November 2017 ASX: MSBNasdaq: MESO Cellular Medicines for Intractable Serious and Life-Threatening Diseases Exhibit 99.2

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This presentation includes forward-looking statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this presentation are forward-looking statements. Words such as, but not limited to, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “targets,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” “could,” and similar expressions or phrases identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and future events , recent changes in regulatory laws, and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operation, business strategy and financial needs. These statements may relate to, but are not limited to: expectations regarding the safety or efficacy of, or potential applications for, Mesoblast's adult stem cell technologies; expectations regarding the strength of Mesoblast's intellectual property, the timeline for Mesoblast's regulatory approval process, and the scalability and efficiency of manufacturing processes; expectations about Mesoblast's ability to grow its business and statements regarding its relationships with current and potential future business partners and future benefits of those relationships; statements concerning Mesoblast's share price or potential market capitalization; and statements concerning Mesoblast's capital requirements and ability to raise future capital, among others. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and actual results may differ from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements, and the differences may be material and adverse. You should read this presentation together with our financial statements and the notes related thereto, as well as the risk factors, in our most recently filed reports with the SEC or on our website. Uncertainties and risks that may cause Mesoblast's actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those which may be expressed or implied by such statements, include, without limitation: risks inherent in the development and commercialization of potential products; uncertainty of clinical trial results or regulatory approvals or clearances; government regulation; the need for future capital; dependence upon collaborators; and protection of our intellectual property rights, among others. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligations to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. | 2

Our Mission: Mesoblast is committed to bring to market disruptive cellular medicines to treat serious and life-threatening illnesses |

Investment Proposition: Building a Leading Franchise of Cellular Medicines Disruptive Cellular Technology Platform Commercial Translation Capabilities Advanced Pipeline of Cellular Medicines Targeting Serious or Life-Threatening Conditions with Unmet Needs | 4

Disruptive Cellular Medicine Platform1-4 | STRO-1+ Mesenchymal Precursor Cells (MPCs) are at the apex of the hierarchy of Mesenchymal Lineage cells STRO-1/STRO-3 immuno-selection provides a homogeneous population of MPCs with unique receptors that respond to activating inflammation and damaged-tissue signals In response to activating signals present in the endogenous environment, MPCs secrete a diverse variety of biomolecules responsible for immunomodulation and tissue repair The multi-modal mechanisms of action target multiple pathways Simmons PJ and Torok-Storb, B. Identification of stromal cell precursors in bone marrow by a novel monocloncal antibody, STRO-1. Blood. 1991;78:55-62. Gronthos S, Zannettino AC, Hay SJ, et al. Molecular and cellular characterisation of highly purified stromal stem cells derived from human bone marrow. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(Pt 9):1827-35. See F, Seki T, Psaltis PJ, et al.Therapeutic effects of human STRO-3-selected mesenchymal precursor cells and their soluble factors in experimental myocardial ischemia. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15:2117-29. Psaltis PJ, Paton S, See F, et al. Enrichment for STRO-1 expression enhances the cardiovascular paracrine activity of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cell populations. J Cell Physiol. 2010;223(2):530-40.

Commercial Translation Capabilities: Technology Positioned for Scalable, Industrialized Manufacturing Immune privileged nature of STRO-1+ MPCs enables allogeneic “off the shelf” product candidates Culture expansion scalable to produce commercial quantities of potent and reproducible therapeutic doses In-house proprietary media formulations and commercial-grade bioreactors to deliver step-change yield improvements Specific formulations defined for product delineation Management know how in regulatory activities necessary for product approval and commercial launch TEMCELL® HS. Inj., first allogeneic cellular medicine received full approval in Japan and successfully launched for acute Graft vs Host Disease1 | Lonza contract manufacturing facility in Singapore 1. TEMCELL® HS. Inj. Is the registered trademark of JCR Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., Mesoblast’s Licensee.

