a result of strong same-store sales growth and new restaurant expansion in both Canada and the U.S. Systemwide sales include restaurant-level sales at both franchised and Company-operated restaurants. Systemwide sales

28

growth is determined using a constant exchange rate to exclude the effects of foreign currency translation. U.S. dollar sales are converted into Canadian dollar amounts using the average exchange rate of the base year for the period covered.

In the second quarter of 2010, Canadian same-store sales growth was 6.4% (1.7% in the second quarter of 2009). Successful menu initiatives, promotions, and operational initiatives, such as our hospitality strategy, helped contribute to transaction growth. Average cheque was positively impacted this quarter by previous pricing in the system, which we expect to have a more moderate impact in the second half of the year as pricing is lapped. There was a slight positive impact from the partial timing shift of the Easter holiday into the first quarter of 2010, from the second quarter of 2009. Our co-branding initiative with Cold Stone Creamery^® in Canada also had a slightly positive effect on same-store sales growth in the second quarter of 2010. Canadian same-store sales growth was 5.8% in the first half of 2010 (2.5% in the first half of 2009).

Our U.S. same-store sales growth was 3.1% in the second quarter of 2010 (3.3% in Q2 2009). U.S. sales gains related primarily to a combination of transaction growth and a higher average cheque. Transaction growth was driven by continued menu innovation, value promotions and, to a lesser extent, Cold Stone Creamery co-branded locations. Average cheque benefited from additional pricing in the system, offset significantly by promotional activity and value pricing. These initiatives were designed to drive transactions in order to help address continuing economic weakness and ongoing competitive activity in our core U.S. markets. In addition, same-store sales growth was favourably impacted, to a lesser extent, by the timing shift of holidays (Independence Day occurring in the third quarter of 2010 and part of the Easter holiday in the first quarter of 2010), and more moderate contributions from our Cold Stone Creamery co-branded locations. On a year-to-date basis, U.S. same-store sales growth was 3.1% (3.3% in 2009 year-to-date).

Operating income increased $20.8 million, or 16.1%, in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009. Operating income increased $37.3 million, or 15.5%, in the year-to-date period of 2010. Higher systemwide sales from continued same-store sales growth at existing locations and from additional restaurants in the system drove operating income in both the quarter and year-to-date periods and were significant contributors to higher revenues, and higher distribution income. Partially offsetting this growth was higher general and administrative expenses. In addition, the adoption of a new accounting standard relating to the consolidation of certain variable interest entities at the beginning of 2010, and retroactively applied to prior periods, positively impacted our second quarter 2010 operating income growth rate by 0.4% and negatively impacted our 2010 year-to-date operating income performance by 0.2% (see below for the reconciliation of Operating income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. to Operating income).

Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. increased $16.4 million, or 21.0%, in the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the second quarter of 2009, resulting primarily from higher operating income and a lower effective tax rate, offset, in part by higher interest expense. Our effective tax rate was 29.5% in the second quarter of 2010, which is lower than the 32.8% effective tax rate in the second quarter 2009, primarily as a result of the lower tax rates in Canada which we now benefit from as a result of our reorganization as a Canadian public company in September 2009 and the favourable settlements of tax audits in the second quarter of 2010. Interest expense was higher resulting primarily from the early settlement of one outstanding interest rate swap associated with the partial prepayment of $200 million of our term debt and the write-off of deferred financing costs associated with the portion of the term debt that was prepaid. These items increased interest expense by $1.1 million in both the quarter and the year-to-date periods of 2010. Diluted earnings per share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. (“EPS”) increased to $0.54 in the second quarter of 2010 from $0.43 in the second quarter of 2009. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding in the second quarter of 2010 was 174.9 million, or 3.3% lower than the diluted weighted average share count in the second quarter of 2009, due primarily to our 2009 and 2010 share repurchase programs.

Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. increased $28.8 million, or 20.0%, in the year-to-date period of 2010 as compared to the year-to-date period of 2009. This increase is driven by substantially the same factors contributing to the second quarter 2010 increase, namely higher operating income, a lower effective tax rate, offset in part due to higher interest expense. Diluted earnings per share for the year-to-date period were $0.99 as compared to $0.80 per share in the year-to-date period of 2009. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding was 3.1% lower in the year-to-date period of 2010 as a result of our share repurchase programs.

        In late April 2010, we received notice from IAWS Group Ltd., a subsidiary of Aryzta AG, our 50-50 partner under the Maidstone Bakeries joint venture, invoking the buy/sell provisions of the joint venture. The Company has decided to sell its 50% interest in the joint venture for gross proceeds of $475 million. Due to Aryzta’s ability to potentially leverage available surplus capacity for other channels and the international nature of their tax structure, this facility represents greater economic value to Aryzta than to Tim Hortons. The all-cash transaction is subject to receipt of regulatory approvals, and is expected to close before year-end 2010. We had a net investment of approximately $75 million in this joint venture as of the end of the second quarter of 2010. The financial impact of this transaction is subject to the finalization of income tax, accounting and other considerations. The Maidstone Bakeries joint venture is currently consolidated in our financial results in accordance with SFAS No. 167, now codified within ASC 810. After the closing of the transaction, we will no longer be required to consolidate this entity. In fiscal 2009, the joint venture contributed approximately $26 million to our operating income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. and $22 million to our net income, or $0.12 per share, representing our 50% share of earnings. Upon closing, the Company’s supply obligations for products extend for donuts and Timbits^TM until early 2016, and we have supply rights until late 2017, at our option, allowing us sufficient flexibility to secure alternative means of supply, if necessary. In addition, the existing agreements also have protections regarding intellectual property rights and dealing with competitors, as well as terms relating to price determination, that remain in effect after closing of the transaction.

We generate substantial cash flows from operations and have historically self-funded our growth requirements from internally-generated cash flows. We are therefore considering possible options for the use of net proceeds from the transaction, including potential avenues to return value to shareholders. Final decisions regarding the use of proceeds will be announced at the appropriate time.

29

Selected Operating and Financial Highlights

	Second quarter ended				Year-to-date period ended
	July 4,         2010		June 28,         2009		July 4,         2010		June 28,     2009
Systemwide sales growth (1)		9.2%		5.0%		9.6%		5.7%
Average same-store sales growth
Canada		6.4%		1.7%		5.8%		2.5%
U.S.		3.1%		3.3%		3.1%		3.3%
Systemwide restaurants		3,627		3,475		3,627		3,475
Revenues (in millions)	$	639.9	$	605.5	$	1,222.5	$	1,161.2
Operating income (in millions)	$	149.9	$	129.0	$	277.6	$	240.3
Operating income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. (in millions) (2)	$	142.1	$	122.8	$	263.4	$	227.7
Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. (in millions)	$	94.1	$	77.8	$	173.0	$	144.2
Basic and diluted EPS	$	0.54	$	0.43	$	0.99	$	0.80
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – Diluted (in millions)		174.9		180.9		175.6		181.1

⁽¹⁾ Systemwide sales growth is determined using a constant exchange rate to exclude the effects of foreign currency translation. U.S. dollar sales are converted to Canadian dollar amounts using the average exchange rate of the base quarter for the period covered. Systemwide sales growth excludes sales from our Republic of Ireland and United Kingdom licensed locations. Systemwide sales growth in Canadian dollars, including the effects of foreign currency translation, was 8.1% and 6.3% for the second quarter ended 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 8.2% and 7.3% for year-to-date 2010 and 2009, respectively.

⁽²⁾ Operating income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. is a non-GAAP measure in that it excludes operating income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Prior to the adoption of a new accounting standard at the beginning of the first quarter of 2010, operating income was, for the most part, unaffected by noncontrolling interests, which is not the case post-adoption. The presentation of this non-GAAP measure is made with operating income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure. Management believes that operating income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. is important information for comparison purposes to prior periods and for purposes of evaluating the Company’s operating income performance without the effects of the new accounting standard relating to the consolidation of variable interest entities to which we are considered the primary beneficiary. This new accounting standard requires the consolidation of a significant joint venture as well as, on average, approximately 274 non-owned restaurants. Previously, we did not consolidate this joint venture and we consolidated approximately 118 non-owned restaurants, on average, in accordance with the prior accounting standard. We present information excluding amounts related to this new accounting standard as it is more reflective of the way we manage and measure our performance internally. Therefore, this measure provides a more consistent view of management’s perspectives on underlying performance than the closest equivalent U.S. GAAP measure.

	Second quarter ended				Change from prior year
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009		$		%
Operating income	$	149.9	$	129.0	$	20.8	16.1%
Operating income attributable to noncontrolling interests		7.7		6.2		1.5	23.4%
Operating income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	142.1	$	122.8	$	19.3	15.7%
	Year-to-date period ended				Change from prior year
	July 4,     2010		June 28,     2009		$		%
Operating income	$	277.6	$	240.3	$	37.3	15.5%
Operating income attributable to noncontrolling interests		14.2		12.6		1.7	13.3%
Operating income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	263.4	$	227.7	$	35.7	15.7%

30

Systemwide Sales Growth

Systemwide sales growth was 9.2% during the second quarter of 2010 (5.0% in second quarter 2009), and 9.6% year-to-date in 2010 (5.7% in year-to-date 2009), as a result of continued same-store sales growth and new restaurant expansion in both Canada and the U.S.

Our financial results are driven largely by changes in systemwide sales, which include restaurant-level sales at both franchised and Company-operated restaurants, although approximately 99.5% of our system is franchised. The amount of systemwide sales impacts our royalties and rental income, as well as our distribution income. Changes in systemwide sales are driven by changes in average same-store sales and changes in the number of restaurants, in the addition of new restaurants. Systemwide sales growth is determined using a constant exchange rate to exclude the effects of foreign currency translation. U.S. dollar sales are converted into Canadian dollar amounts using the average exchange rate of the base year for the period covered. Systemwide sales growth excludes sales from our Republic of Ireland and United Kingdom licensed locations as these locations operate on a significantly different business model compared to our North American operations.

Average Same-Store Sales Growth

Average same-store sales growth, one of the key metrics we use to assess our performance, provides information on total retail sales at restaurants operating systemwide that have been open for thirteen or more months (i.e., includes both franchised and Company-operated restaurants) and provides a useful comparison between periods. Our average same-store sales growth is generally attributable to several key factors, including new product introductions, improvements in restaurant speed of service and other operational efficiencies, more frequent customer visits, expansion into broader menu offerings and pricing. Restaurant-level price increases are primarily used to offset higher restaurant-level costs on key items such as coffee and other commodities, labour, supplies, utility and other items.

Product innovation is one of our focused strategies to drive same-store sales growth, including innovation at breakfast as well as other day parts. During the second quarter of 2010, we promoted our new cheese bagel, new home style bun, featuring a turkey caesar sandwich, iced coffee and strawberry-themed products. We continued our rollout of our Canadian hospitality program and our Cold Stone Creamery co-branding initiative, with sales benefiting positively from both of these initiatives.

New Restaurant Development

Opening restaurants in new and existing markets in Canada and the U.S. has historically been a significant contributor to our growth. The following summary outlines restaurant openings and closures for the second quarters and year-to-date periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009, respectively:

	Second quarter ended		Year-to-date period ended
	July 4,     2010	June 28,     2009	July 4,     2010	June 28,     2009
Canada
Restaurants opened	15	15	35	35
Restaurants closed	(4)	(6)	(10)	(13)
Net change	11	9	25	22
U.S.
Restaurants opened	21	10	25	18
Restaurants closed	(1)	(1)	(1)	(2)
Net change	20	9	24	16
Total Company
Restaurants opened	36	25	60	53
Restaurants closed	(5)	(7)	(11)	(15)
Net change	31	18	49	38

From the end of the second quarter of 2009 to the end of the second quarter of 2010, we opened 183 system locations, including both full-serve and self-serve franchised locations and Company-operated restaurants, and we had 31 restaurant closures for a net increase of 152 restaurants. Typically, 20 to 40 system restaurants are closed annually, the majority of which are in Canada. Restaurant closures generally result from an opportunity to acquire a better location, which will permit us to upgrade size and layout or add a drive-thru. Restaurant closures made in the normal course typically occur at the end of a lease term or at the end of the useful life of the principal asset. We have also closed, and may continue to close, restaurants for which the restaurant location has performed below our expectations for an extended period of time, and/or we believe that sales from the restaurant can be absorbed by

31

surrounding restaurants. Included in our second quarter 2010 U.S. restaurant openings were 15 self-serve kiosk locations. Self-serve kiosk locations have significantly different economics than our standard and non-standard restaurants, including substantially less capital investment as well as significantly lower sales and, therefore lower associated royalties and distribution income; however, such kiosks serve to increase our brand awareness and create another outlet to drive convenience, which is important in our developing markets.

One of our strategic planning initiatives is to grow differently in ways we have not grown before. Initiatives in support of this strategy include the expansion of our Cold Stone Creamery co-branding concept. In 2009, we began to co-brand certain U.S. restaurants with Cold Stone Creamery and, in the second half of 2009, we expanded this initiative to Canada. As of July 4, 2010, we had 133 co-branded locations, including 70 co-branded locations in the U.S. (67 in Tim Horton restaurants and three in Cold Stone Creamery locations) and 63 co-branded locations in Tim Hortons restaurants in Canada. In addition, we have a few Cold Stone Creamery locations that are operating on a limited term agreement, and we are testing some take home only formats. We have decided to broaden our initial 2010 plan for up to 60 co-branded locations in Canada by an additional 20 to 25 restaurants. In the fourth quarter of 2009, we entered into two separate licensing arrangements with Kahala Franchise Corp., the Franchisor of the Cold Stone Creamery brand. The nature and purpose of the arrangements are to expand the parties’ co-branding initiative. We have exclusive development rights in Canada, and certain rights to use licenses within the U.S., and to operate ice cream and frozen confections retail outlets in combination with Tim Hortons restaurants.

In addition to the Cold Stone Creamery co-branding initiative, we began testing new concept restaurants in certain U.S. markets to differentiate our customer offering as a cafe and bake shop destination. At the end of the second quarter of 2010, we had two new concept restaurants opened in the U.S. These restaurants will be utilized to test various new products, equipment and restaurant design features in support of our U.S. strategic plan.

The following table shows our restaurant count as of July 4, 2010, January 3, 2010 and June 28, 2009:

Systemwide Restaurant Count

	As of July 4, 2010		As of January 3, 2010		As of June 28, 2009
Canada
Company-operated	14		13		15
Franchised – self-serve kiosks	95		98		99
Franchised – standard and non-standard	2,931		2,904		2,825
Total	3,040		3,015		2,939
% Franchised	99.5	%	99.6	%	99.5	%
U.S.
Company-operated	3		5		5
Franchised – self-serve kiosks	106		87		87
Franchised – standard and non-standard	478		471		444
Total	587		563		536
% Franchised	99.5	%	99.1	%	99.1	%
Total system
Company-operated	17		18		20
Franchised – self-serve kiosks	201		185		186
Franchised – standard and non-standard	3,409		3,375		3,269
Total	3,627		3,578		3,475
% Franchised	99.5	%	99.5	%	99.4	%

We have completed the process of actively converting many of our U.S. Company-operated restaurants to operator agreements. The effect of these conversions to date has been accretive to our U.S. segment operating income. Initially, after conversion, we usually provide additional relief to the operator and in the majority of cases we are required to consolidate these restaurants in accordance with variable interest entity accounting rules for consolidations, which recently changed effective for our first quarter of 2010. We had previously consolidated approximately 118 non-owned restaurants, on average, under the previous accounting standard, and with the adoption of the new variable interest entities accounting standard, are now consolidating, on average, approximately 274 non-owned restaurants in all the periods presented. We adopted this standard with retroactive application to prior periods for comparability. We believe that, in the long-term, the franchising strategy generally provides better overall profitability to the Company.

32

Segment Operating Income (Loss)

Systemwide sales and average same-store sales growth is affected by the business and economic environments in Canada and the U.S. We manage and review financial results from Canadian and U.S. operations separately. We, therefore, have determined the reportable segments for our business to be the geographic locations of Canada and the U.S. Each segment includes all manufacturing and distribution operations that are located in their respective geographic locations. We continue to manage the development of our international operations in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom, which consist primarily of branded licensed self-serve kiosk locations, corporately. As a result, operating income from these operations is included in Corporate charges in our segmented operating results and is insignificant. Our reportable segments exclude the effects of the variable interests accounting standard, reflective of the way the business is managed.

