10-Q 1 a07-11182_110q.htm 10-Q

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)

x                              QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2007

Or

o                                 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                to

Commission File Number: 000-51802


MORGANS HOTEL GROUP CO.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

 

16-1736884

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)

475 Tenth Avenue
New York, New York

 

10018

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

212-277-4100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x  Yes  o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See the definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerate filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  o

Accelerated filer  o

Non-accelerated filer  x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes  o  No  x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of May 8, 2007 was 31,992,506.

 




TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

 

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

Item 1.

 

Financial Statements

 

1

 

 

 

Morgans Hotel Group Co. Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

1

 

 

 

Morgans Hotel Group Co. and Predecessor Consolidated/Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss

 

2

 

 

 

Morgans Hotel Group Co. and Predecessor Consolidated/Combined Statements of Cash Flows 

 

3

 

 

 

Notes to Consolidated/Combined Financial Statements

 

4

 

Item 2.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

20

 

Item 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

37

 

Item 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

 

38

 

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

Item 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

 

39

 

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

 

41

 

Item 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

41

 

Item 3.

 

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

41

 

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

41

 

Item 5.

 

Other Information

 

41

 

Item 6.

 

Exhibits

 

42

 

 




Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for “forward-looking statements” made by or on behalf of a company. We may from time to time make written or oral statements that are “forward-looking” including statements contained in this report and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in reports to our stockholders. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause our actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expected results include changes in economic, business, competitive market and regulatory conditions. Important risks and factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the factors discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K set forth under the section titled “Risk Factors” and in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”; downturns in economic and market conditions, particularly levels of spending in the business, travel and leisure industries; hostilities, including future terrorist attacks, or fear of hostilities that affect travel; risks related to natural disasters, such as earthquakes and hurricanes; the  integration of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas with our existing business; the seasonal nature of the hospitality business; changes in the tastes of our customers; increases in real property tax rates; increases in interest rates and operating costs; the impact of any material litigation; general volatility of the capital markets and our ability to access the capital markets; and changes in the competitive environment in our industry and the markets where we invest.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results.

Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects are set forth in the Risk Factors section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, beginning on page 16 of that report. The factors set forth in the Risk Factors section could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those contained in any forward-looking statement contained in this report.




PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.                        Financial Statements

Morgans Hotel Group Co.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

March 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net

 

 

$

499,324

 

 

 

$

494,537

 

 

Goodwill

 

 

73,698

 

 

 

73,698

 

 

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

110,523

 

 

 

30,400

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

 

9,606

 

 

 

27,549

 

 

Restricted cash

 

 

29,325

 

 

 

24,368

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

10,222

 

 

 

9,413

 

 

Related party receivables

 

 

3,937

 

 

 

2,840

 

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

8,666

 

 

 

8,175

 

 

Escrows and deferred fees—Hard Rock investment

 

 

 

 

 

62,550

 

 

Other, net

 

 

21,687

 

 

 

24,476

 

 

Total assets

 

 

$

766,988

 

 

 

$

758,006

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

$

581,024

 

 

 

$

553,197

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

36,944

 

 

 

35,039

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

8,362

 

 

 

10,166

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

17,410

 

 

 

16,841

 

 

Total liabilities

 

 

643,740

 

 

 

615,243

 

 

Minority interest

 

 

19,989

 

 

 

20,317

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, and 33,500,000 shares issued at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively

 

 

335

 

 

 

335

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

141,162

 

 

 

138,840

 

 

Treasury stock, at cost, 1,507,494 and 336,026 shares of common stock at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively

 

 

(26,240

)

 

 

(5,683

)

 

Comprehensive loss

 

 

(2,491

)

 

 

(1,103

)

 

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(9,507

)

 

 

(9,943

)

 

Stockholders’ equity

 

 

103,259

 

 

 

122,446

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

 

$

766,988

 

 

 

$

758,006

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated/combined financial statements.

1




Morgans Hotel Group Co. and Predecessor
Consolidated/Combined Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)

 

 

Morgans Hotel
Group Co.
Three Months
Ended 
March 31, 2007

 

Morgans Hotel
Group Co.
Period from
February 17, 2006
to March 31, 2006

 

The Predecessor
Period from
January 1, 2006
to February 16,
2006

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

$

45,263

 

 

 

$

19,074

 

 

 

$

17,742

 

 

Food and beverage

 

 

25,557

 

 

 

10,850

 

 

 

11,135

 

 

Other hotel

 

 

3,646

 

 

 

2,292

 

 

 

1,645

 

 

Total hotel revenues

 

 

74,466

 

 

 

32,216

 

 

 

30,522

 

 

Management fee-related parties

 

 

3,956

 

 

 

1,185

 

 

 

1,022

 

 

Total revenues

 

 

78,422

 

 

 

33,401

 

 

 

31,544

 

 

Operating Costs and Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

12,627

 

 

 

4,963

 

 

 

5,098

 

 

Food and beverage

 

 

17,542

 

 

 

6,568

 

 

 

7,494

 

 

Other departmental

 

 

2,027

 

 

 

1,401

 

 

 

619

 

 

Hotel selling, general and administrative

 

 

15,358

 

 

 

6,371

 

 

 

6,841

 

 

Property taxes, insurance and other

 

 

5,697

 

 

 

1,653

 

 

 

2,024

 

 

Total hotel operating expenses

 

 

53,251

 

 

 

20,956

 

 

 

22,076

 

 

Corporate general and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

2,322

 

 

 

1,052

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

6,733

 

 

 

2,007

 

 

 

2,611

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

4,807

 

 

 

2,295

 

 

 

3,030

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

67,113

 

 

 

26,310

 

 

 

27,717

 

 

Operating income

 

 

11,309

 

 

 

7,091

 

 

 

3,827

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

10,599

 

 

 

8,048

 

 

 

6,537

 

 

Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

(238

)

 

 

614

 

 

Minority interest in joint ventures

 

 

1,102

 

 

 

837

 

 

 

568

 

 

Other non-operating (income) expenses

 

 

(5,723

)

 

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax expense and minority interest

 

 

677

 

 

 

(1,589

)

 

 

(3,892

)

 

Income tax provision

 

 

228

 

 

 

10,661

 

 

 

90

 

 

Income (loss) before minority interest

 

 

449

 

 

 

(12,259

)

 

 

(3,982

)

 

Minority interest

 

 

13

 

 

 

(356

)

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

436

 

 

 

(11,903

)

 

 

(3,982

)

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized (loss) gain on interest rate swap

 

 

(1,218

)

 

 

630

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

 

 

(170

)

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

 

 

$

(952

)

 

 

$

(11,254

)

 

 

$

(3,982

)

 

Income (loss) per share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted

 

 

$

0.01

 

 

 

$

(0.36

)

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

 

32,436

 

 

 

33,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted

 

 

32,749

 

 

 

33,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated/combined financial statements.

2




Morgans Hotel Group Co. and Predecessor
Consolidated/Combined Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

 

 

Morgans Hotel
Group Co.
Three Months
Ended
March 31,
2007

 

Morgans Hotel
Group Co.
Period from
February 17,
2006 to
March 31,
2006

 

The
Predecessor
Period from
January 1,
2006 to
February 16,
2006

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

$

436

 

 

 

$

(11,903

)

 

 

$

(3,982

)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

 

4,666

 

 

 

2,245

 

 

 

2,911

 

 

Amortization of other costs

 

 

141

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

119

 

 

Amortization of deferred financing costs

 

 

446

 

 

 

5,255

 

 

 

1,214

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

2,322

 

 

 

1,052

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in (income) losses from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

4,654

 

 

 

(238

)

 

 

614

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(1,804

)

 

 

10,561

 

 

 

 

 

Change in value of interest rate caps and swaps, net

 

 

1,494

 

 

 

(3,270

)

 

 

(1,655

)

 

Minority interest

 

 

(328

)

 

 

(133

)

 

 

(733

)

 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

 

(808

)

 

 

(730

)

 

 

(168

)

 

Related party receivables

 

 

(1,098

)

 

 

(182

)

 

 

(108

)

 

Restricted cash

 

 

(5,003

)

 

 

1,666

 

 

 

(2,080

)

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

(492

)

 

 

(47

)

 

 

1,127

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

1,906

 

 

 

3,444

 

 

 

(2,082

)

 

Other liabilities

 

 

75

 

 

 

1,275

 

 

 

408

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

 

6,607

 

 

 

9,045

 

 

 

(4,415

)

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions to property and equipment

 

 

(9,453

)

 

 

(861

)

 

 

(5,091

)

 

Deposits into capital improvement escrows, net

 

 

45

 

 

 

(388

)

 

 

(45

)

 

Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

11,957

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

(34,355

)

 

 

(578

)

 

 

(2

)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(31,806

)

 

 

(1,827

)

 

 

(5,138

)

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from long term debt

 

 

32,960

 

 

 

80,000

 

 

 

 

 

Payments on long term debt and capital lease obligations

 

 

(5,132

)

 

 

(291,827

)

 

 

(214

)

 

Payments on Clift Preferred Equity

 

 

 

 

 

(11,393

)

 

 

 

 

Contributions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,738

 

 

Distributions

 

 

 

 

 

(9,500

)

 

 

(968

)

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of costs

 

 

 

 

 

273,314

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of treasury stock

 

 

(20,556

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing costs

 

 

(16

)

 

 

(2,344

)

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

7,256

 

 

 

38,250

 

 

 

2,556

 

 

Net (decrease) increase cash and cash equivalents

 

 

(17,943

)

 

 

45,468

 

 

 

(6,997

)

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

27,549

 

 

 

14,838

 

 

 

21,835

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

 

$

9,606

 

 

 

$

60,306

 

 

 

$

14,838

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

 

 

$

8,896

 

 

 

$

12,261

 

 

 

$

6,521

 

 

Cash paid for taxes

 

 

$

246

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

213

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to condensed/combined financial statements

3




Morgans Hotel Group Co. and Predecessor
Notes to Consolidated/Combined Financial Statements

1.                 Organization and Formation Structuring Transactions

Morgans Hotel Group Co. (the “Company”) was incorporated on October 19, 2005 as a Delaware corporation to complete an initial public offering (“IPO”) that was part of the formation and structuring transactions described below. The Company operates, owns, acquires and redevelops hotel properties.

The Morgans Hotel Group Co. predecessor (the “Predecessor”) comprised the subsidiaries and ownership interests that were contributed as part of the formation and structuring transactions from Morgans Hotel Group LLC (“Former Parent”) to Morgans Group LLC, our operating company. The Former Parent was owned approximately 85% by NorthStar Hospitality, LLC (“NorthStar”), a subsidiary of NorthStar Capital Investment Corp. (“NCIC”) and approximately 15% by RSA Associates, L.P. (“RSA”).

In connection with the IPO, the Former Parent contributed the subsidiaries and ownership interests in nine operating hotels in the United States and the United Kingdom, to Morgans Group LLC in exchange for membership units. Simultaneously, Morgans Group LLC issued additional membership units to the Predecessor in exchange for cash raised by the Company from the IPO. The Former Parent also contributed all the membership interests in its hotel management business to Morgans Group LLC in return for 1,000,000 membership units in Morgans Group LLC exchangeable for shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company is the managing member of Morgans Group LLC, and has full management control.

On February 17, 2006, the Company completed its IPO. The Company issued 15,000,000 shares of common stock at $20 per share resulting in estimated net proceeds of approximately $272.5 million, after underwriters’ discounts and offering expenses. On February 17, 2006, the Company paid down $294.6 million of long term debt which included principal and interest, paid in full the preferred equity in Clift due a related party of $11.4 million, which included outstanding interest and distributed $9.5 million to certain stockholders. Concurrent with the closing of the IPO, the Company borrowed $80.0 million under a new three-year term loan.

These financial statements have been presented on a consolidated/combined basis and reflect the Company’s and the Predecessor’s assets, liabilities and results from operations. The assets and liabilities are presented at the historical cost of the Former Parent. The equity method of accounting is utilized to account for investments in joint ventures over which the Company has significant influence, but not control.

The Company has one reportable operating segment; it operates, owns, acquires and redevelops boutique hotels.

4




Operating Hotels

The Company’s operating hotels as of March 31, 2007 are as follows:

Hotel Name

 

 

 

Location

 

Number of 
Rooms

 

Ownership

 

Delano Miami

 

Miami Beach, FL

 

 

194

 

 

 

(1

)

 

Hudson

 

New York, NY

 

 

804

 

 

 

(5

)

 

Mondrian Los Angeles

 

Los Angeles, CA

 

 

237

 

 

 

(1

)

 

Morgans

 

New York, NY

 

 

113

 

 

 

(1

)

 

Royalton

 

New York, NY

 

 

169

 

 

 

(1

)

 

Sanderson

 

London, England

 

 

150

 

 

 

(2

)

 

St. Martins Lane

 

London, England

 

 

204

 

 

 

(2

)

 

Shore Club

 

Miami Beach, FL

 

 

307

 

 

 

(3

)

 

Clift

 

San Francisco, CA

 

 

363

 

 

 

(4

)

 

Mondrian Scottsdale

 

Scottsdale, AZ

 

 

194

 

 

 

(1

)

 

Hard Rock Hotel & Casino

 

Las Vegas, NV

 

 

647

 

 

 

(6

)

 


(1)          Wholly-owned hotels.

(2)          Owned through a 50/50 unconsolidated joint venture.

(3)          Operated under a management contract, with a minority ownership interest of approximately 7%.

(4)          The hotel is operated under a long-term lease, which is accounted for as a financing.

(5)          The hotel is structured as a condominium, in which the Company owns approximately 96% of the square footage of the entire building.

(6)          Operated under a management contract and owned through an unconsolidated joint venture, in which the Company owns approximately 33.3%.

Restaurant Joint Venture

The food and beverage operations of certain of the hotels are operated under a 50/50 joint venture with a third party restaurant operator.