Portfolio of Advanced Product Candidates: Three Tier 1 Product Candidates in Phase 3 Platform Product Candidate Therapeutic Area Pre-Clinical/ Pre-IND Phase 2 Phase 3 Approval Partnering1 Commercialization Tier 1 Tier 2 Includes MSC-100-IV (Crohn’s disease – biologic refractory), MPC-25-IC (Acute Cardiac Ischemia), MPC-25-Osteo (Spinal Fusion) and MPC-75-IA (Knee Osteoarthritis) This chart is figurative and does not purport to show individual trial progress within a clinical program. For product registration purposes, Phase 3 programs may require more than one trial. Tier 1 programs represent our lead programs where we focus the majority of our time and resources. Tier 2 programs are also in development and may advance to Tier 1 depending on the merit of newly generated data, market opportunity or partnering options. MPC MSC MPC-150-IM TEMCELL® HS Inj MSC-100-IV MPC-06-ID MPC-300-IV Advanced (Class 3) HF End Stage (Class 4) HF1 Acute GVHD Chronic Low Back Pain RA DN/Type 2 Diabetes MPC MPC Acute GVHD Clinical trial is funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Health Research Institute. Japan |

The 21st Century Cures Act (“Cures Act”): Legislation for An Expedited Approval Path for Cellular Medicines Designated as Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapies (RMAT) Cellular medicines may be designated as regenerative advanced therapies, if they are intended to treat, modify, reverse, or cure a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and there is preliminary clinical evidence indicating the potential to address the unmet medical need Key benefits of the legislation for cell-based medicines, designated as regenerative advanced therapies, include: Potential eligibility for priority review and accelerated approval Potential to utilize surrogate endpoints for accelerated approval Potential to utilize a patient registry data and other sources of “real world evidence” for post approval studies, subject to approval by the FDA We Believe Our Portfolio of Advanced Product Candidates is Well Positioned to Achieve Accelerated Approvals Under the Cures Act |

Intellectual Property: An Extensive Portfolio Covering Composition of Matter, Manufacturing, and Therapeutic Applications of Potent Immuno-selected Mesenchymal Lineage Precursors and Progeny | ~ 800 Patents and patent applications across 69 Patent Families. Protection across major markets including the U.S., Europe, Japan and China

Diverse Pipeline of Cellular Medicines | 10

Acute Graft vs Host Disease (aGVHD) MSC-100-IV for Steroid-Refractory aGVHD |

Minimal Treatment Options Market Opportunity Burden of Illness Steroid-refractory aGVHD patients have mortality rates as high as 95%1 Refractory aGVHD is associated with significant extended hospital stay costs2 aGVHD - a severe immunological reaction occurring in BMT patients Is a major limitation in successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants1 No regulatory approved treatment for SR-aGVHD outside of Japan No broad consensus on off-label second-line agents Targeting Unmet Need Pediatrics: first-line steroid refractory Adults: first-line steroid refractory in high-risk (liver/gut disease) patients ~30,000 allogeneic BMTs performed globally (~20K US/EU5) annually, ~20% pediatric4,5 Our licensee JCR Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd received full approval in Japan (TEMCELL® HS Inj.) for aGVHD in 2015; reimbursed up to ~$USD195k3 MSC-100-IV: Market Opportunity for aGVHD West, J., Saliba, RM., Lima, M. (2011) Steroid-refractory acute GVHD: predictors and outcomes. Advances in Hematology. Anthem-HealthCore/Mesoblast claims analysis (2016). Based on a ¥JPY = $USD 0.009375 spot exchange rate on as of the market close on November 11, 2016. Amounts are rounded. Source: Bloomberg. Gratwohl A et al Quantitative and qualitative differences in use and trends of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a Global Observational Study. Haematologica. 2013 Aug;98(8):1282-90. CIBMTR, Decision resources GVHD Epi Nov 2012. |

MSC-100-IV for aGVHD: Product Development Strategy Extensive safety and efficacy data generated and published with MSC-100-IV in children with SR-aGVHD1 High economic burden in treatment of children with SR-aGVHD Fast-track designation for MSC-100-IV provides pathway for priority review and rolling review process Submit single, open-label Phase 3 trial via accelerated approval | Target pediatric patients with SR-aGVHD first Seek label extension for high-risk adult patients with SR-aGVHD (liver/gut disease) This adult subset has the highest mortality and greatest resistance to other treatment agents High economic burden in treating this population subset MSC-100-IV has identified efficacy signals in analyses of this subgroup in a Phase 3 randomized control trial Lifecycle potential in chronic GVHD (cGVHD) Chronic GVHD represents a distinct patient population Proof of concept data already published for MSC in cGVHD2 Allogeneic Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy (Remestemcel-L, Prochymal) as a Rescue Agent for Severe Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Patients - Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation Journal, August 2013. 2. Khandelwal P, Teusink-Cross A, Davies S (2017) Ruxolitinib as Salvage Therapy in Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 23; 1122-1127 Weng JY, Du X, Geng SX, Peng YW, Wang Z, Lu ZS et al. Mesenchymal stem cell as salvage treatment for refractory chronic GVHD. Bone Marrow Transplant 45: 1732-1740 (2010)