The following tables contain information about the operating income (loss) of our reportable segments:

	Second quarter ended						Change from second quarter 2009
	July 4, 2010		% of Revenues	June 28, 2009		% of Revenues	Dollars		Percentage
	(in thousands, except where noted)
Operating Income (Loss)
Canada (1)	$	149,730	23.4%	$	132,347	21.9%	$	17,383	13.1%
U.S.		3,580	0.6%		3,141	0.5%		439	14.0%
Reportable segment operating income		153,310	24.0%		135,488	22.4%		17,822	13.2%
Variable interest entities		7,743	1.2%		6,279	1.0%		1,464	23.3%
Corporate charges (2)		(11,202)	(1.8)%		(12,718)	(2.1)%		1,516	(11.9)%
Consolidated operating income	$	149,851	23.4%	$	129,049	21.3%	$	20,802	16.1%
	Year-to-date period ended						Change from Year-to-date period 2009
	July 4, 2010		% of Revenues	June 28, 2009		% of Revenues	Dollars			Percentage
	(in thousands, except where noted)
Operating Income (Loss)
Canada (1)	$	282,116	23.1%	$	248,169	21.4%		$33,947		13.7%
U.S.		3,334	0.3%		2,577	0.2%		757		29.4%
Reportable segment operating income		285,450	23.4%		250,746	21.6%		34,704		13.8%
Variable interest entities		14,223	1.2%		12,553	1.1%		1,670		13.3%
Corporate charges (2)		(22,086)	(1.9)%		(23,034)	(2.0)%		948		(4.1)%
Consolidated operating income	$	277,587	22.7%	$	240,265	20.7%		$37,322		15.5%

⁽¹⁾ While the adoption of SFAS No. 167 (now ASC 810) resulted in the consolidation of our 50-50 bakery joint venture, the Company’s chief decision maker continues to view and evaluate the performance of the Canadian segment with this 50-50 bakery joint venture accounted for on an equity accounting basis, which reflects 50% of its operating income (consistent with views and evaluations prior to the adoption of the Standard). As a result, the net revenues and the remaining 50% of operating income of this joint venture, have been included in the Variable interest entities line item, along with revenues and operating income from our non-owned consolidated restaurants.

⁽²⁾ Corporate charges include certain overhead costs that are not allocated to individual business segments, the impact of certain foreign currency exchange gains and losses, and the operating income from international operations (discussed below), which continue to be managed corporately.

Reportable segment operating income increased $17.8 million, or 13.2%, in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009. Reportable segment operating income increased $34.7 million, or 13.8%, for the year-to-date period ended July 4, 2010 compared to the year-to-date period ended June 28, 2009. Higher systemwide sales from continued same-store sales growth at existing locations and additional restaurants in the system drove operating income growth during the quarter and year-to-date. The increased systemwide sales resulted in higher revenues and distribution income. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company did not pass on some commodity cost increases on to franchisees given the challenging economic environment, which impacted 2009 distribution income. With the improvement in business conditions, primarily in Canada, these impacts have been passed along in 2010 through the distribution business, positively impacting 2010 income growth in comparison. Fewer company-operated restaurants resulted in lower operating loss, contributing positively to reportable segment operating income performance. We had lower corporate charges during the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2010, primarily due to the 2009 public company reorganization costs incurred, offset in part by higher corporate salaries and benefits and stock-based compensation. Income associated with variable interest entities also increased

33

year-over-year, due primarily to improved income before income tax at our bakery joint-venture. Overall, consolidated operating income increased by $20.8 million, or 16.1%, during the second quarter to $149.9 million from $129.0 million in the second quarter of 2009, and by $37.3 million, or 15.5%, in the year-to-date period of 2010 to $277.6 million from $240.3 million for the year-to-date period of 2009.

Reportable operating income as a percentage of revenues increased 1.6% to 24.0% during the second quarter of 2010 and by 1.8% to 23.4% on a year-to-date basis in 2010 benefiting from strong operating income growth in both Canada and the U.S. In addition, a stronger Canadian dollar, which reduced our U.S. denominated revenue growth, and lower sales from our variable interest entities, both reduced consolidated revenues while only having a marginal impact on operating income, resulting in a favourable impact on reportable operating income margins.

Canada

Operating income in our Canadian segment for the second quarter of 2010 was $149.7 million, representing a growth rate of 13.1% over the comparable period in 2009. Growth during the quarter was driven primarily by higher systemwide sales, which increased our rents and royalties and distribution income. Increases in our distribution income, associated with new products being managed through our supply chain, also increased our Canadian segment operating income. The Canadian segment also benefited from manufacturing income relating to the new coffee roasting facility, which began operations in the fourth quarter of 2009. The segment also benefited from higher earnings from our joint ventures, including our bakery joint-venture. Higher general and administrative costs partially offset these gains.

For the first half of 2010, our Canadian segment operating income was $282.1 million compared to $248.2 million. Growth during the year-to-date period of 2010 was driven primarily by higher systemwide sales, which increased our rents and royalties and distribution income. Increases in our distribution income, associated with new products being managed through our supply chain, also increased our Canadian segment operating income. The Canadian segment benefited from manufacturing income relating to the new coffee roasting facility, which began operations in the fourth quarter of 2009. The segment also benefited from higher earnings from our joint ventures, including our bakery joint-venture. Higher general and administrative costs and lower franchise fee income partially offset these gains.

Canadian systemwide sales grew during the second quarter of 2010 due to very strong same-store sales growth of 6.4% at existing restaurants and the net addition of 101 restaurants since the second quarter of 2009. Same-store sales growth was impacted by transaction gains due to our menu innovation, promotional programs, and restaurant level operations and by pricing already in place in the system. A strengthening Canadian economy also contributed positively to the strong same-store sales growth result. Pricing will have less of an impact in the second half of the year as we lap 2009 pricing. In the second quarter of 2010, we opened 15 restaurants in Canada and closed four, compared to opening 15 restaurants and closing six in the second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, we have opened 35 restaurants in Canada and closed 10 in 2010 as compared to opening 35 restaurants and closing 13 in the comparable period of 2009.

U.S.

The U.S. segment had operating income of $3.6 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to operating income of $3.1 million in the second quarter of 2009 and was $3.3 million for the first half of 2010 compared to $2.6 million in the first half of 2009. For both the second quarter and year-to-date periods, U.S. operating segment improvements were mainly due to increased systemwide sales, resulting in higher distribution income and higher rents and royalties, and operating income improvements from fewer Company-operated restaurants, offset in part by lower franchise fee income, lower contributions from our U.S. coffee roasting facility (volume and margins) and higher general and administrative expenses. Foreign exchange negatively impacted the operating income growth rate by 10.5% in the second quarter of 2010 and by 5.0% year-to-date.

U.S. systemwide sales grew during the second quarter of 2010 due to the net addition of 51 restaurants since the second quarter of 2009 and same-store sales growth of 3.1% in both the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2010. As previously discussed, 15 of the 51 net new restaurants added were self-serve kiosks that generate significantly lower sales and contribute minimally to operating earnings. Self-serve kiosks are one of the ways we use to seed the brand and offer convenience to our customers. U.S. sales in the second quarter of 2010 benefited from pricing taken in early May 2010. Our co-branding initiatives with Cold Stone Creamery was a more moderate contributor to U.S. same-store sales growth both in the quarter and on a year-to-date basis.

During the second quarter of 2010, we opened 21 new restaurants, of which 15 were self-serve kiosks and closed one restaurant. In the second quarter of 2009, we opened 10 new restaurants and closed one restaurant. On a year-to-date basis in 2010 we opened 25 restaurants, including the 15 self-serve kiosks and closed one restaurant, as compared to opening 18 restaurants and closing two in the 2009 year-to-date period.

34

We anticipate that our U.S. segment operating income will continue to show volatility, quarter-to-quarter, as we expand our new unit growth in existing regional markets and into contiguous markets building brand awareness and, where initially, we provide more support to our franchisees.

Variable interest entities

Our variable interest entities’ income before income tax pertains to the entities that we are required to consolidate under SFAS No. 167. These entities include our bakery joint venture, of which we have a 50% ownership interest, and certain non-owned restaurants. In the second quarter of 2010, the income attributable to variable interest entities was $7.7 million, compared to $6.3 million in the second quarter of 2009, of which a significant portion of this income relates to our bakery joint venture. In addition, we consolidated 278 and 279 non-owned restaurants, on average, in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The retroactive implementation of SFAS No. 167 has resulted in the consolidation of approximately 160 more non-owned restaurants than we were consolidating under the previous accounting standard. In addition, over the past year, we have had a gradual shift towards a greater proportion of U.S. non-owned consolidated restaurants as a result of the progression of U.S. restaurants to our operator model, versus Company-operated restaurants, and increased participation in our franchise incentive program. These U.S. locations have historically had lower revenues and income than Canadian non-owned consolidated restaurants. On a year-to-date basis, variable interest entities income was $14.2 million in 2010 compared to $12.6 million in 2009, driven largely by higher income before income tax at our bakery joint venture.

Corporate charges

Corporate charges include certain overhead costs that are not allocated to individual business units and the impact of certain foreign currency exchange gains and losses. Corporate charges were $11.2 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $12.7 million in the second quarter of 2009 and on a year-to-date basis were $22.1 million and $23.0 million, in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The $1.5 million decrease in the quarter and $0.9 million decrease in the year-to-date period primarily reflects lower professional fees as spending related to corporate initiatives in 2010 were less than the $2.7 million incurred in the second quarter of 2009 and $4.2 million incurred in the year-to-date period of 2009 for professional advisory and shareholder communication costs associated with our 2009 public company reorganization that did not recur in 2010. Partially offsetting these lower costs were higher salary and benefits costs and stock-based compensation costs.

The Company, through a wholly-owned Irish subsidiary, has self-serve kiosks in certain licensed locations within convenience stores in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom. The self-serve kiosks feature our premium coffee, tea, specialty hot beverages and a selection of donuts and muffins. As of July 4, 2010, there were 291 self-serve kiosks in licensed locations in the Republic of Ireland and in the United Kingdom, primarily operating under the “Tim Hortons” brand (second quarter 2009 – 297). These kiosks are operated by independent licensed retailers. At present, the distribution of coffee and donuts through licensed locations with respect to these self-serve kiosks is not a material contributor to our net income, and therefore, is netted in corporate charges. These arrangements have resulted in incremental distribution sales and royalties. Our financial arrangements for these self-serve kiosks are different than our traditional franchise models, and we may not, therefore, collect similar data or include these locations in certain of our metrics, including systemwide and same-store sales.

35

Results of Operations

The following tables provides a summary of comparative results of operations and is followed by a more detailed discussion of results for the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2010 as compared to the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2009.

	Second quarter ended								Change from second  quarter 2009
	July 4, 2010		% of Revenues		June 28, 2009		% of Revenues		$		%
	(in thousands, except where noted)
Revenues
Sales	$	444,344	69.4	%	$	425,348	70.3	%	$	18,996	4.5%
Franchise revenues:
Rents and royalties (1)		175,879	27.5	%		160,824	26.6	%		15,055	9.4%
Franchise fees		19,639	3.1	%		19,287	3.2	%		352	1.8%
		195,518	30.6	%		180,111	29.7	%		15,407	8.6%
Total revenues		639,862	100.0	%		605,459	100.0	%		34,403	5.7%
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales		375,347	58.7	%		365,711	60.4	%		9,636	2.6%
Operating expenses		61,560	9.6	%		58,909	9.7	%		2,651	4.5%
Franchise fee costs		20,379	3.2	%		19,615	3.2	%		764	3.9%
General and administrative expenses		36,745	5.7	%		35,694	5.9	%		1,051	2.9%
Equity (income)		(3,760)	(0.6	)%		(3,367)	(0.6	)%		(393)	11.7%
Other (income), net		(260)	—	%		(152)	—	%		(108)	n/m
Total costs and expenses, net		490,011	76.6	%		476,410	78.7	%		13,601	2.9%
Operating income		149,851	23.4	%		129,049	21.3	%		20,802	16.1%
Interest (expense)		(6,878)	(1.1	)%		(5,058)	(0.8	)%		(1,820)	36.0%
Interest income		113	—	%		120	—	%		(7)	(5.8)%
Income before income taxes		143,086	22.4	%		124,111	20.5	%		18,975	15.3%
Income taxes		42,161	6.6	%		40,648	6.7	%		1,513	3.7%
Net income		100,925	15.8	%		83,463	13.8	%		17,462	20.9%
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests		6,804	1.1	%		5,703	0.9	%		1,101	19.3%
Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	94,121	14.7%		$	77,760	12.8%		$	16,361	21.0%

n/m—The comparison is not meaningful

⁽¹⁾ Rents and royalties revenues consist of: (i) royalties, which typically range from 3.0% to 4.5% of gross franchise restaurant sales; and (ii) rents, which consist of base and percentage rent in Canada and percentage rent only in the U.S., and typically range from 8.5% to 10.0% of gross franchise restaurant sales. Franchise restaurant sales are reported to us by our franchisees. Franchise restaurant sales are not included in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, other than approximately 278 and 279 non-owned restaurants on average in the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively, whose results of operations are consolidated with ours pursuant to ASC 810. Franchise restaurant sales do, however, result in royalties and rental income, which are included in our franchise revenues, as well as distribution income. The reported franchise restaurant sales (including those consolidated pursuant to ASC 810) were:

	Second quarter ended
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009
Franchise restaurant sales:
Canada (in thousands of Canadian dollars)	$	1,331,949	$	1,217,911
U.S. (in thousands of U.S. dollars)	$	110,698	$	101,263

36

	Year-to-date period ended								Change from year-to-date 2009
	July 4, 2010		% of Revenues		June 28, 2009		% of Revenues		$		%
	(in thousands, except where noted)
Revenues
Sales	$	850,292	69.6	%	$	816,464	70.3	%	$	33,828	4.1%
Franchise revenues:
Rents and royalties (1)		335,839	27.5	%		304,988	26.3	%		30,851	10.1%
Franchise fees		36,343	3.0	%		39,714	3.4	%		(3,371)	(8.5)%
		372,182	30.4	%		344,702	29.7	%		27,480	8.0%
Total revenues		1,222,474	100.0	%		1,161,166	100.0	%		61,308	5.3%
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales		722,394	59.1	%		703,584	60.6	%		18,810	2.7%
Operating expenses		120,285	9.8	%		115,502	9.9	%		4,783	4.1%
Franchise fee costs		38,205	3.1	%		39,393	3.4	%		(1,188)	(3.0)%
General and administrative expenses		71,417	5.8	%		69,170	6.0	%		2,247	3.2%
Equity (income)		(7,017)	(0.6	)%		(6,432)	(0.6	)%		(585)	9.1%
Other (income), net		(397)	—	%		(316)	—	%		(81)	25.6%
Total costs and expenses, net		944,887	77.3	%		920,901	79.3	%		23,986	2.6%
Operating income		277,587	22.7	%		240,265	20.7	%		37,322	15.5%
Interest (expense)		(12,325)	(1.0	)%		(10,515)	(0.9	)%		(1,810)	17.2%
Interest income		460	—	%		784	0.1	%		(324)	(41.3)%
Income before income taxes		265,722	21.7	%		230,534	19.9	%		35,188	15.3%
Income taxes		80,224	6.6	%		75,689	6.5	%		4,535	6.0%
Net income		185,498	15.2	%		154,845	13.3	%		30,653	19.8%
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests		12,488	1.0	%		10,646	0.9	%		1,842	17.3%
Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	173,010	14.2%		$	144,199	12.4%		$	28,811	20.0%

⁽¹⁾ Rents and royalties revenues consist of: (i) royalties, which typically range from 3.0% to 4.5% of gross franchise restaurant sales; and (ii) rents, which consist of base and percentage rent in Canada and percentage rent only in the U.S., and typically range from 8.5% to 10.0% of gross franchise restaurant sales. Franchise restaurant sales are reported to us by our franchisees. Franchise restaurant sales are not included in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, other than approximately 274 non-owned restaurants on average in both year-to-date periods of 2010 and 2009, respectively, whose results of operations are consolidated with ours pursuant to ASC 810. Franchise restaurant sales do, however, result in royalties and rental income, which are included in our franchise revenues, as well as distribution income. The reported franchise restaurant sales (including those consolidated pursuant to ASC 810) were:

	Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009
Franchise restaurant sales:
Canada (in thousands of Canadian dollars)	$	2,540,226	$	2,317,141
U.S. (in thousands of U.S. dollars)	$	213,125	$	192,652

37

Revenues

Sales

Sales during the second quarter of 2010 increased $19.0 million, or 4.5%, over the second quarter of 2009, with the growth coming from our distribution business, partially offset by lower sales from variable interest entities and company-operated restaurants. Sales for the year-to-date period of 2010 increased $33.8 million, or 4.1%, consistent with the growth factors of the second quarter.