2.                 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated/combined financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company consolidates all wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in combination.

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, as amended (“FIN 46R”), requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. Pursuant to FIN 46R, the Company consolidates five ventures that provide food and beverage services at the Company’s hotels as the Company absorbs a majority of the ventures’ expected losses and residual returns. FIN 46R has been applied retroactively. These services include operating restaurants including room service at five hotels, banquet and catering services at four hotels and

5




a bar at one hotel. No assets of the Company are collateral for the venturers’ obligations and creditors of the venturers’ have no recourse to the Company.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and for loss and credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are provided when it is more likely than not that the recovery of deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The United States entities included in the accompanying combined financial statements for the period January 1, 2006 to February 16, 2006 are either partnerships or limited liability companies, which are treated similarly to partnerships for tax reporting purposes. Accordingly, Federal and state income taxes have not been provided for those accompanying combined financial statements as the partners or members are responsible for reporting their allocable share of the Predecessor’s income, gains, deductions, losses and credits on their individual income tax returns.

The Company’s foreign subsidiaries are subject to United Kingdom corporate income taxes. Income tax expense is reported at the applicable rate for the periods presented.

Subsequent to the IPO, the Company is subject to Federal and state income taxes as a C corporation. Income taxes for the period of February 17, 2006 to March 31, 2006 and for the three months ended March 31, 2007, were computed using the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company has also recorded $10.2 million in net deferred taxes, related to cumulative differences in the basis recorded for certain assets and liabilities, primarily goodwill and property and equipment for the period from February 17, 2006 to March 31, 2007.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended and interpreted (“SFAS 133”), establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. As required by SFAS 133, the Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction.

The Company has interest rate caps that are not designated as hedges. These derivatives are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks, but the Company has elected not to designate these instruments in hedging relationships based on the provisions in SFAS 133. The changes in fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships have been recognized in earnings.

6




A summary of the Company’s derivative and hedging instruments that have been recognized in earnings as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 is as follows (in thousands):

Notional
Amount

 

 

 

Type of 
Instrument

 

Maturity 
Date

 

Strike
Rate

 

Estimated
Fair Market
Value at
March 31,
2007

 

Estimated
Fair Market
Value at
December 31,
2006

 

$473,500

 

Interest cap

 

July 9, 2007

 

 

4.25

%

 

 

$

1,247

 

 

 

$

2,467

 

 

51,250

 

Interest cap

 

July 9, 2007

 

 

4.25

%

 

 

134

 

 

 

265

 

 

30,000

 

Interest cap

 

July 9, 2007

 

 

4.25

%

 

 

78

 

 

 

156

 

 

25,000

 

Interest cap

 

July 9, 2007

 

 

4.25

%

 

 

65

 

 

 

130

 

 

Total fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,524

 

 

 

$

3,018

 

 

 

A summary of the Company’s derivative instruments that have been designated as hedges under SFAS 133 March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 is as follows (in thousands):

Notional
Amount

 

 

 

Type of 
Instrument

 

Maturity 
Date

 

Strike
Rate

 

Estimated
Fair Market
Value at
March 31,
2007

 

Estimated
Fair Market
Value at
December 31,
2006

 

$285,000

 

Interest swap

 

July 9, 2010

 

 

5.04

%

 

 

$

(2,180

)

 

 

$

(1,239

)

 

285,000

 

Sold interest cap

 

July 9, 2010

 

 

4.25

%

 

 

(6,100

)

 

 

(6,796

)

 

285,000

 

Interest cap

 

July 9, 2010

 

 

4.25

%

 

 

6,148

 

 

 

6,792

 

 

85,000

 

Interest cap

 

July 15, 2010

 

 

7.00

%

 

 

28

 

 

 

54

 

 

85,000

 

Sold interest cap

 

July 15, 2010

 

 

7.00

%

 

 

(28

)

 

 

(54

)

 

85,000

 

Interest Swap

 

July 15, 2010

 

 

4.91

%

 

 

(340

)

 

 

(65

)

 

22,000

 

Interest cap

 

June 1, 2008

 

 

6.00

%

 

 

1

 

 

 

3

 

 

18,000

 

Interest cap

 

June 1, 2008

 

 

6.00

%

 

 

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

Total fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(2,470

)

 

 

$

(1,303

)

 

Net fair value of derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(946

)

 

 

1,715

 

 

Total fair value included in other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,701

 

 

 

9,871

 

 

Total fair value included in other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

(8,647

)

 

 

$

(8,156

)

 

 

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock based employee compensation using the fair value method of accounting described in SFAS No.123R,  Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. For share grants, total compensation expense is based on the price of the Company’s stock at the grant date. For option grants, the total compensation expense is based on the estimated fair value using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Compensation expense is recorded ratably over the vesting period, if any.

Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders, less any dividends on unvested restricted common stock, by the weighted-average number of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders, less dividends on unvested restricted common stock, by the weighted-average number of common stock outstanding during the period, plus other potentially dilutive securities, such as unvested shares of restricted common stock and warrants.

7




Minority Interest

The percentage of membership units owned by the Former Parent is presented as minority interest in Morgans Group LLC in the consolidated balance sheet and was approximately $19.7 million as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The minority interest in Morgans Group LLC is (i) increased or decreased by the limited members’ pro rata share of Morgans Group LLC’s net income or net loss, respectively; (ii) decreased by distributions; (iii) decreased by redemptions of membership units for the Company’s common stock; and (iv) adjusted to equal the net equity of Morgans Group LLC multiplied by the limited members’ ownership percentage immediately after each issuance of units of Morgans Group LLC and/or shares of the Company’s common stock and after each purchase of treasury stock through an adjustment to additional paid-in capital. Net income or net loss allocated to the minority interest in Morgans Group LLC is based on the weighted-average percentage ownership throughout the period.

Additionally, $0.3 million and $0.6 million is recorded as minority interest as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively, which represents our third-party food and beverage joint venture partner’s interest in the restaurant venture at certain of our hotels.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48  (“FIN 48”) Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which establishes that the financial statement effects of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return are to be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position with be sustained upon examination. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. On that date, we had no uncertain tax positions. The Company has not yet filed its initial tax return since becoming a C corporation in February 2006. We will recognize interest and penalties, if any, as part of our provision for income taxes in our consolidated statement of operations.

3.                 Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share include the effect of potential shares outstanding, including dilutive securities. Potential dilutive securities may include shares granted under the stock incentive plan and membership units in Morgans Group LLC, which may be exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock under certain circumstances. The outstanding Morgans Group LLC membership units (which may be converted to common stock) have been excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation, as there would be no effect on reported diluted net income (loss) per common share. As of March 31, 2007, restricted stock units and LTIP Units (as defined in Note 7) are included in income per share as they are dilutive. As of March 31, 2007, 1,141,227 stock options have been excluded from the calculation as they would be anti-dilutive.

8




The table below details the components of the basic and diluted loss per share calculations (in thousands, except for per share data):

 

 

Three Months Ended 
March 31, 2007

 

Period from February 17, 2006
to March 31, 2006

 

 

 

Income

 

Weighted
Average
Shares

 

EPS
Amount

 

Loss

 

Weighted
Average
Shares

 

EPS
Amount

 

Basic income (loss) per share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

$

436

 

 

 

32,436

 

 

 

$

0.01

 

 

$

(11,903

)

 

33,500

 

 

 

$

(0.36

)

 

Effect of dilutive stock compensation

 

 

 

 

 

313

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted income (loss) per share

 

 

$

436

 

 

 

32,749

 

 

 

$

0.01

 

 

$

(11,903

)

 

33,500

 

 

 

$

(0.36

)

 

 

On December 7, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of the Company’s common stock, or approximately 10% percent of its outstanding shares based on the then current market price. The stock repurchases under this program have been and will be made through the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements, market conditions, and other corporate liquidity requirements and priorities. The stock repurchase program may be suspended or terminated at any time without prior notice, and will expire on December 7, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had repurchased 1,507,494 shares for approximately $26.2 million.

4.                 Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company’s investments in and advances to unconsolidated joint ventures and its equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Investments

Entity

 

 

 

As of
March 31, 2007

 

As of
December 31, 2006

 

Morgans Hotel Group Europe Ltd.

 

 

$

12,586

 

 

 

$

11,971

 

 

Restaurant Venture—SC London

 

 

(384

)

 

 

(128

)

 

Mondrian South Beach

 

 

11,370

 

 

 

13,024

 

 

Hard Rock Hotel & Casino

 

 

52,049

 

 

 

2,478

 

 

Las Vegas Echelon

 

 

34,690

 

 

 

2,883

 

 

Other

 

 

213

 

 

 

172

 

 

Total

 

 

$

110,523

 

 

 

$

30,400

 

 

 

9




Equity in income (losses) from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

For the Three
Months Ended
March 31,
2007

 

For the Period
from February 17,
2006 to
March 31,
2006

 

For the Period
from January 1
2006 to
February 16,
2006

 

Morgans Hotel Group Europe Ltd.

 

 

$

785

 

 

 

$

33

 

 

 

$

(490

)

 

Restaurant Venture—SC London

 

 

(256

)

 

 

139

 

 

 

(94

)

 

Mondrian South Beach

 

 

(1,368

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hard Rock Hotel & Casino

 

 

(3,817

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shore Club

 

 

 

 

 

66

 

 

 

(30

)

 

Other

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

$

(4,654

)

 

 

$

238

 

 

 

$

(614

)

 

 

Morgans Hotel Group Europe Limited

As of March 31, 2007, we owned interests in two hotels through a 50/50 joint venture known as Morgans Hotel Group Europe Limited with Walton MG London Investors V, L.L.C. (“Walton”).

Morgans Hotel Group Europe Limited (“Morgans Europe”) owns two hotels located in London, England, St Martins Lane, a 204-room hotel, and Sanderson, a 150-room hotel. Net income or loss and cash distributions or contributions are allocated to the partners in accordance with ownership interests. We account for this investment under the equity method of accounting.

Under a management agreement with Morgans Europe, we earn management fees and a reimbursement for allocable chain service and technical service expenses. The management fees are equal to 4.0% of total hotel revenues, including food and beverage, the reimbursement of allocable chain expenses are currently recovered at approximately 2.5% of hotel revenues excluding food and beverage and the technical services fees are a recovery of project specific costs. We also are entitled to an incentive management fee and a capital incentive fee. We did not earn any incentive fees during the three months ended March 31, 2007 or 2006.

On July 27, 2006, our joint venture partner in ownership of our London hotels, Burford Hotels Limited (“Burford”), sent the Company a notice purporting to exercise rights under the buy/sell provision of the joint venture agreement (the “Notice”). As a result of the Notice, the Company began marketing Burford’s share of the joint venture and on February 16, 2007, a subsidiary of the Company and Walton entered into a joint venture agreement for the ownership and operation of hotels in Europe by Morgans Europe. Walton purchased Burford’s interest in the joint venture for the equivalent of approximately $52 million. For facilitating the transaction, we received approximately $6.1 million in cash. and could receive additional consideration based on the value of an interest rate hedge on the existing joint venture debt in the event of a debt refinancing.

Under the new joint venture agreement with Walton, the Company continues to own indirectly a 50% equity interest in Morgans Europe and continues to have an equal representation on the Morgans Europe Board of Directors. Beginning any time after February 9, 2010, either party has the right to buy all the shares of the other party in the joint venture or, if its offer is rejected, require the other party to buy all of its shares at the same offered price per share in cash. The Company also maintained the management of the London hotels under substantially the same terms.

Mondrian South Beach

On August 8, 2006, the Company entered into a 50/50 joint venture (the “South Beach Venture”) with an affiliate of Hudson Capital. The South Beach Venture will renovate and convert an apartment building

10




on Biscayne Bay in South Beach Miami into a condominium and hotel operated under the Company’s Mondrian brand. The Company will operate Mondrian South Beach under a long-term incentive management contract. The hotel expects to have approximately 342 units comprised of studios, one and two-bedroom units, and four penthouse suites.

The South Beach Venture acquired the existing building and land for a gross purchase price of $110.0 million. The South Beach Venture expects to spend approximately $60.0 million on renovations. An initial equity investment of $15.0 million from each of the Company and Hudson Capital was funded at closing. Additionally, the South Beach Venture has received financing of approximately $124.0 million at a rate of LIBOR plus 300 basis points. This loan matures in August 2009.

The South Beach Venture is in the process of selling some or all of the new luxury hotel units as condominiums, subject to market conditions. The South Beach Venture anticipates that unit buyers will have the opportunity to place their units into a rental program. In addition to hotel management fees, the Company could also realize fees from the sale of condominium units.

As of February 1, 2007, the South Beach Venture is being accounted for as a development project in accordance with SFAS No. 67.

Hard Rock Hotel & Casino

On May 11, 2006, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, MHG HR Acquisition Corp. (“Acquisition Corp”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (“HRH”) pursuant to which the Acquisition Corp agreed to acquire HRH in an all cash merger (the “Merger”). Additionally, an affiliate of the Company entered into several asset purchase agreements with HRH or affiliates of HRH to acquire a development land parcel adjacent to the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas (“Hard Rock”) and certain intellectual property rights related to the Hard Rock (such asset purchases, together with the Merger, the “Transactions”). The aggregate consideration for the Transactions was $770 million.

On November 7, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with an affiliate of DLJ Merchant Banking Partners (“DLJMB”) as amended in December 2006, under which DLJMB and the Company formed a joint venture in connection with the acquisition and development of the Hard Rock.