Complete Response was 14%, Partial Response was 51% Responses were observed for all GVHD grades and did not differ by baseline organ involvement Kurtzberg et al: Presentation Tandem Feb 2016 Population: steroid-refractory aGVHD pediatric patients 241 pediatric patients undergoing HSCT were enrolled and treated at 50 sites in North America and Europe from 2007-2014 Ages 2 months – 17 years Acute GvHD grades B-D (CIBMTR) Failed steroid treatment and multiple other agents aGVHD not improving after at least 3 days of methylprednisolone (at least 1 mg/kg/day or equivalent) MSC-100-IV: Expanded Access Program Overall Day 28 Response in Pediatric aGVHD Patients Receiving MSC-100-IV as First-line or Salvage Therapy After Failing Steroids |

MSC-100-IV: Expanded Access Program Correlation of Day 28 Overall Response with Day 100 Survival, Using MSC-100-IV as First-line or Salvage Therapy After Failing Steroids and/or Additional Treatments Kurtzberg et al: Presentation Tandem Feb 2016 MSC-100-IV in Children with SR-aGVHD who failed multiple other modalities - Survival of Pediatric Patients Treated with MSC-100-IV 28-Day Responders vs Non-responders n=241 In 241 Children under EAP, Overall Response (CR+PR) at Day 28 was 65% (95% CI: 58.9%, 70.9%) Day 100 survival correlated with overall response, and was significantly improved in those who responded at Day 28 (82% vs. 39%, p<0.0001) |

1.Protocols 275 (NCT00759018) and 280 (NCT00366145). MSC-100-IV as first line therapy in children with SR-aGVHD MSC-100-IV: Prior Clinical Results1 Support Ongoing Phase 3 Trial in Children with Steroid Refractory Acute GVHD (SR-aGVHD) These combined study results demonstrate that compared with placebo control patients, MSC-100-IV produced superior overall response at day 28, a clinically meaningful endpoint (p=0.0014) when used as first line therapy in these children with SR-aGVHD FDA agreement on ongoing Phase 3 trial design and its eligibility for accelerated approval pathway Enrollment criteria: MSC-100-IV being evaluated as first line therapy in children with SR-aGVHD |

MSC-100-IV: Phase 3 Pediatric Trial as First-line Therapy in aGVHD After Failing Steroids | Multi-center, Single-Arm, Open-Label to evaluate efficacy and safety to day 100 (001) and from day 100 to day 180 (002) Up to 60 pediatric patients (2 months to 17 years) aGVHD following allogeneic HSCT failing systemic corticosteroid therapy Grades C and D aGVHD involving skin, liver and/or GI tract Grade B aGVHD involving liver and/or GI tract with or without concomitant skin disease Primary endpoint: Overall response at Day 28 Key secondary endpoint: Survival at Day 100 in responders at Day 28 Interim futility analysis of primary endpoint successful Nov 2016 Enrollment Complete (Q4 CY17) Primary Endpoint Day 28 (Q1 CY18) Day 100 survival data (Q2 CY18)

MPC-150-IM Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) Program |

MPC-150-IM: Targeting Patients with Worsening HF Despite Optimal Standard of Care Source: Simon-Kucher & Partners 2017. Primary research 2017; Payers n=35, KOLs n=15, Cath lab managers n=4. Corlanor® (ivabradine) approved by FDA (April 2015). ENTRESTO® (sacubitril/valsartan) approved by FDA (July 2015). GlobalData-PharmaPoint Heart Failure (2016); McMurray et al., 2012;Yancy et al., 2013, 2016 ACC/AHAHFSA Focused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. Early ACEI or ARB Statins Beta blockers Re-vascularization or valvular surgery Advanced-Stage HF Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) End-Stage HF LVAD Heart transplants Pharmacological Add-on Diuretics for fluid retention Aldosterone antagonists Hydralazine / isosorbide dinitrate Digitalis New Oral Therapies2 If ACEI / ARB tolerated, ENTRESTO® (sacubitril/valsartan) If HR > 70 BPM, Corlanor® (ivabradine) Heart Failure Disease Progression Class I Class IV MPC-150-IM targets HFrEF NYHA Advanced-stage HF and End-stage HF patients3 Common Treatment Pathway in CHF1

