XML 21 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
2.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates including, but not limited to, those related to revenue recognition, the period of performance, identification of deliverables and evaluation of milestones with respect to collaborations.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company invests in a variety of financial instruments and, by its policy, limits the amount of credit exposure with any one issuer, industry or geographic area.

Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are concentrated in the pharmaceutical industry and government sector. Accordingly, the Company may be exposed to credit risk generally associated with pharmaceutical companies and government funded entities. The Company has not historically experienced any significant losses. At June 30, 2016, accounts receivable consisted of amounts due from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration under an Orphan Products Development grant and the Company believes that the associated credit risks are not significant.

Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents.

Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalent shares outstanding for the period. The Company’s potentially dilutive common stock equivalent shares, which include incremental common shares issuable upon (i) the exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants, (ii) vesting of restricted stock units (RSUs), and (iii) the purchase from contributions to the 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP), (calculated based on the treasury stock method), are only included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share when their effect is dilutive.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the following potentially dilutive securities were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share due to their anti-dilutive effect:

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2016      2015  

Options to purchase common stock, including purchases from contributions to ESPP

     9,352,432         7,954,304   

Restricted stock units

     347,111         58,975   

Warrants to purchase common stock

     150,000         150,000   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     9,849,543         8,163,279   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Revenue Recognition

The Company enters into corporate collaborations under which the Company may obtain upfront license fees, research and development funding, contingent milestones and royalty payments. The Company’s deliverables under these arrangements typically consist of intellectual property rights and research and development services. The Company evaluates whether the delivered elements under these arrangements have value to the collaboration partners on a stand-alone basis and whether objective and reliable evidence of fair value of the undelivered item exists. If the Company determines that multiple deliverables exist, the consideration is allocated to one or more units of accounting based upon the best estimate of the selling price of each deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence, if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific or third-party evidence is available. A delivered item or items that do not qualify as a separate unit of accounting within the arrangement shall be combined with the other applicable undelivered items within the arrangement. The allocation of arrangement consideration and the recognition of revenue then shall be determined for those combined deliverables as a single unit of accounting. A delivered item or items that do not have stand-alone value to the Company’s collaboration partner shall be combined with the other applicable undelivered items within the arrangement. The allocation of arrangement consideration and the recognition of revenue then shall be determined for those combined deliverables as a single unit of accounting. For a combined unit of accounting, non-refundable upfront fees and milestones are recognized in a manner consistent with the final deliverable, which has generally been ratably over the period of performance obligation.

Contingency payments (received upon the achievement of certain events by the Company’s collaborators) and milestone payments (received upon the achievement of certain events by the Company) are non-refundable and recognized as revenues over the period of the collaboration arrangement. This typically results in a portion of the payments being recognized at the date the contingency or milestone is achieved, which portion is equal to the applicable percentage of the performance period that has elapsed at the date of achievement, and the balance being recognized over the remaining performance period of the agreement. In certain situations, the Company may receive contingent payments after the end of the Company’s period of continued involvement. In such circumstances, the Company would recognize the full amount of the contingent revenues when the contingency is achieved. Contingency and milestones payments, when recognized as revenue, are classified as collaboration and license revenues in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Revenue from government and private agency grants are recognized as the related research and development expenses are incurred and to the extent that funding is approved.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss comprises net loss and other comprehensive income. For the periods presented other comprehensive income consists of unrealized gains on the Company’s available-for-sale securities. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, there were no sales of investments, and therefore there were no reclassifications. For the same periods ended June 30, 2015, amounts reclassified from accumulated other income to net income for unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities were not significant, and were recorded as part of other income (expense), net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Updates (ASU) No. 2014-15 (Subtopic 205-40)—Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15) which provides guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether or not there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosure. ASU 2014-15 is effective for the Company the year ending December 31, 2016. Early application is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have an impact on its financial statements.

 

In May 2015, the FASB issued a comprehensive new standard on revenue from contracts with customers. The standard’s core principle is that a reporting entity will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. On July 9, 2015, the FASB voted to delay the effective date of the new standard by one year. The standard would become effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2018. Early application would be permitted in 2017. Entities would have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this new guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its adoption of this standard on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued a new standard that requires all lessees recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet and disclose qualitative and quantitative information about its leasing arrangements. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its financial statements.

In March 2016, FASB issued guidance that changes the accounting for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. The guidance requires the recognition of the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, thus eliminating additional paid in capital pools. The guidance also allows for the employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting. In addition, the guidance allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an estimated basis. The guidance is effective in 2017 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its financial statements.