The closing of the Transactions and completion of the Merger occurred on February 2, 2007. The Company funded one-third of the equity, or approximately $57.5 million, and DLJMB funded two-thirds of the equity, or approximately $115 million. The remainder of the $770 million purchase price was financed with mortgage financing under a credit agreement entered into by the joint venture. The credit agreement provides for a secured term loan facility, with a term of two years or more, consisting of a $760 million loan for the acquisition including $35.0 million of renovation costs, $48.2 million of financing costs and $56.3 million of cash reserves and working capital, and a loan of up to $600 million for future expansion of the Hard Rock. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, DLJMB agreed to fund 100% of the capital required to expand the Hard Rock property, up to a total of an additional $150 million. The Company will have the option, but is not required, to fund the expansion project proportionate to its equity interest in the joint venture.

Concurrent to the closing of the Transactions and the Merger, the Company and DLJMB entered into a property management agreement under which the Company will operate the hotel, retail, food and beverage, entertainment and all other businesses related to the Hard Rock, excluding the casino. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will receive a management fee equal to 4% and a chain service expense reimbursement up to 1.5% of all non-gaming revenue including casino rents and all other rental income. The Company can also earn an incentive management fee of 10% of EBITDA, as defined, above

11




certain levels. The term of the contract is 20 years with two ten-year renewals and is subject to certain performance tests beginning in 2009.

At the February 2, 2007 closing of the Merger and Transactions, the joint venture also entered into a definitive lease agreement with Golden Gaming Inc. (“Golden Gaming”) to operate the casino at the Hard Rock. Under the lease, the base rent is $20.7 million per year payable monthly, plus reimbursements for certain expenses. Golden Gaming is entitled to a management fee of $3.3 million, also payable monthly.

The joint venture’s preliminary allocation of the purchase price is based on the allocation in the purchase and sale agreement. The joint venture will finalize the purchase price allocation in 2007, the results of which may change the purchase price allocation initially booked. Management does not believe a change in the purchase price allocation will materially impact the Company’s equity in income (loss) from unconsolidated joint ventures.

Las Vegas Echelon

In January 2006, the Company entered into a limited liability company agreement with Echelon, a subsidiary of Boyd Gaming Corporation (“Boyd”) through which it will develop, as 50/50 owners, Delano Las Vegas and Mondrian Las Vegas, both of which are expected to open in 2010. After certain milestones in the joint venture development process have been met, the Company is expected to complete its contribution of approximately $97.5 million in cash and Echelon will contribute approximately 6.5 acres of land to the joint venture. It is expected that these contributions will be completed by June 30, 2008, as part of pre-development. As of March 31, 2007, we had made approximately $34.7 million in capital contributions, which includes a $30.0 million contribution upon consummation of the Hard Rock transaction in February 2007.

5.                 Other Liabilities

Other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

 

 

As of 
March 31, 2007

 

As of 
December 31, 2006

 

Accrued designer fee

 

 

$

6,288

 

 

 

$

6,257

 

 

Interest swap derivative liability (Note 2)

 

 

8,647

 

 

 

8,156

 

 

Clift pre-petition liabilities

 

 

2,474

 

 

 

2,427

 

 

Other

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

$

17,410

 

 

 

$

16,841

 

 

 

6.                 Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

Description

 

 

 

As of
March 31, 2007

 

As of
December 31, 2006

 

Interest rate at
March 31, 2007

 

Notes secured by Hudson and Mondrian(a)

 

 

$

370,000

 

 

 

$

370,000

 

 

LIBOR + 1.25

%

Clift debt(b)

 

 

79,024

 

 

 

78,737

 

 

9.6

%

Promissory note(c)

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

7.0

%

Note secured by Mondrian Scottsdale(d)

 

 

40,000

 

 

 

37,327

 

 

LIBOR + 2.30

%

Liability to subsidiary trust(e)

 

 

50,100

 

 

 

50,100

 

 

8.68

%

Revolving Credit(f)

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

(f)

Capital lease obligations

 

 

6,900

 

 

 

7,033

 

 

 

 

Total long term debt

 

 

$

581,024

 

 

 

$

553,197

 

 

 

 

 

12




(a)   New Mortgage Agreement—Notes secured by Hudson and Mondrian Los Angeles

On October 6, 2006, subsidiaries of the Company entered into new mortgage financings, consisting of two separate mortgage loans and a mezzanine loan. These loans, a $217.0 million first mortgage note secured by Hudson, a $32.5 million mezzanine loan secured by a pledge of the equity interests in the Company’s subsidiary owning Hudson, and a $120.5 million first mortgage note secured by Mondrian Los Angeles (collectively, the “New Mortgages”), all mature on July 15, 2010.

The New Mortgages bear interest at a blended rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 125 basis points. The Company has the option of extending the maturity date of the New Mortgages to October 15, 2011. The Company maintains an interest rate cap for the amount of the New Mortgages at 4.25% through June 30, 2007 and has entered into forward starting swaps beginning on June 9, 2007 that will effectively fix the LIBOR rate on the debt under the New Mortgages at approximately 5.0% through the maturity date.

The prepayment clause in the New Mortgages permits the Company to prepay the New Mortgages in whole or in part on any business day, along with a spread maintenance premium (equal to the amount of the prepayment multiplied by the applicable LIBOR margin multiplied by the ratio of the number of months between the prepayment date and October 31, 2007 divided by 12).

The New Mortgages require the Company’s subsidiary borrowers to fund reserve accounts to cover monthly debt service payments. Those subsidiary borrowers are also required to fund reserves for property, sales and occupancy taxes, insurance premiums, capital expenditures and the operation and maintenance of those hotels. Reserves are deposited into restricted cash accounts and are released as certain conditions are met. The Company’s subsidiary borrowers are not permitted to have any liabilities other than certain ordinary trade payables, purchase money indebtedness and capital lease obligations.

The New Mortgages prohibit the incurrence of additional debt on Hudson and Mondrian Los Angeles. Furthermore, the subsidiary borrowers (Hudson and Mondrian owning entities) are not permitted to incur additional mortgage debt or partnership interest debt. In addition, the New Mortgages do not permit (1) transfers of more than 49% of the interests in the subsidiary borrowers, Morgans Group LLC or the Company or (2) a change in control of the subsidiary borrowers or in respect of Morgans Group LLC or the Company itself without, in each case, complying with various conditions or obtaining the prior written consent of the lender.

The New Mortgages provide for events of default customary in mortgage financings, including, among others, failure to pay principal or interest when due, failure to comply with certain covenants, certain insolvency and receivership events affecting the subsidiary borrowers, Morgans Group LLC or the Company, and breach of the encumbrance and transfer provisions. In the event of a default under the New Mortgages, the lender’s recourse is limited to the mortgaged property, unless the event of default results from an insolvency, a voluntary bankruptcy filing or a breach of the encumbrance and transfer provisions, in which event the lender may also pursue remedies against Morgans Group LLC.

(b)   Clift Debt

In October 2004, Clift emerged out of bankruptcy pursuant to a plan of reorganization whereby Clift Holdings LLC sold the hotel to an unrelated party for $71.0 million and then leased it back for a 99-year lease term. Under this lease, the Company is required to fund operating shortfalls including the lease payments and to fund all capital expenditures. This transaction did not qualify as a sale due to the Company’s continued involvement and therefore is treated as a financing. The proceeds from this transaction were used in part to repay the existing mortgage loan on Clift.

13




The lease payment terms are as follows:

Years 1 and 2

 

$2.8 million per annum (completed in October 2006)

Years 3 to 10

 

$6.0 million per annum

Thereafter

 

Increased at 5-year intervals by a formula tied to increases in the Consumer Price Index. At year 10, the increase has a maximum of 40% and a minimum of 20%. At each increased date thereafter, the maximum increase is 20% and the minimum is 10%.

 

(c)   Promissory Note

The purchase of the building adjacent to Delano Miami was partially financed with the issuance of a $10.0 million three-year interest only promissory note by the Company to the seller, which matures on January 24, 2009. The note currently bears interest at 8.5% through January 24, 2008 and at 10.0% thereafter.

(d)   Mondrian Scottsdale Debt

In May 2006, the Company obtained mortgage financing on Mondrian Scottsdale. The $40.0 million loan, which accrues interest at LIBOR plus 2.30%, matures in May 2008 and has three one-year extensions. The Company has purchased an interest rate cap which limits the interest rate exposure to 8.3% and expires on June 1, 2008.

(e)   Liability to Subsidiary Trust Issuing Preferred Securities

On August 4, 2006, a newly established trust formed by the Company, MHG Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), issued $50.0 million in trust preferred securities in a private placement. The Company owns all of the $0.1 million of outstanding common stock of the Trust. The Trust used the proceeds to purchase $50.1 million of junior subordinated notes issued by the Company (the “Notes”) which mature on October 30, 2036. These Notes represent all of the Trust’s assets. The terms of the junior subordinated notes are substantially the same as preferred securities issued by the Trust. The Notes and the trust preferred securities have a fixed interest rate of 8.68% per annum during the first ten years, after which the interest rate will float and reset quarterly at the three-month LIBOR rate plus 3.25% per annum. The securities are redeemable by the Trust, at the Company’s option, after five years at par. To the extent the Company redeems Notes, the Trust is required to redeem a corresponding amount of trust preferred securities.

The Note agreement required that the Company maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.4 to 1.0 and prohibited the Company from issuing subordinate debt through February 4, 2007.

FIN 46R requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The Company has identified that the Trust is a variable interest entity under FIN 46R. Based on management’s analysis, the Company is not the primary beneficiary since it does not absorb a majority of the expected losses, nor is it entitled to a majority of the expected residual returns. Accordingly, the Trust is not consolidated into the Company’s financial statements. The Company accounts for the investment in the common stock of the Trust under the equity method of accounting.

Net proceeds from the issuance of Notes were used by the Company to pay down the Company’s existing credit line and to fund the equity contribution on Mondrian South Beach with the remainder available for general corporate purposes.

14




(f)   New Revolving Credit

On October 6, 2006, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a revolving credit facility in the initial amount of $225.0 million, which includes a $50.0 million letter of credit sub-facility and a $25.0 million swingline sub-facility (the collectively, the “New Revolving Credit Agreement”).

The amount available from time to time under the New Revolving Credit Agreement is also contingent upon the amount of an available borrowing base calculated by reference to collateral described below. Initially, the available borrowing base is capped at approximately $64.0 million, but that amount may be increased up to $225.0 million at the Borrower’s (defined below) option by increasing the amount of the mortgage on Delano Miami granted by the Delano Miami mortgage lender (discussed below) and upon payment of the related additional recording tax. The available borrowing base as of the closing date (assuming an increase in the Delano Miami mortgage and payment of the related additional recording tax) would be approximately $204.5 million. That availability may also be increased through procedures specified in the New Revolving Credit Agreement for adding property to the borrowing base and for revaluation of the property that constitutes the borrowing base.

The commitments under the New Revolving Credit Agreement terminate on October 5, 2011, at which time all outstanding amounts under the New Revolving Credit Agreement will be due and payable. There are no loans currently outstanding under the New Revolving Credit Agreement. A subsidiary of the Company, Morgans Group LLC (the “Borrower”), may, at its option, with the prior consent of the lender and subject to customary conditions, request an increase in the aggregate commitment under the New Revolving Credit Agreement to up to $350.0 million.

The interest rate per annum applicable to loans under the New Revolving Credit Agreement is a fluctuating rate of interest measured by reference to, at the Company’s election, either LIBOR or a base rate, plus a borrowing margin. LIBOR loans have a borrowing margin of 1.35% to 1.90% determined based on the Borrower’s total leverage ratio (with an initial borrowing margin of 1.35%) and base rate loans have a borrowing margin of 0.35% to 0.90% determined based on the Borrower’s total leverage ratio (with an initial borrowing margin of 0.35%). The New Revolving Credit Agreement also provides for the payment of a quarterly unused facility fee equal to the average daily unused amount for each quarter multiplied by 0.25%.

The New Revolving Credit Agreement requires the Borrower to maintain for each four-quarter period a total leverage ratio (total indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA) of no more than (1) 8.0 to 1.0 at any time prior to January 1, 2008, (2) 7.0 to 1.0 at any time during 2008, and (3) 6.0 to 1.0 at any time after December 31, 2008, and a fixed charge coverage ratio (consolidated EBITDA to fixed charges) of no less than 1.75 to 1.00 at all times. The New Revolving Credit Agreement contains negative covenants, subject in each case to certain exceptions, restricting incurrence of indebtedness, incurrence of liens, fundamental changes, acquisitions and investments, asset sales, transactions with affiliates and restricted payments, including, among others, a covenant prohibiting the Company from paying cash dividends on its common stock.

The New Revolving Credit Agreement provides for customary events of default, including failure to pay principal or interest when due, failure to comply with covenants, any representation proving to be incorrect, defaults relating to other indebtedness of at least $10.0 million in the aggregate, certain insolvency and receivership events affecting the Company or its subsidiaries, judgments in excess of $5.0 million in the aggregate being rendered against the Company or its subsidiaries, the acquisition by any person of 40% or more of any outstanding class of capital stock having ordinary voting power in the election of directors of the Company, and the incurrence of certain ERISA liabilities in excess of $5.0 million in the aggregate.

15




Obligations under the New Revolving Credit Agreement are secured by, among other collateral, a mortgage on Delano Miami and the pledge of equity interests in the Borrower and certain subsidiaries of the Borrower, including the owners of Delano Miami, Morgans and Royalton, as well as a security interest in other significant personal property (including trademarks and other intellectual property, reserves and deposits) relating to those hotels.

The New Revolving Credit Agreement is available on a revolving basis for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions. Also on October 6, 2006, the Company terminated its three-year revolving credit facility of $125.0 million which was entered into concurrently with the Company’s IPO in February 2006, which did not have any amounts outstanding at the time of its termination. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had $25.0 million outstanding under the New Revolving Credit Agreement.

7.                 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan

On February 9, 2006, the board of directors of the Company adopted the Morgans Hotel Group Co. 2006 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). The Stock Incentive Plan provides for the issuance of stock-based incentive awards, including incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, shares of common stock of the Company, including restricted stock, and other equity-based awards, including membership units which are structured as profits interests (“LTIP Units”) or any combination of the foregoing. The eligible participants in the Stock Incentive Plan include directors, officers and employees of the Company. An aggregate of 3,500,000 shares of common stock of the Company are currently reserved and authorized for issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan, subject to equitable adjustment upon the occurrence of certain corporate events.