Minimal Treatment Options Market Opportunity Burden of Illness Unmet Need MPC-150-IM: Class IV Market Opportunity 250K – 300K patients/yr suffer from advanced systolic HF (NYHA Class IV)1 50k patients/yr have end-stage heart failure Despite optimal medical therapy, 1-year mortality exceeds 50% in end-stage heart failure patients1 Only ~2K heart transplants are performed in U.S. annually due to limited donors2 LVADs have improved survival, but 1-year mortality remains at 20-30%1 Number of destination (permanent) LVADs implanted/yr are <5K due to associated high morbidity (e.g. GI bleeding and infection) Strengthen native heart muscle Reduce re-hospitalizations Increase survival Gustafsson G, Rogers J. (2017) Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes. European Journal of Heart Failure 19, 595-602., 2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: HCUPnet: ICD-9 principal procedure code 27.51 2014., 3. Medicare provider charge inpatient-DRGALL-FY2014., St. Jude Medical-2016-analyst and investor day US LVAD market growing double-digit CAGR4 US targeted commercial footprint (top 40 centers represent 75% of volume) provides low cost market entry3 |

LVAD MPC Pilot Trial Proof of Concept: Evaluating 25M MPCs as Adjunct to LVAD1-2 Assessed for eligibility (N=81) Randomized (n=30) Excluded (n=51) MPC (n=20) Control (n=10) Lost to follow-up (n=0) Did not receive intervention (n=1) Lost to follow-up (n=0) Analyzed (n=20) Analyzed (n=10) 57.4 yrs (±13.6) 83% Male LVEF 18.1% (± 4.3) 37% Ischemic, 63% Non-ischemic 67% Destination, 33% Bridge to Transplant Study is sponsored Mt. Sinai and funded by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Canadian Institutes for Health Research , and conducted by the NIH-funded Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN). Source: Ascheim DD et al. Circulation. 2014;129:2287-2296.

No cell-related safety events observed Median time to first hospitalization was 91 days in the MPC group vs 51 days in the control group 50% of MPC vs. 20% of control patients tolerated temporary wean at 90 days despite low dose of cells deployed Total number of temporary weans tolerated by MPC group was more than double that of the control group Using Bayesian approach, posterior probability that MPCs increased likelihood of successful wean at 90 days was 93% At 90 days, 30% (3/10) of controls expired compared to 0% (0/20) treated patients LVAD MPC Pilot Trial Outcomes: 25M MPCs Increased Ability to be Weaned off LVADs and Increased Short-Term Survival1 Source: Ascheim DD et al. Circulation. 2014;129:2287-2296. Control Group LVAD MPC Pilot Trial: 12 Month Survival MPC 25M Group Forward looking # of non-censured pts at risk of death: Survival (%) Months From Initial LVAD Implantation

MPC-150-IM: Phase 2b Trial Evaluating 150M MPCs in End-Stage Heart Failure Patients with LVADs The 159-patient, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2:1 randomized trial, is evaluating the safety and efficacy of injecting MPC-150-IM into the native myocardium of LVAD recipients Enrollment completed in Q3, CY2017 Primary efficacy endpoint of the study is the number of temporary weans from LVAD tolerated over 6 months Secondary efficacy endpoints over 12 months include: Time to re-hospitalization Patient survival Various quality of life measurements Study is sponsored by Icahn School of Medicine, funded by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Canadian Health of Research Institute, and conducted by the NIH-funded Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN) Phase 2B Class IV trial six-month primary endpoint reached (Q1 CY18) Phase 2B Class IV trial full data read-out (Q3 CY18)

MPC-150-IM: Commercial Strategy Leverage data for potential earlier market entry opportunity for MPC-150-IM in end-stage heart failure patients (more than 5K/yr) evaluate potential to reduce LVAD morbidity, increase survival and increase LVAD use as destination therapy (DT) targeted product launch strategy would require minimal investment (top 40 centers represent ~75% of volume)* if product strengthens native heart muscle, Bridge to Recovery (BTR) represents a future high-growth market opportunity for temporary LVAD use and explantation in end-stage, Class-IV heart failure patients (~50k/yr) In addition to the Class IV heart failure patients, we will seek to bridge to a larger Class III heart failure population via label extension using our Phase 3 results *Medicare provider charge inpatient-DRGALL-FY2014