Distribution sales. Distribution sales for the second quarter of 2010 increased $46.6 million, or 14.5%, due to new products managed through our supply chain, and continued systemwide sales growth. Sales related to new products managed through our supply chain, including some products from our bakery joint venture, represented approximately $34.2 million, while systemwide sales growth increased sales by approximately $13.0 million due to the higher number of system restaurants year-over-year and continued same-store sales growth. Fluctuations in foreign exchange reduced sales in the second quarter by $2.9 million. Product mix and pricing represented the remaining $2.3 million increase in sales, which related primarily to higher prices for coffee and other commodities due to higher underlying costs.

Distribution sales on a year-to-date basis increased by $69.1 million due to new products managed through our supply chain, including some products from our bakery joint venture, which contributed approximately $38.4 million, while sales growth associated with higher systemwide sales represented approximately $29.6 million. Product mix and pricing represented an increase of approximately $7.4 million, which was offset by foreign exchange fluctuations, which reduced sales by $6.3 million.

Our distribution business will continue to be subject to changes related to the underlying costs of key commodities, such as coffee, sugar, etc. Underlying commodity costs can be impacted by currency changes, which reduced sales growth this quarter, as well as by changes in the underlying commodity costs. These cost changes can impact distribution revenues, costs and margins, and can create volatility quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year. Increases and decreases in commodity costs are largely passed through to franchisees, except for certain costs in 2009 which were absorbed by the Company, resulting in higher or lower revenues and higher or lower costs of sales from our distribution business. These changes may impact margins as many of these products are typically priced based on a fixed-dollar mark-up.

Company-operated restaurant sales. Company-operated restaurant sales were $5.5 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $6.6 million in the second quarter of 2009. On average, there were 17 Company-operated restaurants during the second quarter of 2010 compared to 27 during the second quarter of 2009. For the first half of 2010, the Company operated, on average 19 Company-operated restaurant generating sales of $10.4 million, compared to operating 31 Company-operated restaurants, on average, with sales of $12.7 million in the first half of 2009. Lower sales during both periods were primarily the result of fewer Company-operated restaurants as a result of the transition of many of our Company-operated restaurants to either franchise or operator agreements and unfavourable foreign exchange (see below).

Variable interest entities’ sales. Variable interest entities’ sales represent sales from the consolidation of our bakery joint-venture and the consolidation of non-owned restaurants under ASC 810. The majority of non-owned restaurants that are consolidated are either operated by a franchisee under an operator agreement or participate in our U.S. franchise incentive program. During the second quarter of 2010, we consolidated approximately 278 non-owned restaurants (93 in Canada and 185 in the U.S.), on average, compared to 279 non-owned restaurants (115 in Canada and 164 in the U.S.), on average, during the second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, we consolidated 274 non-owned restaurants, on average, in both 2010 (94 in Canada and 180 in the U.S.) and 2009 (119 in Canada and 155 in the U.S.), respectively. Variable interest entities’ sales were $71.5 million and $97.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. On a year-to-date basis, sales were $157.7 million and $190.7 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The sales declines in both second quarter and year-to-date periods in 2010 relate primarily to our bakery joint-venture. Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, a more significant proportion of output from our bakery joint-venture was managed/billed through our supply chain. The offset to this decline is reflected in our distribution sales, as described above. In addition, unfavourable foreign exchange translation (see below) and mix of non-owned restaurants also contributed to lower sales. We are consolidating a higher proportion of U.S. non-owned restaurants in 2010 as compared to 2009, which impacts sales due to foreign exchange fluctuations. These U.S. non-owned restaurants also generally have lower sales levels than those non-owned restaurants consolidated in Canada.

Foreign exchange. Sales from our U.S. segment are denominated in U.S. dollars and translated into Canadian dollars for the reporting of our results. The strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar decreased the value of reported sales by approximately 1.5% compared to the value that would have been reported had there been no exchange rate movement. Foreign exchange had an unfavourable impact on sales of approximately 1.7% for the 2010 year-to-date period.

38

Franchise Revenues

Rents and Royalties. Revenues from rents and royalties were $175.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 compared to $160.8 million in the second quarter of 2009, representing an increase of $15.1 million, or 9.4%. Revenues from rents and royalties increased $30.9 million, or 10.1%, to $335.8 million for the first half of 2010 compared to $305.0 million in the first half of 2009.

Growth in rents and royalties revenues in the second quarter and for the year-to-date period of 2010 was driven primarily by growth in systemwide sales, partially offset by unfavourable foreign exchange and higher relief. Rents and royalties revenue growth was higher than overall systemwide sales growth during these periods due to a lower rate of growth in relief compared to the rate of growth in systemwide sales. The increase in relief was primarily related to either restaurants that were previously operated as Company restaurants or those opened for less than twelve months.

During both the second quarter and first half of 2010, Canada and the U.S. contributed to our growth in rents and royalties largely in proportion to their overall share of systemwide sales, excluding the effect of foreign exchange translation. Continued same-store sales growth contributed approximately $9.6 million to our rents and royalties revenue growth during the second quarter of 2010 and approximately $22.2 million in the year-to-date period. The addition of 137 new full-serve restaurants in the system year-over-year provided approximately $6.9 million of growth during the second quarter of 2010 and approximately $11.4 million in the year-to-date period.

Franchise Fees. Franchise fees include the sales revenue from initial equipment packages, as well as fees to cover costs and expenses related to establishing a franchisee’s business. Franchise fees were $19.6 million during the second quarter of 2010 compared to $19.3 million in the second quarter of 2009, representing an increase of $0.4 million, or 1.8%. Franchise fees were higher during the second quarter of 2010 due to 46 co-branding renovations in Canada to add Cold Stone Creamery and a higher number of non-traditional franchise sales. Partially offsetting these higher revenues were lower revenues recognized under our U.S. franchise incentive program and fewer standard restaurant sales. Revenues from the sale of equipment under the U.S. franchise incentive program are deferred until the franchise restaurant has exceeded and maintained certain sales volume levels and other recognition criteria. This incentive program impacts the timing of revenue recognition of these U.S. franchise fees. We recognized lower revenues from this program in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the second quarter of 2009.

On a year-to-date basis, franchise fees decreased by $3.4 million, or 8.5%, to $36.3 million in the first half of 2010 compared to $39.7 million in the first half of 2009. Lower franchise fees resulted from lower revenues recognized under our U.S. franchise incentive program, fewer resales and replacements, and fewer standard restaurant sales. Partially offsetting these lower revenues were higher revenues associated with 51 co-branding renovations in Canada and a higher number of non-traditional restaurant sales.

Foreign exchange. Franchise revenues from our U.S. segment are denominated in U.S. dollars and translated into Canadian dollars for reporting of our results. The overall strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar decreased the value of reported rents and royalties and franchise fee revenues in the second quarter of 2010 by approximately 0.8% and 0.5%, respectively, compared to the value that would have been reported had there been no exchange rate movement (0.9% and 0.3% on a year-to-date basis for 2010, respectively).

Total Costs and Expenses

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales increased $9.6 million, or 2.6%, compared to the second quarter of 2009, with costs increasing in distribution, largely offset by lower cost of sales from variable interest entities and company-operated restaurants. Cost of sales for the year-to-date period of 2010 increased $18.8 million, or 2.7%.

Distribution cost of sales. Distribution cost of sales increased $39.9 million, or 14.2%, for the quarter, driven by costs associated with new products managed through our supply chain and systemwide sales growth. Costs associated with new products being managed through our supply chain contributed approximately $33.2 million of the increase. The increase in the number of franchised restaurants open and higher average same-store sales contributed approximately $10.7 million of the increase in cost of sales. Offsetting these increases was foreign exchange which reduced year-over-year cost of sales by $3.0 million.

For the first half of 2010, distribution cost of sales increased by $57.1 million, or 10.7%, over the first half of 2009. Costs associated with new products managed through our supply chain represented approximately $36.7 million and systemwide sales growth represented approximately $24.4 million. Foreign exchange fluctuations reduced cost of sales by $6.2 million in the first half of 2010.

Distribution cost of sales represented 65.4% and 62.6% of our total costs and expenses, net, in the second quarter and first half of 2010, respectively, compared to 58.8% and 58.0% of our total costs and expenses, net, in the second quarter and first half of 2009, respectively, reflecting a shift in underlying product mix through the distribution business, primarily as a result of the new products being managed through our supply chain and the cost increases noted above.

39

Company-operated restaurants cost of sales. Cost of sales for our Company-operated restaurants, which includes food, paper, labour and occupancy costs, varies with the average number and mix of Company-operated restaurants. During the second quarter of 2010, these costs decreased by $1.7 million to $5.7 million compared to the second quarter of 2009 and decreased by $4.3 million to $10.9 million for the first half of 2010. Lower cost of sales for both the second quarter and for the year-to-date period of 2010 were primarily the result of fewer Company-operated restaurants and the impact of foreign exchange, which further reduced costs. On average, we operated 17 restaurants in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 27 restaurants in the second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, we operated, on average, 19 restaurants in 2010 compared to 31 restaurants in 2009.

Variable interest entities’ cost of sales. Variable interest entities’ cost of sales represent sales from the consolidation of our bakery joint-venture and the consolidation of non-owned restaurants under ASC 810. During the second quarter of 2010, we consolidated approximately 278 non-owned restaurants (93 in Canada and 185 in the U.S.) compared to 279 non-owned restaurants (115 in Canada and 164 in the U.S.), on average, during the second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, we consolidated, on average, 274 non-owned restaurants in both 2010 (94 in Canada and 180 in the U.S.) and 2009 (119 in Canada and 155 in the U.S.), respectively. Variable interest entities’ cost of sales was $49.3 million and $77.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. On a year-to-date basis, cost of sales was $120.0 million and $154.1 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decline in cost of sales for both the second quarter and for year-to-date 2010 relates primarily to cost of sales from our bakery joint-venture. Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, a more significant proportion of output from our bakery joint-venture was managed/billed through our supply chain, and therefore was reflected in the higher distribution cost of sales, noted above. In addition, unfavourable foreign exchange translation (see below) and the mix of non-owned restaurants towards a greater proportion in the U.S. also increased cost of sales, partially offset by lower commodity costs at our bakery joint-venture. We are consolidating a higher proportion of U.S. non-owned restaurants in 2010 as compared to 2009, which impacts cost of sales due to foreign exchange fluctuations and these non-owned restaurants generally have lower costs per restaurant than Canadian restaurants consolidated under ASC 810.

Foreign exchange. Cost of sales from our U.S. segment are denominated in U.S. dollars and translated into Canadian dollars for reporting of our consolidated results. The strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar decreased the value of reported cost of sales during the second quarter of 2010 by approximately 1.6%. Year-to-date, foreign exchange decreased the value of reported cost of sales by approximately 1.8%.

Operating Expenses

Total operating expenses, representing primarily rent expense, depreciation, and other property and support costs, were $61.6 million in the second quarter of 2010 as compared $58.9 million in the second quarter of 2009, representing an increase of $2.7 million, or 4.5%. Rent expense increased year-over-year due to higher percentage rent expense on certain properties resulting from increased restaurant sales and from rent expense from 91 additional properties that were leased and then subleased to franchisees. Depreciation expense was also higher as the total number of properties we either own or lease and then sublease to franchisees increased to 2,897 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 2,790 in the comparable period of 2009. Also, in the second quarter of 2009 we had higher development project costs than the second quarter of 2010, due to the timing of certain expenses and foreign exchange, which reduced reported costs during 2010 (see below).

On a year-to-date basis, operating expenses were $120.3 million in 2010, increasing $4.8 million, or 4.1%, compared to $115.5 million in 2009. Rent expense increased year-over-year due to higher percentage rent on certain properties resulting from increased restaurant sales and additional properties that were leased and then subleased to franchisees. Depreciation expense was also higher as the total number of properties we either own or lease and then subleased to franchisees increased over the comparable period of 2009. Partially offsetting these higher expenses year-to-date were lower project costs compared to the year-to-date period of 2009, which were impacted by the timing of certain expenses and a favourable impact from foreign exchange, both of which reduced reported costs during the first half (see below).

Operating expenses from our U.S. segment are denominated in U.S. dollars and translated into Canadian dollars for reporting of our consolidated results. The overall strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar decreased the overall value of operating expenses by approximately 1.6% compared to the value that would have been reported in the second quarter of 2010 had there been no exchange rate movement, and by approximately 1.9% year-to-date.

Franchise Fee Costs

Franchise fee costs include costs of equipment sold to franchisees as part of the commencement of their restaurant business, as well as training and other costs necessary to ensure a successful restaurant opening.

Franchise fee costs were $20.4 million during the second quarter of 2010 compared to $19.6 million in the second quarter of 2009, representing an increase of $0.8 million, or 3.9%. Franchise fee costs were higher during the second quarter of 2010 due to 46 co-branding renovations in Canada to add Cold Stone Creamery, a higher number of non-traditional franchise sales and higher support costs and expenses associated with establishing a franchisee’s business. Partially offsetting these higher costs were lower costs associated with lower franchise sales recognized under our U.S. franchise incentive program and fewer standard restaurant sales.

40

On a year-to-date basis, franchise fee costs decreased by $1.2 million, or 3.0%, to $38.2 million compared to $39.4 million in the first half of 2009. Lower franchise fee costs resulted from lower costs associated with lower franchise sales recognized under our U.S. franchise incentive program, fewer resales and replacement restaurants, and fewer standard restaurant sales. Partially offsetting these lower costs were higher costs associated with 51 co-branding renovations in Canada to add Cold Stone Creamery, a higher number of non-traditional restaurant sales and higher support costs and expenses associated with establishing a franchisee’s business.

Franchise fee costs from our U.S. segment are denominated in U.S. dollars and translated into Canadian dollars for reporting our consolidated results. The strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar decreased the value of franchise fee costs by approximately 0.8% compared to the value that would have been reported in the second quarter of 2010 had there been no exchange rate movement, and by approximately 0.7% on a year-to-date basis.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support current operations and provide the infrastructure to support future growth.

General and administrative expenses increased $1.1 million, or 2.9%, during the second quarter of 2010 to $36.7 million primarily related to higher salary and benefits in support of the growth in our business and higher stock-based compensation relating to performance-based restricted stock units. Professional fees were lower as spending related to corporate initiatives in 2010 were less than the $2.7 million of professional advisory fees related to our 2009 public company reorganization incurred in the second quarter of 2009 that did not recur in 2010. Higher shareholder communication costs for our 2010 annual general meeting were also incurred, compared to our ability to utilize the U.S. “notice and access” methodology for our 2009 annual meeting. Foreign exchange positively impacted general and administrative expenses by $0.6 million, further lowering expenses (see below).

On a year-to-date basis, general and administrative expenses were $71.4 million in the first half of 2010 as compared to $69.2 million in the first half of 2009, representing an increase of $2.2 million, or 3.2%. Higher salaries and benefits, professional fees, related to initiatives in 2010, and shareholder communication costs, as described above, resulted in higher expenses year-to-date. Partially offsetting these higher expenses were professional fees of $4.2 million incurred in the first half of 2009 related to our public company reorganization that did not recur in 2010. In addition, foreign exchange positively impacted general and administrative expenses by reducing expenses by $1.5 million.

In general, our objective is for general and administrative expense growth not to exceed systemwide sales growth. There can be quarterly fluctuations in general and administrative expenses due to timing of recurring expenses or certain other events that may impact growth rates in any particular quarter.

Our U.S. segment general and administrative expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars and translated into Canadian dollars for reporting our consolidated results. The overall strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar decreased the value of general and administrative expenses by approximately 1.7% compared to the value that would have been reported in the second quarter of 2010 had there been no exchange rate movement, and by approximately 2.1% million year-to-date.

Equity Income

Equity income relates to income from equity investments in joint ventures and other investments over which we exercise significant influence but which do not meet the consolidation requirements under SFAS No. 167, now codified in ASC 810. Our most significant equity investment is our 50% interest in TIMWEN Partnership, which leases Canadian Tim Hortons/Wendy’s combination restaurants. Equity income during the second quarter of 2010 was $3.8 million, increasing $0.4 million from the second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, equity income increased $0.6 million to $7.0 million in the first half of 2010 from $6.4 million in the first half of 2009.

As previously disclosed, we do not expect that our equity income will necessarily grow at the same rate as our systemwide sales as it is not representative of all the components of our business. Our TIMWEN Partnership is expected to grow at a slower rate as we are unlikely to add any new properties to this venture in the future.

Other Income and Expense, net

Other income and expense, net, includes amounts that are not directly derived from our primary businesses. This includes gains and losses on asset sales, other asset write-offs, and foreign exchange gains and losses. In the second quarter of 2010, other income, net, was $0.3 million versus $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, other income, net, was $0.4 million in 2010 as compared to $0.3 million in 2009.

