e10vkt
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
o
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
|
OR
|
þ
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from October 1, 2006 to
August 31, 2007
|
Commission File Number:
000-51748
AVANADE INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Washington
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
91-2032865
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.)
|
2211 Elliott Avenue,
Suite 200
Seattle, Washington
98121
(Address of principal executive
offices)
(206) 239-5600
(Registrant’s telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None.
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per
share
Indicate by check mark if Registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer” in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act):
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common equity of the
registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant on
March 31, 2007 was approximately $20,260,689 based on the
then-current sales price of the Registrant’s common shares,
par value $0.0001 per share, of $8.08.
The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par
value $0.0001 per share, outstanding as of November 5, 2007
was 4,987,387.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Definitive Information Statement for the 2008
Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference
into Part III.
AVANADE
INC.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part I.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
|
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part III.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Shareholder Matters
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part IV.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
44
|
|
On May 23, 2007, our Board of Directors (the
“Board”) resolved that our fiscal year that began on
October 1, 2006 would end on August 31, 2007, and from
and after that date, our fiscal year would be the period
beginning September 1 of each year and ending on August 31 of
the following year. As a result, this
Form 10-K
is a Transition Report and includes financial information for
the 11-month
transition period of October 1, 2006 through
August 31, 2007, which we refer to as “fiscal
2007” or “fiscal year 2007.” All references to
years prior to fiscal 2007, unless otherwise noted, refer to our
historical fiscal year, which ended on September 30. For
example, a reference to “fiscal 2006” means the
12-month
period ended September 30, 2006. All references to
quarters, unless otherwise noted and except for our two-month
fiscal fourth quarter ended August 31, 2007, refer to the
historical quarters of our fiscal year prior to our fiscal year
end change. All amounts expressed in dollars are in thousands of
dollars unless otherwise indicated. For example, a reference to
“$40,800” means $40.8 million.
In this Transition Report on
Form 10-K,
we use the terms “Avanade,” “we,” “our
Company,” “our” and “us” to refer to
Avanade Inc. and its subsidiaries. We use the term
“Accenture” to refer to our majority shareholder,
Accenture LLP, which is a subsidiary of Accenture Ltd, a Bermuda
holding company, and its affiliates. We use the term
“Microsoft” to refer to Microsoft Corporation, a
Washington corporation, a minority shareholder, and its
affiliates.
Avanade®
is a registered trademark of Avanade Inc. All other trademarks,
service marks or trade names referred to in this Transition
Report on
Form 10-K
are the property of their respective owners.
Disclosure
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Transition Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Exchange Act”) relating to our operations, results of
operations and other matters that are based on our current
expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections. Words such
as “may,” “will,” “should,”
“likely,” “anticipates,”
“expects,” “intends,” “plans,”
“projects,” “believes,”
“estimates” and similar expressions are used to
identify these forward-looking statements. These statements are
not guarantees of future performance and involve risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict.
Forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions as to
future events that might not prove to be accurate. Actual
outcomes and results could differ materially from what is
expressed or forecast in these forward-looking statements.
Risks, uncertainties and other factors that might cause such
differences, some of which could be material, include, but are
not limited to the factors discussed below under the section
entitled “Risk Factors.”
Available
Information
You may read and copy any materials we file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at the SEC’s
Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, DC, 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains an Internet site
(http://www.sec.gov)
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically
with the SEC.
Avanade has adopted a Code of Business Ethics that applies to
all of Avanade’s employees, officers and directors.
Avanade’s Code of Business Ethics is publicly available on
the Investor Relations section of our website
(www.avanade.com/about/invest.aspx). We do not intend for
information contained on our website to be part of this
Transition Report on
Form 10-K.
1
The materials we file or furnish pursuant to the Exchange Act
are available free of charge through our website
(www.avanade.com/about/invest.aspx), via a link to the
SEC’s internet site, as soon as reasonably practicable
after such materials are electronically filed with, or furnished
to, the SEC. We will provide copies of the SEC filings upon
request without charge. Requests for materials should be made to
Investor Relations of Avanade Inc., 2211 Elliott Avenue,
Suite 200, Seattle, Washington 98121, telephone +1
(206) 239-5600,
fax +1
(206) 239-5605,
email: investor.relations@avanade.com.
Overview
Avanade Inc. is a global technology consulting company that
specializes in delivering services and solutions using Microsoft
enterprise technology. As of August 31, 2007, we had more
than 3,900 employees in 22 countries delivering services to
our clients and an additional 3,000 professionals contracted
from Accenture as part of the global delivery network we use to
provide our solutions and capabilities. We work with businesses
of varying sizes across many industry sectors, including
financial services, manufacturing and technology, as well as
government agencies. See Item 7, “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations — Revenues by Segment/Geographic Business
Area” below for additional detail regarding the geographic
distribution of our revenues.
Avanade was originally incorporated under the laws of the State
of Delaware on February 9, 2000, and reincorporated in the
State of Washington on December 27, 2002. Our corporate
headquarters are located at 2211 Elliott Avenue, Suite 200,
Seattle, Washington 98121. Accenture holds the majority of our
outstanding equity, and Microsoft holds a minority ownership
interest. See Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder
Matters.”
Avanade helps clients use information technology to generate
revenue, reduce costs and reinvest in innovation for competitive
advantage. By extending Microsoft technologies, Avanade
solutions are designed to help clients streamline operations;
create new products and services; optimize digital collaboration
with and among clients, employees, partners, suppliers,
shareholders and communities; and better serve their own
customers. Avanade invests in the development of capabilities
and intellectual property used to accelerate the design,
development and deployment of solutions for our clients and to
maximize the client’s return on their information
technology investments. Each of our solutions includes a mix of
assets, intellectual property and best practices developed from
previous deployments and are designed to reduce the time, risk
and cost associated with implementing new technology solutions
in support of our clients’ business objectives.
Solutions
Avanade delivers solutions in three main market areas. We
combine highly skilled people and reusable solutions for our
clients in the following areas:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Our largest area of business is driven by our client’s
demand for assistance with application development and
integration based on the Microsoft .NET platform. Avanade uses
Microsoft .NET technology in a cost-effective manner to design,
develop, deploy, integrate, manage and maintain applications and
Web services. This includes envisioning, developing, deploying,
integrating and maintaining applications and technology-based
systems built using the Microsoft .NET platform and Microsoft
server products.
|
|
|
•
|
Another of our significant business areas is “technology
infrastructure.” This encompasses activities assisting
clients to optimize their infrastructure investments by using
the Microsoft Windows client and server environments and
infrastructure server products to streamline
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
operations and upgrade, stabilize and secure their information
technology infrastructure systems. This includes the evaluation,
upgrade, integration and deployment of core elements of
enterprise networking, messaging, security and operations based
on Microsoft technology. Examples of solutions in this area
include desktop deployment, enterprise messaging and platform
migrations.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
A developing area of our business is focused on providing
packaged and business intelligence solutions for our clients,
including enterprise resource planning (“ERP”),
Microsoft Dynamics CRM (Client Relationship Management) and
Microsoft-based business intelligence solutions. We have built a
global practice in providing Microsoft Dynamics-related
services, including Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Microsoft
Dynamics — Axapta. In addition, we assist clients with
optimizing the performance and integration of SAP software
systems, the development of mobile applications, and the
development and deployment of business intelligence solutions,
all deployed on the Microsoft platform within the enterprise
environment.
|
While delivering solutions in these three areas, we develop our
knowledge capital and build the world-class skills and
capabilities required to deliver services for our clients. The
subject matter experts we employ within these solution areas are
intimately involved in the delivery of the full range of
consulting and technology services we provide. Our consultants
are highly skilled and technically specialized. To increase our
position in the Microsoft-related consulting services market, we
invest in strengthening our capability through ongoing training,
certification and professional skill development of our
consultants.
For substantially all of our work, we provide services on a
project basis, with clients contracting for an Avanade team for
a specific project, deliverable or general staff augmentation.
The length of the engagements varies, depending on client needs
and the complexity of the project.
Material
Clients
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from engagements
with Accenture and Microsoft. The loss of either relationship
would have a material adverse effect on our business. Additional
information on the relationships we have with Accenture and
Microsoft is provided under the heading “Risk Factors
— Risks that Relate to Our Relationships with
Accenture, Microsoft and Their Related Entities.” For
financial information relating to related party transactions
with Accenture and Microsoft, see Note 11 (Related-Party
Balances and Transactions) to our Consolidated Financial
Statements under “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
Geographic
Business Areas
We serve clients worldwide in three geographic business areas:
the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. Each of these business
areas consists of a number of regions. Our global service center
in Seattle, Washington provides various forms of support for
each of these geographic business areas, including training,
knowledge management, engineering, solution development, legal,
finance, human resources, information technology solutions and
other core services. Our geographic business areas are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Americas. Our Americas geographic
business area, which includes the United States and Canada,
generated approximately 51%, 54% and 51% of our worldwide
revenues before reimbursements, excluding amounts not
attributable to the business area, for fiscal years 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively.
|
|
|
•
|
Europe. Our European geographic
business area includes the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, France,
the Netherlands, Germany, Norway, Belgium, Sweden, Denmark,
Switzerland and
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Finland. Our European area generated approximately 39%, 39% and
42% of our worldwide revenues before reimbursements, excluding
amounts not attributable to the business area, for fiscal years
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Asia Pacific. Our Asia Pacific
geographic business area includes Australia, Singapore, Japan,
Malaysia, Thailand and China. This area generated approximately
9%, 7% and 7% of our worldwide revenues before reimbursements,
excluding amounts not attributable to the business area, for
fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
|
For financial reporting purposes, our geographic business areas
are our reportable operating segments. For certain historical
financial information relating to each geographic business area,
including the United States and the United Kingdom which
individually comprised more than 10% of consolidated revenues
before reimbursements within the last three years, see
Note 12 (Segment Reporting) to our Consolidated Financial
Statements under “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.” See also Item 7, “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations — Revenues by Segment/Geographic Business
Area” for additional detail regarding the geographic
distribution of our revenues.
Global
Delivery Network
We utilize a global delivery network that supports our offshore
capabilities for our business. As of August 31, 2007, the
services of our global delivery network are performed by over
3,000 individuals, all of whom are Accenture employees. These
professionals are responsible for our global strategic delivery
approach, which emphasizes quality, reduced risk, speed to
market and predictability. Our ultimate goal is to deliver
price-competitive solutions and services that drive higher
levels of performance for our clients.
Contracts
The majority of our contracts are terminable by the client on
short notice or without notice. Accordingly, we do not believe
it is appropriate to characterize these contracts as backlog.
Normally, if a client terminates a project, the client remains
obligated to pay for commitments we have made to third parties
in connection with the project, services performed and
reimbursable expenses incurred by us through the date of
termination.
Competition
We operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing global
marketplace and compete with a variety of organizations that
offer services competitive with those we offer. Our clients
typically retain us on a non-exclusive basis. In addition, a
client may choose to use its own resources rather than engage an
outside firm for the types of services we provide. Our
competitors include: off-shore service providers in lower-cost
locations, particularly Indian providers, that offer a subset of
the services we offer, often at highly competitive prices;
global information technology service firms offering a full
range of consulting and outsourcing services; information
technology services providers; large consulting and other
professional service firms; application service providers;
packaged software vendors; service groups of computer equipment
companies; and accounting firms that are expanding or
re-emphasizing their provision of consulting services; as well
as niche solution or service providers that compete with us in a
specific geographic market, industry segment or service area.
These organizations may be global or local in nature, and may
provide services using technology other than the Microsoft
platform.
4
We believe that the principal competitive factors in the markets
in which we compete include:
|
|
|
|
•
|
skills and capabilities of people;
|
|
|
•
|
technical and industry expertise;
|
|
|
•
|
quality of service and product offerings;
|
|
|
•
|
ability to add value;
|
|
|
•
|
reputation and client references;
|
|
|
•
|
price;
|
|
|
•
|
scope of services;
|
|
|
•
|
delivery approach, including an ability to deliver results on a
timely basis;
|
|
|
•
|
availability of appropriate resources; and
|
|
|
•
|
global reach and scale.
|
Our relationships with Microsoft and Accenture help to
differentiate our Company from our competitors. Our relationship
with Microsoft allows us to utilize some aspects of
Microsoft’s technical and industry expertise that many of
our competitors cannot. Our relationship with Microsoft does,
however, limit the scope of our services to Microsoft
technology, and thus may give an advantage to competitors that
offer a broader scope of services. Our relationship with
Accenture provides us with access to a broad, diverse and global
client base that many companies of our size are not able to
access. Our relationship with Accenture also gives us access to
a global network of professionals that we can leverage to expand
our service capabilities and enhances our ability to compete on
price more effectively than some of our competitors who do not
have similar international resources.
Intellectual
Property
Our success has resulted in part from our proprietary
methodologies, software, reusable knowledge capital and
intellectual property rights. Because of the rapid and
continuing changes in technology and client needs, we rely on a
combination of nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements
as well as trade secret, copyright, patent and trademark laws to
protect our intellectual property rights and the rights of third
parties from whom we license intellectual property. We have
promulgated policies related to confidentiality and ownership
and to the use and protection of our intellectual property and
that owned by third parties, and we also enter into agreements
with our employees as appropriate. The services that we provide
focus on the design and development of business solutions based
on the Microsoft enterprise platform. We create value for our
clients by leveraging Microsoft enterprise technology to develop
and build technology infrastructures tailored to the individual
needs of each of our clients and designed to help increase
efficiency, growth and profitability.
We recognize the increasing value of intellectual property in
the marketplace and vigorously create, harvest and protect our
intellectual property.
Research
and Innovation
We are committed to developing leading-edge solutions. We
believe that both research and innovation have been major
factors in our success and will help us continue to grow in the
future. We use our investment in research to help create,
commercialize and disseminate innovative business strategies and
technology. Our research and innovation program is designed to
generate early insights into how knowledge can be harnessed to
create innovative business solutions and strategies with
5
significant value for our clients. We significantly increased
our commitment to research and innovation in fiscal years 2007
and 2006. We spent $10,201, $11,568 and $3,873 in fiscal years
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, primarily through our
engineering and solutions groups, to develop market-ready
solutions for our clients. In addition, we strive to retain
rights to the knowledge capital and assets we develop when
performing services for our clients. This enables us to use the
work we have created for the benefit of future clients.
Employees
We believe our most important asset is our people. We are deeply
committed to the development of our employees. We provide our
professionals with extensive and focused technical and
managerial skills development training appropriate to their
careers with us. We seek to reinforce our employees’
commitments to our clients, culture and values through a
comprehensive performance review system and a competitive career
philosophy that rewards individual performance and teamwork. We
strive to maintain a work environment that promotes our
Microsoft technology expertise.
As of August 31, 2007, we had approximately
3,900 employees worldwide.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report,
you should carefully consider the following factors which could
materially affect our business, financial condition or future
results. The risks described below are not the only risks facing
us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us
or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition
and/or
operating results.
Risks
that Relate to Our Business
Our
results of operations could be negatively affected if we cannot
expand and develop our services and solutions in response to
changes in technology and client demand.
Our success depends on our ability to develop and implement
consulting, systems integration and Microsoft-based technology
solutions that anticipate and respond to rapid and continuing
changes in technology, industry developments and client needs.
We may not be successful in anticipating or responding to these
developments on a timely basis, and our offerings may not be
successful in the marketplace. Also, services, solutions and
technologies offered by current or future competitors may make
our service or solution offerings uncompetitive or obsolete. Any
one of these circumstances could have a material adverse effect
on our ability to obtain and successfully deliver client work.
The
consulting and systems integration and technology markets are
highly competitive, and we might not be able to compete
effectively.
The consulting and systems integration and technology markets
are highly competitive. We compete with a variety of companies
with respect to our offerings, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Off-shore service providers in lower-cost locations,
particularly Indian providers, that offer services similar to
those we offer, often at highly competitive prices;
|
|
|
•
|
Large multinational providers, including the service arms of
large global technology providers, that offer some or all of the
consulting and systems integration and technology services that
we do;
|
6
|
|
|
|
•
|
Niche solution or service providers that compete with us in a
specific geographic market, industry segment or service area,
including companies that provide new or alternative products,
services or delivery models; and
|
|
|
•
|
Accounting firms that are expanding or re-emphasizing their
provision of consulting services.
|
In addition, a client may choose to use its own resources rather
than engage an outside firm for the types of services we provide.
Based on revenue and the number of consultants we have, we are
smaller than some of our competitors. Some of our competitors
may have greater financial, marketing or other resources than we
do, and, therefore, may be better able to compete for new work
and skilled professionals. Additionally, some of our
competitors, particularly those located in regions with lower
costs of doing business, may be able to provide services and
solutions at lower cost or on more favorable terms than we can,
particularly in the systems integration markets. There is a risk
that increased competition could put downward pressure on the
prices we can charge for our services and on our operating
margins. Similarly, if our competitors develop and implement
methodologies that yield greater efficiency and productivity,
they may be able to offer services similar to ours at lower
prices without adversely affecting their profit margins. Even if
we have potential offerings that address marketplace or client
needs, our competitors may be more successful at selling similar
services they offer, including to companies that are Avanade
clients. If we are unable to provide our clients with superior
services and solutions at competitive prices, our results of
operations may suffer.
In addition, we may face greater competition from companies that
have increased in size or scope as the result of strategic
mergers. These mergers may include consolidation activity among
hardware manufacturers, software developers and vendors, and
service providers. This vertical integration may result in
greater convergence among previously separate technology
functions or reduced access to products, and may adversely
affect our competitive position.
Our
business could be adversely affected if our clients are not
satisfied with our services.
Our business model depends in large part on our ability to
attract new work from our base of existing clients, including
those who engage us as a prime contractor. Our business model
also depends on relationships our consulting and sales
leadership develop with our clients so that we can understand
our clients’ needs and deliver solutions and services that
are tailored to those needs. If a client is not satisfied with
the quality of work performed by us, our subcontractor or a
company that we are subcontractor to, or with the type of
services or solutions delivered, then we could incur additional
costs to address the situation, the profitability of that work
might be impaired, and the client’s dissatisfaction with
our services could damage our ability to obtain additional work
from that client. In particular, clients that are not satisfied
might seek to terminate existing contracts prior to their
scheduled expiration date and could direct future business to
our competitors. In addition, negative publicity related to our
client relationships, regardless of its accuracy, may further
damage our business by affecting our ability to compete for new
contracts with current and prospective clients.
Our
results of operations may be affected by the rate of growth in
the use of technology in business and the type and level of
technology spending by our clients.
Our business depends in part upon continued growth in the use of
technology in business by our clients and prospective clients
and their customers and suppliers. In challenging economic
environments, our clients may reduce or defer their spending on
new technologies in order to focus on other priorities. At the
same time, many companies have already invested substantial
resources in their current means of conducting commerce and
exchanging information, and they may be reluctant or slow
7
to adopt new approaches that could disrupt existing personnel,
processes and infrastructures. If the growth of use of
technology in business or our clients’ spending on
technology in business declines or if we cannot convince our
clients or potential clients to embrace new technology
solutions, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
If we
are unable to attract, retain and motivate employees or
efficiently utilize their skills, we might not be able to
compete effectively and will not be able to grow our
business.
Our success and ability to grow are dependent, in large part, on
our ability to hire, retain and motivate sufficient numbers of
talented people with the increasingly diverse skills needed to
serve clients and grow our business. Competition for skilled
personnel is intense at all levels of experience and seniority.
To address this competition, we may need to further adjust our
compensation practices, which could put upward pressure on our
costs and adversely affect our profit margins. We are
particularly dependent on the skills of our consulting and sales
leadership, and if we are not able to successfully retain and
motivate our consulting and sales leadership, our ability to
develop new business and effectively lead our current projects
could be jeopardized. At the same time, the profitability of our
business model depends on our ability to effectively utilize
personnel with the right mix of skills and experience to support
our projects and global delivery centers. The processes and
costs associated with recruiting, training and retaining
employees place significant demands on our resources. There is a
risk that at certain points in time and in certain geographical
regions, we will find it difficult to hire and retain a
sufficient number of employees with the skills or backgrounds we
require, or that it will prove difficult to retain them in a
competitive labor market. If we are unable to hire and retain
talented employees with the skills, and in the locations, we
require, we might need to rely on subcontractors to fill certain
of our labor needs, and costs for hiring subcontractors may be
greater than those for our permanent employees. If we are not
successful at attracting and retaining qualified employees in
sufficient numbers to meet the demands of our business, or
utilizing our people effectively, then our ability to compete
for new work and successfully complete existing work for our
clients could be adversely affected.
Our
results of operations could be affected by economic and
political conditions and the effects of these conditions on our
clients’ businesses and levels of business
activity.