Minimal Treatment Options Market Opportunity Burden of Illness Unmet Need Globally, 17-45% of heart failure patients die within 1 year of hospital admission Majority die within 5 years of admission1 MPC-150-IM to target advanced HFrEF NYHA Class II-III with the objective of reducing major cardiovascular events (e.g. mortality and hospitalizations) MPC-150-IM: Class III Heart Failure Market Opportunity Heart Failure: Preventing disease and death worldwide – European Society of Cardiology 2014., 2. ACC/AHAHFSA Focused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure., 3. Gurwitz JH, Magid DJ, Smith DH, et al. Contemporary Prevalence and Correlates of Incident Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction. The American Journal of Medicine. 2013;126(5):393-400. Derived by applying a HF-REF prevalence rate of 32.6% to the U.S. rate of 5.7m U.S. patients., 4.A Reevaluation of the Costs of Heart Failure and its Implications for Allocation of Health Resources in the United States. Voigt J. Clinl.Cardiol. 37, 5, 312-321 (2014)., 5.The Medical and Socioeconomic Burden of Heart Failure: A Comparative Delineation with Cancer. Dimitrios, F. International Journal of Cardiology (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.ijard.2015.10.172., Despite recent advancements in pharmacotherapy, limited treatment options are available for patients with advanced NYHA Class II-IV Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)2 Therapy that reduces major cardiovascular events (e.g. mortality and hospitalizations) in patients with advanced HFrEF NYHA Class II – III  NYHA Class II-IV patients with LVEF<40% in the US alone3 Over $60.2bn/yr in U.S. direct costs when this illness is identified as a primary diagnosis4 − $115bn as part of a disease milieu4; hospitalizations result in ~69% of expenditures5 |

MPC-150-IM: Durable (36 Months) Protection Against HF-MACE1 in Phase 2 Trial Following Single Dose in NYHA Class II/III With Reduced Ejection Fraction % HF-MACE Kaplan-Meier Curve over 36 months following treatment in all patients1 HF-MACE Kaplan-Meier Curve over 36 months following treatment in patients with LVESV>100ml2 1. HF-MACE is defined as a composite of cardiac related death or non-fatal heart failure hospitalisations. 2. Circ Res. 2015; 117:576-584. Perin E et al. A Phase II Dose-Escalation Study of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells in Patients With Ischemic or Non-Ischemic Heart Failure 3. Journal of Cardiac Failure 2015; Vol 21(8): S107; 19th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Heart Failure Society of America, Emerson et al. Over 36 months, patients receiving 150M MPC had significantly greater probability of remaining free of a first HF-MACE vs. controls (0% vs. 33%, p = 0.026 by log-rank) All HF-MACE events occurred in controls with baseline Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)>100ml, where the treatment effect size was even greater (0% vs. 71%, p = 0.0007 by log rank) Controls with baseline LVESV>100ml had 11 total/recurrent HF-MACE events over 36 months vs. 0 in matched patients receiving 150M MPCs (p=0.0007)

MPC-150-IM: Phase 3 Trial Targets Advanced Heart Failure NYHA class II/III patients with large baseline LVESV and advanced heart failure are at highest risk of heart failure-related major adverse cardiac events (HF-MACE) Have increased likelihood of having recurrent HF hospitalizations Existing therapies are limited and economic burden is greatest The ongoing Phase 3 trial is enriched for HF patients with high risk of HF-MACE Enrichment for these patients based on heart failure hospitalization in the past 9 months and/or significantly elevated baseline NT-proBNP Primary endpoint is a comparison of recurrent non-fatal HF-MACE between cell-treated NYHA class II/III patients and controls Terminal events (such as death, implantation of a mechanical heart assist device or a heart transplant) are also being analyzed as they relate to non- fatal recurrent HF-MACE

MPC-150-IM: Operational Update for Phase 3 Trial in NYHA Class II-III Advanced CHF Patients Trial has enrolled more than 400 of approximately 600 patients In April 2017, a pre-specified interim futility analysis of the efficacy endpoint in the Phase 3 trial's first 270 patients was successfully achieved After completing the interim analysis, the trial’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) formally recommended the trial be continued as planned Phase 3 trial targeted enrollment completion (2H CY18)

Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) Due to Disc Degeneration |

