10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 000-51757

REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	16-1731691
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2001 BRYAN STREET, SUITE 3700 DALLAS, TX	75201
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(214) 750-1771

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

NONE

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

x	Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer
¨	Non-accelerated filer   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	¨	Smaller reporting company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

The issuer had 137,332,211 common units outstanding as of April 29, 2011.

Introductory Statement

References in this report to the “Partnership,” “we,” “our,” “us” and similar terms, when used in an historical context, refer to Regency Energy Partners LP and its subsidiaries. When used in the present tense or prospectively, these terms refer to the Partnership and its subsidiaries. We use the following definitions in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q:

Name	Definition or Description
Bbls/d	Barrels per day
Bcf/d	One billion cubic feet per day
BTU	A unit of energy needed to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit
ERMH	ETP-Regency Midstream Holdings, LLC, a joint venture 70 percent owned by ETP and 30 perent owned by the Partnership. On May 4, 2011, the name of ERMH was changed to Lone Star NGL LLC.
ETE	Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
ETE GP	ETE GP Acquirer LLC
ETP	Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board
Finance Corp.	Regency Energy Finance Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership
GAAP	Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
GE	General Electric Company
GE EFS	General Electric Energy Financial Services, a unit of GECC, combined with Regency GP Acquirer LP and Regency LP
General Partner	Regency GP LP, the general partner of the Partnership, or Regency GP LLC, the general partner of Regency GP LP, which effectively manages the business and affairs of the Partnership through Regency Employees Management LLC
GPM	Gallons per minute
GP Seller	Regency GP Acquirer, L.P.
HPC	RIGS Haynesville Partnership Co., a general partnership, and its 100 percent owned subsidiary, Regency Intrastate Gas LP
IDRs	Incentive Distribution Rights
IRS	Internal Revenue Service
ISDA	International Swap Dealers Association
KMP	Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
LDH	LDH Energy Asset Holdings LLC
LIBOR	London Interbank Offered Rate
LTIP	Long-Term Incentive Plan
MEP	Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC
MLP	Master Limited Partnership
MMbtu	One million BTUs
MMbtu/d	One million BTUs per day
MMcf	One million cubic feet
MMcf/d	One million cubic feet per day
NGLs	Natural gas liquids, including ethane, propane, normal butane, iso butane and natural gasoline
NYMEX	New York Mercantile Exchange
Partnership	Regency Energy Partners LP
RGS	Regency Gas Services LP, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership
RIGS	Regency Intrastate Gas System
SEC	Securities and Exchange Commission
Series A Preferred Units	Series A convertible redeemable preferred units
Services Co.	ETE Services Company, LLC
Tcf	One trillion cubic feet
Tcf/d	One trillion cubic feet per day
WTI	West Texas Intermediate Crude

2

Cautionary Statement about Forward-Looking Statements

Certain matters discussed in this report include “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Statements using words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “project,” “plan,” “expect,” “continue,” “estimate,” “goal,” “forecast,” “may” or similar expressions help identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions and current expectations and projections about future events, we cannot give assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions including without limitation the following:

• volatility in the price of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids;

• declines in the credit markets and the availability of credit for us as well as for producers connected to our pipelines and our gathering and processing facilities, and for our customers of contract compression and contract treating businesses;

• the level of creditworthiness of, and performance by, our counterparties and customers;

• our access to capital to fund organic growth projects and acquisitions, and our ability to obtain debt or equity financing on satisfactory terms;

• our use of derivative financial instruments to hedge commodity and interest rate risks;

• the amount of collateral required to be posted from time-to-time in our transactions;

• changes in commodity prices, interest rates and demand for our services;

• changes in laws and regulations impacting the midstream sector of the natural gas industry, including those that relate to climate change and environmental protection;

• weather and other natural phenomena;

• industry changes including the impact of consolidations and changes in competition;

• regulation of transportation rates on our natural gas pipelines;

• our ability to obtain required approvals for construction or modernization of our facilities and the timing of production from such facilities; and

• the effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard setting boards.

If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or expected.

Other factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our projected results are discussed in Item 1A of our December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

3

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

As disclosed in Note 1, on May 26, 2010, GP Seller sold all of the outstanding membership interests of the Partnership’s General Partner to ETE, effecting a change in control of the Partnership. In connection with this transaction, the Partnership’s assets and liabilities were adjusted to fair value at the acquisition date by application of “push-down” accounting. As a result, the Partnership’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and certain footnote disclosures are presented in two distinct periods to indicate the application of two different bases of accounting between the periods presented: (1) the period prior to the acquisition date (May 26, 2010), identified as “Predecessor” and (2) the period from May 26, 2010 forward, identified as “Successor”.

4

Regency Energy Partners LP

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands except unit data)

(unaudited)

	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	24,724		$	9,400
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $372 and $297		30,388			35,212
Accrued revenues		69,279			74,017
Related party receivables		35,490			32,342
Derivative assets		1,559			2,650
Other current assets		9,499			7,384
Total current assets		170,939			161,005
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Gathering and transmission systems		551,318			543,286
Compression equipment		828,131			812,428
Gas plants and buildings		210,078			185,741
Other property, plant and equipment		104,419			81,295
Construction-in-progress		90,859			97,439
Total property, plant and equipment		1,784,805			1,720,189
Less accumulated depreciation		(92,171	)		(59,971	)
Property, plant and equipment, net		1,692,634			1,660,218
Other Assets:
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries		1,332,899			1,351,256
Long-term derivative assets		—			23
Other, net of accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs of $4,921 and $3,326		35,523			37,758
Total other assets		1,368,422			1,389,037
Intangible Assets and Goodwill:
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $22,902 and $15,584		762,837			770,155
Goodwill		789,789			789,789
Total intangible assets and goodwill		1,552,626			1,559,944
TOTAL ASSETS	$	4,784,621		$	4,770,204
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST
Current Liabilities:
Trade accounts payable	$	37,841		$	50,208
Accrued cost of gas and liquids		75,837			80,756
Related party payables		12,051			3,338
Deferred revenues, including related party amounts of $2,599 and $8,765		18,653			25,257
Derivative liabilities		23,190			13,172
Other current liabilities		34,031			23,419
Total current liabilities		201,603			196,150
Long-term derivative liabilities		58,875			61,127
Other long-term liabilities		6,426			6,521
Long-term debt, net		1,215,839			1,141,061
Commitments and contingencies
Series A convertible redeemable preferred units, redemption amount of $83,891 and $83,891		70,991			70,943
Partners’ Capital and Noncontrolling Interest:
Common units (138,976,777 and 138,255,919 units authorized; 137,328,994 and 137,281,336 units issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010)		2,891,594			2,940,732
General partner interest		332,036			333,077
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(24,666	)		(11,099	)
Total partners’ capital		3,198,964			3,262,710
Noncontrolling interest		31,923			31,692
Total partners’ capital and noncontrolling interest		3,230,887			3,294,402
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL AND NONCONTROLLING INTEREST	$	4,784,621		$	4,770,204

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Regency Energy Partners LP

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

Unaudited

(in thousands except unit data and per unit data)

	Successor			Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
REVENUES
Gas sales, including related party amounts of $1,262 and $0	$	110,087		$	140,904
NGL sales, including related party amounts of $72,993 and $0		118,251			89,806
Gathering, transportation and other fees, including related party amounts of $6,216 and $8,520		81,836			69,485
Net realized and unrealized loss from derivatives		(1,714	)		(939	)
Other, including related party amounts of $1,866 and $0		8,792			5,529
Total revenues		317,252			304,785
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
Cost of sales, including related party amounts of $3,214 and $3,366		216,261			217,271
Operation and maintenance		33,672			28,527
General and administrative, including related party amounts of $3,905 and $0		18,997			15,403
Loss on asset sales, net		28			284
Depreciation and amortization		40,236			24,895
Total operating costs and expenses		309,194			286,380
OPERATING INCOME		8,058			18,405
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		23,808			7,913
Interest expense, net		(20,007	)		(20,482	)
Loss on debt refinancing, net		—			(1,780	)
Other income and deductions, net		2,414			(3,273	)
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		14,273			783
Income tax (benefit) expense		(32	)		321
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS	$	14,305		$	462
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Net loss from operations of east Texas assets		—			(912	)
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	14,305		$	(450	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(231	)		(162	)
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP	$	14,074		$	(612	)
Amounts attributable to Series A convertible redeemable preferred units		1,993			2,001
General partner’s interest, including IDRs		1,292			662
Amount allocated to non-vested common units		—			(79	)
Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss)	$	10,789		$	(3,196	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per common unit:
Amount allocated to common units	$	10,789		$	(2,306	)
Weighted average number of common units outstanding		137,304,783			92,761,787
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations per common unit	$	0.08		$	(0.02	)
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per common unit	$	0.07		$	(0.02	)
Distributions paid per unit	$	0.445		$	0.445
Basic and diluted income (loss) on discontinued operations per common unit:	$	—		$	(0.01	)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per common unit:
Amount allocated to common units	$	10,789		$	(3,196	)
Basic net income (loss) per common unit	$	0.08		$	(0.03	)
Diluted net income (loss) per common unit	$	0.07		$	(0.03	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

Regency Energy Partners LP

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Unaudited

(in thousands)

	Successor			Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Net income (loss)	$	14,305		$	(450	)
Net hedging amounts reclassified to earnings		3,429			2,657
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges		(16,996	)		9,837
Comprehensive income	$	738		$	12,044
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest		231			162
Comprehensive income attributable to Regency Energy Partners LP	$	507		$	11,882

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

7

Regency Energy Partners LP

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Unaudited

(in thousands)