On February 14, 2006, an aggregate of 25,000 shares of restricted common stock were granted to the Company’s non-employee directors and employees pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan. Restricted common stock vests one-third of the amount granted on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to the remainder in 24 equal installments at the end of each month following the first anniversary of the grant date so long as the recipient continues to be an eligible recipient. These restricted shares of common stock will become fully vested on the third anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of each share of restricted common stock granted was $20 at the date of grant.

Also on February 14, 2006, an aggregate of 68,200 shares of restricted common stock were granted to the Company’s employees pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan. Employee restricted common stock vests one-quarter of the amount granted on the anniversary of the grant date and as to the remainder ratably over four years so long as the recipient continues to be an eligible recipient. These restricted shares of common stock will become fully vested on the fourth anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of each share of restricted common stock granted was $20 at the date of grant.

In addition, on February 14, 2006, an aggregate of 862,500 LTIP Units were granted to the Company’s officers and chairman of the board of directors pursuant to the Stock Incentive Plan. LTIP Units vest as to one-third of the amount granted on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to the remainder in 24 equal installments at the end of each month following the first anniversary of the grant date so long as the recipient continues to be an eligible recipient. These LTIP Units will become fully vested on the third anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of each LTIP Unit granted was $20 at the date of grant.

Also on February 14, 2006, an aggregate of 1,006,000 options to purchase common stock of the Company at the IPO price ($20 per share) were granted to our chairman, non-employee directors, officers and employees. Stock options vest as to one-third of the amount granted on the first anniversary of the grant date and as to the remainder in 24 equal installments at the end of each month following the first anniversary of the grant date so long as the recipient continues to be an eligible recipient. These options will become fully vested on the third anniversary of the grant date and expire 10 years after the grant date. The fair value for each option granted was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-

16




Scholes option-pricing model, an allowable valuation method under SFAS No. 123R with the following assumptions: risk-free interest rate of 4.6%, expected option lives of 3½ years, 35% volatility, no dividend rate and 10% forfeiture rate. The fair value of each option was $6.37 at the date of grant.

In the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recognized $2.4 million of stock based compensation expense related to the above described restricted common stock, LTIP Units and options. In the period from February 14, 2006 to March 31, 2006, the Company recognized $1.2 million of stock based compensation expense related to the above-described restricted common stock, LTIP Units and options.

On April 23, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted, subject to approval from our stockholders at the annual meeting of stockholders on May 22, 2007, the Company’s 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2007 Incentive Plan”), which amends and restates the Stock Incentive Plan and increases the number of shares reserved for issuance under the plan by up to 3,250,000 shares. Awards other than options and stock appreciation rights shall reduce the shares available for grant by 1.7 shares for each share subject to such an award. Thus, the maximum number of additional shares under the 2007 Incentive Plan available for grant is 3,250,000, assuming all awards are options and stock appreciation rights, or 1,911,764, if all awards are other than options and stock appreciation rights.

On April 25, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors granted an aggregate of 176,750 LTIP Units and 121,000 performance based restricted stock units to the Company’s named executive officers. The LTIP units and restricted stock units are at risk for forfeiture over the vesting period and require the continued employment. In addition, the restricted stock units are at risk based on the achievement of a 7% total stockholder return over each calendar year of a three-year performance period (subject to certain catch-up features).

8.      Litigation

Shore Club Litigation—New York State Action

The Company is currently involved in litigation regarding the management of Shore Club. In 2002, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, invested in Shore Club and the Company’s management company, MHG Management Company, took over management of the property. The management agreement expires in 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2002 (reflecting six months of data based on information provided to us and not generated by us and six months of operations after MHG Management Company took over management of Shore Club in July 2002), Shore Club had an operating loss and its owner, Philips South Beach LLC, was in dispute with its investors and lenders. After MHG Management Company took over management of the property, the financial performance improved and Shore Club had operating income in 2004. The Company believes this improvement was the direct result of our repositioning and operation of the hotel. This improved performance has continued. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2005, the debt on the hotel was refinanced.

On January 17, 2006, Philips South Beach LLC filed a lawsuit in New York state court against several defendants including MHG Management Company and other persons and entities. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, (i) that MHG Management Company engaged in fraudulent or willful misconduct with respect to Shore Club entitling Philips South Beach LLC to terminate the Shore Club management agreement without the payment of a termination fee to it, (ii) breach of fiduciary duty by MHG Management Company, (iii) tortious interference with business relations by redirecting guests and events from Shore Club to Delano Miami, (iv) misuse of free and complimentary rooms at Shore Club, and (v) misappropriation of confidential business information. The allegations include that MHG Management Company took actions to benefit Delano Miami at the expense of Shore Club, billed Shore Club for expenses that had already been billed by MHG Management Company as part of chain expenses, misused barter agreements to obtain benefits for employees, and failed to collect certain rent and taxes from retail tenants. The lawsuit also asserts that MHG Management Company falsified or omitted information in

17




monthly management reports related to the alleged actions. Ian Schrager, founder of the Predecessor, W. Edward Scheetz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David T. Hamamoto, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, are also named as defendants in the lawsuit.

The remedies sought by Philips South Beach LLC include (a) termination of the management agreement without the payment of a termination fee to MHG Management Company, (b) a full accounting of all of the affairs of Shore Club from the inception of the management agreement, (c) at least $5.0 million in compensatory damages, (d) at least $10.0 million in punitive damages, and (e) attorneys’ fees, interest, costs and disbursements.

The Company believes that MHG Management Company has abided by the terms of the management agreement. The Company believes that Philips South Beach LLC has filed the lawsuit as part of a strategy to pressure us to renegotiate our management agreement with respect to the Shore Club.

On August 1, 2006, the judge granted defendants’ motion to dismiss Philips South Beach LLC’s causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty, breach of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. The judge also struck all claims for punitive damages. Philips South Beach LLC filed a notice of appeal, and we filed a notice of cross-appeal, though neither was perfected. Philips South Beach LLC has filed an amended complaint adding a punitive damages demand. Our motion to dismiss that demand was denied, and we have filed a notice of appeal. We have answered the amended complaint, denying all substantive allegations and asserting various affirmative defenses. Discovery is pending.

The Company intends to continue to pursue this litigation vigorously. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this litigation, on the basis of current information, we do not expect that the outcome of this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Shore Club Litigation—Florida State Action

On April 17, 2006, MHG Management Company and a related subsidiary of the Company filed a lawsuit in Florida state court against Philip Pilevsky and individuals and entities associated with Mr. Pilevsky, charging them with tortious interference with the 20-year exclusive management agreement that MHG Management Company holds for Shore Club, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and tortious interference with actual and prospective business and economic relations, in part as an attempt to break or renegotiate the terms of the management agreement.

On July 13, 2006, the judge issued an order denying defendants’ motion to stay and for a protective order based on the pendency of the Shore Club litigation in New York. An appeal of that order has been fully briefed and argued, and until it is decided, discovery is stayed. Defendants have moved to dismiss on substantive grounds and for certain of them on jurisdictional grounds as well.

Century Operating Associates Litigation

On March 23, 2006, Century Operating Associates filed a lawsuit in New York state court naming several defendants, including the Company, Morgans Hotel Group LLC, and Messrs. Scheetz, Schrager and Hamamoto. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and a fraudulent conveyance in connection with the structuring transactions that were part of the Company’s IPO, and the offering itself. In particular, the lawsuit alleges that the transactions constituted a fraudulent conveyance of the assets of Morgans Hotel Group LLC, in which Century Operating Associates allegedly has a non-voting membership interest, to the Company. The plaintiff claims that the defendants knowingly and intentionally structured and participated in the transactions in a manner designed to leave Morgans Hotel Group LLC without any ability to satisfy its obligations to Century Operating Associates.

18




The remedies sought by Century Operating Associates include (a) Century Operating Associates’ distributive share of the IPO proceeds, (b) at least $3.5 million in compensatory damages, (c) at least $17.5 million in punitive damages, and (d) attorneys’ fees and expenses.

On July 6, 2006, the judge granted the Company’s motion to dismiss it from the case. Century Operating Associates has filed an amended complaint, re-asserting claims against the Company, including a new claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and adding claims against a new defendant, Morgans Group LLC. In April 2007, the judge granted our motion to dismiss all claims against the Company and Morgans Group LLC, and certain claims against certain other defendants. In May 2007, Century Operating Associates amended its compliant again re-asserting the same claims against the Company and Morgans Group LLC.

The Company intends to continue to pursue this litigation vigorously. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this litigation, on the basis of current information, we do not expect that the outcome of this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Other Litigation

The Company is involved in various lawsuits and administrative actions in the normal course of business. In management’s opinion, disposition of these lawsuits is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or liquidity.

9.                 Related Party Transactions

The Company earned management fees, chain services fees and fees for certain technical services and has receivables from hotels it owns through investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as well as hotels owned by the Former Parent. These fees totaled approximately $4.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and $2.1 million (of which approximately $1.0 million was during the Predecessor period from January 1, 2006 to February 16, 2006) for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had receivables from these affiliates of approximately $3.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively, which are included in receivables from related parties on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

19




Item 2.                        Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. In addition to historical information, this discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to, those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a fully integrated hospitality company that operates, owns, acquires, develops and redevelops boutique hotels in gateway cities and select resort markets in the United States and Europe. Over our 22 year history, we have gained experience operating in a variety of market conditions. At March 31, 2007, we owned or partially owned, and managed a portfolio of eleven luxury hotel properties in New York, Miami, Los Angeles, Scottsdale, San Francisco, London and Las Vegas, comprising approximately 3,400 rooms. Each of our Owned Hotels, as defined below, was acquired and renovated by us, or an affiliate, and was designed by a world-renowned designer.

Unlike traditional brand-managed or franchised hotels, boutique hotels provide their guests with what we believe is a distinctive lodging experience. Each of our hotels has a personality specifically tailored to reflect the local market environment and features modern, sophisticated design that includes critically acclaimed public spaces; popular “destination” bars and restaurants and highly personalized service. Significant media attention has been devoted to our hotels which we believe is as a result of their distinctive nature, renowned design, dynamic and exciting atmosphere, celebrity guests and high-profile events. We believe that the Morgans Hotel Group brand, and each of our individual property brands are synonymous with style, innovation and service. We believe this combination of lodging and social experiences, and association with our brands, increases our occupancy levels and pricing power.

In addition to our current portfolio, we expect to operate, own, acquire, redevelop and develop new hotel properties that are consistent with our portfolio in major metropolitan cities and select resort markets in the United States, Europe and elsewhere.

We were incorporated as a Delaware corporation in October 2005 to operate, own, acquire, develop and redevelop boutique hotels in the United States, Europe and elsewhere. As of March 31, 2007, we owned:

·       seven hotels in New York, Miami, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Scottsdale, comprising approximately 2,100 rooms, (the “Owned Hotels”);

·       a building adjacent to Delano Miami which we intend to convert into a new hotel with guest facilities;

·       a 50% interest in two hotels in London comprising approximately 350 rooms, which we manage;

·       a 7% interest in the 300-room Shore Club in Miami, which we also manage (“Shore Club”);

·       a 33.3% interest in the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas, which we also manage effective February 2007 (“Hard Rock”); and

·       a 50% interest in an apartment building on Biscayne Bay in South Beach Miami which we are redeveloping and have rebranded under our Mondrian brand as a hotel and condominium project under the name Mondrian South Beach Hotel Residences (“Mondrian South Beach”).

We conduct our operations through our operating company, Morgans Group LLC, which holds all of our assets. We are the managing member of Morgans Group LLC and hold approximately 97.0% of its

20




membership units. We manage all aspects of Morgans Group LLC including the operation, investment and sale and purchase of hotels and the financing of Morgans Group LLC.

The historical financial data presented herein is the historical financial data for:

·       our Owned Hotels;

·       our joint venture hotels, consisting of the London hotels (Sanderson and St Martins Lane), Shore Club and Hard Rock (the “Joint Venture Hotels”);

·       our management company subsidiary, MHG Management Company; and

·       the rights and obligations of Morgans Hotel Group LLC contributed to Morgans Group LLC in the formation and structuring transactions described above in Note 1 to the financial statements, included elsewhere in this report.

We consolidate the results of operations for all of our Owned Hotels. Certain food and beverage operations at five of our Owned Hotels are operated under 50/50 joint ventures with restaurateur Jeffrey Chodorow. The Asia de Cuba restaurant at Mondrian Scottsdale is operated under license and management agreements with China Grill Management, a company controlled by Jeffrey Chodorow. We believe that we are the primary beneficiary of these entities because we absorb the majority of any restaurant ventures’ expected losses or residual returns. Therefore, these restaurant ventures are consolidated in our financial statements with our partner’s share of the results of operations recorded as minority interest in the accompanying consolidated/combined financial statements. This minority interest is based upon 50% of the income of the venture after giving effect to rent and other administrative charges payable to the hotel.

We own partial interests in the Joint Venture Hotels and certain food and beverage operations at two of the Joint Venture Hotels, Sanderson and St Martins Lane. We account for these investments using the equity method as we believe we do not exercise control over significant asset decisions such as buying, selling or financing nor are we the primary beneficiary of the entities. Under the equity method, we increase our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures for our proportionate share of net income and contributions and decrease our investment balance for our proportionate share of net losses and distributions.

On February 2, 2007, we began managing the hotel operations at the Hard Rock. We will also manage the Mondrian South Beach once redevelopment is complete. As of March 31, 2007, we operated Joint Venture Hotels under management agreements which expire as follows:

·       Sanderson—April 2010 (with two ten year extensions at our option);

·       St Martins Lane—September 2009 (with two ten year extensions at our option);

·       Shore Club—July 2022; and

·       Hard Rock—February 2027 (with two ten year extensions).