41

Interest Expense

Total interest expense, including interest on our recently issued senior unsecured notes (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Overview”) and our credit facilities and capital leases, was $6.9 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $5.1 million in the second quarter of 2009, representing an increase of $1.8 million. Higher interest expense resulted primarily from a settlement loss arising from the early termination and settlement of a $30 million interest rate swap ($0.9 million settlement loss) and remaining deferred debt issuance costs that were expensed, both related to the $200 million early prepayment of our existing $300 million term loan which matures in February 2011. In addition, interest from additional capital leases contributed to higher interest expense in the second quarter.

Interest expense was $12.3 million for the first half of 2010 as compared to $10.5 million in the first half of 2009, representing an increase of $1.8 million. The same factors that impacted the second quarter also impacted the year-to-date period.

The remaining $100 million of our existing term loan matures in February 2011 (see “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Overview”).

Interest Income

Interest income was $0.1 million in both the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Year-to-date, interest income was $0.5 million and $0.8 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Reduced interest income year-over-year was related primarily to lower overall rates on deposits.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate for the second quarter ended July 4, 2010 was 29.5%, compared to 32.8% for the second quarter ended June 28, 2009. The effective income tax rate for the year-to-date periods ended July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009 was 30.2% and 32.8%, respectively. The variance between periods is primarily attributable to our reorganization of the Company as a Canadian public company that took place on September 28, 2009, and to a lesser extent, the favourable resolution of tax audits and other discrete items in the second quarter of 2010 which reduced our effective tax rate by 1.1% (0.5% year-to-date). The reorganization allowed us to benefit from the reduction in the Canadian statutory rates in 2010, address certain adverse implications of the Fifth Protocol to the Canada – U.S. Treaty (the “Treaty”), and realize lower withholding tax rates pursuant to the Treaty.

There are revisions proposed to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, by the administration of the President of the United States, which would affect the federal income taxation of foreign earnings (“the Obama proposals”). On August 10, 2010, President Obama signed the Education Jobs and Medicaid Assistance Act of 2010 that included certain of the revisions in the Obama proposals. We previously disclosed that the Obama proposals, if enacted, in whole or in part, may increase our effective tax rate by up to 3.5% in the year the proposals become effective. We are in the process of determining the impact, if any, to us of the enactment of this legislation.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests relates to the consolidation of our bakery joint-venture and the consolidation of non-owned restaurants under ASC 810. During the second quarter of 2010, we consolidated approximately 278 non-owned restaurants (93 in Canada and 185 in the U.S.) compared to 279 non-owned restaurants (115 in Canada and 164 in the U.S.), on average, during the second quarter of 2009. On a year-to-date basis, we consolidated, on average, 274 non-owned restaurants in both 2010 (94 in Canada and 180 in the U.S.) and 2009 (119 in Canada and 155 in the U.S.), respectively.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $6.8 million and $5.7 million in the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, of which the bakery joint-venture represented substantially all of this income. On a year-to-date basis, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest was $12.5 million in 2010 compared to $10.6 million in 2009. Lower commodity costs at our bakery joint-venture was the primary factor that resulted in higher net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in both the quarter and year-to-date

Comprehensive Income

In the second quarter of 2010, comprehensive income was $123.1 million compared to $50.5 million in the second quarter of 2009. Net income increased $17.5 million quarter-over-quarter, as discussed above. Other comprehensive income included a translation adjustment gain of $21.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 and a translation adjustment loss of $32.7 million in the second quarter of 2009. Translation adjustment income (loss) arises primarily from the translation of our U.S. net assets into our reporting currency, Canadian dollars, at the period-end rates. The remainder of the quarter-over-quarter change in other comprehensive income is attributable to gains of $0.7 million and losses of $0.3 million in the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to cash flow hedges, net of taxes.

Comprehensive income was $190.2 million compared to $129.4 million in the first half of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Net income increased $30.7 million year-over-year, as discussed above. Other comprehensive income included a translation adjustment

42

gain of $4.4 million in the first half of 2010 and a translation adjustment loss of $21.7 million in the first half of 2009. The remainder of the year-over-year change in other comprehensive income is attributable to gains of $0.3 million and losses of $3.7 million in the first half of 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to cash flow hedges, net of taxes.

The 2010 exchange rates were Cdn. $1.0624, and $1.0084 for US$1.00 on July 4, 2010 and April 4, 2010, respectively. The 2009 exchange rates were Cdn. $1.0510, Cdn. $1.1542, and Cdn. $1.2374 for US$1.00 on January 3, 2010, June 28, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. The exchange rate on December 28, 2008 was Cdn. $1.2092 for US$1.00.

XBRL Filing

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T the interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is otherwise not subject to liability under these sections. The financial information contained in the XBRL-related documents is “unaudited” and/or “unreviewed,” as applicable.

As a result of the inherent limitations within the rendering tools, we have identified discrepancies that could not be corrected and, therefore our XBRL tagged financial statements and footnotes should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained within this Form 10-Q.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our primary source of liquidity has historically been, and continues to be, cash generated from Canadian operations which has, for the most part, self-funded our operations, growth in new restaurants, capital expenditures, dividends, share repurchases, acquisitions and investments during the last five years. Our U.S. operations have historically been a net user of cash given investment plans and stage of growth, and we expect this trend to continue through the remainder of 2010. Our Canadian and U.S. revolving credit facilities provide additional sources of liquidity, if needed.

In the first half of 2010, we generated $235.1 million of cash from operations, as compared to cash generated from operations of $194.8 million in the first half of 2009, for a net increase of $40.3 million (see “Comparative Cash Flows” below). We believe that we will continue to generate adequate operating cash flows to fund both our capital expenditures and expected debt service requirements over the next twelve months. If additional funds are needed for strategic initiatives, significant acquisitions and/or other new business opportunities, or other corporate purposes beyond current availability under our revolving credit facilities, we believe, with the strength of our balance sheet and our strong capital structure, we could borrow additional funds. Our ability to incur additional indebtedness will be limited by our financial and other covenants under our existing credit facilities and our senior unsecured notes. If such additional borrowings are significant, our capital structure could be weakened, and it is possible that our credit rating would be impacted and we would not be able to borrow on terms which are favourable to us. It is our intent to target maintaining an investment grade credit rating.

In the second quarter of 2010, we issued $200 million of senior unsecured notes (“Senior Notes”), which we offered on a private placement basis in Canada with a term of seven years, maturing June 1, 2017. Net proceeds from the Senior Notes were primarily used to repay $200 million of our existing term loan (“Term Debt”), prior to maturity and without penalty.

The Senior Notes bear a fixed interest rate of 4.20% with interest payable in semi-annual installments, in arrears, commencing December 1, 2010. The Senior Notes rank equally and pari passu with each other and with the notes of every other series (regardless of their actual time of issue), with all other senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of Tim Hortons Inc. (the “Borrower”), including amounts owing under the senior bank facility (“Senior Bank Facility”), except as to any sinking fund which pertains exclusively to any particular indebtedness of the Borrower and statutory preferred exceptions. The Senior Notes are initially guaranteed by The TDL Group Corp. (“TDL”), the Borrower’s main Canadian subsidiary. Together, the Borrower’s and TDL’s third party revenues must represent at least 75% of the consolidated revenues of the Company (or such threshold percentage established under the new Senior Bank Facility, upon amendment or maturity thereof on or before March 31, 2011). These must be tested quarterly, on a rolling twelve-month basis. To the extent combined third party revenues of these two entities is less than 75% of consolidated revenues, then additional guarantors must be added until 75% of consolidated revenues are reached or exceeded. Alternatively, if the Borrower’s third party revenues reach or exceed 75% of consolidated revenues, the guarantors will be released. There are also certain covenants limiting liens to secure borrowed money (subject to permitted exceptions) and limiting our ability to undertake certain acquisitions and dispositions, but there are no financial covenants.

        The Senior Notes are redeemable, at the Borrower’s option, at any time, upon not less than 30 days notice, but no more than 60 days notice, at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) a price calculated to provide a yield to maturity (from the redemption date) equal to the yield on a non-callable Government of Canada bond with a maturity equal to, or as close as possible to, the remaining term to maturity of the Senior Notes, plus 0.30% and (ii) par, together, in each case, with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date fixed for redemption. In the event of a change of control and a rating downgrade to below investment grade, the Borrower will be required to make an offer to repurchase the Senior Notes at a redemption price of 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.

43

In March 2010, we entered into interest rate forwards with a notional amount of $195 million as a cash flow hedge to limit the interest rate volatility in the period prior to the issuance of the Senior Notes. These bond forwards were settled in June 2010, resulting in an Other comprehensive loss of $4.9 million. This loss will be recognized in interest expense over the seven-year term of the Senior Notes resulting in an effective interest rate of the Senior Notes of 4.59%.

Our existing Senior Bank Facility, which consists of $100 million Term Debt (after our $200 million early prepayment mentioned above) and two revolving credit facilities (U.S. $100 million and $200 million), matures on February 28, 2011. These facilities are at variable interest rates that are based upon either bankers’ acceptances or LIBOR plus a margin, or a fixed base rate. If certain market conditions caused LIBOR to be unascertainable or not reflective of the cost of funding, the Administration Agent can cause the borrowing to be at the base rate which is historically higher than LIBOR. This facility does not carry a market disruption clause and is supported by a syndicate lending group of 11 financial institutions, of which Canadian financial institutions hold approximately 63% of the total funding commitment. We carefully monitor our bank group and currently believe our access to liquidity is substantially unchanged despite credit market conditions. As part of our public company reorganization, we amended and restated the senior bank facility, effective September 28, 2009, to include, among other administrative changes, the Company and our primary U.S. subsidiary as a borrower, and also added the Company as a guarantor.

In connection with the Term Debt, we entered into interest rate swaps in 2006 and 2007 with a notional amount of $130 million which were used to fix a portion of the variable rate Term Debt at 5.04%. Upon partial prepayment of the Term Debt, we also settled an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $30 million, resulting in recognition of $0.9 million from Other comprehensive loss to Interest expense in the second quarter of 2010. The remaining interest rate swaps fix the interest rate on the $100 million of outstanding Term Debt at 4.925%.

When evaluating our leverage position, we review metrics that consider the impact of long-term operating and capital leases as well as other long-term debt obligations. We believe this provides a more meaningful and conservative measure of our leverage position given our significant investments in real estate. At July 4, 2010, we had approximately $414.5 million in long-term debt and capital leases included in current and long-term obligations on our balance sheet, with our remaining $100 million Term Debt classified as current given the timing of its maturity. We continue to believe that the strength of our balance sheet, including our cash position, provides us with opportunity and flexibility for future growth while still enabling us to return excess cash to our shareholders through a combination of our share repurchase program and dividends. Given the credit conditions in financial markets, when investing our cash, we continue to be more focused on capital preservation rather than yield.

Our primary liquidity and capital requirements are for new restaurant construction, renovations of existing restaurants, expansion of our business through vertical integration and general corporate needs. In addition, we utilize cash to fund our dividends and share repurchase programs. Historically, our annual working capital needs have not been significant because of our focused management of accounts receivable and inventory. In each of the last five fiscal years, operating cash flows have funded our capital expenditure requirements for new restaurant development, remodeling, technology initiatives and other capital needs. Our strategic plan outlined key aspects of our business that we intend to focus on during the next four years. Leveraging significant levels of vertical integration and continuing to explore additional systemwide benefits through vertical integration was one of the key initiatives outlined in the “More than a Great Brand” strategic plan. Consistent with that plan, we are in the process of constructing a replacement distribution centre in Kingston, Ontario which will provide warehouse and distribution capability and capacity for frozen and refrigerated products in addition to dry goods to our restaurant owners. Total planned capital expenditures on this facility are currently estimated to be approximately $45 million, with approximately $20 million to be incurred in 2010. The facility is expected to be fully operational in the second half of 2011 and serve more than 650 restaurants in eastern Ontario, and Quebec, responding to continued projected growth in that market. As with other vertical integration initiatives, we expect this new facility will deliver important system benefits, including improved efficiency and cost-effective service for our restaurant owners, as well as providing a reasonable return for the Company. Distribution is a critical element of our business model as it allows us to control costs to our franchisees and service our restaurants efficiently and effectively while contributing to our profitability.

Our Board of Directors approved a 2010 share repurchase program for up to $200 million, or 5% of our outstanding shares, as of February 19, 2010. The 2010 program, which received Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) approval on March 1, 2010, commenced on March 3, 2010 and will continue for twelve months ending on March 2, 2011. The program may terminate earlier if the $200 million maximum or the 5% of outstanding share limit is reached, or, at the discretion the Company, subject to the Company’s compliance with regulatory requirements. The Company may make repurchases on the New York Stock Exchange, the TSX and/or other Canadian market places, subject to regulatory requirements. Timing of the share repurchases will be at management’s discretion given prevailing market conditions, cost and other considerations and pursuant to an automatic trading (or 10b5-1) plan, which was established at inception. We expect that all purchases made under the 2010 program will be primarily funded from cash from operations and all repurchased shares will be cancelled. There can be no assurance as to the precise number of shares that will be repurchased under the 2010 program or that the aggregate dollar amount of the shares will be repurchased.

During the first half of 2010, we spent $98.0 million to purchase and cancel approximately 3.0 million of the Company’s common shares as part of our 2009 and 2010 share repurchase programs at an average cost of $33.00 per share.

44

Our Board of Directors approved a 30.0% increase in the quarterly dividend to $0.13 per share in February 2010. The Company declared and paid its June 2010 and March 2010 dividends at the new rate. Our Board of Directors has declared a quarterly dividend payable on September 8, 2010 to shareholders of record as of August 23, 2010 at the $0.13 rate per share. The Company’s long-term targeted dividend payout range is 30%-35% of prior year, normalized annual net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc. in dividends each year, focusing initially on the lower end of the range, to return value to shareholders based on the Company’s earnings growth. The payment of future dividends, however, remains subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors.

Our Board of Directors also approved the sale of our 50% interest in Maidstone Bakeries for gross proceeds of $475 million (see “Executive Overview”). The transaction is expected to close before year-end 2010. We are currently considering possible options for the use of net proceeds from the transaction, including potential avenues to return value to shareholders.

The Company’s outstanding share capital is comprised of common shares. An unlimited number of common shares, without par value, is authorized and the Company had 173,922,810 common shares outstanding at August 9, 2010. As at this same date, the Company had issued options to acquire 1,108,321 of its common shares pursuant to the Company’s 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, of which 285,813 were exercisable.

Comparative Cash Flows

Operating Activities. Net cash generated from operating activities in the year-to-date period of 2010 was $235.1 million, representing an increase of $40.3 million from the year-to-date period of 2009. The increase was driven primarily by an increase in earnings and changes in timing of working capital movements, primarily in accounts payables and accrued liabilities, with some offset due to an increase in inventory. In addition, we paid $4.8 million in 2010 relating to an interest rate forward which was settled at the time we prepaid a portion of our term debt (see “Financing Activities” below).

Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities decreased $41.4 million from $80.4 million in the year-to-date period of 2009 to $39.0 million in the year-to-date period of 2010. Capital expenditures are typically the largest ongoing component of investing activities and represented the largest portion of the decrease year-over-year. The proceeds from the sale of restricted investments generated $15.2 million in investing activities in the year-to-date period of 2010. There were no similar sales in 2009. Capital expenditures are summarized as follows:

	Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009
	(in millions)
Capital expenditures
New restaurants	$	20.7	$	23.3
Restaurant replacements and renovations		16.3		20.4
New coffee roasting facility		1.3		12.9
New distribution facility		2.5		0
Other capital needs		7.7		12.7
Total capital expenditures	$	48.5	$	69.3

New restaurant development spending decreased slightly in 2010 due to our focus on opening less capital-intensive restaurants in the U.S. In 2009, expenditures for other capital needs related primarily to equipment for our new coffee roasting facility in Canada, and also included spending on an enterprise resource planning computer system implementation, and other equipment purchases required for ongoing business needs. We continue to expect future capital needs related to our normal business activities to be funded through ongoing operations. In 2010, we expect to open 130 to 150 restaurants in Canada and 40 to 60 locations in the U.S. with the majority of these locations being standard locations, but will also include non-standard locations in both markets. Our 2010 capital expenditures are expected to be between $180 million and $200 million, including the commencement of the replacement distribution facility in Kingston, Ontario, mentioned above.

Capital expenditures for new restaurants by operating segment were as follows:

	Year-to-date period ended
	July 4, 2010		June 28, 2009
	(in millions)
Capital expenditures – new restaurants
Canada	$	16.1	$	14.1
U.S.		4.6		9.2
Total	$	20.7	$	23.3

Financing Activities. Financing activities used cash of $160.4 million in the year-to-date period of 2010 compared to $69.4 million in the first quarter of 2009. In the year-to-date period of 2010, we purchased and cancelled $98.0 million of common shares, and paid dividends of $45.4 million. In the year-to-date period of 2009, we repurchased $16.7 million of our shares of common stock and paid dividends of $36.3 million. In 2010, we sold $200 million of Senior Notes on a private placement basis in Canada. The net

45

proceeds from the sale of the Senior Notes were used, primarily, for the prepayment of $200 million of our term debt. Distributions to noncontrolling interests were $10.5 million and $14.1 million the year-to-date-period of 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, we purchased $3.3 million of common shares that are held in trust for the purpose of settling future restricted stock units at the time of vesting (2009: $0.7 million).