	Successor			Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	14,305		$	(450	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization, including debt issuance cost amortization and bond premium amortization		41,649			29,389
Write-off of debt issuance costs and bond premium		—			1,780
Amortization of excess fair value of unconsolidated subsidiaries		1,462			—
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		(25,270	)		(7,913	)
Derivative valuation changes		(4,686	)		7,182
Loss on asset sales, net		28			284
Unit-based compensation expenses		921			1,639
Cash flow changes in current assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, accrued revenues and related party receivables		7,300			(2,017	)
Other current assets		(2,096	)		1,091
Trade accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids, related party payables and deferred revenues		(12,145	)		(13,826	)
Other current liabilities		10,613			12,131
Distributions received from unconsolidated subsidiaries		25,270			3,526
Cash flow changes in other assets and liabilities		15			(35	)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		57,366			32,781
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(68,633	)		(38,465	)
Capital contributions to unconsolidated subsidiaries		—			(20,210	)
Distributions in excess of earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries		16,895			—
Proceeds from asset sales		6			10,632
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(51,732	)		(48,043	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net borrowings under revolving credit facility		75,000			69,009
Debt issuance costs		(184	)		(15,272	)
Partner distributions		(63,599	)		(43,034	)
Disposition of assets between entities under common control in excess of historical cost		25			—
Distributions to noncontrolling interest		—			(1,135	)
Proceeds from issuance of common units under LTIP, net of tax withholding		393			—
Proceeds from equity issuances, net of issuance costs		—			(47	)
Distributions to Series A convertible redeemable preferred units		(1,945	)		—
Net cash flows provided by financing activities		9,690			9,521
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		15,324			(5,741	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		9,400			9,827
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	24,724		$	4,086
Supplemental cash flow information:
Accrued capital expenditures	$	16,605		$	9,936

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

8

Regency Energy Partners LP

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners’ Capital and Noncontrolling Interest

Unaudited

(in thousands except unit data)

	Regency Energy Partners LP
	Units
	Common		Common Unitholders			General Partner Interest			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Noncontrolling Interest		Total
Balance - December 31, 2010		137,281,336	$	2,940,732		$	333,077		$	(11,099	)	$	31,692	$	3,294,402
Issuance of common units under LTIP, net of forfeitures and tax withholding		47,658		393			—			—			—		393
Unit-based compensation expenses		—		921			—			—			—		921
Disposition of assets between entities under common control in excess of historical cost		—		—			25			—			—		25
Partner distributions		—		(61,236	)		(2,319	)		—			—		(63,555	)
Accrued distributions to phantom units		—		(44	)		—			—			—		(44	)
Net income		—		12,782			1,292			—			231		14,305
Distributions to Series A convertible redeemable preferred units		—		(1,906	)		(39	)		—			—		(1,945	)
Accretion of Series A convertible redeemable preferred units		—		(48	)		—			—			—		(48	)
Net cash flow hedge amounts reclassified to earnings		—		—			—			3,429			—		3,429
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges		—		—			—			(16,996	)		—		(16,996	)
Balance - March 31, 2011		137,328,994	$	2,891,594		$	332,036		$	(24,666	)	$	31,923	$	3,230,887

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

9

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein contain the results of Regency Energy Partners LP (the “Partnership”) and its subsidiaries. The Partnership and its subsidiaries are engaged in the business of gathering, processing and transporting natural gas and NGLs as well as providing contract compression and contract treating services. Regency GP LP is the Partnership’s general partner and Regency GP LLC (collectively the “General Partner”) is the managing general partner of the Partnership and the general partner of Regency GP LP.

Basis of Presentation. In May 2010, GP Seller completed the sale of all of the outstanding membership interests of the General Partner pursuant to a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) among itself, ETE and ETE GP (the “ETE Acquisition”). Prior to the closing of the Purchase Agreement, GP Seller, an affiliate of GE EFS, owned all of the outstanding limited partner interests in the General Partner and, as a result of that position, controlled the Partnership. As a result of this transaction, the outstanding voting interests of the General Partner and control of the Partnership were transferred from GE EFS to ETE.

In connection with this change in control, the Partnership’s assets and liabilities were adjusted to fair value on the closing date (May 26, 2010) by application of “push-down” accounting (the “Push-down Adjustments”). Due to the Push-down Adjustments, the Partnership’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and certain footnote disclosures are presented in two distinct periods to indicate the application of two different bases of accounting between the periods presented: (1) the period prior to the acquisition date (May 26, 2010), identified as “Predecessor” and (2) the period from May 26, 2010 forward, identified as “Successor”.

The unaudited financial information included in this Form 10-Q has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. In the opinion of the Partnership’s management, such financial information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for such interim periods in accordance with GAAP. All inter-company items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain prior year numbers have been conformed to the current year presentation.

Use of Estimates. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with GAAP, which includes the use of estimates and assumptions by management that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities that exist at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Although these estimates are based on management’s available knowledge of current and expected future events, actual results could be different from those estimates.

Intangible Assets. Intangible assets, net consisted of the following.

	Customer Relations			Trade Names			Total
				(in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	706,566		$	63,589		$	770,155
Amortization		(6,500	)		(818	)		(7,318	)
Balance at March 31, 2011	$	700,066		$	62,771		$	762,837

As of March 31, 2011, the amortization periods of customer relations and trade names vary between 20 and 30 years. The expected amortization of the intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is as follows.

10

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Year ending December 31,	Total
	(in thousands)
2011 (remaining)	$	21,883
2012		29,177
2013		29,177
2014		29,177
2015		29,177

2. Income per Limited Partner Unit

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per unit computations for the three months ended March 31, 2011. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, diluted earnings per unit equaled basic earnings per unit because all instruments were antidilutive.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	Income (Numerator)			Units (Denominator)		Per-Unit Amount
	(in thousands except unit and per unit data)
Basic income from continuing operations per unit
Limited Partners’ interest	$	10,789			137,304,783	$	0.08
Effect of Dilutive Securities
Common unit options		—			31,056
Phantom units *		—			222,124
Series A Preferred Units		(582	)		4,584,192
Diluted income from continuing operations per unit	$	10,207			142,142,155	$	0.07

* Amount assumes maximum conversion rate for market condition awards.

The following data show securities that could potentially dilute earnings per unit in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per unit because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods presented.

	Successor		Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011		Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Restricted (non-vested) common units		—		421,072
Phantom units *		—		386,706
Common unit options		—		306,651
Series A Preferred Units		—		4,371,586

* Amount assumes maximum conversion rate for market condition awards.

3. Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries

HPC. The Partnership owns a 49.99 percent general partner interest in HPC. The following table summarizes the changes in the Partnership’s ownership interest in HPC. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Partnership’s interest in HPC was $695,659,000 and $698,774,000, respectively.

	Successor			Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Contributions to HPC	$	—		$	20,210
Distributions received from HPC		16,728			3,526
Partnership’s share of HPC’s net income		15,075			7,913
Amortization of excess fair value of investment in HPC		(1,462	)		—

11

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The summarized financial information of HPC at 100 percent level is disclosed below.

RIGS Haynesville Partnership Co.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

Unaudited

(in thousands)

	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Total current assets	$	40,492	$	30,074
Property, plant and equipment, net		895,580		888,892
Total other assets		148,033		148,162
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,084,105	$	1,067,128
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Total current liabilities	$	18,798	$	14,810
Long-term debt		52,000		33,000
Partners’ capital		1,013,307		1,019,318
TOTAL LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL	$	1,084,105	$	1,067,128

RIGS Haynesville Partnership Co.

Condensed Consolidated Income Statements

Unaudited

(in thousands)

	For The Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2011			March 31, 2010
Total revenues	$	48,649		$	35,189
Total operating costs and expenses		18,322			16,723
OPERATING INCOME		30,327			18,466
Interest expense, net		(136	)		(102	)
Other income and deductions, net		(35	)		39
NET INCOME	$	30,156		$	18,403

MEP. The Partnership acquired a 49.9 percent interest in MEP in May 2010. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of the Partnership’s interest in MEP was $637,240,000 and $652,482,000, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Partnership recognized $10,195,000 in income from unconsolidated subsidiaries for its ownership interest in MEP and received $25,437,000 in distributions from MEP.

The summarized financial information of MEP at 100 percent level is disclosed below.

Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC

Condensed Balance Sheet

Unaudited

(in thousands)

	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
ASSETS
Total current assets	$	29,627	$	39,746
Property, plant and equipment, net		2,204,060		2,221,193
Total other assets		5,279		5,224
TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,238,966	$	2,266,163
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Total current liabilities	$	57,547	$	54,265
Long-term debt		799,064		799,018
Partners’ capital		1,382,355		1,412,880
TOTAL LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL	$	2,238,966	$	2,266,163

12

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC

Condensed Income Statement

Unaudited

(in thousands)

	For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Total revenues	$	64,824
Total operating costs and expenses		31,559
OPERATING INCOME		33,265
Interest expense, net		(12,855	)
NET INCOME	$	20,410

4. Derivative Instruments

Policies. The Partnership established comprehensive risk management policies and procedures to monitor and manage the market risks associated with commodity prices, counterparty credit and interest rates. The General Partner is responsible for delegation of transaction authority levels, and the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the General Partner is responsible for the oversight of these risks, including monitoring exposure limits. The Audit and Risk Management Committee receives regular briefings on exposures and overall risk management in the context of market activities.

Commodity Price Risk. The Partnership is a net seller of NGLs, condensate and natural gas as a result of its gathering and processing operations. The prices of these commodities are impacted by changes in the supply and demand as well as other market forces. Both the Partnership’s profitability and cash flow are affected by the inherent volatility of these commodities which could adversely affect its ability to make distributions to its unitholders. The Partnership manages this commodity price exposure through an integrated strategy that includes management of its contract portfolio, matching sales prices of commodities with purchases, optimization of its portfolio by monitoring basis and other price differentials in operating areas, and the use of derivative contracts. In some cases, the Partnership may not be able to match pricing terms or cover its risk to price exposure with financial hedges, and it may be exposed to commodity price risk. Speculative positions with derivative contracts are prohibited under the Partnership’s policies.

The Partnership executed swap contracts that will settle against NGLs (ethane, propane, butane and natural gasoline), condensate and natural gas market prices for expected equity exposure in the approximate percentages set forth below.

	As of March 31, 2011
	2011			2012
NGLs		80	%		42	%
Condensate		86	%		55	%
Natural gas		60	%		18	%

At March 31, 2011, all of the Partnership’s commodity swaps were accounted for as cash flow hedges.