Minimal Treatment Options Market Opportunity Burden of Illness Unmet Need MPC-06-ID: a non-Opioid alternative for Chronic Low Back Pain due to Degenerative Disc Disease Back pain causes more disability than any other condition1 Inflicts substantial direct and indirect costs on the healthcare system1, including excessive use of opioids in this patient population Treatment options for patients with CLBP who fail conservative therapy include opioids and surgery 50% of opioid prescriptions are for chronic low back pain (CLBP) In 2016, over ~7m U.S. patients are estimated to suffer from CLBP due to degenerative disc disease (DDD)3,4,5 MPC-06-ID development program targets over ~3.2m patients Williams, J., NG, Nawi, Pelzter, K. (2015) Risk factors and disability associated with low back pain in older adults in low-and middle-income countries. Results from the WHO Study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE). PloS One. 2015; 10(6): e0127880., 2. Simon, J., McAuliffe, M., Shamim, F. (2015) Discogenic Low Back Pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 25 (2014) 305–317., 3.Decision Resources: Chronic Pain December 2015., 4. LEK & NCI opinion leader interviews, and secondary analysis., 5. Navigant: Commercial Assessment for a Proprietary Cell-Based Therapy for DDD in the U.S. and the EU3 – August 2014., 6. HealthCare Utilization and Cost of Discogenic Lower Back Pain in the US – Anthem/HealthCore. Disease modifying therapy for durable improvement in pain and function has potential to prevent progression to opioid use or surgical intervention |

The Opioid Epidemic | 50% of opioid prescriptions are for chronic low back pain (CLBP) Over 1,000 people are treated in U.S. emergency departments everyday for misusing prescription opioids Over 33,000 people in the U.S. died of prescription opioid related overdoses in 2016 Opioid epidemic declared a public health emergency by U.S. President Trump in October, 2017 A non-opioid solution for CLBP is imperative Information derived from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Underlying Cause of Death 1999-2015 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released December, 2016. Available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucdicd10.html Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Online Database, released September, 2016. Available at: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FFR1-2015/NSDUH-FFR1-2015/NSDUH-FFR1-2015.htm Jones CM. Heroin use and heroin use risk behaviors among nonmedical users of prescription opioid pain relievers - United States, 2002-2004 and 2008-2010. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Sep 1;132(1-2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Feb 12. The 21st Century Cures Act includes measures to combat opioid dependence and accelerated approval for non-opioid pain reducing drugs

MPC-06-ID: Phase 2 Trial Results Support Phase 3 Program 100 patients with >6 months of CLBP due to DDD and unresponsive to conservative therapies (incl. opioids and epidural steroids) were evaluated in a blinded, randomized, placebo controlled Phase 2 trial Pre-specified analyses for change in pain from baseline using VAS and change in function using ODI Primary endpoint composite over 24 months using pain and function thresholds (p<0.05 for 6 million MPCs vs saline using Intent to Treat Analysis and p=0.08 by Per Protocol Analysis)1 12.5% 17.7% 40.7% 34.6% 50.0% 45.0% 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% Saline Hyaluronic Acid 6-million MPC 18-million MPC Composite Responders at both 12 & 24 Months - PP1 % Responder Rate 1. Source Mesoblast Ltd; PP = Per Protocol population. A Composite Responder must have an optimal pain (50% reduction in VAS) AND function (15 point reduction in ODI) response AND no additional intervention. |

MPC-06-ID: Phase 2 Clinical Trial Results: Substantial Reduction in Low Back Pain Through 36 Months After Single Dose ITT Population. Subjects failing therapy due to intervention had BOCF imputed for all visits after the intervention. Patients with missing data were considered treatment failures, so BOCF imputed for all missing values. Abdel Shaheed Christina, Maher Chris G, Williams Kylie A, Day Richard, McLachlan Andrew J. Efficacy, Tolerability, and Dose-Dependent Effects of Opioid Analgesics for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine . American Medical Association; 2016 Jul 1;176(7):958-68. Substantial Clinical Improvement2 Minimal Difference2 # § # § * �� * �� * �� * MPC 6M vs. Saline �� MPC 18M vs. Saline # MPC 6M vs. HA § MPC 18M vs. HA p ≤ 0.05 | 33 Primary P2 endpoint