Global economic and political conditions affect our
clients’ businesses and the markets they serve. A
significant or prolonged economic downturn or a negative or
uncertain political climate could adversely affect our
clients’ financial condition and the levels of business
activity of our clients and the industries we serve. This may
reduce our clients’ demand for our services or depress
pricing of those services and have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations. Changes in global economic conditions
could also shift demand to services for which we do not have
competitive advantages, and this could negatively affect the
amount of business that we are able to obtain. If we are unable
to successfully anticipate changing economic and political
conditions, we may be unable to effectively plan for and respond
to those changes, and our business could be negatively affected.
In addition, the size of our Company and our cash balances may
make it more difficult for us to withstand a prolonged economic
downturn as compared to our larger competitors.
Our
profitability could suffer if we are not able to maintain
favorable pricing rates.
Our profit margin, and therefore our profitability, is dependent
on the rates we are able to charge for our services. If we are
not able to maintain favorable pricing for our services, our
profit margin and our profitability could suffer.
8
The rates we are able to charge for our services are affected by
a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
our clients’ perceptions of our ability to add value
through our services;
|
|
|
•
|
competition;
|
|
|
•
|
introduction of new services or products by us or our
competitors;
|
|
|
•
|
our competitors’ pricing policies;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to charge higher prices where market demand or the
value of our services justifies it;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to accurately estimate, attain and sustain contract
revenues, margins and cash flows over long contract periods;
|
|
|
•
|
procurement practices of clients and their use of third-party
advisors;
|
|
|
•
|
the use by our competitors and our clients of off-shore
resources to provide lower-cost service delivery
capabilities; and
|
|
|
•
|
general economic and political conditions in the geographic
areas in which we operate.
|
Our
profitability could suffer if we are not able to maintain
favorable utilization rates.
The cost of providing our services, including the utilization
rate of our professionals, affects our profitability. If we are
not able to maintain an appropriate utilization rate for our
professionals, our profit margin and our profitability may
suffer. Our utilization rates are affected by a number of
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to transition employees from completed projects to
new assignments and to hire and assimilate new employees;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to forecast demand for our services and thereby
maintain an appropriate headcount in each of our geographies and
workforces;
|
|
|
•
|
our ability to manage attrition; and
|
|
|
•
|
our need to devote time and resources to training, professional
development and other non-chargeable activities.
|
Our
profitability could suffer if we are not able to control our
costs.
Our ability to control our costs and improve our efficiency
affects our profitability. As the continuation of pricing
pressures could result in permanent changes in pricing policies
and delivery capabilities, we must continuously improve our
management of costs. As we increase the number of our
professionals and execute our strategies for growth, we might
not be able to manage significantly larger and more diverse
workforces, control our costs or improve our efficiency.
Our
work with government clients exposes us to additional risks
inherent in the government contracting
environment.
Our clients include national, provincial, state and local
governmental entities. Our government work carries various risks
inherent in the government contracting process. These risks
include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Government entities typically fund projects through appropriated
monies. While these projects are often planned and executed as
multi-year projects, the government entities usually reserve the
right to change the scope of or terminate these projects for
lack of approved funding and at
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
their convenience. Changes in government or political
developments could result in our projects being reduced in scope
or terminated altogether.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Government entities often reserve the right to audit our
contract costs, including allocated indirect costs, and conduct
inquiries and investigations of our business practices with
respect to our government contracts. If the client finds that
the costs are not reimbursable, then we will not be allowed to
bill for them, or the cost must be refunded to the client if it
has already been paid to us. Findings from an audit also may
result in our being required to prospectively adjust previously
agreed rates for our work and may affect our future margins.
|
|
|
•
|
If a government client discovers improper or illegal activities
in the course of audits or investigations, we may become subject
to various civil and criminal penalties and administrative
sanctions, which may include termination of contracts,
forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and
suspensions or debarment from doing business with other agencies
of that government. The inherent limitations of internal
controls may not prevent or detect all improper or illegal
activities, regardless of their adequacy. Additionally, an
allegation of improper activity, even if not proven, could
result in adverse publicity and damage to our reputation and
business.
|
|
|
•
|
Government contracts, and the proceedings surrounding them, are
often subject to more extensive scrutiny and publicity than
contracts with commercial clients. Negative publicity related to
our government contracts, regardless of its accuracy, may
further damage our business by affecting our ability to compete
for new contracts.
|
|
|
•
|
Political and economic factors such as pending elections, the
outcome of recent elections, changes in leadership among key
executive or legislative decision makers, revisions to
governmental tax policies and reduced tax revenues can affect
the number and terms of new government contracts signed.
|
|
|
•
|
Terms and conditions of government contracts tend to be more
onerous and are often more difficult to negotiate than those for
commercial contracts.
|
The occurrences or conditions described above could affect not
only our business with the particular government agency
involved, but also our business with other agencies of the same
or other governmental entities. Additionally, because of their
visibility and political nature, government projects may present
a heightened risk to our reputation. Either of these could have
a material adverse effect on our business or our results of
operations.
Our
global operations are subject to complex risks, some of which
might be beyond our control.
As of August 31, 2007, we had offices in 22 countries
around the world. In fiscal 2007, approximately 51% of our
revenues before reimbursements were attributable to our
activities in the Americas, and 49% were attributable to our
activities outside of the Americas.
If we are unable to manage the risks of our global operations,
including fluctuations in foreign exchange and inflation rates,
international hostilities, terrorism, natural disasters,
security breaches and multiple legal and regulatory systems, our
results of operations could be adversely affected.
10
Our operating results may be adversely affected by
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates. Although we report our operating results
in U.S. dollars, a significant percentage of our revenues
before reimbursements is denominated in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates can have a number of adverse effects on us.
|
|
|
|
•
|
Because our consolidated financial statements are presented in
U.S. dollars, we must translate revenues, expenses and
income, as well as assets and liabilities, into
U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect during or at the
end of each reporting period. Therefore, changes in the value of
the U.S. dollar against other currencies will affect our
revenues before reimbursements, operating income and the value
of balance-sheet items originally denominated in other
currencies. Declines in the value of other currencies against
the U.S. dollar could cause our consolidated earnings
stated in U.S. dollars to be lower than our consolidated
earnings in local currency and could affect our reported results
when compared against other periods. Conversely, increases in
the value of other currencies against the U.S. dollar could
cause our consolidated earnings stated in U.S. dollars to
be higher than our consolidated earnings in local currency and
could affect our reported results when compared against other
periods. There is no guarantee that our financial results will
not be adversely affected by currency exchange rate fluctuations.
|
|
|
•
|
In some countries we could be subject to strict restrictions on
the movement of cash and the exchange of foreign currencies,
which could limit our ability to use this cash across our global
operations.
|
|
|
•
|
As we continue to leverage our global delivery model, more of
our expenses are incurred in currencies other than those in
which we bill for the related services. An increase in the value
of certain currencies, such as the Indian rupee, against the
U.S. dollar could increase costs for delivery of services
at off-shore sites by increasing labor and other costs that are
denominated in local currency, and there can be no assurance
that our contractual provisions would offset this impact. This
could result in a decrease in the profitability of our contracts
that are utilizing delivery center resources.
|
International hostilities, terrorist activities, natural
disasters and infrastructure disruptions could prevent us from
effectively serving our clients and thus adversely affect our
operating results. Acts of terrorist
violence — such as those of recent years in the United
States, Spain and England — armed regional and
international hostilities and international responses to these
hostilities, natural disasters, global health risks or pandemics
or the threat of or perceived potential for these events, could
have a negative impact on us. These events could adversely
affect our clients’ levels of business activity and
precipitate sudden significant changes in regional and global
economic conditions and cycles. These events also pose
significant risks to our people and to physical facilities and
operations around the world, whether the facilities are ours or
those of our alliance partners or clients. By disrupting
communications and travel and increasing the difficulty of
obtaining and retaining highly skilled and qualified personnel,
these events could make it difficult or impossible for us to
deliver services to our clients. Extended disruptions of
electricity, other public utilities or network services at our
facilities, as well as system failures at, or security breaches
in, our facilities or systems, could also adversely affect our
ability to serve our clients. While we plan and prepare to
defend against each of these occurrences, we might be unable to
protect our people, facilities and systems against all such
occurrences. We generally do not have insurance for losses and
interruptions caused by terrorist attacks, conflicts and wars.
If these disruptions prevent us from effectively serving our
clients, our operating results could be adversely affected.
11
We could have liability or our reputation could be damaged if
we do not protect client data or information systems or if our
information systems are breached. We are
dependent on information technology networks and systems to
process, transmit and store electronic information and to
communicate among our locations around the world and with our
alliance partners and clients. Security breaches of this
infrastructure could lead to shutdowns or disruptions of our
systems and potential unauthorized disclosure of confidential
information. We are also required at times to manage, utilize
and store sensitive or confidential client or employee data. As
a result, we are subject to numerous U.S. and foreign
jurisdiction laws and regulations designed to protect this
information, such as the European Union Directive on Data
Protection and various U.S. federal and state laws
governing the protection of health or other individually
identifiable information. If any person, including any of our
employees, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our
established controls with respect to such data or otherwise
mismanages or misappropriates that data, we could be subject to
monetary damages, fines
and/or
criminal prosecution. Unauthorized disclosure of sensitive or
confidential client or employee data, whether through systems
failure, employee negligence, fraud or misappropriation, could
damage our reputation and cause us to lose clients. Similarly,
unauthorized access to or through our information systems or
those we develop for our clients, whether by our employees or
third parties, could result in negative publicity, legal
liability and damage to our reputation.
Our global operations expose us to numerous and sometimes
conflicting legal and regulatory requirements, and violation of
these regulations could harm our
business. Because we provide services to clients
in more than 22 countries, we are subject to numerous, and
sometimes conflicting, legal regimes on matters as diverse as
import/export controls, content requirements, trade
restrictions, tariffs, taxation, sanctions, government affairs,
immigration, internal and disclosure control obligations, data
privacy and labor relations. Violations of these regulations in
the conduct of our business could result in fines, criminal
sanctions against us or our officers, prohibitions on doing
business and damage to our reputation. Violations of these
regulations in connection with the performance of our
obligations to our clients also could result in liability for
monetary damages, fines
and/or
criminal prosecution, unfavorable publicity, restrictions on our
ability to process information and allegations by our clients
that we have not performed our contractual obligations. Due to
the varying degrees of development of the legal systems of the
countries in which we operate, local laws might be insufficient
to protect our rights.
In many parts of the world, including countries in which we
operate, practices in the local business community might not
conform to international business standards and could violate
anticorruption regulations, including the U.S. Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits giving anything of value
with the intent to influence the awarding of government
contracts. Although we have policies and procedures to ensure
legal and regulatory compliance, our employees, subcontractors
and agents could take actions that violate these requirements.
Violations of these regulations could subject us to criminal or
civil enforcement actions, including fines and suspension or
disqualification from U.S. federal procurement contracting,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
If we
are unable to manage the organizational challenges associated
with the expansion of our Company, we might be unable to achieve
our business objectives.
Since 2003, we have more than doubled the size of our workforce
so that, as of August 31, 2007, we had approximately
3,900 employees, located in more than 42 cities in 22
countries. In addition, since 2003 we have grown from 150 to
3,000 professionals contracted from Accenture as part of our
global delivery network. Increasingly, our expansion is taking
place outside of the United States and Europe, with particular
growth in our locations in India and the Philippines. The pace
of our growth presents significant management and organizational
challenges and these issues may become more
12
pronounced if we continue our rate of expansion. For example, it
takes time for our newer employees to develop the knowledge,
skills or experience that our business model requires. Continued
growth may make it increasingly difficult to maintain our
culture, effectively manage our personnel and operations and
effectively communicate to our personnel worldwide our core
values, strategies and goals. Similarly, it could become
increasingly difficult to maintain common standards across an
expanding enterprise or to effectively institutionalize our
know-how. Finally, the size and scope of our operations
increases the possibility that an employee will engage in
unlawful or fraudulent activity, or otherwise expose the Company
to unacceptable business risks, despite our efforts to maintain
internal controls to prevent such instances. If we do not
continue to develop and implement the right processes and tools
to manage our expanding enterprise, our ability to compete
successfully and achieve our business objectives could be
impaired.
Our
business could be negatively affected if we incur legal
liability in connection with providing our solutions and
services.
If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, fail to disclose
our financial or other arrangements with our alliance partners
or otherwise breach obligations to clients, or if our
subcontractors dispute the terms of our agreements with them, we
could be subject to legal liability. We may enter into
non-standard agreements because we perceive an important
economic opportunity or because our personnel did not adequately
adhere to our guidelines. We may find ourselves committed to
providing services that we are unable to deliver or whose
delivery will cause us financial loss. If we cannot or do not
perform our obligations, we could face legal liability and our
contracts might not always protect us adequately through
limitations on the scope of our potential liability. If we
cannot meet our contractual obligations to provide solutions and
services, and if our exposure is not adequately limited through
the terms of our agreements, we might face significant legal
liability and our business could be adversely affected.
If our
pricing structures do not accurately anticipate the cost and
complexity of performing our work, then our contracts could be
unprofitable.
We negotiate pricing terms with our clients utilizing a range of
pricing structures and conditions. Depending on the particular
contract, these include
time-and-materials
pricing, fixed-price pricing and contracts with features of both
of these pricing models. Our pricing is highly dependent on our
internal forecasts and predictions about our projects and the
marketplace, which might be based on limited data and could turn
out to be inaccurate. If we do not accurately estimate the costs
and timing for completing projects, our contracts could prove
unprofitable for us or yield lower profit margins than
anticipated. There is a risk that we will underprice our
contracts, fail to accurately estimate the costs of performing
the work or fail to accurately assess the risks associated with
potential contracts. In particular, any increased or unexpected
costs, delays or failures to achieve anticipated cost savings,
or unexpected risks we encounter in connection with the
performance of this work, including those caused by factors
outside our control, could make these contracts less profitable
or unprofitable, which could have an adverse effect on our
profit margin.
Our
results of operations could be adversely affected if our clients
terminate their contracts with us on short notice.
Our clients typically retain us on a non-exclusive,
project-by-project
basis. Although we do not centrally track the termination
provisions of our contracts, we estimate that the majority of
our contracts can be terminated by our clients with short
notice. Many of our consulting contracts are less than
12 months in duration, and these shorter-duration contracts
typically permit a client to terminate the agreement with as
little as 30 days notice and without significant penalty.
Additionally, large client
13
projects often involve multiple contracts or stages, and a
client could choose not to retain us for additional stages of a
project, try to renegotiate the terms of its contract or cancel
or delay additional planned work. Terminations, cancellations or
delays could result from factors that are beyond our control and
unrelated to our work product or the progress of the project,
including the business or financial conditions of the client,
changes in ownership or management at our clients, changes in
client strategies or the economy or markets generally. When
contracts are terminated, we lose the anticipated revenues and
might not be able to eliminate associated costs in a timely
manner. Consequently, our profit margins in subsequent periods
could be lower than expected.
If we
are unable to collect our receivables or unbilled services, our
results of operations and cash flows could be adversely
affected.
Our business depends on our ability to successfully obtain
payment from our clients of the amounts they owe us for work
performed. We evaluate the financial condition of our clients
and usually bill and collect on relatively short cycles. We
maintain allowances against receivables and unbilled services.
Actual losses on client balances could differ from those that we
currently anticipate and as a result we might need to adjust our
allowances. In addition, timely collection of client balances
depends on our ability to complete our contractual commitments
and bill and collect our contracted revenues. If we are unable
to meet our contractual requirements, we might experience delays
in collection of
and/or be
unable to collect our client balances, and if this occurs, our
results of operations and cash flows could be adversely
affected. If we experience an increase in the time to bill and
collect for our services, our cash flows could be adversely
affected.
We
could be subject to liabilities if our subcontractors or the
third parties with whom we partner cannot deliver their project
contributions on time or at all.
Large and complex arrangements often require that we utilize
subcontractors or that our services and solutions incorporate or
coordinate with the software, systems or infrastructure
requirements of other vendors and service providers. Our ability
to serve our clients and deliver and implement our solutions in
a timely manner depends on the ability of these subcontractors,
vendors and service providers to meet their project obligations
in a timely manner. The quality of our services and solutions
could suffer if our subcontractors or the third parties with
whom we partner do not deliver their products and services in
accordance with project requirements. If our subcontractors or
these third parties fail to deliver their contributions on time
or at all, if their contributions do not meet project
requirements, or if we are unable to obtain reimbursement for
liabilities of third parties that we have assumed, our ability
to perform could be adversely affected and we might be subject
to additional liabilities, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, revenues, profitability or cash flow.
We
have only a limited ability to protect our intellectual property
rights, which are important to our success.
Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to protect our
proprietary methodologies and other intellectual property.
Existing laws of some countries in which we provide services or
solutions might offer only limited protection of our
intellectual property rights. We rely upon a combination of
trade secrets, confidentiality policies, nondisclosure and other
contractual arrangements, and patent, copyright and trademark
laws to protect our intellectual property rights. The steps we
take in this regard might not be adequate to prevent or deter
infringement or other misappropriation of our intellectual
property, and we might not be able to detect unauthorized use
of, or take appropriate and timely steps to enforce, our
intellectual property rights.
14
Depending on the circumstances, we might grant a specific client
greater rights in intellectual property developed in connection
with a contract than we otherwise generally do, in which case we
would seek to cross-license the use of the intellectual
property. However, in certain situations, we might forego rights
to the use of intellectual property we help create, which might
limit our ability to reuse that intellectual property for other
clients. Any limitation on our ability to provide a service or
solution could cause us to lose revenue-generating opportunities
and require us to incur additional expenses to develop new or
modified solutions for future projects.
Our
services or solutions could infringe upon the intellectual
property rights of others or we might lose our ability to
utilize the intellectual property of others.
We cannot be sure that our services and solutions, or the
solutions of others that we offer to our clients, do not
infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties,
and we could have infringement claims asserted against us or
against our clients. These claims could harm our reputation,
cost us money and prevent us from offering some services or
solutions. Historically in a number of our contracts, we have
agreed to indemnify our clients for expenses or liabilities
resulting from claimed infringements of the intellectual
property rights of third parties. In some instances, the amount
of these indemnities could be greater than the revenues we
receive from the client. Any claims or litigation in this area,
whether we ultimately win or lose, could be time-consuming and
costly, injure our reputation or require us to enter into
royalty or licensing arrangements. We might not be able to enter
into these royalty or licensing arrangements on acceptable
terms. If a claim of infringement were successful against us or
our clients, an injunction might be ordered against our client
or our own services or operations, causing further damages.
We could lose our ability to utilize the intellectual property
of others. Third-party suppliers of software, hardware or other
intellectual assets could be acquired or sued, and this could
disrupt use of their products or services by Avanade and our
clients. If our ability to provide services and solutions to our
clients is impaired, our operating results could be adversely
affected.
Consolidation
in the industries that we serve could adversely affect our
business.
Companies in the industries that we serve may seek to achieve
economies of scale and other synergies by combining with or
acquiring other companies. If two or more of our current clients
merge or consolidate and combine their operations, it may
decrease the amount of work that we perform for these clients.
If one of our current clients merges or consolidates with a
company that relies on another provider for its consulting,
systems integration and technology, or outsourcing services, we
may lose work from that client or lose the opportunity to gain
additional work. The increased market power of larger companies
could also increase pricing and competitive pressures on us. Any
of these possible results of industry consolidation could
adversely affect our business.
There
will not be a consistent pattern in our financial results from
quarter to quarter, which may result in increased volatility of
the value of our stock.
Our quarterly revenue and profitability have varied in the past
and are likely to vary significantly from quarter to quarter,
making them difficult to predict. This may lead to volatility in
the value of our stock, which is based in part on management
projections of future results. We are a professional services
organization and a major portion of our revenue is based on the
number of hours billed by our employees and their hourly billing
rates. Companies like ours experience variations in profits
during the year. There are many reasons for these variations,
but they can generally be attributed to the fact that our
business is dependent on the decisions and actions of our
clients. For example, a client could delay or cancel a project
because that client’s business is experiencing financial
problems. When this
15
happens, it could reduce, eliminate or delay our expected
revenue, and we could lose the money that we have spent to
obtain or staff the project. Also, the mix of client projects,
the personnel required, and their applicable billing rates will
affect results of our business in a meaningful way.
Risks
That Relate to Our Relationships with Accenture, Microsoft and
Their Related Entities
Loss
of our significant corporate relationships could reduce our
revenue and growth prospects.
We are a majority-owned subsidiary of Accenture and a strategic
partner of Microsoft. These relationships enable us to increase
revenue by providing us additional access to clients and
marketing exposure, expanding our sales coverage, increasing the
training of our employees and developing and co-branding
offerings that respond to client demand. The loss of either of
these relationships would adversely affect our business by
decreasing our revenue and growth prospects. Policy changes,
including, without limitation, undertaking mergers, acquisitions
and other business combinations involving either of these
entities, could result in changes in the degree to which they
cooperate with us in business development.
Because
we are controlled by Accenture, we have limited ability to set
our own independent strategies, and our business strategy and
direction may be dictated by Accenture’s overall business
strategy.