Interest Rate Risk. The Partnership is exposed to variable interest rate risk as a result of borrowings under its revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2011, the Partnership had $360,000,000 of outstanding borrowings exposed to variable interest rate risk. In April 2010, the Partnership entered into two-year interest rate swaps related to $250,000,000 of borrowings under its revolving credit facility, effectively locking the base rate, exclusive of applicable margins, for these borrowings at 1.325 percent through April 2012. The Partnership accounts for these interest rate swaps using the mark-to-market method of accounting.

Credit Risk. The Partnership’s resale of NGLs, condensate and natural gas exposes it to credit risk, as the margin on any sale is generally a very small percentage of the total sales price. Therefore, a credit loss can be very large relative to overall profitability on these transactions. The Partnership attempts to ensure that it issues credit only to credit-worthy counterparties and that in appropriate circumstances any such extension of credit is backed by adequate collateral, such as a letter of credit or parental guarantee from a parent company with potentially better credit.

The Partnership is exposed to credit risk from its derivative counterparties. The Partnership does not require collateral from these counterparties. The Partnership deals primarily with financial institutions when entering into financial derivatives. The Partnership has entered into Master ISDA Agreements that allow for netting of swap contract receivables and payables in the event of default by either party. If the Partnership’s counterparties fail to perform under existing swap contracts, the Partnership’s maximum loss as of March 31, 2011 would be $1,559,000, which would be reduced in full due to the netting feature. The Partnership has elected to present assets and liabilities under Master ISDA Agreements gross on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

13

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Embedded Derivatives. The Series A Preferred Units contain embedded derivatives which are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately, such as the holders’ conversion option and the Partnership’s call option. These embedded derivatives are accounted for using mark-to-market accounting. The Partnership does not expect the embedded derivatives to affect its cash flows.

Quantitative Disclosures. The Partnership expects to reclassify $19,537,000 of net hedging losses to revenues from accumulated other comprehensive loss in the next 12 months.

The Partnership’s derivative assets and liabilities, including credit risk adjustment, as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are detailed below.

	Assets				Liabilities
	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
Current amounts
Commodity contracts	$	1,559	$	2,650	$	20,996	$	11,421
Long-term amounts
Commodity contracts		—		23		4,427		3,271
Total cash flow hedging instruments		1,559		2,673		25,423		14,692
Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges
Current amounts
Interest rate contracts		—		—		2,194		1,751
Long-term amounts
Interest rate contracts		—		—		—		833
Embedded derivatives in Series A Preferred Units		—		—		54,448		57,023
Total derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges		—		—		56,642		59,607
Total derivatives	$	1,559	$	2,673	$	82,065	$	74,299

14

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

The Partnership’s statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were impacted by derivative instruments activities as follows.

			Successor			Predecessor
			Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
			(in thousands)
			Change in Value Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion)
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships:
Commodity derivatives			$	(16,996	)	$	6,943
			$	(16,996	)	$	6,943
	Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income		Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion)
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships:
Commodity derivatives		Revenues	$	(3,429	)	$	(4,491	)
Interest rate swap derivatives		Interest expense		—			(1,060	)
			$	(3,429	)	$	(5,551	)
	Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income		Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Ineffective Portion
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships:
Commodity derivatives		Revenues	$	88		$	(498	)
			$	88		$	(498	)
	Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income		Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Pre-Hedge Designation Fair Value
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships:
Commodity derivatives		Revenues	$	1,627		$	—
			$	1,627		$	—
	Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income		Amount of Gain/(Loss) from Dedesignation Amortized from AOCI into Income
Derivatives not designated in a hedging relationship:
Commodity derivatives		Revenues	$	—		$	2,894
Interest rate swap derivatives		Interest expense		—			—
			$	—		$	2,894
	Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income		Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives not designated in a hedging relationship:
Commodity derivatives		Revenues	$	—		$	1,156
Interest rate swap derivatives		Interest expense		(259	)		—
Embedded derivatives		Other income & deductions		2,575			(3,385	)
			$	2,316		$	(2,229	)

15

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

5. Long-term Debt

Obligations in the form of senior notes and borrowings under the revolving credit facility are as follows.

	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Senior notes	$	855,839		$	856,061
Revolving loans		360,000			285,000
Total		1,215,839			1,141,061
Less: current portion		—			—
Long-term debt	$	1,215,839		$	1,141,061
Availability under revolving credit facility:
Total credit facility limit	$	900,000		$	900,000
Revolving loans		(360,000	)		(285,000	)
Letters of credit		(15,515	)		(16,015	)
Total available	$	524,485		$	598,985

Long-term debt maturities as of March 31, 2011 for each of the next five years are as follows.

Year Ended December 31,	Amount
	(in thousands)
2011	$	—
2012		—
2013		—
2014		360,000
2015		—
Thereafter		850,000	*
Total	$	1,210,000

* Excludes an unamortized premium of $5,839,000 as of March 31, 2011.

Revolving Credit Facility. The Partnership’s $900,000,000 revolving credit facility expires on June 15, 2014. The revolving credit facility and guarantees are senior to the Partnership’s and the guarantor’s unsecured obligations, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such obligations. The revolving credit facility contains financial covenants requiring RGS and its subsidiaries to maintain debt to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit agreement) ratio less than 5.25. At March 31, 2011, RGS and its subsidiaries were in compliance with these covenants.

The outstanding balance under the revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin or alternate base rate (equivalent to the U.S prime rate lending rate) plus a margin, or a combination of both. The average interest rates, including commitment fees, were 3.1 percent and 3.93 percent, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.

Senior Notes. The Partnership’s $250,000,000 senior notes bear an annual interest rate of 9.375 percent and will mature on June 1, 2016. The Partnership’s $600,000,000 senior notes bear an annual interest rate of 6.875 percent and will mature on December 1, 2018. These senior notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by all of the Partnership’s current consolidated subsidiaries, other than Finance Corp. and a minor subsidiary, and by certain of its future subsidiaries. The senior notes and the guarantees are unsecured and rank equally with all of the Partnership’s and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured obligations. The senior notes and the guarantees will be senior in right of payment to any of the Partnership’s and the guarantors’ future obligations that are, by their terms, expressly subordinated in right of payment to the notes and the guarantees. The senior notes and the guarantees will be effectively subordinated to the Partnership’s and the guarantors’ secured obligations, including the Partnership’s revolving credit facility, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such obligations. As of March 31, 2011, the Partnership was in compliance with the financial covenants required under the terms of the senior notes.

Finance Corp. has no operations and will not have revenues other than as may be incidental as co-issuer of the senior notes. Since the Partnership has no independent operations, the guarantees are fully unconditional and joint and several of its subsidiaries, except for a minor subsidiary, the Partnership has not included condensed consolidated financial information of guarantors of the senior notes.

16

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

6. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal. The Partnership is involved in various claims, lawsuits and audits by taxing authorities incidental to its business. These claims and lawsuits in the aggregate are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Keyes Litigation. In August 2008, Keyes Helium Company, LLC (“Keyes”) filed suit against RGS, the Partnership, the General Partner and various other subsidiaries. Keyes entered into an output contract with the Partnership’s predecessor-in-interest in 1996 under which it purchased all of the helium produced at the Lakin, Kansas processing plant. In September 2004, the Partnership decided to shut down its Lakin plant and contract with a third party for the processing of volumes processed at Lakin; as a result, the Partnership no longer delivered any helium to Keyes. In its suit, Keyes alleges it is entitled to damages for the costs of covering its purchases of helium. On May 7, 2010, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the Partnership. No damages were awarded to the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have appealed the verdict. The hearing on appeal will likely take place in late 2011 or early 2012.

MEP Guarantee. Upon its acquisition of the 49.9 percent interest in MEP from ETE, the Partnership agreed to indemnify ETP for any costs related to ETP’s guarantee of payments under MEP’s senior revolving credit facility (the “MEP Facility”). ETP continued to guarantee 50 percent of the obligations of the MEP Facility, with the remaining 50 percent of MEP Facility obligations guaranteed by KMP. The MEP Facility matured on February 28, 2011.

7. Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Units

On September 2, 2009, the Partnership issued 4,371,586 Series A Preferred Units. As of March 31, 2011, the Series A Preferred Units were convertible to 4,614,250 common units, and if outstanding, are mandatorily redeemable on September 2, 2029 for $80,000,000 plus all accrued but unpaid distributions thereon. The Series A Preferred Units receive fixed quarterly cash distributions of $0.445 per unit beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 2010, if outstanding on the record dates of the Partnership’s common units distributions. Effective as of March 2, 2010, holders can elect to convert Series A Preferred Units to common units at any time in accordance with the Partnership Agreement.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the Series A Preferred Units for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

	For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
	Units		Amount (in  thousands)
Balance at January 1, 2011		4,371,586	$	70,943
Accretion to redemption value		—		48
Ending balance as of March 31, 2011		4,371,586	$	70,991	*

* This amount will be accreted to $80,000,000 plus any accrued and unpaid distributions by deducting amounts from partners’ capital over the 18.5 remaining years.

8. Related Party Transactions

Transactions with ETE. Under a services agreement with Services Co., Services Co. performs certain services for the Partnership. The Partnership pays Services Co’s direct expenses for these services, plus an annual fee of $10,000,000, and receives the benefit of any cost savings recognized for these services. The services agreement has a five year term from May 26, 2010 to May 26, 2015, subject to earlier termination rights in the event of a change in control, the failure to achieve certain cost savings for the Partnership or upon an event of default. The Partnership incurred service fees of $3,905,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

In conjunction with distributions by the Partnership to the limited and general partner interests, ETE received cash distributions of $14,008,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

The Partnership’s Contract Compression segment provides contract compression services to subsidiaries of ETP and records revenues in gathering, transportation and other fees on the statement of operations.

The Partnership’s Contract Compression segment sold compression equipment to a subsidiary of ETP for $765,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011. As this is a transaction between entities under common control, partners’ capital was increased by $25,000, which represented a deemed contribution of the excess sales price over the carrying value of $740,000.

17

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Transactions with HPC. Under a master services agreement with HPC, the Partnership operates and provides all employees and services for the operation and management of HPC. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the related party general and administrative expenses reimbursed to the Partnership were $4,200,000 and $4,133,333, respectively, which is recorded in gathering, transportation and other fees on the statement of operations.

