|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)
|
(Commission File Number)
|
(IRS Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol (s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
|
|
●
|
Accretive transaction, doubling of UEC’s uranium resources in world-class, politically stable, uranium mining jurisdictions at only a 13.7% dilution to UEC’s outstanding shares (1)
|
●
|
Pro forma UEC will have the largest uranium portfolio focused exclusively in the Americas, located in proven and stable jurisdictions, and combining diversified U.S. production and Canadian development assets
|
●
|
Recent global events have set in motion long-term structural changes in the supply chains of energy commodities where security of supply and reduction of geopolitical and transportation risk will be key strategic differentiators
|
●
|
On the demand side, there is a growing trend by Western utilities to secure supplies from uranium projects in politically stable jurisdictions
|
●
|
UEX portfolio is comprised of 29 uranium projects covering key areas of the producing eastern side and development western side of prolific Athabasca basin
|
●
|
5 of the 29 projects are advanced resource stage and already in strong joint-venture partnerships with established uranium miners which allows UEC to remain operationally focused in the U.S. while benefiting from a new development pipeline with significant exploration potential in Canada
|
●
|
UEX complements UEC’s near-term production-ready and brownfield assets in the U.S. with medium and long-term production potential in Canada
|
●
|
UEC maintains its strong balance sheet with over $180 (2) million of cash and liquid assets, with no debt, supporting production readiness and its ability to advance a strengthened project portfolio
|
(1)
|
Subject to the completion of technical reports by UEC after closing
|
(2)
|
See UEC news release dated June 8, 2022; Subsequent to the closing of the Anfield indebtedness, and the pending return of certain surety amounts related to the U1 Americas transaction; Equity holdings include 15M shares of Uranium Royalty Corp (UROY)
|
(3)
|
Based on a spot exchange rate on June 10, 2022 of 1.2777 Canadian dollars per U.S. dollar
|
●
|
UEC's strong balance sheet and liquidity provides UEX with additional capital to fund continued exploration and growth initiatives at its projects in the Athabasca basin and Nunavut
|
●
|
Provides UEX's shareholders with substantial exposure to production-ready uranium assets in the United States, complementing UEX's current portfolio of development stage assets in Canada
|
●
|
49.1% ownership in Shea Creek (operated by Orano, 50.9% ownership): Currently one of the largest undeveloped deposits in the Athabasca Basin, hosts 67.6M lbs. U3O8 of Indicated and 28.1M lbs. U3O8 of Inferred resources (100% basis) (1)
|
●
|
100% ownership in Horseshoe-Raven: Open pit amenable project located only 4 kms from Cameco’s Rabbit Lake Mill, hosts 37.4M lbs. U3O8 of Indicated resources (100% basis) (2)
|
●
|
82.8% ownership in Christie Lake: Resource stage asset located in the Athabasca basin that hosts 20.4M lbs. U3O8 of Inferred resource (100% basis) (3)
|
●
|
16.9% ownership in Kiggavik (operated by Orano, 66.2% ownership): Feasibility stage project located in Nunavut, Canada that hosts 127.3M lbs. U3O8 of Indicated and 5.4M lbs. U3O8 of Inferred resource (100% basis) (treated as a historical estimate for the purposes of National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) (4)
|
●
|
15% ownership in Millennium (operated by Cameco, 69.9% ownership): Feasibility stage project located between McArthur River Mine and Key Lake Mill that hosts 75.9M lbs. U3O8 of Indicated and 29.0M lbs. U3O8 of Inferred resource (100% basis) (treated as a historical estimate for the purposes of NI 43-101) (5)
|
●
|
5% ownership in Wheeler River (operated by Denison, 95% ownership): Denison completed a PFS in 2018 highlighting robust economics. The Wheeler River project hosts a total of 132.1M lbs. U3O8 of Indicated (inclusive of 109.4M lbs. U3O8 probable reserves) and 3.0M lbs. U3O8 of Inferred resources (100% basis) (treated as a historical estimate for the purposes of NI 43-101) (6)
|
●
|
Other Projects: The remainder of UEX’s portfolio consists of one resource-level project, four mid-stage projects and 18 grassroots projects which will help provide further resource growth and long-term production sustainability for UEC
|
●
|
Wyoming Hub & Spoke ISR Portfolio: Seven satellite projects, with a combined Measured and Indicated resource of 62M lbs. U3O8 and 7M lbs. U3O8 of Inferred resources, and the Irigaray Processing Plant with a licensed production capacity of 2.5M lbs./year (7)
|
●
|
Texas Hub & Spoke ISR Portfolio: Four satellite projects, with a combined Measured and Indicated resource of 6.5M lbs. U3O8 and 12.5M lbs. U3O8 of Inferred resources, and the Hobson Processing Plant with an installed production capacity of 2M lbs./year (8)
|
●
|
Other Projects: U.S. Hardrock pipeline, Paraguay ISR uranium portfolio, Paraguay Titanium business and the Diabase project in the Athabasca Basin
|
●
|
Physical Uranium Portfolio: A 5M lb. physical portfolio of U.S. warehoused uranium (U3O8).