As of November 5, 2007, Accenture was the beneficial owner
of approximately 79.3% of our outstanding Convertible
Series A Preferred Stock, which, together with the
100 shares of common stock owned by Accenture, equates to
62.8% of our shares of common stock on a fully diluted basis. As
such, and according to the terms of the Third Amended and
Restated Contribution and Stockholders Agreement, dated as of
February 14, 2005, Accenture is permitted to select up to
four members of our Board of Directors. Our bylaws provide that
the number of members of the board is set by resolution of the
Board of Directors. Currently, there are six members of the
Board of Directors. This enables Accenture, without the consent
of the other stockholders, to:
|
|
|
|
•
|
control our management and policies; and
|
|
|
•
|
determine the outcome of most corporate transactions or other
matters submitted to the Board of Directors for approval,
including mergers or acquisitions less than $100,000.
|
We
rely on Accenture for the majority of our revenue. The loss of
that revenue would have a significant adverse impact on our
results of operations and may affect our ability to continue to
operate.
For the year ended August 31, 2007, approximately 67% of
our revenues before reimbursements came directly from Accenture,
primarily from serving as a subcontractor to Accenture on its
engagements with the end client. In addition, we also benefit
indirectly from Accenture lead generation and opportunity
development. Our success and growth depends, in part, on
continuing to benefit from that relationship. As a result, we
are subject to a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
changes in economic conditions may decrease the demand from
Accenture for our services;
|
|
|
•
|
a lack of any contractual obligation by Accenture to continue
using our services, which allows Accenture to decrease or stop
its use of our services at any time without penalty;
|
|
|
•
|
certain internal Accenture practices are currently in place that
encourage the use of our services, and these practices may be
changed or modified; and
|
16
|
|
|
|
•
|
we may be incurring lower sales and marketing costs due to our
relationships with Accenture and Microsoft. In the absence of
such relationship, sales and marketing costs could be higher.
|
Our
global delivery network relies on Accenture, and the loss of
that network would increase our operating
expenses.
Our global delivery network capabilities rely on Accenture for
the people and infrastructure to support our offshore work. As a
result, we are subject to a number of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the termination or material modification of this relationship at
any time on short notice by Accenture; and
|
|
|
•
|
efforts to recruit and retain personnel may be compromised by
the individuals not having a direct employment relationship with
us.
|
Microsoft
has certain minority rights, and may exercise those rights to
protect its own interests which may not align with our
own.
As of November 5, 2007, Microsoft was the beneficial owner
of approximately 20.7% of our outstanding Convertible
Series A Preferred Stock, which equates to 16.4% of our
shares of common stock on a fully diluted basis. According to
the terms of the Third Amended and Restated Contribution and
Stockholders Agreement, dated as of February 14, 2005,
Microsoft has certain minority holder rights, including the
right to designate one member of the Board of Directors and to
appoint up to two persons to attend meetings as non-voting
observers. See Item 13 of this
Form 10-K,
“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
Director Independence” for further details of
Microsoft’s minority rights. That agreement enables
Microsoft, despite the consent of the other stockholders, to
prevent:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the issuance of equity in the Company to certain competitors of
Microsoft;
|
|
|
•
|
the acquisition or disposition of assets in excess of
$100,000; and
|
|
|
•
|
certain business activities identified in the Third Amended and
Restated Contribution and Stockholders Agreement, including
limiting our ability to enter into a line of business not
related to Microsoft technology.
|
We are
committed to using Microsoft-related technologies, and our
inability to use those technologies would adversely impact our
results of operations.
We are committed to using Microsoft-based technologies as the
basis of our services. As a result, we are subject to a number
of risks, including:
|
|
|
|
•
|
general acceptance of competitive products may put us at a
competitive disadvantage to other consulting companies that are
able to focus on such non-Microsoft-based technology;
|
|
|
•
|
our business is dependent, in part, upon continued growth in the
use of Microsoft-based technology by our clients and prospective
clients and this demand for Microsoft-based technologies may
grow at a reduced rate or decrease, thus reducing the market for
our services;
|
|
|
•
|
we may be perceived as having a narrow focus that may limit our
ability to attract new clients;
|
|
|
•
|
Microsoft may acquire or significantly grow its own consulting
capacity that directly competes with us; and
|
|
|
•
|
we have access to certain Microsoft assets and information and
loss of that access could negatively impact our business.
|
17
Risks
that Relate to Our Employee Put Options
All
stock issued pursuant to awards granted under our stock option
plans is subject to certain put rights, which, if exercised,
could have a materially adverse impact on our
liquidity.
All stock issued pursuant to awards granted under our stock
option plans is subject to certain put rights of the holder that
compel the purchase of the stock by the Company at the fair
value. The redemption value of common stock issued pursuant to
awards granted under our stock option plans and the current
intrinsic value of options that contain put rights for shares
obtained pursuant to option exercises, which are recorded as
temporary equity as services are rendered, was approximately
$165,335 at August 31, 2007. Although we could be required
to repurchase up to 3.33 million shares with a value equal
to approximately $35,205 during the current put/call period,
which would be in addition to the 838,464 shares with an
approximate value of $8,863 that we intend to repurchase
pursuant to the exercise of our call rights, we cannot at this
time estimate the actual number of shares that holders will
require us to repurchase by exercising their put rights during
any particular put/call period; however, based on limited
historical information for the two put/call periods of fiscal
2007 and one put/call period of fiscal 2006, we repurchased on
average 0.5 million shares per put/call period as a result
of exercised put rights. The exercise of a substantial number of
these put rights over a short period of time could have a
significant material adverse effect on our liquidity because our
available working capital may not be adequate to fund the
obligation and cover our operating expenses and other cash
requirements. For additional information, refer to Note 6
(Share-Based Compensation) to our Consolidated Financial
Statements under “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
We have offices and operations in more than 42 cities in 22
countries around the world. We do not own any material real
property. Substantially all of our office space is leased under
month-to-month and long-term leases with varying expiration
dates. We sublease our Seattle office space from Microsoft under
an agreement that terminates in February 2009. We sublease our
Chicago, Australia, Germany, France and Spain office space from
Accenture on a month-to-month basis, and may rent, on an as
needed basis, desk space available in Accenture offices. Rent
charged by Accenture varies each month based on the amount of
space we occupy. Rent incurred on leases with related parties
approximates market rates for similar leases. We believe that
our facilities are adequate to meet our needs in the near future.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are involved in a number of judicial and arbitration
proceedings concerning matters arising in the ordinary course of
our business. We do not expect that any of these matters,
individually or in the aggregate, will have a material impact on
our results of operations or financial condition.
We currently maintain the types and amounts of insurance
customary in the industries and countries in which we operate,
including coverage for professional liability, general liability
and management liability. We consider our insurance coverage to
be adequate both as to the risks and amounts for the businesses
we conduct.
18
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of shareholders of Avanade
Inc. during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
Mitchell C. Hill, 49, has been our Chief Executive
Officer and a director since 2000. In July 2005, Accenture
appointed Mr. Hill as its primary representative, which is
an unpaid position, to facilitate the further development of the
Accenture and Microsoft relationship.
Dennis Knapp, 48, has been our Chief Financial Officer
since 2001. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Knapp served as our
Controller.
Ang Miah Boon, 60, has been our General Manager, Asia
Pacific since December 2006. Miah Boon was Asia Pacific
President at McAfee, Inc., a worldwide supplier of computer
security solutions, responsible for sales and operations for the
Asia Pacific region from April 2001 to April 2005. After McAfee,
he took a sabbatical to look after his family before joining us
in December 2006.
Howard Kilman, 55, has been with Avanade since 2000 and
has been our Vice President and General Manager, Americas since
September 2005. He became our Vice President and General
Manager, U.S. in 2002, and was the General Manager of the
U.S. Central Region from 2000 until 2002.
Ashish Kumar, 41, has been our Chief Technology Officer
since 2000.
Adam Warby, 47, has been our Executive Vice President,
Sales and Marketing since September 2005 and is also General
Manager, Europe. Before September 2005, he was our Senior Vice
President and General Manager of Americas, and, from 2000 to
2003, he was Vice President Sales, Marketing and Alliances.
Andrew White, 44, has been our Chief Operating Officer
since February 2007 and, from 2000 to 2007, he was General
Manager, Europe.
19
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
There is no public market for our common stock, preferred stock
or stock options. Our shares of common stock are not listed on
any exchange and we expect that the restriction on
transferability will preclude our common stock from being quoted
by any securities dealer or traded in any market inclusive of
the over-the-counter market. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
shares are subject to certain repurchase requirements as more
fully described below in Note 6 (Share-Based Compensation)
to our Consolidated Financial Statements under “Stock and
Put Rights.”
As of November 5, 2007, there were approximately 211
holders of record of our common stock. We have not paid any cash
dividends on our common equity during the two most recent fiscal
years and do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company issued
542,562 shares of common stock to employees and recently
terminated employees for proceeds of $1,529 upon the exercise of
options held by them. In each case, the issuance was effected in
reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided under
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act, as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan, or
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as
transactions not involving any public offering.
Purchases
of Common Shares
The following table provides information relating to the
Company’s purchases of its common shares for the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
that May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
Average
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
Publicly
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
Announced Plans
|
Period(2)
|
|
(1)
|
|
per Share
|
|
Programs
|
|
or Programs
|
|
July 1, 2007—July 31, 2007
|
|
|
66,174
|
|
|
$
|
8.84
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
August 1, 2007—August 31, 2007
|
|
|
29,792
|
|
|
$
|
8.84
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
95,966
|
|
|
$
|
8.84
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company purchased
95,966 of its common shares in transactions unrelated to
publicly announced share plans or programs. These transactions
included the acquisition of 61,735 shares of the Company’s
common stock via share withholding for payroll for obligations
due from employees in connection with the delivery of shares of
the Company common stock under the Company’s various equity
share plans in addition to 34,231 shares surrendered to the
Company to pay the exercise price in connection with so-called
“stock-swap” exercises of employee stock options.
|
|
(2)
|
The Company’s fiscal fourth quarter includes only two
months due to the change, effective August 31, 2007, in the
Company’s fiscal year end from September 30 to
August 31.
|
20
Performance
Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder
return on our common stock to the returns of the S&P 500
Index and a peer group index from March 21, 2006, the
effective date of the registration of our common stock under
Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, through the end of our
2007 fiscal year on August 31, 2007. The peer group index
consists of Accenture Ltd, Bearingpoint, Inc., Perot Systems
Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Sapient
Corporation, Diamond Management & Technology
Consultants, Inc., Infosys Technologies Limited, Cap Gemini SA
and Electronic Data Systems Corporation. Last year, the peer
group index also included Digitas Inc. and Keane Inc.; however,
during the 2007 fiscal year, each of those entities was acquired
and ceased to be publicly-traded. Information for those entities
is not available, and they have not been included in the peer
group index this year. The graph assumes that $100 was invested
on March 21, 2006 in shares of our common stock and each of
the two indices, that dividends were reinvested on the date of
payment and that no commissions were paid. The performance shown
in the graph represents past performance and should not be
considered an indication of future performance.
Comparision
of Cumulative Total Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 21,
|
|
|
September 29,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Avanade Inc.(1)
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
S&P 500 Index
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
There is no public market for our
common stock. The calculations of our share price reflected
herein are prepared by a third party in accordance with the
Board’s normal procedures and then approved by the Board.
The determination of the fair market value of our shares
involves judgment, and is based, in part, on prospective
financial information supported by management’s estimates
of future operating results and other information from various
public, financial and industry sources.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The return on shares of our common
stock calculated for the period from March 21, 2006 to
September 29, 2006 assumed there was no material change in
value between March 21, 2006 and March 31, 2006.
|
21
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The data as of August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006
and for the eleven months ended August 31, 2007 and years
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are derived from the
audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes that
are included elsewhere in this report. The data as of
September 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and for the years ended
September 30, 2004 and 2003 are derived from audited
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes that are not
included in this report. The selected financial data should be
read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
and our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes
included elsewhere in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues before reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
$
|
440,552
|
|
|
$
|
354,566
|
|
|
$
|
288,368
|
|
|
$
|
186,808
|
|
|
$
|
106,528
|
|
Other
|
|
|
152,994
|
|
|
|
129,298
|
|
|
|
98,946
|
|
|
|
90,738
|
|
|
|
65,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593,546
|
|
|
|
483,864
|
|
|
|
387,314
|
|
|
|
277,546
|
|
|
|
172,511
|
|
Reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
22,465
|
|
|
|
19,747
|
|
|
|
18,064
|
|
|
|
12,383
|
|
|
|
8,135
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17,521
|
|
|
|
14,195
|
|
|
|
16,933
|
|
|
|
9,100
|
|
|
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,986
|
|
|
|
33,942
|
|
|
|
34,997
|
|
|
|
21,483
|
|
|
|
16,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
633,532
|
|
|
$
|
517,806
|
|
|
$
|
422,311
|
|
|
$
|
299,029
|
|
|
$
|
188,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
554,399
|
|
|
$
|
463,288
|
|
|
$
|
375,349
|
|
|
$
|
273,857
|
|
|
$
|
190,043
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
82,961
|
|
|
$
|
56,598
|
|
|
$
|
43,542
|
|
|
$
|
24,226
|
|
|
$
|
(842
|
)
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(29,567
|
)
|
|
|
9,888
|
|
|
|
12,270
|
|
|
|
7,688
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations including tax expense
of zero, zero, $2, $33 and $70, respectively
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(2,085
|
)
|
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
112,528
|
|
|
$
|
46,710
|
|
|
$
|
31,412
|
|
|
$
|
14,453
|
|
|
$
|
(2,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes the impact of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based
Payment.” For additional information, refer to Note 6
(Share-Based Compensation) to our Consolidated Financial
Statements under “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
As of September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
140,345
|
|
|
$
|
72,898
|
|
|
$
|
55,256
|
|
|
$
|
18,630
|
|
|
$
|
12,998
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
195,138
|
|
|
|
121,062
|
|
|
|
79,253
|
|
|
|
43,758
|
|
|
|
30,186
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
381,087
|
|
|
|
240,857
|
|
|
|
179,474
|
|
|
|
137,470
|
|
|
|
93,297
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,938
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
82,949
|
|
|
|
25,627
|
|
|
|
29,655
|
|
|
|
21,215
|
|
|
|
31,251
|
|
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and
related Notes included elsewhere in this Transition Report on
Form 10-K.
This discussion and analysis also contains forward-looking
statements and should also be read in conjunction with the
disclosures and information contained in “Disclosure
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk
Factors” in this Transition Report on
Form 10-K.
We use the terms “Avanade,” “we,”
“our Company,” “our” and “us” in
this report to refer to Avanade Inc. and its subsidiaries. We
use the term “Accenture” to refer to our majority
shareholder, Accenture LLP, which is a subsidiary of Accenture
Ltd, a Bermuda holding company, and its affiliates. We use the
term “Microsoft” to refer to Microsoft Corporation, a
Washington corporation, a minority shareholder, and its
affiliates. All amounts expressed in dollars are in thousands of
dollars unless otherwise indicated. For example, a reference to
“$40,800” means $40.8 million.
Change in
Fiscal Year
On May 23, 2007, our Board of Directors (the
“Board”) resolved that our fiscal year that began on
October 1, 2006 would end on August 31, 2007, and from
and after that date, our fiscal year would be the period
beginning September 1 of each year and ending on August 31 of
the following year. As a result, this
Form 10-K
is a Transition Report, and includes financial information for
the 11-month
transition period October 1, 2006 through August 31,
2007, which we refer to as “fiscal 2007” or
“fiscal year 2007.” All references to years prior to
fiscal 2007, unless otherwise noted, refer to our historical
fiscal year, which ended on September 30. For example, a
reference to “fiscal 2006” or “fiscal year
2006” means the
12-month
period ended September 30, 2006. All references to
quarters, unless otherwise noted and except for our two-month
fiscal fourth quarter ended August 31, 2007, refer to the
historical quarters of our fiscal year prior to our fiscal year
end change.
Overview
Avanade is a global technology company that specializes in
delivering services and solutions using Microsoft enterprise
technology. We were formed as a joint venture between Accenture
and Microsoft. Accenture and Microsoft continue to account for
the majority of our business engagements. We work with
businesses of varying sizes across many industries.
Our revenues are driven by the ability of our consulting and
sales leadership to secure new contracts and to deliver
solutions and services that add value for our clients. Our
ability to add value to clients and therefore drive revenues
depends in part on our ability to deliver innovative solutions
and deploy skilled teams of professionals quickly. Our revenue
includes all amounts that are billed or
23
billable to clients, including out-of-pocket costs such as
travel and subsistence for consulting staff,
subcontractors’ costs and costs of hardware and software.
Our results of operations are affected by the economic
conditions, levels of business activity and rates of change in
the industries we serve, as well as by the pace of technological
change and the type and level of technology spending by our
clients, specifically as it relates to Microsoft enterprise
technology. Our ability to increase revenue is affected in part
by changing conditions and delivery approaches and trends within
the technology services industry, particularly the growth of
Microsoft services business in our target markets. The ability
to identify and capitalize on these market and technological
changes early in their cycles is a key driver of our
performance. Although we are continuing to see strong demand for
our services, we continue to expect that revenue growth rates
across our segments may vary from quarter to quarter during
fiscal 2008 as economic conditions vary in different industries
and geographic markets.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from engagements
with Accenture and Microsoft. Revenues from Accenture and
Microsoft primarily come from serving as a subcontractor to
Accenture and Microsoft on their engagements with their end
clients. The following summarizes the percentage of revenues
before reimbursements derived from our business with Accenture
and Microsoft:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Related-party revenues before reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
|
|
67
|
%
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Revenues before reimbursements for fiscal 2007 were $593,546,
compared with $483,864 for fiscal 2006, an increase of 23% in
U.S. dollars and 17% in local currency.
As we are a global company, our revenues are denominated in
multiple currencies and may be significantly affected by
currency exchange-rate fluctuations. During the majority of
fiscal 2006, the weakening of various currencies versus the
U.S. dollar resulted in an unfavorable currency translation
and decreased our reported revenues, operating expenses and
operating income. During the majority of fiscal 2007, the
U.S. dollar weakened against many currencies, resulting in
favorable currency translation and greater reported
U.S. dollar revenues, operating expenses and operating
income compared to the same period in the prior year. If this
trend continues in fiscal 2008, our U.S. dollar revenue
growth will be higher than our growth in local currency. In the
future, if the U.S. dollar strengthens against other
currencies, our U.S. dollar revenue growth may be lower
than our growth in local currency.
We continue to experience pricing pressures from competitors as
well as from clients facing pressure to control costs. The
growing use of offshore resources to provide lower-cost service
delivery capabilities within our industry is a source of
pressure on our revenues and operating margins. Consolidation
among our competitors continues, which affects our revenues and
operating margins. In addition, software and hardware companies
are expanding their offerings to include consulting services
that directly compete with ours, which also can affect our
revenues and operating margins.
The primary categories of operating expenses are cost of
services and selling, general and administrative costs. Cost of
services is primarily driven by the cost of consulting
personnel, which consists mainly of compensation, subcontractor
and other personnel costs, including training, travel,
communication and technology support costs. Cost of services as
a percentage of revenues is driven by the prices we obtain for
our services and the utilization of our client-service
personnel. Utilization represents the percentage of our
professionals’ time spent on billable work. Selling expense
is driven primarily by personnel costs and
24
business-development activities. General and administrative
costs primarily include costs for non-client-facing personnel,
information systems, office space and professional fees, which
we seek to manage, as a percentage of revenues, at levels
consistent with or lower than levels in prior-year periods.
Gross margin (revenues before reimbursements less cost of
services before reimbursable expenses) as a percentage of
revenues before reimbursements for fiscal 2007 was 32.5%,
compared with 31.6% for fiscal 2006. The increase in gross
margin for fiscal 2007 was principally due to strong revenue
growth and improved contract margins, partially offset by an
increased use of sub-contractors.
Our cost-management strategy is to anticipate changes in demand
for our services and to identify cost-management initiatives. A
primary element of this strategy is to aggressively plan and
manage our payroll costs to meet the anticipated demand for our
services, given that payroll costs are the most significant
portion of our operating expenses.
Our headcount increased to approximately 3,900 as of
August 31, 2007, from approximately 3,200 as of
September 30, 2006. Annualized attrition for fiscal 2007
was 20.9%, excluding involuntary terminations, slightly higher
compared to 20.2% for fiscal 2006. Additionally, as of
August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, we had
approximately 3,000 and 2,000 professionals, respectively, who
were contracted from Accenture as part of the Global Delivery
Network we use to provide our solutions and capabilities. We
continue to add substantial numbers of new employees and will
continue to actively recruit new employees to balance our mix of
skills and resources to meet current and projected demands,
replace departing employees and expand our global sourcing
approach, which includes our Global Delivery Network and other
capabilities around the world. We have adjusted compensation in
fiscal 2007 in certain skill sets and geographies in order to
attract and retain appropriate numbers of qualified employees
and we may need to continue to adjust compensation in the
future. As in previous fiscal years, we have adjusted and expect
to continue to adjust pricing with the objective of recovering
these compensation increases. Our margins and ability to grow
our business could be adversely affected if we do not continue
to effectively manage attrition, recover increases in
compensation and effectively assimilate and utilize substantial
numbers of new employees.