The Partnership’s Contract Compression segment provides contract compression services to HPC and records revenues in gathering, transportation and other fees on the statement of operations. The Partnership also receives transportation services from HPC and records it as cost of sales.

Transactions with Enterprise. Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (“EPD”) owns approximately 18 percent of ETE’s outstanding common units; therefore, it is considered a related party along with any of its subsidiaries. The Partnership, in the ordinary course of business, sells natural gas and NGLs to subsidiaries of EPD and records the revenues in gas sales and NGL sales. The Partnership also incurs NGL processing fees and transportation fees with subsidiaries of EPD and records these fees as cost of sales.

Others. Prior to December 31, 2010, the employees operating the assets of the Partnership and its subsidiaries and all those providing staff or support services were employees of the General Partner. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, the General Partner receives a monthly reimbursement for all direct and indirect expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership. Effective January 1, 2011, certain employees of the Partnership became employees of ETP, and the Partnership reimburses ETP for all direct and indirect expenses incurred on behalf of the Partnership related to those employees. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, reimbursements of $20,351,000 and $5,510,000 to the General Partner and ETP, respectively, were recorded in the Partnership’s financial statements as operating expenses or general and administrative expenses, as appropriate. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, reimbursement of $20,732,000 to the General Partner were recorded in the Partnership’s financial statements as operating expenses or general and administrative expenses, as appropriate.

As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, details of the Partnership’s related party receivables and related party payables were as follows.

	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Related party receivables
EPD and its subsidiaries	$	29,092	$	25,539
HPC		5,006		5,823
ETE and its subsidiaries		1,382		970
Other		10		10
Total related party receivables	$	35,490	$	32,342
Related party payables
EPD and its subsidiaries	$	598	$	1,323
HPC		629		760
ETE and its subsidiaries		10,814		1,245
Other		10		10
Total related party payables	$	12,051	$	3,338

9. Segment Information

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Partnership renamed its Transportation Segment to Joint Ventures Segment, which represents the Partnership’s equity method investments in its two unconsolidated joint ventures, namely HPC and MEP. In addition, the disposition of the east Texas assets in July 2010 impacts the Gathering and Processing segment, as the results of those operations are now presented within discontinued operations and excluded from the segment information table. Accordingly, the Partnership has recast the segment information for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Gathering and Processing. The Partnership provides “wellhead-to-market” services to producers of natural gas, which include gathering raw natural gas from the wellhead through gathering systems, processing raw natural gas to separate NGLs from the raw natural gas and selling or delivering pipeline-quality natural gas and NGLs to various markets and pipeline systems.

Joint Ventures. The Partnership owns a 49.99 percent general partner interest in HPC, which delivers natural gas from northwest Louisiana to downstream pipelines and markets through the 450-mile Regency Intrastate Gas pipeline system. The Partnership owns a 49.9 percent interest in MEP, which owns approximately 500 miles of natural gas pipeline stretching from southeast Oklahoma through northeast Texas, northern Louisiana and central Mississippi into Alabama.

18

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Contract Compression. The Partnership owns and operates a fleet of compressors used to provide turn-key natural gas compression services for customers’ specific systems.

Contract Treating. The Partnership owns and operates a fleet of equipment used to provide treating services, such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide removal, natural gas cooling, dehydration and BTU management, to natural gas producers and midstream pipeline companies.

Corporate and Others. The Corporate and Others segment comprises a small interstate pipeline and the Partnership’s corporate offices.

The Partnership accounts for intersegment revenues as if the revenues were to third parties, exclusive of certain cost of capital charges.

Management evaluates the performance of each segment and makes capital allocation decisions through the separate consideration of segment margin and operation and maintenance expenses. Segment margin for the Gathering and Processing is defined as total revenues, including service fees, less cost of sales. In the Contract Compression segment and Contract Treating segment, segment margin is defined as revenues minus direct costs. Management believes segment margin is an important measure because it directly relates to volume, commodity price changes and revenue generating horsepower. Operation and maintenance expenses are a separate measure used by management to evaluate performance of field operations. Direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most significant portion of operation and maintenance expenses. These expenses fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a specific period. The Partnership does not deduct operation and maintenance expenses from total revenues in calculating segment margin because management separately evaluates commodity volume and price changes in segment margin.

19

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Results for each period, together with amounts related to balance sheets for each segment, are shown below.

	Gathering and Processing		Joint Ventures		Contract Compression		Contract Treating		Corporate and Others			Eliminations			Total
	(in thousands)
External Revenues
For the three months ended March 31, 2011	$	265,972	$	—	$	38,436	$	8,433	$	4,411		$	—		$	317,252
For the three months ended March 31, 2010		265,598		—		34,979		—		4,208			—			304,785
Intersegment Revenues
For the three months ended March 31, 2011		—		—		6,553		—		67			(6,620	)		—
For the three months ended March 31, 2010		—		—		5,332		—		39			(5,371	)		—
Cost of Sales
For the three months ended March 31, 2011		212,172		—		3,549		1,182		(575	)		(67	)		216,261
For the three months ended March 31, 2010		214,796		—		3,281		—		(767	)		(39	)		217,271
Segment Margin
For the three months ended March 31, 2011		53,800		—		41,440		7,251		5,053			(6,553	)		100,991
For the three months ended March 31, 2010		50,802		—		37,030		—		5,014			(5,332	)		87,514
Operation and Maintenance
For the three months ended March 31, 2011		22,942		—		16,504		734		45			(6,553	)		33,672
For the three months ended March 31, 2010		20,040		—		13,778		—		38			(5,329	)		28,527
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three months ended March 31, 2011		21,457		—		15,178		2,815		786			—			40,236
For the three months ended March 31, 2010		15,220		—		9,207		—		468			—			24,895
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
For the three months ended March 31, 2011		—		23,808		—		—		—			—			23,808
For the three months ended March 31, 2010		—		7,913		—		—		—			—			7,913
Assets
March 31, 2011		1,687,890		1,332,899		1,425,229		219,851		118,752			—			4,784,621
December 31, 2010		1,724,682		1,351,256		1,411,325		220,584		62,357			—			4,770,204
Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
March 31, 2011		—		1,332,899		—		—		—			—			1,332,899
December 31, 2010		—		1,351,256		—		—		—			—			1,351,256
Goodwill
March 31, 2011		313,361		—		476,428		—		—			—			789,789
December 31, 2010		313,361		—		476,428		—		—			—			789,789
Expenditures for Long-Lived Assets
For the three months ended March 31, 2011		29,315		—		36,498		2,197		623			—			68,633
For the three months ended March 31, 2010		24,000		—		11,991		—		2,474			—			38,465

The table below provides a reconciliation of total segment margin to net income from continuing operations.

	Successor			Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Net income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	14,273		$	783
Add (deduct):
Operation and maintenance		33,672			28,527
General and administrative		18,997			15,403
Loss on assets sales, net		28			284
Depreciation and amortization		40,236			24,895
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		(23,808	)		(7,913	)
Interest expense, net		20,007			20,482
Loss on debt refinancing, net		—			1,780
Other income and deductions, net		(2,414	)		3,273
Total segment margin	$	100,991		$	87,514

10. Equity-Based Compensation

The Partnership’s LTIP for its employees, directors and consultants authorizes grants up to 3,565,584 common units. LTIP compensation expense of $921,000 and $1,639,000 is recorded in general and administrative expense in the statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively.

20

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Common Unit Option. The common unit options activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows.

2011
Common Unit Options	Units			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value *(in thousands)
Outstanding at the beginning of period		201,950		$	21.93
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(26,800	)		20.46			$	179
Forfeited or expired		(300	)		23.73
Outstanding at end of period		174,850			22.15		5.2		912
Exercisable at the end of the period		174,850							912

* Intrinsic value equals the closing market price of a unit less the option strike price, multiplied by the number of unit options outstanding as of the end of the period presented. Unit options with an exercise price greater than the end of the period closing market price are excluded.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Partnership received $548,000 in proceeds from the exercise of unit options.

Phantom Units. All phantom units granted prior to November 2010 were in substance two grants composed of (1) service condition grants with graded vesting over three years; and (2) market condition grants with cliff vesting based upon the Partnership’s relative ranking in total unit holder return among 20 peer companies. Distributions related to these unvested phantom units will be accrued and paid upon vesting. All phantom units granted after November 2010 were service condition (time-based) grants only with graded vesting over five years. Distributions related to these unvested phantom units will be paid concurrent with the Partnership’s distribution for common units.

The following table presents phantom units activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

2011
Phantom Units	Units			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at the beginning of the period		742,517		$	23.61
Service condition grants		—			—
Market condition grants		—			—
Vested service condition		(19,647	)		20.65
Vested market condition		(6,300	)		19.52
Forfeited service condition		(34,670	)		25.00
Forfeited market condition		(4,680	)		19.52
Total outstanding at end of period		677,220			24.62

The Partnership expects to recognize $13,418,000 of compensation expense related to non-vested phantom units over a period of 4.3 years.

11. Fair Value Measures

The fair value measurement provisions establish a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of inputs are defined as follows:

• Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active accessible markets;

• Level 2—inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those classified as Level 1; and

• Level 3—inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation.

Entities are encouraged to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation.

The Partnership’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are derivatives related to interest rate and commodity swaps and embedded derivatives in the Series A Preferred Units. Derivatives related to interest rate and commodity swaps are valued using discounted cash flow techniques. These techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs such as future interest rates and commodity prices. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instrument’s term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk and are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy. Derivatives related to

21

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Series A Preferred Units are valued using a binomial lattice model. The market inputs utilized in the model include credit spread, probabilities of the occurrence of certain events, common unit price, dividend yield, and expected volatility, and are classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy. The change in fair value of the derivatives related to Series A Preferred Units is recorded in other income and deductions, net within the statement of operations.