These agreements are subject to early termination in specified circumstances.

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Revenues.   Changes in our revenues are most easily explained by three performance indicators that are commonly used in the hospitality industry:

·       occupancy,

·       average daily rate, or ADR, and

21




·       revenue per available room, or RevPAR, which is the product of ADR and average daily occupancy; but, however, does not include food and beverage revenue, other hotel operating revenue such as telephone, parking and other guest services, or management fee revenue.

Substantially all of our revenue is derived from the operation of our hotels. Specifically, our revenue consists of:

·       Rooms revenue.   Occupancy and ADR are the major drivers of rooms revenue.

·       Food and beverage revenue.   Most of our food and beverage revenue is earned by our 50/50 joint ventures and is driven by occupancy of our hotels and the popularity of our bars and restaurants with our local customers.

·       Other hotel revenue.   Other hotel revenue consists of ancillary revenue such as telephone, parking, spa, entertainment and other guest services, are principally driven by hotel occupancy.

·       Management feerelated parties revenue.   We earn fees under our management agreements that total 4.5% of defined revenues of Shore Club, 4% of the defined revenues for our two London hotels, and from February 2, 2007, 4% of defined non-gaming revenues, including casino rents and all other income, for Hard Rock. In addition, we are reimbursed for allocated chain services, which include certain overhead costs for the hotels that we manage and which are currently recovered at approximately 2.5% of defined revenues of the hotels we manage and 1.5% of defined revenues at Hard Rock.

Fluctuations in revenues, which tend to correlate with changes in gross domestic product, are driven largely by general economic and local market conditions but can also be impacted by major events, such as terrorist attacks or natural disasters, which in turn affect levels of business and leisure travel.

The seasonal nature of the hospitality business can also impact revenues. We experience some seasonality in our business; for example, our Miami hotels are generally strongest in the first quarter, whereas our New York hotels are generally strongest in the fourth quarter.

In addition to economic conditions, supply is another important factor that can affect revenues. Room rates and occupancy tend to fall when supply increases, unless the supply growth is offset by an equal or greater increase in demand. One reason why we focus on boutique hotels in key gateway cities  and select resort markets is because these markets generally have significant barriers to entry for new competitive supply, including scarcity of available land for new development and extensive regulatory requirements resulting in a longer development lead time and additional expense for new competitors.

Finally, competition within the hospitality industry can affect revenues. Competitive factors in the hospitality industry include name recognition, quality of service, convenience of location, quality of the property, pricing, and range and quality of food services and amenities offered. In addition, all of our hotels, restaurants and bars are located in areas where there are numerous competitors, many of whom have substantially greater resources than us. New or existing competitors could offer significantly lower rates or more convenient locations, services or amenities or significantly expand, improve or introduce new service offerings in markets in which our hotels compete, thereby posing a greater competitive threat than at present. If we are unable to compete effectively, we would lose market share, which could adversely affect our revenues.

Operating Costs and Expenses.   Our operating costs and expenses consist of the costs to provide hotel services, including:

·       Rooms expense.   Rooms expense includes the payroll and benefits for the front office, housekeeping, concierge and reservations departments and related expenses, such as laundry,

22




rooms supplies, travel agent commissions and reservation expense. Like rooms revenue, occupancy is a major driver of rooms expense, which has a significant correlation with rooms revenue.

·       Food and beverage expense.   Similar to food and beverage revenue, occupancy of our hotels and the popularity of our restaurants and bars are the major drivers of food and beverage expense, which has a significant correlation with food and beverage revenue.

·       Other departmental expense.   Occupancy is the major driver of other departmental expense, which includes telephone and other expenses related to the generation of other hotel revenue.

·       Hotel selling, general and administrative expense consist of administrative and general expenses, such as payroll and related costs, travel expenses and office rent, advertising and promotion expenses, comprising the payroll of the hotel sales teams, the global sales team and advertising, marketing and promotion expenses for our hotel properties, utility expense and repairs and maintenance expenses comprising the ongoing costs to repair and maintain our hotel properties.

·       Property taxes, insurance and other consist primarily of insurance costs and property taxes.

·       Corporate expenses consist of the cost of our corporate office, net of any cost recoveries, which consists primarily of payroll and related costs, office rent and legal and professional fees and costs associated with being a public company.

·       Depreciation and amortization expense.   Hotel properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 39.5 years for buildings and five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment.

Other Items

·       Interest expense, net.   Includes interest on our debt and amortization of financing costs and is reduced by interest income.

·       Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures.   Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures constitutes our share of the net profits and losses of the joint venture that owns our London hotels, our joint venture that owns the restaurants at our London hotels (both of which are 50% owned by us), Shore Club (in which we had a 7% ownership interest at March 31, 2007), Mondrian South Beach (in which we had a 50% ownership interest at March 31, 2007), and the Hard Rock (in which we had a 33.3% ownership interest at March 31, 2007).

·       Minority interest.   Minority interest expense constitutes the third-party food and beverage joint venture partner’s interest in the profits of the restaurant ventures at certain of our hotels.

·       Other non-operating (income) expenses include gains and losses on sale of assets and asset restructurings, costs of abandoned development projects and financings, gain on early extinguishment of debt and other items that do not relate to the ongoing operating performance of our assets.

·       Income tax expense.   The United States entities included in our predecessor’s combined financial statements are either partnerships or limited liability companies, which are treated similarly to partnerships for tax reporting purposes. One of our foreign subsidiaries is subject to United Kingdom corporate income taxes. Income tax expense is reported at the applicable rate for the periods presented. Certain of our predecessor’s subsidiaries are subject to the New York City Unincorporated Business Tax (“UBT”). Income tax expense in our predecessor’s financial statements comprises the income taxes paid in the United Kingdom on the management fees earned by our wholly-owned United Kingdom subsidiary. Subsequent to the IPO, the Company is subject to Federal and state income taxes. Income taxes for the period from February 17, 2006 to

23




March 31, 2006 and for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were computed using the Company’s calculated effective tax rate. The Company also recorded net deferred taxes related to cumulative differences in the basis recorded for certain assets and liabilities in the amount of $10.2 million at the time of our conversion from a partnership to a C corporation.

Most categories of variable operating expenses, such as operating supplies and certain labor such as housekeeping, fluctuate with changes in occupancy. Increases in RevPAR attributable to increases in occupancy are accompanied by increases in most categories of variable operating costs and expenses. Increases in RevPAR attributable to improvements in ADR typically only result in increases in limited categories of operating costs and expenses, primarily credit card and travel agent commissions. Thus, improvements in ADR have a more significant impact on improving our operating margins than occupancy.

Notwithstanding our efforts to reduce variable costs, there are limits to how much we can accomplish because we have significant fixed costs, such as depreciation and amortization, labor costs and employee benefits, insurance, real estate taxes and other expenses associated with owning hotels that do not necessarily decrease when circumstances such as market factors cause a reduction in our hotel revenues.

Recent Trends and Events

Recent Trends.   Generally, lodging demand in the United States remained robust through 2006 and the first quarter of 2007 and we believe the outlook for the remainder of 2007 is similar. The strong demand is being driven by continued strength associated with business and leisure travelers, while lodging supply growth continued to remain low. The hospitality industry, particularly in the United States began to recover in the fourth quarter of 2003 from the severe downturn that started in early 2001, which was precipitated by the recession of the United States economy and was exacerbated by the dramatic decline in travel following the terrorist acts of September 11, 2001.

We believe that, in general, current industry fundamentals are similar to those observed following the last industry downturn, which occurred in the early 1990s. That downturn, which also resulted from a recession in the general economy, was followed by several years of RevPAR growth. We believe that, given the fact that supply growth is lower than it was in the prior recovery and the United States economy remains strong, occupancy and ADR will continue the improvement, and that United States hospitality RevPAR will follow the business cycle on its upward swing, although there can be no assurances that such improvements will occur.

The London hospitality market experienced very strong growth during 2006 due to the strength of the United Kingdom economy, citywide events and the recovery from the terrorist attacks which occurred in the city in July 2005. This growth is expected to continue through 2007.

Recent Events.   In addition to the recent trends described above, we expect that the following events will cause our future results of operations to differ from our historical performance.

Purchase of Hard Rock Hotel & Casino.   On May 11, 2006, the Company and MHG HR Acquisition Corp. (“Acquisition Corp”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (“HRH”) pursuant to which Acquisition Corp agreed to acquire HRH in an all cash merger (the “Merger”). Additionally, an affiliate of the Company entered into several asset purchase agreements with HRH or affiliates of HRH to acquire a development land parcel adjacent to the Hard Rock and certain intellectual property rights related to the Hard Rock (such asset purchases, the “Transactions”). The aggregate consideration for the Transactions and the Merger was $770 million.

On November 7, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with an affiliate of DLJ Merchant Banking Partners (“DLJMB”) as amended in December 2006, under which DLJMB and

24




the Company formed a joint venture with DLJMB in connection with the acquisition and development of the Hard Rock.

In December 2006, a subsidiary of the Company commenced a cash tender offer for any and all of the outstanding $140,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 8 7/8% Second Lien Notes due 2013 (the “2013 Notes”) of HRH. Concurrent with and as part of the closing of the Merger and the Transactions, the subsidiary became an entity of the joint venture and purchased approximately $139.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2013 Notes. The 2013 Notes purchased were cancelled in connection with the acquisition.

The closing of the Transactions and completion of the Merger occurred on February 2, 2007. The Company funded one-third of the equity, or approximately $57.5 million, and DLJMB funded two-thirds of the equity, or approximately $115.2 million. The remainder of the $770 million purchase price was financed with mortgage financing under a credit agreement entered into by the joint venture. The credit agreement provides for a secured term loan facility, with a term of three years, with two one-year extensions subject to certain conditions, consisting of a $760 million loan for the acquisition including $35.0 million of renovation costs, $48.2 million of financing costs and $56.3 million of cash reserves and working capital, and a loan of up to $600 million for future expansion of the Hard Rock. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, DLJMB agreed to fund 100% of the equity capital required to expand the Hard Rock property, up to a total of an additional $150 million. The Company will have the option to fund the expansion project proportionate to its equity interest in the joint venture. The Company will evaluate its investment decision at the time of the capital calls, which the Company anticipates will occur in 2007.

Concurrent to the closing of the Transactions and the Merger, the Company and DLJMB entered into a property management agreement under which the Company will operate the hotel, retail, food and beverage, entertainment and all other businesses related to the Hard Rock, excluding the casino. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will receive a management fee equal to 4% of defined non-gaming revenue including casino rents and all other rental income and chain service expense reimbursement. The Company can also earn an incentive management fee of 10% of EBITDA, as defined, above certain levels. The term of the contract is 20 years with two ten-year renewals and is subject to certain performance tests beginning in 2009.

At the February 2, 2007 closing of the Merger and Transactions, the joint venture also entered into a definitive lease agreement with Golden Gaming Inc. (“Golden Gaming”) to operate all gaming and related activities of the property’s casino at the Hard Rock. Under the lease, the base rent is $20.7 million per year payable monthly, plus reimbursements for certain expenses. Golden Gaming is entitled to a management fee of $3.3 million, also payable monthly. The gaming assets were sold to Golden Gaming for a note with a principal amount equal to the net book value of the gaming assets. Casino EBITDA in excess of the rent and management fee amounts will be distributed 75% to Hard Rock for payment of principal and interest on the gaming asset note and any other loans to the lessee and 25% to Golden Gaming.

We plan to undertake a large-scale renovation and expansion project for the Hard Rock. The expansion project is expected to result in the addition of approximately 950 guest rooms, including an all-suite 15-story tower with upgraded amenities, approximately 35,000 square feet of casino space, and approximately 60,000 square feet of meeting and convention space. In addition, the project includes the expansion of the Hard Rock’s award-winning pool, several new food and beverage outlets, a new Joint live entertainment venue, approximately 30,000 square feet of new retail space, as well as a new spa and health club. The expansion is expected to add approximately 550 guest rooms in a new tower to be constructed on the existing property site, and to use eight acres of the acquired adjacent 23-acre land parcel to build a new suite tower with an additional 400 rooms. The project, which is scheduled to begin in 2007, is expected to be completed before the end of 2009.

25




We expect renovations to the existing property will take place during 2007, with upgrades to existing suites, restaurants and bars, retail shops, and common areas, and a new ultra lounge and poker room. As part of the renovation, the Hard Rock’s existing suites and common areas will be renovated. These renovations are scheduled to be completed by the first quarter of 2008, with certain elements to be completed earlier.

The Company and DLJMB are currently evaluating several options for the remainder of the 23-acre land parcel.

Morgans Hotel Group Europe Limited.   On February 16, 2007, Royalton Europe Holdings LLC, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, and Walton MG London Investors V, L.L.C. (“Walton”) an affiliate of Walton Street Capital, LLC a real estate investment company, entered into a joint venture agreement for the ownership and operation by Morgans Hotel Group Europe Limited (“Morgans Europe”). Morgans Europe owns, through a subsidiary company, the Sanderson and St. Martins Lane hotels in London, England. The Company manages both of these hotels under separate hotel management agreements.

The joint venture agreement was executed by the parties upon the sale by Burford Hotel Limited (“Burford”) of its equity interest in Morgans Europe to Walton, and the termination of the Restated Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of June 18, 1998, by and between Ian Schrager Hotels LLC (the predecessor company of Royalton Europe Holdings LLC) and Burford.

The Company continues to own indirectly a 50% equity interest in Morgans Europe and continues to have an equal representation on the Morgans Europe board of directors. Beginning any time after February 9, 2010, either party has the right to buy all the shares of the other party in Morgans Europe or, if its offer is rejected, require the other party to buy all of its shares at the same offered price per share in cash.