|
●
|
Strategic Equity Interest: 16% equity stake in Uranium Royalty Corp.
|
●
|
approval of at least 66 2/3% of the votes cast by UEX shareholders at the UEX Meeting, and
|
●
|
approval of a simple majority of the votes cast by UEX shareholders at the UEX Meeting, excluding votes from certain management shareholders, as required under Multilateral Instrument 61-101.
|
Webcast URL
|
|
https://www.bigmarker.com/vid-conferences/VID-Town-Hall?utm_bmcr_source=irinc
|
(1)
|
NI 43-101 Technical Report “2022 Technical Report on the Shea Creek Project, Saskatchewan” with an effective date of January 1, 2022, a copy of which is available under UEX Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. These resources are reported in accordance with the CIM definition standards adopted by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum council on May 19, 2014 (the “CIM Definition Standards”)
|
(2)
|
NI 43-101 Technical Report “2021 Technical Report on the Horseshoe-Raven Project, Saskatchewan” with an effective date of December 31, 2021, a copy of which is available under UEX Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. These resources are reported in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards.
|
(3)
|
NI 43-101 Technical Report “Technical Report for the Christie Lake Uranium Project, Saskatchewan, Canada” with an effective date of December 31, 2021, a copy of which is available under UEX Corporation’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. These resources are reported in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards.
|
(4)
|
Kiggavik resources as reported by Orano in their 2021 Activities Report available on their website at https://www.orano.group/docs/default-source/orano-doc/finance/publications-financieres-et-reglementees/2021/orano-annual-activity-report-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=a2e56244_8 converted from tonnes U to pounds U3O8 and from %U to %U3O8. The reader is cautioned that neither UEC or UEX are aware whether Orano’s reporting of resources conforms to NI 43-101 and CIM guidelines. These are treated by the UEX and UEC as historic resource estimates. There are no other estimates available to UEC or UEX.
|
(5)
|
Millennium resources as reported by Cameco on their website at https://www.cameco.com/businesses/uranium-projects/millennium/reserves-resources#measured_and_indicated as of December 31, 2021. The reader is cautioned that neither UEX nor UEC are aware of whether Cameco’s reporting conforms to NI 43-101 and CIM guidelines. These are treated by the Company as historic resource estimates. Cameco has reported that the estimates have been prepared in accordance with the CIM Definitions Standards. There are no other estimates available to UEC or UEX.
|
(6)
|
Wheeler River resources as reported by Denison’s Prefeasibility Study as posted on October 30, 2018 on SEDAR.com using a cut-off grade of 0.2% U3O8 for the Gryphon Deposit and 0.8% U3O8 for the Phoenix Deposit. These are treated by the UEC and UEX as historic resource estimates.There are no other estimates available to UEC or UEX.
|
(7)
|
The Technical Report Summary (“TRS”) was prepared under S-K 1300 and was filed on April 4, 2022 with the SEC through EDGAR on Form 8-K and is also available on SEDAR as a “Material Document” filed on April 4, 2022. The TRS was prepared on behalf of the Company by WWC Engineering, of Sheridan, Wyoming.
|
(8)
|
NI 43-101 Technical Reports on the Palangana (effective date of January 15, 2010), Goliad (effective date of March 7, 2008), Burke Hollow (effective date of November 27, 2017) and Salvo (effective date of March 31, 2011) projects; copies of which are available under UEC’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. These resources are reported in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards.
|
Exhibit
|
Description
|
|
99.1
|
||
104
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the inline XBRL document)
|
DATE: June 13, 2022.
|
URANIUM ENERGY CORP.
By: /s/ Pat Obara
Pat Obara, Secretary and
Chief Financial Officer
|