The following table presents the Partnership’s derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

	Fair Value Measurment at March 31, 2011						Fair Value Measurment at December 31, 2010
	Fair Value Total		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Total		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Assets
Commodity Derivatives:
Natural Gas	$	1,559	$	1,559	$	—	$	2,481	$	2,481	$	—
Natural Gas Liquids		—		—		—		192		192		—
Total Assets	$	1,559	$	1,559	$	—	$	2,673	$	2,673	$	—
Liabilities
Interest Rate Derivatives	$	2,194	$	2,194	$	—	$	2,584	$	2,584	$	—
Commodity Derivatives:
Natural Gas		162		162		—		427		427		—
Natural Gas Liquids		17,719		17,719		—		10,684		10,684		—
Condensate		7,542		7,542		—		3,581		3,581		—
Embedded Derivatives in Series A Preferred Units		54,448		—		54,448		57,023		—		57,023
Total Liabilities	$	82,065	$	27,617	$	54,448	$	74,299	$	17,276	$	57,023

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 derivatives measured on a recurring basis for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. There were no transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 derivatives for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
	(in thousands)
Balance at beginning of the period	$	57,023		$	44,594
Net unrealized (gain) loss included in other income and deductions, net		(2,575	)		3,385
Balance at the end of period	$	54,448		$	47,979

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities. Restricted cash and related escrow payable approximates fair value due to the relatively short-term settlement period of the escrow payable. Long-term debt, other than the senior notes, is comprised of borrowings under which, interest accrues under a floating interest rate structure. Accordingly, the carrying value approximates fair value. The estimated fair value of the senior notes due 2016 based on third party market value quotations as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $285,000,000 and $274,375,000, respectively. The estimated fair value of the senior notes due 2018 based on third party market value quotations as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $639,000,000 and $607,500,000, respectively.

12. Subsequent Events

Formation of ERMH and LDH Acquisition. On May 2, 2011, ERMH, a newly formed joint venture owned 70 percent by ETP and 30 percent by the Partnership, completed its acquisition of all of the membership interest in LDH, a wholly owned subsidiary of Louis Dreyfus Highbridge Energy LLC, for $1,972,000,000 in cash, subject to customary post-closing purchase price adjustments. The Partnership contributed $591,600,000 in cash to ERMH, in exchange of its 30 percent interest. To fund this capital contribution, the Partnership issued 8,500,001 unregistered common units representing limited partnership interests in a private placement with net proceeds of $203,900,000. The remaining portion of the Partnership’s capital contribution was funded by additional borrowings under the Partnership’s revolving credit facility.

LDH owns and operates an NGL storage, fractionation and transportation business. LDH’s storage assets are primarily located in Mont Belvieu, Texas, one of the largest NGL storage, distribution and trading complexes in North America. Its West Texas Pipeline transports NGLs through a 1,066-mile intrastate pipeline system that originates in the Permian Basin in west Texas, passes through the Barnett Shale production area in north Texas and terminates at the Mont Belvieu storage and fractionation complex. LDH also owns and operates fractionation and processing assets located in Louisiana.

The LDH acquisition is expected to significantly expand the Partnership’s asset portfolios, adding an NGL platform with storage, transportation and fractionation capabilities. Additionally, this acquisition will provide additional consistent fee-based revenues.

ERMH will be managed by a two-person board of directors, with the Partnership and ETP each having the right to appoint one director. ETP will operate the assets on behalf of ERMH with the former LDH employees.

On May 4, 2011, the Partnership approved an investment of up to $112,500,000 to fund its 30 percent of a ERMH growth capital project for a 100,000 Bbls/d fractionator, the related storage services and interconnectivity infrastructure to be constructed in Mont Belvieu, Texas, which is expected to be completed in early 2013.

22

Regency Energy Partners LP

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)

Registration Right Agreement. On May 2, 2011, in connection with the Partnership’s issuance of unregistered common units described above, the Partnership also entered into a registration right agreement with the purchasers. Under the registration rights agreements, the Partnership has agreed to file a shelf registration statement no later than June 1, 2011 for the resale of these common units and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the shelf registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC no later than July 1, 2011.

Amendment of Revolving Credit Facility. On May 2, 2011, the Partnership amended its Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to permit the acquisition of equity interests in ERMH and to allow for additional investments in ERMH of up to $150,000,000.

Distribution. On April 26, 2011, the Partnership declared a distribution of $0.445 per outstanding common unit and Series A Preferred Unit, including units equivalent to the General Partner’s ownership interest in the Partnership, and a distribution with respect to incentive distribution rights of approximately $1,114,000 payable on May 13, 2011, to unitholders of record at the close of business on May 6, 2011.

23

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion analyzes our financial condition and results of operations. You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and the notes included elsewhere in this document.

OVERVIEW. We are a growth-oriented publicly-traded Delaware limited partnership formed in 2005 engaged in the gathering, treating, processing, compression and transportation of natural gas and NGLs. We focus on providing midstream services in some of the most prolific natural gas producing regions in the United States, including the Haynseville, Eagle Ford, Barnett, Fayetteville, and Marcellus shales as well as the Permian Delaware basin. Our assets are located in Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, Mississippi, Alabama, and the mid-continent region of the United States, which includes Kansas, Colorado, and Oklahoma.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS.

Formation of ERMH and LDH Acquisition. On May 2, 2011, ERMH, a newly formed joint venture owned 70 percent by ETP and 30 percent by us, completed its acquisition of all of the membership interest in LDH, a wholly owned subsidiary of Louis Dreyfus Highbridge Energy LLC, for $1,972,000,000 in cash, subject to customary post-closing purchase price adjustments. We contributed $591,600,000 in cash to ERMH, in exchange of our 30 percent interest. To fund this capital contribution, we issued 8,500,001 unregistered common units representing limited partnership interests in a private placement with net proceeds of $203,900,000. The remaining portion of our capital contribution was funded by additional borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

LDH owns and operates an NGL storage, fractionation and transportation business. LDH’s storage assets are primarily located in Mont Belvieu, Texas, one of the largest NGL storage, distribution and trading complexes in North America. Its West Texas Pipeline transports NGLs through a 1,066-mile intrastate pipeline system that originates in the Permian Basin in west Texas, passes through the Barnett Shale production area in north Texas and terminates at the Mont Belvieu storage and fractionation complex. LDH also owns and operates fractionation and processing assets located in Louisiana.

The LDH acquisition is expected to significantly expand our asset portfolios, adding an NGL platform with storage, transportation and fractionation capabilities. Additionally, this acquisition will provide additional consistent fee-based revenues.

ERMH will be managed by a two-person board of directors, with us and ETP each having the right to appoint one director. ETP will operate the assets on behalf of ERMH with the former LDH employees.

On May 4, 2011, we approved an investment of up to $112,500,000 to fund our 30 percent of a ERMH growth capital project for a 100,000 Bbls/d fractionator, the related storage services and interconnectivity infrastructure to be constructed in Mont Belvieu, Texas, which is expected to be completed in early 2013.

Registration Right Agreement. On May 2, 2011, in connection with our issuance of unregistered common units described above, we also entered into a registration right agreement with the purchasers. Under the registration rights agreements, we have agreed to file a shelf registration statement no later than June 1, 2011 for the resale of these common units and to use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the shelf registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC no later than July 1, 2011.

Amendment of Revolving Credit Facility. On May 2, 2011, we amended its Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to permit the acquisition of equity interests in ERMH and to allow for additional investments in ERMH of up to $150,000,000.

OUR OPERATIONS. We divide our operations into five business segments:

• Gathering and Processing. We provide “wellhead-to-market” services to producers of natural gas, which include gathering raw natural gas from the wellhead through gathering systems, processing raw natural gas to separate NGLs and selling or delivering pipeline-quality natural gas and NGLs to various markets and pipeline systems.

• Joint Ventures. We own a 49.99 percent general partner interest in HPC, which owns RIGS, a 450-mile intrastate pipeline that delivers natural gas from northwest Louisiana to downstream pipelines and markets. We own a 49.9 percent interest in MEP, which owns an interstate natural gas pipeline with approximately 500 miles stretching from southeast Oklahoma through northeast Texas, northern Louisiana and central Mississippi to an interconnect with the Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line system in Butler, Alabama.

• Contract Compression. We own and operate a fleet of compressors used to provide turn-key natural gas compression services for customer specific systems.

• Contract Treating. We own and operate a fleet of equipment used to provide treating services, such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide removal, natural gas cooling, dehydration and BTU management to natural gas producers and midstream pipeline companies.

• Corporate and Others. Our Corporate and Others segment comprises a small interstate pipeline and our corporate offices.

HOW WE EVALUATE OUR OPERATIONS. Management uses a variety of financial and operational measurements to analyze our performance. We view these measures as important tools for evaluating the success of our operations and review these measurements on a monthly basis for consistency and trend analysis. These measures include volumes, segment margin, total segment margin, adjusted segment margin, adjusted total segment margin, operating and maintenance expenses, EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA on a segment and company-wide basis.

24

Volumes. We must continually obtain new supplies of natural gas to maintain or increase throughput volumes on our gathering and processing systems. Our ability to maintain existing supplies of natural gas and obtain new supplies is affected by (i) the level of workovers or recompletions of existing connected wells and successful drilling activity in areas currently dedicated to our gathering and processing systems, (ii) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new wells in other areas and (iii) our ability to obtain natural gas that has been released from other commitments. We routinely monitor producer activity in the areas served by our gathering and processing systems to pursue new supply opportunities.

Segment Margin and Total Segment Margin. We define segment margin, generally, as revenues minus cost of sales. We calculate our Gathering and Processing segment margin and Corporate and Others segment margin as our revenues generated from operations minus the cost of natural gas and NGLs purchased and other cost of sales, including third-party transportation and processing fees.

We do not record segment margin for the Joint Ventures segment because we record our ownership percentages of the net income in HPC and MEP as income from unconsolidated subsidiaries in accordance with the equity method of accounting.

We calculate our Contract Compression segment margin as revenues minus the direct costs, primarily compressor unit repairs, associated with those revenues.

We calculate our Contract Treating segment margin as revenues minus direct costs associated with those revenues.

We calculate total segment margin as the total of segment margin of our five segments, less intersegment eliminations.