Selling, general and administrative costs as a percentage of
revenues before reimbursements were 19.2% for fiscal 2007,
compared with 20.3% for fiscal 2006. The decrease in these costs
as a percentage of revenues before reimbursements was primarily
due to strong revenue growth and our ability to manage selling,
general and administrative costs as a percentage of revenues
before reimbursements at a lower level.
Operating income as a percentage of revenues before
reimbursements increased to 13.3% for fiscal 2007 from 11.3% for
fiscal 2006. The increase was principally due to strong revenue
growth, improved contract margins, and our ability to manage
selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenues before reimbursements at a lower level.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses. We continually evaluate our estimates,
judgments and assumptions based on available information and
experience. Because the use of estimates is inherent in the
financial reporting process, actual results could differ from
those estimates. Certain of our accounting policies require
higher degrees of judgment than others in their application.
These include certain aspects of accounting for revenue
recognition, income taxes, share-based compensation and
redeemable common stock and employee put options.
25
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenues from contracts for services on the
percentage-of-completion method in accordance with American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position
81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain
Production-Type Contracts. Percentage-of-completion
accounting involves calculating the percentage of services
provided during the reporting period compared to the total
estimated services to be provided over the duration of the
contract. Estimated revenues for applying the
percentage-of-completion method include estimated incentives for
which achievement of defined goals is deemed probable. This
method is followed where reasonably dependable estimates of
revenues and costs can be made. Estimates of total contract
revenues and costs are continuously monitored during the term of
the contract and recorded revenues and costs are subject to
revision as the contract progresses. Such revisions may result
in increases or decreases to revenues and income and are
reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements in the period
in which they are first identified. If our estimates indicate
that a contract loss will occur, a loss provision is recorded in
the period in which the loss first becomes probable and
reasonably estimable. Contract losses are determined to be the
amount by which the estimated direct and indirect costs of the
contract exceed the estimated total revenues that will be
generated by the contract and are included in Cost of services
and classified in Other accrued liabilities in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The substantial majority of our revenue
contracts are time and materials arrangements and the remainder
are fixed-fee arrangements.
In limited instances when we sell software
and/or
hardware in conjunction with services, revenues are allocated
based on the fair value of the elements in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts Issue (“EITF”)
No. 00-21,
Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables. Revenues recognized in excess of billings are
recorded as unbilled services. If the fair value of the
undelivered element(s) within a multiple elements contract
cannot be determined, revenue is deferred until revenues from
all elements can be determined. Multiple element contracts are
an immaterial portion of our revenues.
The Company follows EITF
No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenues Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent
(“EITF 99-19”).
The majority of the Company’s revenue contracts are
recorded on the gross basis pursuant to the guidance in
EITF 99-19.
Client prepayments (even if nonrefundable) are deferred (i.e.,
classified as a liability) and recognized over future periods as
services are delivered or performed.
Our revenues are affected by the number of work days in the
fiscal quarter, which in turn is affected by the level of
vacation days and holidays. Prior to our fiscal year end change
from September 30 to August 31, we typically had
approximately five to ten percent more work days in our
historical second and third quarters than in our historical
first and fourth quarters. As a result of changing our fiscal
year end to August 31, we expect to experience
approximately five to ten percent more work days in our first
and third quarters than in our second and fourth quarters.
Reimbursements, including those relating to travel and
out-of-pocket expenses, and other similar third-party costs,
such as the cost of hardware and software resale, are included
in revenues, and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses
is included in Cost of services. Reimbursement revenues include
specific billings for reimbursable expenses and, if applicable,
allocations from gross billings where billings do not
specifically identify reimbursable expenses.
Income
Taxes
Determining the consolidated provision for income tax expense,
income tax liabilities and deferred tax assets and liabilities
involves judgment. As a global company, we calculate and
provide
26
for income taxes in each of the tax jurisdictions in which we
operate. This involves estimating current tax exposures in each
jurisdiction as well as making judgments regarding the
recoverability of deferred tax assets. Tax exposures can involve
complex issues and may require an extended period to resolve.
Changes in the geographic mix or estimated level of annual
income before taxes can affect the overall effective tax rate.
We apply an estimated annual effective tax rate to our quarterly
operating results to determine the provision for income tax
expense. In the event there is a significant unusual or
infrequent item recognized in our quarterly operating results,
the tax attributable to that item is recorded in the interim
period in which it occurs. Our effective tax rate for fiscal
2007 was a benefit of 35.6%, compared to a provision of 17.5% in
fiscal 2006. The decrease in the effective tax rate was the
result of benefits related to recognition of the benefits of
certain deferred tax assets. For additional information, refer
to Note 4 (Income Taxes) to our Consolidated Financial
Statements under “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
Deferred tax assets, primarily net operating loss carryforwards
and deferred tax liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
carryforwards and temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. The Company provides a valuation allowance
against net deferred tax assets if, based on the available
evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of August 31,
2007, a $9,433 valuation allowance exists related to continuing
operations based on the Company’s evaluation of the
likelihood of future taxable income against which those assets
may be realized. The Company’s evaluation that realization
is not “more likely than not” is based on the
Company’s short earnings history and the significant level
of initial years’ cumulative unutilized net operating
losses in the jurisdictions where a valuation allowance exists
and significant future tax deductions for anticipated stock
option exercises in certain jurisdictions.
No taxes have been provided on undistributed foreign earnings
that are planned to be indefinitely reinvested. If future
events, including material changes in estimates of cash, working
capital and long-term investment requirements, necessitate that
these earnings be distributed, an additional provision for
withholding taxes may apply, which could materially affect our
future effective tax rate.
As a matter of course, the Company is regularly audited by
various taxing authorities, and sometimes these audits result in
proposed assessments where the ultimate result may be that the
Company owes additional taxes. We establish reserves when,
despite our belief that our tax return positions are appropriate
and supportable under local tax law, we believe certain
positions are likely to be challenged and we may not succeed in
realizing the tax benefit. We evaluate these reserves each
quarter and adjust the reserves and the related interest in
light of changing facts and circumstances regarding the
probability of realizing tax benefits, such as the progress of a
tax audit or the expiration of a statute of limitations. We
believe the estimates and assumptions used to support our
evaluation of tax benefit realization are reasonable. However,
final determinations of prior-year tax liabilities, either by
settlement with tax authorities or expiration of statutes of
limitations, could be materially different than estimates
reflected in assets and liabilities and historical income tax
provisions. The outcome of these final determinations could have
a material effect on our income tax provision, net income, or
cash flows in the period in which that determination is made.
The Company believes its tax positions comply with applicable
tax law and that it has adequately provided for any known tax
contingencies.
Share-Based
Compensation
Avanade has two stock option plans that provide for the grant of
shares of common stock in the form of options or equity-related
awards. Under the terms of the plans, we are required to
determine the fair
27
value of the Company’s common stock semi-annually as of the
end of our fiscal year and as of the end of our second fiscal
quarter each year. In addition, under the authority of the
Board, we have elected to perform quarterly valuations as of the
end of our first and third fiscal quarters each year. Because
our stock is not traded on a public exchange, determining the
fair value involves judgment. In the course of determining fair
value, we rely upon prospective financial information based on
management’s projections of future operating results and
other information from various public, financial and industry
sources. In addition, independent, third-party business
valuation professionals are used to determine the estimated fair
value of the total equity of the Company based on management
projections of future operating results and other information.
The total equity consists of 100% of the stockholder’s
equity, including both the preferred and common stock. As of
August 31, 2007, there were outstanding options to purchase
14,915,550 shares of the Company’s common stock. We do
not intend to grant any additional options to purchase shares of
our common stock in the future.
In June 2006, the Company adopted the Avanade Inc. Long-Term
Incentive Plan (the “AVU Plan”). Awards under the AVU
Plan are granted in the form of Avanade Valuation Units
(“AVUs”), each of which is based on an amount
determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee (the
“Base Value”) that, except for the initial grants
effective June 19, 2006, may not be less than the fair
value of the common stock of the Company as of the effective
date of the applicable grant. AVUs vest according to a schedule
determined by the Compensation Committee as of the date of grant
pursuant to the terms of the AVU Plan and are settled in cash
based on the difference between the fair value of the
Company’s common stock at the vesting date and the Base
Value of the AVU. The AVU Plan provides that the Company’s
aggregate payment of AVUs that vest in any calendar year cannot
exceed twelve percent of the Company’s operating income
unreduced by AVU expenses. For additional information, refer to
Note 6 (Share-Based Compensation) to our Consolidated
Financial Statements under “Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.”
Prior to October 1, 2005, we elected to apply the
disclosure-only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and apply Accounting Principles
Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in
accounting for our stock option plans. Accordingly, employee
share-based compensation expense was recognized based on the
intrinsic value of the stock option on the date of grant. We
have not granted equity instruments in exchange for goods or
services to non-employees.
On October 1, 2005, we adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(“SFAS No. 123R”), using the modified
prospective method. For additional information, refer to
Note 6 (Share-Based Compensation) to our Consolidated
Financial Statements under “Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.”
Redeemable
Common Stock and Employee Put Rights
Holders of our common stock issued upon exercise of options
granted under our stock option plans have put rights that, under
certain circumstances and conditions, require us to purchase
shares of such stock at fair value. Holders of options to
purchase our common stock also have similar put rights, but have
not yet acquired the underlying stock. Vested shares of common
stock issued under our option plans are classified as redeemable
instruments and are recorded at the current fair value on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets, while options issued under our
option plans are classified as redeemable instruments and
recorded at the current intrinsic value of those options as
employment services are rendered. Collectively, these shares and
options are included in Redeemable common stock and employee
stock options on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and totaled
$165,335 and $123,964 as of August 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006, respectively.
28
The current fair value of our common stock is determined by the
Board on the basis of a quarterly business valuation prepared by
independent, third-party business valuation professionals
pursuant to the terms of our option plans. The total of the fair
value of the vested common stock so held and the intrinsic value
of the options represents the estimated cash outlay required to
satisfy put options outstanding, which are recorded as temporary
equity as services are rendered. Effective with the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, the intrinsic value of employee options
has been recorded so as to be consistent with the pattern by
which the related compensation cost is recorded. Changes in fair
and intrinsic value are recorded as adjustments to Additional
paid-in capital on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Revenues
by Segment/Geographic Business Area
Our three reportable operating segments are our geographic
business areas: the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. We manage
our segments on the basis of revenues before reimbursements
because we believe they are a better indicator of segment
performance than revenues. Generally, operating expenses for
each operating segment have similar characteristics and are
subject to the same factors, pressures and challenges. However,
the economic environment and its effects on the geographic areas
served by our operating segments affect revenues and operating
expenses within our operating segments to differing degrees.
Decisions relating to staffing levels are not made uniformly
across our operating segments, due in part to the need of some
of our operating segments to tailor their workforces to the
needs of local businesses. Local currency fluctuations also tend
to affect our operating segments differently, depending on the
geographic concentrations and locations of their businesses.
Revenues for each of our operating segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total Revenues
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Before Reimbursements for
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
the Fiscal Years Ended
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Local
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
SEGMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
304,066
|
|
|
$
|
263,473
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
233,410
|
|
|
|
190,446
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
53,680
|
|
|
|
33,233
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Corporate and eliminations(1)
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
(3,288
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues before reimbursements
|
|
|
593,546
|
|
|
|
483,864
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
39,986
|
|
|
|
33,942
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
633,532
|
|
|
$
|
517,806
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m = not meaningful
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Corporate and eliminations include
inter-company eliminations and other revenues associated with
our GDN resources, which are not attributable to a specific
geographic business areas.
|
We conduct business in the following countries that individually
comprised more than 10% of consolidated revenues before
reimbursements within the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
United States
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
29
Eleven
Months Ended August 31, 2007 Compared to Twelve Months
Ended September 30, 2006
Revenues
Revenues increased 22%, or $115,726, to $633,532 in fiscal 2007,
compared with fiscal 2006. Revenues before reimbursements for
fiscal 2007 were $593,546, compared with $483,864 for fiscal
2006, an increase of $109,682, or 23%. The increase resulted
primarily from growth in our business with Accenture, favorable
foreign currency translation related to our Europe and Asia
Pacific operations, growth in our business with third-party
clients, and to a lesser extent, growth in our business with
Microsoft. Accenture accounted for 67% of our revenues before
reimbursements in both fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, while
Microsoft accounted for 7% and 6% of our revenues before
reimbursements in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively. No
other client accounted for revenues in excess of 10% of our
total revenues in fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006.
Our Americas segment achieved revenues before reimbursements of
$304,066 in fiscal 2007, compared with $263,473 in fiscal 2006,
an increase of 15% in U.S. dollars and in local currency.
The increase was primarily driven by growth in our business with
Accenture and Microsoft in the U.S. and growth in our
business with third-party clients in Canada.
Our Europe segment achieved revenues before reimbursements of
$233,410 in fiscal 2007, compared with $190,446 in fiscal 2006,
an increase of 23% in U.S. dollars and 12% in local
currency terms. The increase was primarily driven by growth in
our business with Accenture in Spain, Italy and Sweden, growth
in our business with third-party clients in Norway, France and
Italy, and growth in our business with Microsoft in the
Netherlands and Spain. This was partially offset by a decrease
in revenues before reimbursements in the U.K. due to a reduction
in overall business volume.
Our Asia Pacific segment achieved revenues before reimbursements
of $53,680 in fiscal 2007, compared with $33,233 in fiscal 2006,
an increase of 62% in U.S. dollars and 45% in local
currency terms. The increase was primarily driven by growth in
our business with Accenture in Australia and Japan, growth in
our business with third-party clients in Thailand, and growth in
our business with Microsoft in Japan and Singapore.
Operating
Expenses
Operating expenses were $554,399 in fiscal 2007, an increase of
$91,111, or 20%, over fiscal 2006, and decreased as a percentage
of revenues to 87.5% from 89.5% over this period. Operating
expenses before reimbursable expenses were $514,413 in fiscal
2007, an increase of $85,067, or 20%, over fiscal 2006, and
decreased as a percentage of revenues before reimbursements to
86.7% from 88.7% over this period.
Cost
of Services
Cost of services was $440,401 in fiscal 2007, an increase of
$75,502, or 21%, over fiscal 2006, and decreased as a percentage
of revenues to 69.5% in fiscal 2007 from 70.5% over this period.
Cost of services before reimbursable expenses was $400,415 in
fiscal 2007, an increase of $69,458, or 21%, over fiscal 2006,
and decreased as a percentage of revenues before reimbursements
to 67.5% from 68.4% over this period. Gross margin (revenues
before reimbursements less cost of services before
reimbursements as a percentage of revenues before
reimbursements) increased to 32.5% from 31.6% during this
period. The decrease in Cost of services as a percentage of
revenues before reimbursements was principally due to strong
revenue growth and improved contract margins, partially offset
by increased use of sub-contractors.
30
Selling,
General and Administrative Costs
Selling, general and administrative costs were $113,998 in
fiscal 2007, an increase of $15,609, or 16%, over fiscal 2006,
and decreased as a percentage of revenues before reimbursements
to 19.2% from 20.3% over this period. This decrease as a
percentage of revenues before reimbursements was primarily due
to strong revenue growth and our ability to manage selling,
general and administrative costs as a percentage of revenues
before reimbursements at a lower level.
Operating
Income (loss)
Operating income was $79,133 in fiscal 2007, an increase of
$24,615, or 45%, over fiscal 2006. Operating income as a
percentage of revenues before reimbursements was 13.3% and 11.3%
in fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in operating
income as a percentage of revenues before reimbursements was
principally due to strong revenue growth, improved contract
margins, and our ability to manage selling, general and
administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues before
reimbursements at a lower level. Operating income (loss) for
each of the operating segments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
76,495
|
|
|
$
|
58,431
|
|
|
$
|
18,064
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
31,429
|
|
|
|
29,989
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
(1,127
|
)
|
|
|
1,571
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(29,235
|
)
|
|
|
(32,775
|
)
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
79,133
|
|
|
$
|
54,518
|
|
|
$
|
24,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following operating income (loss) commentary outlines the
changes for each operating segment:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Americas operating income increased primarily due to improved
contract margins from our Global Delivery Network resources.
|
|
|
•
|
Europe operating income increased primarily due to strong
revenue growth, improved contract margins in Spain, Italy, and
improved operating margins in developing markets including
Denmark and Norway, partially offset by higher compensation
costs and royalty and management fees.
|
|
|
•
|
Asia Pacific operating income increased primarily due to strong
revenue growth and improved contract margins in Australia and
Japan, partially offset by higher royalty and management fees
and compensation costs.
|
|
|
•
|
Corporate and eliminations operating loss decreased primarily
due to increased intercompany royalty and management fees and
improved contract margins from Global Delivery Network resources
in our business with Accenture, partially offset by higher
compensation and marketing costs.
|
Interest
Income
Interest income was $3,541 in fiscal 2007, an increase of
$1,545, or 77%, over fiscal 2006. The increase resulted
primarily from higher average cash balances and an increase in
interest rates.
31
Other
Income (Expense)
Other income was $297 in fiscal 2007, an increase of $177 from
fiscal 2006. The increase resulted primarily from the impact of
foreign currency exchange rates on an intercompany loan,
partially offset by losses on foreign currency forward contracts.
(Benefit)
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for fiscal 2007 was a benefit of 35.6%,
compared to a provision of 17.5% in fiscal 2006. The effective
tax rates for both periods were significantly impacted by the
elimination of valuation allowances related to net operating
losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences.
Changes in the valuation allowances reduced the effective tax
rate for the eleven months ended August 31, 2007 and the
year ended September 30, 2006 by 73.9 and
16.4 percentage points, respectively. For further
information, see Note 4 (Income Taxes) to our Consolidated
Financial Statements under “Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data.”
Year
Ended September 30, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
September 30, 2005
Revenues for each of our operating segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
for the Year
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Local
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
US$
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
SEGMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
263,473
|
|
|
$
|
199,791
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
Europe
|
|
|
190,446
|
|
|
|
164,301
|
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
33,233
|
|
|
|
25,707
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Corporate and eliminations(1)
|
|
|
(3,288
|
)
|
|
|
(2,485
|
)
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
n/m
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues before reimbursements
|
|
|
483,864
|
|
|
|
387,314
|
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
33,942
|
|
|
|
34,997
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
517,806
|
|
|
$
|
422,311
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/m = not meaningful
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Corporate and eliminations include
inter-company eliminations and other revenues not directly
attributable to the segments.
|
Revenues
Revenues increased 23%, or $95,495, to $517,806 in fiscal 2006,
compared with fiscal 2005. Revenues before reimbursements for
fiscal 2006 were $483,864, compared with $387,314 for fiscal
2005, an increase of $96,550 or 25%. The increase resulted
primarily from growth in our business with Accenture and
third-party clients. Accenture accounted for 67% of our revenues
before reimbursements in both fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, while
Microsoft accounted for 6% and 8% of our revenues before
reimbursements in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. No
other client accounted for revenues in excess of 10% of our
total revenues in fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005.
Our Americas segment achieved revenues before reimbursements of
$263,473 in fiscal 2006, compared with $199,791 in fiscal 2005,
an increase of 32% in U.S. dollars and 31% in local
currency. The increase was primarily driven by growth in our
business with Accenture and third-party clients.
Our Europe segment achieved revenues before reimbursements of
$190,446 in fiscal 2006, compared with $164,301 in fiscal 2005,
an increase of 16% in U.S. dollars and 19% in local
currency.
32
The increase was primarily driven by growth in our business with
Accenture and third-party clients, and to a lesser extent,
growth in our business with Microsoft.
Our Asia Pacific segment achieved revenues before reimbursements
of $33,233 in fiscal 2006, compared with $25,707 in fiscal 2005,
an increase of 29% in U.S. dollars and 32% in local
currency. The increase was primarily driven by growth in our
business with third-party clients, and to a lesser extent,
growth in revenues from Microsoft and Accenture.
Operating
Expenses
Operating expenses were $463,288 in fiscal 2006, an increase of
$87,939, or 23%, over fiscal 2005 and remained flat as a
percentage of revenues at 89% in fiscal 2006, compared with
fiscal 2005. Operating expenses before reimbursable expenses
were $429,346 in fiscal 2006, an increase of $88,994, or 26%,
over fiscal 2005, and increased as a percentage of revenues
before reimbursements to 89% from 88% over this period.
Operating expenses for fiscal 2006 included share-based
compensation expense of $5,977, or 1.2% of revenues before
reimbursements, compared with share-based compensation expense
of $1,610, or 0.4% of revenues before reimbursements, for fiscal
2005. Effective October 1, 2005, we adopted
SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment, resulting
in a change in our method of recognizing share-based
compensation expense. Specifically, we now record compensation
expense for employee stock options for our employee share
programs. Had we expensed employee stock options in accordance
with SFAS No. 123R during fiscal 2005, we estimate
that operating expenses would have included $11,472 in total
share-based compensation expense, or 3% of revenues before
reimbursements.