26




Operating Results

Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 to March 31, 2006

The following table presents our operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and the three months ended March 31, 2006, including the amount and percentage change in these results between the two periods. The operations presented for the period from January 1, 2006 through February 16, 2006 are those of our Predecessor. The Company completed its IPO on February 17, 2006, therefore the period from February 17, 2006 through March 31, 2006, represents the results of operations of the Company. The combined periods in 2006 are comparable to the Company’s March 31, 2007 results with the exception of the additions of Mondrian Scottsdale in May 2006, the apartment building in South Beach Miami in August 2006 and the Hard Rock in February 2007. The combined operating results are as follows:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,
2007

 

March 31,
2006

 

Change ($)

 

Change (%)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

$

45,263

 

 

$

36,816

 

 

$

8,447

 

 

 

22.9

%

 

Food and beverage

 

 

25,557

 

 

21,985

 

 

3,572

 

 

 

16.2

%

 

Other hotel

 

 

3,646

 

 

3,937

 

 

(291

)

 

 

(7.4

)%

 

Total hotel revenues

 

 

74,466

 

 

62,738

 

 

11,728

 

 

 

18.7

%

 

Management fee—related parties

 

 

3,956

 

 

2,207

 

 

1,749

 

 

 

79.2

%

 

Total revenues

 

 

78,422

 

 

64,945

 

 

13,477

 

 

 

20.8

%

 

Operating Costs and Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rooms

 

 

12,627

 

 

10,061

 

 

2,566

 

 

 

25.5

%

 

Food and beverage

 

 

17,542

 

 

14,062

 

 

3,480

 

 

 

24.7

%

 

Other departmental

 

 

2,027

 

 

2,020

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

(1)

 

Hotel selling, general and administrative

 

 

15,358

 

 

13,212

 

 

2,146

 

 

 

16.2

%

 

Property taxes, insurance and other

 

 

5,697

 

 

3,677

 

 

2,020

 

 

 

54.9

%

 

Total hotel operating expenses

 

 

53,251

 

 

43,032

 

 

10,219

 

 

 

23.7

%

 

Corporate general and administrative

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

2,322

 

 

1,052

 

 

1,270

 

 

 

120.7

%

 

Other

 

 

6,733

 

 

4,618

 

 

2,115

 

 

 

45.8

%

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

4,807

 

 

5,325

 

 

(518

)

 

 

(10.0

)%

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

 

67,113

 

 

53,171

 

 

13,942

 

 

 

26.2

%

 

Operating income

 

 

11,309

 

 

10,918

 

 

391

 

 

 

3.6

%

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

10,599

 

 

14,585

 

 

(3,986

)

 

 

(27.3

)%

 

Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures

 

 

4,564

 

 

376

 

 

4,278

 

 

 

 

(1)

 

Minority interest in joint ventures

 

 

1,102

 

 

1,405

 

 

(303

)

 

 

(21.6

)%

 

Other non-operating (income) expenses

 

 

(5,723

)

 

42

 

 

(5,765

)

 

 

 

(1)

 

Income (loss) before income tax expense and minority interest

 

 

677

 

 

(5,490

)

 

6,167

 

 

 

(112.3

)%

 

Income tax expense

 

 

228

 

 

10,751

 

 

(10,343

)

 

 

 

(1)

 

Income (loss) before minority interest

 

 

449

 

 

(16,241

)

 

16,690

 

 

 

(102.8

)%

 

Minority interest

 

 

13

 

 

(356

)

 

378

 

 

 

(106.2

)%

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

436

 

 

(15,885

)

 

16,321

 

 

 

(102.7

)%

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized (loss) income on interest rate swap, net of tax

 

 

(1,218

)

 

630

 

 

(1,848

)

 

 

 

(1)

 

Foreign currency translation (loss) gain

 

 

(170

)

 

19

 

 

(189

)

 

 

 

(1)

 

Comprehensive loss

 

 

$

(952

)

 

$

(15,236

)

 

$

14,284

 

 

 

(93.8

)%

 


(1)          Not meaningful.

27




Total Hotel Revenues.   Total hotel revenues increased 18.7% to $74.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $62.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. RevPAR from our comparable Owned Hotels, which includes hotels that were operating during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2007, increased by 15.3% to $251 for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $218 for the same period in 2006. The components of RevPAR from our comparable Owned Hotels for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,
2007

 

March 31,
2006

 

Change ($)

 

Change (%)

 

Occupancy

 

 

81.8

%

 

 

75.9

%

 

 

 

 

 

7.8

%

 

ADR

 

 

$

307

 

 

 

$

287

 

 

 

$

20

 

 

 

7.1

%

 

RevPAR

 

 

$

251

 

 

 

$

218

 

 

 

$

33

 

 

 

15.3

%

 

 

Rooms revenue increased 22.9% to $45.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $36.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006, which is directly attributable to the increase in ADR and RevPAR shown above. The inclusion of Mondrian Scottsdale in the three months ended March 31, 2007 accounts for $2.8 million of the $8.4 million increase. The comparable hotel RevPAR increase of 15.3% was driven primarily by the strength of the market in New York, particularly at Hudson which experienced RevPAR growth of 20.9% for the three month period ending March 31, 2007 as compared to the three month period ending March 31, 2006. Furthermore, Delano Miami experienced a 23.8% RevPAR increase from the three months ended March 31, 2007 to the three months ended March 31, 2006 due to the impact of the recent renovations and citywide events.

Food and beverage revenue increased 16.2% to $25.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $22.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The inclusion of Mondrian Scottsdale in the three months ended March 31, 2007 accounts for $1.7 million of the $3.6 million increase. The remaining increase in food and beverage revenues was primarily due to an increase in food and beverage revenues at Clift of 23.6% over the same three month period in 2006. Clift has experienced an increase in sales in Asia de Cuba and in catering events, for both social functions and as a result of the numerous conventions that have returned to the San Francisco market, in addition to some menu changes that have had a positive result on average checks. Our restaurants and bars are destinations in their own right, with a local customer base in addition to hotel guests; their revenue performance is driven by local market factors in the restaurant and bar business.

Other hotel revenue decreased by 7.4% to $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $3.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The inclusion of Mondrian Scottsdale in the three months ended March 31, 2007 accounts for a $0.2 million increase. Offsetting this increase, our owned hotels experienced a 7.5% decline in telephone revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007 which is consistent across the industry due to increased cell phone usage.

Management Fee—Related Parties.   During the first three months of 2007 and 2006, management fee—related parties was comprised of fee income from our contracts to manage our Joint Venture Hotels. The increase in management fees during the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 relates to the inclusion of management fees earned in managing the Hard Rock from February 2, 2007 through March 31, 2007 of $1.3 million and increased management fees earned on the hotels the Company manages in London and Miami Beach, discussed further below.

Operating Costs and Expenses

Rooms expense increased 25.5% to $12.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $10.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The inclusion of Mondrian Scottsdale in the three months ended March 31, 2007 accounts for $0.9 million of the $2.6 million increase.

28




The remaining increase was driven primarily by additions of guest relations employees as part of the Company’s continued emphasis on its customer relationship management initiatives and travel agent commissions due to higher revenues.

Food and beverage expense increased 24.7% to $17.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $14.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The inclusion of Mondrian Scottsdale in the three months ended March 31, 2007 accounts for $1.5 million of the $3.5 million increase. The food and beverage expense increase was primarily in line with increases in food and beverage revenue, with the exception of Royalton which experienced an increase of 36.6% in food and beverage expense as compared to a 7.5% increase in food and beverage revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006, due to higher payroll and benefits costs in the restaurant and bars.

Hotel selling, general and administrative expense increased 16.2% to $15.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $13.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The inclusion of Mondrian Scottsdale accounts for $1.7 million of this $2.1 million increase. The remaining increase is primarily attributed to increased advertising and promotion expenses incurred at Delano Miami as the hotel was “re-launched” after its renovation.

Property taxes, insurance and other expense increased 54.9% to $5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The inclusion of Mondrian Scottsdale accounts for $1.3 million of this $2.2 million increase, which includes approximately $1.0 million of pre-opening costs. The remaining increase is primarily due to higher property insurance premiums as a result of the hurricanes throughout the United States during 2005. Furthermore, there were increases in real estate taxes for Hudson, Clift and Delano Miami, which were the result of valuation reassessments in 2006 on all properties.

Stock-based compensation of $2.3 million was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. In connection with the completion of our IPO in February 2006, the board of directors of the Company issued incentive stock options, restricted stock, and membership units which are structured as profits interests (“LTIP Units”). The Company has expensed granted stock-based compensation ratably over the vesting period in accordance with SFAS No. 123R.

Other corporate expenses increased 45.8% to $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This increase is primarily due to costs of being a public company such as directors’ and officers’ insurance and board of directors fees as well as additional payroll and payroll related costs incurred due to the hiring of additional employees, due to expansion.

Depreciation and amortization decreased 10.0% to $4.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $5.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Many of our assets, including furniture, fixtures and equipment, are depreciated over five years, and a portion of these assets became fully depreciated during 2006.

Interest Expense, net.   Interest expense, net decreased 27.3% to $10.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $14.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The $4.0 million decrease was due to:

·       decreased interest expense of $3.6 million resulting from the February 2006 payoff and October 2006 refinancing of mortgage and mezzanine debt, including prepayment fees, secured by some of our wholly-owned hotels;

·       decreased amortization of deferred financing costs, including the write off of costs associated with the above mentioned repaid loans, of $5.0 million in 2006; offset by

29




·       an increase in interest expense of $4.0 million due to a decrease in the value of the interest rate cap, which does not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, (this interest rate cap agreement commenced in June 2005); and

·       an increase in interest expense of $1.2 million related to the issuance of junior subordinated notes.

Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures was $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Income of $0.8 million recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2007 related to our joint venture which owns the two hotels in London compared to a loss of $0.3 million recorded for the same period in 2006. RevPAR at our London hotels rose by 23.2% in U.S. dollars and 10.4% in local currency. Also, in February 2007, the Company purchased 33.3% of the Hard Rock and recorded a loss of $3.8 million related to this investment primarily due to interest expense. Lastly, we recorded a loss of $1.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007 related to our 50% investment in Mondrian South Beach. The Company invested in Mondrian South Beach in August 2006.

The components of RevPAR from the comparable Joint Venture Hotels for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are summarized as follows:

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31,
2007

 

March 31,
2006

 

Change ($)

 

Change (%)

 

Occupancy

 

 

74.4

%

 

 

74.3

%

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

%

 

ADR

 

 

$

497

 

 

 

$

403

 

 

 

$

94

 

 

 

23.4

%

 

RevPAR

 

 

$

370

 

 

 

$

299

 

 

 

$

71

 

 

 

23.6

%

 

 

The components of RevPAR from the Hard Rock for the period from February 2, 2007—March 31, 2007 is summarized as follows:

Occupancy

 

96.0

%

ADR

 

$

195

 

RevPAR

 

$

188

 

 

Other non-operating (income) expense was income of $5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to expense of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. For the three months ended March 31, 2007, the other non-operating income relates to consideration of $6.1 million in cash received from the transfer of our joint venture partners’ 50% share of the London hotels to an unrelated third party. The expense recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2006 related to legal expenses incurred related to the Shore Club litigation.

Income tax expense decreased $10.3 million from the three month period ended March 31, 2007 to the same period in 2006. In February 2006, the Company became subject to corporate Federal and state income taxes. The Company recorded net deferred taxes related to cumulative differences in the basis recorded for certain assets and liabilities in the amount of $10.6 million at the time of our conversion from a partnership to a C corporation.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company believes its cash flow and existing cash and cash reserves will be sufficient to fund its working capital needs and renovation plans. The Company intends to generally finance future acquisitions with equity partners and non-recourse mortgage debt. Furthermore, the Company plans to fund its equity component in new acquisitions with cash flow from operations and borrowings under its revolving credit

30




line. Consistent with the Company’s capital investment strategy, the Company may consider accessing the equity in its existing hotels to finance further growth.

We believe that these sources of capital will be available to us in the future to fund our long-term liquidity requirements. However, there are certain factors that may have a material adverse effect on our access to these capital sources. Our ability to incur additional debt is dependent upon a number of factors, including our degree of leverage, the value of our unencumbered assets and borrowing restrictions imposed by existing lenders. See “Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds.”

Our short-term liquidity requirements include working capital to fund our reserve accounts. Our reserve accounts consist of restricted cash that is swept by our lenders beginning on the ninth day of each month to fund monthly debt service payments, property, sales and occupancy taxes and insurance premiums of our hotels. After funding these reserve accounts, we fund operating expenses and our furniture, fixtures and equipment reserve (approximately 4% of total revenues).

Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for scheduled debt maturities, renovations, expansions and other non-recurring capital expenditures that need to be made periodically to our properties, and the costs associated with acquisitions of properties under contract and new acquisitions that we may pursue. Our long-term liquidity requirements are also affected by a potential liability to a designer for which we have accrued $11.9 million.

We plan to renovate several of our existing properties in 2007 at an estimated cost of approximately $40.0 million. We anticipate spending a significant portion of this amount on Mondrian Los Angeles, Royalton and Delano Miami. The majority of our capital expenditures are expected to be funded from cash flow, our restricted cash and reserve accounts.

In January 2006, the Company entered into a limited liability company agreement with Echelon Resorts Corporation (“Echelon”), a subsidiary of Boyd Gaming Corporation (“Boyd”), through which we will develop, as 50/50 owners, Delano Las Vegas and Mondrian Las Vegas, both of which are expected to open in 2010. After certain milestones in the joint venture development process have been met, the Company is expected to complete its contribution of approximately $97.5 million in cash and Echelon will contribute approximately 6.5 acres of land to the joint venture. It is expected that these contributions will be completed by June 30, 2008, as part of pre-development. As of March 31, 2007, we had made approximately $34.7 million in capital contributions, which includes a $30.0 million contribution made upon consummation of the Hard Rock transaction in February 2007. We anticipate contributing another $20.0 million in 2007 for pre-development work, which amounts will be applied toward our capital contributions.