MPC-06-ID: Phase 2 Clinical Trial Results Reduction in Functional Disability Through 36 Months After Single Dose Minimal Difference2 Substantial Clinical Improvement2 FDA Functional Improvement Threshold ITT Population. Subjects failing therapy due to intervention had BOCF imputed for all visits after the intervention. Patients with missing data considered treatment failures, so BOCF imputed for all missing values. Abdel Shaheed Christina, Maher Chris G, Williams Kylie A, Day Richard, McLachlan Andrew J. Efficacy, Tolerability, and Dose-Dependent Effects of Opioid Analgesics for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine . American Medical Association; 2016 Jul 1;176(7):958-68. * p = 0.054 �� § �� * �� * * MPC 6M vs. Saline �� MPC 18M vs. Saline § MPC 18M vs. HA p ≤ 0.05 | 34

MPC-06-ID: Phase 3 Trial Update A 360-patient Phase 3 trial across U.S. and Australian sites Targeted to complete recruitment early Q1 CY18 FDA has provided written guidance: Use of a composite primary endpoint at 12 and 24 months is acceptable Agreed thresholds for pain (50% decrease in VAS) and function (15 point improvement in ODI) No additional intervention at the treated level through 24 months | If the P3 results replicate P2 results in pain and function, leverage this product candidate as a potential non-opioid treatment option for chronic low back pain

Our inflammatory diseases portfolio (MPC-300-IV) |

MPC-300-IV: Cellular product candidate that responds to multiple inflammatory signals Phase 2 Clinical Data in Immune Mediated Diseases 60 patients, type 2 diabetes with inadequately controlled glucose: Randomized, placebo controlled dose-ranging study completed Positive dose-dependent effects seen on reduction in HbA1c at 3 months1 30 patients, diabetic kidney disease: Randomized, placebo controlled dose-ranging study completed Positive effects seen on glomerular filtration rate and on inflammatory biomarkers over 6 months2 48 patients, biologic-refractory rheumatoid arthritis: Randomized, placebo controlled, dose-ranging study over 52 weeks | Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Safety and Tolerability Pilot Study - Diabetes Care, July 2015 Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells (MPC) in Diabetic Nephropathy: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Dose Escalation Study - E BioMedicine, October 2016

Treatment Options Market Opportunity Burden of illness Unmet Need MPC-300-IV: Biological Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Market Opportunity There are approx 6.0 million cases in the US, Japan, and EU5, with 2.9 million in the US alone in 20161,2 ~1/3 of RA patients do not respond or cannot tolerate TNF inhibitors4 Low disease activity or remission is seen in low numbers of patients refractory to TNF inhibitors treated with alternative biologic agents2 Need for disease-modifying therapies that are well tolerated and induce low disease activity or remission in a greater percentage of patients as early as possible in the disease management GlobalData©: Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Forecast 2015-2025 0- January 2017. Decision Resources Rheumatoid Arthritis Dec 2015. Decision Resources Rheumatoid Arthritis April 2016. Decision Resources: Unmet Need Immune and Inflammatory Disorders – Rheumatoid Arthritis April 2016. In 2016, sales of RA agents, predominantly TNF inhibitors exceeded $19 billion globally. Projections of over $22.5 billion by 2025, due to sales of oral JAK inhibitors, TNF biosimilars3 |

MPC-300-IV: Phase 2 Study Design Inclusion Criteria Inadequate response to at least 1 anti-TNF +/- other biologics On a stable regimen methotrexate for >4 months +/- DMARDs for >3 months Randomisation Scheme MPC 1 million cells/kg (N=16 ) MPC 2 x million cells/kg (N=16) Placebo (N=16) Objectives Primary: Safety and tolerability of a single intravenous MPC infusion through a 12-week primary endpoint Secondary: Clinical efficacy at week 4, 12, 39 and 52, primary efficacy endpoint at week 12 Pre-specified analyses were applied to the whole study population and the pre-specified exploratory subgroup based on whether the subjects had previously received 1-2 or >3 biologic agents and included: American College of Rheumatology (ACR 20/50/70, ACR-N) composite clinical responses Health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) Disease Activity Score (DAS28) composite measurement Short-form health survey (SF-36), an assessment of health-related quality-of-life *RF=Rheumatoid factor; anti-CCP=Cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody. ** ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01851070. |