Cost
of Services
Cost of services was $364,899 for fiscal 2006, an increase of
$67,466, or 23%, over fiscal 2005 and remained flat as a
percentage of revenues at 70% in fiscal 2006, compared with
fiscal 2005. Cost of services before reimbursable expenses was
$330,957 in fiscal 2006, an increase of $68,521, or 26%, from
fiscal 2005. Cost of services before reimbursable expenses
increased as a percentage of revenues before reimbursements to
68.4% from 67.8% in fiscal 2005. Gross margins (revenues before
reimbursements less cost of services before reimbursements)
decreased to 31.6% of revenues before reimbursements in fiscal
2006 from 32.2% in fiscal 2005.
The increase in Cost of services as a percentage of revenues
before reimbursements and decrease in gross margin was primarily
due to higher research and innovation costs and an increase in
share-based compensation as a result of the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, partially offset by a decrease in
headcount related costs as a percentage of revenues before
reimbursements.
Selling,
General and Administrative Costs
Selling, general and administrative costs were $98,389 in fiscal
2006, an increase of $20,452, or 26%, over fiscal 2005, and
remained flat as a percentage of revenues before reimbursements
at 20% in fiscal 2006, compared with fiscal 2005.
Operating
Income (loss)
Operating income was $54,518 in fiscal 2006, an increase of
$7,556, or 16%, over fiscal 2005. Operating income as a
percentage of revenues before reimbursements was 11.3% and 12.1%
in fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in operating
income as a percentage of revenues before reimbursements was
primarily due to higher research and innovation costs and an
increase in share-based compensation expense as a result of the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R, partially offset by a
decrease in
33
headcount related costs as a percentage of revenues before
reimbursements. Had we expensed employee stock options during
fiscal 2005 in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, we
estimate that operating income as a percentage of revenues
before reimbursements for fiscal 2005 would have decreased by
2.5 percentage points. Operating income (loss) for each of
the operating segments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
58,431
|
|
|
$
|
31,860
|
|
|
$
|
26,571
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
29,989
|
|
|
|
31,552
|
|
|
|
(1,563
|
)
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
(1,127
|
)
|
|
|
(1,430
|
)
|
|
|
303
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(32,775
|
)
|
|
|
(15,020
|
)
|
|
|
(17,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,518
|
|
|
$
|
46,962
|
|
|
$
|
7,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following operating income (loss) commentary outlines the
changes for each operating segment:
|
|
|
|
•
|
Americas operating income increased primarily due to a 32%
increase in revenues before reimbursements, improved gross
margins and reduction in payroll-related costs as a percentage
of revenues before reimbursements.
|
|
|
•
|
Europe operating income decreased primarily due to higher costs
related to increased headcount, partially offset by reduced use
of sub-contractors.
|
|
|
•
|
Asia Pacific operating loss was lower primarily due to improved
gross margins in Japan and Australia, partially offset by higher
costs related to increased headcount in Japan.
|
|
|
•
|
Corporate and eliminations increased primarily due to higher
costs related to research and innovation activities, increased
headcount and an increase in share-based compensation expense as
a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
|
Interest
Income
Interest income was $1,996 in fiscal 2006, an increase of
$1,071, or 116%, over fiscal 2005. The increase resulted
primarily from higher average cash balances.
Other
Income (Expense)
Other income was $120 in fiscal 2006, compared with other
expense of $3,785 in fiscal 2005, primarily due to losses on
foreign currency forward contracts and the impact of foreign
currency exchange rates on an intercompany loan in fiscal 2005
compared with fiscal 2006.
(Benefit)
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for fiscal 2006 was 17.5% compared to
28.2% in fiscal 2005. The decrease in the effective tax rate was
the result of benefits related to recognition of the future
benefits of certain deferred tax assets.
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act
(“AJCA”) became law. The AJCA includes a deduction of
85% of certain foreign earnings that are repatriated, as defined
in the AJCA. During the fourth quarter ended September 30,
2006, our Board approved a domestic reinvestment plan as allowed
by the AJCA with respect to un-repatriated foreign earnings. We
repatriated $20,643 in foreign earnings during its fourth
quarter ended September 30, 2006 under the AJCA. Of this
amount,
34
$19,043 qualified for the 85 percent deduction. The tax
expense as a consequence of the repatriation of the accumulated
foreign earnings under the AJCA was $4.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations
and a line of credit with Accenture. The line of credit is used,
if necessary, as a short-term working capital facility. The line
of credit has no specified due date and bears interest at a rate
of LIBOR plus 0.15%. As of August 31, 2007, there were no
amounts outstanding on the line of credit. As of August 31,
2007 and September 30, 2006, cash and cash equivalents were
$140,345 and $72,898, respectively.
Cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities,
as reflected in the Consolidated Cash Flows Statements are
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007 to 2006
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
86,449
|
|
|
$
|
29,030
|
|
|
$
|
59,364
|
|
|
$
|
57,419
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(8,716
|
)
|
|
|
(5,250
|
)
|
|
|
(11,679
|
)
|
|
|
(3,466
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(13,042
|
)
|
|
|
(4,857
|
)
|
|
|
(9,670
|
)
|
|
|
(8,185
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
67,447
|
|
|
$
|
17,642
|
|
|
$
|
36,626
|
|
|
$
|
49,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: The $57,419
increase in cash provided by was primarily due to higher Net
income, exclusive of the impact of the deferred income tax
(benefit) expense, an increase in accrued payroll and related
benefits and a lower net increase in unbilled services during
fiscal 2007.
Investing activities: The $3,466
increase in cash used was primarily due to deferred technology
infrastructure costs and an increase in capital expenditures.
Financing activities: The $8,185
increase in cash used was primarily due to an increase in
purchases of common stock due to two put/call periods in fiscal
2007 compared to one put/call period in fiscal 2006, partially
offset by an increase in proceeds from the exercise of stock
options. For additional information, see Note 6
(Share-Based Compensation) to our Consolidated Financial
Statements under “Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.”
Borrowing
Facilities
We have a line of credit with Accenture that has an interest
rate of LIBOR plus 0.15%. During fiscal 2004, we borrowed $5,000
under this line of credit. The $5,000 and related accrued
interest was repaid to Accenture during April 2005.
Foreign
Exchange Instruments
In the normal course of business, we use foreign currency
contracts to manage our exposure to the variability of exchange
rates for the British pound, Euro, Canadian dollar and
Australian dollar. Historically, we have not held any material
derivatives designated as hedges as defined by
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities. No derivatives were designated as
hedges as of August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006.
The changes in fair value of all derivatives are recognized in
Other income (expense) on our Consolidated Income Statements
under
35
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” These
instruments are generally short-term in nature, with maturities
of less than one year and are subject to fluctuations in foreign
exchange rates and credit risk. From time to time, we enter into
forward contracts that are of a long-term nature. Credit risk is
managed through careful selection and ongoing evaluation of the
financial institutions utilized as counterparties.
Redeemable
Common Stock and Employee Put Rights
Holders of our common stock issued upon exercise of options
granted under our stock option plans have put rights that, under
certain circumstances and conditions, require us to purchase
shares of such stock at fair value. Holders of options to
purchase our common stock also have similar put rights, but have
not yet acquired the underlying stock. In addition, all stock
issued pursuant to options or awards granted under our stock
option plans are subject to call rights whereby we can
repurchase them at fair value. These put and call rights may not
be exercised by the holder or us, respectively, until the date
that is six months and one day after the date the shares are
acquired and may only be exercised during the
30-day
periods following each Semi-annual Valuation (the “put/call
period”) conducted for determining the value of our common
stock.
The current redemption value of vested common stock issued
pursuant to awards granted under our stock option plans and the
current intrinsic value of options that contain put rights for
shares obtained pursuant to option exercises are collectively
included in Redeemable common stock and employee stock options
on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and totaled $165,335 and
$123,964 as of August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006,
respectively. As a result of our exercise of our call rights and
certain employee holders of our common stock exercising their
put rights, we repurchased an aggregate of 2,100,373 shares
during the two put/call periods of fiscal 2007, and
1,451,614 shares during the put/call period of fiscal 2006
for a total cash outlay of $17,637 and $9,726, respectively. We
continue to closely monitor the number of shares of our common
stock that we are required to repurchase during each put/call
period as well as the number of shares that we may be required
to repurchase in future periods.
On November 8, 2007, the Board approved the current
Semi-annual Valuation, thereby initiating a put/call period
during which we intend to exercise our call rights to purchase
838,464 shares of our common stock held by current and
former employees. The repurchase of these shares of Avanade
common stock at a price of $10.57 per share is expected to
result in an estimated cash outlay of approximately $8,863,
which is anticipated to be made in December 2007. Additionally,
holders of 3,331,000 shares of our common stock with a
value equal to approximately $35,205 are eligible to exercise
their put rights during this put/call period. We cannot at this
time estimate the actual number of shares holders will require
us to repurchase by exercising their put rights; however, based
on limited historical information from the previous put/call
periods of fiscal 2007 and 2006, we repurchased on average
500,000 shares per put/call period as a result of exercised
put rights. Any cash outlay that may be required to repurchase
these shares is also expected to be made in December 2007.
For additional information about these put and call rights,
refer to Note 6 (Share-Based Compensation) to our
Consolidated Financial Statements under “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Available
Funds and Future Cash Flows
We believe that our available funds and the cash flows expected
to be generated from operations will be sufficient to satisfy
our current and planned operations and needs for the foreseeable
future. We have used, and plan to use in the future, cash from
borrowings (if any) for general corporate purposes, business
expansion needs, stock repurchases and working capital. Our
ability to expand and
36
grow our business in accordance with current plans and to meet
our long-term capital requirements beyond this twelve-month
period will depend on many factors, including continued growth
in our existing locations, the ability to collect our
receivables in a timely fashion, and the capacity to deliver our
contracted projects in an efficient manner.
Obligations
and Commitments
As of August 31, 2007, we had the following obligations and
commitments to make future payments under contracts, contractual
obligations and commercial commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Operating leases(1)
|
|
$
|
20,771
|
|
|
$
|
5,398
|
|
|
$
|
7,067
|
|
|
$
|
4,206
|
|
|
$
|
4,100
|
|
Other commitments(2)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
20,953
|
|
|
$
|
5,580
|
|
|
$
|
7,067
|
|
|
$
|
4,206
|
|
|
$
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
See Note 9 (Lease Commitments)
to our Consolidated Financial Statements under “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.”
|
|
(2)
|
|
Other commitments include
information technology obligations in the ordinary course of
business that we cannot cancel or where we would be required to
pay a termination fee in the event of cancellation. Amounts
shown do not include recourse that we may have to recover
termination fees or penalties from clients.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We have various agreements by which we may be obligated to
indemnify the other parties with respect to certain matters.
Generally, these indemnification provisions are included in
contracts arising in the normal course of business under which
we customarily agree to hold the indemnified party harmless
against losses arising from a breach of representations related
to such matters as title to assets sold, licensed or certain
intellectual property rights and other matters. Payments by us
under such indemnification clauses are generally conditioned on
the other party making a claim. Such claims are generally
subject to challenge by us and dispute resolution procedures
specified in the particular contract. Furthermore, our
obligations under these arrangements may be limited in terms of
time and/or
amount and, in some instances, we may have recourse against
third parties for certain payments made by us. It is not
possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future
payments under these indemnification agreements due to the
conditional nature of our obligations and the unique facts of
each particular agreement. Historically, we have not made any
payments under these agreements that have been material
individually or in the aggregate. As of August 31, 2007, we
were not aware of any obligations arising under such
indemnification agreements that would require material payments.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements
(“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108
provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior
year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for
the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108
is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15,
2006 and, as a result is effective for our fiscal year ending
August 31, 2007. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did
not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) ratified the EITF consensus on EITF Issue
No. 06-2,
Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits
Pursuant to FASB
37
Statement No. 43
(“EITF 06-2”).
EITF 06-2
requires companies to accrue the cost of such compensated
absences over the requisite service period. Upon adoption,
EITF 06-2
must be applied as a change in accounting principle with either
a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at the
beginning of the period of adoption, or through retrospective
application to all prior periods.
EITF 06-2
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006, and as a result, is effective for our fiscal year
beginning September 1, 2007. We intend to apply
EITF 06-2
as a change in accounting principle with the cumulative effect
adjustment to retained earnings as of September 1, 2007. We
do not expect the adoption of
EITF 06-2
to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements for fiscal 2008.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(“FIN 48”), which is a change in accounting for
income taxes. FIN 48 specifies how tax benefits for
uncertain tax positions are to be recognized, measured and
derecognized in financial statements; requires certain
disclosures of uncertain tax matters; specifies how reserves for
uncertain tax positions should be classified in the balance
sheet; and provides transition and interim-period guidance,
among other provisions. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006 and, as a result,
will be effective for our fiscal year beginning
September 1, 2007. Upon adoption, the cumulative effect of
applying the provisions of FIN 48 will be reported as an
adjustment to the opening balance of Retained earnings.
We have substantially completed the process of evaluating the
effect of FIN 48 on our Consolidated Financial Statements
as of the beginning of the period of adoption, September 1,
2007. We estimate that the cumulative effects of applying
FIN 48 will be recorded as an immaterial adjustment to
beginning Retained earnings. In addition, in accordance with the
provisions of FIN 48, we will reclassify an estimated
$12,000 of the liability for unrecognized tax benefits from
current to non-current liabilities because payment of cash is
not anticipated within one year of the balance sheet date.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and as a
result is effective for our fiscal year beginning
September 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157
in fiscal 2009 is not expected to have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We have no market risk sensitive instruments entered into for
trading purposes; therefore, all of our market risk sensitive
instruments were entered into for purposes other than trading.
Foreign
Currency Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency risk in the ordinary course
of business. We hedge material cash flow exposures when feasible
using forward
and/or
option contracts, particularly with respect to the British
pound, Euro, Canadian dollar and Australian dollar. These
instruments are generally short-term in nature, with typical
maturities of less than one year, and are subject to
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and credit risk. Credit
risk is managed through careful selection and ongoing evaluation
of the financial institutions utilized as counterparties.
38
We use sensitivity analysis to determine the effects that market
risk exposures may have on the fair value of our hedge
portfolio. The foreign currency exchange risk is computed based
on the market value of future cash flows as affected by the
changes in the rates attributable to the market risk being
measured. The sensitivity analysis represents the hypothetical
changes in value of the hedge position and does not reflect the
offsetting gain or loss on the underlying exposure. As of
August 31, 2007, a 10% decrease in the levels of foreign
currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar with all
other variables held constant would have resulted in an increase
in the fair value of our financial instruments of $12,473, while
a 10% increase in the levels of foreign currency exchange rates
against the U.S. dollar would have resulted in a decrease
in the fair value of our financial instruments of $12,473. As of
September 30, 2006, a 10% decrease in the levels of foreign
currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar with all
other variables held constant would have resulted in an increase
in the fair value of our financial instruments of $10,751, while
a 10% increase in the levels of foreign currency exchange rates
against the U.S. dollar would have resulted in a decrease
in the fair value of our financial instruments of $10,751.
Interest
Rate Risk
The interest rate risk associated with our borrowing and
investing activities at August 31, 2007 is not material in
relation to our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows. While we may do so in the future, we
have not used derivative financial instruments to alter the
interest rate characteristics of our investment holdings or debt
instruments since fiscal 2002.
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
See the index included on
page F-1,
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation for the period covered by this
transition report on
Form 10-K,
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
our Company have each concluded that, as of the end of such
period, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by
Rule 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
39
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information about our directors is incorporated by reference to
the discussion under the headings “Information about
Directors” and “Corporate Governance —
Committees — Audit Committee” in the Information
Statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, referred
to as the “2008 Information Statement” Information
about our executive officers is contained in the discussion
entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in
Part I of this report.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Based solely upon our review of forms filed by directors,
officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common
stock pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act and on
representations made to us by our directors and executive
officers, we believe that no such person failed to file any such
report or report any such transaction on a timely basis during
our last fiscal year.
Code of
Business Ethics
A copy of our Code of Business Ethics can be found on our
website at www.avanade.com/about/invest.aspx. If the Board
grants any waivers from the Code of Business Ethics to any of
our directors or executive officers, or if we amend the Code of
Business Ethics, we will disclose these matters through the
Investor Relations section of our website. Printed copies of all
of these materials are also available upon written request to
the Investor Relations Department, Avanade Inc., 2211 Elliott
Avenue, Seattle, Washington, 98121.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information about executive and director compensation is
incorporated by reference to the discussion under the headings
“Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors” and
“Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation” in our 2008 Information Statement.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information about security ownership of certain beneficial
owners and management is incorporated by reference to the
discussion under the heading “Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management” in our 2008 Information
Statement.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans
As of August 31, 2007, we had shares authorized for
issuance under two equity compensation plans. These plans
include the Employee Stock Option Plan and the 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan, both of which were approved by the shareholders
in July 2000. We do not intend to grant any further options to
purchase shares of our common stock.
40
The following table sets forth, as of August 31, 2007,
certain information about our equity compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares to
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
|
be Issued Upon
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
(Excluding Shares
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Reflected in
1st
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Column)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders:
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
9,759,087
|
|
|
$
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
2000 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
|
5,156,463
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
7,535,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,915,550
|
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
7,535,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares subject to awards under the Employee Stock Option Plan
that cease to be subject to those awards (other than due to
exercise or payment of the award) are again available for grant
under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. Shares subject to awards
under the Stock Incentive Plan that are similarly cancelled, as
well as shares issued under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan that
are repurchased by us or delivered to us to pay the exercise
price of an option under the plan, are again available for grant
under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. For additional detail
regarding these plans, see Note 6 (Share-Based
Compensation) to our Consolidated Financial Statements under
“Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information about certain relationships and transactions with
related persons is incorporated by reference to the discussion
under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions” in our 2008 Information Statement For
additional detail about related-party transactions, see
Note 11 (Related-Party Balances and Transactions) to our
Consolidated Financial Statements under “Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Information about director independence is incorporated by
reference to the discussion under the heading “Corporate
Governance — Board Composition” in our 2008
Information Statement.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information about independent registered public accounting firm
fees and services is incorporated by reference to the discussion
under the heading “Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm — Fees and Other Matters” in our 2008
Information Statement.
41
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) List of documents filed as part of this report:
1. Financial
Statements as of August 31, 2007 and September 30,
2006 and for the eleven months ended August 31, 2007 and
for the two years ended September 30, 2006 and
2005 — Included in Part II of this Transition
Report on
Form 10-K:
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Income Statements
Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
Statements
Consolidated Cash Flows Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial
Statement Schedules:
None
3. Exhibit Index:
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, dated as of
December 4, 2003(1)
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company, dated as of
February 29, 2003(1)
|
4.1
|
|
Employee Stockholders Agreement, dated as of August 4,
2000, by and among Avanade, Accenture, Microsoft and those
parties listed on Attachment A thereunder(1)
|
4.2
|
|
Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated on
May 13, 2004(1)
|
4.3
|
|
Form of Investment Representation Statement(1)
|
4.4
|
|
2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on
May 13, 2004(1)
|
4.5
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Contribution and Stockholders
Agreement among Accenture LLP, Accenture Ltd, Accenture
International SARL, Microsoft Corporation and Avanade Inc.,
dated February 14, 2005(1)
|
4.6
|
|
Stock Repurchase Agreement between Microsoft Corporation,
Microsoft AVN Holdings, Inc. and Avanade Inc., dated as of
December 21, 2001(1)
|
4.7
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement between Microsoft Corporation,
Microsoft AVN Holdings, Inc. and Accenture Ltd, dated as of
December 21, 2001(1)
|
4.8
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement between Microsoft Corporation and
Avanade Inc., dated as of February 14, 2005(1)
|
4.9
|
|
Form of Early Exercise Notice and Stock Purchase Agreement
(filed herewith)
|
4.10
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate of Avanade Inc.(2)
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2000, between
Avanade Inc. and Mitchell C. Hill(1)
|
10.2
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2001, between
Avanade Inc. and Dennis K. Knapp (filed herewith)
|
10.3
|
|
Employment Agreement, effective December 11, 2006, between
Avanade Asia Pte. Ltd and Ang Miah Boon (filed herewith)
|
10.4
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2001, between
Avanade Inc. and Howard Kilman(1)
|
10.5
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2000, between
Avanade Inc. and Ashish Kumar(1)
|
10.6
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2001, between
Avanade Inc. and Adam Warby(1)
|
42
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
10.7
|
|
Confidential Information, Inventions and Non-Competitive
Agreement, dated November 1, 2003, between Avanade UK Ltd.
and Adam Warby (filed herewith)
|
10.8
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated May 10, 2002, between Avanade
UK Ltd. and Andrew White(1)
|
10.9
|
|
Confidential Information, Inventions and Non-Competitive
Agreement, dated September 5, 2000, between Avanade UK Ltd.
and Andrew White (filed herewith)
|
10.10
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan (filed herewith)
|
10.11
|
|
Form of Avanade Inc. Financial Protection Policy(1)
|
10.12
|
|
Form of Avanade Inc. Business Protection Agreement(1)
|
10.13
|
|
Line of Credit Agreement, dated February 7, 2003, between
Avanade Inc. and Accenture Finance GMBH(2)
|
10.14
|
|
Avanade Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Form 8-K,
filed June 23, 2006)
|
10.15
|
|
Form of Avanade Valuation Unit Grant Notice (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Form 8-K,
filed June 23, 2006)
|
10.16
|
|
Form of Avanade Valuation Unit Grant Notice —
Australia (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s
Form 8-K,
filed June 23, 2006)
|
10.17
|
|
Form of Avanade Valuation Unit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s
Form 8-K,
filed on June 23, 2006)
|
14.1
|
|
Avanade Code of Business Ethics (incorporated by reference to
the like-numbered exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.)