In February 2007, a joint venture, consisting of an affiliate of DLJMB and the Company, acquired the Hard Rock and certain other assets for aggregate consideration of $770.0 million. The Company funded one third of the equity capital, or $57.5 million, from the deposits of $62.5 million it funded in 2006 with the remaining funds returned to the Company. DLJMB funded the remaining two thirds of the equity capital of approximately $115.0 million. The remainder of the $770.0 million purchase price was financed with mortgage financing under a credit agreement entered into by the joint venture. The credit agreement provides for a secured term loan facility, with a term of three years, with two one-year extensions subject to certain conditions, consisting of a $760.0 million loan for the acquisition including $35.0 million of renovation costs, $48.2 million of financing costs and $56.3 million of cash reserves and working capital, and a loan of up to $600.0 million for future expansion of the property. Under the terms of the joint venture agreements, DLJMB agreed to fund 100% of the equity capital required to expand the property, up to a total of an additional $150.0 million. The Company will have the option, but is not required, to fund the expansion project proportionate to its equity interest in the joint venture. The Company will evaluate its investment decision at the time of the capital calls, which the Company anticipates will occur in 2007.

31




Operating Activities.   Net cash provided by operating activities was $6.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to net cash used in operations of $4.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase is primarily due to lower interest costs.

Investing Activities.   Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $31.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $7.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The increase in cash used in investing activities primarily relates to the capital contribution on the Echelon project with Boyd of $30.0 million that the Company made in February 2007.

Financing Activities.   Net cash provided by financing activities amounted to $7.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $40.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The cash provided by financing was greater in the three months ended March 31, 2006 due to the IPO related transactions discussed above in Note 1 to the consolidated/combined financial statements. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company repurchased 1.2 million shares of its common stock for $20.6 million and received funds from its draw on the credit facility, which it used to fund the additional investment in the Echelon project discussed above.

Debt

New Revolving Credit Agreement.   On October 6, 2006, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a revolving credit facility in the initial amount of $225.0 million, which includes a $50.0 million letter of credit sub-facility and a $25.0 million swingline sub-facility (the collectively, the “New Revolving Credit Agreement”), with Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

The amount available from time to time under the New Revolving Credit Agreement is also conditioned upon the amount of an available borrowing base calculated by reference to collateral described below. Initially, the available borrowing base is capped at approximately $64.0 million, but that amount may be increased up to $225.0 million at the Borrower’s option (defined below) by increasing the amount of the mortgage on Delano Miami granted by the Delano Miami mortgaged lender (discussed below) and upon payment of the related additional recording tax. The available borrowing base as of March 31, 2007 (assuming an increase in the Delano Miami mortgage and payment of the related additional recording tax) is approximately $204.8 million. That availability may also be increased through procedures specified in the New Revolving Credit Agreement for adding property to the borrowing base and for revaluation of the property that constitutes the borrowing base.

The commitments under the New Revolving Credit Agreement terminate on October 5, 2011, at which time all outstanding amounts under the New Revolving Credit Agreement will be due and payable. A subsidiary of the Company, Morgans Group LLC (the “Borrower”), may, at its option, with the prior consent of the lender and subject to customary conditions, request an increase in the aggregate commitment under the New Revolving Credit Agreement to up to $350.0 million.

The interest rate per annum applicable to loans under the New Revolving Credit Agreement is a fluctuating rate of interest measured by reference to, at the Company’s election, either LIBOR or a base rate, plus a borrowing margin. LIBOR loans have a borrowing margin of 1.35% to 1.90% determined based on the Borrower’s total leverage ratio (with an initial borrowing margin of 1.35%) and base rate loans have a borrowing margin of 0.35% to 0.90% determined based on the Borrower’s total leverage ratio (with an initial borrowing margin of 0.35%). The New Revolving Credit Agreement also provides for the payment of a quarterly unused facility fee equal to the average daily unused amount for each quarter multiplied by 0.25%.

The New Revolving Credit Agreement requires the Borrower to maintain for each four-quarter period a total leverage ratio (total indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA) of no more than (1) 8.0 to 1.0 at any time prior to January 1, 2008, (2) 7.0 to 1.0 at any time during 2008, and (3) 6.0 to 1.0 at any time after

32




December 31, 2008, and a fixed charge coverage ratio (consolidated EBITDA to fixed charges) of no less than 1.75 to 1.00 at all times. The New Revolving Credit Agreement contains negative covenants, subject in each case to certain exceptions, restricting incurrence of indebtedness, incurrence of liens, fundamental changes, acquisitions and investments, asset sales, transactions with affiliates and restricted payments, including, among others, a covenant prohibiting the Company from paying cash dividends on its common stock.

As of March 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the New Revolving Credit Agreement.

The Company borrowed $30.0 million on the line of credit in February 2007 to make a required deposit as part of our involvement in the Echelon project in Las Vegas. The balance outstanding on the New Revolving Credit agreement at March 31, 2007 was $25.0 million.

Obligations under the New Revolving Credit Agreement are secured by, among other collateral, a mortgage on Delano Miami and the pledge of equity interests in the Borrower and certain subsidiaries of the Borrower, including the owners of Delano Miami, Morgans and Royalton, as well as a security interest in other significant personal property (including trademarks and other intellectual property, reserves and deposits) relating to those hotels.

The New Revolving Credit Agreement is available on a revolving basis for general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.

Also on October 6, 2006, the Company terminated its then-existing three-year revolving credit facility of $125.0 million which was entered into concurrently with the Company’s IPO in February 2006, which did not have any amounts outstanding at the time of its termination.

New Mortgage Agreement.   Also on October 6, 2006, subsidiaries of the Company entered into new mortgage financings with Wachovia Bank, National Association, as lender, consisting of two separate mortgage loans and a mezzanine loan. These loans, a $217.0 million first mortgage note secured by Hudson, a $32.5 million mezzanine loan secured by a pledge of the equity interests in the Company’s subsidiary owning Hudson, and a $120.5 million first mortgage note secured by Mondrian Los Angeles (collectively, the “New Mortgages”), all mature on July 15, 2010.

The New Mortgages bear interest at a blended rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 125 basis points. The Company has the option of extending the maturity date of the New Mortgages to October 15, 2011. The Company maintains an interest rate cap for the amount of the New Mortgages at 4.25% through June 30, 2007 and has entered into forward starting swaps beginning on June 9, 2007 that will effectively fix the LIBOR rate on the debt under the New Mortgages at approximately 5.0% through the maturity date.

The New Mortgages provide for events of default customary in mortgage financings, including, among others, failure to pay principal or interest when due, failure to comply with certain covenants, certain insolvency and receivership events affecting the subsidiary borrowers, Morgans Group LLC or the Company, and breach of the encumbrance and transfer provisions. In the event of a default under the New Mortgages, the lender’s recourse is limited to the mortgaged property, unless the event of default results from an insolvency, a voluntary bankruptcy filing or a breach of the encumbrance and transfer provisions, in which event the lender may also pursue remedies against Morgans Group LLC.

As of March 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the New Mortgage Agreement.

Notes to a Subsidiary Trust Issuing Preferred Securities.   In August 2006, the Trust issued in a private placement, $50.0 million of trust preferred securities. The sole assets of the Trust consist of the Notes due October 30, 2036 issued by our operating partnership and guaranteed by us. The proceeds of the issuance of the Notes was used to repay the Company’s then-existing credit agreement and to fund the equity

33




contribution on Mondrian South Beach with the remainder available for general corporate purposes. These trust preferred securities and the Notes both have a 30-year term, ending October 30, 2036, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.68% for the first ten years, ending October 2016, and thereafter will bear interest at a floating rate based on the three-month LIBOR plus 3.25%. These securities are redeemable by the Trust at par beginning on October 30, 2011.

The Note agreement requires that the Company maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined, of 1.4 to 1.0 and prohibits the Company from issuing subordinate debt through February 4, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the Note agreement.

Clift.   We lease Clift under a 99-year non-recourse lease agreement expiring in 2103. The lease is accounted for as a financing with a balance of $79.0 million at March 31, 2007. The lease payments were $2.8 million per year through October 2006 and $6.0 million per year through October 2014 with inflationary increases at five-year intervals thereafter beginning in October 2014.

Hudson.   We lease two condominium units at Hudson which are reflected as capital leases with balances of $6.1 million at March 31, 2007. Currently annual lease payments total approximately $800,000 and are subject to increases in line with inflation. The leases expire in 2096 and 2098.

Promissory Note.   The purchase of the building adjacent to Delano Miami was partially financed with the issuance of a $10.0 million three-year interest only promissory note by the Company to the seller, which matures on January 24, 2009. The note currently bears interest at 8.5% through February 24, 2008 and 10% thereafter.

Mondrian Scottsdale Debt.   In May 2006, the Company obtained mortgage financing on Mondrian Scottsdale. The $40.0 million loan, which accrues interest at LIBOR plus 2.30%, matures in May 2008 and has three one-year extensions. The Company has purchased an interest rate cap which limits the interest rate exposure to 6.0% and expires on June 1, 2008.

Seasonality

The hospitality business is seasonal in nature and we experience some seasonality in our business. For example, our New York hotels are generally strongest in the fourth quarter while our Miami hotels are generally strongest in the first quarter. Quarterly revenues also may be adversely affected by events beyond our control, such as extreme weather conditions, terrorist attacks or alerts, natural disasters, airline strikes, economic factors and other considerations affecting travel.

To the extent that cash flows from operations are insufficient during any quarter, due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in revenues, we may have to enter into additional short-term borrowings to meet cash requirements.

Capital Expenditures and Reserve Funds

We are obligated to maintain reserve funds for capital expenditures at our hotels as determined pursuant to our debt and lease agreements. These capital expenditures relate primarily to the periodic replacement or refurbishment of furniture, fixtures and equipment. Our debt and lease agreements require us to reserve funds at amounts equal to 4% of the hotel’s revenues and require the funds to be set aside in restricted cash. In addition, the restaurant joint ventures require the ventures to set aside restricted cash of between 2% to 4% of gross revenues of the restaurant. As of March 31, 2007, $5.1 million was available in restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures. In addition, as of March 31, 2007, we have a reserve for major capital improvements of $5.0 million under the New Mortgage Debt.

The lenders under the New Revolving Credit Agreement and New Mortgages require the Company’s subsidiary borrowers to fund reserve accounts to cover monthly debt service payments. Those subsidiary

34




borrowers are also required to fund reserves for property, sales and occupancy taxes, insurance premiums, capital expenditures and the operation and maintenance of those hotels. Reserves are deposited into restricted cash accounts and are released as certain conditions are met. The Company’s subsidiary borrowers are not permitted to have any liabilities other than certain ordinary trade payables, purchase money indebtedness and capital lease obligations.

We plan to renovate several of our existing properties in 2007 at an estimated cost of approximately $40.0 million. We anticipate spending a significant portions of these funds to renovate Mondrian Los Angeles, Royalton and Delano Miami. The majority of our capital expenditures at our existing hotels are expected to be funded from cash flow, our restricted cash and reserve accounts. Our capital expenditures could increase if we decide to acquire, renovate or develop hotels or additional space at existing hotels.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative financial instruments to manage our exposure to the interest rate risks related to our variable rate debt. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors. We generally will use outside consultants to determine the fair value of our derivative financial instruments. Such methods incorporate standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow and option pricing models to determine fair value. We believe these methods of estimating fair value result in general approximation of value, and such value may or may not be realized.

On June 29, 2005, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $580.0 million, the then full amount of debt secured by five hotels (Hudson, Mondrian Los Angles, Delano Miami, Morgans and Royalton), with a LIBOR cap of 4.25%. We recognize the change in the fair value of this agreement in interest expense.

On February 22, 2006, subsequent to our IPO, we entered in to an interest rate forward starting swap that effectively fixes the interest rate on $285.0 million of debt from June 2007 through June 2010. This derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment per SFAS No. 133 and accordingly, the change in fair value of this instrument is recognized in other comprehensive income.

In connection with the New Mortgages (defined and discussed above), the Company entered into an $85.0 million interest rate swap that will effectively fix the LIBOR rate on the $85.0 million of debt at approximately 5.0% with an effective date of July 9, 2007 and a maturity date of July 15, 2010. This swap has been designated as a cash flow hedge and qualifies for hedge accounting treatment in accordance with SFAS No. 133.

In May 2006, we entered into an interest rate cap agreement with a notional amount of $40.0 million, the expected full amount of debt secured by Mondrian Scottsdale, with a LIBOR cap of 6.00% through June 1, 2008. This derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment per SFAS No. 133 and accordingly, the change in fair value of this instrument is recognized in other comprehensive income.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We own interests in two hotels through a 50/50 joint venture known as Morgans Europe. Morgans Europe owns two hotels located in London, England, St Martins Lane, a 204-room hotel, and Sanderson, a 150-room hotel. Net income or loss and cash distributions or contributions are allocated to the partners in accordance with ownership interests. At March 31, 2007, our book investment in Morgans Europe was $12.4 million. We account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. Our equity in income of the joint venture amounted to $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and an equity in loss of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006.

35




The Company owns interest in an apartment building on Biscayne Bay in South Beach Miami through a joint venture (the “South Beach Venture”) with an affiliate of Hudson Capital. The South Beach Venture is in the process of renovating and converting the apartment building into a condo and hotel to be operated under the Company’s Mondrian brand. The Company will operate Mondrian South Beach under a long-term incentive management contract.