Adjusted Segment Margin and Adjusted Total Segment Margin. We define adjusted segment margin as segment margin adjusted for non-cash (gains) losses from commodity derivatives. We define adjusted total segment margin as total segment margin adjusted for non-cash (gains) losses from commodity derivatives. Our adjusted total segment margin equals the sum of our operating segments’ adjusted segment margins or segment margins, including intersegment eliminations. Adjusted segment margin and adjusted total segment margin are included as supplemental disclosures because they are primary performance measures used by management as they represent the results of our revenues and cost of revenues, a key component of our operations.

Revenue Generating Horsepower. Revenue generating horsepower is the primary driver for revenue growth in our Contract Compression segment, and it is also the primary measure for evaluating our operational efficiency. Revenue generating horsepower is our total available horsepower less horsepower under contract that is not generating revenue and idle horsepower.

Revenue Generating Gallons per Minute (GPM). Revenue generating GPM is the primary driver for revenue growth of our Contract Treating segment. GPM is used as a measure of the treating capacity of an amine plant. Revenue generating GPM is our total GPM under contract less GPM that is not generating revenue.

Operation and Maintenance Expense. Operation and maintenance expense is a separate measure that we use to evaluate operating performance of field operations. Direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most significant portion of our operating and maintenance expense. These expenses are largely independent of the volumes through our systems but fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a specific period. We do not deduct operation and maintenance expenses from total revenues in calculating segment margin because we separately evaluate commodity volume and price changes in segment margin.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. We define EBITDA as net income (loss) plus interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. We define adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA plus or minus the following:

• non-cash loss (gain) from commodity and embedded derivatives;

• non-cash unit based compensation;

• loss (gain) on asset sales, net;

• loss on debt refinancing;

• other non-cash (income) expense, net; and

• the Partnership’s interest in adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated subsidiaries less income from unconsolidated subsidiaries.

25

These measures are used as supplemental measures by our management and by external users of our financial statements such as investors, banks, research analysts and others, to assess:

• financial performance of our assets without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;

• the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs, support our indebtedness and make cash distributions to our unitholders and General Partner;

• our operating performance and return on capital as compared to those of other companies in the midstream energy sector, without regard to financing or capital structure; and

• the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects and the overall rates of return on alternative investment opportunities.

Neither EBITDA nor adjusted EBITDA should be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income, operating income, cash flows from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is the starting point in determining cash available for distribution, which is an important non-GAAP financial measure for a publicly traded partnership.

26

The following table presents a reconciliation of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA to net cash flows provided by operating activities and to net income (loss) for the Partnership.

	Successor			Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Reconciliation of “Adjusted EBITDA” to net cash flows provided by operating activities and to net income (loss)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities	$	57,366		$	32,781
Add (deduct):
Depreciation and amortization, including debt issuance cost amortization and bond premium amortization		(41,649	)		(29,389	)
Write-off of debt issuance costs and bond premium		—			(1,780	)
Amortization of excess fair value of unconsolidated subsidiaries		(1,462	)		—
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		25,270			7,913
Derivative valuation change		4,686			(7,182	)
Loss on assets sales, net		(28	)		(284	)
Unit-based compensation expenses		(921	)		(1,639	)
Trade accounts receivable, accrued revenues and related party receivables		(7,300	)		2,017
Other current assets		2,096			(1,091	)
Trade accounts payable, accrued cost of gas and liquids, related party payables and deferred revenues		12,145			13,826
Other current liabilities		(10,613	)		(12,131	)
Distributions received from unconsolidated subsidiaries		(25,270	)		(3,526	)
Other assets and liabilities		(15	)		35
Net income (loss)		14,305			(450	)
Add (deduct):
Interest expense, net		20,007			20,564
Depreciation and amortization		40,236			27,475
Income tax (benefit) expense		(32	)		321
EBITDA		74,516			47,910
Add (deduct):
Non-cash (gain) loss from commodity and embedded derivatives		(4,290	)		7,191
Non-cash unit-based compensation		921			1,597
Loss on assets sales, net		28			284
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		(23,808	)		(7,913	)
Partnership’s ownership interest in HPC’s adjusted EBITDA		19,189			10,675
Partnership’s ownership interest in MEP’s adjusted EBITDA		25,270			—
Loss on debt refinancing, net		—			1,780
Other expense, net		(89	)		90
Adjusted EBITDA	$	91,737		$	61,614

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for HPC and represents 100 percent of HPC’s consolidated results of operations.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	30,156	$	18,403
Add:
Depreciation and amortization		8,082		6,321
Interest expense, net		136		102
EBITDA	$	38,374	$	24,826
Add:
Other expenses, net		11		—
Adjusted EBITDA	$	38,385	$	24,826

The following table presents a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for MEP and represents 100 percent of MEP’s consolidated results of operations.

27

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
	(in thousands)
Net income	$	20,410	$	10,948
Add:
Depreciation and amortization		17,377		16,107
Interest expense, net		12,855		12,558
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA	$	50,642	$	39,613

The following table presents a reconciliation of total segment margin and adjusted total segment margin to net income (loss) for the Partnership.

	Successor			Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Reconciliation of “Adjusted total segment margin” to net income (loss)
Net income (loss)	$	14,305		$	(450	)
Add (deduct):
Operation and maintenance		33,672			28,527
General and administrative		18,997			15,403
Loss on assets sales, net		28			284
Depreciation and amortization		40,236			24,895
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		(23,808	)		(7,913	)
Interest expense, net		20,007			20,482
Loss on debt refinancing, net		—			1,780
Other income and deductions, net		(2,414	)		3,273
Income tax (benefit) expense		(32	)		321
Discontinued operations		—			912
Total segment margin		100,991			87,514
Add (deduct):
Non-cash (gain) loss from commodity derivatives		(1,715	)		3,806
Adjusted total segment margin	$	99,276		$	91,320

28

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2010

	Successor			Predecessor
	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011			Three Months Ended March 31, 2010			Change			Percent
	(in thousands)			(in thousands except percentages)
Total revenues	$	317,252		$	304,785		$	12,467			4	%
Cost of sales		216,261			217,271			(1,010	)		0
Total segment margin (1)		100,991			87,514			13,477			15
Operation and maintenance		33,672			28,527			5,145			18
General and administrative		18,997			15,403			3,594			23
Loss on asset sales, net		28			284			(256	)		90
Depreciation and amortization		40,236			24,895			15,341			62
Operating income		8,058			18,405			(10,347	)		56
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		23,808			7,913			15,895			201
Interest expense, net		(20,007	)		(20,482	)		475			2
Loss on debt refinancing, net		—			(1,780	)		1,780			100
Other income and deductions, net		2,414			(3,273	)		5,687			174
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		14,273			783			13,490			N/M
Income tax (benefit) expense		(32	)		321			(353	)		110
Net income from continuing operations	$	14,305		$	462		$	13,843			N/M
Discontinued operations		—			(912	)		912			100
Net income (loss)	$	14,305		$	(450	)	$	14,755			N/M
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(231	)		(162	)		(69	)		43
Net income (loss) attributable to Regency Energy Partners LP	$	14,074		$	(612	)	$	14,686			N/M	%
Gathering and processing segment margin (2)	$	53,800		$	50,802		$	2,998			6	%
Add (deduct):
Non-cash (gain) loss from commodity derivatives		(1,715	)		3,806			(5,521	)		145
Adjusted gathering and processing segment margin	$	52,085		$	54,608		$	(2,523	)		5
Contract compression segment margin (3)		41,440			37,030			4,410			12
Contract treating segment margin		7,251			—			7,251			N/M
Corporate and others segment margin (2)		5,053			5,014			39			1
Intersegment eliminations (3)		(6,553	)		(5,332	)		(1,221	)		23
Adjusted total segment margin	$	99,276		$	91,320		$	7,956			9	%

(1) For a reconciliation of segment margin to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, see the reconciliation provided above.

(2) Segment margin differs from previously disclosed amounts due to the presentation as discontinued operations for the disposition of our east Texas assets, as well as a functional reorganization of our operating segments.

(3) Contract Compression segment margin includes intersegment revenues of $6,553,000 and $5,332,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively. These intersegment revenues were eliminated upon consolidation.

N/M Not Meaningful

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Regency Energy Partners LP. Net income (loss) attributable to Regency Energy Partners LP increased to net income of $14,074,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from a net loss of $612,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The major components of this change were as follows:

• $15,895,000 increase in income from unconsolidated subsidiaries from the acquisition of a 49.9 percent interest in MEP in May 2010, the completion of HPC’s expansion projects in early 2010 and our increased general partner interest in HPC from 43 percent as of March 31, 2010 to 49.99 percent as of March 31, 2011;

• $13,477,000 increase in total segment margin primarily from the addition of the Contract Treating segment acquired in September 2010 and Contract Compression segment margin primarily attributable to increased revenue generating horsepower provided to third parties; offset by

• $15,341,000 increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily related to the completion of various organic growth projects since March 2010 and the increase of property, plant and equipment amounts resulting from the fair value adjustments upon the acquisition of our General Partner in May 2010 resulting the change of control.

Adjusted Total Segment Margin. Adjusted total segment margin increased to $99,276,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $91,320,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The major components of this increase were as follows:

29

• Adjusted Gathering and Processing segment margin decreased to $52,085,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $54,608,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to lower realized commodity prices. Total Gathering and Processing throughput remained relatively flat (1,006,000 MMBtu/d during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 1,005,000 MMBtu/d during the three months ended March 31, 2010). Total NGL gross production increased to 28,000 Bbls/d during the three months ended March 31, 2011 from 23,000 Bbls/d during the three months ended March 31, 2010;

• Contract Compression segment margin increased to $41,440,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $37,030,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to increased revenue generating horsepower provided to third parties and additional contract compression services provided to the Gathering and Processing segment. As of March 31, 2011, our Contract Compression segment had a total revenue generating horsepower of 848,000, including 764,000 horsepower serving external customers and 84,000 serving the Gathering and Processing segment;

• Contract Treating segment margin was $7,251,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. We acquired the Contract Treating segment in September, 2010. Revenue generating GPM as of March 31, 2011 was 3,268; and

• Intersegment eliminations increased to $6,553,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $5,332,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the increased intersegment transactions between the Gathering and Processing and the Contract Compression segments.

Operation and Maintenance. Operation and maintenance expense increased to $33,672,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $28,527,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the following:

• $1,983,000 increase in labor cost in our Contract Compression segment primarily due to increased bonus accrual as well as increased headcount since March 31, 2010;

• $858,000 increase in consumable products primarily utilized in our Contract Compression segment;

• $734,000 operation and maintenance expense related to our Contract Treating segment that was acquired in September 2010; and

• $514,000 increase in contractor expenses.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense increased to $18,997,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $15,403,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to the following:

• $2,500,000 of service fees paid to Services Co. in 2011; and

• $695,000 general and administrative expense related to our Contract Treating segment that was acquired in September 2010.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased to $40,236,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $24,895,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase was the result of $10,740,000 of additional depreciation and amortization expense due to the completion of various organic growth projects since March 2010. In addition, $4,601,000 of additional depreciation and amortization expense incurred related to the increase of property, plant and equipment amounts resulting from the fair value adjustments upon the acquisition of our General Partner in May 2010 and the resulting change of control. Had the change in control occurred on January 1, 2010, our depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 would have been $29,496,000.

Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries. Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries increased to $23,808,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $7,913,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The schedule set forth below demonstrates the net income for each unconsolidated subsidiary, our share of the net income and the total income from each unconsolidated subsidiary, for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

	Three Months Ended March 31, 2011									Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
	HPC			MEP			Total			HPC			MEP		Total
	(in thousands except percentages)									(in thousands except percentages)
Net income	$	30,156		$	20,410		$	50,566		$	18,403		$	10,948	$	29,351
Interest percentage		49.99	%		49.9	%		N/M			43	%		N/A		N/M
Share of unconsolidated subsidiaries’ net income		15,075			10,195			25,270			7,913			—		7,913
Less: Amortization of excess fair value of unconsolidated subsidiaries		(1,462	)		—			(1,462	)		—			—		—
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	13,613		$	10,195		$	23,808		$	7,913		$	—	$	7,913

N/A—We acquired 49.9 percent interest in MEP in May 2010.

N/M—Not Meaningful

30

HPC’s net income increased to $30,156,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $18,403,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to the completion of HPC’s expansion projects in January 2010, which increased capacity from 0.9 Bcf/d to 2.1 Bcf/d.

MEP’s net income increased to $20,410,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $10,948,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to the completion of MEP’s expansion projects in June 2010, which increased capacity from 1.5 Bcf/d to 1.8 Bcf/d.

Other Income and Deductions, Net. Other income and deductions, net increased to a gain of $2,414,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from a net loss of $3,273,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to the non-cash mark-to-market adjustment in the embedded derivatives related to the Series A Preferred Units issued in September 2009.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

In addition to the information set forth in this report, further information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

See Item 1, Note 1 - Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of this report for the description of our push-down accounting in connection with the acquisition of our General Partner in May 2010 and the resulting change in control, together with the description of recently issued accounting standards.

OTHER MATTERS

Information regarding our commitments and contingencies is included in Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of this report.

IRS Audits. The Closing Conference concluding the IRS examination of the Partnership’s 2007 and 2008 tax returns was held on April 19, 2011. The IRS proposed various adjustments to the Partnership’s tax returns which the Partnership anticipates appealing. It is not known whether such adjustments would be material, or how such adjustments would affect unitholders.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

We expect our sources of liquidity to include:

• cash generated from operations;

• borrowings under our revolving credit facility;

• distributions received from unconsolidated subsidiaries;

• debt offerings; and

• issuance of additional partnership units.

We expect our base growth capital expenditures to be $253,000,000 in 2011, which includes $155,000,000 for the Gathering and Processing segment, mostly in south Texas, $78,000,000 for the Contract Compression segment, $12,000,000 for the Contract Treating segment, and $8,000,000 for the Corporate and Others segment. In addition, we expect our maintenance capital expenditures to be $14,000,000 in 2011, excluding maintenance capital expenditures related to our joint venture interests. We may revise the timing of these expenditures as necessary to adapt to economic conditions.

HPC’s 100 percent growth capital expenditure for 2011 is expected to be $42,000,000 and is expected to be funded under its revolving credit facility.

Working Capital. Working capital is the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities and is a measure of our ability to pay our obligations as they become due. When we incur growth capital expenditures, we may experience working capital deficits as we fund construction expenditures out of working capital until they are permanently financed. Our working capital is also influenced by current derivative assets and liabilities due to fair value changes in our derivative positions being reflected on our balance sheet. These derivative assets and liabilities represent our expectations for the settlement of derivative rights and obligations over the next 12 months, and should be viewed differently from trade accounts receivable and accounts payable, which settle over a shorter span of time. When our derivative positions are settled, we expect an offsetting physical transaction, and, as a result, we do not expect derivative assets and liabilities to affect our ability to pay expenditures and obligations as they come due. Our Contract Compression and Contract Treating segments record deferred revenue as a current liability. The deferred revenue represents billings in advance of services performed. As the revenues associated with the deferred revenue are earned, the liability is reduced.

Our working capital deficit decreased to $30,664,000 at March 31, 2011 from $35,145,000 at December 31, 2010. This decrease was primarily due to the following factors:

31

• an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $15,324,000 generated primarily from cash flows from operations;

• a decrease of $7,543,000 in trade payables and receivables, net primarily due to the timing of our cash receipts and disbursements; and partially offset by

• an increase of $11,109,000 in derivative liabilities and assets, net primarily due to increase in commodity prices and new trades entered into since year end; and

• an increase in other current assets and liabilities, net of $8,497,000 primarily due to the interest accrual on our senior notes, interest is paid semi-annually in December and June.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities. Net cash flows provided by operating activities increased to $57,366,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $32,781,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in cash flows from operating activities was primarily due to an increase in segment margin and income from unconsolidated subsidiaries primarily due to the acquisition of MEP in May 2010.

Cash Flows used in Investing Activities. Net cash flows used in investing activities increased to $51,732,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $48,043,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily related to capital expenditures for growth projects.

Growth Capital Expenditures. Growth capital expenditures are capital expenditures made to acquire additional assets to increase our business, to expand and upgrade existing systems and facilities or to construct or acquire similar systems or facilities. In the three months ended March 31, 2011, we incurred $61,878,000 of growth capital expenditures. Growth capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2011, primarily related to $33,597,000 for the fabrication of new compressor packages for our Contract Compression segment, $25,916,000 for organic growth projects for our Gathering and Processing segment and $2,365,000 for the fabrication of new treating plants for our Contract Treating segment.

Maintenance Capital Expenditures. Maintenance capital expenditures are capital expenditures made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets or to maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and extend their useful lives. In the three months ended March 31, 2011, we incurred $3,433,000 of maintenance capital expenditures.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash flows provided by financing activities slightly increased to $9,690,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $9,521,000 during the same period in 2010.

Capital Resources. On May 2, 2011, we issued 8,500,001 unregistered common units representing limited partnership interests in a private placement with net proceeds of $203,900,000, to partially fund our capital contribution to ERMH. The remaining capital contribution of $387,700,000 was funded through additional borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

Amendment of Revolving Credit Facility. On May 2, 2011, we amended our Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to permit the acquisition of equity interest in ERMH and to allow for additional investments in ERMH of up to $150,000,000.

Additional Investment in ERMH. On May 4, 2011, we approved an investment of up to $112,500,000 to fund our 30 percent of a ERMH growth capital project for a 100,000 Bbls/d fractionator, the related storage services and interconnectivity infrastructure to be constructed in Mont Belvieu, Texas, which is expected to be completed in early 2013.

Cash Distributions from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we received cash distributions of $25,437,000 and $16,728,000 from MEP and HPC, respectively.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Risk and Accounting Policies. We are exposed to market risks associated with commodity prices, counterparty credit, and interest rates. Management and the board of directors of our General Partner have established comprehensive risk management policies and procedures to monitor and manage these market risks. Our General Partner is responsible for delegation of transaction authority levels, and the Audit and Risk Management Committee of our General Partner is responsible for the oversight of credit risk and commodity price risk, including monitoring exposure limits. The Audit and Risk Management Committee receives regular briefings on positions and exposures, credit exposures and overall risk management in the context of market activities.

Commodity Price Risk. We are a net seller of NGLs, condensate and natural gas as a result of our gathering and processing operations. The prices of these commodities are impacted by changes in supply and demand as well as market forces. Our profitability and cash flow are affected by the inherent volatility of these commodities, which could adversely affect our cash available for distribution and our ability to make distributions to our unitholders. We manage this commodity price exposure through an integrated strategy that includes management of our contract portfolio, matching sales prices of commodities with purchases, optimization of our portfolio by monitoring basis and other price differentials in operating areas, and the use of derivative contracts. In some cases, we may not be able to match pricing terms or to cover our risk to price exposure with financial hedges, and we may be exposed to commodity price risk. Speculative positions with derivative contracts are prohibited under our risk management policy.

We execute natural gas, NGLs and WTI trades on a periodic basis to hedge our anticipated equity exposure. Our swap contracts settle against condensate, ethane, propane, butane, natural gas, and natural gasoline market prices. We continually monitor our hedging and contract portfolio and expect to continue to adjust our hedge positions as conditions warrant. We executed swap contracts that will settle against NGLs, condensate and natural gas prices for our expected exposure in the approximate percentages set forth below.

32

	As of March 31, 2011
	2011			2012
NGLs		80	%		42	%
Condensate		86	%		55	%
Natural gas		60	%		18	%

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our hedges for natural gas, NGLs, and WTI, outstanding at March 31, 2011. The relevant index price that we pay for NGLs is the monthly average of the daily closing price for deliveries of commodities into Mont Belvieu, Texas, as reported by the Oil Price Information Service (OPIS). The relevant index price for natural gas is NYMEX on the pricing dates as defined by the swap contracts. The relevant index for WTI is the monthly average of the daily price of WTI as reported by the NYMEX. The fair value of our outstanding trades is determined using a discounted cash flow model based on third-party prices and readily available market information.

Period	Underlying		Notional Volume/ Amount		We Pay			We Receive Weighted Average Price		Fair Value Asset/(Liability)			Effect of Hypothetical Change in Index*
										(in thousands)
April 2011-September 2012		Ethane		758 (MBbls)		Index			$0.49($/gallon)	$	(2,990	)	$	1,841
April 2011-December 2012		Propane		438 (MBbls)		Index			1.03($/gallon)		(6,189	)		2,528
April 2011-December 2012		Normal Butane		267 (MBbls)		Index			1.41($/gallon)		(4,652	)		2,047
April 2011-December 2012		Natural Gasoline		147 (MBbls)		Index			1.83($/gallon)		(3,888	)		1,522
April 2011-December 2012		West Texas Intermediate Crude		370 (MBbls)		Index			86.82($/Bbl)		(7,542	)		3,976
April 2011-June 2012		Natural gas		3,110,000 (MMBtu)		Index			5.15($/MMBtu)		1,397			1,461
April 2011-April 2012		Interest Rate	$	250,000,000		1.325	%		Three-month LIBOR		(2,194	)		2,500
									Total Fair Value	$	(26,058	)

* Price risk sensitivities were calculated by assuming a theoretical 10 percent change, increase or decrease, in prices regardless of the term or the historical relationships between the contractual price of the instrument and the underlying commodity price. Interest rate sensitivity assumes a 100 basis point increase or decrease in the LIBOR yield curve. The price sensitivity results are presented in absolute terms.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls. At the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of our General Partner, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such terms are defined in Rule 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of our managing general partner, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Internal control over financial reporting. Effective January 1, 2011, the Partnership has begun to integrate certain business functions under a shared services agreement with Services Co. As of March 31, 2011, no significant changes have been made to the Partnership’s accounting systems; however, certain controls and procedures have been changed to conform to the existing controls of the shared services provider. Additional changes, including the transition of the Partnership’s accounting systems, are expected to be completed during the second quarter of 2011. None of these changes are in response to any identified deficiency or weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.

There were no other changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The information required for this item is provided in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies, included in the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included under Part I, Item 1, which information is incorporated by reference into this item.

33

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our recently announced transactions present several risks. Many of those risks are similar to the risks associated with our existing businesses, as we have previously disclosed. However, certain of those risks represent new risks related to our business or existing risks that have become more significant. The following risk factors should be read in conjunction with our risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Risks Related to Our Business

We do not control, and therefore may not be able to cause or prevent certain actions by, certain of our joint ventures.

Certain of our joint ventures have their own governing boards, and we may not control all of the decisions of those boards. Consequently, it may be difficult or impossible for us to cause the joint venture entity to take actions that we believe would be in our or the joint venture’s best interests. Likewise, we may be unable to prevent actions of the joint venture.

The profitability of certain activities in our NGL and refined products storage business, our NGL transportation business and our off-gas processing and fractionating business are largely dependent upon market demand for NGLs and refined products, which has been volatile, and competition in the market place, both of which are factors that are beyond our control.

Our NGL and refined products storage revenues are primarily derived from fixed capacity arrangements between us and our customers. However, a portion of our revenues are derived from fungible storage and throughput arrangements, under which our revenues are more dependent upon demand for storage from our customers. Demand for these services may fluctuate as a result of changes in commodity prices. Our NGL and refined products storage assets are primarily located in the Mont Belvieu area, which is a significant storage distribution and trading complex with multiple industry participants, any one of which could compete for the business of our existing and potential customers. Any loss of business from existing customers or our inability to attract new customers could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Revenues from our NGL transportation systems are exposed to risks due to fluctuations in demand for transportation as a result of unfavorable commodity prices and competition from nearby pipelines. We receive substantially all of our transportation revenues through dedicated contracts under which the customer agrees to deliver the total output from particular processing plants that are connected only to our transportation system. We may not be able to renew these contracts or execute new customer contracts on favorable terms if NGL prices decline and demand for our transportation services decreases. Any loss of existing customers due to decreased demand for our services or competition from other transportation service providers could have a negative impact on our revenues and have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

Revenues from our off-gas processing and fractionating system in south Louisiana are exposed to risks due to the low concentration of suppliers near our facilities and the possibility that connected refineries may not provide us with sufficient off-gas for processing at our facilities. The connected refineries may also experience outages due to maintenance issues and severe weather, such as hurricanes. We receive revenues primarily through customer agreements that are a combination of keep-whole and percent-of-proceeds arrangements, as well as from transportation and fractionation fees. Consequently, a large portion of our off-gas processing and fractionation revenues are exposed to risks due to fluctuations in commodity prices. In addition, a decline in NGL prices could cause a decrease in demand for our off-gas processing and fractionation services and could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.

The markets and prices for natural gas and NGLs depend upon factors beyond our control. These factors

34

include demand for oil, natural gas and NGLs, which fluctuate with changes in market and economic conditions, and other factors, including:

• the impact of weather on the demand for oil, natural gas and NGLs;

• the level of domestic oil and natural gas production;

• the availability of imported oil, natural gas and NGLs;

• actions taken by foreign oil and gas producing nations;

• the availability of local transportation systems;

• the price, availability and marketing of competitive fuels;

• the demand for electricity;

• the impact of energy conservation efforts; and

• the extent of governmental regulation and taxation.

Certain of our assets may become subject to regulation.

Intrastate transportation of NGLs is largely regulated by the state in which such transportation takes place. The 1,066-mile West Texas Pipeline, which we acquired as part the LDH acquisition, transports NGLs within the state of Texas and is subject to regulation by the Texas Railroad Commission (“TRRC”). This NGL transportation system offers services pursuant to an intrastate transportation tariff on file with the TRRC. Such services must be provided in a manner that is just, reasonable and non-discriminatory. We believe that this NGL system does not provide interstate service and that it is thus not subject to FERC jurisdiction under the Interstate Commerce Act and the Energy Policy Act of 1992. We cannot guarantee that the jurisdictional status of this NGL pipeline system will remain unchanged, however. Should it be found jurisdictional, the FERC’s rate-making methodologies may, among other things, delay the use of rates that reflect increased costs and subject us to potentially burdensome and expensive operational, reporting and other requirements. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect revenues and cash flow related to these assets.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits below are filed as a part of this report:

Exhibit 2.5 – Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2011, by and among ETP-Regency Midstream Holdings, LLC, LDH Energy Asset Holdings LLC, Louis Dreyfus Highbridge Energy LLC and, for the limited purposes set forth therein, Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. and Regency Energy Partners LP. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Form 8-K/A dated March 25, 2011.)

Exhibit 4.5 – Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 2, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to our Form 8-K dated May 2, 2011.)

Exhibit 10.33 – Assumption, Contribution and Indemnification Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2011, between Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. and Regency Energy Partners LP. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Form 8-K/A dated March 25, 2011.)

Exhibit 10.34 – Common Unit Purchase Agreement, dated March 23, 2011, by and among Regency Energy Partners LP and the purchasers named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K dated March 28, 2011.)

Exhibit 10.35 – Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of ETP-Regency Midstream Holdings, LLC, dated May 2, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K dated May 2, 2011.)

Exhibit 10.36 – Amendment Agreement No. 2 to the Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated May 2, 2011. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Form 8-K dated May 2, 2011.)

Exhibit 12.1 – Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Exhibit 31.1 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1 – Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.2 – Section 1350 Certifications of Principal Financial Officer

Exhibit 101.INS – XBRL Instance Document

Exhibit 101.SCH – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schemat

Exhibit 101.CAL – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

Exhibit 101.DEF – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

Exhibit 101.LAB – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

Exhibit 101.PRE – XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

35

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP By: Regency GP LP, Its general partner By: Regency GP LLC, its general partner
Date: May 5, 2011	/S/    A. TROY STURROCK
	A. Troy Sturrock Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer (Duly Authorized Officer)

36

EX-12.1

Exhibit 12.1

Regency Energy Partners LP

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(in thousands, except for ratio amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Successor		Predecessor
	Three Month Period ended March 31, 2011		Three Month Period ended March 31, 2010
Fixed charges:
Interest expense, net	$	20,007	$	20,482
Capitalized interest		457		401
Interest charges included in rental expense (c)		203		177
Distributions to the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Units		1,945		—
Accretion of the Series A Convertible Redeemable Preferred Units		48		55
Total fixed charges (a)	$	22,660	$	21,115
Earnings:
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	$	14,273	$	783
Less:
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		23,808		7,913
Capitalized interest		457		401
Noncontrolling interests		231		162
Add:
Distributed income from unconsolidated subsidiaries		25,270		3,526
Fixed charges		22,660		21,115
Amortization of capitalized interest		142		113
Total earnings available for fixed charges (b)	$	37,849	$	17,061
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (b)/(a) (1)		1.67		—
(1) Earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by:	$	—	$	4,054
(c) Amount approximates reasonable interest expense included within operating lease payments.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

I, Michael J. Bradley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Regency Energy Partners LP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities and Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 5, 2011	/s/ Michael J. Bradley
	Michael J. Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer of Regency GP LLC, general partner of Regency GP LP, general partner of Regency Energy Partners LP

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

I, Thomas E. Long, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Regency Energy Partners LP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities and Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 5, 2011	/s/ Thomas E. Long
	Thomas E. Long Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Regency GP LLC, general partner of Regency GP LP, general partner of Regency Energy Partners LP

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE

OFFICER OF REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Bradley, President and Chief Executive Officer of Regency GP LLC, the general partner of Regency GP LP, the general partner of Regency Energy Partners LP (the “Partnership”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: May 5, 2011	/s/ Michael J. Bradley
	Michael J. Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer of Regency GP LLC, general partner of Regency GP LP, general partner of Regency Energy Partners LP

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL

OFFICER OF REGENCY ENERGY PARTNERS LP

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Long, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Regency GP LLC, the general partner of Regency GP LP, the general partner of Regency Energy Partners LP (the “Partnership”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date: May 5, 2011	/s/ Thomas E. Long
	Thomas E. Long Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Regency GP LLC, general partner of Regency GP LP, general partner of Regency Energy Partners LP