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Avanade Inc. (filed herewith)
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(filed herewith)
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(filed herewith)
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
like-numbered exhibit to the Company’s Form 10, filed
January 20, 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the
like-numbered exhibit to the Company’s Form 10/A,
filed March 17, 2006.
|
43
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Date: November 20, 2007
|
|
Avanade Inc.
|
Name: Mitchell C. Hill
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
We, the undersigned, hereby severally constitute Dennis K. Knapp
and Mark H. Voigts, and each of them singly, our true and lawful
attorneys with full power to them and each of them to sign for
us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and
all amendments to the Transition Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by
our said attorneys to any and all amendments to said Transition
Report on
Form 10-K.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, this report has been signed below on November 20,
2007 by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in
the capacities indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert
N. Frerichs
Robert
N. Frerichs
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mitchell
C. Hill
Mitchell
C. Hill
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Karl-Heinz
Flöther
Karl-Heinz
Flöther
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Basilio
Rueda
Basilio
Rueda
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Simon
Witts
Simon
Witts
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Pamela
J. Craig
Pamela
J. Craig
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dennis
K. Knapp
Dennis
K. Knapp
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)
|
AVANADE
INC.
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements as of August 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006 and for the eleven months ended
August 31, 2007 and fiscal years ended September 30,
2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Consolidated Income Statements
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
Statements
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated Cash Flows Statements
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Avanade Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets of
Avanade Inc. and its subsidiaries as of August 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006, and the related Consolidated Statements
of Income, Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income,
and Cash Flows for the eleven months ended August 31, 2007
and each of the years in the two-year period ended
September 30, 2006. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Avanade Inc. and its subsidiaries as of
August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the eleven
months ended August 31, 2007 and each of the years in the
two-year period ended September 30, 2006, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, the Company, as of October 1, 2005, changed its
method of accounting for share-based awards.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Seattle, Washington
November 20, 2007
F-2
AVANADE
INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
August 31,
2007 and September 30, 2006
(In
thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
140,345
|
|
|
$
|
72,898
|
|
Receivables from clients, net of allowances of $365 and $1,303,
respectively
|
|
|
28,604
|
|
|
|
21,253
|
|
Due from related parties
|
|
|
62,094
|
|
|
|
55,426
|
|
Unbilled services to clients
|
|
|
19,874
|
|
|
|
21,256
|
|
Unbilled services to related parties
|
|
|
41,551
|
|
|
|
32,101
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
24,529
|
|
|
|
1,394
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
5,218
|
|
|
|
6,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
322,215
|
|
|
|
210,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$40,707 and $36,487, respectively
|
|
|
10,675
|
|
|
|
10,004
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
10,196
|
|
|
|
11,975
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$4,960 and $4,250, respectively
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
32,528
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
4,902
|
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
|
|
58,872
|
|
|
|
30,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
381,087
|
|
|
$
|
240,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
$
|
7,405
|
|
|
$
|
9,999
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
18,148
|
|
|
|
14,204
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
3,771
|
|
|
|
3,009
|
|
Accrued payroll and related benefits
|
|
|
59,500
|
|
|
|
39,890
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
17,166
|
|
|
|
12,747
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
13,209
|
|
|
|
8,251
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
127,077
|
|
|
|
89,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REDEEMABLE COMMON STOCK AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS
|
|
|
165,335
|
|
|
|
123,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Series A preferred stock, par value of $0.0001
per share (aggregate liquidation preference of $587,329 as of
August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively),
105,000,000 shares authorized,74,750,903 shares issued
and outstanding as of August 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
150,000,000 shares authorized, 4,726,363 and
4,244,536 shares outstanding as of August 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
125,018
|
|
|
|
178,128
|
|
Notes receivable from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(41,835
|
)
|
|
|
(154,363
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
82,949
|
|
|
|
25,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
$
|
381,087
|
|
|
$
|
240,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
AVANADE
INC.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the
Eleven Months Ended August 31, 2007 and Years Ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005
(In
thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues before reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
$
|
440,552
|
|
|
$
|
354,566
|
|
|
$
|
288,368
|
|
Other
|
|
|
152,994
|
|
|
|
129,298
|
|
|
|
98,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
593,546
|
|
|
|
483,864
|
|
|
|
387,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
22,465
|
|
|
|
19,747
|
|
|
|
18,064
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17,521
|
|
|
|
14,195
|
|
|
|
16,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,986
|
|
|
|
33,942
|
|
|
|
34,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
633,532
|
|
|
|
517,806
|
|
|
|
422,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services before reimbursable expenses
|
|
|
400,415
|
|
|
|
330,957
|
|
|
|
262,436
|
|
Reimbursable expenses
|
|
|
39,986
|
|
|
|
33,942
|
|
|
|
34,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
|
|
440,401
|
|
|
|
364,899
|
|
|
|
297,433
|
|
Selling, general and administrative costs
|
|
|
113,998
|
|
|
|
98,389
|
|
|
|
77,937
|
|
Restructuring and asset impairment benefits
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
554,399
|
|
|
|
463,288
|
|
|
|
375,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
79,133
|
|
|
|
54,518
|
|
|
|
46,962
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
3,541
|
|
|
|
1,996
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(3,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
82,961
|
|
|
|
56,598
|
|
|
|
43,542
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(29,567
|
)
|
|
|
9,888
|
|
|
|
12,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
112,528
|
|
|
|
46,710
|
|
|
|
31,272
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, including tax expense
of $2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
112,528
|
|
|
$
|
46,710
|
|
|
$
|
31,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
AVANADE
INC.
CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME STATEMENTS
For the
Eleven Months Ended August 31, 2007 and Years Ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005
(In
thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Share-
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Based
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Shareholders’
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2004
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
73,614,776
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,645,264
|
|
|
$
|
248,338
|
|
|
$
|
(475
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(232,485
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,830
|
|
|
$
|
21,215
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,412
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,377
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,136,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,646
|
|
Accenture contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
Change in redeemable common stock and options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,406
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
Income tax benefit on share-based compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
Employee stock options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
|
(3,063
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Employee stock options forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of commons stock related to employee share programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
314,448
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,399
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2005
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
74,750,903
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,891,313
|
|
|
|
226,654
|
|
|
|
(1,728
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(201,073
|
)
|
|
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
29,655
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,710
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,287
|
)
|
|
|
(3,287
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,423
|
|
Income tax benefit on share-based compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
Accenture contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Change in redeemable common stock and options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,584
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
Effect of adoption of SFAS 123R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,728
|
)
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of commons stock related to employee share programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,151,359
|
|
|
|
7,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,972
|
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,798,136
|
)
|
|
|
(11,933
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,363
|
)
|
Repayments of employee notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Interest on notes received from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
74,750,903
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,244,536
|
|
|
|
178,128
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
(154,363
|
)
|
|
|
2,508
|
|
|
|
25,627
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,528
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,749
|
)
|
|
|
(2,749
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,779
|
|
Income tax benefit on share-based compensation plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
Accenture contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Change in redeemable common stock and options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,371
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
Issuance of commons stock related to employee share programs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,136,432
|
|
|
|
8,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,057
|
|
Purchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,654,605
|
)
|
|
|
(22,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,463
|
)
|
Repayments of employee notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Interest on notes received from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of August 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
74,750,903
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,726,363
|
|
|
$
|
125,018
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(41,835
|
)
|
|
$
|
(241
|
)
|
|
$
|
82,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
AVANADE
INC.
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS
For the
Eleven Months Ended August 31, 2007 and Years Ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005
(In
thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
112,528
|
|
|
$
|
46,710
|
|
|
$
|
31,412
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile Net income to Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,193
|
|
|
|
7,543
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency (gain) loss on intercompany notes
|
|
|
(8,435
|
)
|
|
|
(7,173
|
)
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
Loss on disposal of property and equipment, net
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(48,057
|
)
|
|
|
(6,330
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
Non-cash related party interest expense
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
|
|
5,977
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from clients, net
|
|
|
(5,335
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(6,404
|
)
|
Due from related parties
|
|
|
(3,987
|
)
|
|
|
(9,702
|
)
|
|
|
(2,778
|
)
|
Unbilled services to clients
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
(6,660
|
)
|
|
|
287
|
|
Unbilled services to related parties
|
|
|
(7,804
|
)
|
|
|
(12,620
|
)
|
|
|
7,621
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
(845
|
)
|
|
|
(1,312
|
)
|
Other non-current assets
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
241
|
|
Due to related parties
|
|
|
(2,756
|
)
|
|
|
3,389
|
|
|
|
3,457
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
3,597
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(982
|
)
|
Accrued payroll and related benefits
|
|
|
15,164
|
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
8,624
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
3,876
|
|
|
|
(1,778
|
)
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
13,035
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
86,449
|
|
|
|
29,030
|
|
|
|
59,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,882
|
)
|
|
|
(5,359
|
)
|
|
|
(7,098
|
)
|
Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,614
|
)
|
Deferred technology infrastructure costs
|
|
|
(2,474
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(8,716
|
)
|
|
|
(5,250
|
)
|
|
|
(11,679
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of common shares
|
|
|
(20,025
|
)
|
|
|
(10,273
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
6,619
|
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Repayments of employee notes receivable
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Repayment of short-term borrowing from related party
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
Repayment of note payable to related party
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4,853
|
)
|
Payment of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Capital contribution from Accenture
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(13,042
|
)
|
|
|
(4,857
|
)
|
|
|
(9,670
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
67,447
|
|
|
|
17,642
|
|
|
|
36,626
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
72,898
|
|
|
|
55,256
|
|
|
|
18,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$
|
140,345
|
|
|
$
|
72,898
|
|
|
$
|
55,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
14,149
|
|
|
$
|
13,585
|
|
|
$
|
10,378
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Series A preferred stock issued to Microsoft
for note payable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,646
|
|
Common stock issued from exercise of employee stock options in
exchange for notes receivable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
|
|
1.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Description
of Business
Avanade Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Washington, and its subsidiary companies (together, the
“Company”) provides services focused on the design,
development, integration, and deployment of business solutions
on the Microsoft enterprise platform. The Company has a
worldwide presence with operations and subsidiaries in the
United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, France, the
Netherlands, Germany, Norway, Belgium, Sweden, Denmark,
Switzerland, Finland, Australia, Singapore, Japan, Malaysia,
Thailand and China.
The Company is a consolidated subsidiary of Accenture Ltd
(referred to herein, together with its affiliates as
“Accenture”). Accenture owns approximately 75% of the
Company’s outstanding stock as of August 31, 2007.
Microsoft Corporation and its affiliates (collectively
“Microsoft”) owns approximately 20% of the outstanding
stock, and the balance is held by the Company’s employees
as of August 31, 2007.
The Company is subject to the risks and challenges associated
with its state of development including dependence on related
party revenues and financing and competition from larger
consulting services companies which have greater financial and
marketing resources. Management believes, based on the amount of
cash on hand and cash expected to be generated from operations,
that the Company will have sufficient funds to enable it to meet
its cash requirements through the next twelve months, including
those associated with the put provisions contained within its
employee stock option plans. For information regarding the
Company’s employee stock option plans, see Note 6
(Share-Based Compensation) to these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Change in
Fiscal Year End
On May 23, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors (the
“Board”) resolved that the Company’s fiscal year
that began on October 1, 2006 would end on August 31,
2007, and from and after that date, the Company’s fiscal
year would be the period beginning September 1 of each year and
ending on August 31 of the following year. As a result, the
current period covered by these financial statements includes
financial information for the
11-month
period October 1, 2006 through August 31, 2007, which
is referred to as “fiscal 2007” or “fiscal year
2007.” All references to years prior to fiscal 2007, unless
otherwise noted, refer to the Company’s historical fiscal
year, which ended on September 30. For example, a reference
to “fiscal 2006” or “fiscal year 2006” means
the 12-month
period ended September 30, 2006. All references to
quarters, unless otherwise noted and except for the two months
of the Company’s fiscal fourth quarter ended
August 31, 2007, refer to the historical quarters of the
fiscal years prior to the Company’s fiscal year end change.
F-7
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
The following unaudited selected financial data summarizes the
Company’s results of operations for the prior year
11-month
comparable period ended August 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
Ended August 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues before reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
$
|
318,670
|
|
Other
|
|
|
113,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
17,574
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
462,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
41,358
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
$
|
43,196
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
7,559
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
35,637
|
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All
material account balances and transactions between the Company
and its subsidiaries have been eliminated.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial
Statements and accompanying disclosures. Although these
estimates are based on management’s best judgment and
knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may
undertake in the future, actual results may differ from the
estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts reported in previous years have been
reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2007 presentation.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues from contracts for services are recognized on the
percentage-of-completion method in accordance with American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position
81-1,
F-8
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain
Production-Type Contracts. Percentage-of-completion
accounting involves calculating the percentage of services
provided during the reporting period compared to the total
estimated services to be provided over the duration of the
contract. Estimated revenues for applying the
percentage-of-completion method include estimated incentives for
which achievement of defined goals is deemed probable. This
method is followed where reasonably dependable estimates of
revenues and costs can be made. Estimates of total contract
revenues and costs are continuously monitored during the term of
the contract and recorded revenues and costs are subject to
revision as the contract progresses. Such revisions may result
in increases or decreases to revenues and income and are
reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements in the period
in which they are first identified. If estimates indicate that a
contract loss will occur, a loss provision is recorded in the
period in which the loss first becomes probable and reasonably
estimable. Contract losses are determined to be the amount by
which the estimated direct and indirect costs of the contract
exceed the estimated total revenues that will be generated by
the contract and are included in Cost of services and classified
in Other accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In limited instances where the Company sells software
and/or
hardware in conjunction with services, revenues are allocated
based on the fair value of the elements in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue
No. 00-21,
Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables. If the fair value of the undelivered
element(s) within a multiple elements contract cannot be
determined, revenue is deferred until revenue from all elements
can be determined. Multiple element contracts represent an
immaterial portion of the Company’s revenues.
The Company follows EITF
No. 99-19,
Reporting Revenues Gross as a Principal versus Net as an
Agent
(“EITF 99-19”).
The majority of the Company’s revenue contracts are
recorded on the gross basis pursuant to the guidance in
EITF 99-19.
Revenues recognized in excess of billings are recorded as
Unbilled services. Billings in excess of revenues recognized are
recorded as Deferred revenues until revenue recognition criteria
are met. Revenues before reimbursements include the margin
earned on sales of computer hardware and software.
Reimbursements, including those relating to travel and other
out-of-pocket expenses, and other third-party costs, such as the
cost of hardware and software resales, are included in Revenues,
and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses are included
in Cost of services. Reimbursement revenues include specific
billings for reimbursable expenses and, if applicable,
allocations from gross billings where billings do not
specifically identify reimbursable expenses.
Operating
Expenses
Selected components of operating expenses are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Research and development costs
|
|
$
|
10,201
|
|
|
$
|
11,568
|
|
|
$
|
3,873
|
|
Advertising costs
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
F-9
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Share-Based
Compensation Awards
On October 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(“SFAS No. 123R”) to record compensation
expense for its employee stock options and share purchase
rights. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”), and
supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”)
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(“APB No. 25”), and its related
implementation guidance. Prior to the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, the Company followed the intrinsic
value method in accordance with APB No. 25, in accounting
for its employee stock options and share purchase rights. For
information regarding share-based compensation, see Note 6
(Share-Based Compensation) to these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Income
Taxes
The Company calculates and provides for income taxes in each of
the tax jurisdictions in which it operates. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities, measured using enacted tax rates, are
recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the tax and financial statement bases of
assets and liabilities and of operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. A valuation allowance reduces the deferred tax
assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. The Company establishes reserves when the Company
believes certain tax positions are not probable to be sustained
if challenged. Each quarter, the Company evaluates these
reserves and adjusts the reserves and related interest in light
of changing facts and circumstances.
Translation
of Non-U.S.
Currency Amounts
Assets and liabilities of
non-U.S. subsidiaries
whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar are
translated into U.S. dollars at fiscal year-end exchange
rates. Revenue and expense items are translated at average
exchange rates prevailing during the fiscal year. Translation
adjustments are included in Accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) income. Gains and losses arising from intercompany
foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term investment
nature are reported in the same manner as translation
adjustments.
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) are included in
Other income (expense) and totaled $8,434, $7,015 and $(1,938)
in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Foreign
Exchange Instruments
In the normal course of business, the Company uses foreign
currency forward contracts to manage its exposure to the
variability of exchange rates for the British pound, Euro,
Canadian dollar and Australian dollar. These instruments are
generally short-term in nature, with maturities of less than one
year, and are subject to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates
and credit risk. From time to time, the Company enters into
forward contracts that are of a longer-term nature. Credit risk
is managed through careful selection and ongoing evaluation of
the financial institutions utilized as counterparties. The
financial instruments are recorded at estimated fair value or
amounts that approximate fair value, with changes to fair value
recorded in Other income (expense).
F-10
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
The Company does not have any material derivatives designated as
hedges as defined by SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(“SFAS No. 133”), as amended.
Foreign currency forward contracts are recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value and marked to market
through the Consolidated Income Statements in Other income
(expense). The following table summarizes the fair value of the
Company’s foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Included in Other current assets
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
Included in Other current liabilities
|
|
|
7,080
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
As of August 31, 2007, Other current liabilities include
$7,002, and as of September 30, 2006, Other current assets
include $1,219 recorded for the fair value of foreign currency
forward contracts to mitigate the Company’s exposure to
changes in foreign currency exposure on a 57,000 British
pound-denominated inter-company note and related accrued
interest between the Company and one of its subsidiaries. For
the fiscal years ended August 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006 and 2005, Other income (expense)
includes $8,256, $(6,936) and $(2,033), respectively, recorded
for net gains and (losses) on foreign currency forward contracts.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all cash balances and
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less. The amounts are recorded at cost, which
approximates fair market value.
Receivables
from Clients, Net
The Company carries its client receivables at their face amounts
less an allowance for doubtful accounts and sales allowances. On
a periodic basis, the Company evaluates its receivables and
establishes its allowances based on historical experience,
specifically identified accounts and other available information.
Certain
Concentrations
Credit
Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of its
holdings of cash, short-term investments and foreign currency
forward contracts. The Company’s credit risk is managed by
investing in cash and short-term investments in high-quality
money market instruments and securities of the
U.S. Government and its agencies and high-quality corporate
issuers. The Company also monitors the stability of the
financial institutions used, including those used as
counter-party for derivatives and diversification of its
financial resources.
The Company regularly invests funds in excess of its needs in
money market instruments. These instruments are generally
uninsured and subject to investment risk. Included in Cash and
cash equivalents and Restricted cash equivalents were amounts
held in money market instruments totaling $121,313 and $55,761
as of August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006,
respectively.
F-11
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Clients
For the fiscal years ended August 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006 and 2005, 74%, 73% and 75%,
respectively, of the Company’s revenues before
reimbursements was derived from subcontracts with Accenture and
Microsoft.
Services
The Company is committed to using Microsoft-based technologies
as the basis of its services. As a result, the Company is
subject to a number of risks, including the risk that general
acceptance of competitive products may put it at a competitive
disadvantage to other consulting companies that are able to
focus on such non-Microsoft-based technology. The Company is
dependent, in part, upon continued growth in the use of
Microsoft-based technology by its clients and prospective
clients and this demand for Microsoft-based technologies may
grow at a reduced rate or decrease, thus reducing the market for
its services. The Company may be subject to a perceived narrow
focus that may limit its ability to attract new clients. The
Company has access to certain Microsoft assets and information,
the loss of which could result in a negative impact to its
business.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed
on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful
lives:
|
|
|
Computers, related equipment and software
|
|
2 to 5 years
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
3 to 10 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Term of lease, 15 years maximum
|
As of August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 the
Company had unamortized internal use software costs of $691 and
$842, respectively, which is being amortized on a straight-line
basis over an estimated useful life of 3 years.
Long-Lived
Assets
Long-lived assets, including amortizable intangible assets, are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or
group of assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of
long-lived assets or groups of assets is assessed on a
comparison of the carrying amount to the estimated future net
cash flows. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are
less than the carrying amount, the asset is considered impaired
and expense is recorded at an amount required to reduce the
carrying amount to fair value.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization are
tested annually on September 30 for impairment, and are
tested for impairment more frequently if events and
circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An
impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying
amount exceeds the asset’s fair value.
Intangible assets amortization is computed on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets
ranging from 1 to 20 years.
F-12
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income consisted of
foreign currency translation adjustments for all periods
presented.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements
(“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108
provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior
year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for
the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108
is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15,
2006 and, as a result is effective for the Company’s fiscal
year ending August 31, 2007. The Company’s adoption of
SAB No. 108 did not have a material impact on its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) ratified the EITF consensus on EITF Issue
No. 06-2,
Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits
Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43
(“EITF 06-2”).
EITF 06-2
requires companies to accrue the cost of such compensated
absences over the requisite service period. Upon adoption,
EITF 06-2
must be applied as a change in accounting principle with either
a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings at the
beginning of the period of adoption, or through retrospective
application to all prior periods.
EITF 06-2
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006, and as a result, is effective for the Company’s
fiscal year beginning September 1, 2007. The Company
intends to apply
EITF 06-2
as a change in accounting principle with the cumulative effect
adjustment to retained earnings as of September 1, 2007.
The Company does not expect the adoption of
EITF 06-2
to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial
Statements for fiscal 2008.
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(“FIN 48”), which is a change in accounting for
income taxes. FIN 48 specifies how tax benefits for
uncertain tax positions are to be recognized, measured and
derecognized in financial statements; requires certain
disclosures of uncertain tax matters; specifies how reserves for
uncertain tax positions should be classified in the balance
sheet; and provides transition and interim-period guidance,
among other provisions. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006 and, as a result,
will be effective for our fiscal year beginning
September 1, 2007. Upon adoption, the cumulative effect of
applying the provisions of FIN 48 will be reported as an
adjustment to the opening balance of Retained earnings.
The Company has substantially completed the process of
evaluating the effect of FIN 48 on its Consolidated
Financial Statements as of the beginning of the period of
adoption, September 1, 2007. The Company estimates that the
cumulative effects of applying FIN 48 will be recorded as
an immaterial adjustment to beginning Retained earnings. In
addition, in accordance with the provisions of FIN 48, the
Company will reclassify an estimated $12,000 of the liability
for unrecognized tax benefits from current to non-current
liabilities because payment of cash is not anticipated within
one year of the balance sheet date.
F-13
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new
fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and as a
result is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning
September 1, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption
of SFAS No. 157 in fiscal 2009 to have a material
impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
2.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
The components of Property and equipment, net were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Computers, related equipment and software
|
|
$
|
43,145
|
|
|
$
|
38,304
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
2,817
|
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
5,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, gross
|
|
|
51,382
|
|
|
|
46,491
|
|
Total accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(40,707
|
)
|
|
|
(36,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
10,675
|
|
|
$
|
10,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
BUSINESS
COMBINATIONS AND GOODWILL
|
On February 28, 2005, the Company acquired a
U.S. Microsoft Dynamics — Axapta consulting
business for $4,614, net of cash acquired. The Company recorded
$2,708 of goodwill and $1,380 of other intangible assets
associated with the acquisition. The proforma effects of the
fiscal 2005 acquisition on the Company’s operations are not
material.
As of August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, the
Company had goodwill of $10,196 and $11,975, respectively,
recorded in the Company’s Americas segment. All of the
Company’s goodwill relates to acquisitions subsequent to
July 2001 and as such has been accounted for under the
provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”) which
does not permit the amortization of goodwill. The Company
follows the impairment provisions and disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 142. As such, the Company performed
impairment tests of goodwill and determined that goodwill was
not impaired.
During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007, the Company
recorded a reduction in goodwill of $1,779 resulting from
reversals of valuation allowances related to pre-acquisition tax
attributes recorded under purchase accounting for previous
acquisitions.
F-14
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
The provision for income taxes attributable to continuing
operations consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
469
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
U.S. state and local
|
|
|
571
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
17,415
|
|
|
|
15,485
|
|
|
|
11,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,490
|
|
|
$
|
16,218
|
|
|
$
|
11,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
|
(39,134
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
U.S. state and local
|
|
|
(3,556
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(5,367
|
)
|
|
|
(6,372
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48,057
|
)
|
|
|
(6,330
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(29,567
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,888
|
|
|
$
|
12,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) attributable to continuing operations before
income taxes from U.S. and
non-U.S. sources
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
U.S. sources
|
|
$
|
52,622
|
|
|
$
|
29,932
|
|
|
$
|
19,906
|
|
Non-U.S.
sources
|
|
|
30,339
|
|
|
|
26,666
|
|
|
|
23,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
82,961
|
|
|
$
|
56,598
|
|
|
$
|
43,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
A reconciliation of income tax expense attributable to
continuing operations at the U.S. Federal statutory income
tax rate to the actual income tax expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
|
%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(73.9
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
%
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
%
|
State and local taxes
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
%
|
Foreign operations
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
%
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
%
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
%
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
%
|
Dividend from foreign subsidiaries
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
%
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.6
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
%
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets
from continuing operations include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
40,355
|
|
|
$
|
63,948
|
|
|
$
|
73,731
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
7,788
|
|
|
|
5,151
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
1,543
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
14,049
|
|
|
|
7,415
|
|
|
|
2,172
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,919
|
|
|
|
80,189
|
|
|
|
83,386
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(9,433
|
)
|
|
|
(72,676
|
)
|
|
|
(81,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
58,486
|
|
|
|
7,513
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,429
|
)
|
|
|
(563
|
)
|
|
|
(861
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
57,057
|
|
|
$
|
6,950
|
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. As of August 31, 2007, the
Company has recognized net deferred tax benefits of $57,057 due
to the anticipated realization of deferred tax assets primarily
in the U.S., France, Spain, Australia and the United Kingdom.
The decrease in the Company’s valuation allowance for
continuing operations was $63,243, $9,282, and $6,182 for fiscal
years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of August 31,
2007,
F-16
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
the Company has $1,638 of net deferred tax assets and a fully
off-setting valuation allowance related to certain discontinued
operations in Hong Kong and China. As of September 30, 2006
and 2005, the Company had valuation allowances of $2,153 and
$2,126, respectively, related to pre-acquisition tax attributes
recorded under purchase accounting, the reversal of which in
future years would be allocated first to reduce goodwill and
then to reduce other non-current intangible assets of the
acquired entity. Due to the reversal of the valuation allowance
related to these pre-acquisition tax attributes for the fiscal
year ended August 31, 2007, $1,779 was allocated as a
reduction of goodwill. As of August 31, 2007, the remaining
deferred tax asset related to net operating losses which will
expire unutilized was fully eliminated.
The Company expects to realize future benefits for deferred tax
assets related to all of its net operating losses in the U.S.,
France, Spain and Australia. For the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2007, the amount of benefit recorded for each
country was $21,063, $3,499, $2,047 and $4,599, respectively.
The Company has provided full valuation allowances on certain
remaining net
non-U.S. deferred
tax assets of $9,433 as it is unclear when sufficient taxable
income to realize the deferred tax assets will be generated.
Profitability could lead to a reduction of the net deferred tax
asset valuation allowance in future periods. If this occurs, it
could favorably impact net income in that period.
As of August 31, 2007, the Company has Federal net
operating loss carryforwards of $65,396 which expire between
2020 and 2022. Federal tax credit carryforwards include research
and experimentation credits of $1,537, foreign tax credits of
$5,391 and alternative minimum tax credits of $859. The research
and experimentation credits and the foreign tax credits will
expire at various dates through 2027. The alternative minimum
tax credits have an indefinite carryforward period. The
Company’s ability to utilize $48,404 of its Federal net
operating loss carryforwards and $788 of its research credit
carryforwards is limited due to changes in ownership, as defined
in the Internal Revenue Code, which occurred on
December 31, 2001 and May 23, 2003. As of
August 31, 2007, net operating loss carryforwards
associated with ongoing operations in foreign jurisdictions were
$73,011. Some of these foreign losses begin to expire in 2009.
Of this amount, $11,401 expires at various dates through 2019
and $61,610 has an indefinite carryforward period.
During fiscal 2007, the Company was under examination by several
state and
non-U.S. tax
authorities. One audit by a
non-U.S. tax
jurisdiction resulted in adjustment to a net operating loss
carryforward but no cash tax payments. Although the outcome of
tax audits is always uncertain and could result in significant
cash tax payments, the Company does not believe the outcome of
any ongoing audits will have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability for the
undistributed earnings of its foreign operations that arose in
2007 and prior years. The determination of the deferred tax
liability is not practicable. As of August 31, 2007, the
undistributed earnings of these subsidiaries were approximately
$49,039. No taxes have been provided on undistributed foreign
earnings that are planned to be indefinitely reinvested.
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act
(“AJCA”) became law. The AJCA includes a deduction of
85% of certain foreign earnings that are repatriated, as defined
in the AJCA. During the fourth quarter ended September 30,
2006, the Company’s Board approved a domestic reinvestment
plan as allowed by the AJCA with respect to un-repatriated
foreign earnings. The Company repatriated
F-17
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
$20,643 in foreign earnings during its fourth quarter ended
September 30, 2006 under the AJCA. Of this amount $19,043
qualified for the 85 percent deduction. The tax expense as
a consequence of the repatriation of the accumulated foreign
earnings under the AJCA was $4.
|
|
5.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS
|
In the United States, the Company has a 401(k) Savings Plan (the
“Savings Plan”) in which all employees are eligible to
participate. The Savings Plan allows employees to contribute up
to 16% of their compensation, subject to the statutory limits.
After one year of service, the Company matches employee
contributions up to 3% of each participant’s compensation,
subject to statutory limits. The Company’s contributions to
the Savings Plan are discretionary as authorized by the Board.
During the fiscal years ended August 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006 and 2005, $2,351, $2,492 and $2,266,
respectively, were charged to expense in Cost of services and
Selling, general and administrative costs relating to the
Savings Plan.
The Company has a supplemental executive retirement and savings
plan (“SERP”) that allows a certain group of
management or highly compensated employees to defer up to 100%
of their annual compensation. The Company does not make
contributions to the plan.
In the United Kingdom, Canada, Spain and the Netherlands, the
Company maintains defined contribution plans in each country and
provides matching contributions. During the fiscal years ended
August 31, 2007, and September 30, 2006 and 2005,
$3,804, $2,792 and $1,243, respectively, were charged to expense
in Cost of services and Selling, general and administrative
costs.
|
|
6.
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R which
is a revision of SFAS No. 123, and supersedes APB
No. 25, and its related implementation guidance. On
October 1, 2005, the Company adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method.
SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for
transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in
share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123R
requires entities to recognize compensation expense for awards
of equity instruments to employees based on the grant-date fair
value of those awards (with limited exceptions).
SFAS No. 123R also requires the benefits of tax
deductions in excess of compensation expense to be reported as a
financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as
prescribed under the prior accounting rules. This requirement
reduces net operating cash flows and increases net financing
cash flows in periods after adoption. Total cash flows remains
unchanged from what would have been reported under prior
accounting rules.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company
followed the intrinsic value method in accordance with APB
No. 25 to account for its stock options granted under the
Avanade Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the “SIP”) and
the Avanade Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Employee
Plan,” and together with the SIP, the “Option
Plans”). Accordingly, compensation expense was recognized
for employee stock options only if they had intrinsic value on
the measurement date. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R
resulted in the Company recording share-based compensation
expense for unvested employee stock options based on the
grant-date fair value. The impact of adopting
SFAS No. 123R on Net income for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006 was a decrease of $4,912.
F-18
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Results for fiscal 2005 have not been restated. Had compensation
expense for employee stock options granted under the Option
Plans been determined based on fair value at the grant date
consistent with SFAS No. 123, with stock options
expensed using straight-line and accelerated expense attribution
methods, the Company’s Net income for fiscal 2005 would
have been reduced to the pro forma amounts as indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net income as reported
|
|
$
|
31,412
|
|
Add: Share-based compensation expense already included in Net
income as reported, net of tax
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
Deduct: Pro forma share-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
tax
|
|
|
(10,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
(9,365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
22,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of information with respect to share-based
compensation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense included in Net income
|
|
$
|
9,590
|
|
|
$
|
7,361
|
|
|
$
|
1,610
|
|
Income tax benefit related to share-based compensation included
in Net income
|
|
$
|
6,042
|
|
|
$
|
409
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
The income tax benefit related to share-based compensation
included in Net income increased to $6,042 for the eleven months
ended August 31, 2007 over the prior year primarily due to
the impact of the release of the valuation allowance against
deferred tax assets in the U.S.
Share-based compensation related to options granted under the
SIP is being recognized over the vesting period of each
separately vesting portion of the stock options. Share-based
compensation related to options granted under the Employee Plan
that vested prior to July 1, 2005 was recognized on a
straight-line basis from the date of grant through July 1,
2005. Share-based compensation related to options granted under
the Employee Plan that vest on or after July 1, 2005 is
being recognized using the graded method over the vesting period
of the stock options.
Overview
of Stock Option Plans
The Option Plans provide for the grant of up to
30,000,000 shares of common stock in the form of options or
equity-related awards. As of August 31, 2007, no shares
were available for future grants under the Employee Plan and
7,535,799 shares were available for future grants under the
SIP. Awards that expire, terminate or lapse under the Employee
Plan will again be available for grant as awards under the SIP.
Under the terms of the Option Plans, the Company is required to
determine the value of the Company’s common stock as of the
end of its fiscal year and as of the end of its second fiscal
quarter each year (the “Semi-annual Valuations”). In
addition, under the authority of the Board, the Company has
elected to perform quarterly valuations as of the end of its
first and third fiscal quarters
F-19
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
each year. The calculations of the Semi-annual Valuations
reflected herein for the period ended August 31, 2007 have
been prepared by a third party in accordance with the
Board’s normal procedures and have been approved by the
Board as of November 8, 2007. Determining the fair value
involves judgment. In the course of determining fair value, the
Company relies upon prospective financial information based on
management’s estimates of future operating results and
other information from various public, financial and industry
sources. The Company uses independent, third-party business
valuation professionals to assist the Board in determining the
estimated fair value of the total equity of the Company. The
total equity consists of 100% of the stockholder’s equity,
including both the preferred and common stock. The Company
issues new shares of common stock for shares delivered under the
Option Plans. The Company does not intend to grant any further
options to purchase shares of its common stock.
Generally, options granted under the Option Plans vest over a
four-year period, with 25% vesting on the first anniversary of
the date of grant and the remainder vesting on a ratable monthly
basis thereafter. All options expire no later than ten years
from the date of grant. Incentive stock options are granted at
not less than the fair value of the stock on the date of grant
and nonqualified stock options are granted at prices determined
at the discretion of the plan administrator. To date, all
options granted have been nonqualified stock options.
Under the terms of the Option Plans, since July 1, 2005
(i) all vested stock issued pursuant to awards granted
under the Option Plans is subject to purchase by the Company, at
the Company’s sole discretion, at fair value, (ii) the
Company has the right of first refusal with respect to any
proposed sale or other disposition of stock issued pursuant to
an option and (iii) stock issued pursuant to awards granted
under the Option Plans entitles the holder to certain put rights
that compel the purchase of the stock by the Company at the fair
value as determined pursuant to the Semi-annual Valuations. The
rights described above may not be exercised by the holder or the
Company until the date that is six months and one day after the
date the shares are acquired and may only be exercised during
the 30-day
periods following Semi-annual Valuations (the “put/call
period”).
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, the
Company provided loans totaling $2,121 to employees for the cost
to exercise options to purchase 894,830 shares of common
stock, and, in certain cases, the related employee tax
obligations. The loans were made available to all employees who
qualified, excluding executive officers. The loans were secured
by the shares issued pursuant to the related option exercises,
provided full recourse to personal assets of employees and bore
interest at fixed rates of 8.0% to 9.5% per annum. The Company
established interest rates for individual employees based on
credit scoring and reference to market rates of interest. The
principal balance of each loan and any unpaid interest thereon
were due one year from the date of funding of the loan, unless
accelerated due to termination of employment, the sale of the
related stock or a material event of default as defined in the
loan agreement. Prepayment of principal and interest may have
been made at any time without penalty. The loans, plus accrued
interest, were repaid during fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 with
proceeds related to share repurchases withheld by the Company.
2000
Stock Incentive Plan
Under the terms of the SIP, the Company is authorized to grant
fully vested common stock and options to purchase common stock.
F-20
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
The plan administrator has the discretion to allow unvested
options granted under the SIP to be early exercised. Upon
employee termination, the Company has the right to repurchase
any or all of the unvested shares at the per-share exercise
price paid by the employee for the unvested shares.
If an option holder’s employment with the Company ceases,
all options held, whether vested or unvested, are forfeited
automatically upon termination of employment; provided, however,
that employees have an opportunity to exercise their vested
options. In addition, all vested stock issued pursuant to awards
granted under the SIP will be subject to repurchase by the
Company at fair value, provided the employee held the shares for
a period greater than six months and one day and may only be
repurchased during the 30 day periods following Semi-annual
Valuations.
Employee
Stock Option Plan
Options granted under the Employee Plan are not exercisable
prior to vesting.
If an option holder’s employment with the Company ceases,
all options held, whether vested or unvested, are forfeited
automatically upon termination of employment; provided, however,
that employees have an opportunity to exercise their vested
options. All stock issued to employees pursuant to the exercise
of options granted under the Employee Plan are subject to
repurchase at the fair value on the date of repurchase.
Stock option activity for the eleven months ended
August 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006
|
|
|
18,563,892
|
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
95,954
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,136,432
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(113,375
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(398,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of August 31, 2007
|
|
|
14,915,550
|
|
|
$
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
$
|
116,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of August 31, 2007
|
|
|
13,929,327
|
|
|
$
|
2.68
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
109,935
|
|
Options exercisable as of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
16,099,765
|
|
|
$
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
86,354
|
|
Options exercisable as of September 30, 2005
|
|
|
17,047,808
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
$
|
63,762
|
|
The weighted average remaining contractual term and aggregate
intrinsic value for options outstanding as of September 30,
2005 was 6.7 years and $77,375, respectively.
F-21
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Other information pertaining to options is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
3.01
|
|
Total fair value of stock options vested
|
|
$
|
4,175
|
|
|
$
|
9,310
|
|
|
$
|
6,264
|
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
|
|
$
|
19,566
|
|
|
$
|
13,913
|
|
|
$
|
1,223
|
|
For the eleven months ended August 31, 2007, cash received
from the exercise of stock options was $6,619 and the income tax
benefit realized from the exercise of stock options was $790. As
of August 31, 2007, there was $620 of total stock option
compensation expense related to unvested awards not yet
recognized, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.4 years.
The Company made no option grants during fiscal 2007 or fiscal
2006. The fair value of each option grant for fiscal 2005 was
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
The expected life of each award granted during 2005 was
calculated using the “simplified method” described in
SAB No. 107, Share-Based Payments. The
risk-free interest rate was based on the implied yield currently
available on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with a
remaining term equal to the expected life. Expected volatility
was based on an average of the historical volatilities of common
shares and the implied volatility of options for a set of
competitive companies that included sufficient trading history
since their initial public offerings. Expected dividend yield is
based on historical dividend payments and expectations about
future dividend payments.
Avanade
Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan
On June 19, 2006, the Company adopted the Avanade Inc.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “AVU Plan”). Awards
under the AVU Plan are granted in the form of Avanade Valuation
Units (“AVUs”), each of which is based on an amount
determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee (the
“Base Value”) that, except for the initial grants made
effective June 19, 2006, may not be less than the fair
value of the common stock of the Company as of the effective
date of the applicable grant. The awards will vest according to
a schedule determined by the Compensation Committee. Once
vested, each AVU is to be settled in cash based on the
difference between the fair value of the common stock of the
Company at the time the award vests and the applicable Base
Value of such AVU, provided, however, that (i) the
aggregate payment of AVUs that vest in any calendar year may
not, pursuant to the terms of the AVU Plan, exceed twelve
percent of the operating income unreduced by AVU expenses, and
(ii) the Compensation Committee may reduce the amount paid
out with respect to AVUs for any reason in its sole discretion.
Payments, if any, on vested AVUs will be made not later than
F-22
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
March 31 of the calendar year following the date of vesting.
After vested AVUs are paid out, or it is determined by the
Compensation Committee that the settlement values are zero, the
vested AVUs are terminated. Under the AVU Plan, vesting of AVUs
and payments thereon may be accelerated upon the occurrence of
certain events, as more specifically provided in the AVU Plan
documentation. Except as otherwise provided in the AVU Plan and
applicable documents, AVUs that have not vested at or prior to
the time of the termination of a recipient’s employment
shall be cancelled and forfeited.
The AVU Plan will terminate on June 19, 2016 unless earlier
terminated by the Board. The Board has the authority to amend,
alter or discontinue the AVU Plan at any time in its discretion,
provided that such action does not impair any award
recipient’s rights with respect to any AVUs
then-outstanding without such recipient’s consent, except
as the Board deems necessary to comply with applicable laws.
AVU Plan activity for the eleven months ended August 31,
2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
|
|
|
Number of AVUs
|
|
Base Price
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
Value
|
|
AVUs outstanding as of September 30, 2006
|
|
|
2,793,879
|
|
|
$
|
6.14
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
5,085
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,253,205
|
|
|
$
|
8.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and paid
|
|
|
(694,462
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(440,952
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVUs outstanding as of August 31, 2007
|
|
|
4,911,670
|
|
|
$
|
7.34
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
15,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of AVUs outstanding as of August 31, 2007
and September 30, 2006 is estimated using the Monte Carlo
simulation model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.19
|
%
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
The assumptions used for estimating the fair value of AVUs and
related compensation costs for the fiscal years ended
August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 were determined
in the same manner as the expected life, risk-free interest
rate, expected volatility and expected dividend yield used in
the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model for estimating fair
value and related share-based compensation costs for the
Company’s option plans as discussed above.
Stock
and Put Rights
Holders of the Company’s common stock issued under the
Option Plans have put rights that under certain circumstances
and conditions require the Company to purchase vested shares of
such stock at fair value. Holders of options to purchase the
Company’s common stock also have similar put rights,
F-23
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
but have not yet acquired the underlying stock. All put rights
were granted originally to employees in accordance with the
terms of the Option Plans and are described more fully above.
Vested shares of common stock issued under the Option Plans are
classified as redeemable instruments and are recorded at the
current fair value on the Company’s Consolidated Balance
Sheets, while options issued under the Option Plans are
classified as redeemable instruments and recorded at the current
intrinsic value of those options as services are rendered. The
total of the fair value of vested common stock so held and the
intrinsic value of the options represents the estimated cash
outlay required to satisfy put rights outstanding. Effective
with the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the intrinsic
value of such options has been measured so as to be consistent
with the pattern by which the related compensation cost is
recognized. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R resulted in
an increase of $8,147 in the amount classified as redeemable
instruments based on the intrinsic value of employee put rights.
Changes in fair and intrinsic value are recorded as adjustments
to Additional paid-in capital.
Common stock with put rights and stock options are included in
Redeemable common stock and employee stock options on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Vested common stock subject to put rights
|
|
$
|
49,956
|
|
|
$
|
33,785
|
|
Intrinsic value of stock options
|
|
|
115,379
|
|
|
|
90,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
165,335
|
|
|
$
|
123,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
MATERIAL
TRANSACTIONS AFFECTING SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
Share
Repurchase Activity
The Company’s share repurchase activity for the eleven
months ended August 31, 2007 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares acquired pursuant to exercise of put/call rights(1)(2)
|
|
|
2,100,373
|
|
|
$
|
17,638
|
|
Other purchases(3)(4)
|
|
|
554,232
|
|
|
|
4,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,654,605
|
|
|
|
22,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts withheld for employee loan repayments(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
Non-cash amounts related to “stock-swaps”(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash out-lay
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
During the put/call period
following the Semi-annual Valuation approved by the Board
effective May 23, 2007, the Company exercised its call
rights to purchase shares and certain employee holders of the
Company’s common stock exercised their put rights. This
resulted in the repurchase, effective June 25, 2007, of an
aggregate of 1,043,789 shares of the Company’s common
stock at a price of $8.84 per share.
|
|
(2)
|
|
During the Put/call period
following the Semi-annual Valuation approved by the Board
effective November 8, 2006, the Company exercised its call
rights to purchase shares and certain employee holders of the
Company’s common stock exercised their put rights. This
|
F-24
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
|
|
|
|
|
resulted in the repurchase,
effective December 13, 2006, of an aggregate of
1,056,584 shares of the Company’s common stock at a
price of $7.96 per share.
|
|
(3)
|
|
During the eleven months ended
August 31, 2007, as authorized under its option plans, the
Company acquired 379,127 shares of its common stock via
share withholdings for payroll tax obligations due from
employees in connection with the delivery of the Company’s
common shares under the option plans.
|
|
(4)
|
|
During the eleven months ended
August 31, 2007, as authorized under its option plans, the
Company acquired 175,105 shares of its common stock as a
result of shares surrendered to the Company to pay the exercise
price in connection with so-called “stock-swap”
exercises of employee stock options.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The Company withheld $662 of the
proceeds for repayment of loans, plus accrued interest,
previously provided to certain employee shareholders for costs
to exercise the underlying options of employee shares held. As
of August 31, 2007, no amounts remained outstanding for the
Company sponsored loans and related accrued interest.
|
The Company’s share repurchase activity for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares acquired pursuant to exercise of put/call rights(1)
|
|
|
1,451,614
|
|
|
$
|
9,726
|
|
Other purchases(2)(3)
|
|
|
346,522
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,798,136
|
|
|
|
11,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts withheld for employee loan repayments(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
Non-cash amounts related to “stock-swaps”(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash out-lay
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
During the put/call period
following the Semi-annual Valuation approved by the Board
effective May 17, 2006, the Company exercised its call
rights to purchase shares and certain employee holders of the
Company’s common stock exercised their put rights. This
resulted in the repurchase, effective July 3, 2006, of an
aggregate of 1,451,614 shares of the Company’s common
stock at a price of $6.70 per share.
|
|
(2)
|
|
During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006, as authorized under its option plans,
the Company acquired 333,089 shares of its common stock via
share withholdings for payroll tax obligations due from
employees in connection with the delivery of the Company’s
common shares under the option plans.
|
|
(3)
|
|
During the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006, as authorized under its option plans,
the Company acquired 13,433 shares of its common stock as a
result of shares surrendered to the Company to pay the exercise
price in connection with so-called “stock-swap”
exercises of employee stock options.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The Company withheld $1,570 of the
proceeds for repayment of loans, plus accrued interest,
previously provided to certain employee shareholders for costs
to exercise the underlying options of employee shares held.
|
During fiscal 2005, the Company repurchased 68,399 shares
of its common stock for $375 in cash.
Preferred
Stock
Holders of the Convertible Series A preferred stock have
preferential rights over common shareholders to non-cumulative
dividends at a rate of $0.63 (8%) per share per annum, when and
if declared by the Company’s Board of Directors. The
Convertible Series A preferred shareholders have the right
to one vote for each share of common stock into which the
Convertible Series A preferred stock could be converted
and, with respect to that vote, have full voting rights and
powers equal to those of the holders of common stock. In the
event of liquidation, the holders of the Convertible
F-25
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Series A preferred stock have preferential rights over
common shareholders to liquidation payments at the original
issue price plus declared but unpaid dividends. The preferred
shareholders also have right of participation to purchase a pro
rata share of any equity security offering.
The Convertible Series A preferred stock is convertible, at the
option of the holder at any time, into common stock at
approximately $7.86 per share, which is equal to the original
issue price, subject to adjustment pursuant to the
Company’s Restated Articles of Incorporation. In the case
of a qualifying initial public offering (“IPO”) of the
Company’s common stock, the Convertible Series A
preferred stock would automatically convert into Class B
common stock. Class B common stock would be created only in
the case of a qualifying IPO and would have the same rights as
existing common shares, with the exception that Class B
shares would have three votes per share.
The approval of holders of a majority of shares of Convertible
Series A preferred stock is required before the Company can
effect or validate the following actions: (i) any
reclassification or recapitalization of its common stock
outstanding involving a change in the common stock, or any
increase or decrease in the authorized number of shares of
preferred stock; and (ii) any increase in the authorized
amount of any class of shares or series of equity securities of
the Company ranking equal to or senior to the shares of
Convertible Series A preferred stock in liquidation
preference, voting, or dividends.
On February 14, 2005, Microsoft, Accenture and the Company
entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement and the Third Amended
and Restated Contribution and Stockholders Agreement. This
resulted in Microsoft acquiring 1,136,127 shares of Avanade
Convertible Series A preferred stock in exchange for
cancellation of $5,646 of the Company’s note payable to
Microsoft. Also as a result of the amendment, Accenture now has
the right to purchase substantially all of the remaining
outstanding shares of the Company not owned by Accenture at fair
value if certain events occur.
Common
Stock
Holders of the Company’s common stock are entitled to one
vote per share and do not have cumulative voting rights. Each
share of common stock is entitled to a pro rata part of any
dividend at the times and in the amounts, if any, which the
Company’s Board of Directors from time to time determines
to declare, subject to any preferred dividend rights attaching
to any preferred shares. Each share of common stock is entitled,
on a
winding-up
of the Company, to be paid a pro rata part of the value of the
assets of the Company’s remaining after payment of its
liabilities, subject to any preferred rights on liquidation
attaching to any preferred shares. In the case of a qualifying
IPO of the Company’s common stock, the common stock would
automatically convert into Class A common stock on a
one-for-one basis. Class A common stock would be created
only in the case of a qualifying IPO and would have the same
rights as existing common stock.
Holders of the Company’s common stock issued under the
Option Plans have certain put rights (see Note 6
(Share-Based Compensation) to these Consolidated Financial
Statements under “Stock and Put Rights”). Holders of
the Company’s common stock that was not issued under the
Option Plans do not have such put rights.
F-26
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Common
Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
As of August 31, 2007 common stock reserved for future
issuance was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
74,750,903
|
|
Upon exercise of outstanding options
|
|
|
14,915,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,666,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases facilities and certain equipment in each of
its operating locations under noncancelable operating leases
with terms ranging from one to fifteen years. Rental expense in
agreements with rent holidays and scheduled rent increases is
recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. As of
August 31, 2007, future minimum rental commitments under
non-cancelable operating leases, including leases with related
parties, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending August 31,
|
|
Office Space
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
5,207
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
2009
|
|
|
4,007
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,100
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,226
|
|
|
$
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expense totaled $9,354, $8,798 and $7,864 for the fiscal
years end August 31, 2007, September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively.
|
|
10.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Guarantees
The Company has various agreements in which it may be obligated
to indemnify the other parties with respect to certain matters.
Generally, these indemnification provisions are included in
contracts arising in the normal course of business under which
the Company customarily agrees to hold the indemnified party
harmless against losses arising from a breach of representations
related to such matters as title to assets sold, licensed or
certain intellectual property rights and other matters. Payments
by the Company under such indemnification clauses are generally
conditioned on the other party making a claim. Such claims are
generally subject to challenge by the Company and to dispute
resolution procedures specified in the particular contract.
Further, the Company’s obligations under these agreements
may be limited in terms of time
and/or
amount and, in some instances, the Company may have recourse
against third parties for certain payments made by the Company.
It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of
future payments under these indemnification agreements due to
the conditional nature of the Company’s obligations and the
unique facts of each particular agreement. Historically, the
Company has not made any indemnification payments under these
agreements that have been material individually or in the
aggregate. As of August 31, 2007,
F-27
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
management was not aware of any outstanding claims under such
indemnification agreements that would require material payments.
Legal
Contingencies
As of August 31, 2007, the Company or its present personnel
had been named as a defendant in various litigation matters.
Based on the present status of these litigation matters, the
management of the Company believes they will not have a material
effect on the results of operations, financial position or cash
flows of the Company.
|
|
11.
|
RELATED-PARTY
BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS
|
The Company’s related-party transactions with Accenture and
Microsoft are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Related-party revenues before reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture
|
|
$
|
400,373
|
|
|
$
|
324,185
|
|
|
$
|
258,782
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
40,179
|
|
|
|
30,381
|
|
|
|
29,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
440,552
|
|
|
$
|
354,566
|
|
|
$
|
288,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related-party reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture
|
|
$
|
16,371
|
|
|
$
|
15,124
|
|
|
$
|
14,406
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
4,623
|
|
|
|
3,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,465
|
|
|
$
|
19,747
|
|
|
$
|
18,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related-party expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture
|
|
$
|
51,412
|
|
|
$
|
31,576
|
|
|
$
|
16,076
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
3,571
|
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
|
|
2,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,983
|
|
|
$
|
34,856
|
|
|
$
|
19,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
The Company’s related-party balances with Accenture and
Microsoft are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Due from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture
|
|
$
|
55,008
|
|
|
$
|
52,170
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
7,086
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
62,094
|
|
|
$
|
55,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled services to related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture
|
|
$
|
35,540
|
|
|
$
|
28,294
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
6,011
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
41,551
|
|
|
$
|
32,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture
|
|
$
|
6,907
|
|
|
$
|
9,154
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,405
|
|
|
$
|
9,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accenture
|
|
$
|
590
|
|
|
$
|
1,036
|
|
Microsoft
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,167
|
|
|
$
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company subleases its Seattle, Washington, office space from
Microsoft under an agreement that terminates in February 2009.
The Company subleases its Chicago, Australia, Germany, France
and Spain office space from Accenture on a month-to-month basis.
Additionally, the Company may rent, on an as needed basis, desk
space available in Accenture offices. Rent charged by Accenture
varies each month with the amount of space occupied by the
Company. Rent incurred on leases with related parties
approximates market rates for similar leases.
Related party expenses include $47,416, $30,331 and $15,785 for
the eleven months ended August 31, 2007 and years ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, for
subcontracting for professional services expenses incurred with
Accenture and Microsoft. Related party expenses include $2,222
for technology infrastructure costs incurred with Accenture for
the eleven months ended August 31, 2007.
The Company has a line of credit with Accenture which can be
used, if necessary, as a short-term working capital facility.
The line of credit has no specified due date and bears interest
at a rate of LIBOR plus 0.15%. As of August 31, 2007, there
were no amounts outstanding on the line of credit. During fiscal
2004, the Company borrowed $5,000 under the line of credit,
which was repaid along with accrued interest during April 2005.
F-29
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
Operating segments are defined by SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information (“SFAS No. 131”), as
components of an enterprise about which separate financial
information is available that is evaluated regularly by the
chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in
deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The Company’s chief operating decision maker is the Chief
Executive Officer. The Company’s operating segments are
managed separately on the basis of geography and each operating
segment represents a strategic business unit providing services
in its respective geographic area.
The Company earns all of its revenues from Microsoft enterprise
technology consulting services across all segments. From time to
time, the geographic business areas work together to sell and
implement certain contracts. The resulting revenues and costs
from these contracts may be apportioned among the participating
areas based on inter-company arrangements that reflect the
market value of services. Corporate expenses and eliminations
include general corporate expenses, inter-company eliminations
and other charges not directly attributable to the segments.
Assets not identifiable to an individual segment are corporate
assets, which are primarily comprised of cash and cash
equivalents, investments in subsidiaries, intangible assets and
inter-company receivables and loans.
The reportable operating segments are the three operating areas:
Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. Information regarding the
Company’s reportable operating segments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues before reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
304,066
|
|
|
$
|
263,473
|
|
|
$
|
199,791
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
233,410
|
|
|
|
190,446
|
|
|
|
164,301
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
53,680
|
|
|
|
33,233
|
|
|
|
25,707
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
(3,288
|
)
|
|
|
(2,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
593,546
|
|
|
$
|
483,864
|
|
|
$
|
387,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
2,703
|
|
|
$
|
3,035
|
|
|
$
|
3,279
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,193
|
|
|
$
|
7,543
|
|
|
$
|
6,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
76,495
|
|
|
$
|
58,431
|
|
|
$
|
31,860
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
31,429
|
|
|
|
29,989
|
|
|
|
31,552
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
(1,127
|
)
|
|
|
(1,430
|
)
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(29,235
|
)
|
|
|
(32,775
|
)
|
|
|
(15,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
79,133
|
|
|
$
|
54,518
|
|
|
$
|
46,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
$
|
220,441
|
|
|
$
|
135,616
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
150,463
|
|
|
|
102,947
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
28,663
|
|
|
|
17,277
|
|
Corporate and eliminations
|
|
|
(18,480
|
)
|
|
|
(14,983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
381,087
|
|
|
$
|
240,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company conducts business in the following countries that
individually comprised more than 10% of consolidated revenues
before reimbursements within the last three years. Revenues are
attributed to countries based on where client services are
supervised.
The table below summarizes the distribution of revenues before
reimbursements by country:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
United States
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
As of August 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 and 2005,
the Company’s business operations located in the United
States held 78%, 82% and 82%, respectively, of the
Company’s total consolidated long-lived assets. These
long-lived assets primarily include property and equipment, net,
goodwill and other intangible assets, net. No other country
accounted for greater than 10% of the Company’s total
consolidated long-lived assets for these periods, respectively.
Share
Repurchases
On November 8, 2007, the Board approved the current
Semi-annual Valuation, thereby initiating a put/call period
during which the Company intends to exercise its call rights to
purchase 838,464 shares of its common stock held by current
and former employees. The repurchase of these shares of Avanade
common stock at a price of $10.57 per share is expected to
result in an estimated cash outlay of approximately $8,863,
which is anticipated to be made in December 2007. Additionally,
holders of 3,331,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock are eligible to exercise their put rights during this
put/call period. The Company cannot at this time estimate the
actual number of shares that holders will require the Company to
repurchase by exercising their put rights. Any cash outlay that
may be required to repurchase these shares is also expected to
be paid in December 2007. For additional information, refer to
Note 6 (Share-Based Compensation) to these Consolidated
Financial Statements under “Stock and Put Rights.”
F-31
AVANADE
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (continued)
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share amounts or as
otherwise disclosed)
|
|
14.
|
QUARTERLY
DATA (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eleven
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
|
August 31,
|
|
Eleven Months Ended August 31, 2007
|
|
Quarter(2)
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues before reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
$
|
101,998
|
|
|
$
|
117,192
|
|
|
$
|
130,199
|
|
|
$
|
91,163
|
|
|
$
|
440,552
|
|
Others
|
|
|
35,970
|
|
|
|
44,225
|
|
|
|
41,552
|
|
|
|
31,247
|
|
|
|
152,994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,968
|
|
|
|
161,417
|
|
|
|
171,751
|
|
|
|
122,410
|
|
|
|
593,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
5,110
|
|
|
|
7,094
|
|
|
|
4,870
|
|
|
|
22,465
|
|
Others
|
|
|
4,190
|
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
4,885
|
|
|
|
3,744
|
|
|
|
17,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,581
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
11,979
|
|
|
|
8,614
|
|
|
|
39,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
147,549
|
|
|
$
|
171,229
|
|
|
$
|
183,730
|
|
|
$
|
131,024
|
|
|
$
|
633,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
13,960
|
|
|
$
|
26,425
|
|
|
$
|
22,314
|
|
|
$
|
16,434
|
|
|
$
|
79,133
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
56,179
|
|
|
$
|
19,884
|
|
|
$
|
22,687
|
|
|
$
|
13,778
|
|
|
$
|
112,528
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The Company’s fiscal fourth
quarter includes only two months due to the change, effective
August 31, 2007, in the Company’s fiscal year end from
September 30 to August 31.
|
|
(2)
|
|
During the three months ended
December 31, 2006, the Company recognized net deferred tax
benefits of $47,161 due to the anticipated realization of
deferred tax assets, primarily in the United States. For
information regarding changes in the Company’s deferred tax
assets, see Note 4 (Income Taxes) to these Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter(1)
|
|
|
Annual
|
|
|
Revenues before reimbursements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
$
|
75,732
|
|
|
$
|
86,872
|
|
|
$
|
95,207
|
|
|
$
|
96,755
|
|
|
$
|
354,566
|
|
Others
|
|
|
27,464
|
|
|
|
31,345
|
|
|
|
31,639
|
|
|
|
38,850
|
|
|
|
129,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,196
|
|
|
|
118,217
|
|
|
|
126,846
|
|
|
|
135,605
|
|
|
|
483,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties
|
|
|
4,410
|
|
|
|
4,456
|
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
|
|
5,528
|
|
|
|
19,747
|
|
Others
|
|
|
3,071
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
14,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,481
|
|
|
|
7,928
|
|
|
|
8,783
|
|
|
|
9,750
|
|
|
|
33,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
110,677
|
|
|
$
|
126,145
|
|
|
$
|
135,629
|
|
|
$
|
145,355
|
|
|
$
|
517,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
3,224
|
|
|
$
|
10,222
|
|
|
$
|
14,801
|
|
|
$
|
26,271
|
|
|
$
|
54,518
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,471
|
|
|
$
|
7,655
|
|
|
$
|
11,063
|
|
|
$
|
25,521
|
|
|
$
|
46,710
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
During the three months ended
September 30, 2006, the Company recognized net deferred tax
benefits of $6,950 due to the anticipated realization of
deferred tax assets, primarily in France, Spain, and the United
Kingdom. For information regarding changes in the Company’s
deferred tax assets, see Note 4 (Income Taxes) to these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
F-32