The South Beach Venture has acquired the existing building and land for a gross purchase price of $110.0 million. The South Beach Venture expects to spend approximately $60.0 million on renovations. An initial equity investment of $15.0 million from each of the Company and Hudson Capital was funded at closing. We account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. At March 31, 2007, our book investment in the South Beach Venture was $10.5 million. Our equity in loss of the South Beach Venture amounted to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

On February 2, 2007, we completed the purchase of the Hard Rock. The Company funded one-third of the equity, or approximately $57.5 million, and DLJMB funded two-thirds of the equity, or approximately $115 million. The remainder of the $770 million purchase price was financed with mortgage financing under a credit agreement entered into by the joint venture. At March 31, 2007, our book investment in the Hard Rock venture was $52.0 million. Our equity in loss of this venture for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was $3.8 million.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated/combined financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience, information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated/combined financial statements.

·       Impairment of long-lived assets.   We periodically review each property for possible impairment. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. In this analysis of fair value, we use discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of our properties taking into account each property’s expected cash flow from operations, holding period and net proceeds from the dispositions of the property. The factors we address in determining estimated net proceeds from disposition include anticipated operating cash flow in the year of disposition, terminal capitalization rate and selling price per room. Our judgment is required in determining the discount rate applied to estimated cash flows, the growth rate of the properties, the need for capital expenditures, as well as specific market and economic conditions. Additionally, the classification of these assets as held-for-sale requires the recording of these assets at our estimate of their fair value less estimated selling costs which can affect the amount of impairment recorded.

·       Depreciation and amortization expense.   Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of our assets. The respective lives of the assets are based on a number of assumptions made by us, including the cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish our hotels, as well as specific market and economic conditions. Hotel properties and other completed real estate

36




investments are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 39.5 years for buildings and five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. While our management believes its estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income or the gain or loss on the sale of any of our hotels or other assets. We have not changed the estimated useful lives of any of our assets during the periods discussed.

·       Derivative instruments and hedging activities.   Derivative instruments and hedging activities require us to make judgments on the nature of our derivatives and their effectiveness as hedges. These judgments determine if the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments are reported as a component of interest expense in the consolidated/combined statements of operations or as a component of equity on the consolidated/combined balance sheets. While we believe our judgments are reasonable, a change in a derivative’s fair value or effectiveness as a hedge could affect expenses, net income and equity.

·       Consolidation Policy.   We evaluate our variable interests in accordance with FIN 46R to determine if they are variable interests in variable interest entities. Certain food and beverage operations at five of our Owned Hotels are operated under 50/50 joint ventures. We believe that we are the primary beneficiary of the entities because we absorb the majority of the restaurant ventures’ expected losses and residual returns. Therefore, the restaurant ventures are consolidated in our financial statements with our partner’s share of the results of operations recorded as minority interest in the accompanying financial statements. We own partial interests in the Joint Venture Hotels and certain food and beverage operations at two of the Joint Venture Hotels. We account for these investments using the equity method as we believe we do not exercise control over significant asset decisions such as buying, selling or financing nor are we the primary beneficiary of the entities. Under the equity method, we increase our investment in unconsolidated joint ventures for our proportionate share of net income and contributions and decrease our investment balance for our proportionate share of net loss and distributions.

Item 3.                        Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Some of our outstanding debt has a variable interest rate. As described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Derivative Financial Instruments” above, we use some derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate caps, to manage our exposure to interest rate risks related to our floating rate debt. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors. As of March 31, 2007, our total outstanding debt, including capitalized lease obligations, was approximately $581.0 million, of which approximately $435.0 million, or 74.9%, was variable rate debt. Our agreement caps LIBOR at 4.25% and expires in July 2007. At March 31, 2007, the LIBOR rate was 5.3%, thereby making our cap in the money. An increase in market rates of interest will not impact our interest expense. If market rates of interest increase by 1.0%, or approximately 100 basis points, the fair value of our fixed rate debt would decrease by approximately $9.5 million. If market rates of interest decrease by 1.0%, or approximately 100 basis points, the fair value of our fixed rate debt would increase by $12.7 million.

Interest risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our financial instruments and future cash flows. These analyses do not consider the effect of a reduced level of overall economic activity. If overall economic activity is significantly reduced, we may take actions to

37




further mitigate our exposure. However, because we cannot determine the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, these analyses assume no changes in our financial structure.

Currency Exchange Risk

As we have international operations with our two London hotels, currency exchange risk between the U.S. dollar and the British pound arises as a normal part of our business. We reduce this risk by transacting this business in British pounds. We have not repatriated earnings from our London hotels because of our historical net losses in our United Kingdom operations and our joint venture agreement. As a result, any funds repatriated from the United Kingdom are considered a return of capital and require court approval. We may consider repatriating certain funds in 2007. A change in prevailing rates would have, however, an impact on the value of our equity in Morgans Europe. The U.S. dollar/British pound currency exchange is currently the only currency exchange rate to which we are directly exposed. Generally, we do not enter into forward or option contracts to manage our exposure applicable to net operating cash flows. We do not foresee any significant changes in either our exposure to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates or how such exposure is managed in the future.

Item 4.                        Controls and Procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Based on management’s evaluation, including the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective as of March 31, 2007. There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 identified in connection with the evaluation described above that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38




PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.                        Legal Proceedings.

Shore Club Litigation—New York State Action

The Company is currently involved in litigation regarding the management of Shore Club. In 2002, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, invested in Shore Club and the Company’s management company, MHG Management Company, took over management of the property. The management agreement expires in 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2002 (reflecting six months of data based on information provided to us and not generated by us and six months of operations after MHG Management Company took over management of Shore Club in July 2002), Shore Club had an operating loss and its owner, Philips South Beach LLC, was in dispute with its investors and lenders. After MHG Management Company took over management of the property, the financial performance improved and Shore Club had operating income in 2004. The Company believes this improvement was the direct result of our repositioning and operation of the hotel. This improved performance has continued. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2005, the debt on the hotel was refinanced.

On January 17, 2006, Philips South Beach LLC filed a lawsuit in New York state court against several defendants including MHG Management Company and other persons and entities. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, (i) that MHG Management Company engaged in fraudulent or willful misconduct with respect to Shore Club entitling Philips South Beach LLC to terminate the Shore Club management agreement without the payment of a termination fee to it, (ii) breach of fiduciary duty by MHG Management Company, (iii) tortious interference with business relations by redirecting guests and events from Shore Club to Delano Miami, (iv) misuse of free and complimentary rooms at Shore Club, and (v) misappropriation of confidential business information. The allegations include that MHG Management Company took actions to benefit Delano Miami at the expense of Shore Club, billed Shore Club for expenses that had already been billed by MHG Management Company as part of chain expenses, misused barter agreements to obtain benefits for employees, and failed to collect certain rent and taxes from retail tenants. The lawsuit also asserts that MHG Management Company falsified or omitted information in monthly management reports related to the alleged actions. Ian Schrager, founder of the Predecessor, W. Edward Scheetz, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David T. Hamamoto, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, are also named as defendants in the lawsuit.

The remedies sought by Philips South Beach LLC include (a) termination of the management agreement without the payment of a termination fee to MHG Management Company, (b) a full accounting of all of the affairs of Shore Club from the inception of the management agreement, (c) at least $5.0 million in compensatory damages, (d) at least $10.0 million in punitive damages, and (e) attorneys’ fees, interest, costs and disbursements.

The Company believes that MHG Management Company has abided by the terms of the management agreement. The Company believes that Philips South Beach LLC has filed the lawsuit as part of a strategy to pressure us to renegotiate our management agreement with respect to the Shore Club.

On August 1, 2006, the judge granted defendants’ motion to dismiss Philips South Beach LLC’s causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty, breach of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. The judge also struck all claims for punitive damages. Philips South Beach LLC filed a notice of appeal, and we filed a notice of cross-appeal, though neither was perfected. Philips South Beach LLC has filed an amended complaint adding a punitive damages demand. Our motion to dismiss that demand was denied, and we have filed a notice of appeal. We have answered the amended complaint, denying all substantive allegations and asserting various affirmative defenses. Discovery is pending.

39




The Company intends to continue to pursue this litigation vigorously. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this litigation, on the basis of current information, we do not expect that the outcome of this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Shore Club Litigation—Florida State Action

On April 17, 2006, MHG Management Company and a related subsidiary of the Company filed a lawsuit in Florida state court against Philip Pilevsky and individuals and entities associated with Mr. Pilevsky, charging them with tortious interference with the 20-year exclusive management agreement that MHG Management Company holds for Shore Club, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and tortious interference with actual and prospective business and economic relations, in part as an attempt to break or renegotiate the terms of the management agreement.

On July 13, 2006, the judge issued an order denying defendants’ motion to stay and for a protective order based on the pendency of the Shore Club litigation in New York. An appeal of that order has been fully briefed and argued, and until it is decided, discovery is stayed. Defendants have moved to dismiss on substantive grounds and for certain of them on jurisdictional grounds as well.

Century Operating Associates Litigation

On March 23, 2006, Century Operating Associates filed a lawsuit in New York state court naming several defendants, including the Company, Morgans Hotel Group LLC, and Messrs. Scheetz, Schrager and Hamamoto. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and a fraudulent conveyance in connection with the structuring transactions that were part of the Company’s IPO, and the offering itself. In particular, the lawsuit alleges that the transactions constituted a fraudulent conveyance of the assets of Morgans Hotel Group LLC, in which Century Operating Associates allegedly has a non-voting membership interest, to the Company. The plaintiff claims that the defendants knowingly and intentionally structured and participated in the transactions in a manner designed to leave Morgans Hotel Group LLC without any ability to satisfy its obligations to Century Operating Associates.

The remedies sought by Century Operating Associates include (a) Century Operating Associates’ distributive share of the IPO proceeds, (b) at least $3.5 million in compensatory damages, (c) at least $17.5 million in punitive damages, and (d) attorneys’ fees and expenses.

On July 6, 2006, the judge granted the Company’s motion to dismiss it from the case. Century Operating Associates has filed an amended complaint, re-asserting claims against the Company, including a new claim for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, and adding claims against a new defendant, Morgans Group LLC. In April 2007, the judge granted our motion to dismiss all claims against the Company and Morgans Group LLC, and certain claims against certain other defendants. In May 2007, Century Operating Associates amended its compliant again re-asserting the same claims against the Company and Morgans Group LLC.

The Company intends to continue to pursue this litigation vigorously. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this litigation, on the basis of current information, we do not expect that the outcome of this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Other Litigation

In addition, we are subject to various claims and legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. We are not party to any other litigation or legal proceedings that, in the opinion of our management, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

40




Item 1A.                Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, projected results and future prospects. We do not believe that there have been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 2.                        Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

First Quarter 2007 Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information about the Company’s purchases of its common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2007:

Period

 

 

 

Total Number of
Common Shares
Purchased

 

Average Price Paid per
Common Share

 

Total Number of
Common Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs

 

Approximate Dollar
Value of Common
Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs
(in thousands)

 

January 1-31, 2007

 

 

604,400

 

 

 

$

17.18

 

 

 

604,400

 

 

 

$

33,940

 

 

February 1-28, 2007

 

 

344,493

 

 

 

$

18.02

 

 

 

344,493

 

 

 

$

27,731

 

 

March 1-31, 2007

 

 

222,575

 

 

 

$

17.64

 

 

 

222,575

 

 

 

$

23,805

 

 

Total

 

 

1,171,486

 

 

 

$

17.52

 

 

 

1,171,486

 

 

 

$

23,805

 

 

 

Item 3.                        Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.                        Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

Item 5.                        Other Information.

On February 8, 2007, the Company filed a Form 8-K in connection with the acquisition of the Hard Rock (the “Hard Rock 8-K”). In the Hard Rock 8-K, the Company disclosed the execution of several loan agreement guarantees. Included among these guarantees was the Construction Guaranty of Completion, which had not been executed at the time of the Company’s filing of the Hard Rock 8-K and will not be executed by the parties thereto until the initial advance of construction loan proceeds for the hotel expansion project pursuant to Section 3.2(f)(iv) of the Loan Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2007, by and among Column Financial, Inc., HRHH Hotel/Casino, LLC, HRHH Cafe, LLC, HRHH Development, LLC, HRHH IP, LLC, and HRHH Gaming, LLC, which loan agreement is attached as Exhibit 10.2 to this report (the “Hard Rock Loan Agreement”). A form of the Construction Guaranty of Completion is included as Exhibit D to the Hard Rock Loan Agreement.

41




Item 6.                        Exhibits.

Exhibit No.

 

Description of Exhibit

2.1

 

First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 31, 2007, by and between Morgans Hotel Group Co., MHG HR Acquisition Corp., Hard Rock Hotel, Inc., (solely with respect to Section 1.6 and Section 1.8 thereof), 510 Development Corporation and (solely with respect to Section 1.7 thereof) Peter A. Morton (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2007)

10.1

 

Joint Venture Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2007, by and between Royalton Europe Holdings LLC and Walton MG London Investors V, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2007)

10.2

 

Loan Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2007, by and among Column Financial, Inc., HRHH Hotel/Casino, LLC, HRHH Cafe, LLC, HRHH Development, LLC, HRHH IP, LLC, and HRHH Gaming, LLC*

10.3

 

Guaranty Agreement, dated as of February 2, 2007, by Morgans Group LLC and DLJ MB IV HRH, LLC, jointly and severally, for the benefit of Column Financial, Inc.*

10.4

 

Closing Guaranty of Completion, dated as of February 2, 2007, by Morgans Group LLC and DLJ MB IV HRH, LLC, jointly and severally, for the benefit of Column Financial, Inc.*

10.5

 

Guaranty Agreement (Non-Qualified Mandatory Prepayment), dated as of February 2, 2007, by Morgans Group LLC and DLJ MB IV HRH, LLC, jointly and severally, for the benefit of Column Financial, Inc.*

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

32.1

 

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

32.2

 

Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*


*                    Filed herewith

42




SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

MORGANS HOTEL GROUP CO.

May 11, 2007

/s/ W. EDWARD SCHEETZ

 

W. Edward Scheetz

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

May 11, 2007

/s/ RICHARD SZYMANSKI

 

Richard Szymanski

 

Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

 

43