MPC-300-IV: Phase 2 trial in biologic refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis shows early and durable effects after single dose Infusions were well-tolerated and there were no treatment-related serious adverse events reported, with the safety profile comparable among the placebo and two MPC treatment groups. A single intravenous MPC infusion in biologic refractory RA patients resulted in dose-related improvements in clinical symptoms, function, disease activity and patient-reported outcomes. Efficacy signals were observed for each of ACR 20/50/70, ACR-N, HAQ-DI, SF-36 and DAS-28 disease activity score. 2 million MPC/kg dose showed greatest overall treatment responses. Onset of treatment response occurred as early as 4 weeks, peaked at 12 weeks, was sustained through 39 weeks, and waned by 52 weeks. Greatest benefits over 52 weeks were seen in patients who had failed less than 3 biologics (1-2 biologic sub-group) prior to MPC treatment, identifying this as a potentially optimal target population. | Phase 2 trial clinical responses along with the safety profile position MPC-300-IV as an early treatment option in RA patients who are resistant or intolerant to anti-TNF or other biologics Future studies will evaluate whether higher doses can induce even greater rates of low disease activity or remission within 12 weeks

Financials & Milestones |

30 Sep 2017 30 Jun 2017 $Change Cash on Hand 62.9 45.7 17.2 Q1 FY18 Cash Position and Cash Flows for three months ending 30 Sep 2017 (US$m) Cash outflows from Operating activities have reduced 2.3% ($0.5 million) 30 Sep 2017 30 Sep 2016 $Change Operating cash outflows (20.3) (20.8) 0.5 Investing cash outflows (0.6) (0.3) (0.3) Financing cash inflows/(outflows) 38.4 (0.1) 38.5 Forex (0.3) 0.6 (0.9) Net increase (decrease) in cash 17.2 (20.6) 37.8 Cash on hand increased by $17.2 million (38%) due to net financing cash inflows of $38.4m in the quarter as a result of the successful September 2017 entitlement offer of 36.2 million shares

For the three months ending 30 Sep 2017 30 Sep 2016 $ Change % Revenue 1.2 0.4 0.8 197% Research and Development (15.4) (14.0) (1.4) (10%) Manufacturing Commercialization (0.9) (3.3) 2.4 73% Management & Administration (5.0) (5.5) 0.4 8% Contingent Consideration 9.5 (1.0) 10.5 NM Other Operating Income & Expenses 0.7 0.5 0.2 41% Loss Before Tax (9.9) (22.9) 13.0 57% Q1 FY18 - Profit and Loss for the three months ending 30 Sep 2017 (US$m) Revenue increased by $0.8 million (197%) vs comparative period in FY17 Commercialization revenue increased by 178% ($0.4 million) due to an increase in royalty income on sales of TEMCELL® Hs. Inj., versus the comparative period A sales milestone of $0.5 million was recognized as TEMCELL® Hs. Inj., reached a cumulative sales milestone in the three months ended 30 September 2017. No milestones were recognized in the comparative quarter

For the three months ending 30 Sep 2017 30 Sep 2016 $ Change % Revenue 1.2 0.4 0.8 197% Research and Development (15.4) (14.0) (1.4) (10%) Manufacturing Commercialization (0.9) (3.3) 2.4 73% Management & Administration (5.0) (5.5) 0.4 8% Contingent Consideration 9.5 (1.0) 10.5 NM Other Operating Income & Expenses 0.7 0.5 0.2 41% Loss Before Tax (9.9) (22.9) 13.0 57% Q1 FY18 - Profit and Loss for the three months ending 30 Sep 2017 (US$m) Overall management contained spend whilst increasing its R&D investment in Tier 1 clinical programs by deferring manufacturing production and constraining management and administration costs R&D expenses increased by $1.4 million (10%) as management invested in Tier 1 clinical programs Manufacturing Commercialization decreased by $2.4 million (73%) – sufficient clinical grade product on hand enabled the number of production runs to be reduced in the period vs the comparative quarter Management & Admin costs reduced by $0.4 million (8%) as management contained rent and IT costs

| MSC-100-IV for Pediatric Acute GVHD Phase 3 expected to complete enrollment (Q4 CY17) Day 28 primary endpoint data read-out (Q1 CY18) Day 100 survival data (Q2 CY18) MPC-150-IM for Advanced and End-Stage Heart Failure Phase 2B Class IV trial six-month primary endpoint reached (Q1 CY18)1 Phase 2B Class IV trial full data read-out (Q3 CY18)1 Phase 3 trial for Class II/III targeted enrollment completion (H2 CY18) MPC-06-ID for Chronic Low Back Pain Phase 3 trial expected to complete enrollment (early Q1 CY18) Potential Corporate Partnerships Targeted Upcoming Milestones and Catalysts Study is funded by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Canadian Health Research Institute (CHRI), and conducted by the NIH-funded Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN).