6-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 AND 15d-16

UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Period     August 2008                                   File No:  0-52400

Unbridled Energy Corp.   

(Name of Registrant)

Suite 400, 2424 4^th Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2S 2T4

 (Address of principal executive offices)

1.

Financial Statements (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

2.

Management Discussion and Analysis for the period ended June 30, 2008.

3.

Certification of CEO and CFO.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.           FORM 20-F XXX         FORM 40-F ____

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.     

Yes _____

No XXX

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Form 6-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Unbridled Energy Corp.        

(Registrant)

Dated:  August 15, 2008	Signed: /s/ J. Michael Scureman
	J. Michael Scureman Chief Financial Officer

EX-99.1

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008

 (Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

To the Shareholders of Unbridled Energy Corporation

These financial statements for the second quarter ended June 30, 2008, comprised of the balance sheet and the statements of operations and deficit as well as changes in cash flows, have been compiled by management.  These financial statements, along with the accompanying notes, have been reviewed and approved by the members of the Company’s audit committee.  In accordance with Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 51-102, the Company discloses that these unaudited financial statements have not been reviewed by the Company’s auditors.

Vancouver, BC

August 14, 2008

MANAGEMENT

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

ASSETS	June 30 2008	December 31 2007
Current
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 4,599,509	$ 509,382
Amounts receivable – Note 12	221,912	591,779
GST recoverable	13,648	482,458
Prepaid expenses and deposits	184,682	159,071
	5,019,751	1,742,690
Amounts receivable – Note 12	744,986	744,986
Funds held in Trust – Note 3	-	102,221
Reclamation deposits – Note 4	-	231,276
Other assets	92,580	-
Property and equipment – Notes 5 and 12	19,054,130	17,627,482
	$ 24,911,447	$ 20,448,655
LIABILITIES
Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities – Note 10	$ 1,131,414	$ 3,128,775
Unrealized financial instrument	139,083	-
Note payable – Note 6	-	49,565
	1,270,497	3,178,340
Bank loan – Note 7	3,857,015	3,055,682
Unrealized loss on hedge	72,048	-
Asset retirement obligation – Note 8	390,214	373,983
	5,589,774	6,608,005
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share capital – Note 9	30,905,382	23,522,495
Share subscriptions received	-	-
Contributed surplus – Note 9	2,705,400	2,485,337
Deficit	(14,289,109)	(12,167,182)
	19,321,673	13,840,650
	$ 24,911,447	$ 20,448,655

Nature of Operations and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern – Note 1

Commitments – Notes 5, 9 and 11

APPROVED BY THE DIRECTORS:
“Joseph H. Frantz Jr.”	Director	“Robert D. Penner”	Director
Joseph H. Frantz Jr.		Robert D. Penner

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND DEFICIT

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

	Second Quarter ended		Year to date ended
	June 30 2008	July 31 2007	June 30 2008	July 31 2007
Revenue
Oil and gas production          (net of royalties)	$ 213,005	$ 71,212	$ 394,054	$      203,157
Unrealized loss – commodity hedge	(211,131)	-	(211,131)	-
Interest	12,523	6,548	27,345	10,571
	14,397	77,760	210,268	213,728
Expenses
Accounting and audit fees – Note 10	60,154	58,675	70,728	103,962
Bank charges	566	937	1,507	1,498
Consulting – Note 10	54,191	176,311	156,829	365,578
Depletion, depreciation and accretion	83,785	24,126	167,367	106,900
Financial marketing	26,941	-	79,844	(78,265)
Foreign exchange loss	(5,984)	51,149	119,306	51,149
Investor relations	18,336	42,425	47,297	70,975
Interest and finance fees	49,843	-	104,616	-
Legal fees – Note 10	106,519	52,503	166,496	54,414
Office and miscellaneous	121,856	32,082	168,018	(189,534)
Payroll and benefits – Note 10	343,575	143,164	554,880	321,442
Production costs	36,691	44,064	123,905	145,288
Professional fees	50,220	-	62,171	12,200
Regulatory and transfer agent fees	8,750	7,696	18,648	(46,858)
Rent	55,763	55,070	94,572	134,459
Stock-based compensation – Note 9	110,771	319,679	220,063	1,101,078
Travel and promotion	91,159	250,187	175,947	372,393
	1,213,136	1,258,068	2,332,194	2,527,079
Loss before other items:	(1,198,739)	(1,180,308)	(2,121,926)	(2,313,351)
Write-down of oil and gas properties – Note 5	-	-	-	(5,184,841)
Loss before income taxes	(1,198,739)	(1,180,308)	(2,121,926)	(7,498,192)
Future income tax recovery	-	-	-	1,784,565
Net loss and comprehensive loss for the period	(1,198,739)	(1,180,308)	(2,121,926)	(5,713,627)
Deficit, beginning of the period	(13,090,369)	(6,802,147)	(12,167,182)	(2,268,828)
Deficit, end of the period	$ (14,289,108)	$ (7,982,455)	$ (14,289,108)	$(7,982,455)
Basic and diluted loss per share	$ (0.02)	$ (0.03)	$ (0.03)	$        (0.18)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding	61,560,107	42,787,046	61,560,107	42,787,046

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

	Second Quarter ended		Year to date ended
	June 30 2008	July 31 2007	June 30 2008	July 31 2007
Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	$ (1,198,739)	$(1,180,308)	$(2,121,926)	$ (5,713,627)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss       used in operations:
Future income tax recovery	-	-	-	(1,784,565)
Stock-based compensation	110,771	319,679	220,063	1,101,078
Write-down of oil and gas properties	-	-	-	5,184,841
Depletion, depreciation and accretion	83,785	24,126	167,367	106,900
Unrealized loss on commodity hedge	211,131	-	211,131	-
Changes in non-cash working capital balances related to operations:
Amounts receivable	(66,854)	(192,374)	369,867	(227,119)
GST recoverable	452,583	(16,465)	468,810	(31,495)
Prepaid expenses and deposits	(90,266)	(26,157)	(25,611)	(76,057)
Accounts payables and accrued liabilities	(1,403,518)	(215,256)	(2,046,929)	(641,214)
Asset retirement obligation	-	-	-	224,157
Due to a related party	-	-	-	-
	(1,901,107)	(1,286,755)	(2,757,228)	(1,857,101)
Investing Activities
Funds held in Trust	153,667	-	102,221	(111,010)
Other assets	83,677	-	(92,579)	-
Reclamation deposits	-	-	231,276	-
Acquisition of oil and gas properties	(1,497,526)	(476,581)	(1,562,082)	(3,253,340)
Acquisition of equipment	(7,802)	-	(15,701)	-
	(1,267,984)	(476,581)	(1,336,865)	(3,364,350)
Financing Activities
Advances from bank loan	(25,721)	-	801,333	-
Proceeds from note payable	-	-	-	-
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net	7,382,887	1,389,483	7,382,887	4,543,064
Share subscriptions received	-	(582,490)	-	-
	7,357,166	806,993	8,184,220	4,543,064
Increase (decrease)  in cash and cash equivalents	4,188,075	(956,343)	4,090,127	(678,387)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period	411,434	3,488,898	509,382	3,210,942
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$ 4,599,509	$  2,532,555	$   4,599,509	$ 2,532,555
Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:      Cash paid for:
Interest	$      49,843	$                 -	$     104,616	$               -
Income taxes	$                -	$                 -	$                -	$               -

(See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements)

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 1

Nature and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

Unbridled Energy Corporation (“the Company”) is engaged in the exploration for and the development of petroleum and natural gas in Canada and the United States.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia on October 6, 2003.  On July 19, 2006, the Company changed its name to Unbridled Energy Corporation.  These financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Management Discussion and Analysis as at and for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which assumes that the Company will be able to meet its obligations and continue its operations for its next fiscal year.  Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary to the carrying values and classification of assets and liabilities should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  At June 30, 2008, the Company had not yet achieved profitable operations, has accumulated losses of $14,289,108 and expects to incur further losses in the development of its business, all of which casts substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dep endent upon its ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due.

Note 2

Principles of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Unbridled Energy USA Inc., Unbridled Energy New York LLC, Unbridled Energy Ohio LLC and Unbridled Energy PA LLC.  All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.  

Note 3

Funds held in Trust

Funds held in Trust at December 31, 2007 - $102,221 represents a certificate of deposit, which has been assigned to the New York Department of Environmental Conservation as collateral for the Company’s Chautauqua Wells well plugging obligations.  The certificate of deposit bears interest at 4.59%.  At June 30, 2008 the funds held in trust was nil.

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

         Page 2

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

 (Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 4

Reclamation deposits

The amount of $nil (December 31, 2007 - $231,276) is a security deposit held in trust by the Alberta Energy Resources Conversion Board as financial assurance for possible reclamation liabilities.  The amount in trust is periodically reviewed and adjusted based on the financial status of the Company.

Note 5

Property and Equipment

	June 30, 2008
		Accumulated
		Depletion and
	Cost	Depreciation	Net
Petroleum and natural gas properties	$19,068,356	$ 245,003	$ 18,823,353
Leasehold improvements	223,869	63,264	160,605
Office equipment	86,800	16,628	70,172
	$19,379,025	$ 324,895	$ 19,054,130
	December 31, 2007
		Accumulated
		Depletion and
	Cost	Depreciation	Net
Petroleum and natural gas properties	$17,506,274	$ 124,558	$ 17,381,716
Leasehold improvements	213,412	39,057	174,355
Office equipment	81,556	10,145	71,411
	$17,801,242	$ 173,760	$ 17,627,482

The Company did not capitalize any general and administrative costs during the period ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007.  As at June 30, 2008, petroleum and natural gas properties include the cost of unproved properties in Canada and the USA in the amounts of $14,864,131 and $1,474,601 respectively (December 31, 2007 - $14,866,444 and $889,738), which has been excluded from the depletion calculation and future capital costs of $nil  (December 31, 2007 - $nil) have been included in the depletion calculation.  

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 3

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

 (Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 5

Property and Equipment – (cont’d)

Petroleum and Natural Gas Properties:

a)

Canada Oil and Gas Properties

i)

Chambers Property

By an agreement dated January 12, 2006, the Company acquired by assignment of a farm-out and participation agreement a 20% working interest in the Chambers Elkton well 3-17-4-11-W5 located in the Province of Alberta, Canada.  

As consideration for the assignment, the Company issued 3,000,000 common shares of the Company, valued at $3,750,000 and reimbursed $77,000 for seismic and completion costs incurred.  Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 25% of the cost of drilling, completing and abandonment costs on the well.  The working interest of 20% is subject to a combined 8.5% gross overriding royalty (“GORR”).

Pursuant to a separate purchase and sale agreement dated April 14, 2006, the Company acquired an additional 5% working interest and an 8% GORR on a 7% working interest in the same Chambers Elkton well.  As consideration, the Company paid $475,000.  The Company also agreed to acquire a 30% working interest in another well on the prospect, the Chambers 7-18 well.  

Pursuant to a separate Farm In and Option to Purchase Agreement dated April 18, 2007, the Company agreed to incur additional costs related to the drilling and completion, capping or abandoning of the Chambers 16-21-41-11 option well along with its joint venture partners for an interest in the 16-21 well and incremental earned interest in the Chambers 3-17 and Chambers 7-18 wells, which is to be determined based on the proportionate share of actual costs incurred.

At June 30, 2008 principal operations have not yet commenced and the Chambers property is considered to be in the preproduction stage.  To June 30, 2008, the Company has incurred costs, net of incidental revenues, of $14,864,131 for acquisition and drilling.

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

 Page 4

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 5

Property and Equipment – (cont’d)

Petroleum and Natural Gas Properties – (cont’d)

ii)

Tsuu T’ina First Nation Property

By an assignment and assumption agreement dated March 31, 2006, the Company secured the option to acquire up to a 50% participating interest in a joint venture with Arapahoe Energy Corporation (“Arapahoe”) in certain petroleum and natural gas rights on the Tsuu T’ina First Nation (Sarcee Indian Reserve) West of Calgary, Canada.  The Company agreed to pay $750,000 cash and reimburse Arapahoe up to a maximum of $2,000,000, finance a portion of the seismic program on the property and drill two test wells on the property.  To June 30, 2008, the Company has incurred costs, net of revenues, of $7,265,182 for acquisition and drilling.

At June 30, 2008 principal operations have not yet commenced and the Tsuu T’ina property is considered to be in the preproduction stage.  Management assessed the recoverability of this unproved property and recognized a write-down at December 31, 2007 - $2,080,341, which represented the remaining carrying value of the property.  The cumulative write-down is $7,265,182.   As at June 30, 2008 the Company has incurred acquisition and development costs of $2,435,716.

b)

US Oil and Gas Properties

i)

Oil and Gas Property, New York

By a purchase and sale agreement dated March 28, 2007, together with another agreement of the same date, the Company acquired a 50% interest in oil and gas leases located in the Chautauqua County, New York.  The property is in production and consists of 61 gross and approximately 29.65 net wells.  As at June 30, 2008 the Company has incurred acquisition and development costs of $2,626,981.

ii)

Oil and Gas Property, Ohio

By a Leasehold Acquisition, Ownership, Development and Operation Agreement dated March 31, 2007, as amended by a subsequent letter agreement dated May 1, 2007, the Company acquired approximately 15,500 net acres of oil and gas leases located in Jackson County, Ohio.  In December 31, 2007, the company acquired approximately 7,500 net acres in the region, for a total of approximately 23,000 net acres. At June 30, 2008, principal operations have not yet commenced and the property is considered to be in the pre-production stage.  As at June 30, 2008, the Company has incurred acquisition costs of $1,045,627.

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 5

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 6

Note Payable

		June 30		December 31
		2008		2007
HH Allegiance New York, LLC	$	-	$	49,565

The note payable is due to HH Allegiance New York, LLC, a joint venturer in the Chautauqua Wells, and is issued in connection with the purchase of a certificate of deposit and issuance of a letter of credit to collateralize well plugging obligations.    The note is unsecured and bears interest at 4.59%.  The principal is repayable following the satisfaction of any well plugging obligations on the wells to which the letter of credit is related to, the sale of the wells, or other event which terminates the obligation of the Company to maintain the certificate of deposit.  The note was paid back in full on April 23, 2008.  

Note 7

Bank loan

The Company executed a Business Loan Agreement and Promissory Note for letters of credit with Huntington National Bank.  Funds from this debt facility are being applied to the ongoing development of the Company’s existing reserve base in the Appalachian Basin, USA, further development of the Company’s project in the Chambers area of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, and for general corporate purposes. 

The facility provides for a borrowing base up to USD$6,000,000, as determined from time to time by the lender based on the Company’s oil and gas reserves.  At June 30, 2008, the available borrowing base was $4,163,460 (USD$4,200,000) and the Company has drawn $3,857,015 (USD$3,782,500) from the facility.

The loan bears interest of LIBOR plus 250 basis points (4.97125% as at June 30, 2008) and is repayable on November 16, 2009.  The loan is secured by the Company’s reserves in Chautauqua County, New York, USA. The Company is required to make monthly interest payments.  In the event that the loan balance exceeds the available borrowing base, the Company is required to reduce the loan balance by repaying the excess portion.

The loan includes certain non-financial and financial covenants, including but not limited to a requirement to maintain a minimum adjusted EBITDA to adjusted current liability ratio of 1.25:1.00, commencing six months after the Company begins selling gas from the Chambers 3-17 and Chamber 16-21 wells.

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 6

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 8

Asset Retirement Obligation

The following table presents the reconciliation of the carrying amount of the obligations associated with the retirement of the Company’s property and equipment:

	Three months ended March 31 2008	Three months ended April 30 2007	Six months ended June 30 2008	Six months ended July 31 2007
Asset retirement obligation, beginning of the period	$   382,116	$   250,482	$  373,983	$   26,325
Liabilities incurred	-	-	-	219,127
Accretion	8,098	3,210	16,231	8,240
Asset retirement obligation, end of the year	$   390,214	$    253,692	$   390,214	$   253,692

The following significant assumptions were used to estimate the asset retirement obligations:

	Six months ended June 30 2008	Six months ended July 31 2007
Credit-adjusted risk-free discount rate	6%	6%
Inflation rate	3%	3%
Expected timing of cash flows	Estimated year a well becomes uneconomic, 2008 to 2047

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 7

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

 (Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 9

Share Capital

a)

Authorized:

Unlimited common shares without par value

Unlimited preferred shares without par value

b)

Issued: common shares

	Number of Common Shares	Amount
Balance, April 30, 2006	16,169,166	$  6,635,943
Issue of shares for cash:
Private placements                             - at $1.05	7,700,000	8,085,000
- at $1.10	400,000	440,000
- at $0.70	3,931,800	2,752,260
- at $0.65	5,501,000	3,575,650
- at $0.55	665,000	365,750
- at $0.50	5,920,000	2,960,000
Pursuant to the exercise of warrants  - at $0.80	15,000	12,000
Issue of shares for a finders’ fee	163,830	104,673
Share issue costs	-	(1,432,141)
Tax effect of flow-through share renunciation	-	(1,784,565)
Balance, April 30, 2007	40,465,796	$ 21,714,570
Issue of shares for cash:
Private placements                            - at $0.50	2,735,000	1,367,500
- at $0.55	150,000	82,500
- at $0.45	1,183,172	532,427
Share issue costs	-	(174,502)
Balance, December 31, 2007	44,533,968	$ 23,522,495
Issue of shares for cash:
Private placements                            - at $0.30	19,964,350	5,989,305
Private placements                            - at $0.33	5,435,300	1,793,649
Share issue costs	-	(400,067)
Balance, June 30, 2008	69,933,618	$ 30,905,382

c)

Contributed surplus:

	June 30 2008	December 31 2007
Balance, beginning of period	$ 2,485,337	$1,531,650
Stock based compensation	220,063	897,088
Issuance of warrants	-	56,599
Balance, end of period	$  2,705,400	$  2,485,337

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 8

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 9

Share Capital – (cont’d)

d)

Escrow:

In accordance with an Escrow Agreement dated September 28, 2004, 3,701,666 common shares of the Company were subject to escrow and may not be transferred, assigned or otherwise dealt with without the consent of the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX”).  The release of these shares is subject to the approval of the TSX and may be released as to 10% upon the listing of the Company’ shares and 15% every six months thereafter until all the escrowed shares have been released from escrow.  At June 30, 2008 there are no shares held in escrow.

e)

Commitments:

i)

Stock-based Compensation Plan

The Company has granted share purchase options to directors, employees and consultants to purchase common shares of the Company.  These options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant.  Unless stated otherwise, the options vest as to 12.5% on TSX approval and 12.5% every three months thereafter until fully vested.  The maximum number of options outstanding is limited to 10% of the total shares issued and outstanding.  A summary of the status of the stock option plan as of June 30, 2008 and the changes during the period is as follows:

		Weighted
		Average
		Exercise
	Number	Price
Outstanding, April 30, 2006	650,000	$1.32
Granted	1,850,000	$1.35
Cancelled	(400,000)	$1.41
Outstanding, April 30, 2007	2,100,000	$1.33
Granted	1,015,000	$0.75
Cancelled	(350,000)	$1.35
Outstanding, December 31, 2007	2,765,000	$1.10
Cancelled	(550,000)	$1.32
Outstanding, June 30, 2008	2,215,000	$0.73
Exercisable, June 30, 2008	1,703,333	$0.74
Exercisable, December 31, 2007	1,647,500	$1.26

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 9

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

 (Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 9

Share Capital – (cont’d)

e)

Commitments:

i)

Stock-based Compensation Plan – (cont’d)

On June 19, 2008, the TSX approved the repricing of the Companies stock options to $0.75.  As at June 30, 2008, there are 2,215,000 share purchase options outstanding entitling the holders thereof the right to purchase one common share for each option held as follows:

Number of Options	Exercisable	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
50,000	37,500	$0.75	July 18, 2010
150,000	75,000	$0.50	October 15, 2010
100,000	100,000	$0.75	May 14, 2011
700,000	700,000	$0.75	August 17, 2011
400,000	400,000	$0.75	September 5, 2011
715,000	357,500	$0.75	July 18, 2012
100,000	33,333	$0.75	November 20, 2012
2,215,000	1,703,333

During the period ended June 30, 2008, stock-based compensation of $220,063 (July 31, 2007 - $1,101,078) was expensed by the Company.  

Assumptions used in determining the fair value of the options vested in the periods are as follows:

	June 30	July 31
	2008	2007
Weighted average fair value of options granted	$0.44	$0.99
Expected dividend yield	0.0%	0.0%
Expected volatility	100%	91%
Risk-free interest rate	4.50%	4.07%
Expected term	4.0 years	5 years

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 10

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

 (Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 9

Share Capital – (cont’d)

e)

Commitments – (cont’d)

ii)

Share Purchase Warrants

Warrant transactions and the number of warrants outstanding are summarized as follows:

	June 30 2008		December 31 2007
		Weighted		Weighted
		Average		Average
	Number of	Exercise	Number of	Exercise
	Warrants	Price	Warrants	Price
Balance, beginning of year	17,165,577	$0.89	18,286,255	$1.12
Granted	10,460,053	$0.45	4,089,322	$0.81
Exercised	-	$     -	-	$     -
Expired/cancelled	-	$     -	(5,210,000)	$1.65
Balance, end of year	27,625,630	$0.72	17,165,577	$0.89

At June 30, 2008, the following share purchase warrants were outstanding and exercisable:

Number of Shares	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
400,000	$1.31	September 19, 2008
1,183,172	$0.75	October 26, 2008
5,477,720*	$1.00	December 13, 2008
588,466*	$0.70	December 13, 2008
50,659*	$0.70	December 29, 2008
175,000*	$1.00	February 8, 2009
26,250*	$0.70	February 8, 2009
456,050*	$0.55	April 27, 2009
5,932,110*	$0.85	April 27, 2009
171,150	$0.85	May 17, 2009
2,735,000	$0.85	May 17, 2009
10,460,053	$0.45	November 7, 2009
27,625,630

* During the term of these warrants if the common shares of the Company close at or above $1.85 (affecting 6,388,160 warrants) or $2.00 (affecting 6,288,095 warrants) per share for more than 20 consecutive trading days, then the Company, at its option, will be entitled to accelerate the expiry of the warrants at that time to a term of 30 calendar days.  

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 11

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

 (Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 10

Related Party Transactions

The Company incurred the following costs and expenses with a company with a common director, and directors and officers of the Company:

	June 30 2008	July 31 2007
Administration, dues & memberships	$                -	$       15,839
Consulting	71,324	30,990
Legal fees	23,342	20,766
Payroll and benefits	183,972	-
	$     278,638	$       67,595

These charges were in the normal course of operations and were measured by the exchange amount, which is the amount agreed upon by the transacting parties.  

Included in payroll and benefits noted above were directors fees of $41,972 and the cost of the employment contract to terminate an officer of the Company $142,000 (July 31, 2007 - $nil).  Included in consulting noted above were management fees of $nil (July 31, 2007 - $15,000).

Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is $10,197 due to directors for directors fees (July 31, 2007 - $nil).  The payables are unsecured with no specific terms of repayment.  

Note 11

Commitments

The Company has committed to annual minimum rental payments (excluding operating costs and other fees) for office premises as follows:

2008	$    114,091
2009	228,682
2010	240,394
2011	178,683
2012	158,112
Thereafter	158,112
	$  1,078,074

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 12

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

 (Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 12

Amounts Receivable

During the period ended December 31, 2007, the Company’s major joint venture partner in the Chambers prospect failed to perform financially with regard to their obligations under signed authorizations for expenditures totalling $2,194,986.  The Company is now exercising its rights under the Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen Operating Procedure agreement to recover this amount, including setting off Altima’s share of income from the Chambers 3-17 well and initiating a legal action to sell Altima’s interest in the prospect to reduce the receivable.  

Given the uncertainty regarding the collectibility of the accounts receivable, the Company has recorded $1,150,000 as petroleum and natural gas costs during the period ended December 31, 2007 to reflect additional costs which the Company has borne on drilling this well. Any recovery will be recorded as a reduction of the petroleum and natural gas properties in the period that it occurs.  At June 30, 2008, $744,986 is included in amounts receivable due from Altima. The total receivable from the joint venture partner at June 30, 2008 is approximately $2.0 million.

Note 13

Financial Instruments

a)

Fair Values of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Financial instruments consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, amounts receivable, funds held in trust, reclamation deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, bank loan and note payable.  At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there are no significant differences between the carrying amounts reported on the balance sheet and their estimated fair values.  

b)

Credit Risk

Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held at chartered banks and as such the Company is exposed to the risks of the institutions.  

The majority of the amounts receivable is in respect of oil and natural gas operations.  The Company generally extends unsecured credit to these customers and, therefore, the collection of accounts receivable may be affected by changes in economic or other conditions and may, accordingly, impact the Company’s overall credit risk.  Management believes the risk is mitigated by the size and reputation of the companies to which they extend credit.  The Company has not experienced any material credit loss in the collection of receivables in the past other than with Altima which has been allowed for (Note 12).  

UNBRIDLED ENERGY CORPORATION

        Page 13

NOTES TO THE INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 and July 31, 2007

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

Note 13

Financial Instruments – (cont’d)

c)

Commodity Price Risk

The Company’s operations are exposed to commodity price fluctuations.  Management monitors commodity prices and initiates instruments to manage exposure to these risks when it deems appropriate through the use of financial derivative sales contracts.  The Company’s contracts in place at June 30, 2008 are as follows:

Contract Type	Volume (GJ/d)	Pricing Point	Price ($Cdn/GJ)	Term
Fixed price	6000		$8.27	Jul 08 – Feb 10

As at June 30, 2008 the unrealized loss on the commodity hedge was $211,131.

d)

Foreign Exchange Risk

The Company is exposed to fluctuations in the rate of exchange in respect of its US operations.  A portion of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and bank loan are denominated in US dollars and, consequently, the Company is subject to the risk of fluctuating foreign exchange rates.  

Note 14

Geographic Segments

The Company has one segment and operates in two geographic regions as follows:

	June 30 2008
	Canada	United States	Total
Oil and gas revenue, net	$       142,049	$       252,005	$       394,054
Property and equipment	$  15,025,079	$    4,029,051	$  19,054,130

	December 31 2007
	Canada	United States	Total
Oil and gas revenue, net	$                  -	$       192,654	$     192,6543
Property and equipment	$  15,080,632	$    2,546,850	$  17,627,482

Note 15

Subsequent Event

On July 15, 2008 the Company granted incentive stock options to certain employees, directors, senior officers and a consultant to purchase up to 1,660,000 shares at $0.35 per share, and 100,000 shares at $0.75 per share.  These stock options are exercisable up to July 14, 2013.

The Company completed the purchase of a 50% WI in 22 wells in Chautauqua County on July 9, 2008.  The agreement is for the Company to spend $500,000 to work over and/or recomplete certain of the purchased wells to improve production.  Such work is expected to begin during Q3.  Furthermore, the Company obtained the option to purchase an additional 25% WI in the deep rights to the 13,280 acres originally purchased in New York.

EX-99.2

Unbridled Energy Corporation

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Form 51-102F1

For the Period Ended June 30, 2008

Prepared on August 14, 2008

Unbridled Energy Corporation

Management's Discussion & Analysis

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2008

Change in fiscal year end

Effective for the year ending December 31, 2007, the Company changed its year end to December 31 from April 30. Information reported for the second quarter 2008 is compared to the three month period May 1, 2007 to July 31, 2007.

General

The following management discussion and analysis of the financial position of Unbridled Energy Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries should be read in conjunction with the consolidated Financial Statements for the first quarter ended June 30, 2008, the consolidated Financial Statements for the three-month period ended July 31, 2007 and the consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended December 31, 2007.  The Company’s Financial Statements and related notes are presented in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.  All currency amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.

The Company is a public company traded on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol “UNE” and is exploring and developing its oil and gas properties.  The recoverability of amounts shown for oil and gas properties is dependent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves and confirmation of the Company’s interest in the oil and gas properties, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to complete the development of the properties and upon future profitable production or proceeds from the disposition of the properties.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, on October 6, 2003 as Leroy Ventures Inc. and on July 19, 2006, the Company changed its name to Unbridled Energy Corporation.

Forward Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in the following Management Discussion and Analysis constitute forward looking statements. Such forward looking statements involve a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Unbridled Energy Corporation to be materially different from actual future results and achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statements were made. Readers are also advised to consider such forward looking statements while considering the risks set forth below.

Overall Performance

The Company issued 19,964,350 units consisting of one common share and one-half share purchase warrant at $0.30 per unit pursuant to a private placement that closed on May 8, 2008 for gross proceeds to the Company of $5,989,305 and issued 5,435,300 flow-through common shares at $0.33 per share for gross proceeds of $1,793,649.  Each whole warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one common share at $0.45 per share and has an eighteen month expiry.  The Company  paid finders fees of $ 369,791 and issued 477,884 warrants to acquire common shares at $0.45 per share for a period of eighteen months.  Sprott Asset Management purchased approximately 19% in the Company in this Private Placement.  

At the end of June 30, 2008 the Company had working interests (“WI”) of between 25% and 50% in three wells (3-17, 7-18, and 16-21) on the Chambers Property in Alberta, Canada.  The 3-17 well was placed into test production on November 7, 2007, and it produced gas and condensate sporadically in November and December as a result of hydrates forming in the tubing and around the production facility.  A choke (a down hole tool to augment production where condensate is present) was installed in the well in late December and it allowed the well to produce continuously in January and most of February.  Through June 2008 the well has produced 66,198 gross mcf and 2,962 bbls of condensate and other hydrocarbon liquids (20,411 net mcf and 913 net bbls).  On July 1, 2008 the Company installed a string of small diameter coiled tubing into the well to help keep the gas and condensate producing at maximum rates.  The downhole choke was e ffective at eliminating the hydrates, but reduced the condensate production.  The well was returned to production at a rate of  500 mcf/d and 25 bbls/d of condensate.  After the well has been in production for a period of time a reserve estimate will be calculated based upon production from the well.   The Company’s WI in the 3-17 well is 32.49%.  

The Company completed drilling the 16-21 well on the Chambers property at the end of September 2007. In December, the Elkton reservoir was perforated and flow tested for one day, followed by a multi-week pressure buildup.  Based on the analysis of the flow and buildup data, the Elkton contains a large volume of gas in place, but lower permeability, and thus requires a stimulation treatment to justify laying a 4 mile pipeline.  However, the Company is waiting for its joint venture partner to either raise funds for their share of the stimulation or sell their interest before proceeding.  A pipeline may be run to the well after depending upon the results of the stimulation.  The Company is in discussions with third party mid-stream pipeline companies to pay for and install the pipeline since it will serve as a gathering line for future wells.  Current plans call for the stimulation and pipeline installation to occur i n Q3 2008.  The 16-21 well also encountered numerous gas bearing sands and a shale as potential additional future targets.  

The Company has decided to defer laying the pipeline to the 7-18 well and is evaluating several different completion options to improve the economics of this well.  

During the last two months of 2007, our major joint venture partner in the Chambers prospect failed to perform financially with regard to its obligations under signed authorizations for expenditures (AFEs).  This has resulted in the Company being owed approximately $2.0 million from the joint venture partner as of June 30, 2008.  The Company is exercising its rights under the Canadian Association of Petroleum Landmen Operating Procedure (CAPL) agreement to recover this amount, including setting off the partner’s share of income from the 3-17 well and initiating a legal action to sell the joint venture partner’s interest in the prospect to reduce the receivable.  

The Company has initiated a legal action against Canadian Phoenix Resources Corp. (CPR) (formerly Arapahoe Energy Corporation), the operator of and the Company’s co-joint venture participant in the Tsuu T’ina prospect, for the purpose of obtaining a complete accounting of all joint interest billings and to recover funds owed to the Company by CPR, estimated to be between $350,000 to $1,300,000, as a result of project account billing discrepancies.  CPR has denied the Company’s claim.  Because CPR refused to provide the Company with a full accounting for the Tsuu T’ina project, the Company is not presently able to confirm the exact amount owing.

The Tsuu T’ina prospect has been written off of the Company’s books as of December 31, 2007. The Company has evaluated the prospect and has determined as a result of the poor drilling results that it no longer is interested in pursuing oil and gas operations on this prospect.

In the United States (USA), the Company has a WI in 61 older gross wells (29.65 net wells) in Chautauqua County, New York.  During the six months ended June 30, 2008, these wells produced approximately 56,000 gross mcf and 500 bbls of oil gross, representing approximately  23,000 mcf and 210 bbls net to the Company’s interest.  On July 9, 2008 the Company successfully completed negotiations for the purchase of a 50% working interest in 22 additional wells, plus additional acreage and the deep rights across all of the Company’s Chautauqua County, New York acreage.  The agreement calls for the Company to spend $500,000 to workover a number of the purchased wells to improve production, plus a payment of $137,000 for an additional 25% working interest in the deep rights.  Such work is expected to begin in Q3.

As of August 14, 2008, 6 wells have been drilled with our joint venture partners on the Chautauqua County acreage.  The Company is testing the Medina formations with an advanced completion and stimulation technique to propagate longer, propped fractures.  All six wells have been completed and turned into production during Q2 at rates averaging approximately 100 mcf/d per well.  The wells tested at rates of 250 to 650 mscf/d after stimulation.  Once the wells have been in production for several months the reserve report will be updated for all wells in New York.  Up to 15 additional wells are in the process of being permitted on the Company’s approximate 14,000 acre lease position in Ellery and Villenova Townships.  The Company continues to acquire new leases in Chatauqua County, NY with mineral interests to basement.  The NRI for the new leases is approximately 87.5%.

The Company partnered with Schlumberger Data and Consulting Services to acquire new micro-seismic data on its Chautauqua Lake property in New York.  The project was conducted for the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) under a US$150,000 grant agreement.  The project collected new reservoir and hydraulic fracture information in the Grimsby, Whirlpool, and Devonian shales in Chautauqua County from the Mittlefehdlt #1 to optimize future hydraulic fracture treatments.  Until now, this region of New York has not been characterized significantly.  The project included collecting advanced logs, core, and micro-seismic data.  Schlumberger provided the technical analysis for the project.  The project identified a new shale interval that appears prospective based on Schlumberger’s initial log and core analysis.  The Company will announce the discovered resource estimates after S chlumberger completes their log and core interpretation.  There are plans to stimulate the interval in one or more existing wells in 2008 to determine its economic viability.  Finally, the Company is evaluating the potential to drill horizontal wells in the Medina and shale intervals.  

The Company owns 50% WI in approximately 29,000 acres in Jackson County Ohio.  Equitable Production Company, a unit of Equitable Resources, Inc. (NYSE: EQT) signed an agreement with the Company to be a joint interest partner in this prospect.   Associated with the Jackson County acreage, the Company agreed to sell a 50% WI to Equitable on the conditions that Equitable drills, completes, and production tests three horizontal wells into the Devonian Shale. The three well drilling program was completed during Q2 with Equitable earning its 50% WI in all acreage in the AMI.    The first well in Ohio, the Rapier #D1-16, was spudded on April 24, 2008 and was drilled to total depth in five days.  An eight stage well stimulation treatment using the Packers Plus system has been performed for the Rapier #D1-16.  The second well (S & D Enterprise #D3-30) was spudded on April 29, 2008 and reached total depth on May 6, 2008. &n bsp;A seven stage well stimulation treatment using the Packers Plus system was performed on this well.  The drilling rig moved to the third location (Dempsey #D4-4) on May 8 and finished drilling on May 12, 2008.  Subsequently, the well was stimulated using the Packers Plus system an eight stage stimulation treatment.  All three of the wells are currently being flow tested to determine the economic value of this new play.  Additional wells could be drilled between Q4 2008 and Q1 2009 if economics support future development.

The Company and Equitable have joined in an 11 township Area of Mutual Interest, and leasing continues in this area.  

The Company continues to evaluate opportunities to purchase additional acreage in Canada and in the USA, in addition to joint venture opportunities with other operators.   Unbridled is in negotiations with several potential joint venture partners in Appalachia to enter the Marcellus Shale play.  

Results of Operations

Oil and Gas Operations

Reserve estimates prepared for the Company as of December 31, 2007 by Schlumberger Data & Consulting Services (“Schlumberger”), an independent qualified reserve estimator, report net 32 billion cubic feet (“bcf”) and 13,800 barrels of oil net to the Company of P3 (proven probable possible) reserves.  The possible reserves included in the P3 reserves are estimated at net 23.9 bcf.  It is the Company’s intention, as operator, to apply recent advances in proven technology to develop this reserve base.  Readers are directed to the Company’s Form 51-101F1 Statement of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information and related public filings for the period ended December 31, 2007 for additional details on the Company’s reported reserves.

Canada

As of June 30, 2008, the Company owns or controls the following oil and gas interests in the Province of Alberta, Canada:

a)

CHAMBERS PROPERTY

By an agreement dated January 12, 2006, the Company acquired by assignment of a farm-out and participation agreement, a 20% WI in the Chambers 3-17-41-11 W5M well, which was subsequently increased to include an additional 5% WI and the overriding royalty payable to the farmor pursuant to the said farmout and participation agreement and a 50% BPO interest in the Chambers 7-18-41-11 W5M well.  This increase in interest was achieved through the acquisition of White Max Energy Ltd.’s entire interest in the Chambers area (White Max is a Calgary, Alberta based private E&P company).

The Company currently owns a 32.49% WI in the Chambers 3-17-41-11 W5M well.  This well was placed into test production in November 2007.  The next test well was the 16-21 well, which was drilled and reached total depth in September 2007.  This new pool well was drilled to the top of the Shunda formation and encountered multiple gas bearing formations to an approximate depth of 3,300 metres. The Company completed the lower carbonate Elkton formation in the first half of December.  Additional drilling opportunities exist based on the success in the 3-17 well.  The Company also discovered a new organic shale formation to test in 2008.  The shale is present across the entire acreage of Chambers.  The Company holds 12,160 gross acres and 3,872 net acres with an option on another 1,920 acres in the Chambers/Ferrier area.  

b)

TSUU T’INA FIRST NATION RESERVE

The Company has abandoned this prospect as a result of three uneconomic wells being drilled on the property.

United States

As of June 30, 2008, the Company owns or controls the following oil and gas interests in the USA:

a)

CHAUTAUQUA LAKE PROPERTIES, CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY, NEW YORK

On April 2, 2007, the Company purchased a 50% WI in 13,280 gross acres, in the State of New York.  This property, with modest production, was primarily acquired to develop proven, probable, and possible undeveloped unconventional natural gas reserves in tight gas sand and shale reservoirs.  

Since purchasing the property, the Company has completed workovers on 12 wells to improve production from existing completed intervals. In addition, during the month of July, 2008 two wells have been recompleted in the Medina formation, and two additional recompletions are scheduled for August, 2008.  Pipeline shut-ins and high line pressures have restricted production in NY this summer and fall.  

The Company has completed a field-wide geologic, reservoir, completion, and stimulation study.  These studies will establish the most effective technology for the ongoing development of these reserves and the best location for the first group of new wells.  As of August 14, 2008 six wells have been drilled to test the Medina formation in Ellery Township.    

The Company completed the purchase of a 50% WI in 22 wells in Chautauqua County on July 9, 2008.  The agreement is for the Company to spend $500,000 to work over and/or recomplete certain of the purchased wells  to improve production.  Such work is expected to begin during Q3.  Furthermore, the Company obtained the option to purchase an additional 25% WI in the deep rights to the 13,280 acres originally purchased in New York.  The Company will coordinate the completion of the new wells with the recompletion of older wells in formations that have not been completed.

b)

OHIO RIVER PROSPECT, OHIO

During 2007, the Company purchased 100% WI in approximately 23,000 acres in Jackson County, Ohio through an arm’s-length transaction with a third party.  The Devonian group of shale reservoirs and the Clinton tight gas sand are available to exploit natural gas.  A geologic study has been completed to help high grade the first three drilling locations.

The Company entered into a joint venture agreement establishing an eleven township Area of Mutual Interest (AMI) with Equitable to partner on drilling three horizontal test wells in the second quarter 2008 in the Devonian shales in south central Ohio.  The agreement requires Equitable to invest up to $1.8 million to drill, complete and test three horizontal wells on the Company’s approximate 23,000 acre land position; in exchange Equitable will earn a 50% WI in the Company’s Jackson County, Ohio holdings.    Three wells have been drilled and completed, and Equitable has earned its 50% share in the leases in the AMI.  Additional acreage has been leased in the AMI with Equitable.

            The Company signed a Purchase and Sale agreement to acquire two existing wells completed in the Clinton sandstone formation and an option to purchase 2,000 additional acres.  The transaction includes pipeline access to sell gas from a portion of the Company’s lands in Ohio.  One of the wells will be re-entered and drilled horizontally by Equitable Production Company (see (b) above).  This purchase will be rolled into the joint venture agreement with Equitable.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent to the period ended June 30, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors  granted incentive stock options to  certain employees, senior officers, directors and a consultant of the Company to purchase up to 1,660,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.35 per share, and 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The options vest one third on January 15, 2009, one third on July 15, 2009 and one third on January 15, 2010 and are subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s Share Option Plan. The stock options are exercisable up to July 14, 2013.

The Company completed the purchase of a 50% WI in 22 wells in Chautauqua County on July 9, 2008.  The agreement is for the Company to spend $500,000 to work over and/or recomplete certain of the purchased wells to improve production.  Such work is expected to begin during Q3.  Furthermore, the Company obtained the option to purchase an additional 25% WI in the deep rights to the 13,280 acres originally purchased in New York.

Risks and Uncertainties

Mining and oil and gas companies face many and varied kinds of risks in exploration activities. While risk management cannot eliminate the impact of all potential risks, the Company strives to manage such risks to the extent possible and practical.   The principal activity of the Company is now oil and gas exploration and it is inherently risky.  Exploration is also capital intensive and the Company currently has no source of income other than those described above. Only the skills of its management and staff in mineral exploration and exploration financing serve to mitigate these risks and therefore are one of the main assets of the Company.

Following are the risk factors which the Company’s management believes are most important in the context of the Company’s business. It should be noted that this list is not exhaustive and that other risk factors may apply. An investment in the Company may not be suitable for all investors.

Exploration Risks

The business of exploring for oil and gas involves a high degree of risk. Due in some cases to factors that cannot be foreseen, only a small proportion of the properties that are explored worldwide are ultimately developed into marketable resources. At the present, only the Chautauqua Lake wells in New York have marketable reserves and the proposed programs are an exploratory search for proven or probable reserves which can be marketed. The 3-17 well is in test production.  The 16-21 well is capable of producing gas, but not currently at rates that justify laying a 4 mile pipeline.  A stimulation treatment is planned for the 16-21 in Q3 2008.  Both the 3-17 and 16-21 wells have additional gas behind pipe to be exploited in the future.  The areas presently being assessed by the Company may not contain economically recoverable volumes of oil or gas. The operations of the Company may be disrupted by a variety of risks and hazards which are beyond the control of the Company, including labour disruptions, the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labour and other risks involved in the conduct of exploration programs. Once economically recoverable reserves are found, substantial expenditures are required to establish a marketing process.  The economics of developing oil and gas properties is affected by many factors including the cost of operations, fluctuations in the price of the commodities produced, costs of processing equipment, pipeline shut-ins and high line pressure and such other factors as government regulations, including regulations relating to environmental protection.

Financing Risks

The Company has limited financial resources, has limited sources of operating cash flow and has no assurance that additional funding will be available to it for further exploration and development of its projects. Further exploration and development of one or more of the Company’s properties will be dependent upon the Company’s ability to obtain financing through joint venturing, equity or debt financing or other means, and although the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing through the sale of equity securities, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain adequate financing in the future or that the terms of such financing will be favorable. Failure to obtain such additional financing could result in delay or indefinite postponement of further exploration and development of its projects.

Competition

The Company competes with many companies that have substantially greater financial and technical resources than the Company for the acquisition and exploration of oil and gas properties as well as for the recruitment and retention of qualified employees.

Environment and other Regulatory Requirements

The activities of the Company are subject to environmental regulations promulgated by government agencies from time to time. Environmental legislation generally provides for restrictions and prohibitions on spills, releases or emissions of various substances produced in association with certain oil and gas industry operations.  Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which means stricter standards, and enforcement, fines and penalties for non-compliance are more stringent. Environmental assessments of proposed projects carry a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and directors, officers and employees. The cost of compliance with changes in governmental regulations has a potential to reduce the profitability of operations.

Companies engaged in exploration activities generally experience increased costs and delays as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permits. There can be no assurance that all permits which the Company may require for exploration and development of its properties will be obtainable on reasonable terms or on a timely basis, or that such laws and regulations would not have an adverse effect on any project that the Company may undertake. The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all material laws and regulations which currently apply to its activities. However, there may be unforeseen environmental liabilities resulting from exploration activities and these may be costly to remedy.

Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions there under, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities casing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. Parties engaged in exploration operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of the exploration activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations and, in particular, environmental laws.

Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of exploration companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on the Company and cause increases in expenditures and costs or require abandonment or delays in developing new properties.

Title matters

Title to and the area of oil and gas concessions may be disputed. Although the Company has taken steps to verify the title to properties in which it has an interest, in accordance with industry standards for the current state of exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee the Company’s title. Property title may be subject to unregistered prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.

Dependence on Key Personnel

The Company’s development to date has largely depended, and in the future will continue to depend, on the efforts of key management. Loss of any of these people could have a material adverse effect on the Company and its business. The Company has not obtained key-person insurance in respect of any directors and other employees.

Share Price Fluctuations

In recent years, the securities markets have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies, particularly those considered development-stage companies such as the Company, have experienced wide fluctuations in price which have not necessarily been related to the underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. Price fluctuations will continue to occur in the future.

No Dividends

Investors cannot expect to receive a dividend on their investment in the Company in the foreseeable future, if ever. Investors should not expect to receive any return on their investment in the Company’s securities other than possible capital gains.

Competitive Conditions

The oil and gas business is competitive in all phases of exploration, development and production. The Company competes with a number of other entities in the search for and the acquisition of productive oil and gas properties. As a result of this competition, the majority of which is with companies with greater financial resources than the Company, the Company may be unable to acquire attractive properties in the future on terms it considers acceptable. Finally, the Company competes with other resource companies, many of whom have greater financial resources and/or more advanced properties that are better able to attract equity investments and other capital.

The ability of the Company to acquire properties depends on its success in exploring and developing its present properties and on its ability to select, acquire, and bring to production suitable properties or prospects for oil and gas exploration and development.  Factors beyond the control of the Company may affect the marketability of resources discovered by the Company.  Oil and gas prices have historically been subject to fluctuations and are affected by numerous factors beyond the control of the Company.

Summary of Quarterly Results

The following is a summary of selected financial data for the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2008, and the previous seven reporting  periods.

Item	2008 June 30 Q2	2008 Mar. 31, Q1	2007 Dec. 31, 2 Months*	2007 Oct. 31, Q2	2007 Jul. 31, Q1	2007 Apr. 30, Q4	2007 Jan. 31, Q3	2006 Oct. 31, Q2
Cash and cash equivalents	4,599,509	411,434	509,382	762,169	2,643,565	3,488,898	3,210,942	139,946
Working capital	3,888,337	(1,407,792)	(1,435,650)	(1,131,527)	2,128,228	2,523,310	1,719,721	(1,505,659)
Total revenues	14,397	195,872	63,558	68,832	77,760	135,968	27,225	22,707
Net loss	1,198,739	923,187	3,085,432	1,099,295	1,180,308	4,532,959	406,898	558,953
Loss per share and diluted loss per share	0.02	0.02	0.07	0.03	0.03	0.17	0.01	0.02
Total assets	24,911,447	19,826,538	20,448,655	20,268,443	18,189,392	18,455,073	20,457,288	15,192,184
Total long-term financial obligations	4,319,277	4,264,852	3,429,665	256,527	253,692	250,482	26,325	26.325

*Due to change in year end to December 31, only 2 months in this period.

Corporate Structure

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia on October 6, 2003.  On July 19, 2006, the Company changed its name from Leroy Ventures Inc. to Unbridled Energy Corporation.  The Company’s head office is located at 2424 4^th Street SW, Calgary, Alberta T2S 2T4.  Unbridled Energy USA, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company  with its office at 2100 Georgetowne Drive, Suite 301, Sewickley, Pennsylvania 15143, USA.  Subsidiaries of Unbridled Energy USA, Inc. are Unbridled Energy New York LLC, Unbridled Energy Ohio LLC and Unbridled Energy PA LLC, all maintaining their office at 2100 Georgetowne Drive, Suite 301, Sewickely, Pennsylvania 15143, USA.  The results of all subsidiaries have been consolidated in the financial reports of the Company.

Unbridled Energy’s registered and records office is located in the offices of Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP, Suite 3000, 1055 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 3R3.

SELECT ANNUAL INFORMATION

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $4,599,509 (December 2007: $509,382) in cash and cash equivalents and a working capital of $3,888,338 (December 2007: $(1,435,650)).  The Company executed a Business Loan Agreement and Promissory Note for $6 million USD with Huntington National Bank, headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, on November 16, 2007.  The initial lending base is $4.2 million USD.  Funds from this debt facility will be applied to the ongoing development of the Company’s existing reserve base in the Appalachian Basin, USA, further development of the Company’s project in the Chambers area of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, and general corporate purposes.  Interest will be charged on the outstanding principal at a rate of LIBOR plus 250 basis points.  The loan is secured by the Company’s reserves in Chautauqua County, New York, USA.  At June 30, 2008, the Company had drawn on its loan facility $3,857,015 (December 2007 - $3,055,682) and its credit and interest rate risk are limited to interest bearing assets of cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments.  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are short-term and non-interest bearing.

The results of operations reflect the costs of oil and gas property acquisitions, exploration expenses, plus costs incurred by the Company to maintain its properties in good standing with the various regulatory authorities, and for administrative infrastructure to manage the acquisition, exploration, and financing activities of the Company.  General and administrative costs can be expected to increase or decrease in relation to the changes in activity required as property acquisitions and exploration continue.  General and administrative costs are reduced by interest earned on bank accounts and short term investments.  During the period ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded net revenue of $213,005 (July 2007 - $71,212) from its oil and gas properties.  

Period of three months ended June 30, 2008 versus three months ended July 31, 2007 for oil and gas expenditures

	June 30                2008  $	July 31                2007  $
Acquisition costs	539,866	54,703
Asset retirement obligation costs	-	-
Drilling	854,987	282,332
Equipment	102,673	1,350
Geological and geophysics	-	19,625
General exploration expenses	7,802	97,657
	-	-
Total Oil and Gas Property Costs	1,505,328	455,667

The general and corporate expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 were $1,045,066 (July 31, 2007: $1,138,729).  The significant expenses are as per the following table:

	3 Months ended	3 Months ended
	June 30	July 31
General and Corporate	2008  $	2007  $
Financial marketing	26,941	-
Accounting and audit fees	60,154	58,675
Bank charges	566	937
Consulting	54,191	176,311
Investor relations	18,336	42,425
Legal fees	106,519	52,503
Office and miscellaneous	121,856	32,082
Payroll and benefits	343,575	143,164
Professional fees	50,220	-
Regulatory and transfer agent fees	8,750	7,696
Rent	55,763	55,070
Stock-based compensation	110,771	319,679
Travel and promotion	87,424	250,187
	$ 1,045,066	$ 1,138,729

In general, the General Corporate activity costs increased compared to the previous year due to increased activities in a number of categories.  These categories all increased due to the increased level of corporate and field activity as a result of the increase in oil and gas acquisitions and exploration and the requirement for additional personnel and office facilities. Included in Payroll and benefits for the three months ended June 30, 2008 is $204,000 of cost relating to a reduction of staff and the cost associated with the employment contracts of the affected personnel.

LIQUIDITY

General

The activities of the Company, principally the acquisition and exploration of mineral and oil and gas properties, are financed through the completion of equity offerings involving the sale of equity securities.  These equity offerings generally include private placements and the exercise of warrants and options.  Since the Company is a junior resource exploration company, the Company does not have the usual ability to generate sufficient amounts of cash and cash equivalents in the short term.  To maintain the Company's capacity, to meet planned growth, or to fund further development activities, the Company must utilize its current cash reserves, income from investments, and cash from the sale of securities.  This may change in the future if the Company is successful in realizing income from its carried interests in its recently acquired oil and gas properties.  The Company is currently investigating the use of vari ous financing alternatives to fund the development of the Company’s properties.

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $4,599,509 in cash and cash equivalents (December 31, 2007: $509,382) and a working capital of $3,888,337 compared to December 31, 2007 working capital of ($1,435,650).

There are 27,625,630 shares issuable from outstanding warrants (December 31, 2007: 17,165,577) at exercise prices from $0.45 to $1.31, which if fully exercised, would raise $19,984,387 (December 31, 2007: $15,220,865).  There are also 2,215,000 share purchase options outstanding (December 31, 2007: 2,765,000) with a weighted average exercise price of $0.73 which would contribute $1,623,750 (December 31, 2007: $3,041,500) if exercised in full.

The Company’s acquisition costs for resource properties for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $1,577,783 (July 2007: $3,253,340) as a result of the oil and gas property acquisitions.  The Company had debt of $3,857,015 as of June 30, 2008.  The Company’s credit and interest rate risk are limited to interest bearing assets of cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments.  Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are short-term and non-interest bearing.  The line of credit with Huntington Bank bears interest at the rate of the London Interbank Offer Rate plus 250 basis points.

Other

There are no defaults or arrears or anticipated defaults or arrears on dividend payments, lease payments, interest or principal payment on debt, debt covenants, and redemption or retraction or sinking fund payments.  There have been no unusual or infrequent events or transactions over the past year.

Liquidity risk with financial instruments is minimal as excess cash is invested in highly liquid securities.  Receivables are comprised primarily of joint interest billings (the receivable from our joint venture partner is approximately $2.0 million) and GST receivable of $13,648 as of June 30, 2008.  

In terms of the Company’s ability to generate sufficient amounts of cash and cash equivalents, sources of funding are limited to private and/or public placements and debt financing since the Company is a junior exploration company with limited revenues from its New York property at this time.  The main circumstance that could change this would be additional revenues when the Company starts producing the Chambers 16-21 and 7-18 wells in Canada, plus drilling/completing a successful new well in Chambers, plus drilling new wells on its New York and Ohio properties.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s capital expenditure commitments as of the fiscal period ended June 30, 2008 is dependent on a number of factors.  The discovery, development and acquisition of mineral and oil and gas properties are in many instances unpredictable events. Future commodity prices, the success of exploration programs and other property transactions can have a significant impact on capital requirements. The Company expects to receive significant income from its oil and gas properties in the near future but there is no assurance that this will be the case.  Should the Company decide to further develop any of its properties or acquire new properties, the Company may fund its capital requirements by arranging further equity financing, issuing long term debt, arranging joint ventures with other companies, or through a combination of the above.

The principal activity of the Company is oil and gas exploration and development and it is inherently risky.  Exploration is also capital intensive and the Company currently has no source of income other than those described above.  Only the skills of its management and staff in oil and gas exploration and exploration financing serve to mitigate these risks and therefore are one of the main assets of the Company.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTION

The Company has not entered into any off-balance sheet transactions.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

During the period, the Company had the following transactions with officers and directors and other companies with which officers or directors are related:

	June 30 2008	July 31 2007
Consulting	$ 71,324	$ 30,990
Legal fees	23,342	20,766
Administration, dues & memberships	-	15,839
Payroll and benefits	183,972	-
	$ 278,638	$ 67,595

These charges were in the normal course of operations and were measured by the exchange amount, which is the amount agreed upon by the transacting parties.  

Included in payroll and benefits noted above were directors fees of $41,972 (July 31, 2007 - $nil) and the cost of an employment contract with an officer of the company that terminated employment during the quarter in the amount of $142,000 (July31, 2007 – nil).

Included in consulting noted above were management fees of $nil (July 31, 2007 - $15,000).

Included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is $10,197 due to directors for directors fees (July 31, 2007 - $nil).  The payables are unsecured with no specific terms of repayment.  

Commitments

The Company has committed to annual minimum rental payments (excluding operating costs and other fees) for office premises as follows:

2008	$    114,091
2009	228,682
2010	240,394
2011	178,683
2012	158,112
Thereafter	158,112
	$  1,078,074

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Changes in Accounting Policies including Initial Adoption

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted five new Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (“CICA”) accounting standards: (a) Handbook Section 1530, Comprehensive Income; (b) Handbook Section 3855, Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement; (c) Handbook Section 3861, Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation; (d) Handbook Section 3865, Hedges; and (e) Handbook Section 1506, Accounting Changes. The main requirements of these new standards and the resulting financial statement impact are described below.

Consistent with the requirements of the new accounting standards, the Company has not restated any prior period amounts as a result of adopting the accounting changes. The effect of the adoption of these standards is summarized below:

(i) Comprehensive Income, Section 1530:

This standard requires the presentation of a statement of comprehensive income and its components.  Comprehensive income includes both net earnings and other comprehensive income.  Other comprehensive income includes holding gains and losses on available for sale investments, gains and losses on certain derivative financial instruments and foreign currency gains and losses relating to self-sustaining foreign operations, all of which are not included in the calculation of net earnings until realized. The adoption of this section had no impact upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

(ii) Financial Instruments – Recognition and Measurement, Section 3855:

This standard sets out criteria for the recognition and measurement of financial instruments for fiscal years beginning on or after October 1, 2006. This standard requires all financial instruments within its scope, including derivatives, to be included on the balance sheet and measured either at fair value or, in certain circumstances when fair value may not be considered most relevant, at cost or amortized cost. Changes in fair value are to be recognized in either the Statements of Operations or the statement of comprehensive income.

All financial assets and liabilities are recognized when the Company becomes a party to the contract creating the item. As such, any of the Company’s outstanding financial assets and liabilities at the effective date of adoption are recognized and measured in accordance with the new requirements as if these requirements had always been in effect.

All financial instruments are classified into one of the following five categories: held-for-trading, held to maturity, loans and receivables, available for sale financial assets, or other financial liabilities. Initial and subsequent measurement and recognition of changes in the value of financial instruments depends on their initial classification:

• Held to maturity investments, loans and receivables, and other financial liabilities are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost. Amortization of premiums or discounts and transaction costs are amortized into net earnings (loss), using the effective interest method.

• Available for sale financial assets are measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded in other comprehensive income until the asset is realized, at which time they will be recorded in net earnings (losses).

• Held for trading financial instruments is measured at fair value. All gains and losses resulting from changes in their fair value are included in the Statements of Operations in the period in which they arise.

• All derivative financial instruments are classified as held for trading financial instruments and are measured at fair value, even when they are part of a hedging relationship. All gains and losses resulting from changes in their fair value are included in the Statements of Operations in the period in which they arise.

In accordance with this new standard, the Company has classified its financial instruments as follows:

- Amounts receivable are classified as loans and receivables.  They are recorded at cost, which on initial recognition represents their fair value.  Subsequent valuations are recorded at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

- Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, note payable and bank loan are classified as other liabilities.  They are initially measured at fair value.  Subsequent valuations are recorded at amortized cost using the effective interest method.  

The adoption of this section had no impact upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of May 1, 2007.

(iii) Financial Instruments – Disclosure and Presentation, Section 3861:

This standard sets out standards which address the presentation of financial instruments and non-financial derivates, and identifies the related information that should be disclosed. These standards also revise the requirements for entities to provide accounting policy disclosures, including disclosure of the criteria for designating as held-for-trading those financial assets or liabilities that are not required to be classified as held-for-trading; whether categories of normal purchases and sales of financial assets are accounted for at trade date or settlement date; the accounting policy for transaction costs on financial assets and financial liabilities classified as other than held-for-trading; and provides several new requirements for disclosure about fair value.   

The Company has chosen to recognize all transaction costs in the Statements of Operations on financial liabilities that have been designated as other than held for trading.  

(iv) Hedging, Section 3865:

This standard specifies the circumstances under which hedge accounting is permissible and how hedge accounting may be performed. The Company currently has entered into a contract through Lenape Resources Inc. as its agent to sell a portion of its natural gas production to National Fuel Resources at the rate of $8.27/mcf through the month of February, 2010.  Unrealized gains and losses are included in the Statement of Operations.

 (v) Accounting Changes, Section 1506:

Section 1506 revised the standards on changes in accounting policy, estimates or errors to require a change in accounting policy to be applied retrospectively (unless doing so is impracticable or is specified otherwise by an new accounting standard), changes in estimates to be recorded prospectively, and prior period errors to be corrected retrospectively. Voluntary changes in accounting policy are allowed only when they result in financial statements that provide reliable and more relevant information. In addition, these revised standards call for enhanced disclosures about the effects of changes in accounting policies, estimates and errors on the financial statements. The impact of this new standard cannot be determined until such time as the Company makes a change in accounting policy, other than the changes resulting from the implementation of the new CICA Handbook standards discussed in this note.

Oil and Gas Properties

The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas operations whereby all costs of exploring for and developing petroleum and natural gas reserves are initially capitalized.  Such costs include land acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenses, carrying charges on non-producing properties, costs of drilling and overhead charges directly related to acquisition and exploration activities.  These capitalized costs, together with the costs of production equipment, are depleted and amortized on the unit-of-production method based on the estimated gross proved reserves as determined by independent petroleum engineers.  Petroleum products and reserves are converted to a common unit of measurement on the basis of their relative energy content where six thousand cubic feet of gas equals to one barrel of oil.  

Costs of acquiring and evaluating unproved properties are initially excluded from depletion calculations. These unevaluated properties are assessed periodically to ascertain whether impairment has occurred.  When proved reserves are assigned or the property is considered to be impaired, the cost of the property or the amount of the impairment is added to costs subject to depletion calculations.

Environmental and Land Reclamation Costs

The Company recognizes the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred and records a corresponding increase in the carrying value of the related long-lived asset.  The fair value is determined through a review of engineering studies, industry guidelines and management’s estimate on a site-by-site basis.  The liability is subsequently adjusted for the passage of time and is recognized as an accretion expense in the Statements of Operations.  The liability is also adjusted due to revisions in either the timing or the amount of the original estimated cash flows associated with the liability.  The increase in the carrying value of the asset is amortized using the unit of production method based on estimated gross proved reserves as determined by independent engineers.  Actual costs incurred upon settlement of the asset retirement obligations are charged agains t the asset retirement obligation to the extent of the liability recorded.  

Financial Instruments

a) Fair Values of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Financial instruments consist mainly of cash and cash equivalents, amounts receivable, funds held in trust, reclamation deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, bank loan and note payable.  At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there are no significant differences between the carrying amounts reported on the balance sheet and their estimated fair values.  

b)  Credit Risk

Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents are held at chartered banks and as such the Company is exposed to the risks of the institutions.  

The majority of the amounts receivable is in respect of oil and natural gas operations.  The Company generally extends unsecured credit to these customers and, therefore, the collection of accounts receivable may be affected by changes in economic or other conditions and may, accordingly, impact the Company’s overall credit risk.  Management believes the risk is mitigated by the size and reputation of the companies to which they extend credit.  

c)  Commodity Price Risk

The Company’s operations are exposed to commodity price fluctuations.  Management monitors commodity prices and initiates instruments to manage exposure to these risks when it deems appropriate.  

d)  Foreign Exchange Risk

The Company is exposed to fluctuations in the rate of exchange in respect of its US operations.  A portion of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and bank loan are denominated in US dollars and, consequently, the Company is subject to the risk of fluctuating foreign exchange rates.

Shares data - issued and outstanding

As at June 30, 2008, the Company had 69,933,618 shares issued and outstanding and 99,774,248 fully diluted shares outstanding.  As at the date of this MD&A, the total number of shares issued and outstanding is 69,933,618 and the Company has 3,975,000 options outstanding, of which 1,703,333 are exercisable.  The exercise prices and the respective numbers of options at August 14, 2008 are listed as below:

Number of Options	Exercisable	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
50,000	37,500	$0.75	July 18, 2010
150,000	75,000	$0.50	October 15, 2010
100,000	100,000	$0.75	May 14, 2011
700,000	700,000	$0.75	August 17, 2011
400,000	400,000	$0.75	September 5, 2011
715,000	357,500	$0.75	July 18, 2012
100,000	33,333	$0.75	November 20, 2012
100,000	-	$0.75	July 14, 2013
1,660,000	-	$0.35	July 14, 2013
3,975,000	1,703,333

At August 14, 2008 the following share purchase warrants were outstanding and exercisable:

Number of Shares	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
400,000	$1.31	September 19, 2008
1,183,172	$0.75	October 26, 2008
5,477,720*	$1.00	December 13, 2008
588,466*	$0.70	December 13, 2008
50,659*	$0.70	December 29, 2008
175,000*	$1.00	February 8, 2009
26,250*	$0.70	February 8, 2009
456,050*	$0.55	April 27, 2009
5,932,110*	$0.85	April 27, 2009
171,150	$0.85	May 17, 2009
2,735,000	$0.85	May 17, 2009
10,460,053	$0.45	November 7, 2009
27,625,630

* During the term of these warrants if the common shares of the Company close at or above $1.85 (affecting 6,388,160 warrants) or $2.00 (affecting 6,288,095 warrants) per share for more than 20 consecutive trading days, then the Company, at its option, will be entitled to accelerate the expiry of the warrants at that time to a term of 30 calendar days.  

Disclosure for Venture Issuers without Significant Revenue

Additional disclosure concerning the Company’s general and administrative expenses and resource property costs is provided in the Company’s consolidated Statement of Operations and the accompanying notes contained in its consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2008 that is available on its SEDAR Page Site accessed through www.sedar.com.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosures in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and other key management personnel have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as at June 30, 2008, to provide reasonable assurance that all material financial information relating to the Company was made known to the CEO and CFO by others within the Company in order for them to complete their analysis and review of the financial position and results of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008.

The Company evaluated the design of its internal controls over financial reporting as defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 for the period ended June 30, 2008 and based on this evaluation have determine these controls to be effective except as noted in the following paragraph.

This evaluation of the design of internal controls over financial reporting for the Company resulted in the identification of internal control deficiencies which are not atypical for a company of this size including lack of segregation of duties due to a limited number of employees dealing with accounting and financial matters and insufficient in-house expertise to deal with complex accounting, reporting and taxation issues.  Until additional competent personnel are recruited, the internal control deficiencies noted above will continue to exist.

Approval

The disclosure contained in this annual MD&A has been approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and its Board of Directors.  

This MD&A is available on Unbridled’s SEDAR Page Site accessed through www.sedar.com.

Dated August 14, 2008

________________________________________

EX-99.3

#

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

VENTURE ISSUER BASIC CERTIFICATE

I, Joseph H. Frantz Jr., President & Chief Executive Officer of Unbridled Energy Corporation, certify the following:

.

Review:  I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together the interim filings) of Unbridled Energy Corporation (the issuer) for the interim period ending June 30, 2008.

.

No misrepresentations:  Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the interim filings.

.

Fair presentation:  Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

Date:

August 14, 2008

“Joseph H. Frantz Jr.”

Joseph H. Frantz Jr,

President & Chief Executive Officer

NOTICE TO READER

In contrast to the certificate required under Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (MI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in MI 52-109.  In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of:

()

controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

()

a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

The issuer’s certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in MI 52-109 may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.

CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

VENTURE ISSUER BASIC CERTIFICATE

I, J. Michael Scureman, Chief Financial Officer of Unbridled Energy Corporation, certify the following:

.

Review:  I have reviewed the interim financial statements and interim MD&A (together the interim filings) of Unbridled Energy Corporation (the issuer) for the interim period ending June 30, 2008.

.

No misrepresentations:  Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the interim filings.

.

Fair presentation:  Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial statements together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

Date:

August 14, 2008

“J. Michael Scureman”

J. Michael Scureman,

Chief Financial Officer

NOTICE TO READER

In contrast to the certificate required under Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (MI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in MI 52-109.  In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of:

()

controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

()

a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.

The issuer’s certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in MI 52-109 may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.