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have “off-balance sheet” arrangements as of July 4, 2010 and June 28, 2009 as that term is described by the SEC.

Basis of Presentation

The functional currency of Tim Hortons Inc. is the Canadian dollar as the majority of our cash flows are in Canadian dollars. The functional currency of each of our subsidiaries and legal entities is the local currency in which each subsidiary operates, which is the Canadian dollar, the U.S. dollar or the Euro. The majority of our operations, restaurants and cash flows are based in Canada and we are primarily managed in Canadian dollars. As a result, our reporting currency is the Canadian dollar.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying footnotes included in this report have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States with certain amounts based on management’s best estimates and judgments. To determine appropriate carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources, management uses assumptions based on historical results and other factors that they believe are reasonable. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Also, materially different amounts may result under materially different conditions or from using materially different assumptions. However, management currently believes that any materially different amounts resulting from materially different conditions or material changes in facts or circumstances are unlikely.

Other than the adoption of the new accounting standards, as noted below, there have been no significant changes in critical accounting policies or management estimates since the year ended January 3, 2010. A comprehensive discussion of our critical accounting policies and management estimates is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2009 Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2010, filed with the SEC and Canadian Securities Administrators on March 4, 2010, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Effective January 4, 2010, we adopted SFAS No. 167, now codified within ASC 810. This Statement amended Interpretation 46(R) to require an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics: (i) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impacts the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. Additionally, an enterprise is required to assess whether it has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a variable interest entity operates as designed when determining whether it has the power to direct the activities of the variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. This Statement also amended Interpretation 46(R) to focus on a more qualitative approach, rather than a quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, amended certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, added an additional requirement to assess whether an entity is a variable interest entity, on an ongoing basis, and requires enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. See our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements note 11 – Variable Interest Entities for additional information regarding the impact of the adoption of this standard.

46

The following table provides the quarterly income statements for 2009 that have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 167, now codified within ASC 810:

	2009
	Q1		Q2		Q3		Q4		Fiscal year
Revenues
Sales	$	391,116	$	425,348	$	422,995	$	464,606	$	1,704,065
Franchise revenues:
Rents and royalties		144,164		160,824		164,114		175,653		644,755
Franchise fees		20,427		19,287		23,605		26,714		90,033
		164,591		180,111		187,719		202,367		734,788
Total revenues		555,707		605,459		610,714		666,973		2,438,853
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales		337,873		365,711		362,500		398,760		1,464,844
Operating expenses		56,593		58,909		58,558		62,724		236,784
Franchise fee costs		19,778		19,615		21,754		25,756		86,903
General and administrative expenses		33,476		35,694		35,363		37,206		141,739
Equity (income)		(3,065)		(3,367)		(3,931)		(3,337)		(13,700)
Other (income), net		(164)		(152)		(359)		(2,644)		(3,319)
Total costs and expenses, net		444,491		476,410		473,885		518,465		1,913,251
Operating income		111,216		129,049		136,829		148,508		525,602
Interest (expense)		(5,457)		(5,058)		(5,180)		(5,439)		(21,134)
Interest income		664		120		272		894		1,950
Income before income taxes		106,423		124,111		131,921		143,963		506,418
Income taxes		35,041		40,648		64,988		45,929		186,606
Net income		71,382		83,463		66,933		98,034		319,812
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
		4,943		5,703		5,754		7,045		23,445
Net income attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	66,439	$	77,760	$	61,179	$	90,989	$	296,367
Basic earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	0.37	$	0.43	$	0.34	$	0.51	$	1.64
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Tim Hortons Inc.	$	0.37	$	0.43	$	0.34	$	0.51	$	1.64
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — Basic (in thousands)		181,072		180,731		180,681		179,570		180,477
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding — Diluted (in thousands)		181,301		180,923		180,864		179,713		180,609
Dividend per common share	$	0.10	$	0.10	$	0.10	$	0.10	$	0.40

Effective January 4, 2010, we adopted certain provisions within Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06—Fair Value Measurements: Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, as codified in ASC 820—Fair Value Measurements. This ASU provides amendments to ASC 820 that requires more enhanced disclosures about (i) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (ii) the valuation techniques and inputs used, (iii) the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, and (iv) the transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for interim or annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for certain disclosures applicable to Level 3 fair value measurements which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those years. The adoption of this update did not have a significant impact on our financial statements or related disclosures.

47

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13—Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, as codified in ASC 605—Revenue Recognition. The objective of this ASU is to address the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. The ASU also establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable and has expanded disclosures related to vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010, and we are currently assessing the potential impact, if any, the adoption of this ASU may have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11— Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives, as codified in ASC 815—Derivatives and Hedging. This update clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Only one form of embedded credit derivative qualifies for the exemption—one that is related only to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. This ASU is effective for fiscal quarters beginning after June 15, 2010 with early adoption permitted for the first interim period beginning after issuance of this ASU. We are currently assessing the potential impact, if any, the adoption of this update may have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-13 — Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades as codified in ASC 718— Compensation—Stock Compensation. This update addresses the classification of a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which the underlying equity security trades. ASC 718 is amended to clarify that a share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades shall not be considered to contain a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, such an award is not to be classified as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity classification. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2010, and we are currently assessing the potential impact, if any, the adoption of this update may have on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In April 2010, the FAS issued ASU No. 2010-17— Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition as codified in ASC 605—Revenue Recognition. This update provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. Consideration that is contingent on achievement of a milestone in its entirety may be recognized as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone is judged to meet certain criteria to be considered substantive. Milestones should be considered substantive in their entirety and may not be bifurcated. An arrangement may contain both substantive and nonsubstantive milestones that should be evaluated individually. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods, beginning on or after June 15, 2010, and we are currently assessing the potential impact, if any, the adoption of this update may have on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impact of Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented

In February 2010, the SEC released Commission Statement in Support of Convergence and Global Accounting Standards. The statement includes a detailed Work Plan to be executed by the SEC staff in its analysis in determining both whether and how to incorporate International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) into the U.S. financial reporting system. IFRS is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board. Under the proposed roadmap, if the SEC incorporates IFRS into the US domestic reporting system, companies could be required to prepare financial statements and accompanying notes in accordance with IFRS as early as fiscal 2015. As a foreign private issuer, the Company is able to apply IFRS earlier if certain approvals are obtained.

Further, although Canadian securities laws generally require Canadian reporting issuers to apply IFRS beginning in 2011, National Instrument 52-107 Acceptable Accounting Principles, Auditing Standards and Reporting Currency permits issuers that have a class of securities registered under section 12 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or are required to file reports under section 15(d) of the Exchange Act and which are not registered or required to be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 to elect to prepare financial statements that are filed with or delivered to a securities regulatory authority or regulator (other than acquisition statements) in accordance with US GAAP. Pending the developments of the SEC’s work plan, the Company is currently assessing the impact that the adoption of IFRS would have on the consolidated financial statements, accompanying notes and disclosures, and will continue to monitor the development of the potential implementation of IFRS.

48

Market Risk

Our exposure to various market risks remains substantially the same as reported in our 2009 Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2010.

Foreign Exchange Risk

Our exposure to various foreign exchange risks remains substantially the same as reported in our 2009 Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2010.

Commodity Risk

Our exposure to various commodity risks remains substantially the same as reported in our 2009 Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2010.

Interest Rate Risk

In the second quarter of 2010, we issued $200 million of Senior Notes, which were offered on a private placement basis in Canada with a term of seven years. Net proceeds from the Senior Notes were primarily used to prepay $200 million of our existing Term Debt, prior to maturity. The Senior Notes bear a fixed coupon interest rate of 4.20%, and an effective rate of 4.59% (resulting from the settlement of bond forwards used to hedge the interest rate prior to the issuance of the Senior Notes). The remaining $100 million of Term Debt is fixed through interest rate swaps which convert the variable rate debt from a floating rate to a fixed rate of 4.925%. The combination of the Senior Notes and the interest rate swaps fix 100% of our outstanding debt. As our cash is invested in short term variable rate instruments we are now exposed on a net basis to interest rate movements on a net asset position when historically we have been exposed on a net liability position. If interest rates change by 100 basis points, the impact on our annual net income would not be material.

Inflation

Our exposure to various inflationary risks remains substantially the same as reported in our 2009 Form 10-K for the year ended January 3, 2010.

49

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

Certain information contained our Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2010 (“Report”), including information regarding future financial performance and plans, expectations, and objectives of management constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws and forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We refer to all of these as forward-looking statements. A forward-looking statement is not a guarantee of the occurrence of future events or circumstances, and such future events or circumstances may not occur. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “outlook,” “forecast” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as “will,” “should,” “could” or “may.” Examples of forward-looking statements in the Report include, but are not limited to, statements concerning management’s expectations relating to possible or assumed future results, our strategic goals and our priorities, and the economic and business outlook for us, for each of our business segments and for the economy generally. The forward-looking statements contained in our Report are based on currently-available information and are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, risks described in our Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and Canadian Securities Administrators, on March 4, 2010 (the “2009 Form 10-K”) and the risks and uncertainties discussed in the Report, that could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations (i.e., the “risk factors”). Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results. Forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect, including, but not limited to, assumptions about: the absence of a material increase in competition within the quick service restaurant segment of the food service industry; the absence of an adverse event or condition that damages our strong brand position and reputation; continuing positive working relationships with the majority of the Company’s franchisees; there being no significant change in the Company’s ability to comply with current or future regulatory requirements; the absence of any material adverse effects arising as a result of litigation; and general worldwide economic conditions. We are presenting this information for the purpose of informing you of management’s current expectations regarding these matters, and this information may not be appropriate for other purposes.

Many of the factors that could determine our future performance are beyond our ability to control or predict. Investors should carefully consider our risk factors and the other information set forth in our Report (including our long-form Safe Harbor statement contained in Exhibit 99 thereto) and our 2009 Form 10-K, and are further cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in our Report, which speak only as of the date of the Report. The events and uncertainties outlined in the risk factors, as well as other events and uncertainties not set forth below, could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectation(s) included in the forward-looking statement, and if significant, could materially affect the Company’s business, sales revenue, stock price, financial condition, and/or future results, including, but not limited to, causing the Company to (i) close restaurants, (ii) fail to realize our same-store sales, which are critical to achieving our operating income and other financial targets, (iii) fail to meet the expectations of our securities analysts or investors, or otherwise fail to perform as expected, (iv) have insufficient cash to engage in or fund expansion activities, dividends, or share repurchase programs, or (v) increase costs, corporately or at store level, which may result in increased restaurant-level pricing, which, in turn, may result in decreased customer demand for our products resulting in lower sales, revenue, and earnings. We assume no obligation to update or alter any forward-looking statements after they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

This information is incorporated by reference from the section titled “Market Risk” on page 49 of this Form 10-Q.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as contemplated by Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Disclosure controls and procedures include those designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

50

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On June 12, 2008, a claim was filed against the Company and certain of its affiliates in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) by two of its franchisees, Fairview Donut Inc. and Brule Foods Ltd., alleging, generally, that the Company’s Always Fresh baking system and expansion of lunch offerings have led to lower franchisee profitability. The claim, which seeks class action certification on behalf of Canadian franchisees, asserts damages of approximately $1.95 billion. The plaintiffs filed a motion for certification of the putative class in May of 2009 and the Company filed its responding materials as well as a motion for summary judgment in November of 2009. Cross examinations on both sides’ affidavits are being scheduled. The Court has reserved the week of November 29, 2010 for the hearing on this matter. Plaintiffs filed a motion requesting that the Company’s summary judgment motion be heard following hearing and determination of plaintiffs’ motion for certification. It was the Company’s position that the motions should be heard together. A hearing on plaintiffs’ motion to separate the certification and summary judgment motions was heard on May 13, 2010 and the court ruled in favour of the Company that the two motions should be heard together. Both motions are now scheduled for the week of November 29, 2010, subject to the delivery of required materials and completion of examinations. The Company believes the claim is frivolous and completely without merit, and the Company intends to oppose the certification motion and defend the claim vigorously. However, there can be no assurance that the outcomes will be favourable to the Company or that it will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position or liquidity in the event that the ultimate determinations by the Court and/or appellate court are not in accordance with the Company’s evaluation of this claim. The outcome and value of this claim are not determinable at this time and, coupled with the Company’s position that this claim is without merit, the Company has not recorded any provisions in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

From time to time, the Company is also a defendant in litigation arising in the normal course of business. Claims typically pertain to “slip and fall” accidents at franchised or Company-operated restaurants, employment claims and claims from customers alleging illness, injury or other food quality, health or operational concerns. Other claims and disputes have arisen in connection with supply contracts, the site development and construction of system restaurants and/or leasing of underlying real estate, and with respect to various franchisee matters, including but not limited to those described in the first paragraph above. Certain of these claims are not covered by existing insurance policies; however, many are referred to and are covered by insurance, except for deductible amounts, and to-date, these claims have not had a material effect on the Company. Reserves related to the resolution of legal proceedings are included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as a liability under “Accounts payable.” As of the date of hereof, the Company believes that the ultimate resolution of such matters will not materially affect the Company’s financial condition or earnings.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our 2009 Form 10-K filed with the SEC and Canadian Securities Administrators on March 4, 2010, as well as information in our other public filings, press releases, and in our Safe Harbor statement. Any of these “risk factors” could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the 2009 Form 10-K, and the additional information provided in this Form 10-Q and elsewhere, as described above, may not describe every risk facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

As a result of the successful completion of a private placement of $200 million principal amount of senior unsecured 4.20% notes in Canada on June 1, 2010 and the inaugural credit rating that we received in connection with such issuance, our business, financial condition or future results could be adversely impacted as a result of a future downgrade of our credit rating. Consequently, we are adopting the risk factor set forth below in its entirety, to be included with the risk factors described in the 2009 Form 10-K.

A downgrade of our credit rating could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity and access to capital markets.

Failure to maintain our credit rating could adversely affect our cost of funds, liquidity and access to capital markets. We received an inaugural debt rating in connection with the issuance of our senior unsecured 4.20% notes in Canada on June 1, 2010. Although we have indicated our intent to target maintenance of an investment grade credit rating, ratings are evaluated and determined by independent third parties and may be impacted by both events outside of our control as well as significant decisions made by us, including major acquisitions or divestitures. Credit rating agencies perform independent analysis when assigning credit ratings and such analysis includes a number of criteria, including, but not limited to, various financial tests, business composition and market and operational risks and continually review the criteria for industry sectors and various credit ratings. Accordingly, such criteria may change from time to time. A downgrade of our credit rating may limit our access to capital markets and increase our cost of borrowing under future debt facilities or issuances. In addition, if the rating agency were to downgrade our credit rating, the instruments governing our future indebtedness could impose additional restrictions on our ability to make capital expenditures or otherwise limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to changes in our business and the industry in which we operate and our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities. These modifications could also require us to meet more stringent

51

financial ratios and tests or could require us to grant a security interest in our assets to secure the indebtedness in the future. Our ability to comply with covenants contained in the instruments governing our existing and future indebtedness may be affected by events and circumstances beyond our control. If we breach any of these covenants, one or more events of default, including defaults between multiple components of our indebtedness, could result and the payment of principal and interest due and payable on our outstanding senior notes may become accelerated. These events of default could permit our creditors to declare all amounts owing to be immediately due and payable, and terminate any commitments to make further extensions of credit. The lack of access to cost-effective capital resources, an increase in our financing costs, or a breach of debt instrument covenants could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or future results. A downgrade in our credit rating could also affect the value and marketability of our outstanding notes.

Credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold investments in the rated entity. Ratings are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the ratings agencies and there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain our credit rating even if we meet or exceed their criteria or that other credit rating agencies will similarly assign us ratings.

52

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period	(a) Total  Number of Shares Purchased  (1)	(b) Average  Price Paid per Share (Cdn.)  (2)		(c) Total  Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans  or Programs	(d) Maximum Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that  May Yet be Purchased Under the  Plans or Programs (Cdn.) (3) (4)
Monthly Period #4 (April 5, 2010 — May 9, 2010)	407,958	$	33.63	407,958	$	161,284,946
Monthly Period #5 (May 10, 2010 — June 6, 2010)	445,405(5)		34.74	343,037		149,442,751
Monthly Period #6 (June 7, 2010 — July 4, 2010)	313,000		34.50	313,000		138,647,082
Total	1,166,363	$	34.29	1,063,995	$	138,647,082

⁽¹⁾ Based on settlement date.

⁽²⁾ Inclusive of commissions paid to the broker to repurchase the shares.

⁽³⁾ Exclusive of commissions paid to the broker to repurchase the shares.

⁽⁴⁾ On March 1, 2010, the Company obtained regulatory approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) to commence its 2010 share repurchase program (“2010 program”) for up to $200 million in common shares, not to exceed the regulatory maximum of 8,817,291 shares, equivalent to 5% of the outstanding common shares as of February 19, 2010. Purchases of common shares will be made through a combination of automatic trading plan purchases, and at management’s discretion in compliance with regulatory requirements, and given prevailing market, cost, and other considerations. Repurchases will be made by the Company on either the TSX, the New York Stock Exchange and/or other Canadian marketplaces, subject to regulatory requirements. Shares repurchased pursuant to the 2010 program will be cancelled. The 2010 program commenced March 3, 2010 and will end on March 2, 2011, or sooner if the $200 million or 5% share maximum has been reached. The first purchases were made under the 2010 program on March 9, 2010. There can be no assurance as to the precise number of shares that will be repurchased under the 2010 program, or the aggregate dollar amount of the shares purchased. The 2010 program may also be discontinued at the Company’s discretion in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.

⁽⁵⁾ In May 2010, Computershare Trust Company of Canada (the “Trustee”), on behalf of The TDL RSU Plan Trust (the “Trust”), purchased 91,808 shares on the TSX through a broker, the same broker utilized for our publicly announced share repurchase program, as a means of fixing the cash flow requirements in connection with the settlement (after vesting at a future date) of restricted stock units awarded in May 2010 to most of our eligible Canadian employees under our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated from time to time (the “Plan”), upon settlement. As such, the shares acquired by the Trust remain outstanding, and the Trust will retain and hold these shares until directed by The TDL Group Corp. (“TDL”), a Canadian subsidiary of ours, to distribute shares to Canadian employees in settlement of vested restricted stock units. Shares held by the Trust will not count toward determining whether a quorum exists nor are they entitled to voting rights. Dividends paid on the shares owned by the Trust will be paid to the Trust in cash, and, at the direction of TDL, the Trustee may acquire additional shares of our stock with such cash in order to pay trust expenses, obtain additional shares to settle dividend equivalent rights that accrue in respect of the outstanding and unvested restricted stock units, or acquire additional shares to fix the cash cost of future grants. In addition, in May 2010, the Trustee as an agent of ours, also using the same broker utilized for our publicly announced share repurchase program, purchased 10,562 shares on the open market, to settle, after provision for payment of the employees’ minimum statutory withholding tax requirements, our RSU settlement obligation to certain employees.

Dividend Restrictions with Respect to Part II, Item 2 Matters

The terms of the Company’s senior credit facilities contain limitations on the payment of dividends by the Company. The Company may not make any dividend distribution unless, at the time of, and after giving effect to the aggregate dividend payment, the Company is in compliance with the financial covenants contained in the senior credit facilities, and there is no default outstanding under the senior credit facilities.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Index to Exhibits on Page 55.

53

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	TIM HORTONS INC. (Registrant)
Date: August 12, 2010	/s/ CYNTHIA J. DEVINE
	Cynthia J. Devine
	Chief Financial Officer

54

TIM HORTONS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description
4(a)	Trust Indenture, dated June 1, 2010, by and between the Registrant and BNY Trust Company of Canada, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Tim Hortons Inc. filed with the Commission on June 1, 2010)
4(b)	First Supplemental Trust Indenture, dated June 1, 2010, by and between the Registrant and BNY Trust Company of Canada, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Tim Hortons Inc. filed with the Commission on June 1, 2010)
10(a)*	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (2010 Award)
10(b)*	Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement (2010 Award)
31(a)*	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31(b)*	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32(a)*	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32(b)*	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
99*	Safe Harbor Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

* Exhibits attached hereto

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language). Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that the interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise not subject to liability under these sections. The financial information contained in the XBRL-related documents is “unaudited” or “unreviewed.”

55

EX-10.(A)

[Note: Text in [ ] is only included in agreements with individuals employed by U.S. subsidiaries of Tim Hortons Inc., with the exception that text in [ ] in Section 9 is not included in such agreements, but has been included in all other agreements.]

Exhibit 10(a)

Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award

Agreement (2010 Award – NEOs, VPs and Up)

Participant Name (“Grantee”):
Employee Number:
Grant Name:
Date of Grant:	May 18, 2010
Total Award:

Vest Schedule – RSUs
Vest Date	Vest Quantity
November 15, 2012	100%

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT

(with related Dividend Equivalent Rights)

Tim Hortons Inc.

Grant Year: 2010

May 18, 2010

THIS RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made effective as of the 18^th day of May, 2010 (the “Date of Grant”), [by and among/between] Tim Hortons Inc., a corporation incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “Company”), [the below-noted Employer,] and the above-noted Grantee (collectively, the “Parties”).

WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Tim Hortons Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), in order to provide additional incentive compensation to certain employees and directors of the Company and its Subsidiaries (as defined in the Plan); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Plan, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee (“Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company (“Board”) has determined to grant to the Grantee on the Date of Grant an Award of Restricted Stock Units with related Dividend Equivalent Rights as provided herein to encourage the Grantee’s efforts toward the continuing success of the Company and its Subsidiaries; and

WHEREAS, the Award is evidenced by this Agreement, which (together with the Plan), describes all the terms and conditions of the Award.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Award.

1.1 The Company hereby grants to the Grantee in respect of employment services provided by the Grantee an award of the above-noted number of Restricted Stock Units (the “Award”) with an equal number of related Dividend Equivalent Rights (as defined in the Plan). Subject to Section 6 hereof, each Restricted Stock Unit represents the right to receive, at the absolute discretion of the Company, (i) one (1) Share (as defined in the Plan) from the Company, (ii) cash delivered to a broker to acquire one (1) share on the Grantee’s behalf, or (iii) one (1) Share delivered by the Trustee (as defined in Section 7), in any case at the time and in the manner set forth in Section 7 hereof.

1.2 Each Dividend Equivalent Right represents the right to receive the equivalent of all of the cash dividends that would be payable with respect to the Share represented by the Restricted Stock Unit to which the Dividend Equivalent Right relates. With respect to each Dividend Equivalent Right, any amount related to cash dividends shall be converted into additional Restricted Stock Units based on the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date such dividend is made. Any additional Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to this Section shall be subject to the same terms and conditions applicable to the Restricted Stock Unit to which the Dividend Equivalent Right relates, including, without limitation, the restrictions on transfer, forfeiture, vesting and payment provisions contained in Sections 2 through 7, inclusive, of this Agreement. In the event that a Restricted Stock Unit is forfeited pursuant to Section 6 hereof, the related Dividend Equivalent Right shall also be forfeited. Fractional Restricted Stock Units may be generated upon the automatic settlement of Dividend Equivalent Rights into additional Restricted Stock Units and upon the vesting of a portion of a Restricted Stock Unit award (see Section 3). These fractional Restricted Stock Units continue to accrue additional Dividend Equivalent Rights and accumulate until the fractional interest is of sufficient value to acquire an additional Restricted Stock Unit as a result of the settlement of future Dividend Equivalent Rights, subject to adjustment upon the vesting of a portion of the underlying Restricted Stock Unit award (see Section 3). The Committee shall determine appropriate administration for the tracking and settlement of Dividend Equivalent Rights, including with respect to fractional interests, and the Committee’s determination in this regard shall be final and binding upon all Parties.

1.3 This Agreement shall be construed in accordance and consistent with, and is subject to, the provisions of the Plan (the provisions of which are hereby incorporated by reference), as well as any and all determinations, policies, instructions, interpretations, rules, etc., of the Committee in connection with the Plan. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the same definitions as set forth in the Plan.

- 2 -

2. Restrictions on Transfer.

The Restricted Stock Units and Dividend Equivalent Rights granted pursuant to this Agreement may not be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of and may not be pledged or otherwise hypothecated.

3. Vesting.

Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Restricted Stock Units granted hereunder shall vest in their entirety on November 15, 2012. Fractional Restricted Stock Units may be generated and/or adjusted upon the vesting of the Restricted Stock Units awarded under this Agreement. See Section 7 regarding settlement of fractional Restricted Stock Units.

4. Effect of Terminations of Employment.

4.1 Death or Disability. If Grantee’s employment terminates as a result of Grantee’s death or becoming Disabled (as defined in the Plan), or if the Grantee is terminated without Cause in connection with the sale or disposition of a Subsidiary, in each case if such termination occurs on or after the Date of Grant, all Restricted Stock Units which have not become vested in accordance with Section 3 or 5 hereof shall vest as of the date of such termination.

4.2 Retirement. If Grantee’s employment terminates as a result of the Grantee’s Retirement, and if such termination occurs on or after the Date of Grant, any unvested Restricted Stock Units will remain outstanding and will continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule described in Section 3 of this Agreement.

4.3 Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, (a) “Retirement” shall mean termination of employment after attaining age 60 with at least ten (10) years of service (as defined in the Company’s qualified retirement plans) other than by death, Disability or for Cause and (b) the word “terminate” or “termination” in connection with the Grantee’s employment shall mean the Grantee’s “separation from service,” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(h).

4.4 Trading Policies and Transfer of Shares. For a period of six (6) months following a termination of employment, whether under Section 4, 5, or 6 of this Agreement, Grantee shall continue to be subject to the Company’s insider trading and window trading policies and must follow all pre-clearance procedures, and all other requirements, included in those policies. In the case of Retirement, a termination due to Disability, or death, Grantee or Grantee’s estate or legal representative, as the case may be, shall take all reasonable steps to transfer all Shares received under this Agreement (and all other Shares that have vested and are maintained by the Plan Administrator (as defined in Section 7) in a brokerage account for the benefit of Grantee) from the Plan Administrator within five (5) years following the Grantee’s termination of employment. For terminations arising for any reason other than death, Disability or Retirement, Grantee shall transfer all Shares received under this

- 3 -

Agreement (and all other Shares that have vested and are maintained by the Plan Administrator in a brokerage account for the benefit of Grantee) from the Plan Administrator within one (1) year following the Grantee’s termination of employment.

5. Effect of Change in Control.

Subject to Section 6 hereof, in the event of a Change in Control, Section 11.6 of the Plan will apply to the unvested portion of the Award.

6. Forfeiture of Award.

Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, any and all Restricted Stock Units which have not become vested in accordance with Section 3, 4 or 5 hereof shall be forfeited upon:

(a) the termination of the Grantee’s employment with the Company or any Subsidiary for any reason other than those set forth in Section 4 hereof prior to such vesting; or

(b) the commission by the Grantee of an Act of Misconduct prior to such vesting.

For purposes of this Agreement, an “Act of Misconduct” shall mean the occurrence of one or more of the following events: (x) the Grantee uses for profit or discloses to unauthorized persons, confidential information or trade secrets of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, (y) the Grantee breaches any contract with or violates any fiduciary obligation to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, or (z) the Grantee engages in unlawful trading in the securities of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or of another company based on information gained as a result of the Grantee’s employment with, or status as a director to, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.

7. Satisfaction of Award.

In order to satisfy Restricted Stock Units after vesting pursuant to this Agreement, the Company shall, at its election either (i) deliver authorized but unissued Shares; (ii) deliver cash to a broker designated by the Company who, as agent for the Grantee, shall purchase the appropriate number of Shares on the open market; (iii) contribute cash to a trust fund (the “Trust”) to be used by the trustee thereof (the “Trustee”) to purchase Shares for the purpose of satisfying the Grantee’s entitlements under this Agreement, which Shares shall be held by the Trustee, and the Trustee, upon direction, shall deliver such Shares to the Grantee; or, (iv) any combination of the above.

The aggregate number of Shares issued by the Company, purchased by a broker for the Grantee or delivered by the Trustee to a Grantee at any particular time pursuant to this Section 7 shall correspond to the number of Restricted Stock Units that become vested on the vesting date, with one (1) Restricted Stock Unit corresponding to one (1) Share, subject to any withholding as may be required under Section 9 of this Agreement, notwithstanding any delay between a vesting date and the settlement date. Fractional Shares may be issued or

- 4 -

delivered upon settlement of vested Restricted Stock Units. All parties understand, acknowledge and agree that fractional Shares cannot be traded in the public markets, and therefore, any fractional Share issued or delivered to Grantee upon settlement of a vested Restricted Stock Unit, after taking into account the reduction to the number of Shares as required under Section 9 of this Agreement, if applicable, will ultimately be settled in cash when the Grantee sells Shares through the Plan Administrator or transfers Shares out of the Plan Administrator’s system. The Committee shall determine appropriate administration for the settling of vested Restricted Stock Units, including with respect to fractional interests, and the Committee’s determination in this regard shall be final and binding upon all Parties. As used herein, “Plan Administrator” shall mean the party engaged by the Company to administratively track awards and accompanying Dividend Equivalent Rights granted under the Plan, as well as handle the process of vesting and settlement of such awards.

The Company will satisfy its obligations in this Section 7 on each vesting date or as soon as administratively practicable but no later than the later of (a) December 31 of the year in which such vesting date occurs, or (b) sixty (60) days after such vesting date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to Restricted Stock Units that become vested pursuant to Section 4 (other than as a result of the Grantee’s death), if the Grantee is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code as of the date the Grantee’s employment terminates and settlement of such Restricted Stock Units is required to be delayed pursuant to Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, then the Company shall satisfy its obligations in this Section 7 by the later of (i) the date otherwise required by this Section 7 or (ii) the first business day of the calendar month following the date which is six (6) months after the Grantee’s employment terminates.

Any of the Company’s obligations in this Section 7 may be satisfied by the Company or the Employer.

8. No Right to Continued Employment.

Nothing in this Agreement or the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or its Subsidiaries to terminate the Grantee’s employment, nor confer upon the Grantee any right to continuance of employment by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or continuance of service as a Board member.

9. Withholding of Taxes.

Upon (i) the delivery to the Grantee (or the Grantee’s estate, if applicable) of authorized and unissued Shares; (ii) the delivery of cash to a broker to purchase and deliver Shares; or (iii) the delivery by the Trustee of Shares pursuant to the Trust Agreement, in each case pursuant to Sections 1 and 7 hereof, the Company [(or in the case of a Grantee employed by a Subsidiary (the “Employer”))], the Employer or the Trust, as applicable, shall require payment of or other provision for, as determined by the Company, an amount equal to the federal, state, provincial and local income taxes and other amounts required by law to be withheld or determined to be necessary or appropriate to be withheld by the Company, the Employer or the Trust, as applicable, in connection with such delivery. In its sole discretion, the Company, the Employer or the Trust, as applicable, may require or permit payment of or

- 5 -

provision for such withholding taxes through one or more of the following methods: (a) in cash, bank draft, certified cheque, personal cheque or other manner acceptable to the Committee and/or set forth in the relevant exercise procedures; (b) by withholding such amount from other amounts due to the Grantee; (c) by withholding a portion of the Shares then issuable or deliverable to the Grantee having an aggregate fair market value equal to such withholding taxes and, at the Company’s election, either (I) canceling the equivalent portion of the underlying Award and the Company or the Trust paying the withholding taxes on behalf of the Grantee in cash, or (II) selling such Shares on the Grantee’s behalf; or (d) by withholding such amount from the cash then issuable in connection with the Award.

Fractional Shares may be issued or delivered and/or adjusted upon the withholding of taxes in accordance with this Section 9, and the settlement of the Restricted Stock Units into Shares will be adjusted by the amount of the withholding, including by the fractional Shares generated and/or adjusted upon the withholding transaction. Any fractional Shares will ultimately be paid or settled in cash in accordance with Section 7 of this Agreement. Additional fractional Shares may continue to accrue and be added to existing fractional Shares upon future vesting and settlement of Restricted Stock Units (in accordance with the terms of this Agreement) if vested Shares remain in the Plan Administrator’s system.

10. Grantee Bound by the Plan.

The Grantee hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees to be bound by all the terms and provisions thereof. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance and consistent with, and is subject to, the provisions of the Plan (the provisions of which are hereby incorporated by reference), as well as any and all determinations, policies, instructions, interpretations and rules of the Committee in connection with the Plan. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the same definitions as set forth in the Plan.

11. Modification of Agreement.

This Agreement may be modified, amended, suspended or terminated, and any terms or conditions may be waived, but only by a written instrument executed by the Parties hereto.

12. Severability.

Should any provision of this Agreement be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected by such holding and shall continue in full force in accordance with their terms.

13. Governing Law.

The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.

- 6 -

14. Successors in Interest and Assigns.

The Company and the Employer may assign any of their respective rights and obligations under this Agreement without the consent of the Grantee. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon any successors and assigns of the Company and the Employer. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the Grantee including, without limitation, the estate of the Grantee and the executor, administrator or trustee of such estate. All obligations imposed upon the Grantee and all rights granted to the Company and the Employer under this Agreement shall be binding upon the successors of the Grantee including, without limitation, the estate of the Grantee and the executor, administrator or trustee of such estate.

15. Language.

The Parties hereto acknowledge that they have requested that this Agreement and all documents ancillary thereto, including all the documentation provided to the Grantee in respect of the Award, be drafted in the English language only. Les parties aux présentes reconnaissent qu’elles ont exigé que la présente convention et tous les documents y afférents, y compris toute la documentation transmise au bénéficiaire relativement à l’octroi des droits prévu aux présentes, soient rédigés en langue anglaise seulement.

16. Resolution of Disputes.

Any dispute or disagreement which may arise under, or as a result of, or in any way relate to, the interpretation, construction or application of this Agreement shall be determined by the Committee. Any determination made hereunder shall be final, binding and conclusive on the Grantee, the Grantee’s heirs, executors, administrators and successors, and the Company and its Subsidiaries for all purposes.

17. Entire Agreement.

This Agreement and the terms and conditions of the Plan constitute the entire understanding between the Grantee and the Company and its Subsidiaries, and supersede all other agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the Award.

18. Headings.

The headings of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute a part of this Agreement.

19. Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

- 7 -

20. Compliance with Section 409A.

This Agreement is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and is intended not to be a “salary deferral arrangement” (a “SDA”) within the meaning of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (“Canadian Tax Act”), and shall be interpreted and administered consistent with such intent. To the extent that the interpretation and administration of this Agreement in accordance with Section 409A of the Code would cause any of the arrangements contemplated herein to be a SDA, then for any Grantee who is subject to the Canadian Tax Act and not subject to Section 409A of the Code, the Agreement shall be interpreted and administered with respect to such Grantee so that the arrangements are not SDAs. For Grantees subject to both Section 409A of the Code and the Canadian Tax Act, the terms of this Award shall be interpreted, construed, and given effect to achieve compliance with both Section 409A of the Code and the Canadian Tax Act, to the extent practicable. If compliance with both Section 409A of the Code and the Canadian Tax Act is not practicable in connection with the Award covered by this Agreement, the terms of this Award and this Agreement remain subject to amendment at the sole discretion of the Committee to reach a resolution of the conflict as it shall determine in its sole discretion.

21. Recoupment Policy upon Restatement of Financial Results.

The Award, and any proceeds therefrom, is subject to the Company’s right to reclaim its benefits in the event of a financial restatement pursuant to the Recoupment Policy Relating to Performance-Based Compensation (the “Recoupment Policy”) adopted by the Board, as may be amended from time to time. If the Company’s financial statements are required to be restated for any reason (other than restatements due to changes in accounting policy with retroactive effect), the Board will review the Award earned by the Grantee. If the Board determines that, after a review of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the grant of the Award was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently corrected as part of a restatement and a lower Award would have been made to the Grantee based upon the restated financial results; then, the Board will seek recoupment of the Award to the extent that the Board deems appropriate and as provided by applicable law.

22. Accessing Information.

A copy of the Plan and prospectus for the Plan, as may be amended, can be found by the Grantee by accessing his/her Solium Shareworks account at www.solium.com. That site also contains other general information about the Award.

23. Confirming Information.

By accepting this Agreement, either through electronic means or by providing a signed copy, the Grantee (i) acknowledges and confirms that he/she has read and understood the Plan, the related prospectus, this Agreement and all information about the Award available at the Solium website, and that he/she has had an opportunity to seek separate fiscal, legal and taxation advice in relation thereto; (ii) acknowledges that he/she has been provided with a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company; (iii) agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions stated in this

- 8 -

Agreement, including without limitation the terms and conditions of the Plan, incorporated by reference herein; and (iv) acknowledges and agrees that acceptance through electronic means is equivalent to doing so by providing a signed copy.

TIM HORTONS INC.
by
	Name:
	Title:
[(“Employer”)]

- 9 -

EX-10.(B)

[Note: Text in [ ] is only included in agreements with individuals employed by U.S. subsidiaries of Tim Hortons Inc., with the exception that text in [ ] in Section 8 is not included in such agreements, but has been included in all other agreements.]

Exhibit 10(b)

Form of Nonqualified Stock Option                             

Award Agreement (2010 Award-NEOs, VPs and Up)

Participant Name (“Grantee”):
Employee Number:
Grant Name:
Date of Grant:	May 18, 2010
Expiration Date:	[May 15, 2017]
Option Price:	Cdn.$
Total Award:

Vest Schedule – Options
Vest Date	Vest Quantity
[May 15, 2011]	1/3
[May 15, 2012]	1/3
[May 15, 2013]	1/3

TIM HORTONS INC.

2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT

(with related Stock Appreciation Right)

Grant Year: 2010

THIS NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made effective as of the 18^th day of May, 2010 (the “Date of Grant”), [by and among/between] Tim Hortons Inc., a corporation incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “Company”), [the below-noted Employer,] and the above-noted Grantee (collectively, the “Parties”).

WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Tim Hortons Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), in order to provide additional incentive compensation to certain employees and directors of the Company and its Subsidiaries;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 6 and 7 of the Plan, the Human Resource and Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has determined to grant to the Grantee on the Date of Grant a Nonqualified Stock Option and a related Stock Appreciation Right (“SAR”), each as provided herein, to encourage the Grantee’s efforts toward the continuing success of the Company and its Subsidiaries; and

WHEREAS, the Award is evidenced by this Agreement, which (together with the Plan) describes all the terms and conditions of the Award.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Grant of Award. The Company hereby grants to the Grantee, on the Date of Grant, a Nonqualified Stock Option (the “Option”) with a related SAR to purchase the above-noted number of Shares at the above-noted exercise price per Share (the “Option Price”), subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan (the “Award”). The Option is not intended to be treated as an option that complies with Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

2. Vesting; Term of Award. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the Award shall vest as follows:

(a) One-third (1/3) of the total Shares covered by the Award shall vest on May 15, 2011, subject to rounding down the Award to the nearest whole Share as of the vesting date;

(b) One-third (1/3) of the total Shares covered by the Award shall vest on May 15, 2012, subject to rounding down the Award to the nearest whole Share as of the vesting date; and

(c) One-third (1/3) of the total Shares covered by the Award shall vest on May 15, 2013, subject to rounding down the Award to the nearest whole Share as of the vesting date.

The Award shall expire May 15, 2017 (the “Expiration Date”), whether or not the Award (or any portion thereof) has been exercised, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 4 of this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if the Award expires outside of a Trading Window, then the expiration of the term of the Award shall be the later of: (i) the date the Award would have expired by its original terms (including the terms set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement), or (ii) the end of the tenth trading day of the immediately succeeding Trading Window during which the Company would allow the Grantee to trade in its securities; provided, however, that in no event shall the Award expire beyond the tenth anniversary of the Date of Grant.

3. Exercise of Award. Subject to the limitations set forth in this Agreement and in the Plan, the vested portion of the Award may be exercised in whole or in part by providing to the Company or its designee written notice of exercise; provided that the Award may be exercised with respect to whole Shares only. Such notice shall specify (i) whether the Grantee intends to exercise the Option or the SAR and (ii) the number of Shares with respect to which the Award is to be exercised.

(a) Exercise of SAR. If the Grantee desires to receive cash, as opposed to Shares, upon exercise of all or a portion of the vested amount of the Award, the Grantee will exercise the SAR. Upon the exercise of the SAR, the Grantee shall be entitled to receive a cash amount from the Company equal to the product of: (i) the excess

- 2 -

of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise of the SAR over the Option Price; multiplied by (ii) the number of Shares as to which the SAR is being exercised.

(b) Exercise of Option. If the Grantee desires to receive Shares, as opposed to cash, upon exercise of all or a portion of the vested amount of the Award, the Grantee will exercise the Option. If the Option is exercised, payment of the Option Price for the number of Shares specified in the notice of exercise shall accompany the written notice of exercise. The payment of the Option Price may be made, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion as of the time of exercise, as follows: (i) in cash, personal or certified cheque, bank draft or other property acceptable to the Committee; or (ii) through a cashless exercise, including through a registered broker-dealer. The Committee shall determine the means and manner by which Shares to be delivered upon exercise of the Option shall be settled and/or satisfied, in its sole and absolute discretion.

(c) Tandem Nature of Award. Upon the exercise of the SAR, the Option shall be canceled (i.e., surrendered to the Company) to the extent of the number of Shares as to which the SAR is exercised. Upon the exercise of the Option, the SAR shall be canceled (i.e., surrendered to the Company) to the extent of the number of Shares as to which the Option is exercised or surrendered.

4. Termination of Employment.

(a) Death or Disability. Upon termination of the Grantee’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries as a result of the Grantee’s death or the Grantee becoming Disabled, the Award shall become immediately exercisable as of the Termination Date, and the Grantee (or, to the extent applicable, the Grantee’s legal guardian, legal representative or estate) shall have the right to exercise the Award for a period of four (4) years after the date of such termination or, if earlier, until the Expiration Date.

(b) Retirement. Upon termination of the Grantee’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries by reason of the Grantee’s Retirement (as defined below), for a period of four (4) years following the date of such Retirement (but in no event beyond the Expiration Date), the Award shall remain outstanding and (i) to the extent not then fully vested, shall continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule set forth in Section 2 of this Agreement, and (ii) the Grantee shall have the right to exercise the vested portion of the Award. For purposes of this Agreement, “Retirement” shall mean termination of employment after attaining age sixty (60) with at least ten (10) years of service other than by death, Disability or for Cause.

(c) Termination in Connection with Certain Dispositions. In the event the Grantee’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries is terminated without Cause in connection with a sale or other disposition of a Subsidiary, the Award shall remain outstanding and (i) to the extent not then fully vested, will become immediately vested on the Termination Date, and (ii) the Grantee will have the right to exercise such

- 3 -

vested portion of the Award for a period of one (1) year following the Termination Date or, if earlier, until the Expiration Date.

(d) Termination for Cause. For greater clarity, upon the termination of the Grantee’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries for Cause, the portion of the Award that has not been exercised shall be forfeited (whether or not then vested and exercisable) on the Termination Date.

(e) Termination for Any Other Reason. Upon the termination of the Grantee’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason not described in Section 4(a), 4(b), 4(c), or 4(d) of this Agreement, the Award shall (i) to the extent not vested and exercisable as of the Termination Date, terminate as of the Termination Date, and (ii) to the extent vested and exercisable as of the Termination Date, remain exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days following the Termination Date or, in the event of the Grantee’s death during such ninety (90) day period, remain exercisable by the Grantee’s estate until the end of one (1) year period following the Termination Date; provided, however, that, in either case, the Award shall not remain exercisable beyond the Expiration Date.

5. Effect of Change in Control. In the event of a Change in Control, Section 11.6 of the Plan will apply to the unvested portion of the Award.

6. Non-Transferability of Award. Except to the extent that the Grantee’s legal representative or estate is permitted to exercise the Award pursuant to the terms of the Plan or in accordance with a determination of the Committee, the Award is exercisable only during the Grantee’s lifetime and only by the Grantee. Unless otherwise provided for by a determination of the Committee, the Award shall not be transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

7. No Right to Continued Employment. Nothing in this Agreement or the Plan shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or its Subsidiaries to terminate the Grantee’s employment, nor be construed as giving the Grantee any right to continuance of employment by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or continuance of service to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.

8. Withholding of Taxes. Upon the exercise of the Award, the Company [(or in the case of a Grantee employed by a Subsidiary (the “Employer”))], the Employer, or a trust established to deliver Shares under an Award (“Trust”), as applicable, shall require payment of or other provision for, as determined by the Company, an amount equal to the federal, state, provincial and local income taxes and other amounts required by law to be withheld or determined to be necessary or appropriate to be withheld by the Company, the Employer, or Trust, as applicable, in connection with such exercise. In its sole discretion, the Company, the Employer, or Trust, as applicable, may require or permit payment of or provision for such withholding taxes through one or more of the following methods: (a) in cash, bank draft, certified cheque, personal cheque or other manner acceptable to

- 4 -

the Committee and/or set forth in the relevant exercise procedures; (b) by withholding such amount from other amounts due to the Grantee; (c) by withholding a portion of the Shares then issuable or deliverable to the Grantee having an aggregate fair market value equal to such withholding taxes and, at the Company’s election, either (I) canceling the equivalent portion of the underlying Award and the Company, the Employer, or Trust paying the withholding taxes on behalf of the Grantee in cash, or (II) selling such Shares on the Grantee’s behalf; or (d) by withholding such amount from the cash then issuable in connection with the Award. [The Grantee acknowledges and agrees that, notwithstanding that the Employer is not a party to this Agreement, the Employer, if applicable, shall be entitled to take such actions provided for in this Section as the Employer shall deem appropriate.]

9. Grantee Bound by Plan; Award Subject to Terms of Plan. The Grantee hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees to be bound by all the terms and provisions thereof. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance and consistent with, and is subject to, the provisions of the Plan (the provisions of which are hereby incorporated by reference), as well as any and all determinations, policies, instructions, interpretations and rules of the Committee in connection with the Plan, including the Option/SAR Exercise and Settlement Policy and related procedures adopted by the Committee. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the same definitions as set forth in the Plan.

10. Modification of Agreement. The Board or Committee may make amendments or changes to this Award, subject to the terms and conditions of Section 22 of the Plan.

11. Severability. Should any provision of this Agreement be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable or invalid for any reason, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected by such holding and shall continue in full force in accordance with their terms.

12. Governing Law. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein.

13. Successors in Interest and Assigns. The Company and the Employer may assign any of their respective rights and obligations under this Agreement without the consent of the Grantee. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon any successors and assigns of the Company and the Employer. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the Grantee including, without limitation, the estate of the Grantee and the executor, administrator or trustee of such estate. All obligations imposed upon the Grantee and all rights granted to the Company and the Employer under this Agreement shall be binding upon the successors of the Grantee including, without limitation, the estate of the Grantee and the executor, administrator or trustee of such estate.

- 5 -

14. Resolution of Disputes. Any dispute or disagreement which may arise under, or as a result of, or in any way relate to, the interpretation, construction or application of this Agreement shall be determined by the Committee. Any determination made hereunder shall be final, binding and conclusive on the Grantee, the Grantee’s heirs, executors, administrators and successors, and the Company and its Subsidiaries for all purposes.

15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the terms and conditions of the Plan constitute the entire understanding between the Grantee and the Company and its Subsidiaries, and supersede all other agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the Award.

16. Headings. The headings of this Agreement are inserted for convenience only and do not constitute a part of this Agreement.

17. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.

18. Recoupment Policy upon Restatement of Financial Results. The Award, and any proceeds therefrom, is subject to the Company’s right to reclaim its benefits in the event of a financial restatement pursuant to the Recoupment Policy Relating to Performance-Based Compensation (the “Recoupment Policy”) adopted by the Board, as may be amended from time to time. If the Company’s financial statements are required to be restated for any reason (other than restatements due to changes in accounting policy with retroactive effect), the Board will review the Award earned by the Grantee. If the Board determines that, after a review of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the grant of the Award was predicated upon the achievement of certain financial results that were subsequently corrected as part of a restatement and a lower Award would have been made to the Grantee based upon the restated financial results; then, the Board will seek recoupment of the Award to the extent that the Board deems appropriate.

19. Language. The Parties hereto acknowledge that they have requested that this Agreement and all documents ancillary thereto, including all the documentation provided to the Grantee in respect of the Award, be drafted in the English language only. Les parties aux présentes reconnaissent qu’elles ont exigé que la présente convention et tous les documents y afférents, y compris toute la documentation transmise au bénéficiaire relativement à l’octroi des droits prévu aux présentes, soient rédigés en langue anglaise seulement.

20. Accessing Information. A copy of the Plan and prospectus for the Plan, as may be amended, can be found by the Grantee by accessing his/her Solium Shareworks account at www.solium.com. That site also contains other general information about the Award.

- 6 -

21. Confirming Information. By accepting this Agreement, either through electronic means or by providing a signed copy, the Grantee (i) acknowledges and confirms that he/she has read and understood the Plan, the related prospectus, this Agreement and all information about the Award available at the Solium website, and that he/she has had an opportunity to seek separate fiscal, legal and taxation advice in relation thereto; (ii) acknowledges that he/she has been provided with a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company; (iii) agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions stated in this Agreement, including without limitation the terms and conditions of the Plan, incorporated by reference herein; and (iv) acknowledges and agrees that acceptance through electronic means is equivalent to doing so by providing a signed copy.

TIM HORTONS INC.

By:

Name:

Title:

[(“Employer”)]

- 7 -

EX-31.(A)

Exhibit 31(a)

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald B. Schroeder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tim Hortons Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2010

/s/ DONALD B. SCHROEDER

Name: Donald B. Schroeder

Title:  Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.(B)

Exhibit 31(b)

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Cynthia J. Devine, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Tim Hortons Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2010

/s/ CYNTHIA J. DEVINE

Name:  Cynthia J. Devine

Title:    Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.(A)

Exhibit 32(a)

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *

This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 of Tim Hortons Inc. (the “Issuer”).

I, Donald B. Schroeder, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: August 12, 2010

/s/ DONALD B. SCHROEDER

Name: Donald B. Schroeder

* This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this certification therein by reference.

EX-32.(B)

Exhibit 32(b)

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *

This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 of Tim Hortons Inc. (the “Issuer”).

I, Cynthia J. Devine, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Dated: August 12, 2010

/s/ CYNTHIA J. DEVINE

Name: Cynthia J. Devine

* This certification is being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this certification therein by reference.

EX-99

Exhibit 99

TIM HORTONS INC.

Safe Harbor Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Canadian Securities Laws

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information, so long as those statements are identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those disclosed in the statement. Canadian securities laws have corresponding safe harbor provisions, subject to certain additional requirements including the requirement to state the assumptions used to make the forecasts set out in forward-looking statements. Tim Hortons Inc. (the “Company”) desires to take advantage of these “safe harbor” provisions.

Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They often include words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “outlook,” “forecast” or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as “will,” “should,” “could” or “may.” Examples of forward-looking statements that may be contained in our public disclosure from time to time include, but are not limited to, statements concerning management’s expectations relating to possible or assumed future results, our strategic goals and our priorities, and the economic and business outlook for us, for each of our business segments and for the economy generally. Many of the factors that could determine our future performance are beyond our ability to control or predict. The following factors, in addition to other factors set forth in our Form 10-K filed on March 4, 2010 and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 12, 2010 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Canadian securities regulators, and in other press releases, communications, or filings made with the SEC or the Canadian securities regulators, could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectation(s) included in forward-looking statements and, if significant, could materially affect the Company’s business, sales revenue, share price, financial condition, and/or future results, including causing the Company to (i) close restaurants, (ii) fail to realize same-store sales, which are critical to achieving our operating income and other financial targets, (iii) fail to meet the expectations of our securities analysts or investors, or otherwise fail to perform as expected, (iv) have insufficient cash to engage in or fund expansion activities, dividends, or share repurchase programs, or (v) increase costs, corporately or at store level, which may result in increased restaurant-level pricing, which in turn may result in decreased customer demand for our products resulting in lower sales, revenue, and earnings. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results. We assume no obligation to update or alter any forward-looking statements after they are made, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

Forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions which may prove to be incorrect, including, but not limited to, assumptions about: the absence of a material increase in competition within the quick service restaurant segment of the food service industry; the absence of an adverse event or condition that damages our strong brand position and reputation; continuing positive working relationships with the majority of the Company’s franchisees; there being no significant change in the Company’s ability to comply with current or future regulatory requirements; the absence of any material adverse effects arising as a result of litigation; and general worldwide economic conditions. We are presenting this information for the purpose of informing you of management’s current expectations regarding these matters, and this information may not be appropriate for any other purposes.

Competition . The quick service restaurant industry is intensely competitive with respect to price, service, location, personnel, qualified franchisees, real estate sites and type and quality of food. The Company and its franchisees compete with international, regional and local organizations, primarily through the quality, variety, and value perception of food products offered. The number and location of units, quality and speed of service, attractiveness of facilities, effectiveness of advertising/marketing and operational programs, discounting activities, price, changing demographic patterns and trends, changing consumer preferences and spending patterns or a desire for a more diversified menu, changing health or dietary preferences and perceptions, and new product development by the Company and its competitors are also important factors. Certain of the Company’s competitors, most notably in the U.S., have greater financial and other resources than we do, including substantially larger marketing budgets and greater leverage from their marketing spend.

Factors Affecting Growth and Other Important Strategic Initiatives. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve new restaurant or same-store sales growth objectives, that new restaurants will be profitable or that strategic initiatives will be successfully implemented. Early in the development of new markets, the opening of new restaurants may have a negative effect on the same-store sales of existing restaurants in the market. The Company may also enter markets where our brand is not well known and where it has little or operating experience and as a result, may not achieve the level of penetration needed in order to drive brand recognition, convenience, increased leverage to marketing dollars, and other benefits the Company believes penetration yields. When the Company enters new markets, it may be necessary to increase franchisee relief and support costs, which lowers its earnings. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully adapt its brand, development efforts, and restaurants to these differing market conditions. The Company may also continue to selectively close restaurants that are not achieving acceptable levels of profitability or change its growth strategies over time, where appropriate. Such closures may be accompanied by impairment charges that may have a negative impact on our earnings. The Company also intends to evaluate potential mergers, acquisitions, joint venture investments, alliances, vertical integration opportunities and divestitures, which are subject to many of the same risks that also affect new store development as well as various other risks. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to complete the desirable transactions, for reasons including restrictive covenants in debt instruments or other agreements with third parties. The Company may continue to pursue strategic alliances (including co-branding) with third parties for different types of development models and products and there can be no assurance that: significant value will be recognized through such strategic alliances; the Company will be able to maintain our strategic alliances; or, the Company will be able to enter into new strategic relationships in the future. Entry into such relationships as well as the expansion of the Company’s current business through such initiatives may expose it to additional risks that may adversely affect the Company’s brand and business. The Company’s financial outlook and long-range targets are based on the successful implementation, execution and customer acceptance of the Company’s strategic plans and initiatives; accordingly, the failure of any of these criteria could cause the Company to fall short of achievement of its financial objectives and long-range goals.

Food Safety and Health Concerns. Incidents or reports, whether true or not, of food-borne illness and injuries caused by or claims of food tampering, employee hygiene and cleanliness failures or impropriety at Tim Hortons or other quick service restaurants unrelated to Tim Hortons could result in negative publicity, damage our brand value and potentially lead to product liability or other claims. Any decrease in customer traffic or temporary closure of any of our restaurants as a result of such incidents or negative publicity may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Litigation . The Company is or may be subject to claims incidental to the business, including: obesity litigation; health and safety risks or conditions of the Company’s restaurants associated with design, construction, site location and development, indoor or airborne contaminants and/or certain equipment utilized in operations; employee claims for employment or labour matters, including potentially, class action suits regarding wages, discrimination, unfair or unequal treatment, harassment, wrongful termination, and overtime compensation claims; claims from franchisees regarding profitability or wrongful termination of their franchise or operating (license) agreement(s); taxation authorities regarding certain tax disputes; and falsified claims. The Company’s current exposure with respect to pending legal matters could change if determinations by judges and other finders of fact are not in accordance with management’s evaluation of these claims and the Company’s exposure could exceed expectations and have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

The Importance of Canadian Segment Performance and Brand Reputation. The Company’s financial performance is highly dependent upon its Canadian operating segment, which accounted for approximately 86.7% of its consolidated revenues, and all of its profit, in 2009. Any substantial or sustained decline in the Company’s Canadian business would materially and adversely affect its financial performance. The Company’s success is also dependent on its ability to maintain and enhance the value of its brand, its customers’ connection to its brand, and a positive relationship with its franchisees. Brand value can be severely damaged, even by isolated incidents, including those that may be beyond the Company’s control such as actions taken or not taken by its franchisees relating to health or safety, litigation and claims (including litigation by, other disputes with, or negative relationship with franchisees), security breaches or other fraudulent activities associated with its electronic payment systems, illegal activity targeted at the Company and incidents occurring at or affecting its strategic business partners (including in connection with co-branding initiatives and our self-serve kiosk model), affiliates, corporate social responsibility programs, or falsified claims or health or safety issues at our vertically integrated manufacturing plants.

Distribution Operations and Supply Chain. The occurrence of any of the following factors is likely to result in increased operating costs and decreased profitability of the Company’s distribution operations and supply chain and may also injure our brand, negatively affect our results of operations and our ability to generate expected earnings and/or increase costs, and/or negatively impact our relationship with our franchisees: higher transportation or shipping costs; inclement weather, which could affect the cost and timely delivery of ingredients and supplies; increased food and other supply costs; shortages or interruptions in the availability or supply of perishable food products and/or their ingredients; the failure of our distribution business to perform at historic levels, and political, physical, environmental or technological disruptions in the Company’s or its suppliers’ manufacturing and/or warehouse plants, facilities or equipment.

Importance of Franchisees. A substantial portion of the Company’s earnings come from royalties and other amounts paid by franchisees, who operated 99.5% of the Tim Hortons restaurants as of January 3, 2010. The Company’s revenues and profits would decline and its brand reputation could also be harmed if a significant number of franchisees were to experience, among other things, operational or financial difficulties or labour shortages or significant increases in labour costs. Although the Company generally enjoys a positive working relationship with the vast majority of its franchisees, active and/or potential disputes with franchisees could damage its reputation and/or its relationships with the broader franchisee group. The Company’s franchisees are independent contractors and, as a result, the quality of their operations may be diminished by factors beyond the Company’s control. Any operational shortcoming of a franchise restaurant is likely to be attributed by consumers to the Company’s entire system, thus damaging its brand reputation and potentially affecting revenues and profitability.

Government Regulation. The Company and its franchisees are subject to various federal, state, provincial, and local (“governmental”) laws and regulations. The development and operation of restaurants depend to a significant extent on the selection, acquisition, and development of suitable sites, which are subject to laws and regulations regarding zoning, land use, environmental matters (including limitation of vehicle emissions in drive-thrus; anti-idling bylaws; regulation of litter, packaging and recycling requirements; regulation relating to discharge, storage, handling, release and/or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances; and other governmental laws and regulations), traffic, franchise, design and other matters. Additional governmental laws and regulations affecting the Company and its franchisees include: business licensing; franchise laws and regulations; health, food preparation, sanitation and safety; labour (including applicable minimum wage requirements, overtime, working and safety conditions, family leave and other employment matters, and citizenship requirements); nutritional disclosure and advertising; regulations, laws, treaties or the interpretation or enforcement thereof relating to tax matters that may affect our anticipated effective tax rate, operating income (in the context of non-consolidated joint ventures), cash tax payment liabilities, and/or tax reserves, realization of the Company’s tax assets, business planning within our corporate structure that have tax implications, ongoing tax disputes, and disclosure of tax related matters; tax laws affecting our franchisees’ business; employee benefits; accounting; and anti-discrimination. Compliance with these laws and regulations and planning initiatives undertaken in connection therewith could increase the cost of doing business and, depending upon the nature of the Company’s and its franchisees’ responsive actions thereto could damage our reputation. Changes in these laws and regulations, or the implementation of additional regulatory requirements, particularly increases in applicable minimum wages, tax law, planning or other matters that may, among other things, affect the Company’s anticipated effective tax rate and/or tax reserves; business planning within our corporate structure; our strategic initiatives and/or the types of projects we may undertake in furtherance of our business, or franchise requirements, may adversely affect the Company’s financial results.

In addition, a taxation authority may disagree with certain views of the Company with respect to the interpretation of tax treaties, laws and regulations and take the position that material federal income tax liabilities, interests, penalties or amounts are payable by the Company, including in connection with the public company reorganization. Contesting such disagreements or assessments may be lengthy and costly and, if the Company were unsuccessful in disputing the same, the implications could be materially adverse to us and affect our anticipated effective tax rate, projected results, future operations and financial condition, where applicable.

Economic, Market and Other Conditions. The quick-service restaurant industry is affected by changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and political conditions, consumer preferences and perceptions (including food safety, health or dietary preferences and perceptions), discretionary spending patterns, consumer confidence, demographic trends, seasonality, weather events and other calamities, traffic patterns, the type, number and location of competing restaurants, enhanced governmental regulation (including nutritional and franchise regulations), changes in capital market conditions that affect valuations of restaurant companies in general or the value of the Company’s stock in particular, and litigation relating to food quality, handling or nutritional content. Factors such as inflation, higher energy and/or fuel costs, food costs, the cost and/or availability of a qualified workforce and other labour issues, benefit costs, legal claims, legal and regulatory compliance (including environmental regulations), new or additional sales tax on the Company’s products, disruptions in its supply chain or changes in the price, availability and shipping costs of supplies, and utility and other operating costs, also affect restaurant operations and expenses and impact same-store sales and growth opportunities. The ability of the Company and its franchisees to finance new restaurant development, improvements and additions to existing restaurants, acquire and sell restaurants, and pursue other strategic initiatives (such as acquisitions and joint ventures), are affected by economic conditions, including interest rates and other government policies impacting land and construction costs and the cost and availability of borrowed funds. In addition, unforeseen catastrophic or widespread events affecting the health and/or welfare of large numbers of people in the markets in which the Company’s restaurants are located and/or which otherwise cause a catastrophic loss or interruption in the Company’s ability to conduct its business, would affect its ability to maintain and/or increase sales and build new restaurants. Unforeseen events, including war, terrorism and other international, regional or local instability or conflicts (including labour issues), public health issues (including tainted food and water supply or widespread/pandemic illness such as the avian or H1N1 flu), and natural disasters such as earthquakes, hurricanes, or other adverse weather and climate conditions could disrupt the Company’s operations, disrupt the operations of its franchisees, suppliers, or customers, or result in political or economic instability.

Reliance on Systems. If the network and information systems and other technology systems that are integral to retail operations at system restaurants and at the Company’s manufacturing facilities, the Maidstone Bakeries facility, and corporate offices are damaged or interrupted from power outages, computer and telecommunications failures, computer worms, viruses and other destructive or disruptive software, security breaches, catastrophic events and improper or personal usage by employees, such an event could have an adverse impact on the Company and its customers, franchisees and employees, including a disruption of our operations, customer dissatisfaction or a loss of customers or revenues. The Company relies on third party vendors to retain data, process transactions and provide certain services. In the event of failure in such third party vendors’ systems and processes, the Company could experience business interruptions or privacy and/or security breaches surrounding our data. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company implemented an integrated financial system for the reporting and processing of financial data across numerous departmental and operational areas. This implementation and the conversion of these processes expose the Company to risk, including risks associated with maintaining and designing internal control and SOX 404 compliance, as well as corresponding Canadian requirements. Initially, the Company has experienced delays in business processes as new users adjust to utilizing the new financial system, which may impact the Company’s relations with its franchisees, vendors and suppliers.

Foreign Exchange Fluctuations. The Company’s Canadian restaurants are vulnerable to increases in the value of the U.S. dollar as certain commodities, such as coffee, are priced in U.S. dollars in international markets. Conversely, the Company’s U.S. restaurants are impacted when the U.S. dollar falls in value relative to the Canadian dollar, as U.S. operations would be less profitable because of the increase in U.S. operating costs resulting from the purchase of supplies from Canadian sources, and profits from U.S. operations will contribute less to (or, for losses, have less of an impact on) the Company’s consolidated results. Increases in these costs could make it harder to expand into the U.S. and increase relief and support costs to U.S. franchisees, affecting the Company’s earnings. The opposite impact occurs when the U.S. dollar strengthens against the Canadian dollar. In addition, fluctuations in the values of Canadian and U.S. dollars can affect the value of the Company’s common stock and any dividends the Company pays.

Privacy Protection. If the Company fails to comply with new and/or increasingly demanding laws and regulations regarding the protection of customer, supplier, vendor, franchisee, employee and/or business data, or if the Company (or a third party with which it has entered into a strategic alliance) experiences a significant breach of customer, supplier, vendor, franchisee, employee or Company data, the Company’s reputation could be damaged and result in lost sales, fines, lawsuits and diversion of management attention. The introduction of credit payment systems and the Company’s reloadable cash card makes us more susceptible to a risk of loss in connection with these issues, particularly with respect to an external security breach of customer information that the Company, or third parties under arrangement(s) with it, control.

Other Significant Risk Factors. The following factors could also cause the Company’s actual results to differ from its expectations: an inability to adequately protect the Company’s intellectual property and trade secrets from infringement actions or unauthorized use by others (including in certain international markets that have uncertain or inconsistent laws and/or application with respect to intellectual property and contract rights); liabilities and losses associated with owning and leasing significant amounts of real estate; an inability to retain executive officers and other key personnel or attract additional qualified management personnel to meet business needs; changes in its debt levels and a downgrade on its credit ratings; and certain anti-takeover provisions that may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date and time made. Except as required by federal or provincial securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to forward-looking statements, or to update them to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date forward-looking statements are made, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.